Patent Grant
11399955
Various surgical instruments and methods have been devised for the implantation of devices into the disc space between adjacent vertebrae of the spinal column. For example, spinal fusion procedures can require sequential distraction to restore the disc space height prior to inserting a pair of fusion devices in the disc space in side-by-side relation. To implant these devices, an initial opening or openings are made in the disc space at the locations through which the devices are to be inserted. A first distractor is inserted in the disc space at one of the device locations. A second larger distractor is inserted in the disc space at the other of the device locations. Sequential distraction in alternate disc space locations is continued until the desired disc space height is achieved. The next to last inserted distractor is then removed. The disc space is prepared for insertion of one fusion device in the location previously occupied by the withdrawn distractor while the other distractor maintains the restored disc space height.
In another technique, a spinal disc space is accessed and distracted for insertion of an implant. Distraction of the disc space is maintained by applying a distraction force to bone screws engaged in the vertebrae on each side of the disc space.
While the above procedure can be effective for some techniques, there are disadvantages. For example, dissection and retraction of tissue, vasculature and nervature is required to accommodate the pair of distractors inserted in the disc space, or to accommodate the external distractors. Alternating sequential distraction can be time-consuming and requires many steps to complete the surgical procedure. Engagement of bone screws to the vertebrae and application of a distraction force to the engaged bone screws also requires additional time and steps in the surgical procedure.
There remains a need for instruments and techniques for restoring and maintaining a spinal disc space anatomy that minimizes dissection and retraction and of tissue, vasculature and nervature. There further remains a need for instruments and techniques for restoring and maintaining a spinal disc space anatomy that minimizes the steps and complexity of the procedure during surgery.
Implants are provided that can be sequentially inserted and withdrawn from a spinal disc space to restore the disc space to a desired disc space height and to post-operatively maintain the desired spinal disc space height when a selected implant is left in the spinal disc space.
Instruments are provided for determining the desired disc space height and for selecting an implant providing the desired disc space height when inserted in the collapsed disc space.
Implants are provided that can have the same height and leading end portion configuration of at least some trial instruments of a set of trial instruments. Each trial instrument of the set has a trial body providing a restored disc space height and a leading end portion configured to distract the disc space to the restored disc space height.
Implants are provided that have a self-distracting lead end configuration.
Methods for restoring and maintaining a spinal disc space height are provided that include, for example, sequentially inserting and withdrawing a number of implants into a collapsed, non-distracted spinal disc space. The implant providing a desired disc space height is left in the disc space to post-operatively maintain the desired disc space height.
Methods for restoring and maintaining a spinal disc space height are provided that include, for example, sequentially inserting and withdrawing a number of trial bodies into a collapsed spinal disc space. When an inserted trial body is withdrawn, the non-distracted disc space at least partially collapses. Each of the inserted trial bodies has a leading end portion configured to re-distract the disc space after withdrawal of the previous trial body. An inserted trial body is determined to provide a desired disc space height. An implant corresponding in height and leading end portion configuration to the trial body providing the desired disc space height can be inserted into the disc space to restore the collapsed disc space to the desired disc space height and post-operatively maintain the desired disc space height.
Related objects, advantages, aspects, forms, and features of the present invention will be apparent from the following description.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended. Any such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated device, and any such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
Methods, techniques, instrumentation and implants are provided to restore and/or maintain a collapsed spinal disc space at a desired disc space height. The instruments and implants may be used in techniques employing minimally invasive instruments and technology to access the disc space. Access to the collapsed disc space can be uni-portal, bi-portal, or multi-portal. The instruments and implants may also be employed in open surgical procedures in which skin and tissue is dissected and retracted to access the collapsed spinal disc space. The methods, techniques, instruments and implants may also be employed in any surgical approach to the spine, including lateral, antero-lateral, postero-lateral, posterior, and anterior approaches. Also, the surgical methods, techniques, instruments and implants may find application at all vertebral segments of the spine, including the lumbar, thoracic and cervical spinal regions.
Referring now to
Trial instrument 20 is insertable into a collapsed disc space D between adjacent vertebrae V1 and V2. Leading end portion 30 can be provided with a rounded nose-like shape that allows at least a portion of leading end portion 30 to be inserted into a collapsed, undistracted disc space D. As trial body 26 is advanced into disc space D, the edges of vertebrae V1 and V2 ride upwardly and downwardly, respectively, along the rounded nose portion of leading end portion 30. Once leading end portion 30 is completely inserted, collapsed disc space D is distracted to restore disc space D′, as shown in
With trial body 26 inserted in disc space D, the surgeon can determine whether disc space D has been adequately distracted or positioned to a desired disc space height by the tactile feel and visual inspection of trial instrument 20 in the disc space. For example, if trial instrument 20 is easily moved, or does not provide a snug fit, then a trial instrument 20 may be withdrawn and a second trial instrument having a trial body with a greater height H1 is inserted. Alternatively, if the fit of trial body 26 is too tight or won't fit, it can be withdrawn and another trial instrument having a trial body with a smaller height H1 can be inserted in disc space D. The particular trial instrument 20 providing a restored disc space height that corresponds to a desired disc space height is noted by the surgeon for selection of an implant.
In
In use, implant 40 can be selected from a set of implants corresponding in size and shape with a set of trial instrument bodies 26. The selected implant corresponds in size and shape with the trial body 26 providing the desired fit and desired disc space height for collapsed disc space D. Once implant 40 is selected, trial body 26 is withdrawn from restored disc space D′, and restored disc space D′ at least partially collapses. Implant 40 has a leading end portion 46 that is the same size and shape as that of trial body 26, and implant 40 will be insertable into the collapsed disc space D since trial body 26 was insertable in collapsed disc space D. Implant 40 restores and post-operatively maintains the collapsed disc space D at a desired disc space height H1 between vertebrae V1 and V2, as shown in
Referring to
Trial instrument 20′ is insertable into a collapsed disc space D between adjacent vertebrae V1 and V2. Leading end portion 30′ can be provided with an aggressively tapered nose portion as compared to leading end portion 30, which is overlaid on leading end portion 30′ in
For example, the height of nose portion 30a′ can be in the range from 3 millimeters or less to about 5 or 6 millimeters. Leading end portion 30′ further includes an upper transition surface 30b′ and a lower transition surface 30c′. Transition surfaces 30b′, 30c′ extend from nose portion 30a′ to respective ones of the upper surface 26a′ and lower surface 26b′. Transition surfaces 30b′, 30c′ provide a smooth and gradual transition for separation of collapsed vertebrae V1 and V2 as trial body 26′ is advanced into collapsed disc space D. As shown in
In
Leading end portion 46′ can be provided with an aggressively tapered nose portion such as that provided with leading end portion 30′ of trial instrument 20′. Leading end portion 46′ can have a pointed or blunt nose portion 46a′. Nose portion 46a′ can be relatively small in height for insertion into a severely collapsed disc space D. For example, the height of nose portion 46a′ can range from 3 millimeters or less to about 5 to 6 millimeters. Leading end portion 46′ further includes an upper transition surface 46b′ and a lower transition surface 46c′. Transition surfaces 46b′, 46c′ extend from nose portion 46a′ to respective ones of the upper surface 42a′ and lower surface 42b′. Transition surfaces 46b′, 46c′ provide a smooth and gradual transition for separation of collapsed vertebrae V1 and V2 as implant body 42′ is advanced into collapsed disc space D. Leading end portion 46′ is completely inserted to restore collapsed disc space D. As shown in
In use, implant 40′ can be selected from a set of implants having similar configurations but different heights H1. Implant 40′ can be selected to correspond in height with the trial body 26′ providing the desired fit and desired disc space height for collapsed disc space D. Once implant 40′ is selected, the last inserted trial body 26′ is withdrawn from restored disc space D′, and restored disc space D′ collapses. However, since leading end portion 46′ of implant 40′ is the same as that of leading end portion 30′ of trial body 26′, and the last inserted trial body 26′ was insertable in the collapsed disc space D, the selected implant 40′ will also be insertable in the collapsed disc space D. Implant 40′ thus provides a restored disc space D′ corresponding to the desired disc space height indicated by trial body 26′, and the selected and inserted implant 40′ post-operatively maintains the restored disc space D′ at a desired disc space height H1.
In the embodiments of
It is further contemplated that implants 40′ can be provided in a set of implants having increasing heights H1. The height at leading end portion 46′ can be the same for each implant 40′ of the set so that any of the implants of the set could be selected for insertion into the collapsed disc space when it is initially accessed. Sequential distraction with the implants 40′ may not be needed or can be minimized if one of the first selected implants provides the desired disc space height and fit. For example, each of the various height implants 40′ of the set can include transition surfaces 46b′, 46c′ that taper from the same height nose portion 46a′ provided on each implant to the differing heights H1 between upper and lower surfaces 42a′, 42b′ provided on each implant.
In
In
It is contemplated that implant insertion instrument set 80 can be provided with trial instrument set 50. Each of the implants can be preloaded on an instrument shaft to save time during surgery. However, each of the implants could also be provided separated with a single instrument shaft and then, when the desired implant height is determined, the appropriate implant coupled to the instrument shaft. Heights H′″, H″, and H′ of implants 82c, 84c, 86c correspond to the heights H″′, H″, H′ of the trial bodies of trial instruments 66, 68, and 70, respectively. Accordingly, the surgeon determines which of the trial bodies of trial instruments 66, 68 or 70 has a height providing the desired fit in the disc space by alternately inserting selected ones of the trial bodies in the disc space. The trial body providing the desired disc space height is removed and the implant insertion instrument providing an implant with the same height is selected, and the implant is inserted into the disc space to restore and maintain the desired disc space height.
It is contemplated that more than three implant insertion instruments 82, 84, 86 could be provided with implant insertion instrument set 80. For example, a set of implant insertion instruments could be provided with implants each having a height corresponding to the height of one of the trial bodies of trial instrument set 50. It is further contemplated that, rather than providing any trial instrument set 50, an implant insertion instrument set 80 can be provided with a number of implants providing the desired range of heights. The implants of the implant insertion instrument set are sequentially inserted and, if necessary, withdrawn from the collapsed disc space. The implant providing the desired fit and desired disc space height is left in the disc space to post-operatively maintain the disc space height.
In
Extending distally from hub 96 is an actuator assembly including a first member 98 and a second member 100. First member 98 includes a coupling portion 108 at its distal end, and second member 100 includes a coupling portion 104 at its distal end. First and second members 98, 100 are pivotally coupled at pin 106 so that at least one of the coupling portions 104, 108 is movable relative to the other coupling portion about pin 106. In the illustrated embodiment, coupling portion 104 is movable about pin 106 in the directions of arrow P1 by moving handle 102 in the directions of arrows P2 to engage and release implant 110 between coupling members 104, 108.
In one embodiment, implant 110 is comprised of two or more pieces of material that can be temporarily or permanently joined together, and can be held together by insertion instrument 90 during insertion into the disc space. Implant 110 includes a self-distracting leading end portion 116 to facilitate insertion in a collapsed disc space. In another embodiment, implant 110 is comprised of a single piece of material. The material comprising implant 110 can be solid, porous, multiply drilled, perforated, open and/or spongy, for example.
Further details regarding one embodiment of implant 110 are shown in
In
In the embodiment of implant 110 discussed above, it is contemplated that implant 110 can be made of cortical bone cut so that the longitudinal axes of lateral sections 112a, 112b between leading end portions 116a, 116b and proximal end 111 are parallel to the longitudinal axis of the host bone from which the sections are cut. By cutting through the host bone longitudinally to obtain the implant sections, leading end portion 116 of implant 110 is provided with maximum strength and durability to withstand impaction of implant 110 into the disc space. Other embodiments of implant 110 contemplate that implant 110 is provided as an integral unit, and can be made from a single piece of bone material, or made from non-bone material.
As shown in
Referring now to
Distal portion 140 includes a trial body 142 and a shaft coupling portion 144 extending proximally from trial body 142. Shaft coupling portion 144 can be coupled to an insertion instrument. Other embodiments contemplate that trial body 142 can be integral with the insertion instrument. Contemplated coupling arrangements between trial body 142 and the insertion instrument include clamping connections, frictional connections, set screw connections, threaded connections, bayonet connections, and ball-detent connections, for example. Trial body 142 includes an upper surface 142a and a lower surface 142b for contacting the endplate of the adjacent vertebra. Trial body 142 also includes lateral surfaces 142c and 142d. Rounded or tapered lateral transition surfaces extend between upper and lower surfaces 142a, 142b and the respective lateral surfaces 142c, 142d. Trial body 142 further includes a leading end portion 146 and a proximal end 148. Proximal end 148 can be tapered to facilitate withdrawal of trial body 142 from the disc space. Leading end portion 146 includes a nose portion 146a and rounded portions transitioning to the upper and lower surfaces 142a, 142b.
Distal portion 140 includes an overall length L1, and trial body 142 includes a length L2. Upper and lower surfaces 142a, 142b can be curved along a radius R2 to generally mate with the vertebral endplate geometry. The upper and lower transition surfaces of leading end portion 146 can be curved along radius R2′. Trial body 142 includes an overall maximum height H2 between upper and lower surfaces 142a, 142b. Upper and lower surfaces 142a, 142b can be curved to provide a height H2′ at leading end 146. Height H2′ is less than height H2 to facilitate insertion of leading end portion 146 into the spinal disc space. Trial body 142 can be provided with an overall width W3 between lateral surfaces 142c and 142d.
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
It is contemplated that a set of self-distracting implants could be provided by modifying each of the distal portions 140 of
In one specific embodiment of a trial instrument set employing the distal portions of
In the specific embodiment, height H2 of the
The specific embodiment further contemplates that upper and lower surface 142a, 142b have a different curvature for each of the bodies 142 to conform to an adjacent vertebral endplate associated with the particular distraction height provided by the particular body 142. For example, radius R2 can about 221 millimeters, radius R3 can be about 179 millimeters, radius R4 can be about 152 millimeters, radius R5 can be about 133 millimeters, radius R6 can be about 119 millimeters, radius R7 can be about 108 millimeters, radius R8 can be about 100 millimeters, radius R9 can be about 92 millimeters, radius R10 can be about 86 millimeters, and radius R11 can be about 81 millimeters.
While specific dimensional and geometrical features have been provided for one particular embodiment of a set of distal portions 140, it should be understood however, that such dimensional and geometrical attributes are provided for a specific embodiment, and other embodiments contemplate other dimensions than those provided herein.
Referring now to
Distal portion 240 includes a trial body 242 and a shaft coupling portion 244 extending proximally therefrom. Shaft coupling portion 244 can be coupled to an insertion instrument. Other embodiments contemplate that trial body 242 can be integral with the insertion instrument. Contemplated coupling arrangements between trial body 242 and the insertion instrument include clamping connections, frictional connections, set screw connections, threaded connections, bayonet connections, and ball-detent connections, for example. Trial body 242 includes an upper surface 242a and a lower surface 242b for contacting the endplate of the adjacent vertebra. Trial body 242 also includes lateral surfaces 242c and 242d. Rounded or tapered lateral transition surfaces extend between upper and lower surfaces 242a, 242b and the respective lateral surfaces 242c, 242d. Trial body 242 further includes a leading end portion 246 and a proximal end 248. Proximal end 248 can tapered to facilitate withdrawal of trial body 242 from the disc space. Leading end portion 246 includes a flat or slightly rounded nose portion 246a and upper and lower transition surfaces 246b, 246c extending therefrom. Upper and lower transition surfaces 246b, 246c provide a gradually increasing distraction height extending from nose portion 246a to facilitate distraction of the adjacent vertebrae.
Distal portion 240 includes an overall length L1, and trial body 242 includes a length L2. Upper and lower surfaces 242a, 242b can be curved along a radius R3 to generally mate with the vertebral endplate geometry. The upper and lower transition surfaces 246b, 246c of leading end portion 246 can be tapered along angle A1 relative to a central axis extending longitudinally through body 242. Trial body 242 includes an overall maximum height H3 between upper and lower surfaces 242a, 242b. Upper and lower surfaces 242a, 242b are tapered from height H3 to height H12 at nose portion 246a. A radius R12 can provide a smooth transition between transition surfaces 246b, 246c and nose portion 246a. Height H12 is less than height H3 to facilitate insertion of leading end portion 246 into the spinal disc space. Trial body 242 can be provided with an overall width W3 between lateral surfaces 242c and 242d.
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
It is contemplated that a set of self-distracting implants could be provided by modifying each of the distal portions 240 of
In one specific embodiment of a trial instrument set employing the distal portions of FIGS.
21A-29B, each of the bodies 242 can be provided with a width W3 of about 10 millimeters and a length L1 of about 42 millimeters. Each of the distal portions 240 can be provided with an overall length L2 of about 60 millimeters. Leading end portion 246 can be provided with a radius R of 5 millimeters between lateral surfaces 242c, 242d.
In the specific embodiment, height H3 of the
Transition surfaces 246b, 246c extend between radius R12 and the adjacent upper and lower surface 242a, 242b. The angular orientation of transition surfaces 246b, 246c relative to the central axis of the body 242 can range from angle A1 to angle A5 for various ones of the embodiments shown. In one specific embodiment trial instrument set, angle A1 is about 15 degrees, angle A2 is about 20 degrees, angle A3 is about 25 degrees, angle A4 is about 30 degrees, and angle A5 is about 35 degrees. The specific embodiment further contemplates that upper and lower surface 242a, 242b can be provided with a different curvature for each of the bodies 242. For example, radius R3 can be about 179 millimeters, radius R4 can be about 152 millimeters, radius R5 can be about 133 millimeters, radius R6 can be about 119 millimeters, radius R7 can be about 108 millimeters, radius R8 can be about 100 millimeters, radius R9 can be about 92 millimeters, radius R10 can be about 86 millimeters, and radius R11 can be about 81 millimeters.
While specific dimensional and geometrical features have been provided for one particular embodiment of a set of distal portions 240, it should be understood however, that such dimensional and geometrical attributes are provided for a specific embodiment, and other embodiments contemplate other dimensions than those provided herein.
The present invention contemplates various procedures and instrument sets. For example, the surgeon can determine whether a trial body or implant provides a desired disc space height by tactile feedback of the inserted trial body or implant, and also by visual inspection. The inserted trial body or implant body should sufficiently stretch the remaining annulus tissue to provide firm engagement between the upper and lower surfaces of the trial or implant body and the adjacent vertebral endplates. Sufficient surface area contact should be present to prevent or minimize post-operative movement of the adjacent vertebrae relative to the implant. By providing the trial bodies and implant bodies with correspondingly sized and shaped leading end portions, and by inserting the trial bodies and implant bodies in a non-distracted disc space, the inserted trial or implant body provides immediate feedback to the surgeon of the desirability of the fit. If distraction were maintained by, for example, a second distractor, feedback to the surgeon of the post-operative fit of the implant would not be reliable or available, if at all, until distraction were removed. As such, the trial bodies and implants can be employed without utilization of external distraction or distraction maintained in another disc space location during trial body and implant insertion. However, secondary distraction can be used to at least partially maintain disc space distraction upon withdrawal of the implants and trial bodies can be employed. For example, pedicle screws and a rod can be employed on the contralateral side to at least partially maintain distraction obtained with a particular implant or trial body.
Further, the trial bodies provide an indication of the fit of the implant into the disc space location. Since the implant includes a leading end portion and height that corresponds to that of the trial body, there is an immediate confirmation to the surgeon that the corresponding implant will fit into the space occupied by the trial body. If distraction were maintained at another location in the disc space or externally, there is no indication that the implant will fit properly until the implant is inserted and distraction removed. As a result, the implant may wedge too tightly in the disc space when distraction is removed, making subsequent removal of the implant difficult if an appropriate fit is not obtained. Alternatively, the implant may be too loose when the distraction is removed due to over distraction of the disc space.
The implants can be impacted or pushed into the disc space. As a result, disruption to the annulus tissue and tissue approaching the collapsed disc space is minimized since the lateral and vertical footprint of the implant in the disc space can be the same as the lateral and vertical footprint occupied in the implant's approach to the disc space. Also, by providing the implant with the same footprint as the trial body laterally and vertically, and by performing distraction and implant insertion through the same portal or pathway, no additional tissue dissection and/or retraction is required to accommodate distraction of the disc space during implant insertion.
The trial bodies and implants can be inserted into the disc space with minimal disc space preparation. According to one method, the collapsed disc space is accessed, and an opening is formed in the annulus having a width corresponding to the width of the trial bodies and/or implants. Disc material is removed through the annulus opening, and, if desired by the surgeon, manual roughening of the endplates is performed with a scraper or other suitable endplate roughening instrument. The trial bodies and/or implant bodies are then sequentially inserted and, if necessary, withdrawn through the annulus opening and into the disc space. Since the implants are self-distracting, it is not necessary to chisel, drill or otherwise form the vertebral endplates to receive the implant, although such steps are not precluded. Consequently, fewer steps in the surgical procedure are necessary since requirements for bilateral distraction, external distraction, chiseling, drilling and reaming are eliminated. In addition, the lack of other instruments or devices in the disc space facilitates visualization of the disc space preparation, trial body insertion, and/or implant insertion. Elimination of cutting instruments in the disc space also theoretically improves the safety of the procedure.
Minimally invasive techniques employing the trial instruments and implants are contemplated. In any particular patient, the implants can be inserted via any one or combination of posterior, postero-lateral, antero-lateral, transforaminal, far lateral and/or anterior approaches. Implant insertion can occur through a single pathway to a collapsed spinal disc space, or through multiple pathways to the collapsed disc space, or through multiple pathways to multiple levels of collapsed discs of the spinal column. Since the implant, and trial instruments if employed, are inserted into the same disc space location from the same approach, the entire procedure for inserting an implant can be completed through one pathway. If a multiple pathway procedure is to be employed, the surgeon can complete implant insertion through one pathway before creating and moving to work in a second pathway.
Since distraction and implant insertion occur along the same pathway to the collapsed disc space, the implants and trial instruments are suited for use in minimally invasive procedures which employ a retractor sleeve to provide a pathway to the collapsed disc space. Such retractor sleeves can employ any one or combination of an endoscopic viewing element in the working channel, a microscopic viewing system over the proximal end of the retractor sleeve, fluoroscopic viewing, loupes, naked eye and/or image guidance.
The trial bodies of the trial instruments and the implant bodies can be made from any biocompatible material, including synthetic or natural autograft, allograft or xenograft tissues, and can be resorbable or non-resorbable in nature. Examples of tissue materials include hard tissues, connective tissues, demineralized bone matrix and combinations thereof. Further examples of resorbable materials are polylactide, polyglycolide, tyrosine-derived polycarbonate, polyanhydride, polyorthoester, polyphosphazene, calcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, bioactive glass, and combinations thereof. Further examples of non-resorbable materials are non-reinforced polymers, carbon-reinforced polymer composites, PEEK and PEEK composites, shape-memory alloys, titanium, titanium alloys, cobalt chrome alloys, stainless steel, ceramics and combinations thereof and others as well. If the trial body or implant is made from radiolucent material, radiographic markers can be located on the trial body or implant to provide the ability to monitor and determine radiographically or fluoroscopically the location of the body in the spinal disc space. The material comprising the trial bodies can be solid, porous, spongy, perforated, drilled, and/or open.
There is contemplated an implant for insertion into a spinal disc space between adjacent vertebrae. The implant can be impacted or pushed into the disc space. The implant can be provided with a distal end or leading insertion end that is sized for insertion into the collapsed disc space. As the implant is inserted, the implant can restore the collapsed disc space to a desired disc space height. The desired disc space height corresponds to the height of the implant proximal the distal end. Once inserted, the implant can maintain the disc space at the desired disc space height.
There is further contemplated an implant that, when inserted, restores and maintains a desired disc space height of a collapsed disc space between an upper vertebra and a lower vertebra. The implant includes a body with a distal end, a proximal end, an upper surface orientable toward an endplate of the upper vertebra and a lower surface orientable toward an endplate of the lower vertebra. The body of the implant has a first height between the upper and lower surfaces corresponding to the desired disc space height. The body of the implant also has a second height at its distal end that is less than a height of the collapsed disc space.
It is contemplated that the implants can be provided with bi-convex curvature of the upper and lower surfaces, allowing the implants to center in the endplates of the disc space. It is further contemplated that the upper and lower surfaces of the implant can be planar or include compound geometry. The upper and lower surfaces of the implant can also be configured to establish lordotic or kyphotic angulation between the adjacent vertebral bodies.
Also contemplated is a set of implants having two or more implants of increasing height. The height of each implant corresponds to a restored disc space height. The leading insertion end of each implant is sized for insertion into a collapsed disc space. As each implant is inserted, the implant restores the collapsed disc space to the restored disc space height provided by the inserted implant. If the restored disc space height does not correspond to the desired disc space height, the inserted implant is withdrawn and a larger height implant is inserted. Sequential insertion and withdrawal of increasing height implants is continued until the restored disc space height provided by an implant of the set of implants corresponds to the desired disc space height. The implant providing the desired disc space height is positioned in the disc space to restore and post-operatively maintain the desired disc space height.
There is further contemplated an instrument set having two or more self-distracting trial instruments and at least one implant. The two or more trial instruments each have a body with a leading insertion end sized for insertion into a collapsed disc space. The leading insertion ends of each trial body are substantially the same in size and shape. Each trial body has a height proximal the leading insertion end that restores the collapsed disc space height to a height different than that of the other trial bodies. The at least one implant has a leading insertion end that is substantially the same in size and shape as the leading insertion end of at least one of the trial bodies of the trial instruments. The implant has a height proximal its leading insertion end that corresponds to the desired restored disc space height provided by the at least one trial body.
Also contemplated is a kit including a set of trial instruments, each having a trial body at a distal end thereof. The trial bodies have a self-distracting leading end portion insertable in a collapsed spinal disc space. The kit further includes a set of implants positionable in the collapsed spinal disc space. Each implant has a body sized and shaped to correspond in size and shape to a respective trial body of the trial instruments. The fit of each implant body in the spinal disc space is indicated to the surgeon by the fit of the corresponding trial body of the trial instruments. When a trial body provides a desired fit, the trial body is removed and the implant corresponding to the trial body is inserted into the collapsed disc space in the location previously occupied by the withdrawn trial body.
It is contemplated that an insertion instrument can be engaged to lateral walls of an intervertebral implant. The insertion instrument includes a distal coupling portion positionable in notches formed in corresponding ones of the lateral walls of the implant. The coupling portion has a first position engaging the implant in the notches and a second position disengaged from the implant in the notches. The width of the coupling portion in each of its first and second positions is less than the width of the implant between the lateral walls of the implant.
Methods for inserting an intervertebral implant into a collapsed spinal disc space are also contemplated. A number of implants are sequentially inserted into the collapsed disc space to restore the disc space. If a particular implant does not restore the disc space to a desired disc space height, the implant is withdrawn from the disc space. When an inserted implant is withdrawn, the disc space is non-distracted and allowed to collapse. The implant providing the desired disc space height remains in the disc space to post-operatively maintain the desired disc space height.
A method is contemplated for inserting an intervertebral implant that includes accessing a collapsed spinal disc space from an uni-portal approach. A first implant is inserted through the portal into the disc space to restore the disc space height. If the restored disc space height does not correspond to a desired disc space height, the inserted implant is removed from the disc space and portal, and the disc space is allowed to collapse. A second implant of different height is inserted into the undistracted, collapsed disc space to provide another restored disc space height. When an inserted implant provides a restored disc space height that corresponds to a desired disc space height, the inserted implant remains in the disc space to post-operatively maintain the desired disc space height.
Also contemplated is a method for inserting an intervertebral implant is provided that includes accessing a collapsed spinal disc space. A number of trial bodies are provided with leading end portions sized for insertion into a non-distracted disc space. The trial bodies are sequentially inserted into and removed from the disc space. The trial body providing the desired disc space height is used to select an implant having a height and a self-distracting leading end portion corresponding to the height and leading end portion of the last inserted trial body. The implant is then inserted into the non-distracted disc space to restore the disc space and post-operatively maintain the desired disc space height.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected.
The present application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/652,662, filed Jul. 18, 2017; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/590,471, filed Jan. 6, 2015 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,737,415); which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/689,910, filed Nov. 30, 2012 (U.S. Pat. No. 9,011,541); which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/451,836, filed Jun. 13, 2006 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,349,011); which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/274,856 filed on Oct. 21, 2002 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,063,725); all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4349921 | Kuntz | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4566466 | Ripple et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4743256 | Brantigan | May 1988 | A |
| 4834757 | Brantigan | May 1989 | A |
| 4863476 | Sheppard | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4878915 | Brantigan | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4950296 | McIntyre | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5176415 | Choksi | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5192327 | Brantigan | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5306309 | Wagner et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5425772 | Brantigan | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5443514 | Steffee | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5445639 | Kuslich et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5458638 | Kuslich et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5484437 | Michelson | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5522899 | Michelson | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5607424 | Tropiano | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5609635 | Michelson | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5645596 | Kim et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5669909 | Zdeblick et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5683463 | Godefroy et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5716415 | Steffee | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5766252 | Henry et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5776199 | Michelson | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782830 | Farris | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5797909 | Michelson | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5860973 | Michelson | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5865845 | Thalgott | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5888224 | Beckers et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888226 | Rogozinski | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888227 | Cottle | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5893890 | Picharodi | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5895426 | Scarborough et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5899939 | Boyce et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5984922 | McKay | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6025538 | Yaccarino, III | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6042582 | Ray | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045580 | Scarborough et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6059829 | Schlaepfer et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6080158 | Lin | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6093207 | Pisharodi | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6096038 | Michelson | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6111164 | Rainey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6113639 | Ray et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123705 | Michelson | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6123731 | Boyce et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6143033 | Paul et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6146422 | Lawson | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6159214 | Michelson | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6159215 | Urbahns et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6174311 | Branch et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6179873 | Zientek | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6200347 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210412 | Michelson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6241771 | Gresser et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6245108 | Biscup | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6258125 | Paul et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264656 | Michelson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6277149 | Boyle et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6290724 | Marino | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6302914 | Michelson | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6315795 | Scarborough et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6319257 | Carignan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6325827 | Lin | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6383221 | Scarborough et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6423095 | Hoeck et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425920 | Hamada | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6428544 | Ralph et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6432140 | Lin | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6436102 | Ralph et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6443987 | Bryan | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6447547 | Michelson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6447548 | Ralph et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6458158 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6458159 | Thalgott | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6468276 | McKay | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6471725 | Ralph et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6478801 | Ralph et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6482233 | Aebi et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6500206 | Bryan | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6520993 | James et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6530955 | Boyle et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6554863 | Paul et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6562047 | Ralph et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6569168 | Lin | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6607557 | Brosnahan et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6610065 | Branch et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6610089 | Liu et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6626905 | Schmiel et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6626906 | Young | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6638310 | Lin et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6719794 | Gerber et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6723096 | Dorchak et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6740119 | Ralph et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6743257 | Castro | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6746484 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6749636 | Michelson | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6767366 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6843804 | Bryan | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6852127 | Varga et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6855151 | Ralph et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6890355 | Michelson | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6902566 | Zucherman et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6976988 | Ralph et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6979353 | Bresina | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6986788 | Paul | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6987136 | Erbe et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6991654 | Foley | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7060073 | Frey et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7063725 | Foley | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7105023 | Eckman | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7112224 | Liu et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7125425 | Foley et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7476252 | Foley | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 8349011 | Foley | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8480745 | Liu et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 9011541 | Foley | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9737415 | Foley | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 10420655 | Foley | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 20010020170 | Zucherman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010049560 | Paul et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020016633 | Lin et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020058950 | Winterbottom et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020062153 | Paul et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065558 | Varga et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020087212 | James et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161366 | Robie et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165550 | Frey et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030014057 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014114 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014115 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023245 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023306 | Liu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023309 | Ralph et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083747 | Winterbottom | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030083748 | Lee et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030087984 | Erbe et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105527 | Bresina | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114931 | Lee et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125739 | Bagga et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135275 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030135276 | Eckman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139814 | Bryan | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149438 | Nichols et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030199980 | Siedler | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040078079 | Foley | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102847 | Sato et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040106996 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040162617 | Zucherman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193159 | Zucherman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20060217806 | Peterman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0493698 | Apr 1995 | EP |
| 716840 | Jun 1996 | EP |
| 0834295 | Apr 1998 | EP |
| 1099429 | May 2001 | EP |
| 1201207 | May 2002 | EP |
| 2724312 | Mar 1996 | FR |
| 2727004 | May 1996 | FR |
| 2742044 | Jun 1996 | FR |
| 2736538 | Jan 1997 | FR |
| 2795945 | Jan 2001 | FR |
| 2841124 | Dec 2003 | FR |
| 2001003615 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| 2001028465 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| 2001068005 | Sep 2001 | WO |
| 2002038086 | May 2002 | WO |
| 2003009786 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| 2003037228 | May 2003 | WO |
| 2005072659 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| TANGENT; Posterior Discectomy & Grafting Instrumentation Set; Surgical Technique; by Charles L. Branch, Jr., M.D.; Wake Forest University, Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; 1999. |
| International Written Opinion for PCT/US03/32154 dated Oct. 29, 2004. |
| Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion for EP Application No. 09151462.0 dated Apr. 1, 2009. |
| European Office Action for EP Application No. 09151462.0 dated Mar. 3, 2011. |
| Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion for EP Application No. 09151459.0 dated Apr. 1, 2009. |
| Notice of Final Rejection for KR Application No. 10-2005-7006840 dated May 30, 2011 and English Translation thereof. |
| International Search Report for PCT/US03/32154 dated Mar. 19, 2004. |
| International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US03/32154 dated Feb. 10, 2005. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190388233 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11451836 | Jun 2006 | US |
| Child | 13689910 | US | |
| Parent | 10274856 | Oct 2002 | US |
| Child | 11451836 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15652662 | Jul 2017 | US |
| Child | 16561231 | US | |
| Parent | 14590471 | Jan 2015 | US |
| Child | 15652662 | US | |
| Parent | 13689910 | Nov 2012 | US |
| Child | 14590471 | US |
