Patent Grant
12027008
Electronic gaming machines (“EGMs”) or gaming devices provide a variety of wagering games such as slot games, video poker games, video blackjack games, roulette games, video bingo games, keno games and other types of games that are frequently offered at casinos and other locations. Play on EGMs typically involves a player establishing a credit balance by inputting money, or another form of monetary credit, and placing a monetary wager (from the credit balance) on one or more outcomes of an instance (or single play) of a primary or base game. In some cases, a player may qualify for a special mode of the base game, a secondary game, or a bonus round of the base game by attaining a certain winning combination or triggering event in, or related to, the base game, or after the player is randomly awarded the special mode, secondary game, or bonus round. In the special mode, secondary game, or bonus round, the player is given an opportunity to win extra game credits, game tokens or other forms of payout. In the case of “game credits” that are awarded during play, the game credits are typically added to a credit meter total on the EGM and can be provided to the player upon completion of a gaming session or when the player wants to “cash out.”
“Slot” type games are often displayed to the player in the form of various symbols arrayed in a row-by-column grid or matrix. Specific matching combinations of symbols along predetermined paths (or paylines) through the matrix indicate the outcome of the game. The display typically highlights winning combinations/outcomes for ready identification by the player. Matching combinations and their corresponding awards are usually shown in a “pay-table” which is available to the player for reference. Often, the player may vary his/her wager to include differing numbers of paylines and/or the amount bet on each line. By varying the wager, the player may sometimes alter the frequency or number of winning combinations, frequency or number of secondary games, and/or the amount awarded.
Typical games use a random number generator (RNG) to randomly determine the outcome of each game. The game is designed to return a certain percentage of the amount wagered back to the player over the course of many plays or instances of the game, which is generally referred to as return to player (RTP). The RTP and randomness of the RNG ensure the fairness of the games and are highly regulated. Upon initiation of play, the RNG randomly determines a game outcome and symbols are then selected which correspond to that outcome. Notably, some games may include an element of skill on the part of the player and are therefore not entirely random.
In some contexts, multiplayer gaming events may be conducted using EGMs, e.g., slot-machine tournaments may be conducted in which a large number, e.g., 24, 32, etc., numbers of players may simultaneously play the same wagering game on different EGMs during a single tournament session. The players' score in the wagering game of the tournament session may be used to determine the players' relative rankings within the tournament session. Such relative rankings may be displayed using a leaderboard, e.g., a tabular representation of player ranking, player name, and score listed in descending order based on ranking.
Presented herein are various techniques and systems for providing players with a graphical, race-style leaderboard presentation that may provide granular ranking and score information in a format that, in some implementations, allows players to, with a quick glance, get a sense for their overall ranking and the relative score differentials between their score and a population of adjacently ranked other players.
Such leaderboard presentations may be provided in at least two formats that may share some common elements. For example, such leaderboard presentations may represent the various players for which ranking information is depicted with a graphical indicator of some sort (either a static image or icon or an animated image or icon). Another common feature of such leaderboard presentations is that the relative positioning of such graphical indicators may provide general insight as to the ranking of the players represented by such graphical indicators relative to each other and, in some instances, the score differentials between those players. Such leaderboard presentations may also, in many cases, feature animations that provide the illusion that the viewer is viewing a race, e.g., by causing the graphical indicators to be animated in a way that causes them to all appear to be moving in a particular direction and by causing a background graphic to scroll by the graphical indicators in the opposite direction. For example, if the graphical indicators are people or animals, they may be animated to appear to be running, and the background graphic may be caused to scroll past the graphical indicators in a direction opposite the direction in which the people or animals appear to be running—the positioning of the graphical indicators, it should be noted, may, in many cases, be generally stationary relative to the boundaries of the leaderboard presentation unless being moved to reflect a change in ranking and/or score differentials.
As mentioned above, such leaderboard displays may be provided in at least two formats. In one format, such leaderboard displays may be configured in a player-agnostic manner, i.e., without being tailored to the informational needs of any particular player. Such player-agnostic leaderboards may be well-suited for display to spectators, e.g., on overhead signage, and may provide insight as to either all of the players participating in a particular multiplayer gaming experience of interest or to a subset thereof, e.g., the 20 highest-ranked players in such a multiplayer gaming experience.
In another format, such leaderboard displays may be provided in a player-centric manner, i.e., in a manner that is designed to rapidly convey information that is selected to be particularly relevant to a specific player, e.g., information regarding that player's current ranking, the relative magnitude of score differentials between that player and various other adjacently ranked players, and so forth.
These and other aspects of such leaderboard presentations are discussed below in more detail. As will become apparent, such leaderboard presentations may be used in the support of EGM tournament play, including in the context of implementations such as those listed below. It will be understood that the implementations of EGM tournament play systems discussed below may be used without necessarily being accompanied by a leaderboard presentation such as those discussed above or later below, although the use of the leaderboard presentations discussed herein in support of a EGM tournament play is also specifically contemplated.
In some implementations, an electronic gaming system is provided that includes one or more processors and one or more memory devices. The one or more processors and the one or more memory devices may be operably connected, and the one or more memory devices may store computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to (a) receive data regarding values of a metric of interest for a plurality of players of electronic gaming machines participating in a multiplayer gaming event, (b) determine, for each player of a first set of one or more of the players, a corresponding indicator position along a path based, at least in part, on the value of the metric of interest for that player, and (c) cause, for each player of the first set of one or more players, a graphical indicator to be displayed in a location on one or more displays based on the corresponding indicator position along the path.
In some implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to repeat (a) through (c) one or more times over a period of time and cause at least some of the graphical indicators to move between different locations on the display according to changes in the indicator positions for those graphical indicators.
In some implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to, for each graphical indicator, cause that graphical indicator to move between one or more interim indicator positions for that graphical indicator in between each instance of (c), wherein each interim indicator position is obtained by multiplying the most recent indicator position for that graphical indicator by a randomly generated displacement factor.
In some implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to modify, for each player of the first set of one or more of the players, the corresponding indicator position along the path by multiplying that indicator position by a randomly generated displacement factor before (c).
In some implementations, the path may be a virtual path that is not graphically depicted on the one or more displays.
In some implementations, the path is a linear path between a starting terminus and an ending terminus.
In some such implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to cause a background graphic to be displayed behind the graphical indicators and scroll in a direction extending from the ending terminus to the starting terminus.
In some implementations, the plurality of players may all be participants in a common tournament session of a multiplayer gaming tournament, and the metric of interest may be a session score of each player of the plurality of players for the common tournament session.
In some implementations, the path may have a starting terminus and an ending terminus, the starting terminus may be associated with a first metric value, the ending terminus may be associated with a second metric value, and the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to determine the corresponding indicator position for each player of the first set of one or more players such that a distance along the path from the starting terminus to that indicator position is based on the product of a length of the path between the starting terminus and the ending terminus multiplied by the ratio of a first quantity to a second quantity; the first quantity may be the value of the metric of interest for that player minus the first metric value and the second quantity may be the second metric value minus the first metric value.
In some such implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to use a lowest value of the metric of interest for the plurality of players as the first metric value, and use a highest value of the metric of interest for the plurality of players as the second metric value.
In some implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to use a highest value of the metric of interest for the plurality of players as the second metric value, determine the Nth highest value of the metric of interest for the plurality of players, wherein N is less than the number of players in the plurality of players, and use the Nth highest value of the metric of interest as the first metric value.
In some implementations, there may be N players in the first set of players and the value of the metric of interest for each player of the first set of players may be greater than or equal to the Nth highest value.
In some implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to repeat (a) through (c) one or more times over a period of time, and cause the players that are in the first set of players to be modified based on changes in which players of the plurality of players are associated with the N highest values of the metric of interest over time.
In some implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to cause no graphical indicators to be shown for players of the plurality of players that are not in the first set of players.
In some implementations, N may be selected from the group consisting of: 5, 10, 15, and 20.
In some implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to cause, for each displayed graphical indicator, a player name label to be displayed in association with that graphical indicator indicating a name associated with the player of the first set of players for that graphical indicator.
In some implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to cause, for each displayed graphical indicator, a gaming machine number label to be displayed in association with that graphical indicator indicating an electronic gaming machine being used by the player of the first set of players for that graphical indicator.
In some implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to (d) receive data regarding a first leader metric value, the first leader metric value representing a value of the metric of interest that is the highest value of that metric of interest achieved by any player in one or more previous or concurrent multiplayer gaming events associated with a first time period, (e) determine, for the first leader metric value, a corresponding first leader indicator position along the path based, at least in part, on the first leader metric value, and (f) cause a first leader graphical indicator to be displayed in a corresponding location on the one or more displays based on the first leader indicator position along the path.
In some such implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to: (g) receive data regarding a second leader metric value, the second leader metric value representing a value of the metric of interest that is the highest value of that metric of interest achieved by any player in one or more previous or concurrent multiplayer gaming events associated with a second time period, wherein the second time period includes, and is longer than, the first time period, (h) determine, for the second leader metric value, a corresponding second leader indicator position along the path based, at least in part, on the second leader metric value, and (i) cause a second leader graphical indicator to be displayed in a corresponding location on the one or more displays based on the second leader indicator position along the path.
In some further such implementations, the one or more memory devices may further store additional computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to (j) determine that the value of the metric of interest for a first player of the plurality of players has exceeded the first leader metric value, (k) cause the first leader indicator to no longer be displayed responsive, at least in part, to (j), and (l) perform (i) responsive, at least in part, to the determination in (j).
Various systems and techniques for presenting more engaging EGM tournament play are also disclosed herein, including, for example, tournament systems in which various wagering game features, such as soundtracks, multiplier modes, persistent wild modes, and so forth, may be enabled at various times during a tournament session based on the amount of time that has elapsed in the session.
The timing of the activation of many such wagering game features may be arranged so as to introduce greater uncertainty and variability in player game play during a session as the end of the session draws closer. In a typical tournament setting, the closer the tournament is to its end point, the more certain its overall outcome may generally be—the player scores may generally be spread apart, and a handful of players may clearly be in the lead score-wise, with the remaining players having less competitive scores. To potentially offset such scoring inertia, the tournament system may activate the various wagering game features at different times, which may provide greater volatility in player scores during the latter part of the tournament session, thereby making the outcome of the tournament less certain and heightening player interest during the latter part of the tournament session. This can help offset any player apathy that may set in as the session progresses due to a perception that the tournament results may already be inevitable based on the players' current scores. Wagering game features that affect game play or the frequency and/or quantity of winning outcomes may, for example, start being introduced in approximately the last half of a session, and may include features that increase the player's chances of obtaining a winning outcome (like persistent wilds) and/or increase the amount of winning outcomes (like multiplier modes). Other features may be included as well, such as personalized multiplier modes that only affect individual players, as well as delayed recalculation of some player's scores and rankings when in a personalized score multiplier mode—such features may result in large changes in a player's points and ranking, allowing for sudden upsets and come-from-behind victories.
In addition to such features, tournament systems as discussed herein may also or alternatively include other features, such as prizes or trophies that may be awarded during session play but which may not have a known value until later in the tournament, and which may only have value then if the player to which they are awarded is present on the premises of where the tournament is being held.
Another feature which such tournament systems may have is a replay feature in which a player may obtain a replay of their game play during a session after the session is completed, e.g., via a smartphone, tablet, or website. Such replay features may include, for example, video of the player during the session, as well as, in some cases, a game replay and/or player video for competitors of the player during the session.
These features, as well as various other features, are discussed in more detail below, and are not intended to be limiting as to the scope of this disclosure.
In some implementations, a system may be provided that includes a plurality of electronic gaming machines, each electronic gaming machine (EGM) including one or more displays, one or more EGM processors, one or more EGM memory devices, and an EGM communications interface. In such implementations, for each EGM the one or more displays, the one or more EGM processors, the one or more EGM memory devices, and the EGM communications interface may be operatively connected, and the one or more EGM memory devices may store computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more EGM processors to present a wagering game. Such implementations may further include a tournament management system (TMS) which may include one or more TMS processors, one or more TMS memory devices, and one or more TMS communications interfaces. The one or more TMS processors may be operatively connected with the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more TMS communications interfaces, the one or more TMS communications interfaces may be configured to communicate with each EGM via the EGM communications interface for that EGM, and the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to: initiate a session for a tournament, the session having a session duration, cause each EGM to present the wagering game in a tournament mode during the session, and cause one or more wagering game features to be activated on the EGMs during the session based on how much of the session duration has elapsed.
In some such implementations, there may be 8, 16, 24 or 32 EGMs.
In some further such implementations, the EGMs may be arranged in banks of eight EGMs each, with each bank including a first row of 4 EGMs arranged side-to-side and a second row of 4 EGMs arranged side-to-side, with the EGMs of the first row being back-to-back with the EGMs of the second row.
In some implementations of the system the one or more wagering game features may include a soundtrack having at least a first segment with a duration equal to the session duration. The first segment may include a first portion and a second portion, the first portion may precede the second portion when the soundtrack is played, at least one of the tempo and the volume of the second portion may be increased in the second portion as compared with the first portion, and the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to, cause the soundtrack to be activated during the session by causing the soundtrack to be played during the session.
In some implementations of the system, the one or more wagering game features may include a soundtrack having at least a first segment with a duration equal to the session duration, the first segment may include a Shepard scale, and the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM collectively may store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to, cause the soundtrack to be activated during the session by causing the soundtrack to be played during the session.
In some implementations of the system, the one or more wagering game features may include a soundtrack having at least a first segment with a duration equal to the session duration, the first segment may includes an intro portion, one or more loop portions, and an outro portion, the intro portion may precede the one or more loop portions, the outro portion may follow the one or more loop portions, at least one of the tempo and the volume of outro portion may be increased in the outro portion as compared with the intro portion, and the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to, cause the soundtrack to be activated during the session by causing the soundtrack to be played during the session.
In some implementations of the system with the soundtrack, the soundtrack may also have a second segment following the first segment, the second segment may be played after the session ends, and at least one of the tempo and the volume of the second segment may be lower in the second segment as compared with an end portion of the first segment.
In some such implementations, the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may further collectively store computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to, select the session duration from a plurality of different session durations responsive to one or more inputs, each of the different session durations may have a corresponding session duration that is equal in length to the sum of the duration of the intro portion, the duration of the outro portion, and a total duration of X repetitions of the loop portion, and X may be a positive integer.
In some implementations of the system, the wagering game that each EGM presents during the session may be a reel-based wagering game in which a plurality of symbols are presented on the one or more displays of that EGM in conjunction with each play of the wagering game, the wagering game that each EGM presents during the session may provide an award amount in conjunction with each play of the wagering game based on patterns of the symbols that are presented on the one or more displays of that EGM for that play of the wagering game, the plurality of symbols presented for each play of the wagering game may include one or more wild symbols that are treated as equivalent to at least two other, different symbols in the plurality of symbols for the purposes of identifying the patterns of symbols, and the one or more wagering game features may include a wagering game feature in which the EGMs enter a persistent wild mode in which, during a first time period, any wild symbols presented on a display of the one or more displays of the EGMs responsive to a play of the wagering game are retained for further plays of the wagering game during the duration of the first time period.
In some such implementations of the system, the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to, activate the wagering game feature in which the EGMs enter a persistent wild mode responsive to elapsed time of the session being within 40% to 60% of the session duration.
In some implementations of the system, the first time period may have a duration of between 5 and 15 seconds.
In some implementations of the system, the wagering game that each EGM presents during the session may be a reel-based wagering game in which a plurality of symbols are presented on the one or more displays of that EGM in conjunction with each play of the wagering game, the wagering game that each EGM presents during the session may provide an award amount in conjunction with each play of the wagering game based on patterns of the symbols that are presented on the one or more displays of that EGM for that play of the wagering game, the one or more wagering game features may include a wagering game feature in which the EGMs enter a win multiplier mode where, during a first time period, the award amount provided responsive to each play of the wagering game where a winning pattern of symbols is presented is multiplied by a score multiplier, and the score multiplier may be a number greater than 1. In some such implementations of the system, the score multiplier may be a number selected from the group consisting of 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10. In some further or alternative such implementations of the system, the first time period may have a duration of between 5 and 15 seconds.
In some such implementations of the system, the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to activate the wagering game feature in which the EGMs enter the win multiplier mode at multiple points in time during the session and use a larger score multiplier for each activation of the wagering game feature in which the EGMs enter the win multiplier mode during the session.
In some implementations of the system, the wagering game that each EGM presents during the session may be a reel-based wagering game in which a plurality of symbols are presented on the one or more displays of that EGM in conjunction with each play of the wagering game, the wagering game that each EGM presents during the session may provide an award amount in conjunction with each play of the wagering game based on patterns of the symbols that are presented on the one or more displays of that EGM for that play of the wagering game, and the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to determine that a first EGM of the EGMs is the first of the EGMs to have presented a first pattern of symbols during the session, the symbols in the first pattern of symbols all being the same, determine an identity of a player associated with the first EGM during the session, and provide a notification that the player associated with the first EGM has won a prize.
In some such implementations, the first pattern of symbols may include five symbols.
In some implementations of the system, the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to determine that a first EGM of the EGMs has accrued a total award amount that is higher than the total award amount of any of the other EGMs within a predetermined time interval from the start of the session, determine an identity of a player associated with the first EGM during the session, and provide a notification that the player associated with the first EGM has won a prize.
In some implementations of the system, the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to determine a relative ranking for players of the EGMs participating in the session based on a running total amount won by each of the players during the session, identify a player associated with a first EGM that experienced a greatest change in relative ranking during a first time period, and provide a notification that the player associated with the first EGM has won a prize.
In some such implementations, the first time period may be a time interval that starts and ends within the session and does not overlap with the start and end of the session.
In some implementations of the system that are configured to provide a notification, the notification may be one or more of an audio announcement identifying the player, a graphical presentation on a display identifying the player, activation of illumination features on the EGM of the first EGM, a notification sent to a communications device associated with the player associated with the first EGM, or a notification sent to communications devices associated with each player participating in the session.
In some implementations of the system, the tournament may include multiple sessions, each session may include multiple players, and the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to track the number of prizes won by each player participating in one or more of the sessions during the tournament, select a winning player of the players based on the number of prizes won by the winning player, and assign an award to the winning player.
In some implementations of the system, the wagering game that each EGM presents during the session may be a reel-based wagering game in which a plurality of symbols are presented on the one or more displays of that EGM in conjunction with each play of the wagering game, the wagering game that each EGM presents during the session may provide an award amount in conjunction with each play of the wagering game based on patterns of the symbols that are presented on the one or more displays of that EGM for that play of the wagering game, and the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to (a) determine if any symbols presented on that EGM in conjunction with a play of the wagering game are multiplier symbols and (b) modify the award amount in conjunction with the play of the wagering game from (a) based on the multiplier symbols of (a).
In some implementations of the system, each multiplier symbol may be associated with a corresponding score multiplier, and the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to, modify the award amount in (b) by multiplying that award amount by the corresponding score multiplier associated with each multiplier symbol that is determined in (a) to be presented in conjunction with that play of the wagering game.
In some such implementations of the system, the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to determine if at least a predetermined number of the symbols presented on that EGM in conjunction with a play of the wagering game are scatter symbols, and treat, responsive to determining that at least the predetermined number of symbols presented on that EGM in conjunction with the play of the wagering game are scatter symbols, any symbols presented during one or more subsequent plays of the wagering game that are of a particular type as multiplier symbols.
In some further such implementations of the system, the number of scatter symbols that may be presented on that EGM in conjunction with the play of the wagering game may determine the number of subsequent plays of the wagering game where the symbols of the particular type are treated as multiplier symbols.
In some implementations of the system, the system may further include a tournament host tablet (THT) which may, in turn, include one or more THT processors, one or more THT memory devices, and a touch-screen display. In such implementations, the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM, the one or more TMS memory devices, and the one or more THT memory devices may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more EGM processors, the one or more TMS processors, and the one or more THT processors, collectively, to cause the THT to present indications of a plurality of players participating in the session via the touch-screen display, and cause the THT to provide information in association with each of the indications, via the touch-screen display and throughout the session, and regarding one or more of: the players, a score of each player, and winning outcomes of players.
In some such implementations of the system, the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM, the one or more TMS memory devices, and the one or more THT memory devices may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more EGM processors, the one or more TMS processors, and the one or more THT processors, collectively, to, cause the THT to present a graphical representation of relative positioning of each EGM relative to the other EGMs.
In some such implementations of the system, the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM, the one or more TMS memory devices, and the one or more THT memory devices may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more EGM processors, the one or more TMS processors, and the one or more THT processors, collectively, to identify a first set of players of the players, each player in the first set of players having a score higher than the players in the session that are not in the first set of the players, and cause the THT to, for each player in the first set of players, highlight, via the touch-screen display, the indication of that player.
In some implementations of the system, the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM, the one or more TMS memory devices, and the one or more THT memory devices may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more EGM processors, the one or more TMS processors, and the one or more THT processors, collectively, to identify a first player of the players, where the first player has a score that is increasing faster than the score of any other player in the session and over an immediately preceding time interval of a predetermined duration and cause the THT to highlight, via the touch-screen display, the indication of the first player.
In some implementations of the system, the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM, the one or more TMS memory devices, and the one or more THT memory devices may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more EGM processors, the one or more TMS processors, and the one or more THT processors, collectively, to cause the THT display to provide user-selectable controls that are configured to allow a tournament host to cause, by providing inputs to the touch-screen display of the THT, one or more items to occur that are selected from the group consisting of: pre-recorded audio to be played over speakers of one or more of the EGMs and pre-recorded audio to be player over speakers other than the speakers of the one or more EGMs.
In some implementations of the system, the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to cause replay data of content displayed on a first EGM of the EGMs during the session to be stored, and provide, after the conclusion of the session, the replay data to a remote device of a player that was playing the wagering game on the first EGM during the session.
In some implementations of the system, each of one or more of the EGMs may include an imaging sensor configured to obtain player video data of a player playing the EGM that houses that imaging sensor, and the one or more TMS memory devices and the one or more EGM memory devices of each EGM may collectively store further computer-executable instructions for further controlling the one or more TMS processors and the one or more EGM processors of each EGM, collectively, to cause the player video data to be obtained from each of the one or more EGMs that include the imaging sensor during the session, cause the obtained player video data to be stored, and provide, after the conclusion of the session, at least some player video data obtained from at least one EGM during the session to a remote device associated with a first player who was playing the wagering game on one of the EGMs during the session.
In some implementations of the system, the player video data that may be provided to the remote device associated with the first player may be first player video data of the first player obtained during the session.
In some implementations of the system, the player video data that is provided to the remote device associated with the first player may include second player video data of one or more second players who participated in the session, and the one or more second players may be different from the first player.
In some implementations of the system, the second player video data that may be provided to the remote device associated with the first player may include multiple segments, at least some of the segments may be first segments, and each first segment may include second player video data of one of the second players having a ranking, based on a score of each player at the time the second player video data in that first segment was obtained, adjacent to a ranking of the first player at the time the second player video data in that first segment was obtained.
In some such implementations of the system, all of the segments may be first segments.
In some additional implementations, the second player video data for at least some of the segments may be augmented with a graphical overlay that alters an appearance of the second player in the corresponding segment.
In some implementations of the system, the graphical overlay may include one or more graphical objects that are animated so as to have motions synchronized with motion in the overlaid second player video data, and the one or more graphical objects may obscure one or more facial features of the second player in the overlaid second player video data.
In some such implementations, the player video data that may be provided to the remote device associated with the first player may further include first player video data of the first player that was obtained contemporaneously with the second player video data for one or more of the segments.
As discussed above, a multiplayer game server (MGS) for wagering game tournament play is provided; the MGS may include one or more computing systems that have computer-executable instructions stored in a memory device or devices thereof that, when executed by one or more processors of the MGS, cause the MGS to manage various aspects of tournament game play using EGMs. In particular, the MGS may facilitate and/or manage various phases of a tournament session for a plurality of players, including, for example, the start of the tournament session, ongoing play during the tournament session, and the end of the tournament session. Prior to discussing the MGS, various aspects of EGMs and other gaming-related equipment are discussed below with respect to
Communication between the gaming devices 104A-104X and the server computers 102, and among the gaming devices 104A-104X, may be direct or indirect using one or more communication protocols. As an example, gaming devices 104A-104X and the server computers 102 can communicate over one or more communication networks, such as over the Internet through a website maintained by a computer on a remote server or over an online data network including commercial online service providers, Internet service providers, private networks (e.g., local area networks and enterprise networks), and the like (e.g., wide area networks). The communication networks could allow gaming devices 104A-104X to communicate with one another and/or the server computers 102 using a variety of communication-based technologies, such as radio frequency (RF) (e.g., wireless fidelity (WiFi®) and Bluetooth®), cable TV, satellite links and the like.
In some embodiments, server computers 102 may not be necessary and/or preferred. For example, in one or more embodiments, a stand-alone gaming device such as gaming device 104A, gaming device 104B or any of the other gaming devices 104C-104X can implement one or more aspects of the present disclosure. However, it is typical to find multiple EGMs connected to networks implemented with one or more of the different server computers 102 described herein.
The server computers 102 may include a central determination gaming system server 106, a ticket-in-ticket-out (TITO) system server 108, a player tracking system server 110, a progressive system server 112, and/or a casino management system server 114. Gaming devices 104A-104X may include features to enable operation of any or all servers for use by the player and/or operator (e.g., the casino, resort, gaming establishment, tavern, pub, etc.). For example, game outcomes may be generated on a central determination gaming system server 106 and then transmitted over the network to any of a group of remote terminals or remote gaming devices 104A-104X that utilize the game outcomes and display the results to the players.
Gaming device 104A is often of a cabinet construction which may be aligned in rows or banks of similar devices for placement and operation on a casino floor. The gaming device 104A often includes a main door which provides access to the interior of the cabinet. Gaming device 104A typically includes a button area or button deck 120 accessible by a player that is configured with input switches or buttons 122, an access channel for a bill validator 124, and/or an access channel for a ticket-out printer 126.
In
In many configurations, the gaming device 104A may have a main display 128 (e.g., video display monitor) mounted to, or above, the gaming display area 118. The main display 128 can be a high-resolution LCD, plasma, LED, or OLED panel which may be flat or curved as shown, a cathode ray tube, or other conventional electronically controlled video monitor.
In some embodiments, the bill validator 124 may also function as a “ticket-in” reader that allows the player to use a casino issued credit ticket to load credits onto the gaming device 104A (e.g., in a cashless ticket (“TITO”) system). In such cashless embodiments, the gaming device 104A may also include a “ticket-out” printer 126 for outputting a credit ticket when a “cash out” button is pressed. Cashless TITO systems are used to generate and track unique bar-codes or other indicators printed on tickets to allow players to avoid the use of bills and coins by loading credits using a ticket reader and cashing out credits using a ticket-out printer 126 on the gaming device 104A. The gaming device 104A can have hardware meters for purposes including ensuring regulatory compliance and monitoring the player credit balance. In addition, there can be additional meters that record the total amount of money wagered on the gaming device, total amount of money deposited, total amount of money withdrawn, total amount of winnings on gaming device 104A.
In some embodiments, a player tracking card reader 144, a transceiver for wireless communication with a mobile device (e.g., a player's smartphone), a keypad 146, and/or an illuminated display 148 for reading, receiving, entering, and/or displaying player tracking information is provided in EGM 104A. In such embodiments, a game controller within the gaming device 104A can communicate with the player tracking system server 110 to send and receive player tracking information.
Gaming device 104A may also include a bonus topper wheel 134. When bonus play is triggered (e.g., by a player achieving a particular outcome or set of outcomes in the primary game), bonus topper wheel 134 is operative to spin and stop with indicator arrow 136 indicating the outcome of the bonus game. Bonus topper wheel 134 is typically used to play a bonus game, but it could also be incorporated into play of the base or primary game.
A candle 138 may be mounted on the top of gaming device 104A and may be activated by a player (e.g., using a switch or one of buttons 122) to indicate to operations staff that gaming device 104A has experienced a malfunction or the player requires service. The candle 138 is also often used to indicate a jackpot has been won and to alert staff that a hand payout of an award may be needed.
There may also be one or more information panels 152 which may be a back-lit, silkscreened glass panel with lettering to indicate general game information including, for example, a game denomination (e.g., $0.25 or $1), pay lines, pay tables, and/or various game related graphics. In some embodiments, the information panel(s) 152 may be implemented as an additional video display.
Gaming devices 104A have traditionally also included a handle 132 typically mounted to the side of main cabinet 116 which may be used to initiate game play.
Many or all the above described components can be controlled by circuitry (e.g., a game controller) housed inside the main cabinet 116 of the gaming device 104A, the details of which are shown in
An alternative example gaming device 104B illustrated in
Example gaming device 104B includes a main cabinet 116 including a main door which opens to provide access to the interior of the gaming device 104B. The main or service door is typically used by service personnel to refill the ticket-out printer 126 and collect bills and tickets inserted into the bill validator 124. The main or service door may also be accessed to reset the machine, verify and/or upgrade the software, and for general maintenance operations.
Another example gaming device 104C shown is the Helix™ model gaming device manufactured by Aristocrat® Technologies, Inc. Gaming device 104C includes a main display 128A that is in a landscape orientation. Although not illustrated by the front view provided, the landscape display 128A may have a curvature radius from top to bottom, or alternatively from side to side. In some embodiments, display 128A is a flat panel display. Main display 128A is typically used for primary game play while secondary display 128B is typically used for bonus game play, to show game features or attraction activities while the game is not in play or any other information or media desired by the game designer or operator. In some embodiments, example gaming device 104C may also include speakers 142 to output various audio such as game sound, background music, etc.
Many different types of games, including mechanical slot games, video slot games, video poker, video blackjack, video pachinko, keno, bingo, and lottery, may be provided with or implemented within the depicted gaming devices 104A-104C and other similar gaming devices. Each gaming device may also be operable to provide many different games. Games may be differentiated according to themes, sounds, graphics, type of game (e.g., slot game vs. card game vs. game with aspects of skill), denomination, number of paylines, maximum jackpot, progressive or non-progressive, bonus games, and may be deployed for operation in Class 2 or Class 3, etc.
The games available for play on the gaming device 200 are controlled by a game controller 202 that includes one or more processors 204. Processor 204 represents a general-purpose processor, a specialized processor intended to perform certain functional tasks, or a combination thereof. As an example, processor 204 can be a central processing unit (CPU) that has one or more multi-core processing units and memory mediums (e.g., cache memory) that function as buffers and/or temporary storage for data. Alternatively, processor 204 can be a specialized processor, such as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), graphics processing unit (GPU), field-programmable gate array (FPGA), digital signal processor (DSP), or another type of hardware accelerator. In another example, processor 204 is a system on chip (SoC) that combines and integrates one or more general-purpose processors and/or one or more specialized processors. Although
Memory 208 is defined herein as including volatile and nonvolatile memory and other types of non-transitory data storage components. Volatile memory is memory that does not retain data values upon loss of power. Nonvolatile memory is memory that does retain data upon a loss of power. Examples of memory 208 include random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), hard disk drives, solid-state drives, USB flash drives, memory cards accessed via a memory card reader, floppy disks accessed via an associated floppy disk drive, optical discs accessed via an optical disc drive, magnetic tapes accessed via an appropriate tape drive, and/or other memory components, or a combination of any two or more of these memory components. In addition, examples of RAM include static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), magnetic random access memory (MRAM), and other such devices. Examples of ROM include a programmable read-only memory (PROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), an electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), or other like memory device. Even though
Memory 208 can store one or more game programs 206 that provide program instructions and/or data for carrying out various embodiments (e.g., game mechanics) described herein. Stated another way, game program 206 represents an executable program stored in any portion or component of memory 208. In one or more embodiments, game program 206 is embodied in the form of source code that includes human-readable statements written in a programming language or machine code that contains numerical instructions recognizable by a suitable execution system, such as a processor 204 in a game controller or other system. Examples of executable programs include: (1) a compiled program that can be translated into machine code in a format that can be loaded into a random access portion of memory 208 and run by processor 204; (2) source code that may be expressed in proper format such as object code that is capable of being loaded into a random access portion of memory 208 and executed by processor 204; and (3) source code that may be interpreted by another executable program to generate instructions in a random access portion of memory 208 to be executed by processor 204.
Alternatively, game programs 206 can be set up to generate one or more game instances based on instructions and/or data that gaming device 200 exchanges with one or more remote gaming devices, such as a central determination gaming system server 106 (not shown in
Gaming devices, such as gaming device 200, are highly regulated to ensure fairness and, in many cases, gaming device 200 is operable to award monetary awards (e.g., typically dispensed in the form of a redeemable voucher). Therefore, to satisfy security and regulatory requirements in a gaming environment, hardware and software architectures are implemented in gaming devices 200 that differ significantly from those of general-purpose computers. Adapting general purpose computers to function as gaming devices 200 is not simple or straightforward because of: (1) the regulatory requirements for gaming devices 200, (2) the harsh environment in which gaming devices 200 operate, (3) security requirements, (4) fault tolerance requirements, and (5) the requirement for additional special purpose componentry enabling functionality of an EGM. These differences require substantial engineering effort with respect to game design implementation, game mechanics, hardware components, and software.
One regulatory requirement for games running on gaming device 200 generally involves complying with a certain level of randomness. Typically, gaming jurisdictions mandate that gaming devices 200 satisfy a minimum level of randomness without specifying how a gaming device 200 should achieve this level of randomness. To comply,
Another regulatory requirement for running games on gaming device 200 includes ensuring a certain level of RTP. Similar to the randomness requirement discussed above, numerous gaming jurisdictions also mandate that gaming device 200 provides a minimum level of RTP (e.g., RTP of at least 75%). A game can use one or more lookup tables (also called weighted tables) as part of a technical solution that satisfies regulatory requirements for randomness and RTP. In particular, a lookup table can integrate game features (e.g., trigger events for special modes or bonus games; newly introduced game elements such as extra reels, new symbols, or new cards; stop positions for dynamic game elements such as spinning reels, spinning wheels, or shifting reels; or card selections from a deck) with random numbers generated by one or more RNGs, so as to achieve a given level of volatility for a target level of RTP. (In general, volatility refers to the frequency or probability of an event such as a special mode, payout, etc. For example, for a target level of RTP, a higher-volatility game may have a lower payout most of the time with an occasional bonus having a very high payout, while a lower-volatility game has a steadier payout with more frequent bonuses of smaller amounts.) Configuring a lookup table can involve engineering decisions with respect to how RNG outcomes are mapped to game outcomes for a given game feature, while still satisfying regulatory requirements for RTP. Configuring a lookup table can also involve engineering decisions about whether different game features are combined in a given entry of the lookup table or split between different entries (for the respective game features), while still satisfying regulatory requirements for RTP and allowing for varying levels of game volatility.
When a player wishes to play the gaming device 200, he/she can insert cash or a ticket voucher through a coin acceptor (not shown) or bill validator 234 to establish a credit balance on the gaming device. The credit balance is used by the player to place wagers on instances of the game and to receive credit awards based on the outcome of winning instances. The credit balance is decreased by the amount of each wager and increased upon a win. The player can add additional credits to the balance at any time. The player may also optionally insert a loyalty club card into the card reader 230. During the game, the player views with one or more UIs, the game outcome on one or more of the primary game display 240 and secondary game display 242. Other game and prize information may also be displayed.
For each game instance, a player may make selections, which may affect play of the game. For example, the player may vary the total amount wagered by selecting the amount bet per line and the number of lines played. In many games, the player is asked to initiate or select options during the course of game play (such as spinning a wheel to begin a bonus round or select various items during a feature game). The player may make these selections using the player-input buttons 236, the primary game display 240 which may be a touch screen, or using some other device which enables a player to input information into the gaming device 200.
During certain game events, the gaming device 200 may display visual and auditory effects that can be perceived by the player. These effects add to the excitement of a game, which makes a player more likely to enjoy the playing experience. Auditory effects include various sounds that are projected by the speakers 220. Visual effects include flashing lights, strobing lights or other patterns displayed from lights on the gaming device 200 or from lights behind the information panel 152 (
When the player is done, he/she cashes out the credit balance (typically by pressing a cash out button to receive a ticket from the ticket printer 222). The ticket may be “cashed-in” for money or inserted into another machine to establish a credit balance for play.
Although
The UI system 302 includes one or more UIs that a player can interact with. The UI system 302 could include one or more game play UIs 304, one or more bonus game play UIs 308, and one or more multiplayer UIs 312, where each UI type includes one or more mechanical UIs and/or graphical UIs (GUIs). In other words, game play UI 304, bonus game play UI 308, and the multiplayer UI 312 may utilize a variety of UI elements, such as mechanical UI elements (e.g., physical “spin” button or mechanical reels) and/or GUI elements (e.g., virtual reels shown on a video display or a virtual button deck) to receive player inputs and/or present game play to a player. Using
The game play UI 304 represents a UI that a player typically interfaces with for a base game. During a game instance of a base game, the game play UI elements 306A-306N (e.g., GUI elements depicting one or more virtual reels) are shown and/or made available to a user. In a subsequent game instance, the UI system 302 could transition out of the base game to one or more bonus games. The bonus game play UI 308 represents a UI that utilizes bonus game play UI elements 310A-310N for a player to interact with and/or view during a bonus game. In one or more embodiments, at least some of the game play UI element 306A-306N are similar to the bonus game play UI elements 310A-310N. In other embodiments, the game play UI element 306A-306N can differ from the bonus game play UI elements 310A-310N.
Based on the player inputs, the UI system 302 could generate RNG calls to a game processing backend system 314. As an example, the UI system 302 could use one or more application programming interfaces (APIs) to generate the RNG calls. To process the RNG calls, the RNG engine 316 could utilize gaming RNG 318 and/or non-gaming RNGs 319A-319N. Gaming RNG 318 corresponds to RNG 212 shown in
The RNG conversion engine 320 processes each RNG outcome from RNG engine 316 and converts the RNG outcome to a UI outcome that is feedback to the UI system 302. With reference to
After generating the UI outcome, the game processing backend system 314 sends the UI outcome to the UI system 302. Examples of UI outcomes are symbols to display on a video reel or reel stops for a mechanical reel. In one example, if the UI outcome is for a base game, the UI system 302 updates one or more game play UI elements 306A-306N, such as symbols, for the game play UI 304. In another example, if the UI outcome is for a bonus game, the UI system could update one or more bonus game play UI elements 310A-310N (e.g., symbols) for the bonus game play UI 308. In response to updating the appropriate UI, the player may subsequently provide additional player inputs to initiate a subsequent game instance that progresses through the game processing pipeline.
While the above discussion has focused on the operation of electronic gaming machines during conventional wagering play, e.g., solo play by players, electronic gaming machines may sometimes be configured so as to participate in “tournaments.” In the context of this disclosure, a “tournament” refers to a multiplayer gaming event in which multiple electronic gaming machines are specially configured to operate in a mode where the electronic gaming machines (or, rather, the players of the electronic gaming machines) compete amongst each other. In some tournament implementations, the player of each participating electronic gaming machine is provided with a large, or infinite, pool of credits with which to make wagers during one or more tournament sessions. The players then compete against each other to see which player can win the largest number of credits for a given tournament session by playing the wagering game using the credits (e.g., the credits won during a tournament may be thought of as “points,” the total of which for each player is the player's “score”); in some tournaments, the credits provided to each player for use in the tournament may be non-cashable, e.g., not redeemable for cash (tournaments using non-cashable credits may be referred to herein as “free tournaments” or “marketing tournaments”; it will be understood that any of the tournament systems discussed herein may be used to provide free tournaments or marketing tournaments, or other types of tournaments). Each session may have a generally fixed duration (although some tournaments may have session durations that may vary due to events that occur during play or due to other factors), which is typically quite short, e.g., 2, 3, 4, etc. minutes. In some implementations, a session duration may be defined by a number of spins that each player is permitted to take, e.g., each player may make 100 spins during a session, although each player may use a different amount of time to make those 100 spins. In other implementations, session duration for each player may be defined by a combination of such limits, e.g., a time-based limit or a spin-based limit, whichever each player achieves first (for example, 2 minutes or 100 spins, whichever is reached first by a player). Once a session begins, the players participating in that session try to win as many credits as possible by making wagers on their respective electronic gaming machines. In free tournaments or marketing tournaments, since the credits being wagered do not actually have fungible monetary value, the players are generally freed from any reluctance to place wagers; this, and the relatively short duration of the session, encourage players to make as many plays of the wagering game as possible, and wager as many credits as possible, during the duration of the session. Other types of tournaments may use other mechanisms to determine the pool of credits used by the player, e.g., each player may buy in to the tournament and receive an amount of credits for use in the tournament that is based on their buy-in amount; in other implementations, however, a player may buy in to a tournament and be provided with an infinite pool of credits for use during the tournament. In some implementations, the winnings resulting from such tournaments may be non-cashable and used solely to determine the relative rankings of the players in the tournament, whereas in other implementations, the winnings from such tournaments may not only determine the player's relative rankings within the tournament, but may also be wholly or partially cashable as well.
The term “wagering mode,” as used herein, refers to a mode of electronic gaming machine operation in which the electronic gaming machine is operable for wagering game play in which monetary wagers are made for a chance to win a monetary award determined by each individual game outcome and the player is typically only playing against the EGM and not against other players (it will be understood that players may, as part of EGM play, be competing for prizes and/or jackpots that may be available to players on a large number of EGMs, and if one player wins such a prize and/or jackpot, the other players may lose out on the opportunity to win that jackpot, although such competition for a common prize is not, by itself, considered to be competing against other players in the same sense as in a tournament). In some instances, an electronic gaming machine may generally only be operable in a wagering mode, in which case “wagering mode” may simply be viewed as the default operating state of the electronic gaming machine. Electronic gaming machines in wagering mode where actual monetary wagers are in play are strictly regulated and subject to extensive restrictions on how individual game outcomes are determined.
The term “tournament mode,” as used herein, refers to a mode of electronic gaming machine operation in which the electronic gaming machine is operable for play of a wagering game in a manner similar to play during wagering mode but in a competitive multiplayer setting. Such competitive multiplayer settings may generally exhibit one or more characteristics that set them apart from “wagering mode” game play. For example, in tournament mode, players competing in a particular tournament session may be given the same duration of time in which to play the subject wagering game, e.g., all players get 2 minutes in which to try and get as high a score as possible in the wagering game; in most such implementations, the time periods given to the players in a particular session may not only be all equal in length, but may also have the same start and end times. In contrast, during wagering mode game play, players are free to play for as little or as long as they like (assuming they have sufficient credits), and the duration of play of one player is not connected with the duration of play of other players. In another example, tournament mode game play results are typically used to generate a relative ranking of players that are participating in the tournament or in a tournament session. In wagering mode game play, in contrast, players are not typically ranked against one another. In one implementation, as discussed above, the player may be provided with an infinite or very large pool of (e.g., non-cashable) credits that may be wagered during a time period for a tournament session in order to potentially win (e.g., non-cashable) credits (in contrast to wagering mode game play, in some implementations, the credits from winnings in tournament mode using non-cashable credits may be kept separate from the credits in the wagering credit pool). In tournament mode, the player's objective is to obtain as many credits as possible during the tournament session time period; at the end of the time period, the player's credit winnings may be compared against the credit winnings of other players engaged in tournament mode play during that time period, and determinations may be made as to which player(s) won the tournament session based on the players' credit winnings. A single tournament may feature multiple rounds of sessions, with players' performance in those tournament sessions being taken into account in determining who wins the tournament or who may advance to play in tournament sessions in later rounds. For example, a tournament may be structured such that every player plays in a first round of tournament sessions, with the three highest scorers from each tournament session being advanced to a subsequent round of tournament sessions, in which the three highest scorers of each tournament session in the subsequent round of tournament sessions are then advanced to a further subsequent round of tournament sessions, with the pool of players and the number of tournament sessions provided in each round of the tournament growing smaller and smaller until a final round is played with a single tournament session. In some other tournaments, a similar tiered tournament session round structure may be utilized, but a player's eligibility to participate in a subsequent round may be based on their score in the tournament session for the current round. For example, players achieving tournament session scores in the upper 25% of the scores achieved in all of the tournament sessions for the round may be advanced to the subsequent round of tournament sessions. Players may win awards, including monetary awards, for their placement in the tournament or other achievements, e.g., trophies won, etc., but such awards may not be directly tied to any actual monetary wager in many implementations. Accordingly, tournament mode gameplay that uses non-cashable credits is generally not subject to the same regulatory restrictions and controls that are placed on wagering mode play.
Various implementations of tournament systems according to this disclosure may offer several benefits. For example, the tournament systems and techniques discussed herein may encourage players to visit a casino more often, thereby potentially driving up casino revenue. Such systems may also cause players that visit a casino to participate in a tournament to spend additional time at the casino before, after, and/or during their tournament play, thereby further increasing revenues for the casino. Tournament systems that run tournaments that do not involve wagering games in which players may win cashable credits may offer other technical benefits as well—for example, regulations that typically govern the RTP or randomness of EGMs in most jurisdictions may not apply to EGMs that are operating in a tournament mode and providing winnings of non-cashable credits.
The present inventors have determined that tournament play may be made even more engaging to players by activating various wagering game features for the EGMs used in a tournament session during the course of the tournament session (for clarity, reference to “session” herein is to be understood, unless otherwise indicated through context, to refer to a “tournament session”). A tournament session, as the term is used herein, refers to a multiplayer gaming event in which a group of players engage in competitive multiplayer play against each other on wagering game machines and/or in online or mobile wagering game play in the context of a gaming tournament for a certain time period. The play of each player during a tournament session is generally continuous and the composition of each group of players within a tournament session does not typically change during the tournament session. Such wagering game features may, for example, be activated at various times during the session, with different wagering game features being activated at different times and the activation of such features being orchestrated to enhance player excitement and engagement with the tournament. In some respects, tournament game play, as set forth herein in some implementations, may be viewed as a complete player entertainment experience, similar to participating in an amusement park ride.
The player's engagement with the tournament may, in some implementations, begin off-site from a casino or other wagering game facility, e.g., in the comfort of the player's home, while in the office, or out running errands. A casino or other wagering game facility (“casino” will be used herein to refer to any facility that may have electronic gaming machines on-site) intending to hold a wagering game tournament may select the player, as well as various other players, as potential participants in the tournament and may cause notifications to be sent to each such selected player via, for example, a smartphone application that is installed on the player's phone. In some implementations, the smartphone application may be a concierge application for the casino. In some other implementations, the smartphone application may, for example, be an online or mobile wagering game application (or an application that allows a person to select between a plurality of such online or mobile wagering game applications, e.g., the Heart of Vegas application offered by Aristocrat® Technologies, Inc.). Online or mobile wagering game applications, in many jurisdictions, do not allow wagers to be placed using cashable credits (and do not allow any won credits to be cashed out); instead, online or mobile wagering game applications typically operate using some form of virtual currency. The player may receive such virtual currency through a variety of means, e.g., by receiving a free quantity of such virtual currency at various times, e.g., on a daily basis, by purchasing a quantity of such virtual currency using real currency, or through obtaining additional virtual currency by making winning wagers using the virtual currency in the online or mobile wagering game application (as used herein, “online” may also refer to mobile contexts). The online wagering game application may, in many implementations, offer game play that is similar to game play on an EGM of a similar wagering game. The player may thus have a common experience with the wagering game, regardless of whether played on an EGM in a casino or on a smartphone at home—the only difference would be that play on the EGM would generally entail the use (and winning) of cashable credits, whereas play on the online version of the same wagering game would typically involve the use (and winning) of non-cashable credits (although EGMs used in tournament implementations may be configured, in some implementations, to use non-cashable credits as well, making the experience of playing such a wagering game online and in a tournament setting very similar). This distinction may not exist in jurisdictions that permit online wager gaming using cashable credits. In some implementations, online wagering game application(s) and casino concierge applications may be combined into a single application or application experience.
Various details of a tournament experience are discussed below with reference to
While a large percentage of players are likely to have smart phones with online wagering game applications and/or casino concierge applications, notifications inviting players to participate in a tournament may also be sent out to selected players through other mechanisms, e.g., through standard or multimedia text messages, email, physical mail, phone calls, social media posts, etc.
In some implementations, a player may be selected for participation in a tournament based on the player's play of an online wagering game. For example, a player that achieves a particular milestone in online wagering game play, e.g., achieving a lifetime total balance of virtual credits wagered in online wagering game play in excess of a predefined amount, achieving a particular game outcome in an online wagering game play, playing a particular online wagering game a predetermined number of times, etc., may be selected for participation in a tournament based on achieving one or more such milestones. Players may also be selected for participation in a tournament based on, for example, on-site activity at a casino, e.g., achieving a particular outcome on an EGM at the casino or a related property, spending a certain amount of money at restaurants or gift shops at the casino or a related property or properties, booking a hotel room of a particular value at the casino or a related property, etc. In another or further implementation, a player may be selected for participation in a tournament based on their performance in another tournament, e.g., a player may be selected to participate in a tournament that is on-site at a particular casino based on their placement in a previous online tournament.
In some implementations, a tournament may be configured to allow players to participate remotely via an online wagering game application. As mentioned earlier, EGMs configured for tournament play provide their players with a pool of credits to be used for wagering game play during the tournament; similarly, online wagering game application play may also involve a pool of credits to be used for online wagering game play; such credit pools may be finite in some implementations, but are often configured to be infinite for each player (it will be understood that in implementations with infinite credit pools, the EGM may, in some such implementations, not even draw wagers from a credit pool at all and may simply be configured to allow the player to engage in as many spins or plays as they like with a given wager amount during the tournament session. In view of this, some tournaments may be configured to allow players to participate in tournament play by playing wagering games either on an EGM or on, for example, a smartphone or tablet using an online wagering game application. Generally speaking, reference herein to EGMs may be understood to be inclusive of traditional EGMs, e.g., slot machines located in a casino or other venue, as well as alternative EGMs, e.g., smartphones, tablets, or other devices that may provide similar tournament game play experience. In such implementations, the tournament may be configured to allow for mixed play, in which players playing against each other in a tournament session may include players playing the wagering game on traditional EGMs and also players playing an online version of the wagering game via alternative EGMs. In such implementations, the wagering game used in the session may be the same wagering game for both the traditional EGM-based players and the alternative EGM-based online players. Tournaments may also be configured to offer segregated play for traditional EGM-based players and alternative EGM-based online players, e.g., a tournament may have some sessions where only traditional EGM-based players may participate, and other sessions where only alternative EGM-based online-based players may participate; this may help normalize the playing experience for players within a particular tournament session. Online players, for example, may not be provided with the same amount of information available to traditional EGM-based players, who can easily see and hear what other players are doing in the cluster of EGMs in which the traditional EGM-based players are playing. This enhanced situational awareness of traditional EGM-based players may cause traditional EGM-based players to engage in more aggressive play if they perceive that another player is on a “hot streak,” whereas alternative EGM-based online players may not be subject to such stimuli. Online players may also experience issues such as network lag that may cause their game play experience to be different from traditional EGM-based wagering game play. In some such tournaments, the tournament sessions for a first round of a tournament may include segregated alternative EGM-based online wagering game play tournament sessions and traditional EGM-based wagering game play tournament sessions, but the tournament sessions for a second round of that tournament may feature only traditional EGM-based wagering game play, thereby requiring the players that participated in the first round of tournament session play in an online format to physically visit the venue where the EGM-based tournament sessions are being offered in order to participate in the second round of tournament session play.
In many implementations, regardless of how a tournament that allows for both online and on-site, EGM-based play is configured to operate, the tournament may be configured to require that a participating player participate in at least some specified number of traditional EGM-based sessions during the tournament, which would require each player to physically visit a location where the tournament EGMs are accessible, e.g., a casino, in order, for example, to remain qualified for the tournament, to advance to a further round of play in the tournament, or in some other way continue participating in the tournament.
For example, a given tournament may require a player to participate in 5 of 100 qualifying sessions in order to qualify to potentially move on to a championship phase of the tournament; players with the highest total scores from the qualifying sessions may advance to the championship phase. In such an implementation, each player may be required to participate in at least one (or some other number) of the qualifying sessions on-site, but may be allowed to participate in the remaining qualifying sessions via online participation. In the championship phase, stricter participation rules may be implemented, e.g., the championship sessions may only be open to players that participate on-site, e.g., on an EGM, in those sessions.
There may be many ways in which a tournament system may be configured to run a tournament. For example, some tournaments may simply determine an overall tournament winner based on the player with the highest cumulative session score at the end of the tournament; in such instances, the more sessions a player plays, the higher likelihood that they will win the tournament (as the points or credits from every session played will contribute to their overall score).
In another implementation, the tournament system may be configured to determine a player's standing in the tournament based on a subset of the player's scores for the sessions they participated in. For example, the tournament system may determine each player's total tournament score by only using the player's top session score of multiple session scores as the player's score for a portion of the tournament, e.g., a round of the tournament, in which those multiple session scores were obtained. In another implementation, the tournament system may be configured to allow each player to play up to X tournament sessions during a given phase of the tournament, and may then sum the Y highest scores achieved across those tournament sessions to determine the player's score for that phase of the tournament (where X≥Y). Some tournament systems may be configured to allow some of the tournament sessions that are used to calculate a player's score for a given phase of a tournament to include one or more scores for sessions in which the player participated remotely, e.g., through online play as opposed to on-site play at the casino. In some such tournament systems, only a limited number Z of online sessions may be used by the tournament system to determine a player's Y top scores, where Z<Y. Various permutations of Y and Z may be used, including, but not limited to, Y=2 and Z=1, Y=3 and Z=1 or 2, Y=4 and Z=1, 2, or 3, and Y=5 and Z=1, 2, 3, or 4. For example, if a player participated in ten sessions, half of which were on-site sessions and half of which were online sessions, during a particular phase of a tournament, the tournament system may be configured to determine the player's tournament score for that phase of the tournament by summing together the player's three highest tournament session scores from the ten sessions, with a maximum of two of those highest tournament scores being allowed to be from online sessions. Thus, if the player scores during a tournament phase were: 20,100 (online), 19,800 (online), 18,540 (online), 16,330 (online), 16,100 (on-site), 14,230 (on-site), 12,210 (on-site), 9,840 (online), 7,320 (on-site), and 6,930 (on-site), the tournament system may determine the player's score for that phase of the tournament by summing the 1st highest score (20,100), the 2nd highest score (19,800), and the 5th highest score (16,100); the 3rd highest score and the 4th highest score, in this example, were not used since they were both from online sessions, and the 1st and 2nd highest scores had used up the allocated online session scores.
Other tournament configurations may allow for a “bracketed” system in which players compete against other players in the same “bracket” and then the top-scoring players in each bracket are allowed to advance into the next, smaller bracket to compete against the other players that were the top-scoring players in their brackets. Such bracketed competition may continue until only one bracket is left, at which point the winner of that final bracket may be declared the tournament champion. In some implementations, a player's score for determining whether or not they are a top-scoring player may be based on their performance in multiple tournament sessions, some of which may be played remotely, e.g., online. In such tournament implementations, each bracket may be considered a phase of the tournament, with the results of the bracket being determined by the outcomes of the tournament sessions within the bracket. In some implementations, player scores may be determined using a subset of the tournament sessions in which they played in the bracket, e.g., as described above (each bracket may be considered to be a different phase of the tournament).
Selections of players as potential participants in tournaments may be made using a tournament management system, for example, that may have access to a variety of different sources of data, including, for example, player tracking account information, casino transaction histories for players, online wagering game account data, etc., that may be used to drive selection of particular players. In some implementations, the players selected for participation may be selected based on various criteria being satisfied, e.g., players in a certain age group, e.g., 55 and older, between 21 and 30, etc., players having a particular status, e.g., Gold and Platinum level players, players that are enrolled in a player reward program, etc. The tournament management system may be configured to automatically make such selections and notify the selected players, or may be configured to present an interface to an administrator that allows the administrator to guide the selection of players, e.g., by enabling one or more filters or other criteria that are used to identify a population of selected players. Once the desired population of players has been determined, notifications may be sent out to those players inviting them to participate.
Once a player has received an invitation to participate in a tournament (or is otherwise notified of being eligible for participation in the tournament), the player may indicate, in some manner, that they accept the invitation. For example, the player may reply to the notification (or click a hyperlink in the notification) to indicate interest in participating. The tournament management system may track such responses or player actions and then add the players that indicate acceptance of the invitation to participate to a roster of participating players for the tournament.
Once a player is listed as participating in a tournament, various details of the player's participation may be specified and relayed to the player. For example, in some tournaments, players may be assigned by the tournament management system (TMS) a particular session in which they are scheduled to compete, and may need to show up at a designated location, e.g., on-site near the EGMs for the tournament, at a designated time in order to participate in the session. Similarly, in some implementations, players may be assigned by the TMS to a particular EGM in a particular session. In other implementations, the players may be provided with an interface, e.g., via smartphone or at an on-site kiosk, that allows them to select a particular session in which they wish to participate and/or a particular EGM that the player wishes to use during the session.
When a player's on-site session is about to begin, the players may each be directed to the EGM that each is assigned (or, if players are not pre-assigned an EGM, the players may be directed to pick any unoccupied EGM configured to participate in the session).
The topper displays 408 may be used for various purposes during the tournament, including for displaying graphical content indicating that the gaming machine in question is participating in a tournament, graphical content indicating an event or milestone achieved by the player of a particular EGM, graphical content indicating a particular phase of game play, etc. Since the topper display 408 of each EGM 402 is the most difficult display of the EGM 402 for the player thereof to focus on, the topper display may be used to display content that may be more for the benefit of spectators than the individual players; information intended for the individual players may be presented using displays that are positioned so as to be more easily viewed by the individual players, e.g., the main top display 410 and the main bottom display 412, for example.
The main top display 410 may, for example, be used to display leaderboard information and occasionally, other content, e.g., welcome messages, announcements of special play modes, win events, etc. The main bottom display 412 may, for example, be used to display wagering game content, e.g., reels, player controls, etc., in the wagering game display region 422, amounts won in a win display region 424, the player's current rank in the player rank region 414, the player's running total credits/points won for the current session in the score region 416, the amount of time remaining in the current session in the time remaining region 418, and any trophies or prizes won during the current session in the trophy display region 420.
In
A welcome message may be displayed, e.g., displayed on each EGM and/or on a kiosk display, topper display, leaderboard display, or other signage display, such as overhead sign 406 and leaderboard display 404, in order to welcome players to the upcoming session. In some implementations, as shown in
In some implementations, as shown in
In
In most implementations, the EGMs 402 will also each display a session countdown timer, e.g., in the time remaining region 418, that informs each player of how much time remains before the session will end and player scores are used to determine a session winner, second place finisher, and so forth. The EGMs 402 may, in some implementations, also present an EGM-based leaderboard display, similar to the leaderboard display discussed earlier and as seen displayed in the main top display 410 of the EGMs 402 in
When a session first begins, the players may be shown in various leaderboards in an order that does not actually reflect their relative ranking since, at the very start, all players may have the same score and thus the same rank—as players score more and more points, the physical positioning of each player on the leaderboard, as well as their numeric ranking, may be updated based on the updated scores received throughout the session. In some implementations, some leaderboards for a tournament system may be configured to display ranking information for players within the currently active (or most recently completed) tournament session, whereas other leaderboards for the tournament system may be configured to display ranking information for players within the tournament overall. Thus, for example, a tournament-level leaderboard may show the top 20 players in a tournament based on the total of those players' scores for all of the tournament sessions that the players participated in during the tournament, whereas a session-level leaderboard may show the top 20 players in the current or most recent tournament session based on the scores of those players attributable to that tournament session. In some implementations, the player rankings in the tournament may be based, for example, on the top session scores of each player or on the top X session scores for each player, e.g., the top two or top three session scores for each player). It is thus possible for both types of leaderboards to have completely different compositions and, in some cases, there may be no overlap between the two ranking lists.
In some implementations, an additional or alternative mechanism for conveying player ranking may be provided, on the EGM of each player and/or on a leaderboard or other signage or display, in the form of a “race” graphic in which graphical indicators representing each of the players may be caused to be animated so as to show relative standings between the players during the session that are more visually themed than a tabular leaderboard, allowing for players to easily determine their relative rankings within the tournament session with a quick glance during play, as compared with having to scan an entire leaderboard for their name. For example, in a buffalo-themed wagering game, each player may be represented by a graphic or an animation of a charging/running buffalo in a herd of charging/running buffalo; a background graphic, e.g., of prairie, may be caused to scroll in the direction opposite the apparent direction of travel of the buffalo to give the appearance that the buffalo are racing, e.g., racing across the prairie.
Similarly, if the score for a player whose graphical indicator is in the trailing group of buffalo graphical indicators starts approaching the score of the current player, the buffalo graphical indicator for that player may be caused to break away from the trailing group of buffalo graphical indicators and move towards the current player's buffalo graphical indicator, eventually passing it to join the leading group of buffalo graphical indicators once that player's score exceeds that of the current player.
In either case, a graphical indicator that is shown as having broken away from either the trailing or leading group of graphical indicators so as to approach the current player's graphical indicator may, if the score differential between that player and the current player starts increasing again, be caused to reverse course and rejoin whichever portion of the “herd” it was in prior to breaking away therefrom.
In some implementations, the graphical indicators for only a few of the players that have scores above and below the player's score may be shown in the race animation at various points in time. For example, only the graphical indicators for up to X, e.g., three, players with the closest higher scores and up to Y, e.g., three, players with the closest lower scores may be shown on the animation at any given point in time; this may prevent an overly crowded animation that makes it hard to see individual graphical indicators. In some such implementations, the highest-ranked player's graphical indicator may always be shown on the race animation, regardless of whether that player is within the group of X players that have scores higher than, and closest to, the player's score.
In some implementations, when the tournament session first begins, the graphical indicators for the players may be shown clustered together near the center of the race animation and may then separate and spread apart as the players start accumulating points. For example, in
Put more generally, a “race” representation of player ranking for an EGM may be provided by generating three groups of graphical indicators or other indicators of players: a first group of zero or more other players that have scores lower than the current player, a second group consisting of the current player (for ease of reference, this will be referred to as a group despite having only one member), and a third group of zero or more other players that have scores higher than the current player. The graphical indicators may generally be animated or otherwise caused to appear as if they are travelling in a direction extending from a first side of the race representation to a second, opposite side of the race representation.
The race representation may depict each group of graphical indicators as being spatially separated from most or all of the graphical indicators in either of the other groups of graphical indicators (or a single group of graphical indicators if the player does not have players both ahead and behind them in ranking), with the groups ordered by the average score of the players whose graphical indicators are in each group, and with the group having graphical indicator(s) with the lowest average score being positioned closest to the first side of the race representation and the group having the graphical indicator(s) with the highest average score being positioned closest to the second side of the race representation. When a parameter based on the score differential between a player having a graphical indicator in either the first group or the third group and the current player exceeds a first threshold criterion, the graphical indicator for that player may be caused to move away from the group in which it was located and towards the second group. If the score differential reverses sign, e.g., turns from a positive differential to a negative differential, or vice-versa, the graphical indicator for that player may be caused to move past the graphical indicator for the current player and towards whichever of the first group or the third group is in the direction of travel of that graphical indicator (in the case where either the first or third group is missing and the player's graphical indicator moves past the current player's graphical indicator and there is no group for the player's graphical indicator to merge into, the player's graphical indicator may then form the missing group). The parameter based on the score differential may, for example, be an absolute value of the score differential itself, the absolute value of the rate of change of the score differential, or some other characteristic. It will be understood that the above discussion is merely a broad, high-level framework, and that various modifications and refinements of such framework may be considered within the scope of this disclosure.
In yet further implementations, the graphical indicators for the players may simply be shown with relative spacing in between them that is proportionate to the difference in scores between those players. In such an implementation, the graphical indicators may not be clustered into groups so much as spread apart in a manner that reflects the current point spread between the players. In some such implementations, the entire spread of players may not be shown in the race animation at one time, with only the graphical indicators of a subset of the players shown at any given time for each race animation. For example, the race animation may scale so as to only show graphical indicators for players within X points of the current player (and possibly also the player in first place, regardless of the point difference between the first place player and the player for which the race animation is presented), or to only show the graphical indicators for the closest Y players, e.g., the closest 3 players.
Regardless of the specifics of how a race animation may be configured to convey relative positioning and ranking of players, it will be understood that the graphical indicator for each player, i.e., the graphical indicator representing the player of the EGM on which a particular race animation is presented, may be formatted in a way that contrasts it with the graphical indicators of other players. For example, the other player graphical indicators may be presented as semi-transparent, with a washed out appearance, or in a normal manner, whereas the graphical indicator for the player may be presented as being solid/opaque, as having vivid, non-washed-out colors, or having edge effects, e.g., white outlines or a glowing aura, that contrasts it with the other players' graphical indicators.
While the race graphics or animations discussed above feature a player-centric presentation, i.e., conveying relative player ranking information in a manner that allows a particular player to rapidly determine their ranking relative to other players (by highlighting the graphical indicator for that player or locating the graphical indicator for that player in a particular location, such as the center of the display), other implementations of race graphics or animations may provide a non-player-centric presentation. For example, the race graphic that is shown on the overhead sign 406 in
Another feature that may be part of some race animations is an extra graphical indicator that represents the player with the highest tournament session score achieved during similar sessions during the course of the day. For example, if the tournament-wide highest tournament session score was achieved in the fourth session of the tournament, the graphical indicator for the player that achieved that tournament session score may be added to the race animations for every subsequent session (at least, for that round of sessions) until a player beats that tournament session score, at which point the graphical indicator that is shown in race animations for subsequent tournament sessions will be updated to reflect that new highest tournament session score. In some implementations, the highest-scoring player's graphical indicator may be caused to update its position relative to the other graphical indicators in the race animation based on the highest-scoring player's score over time from the earlier session—thus, the players of the current session may, in effect, race the highest-scoring player's score from a previous session.
A similar feature may be used to convey other information—for example, if the top X players in a tournament will receive some sort of award at the conclusion of the tournament (or at the conclusion of a particular phase of the tournament, e.g., a current round of the tournament), an additional graphical indicator may be included in a race graphic or animation that represents the player that is currently in the X ranked position, regardless of whether or not they are participating in the current tournament session. For example, a player-centric race graphic may include a graphical indicator that represents the player in the X ranked position in the tournament. In such an implementation, the relative position of the graphical indicator for the player of the EGM on which the race graphic is shown relative to the graphical indicators of other players in the current tournament session may be determined according to the scores attained by each of those players within that tournament session. In contrast, the relative position of the graphical indicator for the player of the EGM on which that race graphic is shown relative to the graphical indicator for the X ranked player may be determined similarly, but taking into account as well the current player's total tournament score. For example, if the current player had 21,000 points at the start of a tournament session and has earned an additional 3000 points so far during the tournament session, the position of the player's graphical indicator relative to the graphical indicator for the X ranked player may be determined based on the X ranked player's total tournament score, e.g., which may be 25,000 points in this example, as compared with the current player's total tournament score, e.g., 24,000 points. Alternatively, the X ranked player's score may be normalized to account for the current player's pre-tournament session tournament score before being compared with the current player's tournament session score. For example, the X ranked player's score of 25,000 points may be normalized to the player's score by subtracting the 21,000 points that the current player had at the start of the current tournament session to make the X ranked player's score 4000 points—the position of the current player's graphical indicator relative to the X ranked player's graphical indicator may then be determined by comparing the current player's tournament session score against the X ranked player's normalized score of 4000 points.
In some implementations, a similar additional graphical indicator may be included to represent the top-ranked player in the tournament (this, for example, would be equivalent to a graphical indicator for a situation where X=1 in the above example, although there may be players with ranks lower than X that may receive awards).
It will be understood that there may be a variety of different types of leaderboards provided by the tournament system, each of which may provide player ranking information to different degrees of granularity and completeness and/or in different styles. For example, one or more of the leaderboard display 404 may be placed at various locations within a tournament area, or displayed on separate displays, e.g., at locations outside of the tournament area (such as on a display in a bar or restaurant in the tournament venue, or even in a location outside of the tournament venue, such as in another casino. Leaderboard displays, as the term is used herein, may be used to refer to displays that are generally separate from EGMs 402 and/or overhead sign 406 and which may be placed as desired to provide tournament information to players, spectators, etc. In some implementations, overhead signs 406 may also be repositionable to allow for tournaments to be conducted at various different locations within a casino, e.g., using EGMs that provide different wagering games for each tournament. Some leaderboard displays may be temporarily attached to EGMs, e.g., to the sides of EGMs at the ends of a bank of EGMs, but may be easily removable; such leaderboard displays are still, within the scope of this disclosure, considered to be separate from the EGMs to which they are attached since they are designed to be easily removable without affecting the functionality provided by the EGM(s) to which they are attached.
Leaderboard information may also or alternatively be provided on the overhead sign 406 (such as in
Leaderboard information that is depicted on the displays of the EGM, e.g., the main top display 410, the main bottom display 412, the topper display 408, and/or the virtual button deck 436, may be referred to herein as “EGM-based leaderboards” or “EGM-based leaderboard displays.”
As noted above, leaderboard information provided on any of the various types of leaderboards/displays discussed above may be depicted in a variety of ways. One possible depiction is a ranked listing of players, with the highest-ranked player at the top of the list, and the players shown in descending order. Another type of leaderboard depiction is a “race graphic” or “race animation,” such as is discussed above, in which icons or graphical indicators of at least some players are shown in a manner that indicates the relative ranking of at least one player relative to the ranking of one or more other players in a format that suggests a race or that the field of players is moving towards a particular goal.
As the tournament session progresses, players may make multiple plays of the wagering game that is the focus of the tournament, with their winnings accruing to their total score for the session.
In some implementations, the “big win” may be one of several levels of notable win events that may be tracked, with each level associated with a different lower limit and with the notification that is provided to a particular player responsive to achieving such a notable win event being of the highest level that the player's winning outcome is eligible for. For example, there may be five levels of notable win events that a player may be recognized for: a “big win,” which may occur for wins of 8× or more of the wager made, a “great win,” which may occur for wins of 12× or more of the wager made, a “huge win,” which may occur for wins of up to 20× or more of the wager made, a “super win,” which may occur for wins of up to 50× or more of the wager made, and an “amazing win,” which may occur for wins of 100× or more of the wager made. If a player, for example, achieves a winning outcome for a play that results in a 60 credit (or point) win based on a 1 credit wager, then they may be rewarded with a notable win event notification saying “Super win!” or the like. Notable win event notifications may be displayed on a particular player's EGM 402 for a given period of time before, for example, being faded out and no longer visible. In some implementations, when a notable win event notification is displayed, the player of the EGM 402 on which it is displayed may still be able to make further plays of the wagering game while the notable win event notification is displayed.
Another feature shown in
A “Pole Position” trophy awarded to the player for a tournament session with the most points after X seconds, e.g., 10 seconds, has elapsed from the start of the tournament session.
A “Come from Behind” trophy awarded to the player for a tournament session who moves up the most ranks within a given time interval, e.g., 1:35 to 1:50.
Another “Come from Behind” trophy awarded to the player who finishes within the top X places, e.g., 3, 5, or 10 places, in a tournament session but had the lowest rank at a predetermined time, e.g., the halfway point, during the tournament session.
A “Photo Finish” trophy awarded to players for a tournament session who are within X points, e.g., 5000 points, of first place at the conclusion of the tournament session.
A “Collector” trophy awarded to players for a tournament session who get the most occurrences across all of their session game plays of one or more particular, specified symbols. For example, in a Buffalo-themed wagering game, “buffalo” symbols may occasionally be shown in one or more reel stops, and the total number of such buffalo symbols that occur for each player during the session may be tallied up, and the player with the largest number of buffalo symbol occurrences may be awarded a collector trophy, which may, for example, alternatively be named a “Buffalo Herd” trophy.
A “Biggest Feature Win” trophy awarded to the player for a tournament session with the highest paying free spin feature during the tournament session.
A “Last-to-First” trophy awarded to the player for a tournament session who is in last place in the tournament session at a particular time during the tournament session, e.g., the halfway point, and who then finishes in first place in the tournament session when it finishes.
A “Back-to-Back” trophy awarded to the player for the tournament session who gets two particular types of wins in a row.
A “Best Reflex” or “Hot Shot” trophy awarded to the first player for the tournament session to hit the play or spin button (i.e., first person out of the gate) in the tournament session.
A “Got the Beat” trophy awarded to the player for a tournament session who hits the play button the most times during the tournament session.
Trophies may have various effects depending on the particular configuration of a tournament. In some implementations, trophies may cause a predefined amount of points to be added to the player's score immediately upon the trophy being obtained or earned. In some other implementations, trophies may be associated with predefined point values that may be added to a player's score at the end of the session. In such implementations, if the additional points increase the player's score enough to cause the player's rank to increase, this may result in the player moving up in the leaderboard at the end of the session. For example, if the second place player has a trophy that awards an amount of points that is sufficient to cause the second-place player's rank to increase to first place, then that player may be crowned the winner of that session.
In some additional or alternative implementations, trophies may have benefits other than, or in place of, additional points. For example, trophies may serve as vouchers, or be exchangeable for vouchers, that allow the trophy holder to obtain a predefined benefit, such as a free meal, a free drink, an amount of promotional credits that may be wagered in non-tournament wagering game play, or non-cashable credits that may be used in online play, e.g., social wagering game play. In some implementations, trophies that are won by each player may be associated with the player for at least the duration of the tournament and may be used to award various other prizes. For example, the tournament system may be configured to track the number of trophies won by each player during the tournament, and may then, at the conclusion of the tournament, conduct a random selection of one or more players based on the number of trophies won by each player during the tournament. For example, each trophy may be treated as a virtual lottery ticket, and a winner may be selected from all of the players who earned trophies by randomly picking one of the trophy-earning players from the pool of all trophy-earning players. Each such trophy-earning player may have a chance to win such a prize that is commensurate with the number of trophies won by that player during the tournament divided by the total number of trophies won during the tournament. For example, if a player earned 4 trophies over the course of a tournament, and the players in the tournament collectively earned 24 trophies, that particular player would have a ⅙ chance of winning the end-of-tournament lottery. The winner of such a trophy lottery may be provided with a prize that is separate from whatever prize is awarded to the highest-ranked player of the tournament. In some implementations, additional achievements, e.g., each win of a tournament session, may earn a player an additional chance to win a drawing at the conclusion of the tournament.
As can be seen from
For example, in some implementations, the tournament system may be configured to cause all of the EGMs 402 for all of the players to enter into a “sticky wilds” mode (which may also be referred to herein as a “persistent wild” mode). In reel-based wagering games, players cause a plurality of reels to be “spun” (in modern EGMs, the reels are virtual/digital representations of reels) and score credits or points based on which combinations of symbols are displayed across the reels when the reels stop moving. Typically, a portion of each reel having multiple symbols, e.g., 3 or 5 symbols, is visible when the reel stops rotating; the positions in which the symbols stop when the reels stop rotating are commonly referred to as “reel stops.”
A “wild” symbol is typically viewed as equivalent to a plurality of other symbols featured on the reels or, in some cases, any symbol featured on the reels. A wild symbol can thus usually be used in place of any given symbol in order to complete a pattern. “Sticky wilds” mode refers to a mode in which any wild symbols that are located at a reel stop when the sticky wilds mode is active and the reels stop spinning are retained for subsequent plays while sticky wilds mode is active. Thus, for example, if three wild symbols are obtained during a first play of the wagering game during sticky wilds mode, those three wild symbols will remain at those reel stops when the reels are spun again during the sticky wilds mode. If an additional two wild symbols are obtained during the subsequent play of the wagering game, then the next play of the wagering game while sticky wilds mode is active will result in at least five reel stops having wild symbols in them. As more and more wild symbols remain “stuck” in the reel stops, the chances of forming a winning pattern of symbols increases with each additional wild symbol obtained.
If used, a sticky wilds mode may be limited to a certain duration, e.g., 10 seconds (if of too long a duration, there is a risk that there will be too many wild symbols in play, with maximum wins achieved on every spin, which would be somewhat pointless).
In
In this case, the far left EGM 402 is also displaying a “1st” indicator in the topper display 408, which may be provided whenever a player moves into the first-ranked position, as Player 1 has in this instance; displaying the “1st” indicator on, for example, a topper display 408 may make it easier for spectators and other players to see which player is in the lead, which may generate increased excitement as other players may be alerted as to who is the current leader, which may introduce an aspect of personalization to the tournament. Similar such displays may be provided on the topper displays 408 of EGMs 402 for other players as well, e.g., a “2nd” and “3rd” indicator may be displayed on the topper display 408 on the EGMs 402 for the players that are currently ranked second and third within the tournament session (based on their tournament session scores).
In addition (or alternative) to the potential display of the top-ranked players' ranks on the topper display 408, some tournament systems may activate other features of the EGMs 402 when the player of a respective EGM 402 achieves a particular rank. For example, when a player moves into a first-place position, the EGM 402 on which they are playing may be caused to, for example, flash the candle on top of the EGM 402 (the candle, as alluded to earlier with respect to candle 138 in
In some implementations, the EGMs 402 may also be caused to generate indications of a loss in rank of a player. For example, if the first-ranked player is unseated by another player and moves to second place, the “Pt” indicator displayed on the first player's topper (or other portion of the player's EGM 402) may be caused to flash briefly and then morph into “2nd”; when the lowest-ranked player having their ranking displayed on the topper display 408 of their EGM 402 (or otherwise emphasized) is unseated and thus moves into a ranking that is not displayed on the topper display 408 of their EGM 402, their previous ranking may be animated in a way that makes it disappear instead of being replaced with the player's new ranking. Such transitions may be accompanied, in some instances, with corresponding sound effects. For example, audio or sounds associated with disappointment or the end of something, e.g., “whomp-whomp,” “doh!,” violins playing sad music, a bursting bubble sound, the sound of a motor dying, screeching tires, crashing noises, breaking glass, or other such audio cues may be played whenever a player in the top-ranked position, or one of the top-ranked positions, is unseated by another player.
In
In
In
Another feature that may be triggered at some point during the play of a tournament session is an all wins multiplier mode in which, for a given interval of time, all wins on all EGMs 402 are multiplied by a specified multiplier factor. For example, in
If desired, a further all wins multiplier mode, e.g., with a higher score multiplier factor, e.g., 3×, may be initiated after an earlier all wins multiplier mode, e.g., a 2× all wins multiplier mode. For example, as shown in
In some implementations, when the remaining time for a session drops below a threshold amount, e.g., 5 seconds, a session countdown timer may be displayed, e.g., as shown in
It will be appreciated that, as discussed in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/913,685, some implementations of such systems may include a base multiplier that is applied to all win amounts awarded by the EGMs 402; such a base multiplier may be further augmented by the further application of one or more all wins multipliers. Use of a base multiplier may allow for scores during a tournament to have higher numeric values as compared with the number of credits that would normally be won for an equivalent outcome on such EGMs 402 during non-tournament play of that EGM 402. In many such instances in which base multipliers and all wins multipliers may be used, the base multiplier may be set to a value that may be considerably higher than that of the all wins multiplier(s). For example, a base multiplier value of 10 or 100 may be used in some instances while one or more all wins multiplier(s) having values of 2, 3, 4, or 5 may be used. In such systems, the multiplier(s) that are active (base multiplier and/or all wins multiplier(s)) may be applied by the tournament management system to each win amount that is reported out by each EGM 402. For example, each time an EGM 402 generates a non-zero winning outcome (or a non-consecutive zero outcome), it may send a message to the tournament management system with the win amount; the tournament management system may then apply the relevant multiplier(s) and then send the result back to the EGM 402 for presentation to the player. The win amount, as used herein, may refer to an amount that corresponds to an outcome determined by a wagering game in a multiplayer tournament setting, but which may then be modified by one or more of the multipliers discussed above before being presented to the player as the result of that play and used in determining the player's session score.
Once the session has ended, all of the EGMs 402 may be caused to no longer accept further plays or wagering events that count towards the tournament session score. As shown in
In many tournament system implementations, the wagering game that is used for tournament play may generally be similar to a wagering game that is available for standard, non-tournament wagering play. By using wagering games that are familiar to players from their typical casino experiences, tournaments may attract players that have interest in such wagering games already, as well as potentially introduce players that have not played such wagering games before to a new player experience, which may cause such players to seek out the non-tournament version of such a wagering game in the future.
However, some features of non-tournament wagering games may be generally unsuited for tournament mode play. For example, in some wagering games, players may occasionally be rewarded with benefits like free plays or bonus games. In the context of a tournament session, free plays may be worthless since the players are provided with an infinite pool of credits with which to make wagers. Moreover, the extra time required to play a bonus game may occupy a significant portion of the total session time—this is time that a player cannot use to place further wagers (or make further plays or spins). Players of the non-tournament version of the wagering game, however, will be used to encountering such game features, and will feel that they are missing out on the game experience if such features are not present in some form. For example, if a free spin round/bonus is typically won in the non-tournament version of the wagering game when 3 or more scatter symbols are obtained on a play, the player will expect a) to also see scatter symbols appear periodically during tournament session play and b) to receive a benefit when enough such scatter symbols, e.g., 3 scatter symbols, are obtained on a given play of the wagering game. In tournament mode, such a wagering game may be configured differently in order to still provide players with a familiar, although slightly different, experience.
For example, if there are wagering game features that provide, for example, a bonus game play or free plays, during non-tournament wagering game play, those same features may be configured to instead provide other benefits during tournament play. For example, if various numbers of scatter symbols are obtained in a given wagering game play during the tournament session, the player may be rewarded with a personalized score multiplier, i.e., a score multiplier that only affects their score and does not extend to other players' scores. Such a score multiplier may, for example, apply to the next 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. plays that the player makes after obtaining the scatter symbols; the number of plays for which the score multiplier is in effect, as well as the magnitude of the score multiplier, may be determined based on the number of scatter symbols that are obtained by the player, with increased numbers of scatter symbols being obtained resulting in increasingly larger numbers of plays in which the score multipliers may be in effect and/or larger score multipliers.
Scatter symbols, for clarity, refer to particular symbols that may result from a reel spin; in contrast to normal reel symbols, which must be obtained in particular patterns or on sequential reels in order to achieve a beneficial effect, e.g., a winning outcome, scatter symbols simply require that at least a predetermined number of such symbols be obtained, regardless of the patterns that such symbols may make or be part of, on a wagering game play in order to reap the benefits thereof. In some implementations, scatter symbols may also be eligible to form part of a winning symbol pattern, e.g., if five scatter symbols are obtained in a row across five reels, this may be considered a winning outcome—the five scatter symbols, however, may also count towards the scatter symbol count that may trigger, for example, a personalized score multiplier. In some implementations, any point or credit amount won based on a winning outcome involving scatter symbols may be held in reserve, in effect, until the conclusion of whatever wager game feature may be triggered by the scatter symbols. For example, if a five-in-a-row pattern of scatter symbols is obtained, this may a) cause a personalized score multiplier mode to be enabled and b) cause the player to receive 2000 credits or points. However, in some implementations, the 2000 credits or points may not be added to the player's running total while the personalized score multiplier mode is active, and may only be added after the personalized score multiplier mode has ended.
In some implementations, the player may be rewarded for a given scatter symbol outcome with a personal “wild multiplier mode” in which, for a predetermined number of subsequent plays, any wild symbols that the player obtains may turn into 2× or 3× multipliers. In such implementations, any occurrence of a wild symbol on a given play may be randomly replaced with a 2× or 3× multiplier symbol; all of the multiplier symbols that are displayed on the wagering game display region 422 of a player's EGM 402 may then be multiplied together and any amount won on the same game play may be multiplied by the resulting product. Thus, for example, if a player achieves a reel display outcome that includes five wild symbols that then change into three 2× score multipliers and two 3× score multipliers, the player's score for that play will be multiplied by 2·2·2·3·3=72, e.g., if the player achieves an outcome that provides a 50× return on the initial wager, then, with the wild multiplier mode score multiplier, the actual outcome for that play, based on a 1 credit wager, will be 2·2·2·3·3·50=3600.
In some implementations, achieving various predetermined numbers of scatter symbols during a wild multiplier mode wagering game play may cause an extension of the wild multiplier mode, e.g., additional spins or wagering game plays in which the wild multiplier mode is active. For example, obtaining three scatter symbols during non-wild multiplier mode session play may cause the player to be rewarded by enabling the wild multiplier mode for the next three plays or spins. Similarly, obtaining four scatter symbols during non-wild multiplier mode session play may cause the player to be rewarded by enabling the wild multiplier mode for the next four plays or spins, and obtaining five scatter symbols during non-wild multiplier mode session play may cause the player to be rewarded by enabling the wild multiplier mode for the next five plays or spins. If a predetermined number of scatter symbols are obtained by the player while the wild multiplier mode is active, the wild multiplier mode may be extended by a predetermined amount, e.g., based on the number of scatter symbols obtained while the wild multiplier mode is active.
In some implementations, if the player achieves X scatter symbols during non-wild multiplier mode tournament session play, and X is between Y and Z, inclusive (Y and Z may, for example, be 3 and 5), then the player may be rewarded by enabling wild multiplier mode for the next X plays or spins. In some such implementations, if the player achieves A scatter symbols during wild multiplier mode tournament session play, and A is between B and C, inclusive (B and C may, for example, be 2 and 4), the wild multiplier mode may be extended for another A plays or spins. In some implementations, Z and C may not be used, e.g., there may be a lower limit Y and/or B, but no upper limit Z and/or C on X and/or A, respectively. In some implementations, a notification may be displayed on a display of the EGM 402 indicating the number of plays remaining where the wild multiplier mode will be enabled; each time the player makes a further play, the counter indicating the number of plays remaining in wild multiplier mode will be decremented by one. If the player earns additional plays in the wild multiplier mode, then the counter indicating the number of plays remaining in wild multiplier mode will be incremented by the number of additional such plays. In other implementations, a notification may be displayed on a display of the EGM 402 indicating the number of the current spin out of the total awarded spins where the wild multiplier mode will be enabled (e.g., spin 3 of 5); each time the player makes a further play, the counter indicating the spin being played in wild multiplier mode will be incremented by one. If the player earns additional plays in the wild multiplier mode, then the counter indicating the total number of wild multiplier mode plays awarded will be incremented by the number of additional such plays.
In
In
In
In
In
Plays in the wild multiplier mode may be continued until the last play in the wild multiplier mode is used up, e.g., as shown in
In addition to the various gameplay-related features discussed above, tournament systems such as are discussed herein may also feature numerous auditory features that may be used to enhance players' experiences and that may be activated or triggered based on the elapsed duration of a session. Such auditory features may include the playing of sound effects, voiceovers or announcements, and/or soundtracks. For example, for tournament sessions that are typically of a fixed duration, a soundtrack or other music may be selected that is tailored according to the session duration. Such a soundtrack may, for example, have one or more segments, with a first segment of the one or more segments having a duration equivalent to the session duration. Other segments may, for example, include a segment that is played before the first segment and that includes music that may be played while players move to their EGMs 402 in preparation for session play, as well as a segment that is played after the first segment and that includes music that may be designed to calm players down after a frenetic session of wagering game play. Such a calming segment of music may have a lower volume and/or slower tempo than the portion of the soundtrack played during the last portion of the session in order to provide a calming effect.
In some implementations, the first segment may be divided into two or more portions, with a first portion thereof preceding a second portion thereof when the soundtrack is played, and with the second portion having a tempo and/or a volume level that is greater, e.g., greater on average or having a greater peak value, than the tempo and/or volume level of the first portion. In such implementations, the music in the second portion may instill increased excitement in players since the volume and/or tempo of the second portion may increase in magnitude. This may correlate, for example, with the activation of various wagering game features, e.g., multiplier mode and/or sticky wilds mode.
In some implementations, the soundtrack may include, in addition to, as part of, or in place of the music, a Shepard scale, which is a sound effect that causes an auditory illusion in listeners. The Shepard scale (or Shepard tone) is a sound that appears to continuously increase or decrease in pitch, depending on the nature of the scale, as it is played—regardless of how long it is played for. The Shepard scale effect, for example, may be generated by simultaneously and cyclically playing multiple ascending (or descending) scales that are each separated from the closest neighboring scale(s) by one octave. The volume of the scales may be at a maximum near the middle of each scale, with the volume fading to zero or near zero at the start and end of each scale. The auditory effect is analogous to the visual effect of a rotating barber pole, in which slanted lines overlap one another in the vertical direction and appear to continuously move downward as the pole rotates, with no apparent end. A Shepard tone may use discrete scales or may use continuous scales; the latter option may also be referred to as a Shepard-Risset glissando, although the term Shepard scale is used herein to refer to either type of Shepard scale. The apparently continuously increasing (or decreasing) pitch of a Shepard scale, despite the actual audible structure of Shephard tone failing to do so, typically causes the human mind to experience a state of unease and tension that may cause heightened emotional investment in the source of the Shepard scale, e.g., the play of the wagering game. The use of a Shepard scale in a tournament session soundtrack, for example, may cause a player to experience increasing degrees of tension and emotional investment as the session progresses towards its conclusion, making the tournament session more memorable to the player.
In some implementations, the soundtrack for a given wagering game provided for tournament play may be composed of various portions, e.g., an intro portion, a loop or middle portion, and an outro portion. The soundtrack may be assembled in real-time or near-real-time depending on the session duration, with the intro portion played first, one or more repetitions of the middle or loop portion, and closing with the outro. The end of the intro portion, the start of the outro portion, and the start and end of the middle or loop portions may all be tailored such that the portions may be assembled into a cohesive musical experience in which the intro portion smoothly transitions to the middle or loop portion, and each loop or middle portion may smoothly transition to either a following middle or loop portion or the outro portion. In some implementations, the outro portion may have a higher tempo and/or volume level, e.g., a higher peak tempo and/or volume or a higher average volume and/or tempo, than the intro portion. In some cases, a tournament system may be configured to allow for a selection of a session duration from multiple possible session durations, with each offered session duration having a duration equal to the sum of the duration of the middle or loop portion multiplied by a positive whole integer X, the duration of the intro portion, and the outro portion.
Tournament systems as described herein may also provide various audible announcements that may convey information to the players and/or provide information regarding wagering game or tournament events. For example, pre-recorded messages such as “Welcome to the tournament!,” “Enjoy your tournament!,” “Get ready to lead the herd!,” “Almost time to charge ahead!,” “It's BUUUUFFAAAAALLOOOOO Time!,” “Get ready to party!,” or “Let's rock!” may be triggered before a session starts, e.g., after a player completes a sign-in or registration process. Similarly, messages such as “Welcome to the slot tournament!,” “Players, take your seats!,” or “Pick a seat—any seat!” may be prerecorded and played, for example, just before the session is about to begin and while the players are taking their seats.
After the players have taken their seats and just before actual session play is to begin, the tournament system may, in some cases, provide an additional pre-recorded message, e.g., “Ladies and gentlemen. Let's get this party started!,” “Ladies and gentlemen, get ready to play!,” or “Ladies and gentlemen, here we go!” Various other pre-recorded announcements may be automatically triggered during session play depending on the occurrence of various events, e.g., when a first place player is displaced to second place by another player, the tournament system may be caused to provide a prerecorded announcement such as “We have a new leader!,” “Someone new just took the lead!,” or “We have a new player in 1st place!”
In addition to such pre-recorded announcements, additional commentary or instructions may be provided by a live tournament director, e.g., an employee of the casino offering the tournament. The tournament director may, for example, act as a master-of-ceremonies (MC) for the tournament, assisting players with registering for the tournament, managing the seating of players for each session, initiating the start of each session, providing commentary on events during each session, and then engaging in post-session commentary, interviews with winning players, and other functions.
In order to facilitate the MC's role, the tournament system may include a tablet or similar computing device, e.g., a hand-held computing device with a touch-screen display (which may be referred to herein as a tournament host tablet or THT), that may execute one or more programs to provide graphical user interfaces for managing aspects of tournament configuration, player enrollment, monitoring of wagering game play during tournament sessions, and other aspects of the tournament system.
For example, during session wagering game play, the tablet may provide a GUI depicting player indications with a summary of player scores, ranking, trophy accumulation, big win events, names, current score multiplier (if any), number of wild multiplier mode plays remaining (if any), or other information that may be used by the MC to provide commentary regarding events of interest during the session, e.g., when a particular player is experiencing a significant score multiplier, when a particular player wins a trophy, when a particular player makes it into one of the top three rankings, etc. In some implementations, the GUI may consist of an overhead representation of the physical layout of the EGMs that are participating in the tournament; in such a GUI, the information associated with each player participating in a given session may be presented within the representation of the EGM which that player is using (and/or in close proximity to such a representation). For example, in a tournament with 24 EGMs, such an overhead representation may include three 4×2 rectangular arrays of rectangles, with the arrays centered along a common axis that the long axis of each rectangular array is perpendicular to. Each rectangle may represent one of the EGMs, and the name of the player playing that EGM, their current score, ranking, etc., may be displayed in the rectangle representing that EGM.
In some implementations, the GUI may be configured to highlight player indications for players based on various conditions, e.g., with a different color, or by alternating the background color for each player indication, or alternating the color or appearance of a border around the player indication. For example, in some implementations, the GUI may highlight all player indications for players having scores that are above a particular threshold, e.g., scores that are in the top 10 scores for a session. In some additional or alternative implementations, the GUI may highlight the player indication for a player that is experiencing the current highest rate of score change over the most recent time interval of a predetermined duration, e.g., over the last 5 seconds.
The tablet GUI may include controls that allow the MC to, for example, engage in live commentary, e.g., via a wireless headset and microphone linked to the tablet, that may be relayed over a sound system, e.g., speakers of the EGMs 402 and/or other speakers, such as speakers in the overhead sign 406 or leaderboard display 404, to the players and any spectators that may be watching. The tablet GUI may also, in some implementations, include controls that allow the MC to trigger playback of pre-recorded audio, such as celebration sounds, fireworks sounds, applause, etc. on selected EGMs, e.g., the EGM of a selected player, in order to highlight an event involving that player. Similarly, the tablet GUI may also, in some implementations, include controls that allow the MC to trigger other multimedia effects as well, such as illumination or flashing effects of an EGM's candle, animations that may be displayed on a display of an EGM, edge lighting effects on an EGM, etc.
In
In the GUIs of both
As mentioned above, the tablet may also be configured to allow for a particular tournament to be configured, and may include a separate or additional GUI for facilitating such setup. In some implementations, the tablet may be configured to provide a GUI that includes controls that may allow the MC to cause the EGMs that are to be used in a tournament to suspend normal wagering game play, e.g., wagering mode, and enter tournament mode, at which point they may be prevented from being used by a player unless for tournament game play.
In some implementations, players that participate in a tournament may be provided with the ability to access a replay of a tournament session in which they participated. For example, each EGM that is used in a tournament session may store video data of the wagering game play, e.g., video screen captures of the contents of the main bottom display 412, or data that allows key aspects of the wagering game play to be recreated (for example, instead of storing screen captures for the entire main bottom display contents, the EGM may instead store data such as information describing the reel spin behavior, which symbols appear at which reel stops, etc., that may then be used by a simulator program installed on a player's mobile device to re-create the same game play that the player experienced during the session). The phrase “replay data” is used herein to refer to any data that may be used to later re-create one or more aspects of wagering game play, e.g., via screen-captured video or via re-created game play using a simulator.
Such replay data may be used to provide the players of the tournament with the ability to re-live their tournament gaming experience at a later time, e.g., in the comfort of their homes, with friends, etc. The tournament system may, in some instances, be configured to allow players to share their replays with other people, e.g., by providing the players with a hyperlink or internet address, or the ability to post such links or addresses to a social media platform, that may be sent to another individual to allow that individual to access a particular player's replay.
The replay data may also include data that allows at least some leaderboard information to be replayed in tandem with the wagering game replay so that the player may see their progression up (or down) through the ranks of other players during the course of the replay.
In some implementations, players may also be provided with player video data that was recorded during a session in which they participated. Such player video data may, for example, be obtained using imaging sensors, e.g., digital camera sensors, located in each EGM and positioned so as to capture video of the face or head of the player of that EGM while the player is playing the wagering game offered by that EGM. When a player initiates a session replay, for example, the player's wagering game play for the session may be recreated and presented to the player in tandem with player video data of the player that is synchronized with the replay of the wagering game. Thus, the player will be shown not only the re-creation of the wagering game during the replay, but video of their facial expressions and reactions during that wagering game play. This allows them to re-live the excitement that they experienced during the tournament, giving them a greater connection to their tournament experience and fostering an increased desire on the player's part to experience further such excitement, e.g., by participating in further tournaments and/or playing the wagering game in question during normal wagering play.
In some further implementations, players may also be provided with replay data and/or player video data for other players in addition to their own replay data and/or player video data. For example, when a player initiates a replay of a tournament session experience that they participated in, they may be provided, as discussed above, with a re-creation of their wagering game play during the session, and possibly player video data of themselves during the session. The player may also be provided, in some implementations, with re-creations of other players' wagering game play and/or player video data of other players in tandem with the re-creation of their own wagering game play and/or the player video data of themselves. The re-creations of other players' wagering game play and/or the player video data of the other players may be selectively provided during the re-creation of the player's wagering game play such that, for example, the wagering game play and player video data for the player with the next-highest score and rank is shown, i.e., the player is able to view their own game play and facial expressions at any given point during the session while simultaneously viewing the game play and facial expressions of the person that they were trying to surpass in score at that point in time during the session. Thus, they may see their own expression of increasing elation as they approach the next-highest-ranked player's score, along with increasing concern on the part of the next-highest-ranked player as the gap between the two players narrows, followed by, for example, the player's jubilation as they pass the next-highest-ranked player's score and the next-highest-ranked player's dismay as they lose a rank position. The re-created game play and player video data of other players may be switched as the replay progresses so as to generally always show the next-highest-ranked player based on current rank of the player at any given time during the replay or, if the player is in the highest-ranked position at any point in the replay, the next-highest-ranked player may be the player with a rank immediately below the player's rank, e.g., second place. The wagering game replay and player video data for the current next-highest-ranked player may not be replaced with the wagering game replay and player video data for the subsequent next-highest-ranked player immediately after the replay depicts the player surpassing the current next-highest-ranked player's score; there may be a delay introduced of a few seconds to allow the current next-highest-ranked player's facial expression upon being displaced/outranked by the player to be savored during the replay. After the short delay period the wagering game replay and player video data for the current next-highest-ranked player (or, more accurately, the former next-highest ranked player, as the player that was the current next-highest-ranked player will no longer be the next-highest-ranked player once displaced) may be replaced with or displaced by the wagering game replay and player video data for the subsequent next-highest-ranked player.
On the right side of the GUI, the upper quadrant shows replay video 3660B that recreates the state of a second player's wagering game and player video 3658B that shows the second player's facial expressions at the 28-second mark; overlays for the second player's score (20,450 cr), rank (3rd), and name (Wanda M.) have been added to the right side of the GUI as well. The second player, in this case, is the player that had the next-highest score or rank compared to the first player at the 28-second mark of the session; at the 28-second mark during the session, the first player and the second player Wanda M. would effectively be engaged in competition with each other, as any upward change in the first player's rank would likely cause the second player Wanda M.'s rank to decrease (there may be some scenarios, e.g., where both the first player and the second player Wanda M. score winning outcomes that cause both players to advance upward in rank in tandem, in which the first player may experience a change in rank without surpassing the second player Wanda M.). As can be seen in
In
In
In some implementations, the player video that is used for replay purposes may be augmented in a way that partially or wholly masks one or more of the players' identities. For example, the player video associated with at least some players may be processed using one or more augmented reality routines that overlay identity-masking graphics over the source video content; such identity-masking graphics may, for example, include cartoon-like facial features, such as oversized eyes and mouths, that may be added to the video and located and sized such that such features align with corresponding facial features of the player visible in the video. Such features may then be animated in a way that mimics the movement of those same features in the video, similar to how some modern smartphones are configured to overlay augmented-reality “emoji” content over video taken with the smartphone camera, or how the smartphone app “Snapchat” operates in some modes. Such augmented reality overlays may thus still generally communicate the emotional state of the “masked” player to a viewer while preserving the displayed player's identity.
In some implementations, the augmented reality overlay may cover almost all or all of the overlaid player's face or visible body, e.g., the player's face may be overlaid with an animated portrayal of a cartoon character or animal avatar, instead of just a partial overlay.
Such augmented reality overlays may be implemented in a variety of ways. For example, in some implementations, such augmented reality masking overlays may be applied to all player video obtained during session play, and the replay presentation for any particular player may feature masked player video (both of the player for which the replay is prepared and any other players that may be depicted as part of the replay). In some other implementations, the video of the player for which the replay is prepared may be unmodified, allowing the player to see themselves without any masking effects applied, but the video of any other player that is shown as part of the replay may have an augmented reality masking overlay applied, thereby preserving the privacy of the other player to some extent.
In some implementations, the augmented reality overlay feature may be a player-selectable feature, e.g., each player may have the opportunity to enable or disable the augmented reality overlay for video that features that player, thus allowing each player to, in effect, control the level of privacy afforded to that player in other player's video replays.
The type of content that may be provided to a player viewing a replay provided by the tournament system may take a variety of forms. For example, a replay may, as discussed above, include screen captures of the wagering game itself and video of the player (or other players). A replay may also include content from a variety of other sources as well, such as content shown on the player's EGM's main top display, the topper display, the leaderboard displays, etc. For example, a replay may include graphical content for a race graphic, e.g., a herd of running buffalo, with each buffalo representing a particular player in the tournament session being replayed. In some implementations, the tournament system may receive inputs from a player requesting a replay that defines which content to include therein. For example, a player may use a concierge application on their smartphone to request a replay from the tournament system; the concierge application may, in turn, allow the user to select certain options that may define what content will be displayed during the replay. Thus, the player may choose, for example, one or more video of the player's face, video of the player's opponents' faces, screen captures of the player's wagering game play, screen captures of the player's opponents' game play, screen captures of leaderboard information, screen captures of “race” graphics or other similar mechanisms for graphically depicting the rank of the player requesting the replay. The tournament system, responsive to receiving data indicative of such user selections, may cause the corresponding tournament session content for each selection to be presented to the user via the replay feature in a synchronized format, e.g., with each region of the display showing content for the tournament session that occurred at the same time during the tournament session. This may allow players to experience tournament session multimedia content that they perhaps missed during the actual tournament session, e.g., because the player was focused on playing the wagering game during the tournament session, they may not have been able to divert their attention to content that was displayed on displays other than the display showing the wagering game content and may have missed such additional content. The tournament system may also provide the player with the ability to share such replays with other people, e.g., through providing a code, hyperlink, message, or social media platform or posting to the other person that may give the other person the ability to interact with the tournament system and initiate the replay for the player.
While the tournament systems disclosed herein provide various features that provide a more engaging experience during tournament session game play, as well as potential features that may allow players to re-live that experience, some implementations of the tournament systems disclosed herein may include additional features that may encourage particular post-session behaviors by players, e.g., encouraging players to remain geographically close to a particular location, such as the casino or venue where the tournament is being held.
For example, as discussed earlier, players that have won trophies during session game play may be entered into a lottery drawing or similar contest where their chances of winning increase with the number of trophies they have won during the tournament. Such a lottery drawing, however, may only be performed at the conclusion of the tournament, and players that are selected during the lottery may only be able to collect their prizes if they are present at the venue, e.g., present to collect the prize in-person at the time of the lottery or, in some instances, verified as being within a geofence enclosing the venue at the time of the lottery (such as if a smartphone associated with that player indicates that the player, or at least a person assumed to be the player, is within the boundaries of the geofence).
Another feature that may be included in some implementations is a “follow-the-leader” feature, where players may be eligible to obtain further winnings based on the performance in later sessions (or the tournament overall) of another player in their session. For example, if a particular player, e.g., a first player, wins their session, the other players in that session, e.g., second players, may be given opportunities to share in potential rewards earned by the first player in other, subsequent sessions and/or the tournament overall. As with the trophy lottery discussed above, eligibility for such rewards-by-association may be made contingent on player behaviors, such as the player being within a particular geographic area. Thus, for example, some tournaments may feature session-level awards, e.g., a moderate monetary prize, vouchers for free meals at a casino restaurant, etc., for the player that wins that session, and may feature a pool of lesser rewards, e.g., smaller monetary amounts, vouchers for free appetizers or drinks at the casino restaurant, etc., that may be awarded to players that competed in one or more previous sessions that the winning player of the session also won (such additional players may be referred to herein as “associated players.” Such awards, however, may only be distributed to each of the associated players if the associated player is on-site or within a geofence associated with the tournament venue. The rewards for associated players may, for example, be provided at the end of each session, only at the end of the tournament, or both at the end of each session and the end of the tournament, depending on the particular configuration of the tournament.
Yet another feature that may be included in tournament gaming systems, as disclosed herein, may be “mystery” prizes that may be received by players during or after their tournament sessions. Such mystery prizes may, for example, be awarded to players for various reasons, e.g., randomly, as consolation prizes that are awarded to one or more players that do not achieve a high enough score in a session to be considered session winners (such as players that do not achieve sufficient points to advance to play in a following session or players that do not place in the top three ranks in a session, etc.), as the result of obtaining a particular game play outcome, etc.
Mystery prizes may be awarded virtually, and may be configured such that the actual nature of the mystery prize is not apparent to the player that wins it (as well as to other players) until at least after the player's session ends. For example, the tournament system may be configured to display on the player's EGM an icon or other indicator of one or more mystery prizes that the player may have won during a tournament session; once the tournament session is over, the tournament system may, for example, continue to maintain an association between a player and records identifying the nature of the various mystery prizes that the player may have won. In some implementations, indicators of the various mystery prizes may be made available to the player through a device other than the EGM. For example, if the player has a smartphone with a concierge application installed, then the player's mystery prizes may be depicted using various icons or other indicators in the concierge application. Similar notifications may be provided via a push notification system, e.g., through text messages.
The tournament system (of which a concierge application such as that described above may be part) may be configured to maintain the secrecy regarding the nature of each mystery prize until after the tournament session in which the mystery prize was awarded has completed and until one or more particular conditions are met, after which the player may be allowed to learn the nature of the mystery prize. For example, a tournament system may be configured to present a GUI, e.g., via a concierge application, in which an icon or other indicator for a mystery prize may be configured to be selectable by a user. The tournament system may then, responsive to such selection, change the indicator for the mystery prize to an image, animation, and/or text that identifies the nature of the prize (as well as other relevant information).
Mystery prizes may be “unlocked” or revealed to players responsive to the fulfillment of a variety of different conditions being met. For example, some conditions may simply be time-based, e.g., the tournament system may be configured to reveal the nature of a mystery prize to a player after a predetermined period of time has elapsed, e.g., from when the mystery prize was awarded to the player or from the end of the tournament session in which the mystery prize was awarded. Such a period of time may be, for example, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, 7 hours, 8 hours, 9 hours, 10 hours, 11 hours, 12 hours, 13 hours, 14 hours, 15 hours, 16 hours, 17 hours, 18 hours, 19 hours, 20 hours, 21 hours, 22 hours, 23 hours, 24 hours, or any desired time interval.
In some implementations, the tournament system may be configured to reveal the nature of the mystery prize when a location-based condition is satisfied, e.g., when the player to which the mystery prize was awarded travels to a particular location or within a particular region or area, e.g., a geofence, or outside of a particular location or region, e.g., when the player leaves the casino or property where a tournament session was held. The tournament system may determine that the player is at such a location or within such a region through a variety of mechanisms. In some instances, the tournament system may use geolocation data for the player, e.g., geolocation data provided through a mobile communications device associated with the player (such geolocation data may, for example, be obtained from the player's mobile communications device by the concierge application or some other application that is configured to communicate with one or more servers of the tournament system that may manage the distribution and status of the mystery prizes awarded to players), to determine whether the player is at the location or within the region. In other implementations, other mechanisms may be used to determine whether the player is at the location or within the region. For example, the tournament system may be configured to receive a signal from a kiosk, terminal, or other location-based device that may be configured to read a player's player tracking card (when inserted by the player into the device), a radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag associated with the player, or otherwise engage in short-range communications with a device carried by the player when such a location-based device engages in such short-range communications with the device carried by the player. On receiving such a signal, the tournament system may determine, based on the occurrence of the short-range communication between the player-carried device and the location-based device, that the player is at the location where the location-based device is located. In yet further implementations, the tournament system may determine the location of a player through, for example, receiving data from a remote device indicating that the player is present at the location. For example, in some implementations, the tournament system may receive data from a website, remote terminal, or other device that may be interacted with by a third party, e.g., an employee at an establishment at the location. The employee, upon interacting with the player, may then interact with such a device to provide inputs that indicate that the player is at the location of the device.
It will be understood that the above conditions, as well as other conditions not explicitly discussed above, may also be combined—e.g., a mystery prize may be unlocked for a player if the player travels to a particular location within a particular time window after receiving the mystery prize.
Mystery prizes may provide the players that receive them with any of a variety of actual benefits when unlocked or revealed to the player. For example, a mystery prize may cause a predetermined number of points to be awarded to the receiving player upon being unlocked or revealed to the player, e.g., 10,000 points, that may be added to the player's tournament total. Another implementation of a mystery prize may automatically enter a player into a higher-level tournament session, e.g., a quarterfinal or semifinal tournament session. In yet another example, a mystery prize may provide a cashable award, a voucher that may be redeemed on an EGM for promotional credits that may be used to place wagers on the EGM, etc. Other types of mystery prizes may include, for example, awards of virtual credits or points that may be used in online gaming, e.g., social gaming, or rewards that may require additional action on the part of a player to obtain, e.g., an award that will cause the player to be elevated to the next higher tier of a player loyalty program if they return to the venue/casino within some timeframe, e.g., 24 to 48 hours, and spend a predetermined threshold amount, e.g., $500.
In addition to mystery prizes, some implementations of tournament systems may include secret winning outcome patterns that may trigger special bonuses for players. In most cases, the various winning patterns for an EGM are typically known to a player in advance (or knowable in advance, e.g., by looking at an information screen of the EGM that provides information about the wagering game offered on the EGM). In addition to such publicly known winning outcomes, some tournament systems may be configured to recognize additional patterns that are not publicly advertised to the player; such additional patterns may be referred to herein as “secret patterns” or “secret winning outcomes.” If a player's EGM forms a secret winning pattern during a play or spin of the wagering game, the tournament system may cause the player to be awarded with a corresponding prize or secret award. The tournament system, having determined that a player should be awarded such a prize or secret award, may associate the play with such a prize or secret award. However, the tournament system may not make the player immediately aware of the prize or secret award that has been awarded to them. Instead, the tournament system may wait to inform the player of the prize or secret award until after one or more predetermined conditions are met, e.g., after a predetermined period of time has elapsed, after the tournament session in which the secret pattern was achieved has finished, after the tournament has completed, etc.
Such a secret prize or award may, for example, cause the receiving player to advance to the next level or tier of tournament sessions (regardless of the player's score), or may provide a one-time grant of points, or other benefit.
In some tournament systems, players may be offered the chance to participate in a team-based format, e.g., players may be paired up into teams of two or more players. In some such implementations, one person on the team may play the wagering game in a session for points, and the other person on the team may play the wagering game in that same session for multipliers or other bonuses that affect the points that the first player on the team is winning. For example, the tournament system may be configured to allow players to register for play as a two-person team, and may then designate one of the two players on each team as being the player that is playing for points, e.g., the scoring player or the main player, and the other player of each team as being the player that is playing for multipliers or other bonuses, e.g., the non-scoring player or the booster player. Such designations may be randomly made by the tournament system, or may be made responsive to inputs provided by one or both of the players of each team, i.e., user-selectable. The wagering game that each player of each team is provided to play may be tailored by the tournament system to match the “role” that each player has within their team. For example, in some such implementations, the wagering game that is presented to the main player of each team may be specially configured by the tournament system to generally only acknowledge outcomes that produce a payout or point increase and not generally acknowledge outcomes that would normally produce non-payout outcomes, e.g., bonus awards, multipliers, etc. Conversely, the tournament system may specially configure the wagering games played by the booster player of each team such that the wagering game generally only acknowledges outcomes that result in bonuses and/or multipliers and generally does not acknowledge outcomes that would normally produce a payout or point increase. During tournament session play, the tournament system may cause any bonuses or multipliers that are obtained by the booster player to be applied to the main player's game play as if the main player had obtained them during play. For example, if the booster player on a team achieves a 3× multiplier bonus for the next three spins, the outcomes for the next three spins obtained by the main player may be multiplied by 3×. It will be understood that in some implementations, the main player's wagering game may still acknowledge some bonus or multiplier outcomes (which may be applied to the main player's game play), and that the booster player's wagering game may still acknowledge outcomes that result in a win of an amount of credits (which may be added to the team score), but the outcomes that are predominantly acknowledged by the main player's wagering game may be credit-win outcomes, and the outcomes that are predominantly acknowledged by the booster player's wagering game may be bonus or multiplier outcomes. It will be further understood that the wagering games played by the main players and the booster players need not be the same game—each player “role” may actually be provided, in some implementations, with very different wagering game experiences in terms of game play, graphics, sound, etc.
Such an arrangement, in effect, splits up the wagering game experience that is normally experienced by a single player into two interwoven wagering game experiences that allow two players to have their own wagering game experiences in which the outcome experienced by the players collectively is the product of the outcomes that each individual player achieves during their individual play. In such an arrangement, the rankings in a tournament session may be reflective of team ranking instead of individual player rankings.
Another team implementation may include a tournament where players on a team are treated as a unit for the purposes of determining ranking or progression through the tournament, but the tournament session scores of the team may be based on a subset or other composite of the scores of the players on that team, e.g., the average score of the team players during the session (or sessions), or the sum or average of the highest X scores of each team for each session.
In many such team-based implementations, the tournament system may be configured to configure the EGMs involved in providing a tournament session such that the players on each team are seated at adjacent EGMs in order to promote communication between players and to increase player excitement. However, some other tournament systems may be configured to allow teammates to play on non-adjacent EGMs, e.g., EGMs in different banks of EGMs or even different properties.
The various tournament features discussed herein may be provided, for example, through cooperation between a large number of different devices, e.g., using processors of a plurality of EGMs 402, one or more processors of a tournament management system (TMS), and, in some instances, one or more processors of a tournament host tablet (THT) that may be directly or indirectly communicatively connected with one another (for example, the TMS may be directly communicatively connected with the EGMs and a THT, but the THT may not be directly communicatively connected with the EGMs; the THT may still, however, cause the EGMs to perform various actions by relaying commands or instructions through the TMS). The EGMs, TMS, and THT may also have respective memory devices that may store computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors of each respective device to perform various aspects of the tournament functions and features discussed above. It will be understood that there may be a large number of ways in which such a group of communicatively connected devices or systems may be configured in order to provide various types of functionality, and all such configuration permutations are considered within the scope of this disclosure. For example, in some implementations, an EGM may store computer-executable instructions for controlling game play of a wagering game presented on the EGM. However, much of the processing that may be performed in order to provide such wagering game play may optionally be performed on another device, and the EGM itself may simply act as a presentation device that shows particular graphics at particular times based on instructions received from another device.
The EGMs 4202 and the TMS 4248 may be communicatively connected with one another via at least one of their respective communications interfaces 4256, 4256a, and the THT 4250 and TMS 4248 may, similarly, be communicatively connected with one another via at least one of their respective communications interfaces 4256a, 4256b. The one or more memory devices, e.g., random access memory devices, solid-state memory devices, hard disk drives, etc., of the various devices may store computer-executable instructions for controlling various processors of the system to provide one or more of the functionalities discussed above.
In recognition of the possibility of such distributed processing arrangements, the term “collectively,” as used herein with reference to memory devices and/or processors or various other items, should be understood to indicate that the referenced collection of items has the characteristics or provides the functionalities that are associated with that collection. For example, if a server and a client device collectively store instructions for causing A, B, and C to occur, this encompasses at least the following scenarios:
In all of the above scenarios, between the server and the client device, there are, collectively, instructions that are stored for causing A, B, and C to occur, i.e., such instructions are stored on one or both devices and it will be recognized that using the term “collectively,” e.g., the server and the client device, collectively, store instructions for causing A, B, and C to occur, encompasses all of the above scenarios as well as additional, similar scenarios.
Similarly, a collection of processors, e.g., a first set of one or more processors and a second set of one or more processors, may be caused, collectively, to, perform one or more actions, e.g., actions A, B, and C. As with the previous example, various permutations fall within the scope of such “collective” language:
It will be appreciated that a TMS may be at least partially implemented in a cloud computing environment, e.g., an environment in which the TMS may be implemented using shared computing resources, e.g., one or more servers that are located in disparate geographic areas, are in communication with each other, and cooperate to provide tournament functionality to remote devices, e.g., EGMs in a casino. Such cloud-based architectures may allow the TMS to operate tournaments in multiple locations, e.g., different casinos (either under common ownership or separate ownership), or may allow the TMS to operate a single tournament across multiple locations, e.g., where tournament sessions may include players located at different geographical locations, including, for example, players who may participate via an online wagering game.
It will also be appreciated that, as discussed earlier herein, the tournament systems and techniques discussed herein may also be implemented such that one or more tournament sessions may be played by a player on a remote device, e.g., on a smartphone at a location other than at the venue where EGMs that are participating in the tournament are located. In such implementations, the remote devices for the players participating in a particular session may be controlled by the tournament system in a manner similar to how the EGMs are controlled in the implementations discussed above. In such implementations, the replay feature discussed above may have increased utility, as the players will generally not be able to see one another as they are playing (unless they happen to be in the same remote location), and the replay feature may allow them to re-live the tournament with the additional benefit of seeing the other players and their reactions.
As mentioned earlier herein, a player may be able to interact with a tournament management system using a concierge application that is installed on a mobile communications device, e.g., a tablet or smartphone, that belongs to the player (or via, for example, one or more webpages or other mechanisms for presenting a person with a graphical user interface and sending and receiving data). Concierge applications may take any of a variety of different forms, but many implementations thereof may generally include functionality for receiving and presenting messages or notifications to a player, sending notifications or messages to another player (either directly or via the TMS), providing indications of the status of other players that may be associated with the player (for example, a list of “friends” that are associated with the player may be presented by the concierge application, along with icons indicating each player's status, e.g., “in game,” “in tournament,” “at Five Start Casino,” “Offline,” “Away,” etc.), allowing the player to invite other players to view the player's tournament game replay data, allowing the player to review statistics relating to their wagering game play, including statistics relating to their performance in any tournament that they are participating in, allowing the player to register for a tournament, allowing the player to invite another player or players to form a team (such as, for example, inviting another player to be a booster player for the player in a 2-person team format tournament, as discussed above), and so forth.
The concierge application, for example, may be configured to obtain data from a remote server, e.g., a player tracking server, that may store information identifying various other players that are associated with a particular player, e.g., friends, teammates, etc., of the player. Such information may, for example, be associated with further data identifying a mechanism for communicating with such other players, e.g., an email address, a phone number, a physical address, or an account identity, e.g., a player tracking account. The concierge application may, in some instances, allow the user to initiate communications with one or more of those other players, e.g., through receiving inputs from the player that define the parameters of such a message, and then transmitting data defining the message to a device used by the other player, e.g., using the other player's email address, phone number, etc.
In some implementations, as discussed above, the concierge application may include an interface that allows a user to share tournament-specific information with one or more other people, e.g., friends of the player. For example, the concierge application may include a graphical user interface in which the player may review details of various upcoming tournaments, including tournaments that they may be invited to or in which they may have already registered. Such an interface may, for example, include one or more user-selectable controls that allow the player to, for example, share their participation in a particular tournament with a friend, e.g., by sending the friend a notification indicating that the player is participating in a particular tournament. Such a notification may include information identifying the location and time of the tournament, in case the friend wishes to try and coordinate a visit to the venue of the tournament so as to coincide with the player's participation in the tournament. In some implementations, the concierge application and/or TMS may be configured to include in the notification information that may allow the recipient to either join the tournament as well or be apprised of what conditions must be met in order to potentially be invited to participate in the tournament.
In some implementations, the concierge application (or similar feature) may be configured to provide the user with the ability to live-stream or otherwise receive real-time or near-real time video content pertaining to a tournament. For example, the concierge application may be configured to allow a user to select a tournament that is either underway or about to begin. The concierge application may then, in some instances, present the user with one or more inputs that allow the user to select, for example, between different options for the content to be presented. For example, the concierge application may be configured to allow a user to specify a particular player that is participating in the tournament, and the TMS may then cause one or more video feeds relating to that player's participation in the tournament to be provided to the user's device on which the concierge application is executing. For example, a video feed showing the wagering game played by that player may be provided, as well as another video feed that may provide video of the player's face as they play the wagering game.
In some implementations, a version of the concierge application or other application providing similar capabilities in many respects may also be provided on various devices that may not be associated with a particular person, e.g., a casino property may have terminals, kiosks, or other apparatuses with displays thereon that may be configured to stream content relating to a tournament in real-time or near-real time.
In yet further implementations, the tournament system may include the capability of streaming to a social media platform, e.g., via a plugin or other mechanism that may allow video content, as well as other data (rankings, scores, etc.) relating to a tournament to be streamed to a social media website for distribution to various social media accounts.
As mentioned earlier, the concierge application may also serve as a mechanism that allows a player to track various statistics relating to their tournament play, including, for example, statistics relating to any trophies won in the various sessions played by the player in the tournament, the player's overall ranking in the tournament, how much time is left in the tournament, how many tournament session entries the player may have available (each tournament session entry entitling the player to participate in a tournament session and attempt to improve their score), the rankings of all of the players in the tournament, times/schedules for upcoming tournament events, e.g., upcoming tournament sessions, drawings, etc., information describing any “mystery prizes” that the player may have been awarded (including, for example, what the nature of those prizes is, if such information has been revealed to the player, or what the player must do in order to have the nature of the mystery prize(s) revealed to them), information regarding the timing of any drawings or lotteries that may, for example, be based on the player's trophy count, and so forth.
The tournament systems disclosed herein may be part of a larger architecture that is designed to encourage repeat user engagement with all parts of a patron ecosystem.
In (C), the player participates in one of the earlier tournament sessions for the tournament, doing quite well—well enough that they are in third place overall in the tournament. After finishing the tournament session, the player may, in (D), walk over to another area of the casino to engage in some non-tournament wager gaming, e.g., on Lightning Link (an Aristocrat® Technologies, Inc. offering), while waiting to see how the tournament is going. In some implementations, the TMS may cause a message to be presented to the player, e.g., via the concierge application, via text message, and/or via an on-screen message provided on an EGM used by the player, that indicates that further tournament session entries may, at times, be awarded during play of non-tournament wagering games in the establishment; this may serve as an incentive to the player to engage in such other wagering game play. In some implementations, the TMS may be configured to inform the player that additional tournament session entries may potentially be won after engaging in particular activities, e.g., making X wagers on a particular type of EGM, playing a particular type of wagering game, playing a wagering game that the player has not played before, playing a wagering game that the player has not played within a predetermined period of time, and/or on an EGM in a particular location.
While playing the non-tournament EGMs, the player finds in (E) that his non-tournament wagering game play has resulted in a free additional entry into the tournament, e.g., another play in a tournament session. For example, the player may experience a “big win,” e.g., a winning outcome exceeding a predetermined threshold amount that may, as part of the payout, include another entry into a tournament session for the player. In another example, a player may be awarded another tournament session entry after providing a certain amount of coin-in to a wagering game, e.g., placing at least that amount of wagers while playing the wagering game. After finishing playing on the non-tournament EGMs, the player decides to take a break in (F) and uses the concierge application on their smartphone to check their ranking in the tournament (the player may, alternatively, check the leaderboards on any display in the casino providing such information to potentially discover their ranking). The concierge application has unfortunate news for the player—a large number of other players in other sessions have achieved higher scores than the player, resulting in the player's overall ranking dropping to 76th place. The player realizes that it would be a good idea to use the free tournament entry they won earlier, and returns to the tournament EGM area and enters another session in (G); this time, the player does well enough to place first in the session. The player, who has been informed, e.g., via the concierge application, general knowledge, or through conversations with casino or tournament personnel, that a drawing will be conducted at the completion of the tournament based on the number of trophies won by each player and/or the number of sessions won by each player, decides in (H) to walk back to the non-tournament EGM area and engages in some further wagering game play in (I) while waiting for the tournament to conclude. The tournament system, via the player's EGM and/or the concierge application, provides a notification to the player that drawings related to the end of the tournament will be occurring in 10 minutes. Such drawings may be for additional prizes, such as are discussed earlier herein with respect to trophies. The player then goes to the tournament area of the casino, discovers that they won a drawing prize that further increased their overall tournament ranking to first place—the player is crowned the winner of the tournament in (J), and then drives home in (K) reflecting on the exciting experience they had in the tournament and at the Five Star Casino. The TMS may also cause the concierge application to, in some implementations, notify the player that they have been awarded an amount of non-cashable credits that may be used, for example, in online or social wagering games similar to those that may have resulted in the player's initial qualification for the tournament. In some implementations, the player may be notified of either winning a prize as a result of tournament play or the nature of a mystery prize that they received as a result of tournament play after leaving, for example, the property, e.g., casino, where the tournament session was held. This can help to re-engage the player with the tournament operator, e.g., the casino, and keep their interest piqued. For example, in some implementations, the player may receive a prize of non-cashable credits that may be used in an online wagering game, e.g., for social gaming, that is operated by or affiliated with the tournament operator. The player, once back at home, may continue to engage with the casino/tournament system in (L) by using the concierge application on their smartphone, e.g., to play online versions of wagering games (for example, using some of the non-cashable credits that the player may have earned as a result of participating in the tournament), message friends of theirs, view replays of their tournament session play, or otherwise interact with the tournament system. The player's interactions with the concierge application may, for example, lead to the player satisfying one or more criteria that make the player eligible for entry into another tournament, at which point the engagement loop shown in
It is to be further understood that while many of the tournament systems discussed herein may randomly determine wagering game play outcomes, some tournament systems may be configured to determine wagering game play outcomes using, for example, historical data that may be randomly selected. For example, in a horse-racing venue, historical horse race data may be randomly selected to determine an outcome of a wagering game play, e.g., the results of a randomly selected historical horse race may be used as a proxy for a wagering game outcome (such a result may be transformed or translated into an equivalent outcome in the wagering game if it occurs). This, as well as other mechanisms for determining wagering game outcomes in a tournament context, are all considered to be within the scope of this disclosure.
As noted earlier, the tournament systems discussed herein may include, in some implementations, one or more graphical leaderboards to convey relative ranking information regarding players in tournaments that are provided using such systems. As mentioned earlier, there are at least two general formats of graphical leaderboards contemplated herein—a player agnostic format and a player-specific format. Both formats are discussed below. It will be apparent that the graphical leaderboards discussed herein may be used in the context of the EGM tournament systems discussed above, or, alternatively, with other types of EGM tournament systems and/or non-tournament EGM systems, e.g., EGMs that may allow players to compete against each other simultaneously, but not necessarily in the context of a tournament.
Graphical leaderboards that are player-agnostic may typically take on the appearance of a series of graphical indicators arranged along a path and in an order along the path indicative of their rankings relative to each other based on, for example, their score in a multiplayer gaming event of interest (such as the player's scores during a gaming tournament session).
In
Generally speaking, the graphical indicators 4404 may be caused to be displayed so as to be arranged along a path 4410, which may extend between two termini, e.g., starting terminus 4406 (also indicated by the letter “A”) and ending terminus 4408 (also indicated by the letter “B”). In this particular example, the path (which is not necessarily visible and may simply be an implicit or virtual path) is a straight, horizontal line that extends from the left side of the display window 4402 to just shy of the right side of the display window 4402; the graphical indicator 4404 (for “Stan”) that is closest to the starting terminus 4406 of the path 4410 has the lowest rank of the players represented by the displayed graphical indicators 4404, and the graphical indicator 4404 that is closest to the ending terminus 4408 of the path 4410 has the highest rank of the players represented by the displayed graphical indicators 4404. It will be understood that the termini of the path 4410 may be positioned at any location within the display window 4410 (or even outside of the display window 4410, if desired), however, in the present example, the starting terminus 4406 is located at the bottom left corner of the display window 4402 and the ending terminus 4408 is located along the bottom edge of the display window 4402 and offset from the right side of the display window 4402 by a small distance.
The various graphical indicators 4404 that are displayed in the display window may, in some implementations, each include or be associated with one or more labels, e.g., player name labels 4412. As seen in
In
In order to determine the various graphical indicator 4404 positions, the path length of the path 4410 may be associated with a particular range of metric values, e.g., a point range of interest. The beginning terminus 4406 may be associated with the bottom end of that range of values, and the ending terminus 4408 may be associated with the upper end of that range of values. The range of values that is selected to be associated with the path length of the path 4410 may be selected in a variety of different ways, including, but not limited to: a range defined between the maximum and minimum metric values that are associated with a group of players within the multiplayer event of which the graphical leaderboard is configured to be representative (for example, the range may be defined to be bounded by the lowest and highest scores of all of the players participating in that multiplayer event, or may be defined to be bounded by the lowest and highest scores of the players having the highest 20 scores within that multiplayer event); a range defined between the product or products that result by applying a multiplication factor, e.g., 1.1, 1.2, etc., to one or both of the maximum and minimum metric values that are associated with a group of players within the multiplayer event of which the graphical leaderboard is configured to be representative; an offset range bounded by the maximum metric value that is associated with a group of players within the multiplayer event of which the graphical leaderboard is configured to be representative and extending over a fixed, predetermined interval, e.g., 1000 points; a percentage-based range bounded by the maximum metric value that is associated with a group of players within the multiplayer event of which the graphical leaderboard is configured to be representative and extending over an interval that is a fixed percentage of the maximum metric value (for example, extending between the maximum metric value and 90% of the maximum metric value); and various other optional range options.
The graphical leaderboard 4400 may be updated in real-time, on a regular periodic basis, or in an event-driven manner (such as whenever there is a change in metric for a given player); with each such update, the indicator positions 4418 and, in some cases, the metric range represented by the path length, may be re-determined and the graphical indicators 4404 may be repositioned accordingly. Such repositioning may preferably be performed in an animated fashion, e.g., by causing the relevant graphical indicators 4404 to be moved closer to one terminus of the path 4410 or the other over a span of time, to avoid sudden jumps of graphical indicators 4404 from one position to another. In some implementations, the updates may occur frequently enough that some or all graphical indicators 4404 may not have finished moving to their newly determined indicator positions 4418 by the time even more recently determined indicator positions 4418 are available, in which case the graphical indicators 4404 may be moved from whatever locations they were at when the most recently determined indicator positions 4418 became available to the most recently determined indicator positions 4418.
Each indicator position 4418, as measured in terms of distance along the path 4410 from the starting terminus 4406, may be generally determined through using the following formula:
where:
As can be seen in
It will be understood that the number of graphical indicators that are displayed within the display window 4402 may be determined through any of several techniques, including, for example: displaying graphical indicators for up to the total number of players participating in the multiplayer event for which the graphical leaderboard is configured (the actual number of graphical indicators that are displayed may be less than the total number of players since players associated with metrics that are outside of the range of metrics bounded by the termini of the path may not be displayed); displaying graphical indicators for up to a predetermined maximum number of players other than the total number of players participating in the multiplayer event for which the graphical leaderboard is configured (e.g., the top twenty players of a 32-player multiplayer gaming event); and displaying graphical indicators for any players in the multiplayer gaming event for which the graphical leaderboard is configured and for which the relevant metric associated with the player, e.g., the player's score for that multiplayer gaming event, is within the range defined by the values associated with the starting and ending termini for the path 4410. It will be understood that graphical indicators 4404 may, in some circumstances, be caused to be added to and/or removed from the display window 4402 during the display of a graphical leaderboard depending on which techniques are used to determine which graphical indicators 4404 are to be displayed and on how the various metrics reflected by the graphical leaderboard 4400 change over time.
It will be understood that various conversions between units may be performed, as needed, in order to convert the various metrics determining the player rankings into an on-screen display of a graphical leaderboard. In particular, some form of conversion between the units of the metric, e.g., points, and the units of the display, e.g., pixels, may need to be performed; such conversions may be performed by, in effect, normalizing the various metrics to the length or dimensions of the path 4410, and then normalizing the path length or dimensions to the dimensions of the display window (or the portion of the display screen occupied thereby). This may allow the graphical leaderboard to be adapted to fit any of a variety of different display screen sizes and/or resolutions. It will be appreciated as well that such normalization may be performed implicitly, e.g., without resort to multi-level normalizations.
For example, if a graphical leaderboard is configured to be displayed on a display screen that is 1920 pixels wide, and the termini of the path along which the graphical indicators 4404 will be arranged are located 100 pixels in from both the left and right edges of such a display screen (to allow for a border graphic to be displayed around where the graphical indicators 4404 will be depicted, for example), then the pixel-based length of the path 4410 would be 1720 pixels. If the starting terminus 4406 for such a path 4410 is associated with a player score of 33,120 points and the ending terminus 4408 of that path 4410 is associated with a player score of 67,330 points, a player having a score of 43,890 points would have a graphical indicator that would be located at:
from the starting terminus 4406, i.e., at 641 pixels from the left side of the display screen.
In some implementations of player-agnostic graphical leaderboards (and also, for that matter, some implementations of player-specific leaderboards), one or more further graphical indicators may be displayed as well to provide various further insights as to parameters of interest to players and/or spectators.
In some implementations, if the multiplayer gaming event leader (the first player) surpasses the metric of the previous leader, then the graphical indicator 4404 representing that player may be modified and/or emphasized in some manner to indicate such status. For example, the graphical indicator 4404 representing that player may be caused to be highlighted, either through a graphical effect (such as applying a color change, metallization effect (making the graphical indicator appear to be polished metal, such as silver or gold), halo effect, glow effect, flame effect, etc.), or through associating a label with the graphical indicator (such as the text “Daily Leader!” with an arrow pointing to that graphical indicator 4404).
In some implementations, there may be multiple types of “leaders” that may be sequentially represented by a previous leader indicator 4420. For example, there may be a daily leader, a weekly leader, a monthly leader, a seasonal leader, a quarterly leader, a yearly leader, a semi-annual leader, and/or an all-time leader; the metrics associated with such leader types may be referred to herein as leader metrics and the values associated therewith may be referred to herein as leader metric values. In some such implementations, the graphical leaderboard may be configured to provide, at any given point in time (and if applicable), a previous leader indicator that indicates the type of previous leader of the various types of previous leader that may be tracked that is associated with a metric, e.g., a score, that is closest to, but still above, the metric associated with the player represented by the graphical indicator 4404 closest to the ending terminus 4408 (the first player, under the convention mentioned earlier). Thus, if the first player's metric exceeds that of the daily leader, a new previous leader indicator may be caused to be displayed to indicate that there is another type of previous leader that the player can seek to unseat, e.g., a monthly leader (there may also have been a weekly leader, but if the monthly leader was also the weekly leader, then, in some implementations, the previous leader indicator may simply indicate the broader category of leader, i.e., the monthly leader in this case). If the player unseats the monthly leader, then another leader indicator may be caused to be displayed to indicate that there is a quarterly leader, and so forth.
In some implementations, the metric for the previous leader against which the first player's metric is compared to determine if the first player has overtaken the previous leader may be a static metric, i.e., whatever the value of the metric was for that previous leader at the conclusion of the multiplayer gaming event in which that metric was obtained. In such implementations, once the first player's metric exceeds the previous leader's metric, the first player will replace the previous leader as the relevant leader. In other implementations, the metric for the previous leader may instead be a time-varying metric reflecting, for example, the value of the previous leader's metric over the course of the multiplayer gaming event in which that metric was obtained. In such implementations, the previous leader graphical indicator 4404 may be caused to, in essence, behave similarly to the graphical indicators 4404 of the players of the multiplayer gaming event for which the graphical leaderboard 4400 is configured. Thus, at the 10-second mark, the previous leader graphical indicator 4404 may be positioned at a location on the path based on the previous leader's metric at the 10-second mark in the multiplayer gaming event in which the previous leader earned the relevant previous leader status. At the 20-second mark, the previous leader graphical indicator 4404 may be positioned at a location on the path based on the previous leader's metric at the 20-second mark in that previous multiplayer gaming event, and so forth. Thus, the previous leader graphical indicator 4404 may make it appear as if the previous leader is actually competing in the current multiplayer gaming event in real-time (even though the metric that governs the location of the previous leader graphical indicator was obtained in an earlier multiplayer gaming event). Because of this, the previous leader graphical indicator may not always be ahead of all of the graphical indicators 4404, and may, for example, move up or down in rank during the course of the multiplayer gaming event for which the graphical leaderboard is configured to present ranking information (it may even be removed from the display window 4402 if it falls below the metric value associated with the starting terminus 4406). For example, if the previous leader achieved that previous leader status due to obtaining a large win in the last few seconds of the earlier multiplayer gaming event, then the previous leader graphical indicator for that previous leader may, for most of the duration of the current multiplayer gaming event, not be in the lead at all—but may suddenly move ahead by a large amount at the same time in the current multiplayer gaming event as the previous leader moved ahead by the same amount in the earlier multiplayer gaming event. In some such implementations, if the previous leader's metric exceeds the highest metric of the current players by some amount, then the leader indicator may, in some instances, be caused to move off-screen, and may be represented by a previous leader indicator 4420, for example.
In some implementations, the previous leader indicator 4420 may be configured to convey additional information regarding the previous leader, e.g., how “close” the first player's metric is to the previous leader's corresponding metric. For example, the previous leader indicator 4420 may be caused to grow in size or move more towards an edge or a center of the display window and in a direction transverse to the path at the ending terminus 4408 the closer the first player's metric gets to the previous leader's metric, thereby indicating to the players that they are getting closer and closer to overtaking the previous leader's metric. In some implementations, the previous leader indicator 4420 may be caused to flash, blink, pulsate, or otherwise be emphasized in a cyclic manner, and the frequency with which such cyclic emphases are provided may be increased as the first player's metric nears the previous leader's metric.
In some implementations, a graphical indicator may be highlighted or otherwise indicated as a “qualifier” or other similar status (or a separate graphical indicator provided that represents such a status). In such implementations, the “qualifier” graphical indicator may be positioned such that it represents the lowest ranked player that currently has a ranking that will result in a prize or award for the tournament event for which the leaderboard is presenting data. For example, if the four highest-ranked players of a tournament session at the end of the tournament session will receive a prize or award, then the fourth-place graphical indicator (if displayed on a graphical leaderboard) may be highlighted to indicate that it is a “qualifier.” Similarly, if the top twenty highest-ranked players of a tournament at the end of the tournament will receive a prize or award, then the graphical indicator for the twentieth-ranked player may be highlighted to indicate that it is a “qualifier.” If another graphical indicator surpasses that “qualifier,” then the surpassing graphical indicator or another graphical indicator ahead of the surpassed graphical indicator may be highlighted as the “qualifier.” This may give the players a sense of when their current ranking is sufficient to put them into contention for actual prizes. In yet another example, a separate qualifier graphical indicator may be provided to indicate a qualifier from a prior event. For example, for a given tournament round in which multiple tournament sessions are played, the top twenty (or some other number of) scorers across all of the tournament sessions for that tournament round may be awarded monetary (or other) prizes. A graphical leaderboard may thus be configured to display a qualifier graphical indicator based on 20th-ranked score on the graphical leaderboard; this score may be for a player in the current tournament session, or from one of the earlier tournament sessions in the tournament round. Similarly, if the tournament is configured such that the X top-ranked players will receive prizes, then player-specific graphical leaderboards, in some implementations, may include a “qualifier” graphical indicator that indicates how close the player for which the player-specific graphical leaderboard is presented is to potentially qualifying for a prize. For example, if the player has scored 102,010 points in the tournament thus far and has accrued a further 23,120 points in the current tournament session (for which the player-specific graphical leaderboard is providing intra-session ranking information showing the player's rank relative to other players' ranks based on their scores for the tournament session), a “ghost” graphical indicator may be used as a “qualifier” graphical indicator to show how close the player is to potentially qualifying for a prize (of course, they may qualify and be disqualified later if someone else displaces them). For example, if the current qualifier tournament score is 127,310 points total, then the qualifier graphical indicator may be positioned on the graphical leaderboard in a position commensurate with a session score of 25,300 points, i.e., 127,310 points minus 102,010 points. Thus, the player would only be 2180 points from overtaking the qualifier. Of course, the various graphical leaderboards may, as discussed herein, generally update dynamically, so if the qualifier score changes, then the graphical indicators may update accordingly. For example, if the player with the current qualifier score is playing at the same time as the current tournament session (either in that same tournament session or in another session played concurrently), their score may be increasing as well, and the qualifier graphical indicator position may be updated to reflect such a score change. Alternatively, the player with the current qualifier score may be displaced by a completely different player who achieves a higher qualifier score; in such a case, the qualifier graphical indicator may update its position to reflect the score of the new qualifier.
The various locations of the graphical indicators, as well as, in some instances, the metrics associated with the termini of the path 4410, may be updated continuously during the multiplayer gaming events. There has not yet, however, been discussion of the appearance of the graphical leaderboards at the start and end of a multiplayer gaming session. There may be a variety of different ways that a graphical leaderboard may be configured to present information at the start and end of a multiplayer gaming session, and the discussion above regarding graphical leaderboard operation during a multiplayer gaming session should be understood to be relevant regardless of how, exactly, the start and end of the multiplayer gaming event are represented on the graphical leaderboard. Discussed below are some examples of such starting and ending presentations, but it will be understood that these are not intended to be limiting.
In one implementation, at the start of a multiplayer gaming event, the graphical indicators 4404 for all of the players may be located at the same location along the path 4410, as they may all start out with the same score. Moreover, the path 4410 may have a default starting length, e.g., one that may not be dependent on the value of the metrics that determine the locations of the graphical indicators. In other implementations, the path 4410 may have a path length that is determined at the start of the multiplayer gaming event based on the metric values for the players at the start of the multiplayer gaming event, e.g., a multiplayer gaming event may begin with each player of the multiplayer gaming event starting with a default metric value, e.g., 1,000 points (if the metric is the player score). In some such implementations, the initial graphical indicator 4404 positions may not be determined according to the usual rules discussed earlier, but may instead all be set to a particular position, e.g., at the starting terminus 4406 or midway between the starting terminus 4406 and the ending terminus 4408. However, as soon as the first change in a player metric occurs, then graphical indicator 4404 positions may be determined as discussed earlier.
In yet other implementations, the initial placement of the graphical indicators may be spaced apart, and the graphical indicators placed in an order that is determined based on factors other than the metric value. For example, the graphical indicators may initially be randomly ranked, ranked by which EGM each player is using, ranked alphabetically by player first or last name, ranked by some other metric that the leaderboard is not configured to track (such as total loyalty program points accrued by each player, by number of gaming tournaments each player has played in, by number of tournament sessions that each player has participated in, by age, etc.).
In at least one implementation, the initial positioning of graphical indicators may be at least partially determined according to the order in which players first hit the “play” button after the start of the tournament event for which the graphical leaderboard is configured. Thus, the graphical indicator of the first player to hit the “play” button may be caused to move into first place (even if they have not experienced a change in metric yet as a result of that “play”), and the graphical indicator of the second player to hit “play” may be caused to move into second place, and so forth. In some such implementations, there may be a trophy or prize awarded to the player that is first to press play, e.g., a “pole position” prize or trophy. Such a “pole position” status for a graphical indicator may be indicated through use of a special callout or other indicator on the graphical leaderboard.
It will be understood that the positioning of graphical indicators at the start of the operation of a graphical leaderboard may be determined according to different rules as compared with the positioning of those graphical indicators once changes in the metric of interest have started to occur. For example, the initial value of the metric of interest may initially have no effect on the positioning of the graphical indicators relative to one another—the graphical indicators are either all located at the same position (due to every player having the same initial value of metric), or are positioned at locations that are determined without reference to the initial metric value. However, as soon as the metric of interest for a player increases by any amount, then the graphical indicator for that player may be caused to move to a position ahead of the graphical indicators for all of the players that have not seen any increase in the metric of interest yet. As players continue to experience at least some increase in the value of the metric of interest, the graphical indicators for those players will similarly be moved ahead of any graphical indicators for players that have not yet experienced an increase in the metric of interest. Players that have experienced increases in the metric of interest may have their graphical indicators positioned according to those increased values of the metric of interest, whereas players that have not yet experienced an increase in the value of the metric of interest may have the positions of their graphical indicators determined according to other rules (such as those discussed above for initial positioning of the graphical indicators) but, generally speaking, at positions behind the position of the lowest-ranked player that has also experienced an increase in the value of the metric of interest. In some implementations, the graphical indicators in the two different populations of graphical indicators (a first population of graphical indicators for players that have experienced increases in the value of the metric of interest and a second population of graphical indicators for players that have not) may be positioned along different portions of the path, e.g., the first quarter of the path, i.e., closest to the starting terminus, may be allocated to graphical indicators of the second population, and the last three quarters of the path may be allocated to graphical indicators of the first population. In some such implementations, the portions of the path allocated to each population may be changed over time commensurate with the ratio of indicators in each population. Thus, as the second population shrinks in number (as more and more players experience an increase in the metric of interest and the graphical indicators thereof enter the first population), the portion of the path dedicated to the second population of graphical indicators may shrink more and more until it vanishes completely.
When a multiplayer gaming event concludes, the graphical leaderboard may provide an indication of the conclusion of the multiplayer gaming event, e.g., by causing, for example, a finish line graphic 4422 to be presented in the display window 4402, as shown in
In another “finish line” implementation, the finish line graphic 4422 may only travel along the path 4410 for a certain distance, e.g., halfway, before stopping, and the graphical indicators 4404 may then, in conjunction with the finish line graphic 4422 stopping, be caused to move (while still preserving their ranked order) towards or past the ending terminus 4408 until all of the graphical indicators 4404 have crossed the finish line.
It will be understood that, in some implementations, the number of graphical indicators that are displayed on such a graphical leaderboard during the multiplayer gaming event may be different from the number of such graphical indicators that are displayed on such graphical leaderboards at the start and/or end of the multiplayer gaming event. For example, at the start of the multiplayer gaming event, there may be graphical indicators 4404 shown for all of the players participating in that multiplayer gaming event, although as the metrics on which the positioning of the graphical indicators 4404 is based start to become more spaced apart, graphical indicators for players associated with metrics below the metric value associated with the starting terminus 4406 may be caused to no longer be displayed. Somewhat similarly, when the multiplayer gaming event finishes, graphical indicators 4404 for players that were not being displayed prior to the finishing animation for the graphical leaderboard 4400 may be caused to appear in the display window 4402 and move towards the ending terminus 4408 during the finishing animation (and in a manner that preserves the rankings of each player in accord with the values of the metric of interest).
For player-specific graphical leaderboard implementations, many of the concepts described above with respect to player-agnostic graphical leaderboard implementations may be similarly employed, although with some key differences. In particular, most implementations of a player-specific leaderboard may be configured to generally keep the graphical indicator for the relevant player stationary relative to the display window 4402 throughout the multiplayer gaming event for which the graphical leaderboard is configured; this allows the player to rapidly locate where the graphical indicator 4404 that represents them is, as it will generally always be at the same location (for convenience, the elements of a player-specific graphical leaderboard that are the same as or similar to elements in a player-agnostic graphical leaderboard are referenced using the same reference numbers in the discussion below and the relevant figures). In some implementations, the graphical indicator 4404 for that player may initially start out at a different location, e.g., near the starting terminus 4406, and then move to a location where the graphical indicator 4404 may be stationary for the remaining duration of the multiplayer gaming event for which the graphical leaderboard is providing ranking information, or at least until, for example, the final few seconds, at which point the graphical leaderboard may provide a finishing animation in which the graphical indicator 4404 may be caused to move from the location that it occupied for most of the relevant multiplayer gaming event and towards the ending terminus 4408. Aside from such potential movements of the relevant player's graphical indicator at the very start of the multiplayer gaming event and/or the very end of the multiplayer gaming event, however, the graphical indicator 4404 representing that player may otherwise stay in a fixed location relative to the display window.
In many implementations, the graphical indicator representing the player of interest may be caused to be positioned at the midpoint of the path 4410, although other implementations may, depending on the particular effect desired, cause the graphical indicator 4404 representing the player of interest to be positioned at other locations, e.g., a third of the distance along the path 4410, two thirds of the distance along the path 4410, etc.
For player-specific graphical leaderboard implementations, the termini of the path 4410 may be determined somewhat differently from how the termini are determined for the path 4410 for a player-agnostic leaderboard implementation. To facilitate discussion of player-specific leaderboards, certain characteristics of the paths of graphical leaderboards in general are discussed with reference to
The characteristics and parameters of the paths shown in
As shown in
As discussed above, the location of the graphical indicator 5104′ along the path may be set to any desired value. In particular, the graphical indicator 5104′ may be positioned along the path at a location that is a distance Ploc along the path from the starting terminus 5106 (A).
Ploc=Plen·x
Ploc is the distance from terminus A along the path to player indicator P and Plen is the length of the path if stretched out straight; in the implementation depicted in
As mentioned earlier, in addition to differences in how to determine where to display the graphical indicator 5104′, the configuration of player-specific graphical leaderboards may also differ with respect to how the metric values associated with the starting terminus 5106 and the ending terminus 5108 are determined. In particular, the metric values for the starting terminus 5106 and the ending terminus 5108 may both be selected using the metric value associated with the player for which the player-specific graphical leaderboard is tailored as a baseline. For example, the values Aval and Bval, which are the values associated with the starting terminus 445106 (A) and the ending terminus 445108 (B), respectively, may be determined according to:
where p=value of player P's metric of interest and a, b=configurable parameters. The parameters a and b may be selected as desired and may, in a simplified case, be selected to be the same. For example, a and b may both be selected to be the value 2, in which case the path will extend from a starting terminus 445106 that is associated with a metric value of 0.5·p to an ending terminus 445108 that is associated with a metric value of 1.5·p. If it is desired that the graphical indicator 5104′ be located proportionately between the starting terminus 5106 and the ending terminus 5108 based on a and b, then, for any given selection of a and b, x may be selected based on:
In some cases, the graphical indicator 5104′ may be placed at a location that is coincident with either the starting terminus 5106 or the ending terminus 5108, in which case the above relationship may not be used to determine the location x.
Once x has been selected and the starting terminus 5106 (A) and the ending terminus 5108 (B) have been associated with particular metric values, the locations Jloc of graphical indicators for other players J along the path measured from the starting terminus 5106 (A) may, for example, be determined to be consistent with, in the general case, the following piecewise function:
where j=value of player J's metric of interest.
The values shown may be approximately or exactly determined. For example, in order to provide some visual variation even when metric values do not change for a prolonged period of time, it may be desirable to introduce some small amount of variance over time in the determined positions of the graphical indicators, e.g., by multiplying each position by some randomly generated displacement factor, e.g., a random value between 0.98 and 1.02 (to generate a variation in the position of the graphical indicator of up to ±2%), thus giving rise to a value that is approximately the result of the indicated functions above. Such random displacement factors may, for example, introduce variations in the positions of the graphical indicators of up to ±1%, ±2%, ±3%, ±4%, ±5%, ±6%, ±7%, ±8%, ±9%, ±10%, and so on; the amount of such random displacement may generally be constrained to avoid large adjustments in position that would make it difficult for observers to obtain a clear understanding of the rankings conveyed by the graphical leaderboard presentation. Additionally, some implementations may cause players that have the same metric value to have their graphical indicators shown in a variety of different ways. For example, in some implementations, the graphical indicators may simply be overlaid on top of one another. In some such implementations, multiple player labels may be displayed in association with the stack of graphical indicators to indicate that multiple players are represented thereby. In other implementations, the graphical indicators may be caused to be shown at different positions (despite technically having the same rank) to allow the different graphical indicators to be discerned; these positions may be closely packed, however, and, in some implementations, these graphical indicators may be caused to randomly swap positions with one another to give the impression that they are moving as a pack but not in unison. In yet other implementations, players with the same value of the metric of interest may have rankings (between those players) that are determined according to a secondary factor, e.g., the value of another metric, such as player loyalty program ranking. Thus, if two players have the same score, the player of the two players that has the higher number of player loyalty program points may be ranked higher than the other player.
For the specific case in which a=b=2, the above relationship for x can be restated as x=(p−Aval)/(Bval−Aval), and the position of each graphical indicator 5104 for each player J may be determined to be consistent with the following piecewise continuous function:
The number of graphical indicators 5104 that may be shown for any particular player-specific graphical leaderboard may be selected in a number of different ways. In some implementations, a graphical indicator 5104 may be shown on a player-specific graphical leaderboard for any player associated with a metric value that is in the range of Aval<j<Bval (or Aval≤j≤Bval). In other implementations, graphical indicators 5104 may only be shown for a predetermined number of players that have the next highest and/or the next lowest metric values in comparison to the metric value for the player for which the player-specific graphical leaderboard 5100 is tailored. For example, only graphical indicators 5104 for the next three lower-ranked and next three higher-ranked players compared to the player for which the player-specific graphical leaderboard is tailored may be shown. In some implementations, selections of which graphical indicators are to be shown for a particular player-specific graphical leaderboard may be made in accordance with both selection techniques, e.g., a graphical indicator 5104 may be shown on a player-specific graphical leaderboard for up to the next three players ranked higher than the player for which the player-specific graphical leaderboard is tailored and with scores at or below Bval and for the next three players ranked lower than that player and with scores at or above Aval (the value of “three” may, of course, be selected to be any desirable number of graphical indicators, e.g., two, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, etc., and the maximum number of graphical indicators shown for players ranked above and below the player of interest may be different, e.g., five players with higher rankings and three players with lower rankings).
As discussed above, the path locations for each graphical indicator may be converted into an on-screen location for one or more displays that depict the graphical leaderboard. In some implementations, for example, the path may be normalized to a line graph dimension using, for example:
r1=lLG/Plen
where lLG=length of the line graph dimension window and r1=a line graph conversion ratio (these equations and discussion relate, for example, to the scenario provided above where the player indicator is located halfway along the path). For example, if it is desired to normalize to a line graph dimension window that is 200 units long, with the player shown at the 100 unit mark, then lLG would equal 200. The positions of another player's graphical indicator on the line graph may be determined according to:
α=(j−p)·r1
where α=position along line graph window. The line graph dimension locations may then be converted to whatever the stage dimensions are, i.e., whatever pixel values correspond to the display locations for the graphical indicators. For example, a stage conversion ratio r2 may be determined according to:
r2=ls/lLG
where ls is the stage size in pixels. In this example, the entire width of 1920×1080 pixel monitor may be used as the stage size, leading ls to be equal to 1920 pixels. The stage dimension value for a given value of α may then be determined according to 0.5·ls+(α·r2). This gives the pixel value for the positioning of that graphical indicator (or rather, the pixel value for some reference point on the graphical indicator, e.g., the center pixel of the graphical indicator).
In some implementations, the positions of the graphical indicators on a player-specific graphical leaderboard may be determined according to a logarithmic scale, e.g., with the graphical indicators for other players shown at distances along the path away from the player indicator that are determined by taking a log of the actual metric differential between the two players (or performing some other non-linear operation on the metric differential to convert it to a separation distance along the path). Thus, as the gap in metric values between players shrinks, the actual distance between the graphical indicators for the two players may shrink in a non-linear manner.
In some implementations, graphical indicators for all of the players in the multiplayer gaming event may be depicted in a player-specific graphical leaderboard, but those players that have metrics that exceed (or fall below) the metrics associated with the starting terminus 5106 and the ending terminus 5108 may simply all be shown at locations coincident with the starting terminus 5106 or the ending terminus 5108, as appropriate.
In
Other information that may be conveyed in the player-specific graphical leaderboard of
As shown in the Figures herein, the graphical indicators used, for both the player-agnostic graphical leaderboard and the player-specific graphical leaderboard, have all been homogenous—for example, all of the graphical indicators used have been icons of people running. It will be understood that the particular graphical indicators used may be selected to be any appropriate graphic, e.g., images or animations of people running (such as in a marathon), bicycling, swimming, etc.; images or animations of animals running (such as buffalo, horses, road runners, etc.), swimming (dolphins, sharks, etc.), flying (birds, dragons, etc.), etc.; or images or animations of vehicles moving (cars, boats, planes, rockets, etc.). Furthermore, the graphical indicators may be enhanced, in some cases, through the application of various additional embellishments, e.g., dust clouds that may be kicked up by a graphical indicator when overtaking another graphical indicator, or when in a particular ranked position.
The particular type of graphic or animation selected for graphical indicators may be selected to be consistent with a particular game theme, e.g., to be consistent with the theme of the wagering game that is used in the multiplayer gaming event for which a graphical leaderboard may be used. It will be understood that in some implementations, there may be some graphical leaderboards that may allow for player-selectable differentiation between the different graphical indicators that are used in such graphical leaderboards.
For example, players may be provided with an opportunity to select between a plurality of different graphical indicators. Such graphical indicators may, in some implementations, not necessarily be thematically related. In other implementations, the graphical indicators may be thematically related but still visually different in some manner. For example, if the graphical leaderboard is for a buffalo-themed game, then players may be allowed to select a graphical indicator from a number of different buffalo-themed graphical indicators, e.g., a young buffalo, an old buffalo, a buffalo with war paint on it, a buffalo wearing a particular sporting team insignia or jersey, a zombie buffalo, a cybernetic buffalo, a samurai buffalo, a buffalo with wings, etc. In another example, the graphical indicators may each have a core graphical component that is generally the same for each player, e.g., a buffalo, horse, bicycle, etc., and an additional graphical component that is customizable by each player to some extent or that may vary from player to player (such variance may, in some implementations, be determined according to preset rules and may not be player-configurable). For example, the additional graphical component may be in the form of a graphic of a person that is riding the buffalo, horse, bicycle, etc. that may vary with respect to the clothing or costume worn by each such depicted person, the color of such clothing or costume, the gender of the person, physical attributes of the person, and so forth—thereby allowing a graphical leaderboard presentation that has both a common theme between all of the graphical indicators (the core graphical component) and a variety of different embellishments (the additional graphical component) that serve to differentiate between individual graphical indicators shown on a graphical leaderboard. In yet another example, if a multiplayer gaming event has a particular cinematic or television show theme, e.g., Game of Thrones, then each player may be allowed to select a graphical indicator that corresponds, for example, to one of a plurality of different characters from that movie or television show. In yet another example, players may be provided with the same or similar core graphical indicators, but may be provided with the ability to select customizations thereof, e.g., players may be provided with the opportunity to select costumes, accessories, or other graphical enhancements that may be overlaid on, or otherwise used to modify the appearance of, the graphical indicators.
In some implementations, the ability of players to customize or otherwise actively participate in the determination of how a graphical indicator that represents them will be presented may be contingent on various conditions. For example, a player may “earn” the opportunity to select, for example, an upgrade or enhancement to their graphical indicator by meeting one or more criteria, e.g., achieving a particular number of player loyalty program points, achieving a particular player loyalty program level, playing in one or more gaming tournament sessions for a given gaming tournament, playing one or more gaming tournament sessions in an online gaming tournament, wagering at least a certain amount in one or more types of wagering games, wagering at least a certain amount in one play of a wagering game, wagering at least a certain amount at a particular set of one or more casino properties within a given time frame, visiting one or more casino properties or each casino property in a predetermined set of one or more casino properties within a given timeframe, winning one or more trophies in a tournament gaming session (as discussed in U.S. Patent Application No. 62/884,072, which was previously incorporated herein by reference), achieving a particular bonus outcome in a wagering game, and so forth. In one example, a player may visit a particular show, e.g., circus show, magic show, stand-up comedy show, musical show, etc., at a casino property or related property and may be presented with upgrades or enhancements for their graphical indicator that may, for example, add on an accessory or costume from the show. For example, a player that attends a Cirque du Soleil show may be presented with the ability to select any of several themed costumes or masks that may be applied to their graphical indicator as a reward for attending the show.
In some implementations, user-selected upgrades or modifications to graphical indicators may only be depicted on certain graphical leaderboards. For example, a player-specific graphical leaderboard may be configured to depict the graphical indicator for the player for which the player-specific graphical leaderboard is tailored using the customizations or enhancements selected by that player. In such a case, the graphical indicators for the other players depicted thereon may, in some implementations, be uncustomized or, in other implementations, reflect the customizations or enhancements selected by the players associated with those graphical indicators. In either case, if there is also a player-agnostic graphical leaderboard that is depicting ranking information for players in the same multiplayer gaming event, such a player-agnostic graphical leaderboard may be configured to show all of the graphical indicators with or without the various enhancements and/or upgrades selected by the various players represented thereby. For example, it may be desirous to limit the display of player-customizable graphical indicators to only player-specific graphical leaderboards that are displayed on the EGMs that each player of a multiplayer gaming event is using, thereby allowing the players to see their customizations (and, if enabled, the customizations of other players), but to cause the graphical indicators that represent those same players on player-agnostic graphical leaderboards that may be more generally visible to spectators at large to be standardized or uncustomized, thereby preserving a consistent visual theme related to the wagering game being played (or of the multiplayer gaming event that is occurring).
In some implementations, the graphical indicator that is used for a particular player in a graphical leaderboard may share one or more elements in common with a graphical indicator of that player in other contexts. For example, a player may, for example, have an avatar or other graphical representation of themselves that they have adopted for use in, for example, a social gaming application or a player loyalty system. In such implementations, a version of that same avatar or other graphical representation may be used as the graphical indicator for that player in a graphical leaderboard (or added as an additional graphical component to a core graphical component of a graphical indicator used to represent that player on a graphical leaderboard). In some such implementations, the continuing association between a player and their avatar or other graphical representation may be leveraged to allow the player to “cultivate” that avatar or other graphical representation (for ease of reference, subsequent reference to “avatar” is to be understood to also encompass other graphical representations that may serve a similar purpose, e.g., providing a relatively unique graphical indication that serves to represent a player in one or more virtual presentations). For example, a centralized server system may be provided that is configured to store data relating to player's avatars and to provide such data to applications that may request it, e.g., a tournament management system may request that the centralized server system provide one or more graphical images of the avatar which the tournament management system may then use to represent the player in a tournament graphical leaderboard presentation. The centralized server system, which may be referred to herein simply as an avatar management system (AMS), may be further configured to provide opportunities for the player to improve or customize one or more aspects of their avatar (including giving the avatar a name, which, in some implementations, may be displayed in conjunction with the avatar, e.g., on a graphical leaderboard, instead of the player's actual name), e.g., the AMS may be configured to adjust the size or scale of the avatar responsive to player actions, e.g., a player that “feeds” their avatar by making regular visits to a casino associated with the AMS may be rewarded by being provided with a larger and/or more imposing (more muscular, more scarred, more active, etc.) avatar. In some implementations, avatars may be implemented as “virtual pets” that players must provide with a basic level of care (in the form of making regular visits, for example, to one or more websites or engaging in the use of one or more specific applications on a mobile device that are associated with that avatar or the player associated with that avatar) in order to keep the avatar's appearance from degrading or becoming less appealing (similar to a Tamagotchi virtual pet, in some respects).
In some implementations, a visually enhanced avatar may also offer non-visual enhancements, e.g., a player that uses a visually enhanced avatar may also be provided with a benefit in one or more tournament sessions in a tournament where the visually enhanced avatar is used. For example, such a player may receive a boost during play, such as having one or more wild symbols displayed during a spin of a reel-based wagering game, receiving a small percentage boost to their chances of achieving a winning pattern, and/or receiving a personalized all-wins multiplier that is applied to their score (such as, for example, a 10% boost where the player receives 1.1 points for every one point won).
In some implementations, the AMS (or another system in communication therewith) may be configured to provide players with opportunities to earn accessories or enhancements for their avatars, e.g., user-selectable options that the user may select in order to activate a particular effect. For example, in some implementations, a player may be able to obtain an accessory such as a jetpack, super-speed power-up, or other speed-enhancing item, that the player may select during play (or prior to) play in order to receive a particular benefit. For example, selecting a jetpack may cause the player's avatar (or graphical indicator associated therewith) to be shown to be wearing a jetpack and the player's score to correspondingly increase by a particular amount, thereby causing the player to appear to accelerate forward on the graphical leaderboard and pass one or more other players' graphical indicators. Such accessories may also, in some implementations, be earned during tournament game play, e.g., as the result of achieving a particular pattern of symbols or a “Big Win” in the wagering game being played. For example, a player gets a “Big Win” and a jetpack appears on the player's avatar as a visual enhancement that depicts their graphical indicator moving really fast past the other players. In such instances, the accessory may be caused to be immediately applied to the player's graphical indicator on the graphical leaderboard, as in the example above, or may be “banked” for later use by the player within that tournament session or even in other tournament sessions. Such enhancements may also or alternatively be configured to be earned, for example, based on the number of additional tournament session entries that a player may earn—for example, every player in a tournament session may have a random chance of being awarded such an enhancement, but players that have played multiple tournament sessions during a given tournament round may be provided with an enhanced chance of being awarded such enhancements.
It will be appreciated that the graphical leaderboards discussed herein may be configured to display data for a variety of different multiplayer contexts—while the examples have primarily focused on displaying ranking information for a given tournament session of a tournament, or for the tournament itself, it will be appreciated that such graphical leaderboards may portray data from a variety of time periods, e.g., tournament sessions, tournament rounds, tournaments, a given day, a given week, a given month, a given year, etc.
It will be understood that the graphical leaderboards discussed herein may be implemented using any of a variety of different mechanisms, including, but not limited to, controllers that include one or more processors and one or more memory devices that store computer-executable instructions for controlling the one or more processors to cause one or more displays to present a graphical leaderboard in accord with the concepts discussed above. Such systems may, for example, receive information regarding a metric of interest for a plurality of players during a multiplayer gaming event (or information derived therefrom), and may then cause a graphical leaderboard based on such information to be displayed. It will be further understood that the disclosure encompasses non-transitory machine-readable media that stores computer-executable instructions for controlling one or more processors to provide such graphical leaderboards. Additionally, it will be understood that such instructions may cause graphical leaderboards to display graphical indicators in accord with the characteristics outlined above, but may utilize other calculations in order to provide the same or equivalent effect—for example, while the discussions herein have focused on determining the locations of graphical indicators as a function of distance from the starting terminus and along the path between the starting terminus and ending terminus, an identical effect may be achieved, with appropriate adjustment, by determining the locations of the graphical indicators as a function of distance from the ending terminus and along the path between the starting terminus and ending terminus. Thus, any reference herein to a particular function or relationship that governs the location or presentation of a particular graphical element should be understood to provide a way of understanding if the location or presentation of that graphical element satisfies a particular requirement, as opposed to governing how, exactly, that location or presentation is determined.
It will be further appreciated that some implementations of leaderboards, in particular, of player-specific leaderboards, may be configured to allow for player customization thereof, e.g., allowing a player to “zoom” in and out to show fewer or more graphical indicators, e.g., by allowing for player inputs such as “pinch to zoom” or the like via touch-screen. Such inputs may, for example, have the effect of increasing or decreasing the value or values of a and b in the equations discussed earlier herein, thereby dynamically adjusting the range of values represented by the path along which the graphical indicators are displayed.
In some implementations, graphical leaderboard-type displays may be used in non-tournament formats, e.g., to show how close a player is to earning various jackpots in a real-money game. For example, a graphical leaderboard-style display may be provided that shows players chasing “buffalos” (or other animals) that represent the mini, minor, major, or other tiered jackpot amounts in a real-money play version of a game. Alternatively, such jackpot amounts may be awarded to the top X players (where X is the number of tiers) in a tournament-style game.
In yet further implementations, some graphical leaderboards may be shown in a first-person perspective, with the player's viewpoint shown from the perspective of, for example, an animal, such as a buffalo, running in a race, and the distance until the next animal indicating how far ahead the next player is.
It will be appreciated that in tournament gaming systems, a tournament management system or other system may track the values of various players' metrics, e.g., scores, over time and may provide updates to the various graphical leaderboard displays so that each graphical leaderboard may be updated as needed to display a desired type of graphical leaderboard. For example, there may be different graphical leaderboard displays that provide graphical leaderboards reflecting players' performance across different time periods and different events. For example, a tournament leaderboard might be configured to display information regarding player rankings within a tournament, a separate tournament session leaderboard might be configured to display information regarding the ranking of players in the current session, and yet another graphical leaderboard might be configured to display rankings of players across an entire week or month of tournament play. Each such leaderboard display may be configured, in some implementations, through parameters that may be entered into the tournament management system via a GUI of some sort.
It will also be appreciated that the graphical leaderboards discussed herein may, in some implementations, give the appearance of a “race” between players, the underlying multiplayer game play that generates the metric of interest for such graphical leaderboards may be of a non-racing game type. For example, the underlying game play that generates the metric of interest may be game play such as slot machine game play, poker game play, roulette game play, blackjack game play, or other games of chance.
Generally speaking, a system for providing a graphical leaderboard may be configured, e.g., via computer-executable instructions stored on one or more memory devices, to receive data regarding values of a metric of interest for a plurality of players participating in a multiplayer gaming event. Such systems may then determine, for each player of a set of one or more of the players in the plurality of players, a corresponding indicator position along a path of a graphical leaderboard based, at least in part, on the value of the metric of interest for that player. The indicator position may, as discussed above, generally be tied to the value of the metric of interest, but may also, in some implementations, be modified slightly for cosmetic or presentation reasons, e.g., by applying a random displacement factor or otherwise adjusting the indicator position. In some implementations, the set of one or more players may include all of the players in the plurality of players; in other implementations, the set of players may be a proper subset of the plurality of players, e.g., when the values of the metric of interest for some players do not meet minimum requirements for displaying a graphical indicator (such as for players that might have a score that is not in the top twenty scores when only the top twenty scorers are represented by graphical indicators for a given multiplayer gaming event). Once the indicator positions for the graphical indicators for the set of players has been determined, the system may then cause graphical indicators for the players in the set of players to be displayed on one or more displays. Such causation may include, for example, the system directly causing the display of such graphical indicators by sending instructions to a video controller associated with a display or indirectly causing the display of such graphical indicators by, for example, transmitting data regarding the indicator positions to systems, e.g., EGMs, that then process that indicator position information, e.g., to translate it into a format that is compatible with the display hardware available on those systems, and cause it to be displayed on displays associated with those systems.
As discussed earlier, systems for providing graphical leaderboards may be configured to perform such underlying functionality on a repeating basis over time—either periodically or on an event-driven basis. Each time new information regarding the metric of interest for one or more players is received by the system, the system may re-determine the indicator positions (if appropriate) and cause the graphical indicators to be updated in accordance with the indicator position information, e.g., to move from the locations they were at based on the indicator positions before the updated information is received to new locations based on the indicator positions after the updated information is received. In some cases, such updates may cause some graphical indicators to be removed from and/or added to the one or more displays, e.g., as new information regarding the values of the metric of interest cause changes in which players are represented by graphical indicators on the graphical leaderboard (for example, if a graphical leaderboard shows only the top 20 players in a 32-player multiplayer gaming event, the composition of the top 20 players may change over time based on fluctuations in the metric of interest).
It is to be understood that the phrases “for each <item> of the one or more <items>,” “each <item> of the one or more <items>,” or the like, if used herein, are inclusive of both a single-item group and multiple-item groups, i.e., the phrase “for . . . each” is used in the sense that it is used in programming languages to refer to each item of whatever population of items is referenced. For example, if the population of items referenced is a single item, then “each” would refer to only that single item (despite the fact that dictionary definitions of “each” frequently define the term to refer to “every one of two or more things”) and would not imply that there must be at least two of those items. Similarly, the term “set” or “subset” should not be viewed, in itself, as necessarily encompassing a plurality of items—it will be understood that a set or a subset can encompass only one member or multiple members (unless the context indicates otherwise).
The use, if any, of ordinal indicators, e.g., (a), (b), (c) . . . or the like, in this disclosure and claims is to be understood as not conveying any particular order or sequence, except to the extent that such an order or sequence is explicitly indicated. For example, if there are three steps labeled (i), (ii), and (iii), it is to be understood that these steps may be performed in any order (or even concurrently, if not otherwise contraindicated) unless indicated otherwise. For example, if step (ii) involves the handling of an element that is created in step (i), then step (ii) may be viewed as happening at some point after step (i). Similarly, if step (i) involves the handling of an element that is created in step (ii), the reverse is to be understood. It is also to be understood that use of the ordinal indicator “first” herein, e.g., “a first item,” should not be read as suggesting, implicitly or inherently, that there is necessarily a “second” instance, e.g., “a second item.”
While the invention has been described with respect to the figures, it will be appreciated that many modifications and changes may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the invention. Any variation and derivation from the above description and figures are included in the scope of the present invention as defined by the claims.
The present application is a continuation under 35 U.S.C. § 120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/946,113, filed Jun. 5, 2020, titled “SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES FOR PROVIDING ANIMATED LEADERBOARDS,” and which claims benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/884,072, filed Aug. 7, 2019, and titled “TOURNAMENT GAMING FOR ELECTRONIC GAMING MACHINES AND OTHER COMPUTING DEVICES,” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/913,682, filed Oct. 10, 2019, and titled “SYSTEMS AND TECHNIQUES FOR PROVIDING ANIMATED LEADERBOARDS,” all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties and for all purposes, in particular with respect to portions thereof that relate to race graphic or otherwise animated leaderboards and the like, especially with respect to gaming tournaments. This application is also related to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 62/913,684, titled “STICKY WILDS FEATURE FOR TOURNAMENT GAMING FOR ELECTRONIC GAMING MACHINES AND OTHER COMPUTING DEVICES,” 62/913,685, titled “TOURNAMENT GAMING SYSTEM WITH ALL WINS MULTIPLIER MODE,” and 62/913,680, titled “TOURNAMENT GAMING FOR ELECTRONIC GAMING MACHINES AND OTHER COMPUTING DEVICES,” all of which were filed on Oct. 10, 2019, and all of which are also hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties and for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| D259499 | Dunham | Jun 1981 | S |
| 5342518 | Posner | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5560603 | Seelig | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5664998 | Seelig | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5755621 | Marks | May 1998 | A |
| 5767854 | Anwar | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5779242 | Kaufmann | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5779549 | Walker | Jul 1998 | A |
| 6039648 | Guinn | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6082887 | Feuer | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093100 | Singer | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6210275 | Olsen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6224486 | Walker | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6270412 | Crawford | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6287202 | Pascal | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6293865 | Kelly | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6309299 | Weiss | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6354592 | Virzi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6425828 | Walker | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6620045 | Berman | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| D492692 | Fallon | Jul 2004 | S |
| 6817948 | Pascal | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| D499786 | Dropo | Dec 2004 | S |
| 6908390 | Nguyen | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 7354345 | Bortnik | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7393280 | Cannon | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7516959 | Huard | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| D605725 | Chang | Dec 2009 | S |
| 7682251 | Bortnik | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7684874 | Schlottmann | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7684882 | Baerlocher | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7689302 | Schlottmann | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7690996 | Iddings | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7704144 | Abbott | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7753790 | Nguyen | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7780520 | Baerlocher | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7787972 | Schlottmann | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7798901 | Nguyen | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7824267 | Cannon | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7878899 | Duhamel | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7972209 | Kelly | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7976389 | Cannon | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8002630 | Nguyen | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8021230 | Baerlocher | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8043157 | Cannon | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8070583 | Baerlocher | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8092309 | Bickley | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8142272 | Walker | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8157647 | House | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8192270 | Slomiany | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8202165 | Duhamel | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8246434 | Moody | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8246439 | Kelly | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8277298 | Mace | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8313372 | Naicker | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8317620 | Kelly | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8342957 | Carpenter | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8382572 | Hoffman | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8419520 | Johnson | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8419546 | Decasa | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8430736 | Cannon | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8439733 | Kay | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8449386 | Englman | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8465363 | Mayeroff | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8469788 | Carpenter | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8485892 | Nguyen | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8506394 | Kelly | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8512119 | Kelly | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8523682 | Bickley | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8540577 | Shvili | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8562418 | Gomez | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8585481 | Owen | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8585494 | Parrinello | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8591338 | Nguyen | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| D694773 | Sakaguchi | Dec 2013 | S |
| D695778 | Edwards | Dec 2013 | S |
| 8602877 | Carpenter | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8613650 | Kovacs | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8622793 | Ford | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8622817 | Englman | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8641507 | Kelly | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8641515 | Nicely | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8684830 | Chun | Apr 2014 | B1 |
| 8690661 | Cannon | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8702499 | Johnson | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8702520 | Seelig | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8715051 | Davis | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8715052 | Bennett | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8715069 | Arnone | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8721421 | Tempest | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8734232 | Bunch | May 2014 | B2 |
| D706808 | Edwards | Jun 2014 | S |
| D710372 | Dellinger | Aug 2014 | S |
| 8801518 | Lipscomb | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8808077 | Chun | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8840462 | Patel | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8851980 | Versaci | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8851981 | Ramsey | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8852001 | Kelly | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8870659 | House | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8894480 | Johnson | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8905841 | Carpenter | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 9005010 | Watkins | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9011241 | Kelly | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| D730373 | Clement | May 2015 | S |
| 9022867 | Kelly | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9033786 | Kelly | May 2015 | B2 |
| D732054 | Yoneda | Jun 2015 | S |
| 9070255 | Christensen | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9111416 | Cannon | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9123208 | Davis | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9123210 | Bennett | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| D741897 | Wilkinson | Oct 2015 | S |
| 9155968 | Hedrick | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9159198 | Moshal | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9165429 | Cannon | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9165430 | Bickley | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9171426 | Dimichele | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9177445 | Vemuri | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9214056 | Kovacs | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| D750113 | Kettner | Feb 2016 | S |
| 9286756 | Bramble | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| D753158 | Mezzanotte | Apr 2016 | S |
| 9311773 | Chun | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| D759065 | Mezzanotte | Jun 2016 | S |
| 9361754 | Decasa, Jr. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9364753 | Bennett | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9384631 | Arnone | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9384635 | Nguyen | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9401073 | Lee | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| D763904 | Knapp | Aug 2016 | S |
| 9430908 | Owen | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9443393 | Johnson | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9443394 | Carpenter | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| D771670 | Chan | Nov 2016 | S |
| D772252 | Myers | Nov 2016 | S |
| D772260 | Ingenlath | Nov 2016 | S |
| D772894 | Zhao | Nov 2016 | S |
| 9495838 | Davis | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9520020 | Bickley | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9530280 | Melnick | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9558632 | Melnick | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| D780201 | Zielinski | Feb 2017 | S |
| 9569933 | Baker | Feb 2017 | B2 |
| 9607479 | Robbins | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| D783655 | Hu | Apr 2017 | S |
| 9613492 | Englman | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9616331 | Jordan | Apr 2017 | B1 |
| 9626836 | Arnone | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9633509 | Cannon | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| D788167 | Fox Uribe | May 2017 | S |
| 9656174 | McLellan | May 2017 | B1 |
| 9697671 | Moody | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9697674 | Morrissette | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9715790 | Arnone | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9734660 | Kiely | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 9747754 | Carpenter | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| D801990 | Reissner | Nov 2017 | S |
| D804505 | Hoffman | Dec 2017 | S |
| 9858750 | Kovacs | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9984529 | Kim | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9990806 | Davis | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| D823336 | Tinney | Jul 2018 | S |
| 10013852 | Jordan | Jul 2018 | B1 |
| 10032338 | Lark | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10055940 | Arnone | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10068432 | Wortmann | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10109155 | Chase | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| D834604 | Feldman | Nov 2018 | S |
| D836653 | Zhou | Dec 2018 | S |
| 10163305 | Wortmann | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10195532 | McLellan | Feb 2019 | B1 |
| 10210706 | Penacho | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| D842316 | Toth | Mar 2019 | S |
| 10235841 | Nguyen | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10255765 | Washington | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| D847833 | Toth | May 2019 | S |
| D849771 | Foley | May 2019 | S |
| D852830 | Penacho | Jul 2019 | S |
| D854554 | Toth | Jul 2019 | S |
| 10354491 | Melnick | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10360766 | Arnone | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10373442 | Schlottmann | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10395474 | Englman | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| D858535 | Evans | Sep 2019 | S |
| 10424162 | Heenan | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| D861703 | Suslik | Oct 2019 | S |
| D861710 | Frackelton | Oct 2019 | S |
| 10445985 | Davis | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10460568 | Givant | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| D867391 | Yoshioka | Nov 2019 | S |
| D868825 | Paulik | Dec 2019 | S |
| D870123 | Butcher | Dec 2019 | S |
| D870126 | Crispino | Dec 2019 | S |
| 10504332 | Riggs | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10510215 | Arnone | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10515514 | Weaver | Dec 2019 | B1 |
| 10540852 | Lark | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| D875110 | Spors | Feb 2020 | S |
| D876450 | Suslik | Feb 2020 | S |
| D876477 | Gansert | Feb 2020 | S |
| D879122 | Ebler | Mar 2020 | S |
| 10621829 | Loader | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| D889493 | Schwegler | Jul 2020 | S |
| D890790 | Marks | Jul 2020 | S |
| D895645 | Sanborn | Sep 2020 | S |
| D896256 | Kawaichi | Sep 2020 | S |
| 10789814 | Palmisano | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| D898769 | Park | Oct 2020 | S |
| D905106 | Kang | Dec 2020 | S |
| D905736 | Felkins | Dec 2020 | S |
| 10864443 | Eatedali | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10872492 | Oberberger | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| D910071 | Chen | Feb 2021 | S |
| D913325 | Chen | Mar 2021 | S |
| D914056 | Chen | Mar 2021 | S |
| D916754 | Johnson | Apr 2021 | S |
| D916903 | Arena | Apr 2021 | S |
| D917503 | Sakurai | Apr 2021 | S |
| 11055951 | La Guardia | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11183020 | Berman | Nov 2021 | B2 |
| 20010034260 | Luciano | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010054003 | Chien | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020028707 | Pascal | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020119824 | Allen | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020183105 | Cannon | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030050831 | Klayh | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030060264 | Chilton | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20040229700 | Cannon | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050020352 | Chilton | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050071024 | Henshaw | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050160003 | Berardi | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20060058082 | Crawford, III | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060082056 | Kane | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060148565 | Gauselmann | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060157934 | Yoseloff | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060178202 | Hughes | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060287045 | Walker | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070129147 | Gagner | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070191102 | Coliz | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070218968 | Snow | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070218982 | Baerlocher | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243936 | Binenstock | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20080045288 | Moshal | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080070692 | Schlottmann | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080070693 | Schlottmann | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080070694 | Schlottmann | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080070695 | Baerlocher | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080076520 | Chan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080146305 | Moody | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080207313 | Acres | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080254883 | Patel | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090005150 | Haveson | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090011810 | Moshal | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090011827 | Englman | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090029773 | Cherry | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090061997 | Popovich | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090061999 | Popovich | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090069093 | Kelly | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090104965 | House | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090118000 | Yoshizawa | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090124320 | Dewaal | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090124364 | Cuddy | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090170584 | Tan | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090197659 | Christensen | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090270168 | Englman | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090275374 | Nelson | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100022307 | Steuer | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100035674 | Slomiany | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100062840 | Herrmann | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100070056 | Coronel | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100105470 | Englman | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100120503 | Hoffman | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100197377 | Aoki | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100210356 | Losica | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100210362 | Toompere | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100227686 | Brunet De Courssou | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100311497 | Suslik | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110014964 | Crowder, Jr. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110028160 | Roeding | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110070940 | Jaffe | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110111856 | White | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110130186 | Chim | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110281624 | Moody | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120122561 | Hedrick | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120129610 | Mazursky | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120225724 | Barber | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130029739 | Ramsey | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130065676 | Owen | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130072294 | Mosley | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130116809 | Carpenter | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130122978 | Slomiany | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130244751 | Bennett | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130252704 | Gilbertson | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130281179 | Tempest | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130296036 | Scott | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130310127 | Bradley | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331181 | Newton | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331184 | Kelly | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331968 | Newton | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140038703 | Lampert | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140038724 | Layne, IV | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140051520 | Davis | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140087815 | Caputo | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140106866 | Hardy | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140162787 | Carpenter | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140194176 | Robbins | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140274308 | Guinn | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140323199 | Dimichele | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150018070 | Meyer | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150099576 | Anderson | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150111643 | Olofsson | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150199878 | Wright | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150228151 | Damodaran | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150248810 | Wortmann | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150287069 | Gissara | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150348361 | Adiraju | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150355727 | Hu | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150356815 | Kim | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20150379822 | Ellis | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160063807 | Bennett | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160104344 | Meyer | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160140807 | Chase | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160148126 | Paleja | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160217646 | Hornik | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160275757 | Decasa, Jr. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160284157 | Marrinson | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160328918 | De Waal | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170161999 | Givant | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170200349 | Englman | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170323528 | Arnone | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20170337775 | Singer | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180052582 | Hilbert | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180068529 | Delekta | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180075708 | San | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180089953 | Palmisano | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180089954 | Carpenter | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180095616 | Valdivia | Apr 2018 | A1 |
| 20180130312 | Cire | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180146206 | Weekes | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180172835 | Koochew | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20190066446 | Mariscal | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190073859 | Penacho | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190080562 | Jungmann | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190096182 | Oberberger | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190102993 | Washington | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190139366 | Davis | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190147706 | Bolling, Jr. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190244482 | Washington | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190262717 | Thielbar | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190287344 | Oberberger | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190333314 | Henshaw | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190340883 | Arnone | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190347907 | Bolling, Jr. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190378379 | Satterlie | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20190385406 | Marks | Dec 2019 | A1 |
| 20200043233 | Nelson | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200043293 | Nelson | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200043294 | Davis | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200111293 | Oberberger | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200184775 | Oberberger | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200279451 | La Guardia | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20210007632 | Blahnik | Jan 2021 | A1 |
| 20210256811 | Uberuaga | Aug 2021 | A1 |
| 20230029032 | Lentine | Jan 2023 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 630112 | Mar 1993 | AU |
| 1997022551 | Aug 1997 | AU |
| 1997029346 | Nov 1997 | AU |
| 1997030070 | Nov 1997 | AU |
| 1997035809 | Jan 1998 | AU |
| 700667 | Jan 1999 | AU |
| 2001036378 | May 2001 | AU |
| 2001294751 | Jun 2002 | AU |
| 2002311978 | Dec 2002 | AU |
| 755912 | Jan 2003 | AU |
| 2002250161 | Jul 2003 | AU |
| 2003281244 | Jan 2004 | AU |
| 2004904539 | Aug 2004 | AU |
| 2005203403 | Feb 2006 | AU |
| 2005285317 | Mar 2006 | AU |
| 2002306874 | Jun 2006 | AU |
| 2006200237 | Aug 2006 | AU |
| 2007200711 | Oct 2007 | AU |
| 2008100162 | Apr 2008 | AU |
| 2008100163 | Apr 2008 | AU |
| 2006208418 | Nov 2008 | AU |
| 2007211906 | Feb 2009 | AU |
| 2005235004 | Apr 2009 | AU |
| 2008323670 | May 2009 | AU |
| 2007216930 | Mar 2010 | AU |
| 2007237214 | Mar 2010 | AU |
| 2008200060 | Mar 2010 | AU |
| 2004267734 | Jul 2010 | AU |
| 2010200449 | Sep 2010 | AU |
| 2005270750 | Dec 2010 | AU |
| 2010202077 | Dec 2010 | AU |
| 2004267733 | Jan 2011 | AU |
| 2004267746 | Jan 2011 | AU |
| 2005203404 | Mar 2011 | AU |
| 2011200529 | Mar 2011 | AU |
| 2010246507 | Jun 2011 | AU |
| 2007200050 | Sep 2011 | AU |
| 2006302141 | Jan 2012 | AU |
| 2005248969 | Feb 2012 | AU |
| 2011205125 | Mar 2012 | AU |
| 2011200434 | Nov 2012 | AU |
| 2010202282 | Jan 2013 | AU |
| 2012268860 | Jan 2013 | AU |
| 2008312413 | Sep 2013 | AU |
| 2013254911 | Nov 2013 | AU |
| 2014900096 | Jan 2014 | AU |
| 2013202667 | Jan 2015 | AU |
| 2015201979 | May 2015 | AU |
| 2012326136 | Jun 2015 | AU |
| 2015200050 | Jul 2015 | AU |
| 2013213728 | Jan 2016 | AU |
| 2011307385 | Mar 2016 | AU |
| 2016203321 | Jun 2016 | AU |
| 2016204577 | Jul 2016 | AU |
| 2014395471 | Jan 2017 | AU |
| 2014317574 | Jun 2017 | AU |
| 2014317575 | Jun 2017 | AU |
| 2016349725 | Jun 2018 | AU |
| 2018203786 | Jun 2018 | AU |
| 2018203839 | Jun 2018 | AU |
| 2563942 | Nov 2000 | CA |
| 2340562 | Aug 2002 | CA |
| 2536018 | Mar 2005 | CA |
| 2920520 | Mar 2005 | CA |
| 2538706 | Apr 2005 | CA |
| 2259197 | Sep 2005 | CA |
| 2253884 | Nov 2005 | CA |
| 2580187 | Mar 2006 | CA |
| 2522944 | Jul 2006 | CA |
| 2527367 | May 2007 | CA |
| 2527416 | May 2007 | CA |
| 2403035 | Jul 2007 | CA |
| 2572719 | Jul 2007 | CA |
| 2604412 | Apr 2008 | CA |
| 2617034 | Jul 2008 | CA |
| 2691337 | Aug 2010 | CA |
| 2812377 | Apr 2012 | CA |
| 2838347 | Dec 2012 | CA |
| 2852464 | Apr 2013 | CA |
| 2876890 | Jul 2015 | CA |
| 2947448 | Nov 2015 | CA |
| 2956084 | Jan 2016 | CA |
| 2535880 | Apr 2016 | CA |
| 2599635 | Aug 2016 | CA |
| 2535838 | Sep 2016 | CA |
| 2941629 | Mar 2017 | CA |
| 3004490 | May 2017 | CA |
| 3017742 | Sep 2017 | CA |
| 3017745 | Sep 2017 | CA |
| 2655095 | Apr 2018 | CA |
| 1853203 | Oct 2006 | CN |
| 1853204 | Oct 2006 | CN |
| 1853205 | Oct 2006 | CN |
| 101018592 | Aug 2007 | CN |
| 101043923 | Sep 2007 | CN |
| 101044523 | Sep 2007 | CN |
| 101044525 | Sep 2007 | CN |
| 101321564 | Jul 2011 | CN |
| 19740287 | Mar 1998 | DE |
| 1021228 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 1296294 | Feb 2004 | EP |
| 1644902 | Apr 2006 | EP |
| 1656647 | May 2006 | EP |
| 1656648 | May 2006 | EP |
| 1677263 | Apr 2007 | EP |
| 1794721 | Jun 2007 | EP |
| 1903522 | Mar 2008 | EP |
| 1912185 | Apr 2008 | EP |
| 1933960 | Jun 2008 | EP |
| 2003630 | Dec 2008 | EP |
| 1740281 | Feb 2009 | EP |
| 1814091 | Feb 2009 | EP |
| 2218487 | Aug 2010 | EP |
| 2435995 | Apr 2012 | EP |
| 2723462 | Nov 2014 | EP |
| 2621595 | Jun 2015 | EP |
| 3171951 | Dec 2017 | EP |
| 3149713 | Feb 2018 | EP |
| 3429710 | Jan 2019 | EP |
| 3429711 | Jan 2019 | EP |
| 2387950 | Oct 2003 | GB |
| 0409224 | Apr 2004 | GB |
| 2401063 | Oct 2006 | GB |
| 2427149 | Mar 2007 | GB |
| 1237704 | Apr 2018 | HK |
| 216538 | Feb 2012 | IL |
| 201847034966 | Sep 2018 | IN |
| 2007502658 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2007502659 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2007502661 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 5941152 | Jun 2016 | JP |
| 2017518850 | Jul 2017 | JP |
| I000434 | Feb 2008 | MO |
| I000877 | Mar 2009 | MO |
| I001296 | May 2016 | MO |
| I001298 | May 2016 | MO |
| 703662 | Jul 2015 | NZ |
| 12018501052 | Jan 2019 | PH |
| 96117375 | Sep 1999 | RU |
| 131166 | May 2007 | SG |
| 11201401444 | May 2014 | SG |
| 10201500175 | Aug 2015 | SG |
| 11201803977 | Jun 2018 | SG |
| 573262 | Jan 2004 | TW |
| 1997027921 | Aug 1997 | WO |
| 1997039811 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| 1997041933 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| 1998000210 | Jan 1998 | WO |
| 2001032276 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| 2003059472 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| 2002094399 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| 2002027676 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| 2003083796 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| 2004004853 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| 2005020165 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 2005020166 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| 2005020164 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| 2005030353 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| 2005102480 | Nov 2005 | WO |
| 2006015442 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| 2006031439 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2005110563 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| 2007044785 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| 2007050119 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| 2007087297 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| 2007146791 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| 2009006274 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| 2009052300 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009062187 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009086466 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| 2009108805 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| 2010011673 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| 2009135086 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| 2010054061 | May 2010 | WO |
| 2010098808 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| 2010137010 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| 2011019949 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| 2012044559 | Apr 2012 | WO |
| 2013059372 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013052453 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014074271 | May 2014 | WO |
| 2014210080 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| 2015172060 | Nov 2015 | WO |
| 2015183335 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| 2016014266 | Jan 2016 | WO |
| 2017079706 | May 2017 | WO |
| 2017160910 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| 2017160917 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| 2019125422 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| 2019168646 | Sep 2019 | WO |
| 201500185 | Dec 2015 | ZA |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Cashman Casino,” Sep. 2018 screenshot from YouTube video. Publication date Apr. 4, 2017, 1 page. |
| “House of Fun,” Sep. 2018 screenshot from web page: “https://www.houseoffun.com/play-now/,” 1 page. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 17, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 29/682,178 (pp. 1-10). |
| “Gold Stacks 88 Lunar Festival Slot—Nice Session, All Features!” Feb. 14, 2019, YouTube, site visited May 27, 2020: https://www.youtube.conn/watch?v=kusOLt2fvM4 (Year: 2019) 1 page. |
| “Figures and Polygons” Sep. 15, 2008, Themathleague, site visited May 27, 2020: https://www.mathleague.com/index.php/ connponent/content/article/31-nnathleaguewebsite/genera1/75-figuresandpolygons#/octagon (Year: 2018) 2 pages. |
| “Catherine Wheels, Fireworks, android/ios game” Oct. 24, 2015, YouTube, site visited May 27, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=DzCYicyl FJA (Year: 2015) 1 page. |
| “Golden Firework Video Slot Casino Game with a “Mega Win” Free Spin Bonus” Apr. 16, 2018, YouTube, site visited May 27, 2020: https://www.youtube.conn/watch?v=YgCbY7c-nYM (Year: 2018) 1 page. |
| “Lucky Firecracker slot game [Wild Jackpots]” Jan. 30, 2015, YouTube, site visited May 27, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=Gzfe182Qtbc (Year: 2015) 1 page. |
| Office Action dated May 14, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,836 (pp. 1-5). |
| Office Action dated Jun. 23, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 29/682,179 (pp. 1-11). |
| “ISoftBet—Scrolls of Ra HD” May 8, 2015, YouTube, site visited Jun. 16, 2020: https://www.youtube.conn/watch?v=9ZciLdlqQNo (Year: 2015) 1 page. |
| “New Game ** Fortune Scroll ** Slot Lover” Feb. 11, 2019, YouTube, site visited Jun. 16, 2020: https://www.youtube.conn/watch?v=cdCsvzzRHvs&list=LLMFvEIKJd5VZ1hOwZ7BZDdQ&index=2873 (Year: 2019) 1 page. |
| “Hot Shot Twin Fire Live Play with many features Bally Slot Machine” Jan. 8, 2017, YouTube, site visited Jun. 16, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_03gJvQecw (Year: 2017) 1 page. |
| “Traditional Torah Icon” Feb. 6, 2018, Alamy, site visited Jun. 16, 2020: https://www.alamy.com/ stock-photo-traditional-torah-icon-174149305.htnnl (Year: 2018) 1 page. |
| “Paper Scroll Clip Art” Dec. 11, 2017, FavPNG, site visited Jun. 16, 2020: https://favpng.com/png_view/ paper-scroll-clip-art-png/DDpwDsEh (Year: 2017) 3 pages. |
| “Torah Scroll Icon” Jun. 25, 2018, Depositphotos, site visited Jun. 16, 2020: https://depositphotos.com/201375256/stock-illustration-torah-scroll-icon-outline-style.html (Year: 2018) 1 page. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 20, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,833 (pp. 1-9). |
| Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 26, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,836 (pp. 1-8). |
| Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 7, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 29/682,179 (pp. 1-7). |
| Legato, Frank, “Tourney Time”, Global Gaming Business Magazine, Mar. 22, 2019, retrieved from internet on Oct. 7, 2019, https://ggbmagazine.com/article/tourney-time/, 20 pages. |
| Office Action dated Aug. 18, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 29/703,046 (pp. 1-12). |
| Countdown Timer Background 10 Seconds, by Kanadaka, YouTube [online], published on Dec. 16, 2013, [retrieved on Aug. 13, 2020], retrieved from the Internet <URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwOYH3RDUe4> (Year: 2013) 1 page. |
| 3 2 1 Go! Countdown Green Screen, by Da24Gemini, YouTube [online], published on Sep. 15, 2012, [retrieved on Aug. 13, 2020], retrieved from the Internet <URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJhxCcx1 M4g> (Year: 2012) 1 page. |
| Candy Words—Match Word Puzzle Game, by Homer S, YouTube [online], published on Mar. 5, 2019, [retrieved on Aug. 13, 2020], retrieved from the Internet <URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TsGNDLrpWk> (Year: 2019) 1 page. |
| Office Action dated Nov. 12, 2020 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,833 (pp. 1-8). |
| Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 7, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 29/703,046 (pp. 1-9). |
| Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,838 (pp. 1-9). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for App. No. PCT/US19/53398, dated Jan. 6, 2020, 9 pages. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for App. No. PCT/US19/53407, dated Jan. 9, 2020, 8 pages. |
| Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 15, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,833 (pp. 1-8). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for App. No. PCT/US2019/053407, dated Apr. 15, 2021, 8 pages. |
| Office Action dated May 11, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/946,113 (pp. 1-14). |
| Notice of Allowance dated May 19, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 29/703,046 (pp. 1-8). |
| Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated Jun. 7, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,833 (pp. 1-2). |
| Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Aug. 5, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,838 (pp. 1-7). |
| Corrected Notice of Allowability dated Aug. 18, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 29/703,046 (pp. 1-4). |
| Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Oct. 21, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/946,113 (pp. 1-5). |
| Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85) dated Nov. 9, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/290,838 (pp. 1-7). |
| IP.com NPL Search Strategy (Year: 2021). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Dec. 27, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/058,548 (pp. 1-32). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Mar. 25, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/304,107 (pp. 1-7). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Apr. 1, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/058,531 (pp. 1-15). |
| Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Apr. 12, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/058,548 (pp. 1-18). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated May 24, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/946,114 (pp. 1-8). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Jun. 9, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/948,846 (pp. 1-7). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Jun. 22, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/946,116 (pp. 1-16). |
| Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Jul. 27, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/948,846 (pp. 1-7). |
| Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Jul. 27, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/304,107 (pp. 1-8). |
| Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Jul. 21, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/946,117 (pp. 1-6). |
| Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Aug. 8, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/058,548 (pp. 1-13). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220157115 A1 | May 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62913682 | Oct 2019 | US | |
| 62884072 | Aug 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16946113 | Jun 2020 | US |
| Child | 17650213 | US |
