This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/134,357, filed on Mar. 17, 2016, and titled “SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND SOFTWARE FOR GENERATING, CUSTOMIZING, AND AUTOMATEDLY E-MAILING A REQUEST FOR QUOTATION FOR FABRICATING A COMPUTER-MODELED STRUCTURE FROM WITHIN A CAD PROGRAM,” which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present invention generally relates to the field of computer-aided design. In particular, the present invention is directed to Systems, Methods, And Software For Generating, Customizing, And Automatedly E-Mailing A Request For Quotation For Fabricating A Computer-Modeled Structure From Within A CAD Program.
Presently, CAD (computer-aided design) programs allow designers to create computer models of products to be manufactured. After a design is complete, the designer typically then seeks out one or more suppliers (i.e., parts suppliers, fabricators, manufacturers, etc.), to which they may send a request for quotation (hereinafter “RFQ”) in order to obtain a price associated with fabricating the designed structure. Typically, the designer manually drafts the RFQ and sends it to one or more suppliers; however, such manually drafted RFQs often are unclear and/or lacking information that one or more of the suppliers may require to produce an accurate price quote. When a designer sends unclear and/or incomplete RFQs to a supplier, the supplier typically has to contact the designer in order to obtain additional information to fill in the gaps in the RFQ. If the supplier opts not to contact the designer and instead responds to the RFQ with a quote based on their understanding of the RFQ, making assumptions where necessary, the quote may not be accurate and/or the designer may be displeased with the quoted price. In general, when a designer sends an unclear and/or incomplete RFQ to a supplier, at least one of the designer and supplier end up having to waste time and/or money to rectify the situation.
In an implementation, the present disclosure is directed to a method of assisting a user in generating a request for quotation (RFQ) for fabrication of a structure represented in a computer-aided design (CAD) model from within a CAD program. The method being executed in an RFQ e-mail system and including receiving from the user a selection of an initiate-RFQ control; in response to the selection, displaying to the user an RFQ-e-mail graphical user interface (GUI), wherein the RFQ-e-mail GUI presents the user with a set of RFQ options; receiving from the user via the RFQ-e-mail GUI one or more selections of RFQ options within the set; and generating an RFQ e-mail as a function of the one or more user selections of RFQ options.
In an implementation, the present disclosure is directed to A machine-readable storage medium containing machine-executable instructions for performing a method of assisting a user in generating a request for quotation (RFQ) for fabrication of a structure represented in a computer-aided design (CAD) model from within a CAD program, the method being executed in an RFQ e-mail system and comprising: a first set of machine-executable instructions for receiving from the user a selection of an initiate-RFQ control; a second set of machine-executable instructions for, in response to the selection, displaying to the user an RFQ-e-mail graphical user interface (GUI), wherein the RFQ-e-mail GUI presents the user with a set of RFQ options; a third set of machine-executable instructions for receiving from the user via the RFQ-e-mail GUI one or more selections of RFQ options within the set; and a fourth set of machine-executable instructions for generating an RFQ e-mail as a function of the one or more user selections of RFQ options.
For the purpose of illustrating the invention, the drawings show aspects of one or more embodiments of the invention. However, it should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings, wherein:
Aspects of the present invention include systems, methods, and software for generating, customizing, and automatedly e-mailing a RFQ for fabricating a computer-modeled structure from within a CAD program. Herein, a request for quote (RFQ) may be any request for pricing or cost such as a bid, estimate, firm fixed quote or ballpark number, and a structure may be an object or part having a particular geometry, while a computer model may be a virtual representation of a structure and may be created using appropriate CAD programs. Examples of structures include a piece of sheet metal, a solid cube, a cylindrical pipe, an injection molded plastic toy, an article of apparel such as a shirt made of cotton, and an assembly of various parts such as a vehicle, among others. In some embodiments, software made in accordance with the present invention generates an RFQ based on user-provided information, presents a user interface allowing a user to customize the RFQ, generates an e-mail including the RFQ, and sends the e-mail to one or more suppliers. One or more aspects of the present invention can be implemented in any of a wide variety of manners, such as within a single computing device or by two or more networked computing devices, among others. In some embodiments, functionalities of the system may be integrated into computer modeling programs directly via add-on software.
As would be apparent to one reasonably skilled in the art, the invention may be applied to other manufacturing types, including but not limited to the manufacture of apparel. Both sheet metal and apparel designers use CAD systems to design their products, using sheets of flat, material for manufacture. Design data, such as material choice, precise dimensions, or locations of additional features may be embedded within the digital design. Designers may choose different metals or fabrics (including non-woven materials such as leather) depending on the strength and other inherent properties of the material, which affects what manufacturing methods may be necessary to work the material. Purchased components (in some cases, identical purchased components) may be added to the design. CAD programs may be used to visualize the shape of the finished product. In both sheet metal and apparel manufacturing the sheet (metal or fabric) may be cut or stamped by a variety of methods using computerized machines. Units are moved from station to station during manufacture. Where sheet metal is connected by rivets or welding, sheet fabric is connected by stitching or gluing. Surface finishes may be applied to both; both may be painted, silk-screened, or otherwise covered with a protective substance.
Turning now to the drawings,
CAD program 112 may allow a user to design and/or edit computer-modeled structures, which may be imported from another location and may be designed using another CAD program. CAD program 112 may include a number of subcomponents, such as CAD graphical user interface (GUI) 116, which may enable interaction between a user and software 108 and/or CAD program 112. Software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may cause GUI 116 to appear on a computer monitor, for example, and the GUI may present a user with a virtual representation of one or more CAD model, such as CAD model representation 116A. CAD model representation 116A may be derived from one or more CAD model, such as CAD model 104A, which may be stored in CAD model data storage 104, for example, and may specify desired shapes, properties, and/or other aspects of a structure that a user may request a supplier (or manufacturer) to fabricate in accordance with such information. In order to facilitate user interaction with CAD GUI 116, the CAD GUI may also include a cursor 116B that a user can utilize to manipulate one or more aspects of the GUI through, for example, a mouse or other pointing device. CAD GUI 116 may further present a user with an RFQ GUI initiation button 116C in the form of, for example, a soft selection button. A user may utilize RFQ GUI initiation button 116C by, for example, clicking it with a mouse via cursor 116B or otherwise selecting it in order to initiate RFQ e-mail functionality of system 100, which may include an RFQ e-mail GUI 120.
One or more of software 108 and CAD program 112 may present RFQ e-mail GUI 120 to a user such that they may select one or more suppliers and/or manufacturing specifications to associate with an RFQ. RFQ e-mail GUI 120 may be implemented in the form of, for example, a pop-up window, a series of text entry fields, drop-down menus, radio buttons, check boxes, and/or any other suitable interface for allowing a user to select and/or otherwise specify one or more suppliers and/or manufacturing specifications to associate with an RFQ. At least one of software 108, CAD program 112, CAD GUI 116, and RFQ e-mail GUI 120 may include an e-mail template 124, which the software and/or CAD program may utilize to generate portions of an RFQ e-mail 128 in order to communicate one or more user-provided manufacturing specifications to one or more user-specified suppliers, such as supplier 132. E-mail template 124 may include one or more strings of text that software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may augment based on one or more pieces of user-supplied information.
In one embodiment, e-mail template 124 may include one or more “blanks” or placeholders that software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may automatedly populate with one or more pieces of user-supplied information. For example, e-mail template 124 may contain a string of text such as “This order requires <Quantity> parts to be made” and software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may populate the placeholder “<Quantity>” with a value based on one or more user-provided manufacturing specifications. By manipulating RFQ e-mail GUI 120, a user may cause software 108 and/or CAD program 112 to automatedly generate RFQ e-mail 128 based at least partially on e-mail template 124. RFQ e-mail 128 may include various user-provided manufacturing specifications and one or more attached CAD model information files, which may include CAD models such as CAD model 104A. It is noted that although
In order to facilitate generation of RFQ e-mail 128, software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may draw information from one or more sources, such as an optional design document 136 or CAD model 104A, which the software and/or CAD program may include or generate. Design document 136 may comprise one or more CAD models, such as CAD model 104A, and may contain a record of various geometric and/or feature data associated with one or more CAD models. Design document 136 may be, for example, a CAD file or other document specifying or otherwise including information regarding one or more CAD models or designs, such as CAD model 104A. A user may optionally cause CAD program 112 to generate design document 136 by, for example, manipulating one or more aspects of CAD GUI 116. Software 108 and/or CAD program may draw additional information from a supplier database 140, which may store information associated with various suppliers associated with system 100. Such information may include, for example, a list of suppliers and corresponding e-mail addresses, supplier ratings and capabilities, and/or other supplier-related information. Like CAD model storage 104, supplier database 140 may comprise one or more databases and may include and/or be implemented in or as a server, a hard drive, a CD, a flash drive, cloud storage, or any other type of data storage. It is noted that although
In this example, system 100 further provides a number of data links to enable data communication between various portions thereof. System 100 may implement these links in the form of, for example, an Internet connection, a local network connection, and/or any other connection between electronic devices or portions of one or more devices. For example, system 100 provides a model data link 144, which, in this embodiment, enables communication between CAD model data storage 104 and software 108. For example, software 108 may retrieve and/or receive CAD model information, such as CAD model 104A, from CAD model data storage 104 via model data link 144. Further, software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may enable a user to save new or updated information to CAD model data storage 104 when, for example, the user makes changes to CAD model data drawn from the CAD model data storage via CAD program 112; the software and/or CAD program may automate this process and may perform the process either continuously or on a timed schedule as a function of user preferences (not shown) set in the software and/or the CAD program. Similarly, when, for example, a user is using CAD program 112 to work with CAD model data drawn from information in CAD model data storage 104 and the information in the CAD model data storage changes due to, for example, another user's modifications, software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may allow the user to load the updated information and, based on the updated information, update the CAD model data the user is working with accordingly; the software and/or CAD program may also automate this process and may perform the process either continuously or on a timed schedule as a function of user preferences (not shown) set in the software and/or the CAD program.
System 100 may further provide a basic data link 148, which may enable communication/updates between CAD GUI 116 and optional design document 136, or directly between CAD GUI 116 and RFQ E-mail GUI 120. For example, CAD program 112 may utilize basic data link 148 in order to create or update design document 136 as a function of user manipulation of CAD GUI 116; the CAD program may automate this process and may perform the process either continuously or on a timed schedule as a function of user preferences (not shown) set in the CAD program. System 100 may also provide a supplier data link 152, which may enable communication/updates between supplier database 140 and CAD program 112. For example, CAD program 112 may retrieve/receive a list of suppliers and associated e-mail addresses from supplier database 140 such that RFQ e-mail GUI 120 may present them to a user; the CAD program and/or supplier database may automate this process and may perform the process either continuously or on a timed schedule as a function of user preferences (not shown) set in the CAD program and/or software 108.
System 100 may additionally provide a design document data link 156, which may enable communication/updates between RFQ e-mail GUI 120 and optional design document 136. For example, CAD program 112 may utilize design document data link 156 to create or update the display of RFQ e-mail GUI 120; the CAD program may automate this process and may perform the process either continuously or on a timed schedule as a function of user preferences (not shown) set in the CAD program. System 100 may also provide an e-mail creation data link 160, which may enable CAD program 112 to cause software 108 to generate RFQ e-mail. For example, CAD program 112 may transmit some or all user-provided data and selections in RFQ e-mail GUI 120 to software 108 to generate RFQ e-mail 128. In alternative embodiments, CAD program 112 may generate RFQ e-mail 128 internally without utilizing any other aspects of software 108. System 100 may further provide an output e-mail data link 164, which may enable communication between software 108 and supplier 132. For example, software 108 may utilize output e-mail data link 164 to transmit RFQ e-mail 128 one or more user-specified suppliers, such as supplier 132. In alternative embodiments, CAD program 112 may transmit RFQ e-mail 128 directly to one or more suppliers without utilizing any other aspects of software 108.
With reference to
At step 215, software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may receive user selection of an initiate-RFQ control, such as RFQ GUI initiation button 116C, via CAD GUI 116 through user input such as, for example, using a mouse to manipulate cursor 116B. At optional step 220, software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may retrieve/receive supplier information from supplier database 140 via supplier data link 152 such that RFQ e-mail GUI 120 may present the supplier information to a user. In some embodiments, CAD program 112 may not need to retrieve/receive supplier information from supplier database 140, such as when the CAD program has previously retrieved/received such information.
At optional step 225, CAD program 112 may retrieve information from design document 136 for display in RFQ e-mail GUI 120 and/or inclusion in RFQ e-mail 128 via design document data link 156. At step 230, software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may display or otherwise present RFQ e-mail GUI 120 to a user. RFQ e-mail GUI 120 may present a list of user-selectable suppliers and common manufacturing specifications to the user such that they can customize the recipients and other details of RFQ e-mail 128. As may be apparent to one skilled in the art, it is not necessary to present a GUI specifically for E-mails. Alternatively, a standard GUI or other interactive element may be used. At step 235, CAD program 112 may receive user selections made through RFQ e-mail GUI 120. At step 240, CAD program 112 and/or software 108 may generate RFQ e-mail 128 via e-mail creation data link 160 such that it may be sent to one or more e-mail addresses of one or more user-selected suppliers, such as supplier 132. In some embodiments, CAD program 112 and/or software 108 may automatedly attach one or more appropriate design documents or CAD models, such as design document 136 or CAD model 104A, to RFQ e-mail 128.
At optional step 245, CAD program 112 may display a preview of RFQ e-mail 128 to the user in RFQ e-mail GUI 120 such that the user may edit the e-mail. In one embodiment, the preview of RFQ e-mail 128 may include user-modifiable fields for e-mail addresses, attachments, and text. At step 250, after the user indicates that RFQ e-mail 128 is ready for transmittal to one or more selected suppliers, CAD program 112 and/or software 108 may send the RFQ e-mail to the one or more suppliers, such as supplier 132, via output e-mail data link 164.
RFQ e-mail GUI 120 may further include a representation 308 of an attached file, which may include a text area displaying the file name and/or file type of the attached document. The attached file may include some or all of the information contained in one or more CAD models and/or design documents, such as CAD model 104A and/or design document 136. In some embodiments, software 104 and/or CAD program 108 may automatedly load appropriate design documents and/or other files and may display information identifying them via representation 308, while in other embodiments the software and/or CAD program may wait for user selection of representation 308 (which may, in this case, be a blank box, button, or other similar user interface element prior to a user selecting it) to automatedly load appropriate files. Software 104 and/or CAD program 108 may perform such automated loading of appropriate files by, for example, analyzing one or more of a user command and/or usage history, one or more loaded and/or displayed CAD models, and recent user selections in order to identify files related to the design on which the user is currently working. In some embodiments, the user may select representation 308 of the attached file to select different and/or additional design documents or other files to attach to RFQ e-mail 128; software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may present the user with appropriate dialogs/prompts via, for example, CAD GUI 116, in order to facilitate such selections.
RFQ e-mail GUI 120 may additionally include a cursor 312 that a user can utilize to manipulate one or more aspects of GUI 120 through, for example, a mouse or other pointing device. In some embodiments, cursor 312 may be the same cursor as cursor 116B, while in other embodiments RFQ e-mail GUI 120 may implement cursor 312 independently from cursor 116B.
In order to allow a user to accept or cancel the selections/inputs provided in RFQ e-mail GUI 120, the RFQ e-mail GUI may provide a “cancel” button 316 and a “confirm” button 320 in the form of, for example, soft-selection buttons. In one embodiment, user selection of “cancel” button 316 may cause RFQ e-mail GUI 120 to exit/cease to display without saving the user's selections/inputs, while user selection of “confirm” button 320 may cause CAD program 112 and/or software 108 to exit/cease to display the RFQ e-mail GUI, to store the user's selections/inputs, and/or to generate RFQ e-mail 128 based on the user's selections/inputs and/or e-mail template 124.
With reference to
In some embodiments, software 104 and/or CAD program 112 may automatedly populate content window 516 based on e-mail template 124. As discussed above, e-mail template 124 may include one or more strings of text that software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may augment based on one or more pieces of user-supplied information. In this example, e-mail template 124 also includes multiple “blanks” or placeholders (indicated as underlined terms, each surrounded by a less-than sign and a greater-than sign), such as manufacturing specification placeholders 524A-D, that software 108 and/or CAD program 112 may automatedly populate with user-supplied information, such as information the user provided to RFQ e-mail GUI 120. In this example, based on user input in RFQ e-mail GUI 120 as shown in
It is to be noted that any one or more of the aspects and embodiments described herein may be conveniently implemented using one or more machines (e.g., one or more computing devices that are utilized as a user computing device for an electronic document, one or more server devices, such as a document server, etc.) programmed according to the teachings of the present specification, as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the computer art. Appropriate software coding can readily be prepared by skilled programmers based on the teachings of the present disclosure, as will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the software art. Aspects and implementations discussed above employing software and/or software modules may also include appropriate hardware for assisting in the implementation of the machine executable instructions of the software and/or software module.
Such software may be a computer program product that employs a machine-readable storage medium. A machine-readable storage medium may be any medium that is capable of storing and/or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by a machine (e.g., a computing device) and that causes the machine to perform any one of the methodologies and/or embodiments described herein. Examples of a machine-readable storage medium include, but are not limited to, a magnetic disk, an optical disc (e.g., CD, CD-R, DVD, DVD-R, etc.), a magneto-optical disk, a read-only memory “ROM” device, a random access memory “RAM” device, a magnetic card, an optical card, a solid-state memory device, an EPROM, an EEPROM, and any combinations thereof. A machine-readable medium, as used herein, is intended to include a single medium as well as a collection of physically separate media, such as, for example, a collection of compact discs or one or more hard disk drives in combination with a computer memory. As used herein, a machine-readable storage medium does not include transitory forms of signal transmission.
Such software may also include information (e.g., data) carried as a data signal on a data carrier, such as a carrier wave. For example, machine-executable information may be included as a data-carrying signal embodied in a data carrier in which the signal encodes a sequence of instruction, or portion thereof, for execution by a machine (e.g., a computing device) and any related information (e.g., data structures and data) that causes the machine to perform any one of the methodologies and/or embodiments described herein.
Examples of a computing device include, but are not limited to, an electronic book reading device, a computer workstation, a terminal computer, a server computer, a handheld device (e.g., a tablet computer, a smartphone, etc.), a web appliance, a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, any machine capable of executing a sequence of instructions that specify an action to be taken by that machine, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a computing device may include and/or be included in a kiosk.
Memory 608 may include various components (e.g., machine readable media) including, but not limited to, a random access memory component, a read only component, and any combinations thereof. In one example, a basic input/output system 616 (BIOS), including basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer system 600, such as during start-up, may be stored in memory 608. Memory 608 may also include (e.g., stored on one or more machine-readable media) instructions (e.g., software) 620 embodying any one or more of the aspects and/or methodologies of the present disclosure. In another example, memory 608 may further include any number of program modules including, but not limited to, an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, program data, and any combinations thereof.
Computer system 600 may also include a storage device 624. Examples of a storage device (e.g., storage device 624) include, but are not limited to, a hard disk drive, a magnetic disk drive, an optical disc drive in combination with an optical medium, a solid-state memory device, and any combinations thereof. Storage device 624 may be connected to bus 612 by an appropriate interface (not shown). Example interfaces include, but are not limited to, SCSI, advanced technology attachment (ATA), serial ATA, universal serial bus (USB), IEEE 1394 (FIREWIRE), and any combinations thereof. In one example, storage device 624 (or one or more components thereof) may be removably interfaced with computer system 600 (e.g., via an external port connector (not shown)). Particularly, storage device 624 and an associated machine-readable medium 628 may provide nonvolatile and/or volatile storage of machine-readable instructions, data structures, program modules, and/or other data for computer system 600. In one example, software 620 may reside, completely or partially, within machine-readable medium 628. In another example, software 620 may reside, completely or partially, within processor 604.
Computer system 600 may also include an input device 632. In one example, a user of computer system 600 may enter commands and/or other information into computer system 600 via input device 632. Examples of an input device 632 include, but are not limited to, an alpha-numeric input device (e.g., a keyboard), a pointing device, a joystick, a gamepad, an audio input device (e.g., a microphone, a voice response system, etc.), a cursor control device (e.g., a mouse), a touchpad, an optical scanner, a video capture device (e.g., a still camera, a video camera), a touchscreen, and any combinations thereof. Input device 632 may be interfaced to bus 612 via any of a variety of interfaces (not shown) including, but not limited to, a serial interface, a parallel interface, a game port, a USB interface, a FIREWIRE interface, a direct interface to bus 612, and any combinations thereof. Input device 632 may include a touch screen interface that may be a part of or separate from display 636, discussed further below. Input device 632 may be utilized as a user selection device for selecting one or more graphical representations in a graphical interface as described above.
A user may also input commands and/or other information to computer system 600 via storage device 624 (e.g., a removable disk drive, a flash drive, etc.) and/or network interface device 640. A network interface device, such as network interface device 640, may be utilized for connecting computer system 600 to one or more of a variety of networks, such as network 644, and one or more remote devices 648 connected thereto. Examples of a network interface device include, but are not limited to, a network interface card (e.g., a mobile network interface card, a LAN card), a modem, and any combination thereof. Examples of a network include, but are not limited to, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet, an enterprise network), a local area network (e.g., a network associated with an office, a building, a campus or other relatively small geographic space), a telephone network, a data network associated with a telephone/voice provider (e.g., a mobile communications provider data and/or voice network), a direct connection between two computing devices, and any combinations thereof. A network, such as network 644, may employ a wired and/or a wireless mode of communication. In general, any network topology may be used. Information (e.g., data, software 620, etc.) may be communicated to and/or from computer system 600 via network interface device 640.
Computer system 600 may further include a video display adapter 652 for communicating a displayable image to a display device, such as display device 636. Examples of a display device include, but are not limited to, a liquid crystal display (LCD), a cathode ray tube (CRT), a plasma display, a light emitting diode (LED) display, and any combinations thereof. Display adapter 652 and display device 636 may be utilized in combination with processor 604 to provide graphical representations of aspects of the present disclosure. In addition to a display device, computer system 600 may include one or more other peripheral output devices including, but not limited to, an audio speaker, a printer, and any combinations thereof. Such peripheral output devices may be connected to bus 612 via a peripheral interface 656. Examples of a peripheral interface include, but are not limited to, a serial port, a USB connection, a FIREWIRE connection, a parallel connection, and any combinations thereof.
The foregoing has been a detailed description of illustrative embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and additions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. Features of each of the various embodiments described above may be combined with features of other described embodiments as appropriate in order to provide a multiplicity of feature combinations in associated new embodiments. Furthermore, while the foregoing describes a number of separate embodiments, what has been described herein is merely illustrative of the application of the principles of the present invention. Additionally, although particular methods herein may be illustrated and/or described as being performed in a specific order, the ordering is highly variable within ordinary skill to achieve methods, systems, and software according to the present disclosure. Accordingly, this description is meant to be taken only by way of example, and not to otherwise limit the scope of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4495559 | Gelatt, Jr. et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
5117354 | Long | May 1992 | A |
5465221 | Merat et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5495430 | Matsunari et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5552995 | Sebastian | Sep 1996 | A |
5570291 | Dudle et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5655087 | Hino et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5758328 | Giovannoli | May 1998 | A |
5847971 | Ladner et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870719 | Maritzen et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5937189 | Branson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6031535 | Barton | Feb 2000 | A |
6112133 | Fishman | Aug 2000 | A |
6295513 | Thackston | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6341271 | Salvo et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343285 | Tanaka et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6611725 | Harrison | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6647373 | Carlton-Foss | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6701200 | Lukis et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6750864 | Anwar | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6834312 | Edwards et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836699 | Lukis et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6859768 | Wakelam et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6922701 | Ananian et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6917847 | Littlejohn et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7006084 | Buss et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7058465 | Emori et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7079990 | Haller et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085687 | Eckenwiler et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7089082 | Lukis et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7107268 | Zawadzki | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7123986 | Lukis et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134096 | Brathwaite et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7299101 | Lukis et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7305367 | Hollis et al. | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7327869 | Boyer | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343212 | Brearley et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7359886 | Sakurai et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366643 | Verdura et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7369970 | Shimizu et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7418307 | Katircioglu | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7467074 | Faruque et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7496487 | Wakelam et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7496528 | Lukis et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7499871 | McBrayer et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7523411 | Carlin | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7526358 | Kawano et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7529650 | Wakelam et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7565139 | Neven, Sr. et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7565223 | Moldenhauer et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7567849 | Trammell et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7568155 | Axe et al. | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7571166 | Davies et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7574339 | Lukis et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590466 | Lukis et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590565 | Ward et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7603191 | Gross | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606628 | Azuma | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7630783 | Walls-Manning et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7656402 | Abraham et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7689936 | Rosel | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7733339 | Laning et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747469 | Hinman | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7748622 | Schon et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761319 | Gil et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7822682 | Arnold et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7836573 | Lukis et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840443 | Lukis et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7908200 | Scott et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7957830 | Lukis et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7979313 | Baar | Jul 2011 | B1 |
7993140 | Sakezles | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8000987 | Hickey et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8024207 | Ouimet | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8140401 | Lukis et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8170946 | Blair et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8175933 | Cook, Jr. et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8180396 | Athsani et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8209327 | Danish et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8239284 | Lukis et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8249329 | Silver | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8271118 | Pietsch et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8275583 | Devarajan et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8295971 | Krantz | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8417478 | Gintis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8441502 | Reghetti et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8515820 | Lopez et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8554250 | Linaker | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8571298 | McQueen et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8595171 | Qu | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8700185 | Yucel et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8706607 | Sheth et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8768651 | Bhaskaran et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8798324 | Conradt | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8806398 | Brathwaite et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8830267 | Brackney | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849636 | Becker et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8861005 | Grosz | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8874413 | Mulligan et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8923650 | Wexler | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8977558 | Nielsen et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9037692 | Ferris | May 2015 | B2 |
9055120 | Firman | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9106764 | Chan et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
20010023418 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010032166 | Ruffo | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010047251 | Kemp | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020052807 | Han | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065790 | Oouchi | May 2002 | A1 |
20020087440 | Blair et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099579 | Stowell et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107673 | Haller et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020152133 | King | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030018490 | Magers et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030069824 | Menninger | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078846 | Burk et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030139995 | Farley | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149500 | Faruque et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163212 | Smith et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172008 | Hage et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030212610 | Duffy et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220911 | Tompras | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008876 | Lure | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040113945 | Park et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040195224 | Kanodia et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215467 | Coffman | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050055299 | Chambers et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050125092 | Lukis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144033 | Vreeke et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050171790 | Blackmon | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050251478 | Yanavi | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273401 | Yeh et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060085322 | Crookshanks | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060185275 | Yatt | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060253214 | Gross | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016437 | Elmufdi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070067146 | Devarajan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073593 | Perry et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112635 | Loncaric | May 2007 | A1 |
20070198231 | Walch | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080120086 | Lilley et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080183614 | Gujral et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080269942 | Free | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281678 | Keuls et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090058860 | Fong et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090208773 | DuPont | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090299799 | Racho et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319388 | Yuan et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100088239 | Blair | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110040542 | Sendhoff et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047140 | Free | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110209081 | Chen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110213757 | Bhaskaran et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120016678 | Gruber et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120072299 | Sampsell | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120230548 | Calman et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120316667 | Hartloff | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130055126 | Jackson | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130097259 | Li | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130100128 | Steedly et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130138529 | Hou | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144566 | De Biswas | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130166470 | Grala et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130218961 | Ho | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130293580 | Spivack | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130297320 | Buser | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130297460 | Spivack | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130311914 | Daily | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130325410 | Jung et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140042136 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140067333 | Rodney et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140075342 | Corlett | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098094 | Neumann et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140157579 | Chhabra et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140207605 | Allin et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140229316 | Brandon | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140279177 | Stump | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140379119 | Sciacchitano et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150055085 | Fonte et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150066189 | Mulligan et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150127480 | Herrman et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150234377 | Mizikovsky | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150339744 | Jaffarian | Nov 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
154476 | Aug 2001 | WO |
171626 | Sep 2001 | WO |
2001077781 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2006086332 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2007067248 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2011139630 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011140646 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2013058764 | Apr 2013 | WO |
2014152396 | Sep 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Krar, S. F., Gill, A., & Cahall, J. C. (2003). Exploring advanced manufacturing technologies. New York, NY: Industrial Press. (Year: 2003). |
Jordan, C. W., W. A. Niven, and R. E. Cavitt. Zephyr: A secure Internet process to streamline engineering. No. UCRL-JC-130755; CONF-981036-. Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (United States), 1998. (Year: 1998). |
Defining Lead Time for APS Planning; http://t3.apptrix.com/syteline/Language/en-US/Other/Process/Defining_Lead_Time.htm. |
Wu et al. Interactive 3D Geometric Modelers with 2D UI, 2002, State University of Campinas, www.dca.fee.unicamp.br, Sao Paulo, Brazil; 2002, 8 pages. |
“Upload Your Photos, Print a 3D Model with hypr3D.” SolidSmack. http://www.solidsmack.com/cad-design-news/hypr3d-photo-video-3d-print/; last accessed on Oct. 13, 2015. |
“123D Catch.” Autodesk. http://apps.123dapp.com/catch/. |
Rothganger et al. “3D Object Modeling and Recognition from Photographs and Image Sequences.” Toward Category-Level Object Recognition. 2006, pp. 105-126, vol. 4170 of the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. |
Dealer Information Systems Corporation. “Parts Inventory.” http://dis-corp.com/content/agriculture/inventory/parts-inventory. |
eMachineShop. “Emachineshop Features.” http://www.emachineshop.com/machine-shop/Features/page518.html. |
Retrieved from:http://www.solidworks.com/sw/products/3d-cad/manufacturing-cost-estimation-quoting.htm p. 1: Automatic Manufacturing Cost Estimation Overview; Solidworks; 2015. |
Retrieved from: http://www.gom.com/fileadmin/user_upload/industries/touch_probe_fixtures_EN.pdf; Application Example: Quality Control, Online Calibration and Validation of Fixtures, Jigs and Gauges. GOM mbH, 2008. |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.194.7785&rep=rep1&type=pdf Kim, Jin Baek, and Arie Segev. “A web services-enabled marketplace architecture for negotiation process management.” Decision Support Systems 40.1 (2005): 71-87. |
Jaiswal, Ashutosh et al., “Design and Implementation of a Secure Multi-Agent Marketplace”, Elsevier Science, pp. 1-23, Jun. 3, 2004; http://magnet.cs.umn.edu/papers/Jaiswal04cera.pdf. |
http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2005/2268/01/22680038.pdf Bui, Tung, and Alexandre Gachet. “Web services for negotiation and bargaining in electronic markets: Design requirements and implementation framework.” System Sciences, 2005. HICSS'05. |
http://www.bridgelinedigital.com/File%20Library/Repository/eCommerce/Sample-eCommerce-RFP-Template_Bridgeline-Digital.pdf. Sample RFP Template: Ecommerce Platform, Bridgeline Digital, 2014. |
Matchbook, Tealbook, http://www.matchbookinc.com/ Sep. 28, 2015. |
3Diligent, Source Smarter, http://www.3diligent.com/customer.html; Sep. 28, 2015. |
Dassault Systemes, Brochure, Mar. 24, 2010: New Features Type3ToCatia http://www.type3.us/content/download/2202/405535/file/New%20Feature_Type3ToCatia_2010_US%20old.pdf. |
Xue, S., X. Y. Kou, and S. T. Tan. “Natural voice-enabled CAD: modeling via natural discourse.” Computer-Aided Design and Applications 6.1 (2009): 125-136. |
Kou, X. Y., S. K. Xue, and S. T. Tan. “Knowledge-guided inference for voice-enabled CAD.” Computer-Aided Design 42.6 (2010): 545-557. |
Sharma, Anirudh, et al. “MozArt: a multimodal interface for conceptual 3D modeling.” Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces. ACM, 2011. |
Sorpas (“User Manual,”, Swanted Software and Engineering Aps, 2011 (120 pages)). |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/267,447, Aug. 5, 2015, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/197,922, Nov. 26, 2014, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/197,922, Apr. 27, 2015, Response to Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/197,922, May 15, 2015, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/267,447, Jun. 18, 2015, Response to Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/263,665, Oct. 8, 2015, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/053,222, Jan. 29, 2016, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/311,943, Apr. 27, 2016, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/486,550, May 26, 2016, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/060,033, Jun. 15, 2016, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/172,462, Jul. 6, 2016, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/053,222, Jul. 29, 2016, Response to Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/185,204, Jul. 29, 2016, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/062,947, Sep. 16, 2016, Office Action. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/060,033, filed Oct. 22, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/053,222, filed Oct. 14, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/172,462, filed Oct. 16, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/062,947, filed Oct. 25, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/172,404, filed Feb. 4, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/303,372, filed Jun. 12, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/185,204, filed Feb. 20, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/195,391, filed Mar. 3, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/246,254, filed Apr. 7, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/229,008, filed Mar. 28, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/197,922, filed Mar. 5, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/263,665, filed Apr. 28, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/267,447, filed May 1, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/311,943, filed Jun. 23, 2014. |