The invention relates generally to systems, tools, and related methods for treating pelvic conditions including but not limited to prolapse conditions, for example treatment of vaginal and vaginal vault prolapse by transvaginal, abdominal, and laparoscopic procedures, such as by a transvaginal, abdominal, or laparoscopic sacral colpopexy procedure.
Pelvic health for men and women is a medical area of increasing importance, at least in part due to an aging population. Examples of common pelvic ailments include incontinence (e.g., fecal and urinary), pelvic tissue prolapse (e.g., female vaginal prolapse), and conditions of the pelvic floor.
In its severest forms, vaginal vault prolapse can result in the distension of the vaginal apex outside of the vagina. An enterocele is a vaginal hernia in which the peritoneal sac containing a portion of the small bowel extends into the rectovaginal space. Vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele represent challenging forms of pelvic disorders for surgeons. These procedures often involve lengthy surgical procedure times.
Abdominal sacralcolpopexy (SCP) is considered to be an especially efficacious treatment, but it can be complicated and is generally considered invasive.
There is ongoing desire and need for minimally invasive yet highly effective methods of implanting supportive implants for treating pelvic conditions in male and female patients, such as vaginal prolapse and other pelvic conditions.
Devices, systems, and methods as described can be used in the treatment of pelvic conditions such as vaginal prolapse (including various forms such as enterocele, cystocele, rectocele, apical or vault prolapse, uterine descent, etc.), and other conditions caused by muscle and ligament weakness, hysterectomies, and the like, in a male and female patients.
Various surgical tools, structures, implants, expansion members (“retractors”), and procedural improvements are described herein for use in treating pelvic conditions. These items can be used in procedures for placing a pelvic implant in a therapeutic location in a male or a female patient, by a method of accessing pelvic tissue, the method involving a vaginal incision or an abdominal incision such as a laparoscopic incision.
Certain described embodiments relate generally to surgical methods and apparatus and, more specifically, to surgical tools having surfaces capable of retracting tissue (a retractor, such as an expansion member), and adapted to provide access and guidance to a surgical site. These embodiments involve various surgical tools and related methods designed to provide improved and safer access to a surgical site or anatomy, for example so that sharp objects and tools can be passed to a surgical location without having to make multiple attempts from an incision to an anatomical target area. Certain of these described embodiments relate generally to various means, devices, and techniques for providing a clear view and unobstructed access to a sacrum, through a vaginal incision or an abdominal incision (e.g., laparoscopically). In several examples, desired utility of a retractor and methods can be provided by way of an expandable device, or other devices capable of being used to retract tissue, that can be inserted into a vaginal, laparoscopic, or abdominal incision and then expanded, dilated, or otherwise used for retraction. Certain preferred versions of these tools can include distal end functionality to add efficiency to a surgical procedure, e.g., for performing a transvaginal transabdominal, or laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.
In one aspect, the invention relates to an expansion member that includes a proximal end, a distal end, and a length from the proximal end to the distal end. The distal end can be placed through a surgical incision to provide access to a region of sacral anatomy. The distal end comprises functionality selected from: viewing functionality, lighting functionality, size adjustability, suction, dissection, anchor delivery, implant delivery, fluid delivery, absorption functionality, cauterization functionality, an expandable surface, a suture needle holder, a dissolvable coating at the distal end, and combinations thereof.
In another aspect the invention relates to an expansion member that includes an expansion member piece and a handle piece. The expansion member piece includes a proximal end, a distal end, and a length from the proximal end to the distal end. The distal end can be placed through a surgical incision to provide access to a region of sacral anatomy. The piece is removably engagable with the proximal end.
In another aspect the invention relates to a expansion member that includes an expansion member piece and an introducer piece. The expansion member piece includes a proximal end, a distal end, and a length from the proximal end to the distal end. The distal end can be placed through a surgical incision to provide access to a region of sacral anatomy.
In yet another aspect the invention relates to a method of performing pelvic surgery to support a vaginal apex. The method includes: providing an expansion member as described; inserting the distal end through a surgical incision selected from a vaginal incision and an abdominal incision, and using the expansion member to provide access to a region of sacral anatomy.
In another aspect the invention relates to a method of performing pelvic surgery to support a vaginal apex. The method includes: providing an expansion member comprising an expansion member piece and a handle piece. The expansion member piece includes a proximal end, a distal end, and a length from the proximal end to the distal end. The distal end can be placed through a surgical incision to provide access to a region of sacral anatomy. The handle piece is removably engagable with the proximal end. The method includes inserting the distal end through a surgical incision selected from a vaginal incision and an abdominal incision; using the expansion member to provide access to a region of sacral anatomy; and removing the handle piece from the expansion member piece.
In another aspect the invention relates to a method of performing pelvic surgery to support a vaginal apex. The method comprising includes providing an expansion member comprising an expansion member piece and an introducer piece. The expansion member piece includes a proximal end, a distal end, and a length from the proximal end to the distal end. The distal end can be placed through a surgical incision to provide access to a region of sacral anatomy. The method includes inserting the introducer piece through a surgical incision selected from a vaginal incision and an abdominal incision; inserting the distal end of the expansion member piece into the introducer piece placed in the surgical incision; removing the introducer piece from the incision, and using the expansion member to provide access to a region of sacral anatomy.
In yet another aspect the invention relates to a blunt dissection device that includes a proximal end, a distal end, a shaft extending along a length between the proximal end to the distal end, a handle at the proximal end. A paddle at the distal end includes a surface capable of moving tissue laterally, and a blunt distal edge. The device includes a light at the distal end.
In another aspect the invention relates to a method of performing pelvic surgery to support a vaginal apex. The method includes: providing a blunt dissection device as described herein, inserting the blunt dissection device through a surgical incision selected from a vaginal incision and an abdominal incision, and using the blunt dissection device to retract tissue to provide access to a region of sacral anatomy.
All figures are not to scale.
Pelvic floor disorders include cystocele, rectocele, enterocele, incontinence (e.g., urinary and fecal incontinence), and uterine and vaginal vault prolapse, among others. These disorders typically result from weakness or damage to normal pelvic support systems. The most common etiologies include childbearing, removal of the uterus, connective tissue defects, prolonged heavy physical labor and postmenopausal atrophy.
Vaginal vault prolapse is often associated with a rectocele, cystocele, or enterocele. It is known to repair vaginal vault prolapse by suturing to the supraspinous ligament or to attach the vaginal vault through mesh or fascia to the sacrum. Many patients suffering from vaginal vault prolapse also require a surgical procedure to correct stress urinary incontinence that is either symptomatic or latent.
A sacral colpopexy is a procedure for providing vaginal vault suspension. It may be performed through an abdominal incision, a vaginal incision, or laparoscopically, and entails suspension (by use of an implant such as a strip of mesh) of the vaginal cuff to a region of sacral anatomy such as the sacrum (bone itself), a nearby sacrospinous ligament, uterosacral ligament, or anterior longitudinal ligament at the sacral promontory. In some SCP procedures that also involve a hysterectomy, an implant can attach to posterior vaginal tissue remaining after removal of the uterus and cervix, and attaches also to anatomy to support the vaginal tissue, at or around the sacrum such as to uterosacral ligaments or to the sacrum itself (i.e., to a component of the sacral anatomy).
As used herein, the term “anchor” refers non-specifically to any structure that can connect an implant to tissue of a pelvic region, to secure the implant to that tissue. The tissue may be bone or a soft tissue such as a muscle, fascia, ligament, tendon, or the like. The anchor may be any known or future-developed structure, or a structure described herein, useful to connect an implant to such tissue, including but not limited to a clamp, a suture, a soft tissue anchor such as a self-fixating tip, a helical anchor such as a screw-type or corkscrew-type anchor that can be driven into bone or soft tissue using rotation, a bone anchor (e.g., screw), or other structures known or later developed for connecting an implant to soft tissue or bone of a pelvic region.
Pelvic implant installation procedures (e.g., SCP procedures) may be performed through an abdominal opening, laparoscopically (through a laparoscopic incision in an abdomen), or transvaginally. According to methods described herein, a tissue expander, expansion member, or other retractor device (these terms being used herein interchangeably) can be used to improve access to a surgical site of a pelvic implant installation procedure. A retractor device can be used in the present methods in a minimally invasive transvaginal SCP procedure, or in an abdominal SCP procedure. Examples of methods, tools, expansion members, and soft tissue anchors useful in pelvic procedures are described in Assignee's copending International Patent Application number PCT/US2010/062577, filed Dec. 30, 2010, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference.
As described herein, a retractor or expansion member includes a distal end and a proximal end, the distal end may include distal end functionality such as a lighting functionality, size adjustability, suction, dissection, anchor delivery, implant delivery, fluid delivery, absorption functionality, cauterization functionality, an expandable surface, a suture needle holder, a dissolvable coating at the distal end, among others. By use of a retractor or expansion member having viewing and lighting functions, clear visualization of internal tissue is provided for placement and anchoring of an implant or implant component (e.g., anchor), e.g., to a region of sacral anatomy. A physician is able to guide a distal end or shaft of an implant delivery tool (i.e., “needle”) with direct viewing, visually identify potential areas of risk, and guide or steer the end of the delivery tool to a desired target tissue site for placing an anchor, implant, or implant component. With a visualization feature, a faster learning curve is provided for physicians to safely pass the needle with the aid of a scope and optical viewing, and the knowledge from scope usage in surgery is applied to and benefits surgical procedures.
According to presently described systems, devices, and methods, an expansion member (a.k.a., “retractor,” “speculum,” or the like) can be useful for accessing a male or female pelvic anatomy during a transvaginal (in female patients) or trans-abdominal pelvic procedure, especially a female pelvic anatomy, transvaginally, to access tissue of the posterior pelvic region such as to perform an SCP procedure. An expansion member can have a length to allow such access when placed transabdominally or transvaginally, e.g., a length to allow a distal end of the expansion member to provide access to pelvic tissue, e.g., posterior pelvic tissue, while a proximal end of the tool extends through an abdominal or vaginal incision and to a location external to the patient. The proximal end of the expansion member remains external to the patient during use to allow a surgeon or other user to access and manipulate the proximal end and access a surgical site at the distal end through an inner opening or channel in the expansion member that extends between the proximal end and the distal end. The expansion member includes body wall or sidewall portions that extend lengthwise between the distal end and the proximal end, and may optionally form a full or partial enclosure or tube along some or all of a length between the proximal end and the distal end. Exemplary lengths of an expansion member (or an expansion member piece, or an introducer piece) between a proximal end and a distal end, may be in the range from 13 to 18 centimeters, especially for use in a female patient to transabdominally or transvaginally access a posterior location of a pelvic region such as a region of sacral anatomy.
According to certain embodiments a retractor or expansion member can include body wall portions (e.g., sidewalls) that make up a full or partial enclosure or “tube” (whether a partial tube or complete tube). The body wall portions provide partial or continuous structure and support along a length of the expansion member between the distal end and proximal end, to separate tissue from an inner opening or channel defined at the interior of the body wall portions (e.g., sidewalls). The body wall structure may extend lengthwise along a partial or complete length of the device, and at lateral locations (around a circumference relative to a length-wise axis) the body wall structure can be a complete or partial structure; the body wall structure may form a tube (e.g., circular, rectangular, or of any other desired cross-section) having structure extending around a complete circumference, e.g., a circular or non-circular “tube”; or a body wall structure may extend partially around a circumference, such as in the form of a partial circular or non-circular “tube.” The cross-section when viewed along a longitudinal axis may be round or angular, circular, partially-circular, square, rectangular, etc., and may be continuous over the cross-sectional shape or interrupted by on or more openings (longitudinal openings) in the body walls. A cross-sectional diameter or other dimension of such a structure can be useful to allow the device to be inserted and placed with reduced trauma through a vaginal or an abdominal incision. Optionally, as described elsewhere herein, a cross-sectional dimension (e.g., diameter) of the tube can be variable, such as by being expandable (then retractable) after placement of the expansion member within a patient incision, to allow increased and expanded access to tissue at a surgical site.
Preferred expansion members can include one or more functional features at a distal end that allow the tool to be useful to carry out functions such as dissection (a mechanical dissection using a sharp blade, a blunt dissection device using an expandable structure such as a balloon, or hydrodissection), blunt dissection, viewing (visualization) of a surgical location, illumination of a surgical location, fluid delivery at a surgical location, irrigation at a surgical location, suction at a surgical location, expandability, and placing anchors (bone anchors, soft tissue anchors such as a self-fixating tip, sutures, etc.) into a desired target tissue at a surgical location.
Various embodiments of expansion members are described hereinbelow, and may have general structural and operational features that allow one or more flexible, rigid, or semi-rigid, distal retracting structure to be introduced through an incision (e.g., a vaginal or abdominal incision), to retract internal tissue. In certain (but not all) embodiments the expansion member can be introduced through an incision in a closed, compressed, or reduced-size or reduced-diameter state, then be moved, assembled, or expanded to enlarge a cross-sectional size or related space or inner opening defined by the expansion member structure, such as sidewalls, to push tissue aside to create space in and access to a pelvic region with access to desired anatomy. A preferred size of an expansion member can include a cross sectional dimension (e.g., a width or diameter associated with an inner opening along a length of the device) in the range from 1 to 5 centimeters, such as from 2 to 4 centimeters (these are referred to herein as diameter ranges d1), when an expansion member is in a reduced-size (e.g., closed) configuration. Upon opening, un-compressing, expanding, or assembling, etc., the expansion member, a preferred dimension (e.g., a width or diameter associated with an inner opening or cross section along a length of the expansion member) can be in the range from 2 to 10 centimeters, such as from 3 to 7 centimeters (these are referred to herein as diameter ranges d2). Also generally, an expansion member (or expansion member piece) can include a length dimension (from a proximal to a distal end) that can be selected to work with a particular anatomy (male or female) and procedure (anterior repair, posterior repair, etc.). A length of an expansion member (or expansion member piece) useful in a transvaginal or abdominal method of treating a posterior pelvic condition (e.g., a SCP procedure) can be sufficient to allow the distal end to reach a region of sacral anatomy as a proximal end remains at or outside of a vaginal introitus or an abdominal incision. A related dimension is the “working depth” of such a device, which is the distance between the distal end of the expansion member and the vaginal introitus or abdominal incision when the expansion member is installed, and which can be any dimension useful or desired, e.g., from 13 to 18 centimeters. A distance by which a portion of an expansion member extends proximally, away from a patient, out of the vaginal introitus or abdominal incision, is preferably minimized. Still referring to the use of these devices in transvaginal or abdominal methods of treatment, another relevant dimension is a “working space” dimension, which is a lateral dimension of an inner opening at a proximal end of the device, such as a diameter, which may preferably be in a range from 3 to 8 centimeters; in a transvaginal or abdominal method, this is an approximate diameter of a vaginal introitus or abdominal incision held open by a proximal end of the expansion member.
Various embodiments of devices (“expansion members,” “retractors,” or “speculums”) are contemplated for use in providing access to internal tissue of a pelvic region through an incision in a male or female patient, e.g., as a tissue retractor used to gain access (e.g., transvaginal or trans-abdominal access) to a posterior region of a female pelvic anatomy. Any of these may be useful according to methods for placing an implant to support pelvic tissue, for example a SCP procedure, using any desired or useful implant, insertions tool, multi-functional tool, anchor, etc.
According to certain embodiments, an expansion member can be designed to have a reduced cross-sectional size and profile in a closed or compressed state for easy entry into a patient (e.g., vaginally or abdominally), and the expansion member can be opened or expanded to open and retract the surrounding tissue between the surgical incision and the surgical area (e.g., posterior pelvic region or a region of sacral anatomy) for improved viewing of the surgical area to keep tissue from interfering with the procedure.
In certain embodiments, an expansion member can be constructed of multiple (e.g., two, three, four, or more) longitudinal panels, sections, or segments, each having a retraction surface, and each connected by a along a longitudinal-extending side or edge, such as by a hinge or other connection. The hinged (or otherwise connected) edge can be curved or straight. The connection (e.g., hinge) can be any form of connection or hinge that creates a moveable connection along the edges of retraction surfaces. A hinge may be a “piano”-style hinge, a flexible adhesive, a flexible polymeric connective material or membrane, a moveable mechanical connection, a flexible adhesive weld, etc.
Figures included herewith show various exemplary embodiments of expansion members and other tools, including certain specific features.
Referring to
Various additional or alternate optional features of expansion members may be incorporated, alone or together, with any of the features described elsewhere herein, for use with a method or a device as described. One feature is adjustability of one or more dimension (length, width (e.g., diameter), height) of an expansion member. An expansion member has a cross-sectional width that defines an inner opening, channel, or tube (complete or partial) used to create access to and working space within a pelvic location, such as access to a posterior pelvic location near a sacrum and sacral promontory. The width can be uniform along a length of an expansion member; non-uniform along the length (e.g., wider at a proximal end and narrower at a distal end); or variable at any location along a length, for adjustment before, during, or after a surgical procedure; e.g., a cross-sectional width of an inner opening at a proximal end, at one or more location along a length between a proximal and a distal end, or at a distal end, may be adjustable, each independently of one another, before, during, or after insertion for use during a surgical procedure. A length is a distance between a distal end and a proximal end and may be fixed or may be variable either before, during, or after a surgical procedure (e.g., a length may be adjustable before, during, or after insertion into a patient for use during a surgical procedure). A height is a dimension in the same cross-sectional plane as a width, and can also be fixed or variable at any one or more location along a length of an expansion member, either before, during, or after a surgical procedure.
Optionally an expansion member may not fully enclose a working space along the length or around a circumference of the device between the distal and proximal ends, but may leave one or more portion or side (along the partial or total length of the expansion member) open, giving access to tissue. For example, a “bottom” side of an expansion member may lack structure, leaving an opening along a length of the device (e.g., at the bottom or top; see
According to exemplary uses of certain described expansion members, including any optional features alone or in combination, a transvaginal vaginal process to reach a sacral promontory can include:
Referring to
As illustrated, expansion member piece 160 is in the form of a partial, expandable and retractable tube having a variable cross-sectional dimensions.
Handle piece 162 includes handles 164 and body 166. Body 166 includes distal end 168 having engagement surfaces that are capable of releasably engaging proximal end 142 of expansion member piece 160. Engagement surfaces may be any useful surface capable of moving panels 147 between a folded and an unfolded configuration. As illustrated, engagement surfaces are in the form of distal ends of panels 147a, but other forms of engagement surfaces will also be useful. When engagement surfaces of distal end 168 are engaged with proximal end 142, e.g., by individually engaging one or multiple panels 147, handle piece 162 can be used to manipulate expansion member piece 160; for example, handle piece 162 engaged with expansion member piece 160 can be used to insert a folded expansion member piece 160 into a patient incision (e.g., vaginal, abdominal, etc.) and place distal end 144 at a region of sacral anatomy or other desired surgical or pelvic location. Upon such placement within a patient, handles 164 can be manipulated to cause expansion member piece 160 to become unfolded, retracting tissue at the patient incision and at the surgical or pelvic location such as at a region of a sacrum. Next, handle piece 162 can be disengaged from proximal end 142 of expansion member piece 160, providing improved access to inner opening 141 at proximal end 142, for use by a surgeon of installed expansion member piece 160 during a surgical procedure. After performing the surgical procedure, handle piece 162 can be re-engaged with proximal end 142, handle piece 162 can be used to re-configure expansion member piece 160 in a folded configuration, and the assembly of handle piece 162 and expansion portion piece 160 can be removed from the patient.
Other optional details of expansion piece 160 can be as desired and as described herein. Optionally, hinges 149 may be straight or curved and may be capable of ratcheting or locking to allow expansion piece 160 to be locked into an opened (unfolded) or partially opened configuration during a surgical procedure. A ratchet or lock may be releasable by a release mechanism on expansion portion piece 160 or handle piece 162. Panels 147 may be rounded or flat and may be constructed of plastic (e.g., transparent or clear polyacrylate) or metal (e.g., stainless steel). Distal end 144 may include any of the optional features described herein such as a light, irrigation feature, suction, anchor placement feature, dissolvable coating, or the like. A length dimension may be fixed or variable.
Referring to
An electroactive polymer is capable of changing shape upon application of an electric field to the electroactive polymer. According to this embodiment of an expansion member, an electroactive polymer can be applied to or placed into contact with one or more surface of an expansion member, in a manner that exposure of the electroactive polymer to an electric field (e.g., current or voltage) causes the expansion member to change shape between a rolled or “closed” configuration, and an unrolled or “opened” configuration. A application of and removal of current or voltage to the electroactive polymer will cause the expansion member to transition between opened and closed configurations. During such transformation from a closed to an opened configuration the expansion member piece can produce a force against tissue that is sufficient to retract the tissue.
Referring to
An electroactive polymer is located on the expansion member piece 260 at locations of the surface (inner surface, outer surface, or both) such that when the electroactive polymer is exposed to or stimulated by an electric field, e.g., a current or voltage is applied to (or removed from) the electroactive polymer, the electroactive polymer changes shape; the expansion member piece 260 changes shape in response to the electroactive polymer changing shape. In use, application or removal of a current or voltage, to the electroactive polymer or other structure (e.g., an electrode) of expansion member piece 260, can transform the shape of expansion member piece 260 from a rolled up or closed form as shown in
In use, expansion member piece 260 can be used alone or in combination with introducer piece 262. When used alone, expansion member piece 260 can be inserted into a patient incision (e.g., an abdominal or vaginal) in the closed configuration and then expanded into the opened configuration to retract tissue. A surgeon can perform a surgical procedure in the pelvic region, such as an SCP procedure with the expansion member placed in the incision and in the opened configuration to retract tissue and allow access to a surgical site. After the surgical to procedure is completed, the expansion member piece can be placed in the closed configuration (by application of or removal of an electric current or voltage) and then removed. The electroactive polymer may be activated or deactivated, e.g., current or voltage can be applied or removed, to cause the expansion member piece to change between the closed and the opened, then the closed, configurations.
When optional introducer piece 262 is used in combination with expansion member piece 260, introducer piece 262 can be first introduced into a surgical incision such as a vaginal or abdominal incision. A distal end of introducer piece 262 can be placed at a desired surgical site such as at a region of sacral anatomy. Expansion member piece 260 in a closed configuration, can be introduced into introducer piece 262 so that distal end 244 is placed at the surgical site, e.g., a region of sacral anatomy. Introducer piece 262 can be removed from the patient, leaving expansion member piece 260 in the incision, which can be expanded to an opened configuration. A surgical procedure can be performed, and expansion member piece 260 can be removed, optionally by first transforming expansion member piece 260 to the closed configuration.
Referring to
Referring to
In use, introducer piece 300 can be first introduced into a surgical incision such as a vaginal or abdominal incision. With blades 302 butted together and membrane 304 folded between or adjacent to blades 302, distal end 310 can be introduced through a surgical incision and advanced toward and placed at a desired surgical site such as at a region of a sacrum. Distal end 310 can be used to deflect the sigmoid colon of the sacral promontory and then become located over the sacral promontory to provide access to the sacral promontory. With introducer piece 300 placed as desired, expansion member piece 316 can be inserted into proximal end 308 between blades 302 and advanced distally toward distal end 310. The advancement causes blades 302 to separate and introducer piece 300 to expand and open with movement of blades 302 apart from each other and unfolding of membranes 304. Expansion member piece 312 can be advanced to place distal end 318 at a surgical location such as to access a region of a sacrum and a sacral promontory. Expansion member 312, between proximal end 316 and distal end 318, includes inner opening or channel 315 leading to bowel-free access to a sacral promontory at distal end 318. A surgical procedure can be performed through inner opening 315 of expansion member piece 312, optionally after removing introducer piece 300 from the incision.
Expansion member piece 312 can be as described herein, such as in the form of a clear, transparent, tubular rigid polymeric member having distal end 318, proximal end 316, and a length and sidewalls 322 therebetween, with distal end 318 shaped (angled) for close contact with the sacrum when expansion member piece 312 is placed within a vaginal or abdominal incision. The length of body sidewall 322 extending between proximal end 316 and distal end 318 can provide an inner opening and workspace 315 between a surgical incision at a location of an abdominal incision or a location of a vaginal introitus, and a posterior pelvic region such as a location of a sacrum, sacral promontory, or other sacral anatomy. Expansion member 312 can include an optional lighting feature (not illustrated), for example in the form of a solid optical fiber extending inside of the tube or at an interior of the tube sidewall.
According to specific methods, an introducer piece 300 and an expansion member 312 as illustrated at
Referring to
Blunt dissection device 350 of
Referring in particular to
Referring in particular to
Referring to
The figures illustrate embodiments of blunt dissection devices 350 that can include optional features such as an expandable structure (e.g., balloon 380), paddles curved laterally (e.g., about a lengthwise direction, see
Devices as described and illustrated (referred sometimes to interchangeably as “expansion members,” “tubes,” or “retractors”) can be used and useful by a method of inserting the device into a surgical incision, for example a transvaginal or abdominal incision, and moving, retracting, or expanding tissue to provide access to desired anatomy. For performing an SCP or other procedure, a tube or retractor can be placed transvaginally or transabdominally, e.g., in a non-expanded, closed, or collapsed state. The expansion member can then be expanded while in place in the patient incision, e.g., transvaginally or transabdominally, to create access through an inner opening of the expansion member to desired anatomy such as the posterior of a pelvic region, e.g., to gain access to a region of sacral anatomy. The expansion member creates an inner opening or workspace extending between a vaginal introitus or an abdominal incision and a region of sacral anatomy, such as an anterior longitudinal ligament. A surgeon can perform a surgical procedure by use of the access, which provides working space to pelvic anatomy such as the sacrum.
The method can optionally also involve a tool, multi-functional tool, implant, adjustable implant, anchor, or other device or method, e.g., as described at Applicant's co-pending International Patent Application number PCT/US2010/062577, filed Dec. 30, 2010, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference.
As presented, an expansion member or dissection tool as described can include features and structures (e.g., fiber optics) to allow viewing or illumination of a surgical site. Illumination can be accomplished by any of various lighting techniques and structures. If a structural component of an expansion member or dissection tool is made of a plastic or polymeric light-conductive material, light can be transmitted through that material from a proximal end to a distal end at the surgical site. Alternately, a fiber optic cable can be incorporated into a length of the device, extending from a proximal to or toward a distal end, to allow light to be transmitted from the proximal end to the distal end. Light could alternately be generated and shone from the distal end.
Tools and devices as described can be made from any suitable material or combination of materials. Examples include any material save for less than 24 hour contact with tissue, such as stainless steel, nitinol, polycarbonate, polypropylene, polyethylene, fluoropolymer, PET, polyurethane, silicone, polysulphone, and ultem. Any structure of an expansion member, retractor, tube, dissection tool, or other identified component may be capable of conducting light between a proximal and distal end, or alternately one or more fiber optics cable may be incorporated into an expansion member, retractor, tube, or component thereof, to provide lighting.
Implants, their various components, structures, features, materials and methods may have a number of suitable configurations as shown and described in the previously-incorporated references, or as described herein. Various methods and tools for introducing, deploying, anchoring and manipulating implants to treat prolapse or another pelvic conditions, as disclosed in the previously-incorporated references, are envisioned for use with the present invention as well as those methods and tools identified and described herein.
Also according to embodiments of the methods, implants, tools, and devices described herein, any of the described tools can be used for placing any desired pelvic implant in a male or a female patient, and for any of a large variety of conditions, such as a pelvic condition. The implant can include any structural features useful for such treatment, including any desired size, shape, and optional features such as adjustability and anchoring systems. Any of these features may be previously known, future developed, described herein, or described in documents incorporated herein, for any particular implant and method. For example, some figures and discussions include examples of features of “anchors” (e.g., soft tissue or bone anchors, as these terms are generically and inclusively used) that can be useful according to the methods of placing a surgical implant. An implant that includes or is otherwise secured by any of the anchors described can be useful to treat a pelvic condition in a male or a female patient; as a single and non-limiting example, an implant that includes or uses an anchor as described can be used in a transvaginal or transabdominal SCP procedure to provide support to a vaginal cuff, through an implant that includes the anchor, the anchor being attached at a region of sacral anatomy such as a sacral ligament (e.g., anterior longitudinal ligament, a.k.a. the “anterior ligament” or “longitudinal ligament”).
Various devices and methods described herein are advantageous because they facilitate reduction of total procedural time needed to treat a pelvic condition.
The various systems, apparatus, and methods detailed herein are envisioned for use with certain known implant and repair systems (e.g., for male and female), features and methods, including those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,500,945, 7,407,480, 7,351,197, 7,347,812, 7,303,525, 7,025,063, 6,691,711, 6,648,921, and 6,612,977, International Patent Publication Nos. WO 2008/057261, WO 2007/097994, WO 2007/149348, and U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2002/151762, 2010-0174134, 2010-0298630, and 2002/147382. Accordingly, the above-identified disclosures are fully incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
The disclosed systems, their various components, structures, features, materials and methods may have a number of suitable configurations as shown and described in the previously-incorporated references. Various methods and tools for introducing, deploying, anchoring and manipulate device, implants, and the like as disclosed in the previously-incorporated references are envisioned for use with the present invention as well.
All patents, patent applications, and publications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety as if individually incorporated, and include those references incorporated within the identified patents, patent applications and publications.
The present non-provisional patent application claims priority under 35 USC § 119(e) from United States Provisional Patent Application having Ser. No. 61/502,694, filed Jun. 29, 2011, entitled “SYSTEMS, IMPLANTS, TOOLS, AND METHODS FOR TREATMENTS OF PELVIC CONDITIONS,” the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2738790 | Todt et al. | Mar 1956 | A |
3124136 | Usher | Mar 1964 | A |
3182662 | Shirodkar | May 1965 | A |
3311110 | Singerman et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3384073 | Van Winkle, Jr. | May 1968 | A |
3472232 | Earl | Oct 1969 | A |
3580313 | McKnight | May 1971 | A |
3763860 | Clarke | Oct 1973 | A |
3789828 | Schulte | Feb 1974 | A |
3815576 | Balaban | Jun 1974 | A |
3858783 | Kapitanov et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3924633 | Cook et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3995619 | Glatzer | Dec 1976 | A |
4019499 | Fitzgerald | Apr 1977 | A |
4037603 | Wendorff | Jul 1977 | A |
4128100 | Wendorff | Dec 1978 | A |
4172458 | Pereyra | Oct 1979 | A |
4235238 | Ogiu et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4246660 | Wevers | Jan 1981 | A |
4441497 | Paudler | Apr 1984 | A |
4509516 | Richmond | Apr 1985 | A |
4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
4585437 | Simms | Apr 1986 | A |
4632100 | Somers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4775380 | Seedhom et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4857041 | Annis et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865031 | O'Keeffe | Sep 1989 | A |
4873976 | Schreiber | Oct 1989 | A |
4920986 | Biswas | May 1990 | A |
4932962 | Yoon et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4938760 | Burton et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4969892 | Burton et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5007894 | Enhorning | Apr 1991 | A |
5012822 | Schwarz | May 1991 | A |
5013292 | Lemay | May 1991 | A |
5013316 | Goble et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019032 | Robertson | May 1991 | A |
5032508 | Naughton et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5036867 | Biswas | Aug 1991 | A |
5053043 | Gottesman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5085661 | Moss | Feb 1992 | A |
5112344 | Petros | May 1992 | A |
5123428 | Schwarz | Jun 1992 | A |
5141520 | Goble et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5149329 | Richardson | Sep 1992 | A |
5188636 | Fedotov | Feb 1993 | A |
5209756 | Seedhom et al. | May 1993 | A |
5250033 | Evans et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256133 | Spitz | Oct 1993 | A |
5269783 | Sander | Dec 1993 | A |
5281237 | Gimpelson | Jan 1994 | A |
5328077 | Lou | Jul 1994 | A |
5337736 | Reddy | Aug 1994 | A |
5362294 | Seitzinger | Nov 1994 | A |
5368595 | Lewis | Nov 1994 | A |
5370650 | Tovey et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5370662 | Stone et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376097 | Phillips | Dec 1994 | A |
5383904 | Totakura et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386836 | Biswas | Feb 1995 | A |
5403328 | Shallman | Apr 1995 | A |
5404870 | Brinkerhoff et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413598 | Moreland | May 1995 | A |
5439467 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5474518 | Velazquez | Dec 1995 | A |
5474543 | McKay | Dec 1995 | A |
5518504 | Polvak | May 1996 | A |
5520700 | Beyar et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520703 | Essig | May 1996 | A |
5527342 | Pietrzak et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544664 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562689 | Green et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571139 | Jenkins, Jr. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582188 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591163 | Thompson | Jan 1997 | A |
5591206 | Moufarrege | Jan 1997 | A |
5611515 | Benderev et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5628756 | Barker, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633286 | Chen | May 1997 | A |
5643320 | Lower et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5669935 | Rosenman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683349 | Makower et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697931 | Thompson | Dec 1997 | A |
5709708 | Thal | Jan 1998 | A |
5725541 | Anspach, III et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741282 | Anspach, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5782916 | Pintauro et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785640 | Kresch et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5807403 | Beyar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5836314 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836315 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840011 | Landgrebe et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842478 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860425 | Benderev et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5899909 | Claren et al. | May 1999 | A |
5919232 | Chaffringeon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922026 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
5925047 | Errico et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5934283 | Willem et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935122 | Fourkas et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944732 | Raulerson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954057 | Li | Sep 1999 | A |
5972000 | Beyar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976146 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980558 | Wiley | Nov 1999 | A |
5984927 | Wenstrom, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988171 | Sohn et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997554 | Thompson | Dec 1999 | A |
6010447 | Kardjian | Jan 2000 | A |
6027523 | Schmieding | Feb 2000 | A |
6030393 | Corlew | Feb 2000 | A |
6031148 | Hayes et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036701 | Rosenman | Mar 2000 | A |
6039686 | Kovac | Mar 2000 | A |
6042534 | Gellman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042536 | Tihon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042583 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048351 | Gordon et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050937 | Benderev | Apr 2000 | A |
6053935 | Brenneman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056688 | Benderev et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068591 | Bruckner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071290 | Compton | Jun 2000 | A |
6074341 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077216 | Benderev et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099538 | Moses | Aug 2000 | A |
6099551 | Gabbay | Aug 2000 | A |
6099552 | Adams | Aug 2000 | A |
6106545 | Egan | Aug 2000 | A |
6110101 | Tihon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117067 | Gil-Vernet | Sep 2000 | A |
6127597 | Beyar et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168611 | Rizvi | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200330 | Benderev et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221005 | Bruckner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6241736 | Sater et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264676 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273852 | Lehe et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6302840 | Benderev | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306079 | Trabucco | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6322492 | Kovac | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328686 | Kovac | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328744 | Harari et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6334446 | Beyar | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352553 | van de Burg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364832 | Propp | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382214 | Raz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6383191 | Zdeblick et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6387041 | Harari et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406423 | Scetbon | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406480 | Beyar et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414179 | Banville | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6423080 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6451024 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475139 | Miller | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478727 | Scetbon | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6482214 | Sidor, Jr. et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491703 | Ulmsten | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6494906 | Owens | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502578 | Raz et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6506190 | Walshe | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6530943 | Hoepffner et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6575897 | Ory | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582443 | Cabak et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592515 | Thierfelder | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6592610 | Beyar | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596001 | Stormby et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599235 | Kovac | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6599323 | Melican et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602260 | Harari et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6612977 | Staskin | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638210 | Berger | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638211 | Suslian et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6638284 | Rousseau et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641524 | Kovac | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6641525 | Rocheleau | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648921 | Anderson | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652450 | Neisz et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6673010 | Skiba et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685629 | Therin | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6689047 | Gellman et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6691711 | Raz | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699175 | Miller | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702827 | Lund | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6752814 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755781 | Gellman | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6802807 | Anderson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6830052 | Carter et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6881184 | Zappala | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6884212 | Thierfelder et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908425 | Luscombe | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6908473 | Skiba et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911002 | Fierro | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911003 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6932759 | Kammerer | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936052 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6953428 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960160 | Browning | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971986 | Staskin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6974462 | Sater | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981944 | Jamiolkowski | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6981983 | Rosenblatt et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6991597 | Gellman et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7014607 | Gellman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025063 | Snitkin | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7025772 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7037255 | Inman | May 2006 | B2 |
7048682 | Neisz et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056333 | Walshe | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7070556 | Anderson | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7070558 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083568 | Neisz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7083637 | Tannhauser | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7087065 | Ulmsten et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112210 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7121997 | Kammerer et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131943 | Kammerer | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7131944 | Jacquetin | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7175591 | Kaladelfos | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7179263 | Zdeblick | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198597 | Siegel et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226407 | Kammerer | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7226408 | Harari et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229404 | Bouffier | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7229453 | Anderson | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235043 | Gellman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7261723 | Smith et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7297102 | Smith et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299803 | Kovac | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7303525 | Watschke et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7326213 | Benderev et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7347812 | Mellier | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7351197 | Montpetit et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357773 | Watschke et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7364541 | Chu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7371245 | Evans et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7374534 | Dalton | May 2008 | B2 |
7387634 | Benderev | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7393320 | Montpetit et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7407480 | Staskin | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410460 | Benderev | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7413540 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7422557 | Arnal | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7431690 | Bryon et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7494495 | Delorme et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7500945 | Cox | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7513865 | Bourne et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7527588 | Zaddem et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7588598 | Delorme et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601118 | Smith et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7611454 | De Leval | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621864 | Suslian et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7637860 | MacLean | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686759 | Sater | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7691050 | Gellman et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7722527 | Bouchier et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722528 | Arnal et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740576 | Hodroff | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753839 | Siegel et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762942 | Neisz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766926 | Bosley et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789821 | Browning | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7981024 | Levy | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8172745 | Rosenblatt | May 2012 | B2 |
20010007073 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010011170 | Davison et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010049467 | Lehe et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007222 | Desai | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020028980 | Thierfelder et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020128670 | Ulmsten et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147382 | Neisz | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020151909 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161382 | Neisz | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030004581 | Rousseau | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030036676 | Scetbon | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065402 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030176875 | Anderson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040015057 | Rocheleau et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040073235 | Lund | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040116777 | Larson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040225181 | Chu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267088 | Kammerer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050000523 | Beraud | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004427 | Cervigni | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004576 | Benderev | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038451 | Rao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055104 | Arnal et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050131391 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131393 | Chu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050199249 | Karram | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245787 | Cox et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050256530 | Petros | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050277806 | Cristalli | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050278037 | Delorme et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283189 | Rosenblatt et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015010 | Jaffe et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060058578 | Browning | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089524 | Chu | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089525 | Mamo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060106416 | Raymond et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122457 | Kovac | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060028828 | Cox et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167487 | Hamada | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173237 | Jacquetin | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195007 | Anderson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195011 | Arnal | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217589 | Wan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229493 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229596 | Weiser et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252980 | Arnal et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287571 | Gozzi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070015953 | MacLean | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070073110 | Larson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078295 | Iandgrebe | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070173864 | Chu | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070219416 | Perez-Cruet et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080039678 | Montpetit et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080132764 | Hamada | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140218 | Staskin et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080300607 | Meade et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005634 | Rane | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012353 | Beyer | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090221868 | Evans | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100022822 | Walshe | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100179575 | Von Pechmann et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100261950 | Lund | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100280627 | Hanes, II | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110124954 | Ogdahl et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110174313 | Von Pechmann et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110301424 | Steigerwald | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120016185 | Sherts et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20130296686 | Sarna | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002241673 | Nov 2005 | AU |
2404459 | Aug 2005 | CA |
2305815 | Aug 1974 | DE |
4220283 | May 1994 | DE |
19544162 | Apr 1997 | DE |
10211360 | Sep 2003 | DE |
20016866 | Mar 2007 | DE |
0248544 | Dec 1987 | EP |
0470308 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0650703 | Jun 1994 | EP |
0643945 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0632999 | Jan 1995 | EP |
1093758 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1060714 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1342450 | Sep 2003 | EP |
2787990 | Jul 2000 | FR |
2852813 | Jan 2004 | FR |
2268690 | Jan 1994 | GB |
2353220 | Oct 2000 | GB |
1299162 | Apr 1998 | IT |
1225547 | Apr 1986 | SU |
1342486 | Oct 1987 | SU |
WO9317635 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO9319678 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO9511631 | May 1995 | WO |
WO9525469 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO9716121 | May 1997 | WO |
WO9730638 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO9747244 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO9819606 | May 1998 | WO |
WO9835606 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9835616 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9835632 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO9842261 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO9853746 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO9916381 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO9937217 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9952450 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO9953844 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO1999059477 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO9959477 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO0064370 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO0013601 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO0018319 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO0027304 | May 2000 | WO |
WO0040158 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO0057812 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0066030 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO0074594 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0074613 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0074633 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO0106951 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0126581 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0139670 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0145588 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0145589 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0156499 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO0228312 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0228315 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0230293 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0232284 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO0234124 | May 2002 | WO |
WO0238079 | May 2002 | WO |
WO0239890 | May 2002 | WO |
WO02058563 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02062237 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO02069781 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02071953 | Sep 2002 | WO |
WO02078552 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO02089704 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO03017848 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO0303778 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO03028585 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO03037215 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03041613 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03047435 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO03068107 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO03075792 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO03092546 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO03096929 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2004012626 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004016196 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004017862 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004017862 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO2004034912 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2005037132 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO2005079702 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005122954 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006015031 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2006108145 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2007011341 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO2007014241 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007016083 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO2007027592 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007059199 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007081955 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2007097994 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO2007137226 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007146784 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2007149348 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2007149555 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO2008057261 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008124056 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO2009005714 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009017680 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO2011082350 | Jul 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
http://www.thefreedictionary.com, definition of “membrane”, accessed Jan. 9, 2015. |
“Access Instrument System with AlloSling Fascia” (5 pages with two pages of Instructions for Use). |
“Introducing: AlloSling Fascia The Natural Choice for Suburethral Sling Procedures”, Advertisement from UroMed Corporation (1 page). |
“We're staying ahead of the curve” lntroducing the IVS Tunneller Device for Tension Free Procedures, Tyco Healthcare, 3 pages (2002). |
Advantage A/T™, Surgical Mesh Sling Kit, Boston Scientific, 6 pages (2002). |
Albert H. Aldridge, B.S., M.D., F.A.C.S., Transplantation of Fascia for Relief of Urinary Stress Incontience, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, V. 44, pp. 398-411, (1948). |
AlloSource product literature (11pages). |
Amundsen, Cindy L. et al., Anatomical Correction of Vaginal Vault Prolapse by Uterosacral Ligament Fixation in Women who also Require a Pubovaginal Sling, The Journal of Urology, vol. 169, pp. 1770-1774, (May 2003). |
Araki, Tohru et al., The Loop-Loosening Procedure for Urination Difficulties After Stamey Suspension of the Vesical Neck, The Journal of Urology, vol. 144, pp. 319-323 (Aug. 1990). |
Asmussen, M. et al., Simultaneous Urethro-Cystometry With a New Technique, Scand J Urol Nephrol 10, p. 7-11 (1976). |
Beck, Peter R. et al., Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence With Anterior Colporrhaphy, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 59, (No. 3), pp. 269-274 (Mar. 1982). |
Benderev, Theodore V., MD, A Modified Percutaneous Outpatient Bladder Neck Suspension System, Journal of Urology, vol. 152, pp. 2316-2320 (Dec. 1994). |
Benderev, Theodore V., MD, Anchor Fixation and Other Modifications of Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension, Urology, vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 409-418 (Nov. 1992). |
Bergman, Arieh et al., Three Surgical Procedures for Genuine Stress Incontinence: Five-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Randomized Study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 173 No. 1, pp. 66-71 (Jul. 1995). |
Blaivas, Jerry et al., Pubovaginal Fascial Sling for the Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 145, pp. 1214-1218 (Jun. 1991). |
Blaivas, Jerry et al., Type III Stress Urinary Incontinence: Importance of Proper Diagnosis and Treatment, Surgical Forum, pp. 473-475, (1984). |
Blaivas, Jerry, Commentary: Pubovaginal Sling Procedure, Experience with Pubovaginal Slings, pp. 93-101 (1990). |
Boyles, Sarah Hamilton et al., Procedures for Urinary Incontinence in the United States, 1979-1997, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 189, n. 1, pp. 70-75 (Jul. 2003). |
Bryans, Fred E., Marlex Gauze Hammock Sling Operation With Cooper's Ligament Attachment in the Management of Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 133, pp. 292-294 (Feb. 1979). |
Burch, John C., Urethrovaginal Fixation to Cooper's Ligament for Correction of Stress Incontinence, Cystocele, and Prolapse, Am. J. Obst. & Gyn. vol. 31, pp. 281-290 (1961). |
Capio™ CL—Transvaginal Suture Capturing Device—Transvaginal Suture Fixation to Cooper's Ligament for Sling Procedures, Boston Scientific, Microvasive®, 8 pages, (2002). |
Cervigni, Mauro et al., The use of Synthetics in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Voiding Dysfunction and Female Urology, vol. 11, pp. 429-435 (2001). |
Choe, Jong M. et al., Gore-Tex Patch Sling: 7 Years Later, Urology, vol. 54, pp. 641-646 (1999). |
Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Monofilament and Multifilament Polypropylene Mesh—A Case Report, Tyco Healthcare, United States Surgical, 4 pages (no date). |
Cook/Ob Gyn®, Urogynecology, Copyright Cook Urological Inc., pp. 1-36 (1996). |
Dargent, D. et al., Insertion of a Suburethral Sling Through the Obturator Membrane in the Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, vol. 30, pp. 576-582 (2002). |
Das, Sakti et al., Laparoscopic Colpo-Suspension, The Journal of Urology, vol. 154, pp. 1119-1121 (Sep. 1995). |
Debodiance, Philipp et al., “Tolerance of Synthetic Tissues in Touch With Vaginal Scars: Review to the Point of 287 Cases”, Europeon Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 87 (1999) pp. 23-30. |
Decter, Ross M., Use of the Fascial Sling for Neurogenic Incontinence: Lessons Learned, The Journal of Urology, vol. 150, pp. 683-686 (Aug. 1993). |
Delancey, John, MD, Structural Support of the Urethra as it Relates to Stress Urinary Incontinence: The Hammock Hypothesis, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 170, No. 6, pp. 1713-1723 (Jun. 1994). |
Delorme, Emmanuel, Trans-Obturator Sling: A Minimal Invasive Procedure to Treat Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, Progres en Urologie, vol. 11, pp. 1306-1313 (2001) English Abstract attached. |
Diana, et al., Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse With Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy Using Prolene Mesh, American Journal of Surgery, vol. 179, pp. 126-128, (Feb. 2000). |
Eglin et al., Transobturator Subvesical Mesh, Tolerance and short-term results of a 103 case continuous series, Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite, vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 14-19 (Jan. 2003). |
Enzelsberger, H. et al., Urodynamic and Radiologic Parameters Before and After Loop Surgery for Recurrent Urinary Stress Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 69, pp. 51-54 (1990). |
Eriksen, Bjarne C. et al., Long-Term Effectiveness of the Burch Colposuspension in Female Urinary Stress Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 69, pp. 45-50 (1990). |
Falconer, C. et al., Clinical Outcome and Changes in Connective Tissue Metabolism After Intravaginal Slingplasty in Stress Incontinence Women, International Urogynecology Journal, pp. 133-137 (1966). |
Falconer, C. et al., Influence of Different Sling Materials of Connective Tissue Metabolism in Stress Urinary Incontinent Women, International Urogynecology Journal, Supp. 2, pp. S19-S23 (2001). |
Farnsworth, B.N., Posterior Intravaginal Slingplasty (Infracoccygeal Sacropexy) for Sever Posthysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse—A Preliminary Report on Efficacy and Safety, Int Urogynecology J, vol. 13, pp. 4-8 (2002). |
Farquhar, Cynthia M. et al., Hysterectomy Rates in the United States 1990-1997, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 99, n. 2, pp. 229-234 (Feb. 2002). |
Fidela, Marie R. et al., Pelvic Support Defects and Visceral and Sexual Function in Women Treated With Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension and Pelvic Reconstruction, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 175, n. 6 (Dec. 1996). |
Flood, C.G. et al., Anterior Colporrhaphy Reinforce With Marlex Mesh for the Treatment of Cystoceles, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 9, pp. 200-204 (1998). |
Gilja, Ivan et al., A Modified Raz Bladder Neck Suspension Operation (Transvaginal Burch), The Journal of Urology, vol. 153, pp. 1455-1457 (May 1995). |
Gittes, Ruben F. et al., No-Incision Pubovaginal Suspension for Stress Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 138 (Sep. 1987). |
Guner, et al., Transvaginal Sacrospinous Colpopexy for Marked Uterovaginal and Vault Prolapse, Inter J of Gynec & Obstetrics, vol. 74, pp. 165-170 (2001). |
Gynecare TVT Tension-Free Support for Incontinence, The tension-free solution to female Incontinence, Gynecare Worldwide,6 pages, (2002). |
Handa, Victoria L. et al, Banked Human Fascia Lata for the Suburethral Sling Procedure: A Preliminary Report, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 88 No. 6, 5 pages (Dec. 1996). |
Heit, Michael et al., Predicting Treatment Choice for Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 101, n. 6, pp. 1279-1284 (Jun. 2003). |
Hodgkinson, C. Paul et.al., Urinary Stress Incontinence in the Female, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Henry Ford Hospital, vol. 10, No. 5, p. 493-499, (Nov. 1957). |
Holschneider, C. H., et al., The Modified Pereyra Procedure in Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontience: A 15-year Review, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 573-578 (Apr. 1994). |
Horbach, Nicollette S., et al., Instruments and Methods, A Suburethral Sling Procedure with Polytetrafluoroethylene for the Treatment of Genuine Stress Incontinence in Patients with Low Urethral Closure Pressure, Obstetric & Gynecology, vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 648-652 (Apr. 1998). |
Ingelman-Sunberg, A. et al., Surgical Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence, Contr. Gynec. Obstet., vol. 10, pp. 51-69 (1983). |
Intramesh L.I.F.T. Siliconized polyester, Cousin Biotech, 1 page (no date). |
Intramesh L.I.F.T.® Polypropylene Less invasive Free tape, Cousin Biotech, 2 pages (no date). |
IVS Tunneller—A Universal Instrument for anterior and posterior intra-vaginal tape placement, Tyco Healthcare, 4 pages (Aug. 2002). |
IVS Tunneller—ein universeiles Instrument fur die Intra Vaginal Schlingenplastik, Tyco Healthcare, 4 pages (2001). |
IVS Tunneller, AMA, (no date) 4 pages. |
IVS Tunneller, Australian Medical Desgin Breakthrough for GSI, mixed incontinence and vault prolapse, AMA Medical Products, 4 pages (no date). |
Jeffcoate, T.N.A. et al., The Results of the Aldridge Sling Operation for Stress Incontinence, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, pp. 36-39 (1956). |
Jones, N.H.J. Reay et al., Pelvic Connective Tissue Resilience Decreases With Vaginal Delivery, Menopause and Uterine Prolapse, Br J Surg, vol. 90, n. 4, pp. 466-472 (Apr. 2003). |
Julian, Thomas, The Efficacy of Marlex Mesh in the Repair of Sever Recurrent Vaginal Prolapse of the Anterior Midvaginal Wall, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 175, n. 6, pp. 1472-1475 (Dec. 1996). |
Karram, Mickey et al., Patch Procedure: Modified Transvaginal Fascia Lata Sling for Recurrent for Severe Stress Urinary Incontinence, vol. 75, pp. 461-463 (Mar. 1990). |
Karram, Mickey M. et al., Chapter 19 Surgical Treatment of Vaginal Vault Prolapse, Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgety, (Walter & Karram eds.) pp. 235-256 (Mosby 1999). |
Kersey, J., The Gauze Hammock Sling Operation in the Treatment of Stress Incontintence, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 90, pp. 945-949 (Oct. 1983). |
Klutke, Carl et al., The Anatomy of Stress Incontinence: Magentic Resonance Imaging of the Female Bladder Neck and Urethra, The Journal of Urology, vol. 143, pp. 563-566 (Mar. 1990). |
Klutke, John James et al., Transvaginal Bladder Neck Suspension to Cooper's Ligament: A Modified Pereyra Procedure, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 88, No. 2 pp. 294-296 (Aug. 1996). |
Klutke, John M.D. et al, The promise of tension-free vaginal tape for female SUI, Contemporary Urology, 7 pages. (Oct. 2000). |
Korea, A. et al., Experience With Silastic Slings for Female Urinary Incontience, Aust NZ J. Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 29, pp. 150-154 (May 1989). |
Kovac, S. Robert, et al, Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 89, No. 4, pp. 624-627 (Apr. 1997). |
Kova, S. Robert, et al, Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: A Long Term Cure for SUI?, Contemporary OB/GYN, 10 pages (Feb. 1998). |
Kovac, S. Robert, Follow-up of the Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling Operation for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence (Kovac Procedure), Journal of Pelvic Surgery, pp. 156-160 (May 1999). |
Leach, Gary E., et al., Female Stress Urinary Incontinence Clinical Guidelines Panel Report on Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, American Urological Association, vol. 158, 875-880 (Sep. 1997). |
Leach, Gary E., MD, Bone Fixation Technique for Transvaginal Needle Suspension, Urology vol. XXXI, No. 5, pp. 388-390 (May 1986). |
Lichtenstein, Irving L. et al, The Tension Free Hernioplasty, The American Journal of Surgery. vol. 157 pp. 188-193 (Feb. 1989). |
LigiSure Atlas™, Tyco Healthcare, Valleylab®, 2 pages (no date). |
Loughlin, Kevin R. et al., Review of an 8-Year Experience With Modifications of Endoscopic Suspension of the Bladder Neck for Female Stress Incontinence, The Journal of Uroloyg, vol. 143, pp. 44-45 (1990). |
Luber, Karl M. et al., The Demographics of Pelvic Floor Disorders; Current Observations and Future Projections, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 184, n. 7, pp. 1496-1503 (Jun. 2001). |
Mage, Technique Chirurgicale, L'Interpostion D'un Trellis Synthetique Dans La Cure Par Voie Vaginale Des Prolapsus Genitaux, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol. 28, pp, 825-829 (1999). |
Marchionni, Mauro et el., True Incidence of Vaginal Vault Prolapse—Thirteen Years of Experience, Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 44, n. 8, pp. 679-684 (Aug. 199). |
Marinkovic, Serge Peter et al., Triple Compartment Prolapse: Sacrocolpopexy With Anterior and Posterior Mesh Extensions, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 110, pp. 323-326 (Mar. 2003). |
Marshall, Victor Fray et al, The Correction of Stress Incontinence by Simple Vesicourethral Suspension, Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 88, pp. 509-518 (1949). |
McGuire, Edward J. et al., Pubovaginal Sling Procedure for Stress Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 119, pp. 82-84 (Jan. 1978). |
McGuire., Edward J. et al., Abdominal Procedures for Stress Incontinence, Urologic Clinics of North America, pp. 285-290, vol. 12, No. 2 (May 1985). |
McGuire, Edward J. et al., Experience With Pubovaginal Slings for Urinary Incontinence at the University of Michigan, Journal of Urology, vol. 138, pp. 90-93(1987). |
McGuire, Edwared J. et al., Abdominal Fascial Slings, Slings, Raz Female Urology, p. 369-375 (1996). |
McGuire, Edwared J., M.D., The Sling Procedure for Urinary Stress Incontinence, Profiles in Urology, pp. 3-18. |
McGuire™ Suture Buide, The McGuire™ Suture Guide, a single use instrument designed for the placement of a suburethral sling, Bard, 2 pages (2001). |
McIndoe, G. A. et al., The Aldridge Sling Procedure in the Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence, Aust. N Z Journal of Obstet Gynecology, pp. 238-239 (Aug. 1987). |
McKiel, Charles F. Jr., et al, Marshall-Marchetti Procedure Modification, vol. 96, pp. 737-739 (Nov. 1966). |
Migliari, Roberto et al., Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Repair for Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse, Eur Urol, vol. 38, pp. 151-155 (Oct. 1999). |
Migliari, Roberto et al., Treatment Results Using a Mixed Fiber Mesh in Patients With Grade IV Cystocele, Journal of Urology, vol. 161, pp. 1255-1258 (Apr. 1999). |
Mitek Brochure, Therapy of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women Using Mitek Glil Anchors, By Valenzio C. Mascio, MD. |
Moir, J. Chassar et.al., The Gauze-Hammock Operation, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of British Commonwealth, vol. 75 No. 1, pp. 1-9 (Jan. 1968). |
Morgan, J. E., A Sling Operation, Using Marlex Polypropylene Mesh, for the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Incontinence, Am. J. Obst. & Gynecol, pp. 369-377 (Feb. 1970). |
Morgan, J. E. et al., The Marlex Sling Operation for the Treatment of Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 16-Year Review, American Obstetrics Gynecology, vol. 151, No. 2, pp. 224-226 (Jan. 1998). |
Morley, George W. et al., Sacrospinous Ligament Fixations for Eversion of the Vagina, Am J Obstet Gyn, vol. 158, n. 4, pp. 872-881 (Apr. 1988). |
Narik, G. et.al., A Simplified Sling Operation Suitable for Routine Use, Gynecological and Obstetrical Clinic, University of Vienna, vol. 84, No. 3, p. 400-405 (Aug. 1, 1962). |
Natale, F. et al., Tension Free Cystocele Repair (TCR): Long-Term Follow-Up, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 11, supp. 1, p. S51 (Oct. 2000). |
Nichols, David H., The Mersilene Mesh Gauze-Hammock for Severe Urinary Stress Incontinence, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 41, pp. 88-93 (Jan. 1973). |
Nicita, Giulio, A New Operation for Genitourinary Prolapse, Journal of Urology, vol. 160, pp. 741-745 (Sep. 1998). |
Niknejad, Kathleen et al., Autologous and Synthetic Urethral Slings for Female Incontinence, Urol Clin N Am, vol. 29, pp. 597-611 (2002). |
Norris, Jeffrey P. et al., Use of Synthetic Material in Sling Surgery: A Minimally Invasive Approach, Journal of Endourology, vol. 10, pp. 227-230 (Jun. 1996). |
O'Donnell, Pat, Combined Raz Urethral Suspension and McGuire Pubovaginal Sling for Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence, Journal Arkansas Medical Society, vol. 88, pp. 389-392 (Jan. 1992). |
Ostergard, Donald R. et al., Urogynecology and Urodynamics Theory and Practice, pp. 569-579 (1996). |
Paraiso et al., Laparoscopic Surgery for Enterocele, Vaginal Apex Prolapse and Rectocele, Int. Urogynecol J, vol. 10, pp. 223-229 (1999). |
Parra, R. O., et al, Experience With a Simplified Technique for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, British Journal of Urology, pp. 615-617 (1990). |
Pelosi, Marco Antonio III et al., Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling: Laparoscopic Assessment of a Transvaginal Operation for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence, Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 45-50 (1999). |
Pereyra, Armand J. et al, Pubourethral Supports in Perspective: Modified Pereyra Procedure for Urinary Incontinence, Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 643-648 (May 1982). |
Pereyra, Armand J., M.D., F.A.C.S., A Simplified Surgical Procedure for Correction of Stress Incontinence in Women, West.J.Surg., Obst. & Gynec, p. 223-226, (Jul.-Aug. 1959). |
Peter E. Papa Petros et al., Cure of Stress Incontinence by Repair of External Anal Sphincter, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, p. 75 (1990). |
Peter Petros et al., Anchoring the Midurethra Restores Bladder-Neck Anatomy and Continence, The Lancet, vol. 354, pp. 997-998 (Sep. 18, 1999). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., An Anatomical Basis for Success and Failure of Female Incontinence Surgery, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 55-60 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., An Analysis of Rapid Pad Testing and the History for the Diagnosis of Stress Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 71, pp. 529-536 (1992). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., An Integral Therory of Female Urinary Incontinence, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 69 Sup. 153, pp. 7-31 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Bladder Instability in Women: A Premature Activation of the Micturition Reflex, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 235-239 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Cough Transmission Ratio: An Indicator of Suburethral Vaginal Wall Tension Rather Than Urethral Closure, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 37-39 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Cure of Urge Incontinence by the Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 61-62 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS III—(With Midline “Tuck”), Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, p. 69-71 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Medium-Term Follow-Up of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation Indicates Minimal Deterioration of Urinary Continence With Time, (3 pages) (1999). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Non Stress Non Urge Female Urinary Incontinence—Diagnosis and Cure: A Preliminary Report, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 69-70 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Part I: Theoretical, Morphological, Radiographical Correlations and Clinical Perspective, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 5-28 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa of al., Part II: The Biomechanics of Vaginal Tissue and Supporting Ligaments With Special Relevance to the Pathogenesis of Female Urinary Incontinence, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 29-40 plus cover sheet (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Part III: Surgical Principles Deriving From the Theory, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 41-52 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Part IV: Surgical Appliations of the Theory—Development of the Intravaginal Sling Pklasty (IVS) Procedure, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 53-54 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation According to the Integrated Theory of Female Urinary Incontinence, Chapter 7, pp. 249-258 (book chapter). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Pregnancy Effects on the Intravaginal Sling Operation, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69 Sup 153, pp. 77-79(1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Combined Intravaginal Sling and Tuck Operation an Ambulatory Procedure for Cure of Stress and Urge Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153 pp. 53-59 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS II—(With Bilateral “Tucks”), Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 61-67 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Free Graft Procedure for Cure of the Tethered Vagina Syndrome, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153 pp. 85-87(1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS IV—(With “Double Breasted” Unattached Vaginal Flap Repair and “Free” Vaginal Tapes), Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, p. 73-75 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Further Development of the Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure—IVS V—(With “Double Breasted” Unattached Vaginal Flap Repair and Permanent Sling)., Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics Sup 153, pp. 77-79 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation, A Minimally Invasive Technique for Cure of Urinary Incontinence in the Female, Aust. NZ J Obstet Gynaecol, vol. 36, n. 4, pp. 453-461 (1996). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Intravaginal Slingplasty Procedure: IVS VI—Further Development of the “Double Breasted” Vaginal Flap Repair—Attached Flap, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 81-84 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Posterior Fornix Syndrome: A Multiple Symptom Complex of Pelvic Pain and Abnormal Urinary Symptoms Deriving From Laxity in the Posterior Fornix of Vagina, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, Sup 153, pp. 89-93 (1993). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Role of a Lax Posterior Vaginal Fornix in the Causation of Stress and Urgency Symptoms: A Preliminary Report, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 71-73 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Tethered Vagina Syndrome, Post Surgical Incontinence and I-Plasty Operation for Cure, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153 pp. 63-67 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., The Tuck Procedure: A Simplified Vaginal Repair for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, pp. 41-42 (1990). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa et al., Urethral Pressure Increase on Effort Originates From Within the Urethra, and Continence From Musculovaginal Closure, Scandinavian Journal of Neurourology and Urodynamics, pp. 337-350 (1995). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa, Development of Generic Models for Ambulatory Vaginal Surgery—Preliminary Report,International Urogynecology Journal, pp. 20-27 (1998). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa, New Ambulatory Surgical Methods Using an Anatomical Classification of Urinary Dysfunction Improve Stress, Urge and Abnormal Emptying, Int. Urogynecology Journal Pelvic Floor Dystfunction, vol. 8 (5), pp. 270-278, (1997). |
Petros, Peter E. Papa, Vault Prolapse II, Restoration of Dynamic Vaginal Supports by Infracoccygeal Sacropexy, an Axial Day-Case Vaginal Procedure, Int Urogynecol J, vol. 12 pp. 296-303 (2001). |
Rackley, Raymond R. et al., Tension-Free Vaginal Tape and Percutaneous Vaginal Tape Sling Procedures, Techniques in Urology, vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 90-100 (2001). |
Rackley, Raymond R. M.D., Synthetic Slings: Five Steps for Successful Placement, Urology Times, p. 46,48,49 (Jun. 2000). |
Raz, Shlomo et al., The Raz Bladder Neck Suspension Results in 206 Patients, The Journal of Urology, pp. 845-846 (1992). |
Raz, Shlomo, Female Urology, pp. 80-86, 369-398, 435-442 (1996). |
Raz, Shlomo, MD, Modified Bladder Neck Suspension for Female Stress Incontinence, Urology, vol. XVII, No. 1, pp. 82-85 (Jan. 1981). |
Readjustable REMEEX® system, Neomedic International, 8 pages (no date). |
Richardson, David A. et al., Delayed Reaction to the Dacron Buttress Used in Urethropexy, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, pp. 689-692, vol. 29, No. 9 (Sep. 1984). |
Richter, K., Massive Eversion of the Vagina: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Therapy of the “True” Prolapse of the Vaginal Stump, Clin obstet gynecol, vol. 25, pp. 897-912 (1982). |
Ridley, John H., Appraisal of the Goebell-Frangenheim-Stoeckel Sling Procedure, American Journal Obst & Gynec., vol. 95, No. 5, pp. 741-721 (Jul. 1, 1986). |
Roberts, Henry, M.D., Cystourethrography in Women, Deptment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Liverpool, May 1952, vol. XXXV, No. 293, pp. 253-259. |
Sabre™ Bioabsorbable Sling, Generation Now, Mentor 4 pages (May 2002). |
Sabre™ Surgical Procedure, Mentor, 6 pages (Aug. 2002). |
Sanz, Luis E. et al., Modification of Abominal Sacrocolpopexy Using a Suture Anchor System, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 48, n. 7, pp. 496-500 (Jul. 2003). |
Seim, Arnfinn et al., A Study of Female Urinary Incontinence in General Practice—Demography, Medical History, and Clinical Findings, Scand J Urol Nephrol, vol. 30, pp. 465-472 (1996). |
Sergent, F. et al., Prosthetic Restoration of the Pelvic Diaphragm in Genital Urinary Prolapse Surgery: Transobturator and Infacoccygeal Hammock Technique, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol. 32, pp. 120-126 (Apr. 2003). |
Sloan W. R. et al., Stress Incontinence of Urine: A Retrospective Study of the Complications and Late Results of Simple Suprapubic Suburethral Fascial Slings, The Journal of Urology, vol. 110, pp. 533-536 (Nov. 1973). |
Spencer, Julia R. et al., A Comparison of Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck With Suprapubic Vesicourethropexy for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence, The Journal of Urology, vol. 137, pp. 411-415 (Mar. 1987). |
Stamey, Thomas A., M.D., Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence in Females, Ann. Surgery, vol. 192 No. 4, pp. 465-471 (Oct. 1980). |
Stanton, Stuart L., Suprapubic Approaches for Stress Incontinence in Women, Journal of American Geriatrics Society, vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 348-351 (Mar. 1990). |
Stanton, Stuart, Springer-Veglag, Surgery of Female Incontinence, pp. 105-113 (1986). |
Staskin et al., A Comparison Tensile Strength among Three Preparations of Irradiated and Non-Irradiated Human Fascia Lata Allografts (2 pages). |
Staskin, David R. et al., The Gore-Tex Sling Procedure for Female Sphincteric Incontinence: Indications, Technique, and Results, World Jornal of Urology, vol. 15, pp. 295-299 (1997). |
Studdiford, William E., Transplantation of Abdominal Fascia for the Relief of Urinary Stress Incontinence, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, pp. 764-775 (1994). |
Subak, Leslee L. et al. Cost of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the United States, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 98, n. 4, pp. 646-651 (Oct. 2001). |
Sullivan, Eugene S. et al., Total Pelvic Mesh Repair a Ten-Year Experience, Dis. Colon Rectum, vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 857-863 (Jun. 2001). |
Suport™, Sub-Urethral Perineal Retro-Pubic Tensionless Sling. Matrix Medical (Pty) Ltd, (no date), 1 pg. |
Swift, S.E., et al., Case-Control Study of Etiologic Factors in the Development of Sever Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Int Urogynecol J, vol. 12, pp. 187-192 (2001). |
T-Sling® (Totally Tension-free) Urinary Incontinence Procedure, Herniamesh, 2 pages (no date). |
TVT Tension-free Vaginal Tape, Gynecare, Ethicon, Inc., 23 pages (1999). |
Ulmsten, U. et al., A Multicenter Study of Tension-Free Vaginal Tape (TVT) for Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 9, pp. 210-213 (1998). |
Ulmsten, U. et al., An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure Under Local Anesthesia for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 7, pp. 81-86 (May 1996). |
Ulmsten, U., Female Urinary Incontinence—a Sympton, not a Urodynamic Disease. Some Theoretical and Practical Aspects on the Diagnosis a Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol 6, pp. 2-3 (1995). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., A Three Year Follow Up of Tension Free Vaginal Tape for Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 106, pp. 345-350 (1999). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., Different Biochemical Composition of Connective Tissue in Continent, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, pp. 455-457 (1987). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., Intravaginal Slinplasty (IVS): An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence, Scand J Urol Nephrol, vol. 29, pp. 75-82 (1995). |
Ulmsten, Ulf et al., The Unstable Female Urethra, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 144 No. 1 pp. 93-97 (Sep. 1, 1982). |
UroMed Access Instrument System for the Sub-urethral Sling Procedure Catalog No. 120235, Directions for Use, (3 pages). |
Vesica® Percutaneous Bladder Neck Stabilization Kit, A New Approach to Bladder Neck Suspenison, Microvasive® Boston Scientic Corporation, 4 pages (1995). |
Vesica® Sling Kits, Simplifying Sling Procedures, Microvasive® Bostion Scientific Corporation, 4 pages (1998). |
Villet, R., Reponse De R. Villet À L'Article De D. Dargent et al., Gynécolgie Obstétrique & Fertilité, vol. 31, p. 96 (2003). |
Visco, Anthony G. et al., Vaginal Mesh Erosion After Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 184, n. 3, pp. 297-302 (297-302). |
Walters, Mark D., Percutaneous Subrethral Slings: State of the Art, Presented at the conference of the American Urogynecologic Society, Chicago, 29 pages (Oct. 2001). |
Waxman, Steve et al., Advanced Urology Surgery for Urinary Incontinence, The Female Patient, pp. 93-100, vol. 21, (Mar. 1996). |
Weber, Anne M. et al., Anterior Vaginal Prolapse. Review of Anatomy and Techniques of Surgical Repair: Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 89, n. 2, pp. 311-318 (Feb. 1997). |
Webster, George D., Female Urinary Incontinence, Urologic Surgery, pp. 665-679. |
Webster, George et al., Voiding Dysfunction Following Cystourethropexy: Its Evaluation and Management, The Journal of Urology, vol. 144, pp. 670-673 (Sep. 1990). |
Winter, Chester C., Peripubic Urethropexy for Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women, Urology, vol. XX, No. 4, pp. 408-411 (Oct. 1982). |
Winters et al., Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy and Abdominal Enterocele Repair in the Management of Vaginal Vault Prolapse, Urology, vol. 56, supp. 6A, pp. 55-63 (2000). |
Woodside, Jeffrey R. et al., Suprapubic Endoscopic Vesical Neck Suspension for the Management of Urinary Incontinence in Myelodysplastic Girls, The Journal of Urology vol. 135 pp. 97-99 (Jan. 1986). |
Zacharin, Robert et al., Pulsion Enterocele: Long-Term Results of an Abdominoperineal Technique, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 55 No. 2, pp. 141-148 (Feb. 1980). |
Zacharin, Robert, The Suspensory Mechanism of the Female Urethra, Journal of Anatomy, vol. 97, Part 3, pp. 423-427 (1963). |
Zimmern, Phillippe E. et al., Four-Corner Bladder Neck Suspension, Vaginal Surgery for the Urologist vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 29-36 (Apr. 1994). |
Mouly, Patrick et al., Vaginal Reconstruction of a Complete Vaginal Prolapse: The Trans Obturator Repair, Journal of Urology, vol. 169, p. 183 (Apr. 2003). |
Pourdeyhimi, B, Porosity of Surgical Mesh Fabrics: New Technology, J. Biomed. Mater. Res.: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 23, No. A1, pp. 145-152 (1989). |
Drutz, H.P. et al., Clinical and Urodynamic Re-Evaluation of Combined Abdominovaginal Marlex Sling Operations for Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 1, pp. 70-73 (1990). |
Petros, Papa PE et al., An Integral Theory and Its Method for the Diagnosis and Management of Female Urinary Incontinence, Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology Supplement 153: p. 1 (1993). |
Horbach, Nicollette, Suburethral Sling Procedures, Genuine Stress Incontinence, Chapter 42, pp. 569-579. |
Henriksson, L., et al., “A Urodynamic Evaluation of the Effects of Abdominal Urethrocystopexy and Vaginal Sling Urethroplasty in Women With Stress Incontinence”, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol, vol. 131, No. 1, Mar. 1, 1978, pp. 77-82. |
Petros, et al., “The Autogenic Ligament Procedure: A Technique for Planned Formation of an Artificial Neo-Ligament”, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol. 69, Sup 153, 1990, pp. 43-51. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130006061 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61502694 | Jun 2011 | US |