The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for syngas generation. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to systems and methods for syngas generation through phase change mediated partial oxidation of methane.
Syngas, a mixture of CO and H2, is a crucial precursor for various chemicals and liquid fuels. Conventional syngas generation is achieved through methane reforming with an oxidant over a catalyst. Typically, the oxidants used are molecular oxygen, steam or CO2, where these can be used separately or as mixtures in a process.
Among syngas generation technologies, steam methane reforming (SMR) and autothermal reforming (ATR) are used for hydrogen production and liquid fuel production, respectively. Both systems employ a Ni-based catalyst, using one or more oxidants to control the H2:CO ratio and methane conversion. ATR process utilizes H2O and O2 for partial oxidation of methane, adjusting the ratios of the two oxidants to provide a H2:CO ratio of ˜2. However, this process requires auxiliary equipment, thus negatively affecting the overall economics of syngas generation.
Improving the economics of syngas generation from methane has tremendous implications towards liquid fuel and chemical production. Commercial gas-to-liquid plants employ air separation units (ASUs) to use molecular oxygen in conjunction with steam to partially oxidize CH4 to CO and H2. The catalyst, however, suffers from carbon deposition under lower oxidant concentrations, limiting the operating range of the process. Additionally, an ASU is energy and capital intensive which severely affects the overall economics for syngas generation.
Generally, the instant disclosure relates to syngas production through stable phase change mediated partial oxidation of a reducing agent.
In one aspect, a method for operating a reactor system is disclosed. The example method includes providing an input stream to the reactor system, where the input stream includes a reducing gas stream and an oxidant stream, determining an initial oxygen content of a metal oxide in the reactor system, measuring an oxygen content of the input stream, measuring an oxygen content of an output stream from the reactor system, calculating a percent oxygen depletion of the metal oxide using the initial oxygen content of the metal oxide, the oxygen content of the input stream, and the oxygen content of the output stream, and, when the percent oxygen depletion of the metal oxide is above a predetermined threshold, adjusting a mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant gas in the input stream.
In another aspect, another method for operating a reactor system is disclosed. The example method includes providing a first input stream to a first reactor assembly in the reactor system, where the first input stream including reducing gas and oxidant; determining an initial oxygen content of a first metal oxide in the first reactor assembly, measuring a first input stream oxygen content, measuring an oxygen content of an output of the first reactor assembly, calculating a percent oxygen depletion of the first metal oxide using the initial oxygen content of the first metal oxide, the first input stream oxygen content, and the oxygen content of the output of the first reactor assembly, when the percent oxygen depletion of the first metal oxide is above a first predetermined threshold, adjusting a mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant in the first input stream, providing a second input stream to a second reactor assembly in the reactor system, the second input stream including reducing gas and oxidant, determining an initial oxygen content of a second metal oxide in the second reactor assembly, measuring a second input stream oxygen content, measuring an oxygen content of an output of the second reactor assembly, calculating a percent oxygen depletion of the second metal oxide using the initial oxygen content of the second metal oxide, the second input stream oxygen content, and the oxygen content of the output stream, and, when the percent oxygen depletion of the second metal oxide is above a second predetermined threshold, adjusting a mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant in the second input stream.
There is no specific requirement that a material, technique or method relating to syngas generation include all of the details characterized herein, in order to obtain some benefit according to the present disclosure. Thus, the specific examples characterized herein are meant to be exemplary applications of the techniques described, and alternatives are possible.
Systems and methods disclosed and contemplated herein relate to syngas generation. Disclosed systems and methods employ stable solid metal oxide phases (termed “stable phase”) during syngas generation, where the metal oxides participate in reactions associated with syngas generation. That is, using a stable phase can eliminate the use of molecular oxygen by efficiently transferring oxygen from reforming agents such as H2O and CO2 to gaseous fuels such as CH4 through stable solid metal oxide phases. The use of a solid phase assisted transfer inherently changes the thermodynamics of the overall system, allowing for higher syngas production efficiencies. This mediation of oxygen is driven by the thermodynamics of the gas-solid reactions and the kinetic rates of reduction and oxidation reactions of the solid metal oxide.
Systems and methods disclosed and contemplated herein generally involve processing a gaseous reducing agent and a gaseous reforming agent to produce syngas in the presence of a stable-phase change metal-oxide based oxygen carrier. In some implementations, the gaseous reducing agent is methane and the gaseous reforming agent includes steam and/or CO2, although other possibilities are contemplated. Example reaction stoichiometry is provided in Reaction I and Reaction II below, where M is a metal.
FexMyOz+CH4-->FexMyOz-d+[CO+H2+CO2+H2O] (I)
FexMyOz-d+CO2,H2O-->FexMyOz+[CO+H2+CO2+H2O] (II)
The gaseous reducing agent abstracts lattice oxygen from the metal-oxide oxygen carrier (as shown in Reaction I), while the oxidizing agents replenish the depleted oxygen (as shown in Reaction II). That is, CH4 reacts with the metal oxide and abstracts the lattice oxygen to form complete combustion products (CO2, H2O) and partial combustion products (CO, H2). The metal on the lattice surface acts as the catalytic active site for hydrogen (H) abstraction from CH4. This creates oxygen vacancies on the surface of the metal oxide, which in-turn act as catalytic active sites for CO2 or H2O reduction. The CO2 and H2O thus oxidize the reduced metal oxide in the same reactor and form CO and H2, respectively.
Under steady state condition, the oxygen abstraction from CH4 and the oxygen donation from CO2/H2O reach an equilibrium. This equilibrium directly affects the oxidation state of the metal oxide reacting and the gas phase composition. As a result, the metal oxide bed has a stratified oxidation state of the active metal where the net oxidation state of the metal oxide does not change with time. Thus, the overall reaction mimics the catalytic dry reforming or steam methane reforming process but the mechanism for CH4 and CO2/H2O gas-solid reactions follows a different path. This unique activation of CH4 and CO2/H2O with the metal oxide acting as the oxygen mediator adds additional degrees of freedom which helps in producing syngas efficiently.
The mediation of reaction I and II by lattice oxygen from the metal-oxides influences the thermodynamic composition of the syngas that is produced from this system. The variation of the thermodynamic composition because of mediation by the lattice oxygen from the metal-oxide carrier differentiates this system from gas-phase only chemistry. The variables that affect thermodynamic gas product composition for this system include, but are not limited to, the amount of lattice oxygen per amount of metal that participates in the reactions, the composition, crystalline structure and the solid phase of the metals, and the specific mixing and kinetic dynamics.
As shown in
Broadly, example systems disclosed and contemplated herein include 1 reactor/1 reactor system, 2 reactors/2 reactor systems, or more than 2 reactors/reactor systems. Each configuration is discussed below.
A. Exemplary Configurations with One Reactor System
Reactor system 114 includes one or more reactors operating under similar conditions and receiving the same input stream 112. Typically, when reactor system 114 includes more than one reactor, each reactor operates in parallel. Output stream 116 from reactor system 114 includes syngas generated in reactor system 114. Each reactor in reactor system 114 also includes metal oxide. In some implementations, the reactors are in fixed bed configurations.
Input stream 112 is provided to reactor system 114, and the input stream includes reducing gas and oxidant provided from reducing gas source 102 and oxidant source 106, respectively. In some instances, reducing gas from reducing gas source 102 is pre-heated before entering reactor system 114. Heat for increasing the temperature of the reducing gas can be provided in various ways, such as with heat exchangers, waste heat streams, solar energy, gas energy, and electrical energy. The net reactions occurring in reactor system 114 are endothermic.
One or more components can be used to adjust a mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant in the input stream 112. For instance, reducing gas source 102 can include flow regulation unit 104 and oxidant source 106 can include flow regulation unit 108. Flow regulation units 104 and 106 operate to adjust the flow rate of reducing gas and oxidant, respectively. An example flow regulation unit is, without limitation, a valve.
As another example not shown in
Broadly, during operation, oxygen monitor 110 measures an oxygen (O) content of input stream 112, and oxygen monitor 118 measures an oxygen (O) content of output stream 116. The oxygen content refers to oxygen present in any gas stream in molecular form (eg. CO2, H2O, CO etc.). Oxygen content can be measured using one or more devices known in the art. Typically, oxygen monitor 110 and oxygen monitor 118 are in electrical communication with one or more controllers (not shown in
B. Exemplary Configurations with Two or More Reactor Systems
Syngas generation system 200 includes two reactor systems: reactor system 222 and reactor system 224. Reactor system 222 and reactor system 224 operate at different mole ratios of reducing gas to oxidant. Each reactor system 222 and 224 can include multiple reactors operating in parallel. Each reactor in reactor system 222 and reactor system 224 also includes metal oxide. In some implementations, the reactors are in fixed bed configurations.
Reducing gas and oxidant source 202 provides a first mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant and reducing gas and oxidant source 204 provides a second mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant, where the first mole ratio and the second mole ratios are different during typical operation.
Reactor system 222 receives input stream 218 that includes reducing gas and oxidant. Flow regulation unit 206 adjusts a flow rate from reducing gas and oxidant source 202 into input stream 218. Flow regulation unit 208 adjusts a flow rate from reducing gas and oxidant source 204 into input stream 218. Oxygen monitor 214 measures the oxygen (O) content of input stream 218 provided to reactor system 222.
Reactor system 224 receives input stream 220 that includes reducing gas and oxidant. Flow regulation unit 210 adjusts a flow rate from reducing gas and oxidant source 202 into input stream 220. Flow regulation unit 212 adjusts a flow rate from reducing gas and oxidant source 204 into input stream 220. Oxygen monitor 216 measures the oxygen (O) content of input stream 220 provided to reactor system 224.
Reactor system 222 provides output stream 226 that includes syngas generated in reactor system 222. Oxygen monitor 230 measures the oxygen (O) content of output stream 226 provided by reactor system 222.
Reactor system 224 provides output stream 228 that includes syngas generated in reactor system 224. Oxygen monitor 232 measures the oxygen (O) content of output stream 228 provided by reactor system 224.
Typically, oxygen monitor 214, oxygen monitor 216, oxygen monitor 230, and oxygen monitor 232 are in electrical communication with one or more controllers (not shown in
In implementations with three or more reactor systems, not shown in the figures, the system can be arranged similarly to system 200. That is, the third (and other) reactor systems can be provided with input streams including an adjustable reducing gas to oxidant mole ratio. Oxygen content monitors are disposed upstream and downstream of each reactor system.
C. Exemplary Operating Conditions
Example systems disclosed herein can operate at various conditions. For instance, reactors/reactor systems disclosed herein typically operate at temperatures of 700° C. to 1100° C. In various implementations, reactors/reactor systems can operate at 700° C. to 1000° C.; 800° C. to 1100° C.; 700° C. to 900° C.; 800° C. to 1000° C.; 900° C. to 1100° C.; 850° C. to 1050° C.; 700° C. to 800° C.; 800° C. to 900° C.; 900° C. to 1000° C.; or 1000° C. to 1100° C. In various implementations, reactors/reactor systems can operate at no less than 700° C.; no less than 800° C.; no less than 900° C.; or no less than 1000° C. In various implementations, reactors/reactor systems can operate at no more than 1100° C.; no more than 1000° C.; no more than 900° C.; or no more than 800° C.
Reactors/reactor systems disclosed herein typically operate at pressures of 0.1 atm to 80 atm. In various implementations, reactors/reactor systems can operate at 0.1 atm to 60 atm; 0.5 atm to 50 atm; 0.5 atm to 5 atm; 1 atm to 40 atm; 2 atm to 30 atm; 5 atm to 20 atm; 10 atm to 15 atm; 1 atm to 20 atm; 20 atm to 40 atm; or 40 atm to 60 atm. In various implementations, reactors/reactor systems can operate at no less than 0.1 atm; no less than 0.5 atm; no less than 1 atm; no less than 5 atm; no less than 10 atm; no less than 20 atm; no less than 30 atm; no less than 40 atm; or no less than 50 atm. In various implementations, reactors/reactor systems can operate at no more than 60 atm; no more than 50 atm; no more than 40 atm; no more than 30 atm; no more than 20 atm; no more than 10 atm; no more than 5 atm; no more than 2 atm; no more than 1 atm; or no more than 0.5 atm.
In one reactor system configurations, such as that shown schematically in
In two reactor system configurations, such as that shown schematically in
In implementations with more than two reactor system configurations, each reactor in each reactor system has constant or near constant mole ratios of reducing gas to oxidant, defined as x1, x2, x3 . . . ‘xn’ a first reactor system has constant or near constant mole ratios of reducing gas to oxidant, defined as x1, and the second reactor system has constant or near constant mole ratios of reducing gas to oxidant, defined as x2 and so on till the nth reactor system that has constant or near constant mole ratios of reducing gas to oxidant, defined as xn. At typical steady state operation, there are m number of streams, such that m<n, where x1 to xm streams are net reducing in nature and xm+1 to xn are net oxidizing in nature with respect to the solid phase present in the reaction system. The nature of the stream (reducing or oxidizing) can be determined based on the phase diagram of the metal oxide similar to the example mentioned in
The various mole ratios mentioned above can be procured from natural sources or combined on-site or off-site to produce the desired compositions for the reaction systems. Some examples of natural sources for such gases include natural gas with x=0.9-0.99, biogas with x=0.3-0.7 etc.
D. Exemplary Reducing Gases and Oxidant
Various reducing gases and oxidizing gases can be used in exemplary systems and methods disclosed herein. For instance, reducing gases can include: natural gas, which can include methane (CH4), H2, CO, and mixtures thereof. Example oxidant includes CO2, steam (H2O), and mixtures thereof.
E. Exemplary Metal Oxides
Reactors in example systems disclosed herein include metal oxides/metal alloys. These metal oxides/metal alloys act as oxygen carriers that can undergo reduction/oxidation reactions with gaseous reducing agents, such as methane, and oxidizing agents, such as CO2 or H2O. In some instances, the metal oxides are provided in powder form. In some instances, the powder form has an average particle size between 150 μm and 250 μm. The metal oxides can also be in pellet form of various shapes with largest dimensions up to 3 mm.
Certain design considerations for metal oxides include reactivity, recyclability and mechanical strength, along with the oxygen carrying capacity. Transition metal oxides such as iron oxide, nickel oxide, copper oxide can be used as active oxygen carriers and have high oxygen carrying capacity, good reactivity and low cost among all the transition metal oxide candidates.
The recyclability of active metal oxide oxygen carriers can be promoted by adding supportive oxides which affect lattice oxygen ion diffusivity. The support material can be any support material known and used in the art. Non-limiting examples of support materials include, but are not limited to, silica, alumina, ceria, titania, zirconia, or a combination comprising two or more of the aforementioned supports, such as MgAl2O4. The amount of support material can vary from 20%, 30% 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80% or any value in between.
Metal oxide reactivity can be enhanced by low concentration dopant modification. Catalytic transition metal dopants include, but are not limited to, Ni, Co, Cu, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh, Pd, Ag, Cd, Lu, Hf, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, and Au. It is thought that these transition metal dopants play three roles in reactivity enhancement of cyclic chemical looping redox reactions: (1) providing extra reaction sites during CO2 and CH4 conversion in addition to the host transition metal oxides such as iron oxides, cobalt oxides, nickel oxides, copper oxides and manganese oxides; (2) the nature of aliovalent dopants, such as Cu2+, Co2+, Ni2+ vs Fe3+, results in an increase of oxygen vacancies which promotes oxygen ion transport in methane partial oxidation; and (3) these catalytic dopants can lower reaction energy barriers of CO2 and CH4 activation with the host transition metal oxide materials such as FeO, FeTiO3, FeAl2O4, CoTiO3, etc.
Broadly, example methods disclosed and contemplated herein involve operating systems described above.
A. Example Methods of Operating Configurations with One Reactor System
Prior to steady-state operation, one or more start-up operations may take place. For instance, reactors in the system may be heated to desired temperatures and operating pressures. Typically, the reactors in the system are heated to a temperature between 700° C. and 1100° C. In some instances, the reactors in the system are heated to a temperature between 800° C. and 1050° C. Typically, the reactors in the system are operated at a pressure between 0.1 atm and 80 atm. In some instances, the reactors in the system are operated at a pressure between 0.5 atm and 5 atm
As another example, a value or range of values for a target mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant may be determined (operation 402). Metal oxide oxygen content is also measured (operation 404) before steady-state operation. The oxygen content of the metal oxide can be monitored in-situ by keeping track of the oxygen in the inlet and the outlet stream of the reactor system. Through an oxygen balance, any accumulation or removal of oxygen from the metal oxide can be estimated. Alternatively and additionally, if a provision for solid sampling is present in the reaction system, the oxygen content can be measured by using one or more devices known in the art.
In some instances, metal oxide is in a powder form. The average particle size of the metal oxide powder can be between 150 μm and 250 μm. Typically, metal oxide is of the form FexMyOz. In some instances, M is titanium (Ti) or nickel (Ni). In some instances, M is nickel (Ni) and cobalt (Co). The metal oxide can be supported on MgAl2O4.
An input stream is also provided to the reactor system (operation 406). The input stream receives a reducing gas stream including reducing gas and an oxidant stream including oxidant. An example reducing gas is natural gas, which can include methane (CH4). An example oxidant includes CO2 and/or steam (H2O). A set of mass flow controllers may be used to adjust the mole ratio in the input stream to the desired mole ratio value or range of mole ratio values.
The oxygen content of the reactor system output stream is also measured (operation 408). Measuring the oxygen content can be performed at one or more locations downstream of the reactor system. Measurements can be obtained continuously or at periodic intervals, such as, for instance, every 1 second, every 2 seconds, every 5 seconds, every 10 seconds, every 20 seconds, every 30 seconds, every 1 minute, every 2 minutes, every 5 minutes, every 10 minutes, every 15 minutes, every 20 minutes, every 30 minutes, or every 60 minutes.
The oxygen content of the input stream is also measured (operation 410). Measuring the oxygen content can be performed at one or more locations upstream of the reactor system. Measurements can be obtained continuously or at periodic intervals, such as, for instance, every 1 second, every 2 seconds, every 5 seconds, every 10 seconds, every 20 seconds, every 30 seconds, every 1 minute, every 2 minutes, every 5 minutes, every 10 minutes, every 15 minutes, every 20 minutes, every 30 minutes, or every 60 minutes.
Next, a percent oxygen depletion is calculated (operation 412) for the reactor system. The percent oxygen depletion can be calculated by dividing the difference of the oxygen (O) in the outlet stream and the input stream by the oxygen (O) content in the metal oxide before startup. This calculation can be expressed as the following formula:
Based on the oxygen depletion calculated in operation 412, a determination is made whether the percent oxygen depletion is above a threshold (operation 414). The threshold can be predetermined. Example thresholds include, but are not limited to, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, or 15%.
When it is determined that the percent oxygen depletion is not above the threshold, then method 400 can return to monitor the oxygen content of the output stream (operation 408) and input stream (operation 410).
When it is determined that the percent oxygen depletion is above the threshold, the reducing gas to oxidant mole ratio is adjusted (operation 416). Adjusting the reducing gas to oxidant mole ratio can include actuating one or more flow controllers for a reducing gas stream and for an oxidant stream. In some implementations, two mixed streams are available, where each stream has a different mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant, and one or more flow controllers actuate the relative amounts of each stream as the input stream.
For instance, the threshold for O depletion will be estimated based on pre-determined information of the metal oxide system. This information is related to the kinetics of the gas-solid reactions based on the phases that are generated during O depletion of the metal oxide. For instance, if the O depletion threshold is defined at 10%, upon reaching this threshold, the gas composition will be adjusted to ensure the O content of the metal oxide and thus the desired solid phases are maintained in the reaction system. This adjustment can be achieved by adjusting the reducing gas to oxidizing gas ratio based on the reducing and oxidizing kinetics of the gas-solid system. The adjustment will vary with metal oxide system, gas composition, pressure, temperature gas flow rate, gas hourly space velocity of the reaction system, etc.
After adjusting the mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant, method 400 can return to monitor the oxygen content of the output stream (operation 408) and input stream (operation 410).
The mole ratio of the input stream may also have to be adjusted if there is an indication of carbon deposition on the metal oxide surface. Carbon deposition can be monitored by measuring the carbon accumulation in the reactor system by looking at the compositions of the input and the out streams. These compositions can be measured using one or more devices known in the art.
B. Example Methods of Operating Configurations with Two or More Reactor Systems
Prior to steady-state operation, one or more start-up operations may take place. Ranges of operating temperatures and pressures are the same as those described above with reference to method 400, and will not be repeated here for purposes of brevity.
Method 500 also includes determining a first mole ratio and a second mole ratio (operation 502). The first mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant, x1, is for the first reactor system. The second mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant, x2, is for the second reactor system. In implementations with more than two reactor systems, mole ratios for each reactor system are also determined.
Metal oxide content is also measured (operation 504) before startup. Typically, the same metal oxide is used in each reactor system. The oxygen content of the metal oxide can be monitored in-situ by keeping track of the oxygen in the inlet and the outlet stream of the reactor system. Through an oxygen balance, any accumulation or removal of oxygen from the metal oxide can be estimated. Alternatively and additionally, if a provision for solid sampling is present in the reaction system, the oxygen content can be measured by using one or more devices known in the art. Exemplary metal oxides are described above with reference to method 400, and will not be repeated here for purposes of brevity.
Input streams are also provided to each reactor system (operation 506). Exemplary aspects of the input stream are described above with reference to method 400 and system 200, and will not be repeated here for purposes of brevity.
The oxygen content of each reactor system output stream is measured (operation 508), and the oxygen content of each reactor system input stream is measured (operation 510). Exemplary aspects of oxygen content measuring are described above with reference to method 400 and system 200, and will not be repeated here for purposes of brevity.
Next, a percent oxygen depletion is calculated (operation 512) for each reactor system. As described in greater detail above, calculating percent oxygen depletion for each reactor system can be expressed as the following formula:
Based on the oxygen depletion calculated in operation 512, a determination is made whether the percent oxygen depletion in a given reactor system is above a threshold (operation 514). The threshold can be predetermined. Example thresholds include, but are not limited to, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, or 15%.
When it is determined that the percent oxygen depletion is not above the threshold, then method 400 can return to monitor the oxygen content of the output stream (operation 408) and input stream (operation 410).
When it is determined that the percent oxygen depletion is above the threshold, the reducing gas to oxidant mole ratio is adjusted (operation 416). Adjusting the reducing gas to oxidant mole ratio can include actuating one or more flow controllers for a reducing gas stream and for an oxidant stream. In some implementations, two mixed streams are available, where each stream has a different mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant, and one or more flow controllers actuate the relative amounts of each stream as the input stream.
As an example, when the operating conditions have a high ratio of reducing gas to oxidant, reaction kinetics may lead to a higher degree of carbon formation through the reactor system. This is typically characterized by a breakthrough curve, wherein after a given amount of time, the amount of unconverted reducing gas in the output stream will start to increase. In such a kinetically controlled operating regime, it can be useful to switch over to a lower mole ratio of oxidant to the reducing gas to mitigate the carbon formation before switching back to the original input feed condition.
An example representation of this variation in operation condition could involve periodic swinging for all reactors in the reactor system. Specifically, in one type of swing, reactors in both systems could be simultaneously alternated between two different mole ratios. As one example, each reactor system could operate at a different mass ratio simultaneously, which could then be switched depending on the degree of kinetic control desired. As another example, a first reactor system is operated at the relatively highest mole ratio and a second reactor system is operated at a lower mole ratio. For systems with more than two reactor systems, one reactor system can operate at the highest mole ratio, one reactor system at the lowest mole ratio, and the other reactor systems operate at stepped down values between the high and low mole ratios.
After adjusting the mole ratio of reducing gas to oxidant, method 400 can return to monitor the oxygen content of the output stream (operation 408) and input stream (operation 410).
Various aspects of the systems and methods were experimentally evaluated. Without limitation, those experiments and the results are discussed below.
A. Thermodynamic Calculations for Example Systems
This section discusses thermodynamic calculation results of example systems obtained using ASPENPLUS v10 (Aspen Technology, Inc., Bedford, Mass.) and compares the syngas production performance of the example systems to conventional steam methane reforming process. The simulation results obtained in this section are based on the principle of Gibbs free energy minimization. The example system has been investigated under different temperatures, pressures, and using various metal oxide materials. Two operating modes, namely constant feedstock mode and alternating feedstock mode, have been investigated.
The first set of thermodynamic calculations were conducted using the constant feedstock operating mode under 1000° C., 10 atm. FeTiO3 was used as the metal oxide material in the fixed bed. CH4, CO2 and H2O were co-injected into the fixed bed reactor to react with FeTiO3. While CH4 continuously extracted oxygen from FeTiO3, the oxygen vacancy was immediately filled by H2O and CO2. High purity syngas is generated without overall change in FeTiO3 oxidation state. The system performance of case 1 is summarized in Table 1, below.
Definitions of CH4 conversion, syngas yield and syngas purity are given below:
The second set of thermodynamic calculations were conducted using alternating feedstock under 1000° C., 30 atm. FeO and Fe2SiO4 were used as the metal oxide material in the fixed bed simulation. As previously mentioned, the gaseous feedstock was switched between a reducing gas mixture mainly composed of CH4 (stage I), and an oxidizing gas mixture containing mostly H2O (stage II). During stage I, CH4 was partially oxidized into syngas while the metal oxide material was reduced to a lower oxidation state. In stage II, the reduced metal oxide was oxidized by H2O or CO2 back to its original oxidation state while producing H2 or CO.
By separating the operation into two distinct phases, the system thermodynamics of the alternating feedstock operating mode can be fundamentally different from the gaseous phase reactions of conventional steam methane reforming. One difference can be shown in the following case studies.
Two case studies were conducted under 1000° C. and 950° C., respectively, under 30 atm. In each case study, three different systems were simulated and compared. The first system was an FeO—Fe based system. The second system was an Fe2SiO4—Fe based SP system. The third system was the conventional SMR system serving as a basis for comparison. The parameters compared between the three systems include CH4 conversion, syngas yield, and syngas purity, as defined in the equations given above.
As illustrated in
A comparison between the example system using FeO as the metal oxide material with the SMR system operating using the same amount of feedstock (CH4 and H2O) was also conducted. The operating point is indicated by a black dot on
As shown in the table, by using equal amount of feedstock, the example system is able to achieve higher CH4 conversion, syngas yield, and syngas purity than the SMR process.
B. Kinetic Aspects of Example Systems
This section discusses kinetic aspects of example metal oxide interaction with CH4 as the reducing gas and CO2 as the oxidizing gas over Fe/FeTiO3 as an example metal oxide.
Performance of exemplary metal oxide was tested in a U-tube fixed bed reactor. Methane/carbon dioxide (CH4/CO2) ratios ranging from 0.8 to 9 were tested as feed to the reactor with a total gas flow of 20 ml/min. The reactant gas conversion and product purity were calculated based on gas analysis in a mass spectrometer. The solids were initially reduced under a gas mixture with a mole ratio of CH4 to CO2 of 9 for 15-20 min, to achieve a suitable starting composition. Table 3 shows the gas analysis for Fe—Ti oxide of particle size 150-250 microns at 1000° C.
The gas analysis for a Ni-doped Fe oxide supported on MgAl2O4 is shown in Table 4. The powder size was between 150-250 microns and the reaction temperature was 1000° C.
These reactant conversion and syngas purity values for the two metal oxides tested were steady for a period of over 2 hours, depicting negligible drop-in activity throughout that time.
C. Stratification Analysis of Example Systems
This section discusses stratification for exemplary systems. More specifically, the stratification analysis was for a nickel (Ni)-doped Fe oxide supported on MgAl2O4 in a U-tube reactor, and the results are shown in Table 5.
This metal oxide of powder size between 150-250 microns was reacted with a CH4/CO2 mixture at temperature of 1000° C. and 1 atm pressure. Experimental results are summarized in Table 6.
The metal oxide bed was segregated into 4 layers to investigate the change in oxidation state across the bed. The oxygen content represents the amount of active lattice oxygen that the metal oxide contains. This oxygen content value was estimated by oxidation studies on a thermogravimetric analyzer. Evidently, the oxygen content decreases from the inlet of the bed to the outlet of the bed. These data appear to be evidence of bed stratification and thus of a different reaction mechanism than the traditional catalytic process.
D. Example Metal Oxide Pre-Treatment
Pre-treatment of exemplary metal oxide was also investigated. Pre-treatment of the metal oxide appears to influence the desired oxidation state of the metal oxide. The kinetic equilibrium between the output stream (including product gas) and the stratified solid metal oxide appears directed related to the solid phase present in the reactor.
Table 7 shows the difference in the performance parameters for the syngen process with and without pre-treatment.
For the data in Table 7, the pre-treatment was carried out in a reducing environment to achieve a metallic iron rich solid phase. These results have been shown to be stable for up to 60 hours of operation, which is evidence of the stability of the kinetic equilibrium and the solid metal oxide phase.
E. Parametric Studies of Exemplary Processes
Effects of gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) and operating pressure were evaluated for an experimental, fixed bed U-tube reactor. Results are discussed below.
Experiments were conducted evaluating the effect of gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) for an Ni-doped Fe oxide supported on MgAl2O4. The CO2:CH4 ratio was constant at 1.5 with the reaction conducted at 1000° C. and 1 atm. Table 8 shows the change in product composition with the increase in GHSV.
The example system does not show a strong correlation with GHSV, thus indicating the flexibility and improved turndown ratio for the example system.
To evaluate the effect of operating pressure, dual doped material was synthesized to attain higher CO2 conversions at higher pressures. This metal oxide included Co and Ni doped in a Fe based oxide with MgAl2O4 support. This metal oxide was investigated at a temperature of 1000° C. and pressures of 1 and 5 atm at CO2 to CH4 ratio of 1.5. Between 1 and 5 atm, the GHSV at reaction conditions was kept the same by increasing the standard volumetric flow rate proportional to the increase in pressure. The experimental data for these runs has been depicted in Table 9. The efficiency of the example dual doped material is highlighted from a high syngas yield of 3.94 per mole of CH4 at 5 atm.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. In case of conflict, the present document, including definitions, will control. Example methods and materials are described below, although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in practice or testing of the present disclosure. The materials, methods, and examples disclosed herein are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
The terms “comprise(s),” “include(s),” “having,” “has,” “can,” “contain(s),” and variants thereof, as used herein, are intended to be open-ended transitional phrases, terms, or words that do not preclude the possibility of additional acts or structures. The singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The present disclosure also contemplates other embodiments “comprising,” “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of,” the embodiments or elements presented herein, whether explicitly set forth or not.
The modifier “about” used in connection with a quantity is inclusive of the stated value and has the meaning dictated by the context (for example, it includes at least the degree of error associated with the measurement of the particular quantity). The modifier “about” should also be considered as disclosing the range defined by the absolute values of the two endpoints. For example, the expression “from about 2 to about 4” also discloses the range “from 2 to 4.” The term “about” may refer to plus or minus 10% of the indicated number. For example, “about 10%” may indicate a range of 9% to 11%, and “about 1” may mean from 0.9-1.1. Other meanings of “about” may be apparent from the context, such as rounding off, so, for example “about 1” may also mean from 0.5 to 1.4.
Definitions of specific functional groups and chemical terms are described in more detail below. For purposes of this disclosure, the chemical elements are identified in accordance with the Periodic Table of the Elements, CAS version, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 75th Ed., inside cover, and specific functional groups are generally defined as described therein.
For the recitation of numeric ranges herein, each intervening number there between with the same degree of precision is explicitly contemplated. For example, for the range of 6-9, the numbers 7 and 8 are contemplated in addition to 6 and 9, and for the range 6.0-7.0, the number 6.0, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, and 7.0 are explicitly contemplated. For example, when a pressure range is described as being between ambient pressure and another pressure, a pressure that is ambient pressure is expressly contemplated.
The present application is a U.S. national stage entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/013823, filed on Jan. 16, 2020, which is related to and claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/793,708, filed on Jan. 17, 2019, the entire contents of each of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2020/013823 | 1/16/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/150438 | 7/23/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
971206 | Messerschmitt | Sep 1910 | A |
1078686 | Lane | Nov 1913 | A |
1658939 | Parsons | Feb 1928 | A |
2182747 | Marshall, Jr. | Dec 1939 | A |
2198560 | Marshall, Jr. | Apr 1940 | A |
2449635 | Barr | Sep 1948 | A |
2614067 | Reed et al. | Oct 1952 | A |
2635947 | Reed et al. | Apr 1953 | A |
2686819 | Johnson | Aug 1954 | A |
2694622 | Reed et al. | Nov 1954 | A |
2697686 | Leffer | Dec 1954 | A |
2899374 | Gomory | Aug 1959 | A |
2979384 | Weiner et al. | Apr 1961 | A |
3027238 | Watkins | Mar 1962 | A |
3031287 | Benson et al. | Apr 1962 | A |
3338667 | Pundsack | Aug 1967 | A |
3353925 | Baumann et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3382033 | Kitagawa | May 1968 | A |
3421869 | Benson | Jan 1969 | A |
3442613 | Grotz, Jr. | May 1969 | A |
3442619 | Huebler et al. | May 1969 | A |
3442620 | Huebler et al. | May 1969 | A |
3494858 | Luckenbach | Feb 1970 | A |
3523821 | Bryce et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3573224 | Strelzoff et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3619142 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3726966 | Johnston | Apr 1973 | A |
3801661 | Hart et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3879514 | Dahl | Apr 1975 | A |
3962409 | Kotera et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4017270 | Funk et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4057402 | Patel et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4075079 | Lang | Feb 1978 | A |
4108732 | Nuttall, Jr. | Aug 1978 | A |
4151124 | Gidaspow et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4155832 | Cox et al. | May 1979 | A |
4160663 | Hsieh | Jul 1979 | A |
4212452 | Hsieh | Jul 1980 | A |
4272399 | Davis et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4318711 | Smith | Mar 1982 | A |
4325833 | Scott | Apr 1982 | A |
4334959 | Green | Jun 1982 | A |
4343624 | Belke et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4348487 | Goldstein et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4375983 | Celada et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4404086 | Oltrogge | Sep 1983 | A |
4420332 | Mori et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4439412 | Behie et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4521117 | Ouwerkerk et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4594140 | Cheng | Jun 1986 | A |
4778585 | Graff | Oct 1988 | A |
4842777 | Lamort | Jun 1989 | A |
4861165 | Fredriksson et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4869207 | Engstrom et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4902586 | Wertheim | Feb 1990 | A |
4895821 | Kainer et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4957523 | Zarate et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5112590 | Krishnamurthy et al. | May 1992 | A |
5130106 | Koves et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5365560 | Tam | Nov 1994 | A |
5447024 | Ishida et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5456807 | Wachsman | Oct 1995 | A |
5509362 | Lyon | Apr 1996 | A |
5518187 | Bruno et al. | May 1996 | A |
5529599 | Calderon | Jun 1996 | A |
5545251 | Knop | Aug 1996 | A |
5584615 | Micklich | Dec 1996 | A |
5630368 | Wagoner | May 1997 | A |
5730763 | Manulescu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5762681 | Lee et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5770310 | Nogochi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5827496 | Lyon | Oct 1998 | A |
5858210 | Richardson | Jan 1999 | A |
5965098 | Boegner et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6007699 | Cole | Dec 1999 | A |
6030589 | Hartweg et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6143203 | Zeng et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6143253 | Radcliffe et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6180354 | Singh et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6187465 | Galloway | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6361757 | Shikada et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6395944 | Griffiths | May 2002 | B1 |
6412559 | Gunter et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6444712 | Janda | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6494153 | Lyon | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506351 | Jain et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6509000 | Choudhary et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517631 | Bland | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6607704 | Guttridge et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6631698 | Hyppanen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6642174 | Gaffney et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6663681 | Kinding et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667022 | Cole | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669917 | Lyon | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682714 | Kindig et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685754 | Kindig et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703343 | Park | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6797253 | Lyon | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6834623 | Cheng | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6875411 | Sanfilippo et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6880635 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6936363 | Kordesch et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7001579 | Metzger et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7067456 | Fan et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7244399 | Myohanen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7404942 | Sanfilippo et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7496450 | Aleman et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7749626 | Take | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7767191 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7837975 | Iyer et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840053 | Liao | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8116430 | Shapiro et al. | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8192706 | Grochowski | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8202349 | Molaison | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8419813 | Hoteit et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435920 | White et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8508238 | Mahalingam et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8562928 | Gupta | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8601958 | Salatino et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8761943 | Lou et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8771549 | Gauthier et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8814963 | Apanel et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8877147 | Fan et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8877150 | Fan et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
9017627 | Gupta | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9290386 | Wasas | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9376318 | Fan et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9382359 | Kanellopoulos et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9518236 | Fan et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9573118 | Colozzi et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9616403 | Fan et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9777920 | Fan et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9790605 | Sheehan et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9874347 | Uddin et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9903584 | Fan et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10010847 | Fan et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10081772 | Fan et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10144640 | Fan et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10501318 | Fan et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10865346 | Fan et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
11111143 | Fan et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
20010055559 | Sanfilippo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020011428 | Scheuerman | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020059864 | Janssen et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020179887 | Zeng et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030006026 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030024388 | Scharpf | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030031291 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030119658 | Allison et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030124041 | Neumann et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130360 | Kindig et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153632 | Wang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030180215 | Niu et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188668 | Bland | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040028181 | Charles, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030214 | Schindler et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040092784 | Legendre | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109800 | Pahlman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040126293 | Geerlings et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040131531 | Geerlings et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040132833 | Espinoza et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138060 | Rapier et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040152790 | Cornaro et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040154223 | Powell et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040197612 | Keefer et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213705 | Blencoe et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040233191 | Mukherjee et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244289 | Morozumi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040265224 | Papavassiliou et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002847 | Maroto-Valer et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050054880 | Dubois et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050175533 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050255037 | Otsuka et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265912 | Alvarez, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050274648 | Goldstein et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060021308 | Merkel | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060042565 | Hu | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060094593 | Beech, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070010588 | Pearson | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070049489 | Becue et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070117714 | Geyer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070157517 | Tsay et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070240407 | Ruth et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258878 | Sanfilippo et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080031809 | Norbeck et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080161624 | Glover et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164443 | White et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080209807 | Tsangaris et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080314838 | Becker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090000194 | Fan et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090042070 | Brown et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090160461 | Zangl et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100071262 | Robinson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100119419 | Sprouse et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100184589 | Miyairi et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100187159 | Naunheimer | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100258429 | Ugolin | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100293845 | Zeman et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100332170 | Gao et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110005395 | Vimalchand et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110011720 | Rinker | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110024687 | White et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054049 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110094226 | McHugh et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110100274 | Kuske et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110138788 | Kanda et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110146152 | Vimalchand et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110176968 | Fan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110176988 | Okamura et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110206469 | Furuyama et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110289845 | Davis et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110291051 | Hershkowitz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110300060 | Guillou et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110303875 | Hoteit et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120167585 | Wormser | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120171588 | Fan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120214106 | Sit et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130071314 | Gupta | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130085365 | Marashdeh et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130125462 | Greiner et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130149650 | Gauthier et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130255272 | Ajhar et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130261355 | Stamires | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140021028 | Paganessi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140144082 | Fan et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140275297 | Velazquez-Vargas et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150238915 | Fan et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150343416 | Fadhel et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160002034 | Fan et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160016800 | Noyes | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160023190 | Fan et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160030904 | Fan et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160268616 | Fan et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170015554 | Siengchum et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20180296978 | Peck et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180353933 | Wendland et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190003704 | Aranda et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190152778 | Fan et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190232220 | Fan et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200156032 | Fan et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1329761 | Jan 2001 | CN |
1325319 | Dec 2001 | CN |
1454711 | Nov 2003 | CN |
1501534 | Jun 2004 | CN |
101389734 | Mar 2009 | CN |
101426885 | May 2009 | CN |
102187153 | Sep 2011 | CN |
102388005 | Mar 2012 | CN |
102612625 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102639213 | Aug 2012 | CN |
102686301 | Sep 2012 | CN |
103468322 | Dec 2013 | CN |
102010028816 | Nov 2011 | DE |
0161970 | Nov 1985 | EP |
1134187 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1445018 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1580162 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1845579 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1933087 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2279785 | Feb 2011 | EP |
2441816 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2450420 | May 2012 | EP |
2495030 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2515038 | Oct 2012 | EP |
2601443 | Jun 2013 | EP |
1976633 | Mar 2014 | EP |
2924035 | May 2009 | FR |
H03-68898 | Mar 1991 | JP |
H10249153 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2006-502957 | Jan 2006 | JP |
20060096609 | Sep 2006 | KR |
101364823 | Feb 2014 | KR |
406055 | Sep 2000 | TW |
426728 | Mar 2001 | TW |
WO1990013773 | Nov 1990 | WO |
WO1999065097 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO2000022690 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO2000068339 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO2001042132 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO2003070629 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2005066468 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO2007082089 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO2007122498 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007134075 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008019079 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO2008071215 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO2008082312 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO2008115076 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO2009007200 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009008565 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009009388 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO2009021258 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO2009023515 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO2009114309 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO2010037011 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO2010063923 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO2010126617 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO2011021161 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO2011031752 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2011031755 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2011084734 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO2012064712 | May 2012 | WO |
WO2012077978 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO2012144899 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO2012155054 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO2012155059 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO2013040645 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO2014085243 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO2014091024 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO2014152814 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO2011153568 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO2014195904 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2015016956 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO2016053941 | Apr 2016 | WO |
WO2017162427 | Sep 2017 | WO |
2020175426 | Sep 2020 | WO |
WO2020210865 | Oct 2020 | WO |
2021162751 | Aug 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kang et al. “Chemical looping partial oxidation of methane with CO2 utilization on the ceria-enhanced mesoporous Fe2O3 oxygen carrier,” Fuel, 2018, 215: 787-798. |
European Patent Office Extended Search Report for Application No. 20741337.8 dated Jul. 22, 2022 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2021/060744 dated Mar. 18, 2022 (18 pages). |
India Patent Office Examination Report for Application No. 202117034155 dated Nov. 21, 2022 (5 pages). |
Heliogen, “Heliogen, Replacing fuels with sunlight,” <https://heliogen.com/> Accessed Aug. 26, 2020. |
Hsieh et al., “250 kWth high pressure pilot demonstration of the syngas chemical looping system for high purity H2 production with CO2 capture,” Applied energy, 2018, 230: 1660-1672. |
Abad et al., “Chemical-looping combustion in a 300 W continuously operating reactor system using a manganese-based oxygen carrier,” Fuel, 2006, vol. 85, Issue 9, pp. 1174-1185. |
Abad et al., “Reduction Kinetics of CU-, Ni-, and Fe-Based Oxygen Carriers Using Syngas (CO + H2) for Chemical-Looping Combustion,” Energy Fuels, 2007, 21 (4), pp. 1843-1853. |
Abad et al., “The use of iron oxide as oxygen carrier in a chemical-looping reactor,” Fuel, 2007, vol. 86, Issues 7-8, pp. 1021-1035. |
Abdallah et al., “Comparison of mesoporous silicate supports for the immobilisation and activity of cytochrome c and lipase,” J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 2014, 108, 82-88. |
Adanez et al., “Progress in Chemical-Looping Combustion and Reforming technologies,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012, vol. 38, Issue 2, pp. 215-282. |
Adanez et al., “Selection of oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion,” Energy & Fuels, American Chemical Society, 2004, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 371-377. |
Ahern et al., “Comparison of fenofibratemesoporous silica drug-loading processes for enhanced drug delivery,” Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 2013, 50, 400-409. |
Alalwan et al., “Co3O4 nanoparticles as oxygen carriers for chemical looping combustion: A materials characterization approach to understanding oxygen carrier performance,” Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 319, 279-287. |
Alalwan et al., “α-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles as Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping Combustion: An Integrated Materials Characterization Approach to Understanding Oxygen Carrier Performance, Reduction Mechanism, and Particle Size Effects,” Energy Fuels, 2018, 32, 7959-7970. |
Anisimov et al., “Density-functional calculation of effective Coulomb interactions in metals,” Phys. Rev. B, 1991, 43, 7570. |
Azis et al., “On the evaluation of synthetic and natural ilmenite using syngas as fuel in chemical-looping combustion (CLC),” Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2010, vol. 88, Issue 11, pp. 1505-1514. |
Balasubramanian et al., “Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process,” Chem Engr Science, 1999, 54(15-16), 3543. |
Barreca et al., “Methanolysis of styrene oxide catalysed by a highly efficient zirconium-doped mesoporous silica,” Appl. Catal. A, 2006, 304, 14-20. |
Bell et al., “H2 Production via Ammonia Decomposition Using Non-Noble Metal Catalysts: A Review,” Top Catal, 2016, 59, 1438-1457. |
Burke et al., “Large pore bi-functionalised mesoporous silica for metal ion pollution treatment,” J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 164, 229-234. |
Cao et al., “Investigation of Chemical Looping Combustion by Solid Fuels. 1. Process Analysis,” Energy Fuels, 2006, 20(5), pp. 1836-1844. |
Carrero et al., “A critical literature review of the kinetics for the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane over well-defined supported vanadium oxide catalysts,” ACS Catalysis, 2014, 4: 3357-3380. |
Cavani et al., “Oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane and propane: How far from commercial implementation?” Catalysis Today, 2007, 127(1): 113-131. |
Cheng et al., “Carbon Dioxide Adsorption and Activation on Ceria (110): A density functional theory study,” J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 138, 014702. |
Cheng et al., “Methane Adsorption and Dissociation on Iron Oxide Oxygen Carrier: Role of Oxygen Vacancy,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 16423-16435. |
Cheng et al., “Oxygen vacancy promoted methane partial oxidation over iron oxide oxygen carrier in chemical looping process,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 32418-32428. |
Cheng et al., “Propagation of Olefin Metathesis to Propene on WO3 Catalysts: A Mechanistic and Kinetic Study,” ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 59-72. |
Cho et al., “Comparison of iron-, nickel-, copper- and manganese-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion,” Fuel, 2004, vol. 83, Issue 9, pp. 1215-1225. |
Chung et al., “Chemically and physically robust, commercially-viable iron-based composite oxygen carriers sustainable over 3000 redox cycles at high temperatures for chemical looping applications,” Energy Environ. Sci., 2017, 10, 2318-2323. |
Coleman et al., “Synthesis and characterization of dimensionally ordered semiconductor nanowires within mesoporous silica,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 7010-7016. |
Connell et al., “Process Simulation of Iron-Based Chemical Looping Schemes with CO2 Capture for Hydrogen and Electricity Production from Coal,” Presented at 29th Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, Oct. 15-18 (2012), pp. 1274-1281. |
De Diego et al., “Development of Cu-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion,” Fuel, 2004, vol. 83, Issue 13, pp. 1749-1757. |
De Klerk, “Gas-to-Liquid Conversion.” Natural Gas Conversion Technologies Workshop of ARPA-E. U.S. Department of Energy, Houston, TX. vol. 13 (2012). |
Delaney et al., “Development of chemically engineered porous metal oxides for phosphate removal,” J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 185, 382-391. |
Delaney et al., “Porous silica spheres as indoor air pollutant scavengers,” J. Environ. Monit., 2010, 12, 2244-2251. |
Denton et al., “Simultaneous Production of High-Purity Hydrogen and Sequestration-Ready CO2 from Syngas,” 2003. |
EIA—Independent Statistics and Analysis. U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration “Annual Energy Outlook 2015 with Projections to 2040,” Apr. 2015. |
EIA—Independent Statistics and Analysis. U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration, “How Much Petroleum Does the United States Import and from Where?” <https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=727&t=6> webpage available as early as Mar. 22, 2017. |
EIA—Independent Statistics and Analysis. U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Natural Gas Vented and Flared.” <https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/NG_PROD_SUM_A_EPG0_VGV_MMCF_A.htm> webpage available as early as Feb. 29, 2016. |
EIA—Independent Statistics and Analysis. U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Energy Information Administration, “Natural Gas Weekly Update.” <https://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/weekly/> webpage available as early as Dec. 4, 2011. |
Environmental Protection Agency, “Geological CO2 Sequestration Technology and Cost Analysis,” Technical Support Document, pp. i-vi & pp. 1-61, Jun. 2008. |
Faezad Othman et al., “Utilization of Low-Grade Iron Ore in Ammonia Decomposition,” Procedia Chemistry, 2016, 19:119-124. |
Faezad Othman et al., “Utilization of Malaysian Low Grade Iron Ore as Medium for Ammonia Decomposition,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2015, 10(22):17286-17288. |
Fan et al., “Chemical looping processes for CO2 capture and carbonaceous fuel conversion prospect and opportunity,” Energy Environmental Science, 2012, p. 7254-7280. |
Fan et al., “Utilization of chemical looping strategy in coal gasification processes,” Particuology, 2008, vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 131-142. |
Fan et al., “Chemical-Looping Technology Platform,” AIChE Journal, 61(1), 2-22 (2015). |
Fan, “Chemical Looping Systems for Fossil Energy Conversions,” Wiley-AIChE: Hoboken, NJ, U.S.A.; 2010. |
Flynn et al., “Pervaporation performance enhancement through the incorporation of mesoporous silica spheres into PVA membranes,” Sep. Purif. Technol., 2013, 118, 73-80. |
Forero et al., “Syngas combustion in a 500 Wth Chemical-Looping Combustion system using an impregnated Cu-based oxygen carrier,” Fuel Processing Technology, 2009, vol. 90, Issue 12, pp. 1471-1479. |
Forzatti, “Present status and perspectives in de-NOx SCR catalysis.” Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 222(1-2), 2001, 221-236. |
Gao et al., “Production of syngas via autothermal reforming of methane in a fluidized-bed reactor over the combined CeO2—ZrO2/SiO2 supported Ni catalysts,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, vol. 33, p. 5493-5500. |
Garcia-Labiano et al., “Temperature variations in the oxygen carrier particles during their reduction and oxidation in a chemical-looping combustion system,” Chemical Engineering Science, 2005, vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 851-862. |
Geldart, “Types of Gas Fluidization,” Power Technology, vol. 7, pp. 285-292, 1973. |
Ghanapragasam et al., “Hydrogen production from coal direct chemical looping and syngas chemical looping combustion systems: Assessment of system operation and resource requirements,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, vol. 34, Issue 6, pp. 2606-2615. |
Ghoneim et al., “Review on innovative catalytic reforming of natural gas to syngas,” World J. Eng. Technol, 2016, 4(1):116-139. |
Go et al., “Hydrogen production from two-step steam methane reforming in a fluidized bed reactor,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, vol. 34, p. 1301-1309. |
Goellner et al., “Baseline analysis of crude methanol production from coal and natural gas,” National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), US Department of Energy, 2014, 83 pages. |
Goellner, J. F., V. Shah, M. J. Turner, N. J. Kuehn, J. Littlefield, G. Cooney, and J. Marriott, “Analysis of Natural Gas-to Liquid Transportation Fuels via Fischer-Tropsch,” United States Department of Energy/NETL, DOE/NETL-2013/1597, Pittsburgh, PA (2013). |
Grimme et al., “A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H—Pu,” J. Chem. Phys., 2010, 132, 19. |
Grimme et al., “Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory,” J. Comput. Chem., 2011, 32, 1456-1465. |
Haque, “Microwave energy for mineral treatment processes—a brief review,” International Journal of Mineral Processing, vol. 57, pp. 1-24, 1999. |
Henkelman et al., “A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths,” J. Chem. Phys., 2000, 113, 9901-9904. |
Herbst et al., “Relativistic calculations of 4f excitation energies in the rare-earth metals: Further results,” Phys. Rev. B, 1978, 17, 3089. |
Herzog, “Carbon Sequestration via Mineral Carbonation: Overview and Assessment,” MIT Laboratory for Energy and the Environmental, http://sequestration.mit.edu/pfd/carbonates.pdf, Mar. 14, 2002. |
Hildebrandt et al., “Producing Transportation Fuels with Less Work,” Science, Mar. 27, 2009, vol. 323, pp. 1680-1681. |
Hossain et al., “Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations—a review,” Chemical Engineering Science, 2008, vol. 63, Issue 18, pp. 4433-4451. |
Hua et al., “Three Dimensional Analysis of Electrical Capacitance Tomography Sensing Fields,” 1999 IOP Publishing LTD, vol. 10, pp. 717-725. |
Huijgen et al., “Carbon dioxide sequestration by mineral carbonation,” ECN-C—03-016, www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/200e/c03016.pdf, Feb. 2003. |
Hung et al., “Zeolite ZSM-5 Supported Bimetallic Fe-Based Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO: Effects of Acidity and Metal Loading,” Advanced Porous Materials, 2016, 4(3): 189-199(11). |
Imanaka et al., “Advances in Direct NOx Decomposition Catalysts,” Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 431-432, 2012, 1-8. |
Ishida et al., “Evaluation of a Chemical-Looping-Combustion Power-Generation System by Graphic Exergy Analysis,” Energy, 12(2), 147-154 (1987). |
Iwamoto et al., “Influence of sulfur dioxide on catalytic removal of nitric oxide over copper ion-exchanged ZSM-5 Zeolite.” Appl. Catal., 69(2), 1991, 15-19. |
Izquierdo et al., “Catalyst Deactivation and Regeneration Processes in Biogas Tri-Reforming Process. The Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide Addition,” Catalysts, 2018, 8(12): 19 pages. |
Jadhav et al., “Carbonation of Mg-Bearing Minerals: Kinetic and Mechanistic Studies,” Ohio Coal Research Consortium/Ohio State University Project C3.12, www.ohiocoal.org/projects/year3/c3.12, Jul. 3, 2002. |
Jin et al., “Development of a Novel Chemical-Looping Combustion: Synthesis of a Looping Material with a Double Metal Oxide of Co0-NiO,” Energy & Fuels, 1998, vol. 12, 1272-1277. |
Johansson et al., “Combustion of Syngas and Natural Gas in a 300 W Chemical-Looping Combustor,” Chemical Engineering Research and Design vol. 2006, vol. 84, Issue 9, pp. 819-827. |
Kaiser et al., “Precombustion and Postcombustion Decarbonization,” IEEE, Power Engineering Review, Apr. 2001, pp. 15-17. |
Kathe et al., “Modularization strategy for syngas generation in chemical ,” AIChE Journal, 2017, 63(8):3343-3360. |
Kathe et al., “Chemical Looping Gasification for Hydrogen Enhanced Syngas Production with in-situ CO2 Capture,” United States Department of Energy, OSTI: 1185194, (2015). |
Kiuchi et al., “Recovery of hydrogen from hydrogen sulfide with metals or metal sulfides,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 1982, 7: 477-482. |
Koulialias et al., “Ordered defects in Fe 1-x S generate additional magnetic anisotropy symmetries,” Journal of Applied Physics, 2018, 123(3): 033902, 10 pages. |
Kresse et al., “Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,” Phys. Rev. B, 1993, 47, 558. |
Kresse et al., “Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 1996, 6, 15-50. |
Kresse et al., “Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set,” Phys. Rev. B, 1996, 54, 11169. |
Kumar et al., “Direct air capture of CO2 by physisorbent materials,” Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 14372-14377. |
Leion et al., “Solid fuels in chemical-looping combustion using oxide scale and unprocessed iron ore as oxygen carriers,” Fuel, 2009, vol. 88, Issue 10, pp. 1945-1954. |
Leion et al., “Solid fuels in chemical-looping combustion,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2008, vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 180-193. |
Leion et al., “The use of petroleum coke as fuel in chemical-looping combustion,” Fuel, 2007, vol. 86, Issue 12-13, pp. 1947-1958. |
Li et al., “Clean coal conversion processes—progress and challenges,” The Royal Society of Chemistry, Energy & Environmental Science, Jul. 30, 2008, vol. 1, pp. 248-267. |
Li et al., “Ionic Diffusion in the Oxidation of Iron-effect of Support and Its Implications to Chemical Looping Applications,” Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 876-880. |
Li et al., “Role of Metal Oxide Support in Redox Reactions of Iron Oxide for Chemical Looping Applications: Experiments and Density Functional Theory Calculations,” Energy Environmental Science, 2011, vol. 4, p. 3661-3667. |
Li et al., “Syngas chemical looping gasification process: Bench-scale studies and reactor simulations,” Aiche Journal, 2010, vol. 56, Issue 8, pp. 2186-2199. |
Li et al., “Syngas Chemical Looping Gasification Process: Oxygen Carrier Particle Selection and Performance,” Energy Fuels, 2009, 23(8), pp. 4182-4189. |
Lin et al., “Novel Magnetically Separable Mesoporous Fe2O3@SBA-15 Nanocomposite with Fully Open Mesochannels for Protein Immobilization,” Chemistry of Materials, 2008, vol. 20, pp. 6617-6622. |
Liu et al., “Enhanced Performance of Alkali Metal Doped Fe2O3 and Fe2O3/Al2O3 Composites as Oxygen Carrier Material in Chemical Looping Combustion,” Energy Fuels. 2013, 27, 4977-4983. |
Liu et al., “Recent Advances in Catalytic DeNOx Science and Technology,” Catalysis Reviews, 48(1), 2006, 43-89. |
Lockwood Greene, “Ironmaking Process Alternative Screening Study, vol. I: Summary Report,” Department of Energy United States of America, Oct. 2000, 153 pages. |
Luo et al., “Shale Gas-to-Syngas Chemical Looping Process for Stable Shale Gas Conversion to High Purity Syngas with H2:CO Ratio of 2:1,” Energy and Environmental Science, 7(12), 4104-4117, (2014). |
Lyngfelt, “Chemical Looping Combustion of Solid Fuels—Status of Development,” Applied Energy, 2014, vol. 113, p. 1869-1873. |
Lyngfelt, “Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping Combustion Operational Experience,” 1st International Conference on Chemical Looping, Mar. 2010. |
Makepeace et. al., “Ammonia decomposition catalysis using non-stoichiometric lithium imide,” Chem. Sci., 2015, 6, 3805. |
Mamman et al., “Simultaneous steam and CO2 reforming of methane to syngas over NiO/MgO/SA-5205 in presence and absence of oxygen,” Applied Catalysis A, 1998, vol. 168, p. 33-46. |
Mao et al., “Facile synthesis of phase-pure FeCr2Se4 and FeCr2S4 nanocrystals via a wet chemistry method,” J. Mater. Chem. C, 2014, 2: 3744-3749. |
Marashdeh, Q. et al., “A Multimodal Tomography System Based on ECT Sensors,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 7, No. 3, 2007, 426-433. |
Marashdeh, Q., Advances in Electrical Capacitance Tomography, Dissertation, The Ohio State University, 2006. |
Masui et al., “Direct Decomposition of NO into N2 and O2 Over C-type Cubic Y2O3—Tb4O7—ZrO2,” Materials Sciences and Applications, 3(10), 2012, 733-738. |
Mattisson et al., “Application of chemical-looping combustion with capture of CO2,” Second Nordic Minisymposium on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Goeteborg, Oct. 26, 2001, pp. 46-51. |
Mattisson et al., “Chemical-looping combustion using syngas as fuel,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas control, 2007, vol. 1, Issue 2, pp. 158-169. |
Mattisson et al., “CO 2 capture from coal combustion using chemical-looping combustion—Reactivity investigation of Fe, Ni and Mn based oxygen carriers using syngas,” Department of Energy and Environment, Division of Energy Technology and Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Division of Environmental Inorganic Chemistry, Chalmers University of Technology, 2007. |
Mattisson et al., “Reactivity of Some Metal Oxides Supported on Alumina with Alternating Methane and Oxygen—Application for Chemical-Looping Combustion,” Energy & Fuels, 2003, vol. 17, pp. 643-651. |
Mattisson et al., “The use of iron oxide as an oxygen carrier in chemical-looping combustion of methane with inherent separation of CO2,” Fuel, 2001, vol. 80, pp. 1953-1962. |
Mattisson et al., “Use of Ores and Industrial Products As Oxygen Carriers in Chemical-Looping Combustion,” Energy & Fuels, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 2307-2315. |
Mihai et al., “Chemical looping methane partial oxidation: The effect of the crystal size and O content of LaFeO3,” Journal of Catalysis, 2012, 293:175-185. |
Miller et al., “Toward Transformational Carbon Capture,” AIChE Journal, 62, 1-10 (2016). |
Moreira, “Steam Cracking: Kinetics and Feed Characterization,” Dissertation, 2015, 10 pages. |
NETL, National Energy Technology Laboratory. U.S. Department of Energy, “Quality Guidelines for Energy System Studies—Specification for Selected Feedstocks.” Jan. 2012. |
NETL, National Energy Technology Laboratory. U.S. Department of Energy, “Syngas Contaminant Removal and Conditioning,” webpage accessed on Jul. 8, 2018. |
Nipattummakul et al., “Hydrogen and syngas production from sewage sludge via steam gasification,” Fuel and Energy Abstracts, 2010, 35 (21), 11738-11745. |
Ockwig et al., “Membranes for Hydrogen Separation,” American Chemical Society, Chem. Rev., Oct. 10, 2007, vol. 107, pp. 4078-4110. |
O'Connor et al., “Carbon Dioxide Sequestration by Direct Mineral Carbonation: Results from Recent Studies and Currents Status,” Abstract, USDOE Office of Fossil Energy, 2001. |
Ohio Coal Development Office of the Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, “Ohio Coal Research Consortium (OCRC)—IV, Year 3 Proposal Solicitation,” http://www.ohioquality.org/ocdo/other_pdf/Consortium_IV_Year_3_RFP.pdf (2006). |
Ortiz et al., “Hydrogen Production by Auto-Thermal Chemical-Looping Reforming in A Pressurized Fluidized Bed Reactor Using Ni-based Oxygen Carriers,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, vol. 35, p. 151-160. |
OSHA, “Hydrogen Sulfide in Workplaces,” <https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/hydrogensulfide/hydrogensulfide_found.html> webpage accessed Jul. 8, 2018. |
Pans et al., “Optimization of H2 production with CO2 capture by steam reforming of methane integrated with a chemical-looping combustion system,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(27): 11878-11892. |
Park et al., “CO2 Mineral Sequestration: Chemically Enhanced Aqueous Carbonation of Serpentine,” The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2003, vol. 81, pp. 885-890. |
Park et al., “CO2 Mineral Sequestration: physically activated dissolution of serpentine and pH swing process,” Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, vol. 59, pp. 5241-5247. |
Perdew et al., “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77, 3865. |
Pfeifer, “Industrial furnaces-status and research challenges,” Energy Procedia, 2017, 120: 28-40. |
Pröll et al., “Syngas and a separate nitrogen/argon stream via chemical looping reforming—A 140 kW pilot plant study,” Fuel, 2010, vol. 89, Issue 6, pp. 1249-1256. |
Qin et al., “Enhanced methane monversion in mhemical looping partial oxidation systems using a copper doping modification,” Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 235, 143-149. |
Qin et al., “Evolution of Nanoscale Morphology in Single and Binary Metal Oxide Microparticles During Reduction and Oxidation Processes,” J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014, 2, 17511-17520. |
Qin et al., “Impact of 1% Lathanum Dopant on Carbonaceous Fuel Redox Reactions with an Iron-Based Oxygen Carrier in Chemical Looping Processes,” ACS Energy Letters, 2017, 2, 70-74. |
Qin et al., “Nanostructure Formation Mechanism and Ion Diffusion in Iron-Titanium Composite Materials with Chemical Looping Redox Reactions,” J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015, 3, 11302-11312. |
Quin et al., “Improved Cyclic redox reactivity of lanthanum modified iron-based oxygen carriers in carbon monoxide xhemical looping combustion,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2017, 8 pages. |
Rollmann et al., “First-principles calculation of the structure and magnetic phases of hematite,” Phys. Rev. B, 2004, 69, 165107. |
Rostrup-Nielsen, “Syngas in Perspective,” Catalysis Today, 2002, 71(3-4), 243-247. |
Ruchenstein et al., “Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over nickel/alkaline earth metal oxide catalysts,” Applied Catalysis A, 1995, vol. 133, p. 149-161. |
Russo et al., “Impact of Process Design of on the Multiplicity Behavior of a Jacketed Exothermic CSTR,” AICHE Journal, Jan. 1995, vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 135-147. |
Ryden et al., “Synthesis gas generation by chemical-looping reforming in a continuously operating laboratory reactor,” Fuel, 2006, vol. 85, p. 1631-1641. |
Ryden et al., “Using steam reforming to produce hydrogen with carbon dioxide capture by chemical-looping combustion,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31(10): 1271-1283. |
Sassi et al., “Sulfur Recovery from Acid Gas Using the Claus Process and High Temperature Air Combustion ( HiTAC ) Technology,” Am. J. Environ. Sci., 2008, 4, 502-511. |
Sattler et al., “Catalytic Dehydrogenation of Light Alkanes on Metals and Metal Oxides,” Chem Rev, 2014, 114(20): 10613-10653. |
Scott et al., “In situ gasification of a solid fuel and CO2 separation using chemical looping,” AICHE Journal, 2006, vol. 52, Issue 9, pp. 3325-3328. |
Shen et al., “Chemical-Looping Combustion of Biomass in a 10kWth Reactor with Iron Oxide as an Oxygen Carrier,” Energy & Fuels, 2009, vol. 23, pp. 2498-2505. |
Shen et al., “Experiments on chemical looping combustion of coal with a NiO based oxygen carrier,” Combustion and Flame, 2009, vol. 156, Issue 3, pp. 721-728. |
Sheppard et al., “Paths to which the nudged elastic band converges,” J. Comput. Chem., 2011, 32, 1769-1771. |
Shick et al., “Single crystal growth of CoCr2 S4 and FeCr2S4,” Journal of Crystal Growth, 1969, 5(4): 313-314. |
Speight, “Gasification processes for syngas and hydrogen production,” Gasification for Synthetic Fuel Production, Woodhead Publishing, 2015, 119-146. |
Sridhar et al., “Syngas Chemical Looping Process: Design and Construction of a 25 kWth Subpilot Unit,” Energy Fuels, 2012, 26(4), pp. 2292-2302. |
Steinfeld et al., “Design Aspects of Solar Thermochemical Engineering—A case Study: Two-Step Water-Splitting Cycle Using the Fe3O4/FeO Redox System,” Solar Energy, 1999, pp. 43-53. |
Steinfeld, “Solar hydrogen production via a two-step water-splitting thermochemical cycle based on Zn/ZnO redox reactions,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002, vol. 27, pp. 611-619. |
Sun et al., “Review: Fundamentals and challenges of electrochemical CO2 reduction using two-dimensional materials,” Chem, 2017, 3, 560-587. |
Takanabe, “Catalytic Conversion of Methane: Carbon Dioxide Reforming and Oxidative Coupling,” Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, 2012, 55, 1-12. |
Thiollier et al., “Preparation and Catalytic Properties of Chromium-Containing Mixed Sulfides,” Journal of Catalysis, 2011, 197(1): 58-67. |
Tian et al., “Thermodynamic investigation into carbon deposition and sulfur evolution in a Ca-based chemical-looping combustion system,” Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2011, vol. 89, Issue 9, p. 1524. |
Trout et al., “Analysis of the Thermochemistry of NOx Decomposition over CuZSM-5 Based on Quantum Chemical and Statistical Mechanical Calculations,” J. Phys. Chem, 100(44), 1996, 17582-17592. |
U.S. Department of Energy, NCCTI Energy Technologies Group, Office of Fossil Energy, “CO2 Capture and Storage in Geologic Formations,” p. 34, Revised Jan. 8, 2002. |
United States Environmental Protection Agency. “Air Pollution Control Technology Fact Sheet: Selective Catalytic Reforming,” <https://www3.epa.gov/ttncatc1/cica/files/fscr.pdf> (2003). |
Usachev et al., “Conversion of Hydrocarbons to Synthesis Gas: Problems and Prospects,” Petroleum Chemistry, 2011, vol. 51, p. 96-106. |
Velazquez-Vargas et al., “Atmospheric Iron-based Coal Direct Chemical Looping (CDCL) Process for Power Generation”, presented in Power-Gen International 2012, Orlando, FL, Dec. 11-13, 2012, BR-1892, 1-5. |
Vernon et al., “Partial Oxidation of Methane to Synthesis Gas,” Catalysis Letters, 1990, vol. 6, p. 181-186. |
Wang et al., “Highly efficient metal sulfide catalysts for selective dehydrogenation of isobutane to isobutene,” ACS Catalysis, 2014, 4: 1139-1143. |
Wang et al., “Isobutane Dehydrogenation over Metal (Fe, Co, and Ni) Oxide and Sulfide Catalysts: Reactivity and Reaction Mechanism,” ChemCatChem, Jul. 2014, vol. 6, pp. 2305-2314. |
Wang et al., “Study of bimetallic interactions and promoter effects of FeZn, FeMn and FeCr Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2010, 326:29-40. |
Warsito, W. et al., Electrical Capacitance Volume Tomography, 2007, pp. 1-9. |
Watanabe, “Electrical properties of FeCr2S4 and CoCr2S4,” Solid State Communications, 1973, 12(5): 355-358. |
Xu et al., “A novel chemical looping partial oxidation process for thermochemical conversion of biomass to syngas,” Applied Energy, 2018, 222:119-131. |
Yamazaki et al., “Development of highly stable nickel catalyst for methane-steam reaction under low steam to carbon ratio,” Applied Catalyst A, 1996, vol. 136, p. 49-56. |
Yin et al., “A mini-review on ammonia decomposition catalysts for on-site generation of hydrogen for fuel cell applications,” Applied Catalysis A: General, 2004, 277, 1-9. |
Zafar et al., “Integrated Hydrogen and Power Production with CO2 Capture Using Chemical-Looping ReformingRedox Reactivity of Particles of CuO, Mn2O3, NiO, and Fe2O3 Using SiO2 as a Support,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2005, 44(10), pp. 3485-3496. |
Zeng et al., “Metal oxide redox chemistry for chemical looping processe,” Nat Rev Chem., 2018, 2, 349-364. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2020/013823 dated Apr. 9, 2020 (16 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2021/039622 dated Dec. 9, 2021 (17 pages). |
Zhou et al., “Syngas chemical looping process: Dynamic modeling of a moving-bed reducer,” AIChE Journal, 2013, 59(9): 3432-3443. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220089438 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62793708 | Jan 2019 | US |