The subject matter disclosed herein relates to knock sensors, and more specifically to knock sensors suitable for sensing engine knock and piston slap in combustion engines.
Combustion engines typically combust a carbonaceous fuel, such as natural gas, gasoline, diesel, and the like, and use the corresponding expansion of high temperature and pressure gases to apply a force to certain components of the engine, e.g., piston disposed in a cylinder, to move the components over a distance. Each cylinder may include one or more valves that open and close correlative with combustion of the carbonaceous fuel. For example, an intake valve may direct an oxidizer such as air into the cylinder, which is then mixed with fuel and combusted. Combustion fluids, e.g., hot gases, may then be directed to exit the cylinder via an exhaust valve. Accordingly, the carbonaceous fuel is transformed into mechanical motion, useful in driving a load. For example, the load may be a generator that produces electric power.
Knock sensors can be used to monitor multi-cylinder combustion engines. A knock sensor can be mounted to the exterior of an engine cylinder and used to determine whether or not the engine is running as desired. Sometimes a knock sensor detects piston slap and mistakes the piston slap for engine knock. When this occurs, the engine control system, which is connected to the knock sensor, may attempt to make adjustments to eliminate the engine knock it believes is happening, but is really piston slap. These adjustments may induce engine knock or otherwise make the engine run in an undesirable way. Thus, it would be desirable to have a way to distinguish piston slap from engine knock.
Certain embodiments commensurate in scope with the originally claimed invention are summarized below. These embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the claimed invention, but rather these embodiments are intended only to provide a brief summary of possible forms of the invention. Indeed, the invention may encompass a variety of forms that may be similar to or different from the embodiments set forth below.
In a first embodiment, a method of distinguishing piston slap from engine knock in a reciprocating device includes obtaining a fundamental frequency of a cylinder, the cylinder having a thrust face and an anti-thrust face, receiving a first signal from a first knock sensor mounted on the cylinder, and identifying piston slap by evaluating whether a first plurality of amplitudes of the first signal at the fundamental frequency and one or more harmonic frequencies of the fundamental frequency exceed a piston slap threshold value.
In a second embodiment, a system includes a controller configured to control a reciprocating device, wherein the controller includes a processor configured to obtain a fundamental frequency of a cylinder, the cylinder including a thrust face and an anti-thrust face, receive a first signal from a first knock sensor disposed on the cylinder, and identify the presence of piston slap by evaluating whether a first plurality of amplitudes of the first signal at the fundamental frequency and one or more harmonic frequencies of the fundamental frequency exceed a piston slap threshold value.
In a third embodiment, a non-transitory computer readable medium comprising executable instructions that when executed cause a processor to obtain a fundamental frequency of a cylinder, the cylinder having a thrust face and an anti-thrust face, receive a first signal from a first knock sensor disposed on the thrust face of the cylinder, and identify the presence of piston slap by evaluating whether a first plurality of amplitudes of the first signal at the fundamental frequency and one or more harmonic frequencies of the fundamental frequency exceed a piston slap threshold value.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood when the following detailed description is read with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like characters represent like parts throughout the drawings, wherein:
One or more specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below. In an effort to provide a concise description of these embodiments, all features of an actual implementation may not be described in the specification. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure.
When introducing elements of various embodiments of the present invention, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
When using knock sensors to monitor a reciprocating device (e.g., a combustion engine), the engine control unit (ECU) may make adjustments based on knock sensor measurements in order to improve how the engine runs. Piston slap occurs when the piston contacts or pushes against one side of the cylinder while moving within the cylinder during combustion. Piston slap may be the result of mismatched piston-cylinder combinations, worn out pistons, cylinders, rods and/or pins, insufficient lubrication, etc. Unlike engine knock, which may be eliminated by adjusting the operational parameters of the engine, piston slap is often due to worn parts and the fit between the piston and the cylinder. Thus, the ECU may be unable to avoid piston slap by adjusting the operational parameters of the engine. Because piston slap may occur at similar frequencies and have similar amplitudes to engine knock, the knock sensors may detect engine slap and mistake it for engine knock. The ECU may then make adjustments to the engine's operational parameters in an effort to avoid what the ECU thinks is engine knock, but is really piston slap. These adjustments to the engine's operational parameters may induce engine knock, or otherwise cause the engine to run in an undesirable way. As such, it would be beneficial to have a way to distinguish piston slap from engine knock.
Turning to the drawings,
The system 10 disclosed herein may be adapted for use in stationary applications (e.g., in industrial power generating engines) or in mobile applications (e.g., in cars or aircraft). The engine 12 may be a two-stroke engine, three-stroke engine, four-stroke engine, five-stroke engine, or six-stroke engine. The engine 12 may also include any number of combustion chambers 14, pistons 24, and associated cylinders (e.g., 1-24). For example, in certain embodiments, the system 10 may include a large-scale industrial reciprocating engine having 4, 6, 8, 10, 16, 24 or more pistons 24 reciprocating in cylinders 26. In some such cases, the cylinders and/or the pistons 24 may have a diameter of between approximately 13.5-34 centimeters (cm). In some embodiments, the cylinders and/or the pistons 24 may have a diameter of between approximately 10-40 cm, 15-25 cm, or about 15 cm. The system 10 may generate power ranging from 10 kW to 10 MW. In some embodiments, the engine 12 may operate at less than approximately 1800 revolutions per minute (RPM). In some embodiments, the engine 12 may operate at less than approximately 2000 RPM, 1900 RPM, 1700 RPM, 1600 RPM, 1500 RPM, 1400 RPM, 1300 RPM, 1200 RPM, 1000 RPM, 900 RPM, or 750 RPM. In some embodiments, the engine 12 may operate between approximately 750-2000 RPM, 900-1800 RPM, or 1000-1600 RPM. In some embodiments, the engine 12 may operate at approximately 1800 RPM, 1500 RPM, 1200 RPM, 1000 RPM, or 900 RPM. Exemplary engines 12 may include General Electric Company's Jenbacher Engines (e.g., Jenbacher Type 2, Type 3, Type 4, Type 6 or J920 FleXtra) or Waukesha Engines (e.g., Waukesha VGF, VHP, APG, 275GL), for example.
The driven power generation system 10 may include one or more knock sensors 32 suitable for detecting engine “knock” and/or other run characteristics of the engine 12. The knock sensor 32 may be any sensor configured to sense vibrations caused by the engine 12, such as vibration due to detonation, pre-ignition, and or pinging. The knock sensor 32 is shown communicatively coupled to a controller, engine control unit (ECU) 34. During operations, signals from the knock sensors 32 are communicated to the ECU 34 to determine if knocking conditions (e.g., pinging), or other behaviors exist. The ECU 34 may then adjust certain engine 12 parameters to ameliorate or avoid the undesirable conditions. For example, the ECU 34 may adjust ignition timing and/or adjust boost pressure to avoid knocking. As further described herein, the knock sensors 32 may additionally detect other vibrations beyond knocking, for example, piston slap.
As shown, the piston 24 is attached to a crankshaft 50 via a connecting rod 52 and a pin 54. The crankshaft 50 translates the reciprocating linear motion of the piston 24 into a rotating motion. As the piston 24 moves, the crankshaft 50 rotates to power the load 30 (shown in
During operations, when the piston 24 is at the highest point in the cylinder 26 it is in a position called top dead center (TDC). When the piston 24 is at its lowest point in the cylinder 26, it is in a position called bottom dead center (BDC). As the piston 24 moves from top to bottom or from bottom to top, the crankshaft 50 rotates one half of a revolution. Each movement of the piston 24 from top to bottom or from bottom to top is called a stroke, and engine 12 embodiments may include two-stroke engines, three-stroke engines, four-stroke engines, five-stroke engine, six-stroke engines, or more.
During engine 12 operations, a sequence including an intake process, a compression process, a power process, and an exhaust process typically occurs. The intake process enables a combustible mixture, such as fuel and air, to be pulled into the cylinder 26, thus the intake valve 58 is open and the exhaust valve 60 is closed. The compression process compresses the combustible mixture into a smaller space, so both the intake valve 58 and the exhaust valve 60 are closed. The power process ignites the compressed fuel-air mixture, which may include a spark ignition through a spark plug system, and/or a compression ignition through compression heat. The resulting pressure from combustion then forces the piston 24 to BDC. The exhaust process typically returns the piston 24 to TDC while keeping the exhaust valve 60 open. The exhaust process thus expels the spent fuel-air mixture through the exhaust valve 60. It is to be noted that more than one intake valve 58 and exhaust valve 60 may be used per cylinder 26.
The engine 12 may also include a crankshaft sensor 62, one or more knock sensors 32, and the engine control unit (ECU) 34, which includes a processor 64 and memory 66 (e.g., non-transitory computer readable medium). The crankshaft sensor 62 senses the position and/or rotational speed of the crankshaft 50. Accordingly, a crank angle or crank timing information may be derived. That is, when monitoring combustion engines, timing is frequently expressed in terms of crankshaft 50 angle. For example, a full cycle of a four stroke engine 12 may be measured as a 720° cycle. The one or more knock sensors 32 may be a Piezo-electric accelerometer, a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) sensor, a Hall effect sensor, a magnetostrictive sensor, and/or any other sensor designed to sense vibration, acceleration, sound, and/or movement. In other embodiments, sensor 32 may not be a knock sensor in the traditional sense, but any sensor that may sense vibration, pressure, acceleration, deflection, or movement.
Because of the percussive nature of the engine 12, the knock sensor 32 may be capable of detecting signatures even when mounted on the exterior of the cylinder 26. The one or more knock sensors 32 may be disposed at many different locations on the engine 12. For example, in
Engine knock is the premature combustion of fuel outside the envelope of normal combustion. In some cases, the ECU 34 may reduce or avoid engine knock when it occurs by adjusting the operating parameters of the engine. For example, the ECU 34 may adjust the air/fuel mix, ignition timing, boost pressure, etc. in an effort to reduce or avoid engine knock.
A knock sensor 32 mounted on the thrust face 74 of the cylinder 26 and oriented perpendicular to piston 24 travel, as shown in
An embodiment of a sample spectrum plot 78 of data 80 captured by a knock sensor 32 disposed on the side of the cylinder is shown in
The fundamental frequency of a cylinder in a combustion engine can be found by using Draper's equation, or experimentally. Draper's equation is as follows:
where fm,n is the resonant frequency of the cylinder, nm,n the non-dimensional mode number, c0 is the phase velocity constant, T is temperature of the combustion mixture, B is the cylinder bore diameter, and m,n are the radial and circumferential mode numbers. Once determined, the fundamental frequency of the cylinder 26 may be provided as input to the ECU 34 or predetermined and stored on the memory 66 to be obtained and/or processed by the processor 64.
Line 86 represents the fundamental frequency of the cylinder 26, in this particular embodiment about 2783 Hz. It should be understood that this is merely an example and that the fundamental frequency 86 will change from cylinder 26 to cylinder. Harmonics occur at multiple whole integers of the fundamental frequency 86. For example, in this embodiment, the second harmonic frequency 88 occurs at about 5566 Hz, or twice the fundamental frequency. Similarly, the third harmonic frequency 90 occurs at about 8350 Hz, the fourth harmonic frequency 92 at about 11133 Hz, the fifth harmonic frequency 94 at about 13916 Hz, the sixth harmonic frequency 96 at about 16699 Hz, and so on. Again, these values are merely an example and specific to the cylinder 26 of the present embodiment. The fundamental frequency 86 and the various harmonics 88, 90, 92, 94, and 96 will vary depending upon the cylinder 26. The memory 66 may store a piston slap threshold value, which may be in the form of a raw amplitude value, a percentage increase, or some other value. When the amplitude at a frequency exceeds the threshold value, piston slap is determined to be present. Engine knock, on the other hand, may occur at both whole integers and non-integers. Given that the amplitude of piston slap decreases as the harmonic ratios go up, and amplitude of engine knock does not decrease, the ECU 34 can distinguish piston slap from engine knock at multiple whole integers of the fundamental frequency by determining whether the amplitude decreases as the harmonic count increases.
In block 102, a sample of data is sampled using the knock sensor 32. For example, the one or more knock sensors 32 collect data and then transmit the data to the ECU 34. In the present embodiment, a single knock sensor 32 is mounted on the thrust face 74 of the cylinder 26 and oriented perpendicular to the direction of piston 24 travel. An embodiment using two knock sensors 32 on a single cylinder 26 will be described later.
In block 104, the process 98 identifies piston slap at the fundamental frequency 86 of the cylinder 26 and the harmonic frequencies of the fundamental frequency 86 of the cylinder 26. This may involve referencing a look up table stored on the memory 66 and comparing the amplitude within one or more windows of frequencies to the look up table. Block 104 may also involve determining whether the amplitude exceeds a piston slap threshold value stored in the memory 66. Block 104 may also involve applying one or more filters to the signal. Filters used by the process 98 may include low pass filters, high pass filters, band pass filters, and the like. The harmonic frequencies of the cylinder 26 are multiples of the fundamental frequency 86 of the cylinder 26. For example, the second harmonic frequency 88 is twice the fundamental frequency 86 of the cylinder 26. In block 104, the process 98 may analyze or evaluate the fundamental frequency 86, as well as the second harmonic 88, third harmonic 90, fourth harmonic 92, fifth harmonic 94, sixth harmonic 96, and so on. The process 98 may analyze or evaluate a range of frequencies surrounding the frequency in question. For example, the process 98 may analyze or evaluate frequencies in the range of ±0.5%, ±1%, ±2%, or ±5% of the frequency in question. Block 104 may include comparing the amplitude to a look up table or a piston slap threshold value store in memory 66.
In decision 106, the process 98 compares the amplitudes at the given frequencies to one or more piston slap threshold values store in memory 66 or to a look up table. If the process 98 determines that piston slap is present (e.g., the amplitude exceeds the piston slap threshold), the process 98 moves to block 108 and alerts the user that piston slap is occurring. The user may be alerted in a number of different ways, including proprietary error codes, via a display, sounds or audio notifications, on a display, via text, and the like. In some embodiments the ECU may shift into another mode of operation (e.g., safe run mode) that reduces the likelihood of piston slap causing excessive damage. The user may then decide whether or not to shut down the engine 12 and investigate the piston slap further.
In block 114, a sample of data is taken using the knock sensors 32. For example, the knock sensors 32 collect data and then transmit the data to the ECU 34. In the present embodiment, two knock sensors 32 are mounted on a single cylinder 26. One knock sensor 32 is mounted on the thrust face 74 of the cylinder 26 and oriented perpendicular to the direction of piston 24 travel. This knock sensor, due to its placement on the cylinder 26, is capable of detecting both engine knock and piston slap. The second knock sensor 32 is placed on the anti-thrust face 76 of the cylinder and only detects engine knock.
In block 116, the signal from the knock sensor 32 mounted on the anti-thrust face 76 of the cylinder 26 is subtracted from the signal of the knock sensor 32 mounted on the thrust face 74 of the cylinder 26. Because the knock sensor 32 on the thrust face 74 detects piston slap and the knock sensor 32 mounted on the anti-thrust face 76 does not, subtracting one from the other results in a piston slap signal. It should be understood, however, that some signal pre-processing may be required to “clean up” and/or smooth out the signals from the two knock sensors 32 such that subtracting one from the other results in a clean piston slap signal.
In decision 118, if no piston slap is present, the process 110 returns to block 114 and samples more data. If piston slap is present, the process 110 moves to block 120 and alerts the user that piston slap is occurring. The user may then decide whether or not to shut down the engine 12 and investigate the piston slap further. The user may be alerted in a number of different ways, including proprietary error codes, via a display, sounds or audio notifications, on a display, via text, and the like. In some embodiments the ECU may shift into another mode of operation (e.g., safe run mode) that reduces the likelihood of piston slap causing excessive damage.
Technical effects of the disclosed embodiments include systems and methods for distinguishing engine knock from piston slap in a reciprocating device that include obtaining a fundamental frequency of a cylinder, the cylinder having a thrust face and an anti-thrust face, receiving a first signal from a first knock sensor mounted on the cylinder, and identifying piston slap by evaluating whether a first plurality of amplitudes of the first signal at the fundamental frequency and one or more harmonic frequencies of the fundamental frequency exceed a piston slap threshold value. Additionally, the technical effects of the disclosed embodiments may also include receiving data from a second knock sensor disposed on the anti-thrust face of the cylinder, and subtracting the signal of the second knock sensor from the signal of the first knock sensor to derive a piston slap signal.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they have structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4364260 | Chen | Dec 1982 | A |
4643023 | Capps | Feb 1987 | A |
5029565 | Talbot | Jul 1991 | A |
5111790 | Grandy | May 1992 | A |
5115778 | Holroyd | May 1992 | A |
5119783 | Komurasski | Jun 1992 | A |
5241480 | Takaku et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5257533 | Imada | Nov 1993 | A |
5337240 | Nakagawa et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339245 | Hirata et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5361213 | Fujieda et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5392642 | Tao | Feb 1995 | A |
5400648 | Mahr | Mar 1995 | A |
5408863 | Sawyers et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5452699 | Rossignol | Sep 1995 | A |
5467638 | Philipp | Nov 1995 | A |
5594649 | Cook et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5682808 | Nakada | Nov 1997 | A |
5693936 | Komachiya et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5763769 | Kluzner | Jun 1998 | A |
5837887 | Shibata et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5905193 | Hashizume et al. | May 1999 | A |
5932801 | Akishita et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5934256 | Wenzlawski et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5996398 | Schleupen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6073602 | Muta | Jun 2000 | A |
6104195 | Yoshinaga et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6273064 | Scholl et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276334 | Flynn et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6330877 | Nordin | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336355 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6550311 | Sloboda | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6598468 | Zur Loye et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6662781 | Torno et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6814054 | Sauler et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6862517 | Galtier | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885932 | Liu et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6912460 | Sauler et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6947829 | Honda | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6978771 | Kuzuyama et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6990947 | Kuzuyama et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7021128 | Rauchfuss et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027909 | deBotton et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7181338 | Takemura et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7191658 | Oda et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7212909 | Yoshino et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7243529 | Takemura et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246600 | Nakashima et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7260469 | Birk et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7263872 | Danet et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7310993 | Popielas et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7325529 | Ancimer et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7356404 | Takemura et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376506 | Schueler | May 2008 | B2 |
7383816 | Zurlo | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7444231 | Ancimer et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444236 | Wiles | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7448254 | Kurtz et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7546198 | Remelman | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7559230 | Zimmer | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7571640 | Andrews | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7628253 | Jin et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7669582 | Kaneko et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7712450 | Sato et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7747380 | Chauvin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7810469 | Vigild et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7823561 | Omuro et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8000884 | Aso et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8032293 | Binder et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8068972 | Auclair et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8078389 | Huang et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8079261 | Crickmore et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8108131 | Huang et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8155857 | Loeffler et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8250905 | Schneider et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260531 | Yasuda | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8316824 | Hagari et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8342011 | Galtier et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8359909 | Duval et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8396649 | Huang | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8463533 | Glugla et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8499623 | Duval et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8528521 | Landsmann et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8538666 | Buslepp et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8606484 | Ohata | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8627800 | Glugla et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8639432 | Matsuo et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8677975 | Auclair et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8680707 | Childs et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8849471 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20060288982 | Kaneko et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090223280 | Masuda et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
203480037 | Mar 2014 | CN |
102004057261 | Jun 2006 | DE |
1447654 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1698775 | Jun 2006 | EP |
1840360 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1988378 | May 2008 | EP |
2128409 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2128410 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2339313 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2433355 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2500705 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2093121 | Aug 1982 | GB |
2005171900 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2007231903 | Sep 2007 | JP |
WO2008000568 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO2008059376 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2009106557 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2010060445 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO2013015372 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO2013026950 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO2013118151 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with corresponding EP Application No. 16159267 on Jul. 22, 2016. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/657,817, filed Mar. 13, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/676,733, filed Apr. 1, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/686,350, filed Apr. 14, 2015, Maruthi Narasinga Rao Devarakonda. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/695,335, filed Apr. 24, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/705,081, filed May 6, 2015, Scott K. Mann. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/745,986, filed Jun. 22, 2015, Sandro Rivellini. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/754,128, filed Jun. 29, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/790,785, filed Jul. 2, 2015, Pavan Chakravarthy Nandigama. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/796,934, filed Jul. 10, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/820,156, filed Aug. 6, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/918,013, filed Oct. 20, 2015, Venkatesh Raman. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/320,101, filed Jun. 30, 2014, Ryan Thomas Smith. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/587,407, filed Dec. 31, 2014, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/587,412. filed Dec. 31, 2014, Jerry Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/587,434, filed Dec. 31, 2014, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/591,192, filed Jan. 7, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/592,547, filed Jan. 8, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/600,674, filed Jan. 20, 2015, Scott K. Mann. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/609,416, filed Jan. 29, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,237, filed Feb. 4, 2015, Pin Zeng. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/617,458, filed Feb. 9, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/621,028, filed Feb. 15, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/626,385, filed Feb. 19, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/639,736, filed Mar. 5, 2015, Jeffrey Jacob Bizub. |
Reduction Piston Slap Excitation by Optimizing Piston Profiles; Takayuki Koizumi et al,; Proc. of 2002 IMAC-XX: Conf. & Exposition on Structural Dynamics, Jun. 12-15, 2000. |
VE Piston Dynamics; FEV Group, Inc.; available online; www.fev.com/what-we-do/software/virtual-engine-powertrain-dynamics-simulation/piston-dynamics-module; Jan. 1, 2015. |
Diagnostic Internal Combustion Engine Based on Crankshaft Angular Acceleration; Binh Le Khac, Tuma J.; available online; www.researchgate.net, May 2012. |
Bolt loosening detection using vibration characteristics of thin plate with piezoelectric elements;Takeshi Nakahara et al; Proc. of SPIE 5391, Smart Struc. & Materials, Jul. 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160265454 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |