The present invention relates generally to systems and methods for facilitating a process for creating a Pseudo-prescription for over the counter items, paid for by paid for by health care payers, using data generated from a point-of-sale transaction at retailers, and more particularly to systems and methods that process that create the Pseudo-prescription from transaction data generated during a point-of-sale purchase at the front of the store.
Over-the-counter medicated items are utilized by nearly 90% of the U.S. population to treat minor health ailments. Americans use over-the-counter items to self-medicate a health episode that was self-diagnosed. Over-the-counter items do not require a prescription and are available at nearly 750,000 retail locations in the U.S. as compared with only 75,000 pharmacy locations that dispense prescribed items. It has been proven that the use of over-the-counter items saves the U.S. healthcare system billions of dollars each year by way of reduced doctor and emergency room visits as a result of early detection, self-diagnosis and self-medication.
Many health plans, including the federal government through the Department of Health and Human Services and more specifically, the centers for Medicare and Medicaid, provide benefit coverage for the use of over-the-counter medications. For prescribed items, payers such as federal and state governments through Medicare and Medicaid contract with entities, typically pharmacy benefits managers, who approve and settle payment with the dispensers of the prescribed item.
This process allows customers to purchase prescribed items without paying for them at the point of purchase because the dispenser is able to connect in real-time and submit the prescription required for the item to the pharmacy benefits manager. The pharmacy benefits manager approves the prescription and settles payment with the dispenser and then receives the funds from the payer. In this example the federal or state agencies contract with them to perform such services.
There have been several attempts to include non-prescribed items in the process described above for prescribed items. All require a prescription because the entire system for processing prescription is based on that foundation. None have been successful and are likely to reduce the use of items that do not require a prescription, over-the-counter items, costing the healthcare system billions of dollars.
There is a need for systems and methods that provide customers the ability to purchase over-the-counter items from the front of a store without a prescription using the normal process for purchasing over-the-counter items.
There is a need for systems and methods that that create a Pseudo-prescription for over the counter items from transaction data generated during a point-of-sale purchase at a front of the store. The Pseudo-prescription can then be submitted to the pharmacy benefits manager during the purchase and the existing process in place of approving the Pseudo-prescription and the subsequent funds flow leveraged.
Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods that create a Pseudo-prescription for over the counter items from transaction data generated during a point-of-sale purchase at the front of a store.
Another object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods that allow front of store transactions at participating retailers that sell over-the-counter items to create proxies (Pseudo-prescription) for over-the-counter items from transaction data.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide systems and methods that allow front of store transactions to sell over-the-counter items to create proxies (Pseudo-prescription) from transaction data, eliminating the need for a customer to visit a doctor to request a prescription for an item that does not require a prescription because the prescription is the only way to associate the purchase with the customers benefits coverage.
These and other objects of the present invention are achieved in, a method for creating a Pseudo-prescription for over the counter items. A retailer infrastructure is provided that includes a point of sale server coupled to a store concentrator and to a product tables/price book(s). An adjudication processor and a claims processor with a process control server are also provided. A Pseudo-prescription is created that contains an NDC for each over-the-counter item being purchased prior to determining if the claims processor.
Systems and methods are provided for facilitating multiple retailers to automate the process of matching items presented at point of purchase with the buyer selected financial transaction financial transaction card to determine if the items presented are permitted to be purchased by the presented financial transaction financial transaction card. More particularly, the present invention provides for the matching of items to multiple item lists for sponsor associated payment/settlement programs.
With the present invention, systems and methods are provided to implement an adjudication process which allows a market basket utilized with product catalogs. Each catalog contains a list of Universal Product Codes (“UPC”), each identifying an item that can be purchased by a financial transaction card. A purse is an identifier for a financial account associated with a financial transaction card. As non-limiting examples, the financial account can be a bank account, credit financial transaction card, debit financial transaction card, pre-paid financial transaction card, a third party funding source and the like. As non-limiting examples, a financial transaction card can be, the financial transaction card is selected from at least one of, credit financial transaction card, debit financial transaction card, gift financial transaction card, fund transfer financial transaction card, other types of payment authenticating piece capable of carrying out a transfer of funds and the like In one embodiment, a financial transaction card, including but not limited to a debit or credit financial transaction card, has multiple financial transaction institutions or purses. The financial transaction card can also have only one spending purse. Items in the market basket are adjudicated against the one or more associated catalogs.
As illustrated in
More generally, in
The catalog management server 36 is included in a catalog management processor 40. The retailer infrastructure 22 also includes a retailer network 42 with a retailer switch 44.
The retailer switch 44 is coupled to the adjudication processor 10. The market basket analysis server 12 is coupled to the product catalogs 18 and validates eligible items in the market basket, as more fully discussed hereafter. The contents of the market basket, including but not limited to, UPC, price, quantity and the like, are communicated between the market basket analysis server 12 and the switch 16, from the retailer switch 44. The catalog management server 36 communicates with the market basket analysis server 12 in the form of the product catalogs 18.
A financial transaction card issuer, hereafter (financial processor 46) is coupled to the adjudication processor 10 and includes financial transaction card numbers 48 and an issuer processor (transactions) 50.
A benefits processor 52 includes a claims processor (accumulator) 54 coupled to switch 16. The benefits processor 52 is in communication with the switch 16. The market basket analysis server 12 can contact the benefit processor 52 via the switch 16 in real time and receive a claim authorization. The benefits processor 52 can communicate via standard prescription languages, NCPDP5.1 and NCPDP d.0.
Account information 56 includes buyer account data 20 that is provided to the market basket analysis server 12 and relates to financial transaction financial transaction card numbers 48, originating with the financial processor 46 that includes an issuer processor 50 (transactions). The issuer processor 50 communicates with a switch 58 and to switch 16 where financial approval transactions are required.
As previously recited, the present invention facilitates multiple retailers to automate the process of matching items presented at POS 26 purchase with the buyer selected payment mechanism to determine if the items presented are permitted to be purchased by the presented payment mechanism. More particularly, the present invention provides for the matching of items to multiple item lists for sponsor associated payment/settlement programs.
In the
The adjudication process utilizes components in the adjudication processor 10. In combination, the switch 16, market basket analysis server 12, catalog management server 36, and the process control server 14 provide adjudication. In one embodiment, the adjudication process also can authorize the financial transaction.
Financial transactions that are triggered by a retailer in-lane purchase activity are typically communicated in the form of ISO 8583 from the retailer switch 44 to the switch 16. The switch 16 decomposes the ISO 8583 message into messages suitable for processing by subsequent processing components, such as the market basket analysis server 12.
In one embodiment, the switch 16 communicates the market basket content data and transaction identification information to the market basket analysis server 12, in the data form that has been parsed and formatted by the switch 16.
The market basket analysis server 12 compares the market basket contents to the product catalog(s) 18. Product catalog(s)18 have been previously loaded to market basket analysis server 12 from catalog management server 36. Product catalogs 18 contain an items list of approved products, identified by UPC and short description. Market basket line item content data is processed iteratively by the market basket server 12.
With the present invention, adjudication to a plurality of catalogs 18 can be processed. With the present invention, a catalog 18 is directly related to an account purse. This purse can be associated to a restricted spend based upon the catalog 18 that is used to adjudicate an item list. For example, a financial transaction financial transaction card may support spending against a food items catalog and also an over-the-counter drug item catalog. One or more spending purses, each with a specific spending balance from a specific Issuer may be identified to a single financial transaction financial transaction card.
With the present invention, the retailer 24 collects the market basket and upon a swipe or scan of a buyer's financial transaction financial transaction card, packages up the market basket sends it to the adjudication processor 10 with either, (i) the retailer processing the purchase request, or (ii) the adjudication processor processing the purchase request. Incoming and outgoing communications between the retailer 24 and the adjudication processor 10 can via an ISO 8583 message format, an XML web services format, and the like, all as real time interchanges. As a non-limiting example, entering can be done by at least one of, swiping the financial transaction financial transaction card through a slot of a financial transaction card reader coupled to the mobile device, through a slot of the mobile device, scanning, through wireless communication, touch of the financial transaction financial transaction card to the mobile device, by typing in information at the mobile device, photos, selecting a financial transaction financial transaction card from an application on a mobile device and from an on-line entity.
As illustrated in
The adjudication transaction contains transaction identification and market basket information as formatted and forwarded to the market basket server process. The authorization transaction contains transaction identification and requests for financial authorization against a specific financial payment account (purse). The result transaction contains transaction identification information, processed market basket adjudication transaction (market basket items flagged to a specific purse and catalog), and financial authorization information.
The market basket server 12 receives an adjudication transaction from the switch 16. The market basket server 12 processes the entire financial transaction financial transaction card to the extent possible and returns the transaction result to the switch for further processing as required. The switch 16 receives the adjudication transaction and determines if further processing is required. The adjudication transaction may require that the switch 16 obtain financial transaction authorization from one or more issuers. The switch 16 formats the transaction information 60 for routing and processing by the issuer.
The switch 16 waits to complete a transaction to the retailer 24 until authorization request(s) are processed and returned by the issuer(s). Authorization information is formatted and returned to the retailer 24 and the transaction is added to a permanent data log of all transactions passing through the switch 16. The switch 16 formats POS result transaction and returns to the retailer 24 and the transaction is added to a permanent data log of all transactions passing through the switch 16.
Referring to the market basket adjudication flow chart of
The operation of the switch 16 is illustrated in
There are multiple authorizations for multiple purses. The switch 16 is configured to couple to multiple financial processors 40 when there are multiple authorizations. The switch 16 can couple to multiple financial processing systems, to process restricted spending against multiple purses tied to multiple issuer processors. Based upon rules provided by the process control server 14, the switch bifurcates the financial transactions to multiple financial financial transaction card issuers and receives authorization from multiple financial processors.
With the present invention the market basket analysis server 12 isolates a buyer's financial account information from the reliance for regulatory compliance of HIPAA and PCI-DSS.
The retailer 24 is isolated from the details of multiple purses, multiple financial transaction financial transaction card issuers member demographics and the like. The PAN of a transaction ties to an account structure that defines the applicable process control rules. Process control rules are provided to the switch 16 from the process control server 14, to establish the path of the financial authorizations. A financial transaction financial transaction card number 48 and associated catalogs 18 with that financial transaction financial transaction card are provided in order for the market basket analysis server 12 to use the catalogs with a purse.
The adjudication processor 10 does not send the retailer member demographics. A financial transaction financial transaction card number 48 and associated catalogs 18 with that financial transaction financial transaction card are provided in order for the market basket analysis server 12 to use the catalogs related to the PAN, financial transaction financial transaction card issuers, and purses.
With the present invention the following steps are taken.
A collection of item data is received, e.g., the market basket. Each item in the market basket has a universal product code (“UPC”) to uniquely identify the item and has a quantity, net price and added tax as determined by the retailer price list.
Each item in a market basket is evaluated and compared by the UPC to items approved for the specific purse as related to the product/plan product catalog 18. Each item in the market basket is marked as eligible or ineligible to a specific product/plan. Eligible items are grouped according to a product/plan and a calculation is made of a total cost of all items, less appropriate discounts and allowances, for each group. Items, group totals, and market basket identification information is formatted into XML data structures, ISO8583, NCPDP 5.1 or NCPDP d.0, for further processing by the retailer 24, benefit processor 52 and the like.
Adjudication can be hosted at a retailer 24 and be internal to the retailer, or adjudication can be hosted external to the retailer and have several retailers connecting to it.
XML data structure is pushed to the switch 16. The switch 16 is utilized to translate data in the retailer specified format for systems hosted within the retailer network and into ISO8583, XML, NCPDP 5.1 or NCPDP d.0 formats for processing by issuer processor 50 or claims processor 54. An XML-based financial authorization request or ISO8583 based financial authorization request is initiated where the financial processor is not integral to the internal retailer network, and where the retailer requires that transactions be initiated by the present invention. In this instance, the system and method of the present invention process control server 14 determines the content of the authorization request against group totals and the switch 16 builds and transmits XML-based authorization requests to the financial processor 46. The switch 14 formats XML-based authorization requests in formats required by the corresponding issuer processor.
Items selected by the buyer and placed in the market basket are presented for purchase to the check out process of the participating retailer 24. This process may be a physical lane within a retail store, a collection of market basket items selected from a catalog and identified by the buyer at the time of check out, or the presentation of a script at a retail store, on-line or telephone based pharmacy counter, among other processes.
The process of using the retailer physical checkout lanes or the retailer physical pharmacy counter requires that market basket items be scanned or hand entered into the retailers store POS 26. The process of using catalog 18, on-line or telephone shopping requires that items be selected and identified by the shopping method and entered as items in the market basket.
Regardless of the method of shopping, all market basket item data, including price, quantity, taxes, point-of-purchase driven discounts are packaged into a single transaction and formatted according to the stores point-of-sale system message specifications. The single transaction must also include retailer identification information and buyer identification information, which at a minimum can include:
1. Retailer ID
2. Store ID
3. Terminal ID
4. PAN—Primary Account Number
5. Timestamp
6. STAN—System Trace Audit Number
7. Line item detail <per unique market basket item>
This transaction comes from the POS 26 to the store concentrator 30 to retailer switch 44 and then to the switch 16. The transaction data can include item data and customer identifier (financial transaction financial transaction card number) data, and the like. Communication is via the retailers 24, store concentrator 30 and to the retailer switch 44. All of the retailers 24 are connected to the network, and data goes from the retailer switch 44 to the retainers 24, and then to another switch inside the retailer. The switch 16 utilizes the retailer switch 44 or to an internal retailer switch with communications to the retailer 24 being in a variety of methods, including but not limited to, ISO 8583 or XML data structures.
Transaction data is received from the originating retailer 24. The market basket transaction is directed from the market basket server 12 to the switch 16. The switch 16 formats the data into an XML data structure, from whatever retailer structure that was received, and transmits the translated XML structure to the market basket analysis server 12.
The market basket analysis server 12 utilizes the PAN to determine the catalogs 18 and purses for the buyer account. The buyer's personal information is not retrieved at any point in during adjudication or financial transaction processing. The buyer PAN relates one or more specific product catalogs to the market basket transaction.
If the buyer identifier, e.g., the account number of a financial transaction financial transaction card (PAN) is not recognized by the switch 16, an error occurs and there is a rejection. If the PAN there is an error, the switch 16 returns a message to the originating retailer 24 that the transaction is declined.
The switch 16 matches the item data received in the market basket transaction, one item at a time. The switch 16 appends two indicators to each line item of the market basket. A flag is produced that communicates if the item is eligible or not eligible, and an indicator of the group (catalog) 18 is also determined to which the item belongs.
Upon completion of processing, each item in the market basket and totals by each group are used to package the market basket transaction and returned to the retailer 24 for processing. In another embodiment, the processed market basket transaction is returned to the switch 16.
Upon receipt of the processed market basket transaction the market basket analysis server 12 matches the buyer identifier to the financial transaction financial transaction card issuer associated with the buyer identifier.
The switch 16 creates an XML-based payment authorization request message that includes financial processor 46 identification and retailer transaction identification information. This payment authorization is then sent to the financial processor 46. In various embodiments, ISO 8583, XML and NCPDPd.0 data structures are used for the authorization request messages between the switch 16 and the financial processor 46.
In various embodiments, the switch 16, (i) receives an authorization message back from the financial processor 46 or claims processor 54; (ii) creates a data log of authorized transactions based upon transaction identification number and (iii) creates an authorization message in the proper format to forward the message to the retailer 24.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the catalog management processor 40 creates a catalog 18 of UPC's for each of a participating retailer 24. Each catalog 18 includes first and second sets of UPC data. The first set is for national brand products and the second set for retailer 24 private label products.
The system and methods of the present invention enable inComm retailers 24 to accept a financial transaction card based payment method at the point of sale for products, including but not limited to medicine and medical supplies, covered by a sponsor, including but not limited to Medicare and/or Medicaid. The present invention provides systems and methods which enable a replacement for reimbursement methods which have traditionally included manual claims or offline systems which do not interact with a retailer's 24 POS 18.
In some cases, the financial transaction card acceptance/redemption mechanism leverages existing POS-to-inComm messaging interface for transaction processing.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a Pseudo-prescription is created that contains an NDC for each over-the-counter item being purchased prior to determining if the claims processor 54 supports real-time authorization. If it is determined that the claims processor 54 can support a real-time authorization request, then an NCPCP formatted claim authorization request message is sent to the claims processor 54. The market basket analysis server 12 contacts the benefit processor 52 via the switch 16 in real time to originate and receive a claim authorization.
The retailer:POS 24 submits a market basket through the retailer switch 44 to adjudication processor switch 16. The switch 16, based upon rules provided by the process control server 14, formats an NCPDP claim transaction for the items in the market basket. The switch 16 waits to complete a transaction to the retailer 24 until NCPDP Claim transaction(s) are processed. If the switch 16 system determines that the claims processor 54 can not support a real-time authorization request, then the switch 16 compares the previously retrieved financial transaction card available balance, from financial processor 46, to the amount requested in the transaction data received from the originating retailer. If the balance is less than the amount requested, then the switch 16 sends a decline to the originating retailer 24. If switch 16 determines if the balance is equal to or greater than the amount requested, then switch 16 submits the NCPDP Claim transaction to the claim processor 54 for approval. Upon receipt, the claims processor 54 formats a NCPDP Claim approval message to the switch 16, switch 16 re-attaches the item data to the authorization message and submits it back to the originating retailer 24. A data log of the transaction is created and submitted to the data store.
Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Ser. No. 61/422,761, filed Dec. 14, 2010, U.S. Ser. No. 13/117,003, filed May 26, 2011, and U.S. Ser. No. 13/117,010, filed May 26, 2011, all of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3288350 | Kushner | Nov 1966 | A |
4482802 | Aizawa et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4734858 | Schlafly | Mar 1988 | A |
4747049 | Richardson et al. | May 1988 | A |
4877947 | Mori | Oct 1989 | A |
4900904 | Wright et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4908521 | Boggan et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4943707 | Boggan | Jul 1990 | A |
5091634 | Finch et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5117355 | McCarthy | May 1992 | A |
5128520 | Rando | Jun 1992 | A |
5202826 | McCarthy | Apr 1993 | A |
5231569 | Myatt | Jul 1993 | A |
5239165 | Novak | Aug 1993 | A |
5255182 | Adams | Oct 1993 | A |
5256863 | Ferguson | Oct 1993 | A |
5350906 | Brody et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5375240 | Grundy | Dec 1994 | A |
5383113 | Kight et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384449 | Peirce | Jan 1995 | A |
5416306 | Imhata | May 1995 | A |
5500513 | Langhans et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5524073 | Stambler | Jun 1996 | A |
5577109 | Stimson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5590038 | Pitroda | Dec 1996 | A |
5602377 | Beller et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5619569 | Kennedy | Apr 1997 | A |
5621201 | Langhans et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5657389 | Houvener | Aug 1997 | A |
5671279 | Elgamal | Sep 1997 | A |
5679940 | Templeton et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5708780 | Levergood | Jan 1998 | A |
5729693 | Holda-Fleck | Mar 1998 | A |
5740915 | Williams | Apr 1998 | A |
5764981 | Veeneman | May 1998 | A |
5766143 | Sheldon | Jun 1998 | A |
5804803 | Cragun | Sep 1998 | A |
5806045 | Biorge et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5844972 | Jagadish et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850217 | Cole | Dec 1998 | A |
5857175 | Day | Jan 1999 | A |
5889863 | Weber | Mar 1999 | A |
5897625 | Gustin | Apr 1999 | A |
5903633 | Lorsch | May 1999 | A |
5903830 | Joao et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907142 | Kelsey | May 1999 | A |
5909492 | Payne et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5937393 | O'Leary et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945653 | Walker et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950173 | Perkowski | Sep 1999 | A |
5956695 | Carrithers et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5968110 | Westrope | Oct 1999 | A |
5991750 | Watson | Nov 1999 | A |
5999624 | Hopkins | Dec 1999 | A |
6000608 | Dorf | Dec 1999 | A |
6003014 | Lee et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012049 | Kawan | Jan 2000 | A |
6014635 | Harris | Jan 2000 | A |
6018719 | Rogers | Jan 2000 | A |
6021397 | Jones et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029139 | Bezos | Feb 2000 | A |
6032133 | Hilt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032135 | Molano et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032859 | Muehlberger et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039244 | Finsterwald | Mar 2000 | A |
6047270 | Joao et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058300 | Hanson | May 2000 | A |
6058382 | Kasai et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070147 | Harms et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072870 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085242 | Chandra | Jul 2000 | A |
6086187 | Iguchi | Jul 2000 | A |
6092053 | Boesch et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6098053 | Slater | Aug 2000 | A |
6108642 | Findley | Aug 2000 | A |
6119099 | Walker | Sep 2000 | A |
6119105 | Williams | Sep 2000 | A |
6125352 | Franklin | Sep 2000 | A |
6134533 | Shell | Oct 2000 | A |
6138911 | Fredregil | Oct 2000 | A |
6154738 | Call | Nov 2000 | A |
6158657 | Hall, III et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173272 | Thomas et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182894 | Hackett et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189787 | Dorf | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6222914 | McMullin | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226624 | Watson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6267670 | Walker | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6302326 | Symonds et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304860 | Martin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304915 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315193 | Hogan | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317028 | Valiulis | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334116 | Ganesan et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6360254 | Linden | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6418414 | Lutz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418441 | Call | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422462 | Cohen | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424706 | Katz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442532 | Kawan | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473500 | Risafi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473739 | Showghi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494367 | Zacharias | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502745 | Stimson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507823 | Nel | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6529880 | McKeen et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529956 | Smith | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536659 | Hauser | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6575361 | Graves et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594644 | Van Dusen | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609106 | Robertson | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6636833 | Flitcroft | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648222 | McDonald et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6675153 | Cook et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6678664 | Ganesan | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6736314 | Cooper et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6827260 | Stoutenburg et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6829596 | Frazee | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6836765 | Sussman | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6862575 | Anttila | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6886742 | Stoutenburg et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6899621 | Behm | May 2005 | B2 |
6915277 | Manchester | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6918537 | Graves et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6932268 | McCoy et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6948063 | Ganesan et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6965866 | Klein | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6993610 | Guy | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7055740 | Schultz | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7072864 | Brake, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083084 | Graves et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7086586 | Sullivan | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7093761 | Smith et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103577 | Blair et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7108183 | Cox, Jr. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7111780 | Broussard et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7209889 | Whitfield | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7216092 | Weber | May 2007 | B1 |
7252226 | Risafi et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7281653 | Beck et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292998 | Graves et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7316350 | Algiene | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7328190 | Smith et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343406 | Buonanno | Mar 2008 | B1 |
20080026 | Melker | Mar 2008 | |
7363265 | Horgan | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7434729 | Cracchiolo | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7437328 | Graves et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7494417 | Walker | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7513422 | Tucker | Apr 2009 | B1 |
7566000 | Agostino et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7590557 | Harrison | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7631803 | Peyret | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7650308 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653599 | Doran et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7702542 | Aslanian | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711598 | Perkowski | May 2010 | B2 |
7747644 | Reihl | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7757944 | Cline et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7767944 | Cline | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7789695 | Robinson | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7848948 | Perkowski et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7866548 | Reed et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7904333 | Perkowski | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7905399 | Barnes | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922083 | Harrison | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7949543 | Chan et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7970626 | Cracchiolo | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8036953 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8046268 | Hunt | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8103520 | Mueller | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8152060 | Wolfe et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8152061 | Wolfe et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8181867 | Bierbaum et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8245910 | Sullivan et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8265050 | Howe | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8265950 | Howe et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8267313 | Harper et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8332277 | Mccaffery et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8332323 | Stals | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8352627 | Harris | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8396758 | Paradise | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8509814 | Parker | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8577735 | Wilen | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8631999 | Wolfe et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8636203 | Patterson | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8662387 | Geller | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8712835 | Philyaw | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8751298 | Giordano et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8768834 | Zacarias et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
9098190 | Zhou | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9183534 | Gharabally | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9449343 | Mayerle | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9483786 | Glass | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9626070 | Cowles | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9672687 | Cage | Jun 2017 | B2 |
10262346 | Glass | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10515397 | Serfass | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10679268 | Kochhar | Jun 2020 | B1 |
20010034609 | Dovolis | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037264 | Husemann et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010056410 | Ishigaki | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002495 | Ullman | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010627 | Lerat | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016749 | Borecki et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020062249 | Iannacci | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065713 | Awada et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020069139 | Bernstein et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020070270 | Narita et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088855 | Hodes | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091573 | Hodes | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095420 | Hovsepian | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116531 | Chu | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128859 | Perkowski | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020130176 | Suzuki | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138573 | Saguy | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020153410 | Santini | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020198831 | Patricelli et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004802 | Callegari | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009382 | D'Arbeloff | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033246 | Slater | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030055782 | Slater | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061162 | Matthews | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069846 | Marcon | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080186 | McDonald et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030088462 | Carrithers et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105688 | Brown et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121967 | Goldberg et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126079 | Roberson | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154163 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163787 | Hay et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172039 | Guy | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030197059 | Tidball et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200179 | Kwan | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204441 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212796 | Willard | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030234819 | Daly et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024697 | Landa et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054587 | Dev et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065726 | McGee et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040117302 | Weichert et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138921 | Broussard et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153344 | Bui | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040182922 | Talarico, Jr. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185881 | Lee | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193464 | Szrek | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193490 | Pletz | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040206814 | Kawai et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215573 | Frederick et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224660 | Anderson | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225560 | Lewis et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260647 | Blinn et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267663 | Karns | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004837 | Sweeny | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027624 | Cai | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050045732 | Whitaker | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050051619 | Graves et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071268 | Riddett, Jr. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086168 | Alvarez | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050116028 | Cotten | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050165682 | Duke | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050167481 | Hansen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050177517 | Leung | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182695 | Lubow et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187793 | Myles | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197919 | Robertson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050203844 | Ferguson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050233797 | Gilmore | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240477 | Friday | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050261968 | Randall et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050274793 | Cantini | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004631 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010007 | Denman | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060037835 | Doran | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041470 | Filho et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053056 | Alspach-Goss et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060058011 | Vanska | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069642 | Doran et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060078100 | Risafi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060080174 | Veeneman | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089160 | Othmer | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060106642 | Reicher et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060113376 | Reed et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060212346 | Soza | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224450 | Moon | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253320 | Heywood | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060255125 | Jennings | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060261150 | Seifert et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277146 | Dively et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011025 | Cracchiolo | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070017975 | Lewis et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021969 | Homeier-Beals | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030824 | Ribaudo | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038577 | Werner | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043682 | Drapkin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055785 | Stevens | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070063024 | Guillot | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070156436 | Fisher | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070114274 | Gibbs | May 2007 | A1 |
20070125838 | Law et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136149 | Woodward et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162338 | Lawe | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174123 | Dorr | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175985 | Barnes et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192182 | Monaco | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198433 | McGee et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208632 | Downes et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214005 | Kennedy | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214080 | Babi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070251995 | Kingsborough et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070257767 | Beeson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265872 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070284434 | Fletcher | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080011820 | Brown et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028395 | Motta et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033857 | Moses | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040285 | Rackley | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080052169 | O'Shea et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059318 | Packes et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080070690 | Van Luchene | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080078831 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097851 | Bemmel et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080133266 | Allen | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080133351 | White et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162341 | Zimmer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080179395 | Dixon et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183627 | Harrison et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080209611 | Silverbrook | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215361 | Nunnari et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255942 | Craft | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080319868 | Briscoe | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006116 | Baker | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037326 | Chitti et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090076896 | DeWitt | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090078755 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094126 | Killian et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090111378 | Sheynman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112709 | Barhydt et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090144161 | Fisher | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157487 | Cottrell et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157554 | Hobson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090163263 | Herndon | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090164329 | Bishop | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171739 | De et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090172561 | Kane | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090173782 | Muscato | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090173784 | Yang | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187491 | Bull | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192904 | Patterson | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192928 | Abifaker | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090197684 | Arezina | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090240516 | Palestrant | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090240579 | Skowreonek | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247131 | Champion | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254432 | Mccaffery et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259589 | Agostino et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281941 | Worth | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287558 | Seth et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090298427 | Wilkinson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319352 | Boyle et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100005424 | Sundaresan | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100008535 | Abulafia | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010906 | Grecia | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100010909 | Marshall et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100041368 | Kumar | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042471 | Chang | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057580 | Raghunathan | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082490 | Rosenblatt | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100088188 | Kumar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097180 | Cardullo | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131415 | Sartipi | May 2010 | A1 |
20100185461 | Broeska et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185505 | Sprogoe | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205063 | Mersky | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235290 | Junger | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100293536 | Nikitin | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299194 | Snyder et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100304852 | Szrek | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312636 | Coulter et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110035268 | Rossi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040684 | Beck et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110057027 | Grossman | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110060904 | Whitfield | Mar 2011 | A9 |
20110087592 | Van Der et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110091092 | Nepomniachtchi | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110106698 | Isaacson | May 2011 | A1 |
20110161226 | Courtion | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166872 | Cervenka et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110166992 | Dessert et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110173083 | Reed et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202419 | Mamdani | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110234514 | Gothard | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246284 | Chaikin | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120060425 | Yamauchi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089467 | Comparelli | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120099780 | Smith | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120136780 | El-Awady | May 2012 | A1 |
20120203572 | Christense | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209688 | Lamothe et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120234911 | Yankovich | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245987 | Isaacson | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120271689 | Etheredge | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120284185 | Mettler | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120290366 | Giles | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120303425 | Katzin | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130073388 | Heath | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130179177 | Dhavle et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130226728 | Oghittu | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130290121 | Simakov | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304561 | Warner et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140006268 | Roberts | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019238 | Blatchley | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140058873 | Sorenson | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140074704 | White | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140297437 | Natarajan | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140164159 | Lovelace | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140081769 | Wilen | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140279187 | Gopinath | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150066757 | Shenoy | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150178701 | Glass | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150278845 | Sorem et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170076293 | Cage | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102609839 | Jul 2012 | CN |
2128809 | Dec 2009 | EP |
2002189963 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003208541 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2008541303 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2010521017 | Jun 2010 | JP |
20020027427 | Apr 2002 | KR |
2013078499 | Jun 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Patent Cooperation Treaty International Search Report, PCT/US11/43516. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty International Search Report, PCT/US11/64388. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty International Search Report, PCT/US 11/64384. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty International Search Report, PCT/US2011/064411. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty International Search Report, PCT/US2011/064405. |
SIGIS: Special Interest Group for IIAS Standards. SIGIS Eligible Product List Criteria for Supporting Private Label Items. 2007. [retrieved on Mar. 28, 2012]. Retrieved from the Internet: http://portal.sig-is.org/en/join/documents/SIGISPrivateLabelEligibilityCriteriaPolicy-12-12-07-1.pdf>entire document. |
ADP National Account Services. Important information for FSA Plans and Health Care Reform. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120150554 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61422761 | Dec 2010 | US |