This disclosure relates to processing of speech signals.
Applications for communication and/or storage of a voice signal typically use a microphone to capture an audio signal that includes the sound of a primary speaker's voice. The part of the audio signal that represents the voice is called the speech or speech component. The captured audio signal will usually also include other sound from the microphone's ambient acoustic environment, such as background sounds. This part of the audio signal is called the context or context component.
Transmission of audio information, such as speech and music, by digital techniques has become widespread, particularly in long distance telephony, packet-switched telephony such as Voice over IP (also called VoIP, where IP denotes Internet Protocol), and digital radio telephony such as cellular telephony. Such proliferation has created interest in reducing the amount of information used to transfer a voice communication over a transmission channel while maintaining the perceived quality of the reconstructed speech. For example, it is desirable to make the best use of available wireless system bandwidth. One way to use system bandwidth efficiently is to employ signal compression techniques. For wireless systems which carry speech signals, speech compression (or “speech coding”) techniques are commonly employed for this purpose.
Devices that are configured to compress speech by extracting parameters that relate to a model of human speech generation are often called voice coders, codecs, vocoders, “audio coders,” or “speech coders,” and the description that follows uses these terms interchangeably. A speech coder generally includes a speech encoder and a speech decoder. The encoder typically receives a digital audio signal as a series of blocks of samples called “frames,” analyzes each frame to extract certain relevant parameters, and quantizes the parameters into an encoded frame. The encoded frames are transmitted over a transmission channel (i.e., a wired or wireless network connection) to a receiver that includes a decoder. Alternatively, the encoded audio signal may be stored for retrieval and decoding at a later time. The decoder receives and processes encoded frames, dequantizes them to produce the parameters, and recreates speech frames using the dequantized parameters.
In a typical conversation, each speaker is silent for about sixty percent of the time. Speech encoders are usually configured to distinguish frames of the audio signal that contain speech (“active frames”) from frames of the audio signal that contain only context or silence (“inactive frames”). Such an encoder may be configured to use different coding modes and/or rates to encode active and inactive frames. For example, inactive frames are typically perceived as carrying little or no information, and speech encoders are usually configured to use fewer bits (i.e., a lower bit rate) to encode an inactive frame than to encode an active frame.
Examples of bit rates used to encode active frames include 171 bits per frame, eighty bits per frame, and forty bits per frame. Examples of bit rates used to encode inactive frames include sixteen bits per frame. In the context of cellular telephony systems (especially systems that are compliant with Interim Standard (IS)-95 as promulgated by the Telecommunications Industry Association, Arlington, Va., or a similar industry standard), these four bit rates are also referred to as “full rate,” “half rate,” “quarter rate,” and “eighth rate,” respectively.
This document describes a method of processing a digital audio signal that includes a first audio context. This method includes suppressing the first audio context from the digital audio signal, based on a first audio signal that is produced by a first microphone, to obtain a context-suppressed signal. This method also includes mixing a second audio context with a signal that is based on the context-suppressed signal to obtain a context-enhanced signal. In this method, the digital audio signal is based on a second audio signal that is produced by a second microphone different than the first microphone. This document also describes an apparatus, a combination of means, and a computer-readable medium relating to this method.
This document also describes a method of processing a digital audio signal that is based on a signal received from a first transducer. This method includes suppressing a first audio context from the digital audio signal to obtain a context-suppressed signal; mixing a second audio context with a signal that is based on the context-suppressed signal to obtain a context-enhanced signal; converting a signal that is based on at least one among (A) the second audio context and (B) the context-enhanced signal to an analog signal; and using a second transducer to produce an audible signal that is based on the analog signal. In this method, both of the first and second transducers are located within a common housing. This document also describes an apparatus, a combination of means, and a computer-readable medium relating to this method.
This document also describes a method of processing an encoded audio signal. This method includes decoding a first plurality of encoded frames of the encoded audio signal according to a first coding scheme to obtain a first decoded audio signal that includes a speech component and a context component; decoding a second plurality of encoded frames of the encoded audio signal according to a second coding scheme to obtain a second decoded audio signal; and, based on information from the second decoded audio signal, suppressing the context component from a third signal that is based on the first decoded audio signal to obtain a context-suppressed signal. This document also describes an apparatus, a combination of means, and a computer-readable medium relating to this method.
This document also describes a method of processing a digital audio signal that includes a speech component and a context component. This method includes suppressing the context component from the digital audio signal to obtain a context-suppressed signal; encoding a signal that is based on the context-suppressed signal to obtain an encoded audio signal; selecting one among a plurality of audio contexts; and inserting information relating to the selected audio context into a signal that is based on the encoded audio signal. This document also describes an apparatus, a combination of means, and a computer-readable medium relating to this method.
This document also describes a method of processing a digital audio signal that includes a speech component and a context component. This method includes suppressing the context component from the digital audio signal to obtain a context-suppressed signal; encoding a signal that is based on the context-suppressed signal to obtain an encoded audio signal; over a first logical channel, sending the encoded audio signal to a first entity; and, over a second logical channel different than the first logical channel, sending to a second entity (A) audio context selection information and (B) information identifying the first entity. This document also describes an apparatus, a combination of means, and a computer-readable medium relating to this method.
This document also describes a method of processing an encoded audio signal. This method includes, within a mobile user terminal, decoding the encoded audio signal to obtain a decoded audio signal; within the mobile user terminal, generating an audio context signal; and, within the mobile user terminal, mixing a signal that is based on the audio context signal with a signal that is based on the decoded audio signal. This document also describes an apparatus, a combination of means, and a computer-readable medium relating to this method.
This document also describes a method of processing a digital audio signal that includes a speech component and a context component. This method includes suppressing the context component from the digital audio signal to obtain a context-suppressed signal; generating an audio context signal that is based on a first filter and a first plurality of sequences, each of the first plurality of sequences having a different time resolution; and mixing a first signal that is based on the generated audio context signal with a second signal that is based on the context-suppressed signal to obtain a context-enhanced signal. In this method, generating an audio context signal includes applying the first filter to each of the first plurality of sequences. This document also describes an apparatus, a combination of means, and a computer-readable medium relating to this method.
This document also describes a method of processing a digital audio signal that includes a speech component and a context component. This method includes suppressing the context component from the digital audio signal to obtain a context-suppressed signal; generating an audio context signal; mixing a first signal that is based on the generated audio context signal with a second signal that is based on the context-suppressed signal to obtain a context-enhanced signal; and calculating a level of a third signal that is based on the digital audio signal. In this method, at least one among the generating and the mixing includes controlling, based on the calculated level of the third signal, a level of the first signal. This document also describes an apparatus, a combination of means, and a computer-readable medium relating to this method.
This document also describes a method of processing a digital audio signal according to a state of a process control signal, where the digital audio signal has a speech component and a context component. This method includes encoding frames of a part of the digital audio signal that lacks the speech component at a first bit rate when the process control signal has a first state. This method includes suppressing the context component from the digital audio signal, when the process control signal has a second state different than the first state, to obtain a context-suppressed signal. This method includes mixing an audio context signal with a signal that is based on the context-suppressed signal, when the process control signal has the second state, to obtain a context-enhanced signal. This method includes encoding frames of a part of the context-enhanced signal that lacks the speech component at a second bit rate when the process control signal has the second state, where the second bit rate is higher than the first bit rate. This document also describes an apparatus, a combination of means, and a computer-readable medium relating to this method.
In these figures, the same reference labels refer to the same or analogous elements.
Although the speech component of an audio signal typically carries the primary information, the context component also serves an important role in voice communications applications such as telephony. As the context component is present during both active and inactive frames, its continued reproduction during inactive frames is important to provide a sense of continuity and connectedness at the receiver. The reproduction quality of the context component may also be important for naturalness and overall perceived quality, especially for hands-free terminals which are used in noisy environments.
Mobile user terminals such as cellular telephones allow voice communications applications to be extended into more locations than ever before. As a consequence, the number of different audio contexts that may be encountered is increasing. Existing voice communications applications typically treat the context component as noise, although some contexts are more structured than others and may be harder to encode recognizably.
In some cases, it may be desirable to suppress and/or mask the context component of an audio signal. For security reasons, for example, it may be desirable to remove the context component from the audio signal before transmission or storage. Alternatively, it may be desirable to add a different context to the audio signal. For example, it may be desirable to create an illusion that the speaker is at a different location and/or in a different environment. Configurations disclosed herein include systems, methods, and apparatus that may be applied in a voice communications and/or storage application to remove, enhance, and/or replace the existing audio context. It is expressly contemplated and hereby disclosed that the configurations disclosed herein may be adapted for use in networks that are packet-switched (for example, wired and/or wireless networks arranged to carry voice transmissions according to protocols such as VoIP) and/or circuit-switched. It is also expressly contemplated and hereby disclosed that the configurations disclosed herein may be adapted for use in narrowband coding systems (e.g., systems that encode an audio frequency range of about four or five kilohertz) and for use in wideband coding systems (e.g., systems that encode audio frequencies greater than five kilohertz), including whole-band coding systems and split-band coding systems.
Unless expressly limited by its context, the term “signal” is used herein to indicate any of its ordinary meanings, including a state of a memory location (or set of memory locations) as expressed on a wire, bus, or other transmission medium. Unless expressly limited by its context, the term “generating” is used herein to indicate any of its ordinary meanings, such as computing or otherwise producing. Unless expressly limited by its context, the term “calculating” is used herein to indicate any of its ordinary meanings, such as computing, evaluating, and/or selecting from a set of values. Unless expressly limited by its context, the term “obtaining” is used to indicate any of its ordinary meanings, such as calculating, deriving, receiving (e.g., from an external device), and/or retrieving (e.g., from an array of storage elements). Where the term “comprising” is used in the present description and claims, it does not exclude other elements or operations. The term “based on” (as in “A is based on B”) is used to indicate any of its ordinary meanings, including the cases (i) “based on at least” (e.g., “A is based on at least B”) and, if appropriate in the particular context, (ii) “equal to” (e.g., “A is equal to B”).
Unless indicated otherwise, any disclosure of an operation of an apparatus having a particular feature is also expressly intended to disclose a method having an analogous feature (and vice versa), and any disclosure of an operation of an apparatus according to a particular configuration is also expressly intended to disclose a method according to an analogous configuration (and vice versa). Unless indicated otherwise, the term “context” (or “audio context”) is used to indicate a component of an audio signal that is different than the speech component and conveys audio information from the ambient environment of the speaker, and the term “noise” is used to indicate any other artifact in the audio signal that is not part of the speech component and does not convey information from the ambient environment of the speaker.
For speech coding purposes, a speech signal is typically digitized (or quantized) to obtain a stream of samples. The digitization process may be performed in accordance with any of various methods known in the art including, for example, pulse code modulation (PCM), companded mu-law PCM, and companded A-law PCM. Narrowband speech encoders typically use a sampling rate of 8 kHz, while wideband speech encoders typically use a higher sampling rate (e.g., 12 or 16 kHz).
The digitized speech signal is processed as a series of frames. This series is usually implemented as a nonoverlapping series, although an operation of processing a frame or a segment of a frame (also called a subframe) may also include segments of one or more neighboring frames in its input. The frames of a speech signal are typically short enough that the spectral envelope of the signal may be expected to remain relatively stationary over the frame. A frame typically corresponds to between five and thirty-five milliseconds of the speech signal (or about forty to 200 samples), with ten, twenty, and thirty milliseconds being common frame sizes. Typically all frames have the same length, and a uniform frame length is assumed in the particular examples described herein. However, it is also expressly contemplated and hereby disclosed that nonuniform frame lengths may be used.
A frame length of twenty milliseconds corresponds to 140 samples at a sampling rate of seven kilohertz (kHz), 160 samples at a sampling rate of eight kHz, and 320 samples at a sampling rate of 16 kHz, although any sampling rate deemed suitable for the particular application may be used. Another example of a sampling rate that may be used for speech coding is 12.8 kHz, and further examples include other rates in the range of from 12.8 kHz to 38.4 kHz.
Coding scheme selector 20 is configured to distinguish active frames of audio signal S10 from inactive frames. Such an operation is also called “voice activity detection” or “speech activity detection,” and coding scheme selector 20 may be implemented to include a voice activity detector or speech activity detector. For example, coding scheme selector 20 may be configured to output a binary-valued coding scheme selection signal that is high for active frames and low for inactive frames.
Coding scheme selector 20 may be configured to classify a frame as active or inactive based on one or more characteristics of the energy and/or spectral content of the frame such as frame energy, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), periodicity, spectral distribution (e.g., spectral tilt), and/or zero-crossing rate. Such classification may include comparing a value or magnitude of such a characteristic to a threshold value and/or comparing the magnitude of a change in such a characteristic (e.g., relative to the preceding frame) to a threshold value. For example, coding scheme selector 20 may be configured to evaluate the energy of the current frame and to classify the frame as inactive if the energy value is less than (alternatively, not greater than) a threshold value. Such a selector may be configured to calculate the frame energy as a sum of the squares of the frame samples.
Another implementation of coding scheme selector 20 is configured to evaluate the energy of the current frame in each of a low-frequency band (e.g., 300 Hz to 2 kHz) and a high-frequency band (e.g., 2 kHz to 4 kHz) and to indicate that the frame is inactive if the energy value for each band is less than (alternatively, not greater than) a respective threshold value. Such a selector may be configured to calculate the frame energy in a band by applying a passband filter to the frame and calculating a sum of the squares of the samples of the filtered frame. One example of such a voice activity detection operation is described in section 4.7 of the Third Generation Partnership Project 2 (3GPP2) standards document C.S0014-C, v10 (January 2007), available online at www-dot-3gpp2-dot-org.
Additionally or in the alternative, such classification may be based on information from one or more previous frames and/or one or more subsequent frames. For example, it may be desirable to classify a frame based on a value of a frame characteristic that is averaged over two or more frames. It may be desirable to classify a frame using a threshold value that is based on information from a previous frame (e.g., background noise level, SNR). It may also be desirable to configure coding scheme selector 20 to classify as active one or more of the first frames that follow a transition in audio signal S10 from active frames to inactive frames. The act of continuing a previous classification state in such manner after a transition is also called a “hangover”.
Active frame encoder 30 is configured to encode active frames of the audio signal. Encoder 30 may be configured to encode active frames according to a bit rate such as full rate, half rate, or quarter rate. Encoder 30 may be configured to encode active frames according to a coding mode such as code-excited linear prediction (CELP), prototype waveform interpolation (PWI), or prototype pitch period (PPP).
A typical implementation of active frame encoder 30 is configured to produce an encoded frame that includes a description of spectral information and a description of temporal information. The description of spectral information may include one or more vectors of linear prediction coding (LPC) coefficient values, which indicate the resonances of the encoded speech (also called “formants”). The description of spectral information is typically quantized, such that the LPC vector or vectors are usually converted into a form that may be quantized efficiently, such as line spectral frequencies (LSFs), line spectral pairs (LSPs), immittance spectral frequencies (ISFs), immittance spectral pairs (ISPs), cepstral coefficients, or log area ratios. The description of temporal information may include a description of an excitation signal, which is also typically quantized.
Inactive frame encoder 40 is configured to encode inactive frames. Inactive frame encoder 40 is typically configured to encode the inactive frames at a lower bit rate than the bit rate used by active frame encoder 30. In one example, inactive frame encoder 40 is configured to encode inactive frames at eighth rate using a noise-excited linear prediction (NELP) coding scheme. Inactive frame encoder 40 may also be configured to perform discontinuous transmission (DTX), such that encoded frames (also called “silence description” or SID frames) are transmitted for fewer than all of the inactive frames of audio signal S10.
A typical implementation of inactive frame encoder 40 is configured to produce an encoded frame that includes a description of spectral information and a description of temporal information. The description of spectral information may include one or more vectors of linear prediction coding (LPC) coefficient values. The description of spectral information is typically quantized, such that the LPC vector or vectors are usually converted into a form that may be quantized efficiently, as in the examples above. Inactive frame encoder 40 may be configured to perform an LPC analysis having an order that is lower than the order of an LPC analysis performed by active frame encoder 30, and/or inactive frame encoder 40 may be configured to quantize the description of spectral information into fewer bits than a quantized description of spectral information produced by active frame encoder 30. The description of temporal information may include a description of a temporal envelope (e.g., including a gain value for the frame and/or a gain value for each of a series of subframes of the frame), which is also typically quantized.
It is noted that encoders 30 and 40 may share common structure. For example, encoders 30 and 40 may share a calculator of LPC coefficient values (possibly configured to produce a result having a different order for active frames than for inactive frames) but have respectively different temporal description calculators. It is also noted that a software or firmware implementation of speech encoder X10 may use the output of coding scheme selector 20 to direct the flow of execution to one or another of the frame encoders, and that such an implementation may not include an analog for selector 50a and/or for selector 50b.
It may be desirable to configure coding scheme selector 20 to classify each active frame of audio signal S10 as one of several different types. These different types may include frames of voiced speech (e.g., speech representing a vowel sound), transitional frames (e.g., frames that represent the beginning or end of a word), and frames of unvoiced speech (e.g., speech representing a fricative sound). The frame classification may be based on one or more features of the current frame, and/or of one or more previous frames, such as frame energy, frame energy in each of two or more different frequency bands, SNR, periodicity, spectral tilt, and/or zero-crossing rate. Such classification may include comparing a value or magnitude of such a factor to a threshold value and/or comparing the magnitude of a change in such a factor to a threshold value.
It may be desirable to configure speech encoder X10 to use different coding bit rates to encode different types of active frames (for example, to balance network demand and capacity). Such operation is called “variable-rate coding.” For example, it may be desirable to configure speech encoder X10 to encode a transitional frame at a higher bit rate (e.g., full rate), to encode an unvoiced frame at a lower bit rate (e.g., quarter rate), and to encode a voiced frame at an intermediate bit rate (e.g., half rate) or at a higher bit rate (e.g., full rate).
Additionally or in the alternative, it may be desirable to configure speech encoder X10 to use different coding modes to encode different types of speech frames. Such operation is called “multi-mode coding.” For example, frames of voiced speech tend to have a periodic structure that is long-term (i.e., that continues for more than one frame period) and is related to pitch, and it is typically more efficient to encode a voiced frame (or a sequence of voiced frames) using a coding mode that encodes a description of this long-term spectral feature. Examples of such coding modes include CELP, PWI, and PPP. Unvoiced frames and inactive frames, on the other hand, usually lack any significant long-term spectral feature, and a speech encoder may be configured to encode these frames using a coding mode that does not attempt to describe such a feature, such as NELP.
It may be desirable to implement speech encoder X10 to use multi-mode coding such that frames are encoded using different modes according to a classification based on, for example, periodicity or voicing. It may also be desirable to implement speech encoder X10 to use different combinations of bit rates and coding modes (also called “coding schemes”) for different types of active frames. One example of such an implementation of speech encoder X10 uses a full-rate CELP scheme for frames containing voiced speech and transitional frames, a half-rate NELP scheme for frames containing unvoiced speech, and an eighth-rate NELP scheme for inactive frames. Other examples of such implementations of speech encoder X10 support multiple coding rates for one or more coding schemes, such as full-rate and half-rate CELP schemes and/or full-rate and quarter-rate PPP schemes. Examples of multi-scheme encoders, decoders, and coding techniques are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,330,532, entitled “METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR MAINTAINING A TARGET BIT RATE IN A SPEECH CODER,” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,691,084, entitled “VARIABLE RATE SPEECH CODING”; and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/191,643, entitled “CLOSED-LOOP VARIABLE-RATE MULTIMODE PREDICTIVE SPEECH CODER,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/625,788, entitled “ARBITRARY AVERAGE DATA RATES FOR VARIABLE RATE CODERS.”
One or more among the frame encoders of speech encoder X20 may share common structure. For example, such encoders may share a calculator of LPC coefficient values (possibly configured to produce results having different orders for different classes of frames) but have respectively different temporal description calculators. For example, encoders 30a and 30b may have different excitation signal calculators.
As shown in
As shown in
Context suppressor 110 may be configured to perform a spectral subtraction operation on the audio signal. Spectral subtraction may be expected to suppress a context component that has stationary statistics but may not be effective to suppress contexts that are nonstationary. Spectral subtraction may be used in applications having one microphone as well as applications in which signals from multiple microphones are available. In a typical example, such an implementation of context suppressor 110 is configured to analyze inactive frames of the audio signal to derive a statistical description of the existing context, such as an energy level of the context component in each of a number of frequency subbands (also referred to as “frequency bins”), and to apply a corresponding frequency-selective gain to the audio signal (e.g., to attenuate the audio signal over each of the frequency subbands based on the corresponding context energy level). Other examples of spectral subtraction operations are described in S. F. Boll, “Suppression of Acoustic Noise in Speech Using Spectral Subtraction,” IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 27(2): 112-120, April 1979; R. Mukai, S. Araki, H. Sawada and S. Makino, “Removal of residual crosstalk components in blind source separation using LMS filters,” Proc. of 12th IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing, pp. 435-444, Martigny, Switzerland, September 2002; and R. Mukai, S. Araki, H. Sawada and S. Makino, “Removal of residual cross-talk components in blind source separation using time-delayed spectral subtraction,” Proc. of ICASSP 2002, pp. 1789-1792, May 2002.
Additionally or in an alternative implementation, context suppressor 110 may be configured to perform a blind source separation (BSS, also called independent component analysis) operation on the audio signal. Blind source separation may be used for applications in which signals from one or more microphones (in addition to the microphone used for capturing audio signal S10) are available. Blind source separation may be expected to suppress contexts that are stationary as well as contexts that have nonstationary statistics. One example of a BSS operation as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,167,417 (Parra et al.) uses a gradient descent method to calculate coefficients of a filter used to separate the source signals. Other examples of BSS operations are described in S. Amari, A. Cichocki, and H. H. Yang, “A new learning algorithm for blind signal separation,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8, MIT Press, 1996; L. Molgedey and H. G. Schuster, “Separation of a mixture of independent signals using time delayed correlations,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 72(23): 3634-3637, 1994; and L. Parra and C. Spence, “Convolutive blind source separation of non-stationary sources”, IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio Processing, 8(3): 320-327, May 2000. Additionally or in an alternative to the implementations discussed above, context suppressor 100 may be configured to perform a beamforming operation. Examples of beamforming operations are disclosed in, for example, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/864,897 referenced above and H. Saruwatari et al., “Blind Source Separation Combining Independent Component Analysis and Beamforming,” EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, 2003:11, 1135-1146 (2003).
Microphones that are located near to each other, such as microphones mounted within a common housing such as the casing of a cellular telephone or hands-free device, may produce signals that have high instantaneous correlation. A person of ordinary kill in the art would also recognize that one or more microphones may be placed in a microphone housing within the common housing (i.e., the casing of the entire devide). Such correlation may degrade the performance of a BSS operation, and in such cases it may be desirable to decorrelate the audio signals before the BSS operation. Decorrelation is also typically effective for echo cancellation. A decorrelator may be implemented as a filter (possibly an adaptive filter) having five or fewer taps, or even three or fewer taps. The tap weights of such a filter may be fixed or may be selected according to correlation properties of the input audio signal, and it may be desirable to implement a decorrelation filter using a lattice filter structure. Such an implementation of context suppressor 110 may be configured to perform a separate decorrelation operation on each of two or more different frequency subbands of the audio signal.
An implementation of context suppressor 110 may be configured to perform one or more additional processing operations on at least the separated speech component after a BSS operation. For example, it may be desirable for context suppressor 110 to perform a decorrelation operation on at least the separated speech component. Such an operation may be performed separately on each of two or more different frequency subbands of the separated speech component.
Additionally or in the alternative, an implementation of context suppressor 110 may be configured to perform a nonlinear processing operation on the separated speech component, such as spectral subtraction based on the separated context component. Spectral subtraction, which may further suppress the existing context from the speech component, may be implemented as a frequency-selective gain that varies over time according to the level of a corresponding frequency subband of the separated context component.
Additionally or in the alternative, an implementation of context suppressor 110 may be configured to perform a center clipping operation on the separated speech component. Such an operation typically applies a gain to the signal that varies over time in proportion to signal level and/or to speech activity level. One example of a center clipping operation may be expressed as y[n]={0 for |x[n]|<C; x[n] otherwise}, where x[n] is the input sample, y[n] is the output sample, and C is the value of the clipping threshold. Another example of a center clipping operation may be expressed as y[n]={0 for |x[n]|<C, sgn(x[n])(|x[n]|−C) otherwise}, where sgn(x[n]) indicates the sign of x[n].
It may be desirable to configure context suppressor 110 to remove the existing context component substantially completely from the audio signal. For example, it may be desirable for apparatus X100 to replace the existing context component with a generated context signal S50 that is dissimilar to the existing context component. In such case, substantially complete removal of the existing context component may help to reduce audible interference in the decoded audio signal between the existing context component and the replacement context signal. In another example, it may be desirable for apparatus X100 to be configured to conceal the existing context component, whether or not a generated context signal S50 is also added to the audio signal.
It may be desirable to implement context processor 100 to be configurable among two or more different modes of operation. For example, it may be desirable to provide for (A) a first mode of operation in which context processor 100 is configured to pass the audio signal with the existing context component remaining substantially unchanged and (B) a second mode of operation in which context processor 100 is configured to remove the existing context component substantially completely (possibly replacing it with a generated context signal S50). Support for such a first mode of operation (which may be configured as the default mode) may be useful for allowing backward compatibility of a device that includes apparatus X100. In the first mode of operation, context processor 100 may be configured to perform a noise suppression operation on the audio signal (e.g., as described above with reference to noise suppressor 10) to produce a noise-suppressed audio signal.
Further implementations of context processor 100 may be similarly configured to support more than two modes of operation. For example, such a further implementation may be configurable to vary the degree to which the existing context component is suppressed, according to a selectable one of three or more modes in the range of from at least substantially no context suppression (e.g., noise suppression only), to partial context suppression, to at least substantially complete context suppression.
Context suppressor 112 may be implemented such that in its first mode of operation, one or more elements that are configured to perform a context suppression operation on the audio signal (e.g., one or more software and/or firmware routines) are bypassed. Alternatively or additionally, context suppressor 112 may be implemented to operate in different modes by changing one or more threshold values of such a context suppression operation (e.g., a spectral subtraction and/or BSS operation). For example, context suppressor 112 may be configured in the first mode to apply a first set of threshold values to perform a noise suppression operation, and may be configured in the second mode to apply a second set of threshold values to perform a context suppression operation.
Process control signal S30 may be used to control one or more other elements of context processor 104.
As noted above, speech encoder X10 may be configured to select from among two or more frame encoders according to one or more characteristics of audio signal S10. Likewise, within an implementation of apparatus X100, coding scheme selector 20 may be variously implemented to produce an encoder selection signal according to one or more characteristics of audio signal S10, context-suppressed audio signal S13, and/or context-enhanced audio signal S15.
It may be desirable to implement apparatus X100 to perform noise suppression and context suppression as separate operations. For example, it may be desirable to add an implementation of context processor 100 to a device having an existing implementation of speech encoder X20 without removing, disabling, or bypassing noise suppressor 10.
Context suppressor 110 may also be configured to include noise suppressor 10 or may otherwise be selectably configured to perform noise suppression on audio signal S10. For example, it may be desirable for apparatus X100 to perform, according to a state of process control signal S30, either context suppression (in which the existing context is substantially completely removed from audio signal S10) or noise suppression (in which the existing context remains substantially unchanged). In general, context suppressor 110 may also be configured to perform one or more other processing operations (such as a filtering operation) on audio signal S10 before performing context suppression and/or on the resulting audio signal after performing context suppression.
As noted above, existing speech encoders typically use low bit rates and/or DTX to encode inactive frames. Consequently, the encoded inactive frames typically contain little contextual information. Depending on the particular context indicated by context selection signal S40 and/or the particular implementation of context generator 120, the sound quality and information content of generated context signal S50 may be greater than that of the original context. In such cases, it may be desirable to use a higher bit rate to encode inactive frames that include generated context signal S50 than the bit rate that is used to encode inactive frames that include only the original context.
It is expressly noted that the features of two or more active frame encoders and corresponding implementations of coding scheme selector 20 and selectors 50a, 50b as described with reference to
Context generator 120 is configured to produce a generated context signal S50 according to a state of a context selection signal S40. Context mixer 190 is configured and arranged to mix context-suppressed audio signal S13 with generated context signal S50 to produce context-enhanced audio signal S15. In one example, context mixer 190 is implemented as an adder that is arranged to add generated context signal S50 to context-suppressed audio signal S13. It may be desirable for context generator 120 to produce generated context signal S50 in a form that is compatible with the context-suppressed audio signal. In a typical implementation of apparatus X100, for example, generated context signal S50 and the audio signal produced by context suppressor 110 are both sequences of PCM samples. In such case, context mixer 190 may be configured to add corresponding pairs of samples of generated context signal S50 and context-suppressed audio signal S13 (possibly as a frame-based operation), although it is also possible to implement context mixer 190 to add signals having different sampling resolutions. Audio signal S10 is generally also implemented as a sequence of PCM samples. In some cases, context mixer 190 is configured to perform one or more other processing operations (such as a filtering operation) on the context-enhanced signal.
Context selection signal S40 indicates a selection of at least one among two or more contexts. In one example, context selection signal S40 indicates a context selection that is based on one or more features of the existing context. For example, context selection signal S40 may be based on information relating to one or more temporal and/or frequency characteristics of one or more inactive frames of audio signal S10. Coding mode selector 20 may be configured to produce context selection signal S40 in such manner. Alternatively, apparatus X100 may be implemented to include a context classifier 320 (e.g., as shown in
In another example, context selection signal S40 indicates a context selection that is based on one or more other criteria, such as information relating to a physical location of a device that includes apparatus X100 (e.g., based on information obtained from a Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) system, calculated via a triangulation or other ranging operation, and/or received from a base station transceiver or other server), a schedule that associates different times or time periods with corresponding contexts, and a user-selected context mode (such as a business mode, a soothing mode, a party mode). In such cases, apparatus X100 may be implemented to include a context selector 330 (e.g., as shown in
Context database 130 is configured to store two or more sets of parameter values that describe corresponding contexts. Other implementations of context generator 120 may include an implementation of context generation engine 140 that is configured to download a set of parameter values corresponding to a selected context from a content provider such as a server (e.g., using a version of the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), as currently described in RFC 3261, available online at www-dot-ietf-dot-org) or other non-local database or from a peer-to-peer network (e.g., as described in Cheng et al., “A Collaborative Privacy-Enhanced Alibi Phone,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Grid and Pervasive Computing, pp. 405-414, Taichung, TW, May 2006).
Context generator 120 may be configured to retrieve or download a context in the form of a sampled digital signal (e.g., as a sequence of PCM samples). Because of storage and/or bit rate limitations, however, such a context would likely be much shorter than a typical communications session (e.g., a telephone call), requiring the same context to be repeated over and over again during a call and leading to an unacceptably distracting result for the listener. Alternatively, a large amount of storage and/or a high-bit-rate download connection would likely be needed to avoid an overly repetitive result.
Alternatively, context generation engine 140 may be configured to generate a context from a retrieved or downloaded parametric representation, such as a set of spectral and/or energy parameter values. For example, context generation engine 140 may be configured to generate multiple frames of context signal S50 based on a description of a spectral envelope (e.g., a vector of LSF values) and a description of an excitation signal, as may be included in a SID frame. Such an implementation of context generation engine 140 may be configured to randomize the set of parameter values from frame to frame to reduce a perception of repetition of the generated context.
It may be desirable for context generation engine 140 to produce generated context signal S50 based on a template that describes a sound texture. In one such example, context generation engine 140 is configured to perform a granular synthesis based on a template that includes a plurality of natural grains of different lengths. In another example, context generation engine 140 is configured to perform a cascade time-frequency linear prediction (CTFLP) synthesis based on a template that includes time-domain and frequency-domain coefficients of a CTFLP analysis (in a CTFLP analysis, the original signal is modeled using linear prediction in the frequency domain, and the residual of this analysis is then modeled using linear prediction in the frequency domain). In a further example, context generation engine 140 is configured to perform a multiresolution synthesis based on a template that includes a multiresolution analysis (MRA) tree, which describes coefficients of at least one basis function (e.g., coefficients of a scaling function, such as a Daubechies scaling function, and coefficients of a wavelet function, such as a Daubechies wavelet function) at different time and frequency scales.
It may be desirable for context generation engine 140 to produce generated context signal S50 according to an expected length of the voice communication session. In one such example, context generation engine 140 is configured to produce generated context signal S50 according to an average telephone call length. Typical values for average call length are in the range of from one to four minutes, and context generation engine 140 may be implemented to use a default value (e.g., two minutes) that may be varied upon user selection.
It may be desirable for context generation engine 140 to produce generated context signal S50 to include several or many different context signal clips that are based on the same template. The desired number of different clips may be set to a default value or selected by a user of apparatus X100, and a typical range of this number is from five to twenty. In one such example, context generation engine 140 is configured to calculate each of the different clips according to a clip length that is based on the average call length and the desired number of different clips. The clip length is typically one, two, or three orders of magnitude greater than the frame length. In one example, the average call length value is two minutes, the desired number of different clips is ten, and the clip length is calculated as twelve seconds by dividing two minutes by ten.
In such cases, context generation engine 140 may be configured to generate the desired number of different clips, each being based on the same template and having the calculated clip length, and to concatenate or otherwise combine these clips to produce generated context signal S50. Context generation engine 140 may be configured to repeat generated context signal S50 if necessary (e.g., if the length of the communication should exceed the average call length). It may be desirable to configure context generation engine 140 to generate a new clip according to a transition in audio signal S10 from voiced to unvoiced frames.
Task T200 may be configured to generate the context signal clips from a template that includes an MRA tree. For example, task T200 may be configured to generate each clip by generating a new MRA tree that is statistically similar to the template tree and synthesizing the context signal clip from the new tree. In such case, task T200 may be configured to generate a new MRA tree as a copy of the template tree in which one or more (possibly all) of the coefficients of one or more (possibly all) of the sequences are replaced with other coefficients of the template tree that have similar ancestors (i.e., in sequences at lower resolution) and/or predecessors (i.e., in the same sequence). In another example, task T200 is configured to generate each clip from a new set of coefficient values that is calculated by adding a small random value to each value of a copy of a template set of coefficient values.
Task T200 may be configured to scale one or more (possibly all) of the context signal clips according to one or more features of audio signal S10 and/or of a signal based thereon (e.g., signal S12 and/or S13). Such features may include signal level, frame energy, SNR, one or more mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), and/or one or more results of a voice activity detection operation on the signal or signals. For a case in which task T200 is configured to synthesize the clips from generated MRA trees, task T200 may be configured to perform such scaling on coefficients of the generated MRA trees. An implementation of context generator 120 may be configured to perform such an implementation of task T200. Additionally or in the alternative, task T300 may be configured to perform such scaling on the combined generated context signal. An implementation of context mixer 190 may be configured to perform such an implementation of task T300.
Task T300 may be configured to combine the context signal clips according to a measure of similarity. Task T300 may be configured to concatenate clips that have similar MFCC vectors (e.g., to concatenate clips according to relative similarities of MFCC vectors over the set of candidate clips). For example, task T200 may be configured to minimize a total distance, calculated over the string of combined clips, between MFCC vectors of adjacent clips. For a case in which task T200 is configured to perform a CTFLP synthesis, task T300 may be configured to concatenate or otherwise combine clips generated from similar coefficients. For example, task T200 may be configured to minimize a total distance, calculated over the string of combined clips, between LPC coefficients of adjacent clips. Task T300 may also be configured to concatenate clips that have similar boundary transients (e.g., to avoid an audible discontinuity from one clip to the next). For example, task T200 may be configured to minimize a total distance, calculated over the string of combined clips, between energies over boundary regions of adjacent clips. In any of these examples, task T300 may be configured to combine adjacent clips using an overlap-and-add or cross-fade operation rather than concatenation.
As described above, context generation engine 140 may be configured to produce generated context signal S50 based on a description of a sound texture, which may be downloaded or retrieved in a compact representation form that allows low storage cost and extended non-repetitive generation. Such techniques may also be applied to video or audiovisual applications. For example, a video-capable implementation of apparatus X100 may be configured to perform a multiresolution synthesis operation to enhance or replace the visual context (e.g., the background and/or lighting characteristics) of an audiovisual communication, based on a set of parameter values that describe a replacement background.
Context generation engine 140 may be configured to repeatedly generate random MRA trees throughout the communications session (e.g., the telephone call). The depth of the MRA tree may be selected based on a tolerance to delay, as a larger tree may be expected to take longer to generate. In another example, context generation engine 140 may be configured to generate multiple short MRA trees using different templates, and/or to select multiple random MRA trees, and to mix and/or concatenate two or more of these trees to obtain a longer sequence of samples.
It may be desirable to configure apparatus X100 to control the level of generated context signal S50 according to a state of a gain control signal S90. For example, context generator 120 (or an element thereof, such as context generation engine 140) may be configured to produce generated context signal S50 at a particular level according to a state of gain control signal S90, possibly by performing a scaling operation on generated context signal S50 or on a precursor of signal S50 (e.g., on coefficients of a template tree or of an MRA tree generated from a template tree). In another example,
A device that includes apparatus X100 may be configured to set the state of gain control signal S90 according to a user selection. For example, such a device may be equipped with a volume control by which a user of the device may select a desired level of generated context signal S50 (e.g., a switch or knob, or a graphical user interface providing such functionality). In this case, the device may be configured to set the state of gain control signal S90 according to the selected level. In another example, such a volume control may be configured to allow the user to select a desired level of generated context signal S50 relative to a level of the speech component (e.g., of context-suppressed audio signal S13).
Apparatus X100 may be configured to control the level of generated context signal S50 relative to a level of one or more of audio signals S10, S12, and S13, which may change over time. In one example, apparatus X100 is configured to control the level of generated context signal S50 according to the level of the original context of audio signal S10. Such an implementation of apparatus X100 may include an implementation of gain control signal calculator 195 that is configured to calculate gain control signal S90 according to a relation (e.g., a difference) between input and output levels of context suppressor 110 during active frames. For example, such a gain control calculator may be configured to calculate gain control signal S90 according to a relation (e.g., a difference) between a level of audio signal S10 and a level of context-suppressed audio signal S13. Such a gain control calculator may be configured to calculate gain control signal S90 according to an SNR of audio signal S10, which may be calculated from levels of active frames of signals S10 and S13. Such a gain control signal calculator may be configured to calculate gain control signal S90 based on an input level that is smoothed (e.g., averaged) over time and/or may be configured to output a gain control signal S90 that is smoothed (e.g., averaged) over time.
In another example, apparatus X100 is configured to control the level of generated context signal S50 according to a desired SNR. The SNR, which may be characterized as a ratio between the level of the speech component (e.g., context-suppressed audio signal S13) and the level of generated context signal S50 in active frames of context-enhanced audio signal S15, may also be referred to as a “signal-to-context ratio.” The desired SNR value may be user-selected and/or may vary from one generated context to another. For example, different generated context signals S50 may be associated with different corresponding desired SNR values. A typical range of desired SNR values is from 20 to 25 dB. In another example, apparatus X100 is configured to control the level of generated context signal S50 (e.g., a background signal) to be less than the level of context-suppressed audio signal S13 (e.g., a foreground signal).
As described above, gain control signal calculator 195 is configured to calculate a state of gain control signal S90 according to a level of each of one or more input signals (e.g., S10, S13, S50). Gain control signal calculator 195 may be configured to calculate the level of an input signal as the amplitude of the signal averaged over one or more active frames. Alternatively, gain control signal calculator 195 may be configured to calculate the level of an input signal as the energy of the signal averaged over one or more active frames. Typically the energy of a frame is calculated as the sum of the squared samples of the frame. It may be desirable to configure gain control signal calculator 195 to filter (e.g., to average or smooth) one or more of the calculated levels and/or gain control signal S90. For example, it may be desirable to configure gain control signal calculator 195 to calculate a running average of the frame energy of an input signal such as S10 or S13 (e.g., by applying a first-order or higher-order finite-impulse-response or infinite-impulse-response filter to the calculated frame energy of the signal) and to use the average energy to calculate gain control signal S90. Likewise, it may be desirable to configure gain control signal calculator 195 to apply such a filter to gain control signal S90 before outputting it to context mixer 192 and/or to context generator 120.
It is possible for the level of the context component of audio signal S10 to vary independently of the level of the speech component, and in such case it may be desirable to vary the level of generated context signal S50 accordingly. For example, context generator 120 may be configured to vary the level of generated context signal S50 according to the SNR of audio signal S10. In such manner, context generator 120 may be configured to control the level of generated context signal S50 to approximate the level of the original context in audio signal S10.
To maintain the illusion of a context component that is independent of the speech component, it may be desirable to maintain a constant context level even if the signal level changes. Changes in the signal level may occur, for example, due to changes in the orientation of the speaker's mouth to the microphone or due to changes in the speaker's voice such as volume modulation or another expressive effect. In such cases, it may be desirable for the level of generated context signal S50 to remain constant for the duration of the communications session (e.g., a telephone call).
An implementation of apparatus X100 as described herein may be included in any type of device that is configured for voice communications or storage. Examples of such a device may include but are not limited to the following: a telephone, a cellular telephone, a headset (e.g., an earpiece configured to communicate in full duplex with a mobile user terminal via a version of the Bluetooth™ wireless protocol), a personal digital assistant (PDA), a laptop computer, a voice recorder, a game player, a music player, a digital camera. The device may also be configured as a mobile user terminal for wireless communications, such that an implementation of apparatus X100 as described herein may be included within, or may otherwise be configured to supply encoded audio signal S20 to, a transmitter or transceiver portion of the device.
A system for voice communications, such as a system for wired and/or wireless telephony, typically includes a number of transmitters and receivers. A transmitter and a receiver may be integrated or otherwise implemented together within a common housing as a transceiver. It may be desirable to implement apparatus X100 as an upgrade to a transmitter or transceiver that has sufficient available processing, storage, and upgradeability. For example, an implementation of apparatus X100 may be realized by adding the elements of context processor 100 (e.g., in a firmware update) to a device that already includes an implementation of speech encoder X10. In some cases, such an upgrade may be performed without altering any other part of the communications system. For example, it may be desirable to upgrade one or more of the transmitters in a communications system (e.g., the transmitter portion of each of one or more mobile user terminals in a system for wireless cellular telephony) to include an implementation of apparatus X100 without making any corresponding changes to the receivers. It may be desirable to perform the upgrade in a manner such that the resulting device remains backward-compatible (e.g., such that the device remains able to perform all or substantially all of its previous operations that do not involve use of context processor 100).
For a case in which an implementation of apparatus X100 is used to insert a generated context signal S50 into the encoded audio signal S20, it may be desirable for the speaker (i.e., the user of a device that includes the implementation of apparatus X100) to be able to monitor the transmission. For example, it may be desirable for the speaker to be able to hear generated context signal S50 and/or context-enhanced audio signal S15. Such capability may be especially desirable for a case in which generated context signal S50 is dissimilar to the existing context.
Accordingly, a device that includes an implementation of apparatus X100 may be configured to feedback at least one among generated context signal S50 and context-enhanced audio signal S15 to an earpiece, speaker, or other audio transducer located within a housing of the device; to an audio output jack located within a housing of the device; and/or to a short-range wireless transmitter (e.g., a transmitter compliant with a version of the Bluetooth protocol, as promulgated by the Bluetooth Special Interest Group, Bellevue, Wash., and/or another personal-area network protocol) located within a housing of the device. Such a device may include a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) configured and arranged to produce an analog signal from generated context signal S50 or context-enhanced audio signal S15. Such a device may also be configured to perform one or more analog processing operations on the analog signal (e.g., filtering, equalization, and/or amplification) before it is applied to the jack and/or transducer. It is possible but not necessary for apparatus X100 to be configured to include such a DAC and/or analog processing path.
It may be desirable, at the decoder end of a voice communication (e.g., at a receiver or upon retrieval), to replace or enhance the existing context in a manner similar to the encoder-side techniques described above. It may also be desirable to implement such techniques without requiring alteration to the corresponding transmitter or encoding apparatus.
Coding scheme detector 60 is configured to indicate a coding scheme that corresponds to the current frame of encoded audio signal S20. The appropriate coding bit rate and/or coding mode may be indicated by a format of the frame. Coding scheme detector 60 may be configured to perform rate detection or to receive a rate indication from another part of an apparatus within which speech decoder R10 is embedded, such as a multiplex sublayer. For example, coding scheme detector 60 may be configured to receive, from the multiplex sublayer, a packet type indicator that indicates the bit rate. Alternatively, coding scheme detector 60 may be configured to determine the bit rate of an encoded frame from one or more parameters such as frame energy. In some applications, the coding system is configured to use only one coding mode for a particular bit rate, such that the bit rate of the encoded frame also indicates the coding mode. In other cases, the encoded frame may include information, such as a set of one or more bits, that identifies the coding mode according to which the frame is encoded. Such information (also called a “coding index”) may indicate the coding mode explicitly or implicitly (e.g., by indicating a value that is invalid for other possible coding modes).
A typical implementation of active frame decoder 70 or inactive frame decoder 80 is configured to extract LPC coefficient values from the encoded frame (e.g., via dequantization followed by conversion of the dequantized vector or vectors to LPC coefficient value form) and to use those values to configure a synthesis filter. An excitation signal calculated or generated according to other values from the encoded frame and/or based on a pseudorandom noise signal is used to excite the synthesis filter to reproduce the corresponding decoded frame.
It is noted that two or more of the frame decoders may share common structure. For example, decoders 70 and 80 (or decoders 70a, 70b, and 80) may share a calculator of LPC coefficient values, possibly configured to produce a result having a different order for active frames than for inactive frames, but have respectively different temporal description calculators. It is also noted that a software or firmware implementation of speech decoder R10 may use the output of coding scheme detector 60 to direct the flow of execution to one or another of the frame decoders, and that such an implementation may not include an analog for selector 90a and/or for selector 90b.
As shown in
As described above with reference to context suppressor 100, it may be desirable to implement context suppressor 200 to be configurable among two or more different modes of operation (e.g., ranging from no context suppression to substantially complete context suppression).
Context generator 220 is configured to produce an instance S150 of generated context signal S50 according to the state of an instance S140 of context selection signal S40. The state of context selection signal S140, which controls selection of at least one among two or more contexts, may be based on one or more criteria such as: information relating to a physical location of a device that includes apparatus R100 (e.g., based on GPS and/or other information as discussed above), a schedule that associates different times or time periods with corresponding contexts, the identity of the caller (e.g., as determined via calling number identification (CNID), also called “automatic number identification” (ANI) or Caller ID signaling), a user-selected setting or mode (such as a business mode, a soothing mode, a party mode), and/or a user selection (e.g., via a graphical user interface such as a menu) of one of a list of two or more contexts. For example, apparatus R100 may be implemented to include an instance of context selector 330 as described above that associates the values of such criteria with different contexts. In another example, apparatus R100 is implemented to include an instance of context classifier 320 as described above that is configured to generate context selection signal S140 based on one or more characteristics of the existing context of audio signal S110 (e.g., information relating to one or more temporal and/or frequency characteristics of one or more inactive frames of audio signal S110). Context generator 220 may be configured according to any of the various implementations of context generator 120 as described above. For example, context generator 220 may be configured to retrieve parameter values describing the selected context from local storage, or to download such parameter values from an external device such as a server (e.g., via SIP). It may be desirable to configure context generator 220 to synchronize the initiation and termination of producing context selection signal S50 with the start and end, respectively, of the communications session (e.g., the telephone call).
Process control signal S130 controls the operation of context suppressor 212 to enable or disable context suppression (i.e., to output an audio signal having either the existing context of audio signal S110 or a replacement context). As shown in
In general, apparatus R100 may be configured to process active frames by decoding each frame according to an appropriate coding scheme, suppressing the existing context (possibly by a variable degree), and adding generated context signal S150 according to some level. For inactive frames, apparatus R100 may be implemented to decode each frame (or each SID frame) and add generated context signal S150. Alternatively, apparatus R100 may be implemented to ignore or discard inactive frames and replace them with generated context signal S150. For example,
Further implementations of apparatus R100 may be configured to use information from one or more inactive frames of the decoded audio signal to improve a noise model applied by context suppressor 210 for context suppression in active frames. Additionally or in the alternative, such further implementations of apparatus R100 may be configured to use information from one or more inactive frames of the decoded audio signal to control the level of generated context signal S150 (e.g., to control the SNR of context-enhanced audio signal S115). Apparatus R100 may also be implemented to use context information from inactive frames of the decoded audio signal to supplement the existing context within one or more active frames of the decoded audio signal and/or one or more other inactive frames of the decoded audio signal. For example, such an implementation may be used to replace existing context that has been lost due to such factors as overly aggressive noise suppression at the transmitter and/or inadequate coding rate or SID transmission rate.
As noted above, apparatus R100 may be configured to perform context enhancement or replacement without action by and/or alteration of the encoder that produces encoded audio signal S20. Such an implementation of apparatus R100 may be included within a receiver that is configured to perform context enhancement or replacement without action by and/or alteration of a corresponding transmitter from which signal S20 is received. Alternatively, apparatus R100 may be configured to download context parameter values (e.g., from a SIP server) independently or according to encoder control, and/or such a receiver may be configured to download context parameter values (e.g., from a SIP server) independently or according to transmitter control. In such cases, the SIP server or other parameter value source may be configured such that a context selection by the encoder or transmitter overrides a context selection by the decoder or receiver.
It may be desirable to implement speech encoders and decoders, according to principles described herein (e.g., according to implementations of apparatus X100 and R100), that cooperate in operations of context enhancement and/or replacement. Within such a system, information that indicates the desired context may be transferred to the decoder in any of several different forms. In a first class of examples, the context information is transferred as a description that includes a set of parameter values, such as a vector of LSF values and a corresponding sequence of energy values (e.g., a silence descriptor or SID), or such as an average sequence and a corresponding set of detail sequences (as shown in the MRA tree example of
In a second class of examples, the context information is transferred to the decoder as one or more context identifiers (also called “context selection information”). A context identifier may be implemented as an index that corresponds to a particular entry in a list of two or more different audio contexts. In such cases, the indexed list entry (which may be stored locally or externally to the decoder) may include a description of the corresponding context that includes a set of parameter values. Additionally or in the alternative to the one or more context identifiers, the audio context selection information may include information that indicates the physical location and/or context mode of the encoder.
In either of these classes, the context information may be transferred from the encoder to the decoder directly and/or indirectly. In a direct transmission, the encoder sends the context information to the decoder within encoded audio signal S20 (i.e., over the same logical channel and via the same protocol stack as the speech component) and/or over a separate transmission channel (e.g., a data channel or other separate logical channel, which may use a different protocol).
The implementation of apparatus X200 shown in
Context encoder 150 may also be configured to perform protocol encoding of the context information (e.g., at a transport and/or application layer). In such case, context encoder 150 may be configured to perform one or more related operations such as packet formation and/or handshaking. It may even be desirable to configure such an implementation of context encoder 150 to send the context information without performing any other encoding operation.
In a related example, apparatus X210 is configured to send an initial context identifier that corresponds to a context description that is stored locally at the decoder and/or is downloaded from another device such as a server (e.g., during call setup) and is also configured to send subsequent updates to that context description (e.g., over inactive frames of encoded audio signal S20).
The implementation of apparatus X220 shown in
Implementations of apparatus X100 that are configured to encode context information into inactive frames of encoded audio signal S20 may be configured to encode such context information within each inactive frame or discontinuously. In one example of discontinuous transmission (DTX), such an implementation of apparatus X100 is configured to encode information that identifies or describes the selected context into a sequence of one or more inactive frames of encoded audio signal S20 according to a regular interval, such as every five or ten seconds, or every 128 or 256 frames. In another example of discontinuous transmission (DTX), such an implementation of apparatus X100 is configured to encode such information into a sequence of one or more inactive frames of encoded audio signal S20 according to some event, such as selection of a different context.
Apparatus X210 and X220 are configured to perform either encoding of an existing context (i.e., legacy operation) or context replacement, according to the state of process control signal S30. In these cases, the encoded audio signal S20 may include a flag (e.g., one or more bits, possibly included in each inactive frame) that indicates whether the inactive frame includes the existing context or information relating to a replacement context.
In an indirect transmission, the decoder receives the context information not only over a different logical channel than encoded audio signal S20 but also from a different entity, such as a server. For example, the decoder may be configured to request the context information from the server using an identifier of the encoder (e.g., a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) or Uniform Resource Locator (URL), as described in RFC 3986, available online at www-dot-ietf-dot-org), an identifier of the decoder (e.g., a URL), and/or an identifier of the particular communications session.
In other examples, the context information may be transferred from the encoder to the decoder by some combination of direct and indirect transmission. In one general example, the encoder sends context information in one form (e.g., as audio context selection information) to another device within the system, such as a server, and the other device sends corresponding context information in another form (e.g., as a context description) to the decoder. In a particular example of such a transfer, the server is configured to deliver the context information to the decoder without receiving a request for the information from the decoder (also called a “push”). For example, the server may be configured to push the context information to the decoder during call setup.
An encoder as shown in
An encoder-decoder system may be configured to process active frames by suppressing the existing context at the encoder or by suppressing the existing context at the decoder. One or more potential advantages may be realized by performing context suppression at the encoder rather than at the decoder. For example, active frame encoder 30 may be expected to achieve a better coding result on a context-suppressed audio signal than on an audio signal in which the existing context is not suppressed. Better suppression techniques may also be available at the encoder, such as techniques that use audio signals from multiple microphones (e.g., blind source separation). It may also be desirable for the speaker to be able to hear the same context-suppressed speech component that the listener will hear, and performing context suppression at the encoder may be used to support such a feature. Of course, it is also possible to implement context suppression at both the encoder and decoder.
It may be desirable within an encoder-decoder system for the generated context signal S150 to be available at both of the encoder and decoder. For example, it may be desirable for the speaker to be able to hear the same context-enhanced audio signal that the listener will hear. In such case, a description of the selected context may be stored at and/or downloaded to both of the encoder and decoder. Moreover, it may be desirable to configure context generator 220 to produce generated context signal S150 deterministically, such that a context generation operation to be performed at the decoder may be duplicated at the encoder. For example, context generator 220 may be configured to use one or more values that are known to both of the encoder and the decoder (e.g., one or more values of encoded audio signal S20) to calculate any random value or signal that may be used in the generation operation, such as a random excitation signal used for CTFLP synthesis.
An encoder-decoder system may be configured to process inactive frames in any of several different ways. For example, the encoder may be configured to include the existing context within encoded audio signal S20. Inclusion of the existing context may be desirable to support legacy operation. Moreover, as discussed above, the decoder may be configured to use the existing context to support a context suppression operation.
Alternatively, the encoder may be configured to use one or more of the inactive frames of encoded audio signal S20 to carry information relating to a selected context, such as one or more context identifiers and/or descriptions. Apparatus X300 as shown in
In a further alternative, the encoder may be configured to transmit few or no bits during inactive frames, which may allow the encoder to use a higher coding rate for the active frames without increasing the average bit rate. Depending on the system, it may be necessary for the encoder to include some minimum number of bits during each inactive frame in order to maintain the connection.
It may be desirable for an encoder such as an implementation of apparatus X100 (e.g., apparatus X200, X210, or X220) or X300 to send an indication of changes in the level of the selected audio context over time. Such an encoder may be configured to send such information as parameter values (e.g., gain parameter values) within an encoded context signal S80 and/or over a different logical channel. In one example, the description of the selected context includes information describing a spectral distribution of the context, and the encoder is configured to send information relating to changes in the audio level of the context over time as a separate temporal description, which may be updated at a different rate than the spectral description. In another example, the description of the selected context describes both spectral and temporal characteristics of the context over a first time scale (e.g., over a frame or other interval of similar length), and the encoder is configured to send information relating to changes in the audio level of the context over a second time scale (e.g., a longer time scale, such as from frame to frame) as a separate temporal description. Such an example may be implemented using a separate temporal description that includes a context gain value for each frame.
In a further example that may be applied to either of the two examples above, updates to the description of the selected context are sent using discontinuous transmission (within inactive frames of encoded audio signal S20 or over a second logical channel), and updates to the separate temporal description are also sent using discontinuous transmission (within inactive frames of encoded audio signal S20, over the second logical channel, or over another logical channel), with the two descriptions being updated at different intervals and/or according to different events. For example, such an encoder may be configured to update the description of the selected context less frequently than the separate temporal description (e.g., every 512, 1024, or 2048 frames vs. every four, eight, or sixteen frames). Another example of such an encoder is configured to update the description of the selected context according to a change in one or more frequency characteristics of the existing context (and/or according to a user selection) and is configured to update the separate temporal description according to a change in a level of the existing context.
The implementations of apparatus R300 and R310 shown in
The various elements of implementations of apparatus for encoding (e.g., apparatus X100 and X300) and apparatus for decoding (e.g., apparatus R100, R200, and R300) as described herein may be implemented as electronic and/or optical devices residing, for example, on the same chip or among two or more chips in a chipset, although other arrangements without such limitation are also contemplated. One or more elements of such an apparatus may be implemented in whole or in part as one or more sets of instructions arranged to execute on one or more fixed or programmable arrays of logic elements (e.g., transistors, gates) such as microprocessors, embedded processors, IP cores, digital signal processors, FPGAs (field-programmable gate arrays), ASSPs (application-specific standard products), and ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits).
It is possible for one or more elements of an implementation of such an apparatus to be used to perform tasks or execute other sets of instructions that are not directly related to an operation of the apparatus, such as a task relating to another operation of a device or system in which the apparatus is embedded. It is also possible for one or more elements of an implementation of such an apparatus to have structure in common (e.g., a processor used to execute portions of code corresponding to different elements at different times, a set of instructions executed to perform tasks corresponding to different elements at different times, or an arrangement of electronic and/or optical devices performing operations for different elements at different times). In one example, context suppressor 110, context generator 120, and context mixer 190 are implemented as sets of instructions arranged to execute on the same processor. In another example, context processor 100 and speech encoder X10 are implemented as sets of instructions arranged to execute on the same processor. In another example, context processor 200 and speech decoder R10 are implemented as sets of instructions arranged to execute on the same processor. In another example, context processor 100, speech encoder X10, and speech decoder R10 are implemented as sets of instructions arranged to execute on the same processor. In another example, active frame encoder 30 and inactive frame encoder 40 are implemented to include the same set of instructions executing at different times. In another example, active frame decoder 70 and inactive frame decoder 80 are implemented to include the same set of instructions executing at different times.
A device for wireless communications, such as a cellular telephone or other device having such communications capability, may be configured to include both an encoder (e.g., an implementation of apparatus X100 or X300) and a decoder (e.g., an implementation of apparatus R100, R200, or R300). In such case, it is possible to the encoder and decoder to have structure in common. In one such example, the encoder and decoder are implemented to include sets of instructions that are arranged to execute on the same processor.
The operations of the various encoders and decoders described herein may also be viewed as particular examples of methods of signal processing. Such a method may be implemented as a set of tasks, one or more (possibly all) of which may be performed by one or more arrays of logic elements (e.g., processors, microprocessors, microcontrollers, or other finite state machines). One or more (possibly all) of the tasks may also be implemented as code (e.g., one or more sets of instructions) executable by one or more arrays of logic elements, which code may be tangibly embodied in a data storage medium.
The foregoing presentation of the described configurations is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the methods and other structures disclosed herein. The flowcharts, block diagrams, and other structures shown and described herein are examples only, and other variants of these structures are also within the scope of the disclosure. Various modifications to these configurations are possible, and the generic principles presented herein may be applied to other configurations as well. For example, it is emphasized that the scope of this disclosure is not limited to the illustrated configurations. Rather, it is expressly contemplated and hereby disclosed that features of the different particular configurations as described herein may be combined to produce other configurations that are included within the scope of this disclosure, for any case in which such features are not inconsistent with one another. For example, any of the various configurations of context suppression, context generation, and context mixing may be combined, so long as such combination is not inconsistent with the descriptions of those elements herein. It is also expressly contemplated and hereby disclosed that where a connection is described between two or more elements of an apparatus, one or more intervening elements (such as a filter) may exist, and that where a connection is described between two or more tasks of a method, one or more intervening tasks or operations (such as a filtering operation) may exist.
Examples of codecs that may be used with, or adapted for use with, encoders and decoders as described herein include an Enhanced Variable Rate Codec (EVRC) as described in the 3GPP2 document C.S0014-C referenced above; the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec as described in the ETSI document TS126 092 V6.0.0, ch. 6, December 2004; and the AMR Wideband speech codec, as described in the ETSI document TS 126 192 V6.0.0., ch. 6, December 2004. Examples of radio protocols that may be used with encoders and decoders as described herein include Interim Standard-95 (IS-95) and CDMA2000 (as described in specifications published by Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA), Arlington, Va.), AMR (as described in the ETSI document TS 26.101), GSM (Global System for Mobile communications, as described in specifications published by ETSI), UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System, as described in specifications published by ETSI), and W-CDMA (Wideband Code Division Multiple Access, as described in specifications published by the International Telecommunication Union).
The configurations described herein may be implemented in part or in whole as a hard-wired circuit, as a circuit configuration fabricated into an application-specific integrated circuit, or as a firmware program loaded into non-volatile storage or a software program loaded from or into a computer-readable medium as machine-readable code, such code being instructions executable by an array of logic elements such as a microprocessor or other digital signal processing unit. The computer-readable medium may be an array of storage elements such as semiconductor memory (which may include without limitation dynamic or static RAM (random-access memory), ROM (read-only memory), and/or flash RAM), or ferroelectric, magnetoresistive, ovonic, polymeric, or phase-change memory; a disk medium such as a magnetic or optical disk; or any other computer-readable medium for data storage. The term “software” should be understood to include source code, assembly language code, machine code, binary code, firmware, macrocode, microcode, any one or more sets or sequences of instructions executable by an array of logic elements, and any combination of such examples.
Each of the methods disclosed herein may also be tangibly embodied (for example, in one or more computer-readable media as listed above) as one or more sets of instructions readable and/or executable by a machine including an array of logic elements (e.g., a processor, microprocessor, microcontroller, or other finite state machine). Thus, the present disclosure is not intended to be limited to the configurations shown above but rather is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed in any fashion herein, including in the attached claims as filed, which form a part of the original disclosure.
The present Application for Patent claims priority to Provisional Application No. 61/024,104 entitled “SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS FOR CONTEXT PROCESSING” filed Jan. 28, 2008, and assigned to the assignee hereof. The present Application for Patent is related to the following co-pending U.S. Patent Applications: “SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS FOR CONTEXT PROCESSING USING MULTIPLE MICROPHONES”, having Ser. No. 12/129,421, filed concurrently herewith, assigned to the assignee hereof; “SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS FOR CONTEXT SUPRESSION USING RECEIVERS”, having Ser. No. 12/129,455, filed concurrently herewith, assigned to the assignee hereof; “SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS FOR CONTEXT DESCRIPTOR TRANSMISSION” having Ser. No. 12/129,525, filed concurrently herewith, assigned to the assignee hereof, and “SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUS FOR CONTEXT PROCESSING USING MULTI RESOLUTION ANALYSIS” having Ser. No. 12/129,466, filed concurrently herewith, assigned to the assignee hereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5537509 | Swaminathan et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5742734 | DeJaco et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5839101 | Vahatalo et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5960389 | Jarvinen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6167417 | Parra et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6330532 | Manjunath et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6526139 | Rousell et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6691084 | Manjunath et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6717991 | Gustafsson et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738482 | Jaber | May 2004 | B1 |
6782361 | El-Maleh | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6873604 | Surazski et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7133825 | Bou-Ghazale | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7162212 | Bennetts et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7165030 | Yi et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174022 | Zhang | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7260536 | Abu-Samaha | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7295972 | Choi | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7536298 | Ramkumar et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7539615 | Koistinen et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7567898 | Bennett | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7613607 | Valve et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7649988 | Suppappola et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7657427 | Jelinek | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668714 | Croak et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
8102872 | Spindola et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
20010039873 | Yi | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020025048 | Gustafsson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020156623 | Yoshida | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030200092 | Gao et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040133421 | Burnett | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040204135 | Zhao | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230428 | Choi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050059434 | Hong | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050152563 | Amada et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050278171 | Suppappola et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060215683 | Sukkar et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070027682 | Bennett | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070100605 | Renevey et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070171931 | Manjunath et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070265842 | Jarvinen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286426 | Xiang | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080208538 | Visser et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090089053 | Choy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090089054 | Choy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090190780 | Nagaraja et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192790 | El-Maleh et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192791 | El-Maleh et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192802 | Nagaraja et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1132988 | Oct 1996 | CN |
1247663 | Mar 2000 | CN |
1139227 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1139337 | Oct 2001 | EP |
1509065 | Feb 2005 | EP |
10039897 | Feb 1998 | JP |
2000004494 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000332677 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2002515608 | May 2002 | JP |
2002542689 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2006081051 | Mar 2006 | JP |
303453 | Apr 1997 | TW |
350172 | Jan 1999 | TW |
376611 | Dec 1999 | TW |
564400 | Dec 2003 | TW |
591606 | Jun 2004 | TW |
200419531 | Oct 2004 | TW |
200531006 | Sep 2005 | TW |
200614150 | May 2006 | TW |
200632869 | Sep 2006 | TW |
9824053 | Jun 1998 | WO |
2006052395 | May 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability—PCT/US2008/078324, The International Bureau of WIPO—Geneva, Switzerland, Jan. 5, 2010. |
International Search Report—PCT/US08/078324—International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Dec. 1, 2008. |
International Search Report—PCT/US08/078325—International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Feb. 18, 2009. |
International Search Report—PCT/US08/078327—International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Apr. 28, 2009. |
International Search Report—PCT/US08/078329—International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Jan. 15, 2009. |
Partial International Search Report—PCT/US08/078325—International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Dec. 8, 2008. |
Partial International Search Report—PCT/US08/078327—International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Dec. 29, 2008. |
Written Opinion—PCT/US08/078324—International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Dec. 1, 2008. |
Written Opinion—PCT/US08/078325—International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Feb. 18, 2009. |
Written Opinion—PCT/US08/078327—International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Apr. 28, 2009. |
Written Opinion—PCT/US08/078329—International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Jan. 15, 2009. |
Taiwan Search Report—TW097137522—TIPO—Sep. 2, 2012. |
M. Athineos et al. Sound texture modelling with linear prediction in both time and frequency domains. Proc. ICASSP-2003, Apr. 2003, Hong Kong, China. Last accessed Jan. 14, 2007 at www.ee.columbia.edu/˜dpwe/pubs/icassp03-ctflp.pdf (4 pp.). |
Mobile firm offers ‘phoney alibi’. BBC News. Published Mar. 10, 2004. Last acessed Jan. 14, 2007 at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3498714.stm (2 pp.). |
M. Cardle et al. Sound-by-Numbers: Motion-Driven Sound Synthesis. Eurographics/SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation, 2003. Last accessed Jan. 14, 2007 at http://www.cardle.info/lab/publications/SoundbyNumbers2003—Cardle.pdf (7 pp.). |
H.-T. Cheng et al. A Collaborative Privacy-Enhanced Alibi Phone. Proc. Int'l Conf. on Grid and Pervasive Computing, Taiwan, May 2006, pp. 405-414. |
H.-T.,Cheng-et al. A Collaborative Privacy-Enhanced Alibi-Phone. Last accessed Jan. 14, 2007 at www.cooperatique.com/doc/alibi—phone—globecom—2005.pdf (6 pp.). |
H.-T. Cheng et al. DoCoDeMo Phone: An Imperceptible Approach for Privacy Protection. Last accessed Jan. 14, 2007 at www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/˜hchu/papers/persec—2005.pdf (5 pp.). |
S. Dubnov et al. Synthesizing Sound Textures through Wavelet Tree Learning. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. Jul./Aug. 2002, pp. 38-48. |
S. Dubnov et al. Synthesis of Sound Textures by Learning and Resampling of Wavelet Trees. Last accessed Jan. 14, 2007 at www.cs.cmu.edu/˜zivbj/graphics/soundTexture.pdf.(26 pp.). |
K.H. El-Maleh. Classification-Based Techniques for Digital Coding of Speech-plus-Noise. Ph.D. thesis, McGill Univ., Montreal, Canada, Jan. 2004. |
ETSI Standard ES 202 050 V1.1.5 (Jan. 2007). Speech Processing, Transmission and Quality Aspects (STQ); Distributed speech recognition; Advanced front-end feature extraction algorithms; Compression algorithms. European Telecommunications Standards Institute, 2007. |
H. Francois et al. Dual-microphone robust front-end for arm's-length speech recognition. IWAENC 2006, Paris, France, Sep. 12-14, 2006. Last accessed Jan. 14, 2007 at www.iwaenc06.enst.fr/iwaenc2006/pdf/A19.pdf (4 pp.). |
H.W. Gierlich et al. Background Noise Transmission and Comfort Noise. Insertion: The Influence of Signal Processing on “Speech”-Quality in Complex Telecommunication Scenarios. Last accessed Jan. 14, 2007 at www.head-acoustics.de/downloads/publications/speech—quality/157.pdf (4 pp.). |
H. Gustafsson et al. Dual-Microphone Spectral Subtraction. Research report 2/00, Univ. of Karlskrona, Sweden. ISSN 1103-1581, 2000. |
R. Hoskinson. Manipulation and Resynthesis of Environmental Sounds with Natural Wavelet Grains. M.S. thesis, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 2002. |
C. Liu et al. A two-microphone dual delay-line approach for extraction of a speech sound in the presence of multiple interferers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 110, No. 6, Dec. 2001, pp. 3218-3231. |
L. Ma et al. Context Awareness using Environmental Noise Classification. Proc. Eurospeech 2003, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 2237-2240. |
A. Misra et al. A new paradigm for sound design. Proc. Ninth Int'l Conf. on Digital Audio Effects, Montreal, Canada, Sep. 2006, pp. DAFX-319-DAFX-324. |
Y. Qian et al. Classified Comfort Noise Generation for Efficient Voice Transmission. Interspeech 2006, Sep. 17-21, Pittsburgh, PA. Last accessed Jan. 14, 2007 at http://www.ece.mcgill.ca/˜pkabal/papers/2006/QianC2006.pdf (4 pp.). |
H. Saruwatari et al. Blind Source Separation Combining Independent Component Analysis and Beamforming. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2003:11, 1135-1146, 2003. |
G. Strobl. Parametric Sound Texture Generator. Thesis, Univ. of Music and Dramatic Arts, Graz, Austria, Jan. 2007. |
G. Strobl et al. Sound texture modeling: a survey. Last accessed Jan. 14, 2007 at pagesperso-orange.fr/gmem/smc06/papers/8-soundtexturemodelingSMC06.pdf (5 pp.). |
M. Tuffy. The Removal of Environmental Noise in Cellular Communications by Perceptual Techniques. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Edinburgh, UK, 1999. |
S.M.Kuo, et al., Integrated near-end acoustic echo and noise reduction systems, ISCAS 2003, vol. 4, pp. 412-415, May 2003. |
Das, U.S. Appl. No. 09/191,643, “Closed-Loop Variable-Rate Muitimode Predictive Speech Coder” filed Nov. 13, 1998. |
“Speech processing devices for acoustic enhancement; p. 330 (Mar. 2003)” ITU-T Standard in Force (I), International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, CH, No. P 330 (Mar. 2003), Mar. 16, 2003, XP017402414. |
Bar-Joseph Z et al: “Synthesizing sound textures through wavelet tree learning” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY, US, vol. 22, No. 4, Jul. 1, 2002, pp. 33-48, XP011094558. |
El Maleh et al. “Frame-level Noise Classification in Mobile Environments,” Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. ASSP, 1999, vol. I, pp. 237-240. |
L. Molgedey et al. “Separation of a mixture of independent signals using time delayed correlations,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 72(23): 3634-3637, 1994. |
L. Parra et al. “Convolutive blind source separation of non-stationary sources”, IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio Processing, 8(3): 320-327, May 2000. |
Philip Arden BT United Kingdom: “Proposed first draft of G.IPP: Transmission performance parameters of IP networks affecting perceived speech quailty and other voiceband services; D 126” ITU-T Draft Study Period 2001-52001. International Telecommunication, Jan. 27-31, 2003. |
Y. Qian. “Classified Comfort Noise Generation for Efficient Voice Transmission” Interspeech 2006—ICSLP, pp. 225-228. |
R. Mukai et al. “Removal of residual crosstalk components in blind source separation using LMS fliters,” Proc. of 12th IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks of Signal Processing, pp. 435-444, Martigny, Switzerland, Sep. 2002. |
R. Mukai et al.: “Removal of residual cross-talk components in blind source separation using time-delayed spectral subtraction.” Proc. of ICASSP 2002, pp. 1789-1792, May 2002. |
S. Amari et al. : “A New Learning Algorithm for Blind Signal Separation” In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8, pp. 757-763, 1996. |
S.F. Boll, “Suppression of Acoustic Noise in Speech Using Spectral Subtraction,” IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 27(2): 112-120, Apr. 1979. |
Yamato K et al: “Post-processing noise suppressor with adaptive gain-flooring for cell-phone handsets and IC recorders” Internet Citation, [Oniine] 2004, XP002470252, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ie15/4145986/4099325/0414609. |
Yektaeian M et al: “Comparison of spectral subtraction methods used in noise suppression algorithms” Information, Communications&Signal Processing, 2007 6th International Conference on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Dec. 10, 2007, pp. 1-4, XP031229350. |
ETSI TS 126 092 V.6.0.0“Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR),” ch. Dec. 6, 2004. |
Rosenberg et al.; RFC 3261, “SIP: Session Initiation Protocol”, Jun. 2002, pp. 1-269. |
“International Search Report—PCT/US08/078332—International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Dec. 12, 2008”. |
“Written Opinion—PCT/US08/078332—International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Dec. 12, 2008”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090192803 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61024104 | Jan 2008 | US |