This application is the U.S. national stage application of International Application No. PCT/NO2010/000298, filed Aug. 6, 2010, which International application was published on Feb. 24, 2011 as International Publication No. WO 2011/021939 A1 in the English language and which application is incorporated herein by reference. The International application claims priority of Norwegian Patent Application No. 20092843, filed Aug. 17, 2009, which application is incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates to a table. More particularly it concerns a table comprising a base, a footing and a tabletop, and where the base is formed with an upper portion being rotatable in the horizontal plane relative to a lower portion, and where the lower portion of the base is arranged to abut a basis.
During use of such as a personal computer in conjunction with such as an armchair, it is often desirable to be able to pull is the table in over the armchair after one is seated.
It is known to use a table with wheels where the table is displaced on the floor to place the tabletop in an operating position extending in over the chair.
Norwegian patent 309551 concerns a table where a tabletop is doubly hinged in the horizontal plane. The tabletop is thereby arranged to be able to be turned in over such as a chair, at the same time as the distance relative to the table base may be adjusted.
Prior art devices may have a drawback in that they do not have sufficient braking effect and thereby have a tendency to be displaced unintentionally during use.
Known devices for the purpose are neither adapted for tilting the tabletop.
The object of the invention is to remedy or reduce at least one of the disadvantages of the prior art.
The object is achieved by the features disclosed in the following description and in the subsequent claims.
There is provided a table comprising a base, a footing and a tabletop, the base being formed with an upper portion being rotatable in the horizontal plane relative to a lower portion, where a lower portion of the base is arranged to abut a basis. The table is characterised in that an upper portion of the base is provided with two diametrically opposite castors abutting rollably against the lower portion of the base, and where a friction element arranged to be able to abut the lower portion of the base, is connected to the upper portion of the base and outside an axis extending between the two castors.
The upper portion of the base is thus arranged to be able to be tilted about the two castors relative to the lower portion of the base. By the friction element being outside the axis between the two castors, the friction element may abut the lower portion of the base, for example when the tabletop is in its operating position, but be tilted up from the lower portion of the base when the tabletop is in a resting position. The friction element will thus brake any displacement between the upper and lower portions of the base when the table is in the operating position, but be inactive when it is lifted up from the lower portion of the base.
The upper portion of the base may be provided with a third castor on the opposite side of the axis relative to the friction element. The third castor effects that the upper portion of the base in a more stable way may be rotated relative to the lower portion of the base.
The upper portion of the base may be provided with a counterweight close to the third castor. The counterweight is arranged to hold the table in a stable position against a basis, and to facilitate rotation of the upper portion of the base relative to the lower portion of the base, as the counterweight contributes to hold the friction element lifted from the lower portion of the base.
In this preferred embodiment example the footing is attached to the upper portion of the base.
In an alternative embodiment both the footing and the friction element may be connected to, relative to the upper portion of the base, a pivotal attachment. In this embodiment it is sufficient that just the attachment is tilted or lifted to lift the friction element up from the lower portion of the base.
This embodiment is well suited for tables where the castors are replaced by such as a turntable.
The footing may be rotatable about its vertical axis at its fastening to the upper portion of the base or at the attachment. The footing may be provided with a toothed ring complementary fitting in a releasable locking body. The locking body is displaceable between an active locking position and an inactive released position.
The locking body may be provided with a friction element arranged to be able to abut the lower part of the base to thereby brake both the rotation of the footing about its attachment and the rotation of the upper portion of the base about the lower portion of the base. The friction element holds the locking body in its active position when the friction element abuts the lower portion of the base.
The tabletop may be connected to the footing by means of a ball attachment. It is thereby a simple operation to adjust the tabletop to the desired angle and thereafter to lock the tabletop in this angle. Other attachment means between the footing and the tabletop may also be appropriate, e.g. an axle suspension where the tabletop is rotatable about a horizontal axis.
The tabletop and the base may be made in appropriate shapes, but the most appropriate seems to be circular.
Advantageously the footing is given a U- or bow-shape. The tabletop may thereby be lowered further down than for example the height of an armrest. This is particularly important when the tabletop is to be tilted. The shape of the footing also makes the tabletop obtain a distance to the vertical portion of the footing, making room for the armrest. The footing being connected to the tabletop from above renders in all material aspects the extension from the underside of the tabletop superfluous. Advantageously the footing is placed eccentrically on the base.
The invention makes production of relatively light, steady tables that are prevented from unintentional rotation from the desired position possible. The locking mechanism is also suitable for heavier tables where it is desirable that the table is rotatable at the same time as it must be able to be kept fixed in a desired position.
In the following is described an example of a preferred embodiment illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In the drawings the reference numeral 1 indicates a table comprising a base 2, a footing 4 and a tabletop 6. The footing 2 is telescopic, as a lower tubular 8 is attached to the base 2 while an upper tubular 10 is displaceable in the lower tubular 8. The upper tubular is given a U-shape and is connected to the tabletop 6 by means of a ball attachment 12. An adapter sleeve connection 14 of a per se known design connected to the lower tubular 8 clamps the upper tubular 10.
The base 2 comprises an upper portion 16 and a lower portion 18, see
The lower tubular 8 of the footing 4 is bolted to the support plate 20. Two castors 30 are arranged diametrically opposite under the upper portion 16 of the base, see
A third castor 34 is arranged at the counterweight 24. The castors 30, 34 are arranged to be able to roll against the lower portion 18 of the base when the upper portion 16 of the base is rotated.
Diametrically opposite the third castor 34 and to the upper portion 16 of the base, more particularly to the support plate 20, are attached two friction elements 36. The friction elements 36 are arranged to be able to abut brakingly the lower portion 18 of the base when the friction element 36 is in its lower position.
In this preferred embodiment the friction elements 36 abut the lower portion 18 of the base when a sufficient moment is applied to the footing 4 about the axis 32 to tilt the counterweight 24 up. The friction elements 36 thereby counteract rotation of the upper portion 16 of the base about the lower portion 18 of the base.
By lifting the tabletop 6 somewhat, or by turning the tabletop 6 to its inward turned position so that the table centre of gravity is on the counterweight side of the axis 32, the upper portion 16 of the base is tilted about the axis 32. The friction elements 36 are lifted up from the lower portion 18 of the base, whereby the upper portion 16 of the base may be turned freely relative to the lower portion 18 of the base.
The ball attachment 12 comprises a ball 38 attached to the upper tubular 10 of the base. The ball 38 is clamped between a first clamp plate 40 attached to the tabletop 6, and a second tensional clamping plate 42. An adjustable over centre handle 44 is connected to a clamping bolt 46 and is arranged to be able to squeeze the clamping plates 40, 42 together and thereby locking the ball attachment 12 in the desired position.
In an alternative embodiment, see
The upper portion 16 of the base is provided with a number of distributed castors 48 and is therefore prevented from being able to tilt relative to the lower portion 18 of the base.
Both the footing 4, i.e. the lower tubular 8 of the base, and the friction elements 36 are attached to fastener 50 which by means of a bolt 52 is linkably attached to the upper portion 16 of the base.
Lifting and lowering of the friction elements 36 are here done by turning the footing 4 about the bolt 52.
In a further embodiment, see
The toothed ring 56 fits complementary in a locking body 58, which is lift- and lowerable relative to the upper portion 16 of the base.
By arranging the friction elements 36 on the underside of the locking body 58 the locking body 58 is held meshed with the toothed ring 56, see
If desirable the locking element 58 may be arranged in a rotatable attachment 50 corresponding to what is explained under reference to
In yet another embodiment, see
The locking body 58 is provided with a hook 64 arranged to be able to grip a cam ring 66. The cam ring 66 is attached to the lower portion 18 of the base.
In
When the trigger rod 60 is lowered, the trigger body 62 and the locking body 58 are also displaced downwards, whereby the locking body 58 meshes with the toothed ring 65 and the hook 64 meshes with the cam ring 66.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20092843 | Aug 2009 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2010/000298 | 8/6/2010 | WO | 00 | 3/14/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/021939 | 2/24/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2104072 | Carr | Jan 1938 | A |
2364516 | Buckstaff | Dec 1944 | A |
2526245 | Lathrop | Oct 1950 | A |
3911509 | Fleckenstein | Oct 1975 | A |
6089167 | Frohardt | Jul 2000 | A |
6315252 | Schultz | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6877442 | Helle | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20020017595 | Koyanagi | Feb 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
309551 | Feb 2001 | NO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for parent application PCT/NO2010/000298, having a mailing date of Oct. 21, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120279427 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |