The subject matter described herein relates to methods and systems for increasing a network's reliability and robustness. More particularly, the subject matter described herein relates to systems, methods, and computer readable media for using a signaling message routing node to provide backup subscriber information management service.
In conventional telecommunications networks that support mobile subscribers, one or more network entities maintain what is referred to as subscriber information, which may include the identity of the subscriber, the services that are available to the subscriber, and the current location of the mobile subscriber. In conventional telecommunications networks, certain network entities are responsible for maintaining subscriber information and for making that information available when needed. For example, global system for mobile communications (GSM) networks include a home location register, or HLR, which maintains information about subscribers to a mobile network. In Internet protocol media subsystems (IMS) networks, some of the same or similar functions are performed by a home subscriber server, or HSS. For simplicity, a network entity responsible for maintaining subscriber information is hereinafter generically referred to an HLR/HSS.
Access to subscriber information is vital to the operation of a mobile telecommunications network. Other network elements, such as mobile switching centers (MSCs) and call session control functions (CSCFs) communicate mobile subscriber status information to the HLR/HSS nodes using various signaling protocols, including GSM/IS-41 mobile application part (MAP), Diameter, and others. Example subscriber information management messages include MAP and Diameter UpdateLocation messages, Diameter user data request (UDR) messages, Diameter profile update, Diameter location information request (LIR) messages, Diameter server assignment request (SAR) messages, and MAP signal routing information (SRI) messages. These messages carry, among other things, information that identifies the current serving MSC or CSCF. The HLR/HSS is also configured to provide mobile subscriber information to a requesting MSC or CSCF.
There are disadvantages associated with conventional telecommunications networks that support mobile subscribers. In conventional networks, mobile subscribers are assigned or homed to a single subscriber information management node, such as an HLR or HSS. If the HLR/HSS nodes in a mobile communications network become unreachable, isolated, or otherwise unavailable, major service disruptions are possible and likely. What is needed, therefore, is a system and method for minimizing the negative impact of loss of access to subscriber information management information, such as may occur as a result of HLR/HSS network element isolation events in a mobile telecommunications network.
One conventional approach to overcome the disadvantages stated above has been to create an entity, called a gateway location register, or GLR, that copies mobility management messages, caches all of the information contained within the mobility management messages, and responds on behalf of the HLR/HSS when possible, in order to reduce the workload on the HLR/HSS. This conventional approach suffers the disadvantage that the GLR always responds on behalf of the HLR/HSS, even if the HLR/HSS is operational. What is needed is a system or method which provides backup service, responding only when the HLR/HSS is not operational.
Another conventional approach to overcome the disadvantages stated above has been to distribute the function of an HLR/HSS across a bank of nodes, where each individual HLR/HSS services a particular subset of subscribers, and to place a distribution function between the bank of nodes, where the each subscriber is routed to that subscriber's HLR/HSS. This conventional approach suffers the disadvantage that failure of a particular HLR/HSS causes a loss of service to whichever subscribers had been assigned to that HLR/HSS. Rather than protect against loss of service, this approach limits loss of service to a subset of subscribers rather than having all subscribers lose service. However, if the distribution function fails, all subscribers lose service anyway. What is needed is a system or method which can supplement this conventional approach by providing backup service for both any individual HLR/HSS that may fail, and also provide backup service in case the distribution function fails as well.
Another conventional approach to overcome the disadvantages stated above involves load sharing across multiple HLR/HSS nodes, where messages are distributed across the nodes to reduce the load on any individual node. This conventional approach suffers the disadvantage that each node must contain a full copy of the subscriber information database. This gives rise to overhead required to keep all databases in synchronization with each other. This approach suffers the additional disadvantage that a corrupted entry in one node's database is quickly replicated across all nodes' databases, rendering them all susceptible to the same kind of database corruption. What is needed is a system or method which stores information independently from the HLR/HSS nodes and is thus isolated from corruption of any one of the HLR/HSS nodes.
Accordingly, in light of these disadvantages, there exists a need for systems, methods, and computer readable media for using a signaling message routing node to provide backup subscriber information management service.
Methods, systems, and computer readable media for using a signaling message routing node to provide a backup subscriber information management service are disclosed. According to one method, a signaling message routing node obtains information associated with a subscriber. The signaling message routing node receives a first subscriber information management message including a message destination and being associated with the subscriber. The signaling message routing node determines whether the message destination is operable to process the first subscriber information management message. In response to determining that the message destination node is operable to process the first subscriber information management message, the signaling message routing node routes the first subscriber information message to the message destination. In response to determining that the message destination is not operable to process the first subscriber information management message, the signaling message routing node responds to the first subscriber information management message on behalf of the message.
The subject matter described herein for using a signaling message routing node to provide backup subscriber information management service and may be implemented in software in combination with hardware and/or firmware. For example, the subject matter described herein can be implemented in software executed by a processor. As such, the terms “function” or “module” as used herein refer to software in combination with hardware and/or firmware for implementing the feature being described. In one exemplary implementation, the subject matter described herein may be implemented using a computer readable medium having stored thereon computer executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to perform steps. Exemplary computer readable media suitable for implementing the subject matter described herein include non-transitory computer-readable media, such as disk memory devices, chip memory devices, programmable logic devices, and application specific integrated circuits. In addition, a computer readable medium that implements the subject matter described herein may be located on a single device or computing platform or may be distributed across multiple devices or computing platforms.
Preferred embodiments of the subject matter described herein will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts, of which:
In accordance with the subject matter disclosed herein, systems, methods, and computer readable media are provided for using a signaling message routing node to provide backup subscriber information management service. In one embodiment, a signaling message routing node is configured to provide home location register/home subscriber server backup. In this embodiment, if the HLR/HSS element in a mobile communications network becomes unreachable, unavailable, or isolated, queries that would normally be routed to and received by the HLR/HSS are redirected by the router to a subscriber information management module. The subscriber information management module receives, processes, and responds to the HLR/HSS query on behalf of the intended HLR/HSS element. The signaling message routing node may also be configured to provide an auto-provisioned subscriber location cache. Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
In the embodiment illustrated in
Similarly, subscriber information cache 108 can be any suitable node for storing subscriber information. As set forth above, subscriber information cache 108 can be an internal database to signaling message routing node 102. Alternatively, subscriber information cache 108 can be an STP, a signaling gateway, a signaling router, a DSR, an IP router, an IMS router, a server, a service control point, or other suitable node separate from with storage capacity.
Subscriber information management message 104 may be mobile application part (MAP) protocol message, a Diameter protocol message, or other type of subscriber information management message. For example, subscriber information management message 104 may be a request to update a subscriber's location information, such as an UpdateLoc message, a request for location information, such as LOC_REQ, a request for routing information for a particular subscriber, such as SRI and SRI_SM, or a registration message. Subscriber information management message 104 may alternatively be a Diameter server assignment request (SAR) message, a Diameter location information request (LIR) message, a Diameter profile update request (PUR) message, a Diameter update location request (ULR), a Diameter user data request (UDR) message, or any other Diameter message received on the Cx, Sh, S6a, S6b, or Sp interface.
The information associated with a subscriber that is obtained by signaling message routing node 102 may be information identifying the subscriber or identifying a network node that is currently serving the subscriber. Information identifying the subscriber may include an international mobile subscriber identity (IMSI) of the subscriber, a mobile station integrated services digital network (MSISDN) number of the subscriber, or other information identifying the subscriber. Information identifying a network node that is currently serving the subscriber may include the address of the node, such as a point code of the node, an IP address of the node, a name, a uniform resource identifier (URI), a uniform resource locator (URL), a Diameter node identifier, or other information identifying the node. Examples of nodes that serve subscribers include mobile switching centers (MSCs), such as visiting MSC (VMSC) 110, which, in the embodiment illustrated in
The information obtained by routing node 102 and stored in subscriber information cache 108 may be all or a subset of the information normally stored in HLR/HSS 106. For example, basic HLR/HSS functionality may be approximated by storing only the subscriber identity and the identity of the node currently serving that subscriber. Additional information may be stored as well, such as the subscriber's profile, which may indicate the type of subscriber (subscription or pre-paid, local/national/international calling plan, etc.) as well as services that the subscriber has access to (calls, text messages, media streaming, Internet access, etc.) To save space, however, subscriber information cache 108 may store one or only a few basic service profiles that would take effect in the event that HLR/HSS 106 becomes inoperable. In this manner, network subscribers and their visitors would be allowed basic access, such as incoming and outgoing calls, limited text messaging, etc., even in an emergency situation. Alternatively, subscriber information cache 108 may provide only one profile for all subscribers in the event of failure of the HLR/HSS 106. Although not described explicitly with respect to
Providing backup subscriber information management service may include providing backup presence service, status updates, registration, and prepaid service. In alternative embodiments, telecommunications system 100 may include or consist of any wireless protocol, including WiMax and WiFi. In alternative embodiments, system 100 could provide backup service for other nodes or other subscriber information management nodes—not just for HLR/HSS nodes. In alternative embodiments, system 100 may include or consist of other network types, such as IMS, or other packet networks, wireline networks, etc.
In step 200, information associated with a subscriber is obtained by a signaling message routing node. For example, signaling message routing node 102 may obtain information associated with a subscriber by intercepting subscriber information management messages and caching subscriber information from those messages in subscriber information cache 108. An exemplary process for obtaining subscriber information will be described in detail with respect to
In step 202, a subscriber information management message having a message destination and being associated with a subscriber is received at the signaling message routing node. In the example illustrated in
In step 204, it is determined whether the message destination is operable to process the subscriber information management message. In one embodiment, either routing node 102 or subscriber information cache 108 may use a physical level protocol, a link level protocol, a network level protocol, an application level protocol, a high-availability protocol, or other suitable protocol to determine whether HLR/HSS 106 is operable to process UpdateLocation message 104. For example, network management messages such as subsystem status test (SST), subsystem prohibited (SSP), and subsystem restricted (SSR) may be used. Other mechanisms for determining the health of message destination 106 include link and linkset monitoring, ping, ICMP, and high availability (HA) protocols. For LTE, the SCTP level handshake can detect failure of the host node and/or failure of an application on the host node. A routing node may detect the failure of HLR/HSS 106 via SS7, SCTP, Diameter, and SIGTRAN protocol handshakes. Alternatively, either routing node 102 or subscriber information management cache 108 may receive notification from an entity other than HLR/HSS 106 that HLR/HSS 106 is not operational to process subscriber information management message 104. For example, this notification may be issued from a network operator or network controller, such as when the network operator detects that HLR/HSS 106 is down or disables HLR/HSS 106 for maintenance, etc.
In step 206, if the message destination is operable to process the subscriber information management message, the process moves to step 208, in which the subscriber information management message is routed to the message destination. In the embodiment illustrated in
In the case where subscriber information management message 104 is a request for location information, responding on behalf of HLR/HSS 106 may include providing the requested subscriber information to the message originator. For example, subscriber information management message 104 may be a request for subscriber location information, such as a send routing information (SRI) message, a send routing information for short messages (SRI_SM) message, a location request (LOC_REQ) message, etc. This type of message is hereinafter referred to generically as a subscriber information request. In this scenario, if HLR/HSS 106 is operable, message 104 is forwarded to HLR/HSS 106. If HLR/HSS 106 is not operable, cache 108 or routing node 102 may respond to message 104 with the latest location information for the subscriber that was stored within cache 108. If subscriber information management message 104 is a registration request, routing node 102 or cache 108 may respond with a registration response containing updated subscriber registration information.
Thus, responding to subscriber information management message 104 may include responding to a request for location update with an answer message indicating that the location update is allowed or responding to a request for profile information by providing user profile information to the requesting entity. In the latter example, profile information may include information about what services a subscriber does and does not have access to, the type of subscriber, etc.
Referring to
In step 304, it is determined whether the message destination is operable to process the subscriber information management message. If so, the process moves to step 306, in which the subscriber information management message is routed to the message destination, and the process ends. If, in step 304, it is determined that the message destination node is not operable to process the subscriber information management message, the process moves to step 308, where the subscriber information management message is responded to on behalf of the message destination node. For example, routing node 102 may respond on behalf of HLR/HSS 106 in response to receiving a subscriber information management message that contains subscriber information by sending the corresponding answer or acknowledge message to the message originator.
In the examples above, backup subscriber information management service is provided for various types of mobile application part (MAP) messages. In addition, the subject matter described herein may be used to provide backup subscriber information management service for various types of Diameter transactions.
In
Referring to
It will be understood that various details of the subject matter described herein may be changed without departing from the scope of the subject matter described herein. Furthermore, the foregoing description is for the purpose of illustration only, and not for the purpose of limitation.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/308,280, filed Feb. 25, 2010; the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4310727 | Lawser | Jan 1982 | A |
4754479 | Bicknell et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
5089954 | Rago | Feb 1992 | A |
5237604 | Ryan | Aug 1993 | A |
5247571 | Kay et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5251248 | Tokunaga et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5400390 | Salin | Mar 1995 | A |
5420916 | Sekiguchi | May 1995 | A |
5422941 | Hasenauer et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423068 | Hecker | Jun 1995 | A |
5430719 | Weisser, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5442683 | Hoogeveen | Aug 1995 | A |
5455855 | Hokari | Oct 1995 | A |
5457736 | Cain et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5475732 | Pester, III | Dec 1995 | A |
5481603 | Gutierrez et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5502726 | Fischer | Mar 1996 | A |
5504804 | Widmark et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5526400 | Nguyen | Jun 1996 | A |
5579372 | Äström | Nov 1996 | A |
5590398 | Matthews | Dec 1996 | A |
5594942 | Antic et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5623532 | Houde et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5689548 | Maupin et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5706286 | Reiman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711002 | Foti | Jan 1998 | A |
5812639 | Bartholomew et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819178 | Cropper | Oct 1998 | A |
5822694 | Coombes et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832382 | Alperovich | Nov 1998 | A |
5841854 | Schumacher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5852660 | Lindquist et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854982 | Chambers et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862481 | Kulkarni et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867788 | Joensuu | Feb 1999 | A |
5878347 | Joensuu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878348 | Foti | Mar 1999 | A |
5889849 | Ban et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890063 | Mills | Mar 1999 | A |
5953662 | Lindquist et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953663 | Maupin et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5983217 | Khosravi-Sichannie et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006098 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011803 | Bicknell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014557 | Morton et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018657 | Kennedy, III et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038456 | Colby et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049714 | Patel | Apr 2000 | A |
6094578 | Purcell et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097960 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115463 | Coulombe et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
H1895 | Hoffpauir et al. | Oct 2000 | H |
6128377 | Sonnenberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6134441 | Äström et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134447 | Havinis et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137806 | Martinez | Oct 2000 | A |
6138007 | Bharatia | Oct 2000 | A |
6138016 | Kulkarni et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138017 | Price et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138023 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144857 | Price et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148204 | Urs et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6175743 | Alperovich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178181 | Glitho | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192242 | Rollender | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205210 | Rainey et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208870 | Lorello et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226517 | Britt et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236365 | LeBlanc et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6263212 | Ross et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6292669 | Meuronen et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298232 | Marin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308075 | Irten et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324279 | Kalmanek et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327350 | Spangler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338140 | Owens et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356529 | Zarom | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363431 | Hammer et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377674 | Chong et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377807 | Iparrea et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411632 | Lindgren et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6421674 | Yoakum et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424832 | Britt et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434127 | Ha | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453174 | Cunningham et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463055 | Lupien et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6493551 | Wang et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505046 | Baker | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512926 | Henry-Labordere | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515997 | Feltner et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519242 | Emery et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519468 | Donovan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529524 | Liao et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535746 | Yu et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6560216 | McNiff et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560456 | Lohtia et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574481 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577723 | Mooney | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594258 | Larson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611516 | Pirkola et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615037 | Bharatia et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625461 | Bertacchi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643511 | Rune et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662017 | McCann et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683881 | Mijares et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6684073 | Joss et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6697620 | Lamb et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6731926 | Link, II et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738636 | Lielbriedis | May 2004 | B2 |
6745041 | Allison et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6795701 | Baker et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6801781 | Provost et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819932 | Allison et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826397 | Vasa | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6836477 | West, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6850768 | Foll | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6865191 | Bengtsson et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6885872 | McCann et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6912389 | Bright et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6917612 | Foti et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6950441 | Kaczmarczyk et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6993038 | McCann | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7035239 | McCann et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039037 | Wang et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043002 | Delaney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7079524 | Bantukul et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7079853 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7092505 | Allison et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7113795 | Somani et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113800 | Linkola | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7145875 | Allison et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7177398 | Meer et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177399 | Dawson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181194 | McCann et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190959 | Palmer et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7221929 | Lee et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221952 | Cho et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7257401 | Dizdarevic et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7274683 | Segal | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7286839 | McCann et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292592 | Rune | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7366945 | Wang et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7397773 | Qu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7453876 | Hua et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7551608 | Roy | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7583646 | Hua et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7627331 | Winterbottom et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7668543 | Muller | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7729485 | Koskinen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7746864 | Asawa et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7801116 | Westman | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7844745 | Darbyshire et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7848767 | McCann et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7889716 | Tejani et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894353 | Li et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7916857 | Palmer et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7962120 | Cai et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8041349 | Fukui et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8175236 | Pandey et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8194634 | Delker et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8195161 | Bumiller | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8208461 | Mitchell | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8380209 | Sylvain | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8391833 | Agarwal | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20010006897 | Kang et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010029182 | McCann et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010030957 | McCann et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010040957 | McCann et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010046856 | McCann | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020132636 | Stockhusen | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147845 | Sanchez-Herrero et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020173320 | Aitken et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176382 | Madour et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003930 | Allison et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030007482 | Khello et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016684 | Prasad et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026289 | Mukherjee et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030054844 | Anvekar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061234 | Ali et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065788 | Salomaki | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030081754 | Esparza et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109271 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030157938 | Haase et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030193967 | Fenton et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030227899 | McCann | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040076126 | Qu et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081206 | Allison et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040082332 | McCann et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040087300 | Lewis | May 2004 | A1 |
20040125925 | Marsot | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040132451 | Butehorn et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142707 | Midkiff et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040198351 | Knotts | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040202187 | Kelly et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040203914 | Kall et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040219935 | McCann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040246965 | Westman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264674 | Delaney et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050003838 | McCann et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050111641 | Koskinen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119017 | Lovell, Jr. et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050238048 | Delaney et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060034256 | Addagatla et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060067338 | Hua et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060098621 | Plata et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060136557 | Schaedler et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060281492 | Jiang | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070061397 | Gregorat et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066326 | Agarwal et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070104184 | Ku et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070133574 | Tejani et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070209061 | Dekeyzer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070254681 | Horvath et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258575 | Douglas et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070288655 | Price et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070297419 | Askerup et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080039104 | Gu et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080176538 | Terrill et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080233931 | Shim | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080248820 | Lohtia | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090003388 | Florkey et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090129372 | Pandey et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090227276 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090232011 | Li et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100113016 | Gayde et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100217858 | Przybysz et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100250662 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100278041 | Shi | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100299451 | Yigang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110067085 | Brouard et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110222532 | Noldus | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120034900 | Agarwal | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120163297 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120202550 | Marsico | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120224524 | Marsico | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120287844 | Ophir et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130157620 | Marsico | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
ZL200680051295.9 | Mar 2013 | CN |
0 512 962 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0 788 283 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0 936 825 | Aug 1999 | EP |
0 944 276 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1 558 004 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1 742 452 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1 950 942 | Jul 2008 | EP |
10-2004-0107271 | Dec 2004 | KR |
WO 9512292 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9611557 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9733441 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9856195 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9911087 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9957926 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0016583 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0147297 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0148981 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0154444 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 02060192 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 03005664 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03021982 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03105382 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004006534 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004008786 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2004075507 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004102345 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2005002311 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005013538 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2006072473 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2007045991 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007064943 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2007092205 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007146257 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2008157213 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009023573 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2010111561 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2012088497 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2011/026307 (Nov. 15, 2011). |
Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC for European Application No. 06 844 747.3 (Jul. 19, 2011). |
Chinese Official Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200680051295.9 (Dec. 24, 2010). |
Notification of Transmittal of the Initernational Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2010/028762 (Oct. 27, 2010). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/291,502 (Oct. 5, 2010). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/405,859 (Aug. 5, 2010). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 11/706,837 (May 27, 2010). |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 06844747.3 (May 11, 2010). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 10/405,859 (Mar. 9, 2010). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/291,502 (Feb. 4, 2010). |
“Diameter (Protocol),” Wikipedia, pp. 1-8 (Document last modified on Jan. 16, 2010). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/706,837 (Dec. 15, 2009). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 11/706,837 (Oct. 26, 2009). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/405,859 (Aug. 3, 2009). |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European application No. 06844747.3 (Jul. 28, 2009). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/706,837 (May 13, 2009). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/291,502 (May 13, 2009). |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 06844747.3 (Apr. 24, 2009). |
Final Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/405,859 (Jan. 6, 2009). |
3GPP, “Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; IP Multimedia (IM) Subsystem Cx and Dx Interfaces; Signalling Flows and Message Contents,” ETSI TS 129 228 V8.4.0 (Jan. 2009). |
Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2006/046108 (Oct. 2, 2008). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2006/046108 (Sep. 9, 2008). |
Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 10/405,859 (Aug. 20, 2008). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/706,837 (Jul. 29, 2008). |
Communication of European publication number and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for Application No. 06844747.3 (Jul. 23, 2008). |
Official Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/405,859 (Mar. 17, 2008). |
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 10/405,859 (Feb. 6, 2008). |
“IP Multimedia Subsystem,” printout from wikipedia.org, Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. (May 29, 2007). |
Supplementary European Search Report for European application No. 04 756 094.1 (Mar. 29, 2007). |
“HP OpenCall Home Subscriber Server Software—Data Sheet”, 4AA0-3360ENW Rev. 2, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (Jul. 2006). |
Camarillo et al., “The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) P-User-Database Private-Header (P-Header),” Network Working Group, RFC 4457, pp. 1-8 (Apr. 2006). |
Liu et al., “Introduction to Diameter,” IBM, pp. 1-12 (Jan. 24, 2006). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point as the Signaling Gateway for the Cisco BTS 10200 Softswitch,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-10 (Summer 2004). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point as the Signaling Gateway for the Cisco PGW 2200 Softswitch,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-11 (Summer 2004). |
“Next-Generation Signaling Transports Cisco IP Transfer Point,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-27 (Summer 2004). |
International Search Report in PCT Application No. 03/32626 (Mar. 5, 2004). |
“A Study in Mobile Messageing: The Evolution of Messaging in Mobile Networks, and How to Efficiently and Effectively Manage the Growing Messaging Traffic,” White Paper, Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-6 (Spring 2004). |
Walker, “The IP Revolution in Mobile Messaging,” Packet, Cisco Systems Users Magazine, vol. 16, No. 1, pp. Cover; 73-74; and 89 (First Quarter 2004). |
“Cisco ITP Multilayer Routing (MLR) SMS MO Routing Requirements,” Cisco Systems, Inc., p. 1 (Copyright 2004). |
“Cisco Signaling Gateway Manager Release 3.2 For Cisco IP Transfer Point,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-9 (Copyright 1992-2004). |
“Solutions for Mobile Network Operators,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-8 (Copyright 1992-2004). |
Moodie, “Agilent acceSS7: White Paper,” Agilent Technologies, pp. 1-14 (Apr. 1, 2003). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-10 (Copyright 1992-2003). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point Multilayer Short Message Service Routing Solution,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-6 (Copyright 1992-2003). |
“Cisco ITP MAP Gateway for Public WLAN Slm Authentication and Authorization,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-13 (Copyright 1992-2003). |
Barry, “A Signal for Savings,” Packet, Cisco Systems Users Magazine, vol. 14, No. 4, pp. Cover; 19-21; and 81 (Fourth Quarter 2002). |
“Agilent Technologies and Cisco Systems SS7 Over IP White Paper,” Cisco Systems, Inc. and Agilent and Technologies, pp. 1-6 (Copyright 2002—Printed in the UK Feb. 1, 2002). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point: MTP3 User Adaptation (M3UA) and SCCP User Adaptation (SUA) Signaling Gateway,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-14 (Copyright 2002). |
“Cisco SS7 Port Adapter for the Cisco 7500 Versatile Interface Processor and 7200 VXR Routers Provide High-Density SS7 Agrregation,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-5 (Copyright 1992-2002). |
“Next-Generation SS7 Networks with the Cisco IP Transfer Point,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-14 (Copyright 1992-2002). |
The attached email dated Oct. 20, 2001 and PowerPoint presentation dated Oct. 24, 2001 disclose an MSISDN-based auto-provisioning solution proposed by a customer of the assignee of the presend application. |
“Agilent acceSS7 Business intelligence,” Agilent Technologies, pp. 1-6 (Copyright 2001—Printed in the UK Nov. 30, 2001). |
“Cisco IP Transfer Point (ITP) Network Management Product Presentation,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-20 (Copyright 2001). |
“Networkers,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-60 (Copyright 2001). |
“Cisco SS7 Signaling Offload,” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-33 (Copyright 1992-2001). |
Rockhold, “Or,” Wireless Review, p. 22, 23, 26, 28, 30, 32, (Aug. 15, 2000). |
Bertrand, “Jambala Mobility Gateway-Convergence and Inter-System Roaming,” Ericsson Review, p. 89-93 (1999). |
“Topsail Beach—SS7 Over IP−” Cisco Systems, Inc., pp. 1-16 (Copyright 1999). |
ETSI, “Digital Cellular Telecommunications Systems (Phase 2+); Support of Mobile Number Portability (MNP); Technical Realisation; Stage 2,” Global System for Mobile Communications, p. 1-71, (1998). |
Smith, “Number Portability Pileup,” Telephony, p. 22, 24, 26 (Jan. 6, 1997). |
Jain et al., “Phone Number Portability for PCS Systems with ATM Backbones Using Distributed Dynamic Hashing,” IEEE, vol. 15 (No. 1), p. 96-105, (Jan. 1997). |
Heinmiller, “Generic Requrements for SCP Application and GTT Function for Number Portability,” Illinois Number Portability Workshop, p. 1-50, (Sep. 4, 1996). |
International Telecommunication Union, “Series Q: Switching and Signalling: Specifications of Signalling Systems No. 7—Signalling Connection Control Part,” p. 11-16, (Jul. 1996). |
Rice, “SS7 Networks in a PCS World,” Telephony, pp. 138, 140 142, 144, 146, (Jun. 24, 1996). |
TEKELEC, “Eagle STP Planning Guide”, Eagle Network Switching Division, (No. 3), p. i-vii, 1-64, A1-A2, B1-2, (May 1996). |
Anonymous, “Generic Switching and Signaling Requirements for Number Portability,” AT&T Network Systems, No. 1, p. 1-75, (Feb. 2, 1996). |
ETSI, Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (Phase 2+); Mobile Application Part (MAP) Specification, Global System for Mobile Communications, pp. 112-114 (1996). |
Jain, et al., “A Hashing Scheme for Phone Number Portability in PCS Systems with ATM Backbones,” Bell Communications Research, p. 593-597, (1996). |
Bishop, “Freeing the Network for Competition,” Telecommunications, p. 75-80, (Apr. 1995). |
Anonymous, “Zeichengabesysteme-Eine neue Generation für ISDN und intelligente Netze,” Zeichengabesystem, Medien-Institut Bremen, p. iz-xi; 170-176, (Feb. 17, 1995). |
Giordano et al., “PCS Number Portability,” IEEE, p. 1146-1150, (Sep. 1994). |
Bellcore, “Signaling Transfer Point (STP) Generic Requirements,” Bell Communications Research, No. 1, p. ii-xxii, 4-84-J14, (Jun. 1994). |
Telcordia Technologies, “CCS Network interface Specifications (CCSNIS) Supporting SCCP and TCAP,” Bell Communications Research, p. ii-xii, 1-1-C-22, (Mar. 1994). |
Buckles, “Very High Capacity Signaling Transfer Point for Intelligent Network Servcies,” DSC Communications Corporation, p. 1308-1311, (1988). |
“Diameter Overview,” referenced from www.ulticom.com/html/products/signalware-diameter-reference-guide.asp (Publication date unknown). |
“Chapter 1: Overview,” SS7 Port Adapter Installation and Configuration, pp. 1-1-1-8 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Configuring ITP Basic Functionality,” IP Transfer Point, Cisco IOS Release 12.2(4)MB12, pp. 31-50 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Configuring ITP Optional Features,” IP Transfer Point, Cisco IOS Release 12.294)MB12, pp. 65-136 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Configuring M3UA and SUA SS7 Over IP Signaling Gateways,” IP Transfer Point, Cisco IOS Release 12.2(4)MB13, pp. 51-66 (Publication Date Unknown). |
“Configuring M3UA and SUA SS7 Over IP Signaling Gateways,” IP Transfer Point, Cisco IOS Release 12.2(4)MB10, pp. 49-62 (Publication Date Unknown). |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for International Application No. PCT/US2011/067130 (Jun. 7, 2012). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/336,132 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Modifying a Diameter Signaling Message Directed to a Charging Function Node,” (Unpublished, filed Dec. 23, 2011). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending International Application No. PCT/US11/67130 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Modifying a Diameter Signaling Message Directed to a Charging Function Node,” (Unpublished, filed Dec. 23, 2011). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/576,213 for “LTE HSS with HLR Proxy Mode for Mobility” (Unpublished, filed Dec. 15, 2011). |
Korhonen et al., “Clarifications on the Routing of Diameter Requests Based on the Username and the Realm,” RFC 5729, pp. 1-12 (Dec. 2009). |
Korhonen et al., “Diameter User-Name and Realm Based Request Routing Clarifications,” draft-ietf-dime-nai-routing-04.txt, pp. 1-13 (Oct. 6, 2009). |
“3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specifications Group Service and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Charging management; Diameter charging applications (Release 7),” 3GPP TS 32.299, V7.7.0, pp. 1-120 (Sep. 2007). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/732,178 (Nov. 6, 2012). |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/732,178 (Jun. 17, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/336,132 (May 20, 2013). |
First Examination Report for Indian Application No. 3231/CHENP/2008 (Jan. 2, 2013). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/336,132 (Dec. 18, 2012). |
Commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/714,360 for “Methods, Systems, and Computer Readable Media for Seamless Roaming Between Diameter and Non-Diameter Networks,” (Unpublished, filed Dec. 13, 2012). |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/291,961 for “A GTP Relay for Direct Internet Access from the Roaming Mobile Network and Other Services,” (Unpublished, filed Jan. 4, 2010). |
Calhoun et al., “Diameter Base Protcol,” Network Working Group, RFC 3588 (Sep. 2003). |
Communication of European publication No. and information on the application of Article 67(3) EPC for European Application No. 11852129.3 (Oct. 2, 2013). |
Second Examination Report for Indian Application No. 3231/CHENP/2008 (Aug. 6, 2013). |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/732,178 (Sep. 26, 2013). |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due for U.S. Appl. No. 13/336,132 (Sep. 23, 2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110211527 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61308280 | Feb 2010 | US |