All of the material in this patent application is subject to copyright protection under the copyright laws of the United States and of other countries. As of the first effective filing date of the present application, this material is protected as unpublished material.
However, permission to copy this material is hereby granted to the extent that the copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent documentation or patent disclosure, as it appears in the United States Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The present invention generally relates to systems and methods in the field of touch sensor devices and has specific application to tactile overlays for multi-touch and/or pressure-sensitive touch sensors. Specific invention embodiments may have particular applicability to touch-based force-sensing devices and methods for determining the location and amount of force exerted on a pressure-sensitive surface.
Touch sensors are input devices and are therefore typically paired with a complementary output device to provide a user with some form of feedback. In modern electronic devices this feedback is typically visual (i.e., a display). In smartphones, for instance, touch sensors are placed directly on top of displays to allow the direct manipulation of on-screen user interfaces. The display provides visual feedback and guides the user through the interaction.
When using a force-sensing touch solution, visual feedback can be implemented by actually printing visual indicators on top of the touch surface itself. For example, treadmills often have force-sensitive buttons behind a flexible membrane. This membrane is printed with a pattern that indicates button location and functionality. Some of these membranes also have raised edges to indicate boundaries between buttons. This adds tactile feedback for the user, and increases the interface's usability. Since the membrane is flexible, the user can transmit forces through the membrane and activate the force-sensitive buttons lying underneath. The membrane provides the user with adequate visual/tactile feedback, rendering a display unnecessary.
With this background as an application context, the present invention disclosure describes how physical augmentation of high-resolution force-sensitive touch sensors allows for the development of next-generation user interfaces. By replacing the set of discrete force-sensitive buttons with a high-resolution two-dimensional array of force sensors, the use of physical augmentation via overlays provides a much more powerful implementation and user experience. Instead of having a fixed set of buttons with a fixed membrane, it is possible to have one touch sensor that is compatible with an infinite number of membranes, each augmenting the sensor to add a different user experience. Touches may still be tracked across the entire sensor so much more data is available to application software directing the overall user experience.
A tactile touch sensor system and method providing for physical augmentation of a high-resolution force-sensitive touch sensor (FSTS) is disclosed. This physical augmentation is enabled through the use of physical overlays that are placed on top of the FSTS. These overlays may be constructed to transmit forces to the underlying FSTS. This force transmission is accomplished by either using a flexible overlay or by fashioning a rigid mechanical overlay such that forces exerted on the overlay by a user are transmitted to the FSTS underneath. Identification of individual overlays by the FSTS permits operational characteristics of the FSTS to be automatically reconfigured to conform to the currently applied overlay format. Various methods teach the construction of these physical overlays and describe how this type of physical augmentation may be used to increase the functionality and modularity of a FSTS module and FSTS systems. These systems may in some embodiments be augmented with additional resistive and/or capacitive sensors to automatically identify or interact with the physical overlay applied to the FSTS.
The present invention involves coupling a physical overlay with a high-resolution, multi-touch, force-sensitive touch sensor. The physical overlay is designed to provide a user with visual/tactile feedback, and may be coupled with matching software to create a functional user interface. Since the physical overlay is placed between a user and the touch sensor, the overlay must be designed so that it transmits forces coming from the user to the sensor. These overlays can be flat or three-dimensional membranes, molded out of a flexible and/or compliant material. If an overlay is flexible, the overlay will naturally transmit forces from the user to the touch sensor. Alternatively, it is possible to construct rigid, mechanical widgets (buttons, sliders, knobs, etc.) which are designed to transmit user-supplied force to the underlying touch sensor. Finally, a programmable, deformable physical interface can be used to support a wide range of application-specific user interfaces.
Today, touch interfaces are primarily found on smartphones and tablets. One of the issues with these interfaces is that they have no tactile feedback. There have been industry efforts to “add back” the tactile feedback in these interfaces through the use of haptics. This has a wide set of challenges, and many efforts fail to effectively offer adequate tactile feedback. By physically augmenting force-sensitive touch sensors, it is possible to create physical and intuitive interfaces that offer both tactile and visual feedback, which increases the usability of the touch sensor. Instead of trying to “add back” the sensation of a button, you can design an overlay for a force-sensitive touch sensor that actually has a button. One can create overlays out of different materials, with different elasticity/compliance. With a “squishy” material, the user can better determine the level of force he/she is exerting on the sensor.
A major advantage of the disclosed invention is that it allows construction using a modular approach, so that one touch sensor is compatible with a wide array of physically flexible overlays. This becomes much more cost-effective for the end-user, and eliminates the end-user purchase requirement of sensor interfaces that are designed for a single application. For instance, a musician can have a force-sensitive touch sensor and also have two overlays: a piano keyboard overlay and a drum pad overlay. This modular approach allows the musician to purchase more overlays (which are relatively inexpensive) and use them on his one touch sensor. Alternatively, the end-user could have multiple touch sensors and mix and match which overlays he is using at any given time.
One of the most obvious use-cases for the present invention is the implementation of a standard QWERTY keyboard functionality. Typing on a flat touch sensor is very unpleasant, and most people need tactile feedback to type accurately and efficiently. Creating a physical QWERTY keyboard overlay would solve some of these issues and make typing on a touch sensor much more enjoyable. In addition to a standard QWERTY keyboard, simply by changing the overlay, keyboards for different languages (such as French) and different key arrangements (such as DVORAK) can be made. Even unusual keyboards, such as court-stenographer keyboards, and keyboards that use highly unconventional layouts and interface schemes can be created simply by changing the overlay.
An infinite number of musical instruments could be fashioned using the present invention. For example, it is possible to make a drum pad or even a piano keyboard using the present invention teachings. For a drum pad, it is possible to 3D-print with a flexible material, and create any type of drum kit or layout. For a piano, it is possible to build an overlay that indicates piano key location. Since touches are tracked across the entire sensor, the sensor knows where the user is touching within a given key. This data can be used to expand the functionality of the piano. For example, software can use the fingers position within a given key to pitch-bend the current note a user is playing. Taking this idea further, novel forms of instruments having different button layouts, sizes, and shapes can be created just by creating custom overlays.
Instead of having a monolithic overlay that covers the entire sensor, it is possible to augment the touch interface with multiple smaller overlays. In order to secure the overlays to the touch sensor, it is possible to employ the use of magnets to hold each overlay against the surface of the sensor. This allows a user to create user interface building blocks and allow a user to develop new interfaces on the fly. These magnetic building blocks could be as simple as a rectangle which marks a special area of the sensor. This might include a drawing software application with a rectangle indicating where the user can draw on the sensor. Other building blocks could be more complicated, such as a physical slider bar. This slider may be built so that it transmits forces through to the touch sensor. This permits adding the slider next to the drawing rectangle and using it to control the drawing line width or other sketching parameters. Besides a slider and a drawing area, many other mechanical building blocks may be created to emulate physical interfaces, such as knobs, physical buttons, toggle switches, and joysticks. With this modular approach, it is possible to develop both simple and highly complex physical interfaces. This modular approach to building physical interfaces could have huge implications in medical and industrial fields, where custom controls for specialized equipment can be very expensive.
For a fuller understanding of the advantages provided by the invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description together with the accompanying drawings wherein:
While the present invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detailed preferred embodiments of the invention with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the broad aspect of the invention to the embodiment illustrated.
The numerous innovative teachings of the present application will be described with particular reference to the presently preferred embodiment, wherein these innovative teachings are advantageously applied to the particular problems of a TACTILE TOUCH SENSOR SYSTEM AND METHOD. However, it should be understood that this embodiment is only one example of the many advantageous uses of the innovative teachings herein. In general, statements made in the specification of the present application do not necessarily limit any of the various claimed inventions. Moreover, some statements may apply to some inventive features but not to others.
Within the context of the present invention, the term “Touch Sensor Array (TSA)” is defined as the interpolating high-resolution force-sensitive touch sensor (FSTS) systems as described in the above-referenced patents and patent applications incorporated by reference in this application.
The present invention anticipates a means of producing TPO overlays in many preferred embodiments by injection molding and/or 3D printing. However, the present invention also anticipates that TPO overlays may be laser-cut from blank overlays or stock overlay materials.
An additional type of overlay anticipated by the present invention is a transparent overlay that retains a printed sheet of paper. This TPO overlay enables end-users that do not have access to a 3D printer or laser cutter to quickly prototype new overlay designs and apply them to the transparent overlay front or back surface.
With respect to the manufacture of TPO overlays, it should be noted that TPO overlays may be made of a squishy material such as a urethane foam (Rogers Corporation PORON® brand microcellular urethanes are provided as an example), silicone foam, neoprene foam, and any regular (non-foamed) silicone or rubber (including thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)).
The term “mouse” when used in the context of a moveable or non-movable TPO overlay should be given a broad interpretation to cover any kind of “puck” which might not even have buttons or a scroll wheel on it. Thus, the term “mouse” when used herein may literally be an object that the user moves and which the TSA sensor tracks. Within this context it is also possible with the present invention for the TSA to track the rotational orientation of the mouse/puck as well as the force distribution (so as to be able to detect tilting pressure applied to the mouse/puck).
While the discussion herein regarding identification of TPO overlays concentrates on automatic identification of these structures, the present invention also anticipates scenarios in which some types of TPO overlays (such as home-made 3D printed overlays), allow the user to specify the overlay ID and/or location on the TSA surface manually.
Many embodiments illustrated herein make use of paired magnets in the TSA and TPO structures to provide a mechanical coupling mechanism between the TSA and TPO. In some embodiments one of these magnets may be replaced by a ferromagnetic material (iron, steel, etc.) that is magnetically coupled to the remaining magnet in the coupled pair. This would provide, for example, the use of a ferromagnetic TPO or TPO bezel to be mated to magnets within the TSA or alternatively magnets within the TPO or TPO bezel to be mated to ferromagnetic material embedded within the TSA or the periphery of a bezel retaining the TSA. Thus, the term “magnet” and similar terms when used herein covers a wide variety of magnetically coupled mating methodologies.
The TSA as described herein may comprise a pressure-sensitive surface (PSS) incorporating row-column force detection and/or row-column force interpolation detection.
One of the main components of the present invention is a high-resolution, multi-touch, force-sensitive touch sensor. This technology is perfectly suited for physical augmentation, because unlike other touch technologies, the touch sensor can be activated with any object that exerts a force. With a capacitive touch technology, you would only be able to activate the sensor with conductive objects. This would make construction of overlays more difficult and would require special materials for fabrication. Many optical solutions will also not work, because most solutions transmit/receive light signals from the side of the sensor. If you placed an overlay on the sensor, it would potentially block paths for this light to travel, and you wouldn't be able to sense interaction on the overlay itself. A multi-touch, force-sensitive touch sensor is used in the preferred embodiment of the present invention. In the rest of the disclosure, “touch sensor” should be understood to be a multi-touch, force-sensitive touch sensor.
A general overview of the present invention system is depicted in the block diagram of
Each of the TPO (0112) (whether integrated form or disparate form) may incorporate a TPO identifier (TPI) (0113) that uniquely identifies the type of TPO (0112) that constitutes the overlay structure. This TPI (0113) is then read by a TPO detector (TPD) (0114) that translates this information into a binary identification format (BIF). This BIF is suitable for interpretation by a TTS hardware computer interface (HCI) (0115) and is subsequently transmitted to a user computing device (UCD) (0101).
The UCD (0101) loads appropriate software and/or device drivers from an application software driver (ASD) (0102) database that are then used to interpret contact/pressure information retrieved from the TSA (0111) as the user (0103) interacts with the TPO (0112). Depending on the TPI (0113) detected by the TPD (0114) and the subsequent software driver loaded by the UCD (0101) from the ASD (0102), a variety of graphical user interfaces (GUI) (0104) may be presented to the user (0101).
A general overview of the present invention method is depicted in the flowchart of
This general method may be modified heavily depending on a number of factors, with rearrangement and/or addition/deletion of steps anticipated by the scope of the present invention. Integration of this and other preferred exemplary embodiment methods in conjunction with a variety of preferred exemplary embodiment systems described herein is anticipated by the overall scope of the present invention.
A detail overview of the present invention system is depicted in the flowchart of
One advantage of this system is the ability to automatically identify (0305) a particular TPO overlay (0304) and load appropriate software drivers/applications (0309) based on this identification process.
It is important to note that physical touch sensor augmentation requires a software component to enable an effective user interface. There must be software that is aware of what TPO overlay is on top of the TSA touch sensor, so that touch data can be translated into functionality as indicated by the overlay. For instance, if a piano keyboard overlay is placed on a sensor, the user must also have software enabled that is translating touches into piano key presses. The application software can generate audio directly or can send key press events to other software using a standard format such as MIDI.
It is also important to keep the overlay “in sync” with the software. If you replace the previously mentioned piano keyboard overlay with a drum pad and the piano software is still running, the drum pad will have very unexpected results (playing the drum pads would activate keys in the piano software). This invention disclosure teaches several methods for keeping the software “in sync” with the overlay. These methods will be described in a later section.
A detail overview of the present invention method is depicted in the flowchart of
The overlay in this example is provided in
A detail overview of the present invention contact/event configuration mapping method is depicted in the flowchart of
A detail overview of the present invention contact locations event generation method is depicted in the flowchart of
An example of how events are generated based on contact locations is depicted in the diagram of
Various methods by which magnets may be incorporated in TSA/TPO structures are generally depicted in the diagram of
Additionally, the use of flexible magnetic strips that are flush (0815) to the surface of the TSA/TPO (0810) and/or protruding (0816) from the surface of the TSA/TPO (0810) are also anticipated in these scenarios. As generally depicted, any of the magnetic structures depicted may be positioned as protruding (0817) or flush (0818, 0819) with the TSA/TPO (0810) surface.
The present invention may implement identification of the TPO by magnetometer sensors as generally depicted in
A general method for the automatic magnetic detection of TPO overlays is generally depicted in
The present invention may implement identification of the TPO by radio frequency identification (RFID) tag/sensors as generally depicted in
A general method for the automatic RFID detection of TPO overlays is generally depicted in
The present invention may implement the described tactile touch sensor system/method using a touch sensitive array (TSA) tablet interface (TTI) as generally depicted in
The tabled illustrated in these figures can be constructed with any type of perimeter form. Additionally while a set number of keys are depicted in the diagrams that follow, the present invention may incorporate any number of keys in based on application context. Keys represented in the figures may incorporate embossed indicia (via an embossing manufacturing process), but this is not a limitation of the present invention.
TPO overlays may be constructed so they are three-dimensional. This can be achieved by molding or 3D-printing a flexible material into a three-dimensional overlay. For a piano, an overlay could be created such that the black keys are taller than the white keys. The overlay could also have gaps in between the keys, so that a user can feel where piano keys start/end. This type of overlay provides both visual and tactile feedback to the user.
The present invention may implement the described tactile touch sensor system/method in a first generic keypad form as generally depicted in
The present invention may implement the described tactile touch sensor system/method in a second generic keypad interface form as generally depicted in
The present invention may implement the described tactile touch sensor system/method in a third generic keypad interface form as generally depicted in
The present invention may implement the described tactile touch sensor system/method in a first keyboard form as generally depicted in
The present invention may implement the described tactile touch sensor system/method in a second keyboard form as generally depicted in
The present invention may implement the described tactile touch sensor system/method in a third keyboard form as generally depicted in
The present invention may implement the described tactile touch sensor system/method in a first piano keyboard form as generally depicted in
The present invention may implement the described tactile touch sensor system/method in a second piano keyboard form as generally depicted in
The TPO structure described herein may be constructed using a programmable deformable membrane as generally depicted in
Programmable membranes become very powerful if the system has programmatic control over which deforming elements are active at any given time, the application software can dynamically control the appearance and tactile layout of the overlay. This removes the need to actually swap out various overlays in the system. It is possible to have a single programmable membrane that takes on various shapes and provides the user with different interfaces. For this solution, the membrane can be laminated directly on the touch sensor surface.
Piezo Deformation (4100)
Air/Fluid/Vacuum Deformation (4200)
Another way to build deforming elements is to embed pockets of air or liquid into the overlay. These pockets are hooked up to a pressurized pumping system that can control the amount of air/liquid in these pockets. As air/liquid is pumped into these pockets, the overlay will expand. As air/liquid is released from these pockets, the overlay will contract.
Heat Deformation (4300)
A final method for achieving this effect is to embed heat-sensitive elements that deform when exposed to heat/cold. Heating elements can be built into the overlay in order to activate these deforming elements.
One way to improve the usability of overlays in a dark setting is to illuminate the overlay. For this approach, side-mounted LEDs can be placed around the bezel of the touch sensor. A TPO overlay can be designed such that it functions as a light-guide for these side-illuminating LEDs. Each overlay can tightly control where light travels within the overlay, and also which areas of the overlay appear illuminated or dark. This improves visual feedback to the user, as each overlay can use this light-guide technique to highlight specific functions presented by the overlay.
The TPO structure described herein may incorporate light piping as generally depicted in
These figures show how an overlay can be used as a light guide to increase visibility of the overlay in various environments. Side-mount LEDs can be mounted around the edge of the touch sensor and can shine into an overlay that is placed on top of the touch sensor. Light injected from the side of the overlay can diffuse and exit out of designated areas. As can be seen from the drawings, some areas allow light to pass through and exit the overlay (these areas will appear illuminated), where other sections are designed to keep light inside the overlay (these areas will appear dark). Different LEDs can be used to illuminate different sets of TPO structures.
So far, overlays have been described as purely passive and unpowered. However, more sophisticated overlays can be created if the overlay can receive power from the sensor. This is made possible by inductively powering the overlays that are placed on the sensor. Depending on the amount of power transferred, these overlays can have powered LEDs, segment-displays, or even play audio through small speakers. These overlays could even have small microcontrollers which are capable of talking over BLUETOOTH® or BLE to the application software directly.
The modular overlay may contain an inductive coil, capable of receiving power from an inductive charger. Touch sensors that are transparent to magnetic fields can be fitted with inductive charging coils to support charging/powering these modular overlays.
The TPO structures described herein may implement energy harvesting as generally depicted in
So far, overlays have been described as monolithic entities, covering the entirety of the touch sensor. However, it is equally beneficial to build smaller overlays that can be placed in different areas of the sensor. If the bottom of the touch sensor is layered with a ferromagnetic material, the magnetic attachment method can be used to mount each overlay reliably to the sensor. If a force-profile, RFID, optical, capacitive, inductive, or resistive identification scheme is implemented, the various overlays can be identified and tracked across the sensor. This is important so that the software can automatically configure itself to translate touch data into overlay-dependent functional output. With this modular overlay approach, one can mix and match flat, 3D, mechanical, and deformable overlays to create new, custom interfaces. These modular overlays are described in more detail in
An example of a TSA tablet interfaced with a variety of modular TPO structures as described herein is generally depicted in
The TPO structure described herein may be attached to the TSA using a variety of techniques as generally depicted in
TPO Peripheral Edge Insertion into TPA (4900)-(5000)
A touch sensor housing can be constructed so that its bezel is rigid but has enough overhang to hold an overlay in place.
As discussed above, a bezel can be designed to hold an overlay without hinges or magnets. This configuration may incorporate a rigid bezel designed to have an overhang capable of holding a flexible overlay. In this configuration, an overlay can be folded and slid into the housing such that the overlay edges fall beneath the bezel overhang. This configuration works for flexible overlays, but not for rigid overlays.
TPO Side Edge Insertion into TPA (5100)-(5200)
A touch sensor housing can be constructed so that its bezel is rigid but has enough overhang to hold an overlay in place.
TPO Magnetic Bezel Attachment to TPA (5300)-(5400)
It is also possible to attach an overlay to a touch sensor with magnets. These magnets can be placed in the bezel of a device to help with sensor/overlay alignment. A touch sensor housing can also be constructed so that the bezel completely detaches from the housing. This is similar to the hinged frame approach, except that both sides detach. With a drop-in frame, the bezel can either snap into the sensor housing or connect via magnets to the top of the overlay.
As generally depicted in
Magnets (5321) contained within the TSA (5320) mate with corresponding magnets (5431) within the magnetic TPO retention bezel (5430). The TPO (5310, 5410) depicted in these drawings is designed to be retained at the edges by the TPO magnetic retention bezel (5330, 5430).
TPO Attachment Using Thru-Hole Magnets (5500)-(5600)
As generally depicted in an alternate embodiment depicted in
TPO Hinged Bezel Attachment to TPA (5500)-(5600)
A touch sensor housing can be constructed so that an area of the bezel opens up on hinges. An overlay can be placed on the touch sensor, and the bezel can be closed back down, securing the overlay to the underlying sensor. As generally depicted in
Overview
As mentioned previously in the SOFTWARE section, it is important to keep application software “in sync” with the TPO overlay that is currently on top of the TSA sensor. If software is mismatched with the overlay, the overlay will not function as the user expects. It can be a difficult task to constantly make sure that the application software is matched with the current overlay. One way to solve this problem is to build a system where the software can check to see which overlay is currently on the touch sensor. Methods for achieving this functionality are described in the following sections.
The TPO structure in many preferred invention embodiments may incorporate some form of unique identification mechanism as generally depicted in
Exemplary TPO/TSA Assembly (5700)
Embedded TPO Magnets (5800)
TPO Magnetic Identification (5900)
Raised TPO Pressure Indicia (Force-Profile Identification) (6000)
Since the overlays are placed against a force-sensitive touch sensor, it is possible to modify an overlay so that it exerts a unique force profile against the sensor. It is possible to form this force profile so that it is unique, which will allow the software to distinguish different overlays from each other.
As an example,
Further examples of the use of pressure indicia identification for TPO structures is depicted in more detail in
Tactile Bar Code Identification (6100)-(6200)
Optical Identification (6100)-(6200)
Alternatively, optical solutions can be employed to identify overlays that are lying on top of the sensor. For instance, barcodes or QR codes may be placed on the bottom side of TPO overlays (
TPO RFID Identification (6300)
Another way to identify which overlay is on top of the sensor is to embed an RFID tag into each overlay. As long as the touch sensor is transparent to magnetic fields, an RFID antenna can be placed directly underneath the touch sensor. This antenna can be connected to electronics capable of reading the RFID tag in the overlay. For molded overlays, an RFID tag can be embedded into the mold itself. For mechanical and deformable overlays, the RFID tag can be placed on the bottom of the overlay. Care must be taken so that the RFID layer continues to allow the transmission of forces to the underlying touch sensor.
TPO Shorting Bar Identification (6400)
TPO Capacitive and/or Inductive Identification (6400)
Additionally, conductive electrodes can be attached, printed, or embedded into the TPO overlay. An array of capacitance and/or inductance sensors can be placed along the edge of the touch sensor. These capacitance and/or inductance sensors can detect the presence/absences of these electrodes. Once again, these electrodes can be used as a binary encoding to distinguish different overlays.
As an example, other variants of the configuration depicted in
While a number of hardware approaches may be taken to affect automatic detection of TPO overlays, the following list of exemplary non-exclusive hardware provides typical interfacing hardware that may be used with many invention embodiments.
Capacitive Detection
The following discussion details a variety of anticipated exemplary TPO forms. One skilled in the art will no doubt be able to expand on these functional forms to include a wide variety of structures using the teachings presented. While the forms presented have been provided exaggerated horizontal and vertical dimensions for the purposes of illustrating the concepts herein, these dimensions and proportions are not limitive of the invention scope. Many application contexts will incorporate the functionality of the disclosed TPO structures but in a more compact form factor to support thin custom console structures or predefined console interfaces having a thin portable form factor.
The previously discussed types of overlays (flat and 3D) both require the use of flexible materials in order to effectively transmit forces from the user to the touch sensor. There is a way, however, to build an overlay with rigid materials. This type of overlay is referred to in the invention disclosure as a mechanical overlay. This type of overlay can be made of any material, as long as it effectively translates user input of interest through to the underlying touch sensor. For instance, an overlay with a physical button, switch, knob, slider, and joystick could be constructed such that interaction with these features translates to distinguishable input on the touch sensor. Examples of mechanical TPO overlays are depicted in
These figures show how modular overlays can be created. These overlays each contain magnets and can be mounted to a touch sensor that has a ferromagnetic material behind it. This allows the overlays to be placed anywhere on the touch sensor. In some circumstances the implementation of a flat, flexible, modular overlay is anticipated. This overlay can be used to indicate generic touch input, or could indicate that a certain region of the sensor is designated for drawing. In the latter case, the top material of this overlay could be specially selected to enhance the writing experience.
The present invention may in some preferred embodiments be implemented in a TPO pushbutton form as generally depicted in
The present invention may in some preferred embodiments be implemented in a TPO rocker switch form as generally depicted in
The present invention may in some preferred embodiments be implemented in a TPO slider form as generally depicted in
The present invention may in some preferred embodiments be implemented in a TPO knob form as generally depicted in
The knob as indicated provides for fully linear circular travel about an axis of rotation. However, it is possible to incorporate detents in the positioning mechanism to provide for a rotary switch function as compared to a traditional potentiometer functionality.
The present invention may in some preferred embodiments be implemented in a TPO mouse/puck form as generally depicted in
As indicated in the variants depicted in
The formations of the mouse/puck TPO as depicted in
The present invention may in some preferred embodiments be implemented in a TPO joystick form as generally depicted in
The present invention may in some preferred embodiments be implemented in a TPO trackpad form as generally depicted in
The present invention may in some preferred embodiments be implemented in a TPO keypad form as generally depicted in
The simplest form of physical touch sensor augmentation is achieved with a flat, flexible overlay. This overlay can be printed with markings that indicate different sensor functions. For instance, a QWERTY keyboard overlay could just be a thin, flexible plastic membrane with a keyboard pattern printed on its top surface. When placed on a sensor, the sensor can turn into a functional keyboard, capable of turning touch data into keyboard keystrokes (assuming the correct software is also enabled). The overlay provides visual feedback to the user, increasing usability of the keyboard functionality. Various examples of these flat TPO overlays with a number of tactile surface patterns are depicted in
The present invention may implement TPO trackpad/keypad overlays in a wide variety of as generally depicted in
These figures depict overlay cross-sections of various features that are made possible with the use of a three-dimensional, flexible overlay. Texture can be added to provide the user with tactile feedback. It is also possible to add indentations or ridges around features to increase usability. It is also possible to create standalone raised/lowered buttons. Subtle indicators can be implemented with small, raised bumps. Finally, dome-switch buttons can be molded with a three-dimensional overlay to give users a button “feel” when using the device.
The present invention may in some preferred embodiments implement a TPO in modular construction form as generally depicted in
As depicted in the single key diagrams of
The present invention may in some preferred embodiments implement a TPO with integrated automatic identification mechanisms as generally depicted in
While the exemplary TPO structures depicted in
As generally depicted in
The above-described automatic TPO identification indicia may in many invention embodiments be associated with an automatic TPO identification method. As generally depicted in the flowchart of
The present invention preferred exemplary system embodiment anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme of construction, but can be generalized as a tactile touch sensor system comprising:
This general system summary may be augmented by the various elements described herein to produce a wide variety of invention embodiments consistent with this overall design description.
The present invention preferred exemplary method embodiment anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme of implementation, but can be generalized as a tactile touch sensor method comprising:
The present invention anticipates a wide variety of variations in the basic theme of construction. The examples presented previously do not represent the entire scope of possible usages. They are meant to cite a few of the almost limitless possibilities.
This basic system and method may be augmented with a variety of ancillary embodiments, including but not limited to:
One skilled in the art will recognize that other embodiments are possible based on combinations of elements taught within the above invention description.
In various alternate embodiments, the present invention may be implemented as a computer program product for use with a computerized computing system. Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that programs defining the functions defined by the present invention can be written in any appropriate programming language and delivered to a computer in many forms, including but not limited to: (a) information permanently stored on non-writeable storage media (e.g., read-only memory devices such as ROMs or CD-ROM disks); (b) information alterably stored on writeable storage media (e.g., floppy disks, hard drives, and USB thumb drives); and/or (c) information conveyed to a computer through communication media, such as a local area network, a telephone network, or a public network such as the Internet. When carrying computer readable instructions that implement the present invention methods, such computer readable media represent alternate embodiments of the present invention.
As generally illustrated herein, the present invention system embodiments can incorporate a variety of computer readable media that comprise computer usable medium having computer readable code means embodied therein. One skilled in the art will recognize that the software associated with the various processes described herein can be embodied in a wide variety of computer accessible media from which the software is loaded and activated. Pursuant to In re Beauregard, 35 USPQ2d 1383 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,710,578), the present invention anticipates and includes this type of computer readable media within the scope of the invention. Pursuant to In re Nuijten, 500 F.3d 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/211,928), the present invention scope is limited to computer readable media wherein the media is both tangible and non-transitory.
A tactile touch sensor (TTS) system and method allowing physical augmentation of a high-resolution touch sensor array (TSA) has been disclosed. Physical augmentation is accomplished using a TSA physical overlay (TPO) placed on top of the TSA. The TPO is constructed to transmit forces to the underlying TSA. Force transmission is accomplished by either using a flexible overlay or with a rigid mechanical overlay that transmits user forces exerted on the overlay to the underlying TSA. Incorporation of TPO identifiers (TPI) within the TPO permits identification of the TPO by a TPO detector (TPD) allowing operational characteristics of the TSA to be automatically reconfigured to conform to the currently applied TPO structure by a user computing device (UCD). The UCD may be configured to automatically load an appropriate application software driver (ASD) in response to a TPI read by the TPD from the currently applied TPO.
The following rules apply when interpreting the CLAIMS of the present invention:
This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for TACTILE TOUCH SENSOR SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventors Ilya Daniel Rosenberg and John Aaron Zarraga, filed electronically with the USPTO on May 26, 2020, with EFS ID 39536193, confirmation number 5495, Ser. No. 16/883,290. This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for TACTILE TOUCH SENSOR SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventors Ilya Daniel Rosenberg and John Aaron Zarraga, filed electronically with the USPTO on Jan. 28, 2019, with EFS ID 34973120, confirmation number 6422, Ser. No. 16/259,230. This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for TACTILE TOUCH SENSOR SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventors Ilya Daniel Rosenberg and John Aaron Zarraga, filed electronically with the USPTO on Jan. 19, 2018, with EFS ID 31554128, confirmation number 8726, Ser. No. 15/875,625, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,338,722 on Jul. 2, 2019. This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for TACTILE TOUCH SENSOR SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventors Ilya Daniel Rosenberg and John Aaron Zarraga, filed electronically with the USPTO on Jun. 25, 2015, with EFS ID 2274923, confirmation number 9331, Ser. No. 14/751,076, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,092 on Jul. 3, 2018. This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for TOUCH SENSOR DETECTOR SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventors Ilya Daniel Rosenberg and John Aaron Zarraga, filed electronically with the USPTO on Jun. 25, 2014, with EFS ID 19410170, confirmation number 8306, Ser. No. 14/314,662, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,001,082 on Apr. 7, 2015. This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for TOUCH SENSOR DETECTOR SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventors Ilya Daniel Rosenberg and John Aaron Zarraga, filed electronically with the USPTO on Sep. 26, 2014, with EFS ID 20257165, confirmation number 2413, Ser. No. 14/498,478, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,582,098 on Feb. 28, 2017. This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for RESISTIVE TOUCH SENSOR SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventors Ilya Daniel Rosenberg and John Aaron Zarraga, filed electronically with the USPTO on Sep. 26, 2014, with EFS ID 20262520, confirmation number 8298, serial number Ser. No. 14/499,001, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,465,477 on Oct. 11, 2016. This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 and incorporates by reference United States Utility Patent Application for CAPACITIVE TOUCH SENSOR SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventors Ilya Daniel Rosenberg and John Aaron Zarraga, filed electronically with the USPTO on Sep. 27, 2014, with EFS ID 20263634, confirmation number 8881, Ser. No. 14/499,090, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,459,746 on Oct. 4, 2016. This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 and incorporates by reference United States Provisional Patent Application for TACTILE TOUCH SENSOR SYSTEM AND METHOD by inventors Ilya Daniel Rosenberg and John Aaron Zarraga, filed electronically with the USPTO on Jul. 17, 2014, with EFS ID 19606351, confirmation number 5185, Ser. No. 62/025,589. This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 and incorporates by reference United States Provisional Patent Application for INTERPOLATING FORCE SENSING ARRAY by inventor Ilya Daniel Rosenberg, filed electronically with the USPTO on Sep. 27, 2013, with Ser. No. 61/883,597. This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 and incorporates by reference United States Provisional Patent Application for INTERPOLATING FORCE SENSING ARRAY by inventor Ilya Daniel Rosenberg, filed electronically with the USPTO on Jan. 16, 2014, with Ser. No. 61/928,269.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
152726 | Cramer | Jul 1874 | A |
276682 | Guernsey | May 1883 | A |
D173309 | Johston | Oct 1954 | S |
D244317 | Russell et al. | May 1977 | S |
D244717 | Schneider et al. | Jun 1977 | S |
D259229 | Lady | May 1981 | S |
4374384 | Moates | Feb 1983 | A |
D270917 | Peterson et al. | Oct 1983 | S |
4555693 | Danish et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4856993 | Maness et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
D303788 | Kondoh et al. | Oct 1989 | S |
D313409 | Chowdhree et al. | Jan 1991 | S |
D328915 | Sato | Aug 1992 | S |
D333125 | Komada et al. | Feb 1993 | S |
5335557 | Yasutake | Aug 1994 | A |
D353369 | Leibengood | Dec 1994 | S |
D355924 | Slater | Feb 1995 | S |
D359036 | Mandel | Jun 1995 | S |
5463388 | Boie et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5505072 | Oreper | Apr 1996 | A |
5543588 | Bisset et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
D377789 | Wang et al. | Feb 1997 | S |
D378211 | Kuo | Feb 1997 | S |
D385857 | Cohen et al. | Nov 1997 | S |
D388065 | Kawauchi et al. | Dec 1997 | S |
5699074 | Sutherland et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
D390211 | Yates et al. | Feb 1998 | S |
5719597 | Fong | Feb 1998 | A |
5756904 | Oreper et al. | May 1998 | A |
5844506 | Binstead | Dec 1998 | A |
D405771 | Nachinson et al. | Feb 1999 | S |
5905209 | Oreper | May 1999 | A |
D413877 | Renk | Sep 1999 | S |
D432137 | Holtzman et al. | Oct 2000 | S |
D432506 | Noguchi et al. | Oct 2000 | S |
D435186 | Fulkerson | Dec 2000 | S |
D435668 | Couey | Dec 2000 | S |
D442590 | Ledbetter et al. | May 2001 | S |
D444460 | Kitazawa et al. | Jul 2001 | S |
6258444 | Muramoto | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259044 | Paratore et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
D446982 | Block | Aug 2001 | S |
D451505 | Iseki et al. | Dec 2001 | S |
D464988 | Edward et al. | Oct 2002 | S |
6507338 | Liao et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
D475050 | Klein | May 2003 | S |
6597347 | Yasutake | Jul 2003 | B1 |
D478089 | Yokota | Aug 2003 | S |
6661407 | Severson | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6694826 | Kiribayashi et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6714213 | Lithicum et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
D490837 | Chang | Jun 2004 | S |
D504889 | Andre et al. | May 2005 | S |
D506195 | Leveridge et al. | Jul 2005 | S |
D508180 | Sneed | Aug 2005 | S |
D513616 | Glassman | Jan 2006 | S |
D519997 | Hirota | May 2006 | S |
D525262 | Boswell et al. | Jul 2006 | S |
D525621 | Hirota | Jul 2006 | S |
7215323 | Gombert et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
D550226 | Rogers | Sep 2007 | S |
D550678 | O'Neil | Sep 2007 | S |
D555640 | Amiya | Nov 2007 | S |
D569415 | Shigeru | May 2008 | S |
D576177 | Asanuma et al. | Sep 2008 | S |
7499036 | Flowers | Mar 2009 | B2 |
D589961 | Hackenberg et al. | Apr 2009 | S |
D602022 | Heck et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
D604300 | Andre et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
7659885 | Kraus et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
D616886 | Andre et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D625727 | Crisp et al. | Oct 2010 | S |
D625728 | Crisp et al. | Oct 2010 | S |
D629400 | Harper | Dec 2010 | S |
D629401 | Crisp et al. | Dec 2010 | S |
D629402 | Crisp et al. | Dec 2010 | S |
D631047 | Hirota | Jan 2011 | S |
D631469 | Demskie et al. | Jan 2011 | S |
D631894 | Chun et al. | Feb 2011 | S |
D636013 | Shin et al. | Apr 2011 | S |
7926365 | Yeh et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
D639810 | Hwang et al. | Jun 2011 | S |
D642160 | Roberts | Jul 2011 | S |
D642174 | Hirota | Jul 2011 | S |
D642562 | Kato | Aug 2011 | S |
8036846 | Vullaganti | Oct 2011 | B1 |
D648723 | Harper et al. | Nov 2011 | S |
D648727 | Van Den Nieuwenhuizen et al. | Nov 2011 | S |
D652837 | Kawasaki | Jan 2012 | S |
D652838 | Kawasaki | Jan 2012 | S |
D664144 | Akana et al. | Jul 2012 | S |
D666618 | Doyea et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D667404 | Akana et al. | Sep 2012 | S |
D668708 | Park et al. | Oct 2012 | S |
8416213 | Shen et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
D684157 | Chan et al. | Jul 2013 | S |
D686630 | Ehrlich | Jul 2013 | S |
8482540 | Reeves et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
D689492 | Halsinger et al. | Sep 2013 | S |
D689496 | Park et al. | Sep 2013 | S |
D689497 | Park et al. | Sep 2013 | S |
D695743 | Akana et al. | Dec 2013 | S |
D695750 | Ehrlich | Dec 2013 | S |
8654096 | Yanase et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
D701570 | Fletcher et al. | Mar 2014 | S |
D702235 | Jonsson et al. | Apr 2014 | S |
D702579 | Lee et al. | Apr 2014 | S |
D705108 | Lee et al. | May 2014 | S |
8766925 | Perlin | Jul 2014 | B2 |
D715291 | Cacioppo et al. | Oct 2014 | S |
D716302 | Delgado | Oct 2014 | S |
8868373 | Eng et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
D718308 | Nishizawa | Nov 2014 | S |
8878823 | Kremin et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
D721375 | Choi et al. | Jan 2015 | S |
D722043 | Requa | Feb 2015 | S |
D726724 | Wahlqvist et al. | Apr 2015 | S |
9001082 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2015 | B1 |
D730915 | Lee et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
D732526 | Ferren et al. | Jun 2015 | S |
D732533 | Hirota | Jun 2015 | S |
9049911 | Wood et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
D735196 | Son | Jul 2015 | S |
D744484 | Huebner | Dec 2015 | S |
D745521 | Jiang et al. | Dec 2015 | S |
D747769 | Sarkis | Jan 2016 | S |
D747991 | Lee et al. | Jan 2016 | S |
D748630 | Helwig et al. | Feb 2016 | S |
D753223 | Chin | Apr 2016 | S |
D754008 | Huebner | Apr 2016 | S |
D754245 | Wampold | Apr 2016 | S |
D762215 | Luttrell | Jul 2016 | S |
9459746 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9465477 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
D773456 | Mitchell | Dec 2016 | S |
D776190 | Kimura et al. | Jan 2017 | S |
D778342 | Washio | Feb 2017 | S |
9582098 | Rosenberg et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
D786238 | Roberts | May 2017 | S |
D786254 | Yum et al. | May 2017 | S |
9746964 | Rosenberg et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
D802599 | Magargee et al. | Nov 2017 | S |
10073565 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10338722 | Rosenberg et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10534478 | Rosenberg et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10705643 | Rosenberg | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20010045941 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020011991 | Iwasaki et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030184528 | Kawasaki et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030197687 | Shetter | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030209604 | Harrison, Jr. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231197 | Janevski | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235452 | Kraus et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040053849 | Bair et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056781 | Rix et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056849 | Lohbihler et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040085716 | Uke | May 2004 | A1 |
20050099403 | Kraus et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060181515 | Fletcher et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197750 | Kerr et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060209037 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060238518 | Westerman | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060256090 | Huppi | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070103454 | Elias | May 2007 | A1 |
20070229468 | Peng et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234825 | Loomis | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070235231 | Loomis et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070257890 | Hotelling | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080018608 | Serban et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080059131 | Tokita et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080158172 | Hotelling | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162996 | Krah | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080211783 | Hotelling et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090002925 | Hung et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090256817 | Perlin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090266218 | Parienti | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090284398 | Shen et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090322700 | D'Souza et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100037709 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100103136 | Ono et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100128002 | Stacy | May 2010 | A1 |
20100188345 | Keskin et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100214232 | Chan et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100238119 | Dubrovsky et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100242274 | Rosenfeld et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100245246 | Rosenfeld et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100277420 | Charlier et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100300773 | Cordeiro | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315102 | Portmann | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328052 | Paquero et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328231 | Paquero et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110041098 | Kajiya et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110050587 | Natanzon et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110051343 | Lee | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110115784 | Tartz et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110141026 | Joquet | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110169832 | Brown et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110283864 | Mathews | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291951 | Tong | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310002 | Tidemand et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120062497 | Rebeschi | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120086659 | Perlin et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120086666 | Badaye et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092285 | Osborn et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120099264 | Degner et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120105361 | Kremin | May 2012 | A1 |
20120105362 | Kremin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120110447 | Chen | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113047 | Hanauer et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120169667 | Lu et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191993 | Drader et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120242594 | Matsumoto | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120256870 | Klein et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120293448 | Dietz et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120327001 | Higginson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130002591 | Whytock et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130033450 | Coulson et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130082936 | Islamkulov | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130082970 | Frey et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130154938 | Arthur et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130174715 | Akiyama | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130187887 | Mizuhashi et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130324254 | Huang et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140015831 | Kim et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140071069 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140104274 | Hilliges et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140253440 | Karakotsios et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267048 | Morris | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140306891 | Latta et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150009145 | Chardonnet et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150091820 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150091857 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150091858 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150091859 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150331577 | Chen | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150338967 | Chern et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150378492 | Rosenberg et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160026261 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160253019 | Geaghan | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160298950 | Modi et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170003796 | Kono | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170329370 | Han | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170336891 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20200110506 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1924775 | Mar 2007 | CN |
1947087 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101258593 | Sep 2008 | CN |
101632057 | Jan 2010 | CN |
101689853 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101836178 | Sep 2010 | CN |
201662772 | Dec 2010 | CN |
102007465 | Apr 2011 | CN |
201910028 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102460357 | May 2012 | CN |
102640097 | Aug 2012 | CN |
102713805 | Oct 2012 | CN |
102844733 | Dec 2012 | CN |
103221911 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103502918 | Jan 2014 | CN |
103748538 | Apr 2014 | CN |
104272218 | Jan 2015 | CN |
93 14 627 | Jan 1994 | DE |
199 62 552 | Jul 2001 | DE |
2 104 023 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2 669 767 | Dec 2013 | EP |
S58-90235 | May 1983 | JP |
S61-37536 | Feb 1986 | JP |
62-100827 | May 1987 | JP |
S62-130420 | Jun 1987 | JP |
S63-204374 | Aug 1988 | JP |
H02-17524 | Jan 1990 | JP |
H02-53132 | Feb 1990 | JP |
H6-242875 | Sep 1994 | JP |
9-511086 | Nov 1997 | JP |
2005-530236 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2009-531709 | Sep 2009 | JP |
3-291714 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2009-282825 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2010-272064 | Dec 2010 | JP |
2011-242906 | Dec 2011 | JP |
2012-003522 | Jan 2012 | JP |
4868232 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2012-530964 | Dec 2012 | JP |
2013-037674 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2013-143152 | Jul 2013 | JP |
2013-529803 | Jul 2013 | JP |
2013-542523 | Nov 2013 | JP |
10-2009-0063637 | Jun 2009 | KR |
9905492 | Feb 1999 | WO |
2007107522 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2009031214 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2010147692 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011154524 | Dec 2011 | WO |
2012147634 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2012158902 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2015048582 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015048583 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015048584 | Apr 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/653,856 dated Oct. 19, 2017, 29 pages. |
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/271,953 dated Dec. 28, 2016, 57 pages. |
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,090 dated Feb. 10, 2016, 40 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2014/057912 dated Jan. 2, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2014/057911 dated Jan. 2, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2014/057913 dated Jan. 2, 2015, 8 pages. |
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/499,001 dated Mar. 10, 2016, 33 pages. |
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/314,662 dated Sep. 2, 2014, 33 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent application No. 14847403.4, dated May 9, 2017, 8 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC issued in European Patent application No. 14847403.4, dated May 29, 2017, 1 page. |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent application No. 14847722.7, dated May 9, 2017, 8 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC issued in European Patent application No. 14847722.7, dated May 29, 2017, 1 page. |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent application No. 14849048.5, dated May 9, 2017, 8 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC issued in European Patent application No. 14849048.5, dated May 29, 2017, 1 page. |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Patent application No. 15811995.8, dated Oct. 13, 2017, 11 pages. |
Rekimoto, SmartSkin: An Infrastructure for Freehand Manipulation on Interactive Surfaces, CHI, Apr. 20, 2002, Minneapolis, MN, 8 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC issued in European Patent application No. 15811995.8, dated Nov. 2, 2017, 1 page. |
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/498,478 dated Jun. 30, 2016, 71 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/223,968 dated Aug. 30, 2017, 28 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/224,003 dated Oct. 18, 2017, 34 pages. |
Steinicke et al., Multi-Touching 3D Data: Towards Direct Interaction in Stereoscopic Display Environments coupled Nith Mobile Devices, 2008. [retrieved on Nov. 16, 2016] Retrieved from the internet. <URL: http:/lciteseerx.ist.psu.edu/l'iewdoc/download?doi=1 0 .1.1 .187. 1133&rep 1 &type=pdf>, 4 pages. |
Non Final Office received for Action U.S. Appl. No. 14/751,076 dated Jul. 13, 2016, 28 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/751,076 dated Jan. 10, 2017, 23 pages. |
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/751,076 dated Apr. 18, 2017, 26 pages. |
Analog Devices, Inc., CapTouch Programmable Controller for Single-Electrode Capacitance Sensors, Analog Devices, 2009, 71 pages , AD7147A, Inc., www_analog_com., 71 pages. |
Atmel, QTouch 12-channel Touch Sensor IC, AT42QT2120, 9634E-AT42, Jun. 2012, 47 pages. |
Texas Instruments, DRV5053 Analog-Bipolar Hall Effect Sensor, SLIS153B, May 2014, revised Sep. 2014, 24 pages. |
Texas Instruments, LDC1000 Inductance-to-Digital Converter, SNOSCX2B, Sep. 2013, revised Mar. 2015, 33 pages. |
Texas Instruments, LDC1312, LDC1314 Multi-Channel 12-Bit Inductance to Digital Converter {LOG) for Inductive Sensing; SNOSCZO, Dec. 2014, 57 pages. |
Toshiba, CMOS Digital Integrated Circuit Silicon Monolithic; TCS20DLR; Mar. 1, 2014, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2015/037831 dated Sep. 23, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2016/044814 dated Dec. 8, 2016, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/875,625 dated Mar. 9, 2018, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/875,625 dated Jul. 12, 2018, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/575,547 dated Dec. 14, 2017, 26 pages. |
The Maker. senselblog.wordpress.com [online], senselblog.wordpress.com. Posted Jul. 27, 2015, 5 pages [Retrieved on Nov. 29, 2017]. https://senselblog. wordpress.com/2015/07/. |
Notice of Allowance and accompanying letter containing list of references for Japanese Design Application No. 2017-3843 dated Jun. 21, 2017, 6 pages. |
Ex Parte Quayle Action received for Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/575,548 dated Aug. 16, 2017, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance received for Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/575,554 dated Dec. 22, 2017, 27 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and accompanying letter containing list of references for Japanese Design Application No. 2017-3845 dated Jun. 21, 2017, 6 pages. |
Search Report received for Chinese Application Serial No. 201480064892.X dated Mar. 6, 2018, 1 page. |
First Office Action received for Chinese Application Serial No. 201480065162.1 dated Feb. 27, 2018, 11 pages. |
First Office Action received for Chinese Application Serial No. 201480065163.6 dated Feb. 27, 2018, 9 pages. |
Decision to Grant a Patent received for Japanese Application No. 2016-545251 dated Jun. 12, 2018, 5 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Rules 161(2) and 162 EPC issued in European Patent application No. 16831440.9, dated Mar. 7, 2018, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/127,143 dated Oct. 17, 2018, 57 pages. |
Second Office Action received for Chinese Application Serial No. 201480064892 dated Sep. 3, 2018, 9 pages. |
Ex Parte Quayle Action received for Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/575,551 dated Dec. 19, 2017, 19 pages. |
Davies, Chris, “Sensel Morph Puts Force Touch-style tech into customizable pad”, SlashGear, Aug. 25, 2015, 9 pages. Retrieved on Dec. 7, 2017. <URL: https://www.slashgear.com/sensel-morph-puts-force-touch-into-customizable-pad-hands-on-25399140/>, 9 pages. |
“Xkey 25-key portable musical keyboard”, Amazon, Sep. 27, 2013, 4 pages. Retreived on Dec. 7, 2017. <URL: https://www.amazon.com/Xkey-25-Key-Portable-Musical Keyboard/dp/BOODU2VKV8>, 4 pages. |
“Akai Professional MPK Mini Keyboard”, Amazon, Jan. 24, 2012, 4 pages. Retrieved on Dec. 7, 2017. <URL: https://www.amazon.ca/Akai-Professional-MPK-Ultra-Portable-Controller/dp/B00466HM28>. |
“61 Key Electronic Piano Keyboard”, TOMTOP, Feb. 26, 2015, 9 pages. Retrieved on Dec. 7, 2017. <URL: https://www.tomtop.com/p-i420.html#flow_review>. |
“Endeavor Intros 24-key Midi Controller”, Synthtopia, Nov. 2, 2012, 3 pages. Retrieved on Dec. 7, 2017. <URL: http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2012/11/02/endeavor-intros-24-key-evo-advanced-midi-controller/>. |
“Piano 24 Keys Vector”, Pixabay, Apr. 23, 2014,. 3 pages. Retrieved on Dec. 7, 2017. <URL: https://pixabay.com/en/piano-keys-octave-music-keyboard-307653/>. |
Paper Practice Piano Handout, Teachers Pay Teachers, Jul. 27, 2014, 3 pages. Retrieved on Dec. 7, 2017. <URL: https://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Product/Paper-Practice-Piano-Handout-142149>. |
“The Pianist: Daniel Reyna”, Vimeo, Oct. 2, 2015, 2 pages. Retrieved on Dec. 7, 2017. <URL: https://vimeo.com/141228710>. |
“Logitech Wireless Rechargeable Touchpad”, Amazon, Sep. 23, 2012, 6 pages. Retrieved on Dec. 7, 2017. <URL: https://www.amazon.com/LOG910003057-Logitech-Wireless-Rechargeable-Touchpad/dp/B0093H4WT6>. |
“Mini Monster Piano”, Amazon, Feb. 6, 2014. Retrieved on Dec. 7, 2017. <URL: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Mini-Monster-Piano-Grand-Black/dp/BOOGCST1HM>. |
Decision to Grant a Patent received for Japanese Application No. 2016-545252 dated Aug. 1, 2018, 6 pages. |
Decision to Grant a Patent received for Japanese Application No. 2016-545253 dated Aug. 1, 2018, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/827,411 dated Dec. 14, 2018, 27 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/259,230 dated Mar. 7, 2019, 30 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/127,143 dated May 16, 2019, 48 pages. |
Ex Parte Quayle Action received for Design U.S. Appl. No. 29/591,295 dated Jul. 25, 2018, 40 pages. |
Takes on Tech, QuNeo Announches Touch Sensor Midi Controller Pad, posted Dec. 13, 2011, [online], [site visited Jul. 18, 2018]. Available from Internet, <URL: https://www.takesontech.com/quneo-announces-touch-sensor-midi-controller-pad> (Year: 2011). |
Amazon, Yamaha DD20 Touch-Sensitive Digital Drums, posted Sep. 4, 1999, [online], [site visited Jul. 18, 2018]. Available from Internet, <URL: https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASI N/B00005M03W/gemotrack9-20/ref=nosim> (Year: 1999). |
Walmart, Spectrum Seven-Pad Digital Drums with Drum Stand, reviewed Dec. 27, 2010, [online], [site visited Jul. 18, 2018]. Available from Internet, <URL: https://www.walmart.com/ip/Spectrum-Seven-Pad-Digital-Drums-with-Drum-Stand/15190390> (Year: 2010). |
Amazon, PAXCESS Electronic Drum Set, postedMar. 30, 2016, [online], [site visited Jul. 18, 2018]. Available from Internet, <URL: https://www.amazon.com/PAXCESS-Electronic-Practice-Headphone-Playtime/dp/BO 1 DL YXX6E/ref=sr 1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1531954233&sr=8-3&keywords=PAXCESS> (Year: 2016). |
Notice of Allowance and accompanying letter containing list of references dated Jun. 21, 2017 for Japanese Design Application No. 2017-3847, 6 pages. |
First Office Action received for Chinese Application Serial No. 201580033673.x dated May 27, 2019, 9 pages. |
Partial Supplementary European Search Report received for EP Patent Application Serial No. 16831440.9 dated Jan. 29, 2019, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report received for EP Patent Application Serial No. 16831440.9 dated May 3, 2019, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/456,248 dated Jul. 25, 2019, 25 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received for EP Patent Application Serial No. 14847403.4 dated Dec. 2, 2019, 8 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received for EP Patent Application Serial No. 14847722.7 dated Dec. 2, 2019, 9 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received for EP Patent Application Serial No. 14849048.5 dated Dec. 2, 2019, 9 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received for EP Patent Application Serial No. 15811995.8 dated Jan. 3, 2020, 7 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Refusal received for Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 2016-575496 dated Sep. 3, 2019, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/700,325 dated Oct. 1, 2020, 89 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/883,290 dated Oct. 13, 2020, 69 pages. |
Second Office Action received for Chinese Application Serial No. 201580033673.x dated Feb. 3, 2020, 9 pages. |
Third Office Action received for Chinese Application Serial No. 201580033673.x dated Aug. 3, 2020, 24 pages. |
First Office Action received for Chinese Application Serial No. 201680056819.7 dated May 18, 2020, 21 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received for EP Patent Application Serial No. 15811995.8 dated Aug. 3, 2020, 4 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to article 94(3) EPC issued in European Patent application No. 16831440.9, dated Mar. 4, 2020, 4 pages. |
Communication Pursuant to Rule 112(1) EPC issued in European Patent application No. 16831440.9, dated Oct. 6, 2020, 1 page. |
Notice of Reasons for Refusal received for Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 2016-575496 dated Apr. 1, 2020, 13 pages. |
Decision for Refusal received for Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 2016-575496 dated Oct. 13, 2020, 8 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Refusal received for KR Patent Application Serial No. 10-2016-7011226 dated Nov. 30, 2020, 4 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Refusal received for KR Patent Application Serial No. 10-2016-7011230 dated Jul. 27, 2020, 10 pages. |
First Office Action received for Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 2,925,692 dated Oct. 14, 2020, 9 pages. |
First Office Action received for Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 2,925,693 dated Oct. 14, 2020, 9 pages. |
First Office action received for Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 2,925,695 dated Oct. 23, 2020, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/883,290 dated Apr. 20, 2021, 46 pages. |
Fourth Office Action received for Chinese Application Serial No. 201580033673.x dated Feb. 2, 2021, 22 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Refusal received for Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 10-2016-7011225 dated Mar. 12, 2021, 5 pages. |
Supplementary Search Report received for Chinese Patent Application Serial No. 201580033673.x dated May 31, 2021, 2 pages. |
First Office Action received for Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 2,953,131 dated Jun. 30, 2021, 4 pages. |
Grant of Patent received for Korean Patent Application Serial No. 10-2017-7002183 dated Aug. 31, 2021, 6 pages. (Including English Translation). |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 17/353,450 dated Mar. 17, 2022, 23 pages. |
Office Action received for Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 2953131 dated Apr. 11, 2022, 4 pages. |
Trial and Appeal Decision received for Japanese Patent Application Serial No. 2016575496 dated Dec. 7, 2021, 35 pages (Including English Translation). |
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/749,760 dated Mar. 19, 2021, 32 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 17/363,659 dated Apr. 14, 2022, 88 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 18/047,003 dated Mar. 2, 2023, 105 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220107715 A1 | Apr 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62025589 | Jul 2014 | US | |
61928269 | Jan 2014 | US | |
61883597 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16883290 | May 2020 | US |
Child | 17552744 | US | |
Parent | 16259230 | Jan 2019 | US |
Child | 16883290 | US | |
Parent | 15875625 | Jan 2018 | US |
Child | 16259230 | US | |
Parent | 14751076 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15875625 | US | |
Parent | 14498478 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 14499001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14499090 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 14751076 | US | |
Parent | 14499001 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 14499090 | US | |
Parent | 14314662 | Jun 2014 | US |
Child | 14498478 | US |