The subject matter described herein relates to providing a service in a telecommunications network. More particularly, the subject matter described herein relates to systems, methods, and computer readable media for location-sensitive number translation in a telecommunications network.
A toll-free number is a telephone number in which the cost of the call is charged to the called party rather than to the calling party. In countries that follow the North American Numbering Plan (NANP), telephone numbers are of the form NPA-NXX-YYYY, where NPA is the numbering plan area code, roughly corresponding to a particular geographical area, and NXX is the exchange, which identifies a physical switching facility, called a central office (CO). The remaining digits, YYYY, identify a line card within the CO. When a CO detects that a subscriber whom that CO serves is attempting to place a call to called party telephone number, the values of NPA and NXX of the called party number are used by a switch to determine how to route a call.
A toll-free number, however, may have an “8XX” area code (e.g., 800, 877, 866, etc.), that does not correspond to any geographical location of the called party, and thus cannot be used by itself to determine the destination of the call or how it should be routed. For this reason, switches in conventional telecommunications networks that provide toll free service must send a query to a toll-free database to determine the true destination of the toll-free called party. A query to a toll-free database is herein referred to as a “toll-free query.”A toll-free query typically includes the toll-free number, and the response to the toll-free query typically includes the directory number to which the toll-free number is mapped. For example, Tekelec, Incorporated provides a toll-free number “1-800-TEKELEC” (1-800-835-3532) for sales inquiries. This toll-free number may be mapped to a local directory number for Tekelec corporate world headquarters in Morrisville, N.C., which is 919-460-5500. Thus, a toll-free query for 800-835-3532 would return the directory number 919-460-5500.
Businesses often use a toll-free number as the primary telephone number for callers to use, because the same toll-free number may be used by a caller regardless of the geographical location of the caller. The savings to the business from using the same toll-free number in advertisements around the country, continent, or world, on company business cards and letterhead, and so on, may outweigh the additional expense incurred by the business of paying for the calls. A toll-free number that is very easy for customers or potential customers to remember, as in the 1-800-TEKELEC example, above, may even increase that business organization's sales, help it achieve high name recognition, or provide some other tangible or intangible benefit.
However, business entities or organizations that have a large or dispersed physical presence in the form of branch offices, service centers, or restaurants in different geographic locations, for example, may desire that a call made to the organization be directed to whichever branch office is geographically closest to the calling party. A fictional take-out pizza restaurant chain having stores in multiple geographic locations, for example, may desire that calls to its toll-free number, e.g., 1-800-GO-PIZZA (1-800-467-4992), be routed to the pizza restaurant closest to the geographic location of the calling party. In order to do this, the toll-free query must provide location information for the calling party, and the toll-free database must be able to use this calling party location information to select the appropriate directory number.
The ability to consider the location of the calling party as part of the process of performing a number translation is herein referred to as calling-party-location-sensitive called party number translation, which may be abbreviated to “location-sensitive called party number translation”, or simply “location-sensitive number translation”, for short.
In conventional systems, however, calling party location information may be unavailable or indeterminate. For example, the toll-free query issued by a switch may include the toll-free called party number, but no calling party information. Even if the toll-free query includes calling party information, that calling party information may not indicate the geographic location of the calling party, such as where the calling party number is a mobile subscriber number, in which case the mobile subscriber may be calling from anywhere within the cellular network. Even if the toll-free query includes information that does give some indication of the location of the calling party, conventional toll-free databases may not support calling party information as an input parameter to a toll-free query. The same problems apply to other number translation services that are not location-sensitive.
Accordingly, in light of these disadvantages associated with conventional approaches to providing called-party number translation in a telecommunications network, there exists a need for improved systems and methods for providing location-sensitive called-party number translation in a telecommunications network.
According to one aspect, the subject matter described herein includes a method for providing location-sensitive called-party number translation in a telecommunications network. The method includes, at a signaling node that includes at least one processor: receiving a first signaling message that includes a called party number; determining proximity information associated with the calling party; performing a location-sensitive called party number translation based on the proximity information associated with the calling party; and sending the first signaling message or a second signaling message, the sent message including the translated called party number.
According to another aspect, the subject matter described herein includes a system for providing location-sensitive called-party number translation in a telecommunications network. The system includes a signaling node for receiving a first signaling message that includes a called party number, and a proximity processing module, operatively associated with the signaling node, for determining proximity information associated with the calling party, performing a location-sensitive called party number translation based on the proximity information associated with the calling party, and sending the first signaling message or a second signaling message, the sent message including the translated called party number.
The subject matter described herein for location-sensitive number translation in a telecommunications network may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or any combination thereof. As such, the terms “function” or “module” as used herein refer to hardware, software, and/or firmware for implementing the feature being described. In one exemplary implementation, the subject matter described herein may be implemented using a computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to perform steps. Exemplary non-transitory, computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include disk memory devices, chip memory devices, programmable logic devices, and application specific integrated circuits. In addition, a computer readable medium that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single device or computing platform or may be distributed across multiple devices or computing platforms.
Preferred embodiments of the subject matter described herein will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts, of which:
In accordance with the subject matter disclosed herein, systems, methods, and computer readable media are provided for location-sensitive called-party number translation in a telecommunications network.
Network 100 includes a signaling node 106, such as a signaling message routing node, for routing signaling messages within network 100. In the embodiment illustrated in
In one embodiment, network 100 may include a proximity processing module (PRXM) 108 for determining proximity information associated with the calling party and using the proximity information to translate or map called party information. In the embodiment illustrated in
In one embodiment, the calling party proximity information may directly identify the geographic location of subscriber 104 or S1102, and may include, for example, information such as the latitude and longitude, GPS location information, or other form of geographic coordinates of the subscriber or switch.
In another embodiment, the calling party proximity information may indirectly identify the geographic location of a subscriber or switch, and may include information identifying the switch, such as the switch address or switch ID. In a cellular network, the calling party proximity information may include, for example, the address or ID of the mobile switching center currently serving the subscriber, the cell ID, the geographic location of the switch, MSC, base station subsystem or other component of the cellular network, and so on.
In another embodiment, the calling party proximity information may be unrelated to the geographic location. For example, the calling party proximity information may relate to topological proximity, where the topological proximity of one node to another node may be defined by the number of intermediate nodes, or “hops”, between the two nodes, path costs, or some other metric.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In one embodiment, the location-sensitive number translation service provided by network 100 may be a location-sensitive toll-free service, in which a toll-free called party number is mapped to one of multiple directory numbers associated with that toll-free called party number based on whichever directory number is most proximate to the calling party. In such embodiments, network 100 may include a location-sensitive toll-free database (TFDB) 110 for mapping toll-free numbers, such as 1-8XX numbers in the United States, to a directory number. An example location-sensitive toll-free database is shown in Table 1, below. Each row in Table 1 represents an entry in TFDB 108, and each entry maps a toll-free number (TFN), shown in the left column, to a DN, shown in the right column, based on calling party proximity information (CGPI), shown in the middle column. A directory number may also be referred to as a “B-party number”.
Referring to the example location-sensitive toll-free database illustrated in Table 1, above, rows 1 and 2 show that the first toll-free number (800) 345-0393 would be mapped to the directory number (919) 469-2255 if the calling party is calling from the (919) area code (North Carolina), but would be mapped to the directory number (212) 458-6965 if the calling party is calling from the (212) area code (New York). In this example, the first toll-free number is mapped to a directory number based on an area code; it can be said that the first toll-free number has a geographic resolution at the area code level. In contrast, rows N through N+3 show that the second toll-free number (800) 254-9990 is mapped to a local directory number at a finer geographic resolution, e.g., at the exchange level. In this manner, the level of geographic resolution can vary according to need. For example, a toll-free number may be mapped to one of only two choices, such as a west coast number and an east coast number. Likewise, a toll-free number may be mapped to as many geographic domains as the toll-free database may support.
In an alternative embodiment, the location-sensitive called party number translation service provided by network 100 may be a location-sensitive E.164 telephone number mapping (ENUM) service, in which an E.164-format called party number is mapped to one of multiple Internet protocol (IP) addresses associated with the E.164-format called party number based on whichever IP address is most proximate to the calling party. In such embodiments, network 100 may include an ENUM database (ENUMDB) 112 for mapping E.164 telephone numbers to IP addresses. An example ENUM database is shown in Table 2, below.
Each row in Table 2 represents an entry in ENUMDB 112, and each entry maps an E.164 subscriber ID (E.164 ID), shown in the left column, to a uniform resource identifier (URI), shown in the right column, based on proximity information (PI), shown in the middle column. The value of the E.164 ID column shown in Table 2, above could be in E.164 format (e.g., 8.7.6.5.4.4.4.0.0.8.1.0) or in directory number format (e.g., 018004445678). For simplicity, the E.164 IDs shown in Table 2 are in directory number format. In alternative embodiments, ENUMDB 112 may map E.164 numbers to IP addresses.
As shown in Table 2, the proximity information can take on various forms. For example, as shown in rows 1˜3 of Table 2, above, the proximity information may be global positioning system (GPS) coordinates that define a position, such as a location on the surface of the earth, including height above or below the surface of the planet. Other positioning coordinate systems may also be used. Alternatively, as shown in rows N through N+2 of Table 2, above, the proximity information may be in the form of a proximity ID that identifies an object whose location is known or is readily determinable.
Where the proximity information is a location, in one embodiment, the proximity information stored in ENUMDB 112 may be position of the URI, in which case the query message to ENUMDB 112 may include the position of the calling party (or of the switch that is serving the calling party) along with the called party number. In this scenario, ENUM DB 112 may select records whose E.164 ID value matches the called party number, calculate a geometric distance between the calling party and the PI value for each selected record, and then select the record with the smallest calculated difference. The record thus selected includes the URI of the server that is geographically closest to the calling party. In this example, the proximity information stored in ENUM DB 112 refers to the location of the respective URI.
Where the proximity information is a location, in another embodiment, the proximity information stored in ENUMDB 112 may define an area served by the respective URI. In this scenario also, the query message to ENUMDB 112 may including the position of the calling party or originating switch. ENUMDB 112 may determine whether the calling party position falls within an area served by a URI, and if so, respond to the ENUM query with that URI. In this example, the proximity information stored in ENUM DB 112 refers to the allowable locations that the calling party may be in order for that calling party's call to be redirected to that particular URI.
Where the proximity information is a proximity ID, the proximity information stored in ENUMDB 112 may identify the switch from which the call originates, in which case the proximity ID may be the switch ID, the switch address, or the switch name. Thus, as shown in rows N through N+2 in Table 2, above, an ENUM query that includes a called party E.164 number 8.5.8.5.9.6.4.9.1.9.1.0, which corresponds to a directory number of 019194695858, will return different results depending on whether the calling party is calling from an MSC having an MSC_ID=“X” or from an MSC having an MSC_ID=“Y”. In the former case, the URI returned will be “Serv4@Network.net”, and in the latter case, the URI returned will be “Serv5@Network.net”. Because switches are typically not mobile but fixed to a particular location, ENUMDB 112 may avoid the need to calculate distance between the calling party and the URI or determine whether the calling party is located within an area served by the URI.
There is a trade-off, however. In one approach, the PI field of ENUMDB 112 stores location information for the URI. In this scenario, ENUMDB 112 would calculate a distance from the calling party location to each URI and then select the closest URI. In such embodiments, ENUMDB 112 need only store, for each called party number, a record for each possible destination URI. For example, if the called party number can only be routed to one of two destination URIs, then ENUMDB 112 may need only store two records for that called party number.
Using a second approach, the PI field of ENUMDB 112 may contain a switch ID. In this scenario, ENUMDB 112 may avoid the need to calculate distance, but it may instead require that ENUMDB 112 include a record for each potential originating switch ID. In a network with only two destination URIs but dozens of potential originating switches, this second approach may require that ENUMDB 112 contain dozens of records, rather than just the two records required under the first approach.
In one embodiment, network 100 may support number portability. In the embodiment illustrated in
In one embodiment, network 100 may support mobile subscribers. In the embodiment illustrated in
In one embodiment, network 100 may include a proximity information database (PRXDB) 118 for mapping proximity information to geographic location, such as GPS coordinates. An example proximity information database is shown in Table 3, below. Each row of Table 3 represents an entry in PRXDB 118, and each entry maps a proximity ID, shown in the left column, to GPS coordinates, shown in the right column. The proximity information may be a switch ID or switch address, or other proximity information associated with the calling party.
Referring to Table 3, if PRXM 108 receives a number translation request, such as a toll-free query or an ENUM query, from a switch identified as “MSC_ID1”, PRXM 108 may use PRXDB 118 to determine that switch MSC_ID1 is located at GPS coordinates (P,Q,R). PRXM 108 may then include those GPS coordinates in the query message and forward the modified number translation request to the appropriate database (e.g., TFDB 110, ENUMDB 112, NPDB 114, HLR/HSS 116.) Like PRXM 108, above, PRXDM 116 may be internal or external to signaling node 106.
In the embodiment illustrated in
Since the call is from a mobile subscriber 104, the calling party identifier (i.e., the mobile subscriber's cell phone number, MS#) does not convey any proximity or location information. PRXM 108 therefore determines proximity information associated with the calling party. In the embodiment illustrated in
PRXM 108 may then either modify the original query message or generate a new query message and send this message (
In an alternative embodiment, the toll-free query (
At block 300, a first signaling message, containing a called party number, is received at a signaling node that includes at least one processor. The first signaling message may include, but is not limited to, a call setup message, a toll-free query, and an ENUM query. For example, in one embodiment, S1102 may send a call setup message, such as an ISUP initial address message (IAM), an ISUP subsequent address message (SAM), a bearer-independent call control (BICC) message, or a SIP INVITE message, that includes the called party number.
In another embodiment, calling subscriber 104 may be a mobile subscriber and S1102 may be a mobile switching center (MSC), which may issue a mobility management message, such as a mobile application part (MAP) send routing information (SRI) message, a MAP send routing information for short message (SRI_SM) message, an anytime interrogation (ATI) message, or an ANSI-41 location request (LOCREQ) message, that includes the called party number.
In yet another embodiment, calling subscriber 104 may be a wireline subscriber and S1102 may be an end office (EO), a central office (CO), a service switching point (SSP), or similar entity, which may issue a call setup message that includes the toll-free called party number. In another embodiment, S1102 may issue a number portability (NP) query that includes the called party number.
In yet another embodiment, calling subscriber 104 may be a user agent client (UAC) in a session initiation protocol (SIP) network and S1102 may be a SIP router, SIP application server (SAS), media gateway (MOW), or similar entity, which may issue SIP INVITE message, a number translation request, such as an ENUM query, or other message that includes the called party number.
At block 302, proximity information associated with the calling party is determined. For example, PRXM 108 may extract information contained within the received message, such as: the name, number, address or other identifier of the calling party; GPS or other location information for the calling party; the name, number, address, or other identifier of the switch or node from which the first signaling message was sent; GPS or other location information for the switch or node from which the first signaling message was sent; or other information that is associated with the calling party.
In one embodiment, the proximity information so extracted may be used directly. For example, in
In another embodiment, the proximity information may come from sources other than data included in the received first signaling message. For example, if a signaling node has multiple ports, each port connecting to entities in different locations, the port number which received the message may indicate a geographic or topological proximity that may be associated with the calling party.
At block 304, a location-sensitive called party number translation is performed based on the calling party proximity information. For example, PRXM 108 may: issue a toll-free query to TFDB 108; issue a number portability query to NPDB 110; issue a mobility management query to HRL 112; issue an ENUM query to ENUM database 122; or some combination of the above.
At block 306, the first signaling message or a second signaling message is sent, the sent message including the translated called party number. For example, the original message (i.e., the first signaling message) may be modified and sent forward to the intended destination, or a new message (i.e., the second signaling message) may be generated and sent forward to the intended destination. Alternatively, a new signaling message (i.e., the second signaling message) may be generated and sent back to the sender of the first message, e.g., the second message may be a response to the first message query.
LIM 400 includes various functions for sending and receiving signaling messages over SS7 signaling links. In the illustrated example, LIM 400 includes a message transfer part (MTP) level 1 and 2 function 408, an I/O buffer 410, a gateway screening (GWS) function 412, a discrimination function 414, a distribution function 416, and a routing function 418. MTP level 1 and 2 function 408 performs MTP level 1 and 2 functions, such as error detection, error correction, and sequencing of signaling messages. I/O buffer 410 stores inbound signaling messages before the messages are processed by higher layers. I/O buffer 410 also stores outbound signaling messages waiting to be transmitted over a signaling link by MTP level 1 and 2 function 408. Gateway screening function 412 screens inbound signaling messages based on destination point code and, optionally, based on originating point code to determine whether the messages should be allowed into the network. Discrimination function 414 analyzes the destination point code in each received signaling message to determine whether the signaling message should be processed by an internal processing module within node 106 or whether the message should be routed over an outbound signaling link. Discrimination function 414 forwards messages that are to be internally processed to distribution function 416. Discrimination function 414 forwards messages that are to be routed over an outbound signaling link to routing function 418. Distribution function 416 distributes messages that are identified as requiring internal processing to the appropriate internal processing module. For example, distribution function 416 may forward SCCP messages to database services module 404 for SCCP processing. Routing function 418 routes signaling messages that are addressed to point codes other than the point code of node 106. For example, routing function 418 may forward messages to another link interface module (not shown in
DCM 402 includes various functions for sending and receiving signaling messages over IP signaling links. Example signaling messages include SS7 over IP messages, session initiation protocol (SIP) messages, and others. In
DSM 404 includes various functions and databases for processing signaling messages. In the illustrated example, DSM 404 includes a service selection function 428, a target message screening function 430, and a routing function 432. Database services module 404 also includes proximity processing module (PRXM) 108 for determining proximity information associated with a calling party. Service selection function 428 receives messages from interface processors and determines the type of service required for each message. For example, service selection function 428 may determine whether further screening of messages is required or whether the messages are simply to be global title translated and routed. For CAP or INAP messages, service selection function 428 may forward the messages to target message screening function 430. Target message screening function 430 screens CAP or INAP messages received by DSM 404 to identify targeted message types. According to the subject matter described herein, target message screening function 430 may identify call setup messages, such as ISUP IAM or SAM, as a targeted message type requiring further processing. For call setup messages, targeted message screening function 430 may communicate with PRXM 108 to determine proximity information for a calling party. For example, PRXM 108 may process signaling messages associated with toll-free calls and determine the called party directory number associated with the toll-free called party that is most proximate geographically or topologically to the calling party.
Signaling node 106 may include one or more processors. For example, in the embodiment illustrated in
In one embodiment, PRXM 108 may receive a mobility management message related to a toll-free call. For example, PRXM 108 may receive an SRI message including a toll-free number. In response, PRXM 108 may identify the SRI message as one that requires toll-free processing and take appropriate action. For example, PRXM 108 may generate a TF query and send the generated query to TFDB 108 via LIM 400 or DCM 402 as appropriate. PRXM 108 may subsequently receive a response to the TF query, and perform additional queries to other databases as needed.
In the embodiment illustrated in
As used herein, the term “database” refers to a database, a table, a data structure, a portion of memory or data storage, or other means to store and retrieve data, in particular two pieces of data in a key/value relationship. Thus, the term “database query” refers to not only a database query, but also a table lookup or access to a data structure, for example. A database query, such as may be used to determine a directory number associated with a toll-free called party number or to determine routing information associated with a directory number, could be performed using one or more protocols, including but not limited to a TCAP or MAP protocol, an Internet protocol (IP), a signaling connection and control part (SCCP) user adaptation (SUA) protocol, a session initiation protocol (SIP), or other protocols usable to perform a data query.
Since subscriber 104 is a fixed line subscriber who is served by central office S1102, NPDB 114 returns the local routing number associated with S1102, “LRN1”. The routing number LRN1 is the proximity information associated with the calling party, which PRXM 108 will use in a query to TFDB 110 (
In the embodiment illustrated in
In one embodiment, intermediate database 602 may map other identifiers, such as client IP addresses, to a temporary DN. Client IP addresses, which may be correlated with a smaller geographic region than a proxy, may be extracted from the bottom-most Via header field and/or he Contact header field of the INVITE message (
In the embodiment illustrated in
PRXM 108 may maintain provisioned data that maps a node identifier to geo-location coordinates or a geo-location proximity identifier that is representative of the geographic area or region served by the node. The mode identifier may be a SIP proxy, softswitch, P-CSCF, LTE MME, or MSC server identifier (e.g., network node identifier, network address, IP address, URI, routing number, etc.) or address. PRXM 108 may infer the source or originating proxy based on the signaling link or linkset, signaling association, signaling connection, signaling session, physical or logical port, etc., on which the ENUM query is received. In the embodiment illustrated in
In an alternative embodiment, the location information associated with the calling party returned by server 116 may be in the form of network topological information, such as a switch identity or address. Thus, in the embodiment illustrated in
PRXM 108 may then use the geographic location information associated with the calling party in an ENUM query (
It will be understood that various details of the subject matter described herein may be changed without departing from the scope of the subject matter described herein. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/117,538, filed Nov. 24, 2008; the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3917915 | Karras | Nov 1975 | A |
4162377 | Mearns | Jul 1979 | A |
4191860 | Weber | Mar 1980 | A |
4310727 | Lawser | Jan 1982 | A |
4313035 | Jordan et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4385206 | Bradshaw et al. | May 1983 | A |
4754479 | Bicknell et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4756020 | Fodale | Jul 1988 | A |
4757267 | Riskin | Jul 1988 | A |
4769834 | Billinger et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4788718 | McNabb et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4819156 | DeLorme et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4897835 | Gaskill et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897870 | Golden | Jan 1990 | A |
4959849 | Bhusri | Sep 1990 | A |
4972461 | Brown et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5008929 | Olsen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5089954 | Rago | Feb 1992 | A |
5150357 | Hopner et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5237604 | Ryan | Aug 1993 | A |
5247571 | Kay et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5251248 | Tokunaga et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5291481 | Doshi et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5315580 | Phaal | May 1994 | A |
5341680 | Mains, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
5400390 | Salin | Mar 1995 | A |
5402474 | Miller et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5422941 | Hasenauer et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423068 | Hecker | Jun 1995 | A |
5426688 | Anand | Jun 1995 | A |
5430709 | Galloway | Jul 1995 | A |
5430719 | Weisser, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5438570 | Karras et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442683 | Hoogeveen | Aug 1995 | A |
5455855 | Hokari | Oct 1995 | A |
5457692 | Ishinabe et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5457729 | Hamann et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5457736 | Cain et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5473596 | Garafola et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5475732 | Pester, III | Dec 1995 | A |
5481603 | Gutierrez et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5502726 | Fischer | Mar 1996 | A |
5504804 | Widmark et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5506893 | Buscher et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5521902 | Ferguson | May 1996 | A |
5526400 | Nguyen | Jun 1996 | A |
5533107 | Irwin et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539804 | Hong et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546398 | Tucker et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550914 | Clarke et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5572579 | Orriss et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579371 | Aridas et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579372 | Åström | Nov 1996 | A |
5583926 | Venier et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586177 | Farris et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590398 | Matthews | Dec 1996 | A |
5592530 | Brockman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594942 | Antic et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598464 | Hess et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5602909 | Carkner et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606600 | Elliott | Feb 1997 | A |
5610969 | McHenry et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610977 | Williams et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623532 | Houde et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625681 | Butler, II | Apr 1997 | A |
5671225 | Hooper et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5689548 | Maupin et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689555 | Sonnenberg | Nov 1997 | A |
5696816 | Sonnenberg | Dec 1997 | A |
5706286 | Reiman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711002 | Foti | Jan 1998 | A |
5711011 | Urs et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712908 | Brinkman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5740239 | Bhagat et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5757895 | Aridas et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764745 | Chan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768352 | Elliott et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768358 | Venier et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771284 | Sonnenberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5774532 | Gottlieb et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784443 | Chapman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796813 | Sonnenberg | Aug 1998 | A |
5812639 | Bartholomew et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819178 | Cropper | Oct 1998 | A |
5822694 | Coombes et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832382 | Alperovich | Nov 1998 | A |
5838683 | Corley et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5854982 | Chambers et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5867558 | Swanson | Feb 1999 | A |
5878126 | Velamuri et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878347 | Joensuu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878348 | Foti | Mar 1999 | A |
5890063 | Mills | Mar 1999 | A |
5903726 | Donovan et al. | May 1999 | A |
5949871 | Kabay et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953662 | Lindquist et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953663 | Maupin et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5983217 | Khosravi-Sichannie et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999525 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006098 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009160 | Sonnenberg | Dec 1999 | A |
6011803 | Bicknell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014557 | Morton et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018657 | Kennedy, III et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021126 | White et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028914 | Lin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038456 | Colby et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049714 | Patel | Apr 2000 | A |
6091957 | Larkins et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091959 | Souissi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094573 | Heinonen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097719 | Benash et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097960 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108332 | Kasiviswanathan | Aug 2000 | A |
6108782 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111946 | O'Brien | Aug 2000 | A |
6115463 | Coulombe et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6115754 | Landgren | Sep 2000 | A |
6119014 | Alperovich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122510 | Granberg | Sep 2000 | A |
H1895 | Hoffpauir et al. | Oct 2000 | H |
6128304 | Gardell et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6128377 | Sonnenberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6134307 | Broukman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134314 | Dougherty et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134316 | Kallioniemi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134432 | Holmes et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134618 | Hebert | Oct 2000 | A |
6137806 | Martinez | Oct 2000 | A |
6138016 | Kulkarni et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138017 | Price et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138023 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144857 | Price et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148204 | Urs et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6181937 | Joensuu | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182086 | Lomet et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188752 | Lesley | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192242 | Rollender | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205210 | Rainey et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215790 | Voit et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219551 | Hentilä et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226517 | Britt et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236365 | LeBlanc et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249572 | Brockman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252952 | Kung et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263212 | Ross et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272136 | Lin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301609 | Aravamudan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304565 | Ramamurthy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308075 | Irten et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321268 | Dillon et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324183 | Miller et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327350 | Spangler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333931 | LaPier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6363411 | Dugan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373930 | McConnell et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377674 | Chong et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393269 | Hartmaier et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411632 | Lindgren et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6424621 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424832 | Britt et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430176 | Christie, IV | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434144 | Romanov | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434155 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438223 | Eskafi et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446127 | Schuster et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453034 | Donovan et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453158 | Donovan et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456708 | Copley et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463055 | Lupien et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466796 | Jacobson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470179 | Chow et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480588 | Donovan | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496690 | Cobo et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505046 | Baker | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510164 | Ramaswamy et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515997 | Feltner et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516194 | Hanson | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6535727 | Abbasi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535746 | Yu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539077 | Ranalli et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560216 | McNiff et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560456 | Lohtia et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564261 | Gudjonsson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571094 | Begeja et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574481 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577723 | Mooney | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584183 | Manto | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6594258 | Larson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611516 | Pirkola et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6633764 | Garcia | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643511 | Rune et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662017 | McCann et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683881 | Mijares et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684073 | Joss et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6718178 | Sladek et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731741 | Fourcand et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6731926 | Link, II et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738636 | Lielbriedis | May 2004 | B2 |
6747970 | Lamb et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748057 | Ranalli et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6760343 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775737 | Warkhede et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6795701 | Baker et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801781 | Provost et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6836477 | West, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6839421 | Ferraro Esparza et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6865266 | Pershan | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871070 | Ejzak | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873849 | de la Red et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885872 | McCann et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6917612 | Foti et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6944666 | Belkin | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950441 | Kaczmarczyk et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6963583 | Foti | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6968052 | Wullert, II | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6993038 | McCann | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010002 | Chow et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7010114 | Stahl et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7027433 | Touhino et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7027582 | Khello et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035239 | McCann et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039037 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7054652 | Luis | May 2006 | B2 |
7058036 | Yu et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7079524 | Bantukul et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079853 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085260 | Karaul et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092505 | Allison et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7170982 | Li et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7221952 | Cho et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7260207 | Marsico | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7274683 | Segal | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7286839 | McCann et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7366530 | McCann et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7397773 | Qu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7415007 | Huang | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7457283 | Dalton, Jr. et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7551608 | Roy | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7627108 | Enzmann et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7664495 | Bonner et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7693135 | Pershan | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7715367 | Nishida et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7746864 | Asawa et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7751386 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756518 | Xu et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7787445 | Marsico | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787878 | Li et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7805532 | Pattison et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7856094 | Khadri et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7860231 | Florkey et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7864752 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7889716 | Tejani et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7948978 | Rogers et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7984130 | Bogineni et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7996541 | Marathe et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8027319 | Chin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8050253 | Kalyanpur et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8073127 | Bantukul et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8184798 | Waitrowski et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8224337 | Gosnell et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8254551 | Heinze et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8452325 | McCann | May 2013 | B2 |
8538000 | Bantukul et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8594679 | Agarwal et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8649498 | Rankin et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
9219677 | McCann et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20010008532 | Lee | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010029182 | McCann et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030957 | McCann et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010031641 | Ung et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034224 | McDowell et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010040957 | McCann et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010055380 | Benedyk et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020029189 | Titus et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020048360 | Zambre et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020054667 | Martinez | May 2002 | A1 |
20020054674 | Chang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020058507 | Valentine et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020095421 | Koskas | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111153 | Hartmaier et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114440 | Madour et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122547 | Hinchey et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147845 | Sanchez-Herrero et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150079 | Zabawskyj et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173320 | Aitken et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176382 | Madour et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176562 | Hao | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030007482 | Khello et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030013464 | Jean Henry-Labordere | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026289 | Mukherjee et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031160 | Gibson Ang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037108 | Peiffer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030054844 | Anvekar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061234 | Ali et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065788 | Salomaki | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081754 | Esparza et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095541 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109271 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030128693 | Segal | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030177281 | McQuillan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030181206 | Zhou et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030193967 | Fenton et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203740 | Bahl et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220951 | Muthulingam et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030227899 | McCann | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030231623 | Ryu et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003037 | Fujimoto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003114 | Adamczyk | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024894 | Osman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034699 | Gotz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052240 | Stahl et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040053604 | Ratilainen et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040053610 | Kim | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040076126 | Qu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081206 | Allison et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082332 | McCann et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087300 | Lewis | May 2004 | A1 |
20040125925 | Marsot | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040131052 | Smith et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040141488 | Kim et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142707 | Midkiff et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153506 | Ito et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040184435 | Westman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196963 | Appelman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040198351 | Knotts | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202187 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233840 | Bye | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243596 | Lillqvist et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040246965 | Westman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264671 | Lamberton et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050003838 | McCann et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027867 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050053213 | Giannoit | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070310 | Caspi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050100145 | Spencer et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101297 | Delaney et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119017 | Lovell, Jr. et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143075 | Halsell | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050176448 | Klockner | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182781 | Bouvet | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050202836 | Schaedler et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220288 | Huey | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050251509 | Pontius | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286531 | Tuohino et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002308 | Na et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060034256 | Addagatla et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034270 | Haase et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060067338 | Hua et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060072726 | Klein et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077957 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095575 | Sureka et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060098621 | Plata et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060105766 | Azada et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060136557 | Schaedler et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060165068 | Dalton et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060209791 | Khadri et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060225128 | Aittola et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060245573 | Sheth et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060291488 | Naqvi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293021 | Zhou | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070019625 | Ramachandran et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070061397 | Gregorat et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070104184 | Ku et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070115934 | Dauster et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070116250 | Stafford | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121875 | Gruchala et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121879 | McGary et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121908 | Benedyk et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127436 | Karimi-Cherkandi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133574 | Tejani et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133757 | Girouard et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070153995 | Fang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167166 | Fleischer et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191003 | Smith et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203909 | Marathe | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070238465 | Han et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070243876 | Duan | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258575 | Douglas et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286379 | Wiatrowski et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080013533 | Bogineni et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019356 | Marsico | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037759 | Chin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080081754 | Plemons et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080084975 | Schwartz | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109532 | Denoual et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080112399 | Cohen et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114862 | Moghaddam et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130856 | Ku et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137832 | Heinze et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080171544 | Li et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080198862 | Bantukul et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080198996 | Bantukul et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215740 | Gruchala et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080247526 | Qui et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253362 | Samarasinghe et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260119 | Marathe et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281975 | Qui et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285438 | Marathe et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080310613 | Fleischer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080311917 | Marathe et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090022146 | Huang | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090041225 | Agarwal et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043704 | Bantukul et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090074174 | Allen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090103707 | McGary et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090193071 | Qiu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090227276 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090264112 | De Zen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090296694 | Kalyanpur et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100020728 | Jefferson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100040029 | Doppler et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100042525 | Cai et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100056100 | Elman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100093307 | Hui et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100177780 | Ophir et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100202446 | McCann et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100285800 | McCann | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299451 | Yigang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110098049 | Gosnell et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110116382 | McCann et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126277 | McCann et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1968267 | May 2007 | CN |
ZL 200680051295.9 | Mar 2013 | CN |
0 088 639 | Sep 1983 | EP |
0 212 654 | May 1987 | EP |
0 258 654 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0 264 023 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0 512 962 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0 669 771 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 936 825 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0 944 276 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1 100 279 | May 2001 | EP |
1 285 545 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1 558 004 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1 742 452 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1 282 983 | Aug 2010 | EP |
1 958 399 | Feb 2012 | EP |
1 676 386 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2 382 267 | May 2003 | GB |
58-215164 | Dec 1983 | JP |
62-200859 | Sep 1987 | JP |
2000-0037801 | Jul 2000 | KR |
10-1998-0052565 | May 2001 | KR |
1020030025024 | Mar 2003 | KR |
2003-0040291 | May 2003 | KR |
10-2003-0066043 | Aug 2003 | KR |
10-2004-0107271 | Dec 2004 | KR |
10-2006-0090378 | Aug 2006 | KR |
10-2007-0061774 | Jun 2007 | KR |
10-2007-0093383 | Sep 2007 | KR |
WO 8401073 | Mar 1984 | WO |
WO 8603915 | Jul 1986 | WO |
WO 8800419 | Jan 1988 | WO |
WO 9512292 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9611557 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9733441 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9818269 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 9856195 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9911087 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9914910 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9957926 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0016583 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0060821 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0120920 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0147297 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0148981 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0154444 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0156308 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 02096147 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03005664 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03105382 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004006534 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004008786 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004075507 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004102345 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005013538 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2006031678 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2006072473 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006102339 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2007045991 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007064943 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007146257 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008011101 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008073226 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2008157213 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009018418 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009023573 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2009070179 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2010083509 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2011047382 | Apr 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Young-Fu Chang, “BICC Extension of SIP in Inter-Network Configuration,” Lucent Technologies draft-chang-sipping-bicc-network-00.txt (Sep. 2001). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,702 (Jun. 5, 2012). |
Non-Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,702 (Feb. 2, 2012). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2010/021374 (Aug. 19, 2010). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2009/065745 (Jun. 15, 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; IP Multimedia Call Control Protocol Based on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Session Description Protocol (SDP); Stage 3 (Release 5),” 3GPP TS 24.229 V5.22.0 (Sep. 2008). |
“BICC Architecture and BICC Protocol Details,” Tekelec, p. 28-41 (2008). |
“BICC Signaling Router (BSR) Reference Architecture (WP005274),” Tekelec, p. 2-91 (2008). |
“GPRS Tunneling Protocol (GTP),” Trillium, Continuous Computing, pp. 1-3 (Copyright 2007). |
“Telecommunications and Internet Converged Services and Protocols for Advanced Networking (TISPAN); Interworking Between Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC) Protocol or ISDN User Part (ISUP),” ETSI EN 383 001 V1.1.1 (Jun. 2006). |
Jennings et al., “Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) URIs for Application such as Voicemail and Interactive Voice Response (IVR),” The Internet Society, RFC 4458 (Apr. 2006). |
“Gateway Control Protocol: Version 3,” Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of Audiovisual Services—Communication Procedures, ITU-T H.248.1 (Sep. 2005). |
“Interworking Between Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol or ISDN User Part,” ITU-T Q.1912.5, p. 1-101 (Mar. 2004). |
“Services and Protocols for Advanced Networks (SPAN); Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC) Capability Set 2 (CS2); Protocol Specification,” ETSI EN 302 213 V1.1.2 (Jan. 2004). |
“Telecommunications and Internet Protocol Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON) Release 4; Technology Mapping; Implementation of TIPHON Architecture Using BICC,” ETSI TS 102 228 V4.1.1 (Nov. 2003). |
Camarillo et al., “Mapping of Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP) Overlap Signalling to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” Network Working Group, RFC 3578 (Aug. 2003). |
Garcia-Martin et al., “Private Header (P-Header) Extensions to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for the 3rd-Generation Partnership Project (3GPP),” Network Working Group, RFC 3455 (Jan. 2003). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Broadband ISDN—Signalling ATM Adaptation Layer (SAAL); Signalling Transport converter on SCTP,” ITU-T Q.2150.3 (Dec. 2002). |
“Bearer Independent Call Bearer Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1950, p. 1-96 (Dec. 2002). |
Camarillo et al., “Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP) to Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Mapping,” Network Working Group, RFC 3398 (Dec. 2002). |
Vemuri et al., “Session Initiation Protocol for Telephones (SIP-T): Context and Architectures,” Network Working Group, RFC 3372 (Sep. 2002). |
Chang, “BICC Extension of SIP in Inter-Network Configuration,” Internet Engineering Task Force, draft-chang-sipping-bicc-network-00.txt, pp. 1-17 (Mar. 2002). |
Multiservice Switching Forum, “Implementation Agreement for BICC,” MSF-IA-BICC.001-FINAL (Feb. 2002). |
Marshall et al., “SIP Extensions for Supporting Distributed Call State,” SIP Working Group, Internet Draft, pp. 1-12 (Aug. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Specification of Signalling Related to Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC); Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2): Basic Call Procedures,” ITU-T Q.1902.4 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2) and Signalling System No. 7 ISDN User Part: Formats and Codes,” ITU-T Q.1902.3, p. 1-141 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2) and Signaling System No. 7 ISDN user part: General Functions of Messages and Parameters,” ITU-T Q.1902.2 (Jul. 2001). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol (Capability Set 2): Functional Description,” ITU-T Q.1902.1, p. 1-23 (Jul. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling, Specification of Signalling Related to Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC); BICC Bearer Control Tunnelling Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1990 (Jul. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Specifications of Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part; Signalling System No. 7—Application Transport Mechanism: Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC); Amendment 1: Bearer Independent Call Control Capability Set 2,” ITU-T Q.765.5 (Jul. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Specifications of Signalling Related to Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC): Interworking Between Signalling System No. 7 ISDN User Part and the Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1912.1 (Jul. 2001). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Interworking Between Selected Signalling Systems (PSTN Access, DSS1, C5, R1, R2, TUP) and the Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1912.2 (Jul. 2001). |
“Signalling Transport Converter on MTP3 and MTP3b,” ITU-T Q.2150.1 (May 2001). |
“Generic Signalling Transport Service,” ITU-T Q.2150.0 (May 2001). |
“ITU-Q1970: Draft New ITU-T Recommendation Q.1970 BICC IP Bearer Control Protocol,” Network Dictionary (2001). |
“Gateway Control Protocol: Transport Over Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP),” Series H: Audiovisual and Multimedia Systems; Infrastructure of Audiovisual Services—Communication Procedures, H.248.4 (Nov. 2000). |
“Bearer Independent Call Control Protocol,” ITU-T Q.1901 (Jun. 2000). |
Sugano et al., “Presence Information Data Format for IMPP,” Internet draft, draft-ietf-impp-pidf-01.text, Network Working Group, pp. 1-17 (Mar. 10, 2000). |
“Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part Enhancements for the Support of Number Portability,” ITU-T Q.769.1 (Dec. 1999). |
“Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part Formats and Codes,” ITU-T Q.763 (Dec. 1999). |
“Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part General Functions of Messages and Signals,” ITU-T Q.762 (Dec. 1999). |
“Signalling System No. 7—ISDN User Part Functional Description,” ITU-T Q.761 (Dec. 1999). |
“Series Q: Switching and Signalling; Specifications of Signalling System No. 7—ISDN Supplementary Services; ISDN User Part Supplementary Services,” ITU-T Q.730 (Dec. 1999). |
Liao et al., “SS7-TCAP/IP Interworking,” Internet Engineering Task Force, pp. 1-14 (Mar. 1999). |
De Ment, “The Evolution of Signaling,” NMS Communications, p. 1-28 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Mobile Wireless Overview,” Cisco IOS Mobile Wireless Configuration Guide, pp. MWC-1-MWC-8 (Publication Date Unknown). |
Advisory Action and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,702 (Jan. 15, 2014). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,702 (Aug. 15, 2013). |
Hearing notice for India Patent Application No. 2112/CHENP/2009 (Aug. 8, 2016). |
Communication of the extended European search report for European Patent Application No. 097178651 (Jul. 17, 2015). |
“Address Resolution in MMS (Re: SerG LS E.164 Address Sch,” 3GPP TSG-T WG2-SWG3, vol. T WG2, No. Camcun, Mexico 2001126-20011130 http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg—t/WG2—Capability/TSGT2—15—Cancun/Docs/ (Dec. 4, 2001). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due and Examiner-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/689,702 (Aug. 19, 2015). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/400,576 dated Aug. 24, 2011. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/400,576 dated Mar. 9, 2012. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/400,576 dated Jun. 26, 2012. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/400,576 dated Jul. 19, 2013. |
3rd Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Diameter based protocols to support Short Message Service (SMS) capable Mobile Management Entities (MMEs),” 3GPP TS 29.338, V12.0.0, pp. 1-40 (Mar. 2013). |
3rd Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Circuit Switched (CS) fallback in Evolved Packet System (EPS); Stage 2,” 3GPP TS 23.272, V10.10.0, pp. 1-84 (Mar. 2013). |
“Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Circuit Switched (CS) fallback in Evolved Packet System (EPS); Stage 2,” ETSI TS 123 272, V11.3.0, pp. 1-93 (Jan. 2013). |
Notice of Publication of Abstract for Indian Patent Application No. 6406/CHENP/2010 A (Jun. 17, 2011). |
“Ericsson Unified Number Portability,” (Downloaded from the Internet on Jan. 24, 2011). |
Tsou et al., “Realm-Based Redirection in Diameter,” draft-ietf-dime-realm-based-redirect-03, RFC 3588, pp. 1-6 (Jul. 12, 2010). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Policy and Charging Control signalling flows and Quality of Service (QoS) parameter mapping (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 29.213, V9.2.0, pp. 1-129 (Mar. 2010). |
Korhonen et al., “Clarifications on the Routing of Diameter Requests Based on the Username and the Realm,” RFC 5729, pp. 1-9 (Dec. 2009). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International application No. PCT/US2009/036538 (Sep. 30, 2009). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Evolved Packet System (EPS); Mobility Management Entity (MME) and Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN) related interfaces based on Diameter protocol (Release 9),” 3GPP TS 29.272, V9.0.0, pp. 1-71 (Sep. 2009). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network and Terminals; Evolved Packet System (EPS); Mobility Management Entity (MME) and Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN) related interfaces based on Diameter protocol (Release 8),” 3GPP TS 29.272 V8.4.0, pp. 1-71 (Sep. 2009). |
Jones et al., “Diameter Command Code Registration for the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS),” Network Working Group, RFC 5516, pp. 1-5 (Apr. 2009). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Policy and charging control architecture (Release 8),” 3GPP TS 23.203, V8.1.1, pp. 1-87 (Mar. 2008). |
“IP Multimedia Subsystem,” printout from wikipedia.org, Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. (May 29, 2007). |
“HP OperCall Home Subscriber Server Software—Data Sheet”, 4AA0-3360ENW Rev. 2, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (Jul. 2006). |
Lucent Technologies, “ENUM Use and Management for the Successful Deployment of ENUM-Enabled Services; Understand ENUM and its Deployment to Insure Success of your VoIP and Other ENUM-enabled Services,” White Paper, pp. 1-12 (Jul. 2006). |
Tschofenig et al., “Securing the Next Steps in Signaling (NSIS) Protocol Suite,” International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology, vol. 1, pp. 1-14 (2006). |
Stiemerling et al., “NAT/Firewall NSIS Signaling Layer Protocol (NSLP),” draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-natfw-06, pp. 1-70 (May 16, 2005). |
Schwarz, “ENUM Trial to Link Phone, Internet Addresses,” (Mar. 22, 2005). |
Peterson, “Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service Registration for Presence Services,” Network Working Group, RFC 3953 (Jan. 2005). |
Jones, “The Definitive Guide to Scaling Out SQL Server,” http://www.snip.gob.ni/Xdc/SQL/DGSOSSFinal.pdf (Retrieved on Aug. 16, 2010) (2005). |
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Core Network; Support of Mobile Number Portability (MNP); Technical Realization; Stage 2 (Release 6),” 3GPP TS 23.066, V6.0.0, pp. 1-83 (Dec. 2004). |
Peterson et al., “Using E.164 Numbers With the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” Network Working Group, RFC 3824, pp. 1-14 (Jun. 2004). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point as the Signaling Gateway for the Cisco BTS 10200 Softswitch,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-10 (Summer 2004). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point as the Signaling Gateway for the Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-11 (Summer 2004). |
“Next-Generation Signaling Transports Cisco IP Transfer Point,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-27 (Summer 2004). |
“A Study in Mobile Messaging: The Evolution of Messaging in Mobile Networks, and How to Efficiently and Effectively Manage the Growing Messaging Traffic,” White Paper, Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-6 (Spring 2004). |
Walker, “The IP Revolution in Mobile Messaging,” Packet, Cisco Systems Users Magazine, vol. 16, No. 1, pp. Cover; 73-74; and 89 (First Quarter 2004). |
“Cisco ITP Multilayer Routing (MLR) SMS MO Routing Requirements,” Cisco Systems, Inc., p. 1 (Copyright 2004). |
“Cisco Signaling Gateway Manager Release 3.2 for Cisco IP Transfer Point,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-9 (Copyright 1992-2004). |
“Solutions for Mobile Network Operators,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-8 (Copyright 1992-2004). |
Cisco, “Quality of Service Networks,” Internetworking Technologies Handbook, Chapter 49, pp. 49-1-49-32 (Sep. 11, 2003). |
Calhoun et al., “Diameter Base Protocol,” RFC 3588, pp. 1-90 (Sep. 2003). |
Moodie, “Agilent acceSS7: White Paper,” Agilent Technologies, pp. 1-14 (Apr. 1, 2003). |
Foster et al., “Number Portability in the Global Switched Telephone Network (GSTN): An Overview,” Network Working Group, RFC 3482 (Feb. 2003). |
Loshin, “19.4: Network Address Translation,” TCP/IP Clearly Explained, Fourth Edition, Morgan Kaufman Publishers, pp. 435-437 (2003). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-10 (Copyright 1992-2003). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point Multilayer Short Message Serivce Routing Solution,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-6 (Copyright 1992-2003). |
“Cisco ITP MAP Gateway for Public WLAN Slm Authentication and Authorization,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-13 (Copyright 1992-2003). |
Barry, “A Signal for Savings,” Packet, Cisco Systems Users Magazine, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. Cover; 19-21; and 81 (Fourth Quarter 2002). |
“Global Implementation of ENUM: A Tutorial Paper,” International Telecommunication Union, Telecommunication Standardization Union, Study Group 2, (Feb. 8, 2002). |
“Agilent Tchnologies and Cisco Systems SS7 Over IP White Paper,” Cisco Systems, Inc. and Agilent and Technologies, pp. 1-6 (Copyright 2002—Printed in the UK Feb. 1, 2002). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point: MTP3 User Adaptation (M3UA) and SCCP User Adaptation (SUA) Signaling Gateway,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-14 (Copyright 2002). |
“Cisco SS7 Port Adapter for the Cisco 7500 Versatile Interface Processor and 7200 VXR Routers Provide High-Density SS7 Agrregation,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-5 (Copyright 1992-2002). |
“Next-Generation SS7 Networks with the Cisco IP Transfer Point,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-14 (Copyright 1992-2002). |
The attached email dated Oct. 20, 2001 and PowerPoint presentation dated Oct. 24, 2001 disclose an MSISDN-based auto-provisioning solution proposed by a customer of the assignee of the presend application. |
“Agilent acceSS7 Business intelligence,” Agilent Technologies, pp. 1-6 (Copyright 2001—Printed in the UK Nov. 30, 2001). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point (ITP) Network Management Product Presentation,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-20 (Copyright 2001). |
“Networkers,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-60 (Copyright 2001). |
“Cisco SS7 Signaling Offload,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-33 (Copyright 1992-2001). |
Mealling, “The Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) DNS Resource Record,” Network Working Group, RFC 2915 (Sep. 2000). |
Rockhold, “Or,” Wireless Review, p. 22, 23, 26, 28, 30, 32, (Aug. 15, 2000). |
“Topsail Beach-SS7 Over IP-” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-16 (Copyright 1999). |
ETSI, “Digital Cellular Telecommunications Systems (Phase 2++); Support of Mobile Number Portability (MNP); Technical Realisation; Stage 2,” Global System for Mobile Communications, p. 1-71, (1998). |
Smith, “Number Portability Pileup,” Telephony, p. 22, 24, 26, (Jan. 6, 1997). |
Jain et al., “Phone Number Portability for PCS Systems with ATM Backbones Using Distributed Dynamic Hashing,” IEEE, vol. 15 (No. 1), p. 96-105, (Jan. 1997). |
Heinmiller, “Generic Requrements for SCP Application and GTT Function for Number Portability,” Illinois Number Portability Workshop, p. 1-50, (Sep. 4, 1996). |
International Telecommunication Union, “Series Q: Switching and Signalling: Specifications of Signalling Systems No. 7—Signalling Connection Control Part,” p. 11-16, (Jul. 1996). |
Rice, “SS7 Networks in a PCS World,” Telephony, pp. 138, 140 142, 144, 146, (Jun. 24, 1996). |
Tekelec, “Eagle STP Planning Guide”, Eagle Network Switching Division, (No. 3), p. i-vii, 1-64, A1-A2, B1-2, (May 1996). |
Anonymous, “Generic Switching and Signaling Requirements for Number Portability,” AT&T Network Systems, No. 1, p. 1-75, (Feb. 2, 1996). |
ETSI, Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+); Milbe Application Part (MAP) Specification, Global System for Mobile Communications, pp. 112-114 (1996). |
Jain, et al., “A Hashing Scheme for Phone Number Portability in PCS Systems with ATM Backbones,” Bell Communications Research, p. 593-597, (1996). |
Bishop, “Freeing the Network for Competition,” Telecommunications, p. 75-80, (Apr. 1995). |
Anonymous, “Zeichengabesysteme—Eine neue Generation für ISDN und intelligente Netze,” Zeichengabesystem, Medien-Institut Bremen, p. iz-xi; 170-176, (Feb. 17, 1995). |
Giordano et al., “PCS Number Portability,” IEEE, p. 1146-1150, (Sep. 1994). |
Bellcore, “Signaling Transfer Point (STP) Generic Requirements,” Bell Communications Research, No. 1, p. ii-xxii, 4-84-J14, (Jun. 1994). |
Telcordia Technologies, “CCS Network interface Specification (CCSNIS) Supporting SCCP and TCAP,” Bell Communications Research, p. ii-xii, 1-1—C-22, (Mar. 1994). |
Buckles, “Very High Capacity Signaling Trnsfer Point for Intelligent Network Servcies,” DSC Communciations Corporation, p. 1308-1311, (1988). |
Neustar, “ENUM: Driving Convergence in the Internet Age,” pp. 1-5 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Diameter Overview,” referenced from www.ulticom.com/html/products/signalware-diameter-reference-guide.asp (Publication date unknown). |
“Chapter 1: Overview,” SS7 Port Adapter Installation and Configuration, pp. 1-1-1-8 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Configuring ITP Basic Functionally,” IP Transfer Point, Cisco IOS Release 12.2(4)MB12, pp. 31-50 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Configuring ITP Optional Features,” IP Transfer Point, Cisco IOS Release 12.294)MB12, pp. 65-136 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Configuring M3UA and SUA SS7 Over IP Signaling Gateways,” IP Transfer Point, Cisco IOS Release 12.2(4)MB13, pp. 51-66 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Configuring M3UA and SUA SS7 Over IP Signaling Gateways,” IP Transfer Point, Cisco IOS Release 12.2(4)MB10, pp. 49-62 (Publication Date Unknown). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/044,510 (Sep. 20, 2016). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100157986 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61117538 | Nov 2008 | US |