This invention relates to the field of manufacturing of dentures and particularly forming anatomical and functional features in dentures.
Dentures need to be closely fitted to anatomical landmarks on the patient in order for the denture to comfortably fit as well as to be under the neuromuscular control of the patient. It is critical for the dentures to properly fit in order for the dentures to be worn comfortably and securely without the embarrassment of falling out during use.
The anatomical landmarks are typically located relative to the patient's anatomy by using a customized denture impression tray. Thermoplastic molding compound is applied along the peripheral edges of the tray which is positioned in the patient while the compound is soft. The patient manipulates their jaw while the compound is setting to provide in the impression appropriate clearances within the buccal, labial and/or lingual folds. This process is uncomfortable for the patient and does not provide precise location of the anatomical features. The resulting impressions are typically used in creating a wax rim. The wax rim is tried in the patient and marked to provide areas which need to be carved for a better fit. This requires skill on the part of the dentist and technicians.
One critical area of fit for the denture is the post dam. The post dam on a denture is a ridge along the back of the denture which presses slightly into the posterior palate to form a seal. The increased thickness of the denture along a narrow border adds pressure on the tissue and maintains a vacuum seal. Without this sealing effect, the upper denture the vacuum between the denture and the roof of the mouth is reduced or lost and the denture loosens as the wearer talks, chews or swallows. This seal is critical for the upper denture to be secure in the patient.
The ideal location for the post dam is along the junction of the hard and soft palates. The junction between the hard and soft palate where the denture border lies is neither a straight line nor of uniform consistency. It is harder in the midline and soft on both sides of the midline. Thus, an ideal post dam has to reflect the anatomy and features of that pa.tt of the mouth. If the denture extends too far to the rear of the mouth, the patient may suffer from gagging. If the denture extends too much into the hard palate, the denture will likely lose the vacuum seal and will not fit
Currently, the post dam is created on the denture by modifying the impressions or by application of a wax material to the area of the plaster model representing the roof of the mouth. Both require the use of a plaster model of the denture upon which the post dam is carved by a technician based on the estimation of where the line between the hard and soft palate occurs in the impression into the mold from the denture will be fabricated. Both techniques are less than precise in locating the ideal position. Thus the precision on where the post dam is located depends upon the quality of the impressions and the skill of the technician.
Another set of anatomical feature that are critical for the proper use of dentures are the labial and buccal frenae. The labial frenum attaches to the center of the upper lip and between the upper two front teeth while the buccal frenums attach the alveolar ridge to the cheek on each side of the mouth. If the matching notches of the denture are not located precisely for the labial frenum and the buccal frenums, the denture can often be pulled loose. Currently these frenums are visually located by the dentist or technician and the notches formed by a file in the impressions.
The rugae is typically neglected in the creation of dentures. The palatial rugae is asymmetrical and has irregular elevations of the mucosa located in the anterior third of the palate. Each individual has a unique rugae which can affect the speech of the individual. Currently, most dentures do not include a rugae and are smooth, instead. In those instances where a denture does include a rugae, the rugae is typically formed from a template rather than having a unique rugae for each patient.
Thus, presently there is no process for creating dentures that have the precise fit to or mimicking of the anatomical features of the patients mouth.
The present invention provides systems and processes for creating dentures that have features precisely located and formed to provide a close comfortable fit for the dentures in the patient. These features provide critical functional and aesthetic improvement for the fit and comfort of the patient. The system of a preferred embodiment uses a process whereby a true replication of the patient's jaw structure is created in a digital three dimensional model. This true replication is then used to precisely locate and/or copy the anatomical landmarks of the patient for use in fabricating a denture base for use in a denture for the individual patient.
The term denture base generally refers to the part of a denture that fits the oral mucosa of the basal seat, restores the normal contours of the soft tissues of the edentulous mouth, and supports the artificial teeth. The term denture refers to the denture base with the artificial teeth attached. The term anatomical landmarks refers to the structures on the anatomy of the wearer that define the periphery of the denture. The term anatomical features includes the features corresponding to the anatomical landmarks of the wearer as well as aesthetic and functional features that are created in the denture.
One anatomical landmark that is determined preferably by the system, but alternatively by a technician using the system is the line between the hard and soft palates. This line is irregular and difficult to determine precisely using current techniques. One preferred embodiment of the present invention determines this line from the digital model. Once this line is determined, a post dam is created on the digital model.
Another set of anatomical landmarks that are determined are the labial frenum and the buccal frenums. The precise location of the frenums in a preferred embodiment is identified so that notches matching these frenums are precisely located and shaped in the denture base. This minimizes dislocation of the denture during speech and improves the comfort, fit and aesthetics of the denture.
Another preferred embodiment accentuates the buccal reflection of the patient. This accentuation is called the buccal roll. The buccal roll for purposes of this patent is defined as the small rounded ridge that is added to the denture to improve vacuum adherence, goes from the anterior middle back to the most posterior points on the outer margin. From this precise location of the buccal roll, a slight undercut can be formed in the denture base. The tissues and muscles surrounding the buccal roll will engage into the undercut to form a gripping region to further secure the denture.
The system of a preferred embodiment is able to precisely locate the margin, or trim line along the buccal reflection. This reduces the time for technician to carve or trim the denture base after molding and improves the comfort. This line can also be registered by the system to be included into the digital denture model and on the denture base.
Another embodiment of the present invention determines the soft tissue lines from the digital model so that they can be registered and included into the denture base for fabrication. In particular, the gingival margin where the gum ends on the teeth and the soft tissue surrounding the roots of the teeth below the gum are mimicked on the denture base. These soft tissue lines are largely for aesthetic reasons but also may improve the comfort to the patient.
One unique feature of a preferred embodiment is able to create the rugae of the individual patient for use in the denture base. The rugae is copied on the tissue side and mimicked on the teeth side. The rugae can also be accentuated or diminished as needed to improve the speech or comfort of the patient. Each rugae is unique to an individual and affect the speech and comfort of the individual. The rugae is also used to identify individuals for forensic purposes. The rugae is registered by the system for copying into the digital denture base model for selection or fabrication in the denture base.
The system of a preferred embodiment may also be used to select areas of the denture base that may be selectively thinned or thickened. This thinning or thickening may be done across the arch of the denture base, along the palatial region of the denture base or around the teeth pockets. The system or a user of the system is able to identify areas on the digital model that may be able to be thinner without jeopardizing structural integrity. The system can perform finite element analysis or other design on the fly techniques to determine the optimum design for the denture base and the denture teeth.
In a preferred embodiment, once the anatomical (including aesthetic and functional features) have been formed in the digital denture model, the denture teeth are selected or fabricated, the denture base is fabricated. The teeth are temporarily installed in the denture base to create a try-in denture. The try-in denture is then shipped to the dentist for a patient try-in. If the fit is not satisfactory, then the denture is used as a secondary impression tray and new impressions are created and scanned. These scans along with any additional changes in measurement data are put back into the system to render an improved digital denture model. New denture teeth are selected or fabricated based on this improved model, if necessary. The teeth are once again temporarily installed and the improved try-in denture is ready for another try-in with the patient.
The system of a preferred embodiment may also be to select and design areas where implant supports may be placed. These implant supports could be for example a bar or a housing. The placement could be a optimization process between the anatomical landmarks captured by a CT scan (bone density and shape) and the aesthetics and functional aspects of the denture.
This process is continued until the patient and dentist are satisfied with the denture. Once the denture has been deemed satisfactory, the denture is shipped back to the lab so that the teeth can be permanently installed and the final finish and polish procedures are performed. The finished denture is then shipped to the dentist for the patient final insert and acceptance.
These and other features of the claimed inventions will be evident from the ensuing detailed description of preferred embodiments, from the drawings and from the claims.
The present invention provides systems and process for the fabrication of dentures that correspond to anatomical landmarks of the patient. Descriptive embodiments are provided before for explanatory purposes. It is to be expressly understood that the present invention is not be limited to these descriptive embodiments. Other embodiments are considered to be within the scope of the present invention, including without limitation the use of the present invention for other applications, such as denture duplication, dental implants, and other dental and orthodontic applications. The descriptions below discuss the systems of the present invention as used in dental labs, but it is to be expressly understood that these systems could also be implemented in the dentist office or through a network allowing interaction between the dentist and the dental lab through the systems. The processes and systems of the present invention may also be used in combination with all or parts of the following applications, entitled System and Processes for Optimization for Dentures, Ser. No. 12/939,141; System and Process for Duplication of Dentures, Ser. No. 12/939,136; Combination Tool for Anatomical Measurement for Denture Manufacture, Ser. No. 13/249,210; and Removable Handle for Use with Dentures, Ser. No. 12/939,143; all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Overview
The terms denture base generally refers to the part of a denture that fits the oral mucosa of the basal seat, restores the normal contours of the soft tissues of the dentulous mouth, and supports the artificial teeth. The term denture refers to the denture base with the artificial teeth attached. The term anatomical landmarks refers to the structures on the anatomy of the wearer that define the periphery of the denture. The term anatomical features includes the features corresponding to the anatomical landmarks of the wearer as well as functional and aesthetic features that are created in the denture.
The system of a preferred embodiment uses a process whereby a true replication of the patient's jaw structure is created in a digital three dimensional model. This true replication is then used to precisely locate and/or copy the anatomical landmarks of the patient for use in fabricating a denture base for use in a denture for the individual patient.
In one preferred embodiment as described in the flow chart of
Once the digital model has been created, denture teeth are selected from a library or fabricated directly for that digital model. This can be based on using a library and selecting the best denture teeth, through an optimization process as described in the above identified co pending application, or through another process.
The system of a preferred embodiment of the present invention either creates a digital denture base or modifies an existing digital denture base to create the best fit in the patient by precise use of the anatomical landmarks of the patient. These include locating the ideal location of the post dam, locating and forming the notches for the labial and buccal frenums, creating the idealized margins along the buccal reflection, creating the idealized gum line and root structures, creating a true copy of the patient's palatial rugae and duplicating that structure on the denture base, locating the soft tissue lines of the patients mouth, locating areas for dental implant structures and any other features that are useful or desirable from either a functional or aesthetic standpoint.
A description of one process and system for preforming the claimed inventions is described below. In this preferred embodiment, a digital three dimensional model of the patient's mouth and jaw structure is created from scanned bite impressions and from precise measurements of the anatomical features of the patient.
Measurement Process
The dentist obtains data regarding several anatomical landmarks of the patient to send to the dental lab. First, the dentist takes the bite impressions. This can be done by using an upper bite impression tray, a lower bite impression tray and a centric relationship tray or a triple bite impression tray that simultaneously takes upper and lower and centric bite impressions. The resulting bite impressions are digitally scanned as shown in
The dentist also takes additional measurements of anatomical features of the patient. These include, without limitation, the vertical height relation to the upper and lower bite alignment; the lip support of the patient; the smile line of the patient; the centric relationship of the patient; and the midline measurement. Other measurements may be taken as well.
The lip line measurement is intended to provide a measurement of the upper lip from the anterior papilla at rest. This is traditionally measured by a papillameter which consist of a vestibule shield, incisive papilla rest and an vertical handle with measurement increments.
The smile line measurement can also be determined by the papillameter. The device is inserted into position and the patient is requested to smile so that the lip line at that position from the anterior papilla can be measured.
The midline is determined from typically from the existing intraoral anatomic structures, usually the maxillary anterior labial frenum.
The vertical height dimension is typically determined from measurements taken from nose and chin reference points. Measurements of the vertical height are taken at rest and of the vertical dimension of occlusion.
A centric tray is commonly used to take a double arch registration to record vertical and centric jaw registration.
The occlusal plane is an orientation of the position of an imaginary occlusal plane which theoretically touches the incisal edges of the incisors and tips of the occluding surface of the posterior teeth. A normal occlusal plane extends parallel to a line drawn from the tragus of the ear to the ala of the nose and parallel to the interpupillary line (Kamper's Line). This ensures that the patient will not dislodge the lower denture, particularly while eating and not bite the lateral borders of the tongue. Tools for measuring the occlusal plane typically include a thin flat plane have a curved bite piece and a pair of laterally and distally extending wings projecting from the bite piece.
There are individual tools for each of these measurements. A single tool for obtaining all of these measurements is disclosed in application Ser. No. 13/249,210 entitled Combination Tool for Anatomical Measurement for Denture Manufacture, and is incorporated by reference herein above. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, this tool is used to supply the necessary measurements for the optimization process for designing a denture mold.
The dentist also selects the teeth to be fitted into the denture base. Typically, the dentist will use a facial meter, anterior tooth selection guide and a library catalog to determine the appropriate teeth. Other methods may be used as well along with the determination of the appropriate shading of the teeth.
The scan, measurements and teeth selection are then transmitted to the dental lab or directly into the system
System
The scanned images 12, 14 of the bite impressions and the measurements are then transmitted into a system that will process this information to create the digital three dimensional model. Systems for creating such digital three dimensional models are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,616,444, assigned to Ormco Corporation and patents relating to that patent, U.S. Pat. No. 6,851,949, assigned to OraMetrix, Inc. and patents relating to that patent; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,433,810, assigned to Align Technology, Inc. and patents relating to that patent, all of the above cited patents and patents and published patent applications relating to them are incorporated herein by reference. These systems are disclosed for use with orthodontic appliances. The present invention takes the information from these systems and utilizes the additional information described above in regard to the measurements of the patient's anatomy and impressions to create a digital model 20 as shown in
The system of a preferred embodiment further includes the capability to uniquely distinguish certain anatomical landmarks of the patient from this digital model. These landmarks are used to create features that are registered to ensure their incorporation into the digital model of a denture base from which a denture base is fabricated. The anatomical landmarks of the mandibular arch, as shown in
One anatomical landmark that is determined preferably by the system, but alternatively by a technician using the system is the line 50 as shown in
Another anatomical landmark that is determined is the labial frenum 52. The precise location of the labial frenum can be registered for the creation of the notch 72 in the denture base as shown in
The buccal reflection 66 of the patient can be located as well by changes in density due to changes in pressure on the impression compound or simply by the change in structure of the impression. From this precise location of the buccal reflection, the buccal roll 59 can be formed on the denture base. Then, an undercut can be formed in the denture base on the buccal roll. The tissue and muscles surrounding the buccal roll will engage into the undercut to form a gripping region to further secure the denture.
The margin, or trim line along the buccal reflection 66, as shown in
The soft tissue lines are also determined from the digital model so that they can be registered and included into the denture base for fabricating the base. In particular, the gingival margin where the gum ends on the teeth and the soft tissue surrounding the roots of the teeth below the gum are mimicked on the denture base. These soft tissue lines are largely for aesthetic reasons but also may improve the comfort to the patient.
The rugae 78 of the individual patient can also be uniquely copied for use in the denture base. Each rugae is unique to an individual and affect the speech and comfort of the individual. The rugae is also used to identify individuals for forensic purposes. The rugae is copied on the tissue side and mimicked on the teeth side. The rugae can also be accentuated or diminished as needed to improve the speech or comfort of the patient. The rugae is registered by the system for copying into the digital denture base.
The digital denture model can also be used to identify locations on the optimal denture base for implant supports to be inserted. These supports can be housings such as housings 90 shown in
The digital denture model can also be used to identify areas on the denture base which can be thinned to increase comfort while not compromising the structural integrity of the denture base. This can be in the arch, the palatial region and around the teeth pockets. A finite element analysis can also be used to determine these areas.
Other features can be identified and registered by the system if desired. In one embodiment, denture teeth are selected from a library that best fits the digital denture base and modified if necessary. In an alternative embodiment, the denture teeth are fabricated directly from information based on the digital denture base model.
Examples of a denture base with the features formed therein are illustrated in
The denture base is selected or fabricated and the teeth are temporarily installed. This try-in denture is then shipped to the dentist for a patient try-in. If the fit is not satisfactory, then the denture is used as a secondary impression tray and a new impression is created and scanned. This scan along with any additional changes in measurement data is put back into the system. A new denture base is created. The teeth are once again temporarily installed and the denture is ready for another try-in with the patient.
This process is continued until the patient and dentist are satisfied with the denture. Once the denture has been deemed satisfactory, the denture is shipped back to the lab so that the teeth can be permanently installed and the final finish and polish procedures are performed. The finished denture is then shipped to the dentist for the patient final try-in and acceptance.
The system of a preferred embodiment of the present invention can be implemented in many forms. The above description below is simply one example of an implementation of the system.
It is to be expressly understood that the above description is intended only for explanatory purposes and is not meant to limit the scope of the claimed inventions. Other embodiments are considered to be within the scope of the claimed inventions.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
200445 | Fahnestock | Feb 1878 | A |
321847 | Peirce et al. | Jul 1885 | A |
711324 | Lacy | Oct 1902 | A |
1223450 | Van Allen | Apr 1917 | A |
1293627 | Bowers | Feb 1919 | A |
1585348 | Hick et al. | May 1926 | A |
1652910 | Psayla | Dec 1927 | A |
1714185 | Hugh | May 1929 | A |
1863591 | Crowell | Jun 1932 | A |
1914606 | Kinna et al. | Jun 1933 | A |
2107181 | Guyton | Feb 1938 | A |
2418833 | Harris et al. | Apr 1947 | A |
2472492 | Saffir | Jun 1949 | A |
2641835 | Greenmun | Jun 1953 | A |
2985961 | Schwartz | May 1961 | A |
2994957 | Mcleod | Aug 1961 | A |
3083459 | McMurry et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3241238 | Kertsten | Mar 1966 | A |
3644996 | Weinkle | Feb 1972 | A |
3667123 | Huey | Jun 1972 | A |
3727309 | Huey | Apr 1973 | A |
3748739 | Thibert | Jul 1973 | A |
3813777 | Van Handel et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
4029632 | Gross et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4227877 | Tureaud et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4247287 | Gigante | Jan 1981 | A |
4299573 | Ricci | Nov 1981 | A |
4533325 | Blair | Aug 1985 | A |
4591341 | Andrews | May 1986 | A |
4634377 | Behrend | Jan 1987 | A |
4784608 | Mays | Nov 1988 | A |
4931016 | Sillard | Jun 1990 | A |
5098296 | Cullen | Mar 1992 | A |
5151044 | Rotsaert | Sep 1992 | A |
5188529 | Luth | Feb 1993 | A |
5427906 | Hansen | Jun 1995 | A |
5672305 | Kogure | Sep 1997 | A |
5711668 | Huestis | Jan 1998 | A |
5716214 | Lund | Feb 1998 | A |
5718584 | Wong | Feb 1998 | A |
5833461 | Wong | Nov 1998 | A |
5839900 | Billet et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6056547 | Names | May 2000 | A |
6139322 | Liu | Oct 2000 | A |
6149427 | Van Handel | Nov 2000 | A |
6224372 | Ibsen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6227851 | Chishti | May 2001 | B1 |
6384107 | Liu | May 2002 | B2 |
6422864 | Glatt | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6488503 | Lichkus et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6616444 | Andreiko et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6851949 | Sachdeva | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7021934 | Aravena | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7153135 | Thomas | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7234940 | Weissman | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7433810 | Pavloskaia et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7474932 | Geng | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7758345 | Christensen | Jul 2010 | B1 |
8043091 | Schmitt | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8348669 | Schmitt | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8567408 | Roettger | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8641938 | Howe | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8801431 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8875398 | Balshi et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9055993 | Grobbee et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20020180760 | Rubbert et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030108845 | Giovannone | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030162147 | Dequeker | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030211444 | Andrews | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040005530 | Mullaly | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040219490 | Gartner et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050175957 | Haje | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186539 | McLean et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050284489 | Ambis | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060040232 | Shoup | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040236 | Schmitt | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060210945 | Savic | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060286507 | Dequeker | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070231774 | Massad | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080085489 | Schmitt | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080090207 | Rubbert | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080127698 | Luckey et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080206710 | Kruth et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206714 | Schmitt | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209974 | Ewolski et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080300716 | Kopelman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090148813 | Sun et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090287332 | Adusumilli et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291407 | Kuo | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090325125 | Diangelo | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100015572 | Dierkes et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100062394 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100086186 | Zug | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094446 | Baloch et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100324875 | Kalili | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110045442 | Adusimilli et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110112804 | Chishti et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110129796 | Riggio | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110236856 | Kanazawa et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110244417 | Hilsen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120058449 | Sklarski et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120178045 | Massad | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179281 | Steingart et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120258426 | Boe | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120285019 | Schechner et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120329008 | Fishman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130108988 | Simoncic | May 2013 | A1 |
20130209962 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130216978 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130218532 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130249132 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130280672 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130316302 | Fisker | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140045967 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140272796 | Grobbee et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150010885 | Balshi et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150037760 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150064653 | Grobbee et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150134094 | Thompson et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2008307281 | Dec 2008 | JP |
0132096 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2009105661 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2009105700 | Aug 2009 | WO |
2010022479 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2012041329 | Apr 2012 | WO |
2012061652 | May 2012 | WO |
2012061655 | May 2012 | WO |
2012061659 | May 2012 | WO |
2012061660 | May 2012 | WO |
2014130536 | Aug 2014 | WO |
2015031062 | Mar 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
USPTO; Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,136. |
USPTO; Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,210. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,210. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,210. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Feb. 12, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/369,238. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Dec. 23, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,466. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 6, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,466. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Sep. 5, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,621. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,621. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,963. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated dated Nov. 7, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,963. |
USPTO; Advisory Action dated Feb. 23, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,963. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,295. |
USPTO; Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 2, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348. |
USPTO; Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Oct. 21, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,348. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059230. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059230. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059235. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059235. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 9, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059239. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059239. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 18, 2012 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059240. |
PCT; International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 8, 2013 in Application No. PCT/US2011/059240. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 25, 2014 in Application No. PCT/US2014/017136. |
PCT; International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 7, 2014 in Application No. PCT/US2014/023654. |
EPO; European Search Report dated Mar. 4, 2014 in Application No. 11838839.6. |
EPO; European Search Report and Opinion dated Mar. 3, 2014 in Application No. 11838843.8. |
USPTO; Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/939,138. |
USPTO; Final Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,466. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 22, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/823,621. |
USPTO; Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/013,295. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150134094 A1 | May 2015 | US |