Systems and methods to generate units of work within a collaboration environment based on selection of text

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11809222
  • Patent Number
    11,809,222
  • Date Filed
    Monday, May 24, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 7, 2023
    6 months ago
  • Inventors
    • Davies; Rodrigo (San Francisco, CA, US)
    • Yao; Yujian (San Francisco, CA, US)
    • Bennett-Cauchon; Micah (Brooklyn, NY, US)
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Nguyen; Thu N
    Agents
    • ESPLIN & ASSOCIATES, PC
Abstract
Systems and methods to link generate units of work within a collaboration environment are described herein. Exemplary implementations may: manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment; effectuate presentation of a user interface of the collaboration environment; obtain input information conveying user input into the user interface including selection of text; obtain content information characterizing content of text selected within the individual view of the collaboration environment; generate individual units of work based on the content information by storing the work information describing the individual units of work as part of the environment state information; and/or perform other operations.
Description
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates to systems and methods to generate units of work within a collaboration environment based on selection of text.


BACKGROUND

Collaboration environments, sometimes referred to as work management platforms, may enable users to assign projects, tasks, or other assignments to assignees (e.g., other users) to complete. A collaboration environment may comprise an environment in which individual users and/or a virtual team of users does its work and may enable users to work in a more organized and efficient manner.


SUMMARY

One aspect of the present disclosure relates to generating units of work within a collaboration environment based on selection of text. Traditionally, users may manually generate units of work within a collaboration environment. Generating units of work may include manually entering information into a user interface. Manually generating units of work may be time consuming, may decrease workflow efficiency, and the detailed creation of a unit of work may be affected by user error. To address these and/or other problems, one or more implementations presented herein propose a technique to automatically generate units of work based on selection of text and/or other content appearing in a user interface of the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, a user may select a portion of text and be prompted with an option to create a unit of work in relation to that text. For example, the selected text may become a title of a unit of work and/or added to a description for a unit of work. In some implementations, when the unit of work is generated, one or more other fields may be automatically filled based on context surrounding the text that was selected. By way of non-limiting illustration, metadata from a source of the unit of work may be used to provide additional context for the unit of work, including automatically setting certain fields for the created unit of work. By way of non-limiting illustration, the user who initially drafted the source text may automatically become the assignee of the new unit of work, the unit of work may become part of a project the source text is associated with, and/or the new unit of work may become a subtask of an existing unit of work including the source text. Further, the new unit of work may automatically include a link to the source text. In some implementations, metadata associated with the text-selecting user may be used to provide additional context for the unit of work, including automatically setting certain fields for the created unit of work. By way of non-limiting illustration, a user of a given role in relation to the text-selecting user may automatically become the assignee of the new unit of work (e.g., project manager selects text, and their intern becomes assignee of a newly generated unit of work).


One or more implementations of a system to generate units of work within a collaboration environment based on selection of text may include one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions and/or other components. Executing the machine-readable instructions may cause the one or more hardware processors to facilitate generating units of work within a collaboration environment. The machine-readable instructions may include one or more computer program components. The one or more computer program components may include one or more of an environment state component, a user interface component, a selection component, a work creation component, and/or other components.


The environment state component may be configured to manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment and/or other information. The collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment. The environment state information may define one or more records. The one or more records may include one or more of user records, work unit records, project records, and/or other records. The user records may include user information describing the users of the collaboration environment. The work unit records may include work information describing units of work assigned to, created by and/or managed by the users within the collaboration environment. The project records may include project information describing projects assigned to, created by and/or managed within the collaboration environment. In some implementations, individual projects may include individual sets of the units of work supporting the individual projects.


The user interface component may be configured to effectuate presentation of the collaboration environment. The user interface may provide one or more views of the collaboration environment. In some implementations, an individual view of the collaboration environment may textually display one or more of user information of an individual user record, work information of an individual work unit record, project information of an individual project record, and/or other information.


The selection component may be configured to obtain input information and/or other information. The input information may convey user input into the user interface. In some implementations, the user input may include selection of text displayed within an individual view of the collaboration environment.


In some implementations, the selection component may be configured to obtain content information and/or other information. The content information may characterize content of the text selected within the individual view of the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, in response to selection of first text displayed within a first view of the collaboration environment, the selection component may be configured to obtain first content information characterizing first content of the first text. In some implementations, the content information characterizing the content of the text may include one or more of words included in the text, phrases included in the text, context information specifying context of the text, and/or other information.


The work creation component may be configured to generate individual units of work based on the content information and/or other information. The individual units of work may be generated by storing work information describing the individual units of work as part of the environment state information. By way of non-limiting illustration, a first unit of work may be generated based on the first content information by storing first work information describing the first unit of work in a first work unit record within the environment state information.


As used herein, any association (or relation, or reflection, or indication, or correspondency) involving servers, processors, client computing platforms, and/or another entity or object that interacts with any part of the system and/or plays a part in the operation of the system, may be a one-to-one association, a one-to-many association, a many-to-one association, and/or a many-to-many association or N-to-M association (note that N and M may be different numbers greater than 1).


These and other features, and characteristics of the present technology, as well as the methods of operation and functions of the related elements of structure and the combination of parts and economies of manufacture, will become more apparent upon consideration of the following description and the appended claims with reference to the accompanying drawings, all of which form a part of this specification, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts in the various figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for the purpose of illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. As used in the specification and in the claims, the singular form of “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a system configured to generate units of work within a collaboration environment based on selection of text, in accordance with one or more implementations.



FIG. 2 illustrates a method to generate units of work within a collaboration environment based in selection of text, in accordance with one or more implementations.



FIG. 3 illustrates a user interface, in accordance with one or more implementations.



FIG. 4 illustrates a user interface, in accordance with one or more implementations.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 1 illustrates a system 100 configured to generate units of work within a collaboration environment based on selection of text, in accordance with one or more implementations. Manually generating units of work may be time consuming, may decrease workflow efficiency, and the detailed creation of a unit of work may be affected by user error. To address these and/or other problems, one or more implementations presented herein propose a technique to automatically generate units of work based on selection of text and/or other content appearing in a user interface of the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, a user may select a portion of text and be prompted with an option to create a unit of work in relation to that text. For example, the selected text may become a title of a unit of work and/or added to a description for a unit of work. Generating units of work in an automated fashion by selecting text may decrease the amount of time needed for generating units of work, in turn improving workflow efficiency. Another added benefit of generating of units of work in an automated fashion may be accuracy in conveying information pertinent to the successful execution of units of work, the quality of work product by users in the collaboration environment may improve.


In some implementations, system 100 may include one or more of one or more servers 102, one or more client computing platforms 104, external resource(s) 126, and/or other components. Server(s) 102 may be configured to communicate with one or more client computing platforms 104, one or more external resources 126, and/or other entities of system 100 according to a client/server architecture and/or other architectures. Client computing platform(s) 104 may be configured to communicate with other client computing platforms via server(s) 102 and/or according to a peer-to-peer architecture and/or other architectures. Users may access system 100 via client computing platform(s) 104.


Server(s) 102 may include one or more of non-transitory electronic storage 128, one or more processors 130 configured by machine-readable instructions 106, and/or other components. The non-transitory electronic storage 128 may store one or more records and/or other information. Machine-readable instructions 106 may include one or more instruction components. The instruction components may include computer program components. Executing the machine-readable instructions 106 may cause server(s) 102 to facilitate generating units of work within a collaboration environment based on selection of text. The computer program components may include one or more of an environment state component 108, user interface component 110, selection component 112, work creation component 114, and/or other components.


Environment state component 108 may be configured to manage environment state information and/or other information used in maintaining a collaboration environment. The collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment. The environment state information may include one or more of user records, work unit records, project records, objective records, and/or other records. The user records may include user information describing the users of the collaboration environment. The work unit records which may include work information describing units of work assigned to, created by, and/or managed by the users within the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, the work unit records may include a first work unit record including first work information for a first unit of work. The project records may include project information describing projects created, assigned, and/or managed within the collaboration environment. An individual project may include individual sets of the units of work supporting the individual projects. The objective records may include objective information describing business objectives specified within the collaboration environment.


The user information in the user records may include values of user parameters and/or other information. The values of the user parameters may be organized in the user records corresponding to users interacting with and/or viewing the collaboration environment. The values of the user parameters may include information describing the users, their actions within the collaboration environment, their settings, and/or other user information; and/or metadata associated with the users, their actions within the environment, their settings, and/or other user information. Individual ones of the users may be associated with individual ones of the user records. A user record may define values of the user parameters associated with a given user.


The values of the user parameters may, by way of non-limiting example, specify one or more of: a user name, a group parameter, a user account, user role information, a user department, descriptive user content, a to-email, a from-email, a photo, an organization, a workspace, one or more user comments, one or more teams the user belongs to, one or more of the user display settings (e.g., colors, size, project order, task order, other unit of work order, etc.), one or more authorized applications, one or more interaction parameters (e.g., indicating a user is working on/worked on a given unit of work, a given user viewed a given work unit of work, a given user selected a given unit of work, a timeframe a given user last interacted with and/or worked on a given unit of work, a time period that a given unit of work has been idle, and/or other interaction parameters), one or more notification settings, one or more progress parameters, status information for one or more work units the user is associated with (units of work assigned to the user, assigned to other users by the user, completed by the user, past-due date, and/or other information), one or more performance/productivity metrics of a given user (e.g., how many units of work the user has completed, how quickly the user completed the units of work, how quickly the user completes certain types of work units, the efficiency of the user, bandwidth of the user, activity level of the user, how many business objectives the user has helped fulfill through their completion of units of work, etc.), application access information (e.g., username/password for one or more third-party applications), one or more favorites and/or priorities, schedule information, and/or other information.


Schedule information for the individual users may include one or more calendar entries associated with the individual users. The individual calendar entries may be associated with individual start dates and individual end dates. In some implementations, schedule information may be stored locally within electronic storage 128 by virtue of features and/or functionality provided within a collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, a collaboration environment may have features and/or functionality of a calendar application configured to facilitate calendaring entries into a schedule. It is noted that schedule information may be determined through features and/or functionality provided by one or more external resources 126. By way of non-limiting illustration, and external resource may include a calendar application which may be external to a collaboration environment. The collaboration environment may have permissions to access the external calendar application to determine and/or obtain schedule information.


The work information in the work unit records may include values of one or more work unit parameters. The values of the work unit parameters may be organized in work unit records corresponding to units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment. A given unit of work may have one or more assignees and/or collaborators working on the given work unit. Units of work may include one or more to-do items, action items, objectives, and/or other units of work one or more users should accomplish and/or plan on accomplishing. Units of work may be created by a given user for the given user and/or created by the given user and assigned to one or more other users. Individual units of work may include one or more of an individual task, an individual sub-task, and/or other units of work assigned to and/or associated with one or more users. Individual units of work may include one or more digital content items. An individual unit of work may include an individual digital content item by virtue of the individual digital content item (and/or a copy or instance thereof) being attached and/or appended thereto. A digital content item may include one or more of an image, a video, an audio file, a PDF, a word document, and/or other digital content items.


In some implementations, units of work created by, assigned to, and/or completed by the users may refer generally to a linking of the units of work with the individual users in the collaboration environment. A unit of work may be linked with a user in a manner that defines one or more relationships between the user and the unit of work. Such a relationship may connote and/or be a result of an action (past, present, and/or future) of the user with respect to the unit of work. Such actions may include one or more of creating a work unit record for a unit of work, being assigned to participate in a unit of work, participating in a unit of work, being granted access to a work unit record of a unit of work, adjusting a value of a work unit parameter of a work unit record of a unit of work, being assigned a role at the unit of work level, and/or other actions.


Individual sets of work unit records may be defined by a record hierarchy. A record hierarchy may convey individual positions of work unit records (and their corresponding units of work) in the record hierarchy. By way of non-limiting illustration, a position may specify one or more of a work unit record being superior to another work unit record, a work unit record being subordinate to another work unit record, and/or other information. As a result, individual work unit records in the individual sets of work unit records may be subordinate to other individual work unit records in the individual sets of work unit records. For example, a work unit record may define a unit of work comprising a task, and a subordinate work unit record may define a unit of work comprising a sub-task to the task. A record hierarchy may define a relationship between work unit records. A work unit record may have some restrictions placed on it by virtue of having a subordinate work unit record. By way of non-limiting illustration, a work unit record may be restricted from access by one or more users unless and/or until a subordinate work unit record is completed and/or started.


Individual work unit records may include hierarchical information defining a record hierarchy of the individual work unit records. The hierarchical information of a work unit record may include one or more of information identifying other work unit records associated in a record hierarchy the work unit record belongs to, a specification of the position of the work unit record in the hierarchy, restrictions and/or other relationships placed on the work unit record by virtue of its position, and/or other information.


In some implementations, the one or more work unit parameters may include one or more of a work assignment parameter, work completion parameter, a work management parameter, work creation parameter, dependency parameter, and/or other parameters. The values of the work assignment parameter may describe units of work assigned to the individual users. The values of the work management parameter may describe units of work managed by the individual users. The values of the work creation parameter may describe units of work created by the individual users. In some implementations, values of a dependency parameter may describe whether a given unit of work is dependent on one or more other units of work. A unit of work being dependent on an other unit of work may mean the unit of work may not be completed, started, assigned, and/or have other interactions performed in relation to the unit of work before some action is performed on the other unit of work. By way of non-limiting illustration, a first unit of work may not be started until a second unit of work is completing, meaning the first unit of work is dependent on the second unit of work. In some implementations, values of the dependency parameter may go hand in hand with the hierarchical information. By way of non-limiting illustration, a unit of work that is subordinate to an other unit of work may be dependent on the other unit of work, or vice versa.


In some implementations, values of work unit parameters may include one or more of a unit of work name, a unit of work description, user role information, one or more unit of work dates (e.g., a start date, a due date or end date, a completion date, and/or dates), project inclusion (e.g., identification of projects supported by the individual units of work), one or more members associated with a unit of work (e.g., an owner, one or more collaborators, collaborator access information, and/or other unit of work collaborators and/or collaborator information), completion state, one or more user comment parameters (e.g., permission for who may make comments such as an assignee, an assignor, a recipient, one or more followers, and/or one or more other interested parties; content of the comments; one or more times; presence or absence of the functionality of up-votes; one or more hard-coded responses; and/or other parameters), one or more interaction parameters (e.g., indicating a given unit of work is being worked on/was worked on, a given work unit of work was viewed, a given unit of work was selected, how long the given unit of work has been idle, a last interaction parameter indicating when and what user last interacted with the given unit of work, users that interacted with the given unit of work, quantity and/or content of comments on the unit of work, and/or other interaction parameters indicating sources of the interactions, context of the interactions, content of the interactions and/or time for the interactions), one or more digital content item attachments, notification settings, privacy, an associated URL, one or more interaction parameters (e.g., sources of the interactions, context of the interactions, content of the interactions, time for the interactions, and/or other interaction parameters), updates, state of a workspace for a given unit of work (e.g., application state parameters, application status, application interactions, user information, and/or other parameters related to the state of the workspace for a unit of work), one or more performance/productivity metrics for a given unit of work, hierarchical information, dependency, one or more custom fields (e.g., priority, cost, stage, and/or other custom fields), and/or other information.


The values of the work assignment parameter describing units of work assigned to the individual users may be determined based on one or more interactions by one or more users with a collaboration environment. In some implementations, one or more users may create and/or assign one or more unit of work to themselves and/or another user. In some implementations, a user may be assigned a unit of work and the user may effectuate a reassignment of the unit of work from the user or one or more other users.


In some implementations, values of the work completion parameter may indicate that a completion status of a unit of work has changed from “incomplete” to “marked complete” and/or “complete”. In some implementations, a status of complete for a unit of work may be associated with the passing of an end date associated with the unit of work. In some implementations, a status of “marked complete” may be associated with a user providing input via the collaboration environment at the point in time the user completes the unit of work (which may be before or after an end date).


In some implementations, managing the environment state component 108 may include maintaining queues of the units of work assigned to the users. The queues may be presented to the users in a user interface of the collaboration environment to facilitate access to the units of work via work unit pages. Individual queues may represent the units of work assigned to individual users organized in an order based on the individual end dates and/or other dates (e.g., start dates) and/or other ordering. Individual queues may be presented in a user interface based on one or more of a list view, a calendar view, and/or other views. The calendar view may be a calendar view by week, by more than one week (e.g., 1st through 15th), by month, by more than one month (e.g., May through July), and/or other calendar views. Units of work may be represented in a calendar view by user interface elements (e.g., icons, calendar entries, etc.).


Project information in project records may define values of project parameters for projects managed within the collaboration environment. The project parameters may characterize one or more projects created, assigned, and/or managed within the collaboration environment and/or via the collaboration environment, and/or the metadata associated with the one or more projects. Individual ones of the projects may be associated with individual ones of the project records. The project information may define values of the project parameters associated with a given project managed within the collaboration environment and/or via the collaboration environment. A given project may have one or more owners and/or one or more collaborators working on the given project. The given project may include one or more units of work assigned to one or more users under the given project heading. In some implementations, projects may include one or more units of work that may directly facilitate progress toward fulfillment of the projects. Accordingly, completion of units of work may directly contribute to progress toward fulfillment of the project. By way of non-limiting illustration, an individual project may be associated with a client and the units of work under the individual project heading may be work directly contributing to the fulfillment of a business relationship with the client.


In some implementations, activities that impact the progress toward completion of the individual projects may be reflected by changes in the values of one or more of the work unit parameters and/or the values of one or more of the project parameters.


The values of the project parameters may, by way of non-limiting example, include one or more of: one or more units of work within individual ones of the projects (which may include values of work unit parameters defined by one or more work unit records), status information, user role information, one or more user comment parameters (e.g., a creator, a recipient, one or more followers, one or more other interested parties, content, one or more times, upvotes, other hard-coded responses, etc.), a project name, a project description, one or more project dates (e.g., a start date, a due date, a completion date, and/or other project dates), one or more project collaborators (e.g., an owner, one or more other project collaborators, collaborator access information, and/or other project collaborators and/or collaborator information), one or more attachments, notification settings, privacy, an associated URL, one or more interaction parameters (e.g., sources of the interactions, context of the interactions, content of the interactions, time for the interactions, and/or other interaction parameters), updates, ordering of units of work within the given project, state of a workspace for a given task within the given project, and/or other information.


In some implementations, projects created by, assigned to, and/or completed by the users may refer generally to a linking of the projects with the individual users in the collaboration environment. A project may be linked with a user in a manner that defines one or more relationships between the user and the project. Such a relationship may connote and/or be a result of an action (past, present, and/or future) of the user with respect to the project. Such actions may include one or more of creating a project record for a project, being assigned to participate in a project, participating in a project, being granted access to a project record of a project, adjusting a value of a project parameter of a project record of a project, being assigned a project-level role, and/or other actions.


User role information may specify individual roles of the individual users. A role may represent a position of an individual user. The position may be specified based on a description of one or more of a job title, level, stage, and/or other descriptions of position. The role may be specified with respect to a business organization as a whole and/or other specifications. By way of non-limiting illustration, a role may include one or more of chief executive officer (or other officer), owner, manager, supervisor, accountant, associate, employee, intern, entry level, midlevel, senior, administrator, director, foreman, engineer, product developer, human resource officer, artist, art director, and/or other descriptions.


In some implementations, user role information may specify roles of the users within the units of work and/or the projects. The roles may convey expected contribution of the users in completing and/or supporting the units of work and/or the projects. The individual roles of individual users within the units of work may be specified separately from the individual roles of the individual users within the projects. The individual roles of individual users within the units of work and/or projects may be specified separately from the individual roles of the individual users within a business organization as a whole.


The objective information in objective records may include values of one or more objective parameters. The values of the objective parameters may be organized in objective records corresponding to business objectives managed, created, and/or owned within the collaboration environment. A given business objective may have one or more collaborators, and/or team members working on the given business objective. Business objectives may include one or more associated units of work and/or projects one or more users should accomplish and/or plan on accomplishing. Business objectives may be created by a given user for the given user and/or created by the given user and assigned to be owned to one or more other users. Individual business objectives may include one or more of an individual goal, an individual sub-goal, and/or other business objectives assigned to be owned by a user and/or associated with one or more users.


The business objectives may be associated with a set of units of work and/or projects that may indirectly facilitate progress toward fulfillment of the business objectives. The set of units of work and/or projects may not directly contribute to the progress. By way of non-limiting illustration, a connection between the set of units of work and/or projects and a corresponding business objective may be indirect in that completion of at least one of the units of work and/or projects may have no direct impact on progress toward fulfillment of the business objective. The concept of “no direct impact” may mean that completion of the at least one unit of work and/or project may not cause progress toward fulfillment of the business objective without independent action outside of the at least one unit of work and/or project. Instead, the fulfillment of the at least one unit of work and/or project may make such independent action more likely (e.g., through coercion, assistance, education, incentivization, reminder, etc.). However, in some implementations, business objectives may be associated with a set of units of work and/or projects that may directly facilitate progress toward fulfillment of the business objectives. Accordingly, completion of the set of units of work and/or projects may directly contribute to the progress toward fulfillment. Business objectives may be associated with an objectives and key result (OKR) goal-setting framework. Business objectives may be specified on one or more of a team basis, organization basis, and/or other specifications. In some implementations, business objectives may be characterized as user objectives. The user objectives may be associated with a set of units of work and/or projects that may indirectly (and/or directly) facilitate progress toward fulfillment of the user objectives. User objectives may be specified on an individual user basis.


Individual objective records may describe individual business objectives and/or identify sets of work unit records and/or project records that support the individual business objectives.


Individual sets of objective records may be defined by an objective record hierarchy. An objective record hierarchy may convey individual positions of objective records (and their corresponding business objectives) in the objective record hierarchy. By way of non-limiting illustration, a position may specify one or more of an objective record being superior to one or more other objective records, an objective record being subordinate to one or more other objective records, and/or other information. As a result, individual objective records may be subordinate and/or superior to other individual objective records. For example, the objective records may further include a second objective record. The first objective record and the second objective record may be organized by a first objective record hierarchy specifying that the second objective record is subordinate to the first objective record.


An objective record may define a business objective comprising a progress towards fulfillment, and a subordinate objective record may define a business objective comprising a subordinate progress towards fulfillment to the subordinate business objective. An objective record hierarchy may define a relationship between objective records.


Individual objective records may include hierarchical information defining an objective record hierarchy of the individual objective records. The hierarchical information of an objective record may include one or more of information identifying other objective records associated in an objective record hierarchy the objective record belongs to, a specification of the position of the objective record in the hierarchy, other relationships placed on the objective record by virtue of its position, and/or other information.


In some implementations, as a consequence of the objective record hierarchies, the individual business objectives described in the individual objective records that are subordinate to the other individual objective records may be subordinate to the individual business objectives in the other individual objective records.


In some implementations, the one or more objective parameters may include one or more of an objective definition parameter, an objective owner parameter, an objective management parameter, an objective creation parameter, an objective progress parameter, and/or other parameters. The value of the objective definition parameter may describe the particular business objective. The values of the objective owner parameter may describe business objectives assigned to be owned by an individual user. The values of the objective management parameter may describe business objectives managed as collaborators by the individual users. The values of the objective creation parameter may describe business objectives created by the individual users.


In some implementations, the business objectives may be described based on one or more of a business objective name, a business objective description, one or more business objective dates (e.g., a start date, a due date, and/or dates), one or more members associated with a business objective (e.g., an owner, one or more other project/task members, member access information, and/or other business objective members and/or member information), progress information (e.g., an update, a hardcoded status update, a measured status, a progress indicator, quantity value remaining for a given business objective, completed work units in a given project, and/or other progress information), one or more interaction parameters, notification settings, privacy, an associated URL, one or more custom fields (e.g., priority, cost, stage, and/or other custom fields), and/or other information.


The values of the objective owner parameter describing business objectives owned by the individual users may be determined based on one or more interactions by one or more users with a collaboration environment. In some implementations, one or more users may create and/or assign ownership of one or more business objectives to themselves and/or another user. In some implementations, a user may be assigned to own a business objective and the user may effectuate a reassignment of ownership of the business objective from the user or one or more other users.


Progress information for the individual business objectives may convey progress toward fulfillment of the individual business objectives. The progress information for the individual business objectives may convey progress toward fulfillment of the individual business objectives. In some implementations, the progress toward fulfillment of the business objectives may be specified as one or more of a quantitative value, a qualitative value, and/or other information. In some implementations, the quantitative value may be a percentage of completion, an integer value, a dollar amount, and/or other values. In some implementations, progress toward fulfillment of the individual business objectives may be determined independently from incremental completion of the units of work in the individual sets of units of work associated with the individual business objectives. Meaning, the completion of the units of work associated with a given business objective may not directly progress the given business objective toward fulfillment, but completing the units of work may make accomplishing the business objective more likely (e.g., through coercion, assistance, education, incentivization, reminder, etc.). However, in some implementations, progress toward fulfillment of the individual business objectives may be directly determined based on incremental completion of the units of work in the individual sets of units of work associated with the individual business objectives.


It is noted that any metadata and/or values of parameters related to any users, projects, business objectives, and/or units of work may be considered values of user parameters, project parameters, objective parameters, and/or work unit parameters.


In some implementations, environment state component 108 may be configured to manage information defining work unit pages corresponding to the individual units of work. Individual work unit pages may provide access to individual units of work. Managing information defining work unit pages may include determining, obtaining, and/or modifying information used to generate work unit pages. Managing information defining individual work unit pages may include providing information to the environment state component 108 to effectuate presentation of the work unit pages, and/or other information. In some implementations, individual work unit pages may include individual sets of interface elements displaying the values of one or more of the work unit parameters of the individual units of work.


In some implementations, environment state component 108 may be configured to manage information defining project pages corresponding to the individual projects. Individual project pages may provide access to individual project. Managing information defining project pages may include determining, obtaining, and/or modifying information used to generate project pages. Managing information defining individual project pages may include providing information to the environment state component 108 to effectuate presentation of the project pages, and/or other information. In some implementations, individual project pages may include individual sets of interface elements displaying the values of one or more of the project parameters of the individual projects.


In some implementations, environment state component 108 may be configured to manage information defining business objective pages corresponding to the individual business objectives. Individual business objective pages may provide access to individual business objectives. Managing information defining business objective pages may include determining, obtaining, and/or modifying information used to generate business objective pages. Managing information defining individual business objective pages may include providing information to the environment state component 108 to effectuate presentation of the business objective pages, and/or other information. In some implementations, individual business objective pages may include individual sets of interface elements displaying the values of one or more of the objective parameters of the individual business objectives.


The user interface component 110 may be configured to effectuate presentation of a user interface of the collaboration environment. The user interface may provide one or more views of the collaboration environment. In some implementations, an individual view of the collaboration environment may textually and/or graphically display information from one or more of a user record, a project record, an objective record, and/or other records. By way of non-limiting illustration, a view may display one or more of a work unit page, a project page, a business objective page, a queue of units of work, and/or other information. In some implementations, textual display of information may include display of a body of text.


The selection component 112 may obtain input information conveying user input into a user interface. In some implementations, the user input may include selection of text displayed within a body of text in an individual view of the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, the selection of text may be indicated by the user by highlighting the text, underlining the text, placing the text in brackets, changing the font of the text, and/or other forms of indicating a selection of text by a user.


Selection component 112 may be configured to obtain content information characterizing content of text selected within an individual view of the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, in response to selection of first text displayed within a first view of the collaboration environment, obtaining first content information may characterize first content of the first text.


The content information characterizing the content of the text may include one or more of words included in the text, phrases included in the text, context information specifying context of the text, and/or other content. The selection component 112 may use natural language processing techniques and/or other techniques.


In some implementations, content of the text may trigger generate of one or more units of work. By way of non-limiting illustration, the content information that triggers generation of the individual units of work by users may include one or more trigger phrases and/or words. The individual units of work may be generated from selected text based on identifying one or more of the trigger phrases and/or words from the words and/or phrases included in the text. By way of non-limiting illustration, the trigger phrases and/or words may include words and/or phrases conveying action items or tasks to be completed, desires or wants, and/or other information. In some implementations, the trigger phrases and/or words may include words accompanied by one or more of will you, can you, could you, please, by a given date, before the given date, we need, I need, I want, would be grateful if, you could, and/or other phrases and/or words. By way of non-limiting illustration, text may include “The background research to be completed should help us determine the next course of action.” An action item determined from this text may include “doing background research.” Another action item determined from this text may include “determine next source of action.” By way of non-limiting illustration, text may include “When Tom completes the background research, we will know the next course of action.” A desire from this text may include “have Tom do the background research.” In some implementations, the trigger phrases and/or words may be directly correlated to other projects and/or units of work. By way of non-limiting illustration, the first unit of work may be generated based on identifying a first trigger phrase and/or word included in the first text.


The selection component 112 may be configured to store trigger information. The trigger information may include trigger phrases and/or words, and the corresponding values of work unit parameters that may be generated for one or more units of work. In some implementations, the trigger phrases and/or words may be user-specific and/or system-wide. In some implementations, the trigger phrases and/or words may be set by users and stored within the user records for the users. In some implementations, the selection component 112 may be configured to determine trigger phrases and/or words through one or more machine learning techniques.


In some implementations, the content information characterizing the content of the text may include context information specifying context of the text. The context may include one or more of a source record of the text, a superior record to the source record, a creator of the text, a selector of the text, and/or other information. In some implementations, the individual units of work may be further generated based on the context information. The context information may be used to set individual values of individual work unit parameters.


In some implementations, a creator of the text include user who created a body of text including the selected text. In some implementations, a generated unit of work may include the creator of the text as one or more of an assignee, an assignor, a collaborator, a reviewer, and/or other value of a work unit parameter.


In some implementations, a selector of the text may include a user performing the selection of text within a body of text. In some implementations, a generated unit of work may include the selector of the text as one or more of an assignee, an assignor, a collaborator, a reviewer, and/or other value of a work unit parameter.


In some implementations, a source record of the text may include a record that includes the body of text from which the text was selected. The source record may include one or more of a user record, a work unit record, a project record, an objective record, and/or other records. In some implementations, a generated unit of work may be included in the source record. In some implementations, a generated unit of work may be specified by a work unit record that is subordinate to the source record. In some implementations, a generated unit of work may be specified by a work unit record that is superior to the source record.


In some implementations, a superior record to the source record may include a record specified as superior to the source record based on hierarchical information and/or other information. In some implementations, a generated unit of work may be included in the superior record. In some implementations, a generated unit of work may be specified by a work unit record that is subordinate to the superior record. In some implementations, a generated unit of work may be specified by a work unit record that is superior to the superior record.


The selection component 112 may be configured to identify one or more of the users linked to a body of text. The one or more users linked to the text may include one or more of the creator of the text, the selector of the text, users linked to the source record, users linked to the superior record, and/or other users. The selection component 112 may be configured to obtain the user records for the users linked to a body of text.


By way of non-limiting illustration, the first unit of work may be generated based on first context of the first text. The first context may include one or more of a first source record of the first text, a first superior record to the first source record, a first user who created the first text, a second user who selected the first text, and/or context.


In some implementations, the user interface component 110 may be configured to effectuate presentation of a user interface element in response to the selection of the text. The user interface element may be configured to be selected by the users to cause the generation of individual units of work based on the content information. By way of non-limiting illustration, the user interface element may be presented within a preview window and/or drop-down menu providing the option to generate a unit of work based on the selected text. The user interface element may provide a preview of the potential unit of work including one or more of a title of the potential unit of work, an assignee of the potential unit of work, an assignor of the potential unit of work, a record hierarchy of the potential unit of work, and/or other information. In some implementations, the interface element may include one or more of a text input field, a drop-down menu, a set of check boxes, virtual buttons, and/or other user interface elements that when interacted with, cause an individual unit of work to be generated.


The work creation component 114 may be configured to generate individual units of work based on the content information by storing the work information describing the individual units of work as part of the environment state information. By way of non-limiting illustration, a first unit of work may be generated based on the first content information by storing first work information describing the first unit of work in a first work unit record within the environment state information.


In some implementations, the selection component 112 may be configured whereby selecting text by way of highlighting the text in a certain shade of color may characterize the content of the selected text by way of urgency and/or priority. By way of non-limiting illustration, highlighting the selected text in a shade of green corresponds to generating a unit of work that does not have a pressing timeline. Highlighting the selected text in a shade of red corresponds to generating a unit of work that must be completed as soon as possible (e.g., a due date may be specified day-of, within a predetermined number of days, and/or other specifications).


In some implementations, generating the individual units of work based on the content information may include automatically generating one or more values of one or more work unit parameters of the individual units of work.


By way of non-limiting illustration, generating the first unit of work may include automatically generating a first value of a first work unit parameter of the first unit of work. The first work unit parameter may include a title parameter and the first value may include the first text. In some implementations, a title of the first unit of work may be the first text and/or a portion of the first text. Generating the first unit of work may include automatically generating a second value of a second work unit parameter of the first unit of work. The second work unit parameter may include an assignee parameter. The second value may include the first user who created the first text or the second user who selected the first text. By way of non-limiting illustration, an assignee of the first unit of work may include either the first user or the second user. Generating the first unit of work may include automatically generating a third value of a third work unit parameter of the first unit of work. The third work unit parameter may include a dependency parameter. The third value may include the first source record of the first text. In some implementations, the first source record may include a second work unit record of a second unit of work. By way of non-limiting illustration, the first unit of work is dependent on the second unit of work. Generating the first unit of work may include automatically generating a fourth value of a fourth work unit parameter of the first unit of work. In some implementations, the fourth work unit parameter may include a project inclusion parameter. The fourth value may include the first superior record to the first source record. The first superior record may include a first project record of a first project. By way of non-limiting illustration, the first unit of work may be included in the first project.


In some implementations, the environment state component 108 may be configured to, in response to the generating units of work within a collaboration environment based on selection of text, generate and/or store resource information in individual work unit records of the individual units of work and/or individual project records of the individual projects. The resource information may include one or more of resource identifiers that facilitate access to individual records. A resource identifier may include one or more of a pointer, a hyperlink, and/or other identifier configured to provide access to an individual record (e.g., a source record and/or other record).


Storing the resource information in the individual work unit records of the individual units of work may cause individual resource identifiers to be presented in the individual work unit pages. Storing the resource information in the individual project records of the individual projects may cause individual resource identifiers to be presented in the individual project pages. By way of non-limiting illustration, in response to the first request, first resource information may be stored in the first work unit record. The first resource information may include a first resource identifier. The first resource identifier may be presented in the first work unit page.


In some implementations, environment state information may be updated as users continue to interact with the collaboration environment via the user interfaces over time. The environment state component 108 may store and/or archive the environment state information periodically and/or based on user request to archive. In some implementations, the environment state component 108 may store historical environment state information specifying historical user information, historical work information, historical project information, historical objective information, user interaction history, and/or other information.



FIG. 3 illustrates a user interface 300 of a collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations. The user interface 300 may include a view of a collaboration environment. In particular, the user interface 300 may comprise a project page 302 for a project 301. The user interface 300 may display different values of one or more project parameters of the project, and/or other information. By way of non-limiting illustration, a user interface element 301 may display a title of the first project (e.g., Project Q). A user interface element 304 may correspond to a description parameter, presenting a description of the project 301. The description may include a body of text. A user interface element 310 may identify a creator of the body of text. A user interface element 312 may correspond to the other users linked to the project 301. A user interface element 312 may correspond to the expected date of completion of project Q. User interface element 306 may correspond to a first selected text from the body of text, providing content for generating a first unit of work. A user interface element 308 may correspond to a preview of a unit of work that may be generated by the user by selecting the “create task” virtual button.



FIG. 4 illustrates a user interface 400, in accordance with one or more implementations. The user interface 400 may display a work unit page 402 for a unit of work generated from the first selected text 306 from project 301 of FIG. 3. In FIG. 4, user interface element 401 may correspond to a link to the source record which contains the first selected text 306 (e.g., project record of project Q). The user interface element 404 may correspond to the title of the unit of work, which may include the selected text and/or a portion thereof. The user interface element 406 may correspond to the expected date of completion of the unit of work. The user interface element 408 may correspond to a description of the unit of work. The user interface element 410 may correspond to the assignor of the unit of work, which may comprise the selector of the first selected text from FIG. 3 (shown as User X). The user interface element 412 may correspond to an assignee of the unit of work, which may comprise a user linked to the project, or in this example, a user specifically mentioned in the first selected text.


Referring back to FIG. 1, in some implementations, server(s) 102, client computing platform(s) 104, and/or external resources 126 may be operatively linked via one or more electronic communication links. For example, such electronic communication links may be established, at least in part, via a network 116 such as the Internet and/or other networks. It will be appreciated that this is not intended to be limiting, and that the scope of this disclosure includes implementations in which server(s) 102, client computing platform(s) 104, and/or external resource(s) 126 may be operatively linked via some other communication media.


A given client computing platform may include one or more processors configured to execute computer program components. The computer program components may be configured to enable an expert or user associated with the given client computing platform to interface with system 100 and/or external resource(s) 126, and/or provide other functionality attributed herein to client computing platform(s) 104. By way of non-limiting example, the given client computing platform 104 may include one or more of a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a tablet computing platform, a NetBook, a Smartphone, a gaming console, and/or other computing platforms.


External resource(s) 126 may include sources of information outside of system 100, external entities participating with system 100, and/or other resources. In some implementations, some or all of the functionality attributed herein to external resource(s) 126 may be provided by resources included in system 100.


Server(s) 102 may include electronic storage 128, one or more processors 130, and/or other components. Server(s) 102 may include communication lines, or ports to enable the exchange of information with a network 116 and/or other computing platforms. Illustration of server(s) 102 in FIG. 1 is not intended to be limiting. Server(s) 102 may include a plurality of hardware, software, and/or firmware components operating together to provide the functionality attributed herein to server(s) 102. For example, server(s) 102 may be implemented by a cloud of computing platforms operating together as server(s) 102.


Electronic storage 128 may comprise non-transitory storage media that electronically stores information. The electronic storage media of electronic storage 128 may include one or both of system storage that is provided integrally (i.e., substantially non-removable) with server(s) 102 and/or removable storage that is removably connectable to server(s) 102 via, for example, a port (e.g., a USB port, a firewire port, etc.) or a drive (e.g., a disk drive, etc.). Electronic storage 128 may include one or more of optically readable storage media (e.g., optical disks, etc.), magnetically readable storage media (e.g., magnetic tape, magnetic hard drive, floppy drive, etc.), electrical charge-based storage media (e.g., EEPROM, RAM, etc.), solid-state storage media (e.g., flash drive, etc.), and/or other electronically readable storage media. Electronic storage 128 may include one or more virtual storage resources (e.g., cloud storage, a virtual private network, and/or other virtual storage resources). Electronic storage 128 may store software algorithms, information determined by processor(s) 130, information received from server(s) 102, information received from client computing platform(s) 104, and/or other information that enables server(s) 102 to function as described herein.


Processor(s) 130 may be configured to provide information processing capabilities in server(s) 102. As such, processor(s) 130 may include one or more of a digital processor, a physical processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information. Although processor(s) 130 is shown in FIG. 1 as a single entity, this is for illustrative purposes only. In some implementations, processor(s) 130 may include a plurality of processing units. These processing units may be physically located within the same device, or processor(s) 130 may represent processing functionality of a plurality of devices operating in coordination. Processor(s) 130 may be configured to execute components 108, 110, 112, 114, and/or other components. Processor(s) 130 may be configured to execute components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114, and/or other components by software; hardware; firmware; some combination of software, hardware, and/or firmware; and/or other mechanisms for configuring processing capabilities on processor(s) 130. As used herein, the term “component” may refer to any component or set of components that perform the functionality attributed to the component. This may include one or more physical processors during execution of processor readable instructions, the processor readable instructions, circuitry, hardware, storage media, or any other components.


It should be appreciated that although components 108, 110, 112 and/or 114 are illustrated in FIG. 1 as being implemented within a single processing unit, in implementations in which processor(s) 130 includes multiple processing units, one or more of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 may be implemented remotely from the other components. The description of the functionality provided by the different components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 described below is for illustrative purposes, and is not intended to be limiting, as any of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 may provide more or less functionality than is described. For example, one or more of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 may be eliminated, and some or all of its functionality may be provided by other ones of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114. As another example, processor(s) 130 may be configured to execute one or more additional components that may perform some or all of the functionality attributed below to one of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114.



FIG. 2 illustrates a method 200 to generate units of work within a collaboration environment based on selection of text, in accordance with one or more implementations. The operations of method 200 presented below are intended to be illustrative. In some implementations, method 200 may be accomplished with one or more additional operations not described, and/or without one or more of the operations discussed. Additionally, the order in which the operations of method 200 are illustrated in FIG. 2 and described below is not intended to be limiting.


In some implementations, method 200 may be implemented in one or more processing devices (e.g., a digital processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information). The one or more processing devices may include one or more devices executing some or all of the operations of method 200 in response to instructions stored electronically on an electronic storage medium. The one or more processing devices may include one or more devices configured through hardware, firmware, and/or software to be specifically designed for execution of one or more of the operations of method 200.


An operation 202 may manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment and/or other information. The collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment. The environment state information may include user records, work unit records, project records, and/or other records. The user records may include user information describing the users of the collaboration environment. The work unit records may include values of work information describing units of work assigned to, created by, and/or managed by the users within the collaboration environment. The project records may include project information describing projects managed within the collaboration environment. The individual projects may include individual sets of the units of work supporting the individual projects. Operation 202 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to environment state component 108, in accordance with one or more implementations.


An operation 204 may effectuate presentation of a user interface of the collaboration environment. The user interface may provide one or more views of the collaboration environment. An individual view of the collaboration environment may textually and/or graphically display one or more of the user information of an individual user record, the work information of an individual work unit record, or the project information of an individual project record. Operation 204 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to user interface component 110, in accordance with one or more implementations.


An operation 206 may obtain input information conveying user input into the user interface. The user input may include selection of text displayed within the individual view of the collaboration environment. Operation 206 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to selection component 112, in accordance with one or more implementations.


An operation 208 may obtain content information characterizing content of the text selected within the individual view of the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, in response to selection of the first text displayed within a first view of the collaboration environment, first content information characterizing first content of the first text may be obtained. Operation 208 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to selection component 112, in accordance with one or more implementations.


An operation 210 may generate individual units of work based on the content information by storing the work information describing the individual units of work as part of the environment state information. By way of non-limiting illustration, a first unit of work may be generated based on the first content information by storing first work information describing the first unit of work in a first work unit record within the environment state information. Operation 210 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to work creation component 114, in accordance with one or more implementations.


Although the present technology has been described in detail for the purpose of illustration based on what is currently considered to be the most practical and preferred implementations, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that the technology is not limited to the disclosed implementations, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover modifications and equivalent arrangements that are within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, it is to be understood that the present technology contemplates that, to the extent possible, one or more features of any implementation can be combined with one or more features of any other implementation.

Claims
  • 1. A system configured to generate units of work within a collaboration environment based on selection of text, the system comprising: one or more physical processors configured by machine-readable instructions to: manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment, the collaboration environment being configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment, the environment state information including user records, work units records, and project records, the user records including user information describing the users of the collaboration environment, the work unit records including work information describing units of work assigned to, created by, and/or managed by the users within the collaboration environment, and the project records including project information describing projects managed within the collaboration environment, wherein individual projects include individual sets of the units of work supporting the individual projects;effectuate presentation of a user interface of the collaboration environment, the user interface providing one or more views of the collaboration environment, wherein an individual view of the collaboration environment textually displays one or more of the user information of an individual user record, the work information of an individual work unit record, or the project information of an individual project record;obtain input information conveying user input into the user interface, wherein the user input includes selection of text displayed within the individual view of the collaboration environment;obtain content information characterizing content of the text selected within the individual view of the collaboration environment, such that in response to selection of first text displayed within a first view of the collaboration environment, obtain first content information characterizing first content of the first text; andgenerate individual units of work based on the content information by storing the work information describing the individual units of work as part of the environment state information, such that a first unit of work is generated based on the first content information by storing first work information describing the first unit of work in a first work unit record within the environment state information.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more physical processors are further configured by the machine-readable instructions to: effectuate presentation of a user interface element in response to the selection of the text, wherein the user interface element is configured to be selected by the users to cause the generation of the individual units of work based on the content information.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the content information characterizing the content of the text includes words and/or phrases included in the text.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein the content information that triggers generation of the individual units of work includes one or more trigger phrases and/or words, such that the individual units of work are generated based on identifying one or more of the trigger phrases and/or words from the words and/or phrases included in the text, such that the first unit of work is generated based on identifying a first trigger phrase and/or word included in the first text.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the content information characterizing the content of the text includes context information specifying context of the text, the context including one or more of a source record of the text, a superior record to the source record, a creator of the text, or a selector of the text, wherein the individual units of work are further generated based on the context information, such that: the first unit of work is generated based on first context of the first text, the first context including one or more of a first source record of the first text, a first superior record to the first source record, a first user who created the first text, or a second user who selected the first text, wherein the first source record includes an individual one of the user records, the work unit records, or the project records.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the one or more physical processors are further configured by the machine-readable instructions to: identify one or more of the users linked to the text, the one or more users linked to the text including the creator of the text and the selector of the text;obtain the user records for the one or more of the users; andgenerate the individual units of work based on the user records for the one or more of the users.
  • 7. The system of claim 5, wherein generating the individual units of work based on the content information includes automatically generating one or more values of one or more work unit parameters of the individual units of work, such that generating the first unit of work includes automatically generating a first value of a first work unit parameter of the first unit of work, wherein the first work unit parameter includes a title parameter, and the first value includes the first text such that a title of the first unit of work is the first text.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein generating the first unit of work includes automatically generating a second value of a second work unit parameter of the first unit of work, wherein the second work unit parameter includes an assignee parameter, and the second value includes the first user who created the first text or the second user who selected the first text, such that an assignee of the first unit of work includes either the first user or the second user.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein generating the first unit of work includes automatically generating a third value of a third work unit parameter of the first unit of work, wherein the third work unit parameter includes a dependency parameter, wherein the third value includes the first source record of the first text, wherein the first source record includes a second work unit record of a second unit of work, such that the first unit of work is dependent on the second unit of work.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein generating the first unit of work includes automatically generating a fourth value of a fourth work unit parameter of the first unit of work, wherein the fourth work unit parameter includes a project inclusion parameter, and the fourth value includes the first superior record to the first source record, the first superior record including a first project record of a first project, such that the first unit of work is included in the first project.
  • 11. A method to generate units of work within a collaboration environment based on selection of text, the method comprising: managing environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment, the collaboration environment being configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment, the environment state information including user records, work units records, and project records, the user records including user information describing the users of the collaboration environment, the work unit records including work information describing units of work assigned to, created by, and/or managed by the users within the collaboration environment, and the project records including project information describing projects managed within the collaboration environment, wherein individual projects include individual sets of the units of work supporting the individual projects;effectuating presentation of a user interface of the collaboration environment, the user interface providing one or more views of the collaboration environment, wherein an individual view of the collaboration environment textually displays one or more of the user information of an individual user record, the work information of an individual work unit record, or the project information of an individual project record;obtaining input information conveying user input into the user interface, wherein the user input includes selection of text displayed within the individual view of the collaboration environment;obtaining content information characterizing content of the text selected within the individual view of the collaboration environment, including in response to selection of first text displayed within a first view of the collaboration environment, obtaining first content information characterizing first content of the first text; andgenerating individual units of work based on the content information by storing the work information describing the individual units of work as part of the environment state information, including generating a first unit of work based on the first content information by storing first work information describing the first unit of work in a first work unit record within the environment state information.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising: effectuating presentation of a user interface element in response to the selection of the text, wherein the user interface element is configured to be selected by the users to cause the generation of the individual units of work based on the content information.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the content information characterizing the content of the text includes words and/or phrases included in the text.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the content information that triggers generation of the individual units of work includes one or more trigger phrases and/or words, such that the individual units of work are generated based on identifying one or more of the trigger phrases and/or words from the words and/or phrases included in the text, such that the first unit of work is generated based on identifying a first trigger phrase and/or word included in the first text.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the content information characterizing the content of the text includes context information specifying context of the text, the context including one or more of a source record of the text, a superior record to the source record, a creator of the text, or a selector of the text, wherein the individual units of work are further generated based on the context information, such that: the first unit of work is generated based on first context of the first text, the first context including one or more of a first source record of the first text, a first superior record to the first source record, a first user who created the first text, or a second user who selected the first text, wherein the first source record includes an individual one of the user records, the work unit records, or the project records.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising: identifying one or more of the users linked to the text, the one or more users linked to the text including the creator of the text and the selector of the text;obtaining the user records for the one or more of the users; andgenerating the individual units of work based on the user records for the one or more of the users.
  • 17. The method of claim 15, wherein generating the individual units of work based on the content information includes automatically generating one or more values of one or more work unit parameters of the individual units of work, including generating the first unit of work includes automatically generating a first value of a first work unit parameter of the first unit of work, wherein the first work unit parameter includes a title parameter, and the first value includes the first text such that a title of the first unit of work is the first text.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein generating the first unit of work includes automatically generating a second value of a second work unit parameter of the first unit of work, wherein the second work unit parameter includes an assignee parameter, and the second value includes the first user who created the first text or the second user who selected the first text, such that an assignee of the first unit of work includes either the first user or the second user.
  • 19. The method of claim 18, wherein generating the first unit of work includes automatically generating a third value of a third work unit parameter of the first unit of work, wherein the third work unit parameter includes a dependency parameter, wherein the third value includes the first source record of the first text, wherein the first source record includes a second work unit record of a second unit of work, such that the first unit of work is dependent on the second unit of work.
  • 20. The method of claim 19, wherein generating the first unit of work includes automatically generating a fourth value of a fourth work unit parameter of the first unit of work, wherein the fourth work unit parameter includes a project inclusion parameter, and the fourth value includes the first superior record to the first source record, the first superior record including a first project record of a first project, such that the first unit of work is included in the first project.
US Referenced Citations (503)
Number Name Date Kind
5233687 Henderson, Jr. Aug 1993 A
5524077 Faaland Jun 1996 A
5530861 Diamant Jun 1996 A
5608898 Turpin Mar 1997 A
5611076 Durflinger Mar 1997 A
5623404 Collins Apr 1997 A
5721770 Kohler Feb 1998 A
5983277 Heile Nov 1999 A
6024093 Cron Feb 2000 A
6256651 Tuli Jul 2001 B1
6292830 Taylor Sep 2001 B1
6332147 Moran Dec 2001 B1
6385639 Togawa May 2002 B1
6621505 Beauchamp Sep 2003 B1
6629081 Cornelius Sep 2003 B1
6769013 Frees Jul 2004 B2
6859523 Jilk Feb 2005 B1
7020697 Goodman Mar 2006 B1
7039596 Lu May 2006 B1
7086062 Faour Aug 2006 B1
7349920 Feinberg Mar 2008 B1
7418482 Lusher Aug 2008 B1
7428723 Greene Sep 2008 B2
7640511 Keel Dec 2009 B1
7676542 Moser Mar 2010 B2
7779039 Weissman Aug 2010 B2
7805327 Schulz Sep 2010 B1
RE41848 Daniell Oct 2010 E
7844454 Coles Nov 2010 B2
7917855 Satish Mar 2011 B1
7996744 Ojala Aug 2011 B2
7996774 Sidenur Aug 2011 B1
8214747 Yankovich Jul 2012 B1
8314809 Grabowski Nov 2012 B1
8499300 Zimberg Jul 2013 B2
8522240 Merwarth Aug 2013 B1
8527287 Bhatia Sep 2013 B1
8554832 Moskovitz Oct 2013 B1
8572477 Moskovitz Oct 2013 B1
8627199 Handley Jan 2014 B1
8639552 Chen Jan 2014 B1
8768751 Jakowski Jul 2014 B2
8831879 Stamm Sep 2014 B2
8843832 Frields Sep 2014 B2
8863021 Bee Oct 2014 B1
9009096 Pinckney Apr 2015 B2
9024752 Tumayan May 2015 B2
9143839 Reisman Sep 2015 B2
9152668 Moskovitz Oct 2015 B1
9201952 Chau Dec 2015 B1
9208262 Bechtel Dec 2015 B2
9251484 Cantor Feb 2016 B2
9299039 Wang Mar 2016 B1
9350560 Hupfer May 2016 B2
9383917 Mouton Jul 2016 B2
9405532 Sullivan Aug 2016 B1
9405810 Smith Aug 2016 B2
9454623 Kaptsan Sep 2016 B1
9514424 Kleinbart Dec 2016 B2
9600136 Yang Mar 2017 B1
9674361 Ristock Jun 2017 B2
9712576 Gill Jul 2017 B1
9785445 Mitsui Oct 2017 B2
9830398 Schneider Nov 2017 B2
9842312 Rosati Dec 2017 B1
9949681 Badenes Apr 2018 B2
9953282 Shaouy Apr 2018 B2
9959420 Kiang May 2018 B2
9978040 Lee May 2018 B2
9990636 Lewis Jun 2018 B1
10001911 Breedvelt-Schouten Jun 2018 B2
10003693 Wolthuis Jun 2018 B2
10083412 Suntinger Sep 2018 B2
10157355 Johnson Dec 2018 B2
10192181 Katkar Jan 2019 B2
10235156 Johnson Mar 2019 B2
10264067 Subramani Apr 2019 B2
10308992 Chauvin Jun 2019 B2
10373084 Kurjanowicz Aug 2019 B2
10373090 Holm Aug 2019 B2
10382501 Malatesha Aug 2019 B2
10455011 Kendall Oct 2019 B2
10496943 De Dec 2019 B2
10594788 Larabie-Belanger Mar 2020 B2
10606859 Smith Mar 2020 B2
10613735 Karpe Apr 2020 B1
10616151 Cameron Apr 2020 B1
10623359 Rosenstein Apr 2020 B1
10657501 Choi May 2020 B2
10671692 Koopman Jun 2020 B2
10684870 Sabo Jun 2020 B1
10706484 Murnock Jul 2020 B1
10785046 Raghavan Sep 2020 B1
10810222 Koch Oct 2020 B2
10846105 Granot Nov 2020 B2
10846297 Smith Nov 2020 B2
10922104 Sabo Feb 2021 B2
10956845 Sabo Mar 2021 B1
10970299 Smith Apr 2021 B2
10977434 Pelz Apr 2021 B2
10983685 Karpe Apr 2021 B2
11062270 Hilleli Jul 2021 B2
11082281 Rosenstein Aug 2021 B2
11095468 Pandey Aug 2021 B1
11113667 Jiang Sep 2021 B1
11138021 Rosenstein Oct 2021 B1
11140174 Patel Oct 2021 B2
11170761 Thomson Nov 2021 B2
11204683 Sabo Dec 2021 B1
11212242 Cameron Dec 2021 B2
11263228 Koch Mar 2022 B2
11288081 Sabo Mar 2022 B2
11290296 Raghavan Mar 2022 B2
11327645 Karpe May 2022 B2
11341444 Sabo May 2022 B2
11341445 Cheng May 2022 B1
11449836 Clifton Sep 2022 B1
11496711 Cronan Nov 2022 B1
20020065798 Bostleman May 2002 A1
20020082889 Oliver Jun 2002 A1
20020143594 Kroeger Oct 2002 A1
20030028595 Vogt Feb 2003 A1
20030036934 Ouchi Feb 2003 A1
20030041317 Sokolov Feb 2003 A1
20030065722 Ieperen Apr 2003 A1
20030097406 Stafford May 2003 A1
20030097410 Atkins May 2003 A1
20030126001 Northcutt Jul 2003 A1
20030200223 Hack Oct 2003 A1
20030225598 Yu Dec 2003 A1
20030233265 Lee Dec 2003 A1
20030233268 Taqbeem Dec 2003 A1
20040083448 Schulz Apr 2004 A1
20040093290 Doss May 2004 A1
20040093351 Lee May 2004 A1
20040098291 Newburn May 2004 A1
20040125150 Adcock Jul 2004 A1
20040162833 Jones Aug 2004 A1
20040187089 Schulz Sep 2004 A1
20040207249 Baumgartner Oct 2004 A1
20040230447 Schwerin-Wenzel Nov 2004 A1
20040268451 Robbin Dec 2004 A1
20050210394 Crandall Sep 2005 A1
20050216111 Ooshima Sep 2005 A1
20050222971 Cary Oct 2005 A1
20060028917 Wigginton Feb 2006 A1
20060030992 Iwatsuki Feb 2006 A1
20060047454 Tamaki Mar 2006 A1
20060085245 Takatsuka Apr 2006 A1
20060095859 Bocking May 2006 A1
20060136441 Fujisaki Jun 2006 A1
20060143270 Wodtke Jun 2006 A1
20060167736 Weiss Jul 2006 A1
20060190391 Cullen, III Aug 2006 A1
20060200264 Kodama Sep 2006 A1
20060218551 Berstis Sep 2006 A1
20060224430 Butt Oct 2006 A1
20060277487 Poulsen Dec 2006 A1
20070016465 Schaad Jan 2007 A1
20070016646 Tendjoukian Jan 2007 A1
20070025567 Fehr Feb 2007 A1
20070038494 Kreitzberg Feb 2007 A1
20070041542 Schramm Feb 2007 A1
20070050225 Leslie Mar 2007 A1
20070073575 Yomogida Mar 2007 A1
20070143169 Grant Jun 2007 A1
20070147178 Masuda Jun 2007 A1
20070150327 Dromgold Jun 2007 A1
20070232278 May Oct 2007 A1
20070255674 Mahoney Nov 2007 A1
20070255715 Li Nov 2007 A1
20070260499 Greef Nov 2007 A1
20070288283 Fitzpatrick Dec 2007 A1
20070294344 Mohan Dec 2007 A1
20080033777 Shukoor Feb 2008 A1
20080046471 Moore Feb 2008 A1
20080079730 Zhang Apr 2008 A1
20080082389 Gura Apr 2008 A1
20080082956 Gura Apr 2008 A1
20080091782 Jakobson Apr 2008 A1
20080120129 Seubert May 2008 A1
20080126930 Scott May 2008 A1
20080134069 Horvitz Jun 2008 A1
20080155547 Weber Jun 2008 A1
20080158023 Chung Jul 2008 A1
20080167937 Coughlin Jul 2008 A1
20080175104 Grieb Jul 2008 A1
20080195964 Randell Aug 2008 A1
20080221946 Balon Sep 2008 A1
20080222566 Daughtrey Sep 2008 A1
20080244582 Brown Oct 2008 A1
20080268876 Gelfand Oct 2008 A1
20080270198 Graves Oct 2008 A1
20080281665 Opaluch Nov 2008 A1
20080313004 Ryan Dec 2008 A1
20090018835 Cooper Jan 2009 A1
20090048986 Anderson Feb 2009 A1
20090055796 Springborn Feb 2009 A1
20090076878 Woerner Mar 2009 A1
20090089133 Johnson Apr 2009 A1
20090089225 Baier Apr 2009 A1
20090089682 Baier Apr 2009 A1
20090089701 Baier Apr 2009 A1
20090094623 Chakra Apr 2009 A1
20090100340 Paek Apr 2009 A1
20090113310 Appleyard Apr 2009 A1
20090133027 Gunning May 2009 A1
20090167553 Hong Jul 2009 A1
20090187454 Khasin Jul 2009 A1
20090199192 Laithwaite Aug 2009 A1
20090204463 Burnett Aug 2009 A1
20090204471 Elenbaas Aug 2009 A1
20090234699 Steinglass Sep 2009 A1
20090241053 Augustine Sep 2009 A1
20090260010 Burkhart Oct 2009 A1
20090287523 Lau Nov 2009 A1
20090296908 Lee Dec 2009 A1
20090299803 Lakritz Dec 2009 A1
20090307319 Dholakia Dec 2009 A1
20100005087 Basco Jan 2010 A1
20100070888 Watabe Mar 2010 A1
20100088137 Weiss Apr 2010 A1
20100106627 O'Sullivan Apr 2010 A1
20100114786 Aboujaoude May 2010 A1
20100115523 Kuschel May 2010 A1
20100122334 Stanzione May 2010 A1
20100131860 Dehaan May 2010 A1
20100145801 Chekuri Jun 2010 A1
20100169146 Hoyne Jul 2010 A1
20100169802 Goldstein Jul 2010 A1
20100180212 Gingras Jul 2010 A1
20100223575 Leukart Sep 2010 A1
20100269049 Fearon Oct 2010 A1
20100299171 Lau Nov 2010 A1
20100312605 Mitchell Dec 2010 A1
20100313151 Wei Dec 2010 A1
20100332236 Tan Dec 2010 A1
20110015961 Chan Jan 2011 A1
20110022662 Barber-Mingo Jan 2011 A1
20110054968 Galaviz Mar 2011 A1
20110055177 Chakra Mar 2011 A1
20110060720 Devereux Mar 2011 A1
20110071878 Gingras Mar 2011 A1
20110071893 Malhotra Mar 2011 A1
20110072372 Fritzley Mar 2011 A1
20110093538 Weir Apr 2011 A1
20110093619 Nelson Apr 2011 A1
20110113365 Kimmerly May 2011 A1
20110154216 Aritsuka Jun 2011 A1
20110161128 Barney Jun 2011 A1
20110184768 Norton Jul 2011 A1
20110270644 Roncolato Nov 2011 A1
20110307100 Schmidtke Dec 2011 A1
20110307772 Lloyd Dec 2011 A1
20120030194 Jain Feb 2012 A1
20120035942 Graupner Feb 2012 A1
20120066030 Limpert Mar 2012 A1
20120066411 Jeide Mar 2012 A1
20120072251 Mircean Mar 2012 A1
20120079449 Sanderson Mar 2012 A1
20120110087 Culver May 2012 A1
20120117499 Mori May 2012 A1
20120123835 Chu May 2012 A1
20120131191 May May 2012 A1
20120158946 Shafiee Jun 2012 A1
20120192086 Ghods Jul 2012 A1
20120221963 Motoyama Aug 2012 A1
20120239451 Caligor Sep 2012 A1
20120254218 Ali Oct 2012 A1
20120266068 Ryman Oct 2012 A1
20120278388 Kleinbart Nov 2012 A1
20120296993 Heyman Nov 2012 A1
20120304187 Maresh Nov 2012 A1
20120317108 Okazaki Dec 2012 A1
20130007332 Teh Jan 2013 A1
20130013560 Goldberg Jan 2013 A1
20130014023 Lee Jan 2013 A1
20130018688 Nudd Jan 2013 A1
20130021629 Kurilin Jan 2013 A1
20130066944 Laredo Mar 2013 A1
20130067375 Kim Mar 2013 A1
20130067549 Caldwell Mar 2013 A1
20130073328 Ehrler Mar 2013 A1
20130103412 Nudd Apr 2013 A1
20130124638 Barreto May 2013 A1
20130151421 Van Der Ploeg Jun 2013 A1
20130151604 Ranade Jun 2013 A1
20130173486 Peters Jul 2013 A1
20130179208 Chung Jul 2013 A1
20130179799 Savage Jul 2013 A1
20130215116 Siddique Aug 2013 A1
20130227007 Savage Aug 2013 A1
20130246110 Nakhayi Ashtiani Sep 2013 A1
20130246399 Schneider Sep 2013 A1
20130275229 Moganti Oct 2013 A1
20130279685 Kohler Oct 2013 A1
20130317871 Kulkarni Nov 2013 A1
20130318447 Deluca Nov 2013 A1
20130321467 Tappen Dec 2013 A1
20130339099 Aidroos Dec 2013 A1
20130339831 Gulanikar Dec 2013 A1
20140007005 Libin Jan 2014 A1
20140012603 Scanlon Jan 2014 A1
20140025767 De Kezel Jan 2014 A1
20140028826 Lee Jan 2014 A1
20140036639 Taber Feb 2014 A1
20140040780 Brian Feb 2014 A1
20140040905 Tadanobu Feb 2014 A1
20140058801 Deodhar Feb 2014 A1
20140059910 Norton Mar 2014 A1
20140074536 Meushar Mar 2014 A1
20140089719 Daum Mar 2014 A1
20140101310 Savage Apr 2014 A1
20140156539 Brunet Jun 2014 A1
20140165001 Shapiro Jun 2014 A1
20140172478 Vadasz Jun 2014 A1
20140189017 Prakash Jul 2014 A1
20140200944 Henriksen Jul 2014 A1
20140208325 Chen Jul 2014 A1
20140215344 Ligman Jul 2014 A1
20140229609 Wong Aug 2014 A1
20140236663 Smith Aug 2014 A1
20140244334 De Aug 2014 A1
20140257894 Melahn Sep 2014 A1
20140279294 Field-Darragh Sep 2014 A1
20140288987 Liu Sep 2014 A1
20140310047 De Oct 2014 A1
20140310051 Meng Oct 2014 A1
20140350997 Holm Nov 2014 A1
20140364987 Shikano Dec 2014 A1
20150006448 Gupta Jan 2015 A1
20150007058 Wooten Jan 2015 A1
20150012330 Sugiura Jan 2015 A1
20150052437 Crawford Feb 2015 A1
20150058053 De Feb 2015 A1
20150113540 Rabinovici Apr 2015 A1
20150134393 De May 2015 A1
20150149540 Barker May 2015 A1
20150153906 Liao Jun 2015 A1
20150154291 Shepherd Jun 2015 A1
20150169069 Lo Jun 2015 A1
20150213411 Swanson Jul 2015 A1
20150215256 Ghafourifar Jul 2015 A1
20150262111 Yu Sep 2015 A1
20150312375 Valey Oct 2015 A1
20150317595 De Nov 2015 A1
20150339006 Chaland Nov 2015 A1
20150363092 Morton Dec 2015 A1
20150363733 Brown Dec 2015 A1
20150379472 Gilmour Dec 2015 A1
20160012368 O'Connell Jan 2016 A1
20160048408 Madhu Feb 2016 A1
20160048786 Fukuda Feb 2016 A1
20160063192 Johnson Mar 2016 A1
20160063449 Duggan Mar 2016 A1
20160072750 Kass Mar 2016 A1
20160110670 Chatterjee Apr 2016 A1
20160124775 Ashtiani May 2016 A1
20160140474 Vekker May 2016 A1
20160140501 Figlin May 2016 A1
20160147773 Smith May 2016 A1
20160147846 Smith May 2016 A1
20160148157 Walia May 2016 A1
20160180277 Skiba Jun 2016 A1
20160180298 Mcclement Jun 2016 A1
20160182311 Borna Jun 2016 A1
20160188145 Vida Jun 2016 A1
20160216854 Mcclellan Jul 2016 A1
20160224939 Chen Aug 2016 A1
20160234391 Wolthuis Aug 2016 A1
20160275436 Kurjanowicz Sep 2016 A1
20160313934 Isherwood Oct 2016 A1
20160328217 Hagerty Nov 2016 A1
20160342927 Reznik Nov 2016 A1
20170004213 Cunico Jan 2017 A1
20170009387 Ge Jan 2017 A1
20170017364 Kekki Jan 2017 A1
20170017924 Kashiwagi Jan 2017 A1
20170039503 Jones Feb 2017 A1
20170061341 Haas Mar 2017 A1
20170068933 Norton Mar 2017 A1
20170093874 Uthe Mar 2017 A1
20170097929 Cecchi Apr 2017 A1
20170099296 Fisher Apr 2017 A1
20170103369 Thompson Apr 2017 A1
20170116552 Deodhar Apr 2017 A1
20170132200 Noland May 2017 A1
20170153799 Hoyer Jun 2017 A1
20170154024 Subramanya Jun 2017 A1
20170161258 Astigarraga Jun 2017 A1
20170177671 Allgaier Jun 2017 A1
20170185592 Frei Jun 2017 A1
20170192642 Fishman Jul 2017 A1
20170206217 Deshpande Jul 2017 A1
20170249577 Nishikawa Aug 2017 A1
20170316367 Candito Nov 2017 A1
20170317898 Candito Nov 2017 A1
20170323233 Bencke Nov 2017 A1
20170323267 Baek Nov 2017 A1
20170323350 Laderer Nov 2017 A1
20170344754 Kumar Nov 2017 A1
20170346861 Pearl Nov 2017 A1
20170351385 Ertmann Dec 2017 A1
20170364866 Steplyk Dec 2017 A1
20180032524 Byron Feb 2018 A1
20180052943 Hui Feb 2018 A1
20180053127 Boileau Feb 2018 A1
20180059910 Wooten Mar 2018 A1
20180060785 Carnevale Mar 2018 A1
20180060818 Ishiyama Mar 2018 A1
20180063063 Yan Mar 2018 A1
20180068271 Abebe Mar 2018 A1
20180075387 Kulkarni Mar 2018 A1
20180088754 Psenka Mar 2018 A1
20180089625 Rosati Mar 2018 A1
20180095938 Monte Apr 2018 A1
20180102989 Borsutsky Apr 2018 A1
20180131649 Ma May 2018 A1
20180157477 Johnson Jun 2018 A1
20180165610 Dumant Jun 2018 A1
20180173386 Adika Jun 2018 A1
20180189706 Newhouse Jul 2018 A1
20180189736 Guo Jul 2018 A1
20180225618 Shaouy Aug 2018 A1
20180225795 Napoli Aug 2018 A1
20180247352 Rogers Aug 2018 A1
20180247648 Nadimpalli Aug 2018 A1
20180260081 Beaudoin Sep 2018 A1
20180262620 Wolthuis Sep 2018 A1
20180285471 Hao Oct 2018 A1
20180316636 Kamat Nov 2018 A1
20180331842 Faulkner Nov 2018 A1
20180357049 Epstein Dec 2018 A1
20180367477 Hariram Dec 2018 A1
20180367483 Rodriguez Dec 2018 A1
20180373804 Zhang Dec 2018 A1
20190005048 Crivello Jan 2019 A1
20190014070 Mertvetsov Jan 2019 A1
20190018552 Bloy Jan 2019 A1
20190034057 Rudchenko Jan 2019 A1
20190068390 Gross Feb 2019 A1
20190079909 Purandare Mar 2019 A1
20190080289 Kreitler Mar 2019 A1
20190095839 Itabayashi Mar 2019 A1
20190095846 Gupta Mar 2019 A1
20190102700 Babu Apr 2019 A1
20190138583 Silk May 2019 A1
20190138589 Udell May 2019 A1
20190138961 Santiago May 2019 A1
20190139004 Vukovic May 2019 A1
20190147386 Balakrishna May 2019 A1
20190187987 Fauchère Jun 2019 A1
20190213509 Burleson Jul 2019 A1
20190265821 Pearl Aug 2019 A1
20190272902 Vozila Sep 2019 A1
20190318321 Lopez Venegas Oct 2019 A1
20190340296 Cunico Nov 2019 A1
20190340574 Ekambaram Nov 2019 A1
20190347094 Sullivan Nov 2019 A1
20190347126 Bhandari Nov 2019 A1
20190362252 Miller Nov 2019 A1
20190370320 Kalra Dec 2019 A1
20200019907 Notani Jan 2020 A1
20200059539 Wang Feb 2020 A1
20200065736 Relangi Feb 2020 A1
20200118568 Kudurshian Apr 2020 A1
20200162315 Siddiqi May 2020 A1
20200192538 Karpe Jun 2020 A1
20200192908 Smith Jun 2020 A1
20200193556 Jin Jun 2020 A1
20200218551 Sabo Jul 2020 A1
20200228474 Cameron Jul 2020 A1
20200233879 Papanicolaou Jul 2020 A1
20200244611 Rosenstein Jul 2020 A1
20200328906 Raghavan Oct 2020 A1
20200344253 Kurup Oct 2020 A1
20200349614 Batcha Nov 2020 A1
20210004380 Koch Jan 2021 A1
20210004381 Smith Jan 2021 A1
20210089860 Heere Mar 2021 A1
20210097466 Sabo Apr 2021 A1
20210103451 Sabo Apr 2021 A1
20210110347 Khalil Apr 2021 A1
20210117479 Liu Apr 2021 A1
20210134296 Iturbe Desentis May 2021 A1
20210136012 Barbitta May 2021 A1
20210182475 Pelz Jun 2021 A1
20210209561 Kishore Jul 2021 A1
20210216562 Smith Jul 2021 A1
20210232282 Karpe Jul 2021 A1
20210287673 Kaplan Sep 2021 A1
20210320891 Rosenstein Oct 2021 A1
20210342786 Jiang Nov 2021 A1
20210365862 Doan Nov 2021 A1
20210382734 Rosenstein Dec 2021 A1
20220019320 Sabo Jan 2022 A1
20220058548 Garg Feb 2022 A1
20220060345 Wiener Feb 2022 A1
20220075792 Koch Mar 2022 A1
20220078142 Cameron Mar 2022 A1
20220158859 Raghavan May 2022 A1
20220207489 Gupta Jun 2022 A1
20220377279 Cronan Nov 2022 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
101305350 Nov 2008 CN
101563671 Oct 2009 CN
102378975 May 2015 CN
2015036817 Mar 2015 WO
2015123751 Aug 2015 WO
2020006634 Jan 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (49)
Entry
(Tiburca, Andrew) Best Team Calendar Applications for 2018—Toggl https://toggl.com/blog/best-team-calendar-applications-for-2018 (Year: 2017).
Creating Tables with Fields from 2 Different Tables, published: 2009, publisher: StackOverflow, pp. 1-2. (Year: 2009).
“Rules of Data Conversion from Document to Relational Databases”, published: 2014, publisher: Future-processing, pp. 1-8 (Year: 2014).
Critical chain project management, Wikipedia, archives org, Dec. 17, 2016 https://web.archive.Org/web/20161217090326/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_chain_project_management (Year: 2016) 5 pages.
Critical Path Method, Wikipedia, archives org, Sep. 19, 2017 https://web.archive.Org/web/20170919223814/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method (Year: 2017) 6 pages.
Fruhlinger, Joshua. “The Best To-Do ListApps for Feeling Productive; With the right app, feeling productive can be just as gratifying as actually getting things done” Wall Street Journal (Online); New York, N.Y. [New York, N.Y]Nov. 8, 2013 (Year: 2013) 4 pages.
Helen Mongan-Rallis & Terrie Shannon, “Synchronous Chat,” Aug. 2016, Dept. of Education, Univ. of MN Duluth, web.archive.org/web/20160825183503/https://www.d.umn.edu/hrallis/professional/presentations/cotfsp06/indiv_tools/sync_chat.htm (Year: 2016) (2 pages).
Wix.com, How to Use Wix Code with Marketing Tools to Create Custom Events, Oct. 18, 2018, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTBVykOYGvO&feature=emb_title, 2 pages.
www.asana.com (as retrieved from https://web.archive.Org/web/20160101054536/https://asana.com/press and https:// web.archive.org/web/20160101054527/https://asana.com/product) (Year: 2016) 15 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/584,750, Examiner Interview Summary dated Feb. 25, 2016”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/584,750, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2015”, 21 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/584,750, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 28, 2016”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/584,750, Response filed Feb. 29, 2015 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2015”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/584,850, Final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2017”, 31 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/584,850, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2017”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/584,850, Response filed Apr. 10, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2017”, 13 pgs.
“How to Asana: Inviting teammates to Asana.” YouTube, Asana, Mar. 21, 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLOruY1KyxU ( Year: 2017), 13 pages.
Asana Demo and Product Tour, you tube excerpt, Dec. 7, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMAFWVLGFyw (Year: 2017) (16 pages).
Asana integrations, Asana tutorial, youtube, excerpt, Nov. 16, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBiQ7DJNinE (Year: 2016) (21 pages).
Asana Workload and Portfolios, youtube, excerpt, Aug. 1, 2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XkNcfFDG6M (Year: 2019) (20 pages).
Asana YouTube channel, list of all product videos, Nov. 19, 2014-Aug. 19, 2019 https://www.youtube.com/user/AsanaTeam/videos?disable_polymer=1 (Year: 2019) (5 pages).
Asana, Task dependencies, archives org, Aug. 25, 2017 https://web.archive.org/web/20170825002141/https://asana.com/guide/help/tasks/dependencies (Year: 2017) (5 pages).
Asana,Manage your team capacity with Workload, youtube, excerpt, Aug. 1, 2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ufXyZDzZnA&list=PLJFG93oiowJAi UwyOhIGWHdtJzJrzyIBv (Year: 2019) (1 page).
Biggs, “GateGuru Relaunches With New Ways to Streamline Your Travel Experience”, Techcrunch, (Apr. 26, 2013), 3 pgs.
Castaneda Samuel, Introduction Manual—Asana, Sep. 25, 2017 https://static1.squarespace.com/static/586d532ae58c6232db243a65/t/5c210c10f950b7fc7a8e3274/1545669658049/Asana+Manual.pdf (Year: 2017) (20 pages).
Command and control, wikipedia, archives org, Mar. 16, 2018 https://web.archive.org/web/20180316193655/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_and_control (Year: 2018), 6 pages.
How to Asana Asana time tracking, youtube, excerpt, May 24, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z91qlex-TLc (Year: 2017) (1 page).
How to Asana, Asana project management, youtube, excerpt, Mar. 7, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqANMTvVpE (Year: 2017) (28 pages).
How to Asana, Creating your first Asana project, youtube, excerpt, Jan. 31, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L04WmcUdsLo (Year: 2017) (1 page).
How to Asana, Getting Asana into your workflow, youtube, excerpt, Jul. 17, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YLrNMdv3o (Year: 2017) (24 pages).
How to Asana, Planning with Asana calendar, youtube excerpt, Feb. 14, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8t6KYiVPyc (Year: 2017) (19 pages).
How to Asana, Using Asana for task management, youtube, excerpt, Feb. 7, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwvbgiejhQ (Year: 2017) (8 pages).
How to Asana, Visualizing work with Asana kanban boards, youtube, excerpt, Feb. 21, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmZaZGydfPY (Year: 2017) (41 pages).
How to Asana, Workflow management, youtube, excerpt, May 30, 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rk8nPWmXsRo (Year: 2017) (9 pages).
How to use Advanced Search in Asana, Asana tutorial, May 25, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VyJ3toPfQM (Year: 2016) (28 pages).
Justin Rosenstein, Unveiling the Future of Asana, Mar. 28, 2018 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRI?d_WM4Bc (Year: 2018) (2 pages).
Prioritize My Tasks in Asana, Asana tutorial, youtube, excerpt, May 25, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbCnMvw01nl (Year: 2016) (3 pages).
Project views, Asana tutorial, youtube, excerpt May 25, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYjA8ZH3ceQ (Year: 2016) (5 pages).
Using Asana Premium, Asana tutorial, youtube, excerpt, Sep. 10, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMgLtDDmyeo (Year: 2016) (4 pages).
Where does Asana fit in, archives org, Jul. 8, 2017 https://web.archive.org/web/20170708150928/https://asana.com/guide/resources/infosheets/where-does-asana-fit (Year: 2017) (5 pages).
www.cogmotive.com/blog/author/alan Alan Byrne: “Creating a company Shared Calendar in Office 365”; pp. 1-17; Sep. 10, 2013.
Hartmann, “TimeProjectscheduling with resource capacities and requests varying with time: a case study,” 2013, Flexible services and manufacturing journal, vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 74-93 (Year: 2013).
Paul Minors, How to automate your tasks, youtube excerpts, Oct. 18, 2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwF9XyUQrzw (Year: 2019).
Mauricio Aizawa, Zapier, How to Automate Asana Tasks creation using Evernote, youtube excerpts, Mar. 16, 2018 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjDQ4Gny4WI (Year: 2018).
Assef, F., Cassius, T. S., & Maria, T. S. (2018). Confrontation between techniques of time measurement. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(5), 789-810. (Year: 2018).
Dawei Li, “Deepcham: Collaborative Edge-Mediated Adaptive Deep Learning for Mobile Object Recognition”, 2016, IEEE/ACM, pp. 64-76. (Year: 2016).
Lauren Labrecque, “Fostering Consumer-Brand Relationships in Social Media Environments: The Role of Parasocial Interaction”, 2014, Journal of Interactive Markeing, 28 (2014), pp. 134-148 (Year: 2014).
Macro, computer science, wikipedia, archives org Feb. 11, 2020 http://web.archive.org/web/20200211082902/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_(computer_science) (Year: 2020).
Sarikaya, Ruhi. “The technology behind personal digital assistants: An overview of the system architecture and key components.” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 34.1 (2017): 67-81. (Year: 2017).