The present invention relates to a tactile control interface intended notably to be installed in a motor vehicle.
In order to improve the ergonomics of motor vehicles and allow access to a multitude of functions without overloading the different control units (dashboard, steering-column control, central console, etc.), manufacturers increasingly use a tactile interface coupled to a display screen and allowing the user to access a plurality of functions or controls from a simple uniform interface which enables refined control units to be obtained. Furthermore, in order to be compatible with the automotive sector, an interface of this type must be reliable and have a limited cost.
In order to obtain an interface of this type, the present invention relates to a tactile control interface including an outer surface and means for locating a pressure by a finger of a user on the outer surface in which the outer surface is made from a rigid plate and in that said locating means include:
at least three force sensors onto which the plate is attached and which are configured for measuring a force in a direction substantially normal to the plane of the plate,
means for calculating the position of the pressure of a finger on the plate on the basis of the measurements supplied by said at least three force sensors.
According to a different aspect of the present invention, the calculation means are configured to determine the position of the pressure of the finger on the plate through triangulation on the basis of the measurements supplied by said at least three force sensors.
According to an additional aspect of the present invention, the tactile control interface includes at least four force sensors, wherein the calculation means are configured to perform a plurality of locations through triangulation on the basis of three force sensors by using alternately the different combinations of three sensors from among the at least four force sensors.
According to a different aspect of the present invention, the calculation means are configured to estimate environmental parameters by using the measurements supplied by a force sensor not used for the triangulation.
According to an additional aspect of the present invention, the calculation means are configured to locate a pressure point by determining a barycenter of the measurements supplied by two force sensors successively for different pairs of force sensors.
According to a different aspect of the present invention, the force sensors are piezoelectric sensors.
According to an additional aspect of the present invention, the piezoelectric sensors are sensors mechanically amplified by a more or less elliptically shaped structure, the piezoelectric element being located along the major axis of the ellipse and the force measured been applied along the minor axis of the ellipse.
According to an additional aspect of the present invention, at least one of the force sensors is configured to transmit a haptic feedback to the user.
According to a different aspect of the present invention, the locating means are configured to determine the force of a pressure of a user.
According to an additional aspect of the present invention, the tactile interface also includes a display screen disposed facing the plate, said plate being transparent.
According to an additional aspect of the present invention, the calculation means include a microcontroller.
According to a different aspect of the present invention, the force sensors are distributed in such a way that the barycenter of the points situated facing the force sensors on the outer surface differs from the geometric center of said outer surface and the locating means are configured to take account of the position of the force sensors in order to determine the position of a pressure of a user.
Other characteristics and advantages of the invention will become evident from the description that will now be given, with reference to the attached drawings which, in an indicative but non-limiting manner, represent one possible embodiment.
In these drawings:
In these figures, the same reference numbers correspond to elements having the same function. Furthermore, for the references including a number and a letter, the number denotes a class of elements having the same function, whereas the letter denotes a particular element of the class, for example the element 5a is a particular element of the class of force sensors denoted by the reference 5.
The embodiments of the present invention relate to a tactile control interface 1 including an outer surface or tactile surface 2 on which the finger of the user presses to cause a control and means for locating the pressure. The outer surface 2 is made from a rigid plate 3. The locating means include force sensors 5 onto which the rigid plate 3 is attached. A rigid plate is understood to mean a plate having a negligible deformation in relation to the deformation of the force sensors 5 under the effect of a pressure on said plate, wherefore the pressure force of the finger of the user is transmitted entirely to the force sensors 5. The rigid plate 3 is, for example, made from polycarbonate or glass. Thus, by using at least three force sensors 5 of which the position in relation to the surface of the rigid plate 3 is known, the position of the pressure point on the plate 3 can be inferred from the force measurements supplied by the force sensors 5. This inference for passing from the measurements supplied by the sensors to the position of the pressure is implemented, for example, through triangulation. The location of the pressure points may be static or dynamic, i.e. a movement or sliding of the finger on the plate 3 is also determined.
The force sensors 5 are configured to measure a force in a direction more or less normal to the plane of the plate 3 and are, for example, piezoelectric sensors. Amplified piezoelectric sensors can be used to improve the sensitivity of the tactile control interface 1.
According to a second embodiment, the tactile interface 1 includes four force sensors 5 disposed, for example, at the four corners of the plate 3 as shown in
Alternatively, the location of the pressure area can be determined by calculating the barycenter of the measurements supplied by two force sensors 5 by using at least two pairs of sensors disposed in a non-parallel manner. For example, a barycenter between the sensors 5a and 5b is determined which provides a first axis on which the pressure area is located, this axis is perpendicular to the straight line passing through the sensors 5a and 5b then, or simultaneously, between the sensors 5b and 5c, which provides a second axis on which the pressure area is located, the intersection between these two axes corresponding to the geographical situation of the pressure on the tactile surface 2. The calculation of the barycenter of other pairs of sensors enables improvement in the quality and reliability of the location of the support area by also integrating the lack of homogeneity which the plates 3 may evince.
Moreover, it must be noted that, for the different embodiments, the positioning of the force sensors 5 may correspond to a “homogeneous” distribution in which the barycenter of the points of the tactile surface 2 facing the force sensors 5 corresponds to the geometric center of the tactile surface 2, i.e. the barycenter of all points of the surface. For example, in the case of a rectangular surface with four sensors, the sensors will be placed at the center of the four sides or at the four corners and the geometric center will correspond to the intersection of the diagonals of the rectangle. The distribution may also be “non-homogeneous or inhomogeneous” in the case where the barycenter of the points of the tactile surface 2 facing the force sensors 5 will be different from the geometric center of the plate 3, for example to take account of the non-homogeneity of the structure of the plate 3 (different thicknesses or different materials of the plate 3), the presence of constraints in some areas of the plate (due, for example, to an attachment of the plate onto a structure of the control interface) or to improve sensitivity in some areas of the tactile surface 2. In fact, in some embodiments, only a part of the plate 3 can be used as the tactile control in such a way that the force sensors 5 are positioned in order to obtain an increased sensitivity in this area.
Moreover, the force sensors 5, notably in the case of piezoelectric sensors, can be used to supply a haptic feedback to the user to indicate to said user that the control has indeed been selected or validated. The haptic feedback consists in causing the rigid plate 3 to vibrate. For this purpose, one or more of the force sensors 5 is used to transmit a vibration wave to the rigid plate 3. In fact, in the case of piezoelectric sensors, the deformation of the sensor under the influence of a force creates a voltage, proportional to the deformation applied, at the output of the sensor. However, this piezoelectric effect can be inverted in such a way that the application of a voltage to the output of the piezoelectric sensor allows a deformation of the sensor which can create a vibration wave. The piezoelectric sensors are thus used not only to locate the pressure area, but also for the haptic feedback, thereby reducing the number of components required for the tactile interface 1. As previously, the position of the sensor(s) supplying a haptic feedback may be “non-homogeneous” in such a way as to increase the sensitivity of the haptic feedback in certain areas of the plate or to take account of the geometry or structure of the plate.
Moreover, as previously described, the measurement of the piezoelectric sensors is sensitive to the force generated by the pressure of the user's finger on the rigid plate 3. As well as the position of the pressure, the force of the pressure can therefore also be determined, for example by calculating the sum of the forces measured by the different force sensors in such a way that different controls can be envisaged according to the force of the pressure. Thus, the fact alone of touching an area of the outer plate will be able to select a function, and a greater pressure force of the user in this area will validate the choice of the selected function. A potentiometer effect can also be introduced, for example if the area corresponds to the sound volume control, a greater pressure force will result in an increase in the volume corresponding to a first dynamic effect.
A second dynamic effect corresponds to the determination of the movement or sliding of the pressure point on the tactile surface, this sliding being able to correspond to a particular control. The two dynamic effects (spatial with the sliding and temporal with the potentiometer function) can be paired to obtain an additional control or a double control.
The tactile interface 1 may also include a display screen 17 located behind and facing the rigid plate 3 in such a way as to display the different functions of the tactile interface. In this case, the rigid plate 3 will be transparent and the force sensors 5 will be placed on the periphery of the rigid outer plate 3 or the periphery of the screen 17 if the plate 3 is larger than the screen 17 in such a way as to permit the user to see the display screen. The display screen 17 is then placed as close as possible to the rigid plate 3 while avoiding the propagation of the vibration waves between the rigid plate 3 and the display screen.
In order to better understand the embodiments of the present invention, an example of use will now be described in detail in the case of a tactile interface 1 located in the central console of a motor vehicle.
The use of a rigid plate mounted on force sensors thus provides a simple and reliable tactile interface that can easily be installed in a motor vehicle. Moreover, the use of amplified piezoelectric sensors provides a high sensitivity and allows a haptic feedback to be supplied without the need to include an additional actuator.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12 03410 | Dec 2012 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2013/000300 | 11/19/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/091089 | 6/19/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3657475 | Peronneau | Apr 1972 | A |
4745565 | Garwin | May 1988 | A |
5714694 | Diessner | Feb 1998 | A |
5768616 | Teterwak | Jun 1998 | A |
7054525 | Bugaud | May 2006 | B1 |
7176897 | Roberts | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7532202 | Roberts | May 2009 | B2 |
8482381 | Chatterjee | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8564559 | Hou | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8736559 | Pertuit | May 2014 | B2 |
9164605 | Pirogov | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9644984 | Fliegner | May 2017 | B2 |
20030214485 | Roberts | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040125086 | Hagermoser | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060119589 | Rosenberg | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070229475 | Gettemy | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20100045624 | Hisatsugu | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100057235 | Wang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079391 | Joung | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103640 | Brown et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110187667 | Kaida | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110227872 | Huska | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20140028575 | Parivar | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140111448 | Moses | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 202 619 | Jun 2010 | EP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued in PCT/FR2013/000300 dated Jan. 28, 2014 (2 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150309576 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |