The present application claims foreign priority of Chinese Patent Application No. 201810568038.7 filed on Jun. 5, 2018, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present disclosure relates generally to tableware fields, and more particularly, to a tableware handle and tableware thereof.
At present, disposable plastic tableware used at home and abroad is developing toward the direction of light, solid, safe, energy-saving and environmental protection. Especially, it needs to have the characteristics of stable stack and adaptability to the clean and sanitary use of self-service tableware.
The disposable plastic tableware on the market now, according to the different handle structures, can be divided into two categories: non-stackable type and stackable type. The advantages of the stackable type over the non-stackable type lie in the convenience of stacking, picking up and packaging in production, especially in reducing the raw materials for production and packaging, saving storage space and transportation costs, to be specific, which generally reducing more than 10% of raw materials and more than 20% of space. Accordingly, the tableware that can be stably stacked can greatly reduce the consumption of raw materials, save storage space and freight. In short, it saves energy and reduces production costs.
No matter the disposable plastic tableware can be stacked or not, the main plastic raw materials are PP (polypropylene) or PS (polystyrene, polystyrene). The main weaknesses of such disposable plastic tableware are insufficient strength. The handle of such disposable plastic tableware is easy to be broken to form sharp knife-like hard objects at the torn section, which may hurt the user or others. Moreover, when the handle of such disposable plastic tableware breaks up, debris may be ejected out at a high speed and hurt others.
Above all, except for the nature of the material, the structure of the product is the key point. The disposable plastic tableware handle has designed different widths, heights, wall thicknesses, shapes and structures at different segments, so such different segments would have different strengths. The segments having poorest strength often become the breaking point of the rapid fracture. Once the breaking point cannot withstand the effect of external force, it will be broken in an instant, generate an impact force for ejecting the debris at a high speed.
In order to avoid being broken easily, in the design of disposable plastic tableware products, it is often necessary to thicken the thickness of the product, that is, to increase the weight, especially to increase the glue thickness of or add reinforcing ribs at the so-called weak points. Although the product strength has been strengthened in such a way, however the strength difference between the different handle segments cannot be avoided. In particularly, when an X-shaped reinforcing rib is added to the handle back, a strong stress will be produced in the reinforcing rib position. On the contrary, the surrounding points around the reinforcing rib position will be easier to be broken, and the impact force generated at the breaking is stronger and results in greater danger, while the production cost is increased.
The object of the present application is to provide a tableware handle of lightweight and good strength, which can be used in plastic tableware of fork, spoon, soup ladle, fork spoon, table-knife and so on. Such tableware handle is especially not easy to be broken and can be stacked stably.
In one aspect, a tableware handle is provided, comprising a handle body, a neck portion arranged at a first end of the handle body and a tail portion arranged at a second end of the handle body, the handle body has a “W” shape cross section formed by a convex, two reinforcing grooves and two reinforcing ribs symmetrically arranged on both sides of the convex, the convex has a trigonometric line shape and each of the two reinforcing ribs and two reinforcing grooves are on each side of the convex, the convex is extending along an central axis of the handle body;
wherein a positioning concave structure having a crescent shape is arranged at a front surface of the handle body; wherein the positioning concave structure extends from the second end of the handle body to the tail portion;
the handle body has a front surface and a back surface, in which the front surface containing a culmination of the convex and a culmination of the of the reinforcing grooves and the back surface containing a back surface of the convex which forms a concave groove and a bottom surface of the two reinforcing ribs; wherein the convex and the concave groove both extend along from the tail portion to the neck portion; the two reinforcing grooves and the two reinforcing ribs are all extend along the tail portion to the neck portion.
In another aspect, a tableware is provided, comprising the tableware handle discussed above and a food taking portion fixedly connected with each other.
By the implementation of the tableware handle and tableware thereof, several advantages can be obtained. The tableware handle and tableware thereof having a lightweight and good strength, are especially not easy to be broken and can be stacked stably. Moreover, there are small stacking clearance between the tableware handles, saving packaging, storage and transportation space. In additional, the tableware handle and tableware thereof are safe to use, light, comfortable and environmental protected. Furthermore, the tableware handle and tableware thereof can be stably stacked with each other, so are particularly suitable for being positioned the blanking system of the automatic tableware packaging machine, thus improving the automatic packaging efficiency of tableware.
The present application is further illustrated combining the embodiments and drawings attached.
Reference numbers in the accompanying drawings include:
These and other advantage, aspect and novel features of the present invention, as well as details of an illustrated embodiment thereof, will be more fully understand from the following description and drawings. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are intended only to explain the invention and are not intended to limit it.
The questions such as whether the strength of the plastic tableware is enough, whether the weight of the plastic tableware can be reduced, whether the plastic tableware is easy to be broken, and whether the plastic tableware can be stably stacked with each other, are mainly reflected in the structure of tableware handle. Among all kinds of plastic tableware on the market, the cross-sectional structures of the tableware handles which have been disclosed are generally divided as following four types.
1. The cross section of the tableware handle has a transverse line shape (). As the tableware handle has a sheet shape, it has a poor bending strength in the vertical direction of the handle surface of the tableware, and is easy to be bent. Accordingly, such defects should be overcome by increasing the thickness or adding reinforcing edges which are perpendicular to the handle surface and slightly protruding upward or downward at the left and right ends of the tableware handle. Although the thickness is increased or reinforcing edges are added, such structures are still easy to be broken, and cannot be stably stacked with each other. That is because there are no baffles at both sides of the tableware handle, which makes such tableware handle easy to slide left and right and cannot be stably stacked, not to mention being stacked high. Accordingly, such tableware handle is inconvenient to take out and place in, as well as package. In additional, as such tableware handle has a thick thickness, it is impossible to save the stacking space. Accordingly, such structure of the tableware handle is generally used in the heavy tableware.
2. The cross section of the tableware handle has an arch bridge shape (∩), which is characterized by that the cross-section of the handle surface has a trigonometric line shape (A) or an arc shape, however both sides of the cross-section have different angles relative to the handle surface, which results in following two different effects. The left and right sides of the tableware handle are perpendicular to the handle surface, while the heights of the sides are larger than the width of the handle surface for at least about 50%, and larger than the height of the tableware handle of the transverse line shape. Accordingly, such kind of tableware handle has a better strength and bending resistance than that of the tableware handle of the transverse line shape. However, if the wall thickness of the tableware handle is not large enough, its strength and bending resistance are still insufficient, and it is still easy to be broken or tore off. In order to improve the strength and bending resistance, it is necessary to increase the thickness of the handle wall of the tableware, or add X-shaped reinforcing ribs at the back surface of the tableware handle, which would increase the weight of the tableware handle. Meanwhile, the strength difference between the reinforcing rib position and the surrounding points around the reinforcing rib position would be greater, resulting that the surrounding points around the reinforcing rib position will be easier to be broken, and the impact force generated at the breaking is stronger and results in greater danger. In additional, such structure has the same defect as that of the transverse line shape, that is, both of which cannot be stacked high.
3. Both sides of the tableware handle are bent to form an obtuse angle with respect to the handle surface of the tableware handle, while the heights of the sides are close to the width of the handle surface. If the obtuse angle is large enough, the tableware handle can be stacked high. The larger the obtuse angle, the better the stacking performance; while the poor the strength and bending resistance of the tableware handle. In additional, if the handle wall of the tableware handle is thin, the tableware handle would have worse strength and bending resistance. Accordingly, in order to improve the strength, the wall thickness of the tableware handle should be increased or X-shaped reinforcing ribs should be added at the back surface of the tableware handle. Similarly, problems of weight increasing or easy to being broken will also occur. However, as the wall thickness of the handle is increased for strengthening strength, or X-shaped reinforcing ribs are added to the back surface of the tableware handle, the handle thickness should be correspondingly increased which makes the space saved by stacking not obvious.
4. The cross section of the handle surface of the tableware handle has a simple trigonometric line shape (∧) or an inverted trigonometric line shape (∨). Both sides are located at both sides of the central axis of the tableware handle and form an angle of less than 180 degrees. Such kind of tableware handle can be stacked high stably. However, if the handle wall of the tableware handle is thin, the tableware handle would have worse strength and bending resistance. Accordingly, in order to improve the strength, the wall thickness of the tableware handle should be increased or X-shaped reinforcing ribs should be added at the back surface of the tableware handle. Similarly, problems of weight increasing or easy to being broken will also occur.
To sum up, the disposable plastic tableware should not only conform to the stacking structure, but also require to reduce weight and have enough strength, especially not easy to be broken. These are contradictory aspects, but also the problems which should be solved urgently in the current development of disposable plastic tableware which can be stacked.
As shown in
As shown in
In order to facilitate the user to take the fork 31, a positioning concave structure 20 having a crescent shape is arranged at an end of the front surface 145 of the handle body 141. The positioning concave structure 20 is provided with anti-skid lines on its surface. The positioning concave structure 20 extends from the end of the handle body 141 to be cross-linked with the tail portion 144. The positioning concave structure 20 has a function for facilitating the thumb grabbing and preventing the fork 31 from sliding down when the fork 31 is taken from the self-service device for taking tableware.
In order to enhance structural strength, the fork 31 further comprises an enhancing block 1421 and a fork tooth reinforcing strip 121. The enhancing block 1421 is arranged at the connection and transition portion between the tableware handle 14 and the food taking portion 12 for improving the strength of the connection and transition portion between the tableware handle 14 and the food taking portion 12. The fork tooth reinforcing strip 121 is arranged at the back surface of the fork 31 and extends from the neck portion 142 of the tableware handle 14 and the end of the fork tooth.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Specifically, the reinforcing rib 18 is arranged on the back surface of the handle body 141, the reinforcing rib groove 19 is arranged on the front surface 145 of the tableware handle 14. The reinforcing rib 18 and the reinforcing rib groove 19 have adapted position and size, such that the reinforcing rib 18 of one fork 31 can be exactly placed in the reinforcing rib groove 19 of the other fork 31. The cross section of the reinforcing rib 18 is triangular, and is connected with the reinforcing strip 16. Please referring
At the same time, the reinforcing rib 18 has strengthens the structure strength of convex 15 and concave groove 17, so that the stiffness of the tableware handle 14 can be increased and the material can be saved without adding any other superfluous materials. As shown in
In the length direction of the tableware handle 14, the convex 15 and the concave groove 17 both extend all through from the tail portion 144 to the neck portion 142. The convex 15 and the concave groove 17 have adapted position and size, such that the convex 15 of one fork 31 can be exactly accommodated in the concave groove 17 of the other fork 31.
Compared with the traditional fork, the advantages of the present embodiment are that the tableware handle 14 has a “W” shape handle structure which is formed by connecting three sharp corners of two reinforcing ribs 18 and one convex 15. The anti-deformation reinforcing handle formed by two reinforcing ribs 18 and one convex 15 has a comfortable handling feeling during the use and is not easy to be bent and deformed when used. Especially in injection molding process, it saves raw materials and reduces manufacturing cost. Moreover, the tableware handle 14 of the present application has the functions of safe, light, comfortable and environmental protection.
As shown in
Preferably, the fork 31 of the present application is made of PP plastic (polypropylene plastic). In the present embodiment, the food taking portion 12 and the tableware handle 14 of the fork 31 are all made of PP plastic by one injection molding. When used improperly, or when the tableware handle 14 is forced to bend destructively, the tableware handle 14 is not easy to break apart. The PP plastic is also known as a rubber which can be twisted for multiple times, which is easy to be broken at the gap presented on the surface. However, if some portions of the PP plastic are bent by an excessive force but not broken off, the long molecular chain of the PP plastic at these portions would be reoriented to form a structure which is harder to be broken off, and then the portion of the PP plastic would be difficult to be broken off.
As no “X” shape reinforcing grid is needed for the tableware handle 14 of the fork 31, the tableware handle 14 has uniform strength at different segments but no special weak portions. Accordingly, when the destructive external force is applied, no breaking point would be easily to generate. No matter a destructive external force is applied along the direction which is perpendicular to the forward direction of the handle surface or the backward direction of the handle surface, such force would be applied first onto the convex 15, and then to the two reinforcing ribs 18 which push the reinforcing strips 16 to translate towards the left side and the right side respectively, and finally bend and deform the same. As mentioned above, in the bending and deformation process of the tableware handle 14, as no special weak point would form the breaking point, the tableware handle is unlikely to be broken and no breaking apart situation of the tableware handle would be produced, let alone the fragments.
In the present application, the cross-sectional area of the handle body 141 accounts for more than 70% of the cross-sectional area of the tableware handle 14, so if the thickness of the handle body 141 is reduced, the weight of the tableware handle 14 can be effectively reduced. As mentioned above, the fork structure of the present application can reduce the thickness of the handle wall properly, while has little effect on the handle strength. Accordingly, the fork 31 of the present application can be made lighter.
The fork 31 of the present application has a lightweight and good strength, is especially not easy to be broken and can be stacked stably. Moreover, there are small stacking clearance between the forks 31, saving packaging, storage and transportation space. In additional, the fork 31 is safe to use, light, comfortable and environmental protected. Furthermore, the fork 31 can be stably stacked with each other, so is particularly suitable for being positioned the blanking system of the automatic fork packaging machine, thus improving the automatic packaging efficiency of tableware.
It is understandable that the present embodiment describes the structure of the tableware handle 14 with the fork 31 as an example, however the tableware handle 14 of the present application is not limited to the fork 31, but can also be used in tableware such as spoon 32 (as shown in
The foregoing is a further detailed description of the present application in connection with specific preferred embodiments, and cannot be considered as that the specific implementation of the present application is limited to these illustrations. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that any various modifications or substitutions may be made to the present application without departing from the spirit of the invention, and such modifications or substitutions should be considered as falling within the scope of the present application.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
201810568038.7 | Jun 2018 | CN | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
146070 | Hart | Dec 1873 | A |
D20545 | Galt | Mar 1891 | S |
D42146 | Osborne | Feb 1912 | S |
1238149 | Kean | Aug 1917 | A |
D74863 | Cornell | Apr 1928 | S |
2216005 | Goldstein | Sep 1940 | A |
D138562 | Warren | Aug 1944 | S |
D180073 | Doerfler | Apr 1957 | S |
D190250 | Latham | May 1961 | S |
4524512 | Formo | Jun 1985 | A |
D299899 | Liebmann | Feb 1989 | S |
D307095 | Juergens | Apr 1990 | S |
D362160 | Brabeck | Sep 1995 | S |
D374800 | Liistro | Oct 1996 | S |
D387956 | Gagnon | Dec 1997 | S |
D388664 | Gagnon | Jan 1998 | S |
D391454 | Iacovelli | Mar 1998 | S |
5904250 | De Schutter | May 1999 | A |
D411938 | Morrison | Jul 1999 | S |
D415928 | Kaposi | Nov 1999 | S |
6134790 | Watson | Oct 2000 | A |
D449765 | Toffolon | Oct 2001 | S |
6408524 | Lai | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6457636 | Van de Ven | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6701625 | Thomason | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7013568 | Schmidt | Mar 2006 | B2 |
D530987 | Lee | Oct 2006 | S |
D536222 | Heiberg | Feb 2007 | S |
D552432 | Shane-Schuldt | Oct 2007 | S |
D575594 | Richmond | Aug 2008 | S |
D625551 | Holcomb | Oct 2010 | S |
D634975 | He | Mar 2011 | S |
8079390 | Bigsby | Dec 2011 | B2 |
D663581 | Oakes | Jul 2012 | S |
8272132 | Bolgert | Sep 2012 | B2 |
D675869 | Gallop | Feb 2013 | S |
D684434 | Harris | Jun 2013 | S |
D705006 | Dicocco | May 2014 | S |
D706586 | Kestenbaum | Jun 2014 | S |
8776379 | Walters | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8839522 | Walters | Sep 2014 | B2 |
D717111 | Wang | Nov 2014 | S |
D717112 | Wang | Nov 2014 | S |
D720586 | Grinalds | Jan 2015 | S |
D756171 | Mou | May 2016 | S |
D756172 | Mou | May 2016 | S |
9549626 | Truog | Jan 2017 | B2 |
D778120 | Mou | Feb 2017 | S |
D796271 | McFarland | Sep 2017 | S |
9924816 | Oakes | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10081095 | Lee | Sep 2018 | B1 |
D852007 | Oakes | Jun 2019 | S |
20050155229 | Lee | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20090217532 | Cantu | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100000096 | Muehlemann | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100325896 | Hebebrand | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20130152406 | McFarland | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130247387 | Dietz | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20170340152 | Lee | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20190183272 | Malcolm | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190223641 | Oakes | Jul 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2574491 | Dec 2019 | GB |
WO-2019232984 | Dec 2019 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190365127 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |