Directional drilling has proven useful in facilitating production of fluid, e.g. hydrocarbon-based fluid, from a variety of reservoirs. In many applications, a vertical wellbore is drilled, and casing is deployed in the vertical wellbore. One or more windows are then milled through the casing to enable drilling of lateral wellbores. Each window formed through the casing is large enough to allow passage of components, e.g. passage of a bottom hole assembly used for drilling the lateral wellbore and of a liner for lining the lateral wellbore. The bottom hole assembly may comprise a variety of drilling systems, such as point-the-bit and push-the-bit rotary drilling systems.
However, conventional wellbore departure and drilling systems are designed in a manner which generally requires multiple downhole trips. For example, a window milling bottom hole assembly may initially be run downhole to create an exit path in the existing casing of the vertical wellbore. The window milling bottom hole assembly also may be employed to drill a rathole of sufficient size for the next drilling assembly. In a subsequent trip down hole, a directional drilling bottom hole assembly is run to extend the rathole and to drill laterally to a desired target and to thus create the lateral wellbore.
A system and method are disclosed which facilitate the drilling of lateral wellbores by optionally eliminating one or more trips downhole. The system comprises a steerable drilling assembly and a whipstock. The steerable drilling assembly includes a cutting implement having cutters arranged and designed to enable both milling through a casing and at least partially drilling a lateral wellbore during a single downhole trip. The whipstock is releasably coupled to the cutting implement by an attachment member. The attachment member is arranged and designed to couple the cutting implement to the whipstock during deployment of the whipstock to a desired downhole location and to facilitate release of the cutting implement from the whipstock at the desired downhole location. The attachment member is further arranged and designed to minimize any portion of the attachment member remaining coupled to the whipstock after release of the cutting implement from the whipstock. In one or more embodiments, at least one back-up component is positioned behind at least one of the cutters to control the depth of cutting. The method employs one or more components of the system disclosed herein to provide an economical solution for drilling lateral wellbores by enabling the milling of a casing window and the drilling of a desired lateral wellbore during a single trip downhole. The disclosed system and method also promote good downhole dynamics control and improve overall bottom hole assembly functionality during drilling.
Certain embodiments will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements. It should be understood, however, that the accompanying figures illustrate only the various implementations described herein and are not meant to limit the scope of various technologies described herein, and:
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the present disclosure. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the present disclosure may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible.
The disclosed invention generally relates to a system and methodology which facilitate the drilling of lateral wellbores by eliminating one or more trips downhole. The system design facilitates formation, e.g. by milling, of a casing window and drilling of a desired lateral wellbore with a single trip downhole. In one or more embodiments, an attachment is provided which improves the temporary connection between the drill bit/mill and the whipstock during conveyance of the whipstock and the drilling assembly downhole through the vertical wellbore to enable creation of the casing window and lateral wellbore. In at least some applications, the cutting implement, e.g. drill bit or mill, is provided with back-up components which are located behind cutters, e.g. polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) cutters, mounted on the cutting implement.
The control of downhole dynamics and the performance of the bottom hole assembly can be improved by making adjustments to the physical form of the cutting implement according to the parameters of a given application. Simulation software may be employed to facilitate design of the drill bit/mill in a manner which, for example, mitigates vibration for the given application. This optimization of the physical form may involve providing asymmetric location of blades, adjusting cutter layout, and performing other adjustments to the physical form of the cutting implement for the specific application, as explained in greater detail below.
Referring generally to
Drilling assembly 34 may comprise a bottom hole assembly having a variety of components depending on the specifics of a drilling application. The example illustrated is just one embodiment which may be employed to drill the desired lateral wellbore 28. In this embodiment, the drilling assembly 34 is used to rotate a cutting implement 36, such as a drill bit/mill. The cutting implement 36 is uniquely designed to enable both the cutting/milling of a window through casing 26 and the drilling of a lateral wellbore 28 through the adjacent formation for an extended, desired length, e.g. target, all, optionally, during a single trip downhole into the well.
Examples of other components that may be utilized in drilling assembly 34 include a motor 38, e.g. a mud motor, designed to rotate cutting implement 36. A turbine (not shown) may also be equally employed to rotate cutting implement 36. The drilling assembly 34 with directional control (or a steerable drilling assembly) may comprise a bent angle housing 40 to direct the angle of drilling (i.e., directionally control the drilling) during drilling of lateral wellbore 28. The drilling assembly 34 with directional control for directionally controlling the wellbore may alternatively employ other directional control systems including, but not limited to, push-the-bit or point-the-bit rotary steerable systems (not shown). A variety of other features and components may be incorporated into drilling assembly 34, such as a watermelon mill 42, a running tool 44, and a measurement while drilling tool 46. The specific components and the arrangement of such components are selected according to the specific drilling application and environment.
One example of cutting implement 36 is illustrated in
The cutting implement 36 also may comprise a recess or recessed region 60 for receiving a whipstock attachment system 62, as further illustrated in
The actual size and configuration of attachment system 62 may vary according to the specifics of a drilling operation and/or environment. In one embodiment, however, the attachment member 64 is secured to an upper portion of the whipstock 30 by welding. The attachment head 70 of the attachment member 64 is received within opening 66 such that the attachment member 64 protrudes at an angle a few inches above the upper end of the whipstock 30. The attachment member 64 is subsequently welded in place. In this embodiment, the attachment member 64 is secured to cutting implement 36 between a pair of blades 54, but below the cutters 52 on gauge. This ensures that after the cutting implement 36 is coupled to the whipstock 30, the entire assembly gauges properly.
When the whipstock 30 is anchored/secured to the wellbore by hydraulic anchor 32, the attachment member 64 is designed to break at one or more notches 72 if the cutting implement 36 is subsequently pulled up with sufficient force. The one or more notches 72 may be positioned and designed to shear the attachment member 64 generally flush or nearly flush with the whipstock 30 so as to leave minimal, if any, protrusion of the remaining portion of attachment member 64 from opening 66 (i.e., protruding off the face of the whipstock 30) after shearing. Thus, the one or more notches 72 are designed to sever the attachment not at a right angle but at an angle that is similar to, or which approaches, the slope angle/profile of the whipstock 30. Likewise, the shearing of the attachment member 64 is arranged and designed to leave the remainder of the attachment member 64 coupled to the cutting implement 36 generally at or below the profile of the cutting structure. The remainder of the attachment member 64 coupled to the cutting implement is securely retained in recessed region 60 of cutting implement 36 so that once milling of the casing 26 is initiated, a very minimal portion (if any) of the attachment member 64 remaining coupled to cutting implement 36 is milled away before cutting the window through casing 26. The remaining portion of attachment member 64 protruding from opening 66 is less than that portion of attachment member 64 that remains within opening 66 of whipstock 30 or that remains within the cutting profile of cutting implement 36. As a result of this arrangement, the torque required to mill any portion of the attachment member 64 is lower and the damage to cutters 52 is minimized. Additionally, the design improves the ability to maintain the correct tool face for milling the window through the casing and for departing more easily into the surrounding formation.
In the example illustrated, the cutting implement 36 comprises a generally hollow interior having a primary flow passage 80 for conducting fluid, e.g. drilling fluid, to outlet nozzles 82. Additionally, a bypass port 84 is connected to a secondary flow passage 86, which directs a secondary flow of fluid to a tubing 88 coupled between a face of the cutting implement 36 and the whipstock 30. The tubing 88 is employed to convey hydraulic fluid and pressure to hydraulic anchor 32 (
Referring again to
Combination of the whipstock attachment system 62 and the hydraulic flow control within cutting implement 36 reduces potential damage to the cutting end 50 of cutting implement 36 by reducing or eliminating milling of a connector, and thereby, reducing debris. These improvements also reduce the amount of detrimental vibrations experienced by cutting implement 36, thus facilitating both milling of the casing window and drilling of extended laterals 28 into one or more proximate formations during a single trip downhole.
Additionally, the overall structure and arrangement of specific components of cutting implement 36 can be used to improve the milling and drilling capabilities of the cutting implement according to the specifics of a given application. Adjustments to the cutting structure may include adjustments to back-up/insert profile, insert layout, body profile, and body details. The geometry, material properties and cutting structure of any additional mills and reamers in the bottom hole assembly, e.g. drilling assembly 34, as well as the geometry, configurations, material properties and actions of other drilling assembly components, e.g., whipstock etc., can affect the milling and drilling capabilities. Further, the casing geometry and material of construction can also affect the milling and/or drilling capabilities. In operation, the cutting implement 36 is able to mill through, for example, the metal material of casing 26 and then continue to drill through rock of the subterranean Earth region in which a lateral borehole 28 is formed/drilled.
In one or more applications, the various characteristics of the cutting implement 36 as well as other drilling system components can be determined and/or optimized with the aid of analytical software, such as the IDEAS analysis program of Schlumberger Corporation. The analytical software is useful in processing the parameters and variables defining component and application characteristics to better select optimal configurations of the cutting structure and body shape of cutting implement 36. The analytical software also may be used to determine other optimized geometries and materials in the cutting implement 36 and in other drilling assembly components. The configuration optimization may be based on optimizing the performance of the cutting implement 36 for reliably cutting specified windows in the casing 26 with the intent of reliably continuing afterwards to drill at improved performance into the surrounding formation to an expected or desired target depth.
In one or more applications, the cutting implement design and selection process suggests relatively heavy-set, slightly asymmetrical cutter layouts with minimal exposure above the body surfaces of blades 54. Further, the back-up components/inserts 58 are positioned to inhibit excess gouging and to trail the cutters on or closely preceding the cutting implement gauge area.
Referring generally to
In
By way of further example, an analytical, dynamic modeling software, such as the IDEAS analysis program, may be employed to balance the cutting structure by considering contact surfaces, forces, and abrasion on mills, reamers, and other drilling assembly components. The cutters 52 may be PDC cutters and the layout of cutters 52 may be arranged to include spiral, plural, and staggered layouts. Additionally, the sizes, trailing exposure, and other cutter parameters can be adjusted to optimize the milling/drilling application. Similarly, the arrangement, shape, materials selected, and the surface/edge/layer details of the inserts 58 can be optimized according to the specifics of the drilling application and environment. The materials selected may include superhard materials, e.g. diamond or CBN materials, ceramic materials, sintered/infiltrated composites, impregnated materials, controlled density materials, and other materials selected for use as cutting edges, abrasive elements, bearing surfaces, and/or sacrificial wear inserts/pads. Also, the cutters 52 and the inserts 58 may be formed from different materials.
The relative exposure of the inserts 58 in comparison to PDC tips of cutters 52 also can be important. A range of PDC tip exposures above the blades 54 also may be implemented along with various coatings on the outer surfaces of the blades. Additionally, the interaction of the inserts 58 and the milled surfaces left by, for example, PDC cutters 52, can be optimized to inhibit gouging, whirl, and vibration of the cutting implement 36 and overall drilling assembly. The analytical software, such as the IDEAS software, helps enable optimization of these various relationships to improve the life of the drilling system components. The analysis also helps provide cutter implement designs which facilitate milling of the casing window and drilling of the lateral wellbore over a substantial length to a target destination in a single trip downhole.
Although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail above, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this invention. Accordingly, such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the claims.
The present document is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/410,134, filed on Mar. 1, 2012 and titled “High Performance Wellbore Departure and Drilling System,” which is based on and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/448,085, filed on Mar. 1, 2011, and titled “High Performance Wellbore Departure and Drilling System,” each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61448085 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13410134 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14656806 | US |