SYSTEMS FOR CATALYTICALLY REMOVING OXIDIZED CONTAMINANTS FROM A FLUID AND RELATED METHODS

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to systems and methods for removing oxidized contaminants from water or wastewater.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Precious metal-based catalysis has emerged as a promising strategy for efficiently promoting destruction of a wide spectrum of oxidized contaminants in water via H₂-, borohydride-, or formate-induced reduction in ambient conditions. Its practical applications for long-term continuous treatment of water and wastewater at large scales, however, have not been realized due to two crucial roadblocks.

First, most laboratory-scale tests of catalytic contaminant removal used precious-metal-based catalysts supported on micro-size activated carbon, metal oxides, silica, or polymeric dispersers (for example, polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)). The coating of precious metal nanoparticles (NPs) onto these supporters requires high temperature and/or high pressure and thus is energy-consuming. In addition, NP synthesis and the NP coating are usually two distinct steps, which leads to a low yield of harvested catalysts. Often, only a small portion of the precursor or synthesized NPs can be retained on the supporter for subsequent catalytic applications. Furthermore, these precious metals/supporter catalysts are mostly suspended or fluidized evenly in liquid phase and, thus, subject to being washed out in continuous operation.

Second, only a few electron donors (H₂, formate, and borohydride) are able to drive reduction reactions catalyzed by precious metals. H₂is advantageous compared to the other two electron donors, because it is nontoxic, does not generate any secondary contamination or carbon footprint, and can be readily obtained at a reasonable cost. However, H₂has low-solubility gas diffusion, which means that its diffusion through gas-liquid interfaces and then to the catalytic surface significantly slows the catalytic reaction. From a practical perspective, conventional gas transfer approaches, which involve bubbling, are not feasible at full-scale applications due to the significantly high cost (reflected by wasting of H₂and energy) and off-gassing of combustible H₂.

Accordingly, systems and methods that can overcome the roadblocks of using precious metal-based catalysis to remove contaminants are needed.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The disclosure relates to methods related to the removal of oxidized contaminants water or wastewater via precious metal-based catalysis and to systems for the practice of such methods. In some aspects, the disclosure also relates to methods and systems for synthesizing precious metal nanocatalysts.

In some aspects, a method for establishing a catalyst film for long-term removal of oxidized contaminants from a fluid is disclosed. The method comprises providing a non-porous gas transfer membrane. The non-porous gas transfer membrane comprises a gas-phase side and a liquid-phase side. The method further comprises contacting the liquid-phase side of the non-porous gas transfer membrane with a precious metal medium and contacting the gas-phase side of the non-porous gas transfer membrane with hydrogen (H₂) gas at a sufficient partial pressure to convert at least 90% of the precious metal salt in the precious metal medium to elemental form. The precious metal medium comprising a precious metal salt and a solvent. The elemental form of the precious metal is in the form of a nanoparticle and is deposed on the liquid-phase side of the non-porous gas transfer membrane. In particular embodiments, the mean diameter of the precious metal nanoparticles is less than 5 nm.

In other aspects, a method for removing oxidized contaminants from a fluid is disclosed. The method comprises establishing a catalyst film comprising precious metal nanoparticles on a non-porous gas transfer membrane; contacting a fluid containing oxidized contaminant to the catalyst film; and contacting the catalyst film with H₂gas, wherein the precious metal nanoparticles reduce the oxidized contaminants and the H₂gas is provided at a sufficient partial pressure to reduce the oxidized contaminants.

In yet other aspects, a system for removing oxidized contaminants from a fluid is described. The system comprises a non-porous gas transfer membrane, a catalyst film comprising precious metal nanoparticles, and a H₂gas source. The catalyst film is deposed on the non-porous gas transfer membrane. The precious metal nanoparticles and the hydrogen gas catalyze the reduction of oxidized contaminants. The catalyst film is deposed on the liquid-phase side of the gas transfer membrane, and the H₂gas source delivers H₂gas to the gas-phase side of the gas transfer membrane.

In some aspects, the catalyst film consists of precious metal nanoparticles. In particular embodiments, the catalyst film consists of precious metal nanoparticles with a mean diameter of less than 5 nm.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates, in accordance with certain embodiments, a schematic of a bench-scale form of the catalytic reactor (also referred to herein as H₂-MCfR).

FIG. 2 depicts, in accordance with certain embodiments, autocatalytic monometallic palladium nanoparticles synthesis and coating on the nonporous polypropylene hollow fiber membranes in the membrane catalyst film reactor (MCfR). The upper portion depicts photos of the fiber section in one MCfR glass tube over time. The lower portion depicts the average percentage profile of palladium species over time in the MCfR.

FIGS. 3-A1 to 3-A5 depict, in accordance with certain embodiments, scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images of Pd-films coated on the membranes 0.1 mM Na₂PdCl₄as the precursor.

FIGS. 3-B1 to 3-B5 depict, in accordance with certain embodiments, STEM images of Pd⁰-films coated on the membranes 1 mM Na₂PdCl₄as the precursor.

FIGS. 3-C1 to 3-C5 depict, in accordance with certain embodiments, STEM images of Pd⁰-films coated on the membranes 2 mM Na₂PdCl₄as the precursor.

FIGS. 3-D1 to 3-D5 depict, in accordance with certain embodiments, STEM images of Pd⁰-films coated on the membranes 5 mM Na₂PdCl₄as the precursor.

FIG. 4 depicts, in accordance with certain embodiments, the reduction of nitrite catalyzed by Pd-film (0.1 mM Pd precursor) in H₂-MCfRs (left), the reduction of chromate catalyzed by Pd-film (0.1 mM Pd precursor) in H₂-MCfRs (middle), and the reduction of chlorate catalyzed by Pd-film (0.1 mM Pd precursor) in H₂-MCfRs (right).

FIGS. 5A-5D depict, in accordance with certain embodiments, reduction of trichloroethane (TCA) catalyzed by Pd-film in a MCfR (FIG. 5A), reduction of trichlorofluroroethane (CFC-11) catalyzed by Pd-film in a MCfR (FIG. 5B), reduction of 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) catalyzed by Pd-film in a MCfR (FIG. 5C), and reduction of 1,3,5-trinitroperhydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) catalyzed by Pd-film in a MCfR (FIG. 5D).

FIGS. 6A-6G depict, in accordance with certain embodiments, rate constants, catalytic activities, and product selectivities of Pd-film-catalyzed reductions of various oxidized contaminants in the MCfR.

FIG. 7 depicts, in accordance with certain embodiments, results of continuous removal of TCA and TCE in a MCfR featuring Pd-film as the catalyst.

FIG. 8 depicts, in accordance with certain embodiments, the concentration changes of Pd(II) and Rh(III) in the precious metal medium during the establishment of the catalyst film.

FIGS. 9A-9D depict, in accordance with certain embodiments, the characteristics of a Pd/Rh catalyst film as shown from microscopy and spectroscopy images. FIGS. 9A and 9B show the morphology of cross sections of the Pd/Rh film (images from transmission electron microscopy). FIGS. 9C and 9D show diffraction patterns from electron energy loss spectroscopy, which show Pd⁰and Rh⁰are located on different planes of the catalyst film.

FIGS. 10A-10C depict, in accordance with certain embodiments, the removal and defluorination of PFOA by Pd/Rh-film and Pd/Ir-film at pH 7.

FIG. 11 depicts, in accordance with certain embodiments, the concentration of PFOA during continuous operation of a MCfR with a Pd/Rh-film.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Detailed aspects and applications of the invention are described below in the drawings and detailed description of the invention. Unless specifically noted, it is intended that the words and phrases in the specification and the claims be given their plain, ordinary, and accustomed meaning to those of ordinary skill in the applicable arts.

In the following description, and for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various aspects of the invention. It will be understood, however, by those skilled in the relevant arts, that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. It should be noted that there are many different and alternative configurations, devices, and technologies to which the disclosed inventions may be applied. The full scope of the inventions is not limited to the examples that are described below.

The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a step” includes reference to one or more of such steps.

The term “about” when used in the context of numeric values denotes an interval of accuracy that is familiar and acceptable to a person skilled in the art. The interval is +10% of the given numeric value, +5% of the given numeric value, or +2% of the given numeric value.

As used herein, the term “precious metal” refers to gold (Au), silver (Ag), and platinum group metals (PGM). The members of PGM include platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), ruthenium (Ru), rhodium (Rh), osmium (Os), and iridium (Ir).

As used herein, the terms “precious metal-film” and “catalyst film” refer to a film of precious metal nanocatalysts.

Disclosed herein is an innovative technology that features a sustainable nanoparticle support for catalytic reduction of oxidized contaminants to remove these contaminants from a fluid. The catalytic reactor system (H₂-MCfR) described herein have minimal catalyst loss and efficient gas delivery for maximal H₂utilization. Accordingly, the disclosure also relates to methods for removing at least one oxidized contaminant from a fluid. The oxidized contaminants that can be removed by the disclosed system methods include herbicides, pesticides, disinfection byproduct, solvents, freon, explosives, and precursors or raw materials, for example, nitrite, chromate, and trichloroethene. In particular embodiments, the catalytic reactor system reduces at least one oxidized contaminant selected from the group consisting of chlorophenols, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid, 1-chloro-3-ethylamino-5-isopropylamino-2,4,6-triazine, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile, trichloroacetic acid, trichloroacetonitrile, NDMA, bromochloroiodomethane, trichloroethane, trichloroethene, chloroform, CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113, phenol, nitrophenols, PFAS, 1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-triazinane, 1,3,5,7-Tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazoctane, and TNT.

Compared to biological systems for treating oxidized contaminants, the catalytic reactor system described herein does not have a lag phase, is more stable, has no issues with fouling, and is more resistant against sudden changes of operational conditions. Additionally, no addition of organic electron donors, which may cause secondary contamination, are needed. The catalytic reactor system has significantly faster removal of organic contaminants compared to biological systems for treating oxidized contaminants.

Compared to other catalytic systems for treating oxidized contaminants, the disclosed catalytic reactor system enables one-pot synthesis and does not require high temperatures or pressures. Accordingly, the energy and resource costs for the synthesis of catalysts are less for the catalytic reactor system described herein. The utilization of precursors in the disclosed catalytic reactor system is over 99%. The disclosed catalytic reactor system also treats a wider spectrum of contaminants than catalytic systems of the prior art. As shown in the example, the catalytic system described herein is suitable for long-term continuous treatment, as it has minimal catalyst loss and constantly high catalytic activity.

Catalytic Reactor System

The catalytic reactor system comprises a film of precious metal nanoparticles (the catalyst film), a gas transfer membrane on which the film of precious metal nanoparticles is deposed, and a hydrogen-gas source. In some embodiments, the gas transfer membrane is nonporous. H₂gas is delivered to the lumen at a carefully controlled pressure, and the H2 diffuses through the walls in a bubbleless form. The H₂gas functions as the electron donor to drive autocatalytic reduction of the soluble precious metals (with an oxidation state of +2 or +3) to elemental precious metals (with an oxidation state of 0), which spontaneously deposit as nanoparticles on the membrane wall of the liquid-phase side. The H₂gas also facilitates the reduction of oxidized contaminants by the precious metal nanoparticles. Accordingly, “precious metal nanocatalyst” as referenced herein refer to the film of precious metal nanoparticles deposed on the gas transfer membrane. A bench-scale example of this system is shown in FIG. 1.

In particular embodiments, the catalyst film is spontaneously formed on the liquid-phase side of the gas transfer membrane, for example, the member's outer surfaces, which would be the liquid-phase side. The liquid-phase side of the gas transfer membrane is in fluid contact with the liquid containing precious metal contaminants or a precious metal medium. For example, dissolved Pd(II) in the precious metal medium is autocatalytically reduced by the H₂gas provided by the hydrogen-gas source to form Pd⁰nanoparticles (NPs) that are simultaneously deposited on the gas transfer membrane as a Pd⁰-film. The Pd⁰-film is capable of catalyzing the oxidation of the H₂coupled to reduction of the oxidized contaminants in the bulk liquid. As another non-limiting example, a precious metal medium containing dissolved Pd(II) and Rh(III) is contacted to the liquid-phase side of the gas transfer membrane, and the H₂gas provided by the hydrogen-gas source facilitates the reduction of Pd(II) and Rh(III) to Pd⁰and Rh⁰. The Pd⁰and Rh⁰nanoparticles are simultaneously deposited on the gas transfer membrane as a Pd/Rh-film.

Thus, described herein is a method of producing the catalyst film. The method comprises providing an aqueous system in contact with a nonporous gas transfer membrane; submerging the nonporous gas transfer membrane in a precious metal medium; and pressurizing the gas-phase side of the membrane with H₂at desired partial pressure, wherein precious metal nanoparticles are formed and coated on the nonporous gas transfer membrane to form a catalyst film. Thus, in some aspects, the catalyst film consists of precious metal nanoparticles. In certain embodiments, the catalyst film consists of nanoparticles of one type of precious metal, which is also referred to herein as a monometallic catalyst film. In other embodiments, the catalyst film consists of nanoparticles of two types of precious metals, which is also referred to herein as a bimetallic catalyst film.

In some aspects, the method comprises contacting the liquid-phase side of the gas transfer membrane with a precious metal medium. Meanwhile, the gas-phase side of the non-porous gas transfer membrane is contacted with H₂gas at a sufficient partial pressure to convert at least 90% of the precious metal salt in the precious metal medium to elemental form. In some aspects, at least 99% of the precious metal salt in the precious metal medium is converted to elemental form. In particular implementations, at least 90% of the precious metal salt in the precious metal medium is converted to elemental form within 150 minutes of contact with the precious metal medium and H₂gas. In certain implementations, at least 90% of the precious metal salt in the precious metal medium is converted to elemental form within 110 minutes of contact with the precious metal medium and H₂gas. In some aspects, at least 99% of the precious metal salt in the precious metal medium is converted to elemental form within 150 minutes of contact with the precious metal medium and H₂gas. In a particular embodiment, at least 99% of the precious metal salt in the precious metal medium to is converted elemental form within 110 minutes of contact with the precious metal medium and H₂gas. In certain embodiments, the elemental form of the precious metal are nanoparticles with a mean diameter of less than 5 nm, less than 4 nm, less than 3 nm, less than 2 nm, less than 1 nm, less than 0.5 nm, or between 0.3 nm and 0.4 nm. In some embodiments, the precious metal nanoparticles have diameters of less than 10 nm, for example, less than 9 nm, less than 8 nm, less than 7 nm, less than 6 nm, less 5 nm, less than 4 nm, less than 3 nm, less than 2 nm, less than 1 nm, less than 0.5 nm, or between 0.3 nm and 0.4 nm. In some aspects, the nanoparticles agglomerate to form nanoclusters, which have diameters of less than 10 nm, for example, less than 9 nm, less than 8 nm, less than 7 nm, less than 6 nm, less 5 nm, less than 4 nm, less than 3 nm, or less than 2 nm. Accordingly, in certain implementations, the catalyst film consists of precious metal nanoparticles with diameters of less than 10 nm, for example, with a mean diameter of less than about 10 nm, less than about 9 nm, less than about 8 nm, less than about 7 nm, less than about 6 nm, less than about 5 nm, less than about 4 nm, less than 3 nm, less than 2 nm, less than 1 nm, less than 0.5 nm, or between 0.3 nm and 0.4 nm. In some aspects, the catalyst film consists of precious metal nanoparticles with a mean diameter of less than 5.5 nm, less than 5.25 nm, less 5 nm, less than 4.5 nm, less than 4.25 nm, less than 4 nm, less than 3.5 nm, less than 3.25 nm, less than 3 nm, less than 2.5 nm, less than 2.25 nm, less than 2 nm, less than 1.5 nm, less than 1.25 nm, less than 1 nm, less than 0.5 nm, less than 0.4 nm, or between 0.3 nm and 0.4 nm. In certain embodiments, the catalyst film comprises nanoclusters having diameters of less than 10 nm, for example, less than 9 nm, less than 8 nm, less than 7 nm, less than 6 nm, less 5 nm, less than 4 nm, less than 3 nm, or less than 2 nm.

In some aspects, the loading density of the catalyst film is between 5 mg and 12 g precious metal/m². For example, in certain embodiments, the loading density of a monometallic catalyst film is about 0.07 mmol Pd/m²(about 7.7 mg Pd/m²) or 0.07±0.007 mmol Pd/m²(7.7±0.08 mg Pd/m²). In other embodiments, the loading density of a bimetallic catalyst film is about 12 mg precious metal/m²or between 11 mg precious metal/m²to 11.5 mg precious metal/m². For example, the loading density of a Pd/Rh-film is 11.2 g precious metal/m², in particularly 5.6 g Pd/m²and 5.6 g Rh/m².

Accordingly, in certain embodiments, the catalytic reactor system further comprises a precious metal medium, which comprises at least one precious metal salt in a solvent. The precious metal medium provides the charged precious metal ions for the formation of the catalyst film on the gas transfer membrane. In some aspects, the precious metal medium the liquid containing precious metal contaminants, for example liquid from a waste stream that comprises precious metal contaminants.

The operational conditions of the catalytic reactor system can be conveniently and accurately tuned for optimizing the conditions to reduce particular oxidized contaminants. For example, the selection of particular precious metal and their amount in the precious metal medium for the production of the catalyst film, the pH in the liquid comprising the oxidized contaminants or the precious metal medium, H₂pressure, and surface-loading rate of the oxidized contaminant each may be adjusted to optimize conditions for catalytic reduction of certain oxidized contaminants.

a. Gas Transfer Membrane:

The gas transfer membrane used in the catalytic reactor system does not have pores in its wall (for example, a nonporous membrane). The lack of pores in the membrane enables transferring gas (for example, hydrogen) in a bubble-free form at controllable rates. In some embodiments, the membrane is a hollow-fiber membrane. In such embodiments, gas is supplied to the lumen of the hollow-fiber membrane (the gas-phase side). Accordingly, catalyst film would be anchored to the outer surface of the hollow-fiber membrane (the liquid-phase side). In other embodiments, the membrane is a flat- or curled-sheet membrane. In such embodiments, hydrogen gas is supplied to one side of the sheet membrane (the gas-phase side), while catalyst film is anchored to the other surface of the sheet membrane (the liquid-phase side).

The membrane may be made of a variety of polymeric materials, for example polypropylene, polyurethane, polysulfone, or composite forms. In certain embodiments, the thickness of the gas transfer membrane is may be 50-70 μm, for example between 50-55 μm.

In particular embodiments, the gas transfer membrane is a nonporous polypropylene hollow-fiber membrane (200 μm OD, 100-110 μm ID, wall thickness 50-55 μm).

b. Precious Metal Medium

Exemplary precious metals that could be used for producing the catalyst film include transition metal and post-transition metals. Example of transition metals that may be used to produce catalyst films include metals in the platinum metal group (which are ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, osmium, iridium, and platinum), copper, gold, silver, rhenium, molybdenum, wolframium, cobalt, and nickel. Examples of post-transition metals that may be used to produce catalyst films include tin, gallium, and indium.

The precious metal medium comprises a precious metal a solvent. The solvent in the precious metal medium is selected from at least one of water, salt solution, hydrochloric acid, methanol, ethanol, acetonitrile, toluene, dichloromethane, chloroform, or tetrahydrofuran. In certain implementations, the solvent is deionized water.

Precious metal salts rapidly dissolve in the solvent and release soluble precious metal ions. Soluble precious metal ions include Au³⁺, Ag⁺, (PtCl₄)²⁺, (PdCl₄)²⁺, Rh³⁺, Ru³⁺, Ir⁴⁺, Os⁴⁺, Cu²⁺, Sn²⁺, Ni²⁺, Mo⁶⁺, and W⁶⁺. Accordingly, the precious metal medium comprises at least one precious metal ions selected from the group consisting of Au³⁺, Ag⁺, (PtCl₄)²⁺(PdCl₄)²⁺, Rh³⁺, Ru³⁺, Ir⁴⁺, Os⁴⁺, Cu²⁺, Sn²⁺, Ni²⁺, Mo⁶⁺, and W⁶⁺. Exemplary precious metal salts in the precious metal medium include gold chloride (AuCl₃), silver nitrate (AgNO₃), sodium tetrachloropalladate (Na₂PtCl₄), sodium tetrachloropalladate (Na₂PdCl₄), ruthenium chloride (RhCl₃), ruthenium chloride (RuCl₃), potassium hexachloroiridate (K₂IrCl₆), potassium hexachloroosmate (K₂OsCl₆) cupric chloride (CuCl₂), tin chloride (SnCl₂), nickel chloride (NiCl₂), molybdenum oxide (MoO₃), and sodium tungstate (Na₂WO₄).

The range of the concentration of the precious metal in the precious metal catalyst is wide, for example, 0.1-100 mM. In some aspects, the concentration of precious metal in the precious metal medium is 0.1-5 mM, for example 1-5 mM. In particular embodiments, the concentration of precious metal in the precious metal medium is about 0.1 mM, about 1 mM, about 2 mM, or about 5 mM. In some aspects, the concentration of precious metal in the precious metal medium is 0.1±0.01 mM, 1±0.1 mM, 2±0.2 mM, or 5±0.05 mM. In other aspects, the concentration of precious metal in the precious metal medium is 0.1±0.005 mM, 1±0.05 mM, 2±0.1 mM, or 5±0.025 mM.

In some embodiments, the precious metal medium further comprises an acid, abase, and/or pH buffers. The acid may be hydrochloric acid. The base may be sodium hydroxide. In particular embodiments, the pH buffer adjusts the pH of the precious metal medium to anywhere in the range of 0 and 14. In certain embodiments, the pH of the precious metal medium is between 3 and 10, for example, a pH of 3-8, 3.5-7.5, 6.5-8.5, or about 7. In some aspects, the pH of the precious metal medium is 7±0.5, 7±0.4, 7±0.3, 7±0.2, 7±0.1, or 7±0.05.

e. Hydrogen Gas Source

The hydrogen gas source can be any reliable source of H₂gas, for examples, a gas storage tank having pressurized H₂gas, a H₂generator via water electrolysis, or a methane reformer. In some embodiments, the H₂purity is over 99%. In other embodiments, the H₂-gas source include a built-in or external gas pressure regulator. The gas pressure regulator regulates the pressure of H₂gas from the gas storage tank to the gas-phase side of the membrane. In particular implementations, the gas pressure regulator regulates the pressure of H₂gas so that H₂gas is delivered to the gas-phase side of the membrane at no more than about 30 psig, for example, 3-30 psig, 5-30 psig, 2-15 psig, 2.5-15 psig, 2-10 psig, between about 3 psig and about 9 psig, or at about 10 psig. In some embodiments, the gas pressure regulator regulates the pressure of H₂gas so that H₂gas is delivered to the gas-phase side of the membrane at a partial pressure of 2.7-9.9 psig, 10±1 psig, 10±0.5 psig, or 10±0.25 psig.

In some aspects, the partial pressure of H₂gas provided that is sufficient to convert at least 90% of the precious metal salt in the precious metal medium to elemental form within 150 minutes of contact with the precious metal medium and H₂gas is about 10 psig, for example, 10±1 psig, 10±0.5 psig, or 10±0.25 psig.

In some aspects, the partial pressure of H₂gas provided to the catalytic reactor system is between 2 psig and 20 psig. In certain implementations, the partial pressure of H₂gas provided to the gas transfer membrane for reducing oxidized contaminants is between about 3 psig and about 5 psig, for example, about 3 psig, 3±0.3 psig, about 4 psig, 4±0.4 psig, or about 5 psig or 5±0.5 psig. In some implementations, the partial pressure of H₂gas provided for forming a monometallic catalyst film is between 2 psig and 10 psig, between about 3 psig and about 9 psig or 2.7-9.9 psig. In some implementations, the partial pressure of H₂gas provided for forming a bimetallic catalyst film and for reducing oxidized contaminants is between 10 psig and 20 psig.

Methods of Removing Oxidized Contaminants from a Fluid

The described methods of removing oxidized contaminants from a fluid comprises catalytically converting the contaminants into harmless or readily biodegradable forms. In some aspects, the methods of catalytically reducing oxidized contaminants described herein do not result in catalyst loss. The method comprises providing a fluid comprising an oxidized contaminant to the catalyst film, where the catalyst film reduces the oxidized contaminant. In some implementations, the method comprises tuning operational conditions of the catalytic reactor system to optimize treatment efficiency (for example, maximizing the contaminant removal rate and minimizing undesired products). In some aspects, the operational conditions are adjusted to ensure there is little to no catalyst loss.

In particular implementations, method comprises establishing a catalyst film comprising precious metal nanoparticles; contacting a fluid containing oxidized contaminant to the catalyst film; and contacting the catalyst film with hydrogen (H₂) gas. The precious metal nanoparticles reduce the oxidized contaminants and the H₂gas is provided at a sufficient partial pressure to reduce the oxidized contaminants. In some aspects, the fluid containing the oxidized contaminants is water or wastewater.

As shown in the examples, the optimal partial pressure of H₂gas provided reduce a large variety of oxidized contaminants via a monometallic catalyst film is 2-10 psig, between about 3 psig and about 9 psig, 2.7-9.9 psig, between about 3 psig and about 5 psig, for example, about 3 psig, 3±0.3 psig, about 4 psig, 4±0.4 psig, or about 5 psig or 5±0.5 psig.

Illustrative, Non-Limiting Examples in Accordance with Certain Embodiments

The disclosure is further illustrated by the following examples that should not be construed as limiting. The contents of all references, patents, and published patent applications cited throughout this application, as well as the figures, are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes.

1. Activation of MCfR: Forming Pd⁰-Film

A bench-scale MCfR featuring monometallic a Pd⁰-film was prepared in ambient conditions (23° C. and 1 atm). The MCfR was of the same dual-tube design as shown in FIG. 1. The working volume of the MCfR was 60 mL. One bundle of 60 25-cm polypropylene fibers was installed in each of the dual tubes, giving a total membrane surface of 190 cm². The liquid phase of the MCfR was filled with Pd²⁺ medium. The Pd²⁺ medium contains 600 mg/L sodium tetrachloropalladate (Na₂PdCl₄; i.e., 2.0 mM soluble Pd(II)) as the precursor. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 7. H₂was supplied from a pure-H₂tank at a constant partial pressure of 10 psig.

FIG. 2 shows photos of a fiber section and the concentration profile of the Pd species over time in one MCfR. The first 40 minutes involved nucleation, and only 6% of the soluble Pd(II) was reduced to insoluble Pd⁰. By eighty minutes, more than one-half of the total added Pd(II) was deposited on the fiber surface at Pd⁰, turning the fibers' color from white to greyish-black. Then, Pd(II) reduction accelerated, with more than 99% of the total Pd converted to Pd⁰by 110 minutes, and the fibers turned dark black, since the reduced Pd⁰solids were deposited onto the fiber surface. Full reduction to Pd⁰and its deposition on the fibers were further confirmed by the minimal concentrations of insoluble Pd in the liquid samples. This rapid autocatalytic synthesis of metallic Pd⁰had a >99.7% yield, spontaneously coating 11.2 g Pd/m²on membranes within 150 minutes.

Other dose concentrations (0.1 mM, 1 mM, and 5 mM) of Na₂PdCl₄as the precursor also were tested. The Pd⁰synthesis follow the similar kinetic pattern with the similar >99% yield. FIGS. 3-A1 to 3-D5 show scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images using a range of magnifications of these Pd⁰-films. In general, all the Pd⁰anchored on the membranes were nanoparticles of ≤5 nm.

2. Application of MCfR: Destruction of Oxyanions with Pd⁰-Films

Precious metal-films in the H₂-MCfR system are able to catalyze reduction of a variety of oxyanions. These oxyanions include but are not limited to: nitrate (NO₃⁻), nitrite (NO₂⁻), perchlorate (CLO₄⁻), chlorate (CLO₃⁻), selenate (SeO₄²⁻), selenite (SeO₃²⁻), arsenate (AsO₄³⁻), antimonate (Sb₂O₇⁴⁻/SbO₄³⁻), vanadate (V₂O₇/VO₄³⁻), chromate (Cr₂O₇²⁻/CrO₄²⁻), molybdate (Mo₂O₇²⁻/MoO₄²⁻), tungstate (W₂O₇²⁻/WO₄²⁻), and perrhenate (ReO⁴⁻/ReO₅³⁻)

FIGS. 4A-4C present selected examples for nitrite reduction (4A), chromate reduction (4B), and chlorate reduction (4C) catalyzed by 0.56 g/m₂Pd⁰-film (0.1 mM Pd precursor) in the H₂-MCfR.

As shown in FIG. 4A, over 90% of the initial 4 mM (56 mg-N/L) NO₂⁻was rapidly removed (within 10 minutes), and the NO₂⁻concentration dropped below the MCL (1 mg- N/L) [10] within 15 minutes. The decrease in NO₂⁻concentration fit well to a pseudo- first-order decay model (R²=0.989) with an observed catalytic activity of 25.8 L·g_Pd⁻¹.min⁻¹, a value similar to reported activities of suspended Pd⁰catalysts supported by metal oxides under optimal conditions (4.4-48 L·g_Pd⁻¹·min⁻¹). The rate was almost 100-fold faster than reported for PVP-supported Pd [13]. A transient, but inconsiderable accumulation of N₂O (up to 5% of the total initial N) occurred during the first 10 minutes, followed by fast consumption within 5 minutes). Neither NO nor NH⁴⁺was detected throughout the 30-minute test, which gives >99.9% selectivity towards N₂, the desired product.

As shown in FIG. 4B, over 90% and 95% of the initial 0.4 mM (20 mg-Cr/L) CrO₄²⁻was immediately removed within 90 and 120 minutes, respectively. The CrO₄²⁻concentration eventually dropped below its MCL (0.1 mg-Cr/L) within 150 minutes. The decrease in CrO₄²⁻concentration fit well to a pseudo-first-order decay model (R₂=0.991), with an observed catalytic activity rate of 3.0 L·g_Pd⁻¹·min⁻¹. The rate was slightly lower than the highest reported values for H₂-induced colloidal or Al₂O₃-supported Pd catalysts (3.6 and 6.7 L·g_Pd⁻¹·min⁻¹, respectively). As expected, Cr(III), the product of CrO₄²⁻ reduction, accumulated in the form of soluble Cr³⁺ ion under acidic conditions.

Chemical reduction of ClO_x⁻species, though faster than microbial reduction, is still challenging due to a higher activation barrier for electron transfer than other oxyanions. Similar to NO₃⁻, monometallic precious metals are not able to catalyze reduction of the most oxidized perchlorate (ClO₄⁻), but the less oxidized ClO₃⁻. Even for ClO₃⁻reduction, monometallic Pd has been proved not the optimal catalyst due to its low catalytic activity. In the basic H₂-MCfR featuring monometallic PdNPs, only 10% of the initial 1 mM ClO₃⁻was reduced during the first 120 minutes. The H₂-MCfR was modified by adding 0.1 mM perrhenic acid (HReO₄) prior to ClO₃⁻reduction. The soluble ReO₄⁻was first reduced to Re₂O₅, which was immobilized on the Pd surface. The Re₂O₅then functioned as an electron shuttle to lower the activation energy for ClO₃⁻reduction. With the assistance of Re₂O₅, ClO₃⁻reduction reached 88% removal within 120 minutes (FIG. 4C). The resulting catalytic activity of 1.8 L·g_Pd⁻¹·min⁻¹was close to the highest levels reported in previous studies using supported Pd—ReO_x, Rh, or Ru NPs in suspension. Along with ClO₃⁻, we observed accumulation of no other less oxidized ClO_x⁻, and free chloride ions (Cl⁻) were >96% of the removed ClO₃⁻, which confirms that ClO₃⁻ was substantially reduced to Cl⁻, the desired product.

3. Application of MCfR: Destruction of Organics with Pd⁰-Films

Precious metal-film in the MCfR system is capable of catalyzing reduction of a variety of organics, for example, halogenated compounds, nitrated compounds, and unsaturated hydrocarbons.

FIGS. 5A-5D present selected examples of trichloroethene (TCE) dechlorination and saturation (5A), trichlorofluoroethane (CFC-11) dechlorination and defluorination (5B), 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) nitro-reduction (5C), and 1,3,5-Trinitroperhydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) denitration catalyzed by 0.56 g/m²Pd-film (0.1 mM Pd precursor) in the MCfR.

As shown in FIG. 5A, more than 99% of the initial 42 μmole TCE was removed with a pseudo-first-order catalytic activity of 5.4 L·g_Pd⁻¹·min⁻¹(R₂=0.989), and 97% of the Cl in the initial TCE was released as Cl⁻ during the 85-minute test. The tests further confirm that, in addition to dechlorination, the membrane-supported PdNPs also were able to catalyze hydrogenation of unsaturated C═C bonds to saturated C—C bonds.

Among the possible reduced products from TCE, saturated monochloroethane (MCA; 17.4% selectivity) and ethane (82.6% selectivity) accumulated, while unsaturated dichloroethene (DCE, or C₂H₂C₁₂) and vinyl chloride (VC, or C₂H₃Cl) were not detected throughout the 85-minute test. This supports that hydrogenating saturation of the C═C bond (H addition) was prior to dechlorination (H replacement) in TCE.

As shown in FIG. 5B, over 90% and 95% of 50 μM CCl3F was removed within 3 and 4 hours, respectively, at a pseudo-first-order catalytic activity of 1.4 L·g_Pd⁻¹·min⁻¹(R₂=0.989). The CCl₃F dehalogenation rate in the MCfR at room temperature was faster than any CFC dehalogenation reported at higher temperatures (at least 75° C.; usually >300° C.) using noble metals, transient metals, or zeolite catalysts. F⁻ and Cl⁻ were released, eventually accounting for 42% and 45% of the total F and Cl in the initial CCl3F, respectively. This confirms that the membrane-supported PdNPs in the H₂-MCfR were capable of simultaneous dechlorination and defluorination of CFCs at ambient temperature.

As shown in FIG. 5C, 60% of the initial 96 μM 4-nitrophenol was rapidly removed within one-half minute. Extrapolating the half-minute data reveals a pseudo-first-order catalytic activity of 157 L·g_pd⁻¹·min⁻¹(R₂=0.98), a value almost equal to the highest-ever-reported highest value (176.4 L·g_Pd⁻¹·min⁻¹) for carbon-composite-supported PdNP suspension. The main product was 56 μM 4-aminophenol (4-AP), accounting for 98% of the removed 4-CP, which confirms that the membrane-supported PdNPs in the H₂-MCfR was able to reduce nitro to amino functional groups around the C—N bond. As the reaction proceeded, 4-CP removal and 4-AP accumulation gradually slowed down. After 4 minutes, the 4-AP concentration started to drop. In the end of the 13-minute test, residual 4-AP was only 4 μM, and appearing was 89 μM of 4-aminocyclohexanone, the saturated counterpart of 4-AP. This supports a pattern of 4-NP destruction: C—N reduction followed by C═C saturation. Meanwhile, along with the 4-AP depletion, the retarded 4-nitrophenol removal recovered, reaching 99% and 99.9% within 8 and 12 minutes, respectively. This reveals a new possible trend that was not observed in the 4-CP test: the presence of 4-AP inhibited Pd-catalyzed 4-NP reduction, probably due to competition in adsorption sites. Loss of 4-AP eliminated the competition.

As shown in FIG. 5D, over 99.5% of the initial 91 μM RDX was removed within one hour at 22° C. and neutral pH. The pseudo-first-order catalytic activity was 6.9 L·g_Pd⁻¹·min⁻¹(R₂=0.994), a catalytic reactivity considerably higher than most photocatalytic and ZVI/Fention processes and close to the recent Bi/Fe⁰or Pd/Fe⁰bimetallic processes. The residual concentration then dropped to below the detection limit (20 μg/L, close to EPA health advisory level) within 90 minutes. We also observed transient accumulation of NO₂⁻, but no appearance of less nitrated cyclic intermediates; this indicates that the nitro functional group around the N—N bond in RDX was thoroughly denitrated, and the ring was further cleaved. In addition, the NO₂⁻consumption confirmed that PdNPs catalyzed subsequent NO₂⁻reduction, and absence of nitrous oxide (N₂O) and ammonium (NH⁴⁺) confirms a nearly 100% selectivity towards N₂.

Table 1 summarizes the reaction pathways and products of Pd-film-catalyzed reduction of the organic contaminants described above as well as other representative organics that have been tested in the MCfR system. The list of the target contaminants in Table 1 is not exhaustive.

4. Application of MCfR: Operational Condition Controls for Optimizing Catalytic Activities and Product Selectivity

FIGS. 6A-6H present the reduction of selected oxidized contaminants (nitrite, chlorite, TCE, and 4-CP) catalyzed by the Pd-film with variable conditions (catalyst type, catalyst dosage, pH, and H₂pressure) that can be conveniently and accurately tuned in the MCfR system.

Different types of catalysts lead to distinct catalytic pattern and efficiency. For example, the catalytic activity of monometallic Rh for nitrite reduction is only ¼th of monometallic Pd-film, but the bimetallic Pd/Rh-film (at a molar ratio of 1:1) shows similar activity of monometallic Pd (FIG. 6A). The pure Pd-film is scarcely able to catalyze chlorate reduction (FIG. 6B).

Increasing catalyst dosage enhances contaminant removal rate until a threshold is reached. The threshold, also known as the optimal dosage, yields the fastest contaminant removal and the highest catalytic activity. When the catalyst dosage beyond the optimal level, the contaminant removal remains, but the catalytic activity drops; this indicates redundancy of the catalysts. For example, when the Pd-to-nitrite molar ratio was increased from 1:1,000 to 1:400, the pseudo-first-order rate constant of nitrite reduction catalyzed by the Pd-film accordingly increased from 0.05 to 0.25 min⁻¹, and the catalytic activity increased from 15 to 25 L/g-Pd/min. When the Pd dosage further increased to 1:100, the rate constant slightly increased to 0.28 min⁻¹, while the catalytic activity dramatically dropped to 5 L/g-Pd/min (FIG. 6C). It can be concluded that the Pd-to-nitrite ratio of 1:400 was close to the optimal dosage for nitrite reduction catalyzed by the Pd-film in the MCfR system.

Catalyst dosage not only affects catalytic efficiency but also determines product selectivity. For example, when the molar ratio of Pd to 4-CP was 0.1:1, the product was exclusively phenol when the 4-CP removal reached 99% (FIG. 6D); this indicates that only dechlorination occurred. When the molar ratio of Pd to 4-CP was higher than 1:1, substantial products became the saturated cyclohexanol and phenol was inconsiderable at 99% 4-CP removal (FIG. 6D); this indicates ring saturation, driven by more abundant catalyst, also occurred along with dechlorination. Under this scenario, specific catalyst dosage is designed in order to maximize the catalytic selectivity towards a certain desired product.

Catalytic reduction of nitrite (FIG. 6E) was considerably faster in acidic conditions than neutral conditions. This is in accord with previous reports that lower pH usually is preferred in reduction reactions catalyzed by precious metals, as anions such as hydroxide (OH⁻) and carbonate (CO₃²⁻), which naturally become more abundant under alkaline conditions, deactivate precious metal catalysts. Furthermore, the reaction of H₂oxidation coupled with nitrite reduction produces bases that further increase pH. This obstacle, however, can be attenuated by providing acid from CO₂gas in the MCfR system. In specific, the gas-transfer membranes can deliver multiple gases (for example, H₂and CO₂) at a desired ratio. For the treatment of neutral-pH water, the nitrite reduction rate was doubled and tripled for 20% and 50% CO₂supply along with H₂than for no CO₂supply (FIG. 6E).

Higher H₂pressure means a faster supply of the electron donor and can promote catalytic efficiency. For example, in the MCfR for TCE removal (FIG. 6G), an increase of the H₂pressure from 2.5 to 15 psig not only increased catalytic activity by almost four times, but also enhanced the selectivity towards desired nontoxic ethane from 80% to 95%. However, the H₂pressure needs to be carefully regulated for two reasons: 1) excess H₂beyond “supply on demand” wastes H₂, which can lead to economic and safety problems; and 2) in some cases, too-rapid H₂supply leads to selectivity towards undesired products. From example, when the H₂pressure was higher than 10 psig, undesired ammonium accumulated as a result of over-reduction of nitrite beyond the harmless N₂gas (FIG. 6F).

5. Application of MCfR: Long-Term Removal of Co-Existing TCA and TCE Catalyzed by Pd⁰-Film Under Continuous Operation

The H₂-MCfR system can operate continuously for long-term removal of a sole or multiple oxidized contaminants from water with minimal detachment or deactivation of the precious metal-film catalysts. For example, the H₂-MCfR was continuously fed with water contaminated by TCA and TCE for over 90 days. FIG. 7 presents the operational conditions and effluent results. Tables 2-4 summarizes the average performance results at steady states of nine stages featuring a range of influent TCA/TCE concentrations, H₂pressures, pHs, and HRTs. Overall, the TCA and TCE removals were substantial during the 90-day operation. When the total surface loading of TCA and TCE was no more than 2 g/m²/day (Stages I to VII and IX), TCA and TCE removals at steady state were over 96% and 90%, respectively. When the total surface loading was doubled (Stage VIII), the TCA and TCE removals at steady state only moderately decreased, to 89% and 75%, respectively.

Weekly monitoring of Pd concentrations in the effluent samples reveal that detached Pd⁰from the membrane surface was minimal (6.2±4.4 μg/L). The cumulative catalyst loss during the 90-day operation was 0.16 mg, or only 4% of the total Pd coated on the membrane. These results verify that the MCfR system is capable of long-term treatment of contaminants at high surface loading with minimal loss of the catalyst quantity or quality. 6. Activation of MCfR: Forming a Pd/Rh Catalyst Film

For a bench-scale MCfR featuring a Pd/Rh-film, the concentration of Pd and Rh in the precious metal medium was 2.5 mM for both metals. FIG. 8 shows the concentration profile of the Pd and Rh species over time in the MCfR. More than 99% of the total Pd ions and Rh ions were converted to Pd⁰and Rh⁰within 180 minutes of exposure to the precious metal medium (pH. Of 7, HRT=24 hours, H₂gas provided at 20 psig). The spontaneously coated gas transfer membrane has a loading density of 5.6 g Pd/m²and 5.6 g Rh/m². FIGS. 9A and 9B are transmission electron microscopy images of the Pd/Rh-film, which show the Pd nanoparticles and the Rh nanoparticles are formed together, perhaps as alloy catalysts. FIGS. 9C and 9D are electron energy loss spectroscopy images that show the distribution of the Pd and Rh nanoparticles in the catalyst film. The Pd nanoparticles and Rh nanoparticles were distributed homogenously, and the diffraction patterns indicate presence on different planes. Pd⁰is present on four different planes: (1 1 1), (2 0 0), (2 2 0) and (3 1 1). Rh⁰only appears on two planes: (2 0 0) and (4 0 0).

For a bench-scale MCfR featuring a Pd/Ir-film, the concentration of Pd and Ir in the precious metal medium was 2.5 mM for both metals. Although Ir(IV) cannot be autocatalytically reduced to form Ir⁰NPs, Pd⁰catalysis, allowed Ir(IV) to be reduced and form Ir⁰NPs.

7. Application of a Bimetallic MCfR: Bimetallic Catalyst Films can Defluorinate PFOA

The bench-scale MCfRs with the bimetallic catalyst films were run at ambient conditions (23° C. and 1 atm) with the influent pH being 7 at HRT of 24 hours. H₂gas was provided at 20 psig. The results of PFOA and F⁻ concentrations in a H₂-MCfR with a Pd/Rh-film are shown in FIG. 10A. A 29-hour test with this H₂-MCfR resulted in over 60% of the PFOA was depleted and reductive defluorination (43.8 μM F⁻ accumulation, accounting for 21.9% of the total F in the ˜10 μM PFOA) with a pseudo-zero-order rate of 1.73 μM/h. The results of PFOA and F⁻ concentrations in a H₂-MCfR with a Pd/Ir-film are shown in FIG. 10B. A 115-hour test with this H₂-MCfR resulted in 99% PFOA depletion with a pseudo-first-order rate of 0.215 h⁻¹with reductive defluorination (124.2 μM F⁻ accumulation, accounting for 65.2% of the total F in the ˜7.6 μM PFOA) with a pseudo-zero-order rate of 1.12 μM/h in the H₂-MPfR during.

As summarized in FIG. 10C, Pd/Rh-film and Pd⁰/Ir⁰showed much higher defluorination rates than mono-Pd⁰and mono-Rh⁰. This was caused by the synergistic effect of the bimetallic catalyst. Pd⁰played a key role in adsorbing PFOA and H₂, while Rh⁰was responsible for carbon-fluoride dissociation. The Pd/Ir-film also showed much higher PFOA removal rate than mono-Pd⁰at pH 7.

8. Application of a Bimetallic MCfR: Long-Term Removal of PFOA Catalyzed by Pd/Rh-Film Under Continuous Operation

FIG. 11 shows the PFOA concentrations in the influent and effluent of a MCfR with Pd/Rh-film under environmentally relevant concentrations of PFOA during a period of 30 days. Within the first day of the experiment, the effluent PFOA decreased sharply to <136 μM (or 75% removal). For the following 29 days, the effluent concentration of PFOA stabilized at 82 ±35 ppt (or 83±8% removal). Thus, bimetallic catalyst films are capable of long-term treatment of contaminants.

TABLE 1

Organic contaminants catalyzed by Pd-film in the continuous H₂-MCfR.

Target Contaminant
Catalyst in MCfR

Category
Name
Pathway
Desired Products

Herbicide/
Chlorophenols
Dechlorination
Phenol

Pesticide

Ring saturation
Cyclohexanol

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic
Dechlorination
Phenoxyacetic acid

acid

3,6-dichloro-2-
Dechlorination
2-methoxybenzoic acid

methoxybenzoic acid

1-chloro-3-ethylamino-5-
Dechlorination
3-ethylamino-5-

isopropylamino-2,4,6-

isopropylamino-2,4,6-

triazine

triazine

3,5-dibromo-4-
Debromorination
4-hydroxybenzonitrile

hydroxybenzonitrile

Disinfection
Trichloroacetic acid
Dechlorination
Acetic acid

byproduct
Trichloroacetonitrile
Dechlorination
Acetonitrile

NDMA
Denitration
Dimethylamine

Bromochloroiodomethane
Dehalogenation
Methane

Solvent
Trichloroethane
Trichloroethane
Ethane

Trichloroethene
Chloroform
Ethane

Chain saturation

Chloroform
Dechlorination
Methane

Freon
CFC-11
Dechlorination
Methane

CFC-12
Dechlorination
Methane

CFC-113
Dechlorination
Ethane

Precursors/
Phenol
Ring saturation
Cyclohexanol

raw
Nitrophenols
Nitro-reduction
Aminophenols

materials

Ring saturation
Aminocyclohexanols

PFAS
Defluorination
Nonfluorinated

hydrocarbons

Explosive
1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-
Denitration
hexamethylenetetramine

triazinane

1,3,5,7-Tetranitro-1,3,5,7-
Denitration
1,3,5,7-Tetrazocane

tetrazoctane

TNT
Nitro-reduction
2,4,6-Triaminotoluene

TABLE 2

Average performance results at steady states in the continuous H₂-MCfR (8

mg-Pd/m²-membrane) with various influent TCA concentration, H₂pressure, pH, and HRT.

TCA

H₂
pH
HRT
C_in
Surface Loading
C_out
Flux
Removal

Stage
psig
s.u.
hour
mM
g/m²/d
μM
g/m²/d
%

I
3
7
6.0 ± 0.3
0.1
0.10 ± 0.02
11.2 ± 1.6
0.09 ± 0.00
88.8 ± 1.6

II
3
7
6.2 ± 0.3
0.5
0.50 ± 0.03
35.8 ± 6.7
0.44 ± 0.01
92.8 ± 1.3

III
3
7
6.2 ± 0.4
1
1.00 ± 0.07
173.4 ± 15.0
0.93 ± 0.02
87.5 ± 1.5

IV
6
7
6.1 ± 0.3
1
1.02 ± 0.05
89.7 ± 10.3
0.92 ± 0.04
91.0 ± 1.0

V
9
7
6.2 ± 0.2
1
1.00 ± 0.03
57.8 ± 10.0
0.94 ± 0.02
94.2 ± 1.0

VI
3
4
6.0 ± 0.3
1
1.03 ± 0.05
133.7 ± 8.1
0.90 ± 0.05
86.8 ± 0.8

VII
3
11
6.2 ± 0.1
1
1.0 ± 0.01
118.9 ± 31.6
0.88 ± 0.01
88.1 ± 2.2

VIII
3
7
3.2 ± 0.2
1
1.94 ± 0.07
251.0 ± 12.5
1.45 ± 0.06
74.9 ± 1.2

IX
3
7
12.3 ± 0.2
1
0.50 ± 0.03
51.5 ± 4.0
0.48 ± 0.03
94.9 ± 0.4

TABLE 3

Average performance results at steady states in the continuous

H₂-MCfR (8 mg-Pd/m²-membrane) with various influent TCE concentration

TCE

H₂
pH
HRT
C_in
Surface Loading
C_out
Flux
Removal

Stage
psig
s.u.
hour
mM
g/m²/d
μM
g/m²/d
%

I
3
7
6.0 ± 0.3
0.1
0.10 ± 0.01
0.7 ± 0.8
0.10 ± 0.00
99.3 ± 0.8

II
3
7
6.2 ± 0.3
0.5
0.49 ± 0.03
12.5 ± 2.2
0.48 ± 0.00
97.5 ± 0.4

III
3
7
6.2 ± 0.4
1
0.98 ± 0.07
36.3 ± 8.5
0.95 ± 0.01
96.7 ± 0.9

IV
6
7
6.1 ± 0.3
1
1.00 ± 0.05
27.3 ± 3.5
0.97 ± 0.01
97.3 ± 0.4

V
9
7
6.2 ± 0.2
1
0.98 ± 0.02
22.8 ± 1.4
0.95 ± 0.01
97.7 ± 0.1

VI
3
4
6.0 ± 0.3
1
1.02 ± 0.05
27.7 ± 2.6
0.95 ± 0.01
97.2 ± 0.3

VII
3
11
6.2 ± 0.1
1
0.98 ± 0.01
39.8 ± 3.2
0.95 ± 0.01
96.0 ± 0.3

VIII
3
7
3.2 ± 0.2
1
1.91 ± 0.07
112.5 ± 12.5
0.95 ± 0.01
88.8 ± 1.3

IX
3
7
12.3 ± 0.2
1
0.50 ± 0.03
12.4 ± 4.8
0.49 ± 0.02
98.8 ± 0.5

TABLE 4

Average DCA, MCA, and ethane selectivity

during different stages.

Selectivity

H₂
pH
HRT
DCA
MCA
Ethane

Stage
psig
s.u.
hour
%
%
%

I
3
7
6.0 ± 0.3
4.1 ± 0.8
1.9 ± 0.8
94.0 ± 0.8

II
3
7
6.2 ± 0.3
3.1 ± 0.4
11.3 ± 1.1
85.6 ± 1.5

III
3
7
6.2 ± 0.4
2.5 ± 0.1
15.3 ± 1.9
82.2 ± 1.8

IV
6
7
6.1 ± 0.3
1.5 ± 0.1
12.6 ± 1.3
85.9 ± 1.5

V
9
7
6.2 ± 0.2
1.3 ± 0.1
10.8 ± 0.4
87.9 ± 0.4

VI
3
4
6.0 ± 0.3
2.4 ± 0.2
14.2 ± 1.6
83.4 ± 1.7

VII
3
11
6.2 ± 0.1
2.2 ± 0.1
14.1 ± 0.8
83.7 ± 0.9

VIII
3
7
3.2 ± 0.2
6.0 ± 0.3
35.0 ± 3.8
58.9 ± 4.0

IX
3
7
12.3 ± 0.2
2.1 ± 0.3
9.5 ± 0.5
88.4 ± 0.6

SYSTEMS FOR CATALYTICALLY REMOVING OXIDIZED CONTAMINANTS FROM A FLUID AND RELATED METHODS

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

Original Assignees

CPC

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

PCT Information

Provisional Applications (1)