Patent Grant
10179238
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
Embodiments of the invention relate generally to systems, devices, and methods for treating tremor, and more specifically relate to system, devices, and methods for treating tremor by stimulation of peripheral nerve(s).
Hand tremors are one of the most common movement disorders, affecting an estimated 10 million people in the U.S., with growing numbers due to the aging population. The prevalence increases with age, increasing from 5-10% of the population over 65, to above 20% over 95. Essential tremor is characterized by oscillatory movement, for example between 4-12 Hz, affecting distal limbs, like the hands. Unlike Parkinson's tremor, which exists at rest, essential tremor affects postural and kinetic activities, meaning tremor is invoked by holding a limb against gravity or during intentional movement, respectively. Tremor is also a significant problem for patients with other diseases, such as orthostatic tremor, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's Disease. Treatment options for these conditions are limited, have undesirable side effects, or have high risk relative to the potential benefits, so alternative treatment is warranted. A number of conditions, such as tremors, can be treated through some form of transcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation.
Designing a device to accomplish such a treatment is challenging. One difficulty in designing a product for patients with tremors is creating a device that is easy to position and configure for individuals whose hands are unsteady. People have a wide variation in wrist diameters, nerve locations, nerve depolarization characteristics, and skin conduction that leads to challenges in designing a device to comfortably, safely, and reliably target peripheral nerves for stimulation across a broad population. For instance, in a wrist worn device targeting the median, ulnar, and radial nerves at the wrist, the band circumference for the adult population would have to vary from 13.5-19.8 cm to accommodate 5th percentile female to 95th percentile male. See Henry Dreyfus Associates, “The Measure of Man and Woman”, Wiley, 2001. In addition to differences in size, there are variation in the location, depth, and branching of nerves. Thus, a system and method that can reliably stimulate one or more nerves in the wrist across a wide range of wrist sizes would be advantageous in treating hand tremors.
A second challenge to designing such a device is that tremors vary between different people. Even within the same person tremor can occur at variable times throughout the day, depending on multiple factors, including but not limited to the patient's stress level fatigue, and diet. Thus, individually customized and responsive therapy capable of treating the tremor when it occurs or is likely to occur can provide a more elective, yet power efficient device.
The present invention relates generally to systems, devices, and methods for treating tremor, and more specifically relate to system, devices, and methods for treating tremor by simulation of peripheral nerve(s). It should be understood that some of the features described in connection with one embodiment may be combined with another embodiment.
In some embodiments, a system for treating a patient suffering from tremor is provided. The system can include a pulse generator, and a circumferential band adapted to be secured to the patient's arm or wrist, the band supporting a first and a second electrode in electrical communication with the pulse generators the first and second electrodes being spaced on the band so as to deliver electrical stimuli from the pulse generator to the patient to preferentially excite a first nerve selected from the patient's median, radial or ulnar nerve, the first and second electrodes being arranged and configured such that in a transverse cross-sectional plane of the arm or wrist there is a 90 degree to 180 degree angle between a line connecting the first nerve and the first electrode and a line connecting the first nerve and the second electrode.
In some embodiments, the band supports a third electrode in electrical communication with the pulse generator, the first and third electrodes being spaced on the band so as to deliver electrical stimuli from the pulse generator to the patient to preferentially excite a second nerve selected from the patient's median, radial or ulnar serve, the first and third electrodes being arranged and configured such that in a transverse cross-sectional plane or the arm or wrist there is a 90 degree to 180 degree angle between a line connecting the second nerve and the first electrode and a line connecting the second nerve and the third electrode, where the first nerve and the second nerve are different nerves.
In some embodiments, when the circumferential hand secured around the patient's arm or wrist, the first electrode is positioned on a dorsal side of the patient's arm or wrist, the second electrode is positioned on the ventral side of the patient's arm or wrist, and the third electrode is positioned on the patient's arm or wrist in between the first electrode and second electrode.
In some embodiments, the electrodes each have a center and the electrode centers are spaced about 5 mm to one quarter the circumference of the wrist or arm apart.
In some embodiments, the band comprises flexible circuitry, and the band is fastened to the housing through a riveted connector that also provides electrical communication between the flexible circuitry of the band and the pulse generator.
In some embodiments, the housing has a distal end configured to be oriented towards the patient's hand, and a proximal end configured to be oriented away from the patient's hand, such that the band, the first electrode, and the second electrode are closer to the distal end of the housing than to the proximal end of the housing.
In some embodiments, the pulse generator is the only pulse generator, and the system further includes a switch matrix configured to switch the pulse generator between at least one pair of electrodes.
In some embodiments, the switch matrix comprises a single high voltage source and ground.
In some embodiments, each electrode in the switch matrix is associated with its own set of protection circuitry.
In some embodiments, the system further includes a controller configured to deliver an alternating stimulation pattern from the pulse generator to the electrodes.
In some embodiments, the stimulation pattern includes an application of a plurality of alternating bursts of electrical stimulation delivered in a first pulse train to a first nerve selected from the patient's median, radial or ulnar nerve, and a second pulse train delivered to a different nerve selected from the patient's median, radial or ulnar nerve, wherein the first pulse train and the second pulse train are offset by about one half the tremor period.
In some embodiments, the stimulation pattern includes an application of a plurality of bursts of electrical stimulation, such that each burst includes a stimulation frequency between about 50 Hz and 2,000 Hz, and a pulse width between about 50 microsecond and 1 millisecond, and a pulse shape selected from the group consisting of monophasic rectangular, biphasic asymmetric rectangular, or biphasic symmetric rectangular.
In some embodiments, the stimulation pattern includes an application of a plurality of alternating bursts of electrical stimulation, such that each burst comprises a duration of about one half the tremor period.
In some embodiments, the system further includes a motion sensor configured to measure motion of the patient's arm or wrist.
In some embodiments, the motion sensor includes a 3-axis gyroscope or accelerometer.
In some embodiments, the system further includes a controller in communication with the pulse generator and the motion sensor, the controller programmed to determine one or more characteristics of the tremor based on a signal generated by the motion sensor.
In some embodiments, the one or more characteristics of the tremor is selected from the group consisting of the tremor frequency, the tremor amplitude, and the tremor phase.
In some embodiment, the controller is further programmed to adjust one or more parameters of the electrical stimuli based on the determined characteristics of the tremor.
In some embodiments, the first electrode, second electrode, and third electrode are fabricated on a disposable and replaceable flexible substrate with one or more electrical connectors for electrical communication with the pulse generator.
In some embodiments, each electrode further includes a pull tab to aid in fastening and removal.
In some embodiments, the housing and/or bands comprise a plurality of electrical snaps for removably receiving the first electrode, second electrode, and third electrode.
In some embodiments, the first electrode, second electrode, and third electrode are disposed on a thin liner with a spacing that corresponds to the position of the plurality of electrical snaps on the housing and/or band.
In some embodiments, the system further includes an adhesive disposed on the thin liner around the electrodes.
In some embodiments, the system further includes a cradle that securely supports the housing and the bands such that the first electrode, second electrode, and third electrode can be attached to the housing and/or band.
In some embodiments, the cradle has a cavity for securely receiving the housing such that the base of the housing is exposed.
In some embodiments, the first electrode, second electrode, and third electrode are recessed into the housing or band such that the electrodes extend a predetermined distance from the housing or band.
In some embodiments, the first electrode and second electrode are disposable and replaceable.
In some embodiments, the band includes moldable indentations configured to encompass the electrodes and protect them from dehydration.
In some embodiments, the first electrode and the second electrode are coated with an electrically conductive hydrogel.
In some embodiments, the first electrode and the second electrode are connected with a foam backing layer.
In some embodiments, the foam backing layer includes a serpentine shaped portion between the electrodes.
In some embodiments, the housing includes one or more depressible user input buttons, each button located on a side of the housing, and a broad bracing surface on the opposite side of the housing from each button.
In some embodiments, the housing has a skin contact side with a curved surface that follows the curvature of the patient's arm or wrist.
In some embodiments, the system further includes a rechargeable button and an inductive coil configured to receive power from an external source to inductively charge the battery. The rechargeable battery and inductive coil can be enclosed in the housing.
In some embodiments, the electrodes have a diameter or width between about 5 mm and one-quarter the circumference of the arm or wrist.
In some embodiments, the system has only three electrodes. In other embodiments, the system only has two electrodes.
In some embodiments, the polarity of the electrodes connected to the stimulator is switchable.
In some embodiments, a method of treating a patient suffering from tremor is provided. The method can include placing a band comprising a first electrode and a second electrode around the patient's arm or wrist in a configuration such that in the transverse cross-sectional plane of the arm or wrist there is a 90 degree to 180 degree angle between a line extending between a first nerve and the first electrode and a line extending between the first nerve and the second electrode, the first nerve selected from the patient's median, radial and ulnar nerves, wherein the first and second electrodes are spaced a predetermined distance apart; and delivering a first electrical stimulus from the electrodes to excite the first nerve to reduce the patient's tremor.
In some embodiments, the band includes a third electrode spaced a predetermined distance apart from the first and second electrode such that there is a 90 degree to 180 degree angle between a line extending between a second nerve and the first electrode and a line extending between the second nerve and the third electrode, the second nerve selected from the patient's median, radial and ulnar nerves.
In some embodiments, the method further includes delivering a second electrical stimulus from the first electrode and the third electrode to excite the second nerve.
In some embodiments, first nerve is the median nerve and the second nerve is the radial nerve.
In some embodiments, the band is operatively connected to a housing enclosing a motion sensor, and the method further includes measuring one or more characteristics of the tremor with the motion sensor while the patient performs a tremor-invoking task.
In some embodiments, the tremor-invoking task is an instructed task or a kinetic activity.
In some embodiments, the instructed task is a postural hold and the kinetic activity is drawing or writing.
In some embodiments, the tremor-invoking task is a task the patient performs uninstructed as part of normal daily activities.
In some embodiments, the measured characteristics of the tremor include a frequency spectrum of the tremor.
In some embodiments, the method further includes determining a tremor frequency by determining a center frequency peak within a 4 to 12 Hz range in the frequency spectrum of the tremor.
In some embodiments, the measured characteristics of the tremor include an amplitude of the tremor.
In some embodiments, the method further includes temporally offsetting the first electrical stimulus from the second electrical stimulus by a period of time based on a period of the tremor.
In some embodiments, the period of time is a function of the period of the tremor divided by the number of nerves that are stimulated.
In some embodiments, the number of nerves that are stimulated is two.
In some embodiments, the first electrode is in electrical communication to a first contact of a stimulator and the second electrode is in electrical communication to a second contact of the stimulator, the stimulator configured to generate an electrical pulse between of the first electrode and the second electrode, the electrical pulse having a polarity.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises switching the first contact and the second contact of the stimulator such that the first electrode is in electrical communication with the second contact and the second electrode is in electrical communication with the first contact in order to change the polarity of the electrical pulse so that the first electrical stimulus is biphasic.
In some embodiments, the method further includes measuring motion of the patient; determining the energy, amplitude, frequency, and pattern of the measured motion; and separating non-tremor motion from tremor motion based in part on the determined energy, amplitude, frequency, and pattern of the measured motion.
In some embodiments, the method further includes determining a stimulation sensation threshold and a muscle contraction or discomfort threshold.
In some embodiments, the method further includes increasing an amplitude of the first electrical stimulus from the stimulation sensation threshold towards the muscle contraction or discomfort threshold.
In some embodiments, the step of increasing the amplitude of the first electrical stimulus includes increasing the amplitude linearly or exponentially.
In some embodiments, the step of increasing the amplitude of the first electrical stimulus includes increasing the amplitude in a series of progressively greater peak amplitudes separated by reductions in amplitude.
In some embodiments, the step of increasing the amplitude of the first electrical stimulus includes increasing the amplitude to a value greater than the muscle contraction or discomfort threshold and then reducing the amplitude to below the muscle contraction or discomfort threshold.
In some embodiments, the step of increasing the amplitude of the first electrical stimulus includes increasing the amplitude in a series of stepwise increments, where each increment in amplitude is held for a predetermined duration.
In some embodiments, each stepwise increment in amplitude is followed by a decrease in amplitude that is smaller in magnitude than the increase in each stepwise increment.
In some embodiments, the first electrical stimulus and the second electrical stimulus are delivered out of phase to the tremor.
In some embodiments, the method further includes determining the tremor frequency and phase by analyzing a signal from a motion sensor worn by the patient selected from the group consisting of an accelerometer, a gyroscope, a magnetometer, and a bend sensor.
In some embodiments, the step of using motion sensors to measure characteristics of the tremor during a tremor-invoking task and using these tremor characteristics to determine parameters of the stimulation waveform is done in real-time.
In some embodiments, the last electrical stimulus and/or the second electrical stimulus have a stochastic resonance electrical stimulation pattern.
In some embodiments, the method farther includes determining an electrical stimulation, level that is above a sensation threshold and below a muscle contraction threshold and the patient's pain tolerance threshold.
In some embodiments, the positioning of the band is verified by paresthesia in the patient's hand.
In some embodiments, the positioning of the band is based in part on a comparison of a shape of the housing with one or more anatomical features.
In some embodiments, the first electrical stimulus has a duration between about 20 and 60 minutes.
In some embodiments, the method further includes measuring motion of the patient's arm or wrist during a specific task; and determining characteristics of the tremor from the measured motion.
In some embodiments, the specific task is a postural, kinetic, or intentional movement.
In some embodiments, the characteristics of the tremor include tremor frequency; and the method further includes alternating a timing of burst patterns of the first electrical stimulus based on the tremor frequency.
In some embodiments, a method of treating a patient suffering from tremor is provided. The method can include determining a circumference of a patient's wrist; providing a band and housing having a predetermined circumferential spacing for a first electrode, a second electrode, and a third electrode, where the predetermined circumferential spacing is based on the determined circumference of the patient's wrist, where the housing encloses a pulse generator configured to be in electrical communication with the first electrode, the second electrode, and the third electrode, where the band and housing are configured to be positioned on the wrist such that the first electrode is positioned approximately along the midline of the dorsal side of the arm or wrist, the second electrode is positioned approximately along the midline of the ventral side of the arm or wrist, and the third electrode is positioned in between the first electrode and second electrode, where the first electrode and the second electrode form a first electrode pair and the first electrode and third electrode form a second electrode pair; stimulating a first nerve by delivering a first electrical stimulus between the first electrode pair; and stimulating a second nerve by delivering a second electrical stimulus between the second electrode pair.
In some embodiments, a method of treating a patient suffering from tremor is provided. The method can include determining a circumference of a patient's wrist; selecting a band and housing having a predetermined circumferential spacing for a first electrode, a second electrode, and a third electrode, where the predetermined circumferential spacing is based on the determined circumference of the patient's wrist, where the housing encloses a pulse generator configured to be in electrical communication with the first electrode, the second electrode, and the third electrode; positioning the band and housing on the wrist such that the first electrode is positioned approximately along the midline of the dorsal side of the arm or wrist, the second electrode is positioned approximately along the midline of the ventral side arm or wrist, and the third electrode is positioned in between the first electrode and second electrode, where the first electrode and the second electrode form a first electrode pair and the first electrode and third electrode form a second electrode pair; stimulating a first nerve by delivering a first electrical stimulus between the first electrode pair; and stimulating a second nerve by delivering a second electrical stimulus between the second electrode pair.
In some embodiments, one or more electrodes can be connected to a given stimulator lead at the same time.
In some embodiments, a device is provided. The device can include an adjustable array of electrodes configured to be adjustable to target one or more nerves of the subject; a skin interface in contact with the adjustable array of electrodes; an adjustable band in contact with the adjustable array of electrodes; and an electronics box in contact with the band.
In some embodiments, the electrodes are a linear array.
In some embodiments, the electrodes circumvent a limb of the subject.
In some embodiments, the limb is a wrist.
In some embodiments, electrodes on the dorsal side of the limb is the common electrode.
In some embodiments, electrodes on the ventral side of the limb are signal electrodes.
In some embodiments, the nerve is a nerve selected from the group consisting of: ulnar, median, and radial, or any combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the electronics is configured to switch current between electrodes in the array of electrodes.
In some embodiments, at least two electrodes in the array of electrodes are the same size.
In some embodiments, at least two electrodes in the array of electrodes are different sizes.
In some embodiments, the array of electrodes configured for the dorsal side of a limb are different sizes than the electrodes of the array configured for the ventral side of the limb.
In some embodiments, electrodes in the array of electrodes are configured to accept a maximum amount of current.
In some embodiments, an impedance value between two or more electrodes in the array of electrodes is from 20 nF to 120 nF.
In some embodiments, an impedance value between two or more electrodes in the array of electrodes is from 5 nF to 300 nF.
In some embodiments, the array of electrodes includes a material selected from the group consisting of: Ag/AgCl, Ag, Au, Stainless steel, and conductive rubber.
In some embodiments, the skin interface includes a material selected from the group consisting of: a hydrogel, a conductive fluid, a conductive gel, a conductive lotion, a fabric, or any combination thereof.
In some embodiments, the skin interface includes a hydrogel.
In some embodiments, the hydrogel has an impedance value that prevents current leakage between electrodes.
In some embodiments, an impedance value of the two or more electrodes is dependent on the spacing of the electrodes.
In some embodiments, the skin interface layer has ranges from above 1000 ohm-cm to 100 kohm-cm in volume resistivity.
In some embodiments, the device has some current leakage between an electrode in the array of electrodes and the skin interlace.
In some embodiments, the leakage current is less than 50%.
In some embodiments, the leakage current is less than 30%.
In some embodiments, the leakage current is less than 10%.
In some embodiments, a method for fitting a subject with a tremor with a neuromodulation device is provided. The method can include contacting a limb of the subject with a device comprising an adjustable array of electrodes, configured to be adjustable to one of more nerves of the subject; determining a location of nerve response; and fitting the subject with the device based on the location of nerve response.
In some embodiments, the nerve response is paresthesia.
In some embodiments, the method of determining the nerve response includes stimulating electrodes in the array of electrodes.
In some embodiments, the location of nerve response is indicative of nerve activation.
In some embodiments, the method of determining nerve response includes contacting a different portion of the limb with a feedback device.
In some embodiments, the limb includes a wrist, and the different portion comprises a finger.
In some embodiments, the feedback device includes a measurement electrode.
In some embodiments, activation of the electrode indicates which nerve has been excited.
In some embodiments, the method of determining nerve response includes identifying positional movement of the limb.
In some embodiments, the fitting includes placing the device on the limb for activating a nerve in the limb with the device.
In some embodiments, the fitting includes selecting electrodes for activation that are necessary for the activation. In some embodiments, parameter can be stored in memory and referenced by the microcontroller in the device during treatment.
In some embodiments, the activating includes peripheral nerve stimulation.
In some embodiments, the activating treats a tremor in the subject.
Although many of the embodiments have been described having two or three electrodes, it should be understood that other embodiments may have additional electrodes, particularly if additional nerves are being target.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
One aspect of this invention is a device and system that provides peripheral nerve stimulation, targeting individual nerves (
In some embodiments, the treatment device 10 is a wristworn device consisting of 1) an array of electrodes 16 encircling the wrist, 2) a skin interface to ensure good electrical contact to the person, 3) an electronics box or housing 12 containing the stimulator or pulse generator 18, sensors 20, and other associated electronics such as a controller or processor 22 for executing instructions, memory 24 for storing instructions, a user interface 26 which can include a display and buttons, a communications module 28, a battery 30 that can be rechargeable, and optionally an inductive coil 32 for charging the battery 30, and the like, and 4) a band to hold all the components together and securely fasten the device around the wrist of an individual.
This system has shown dramatic tremor reduction after providing electrical stimulation to nerves in the patient's wrist in accordances to the embodiments described herein.
Circumferential, Spaced Electrodes
One aspect of our device is the use of only three electrodes to target two nerves (e.g., median and radial), with a shared or common electrode 300 placed on the dorsal side of the wrist (
As shown in
Mapping the nerves of a number of individuals with different wrist sizes by selectively stimulating circumferential locations on the wrist and verifying where the user feels paresthesia in order to identify the median, radial, and ulnar nerve showed the variability in nerve location relative to wrist size, as well as the high individual variable in physiology. Individual nerves can be targeted with electrodes positioned at the correct location, such as the positions shown in
Table 1 presents data showing individuals' wrist sizes and the stimulation locations needed to excite the radial, median, and ulnar nerve. Notice that multiple locations can sometimes target the same nerve and also that individuals of the same wrist circumference and width can often have very different responses. Zero is the centerline of each individual's wrist and numbers refer to elements to the left (negative) and to the right (positive) of the center element (0) when looking at the wrist with palm side up. All subjects in this table were right handed. U=Ulnar, M=medial, and R=Radial.
Some embodiments of the device have different fixed spacings between appropriately sized electrodes to target nerves in patients with varying physiology based on wrist circumference. The wrist circumference of 5th percentile female to 95th percentile male is 13.5-19.5 cm. Sizing diagrams are shown in
Sizing of the electrode structure may be based upon a balance of patient comfort, device power consumption, and ability to target nerves. Small electrode are advantageous because lower currents and power are needed to stimulate a nerve. However the smaller electrodes may have several disadvantages, including: (1) increased difficulty of nerve targeting, as the electrode has to be placed precisely at the right anatomical location; (2) intensified edge effects of the electrical field produced between electrodes, which reduces comfort of the patient; and 3) reduced surface area of the electrode in contact with the skim which can cause small deviations in the electrode integrity and skin adhesion to reduce patient comfort, in contrast, larger electrodes are advantageous because they tend to be more comfortable for the patient because of the reduction of electrical field edge effects, reduction in sensitivity to small deviations in the electrodes, and reduction in sensitivity to the current amplitude step size on the stimulator device. In addition, less precise placement is needed for larger electrodes. However, a disadvantage of larger electrodes is the requirement of more current and power to achieve a specified current density.
In some embodiments, wrist circumference and nerve location are the primary anatomical factors that drive selection of electrode size. The median nerve is generally located on the centerline of the ventral side of the wrist. Therefore, as shown in
In some embodiments, the lower bound of the electrode size can be 5 mm, based on the smallest sizes found in literature of electrode arrays. Within these limits, a 22 mm by 22 mm size was chosen because it allowed a good balance between stimulator power and nerve targeting. The 22 mm size allowed a reasonable amount of misalignment for targeting the nerve (about 1 cm circumferential measured empirically), without consuming an unreasonable amount of power for a wearable device form factor. The 22 mm size is also a standard size for electrode manufacturing as it is used commercially in ECG devices. In some embodiments, the electrode size can be between 10 mm and 30 mm, or 15 mm and 25 mm, or 20 and 25 mm.
Based on electrode size and to accommodate variation in wrist size, the electrode spacing can be grouped into three sixes in some embodiments, in which each size spans a wrist circumference range of 2 cm. In each range, the middle wrist circumference in that 2 cm range was chosen and spacing of the electrodes was calculated based upon the wrist circumference. For example, in the smallest sized band, for wrist sizes 13.5 to 15.5 cm, calculations were based on a 14.5 cm wrist circumference. The center-to-center spacing of the median electrode and the return electrode on the back of the wrist should be roughly half the circumference of the wrist. Subtracting the size of the electrodes (22 mm) determines that the inter-electrode spacing should be around 13 mm.
Sizing calculations were also slightly biased such that placement of the median electrode erred towards the thumb, as this was more effective at stimulating the median nerve and would avoid stimulating the ulnar nerve, in case the electrodes were shifted or placed imprecisely. In some embodiments, ulnar nerve stimulation may be less preferable than radial nerve stimulation as it was found to cause an unpleasant sensation in early testing.
Test arrays were fabricated by affixing hydrogel electrodes to a liner at the desired distances. The common electrode was aligned to the center of the back of the wrist and the hydrogels were connected to a stimulation device. As shown in Table 2, all subjects were able to target the radial and median nerves using the appropriately selected bands. At a shirt of 1 cm towards the thumb, most individuals experienced diminished median nerve excitation that could be accommodated with greater amplitude of stimulation. At a shift of 1 cm towards the pinky, many individuals gained ulnar sensation. After a large shift of about half an electrode pad size, most subjects were still able to feel the stimulation of the correct nerve, but occasionally required a greater amplitude of stimulation. These preliminary results demonstrated that the electrode spacing and size was sufficient.
In one embodiment of the device, the electrode connections could be located on the underside of the electronics box, where one type of electrode connection could be a snap button. In
Other Electrode Array Configurations
Various types of electrode arrays can be used. In some embodiment as described above, a circumferential array of two or more electrodes, such as three electrodes, positioned circumferentially around patient's wrist or arm can be used. Other electrode array configurations can also be used, including two dimensional arrays. The electrode pairs formed in these electrode arrays can be designed such that each element is individually addressable and has limited current density. This array configuration is an improvement over conventional dual-element arrays. First, it limits current density spikes that can cause discomfort and that can increase the risk of burns with larger elements. Discomfort and burns can occur when, for example, hydrogels peel off or dry cloth electrodes have poor contact with the skin. Second, it enables selecting the optimal stimulation location for each patient's specific geometry or neurophysiology. The stimulation location may be targeted either by exciting a single set of electrodes or by steering the current using simultaneous excitation of multiple electrodes. Third, it permits shifting the stimulation location over time to reduce the overall current density applied to a certain patch of skin which can reduce skin irritation due to stimulation.
In some embodiments, an electrode array may have a defined pattern of electrical contacts arranged in a ring around the wrist. In order to stimulate electrically, current can be applied between two sets of contacts through the human skin. In this array, any number of electrodes can be connected to either set of contacts, making it very configurable. In most situations, a skin interface will need to be placed in between the electrode contacts and the person. In many cases, the mechanical and electrical properties of this skin interface coupled with the mechanical properties of the array will influence the performance and complexity of the device.
Typically for nerve excitation in the wrist, two electrodes 800′ are placed longitudinally along the nerve with a reasonable spacing of at least 1 cm, as shown in
The circumferential array structure addresses issues of sizing. In some embodiments as shown in
The array design is defined by the 1) center to center spacing, 2) the interelement spacing, and 3) the shape of the electrode, and 4) the electrical and mechanical properties of the skin interface, typically a hydrogel. In some embodiments, for wrist-worn treatment of tremors the array 900 has a center to center spacing of about 1 cm, an interelement spacing of about 2 mm, and rounded-corner rectangular elements such as 2 mm filet. Since the array 900 can conform to the body, the contacts can be fabricated as an electrically conductive Ag or Ag/AgCl trace 904 on a flexible polyester substrate 906, though other trace and substrates materials could be used such as gold plated copper on polyimide. A single strip of hydrogel with a reasonably high volume resistivity (˜2500 ohm-cm) can be applied across the array and used to contact the skin. The selection of these parameters is determined by the desired range of anatomical sizes, electrical characteristics of the skin interface, sensation of stimulation, duration of stimulation, and permissible complexity of the electronics.
In some embodiments, the device is designed to minimize cross talk between elements/electrodes. Cross talk causes adjacent areas to be stimulated and can lead to draining power or increasing off-target side effects of the stimulation. Cross-talk can be minimized by selecting a hydrogel with a high volume resistivity to discourage current spread in the lateral direction and limit the effective area of stimulation. With lower volume resistivity, current spreading could prevent the ability to specifically target individual nerves. In addition, larger resistivity hydrogels tend to decrease edge effects and increase comfort of stimulation. However, a volume resistivity that is too large will consume more power, which increases demands on the electronics and the size of the battery. In some embodiments, an intermediate resistivity can be chosen in order to balance these competing needs. Additionally, a small amount of current spreading could also be beneficial to patient comfort as the current density will taper off more gradually.
Cross-talk could also be regulated by modifying the shape and the interelement spacing. For instance, decreasing the area of the electrodes 1002 (
Changing the electrode shape can also control the excitation in an area and make the stimulation more comfortable. In the case of rectangular elements, often the corners show an increase in current density, which can lead discomfort. In some embodiments, a circular element/electrode 1102 (
A further approach to reducing cross-talk is to separate the hydrogel pieces and eliminate current flow from pad to pad. However, this increases the complexity of the manufacturing process.
In some embodiments as shown, in
Another benefit of the array geometry is to map the physical layout of underlying neurophysiology. This could be used to tune the stimulation appropriately for each subject. For example, the array elements could be used to map the underlying muscle firing (electromyography) or the underlying nerve activity (electroneurography). This information may be used in a closed-loop system to monitor the tremor or optimize the stimulation over time.
Expanding the underlying concept to the circumferential array described to a finer microarray offers significant advantages for simulation. A structure that is a material with miniature, current-limited array elements would solve problems with current spikes or electrode peeling. Designing the microarray is a balance of a need for high lateral impedance to prevent crosstalk and low impedance for efficient power transfer from the stimulation. As shown in
There are advantages to using a microarray instead of a conventional electrode system in order to maintain comfortable and safe stimulation in situations when the adhesion to the skin is compromised. Two situations generally cause pain the burns to a patient, electrode peeling and breakdown of electrode material; both are associated with increases of current density. In a conventional electrode system, as shown in
In a matrix array with regulated current density, however, the current density can be regulated to prevent discomfort. In
A second common situation where the microarray offers advantage over a conventional electrode system is when one area of the electrode is shorted due to a breakdown in the material or the mechanical nature of the material. In a conventional electrode system as shown in
The two situations described would be particularly problematic for non-adhesive electrode configurations. For example, conductive fabrics may intermittently only contact one small region of the skin and cause all the current to flow through a small area at high current density. One solution to this problem is the embodiment of a non-adhesive array depicted in
Patterned Stimulation Alternating Between Nerves
One aspect of the device is the patterned waveform used to stimulate multiple nerves. This waveform uses alternating bursts of higher frequency stimulation (typically 50 Hz-2 kHz) and 50 μS-1 mS pulse width on peripheral nerves that map to adjacent locations in the brain. This type of stimulation may desynchronize the neuronal populations and restore normal function. These burst patterns match certain tremor characteristics of the patient, including the phase, frequency and amplitude of the tremor. In one implementation, where the median and radial nerves are used to treat tremor, pulse trains at 150 Hz frequency and 300 μS pulse width) are a length that is just under half of the tremor period and alternating between the two nerves.
There are several variations on this stimulation, including stimulating more than two nerves as shown in
The order of the pulse trains on different nerves can be randomized as shown in
There can be pauses at different times in the sequence. These pauses can be regular or occur at random times. The pauses may help with the desynchronization and also have the side effect of increasing the tolerability of stimulation because less power is generally transmitted to the hand. Loss power transmission reduces the power consumption from the battery and can help reduce the overall size of the wearable device.
While the embodiments described above have used constant 150 Hz stimulation as an example, the waveform within each burst can vary in amplitude, timing, or shape. For instance, in some cases, radial and median nerve amplitudes need to be changed since one nerve may be more easily excited than the other based physiology or hand position. The amplitude during the burst can also be varied, for example sinusoidally. The pulse width and frequency inside a particular burst pattern can also vary, for example, a stochastic resonance electrical stimulation pattern could be used to choose a random distribution of the pulse width and frequency of a certain square pulse. Stochastic resonance has been shown to enhance sensory perception and feed back into the central nervous system.
The electronics implementation of this alternating waveform is advantageous because only one stimulator is needed, since only one nerve is stimulated at any given time. This is enabled by the switch matrix design described above and illustrated in
Utilization of only one stimulator since only one nerve is excited at a time. This reduces the size and cost of the device by reducing the amount of electronic components required, compared to other techniques that need multichannel stimulators.
The switch matrix allows every electrode in an electrode pair to be associated with its own protection circuitry. This protects against any single point failure in the matrix. For instance, if a DC blocking capacitor is associated with every electrode, even if one of the capacitors failed, the patient would still be protected from DC currents from the second capacitor, as shown in
Additionally, the switch matrix minimizes or reduces the number of high voltage rails needed for biphasic stimulation, which reduces the number of components in the device. Instead of creating both negative and positive rails, a single voltage rail and ground rail are created. By connecting alternating electrodes to the ground rail or the high voltage rail, the biphasic waveform can be created as shown in
Device Fitting for Electrode Arrays:
In some embodiments, a manual fitting procedure can be used. In a manual fitting procedure, the device can be placed on the patient's arm. Each individual electrode can be switched on and stimulation applied. The location of paresthesia can be noted for each electrode location and correlated to a particular nerve by using information found in literature. For example, if a particular array element causes paresthesia in the thumb, index, and third finger, then that electrode stimulated the median nerve. Ulnar and radial nerves can be found in similar ways. The operator can then program those nerve locations and corresponding associated electrodes into the patient's device. The device can recall these locations to provide consistent therapy to a particular individual, provided that the band and electrodes are consistently placed on the patient's wrist at the same location and orientation. To aid repeatable placement on the wrist, visual or mechanical markers that line up with anatomical features can be employed. One example is to curve the box to fit the curve of the wrist. A second example is to make the device watch-like, with intuitive preferred orientation. A final example is to provide visible indicators, like marks or lines that can line up with corresponding anatomy, like the tendons of the wrist or the bones on the hand and wrist, such as the ulnar styloid process.
In some embodiments, the fitting procedure can be automated using feedback from on-board sensors. For instance, one may use ring receiving electrodes 2200 on the fingers similar to those used in carpal tunnel nerve conduction studies. These receiving electrodes 2200 can be used to measure whether stimulation of a particular electrode 2202 placed circumferentially on the wrist or arm causes a measurable response 2204 in a target nerve 2206, such as the median, radial, or ulnar nerve, as shown in
In some embodiments, fitting can be determined by measuring the response to stimulation. For instance, if stimulation at a particular location leads to greater tremor reduction than stimulation at another location the device will be directed to stimulate the more effective location.
In some embodiments, during the fitting procedure, the search for the correct set of electrodes does not have to be done in a linear fashion. Depending on the person's wrist and width size, there can be a priori knowledge to the approximate locations of certain nerves. For instance, the median nerve is generally located close to the center line of the ventral side of the wrist, and therefore electrodes at that location can be preferentially tested.
While selecting individual elements is the most direct way of selecting a single nerve, more complex current patterns can be used to shape the current density through the limb. The combination of which electrodes to be used to excite a particular nerve can be straight forward or more complex in order to current steer for the purpose of improving comfort. For example, in
A circumferential array is advantageous because array elements can be dynamically selected to change stimulation as necessary. For instance, in some cases, as the position of a person's limb moves around, the position of a nerve can change. In this situation, a different set of electrodes than the original pair may target the nerve more precisely or efficiently and it is advantageous to apply an algorithm to change the set of electrodes used for stimulation.
Dynamic Stimulation Algorithms
In addition to the effective positioning of the electrodes around the patient's arm or wrist, in some embodiments the electrical stimulus delivered to the nerves through the electrodes can be improved in various ways, including for example determining various characteristics of the tremor and using this data as feedback to modify, adjust and set various stimulation parameters as shown in
Dynamic algorithms can also help stimulation comfort and reduce redness or rash. If multiple elements target specific nerve or nerves of interest, the signal can be switched between these different elements in real-time. This may alleviate the irritation at a particular location of the skin by reducing the time of stimulation at a particular location. However, the total net effect of therapy will be the same.
Tremor Phase Feedback:
In some embodiments as shown in
To utilize tremor phase feedback, the signal from the motion sensor can be integrated, or a combination of sensors can be used to form a signal that is reflective of hand position. For example, position and orientation can be determined by integrating accelerometer or gyroscope signals, or by combining the accelerometer, gyro, and magnetometer data to produce a quaternion showing the orientation of the hand. By combining the positions in one or more axes, it is possible to produce a signal used for dynamic feedback.
One algorithm of calculating the triggers for the stimulation identifies where the derivative of the signal changes sign to find peaks in the signal. The signal may be noisy, so a filter or threshold may be required to eliminate noise oscillations. Finally, peaks usually do not occur faster than the typical tremor frequencies (4-12 Hz), so points that are too close together can be eliminated. From the peaks, the instantaneous frequency of the tremor can be calculated by looking at the difference in time between the two peaks. Then, using this frequency, the appropriate time delay needed to stimulate out of phase can be calculated, accounting for the delay in the neural signal from the peripheral nerve to the brain. The calculation is done and real-time and can be adapted to the instantaneous frequency and phase of the signal.
An alternative approach would be to detect zero crossings or any other repeated value in the position or biological signal. However, zero detection can be challenging due to the tendency for noise around zero.
An alternative approach to detecting phase is to use the real-time Hilbert transform. The Hilbert transform will calculate the envelope and phase from a real-time signal. The instantaneous phase can therefore be used to time the stimulation appropriately. However, the Hilbert transform is complex and challenging to implement on a standard microcontroller.
Tremor Amplitude Feedback:
In some embodiments, tremor amplitude feedback modulates the duty cycle of the treatment based upon tremor severity. Tremor amplitude can be defined and determined in a number of ways as shown in
This approach may be computationally intensive and it may be preferable to calculate the spectral energy in the 4-12 Hz band for a short time signal. If a multi-axis accelerometer, gyroscope, or other motion sensor is available, the spectral density can be calculated individually for each axis and then the L2 norm can be found. The L2 norm could also be calculated prior to finding the spectral density depending on the sensors used. The spectral density can be calculated using a variety of numerical approaches 2408 taking the signal from the time domain to frequency domain, including FFT, welch or periodograms, or using a more microcontroller friendly Goertzel tone detection algorithm, all of which are well known in literature. If the energy under the curve 2410 is larger than a threshold, therapy can be applied.
One difficulty of this feedback mechanism is determining the threshold at which therapy should be applied. In some embodiments, the threshold can be set based upon the actual angle of the hand; surveys and patient tests can determine the acceptable angle ranges for performing daily tasks, like drinking or holding a spoon. The same can be done for spectral density. In some embodiments, this threshold can be set as universal across all patients.
In some embodiments, the threshold may be individualized to a particular patient or group of similar patients. This could be done by monitoring the patient's tremor level (e.g., energy or position) over lime and determining the maximum and minimum values for the person in a normal situation. These values could also be recorded over time. Alternatively, the tremor threshold can be defined as a fraction of the minimum value of the tremor.
In some cases, including Parkinsonian tremor, there may be a habituation to stimulation and the tremor will start to increase again after a short period. Detection of an increase in tremor severity can be used to modify amplitude, phase, frequency, waveform, or pulse train of the stimulation to improve efficacy and durability.
Tremor Frequency Feedback
In some therapies as shown in
Predictive Adaptation
A patient's tremor amplitude and frequency can have daily patterns. In some embodiments as shown in
In addition, long term data collection over the span of months or years can provide information on disease progress and the need to adapt therapy. For instance if a person's tremor has been getting worse with the same degree of therapy, and if increasing amounts of therapy are needed to maintain the same overall effect, it may be desirable to modify treatment.
Often a user has external information that can be used to prevent tremor. For instance, tremor is often brought on by stressful events, such as presentations and meetings. Since many patients with tremor already schedule these events, for example in a calendar, the calendar can be used to inform prediction of when treatment may be needed. For instance, if a patient has a meeting scheduled for 1:00 pm, the device may pre-emptively start stimulation at 12:40 pm. A patient could also activate the therapy using a button if suddenly stressed.
Big Data Approaches
As shown in
All the above forms of adaptation, feedback, and external information, like cloud data, can be integrated together to enhance treatment.
Amplitude Setting
One aspect of the design is the method of how optimum amplitude of stimulation is identified and reached during a session. This method is important towards the comfort and efficacy of the treatment. The perception of stimulation differs among patients and circumstances, for instance, an instantaneous increase in amplitude directly from 0 mA to the optimum stimulation level can cause an uncomfortable sensation. A slower increase of stimulation can be more comfortable, but a wearer's perception of the amplitude of stimulation may not be linear with applied current amplitude. If there is a long period where the wearer has no perception of stimulation, for instance if the device ramps linearly from zero amplitude, the wearer may even think the device is broken.
Two subjects were studied in an experiment to understand the perception of stimulation level. Electrodes were positioned to target the median and radial nerves separately. During the session, the stimulation was ramped slowly at 0.1 mA increments to identify the sensation threshold, muscle contraction threshold, and discomfort/pain threshold. After these points were identified, the subject was allowed to rest for several minutes until the sensation of tingling went away. Then, the current, amplitude was ramped from the sensation threshold to 85-90% of the stimulation threshold of muscle contraction or discomfort/pain, whichever occurred at the lower amplitude. At each step, subjects were asked to shade a drawing to see where the paresthesia was felt and also mark on a visual analog scale (VAS) how intense they felt the stimulation compared to the maximum level they felt previously. The distance of their marks on the VAS were then tabulated, and normalized to the length of the VAS marker.
Both subjects reached a muscle contraction threshold (i.e., when they felt their hands were heavy and difficult to move) before severe discomfort. Results are shown in Table 3. This result suggests that amplitude for median and radial nerves are different and potentially should be adjusted separately to achieve optimum stimulation for both nerves. In both subjects, the radial nerve could have been stimulated at much higher amplitudes in achieve a greater effect.
A great degree of habituation and hysteresis were observed in the sensation of stimulation, as shown in
This result indicates that the stimulation ramp could be fairly linear between the threshold of first perception and 85-90% of the max stimulation level (from discomfort or muscle contraction). The ramp should not start linearly from zero, because the first perception occurred at amplitudes half of the max threshold. Thus, if the ramp is slow and linear from 0, for half the time of the ramp, the patient may feel no sensation. Another stimulation could be exponential to reflect the exponential appearance of the radial nerve measurement for Individual 1.
Also, because of habituation and hysteresis, if a higher stimulation level affords greater efficacy, in some embodiments, the waveform can be a series of smaller ramps that increase stimulation level, with either pauses or a small decrease in level between each ramp as illustrated in
Tremor Detection
As discussed above, adaptively modifying the stimulation may require detecting tremor characteristics by processing one or more motion sensors, such as different multi-axis sensors.
In some embodiments, the frequency can be updated sporadically (versus continuously) because the timescale of frequency shifts is long. This a major advantage over devices requiring real-time responsiveness as it is a significant simplification that leads to smaller battery sizes, improved form factor, and the ability to measure tremor from high quality sporadic data instead of requiring continuously high quality tremor extraction from real-time data.
In some embodiments, the frequency of the tremor is measured from the wrist. While tremors are typically measured at the hands, as shown in
In some embodiments, the tremor period can be measured from mechanical inputs using gyroscopes, accelerometers, bend sensors, pressure sensors, etc. from the back of the hand, wrist, or any part of the limb that exhibits tremor.
In some embodiments, the tremor can be measured via EMG or other electrical signals.
In some embodiments, the tremor frequency can be measured at all times and then used to update the stimulation in real time.
In some embodiments, the tremor frequency can be calculated only in situations where it is appropriate. For instance, looking at the band of lower frequencies or other patterns in the spectrum, certain measurements can be eliminated due to confounding voluntary activity. For example,
Band
As shown in
In some embodiments, the electrodes (not shown) are removably recessed into pressed and perforated neoprene 3508 using a snap socket 3508 to create a comfortable seal between the band and skin, as drawn in
In some embodiments, the band lengths can be designed such that the first side fully houses and connects the electrodes that are positioned to target the median and radial nerves. The band length of the opposite side can be between about 10-13 cm to make it easier to fasten the device to the wrist for wrist sizes of 5 percentile female to 95 percentile male.
In some embodiments, the band is flexible to comfortably conform to the wearer's wrist, and allows the band to lie flat on a surface to make installation and removal of electrodes more convenient.
Riveting the electrical flex circuit to the band using an electrically conductive eyelet and snap is a process that secures the circuit in place and provides an electrical connection for the removable hydrogel electrodes.
In some embodiments, the band can be made of foam and neoprene and can accommodate three single electrodes. Recessed electrodes allow for a more comfortable fit and a more compact form factor.
As shown in
One aspect of the device are removable hydrogel coated electrodes that snap into the band and electronics housing. These electrodes a placed directly on the wearer's skin, for a secure, robust electrical connection to prevent loosening or peeling during normal usage, which can cause pain or discomfort.
One embodiment of the electrodes 3700 has tabs 3702 that are not sticky to allow for easier installation and removal of the electrodes from the liner during installation and then from the band and housing during removal, as shown in
One embodiment of the electrodes has three electrodes 3800 spaced on a thin, plastic liner 3802 with a spacing that corresponds to the electrical snaps on the band and housing, which allows for easier and quicker installation, as shown in
One embodiment of the electrodes has a backing made of a neoprene foam, which provides a stiffer, non sticky surface to enable easier removal from the backing liner during installation. One embodiment of the electrodes has three electrodes 3900 spaced on a thin liner 3902 all connected with a single foam backing 3904 to make it easier to remove and discard the electrode after wearing, as shown in
As shown in
One aspect of the design is the location of the electrodes relative to the electronic housing to better target nerves at the wrist. The electrode and band 4100 in the housing box 4102 are shifted off-center distally (i.e., towards the hand) to allow for better targeting of the nerves. By moving the electrode placement distally on the arm the stimulation will more likely activate nerves instead of muscles, as shown in
One aspect of the design has button locations that allow the wearer to mote securely brace their hand when pressing a button 4200 by designing the housing with broad, flat surfaces 4202 on the opposite side of each button 4200, as shown in
One aspect of the design is a curved electronics housing that follows the shape of the arm and wrist, which allows for more consistent and easier positioning of the device when being applied by the wearer.
Alternative Form Factors
One concept for simplifying the process of placing the device is to combine the electrodes into one adhesive patch. In order to target any of the nerves, the electrodes have been lengthened to fit the width of most adults.
If multiple nerves are targeted with the approach above, the band may require multiple interfaces to the electrode to accommodate varying nerve positions. Using snaps may require sliding components to accommodate individual differences in the nerve spacing, which may be addressed using conductive lines. An alternative approach would be to integrate multiple electrodes into one patch and offer patches with a wide variety of dimensions to accommodate different hand sizes and nerve positions.
For optimal efficacy and comfort, the device should be aligned on the arm such that it targets the nerves for stimulation and positions the housing on the dorsal surface of the wrist. There are many ways to accomplish this through device design. One embodiment depicted in
For patients with tremor, plugging in small cables like a USB can be difficult. Therefore, it would be desirable to provide easier interfaces to charge the device. One such way is to use an inductive coil in the device. When placed in the proximity of a charging pad, the device charges with no cables. This also enables and helps the device to be waterproof. However, it does have the disadvantage of being slower to charge and could add to the size of the device. A second possibility is to make a keyed hole 4602, so that patients can easily slide the device 4604 into the charger 4600, as shown in
Another design possibility is a band 4700 with a D-ring 4702 and cinching strap 4704 as shown in
Another embodiment shown in
The terms “about” and “approximately” can mean within 5%, 10%, 15%, or 20%, or can mean within 5 degrees or 10 degrees.
It is understood that this disclosure, in many respects, is only illustrative of the numerous alternative device embodiments of the present invention. Changes may be made in the details, particularly in matters of shape, size, material and arrangement of various device components without exceeding the scope of the various embodiments of the invention. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the exemplary embodiments and descriptions thereof are merely illustrative of the invention as a whole. While several principles of the invention are made clear in the exemplary embodiments described above, those skilled in the art will appreciate that modifications of the structure, arrangement, proportions, elements, materials and methods of use, may be utilized in the practice of the invention, and otherwise, which are particularly adapted to specific environments and operative requirements without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, while certain features and elements have been described in connection with particular embodiments, those skilled in the art will appreciate that those features and elements can be combined with the other embodiments disclosed herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/354,943 filed on Nov. 17, 2016, which is in turn a continuation of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/033809, filed Jun. 2, 2015, titled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERIPHERAL NERVE STIMULATION TO TREAT TREMOR,” now International Publication No. WO 2015/187712, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/006,565, filed Jun. 2, 2014, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/006,555, filed Jun. 2, 2014, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/083,424, filed Nov. 24, 2014, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/157,116, filed May 5, 2015, each of the foregoing of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3204637 | Frank et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
| 3870051 | Brindley | Mar 1975 | A |
| 4300575 | Wilson | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4458696 | Larimore | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4461075 | Bailey | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4569351 | Tang | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4582049 | Ylvisaker | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4739764 | Lue et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4763659 | Dunseath, Jr. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4771779 | Tanagho et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4981146 | Bertolucci | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5003978 | Dunseath, Jr. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5052391 | Silverstone et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5070862 | Berlant | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5137507 | Park | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5330516 | Nathan | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5397338 | Grey et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5540235 | Wilson | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5562707 | Prochazka et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5562717 | Tippey et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5573011 | Felsing | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5575294 | Perry et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5643173 | Welles | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5775331 | Raymond et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5833709 | Rise et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5833716 | Bar-Or et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5899922 | Loos | May 1999 | A |
| 6016449 | Fischell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6081744 | Loos | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6161044 | Silverstone | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6178352 | Gruzdowich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6351674 | Silverstone | Feb 2002 | B2 |
| 6366813 | DiLorenzo | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6445955 | Michelson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6449512 | Boveja | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6505074 | Boveja et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6546290 | Shloznikov | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6564103 | Fischer et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6652449 | Gross et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6704603 | Gesotti | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6731987 | McAdams et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6735474 | Loeb et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6735480 | Giuntoli et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6788976 | Gesolli | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6819956 | DiLorenzo | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6829510 | Nathan et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6836684 | Rijkhoff et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6862480 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6892098 | Ayal et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6937905 | Carroll et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6959215 | Gliner et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6959216 | Faghri | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6988005 | McGraw et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7010352 | Hogan | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7089061 | Grey | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7146220 | Dar et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7162305 | Tong et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171266 | Gruzdowich et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7177694 | Elbaum | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7177703 | Boveja et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7209787 | DiLorenzo | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7228178 | Carroll et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7231254 | DiLorenzo | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7236830 | Gliner | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7254444 | Moore et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7277758 | DiLorenzo | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7324851 | DiLorenzo | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7326235 | Edwards | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7328068 | Spinelli et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7349739 | Harry et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7353064 | Gliner et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7369896 | Gesotti | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7499747 | Kieval et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7529582 | DiLorenzo | May 2009 | B1 |
| 7558610 | Odderson | Jul 2009 | B1 |
| 7636602 | Baru Fassio et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7643880 | Tanagho et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7643882 | Boston | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7650190 | Zhou et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7742820 | Wyler et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7769464 | Gerber et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7857771 | Alwan et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7899556 | Nathan et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7917201 | Gozani et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7930034 | Gerber | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7949403 | Palermo et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7957814 | Goetz et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7974696 | DiLorenzo | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7974698 | Tass et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7996088 | Marrosu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7998092 | Avni | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8000796 | Tass | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8025632 | Einarsson | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8046083 | Teganthoff et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8075499 | Nathan et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8086318 | Strother et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8121694 | Molnar et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8145316 | Deem et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8165668 | Dacey, Jr. et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8187209 | Guiffrida et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8219188 | Craig | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8233988 | Errico et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8260439 | Diubaldi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8301215 | Lee | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8306624 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8313443 | Tom | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8343026 | Gardiner et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8364257 | Van Den Eerenbeemd et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8374701 | Hyde et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8380314 | Pankan et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8382688 | Dar et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8391970 | Tracey et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8396556 | Libbus et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8409116 | Wang et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8412338 | Faltys | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8414507 | Asada | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8428719 | Napadow | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8435166 | Burnett et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8447411 | Skelton et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8452410 | Emborg et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8463374 | Hudson et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8473064 | Castel | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8548594 | Thimineur et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8581731 | Purks et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8583238 | Heldman et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8588884 | Hegde et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8588917 | Whitehurst et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8608671 | Kinoshita et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8626305 | Nielsen et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8639342 | Possover | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8644904 | Chang et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8644938 | Craggs | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8660656 | Moser et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8666496 | Simon et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8679038 | Giuffrida | Mar 2014 | B1 |
| 8682441 | De Ridder | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8688220 | Degiorgio et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8694104 | Libbus et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8694110 | Nathan et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8702584 | Rigaux et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8702629 | Giuffrida et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8706241 | Firlik et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8718780 | Lee | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8740825 | Ehrenreich et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8744587 | Miesel et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8755892 | Amurthur et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8768452 | Gerber | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8788045 | Gross et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8788049 | Lasko et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8792977 | Kakei et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8798698 | Kim et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8821416 | Johansson et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8825163 | Grill et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8825165 | Possover | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8843201 | Heldman et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 8845494 | Whitall et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8845557 | Giuffrida et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
| 8855775 | Leyde | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8862238 | Rahimi et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8862247 | Schoendorf et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8868177 | Simon et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8874227 | Simon et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8880175 | Simon | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8886321 | Rohrer et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8892200 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8897870 | De Ridder | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8903494 | Goldwasser et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8920345 | Greenberg et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8923970 | Bar-Yoseph et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8948876 | Gozani et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8961439 | Yang et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8972017 | Dar et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8989861 | Su et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9002477 | Burnett | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9005102 | Burnett et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9008781 | Ahmed | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9011310 | Ahmed | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9017273 | Burbank et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9026216 | Rossi et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9042988 | Dilorenzo | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9060747 | Salorio | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9089691 | Libbus et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9095351 | Sachs et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9095417 | Dar et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9107614 | Halkias et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9119964 | Marnfeldt | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9155885 | Wei et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9155890 | Guntinas-Lichius et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9162059 | Lindenthaler | Oct 2015 | B1 |
| 9168374 | Su | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9174045 | Simon et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9186095 | Machado et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9192763 | Gerber et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9220895 | Siff et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9227056 | Heldman et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
| 9238142 | Heldman et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9248285 | Haessler | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9248297 | Hoyer et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9254382 | Ahmad et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9265927 | Yonce et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9282928 | Giffrida | Mar 2016 | B1 |
| 9289607 | Su et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9301712 | McNames et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9302046 | Giuffrida et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
| 9314190 | Giuffrida et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
| 9314622 | Embrey et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9332918 | Buckley | May 2016 | B1 |
| 9339641 | Rajguru et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9345872 | Groteke | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9364657 | Kiani et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9364672 | Marnfeldt | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9375570 | Kiani et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9408683 | St. Anne et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9414776 | Sillay et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9452287 | Rosenbluth et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
| 9474898 | Gozani et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9549872 | Chen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9586038 | Kosierkiewicz | Mar 2017 | B1 |
| 9675800 | Li et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9802041 | Wong et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9861283 | Giuffrida | Jan 2018 | B1 |
| 9877679 | Giuffrida | Jan 2018 | B1 |
| 9877680 | Giuffrida et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
| 20020161415 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165586 | Hill et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030032992 | Thacker et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149457 | Tcheng et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030187483 | Grey | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195583 | Gruzdowich et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040093093 | Andrews | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040133249 | Gesotti | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249416 | Yun et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267331 | Koeneman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050055063 | Loeb et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050065553 | Ben Ezra et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075502 | Shafer | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171577 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234309 | Klapper | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060047326 | Wheeler | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052726 | Weisz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060095088 | De Ridder | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161218 | Danilov | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060184059 | Jadidi | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060217781 | John | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224191 | DiLorenzo | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229678 | Lee | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060293723 | Whitehurst et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070027486 | Armstrong | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073361 | Goren et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070123951 | Boston | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070123952 | Strother et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142862 | DiLorenzo | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156179 | Karashurov | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156182 | Castel et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156183 | Rhodes | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156200 | Kornet et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070173899 | Levin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070173903 | Goren et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070203533 | Goren et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070207193 | Zasler et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282228 | Einav et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080004672 | Dalal et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080009772 | Tyler et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080021505 | Hastings et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080027507 | Bijelic et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033259 | Manto et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051839 | Libbus et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080058773 | John | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080147146 | Wahlgren et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177398 | Gross et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080195007 | Podrazhansky et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080208288 | Gesotti | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080216593 | Jacobsen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20090018609 | DiLorenzo | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105785 | Wei et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090112133 | Deisseroth et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090157138 | Errico et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187121 | Evans | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090216294 | Ewing et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090247910 | Klapper | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090299435 | Gliner et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090318986 | Alo et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090326595 | Brockway et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090326607 | Castel et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100010381 | Skelton et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100010572 | Skelton et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057154 | Dietrich et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100099963 | Kilger | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100107657 | Vistakula | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100125220 | Seong | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100152817 | Gillbe | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100174342 | Boston et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100222630 | Mangrum et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100227330 | Fink et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100249637 | Walter et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100292527 | Schneider et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100298905 | Simon | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100324611 | Deming et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110009920 | Whitehurst et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110040204 | Ivorra et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110054358 | Kim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110071590 | Mounaim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110118805 | Wei et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110137375 | McBride | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184489 | Nicolelis et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110202107 | Sunagawa et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110213278 | Horak et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110224571 | Pascual-Leone et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110245734 | Wagner et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110250297 | Oronsky et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282412 | Glukhovsky et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301663 | Wang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120010492 | Thramann et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120053491 | Nathan et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120088986 | David et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120092178 | Callsen et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120109013 | Everett et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120136410 | Rezai et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185020 | Simon et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120220812 | Mishelevich | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120239112 | Muraoka | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120259255 | Tomlinson | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120302821 | Burnett | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120310298 | Besio et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120310303 | Popovic et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130060124 | Zietsma | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130066388 | Bernhard et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130066395 | Simon et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130116606 | Cordo | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130158624 | Bain et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130231713 | De Ridder et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130236867 | Avni et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130238049 | Simon et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130245486 | Simon et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130245713 | Tass | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130253299 | Weber et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130267759 | Jin | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130281890 | Mishelevich | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130289647 | Bhadra et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130297022 | Pathak | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130331907 | Sumners et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130333094 | Rogers et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20130338726 | Machado | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140031605 | Schneider | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140039573 | Jindra | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140039575 | Bradley | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140046423 | Rajguru et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140058189 | Stubbeman | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140067003 | Vase et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140078694 | Wissmar | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140081345 | Hershey | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094675 | Luna et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140094873 | Emborg et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140132410 | Chang | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140142654 | Simon et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140148873 | Kirn | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140163444 | Ingvarsson | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140171834 | DeGoede et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140214119 | Greiner et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140228927 | Ahmad et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140249452 | Marsh et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257047 | Slliay et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257129 | Choi | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140276194 | Osorio | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140277220 | Brennan et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296752 | Edgerton et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296934 | Gozani et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296935 | Ferree et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140300490 | Kotz et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140309709 | Gozanl et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140316484 | Edgerton et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140324118 | Simon et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140330068 | Partsch et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140330335 | Errico et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140336003 | Franz et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140336722 | Rocon De Lima et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140343462 | Burnet | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140350436 | Nathan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140358040 | Kim et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20140364678 | Harry et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150005852 | Hershey et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150012067 | Bradley et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150038886 | Snow | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150057506 | Luna et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150073310 | Pracar et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150080979 | Lasko et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150100004 | Goldman et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150100104 | Kiani et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150100105 | Kiani et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150148866 | Bulsen et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150157274 | Ghassemzadeh et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150164377 | Nathan et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150164401 | Toth et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150190085 | Nathan et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150190634 | Rezai et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150208955 | Smith | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150216475 | Luna et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150230733 | Heo et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150230756 | Luna et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
| 20150277559 | Vescovi et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20150335882 | Gross | Nov 2015 | A1 |
| 20160001096 | Mishelevich | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160008620 | Stubbeman | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160016014 | Wagner et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160022989 | Pfeifer | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160038059 | Asada et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160045140 | Kitamura et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| 20160089045 | Sadeghian-Motahar et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160106344 | Nazari | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160121110 | Kent et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160128621 | Machado et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160129248 | Creasey et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160158542 | Ahmed | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160198998 | Rahimi et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160220836 | Parks | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160262685 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160287879 | Denison et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20170014625 | Rosenbluth et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170079597 | Horne | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170080207 | Perez et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170266443 | Rajguru et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170274208 | Nagel et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170287146 | Pathak et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20180021576 | Wong et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180049676 | Griffiths et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102008042373 | Apr 2010 | DE |
| 102009004011 | Jul 2010 | DE |
| 0000759 | Feb 1979 | EP |
| 0725665 | Jan 1998 | EP |
| 1062988 | Dec 2000 | EP |
| 1558333 | May 2007 | EP |
| 2383014 | Nov 2011 | EP |
| 2801389 | Nov 2014 | EP |
| 2222819 | Mar 2006 | ES |
| 2272137 | Jun 2008 | ES |
| 2002200178 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| 2006-503658 | Feb 2006 | JP |
| 2008018235 | Jan 2008 | JP |
| 2012055650 | Mar 2012 | JP |
| 2013017609 | Jan 2013 | JP |
| WO199400187 | Jan 1994 | WO |
| WO1994017855 | Aug 1994 | WO |
| WO1996032909 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO199843700 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| WO1999019019 | Apr 1999 | WO |
| WO200015293 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO2002017987 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO2005122894 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO2007112092 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO2009153730 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO2010111321 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO2010141155 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| WO2011119224 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| WO2011144883 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| WO2012040243 | Mar 2012 | WO |
| WO2014043757 | Mar 2014 | WO |
| WO2014053041 | Apr 2014 | WO |
| WO2014113813 | Jul 2014 | WO |
| WO2014146082 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO2014151431 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO2014153201 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO2014207512 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO2015033152 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO2015039206 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO2015039244 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO2015042365 | Mar 2015 | WO |
| WO2015079319 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO2015095880 | Jun 2015 | WO |
| WO2015128090 | Sep 2015 | WO |
| WO2015164706 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO2015187712 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO2016019250 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| WO2016102958 | Jun 2016 | WO |
| WO2016110804 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO2016128985 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO2016149751 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| WO2016166281 | Oct 2016 | WO |
| WO2016179407 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO2016189422 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO2016195587 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO2016201366 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| WO2017010930 | Jan 2017 | WO |
| WO2017023864 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO2017053847 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO2017062994 | Apr 2017 | WO |
| WO2017086798 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO2017088573 | Jun 2017 | WO |
| WO2017132067 | Aug 2017 | WO |
| WO2017199026 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO2017208167 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO2017209673 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO2017210729 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO2017221037 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO2018009680 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO2018028220 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO2018028221 | Feb 2018 | WO |
| WO2018039458 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/721,480, filed Sep. 29, 2017, Wong et al. |
| Apartis; Clinical neurophysiology in movement disorders. Handb Clin Neurol; 111; Pediatric Neurology Pt. 1; pp.87-92; Apr. 2013. |
| Australian Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2017 in Australian Patent Application No. 2014207265 in 2 pages. |
| Barbaud et al.; Improvement in essential tremor after pure sensory stroke due to thalamic infarction; European neurology; 46; pp. 57-59; Jul. 2001. |
| Barrios et al.: BCI algorithms for tremor identification, characterization and tracking; Seventh Framework Programme, EU; Contract No. FP7-ICT-2007-224051 (v3.0); 57 pgs.; Jul. 10, 2011. |
| Bartley et al.; Neuromodulation for overactive bladder; Nature Reviews Urology; 10; pp. 513-521; Sep. 2013. |
| Benabid et al.; A putative generalized model of the effects and mechanism of action of high frequency electrical stimulation of the central nervous system; Acta Neural Belg; 105(3); pp. 149-157; Sep. 2005. |
| Bergquist et al.: Motor unit recruitment when neuromuscular electrical stimulation is applied over a nerve trunk compared with a muscle belly: quadriceps femoris, Journal of Applied Physiology; vol. 113, No. 1, pp. 78-89; Jul. 2012. |
| Bergquist et al.; Motor unit recruitment when neuromuscular electrical stimulation is applied over a nerve trunk compared with a muscle belly: triceps surae, Journal of Applied Physiology; vol. 110, No. 3, pp. 627-637; Mar. 2011. |
| Bijelic et al.: E Actitrode®: The New Selective Stimulation Interface for Functional Movements in Hemiplegic Patients; Serbian Journal of Electrical Engineering; 1(3); pp. 21-28; Nov. 2004. |
| Birdno et al.; Pulse-to-pulse changes in the frequency of deep brain stimulation affect tremor and modeled neuronal activity.; Journal of Neurophysiology; 98; pp. 1675-1684; Jul. 2007. |
| Birdno et al.; Response of human thalamic neurons to high-frequency stimulation.; PloS One; 9(5); 10 pgs.; May 2014. |
| Birgersson et al.; Non-invasive bioimpedance of intact skin: mathematical modeling and experiments; Physiological Measurement; 32(1); pp. 1-18; Jan. 2011. |
| Bohling et al.; Comparison of the stratum corneum thickness measured in vivo with confocal Raman spectroscopy and confocal reflectance microscopy; Skin research and Technology; 20(1); pp. 50-47; Feb. 2014. |
| Bowman et al.; Effects of waveform parameters on comfort during transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical sitimulation; Annals of Biomedical Engineering; 13(1); pp. 59-74; Jan. 1985. |
| Brittain et al.; Tremor suppression by rhythmic transcranial current stimulation; Current Biology; 23; pp. 436-440; Mar. 2013. |
| Britton et al.; Modulation of postural tremors at the wrist by supramaximal electrical median nerve shocks in ET, PD, and normal subjects mimicking tremor; J Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry; 56(10): pp. 1085-1089: Oct. 1993. |
| Cagnan et al.; Phase dependent modulation of tremor amplitude in essential tremor through thalamic stimulation; Brain; 136(10); pp. 3062-3075; Oct. 2013. |
| Campero et al.; Peripheral projections of sensory fasicles in the human superificial radial nerve; Brain; 128(Pt 4); pp. 892-895; Apr. 2005. |
| Chen et al.; A web-based system for home monitoring of patients with Parkinson's disease using wearable sensors; IEEE Trans on Bio-Medical Engineering; 58(3); pp. 831-836; Mar. 2011. |
| Clair et al.; Postactivation depression and recovery of reflex transmission during repetitive electrical stimulation of the human tibial nerve, Journal of Neurophysiology; vol. 106, No. 1; pp. 184-192; Jul. 2011. |
| Clar et al.; Skin impedance and moisturization; J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem.; 26; pp. 337-353; 1975; presented at IFSCC Vilith Int'l Congresson Cosmetics Quality and Safety in London on Aug. 26-30, 1974. |
| Constandinou et al.; A Partial-Current-Steering Biphasic Stimulation Driver for Vestibular Prostheses; IEEE Trans on Biomedical Circuits and Systems; 2(2); pp. 106-113; Jun. 2008. |
| Daneault et al.; Using a smart phone as a standalone platform for detection and monitoring of pathological tremors; Frontiers in Human Neuroscience; vol. 6, article 357; 12 pgs.; Jan. 2012. |
| Deuschl et at; Consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on Tremor. Ad Hoc Scientific Committee, Movement Disorders, vol. 13 Suppl 3, pp. 2-23; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filing date and any foreign priority date) 1998. |
| Dideriksen et al.; EMG-based characterization of pathological tremor using the iterated Hilbert transform; IEEE transactions on Bio-medical Engineering; 58(10); pp. 2911-2921; Oct. 2011. |
| Dosen et al.: Tremor suppression using electromyography and surface sensory electrical stimulation; Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation; vol. 1 (Siosystems & Biorobotics Series); pp. 539-543; Feb. 2013. |
| Doucet et al.; Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for skeletal muscle function; The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine; 85(2); pp. 201-215; Jun. 2012. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 25, 2016 in European Application No. 14740684.7 in 7 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 12, 2017 in European Application No. 15802810.0 in 7 pages. |
| Fuentes et al.; Restoration of locomotive function in Parkinson's disease by spinal cord stimulation: mechanistic approach, Eur J Neurosci, vol. 32, pp. 1100-1108; Oct. 2010 (author manuscript; 19 pgs.). |
| Fuentes et al.; Spinal cord stimulation restores locomotion in animal models of Parkinson's disease; Science; 323; pp. 1578-1582; Mar. 2009. |
| Gallego et al.; A neuroprosthesis for tremor management through the control of muscle co-contraction; Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation; vol. 10; 36; (13 pgs); Apr. 2013. |
| Gallego et al.; Real-time estimation of pathological tremor parameters from gyroscope data. ; Sensors; 10(3); pp. 2129-2149; Mar. 2010. |
| Gao; Analysis of amplitude and frequency variations of essential and Parkinsonian tremors; Medical & Bioiogical Engineering & Computing; 42(3); pp. 345-349; May 2004. |
| Giuffridda et al.; Clinically deployable Kinesia technology for automated tremor assessment.; Movement Disorders; 24(5); pp. 723-730; Apr. 2009. |
| Gracanin et al.; Optimal stimulus parameters for minimum pain in the chronic stimulatin of innervated muscle; Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; 56(6); pp. 243-249; Jun. 1975. |
| Haeri et al.; Modeling the Parkinson's tremor and its treatments; Journal of Theorectical Biology; 236(3); pp. 311-322; Oct. 2005. |
| Halon En et al.; Contribution of cutaneous and muscle afferent fibres to cortical SEPs following median and radial nerve stimulation in man; Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.; 71 (5); pp. 331-335; Sep.-Oct. 1988. |
| Hao et al.; Effects of electrical stimulation of cutaneous afferents on corticospinal transmission of tremor signals in patients with Parkinson's disease; 6th International Conference on Neural Engineering; San Diego, CA: pp. 355-358: Nov. 2013. |
| Hauptmann et al.; External trial deep brain stimulation device for the application of desynchronizing stimulation techniques; Journal of Neural Engineering; 6; 12 pgs.; Oct. 2009. |
| Heller et al.; Automated setup of functional electrical stimulation for drop foot using a novel 64 channel prototype stimulator arid electrode array: Results from a gait-lab based study; Medical Enqineering & Physic: 35(1): pp. 74-81; Jan. 2013. |
| Henry Dreyfuss Associates; The Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design (Revised Edition); John Wiley & Sons, New York; pp. 10-11 and 22-25; Dec. 2001. |
| Hernan, Miguel, et al. “Alcohol Consumption and the Incidence of Parkinson's Disease.” May 15, 2003. Annals of Neurology. vol. 54. pp. 170-175. |
| Hua et al.; Posture-related oscillations in human cerebellar thalamus in essential tremor are enabled by voluntary motor circuits; J Neurophysiol; 93(1); pp. 117-127; Jan. 2005. |
| Inoue, Masahiro, Katsuaki Suganuma, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. “Stretchable human interface using a conductive silicone elastomer containing silver fillers.” Consumer Electronics, 2009. ISCE'09. IEEE 13th International Symposium on. IEEE, 2009. |
| Jacks et al.; Instability in human forearm movements studied with feed-back-controlled electrical stimulation of muscles; Journal of Physiology; 402; pp. 443-461; Aug. 1988. |
| Jobges et al.; Vibratory proprioceptive stimulation affects Parkinsonian tremor; Parkinsonism & Related Disorders; 8(3); pp. 171-176; Jan. 2002. |
| Joundi et al.; Rapid tremor frequency assessment with the iPhone accelerometer.; Parkinsonism & Related Disdrders; 17(4); pp. 288-290; May 2011. |
| Kim et al.: Adaptive control of movement for neuromuscular stimulation-assisted therapy in a rodent model; IEEE Trans on Biomedical Engineering.; 56(2); pp. 452-461; Feb. 2009. |
| Krauss et al.; Chronic spinal cord stimulation in medically intractable orthostatic tremor; J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 77(9); pp. 1013-1016; Sep. 2006. |
| Kuhn et al.; Array electrode design for transcutaneous electrical stimulation a simulation study; Medical Engineering & Physics; 31 (8); pp. 945-951; Oct. 2009. |
| Kuhn et al.; The Influence of Electrode Size on Selectivity and Comfort in Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation of the Forearm; Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on; 18(3); pp. 255-262; Jun. 2010. |
| Kunz, Patrik, et al. “5 kHz transcranial alternating current stimulation: lack of cortical excitability changes when grouped in a theta burst pattern.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10 (2016): 683. |
| Lagerquist et al.: Influence of stimulus pulse width on M-waves, H-reflexes, and torque during tetanic low-intensity neuromuscular stimulation, Muscle & Nerve, 42(6), pp. 886-893; Dec. 2010. |
| Laroy et al.; The sensory innervation pattern of the fingers; J. Neurol.; 245 (5); pp. 294-298; May 1998. |
| Lee et al.; Resetting of tremor by mechanical perturbations: A comparison of essential tremor and parkinsonian tremor; Annals of Nuerology; 10(6); pp. 523-531; Dec. 1981. |
| Legon et al.; Pulsed ultrasound differentially stimulates somatosensory circuits in humans as indicated by EEG and fMRI; PLoS One; 7(12); e51177; 14 pgs.; Dec. 2012. |
| Lourenco et al.; Effects produced in human arm and forearm motoneurones after electrical stimulation of ulnar and median nerves at wrist level; Experimental Brain Research; 178(2); pp. 267-284; Apr. 2007. |
| Malek et al.; The utility of electromyography and mechanomyography for assessing neuromuscular function: a noninvasive approach; Phys Med Rehabil in N Am; 23(1); pp. 23-32; Feb. 2012. |
| Mamorita et al.; Development of a system for measurement and analysis of tremor using a three-axis accelerometer; Methods Inf Med; 48(6); pp. 589-594; epub Nov. 2009. |
| Maneski et al.; Electrical Stimulation for suppression of pathological tremor; Med Biol Eng Comput; 49(10); pp. 1187-1193; Oct. 2011. |
| Marsden et al.; Coherence between cerebellar thalamus, cortex and muscle in man; Brain; 123; pp. 1459-1470; Jul. 2000. |
| McAuley et al.; Physiological and pathological tremors and rhythmic central motor control; Brain; 123(Pt 8); pp. 1545-1567; Aug. 2000. |
| McIntyre et al.; Finite element analysis of current-density and electric field generated by metal microelectrodes; Annals of Biomedical Engineering; 29(3); pp. 227-235; Mar. 2001. |
| Meekins et al.; American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine evidenced-based review: use of surface electromyography in the diagnosis and study of neuromuscular disorders; Muscle Nerve 38(4); pp. 1219-1224; Oct. 2008. |
| Miller et al.; Multiplexed microneedle-based biosensor array for characterization of metabolic acidosis; Talanta; 88; pp. 739-742; Jan. 2012 (author manuscript; 13 pgs.). |
| Milne et al.; Habituation to repeated in painful and non-painful cutaneous stimuli: A quantitative psychophysical study; Experimental Brain Research; 87(2); pp. 438-444; Nov. 1991. |
| Mommaerts et al.; Excitation and nerve conduction; in Comprehensive Human Physiology; Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Chap. 13; pp. 283-294; Mar. 1996. |
| Mones et al.; The response of the tremor of patients with Parkinsonism to peripheral nerve stimulation; J Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry; 32(6); pp. 512-518; Dec. 1969. |
| Morgante et al.: How many parkinsonian patients are suitable candidates for deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus?; Results of a Questionnaire, Partkinsonism Relat Disord; 13; pp. 528-531; Dec. 2007. |
| Munhoz et al; Acute effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on tremor; Movement Disorders; 18(2); pp. 191-194; Feb. 2003. |
| Nardone et al.; Influences of transcutaneous electrical stimulation of cutaneous and mixed nerves on subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials; Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol.; 74(1); pp. 24-35; Jan.-Feb. 1989. |
| PCT Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/12388 dated Apr. 10, 2014 in 16 pages. |
| PCT Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/033809 dated Apr. 10, 2014 in 15 pages. |
| PCT Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/037080 dated Sep. 13, 2016 in 10 pages. |
| PCT Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/045038 dated Nov. 15, 2016 in 16 pages. |
| Perez et al.; Patterned Sensory Stimulation Induces Plasticity in Reciprocal Ia Inhibition in Humans; The Journal of Neuroscience; 23(6); pp. 2014-2018; Mar. 2003. |
| Perlmutter et al.; Deep brain stimulation; Ann Rev Neurosci; 29; pp. 229-257; Jul. 2006. |
| Popović-Bijelić, Ana, et al. “Multi-field surface electrode for selective electrical stimulation.” Artificial organs 29.6 (2005): 448-452. |
| Prochazka et al.; Attenuation of pathological tremors by functional electrical stimulation I: Method; Annals of Biomedical Engineering; 20(2); pp. 205-224; Mar. 1992. |
| Pulliam et al.; Continuous in-home monitoring of essential tremor; Parkinsonism Relat Disord; 20(1); pp. 37-40; Jan. 2014. |
| Quattrini et al.; Understanding the impact of painful diabetic neuropathy; Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews; 19, Suppl. 1; pp. S2-8; Jan.-Feb. 2003. |
| Rocon et al.; Design and validation of a rehabilitation robotic exoskeleton for tremor assessment and supression; IEEE Trans Neural Sys and Rehab Eng.; 15(3); pp. 367-378; Sep. 2007. |
| Silverstone et al.; Non-Invasive Neurostimulation in the Control of Familial Essential Tremor Using the Synaptic Neuromodulator; Conference Proceedings, International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society (IFES); Ed. Paul Meadows; 3 pgs.; May 1999. |
| Singer et al.; The effect of EMG triggered electrical stimulation plus task practice on arm function in chronic stroke patients with moderate-severe arm deficits; Restor Neurol Neurosci; 31 (6); pp. 681-691; Oct. 2013. |
| Takanashi et al.; A functional MRI study of somatotopic representation of somatosensory stimulation in the cerebellum; Neuroradiology; 45(3); pp. 149-152; Mar. 2003. |
| Tass et al.; Coordinated reset has sustained aftereffects in Parkinsonian monkeys; Ann Neurol; 72(5); pp. 816-820; Nov. 2012. |
| Tass et al.; Counteracting tinnitus by acoustic coordinated reset neuromodulation; Restorative neurology and Neuroscience; 30(2); pp. 137-159; Apr. 2012. |
| Tass; A Model of desynchronizing deep brain stimulation with a demand-controlled coordinated reset of neural subpopulations; Bioi Cybern; 89(2); pp. 81-88; Aug. 2003. |
| Toloso et al.; Essential tremor: treatment with propranolol; Neurology; 25(11); pp. 1041; Nov. 1975. |
| Treager; Interpretation of skin impedance measurements; Nature; 205; pp. 600-601; Feb. 1965. |
| Valente; Novel methods and circuits for field shaping in deep brain stimulation; Doctoral thesis, UCL (University College London); 222 pgs.; 2011. |
| Von Lewinski et al.; Efficacy of EMG-triggered electrical arm stimulation in chronic hemiparetic stroke patients; Restor Neurol Neurosci; 27(3); pp. 189-197; Jun. 2009. |
| Wardman et al.; Subcortical, and cerebellar activation evoked by selective stimulation of muscle and cataneous afferents: an fMRI study; Physiol. Rep.; 2(4); pp. 1-16; Apr. 2014. |
| Wiestler et al.; Integration of sensory and motor representations of single fingers in the human; J. Neurophysiol.; 105(6); pp. 3042-3053; Jun. 2011. |
| Woldag et al.; Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients R A review; J Neurol; 249(5); pp. 518-528; May 2002. |
| Woolf et al.; Peripheral nerve injury triggers central sprouting of myelinated afferents; Nature;355(6355); pp. 75-78; Jan. 1992. |
| Yeh, Kuei-Lin, Po-Yu Fong, and Ying-Zu Huang. “Intensity sensitive modulation effect of theta burst form of median nerve stimulation on the monosynaptic spinal reflex.” Neural plasticity 2015 (2015) in 8 pages. |
| Yilmaz, Ozlem O., et al. “Efficacy of EMG-biofeedback in knee osteoarthritis.” Rheumatology international 30.7 (2010): 887-892. |
| Zhang et al.; Neural oscillator based control for pathological tremor suppression via functional electrical stimulation; Control Engineering Practice; 19(1); pp. 74-88; Jan. 2011. |
| Zwarts et al.; Multichannel surface EMG: basic aspects and clinical utility; Muscle Nerve; 28(1); pp. 1-17; Jul. 2003. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/580,631, filed Dec. 7, 2017, Wong et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/748,616, filed Jan. 29, 2018, Hamner et al. |
| Bonaz, B., V. Sinniger, and S. Pellissier. “Vagus nerve stimulation: a new promising therapeutic tool in inflammatory bowel disease.” Journal of internal medicine 282.1 (2017): 46-63. |
| Garcia-Rill, E., et al. “Arousal, motor control, and Parkinson's disease.” Translational neuroscience 6.1 pp. 198-207 (2015). |
| Marshall, Ryan, et al. “Bioelectrical stimulation for the reduction of inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease.” Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology 8 (2015): CGast-S31779. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20180036535 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62006565 | Jun 2014 | US | |
| 62006555 | Jun 2014 | US | |
| 62083424 | Nov 2014 | US | |
| 62157116 | May 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 15354943 | Nov 2016 | US |
| Child | 15721475 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US2015/033809 | Jun 2015 | US |
| Child | 15354943 | US |
