TAILORED GENE CHIP FOR GENETIC TEST AND FABRICATION METHOD THEREFOR

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20230129183
  • Publication Number
    20230129183
  • Date Filed
    December 01, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Published
    April 27, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method for fabrication of a tailored gene chip for a genetic test and, more specifically, to a method for designing a tailored chip for accuracy improvement in a genetic test, that is, for determining which markers are included upon the fabrication of a tailored gene chip. The tailored gene chip according to the present invention can acquire more accurate data, compared to the use of commercialized gene chips, and thus is advantageous for a gene test. In addition, selection can be made of more accurate markers even from a lower number of markers since a marker selection method used for configuring the tailored gene chip is carried out in consideration of a target ethnic group.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a tailored gene chip for genetic test, and more particularly, to a tailored gene chip designed to improve the accuracy of genetic test.


BACKGROUND ART

In recent years, genetic mutation markers related to diseases and phenotypes have been revealed by genome sequence decoding and disease studies. If there is a mutation of such a revealed gene, the possibility of developing a disease increases, so it is used as a marker for genetic test and is used for disease prediction.


Genetic test is a test method for genes contained in chromosomes and refers to a test method for diagnosing genetic diseases, some tumors, mutations, and chromosomal abnormalities. There are many methods for analyzing DNA at the molecular level, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), gene sequencing, and gene chip. Among them, gene chips are easy to use and have many commercially available types, and they have the advantage that they do not consume much time and money even if the analysis for the samples of many people is performed.


However, commercialized gene chips are configured to be used for various diseases and phenotypes in various races. For this reason, there is a limit to efficiently using the gene chip in the commercialized specific ethnic group and specific disease/phenotype. It is not suitable for genetic test that identifies multiple DNA markers because in many cases, the target genetic marker is not included, or the results of the marker cannot be viewed due to problems during the experiment or the bias of the samples even if the marker is present. Therefore, in order to efficiently utilize the gene chip, it is essential to construct a new gene chip in which the desired gene and mutation site is planted. Even when the result of the corresponding marker cannot be confirmed due to a problem during the experiment, there is a need for a method capable of correcting it.


DISCLOSURE
Technical Problem

Accordingly, the present inventors completed the present invention by deriving conditions for selecting closely related markers to increase the prediction accuracy of the target marker while researching a method for increasing the accuracy of genetic test using a gene chip.


Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a tailored gene chip with improved accuracy of genetic test, the chip including a target marker; and a nearby marker having a linkage disequilibrium relationship with the target marker.


Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for selecting a nearby marker for improving the accuracy of a genetic test, the method including a step of selecting a target marker and a nearby marker having a linkage disequilibrium relationship with the target marker.


Another object of the present invention is to provide a computer-readable recording medium in which a program for executing the method for selecting a nearby marker on a computer is recorded.


Another object of the present invention is to provide a method for analyzing a single nucleotide polymorphism imputation, the method including steps of: selecting a nearby marker having a linkage disequilibrium relationship with a target marker; and performing the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation using the target marker and the nearby marker.


Another object of the present invention is to provide a computer-readable recording medium recording a program for executing the method for analyzing the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation on a computer.


Technical Solution

In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a tailored gene chip with improved accuracy of genetic test, the chip including a target marker; and a nearby marker having a linkage disequilibrium relationship with the target marker.


In addition, the present invention provides a method for selecting a nearby marker for improving the accuracy of a genetic test, the method including a step of selecting a target marker and a nearby marker having a linkage disequilibrium relationship with the target marker.


In addition, the present invention provides a computer-readable recording medium in which a program for executing the method for selecting a nearby marker on a computer is recorded.


In addition, the present invention provides a method for analyzing a single nucleotide polymorphism imputation, the method including steps of: selecting a nearby marker having a linkage disequilibrium relationship with a target marker; and performing the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation using the target marker and the nearby marker.


In addition, the present invention provides a computer-readable recording medium recording a program for executing the method for analyzing the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation on a computer.


Advantageous Effects

The tailored gene chip according to the present invention can acquire data with higher accuracy compared to a use of a commercialized gene chip, which is advantageous for genetic test. In addition, since the method for selecting a marker used to construct the tailored gene chip considers the target ethnic group, it is possible to select a marker with higher accuracy even with a small number of markers.





DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a view showing the results of measuring single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy using an Axiom APMRA chip including a disease marker in consideration of the mutation characteristics of Asians and a marker for single nucleotide polymorphism imputation.



FIG. 2 is a view illustrating the results of comparing single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy according to a distance from a target marker.



FIGS. 3 and 4 are views showing results of comparison of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy according to the frequency of alleles.



FIG. 5 is a view showing the results of comparing the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy according to the number of alleles of the marker.



FIG. 6 is a view showing the results of a comparison of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy according to the genotype production rate (calling rate).



FIG. 7 is a view showing the results of comparing the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy using a commercially available Axiom APMRA chip; and a gene chip including a nearby marker selected according to the present invention.





BEST MODE OF THE INVENTION

Hereinafter, the present invention is described in detail.


According to an aspect of the present invention, the present invention provides a tailored gene chip with improved accuracy of genetic test, the chip including a target marker; and a nearby marker having a linkage disequilibrium relationship with the target marker.


As used herein, the term “target marker” means a to-be-identified marker through genetic test, and examples thereof include disease-related genetic markers and phenotype-related genetic markers. (i) When the target marker is a disease-related marker, diagnosis or prognosis of a disease can be predicted through identification thereof, and (ii) when the target marker is a phenotype-related marker, the phenotype can be predicted through identification of a genetic marker.


As used herein, the term “linkage disequilibrium (LD)” means that two different alleles appear more closely related than expected value (i.e., theoretical value) due to the non-random linkage of two alleles in different chromosomal regions and is a measure of genetic association. Linkage disequilibrium may be caused by random drift, non-random mating, population structure, etc. in addition to the association of the loci of the two genes.


As used herein, the term “nearby marker” refers to a marker that is genetically closely related to the target marker and may be collected from a mutation database such as dbSNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Database).


As used herein, the term “genetic test” refers to a test method for diagnosing genetic diseases, some tumors, mutations, chromosomal abnormalities, etc., by testing for genes contained in chromosomes. Examples of the genetic test include a polymerase chain reaction, a gene sequencing test, and a gene chip.


As used herein, the term “gene chip (DNA chip)” refers to a biochemical semiconductor made to search tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of genes at once using hydrogen bonding of nucleotides in adenine-thymine (A-T), guanine-cytosine (G-C) formulas. The gene chip is a new level of an analysis system that can be widely applied to basic research of genes, as well as genetic diagnosis of various diseases, rapid detection of pathogens such as bacteria and viruses, and selection of optimal drugs according to an individual's genetic form.


As used herein, the term “tailored gene chip” is a gene chip specialized for a target marker or a group to be analyzed (e.g., race, species, etc.), and has an advantage in that analysis accuracy is higher than that of a commercialized chip. However, tailored gene chips must be manufactured according to the purpose of the analysis.


In an embodiment of the present invention, the gene chip may be a genetic testing system, a genetic testing device, or a testing device including a gene chip.


In an embodiment of the present invention, the target marker is preferably included in the gene chip two or more times. When the target marker is included in the gene chip two or more times as in the above embodiment, the accuracy of the genetic test can be improved by repeatedly producing genotype information for the same target marker. When the target marker is included in the gene chip less than twice, it is not preferable because data collection is difficult if no results are obtained from the target marker position.


In an embodiment of the present invention, the nearby marker preferably satisfies one or more conditions selected from the group consisting of the following conditions (a) to (d).

    • Condition (a): The distance from the target marker is 1 b to 500 Kb
    • Condition (b): The frequency of alleles within the to-be-analyzed group is 0.01 to 0.5
    • Condition (c): The number of alleles is two (di-allele)
    • Condition (d): The calling rate is 50 to 99.99%


In the example of the present invention, as a result of performing single nucleotide polymorphism imputation of marker rs6885224 using the tailored gene chip according to the present invention, it was confirmed that the accuracy was 99.9% when an average of 17.3 selected nearby markers were used (See FIG. 7). Meanwhile, as a result of performing single nucleotide polymorphism imputation using a gene chip in which markers irrelevant to the selection criteria for nearby markers were arranged, it was confirmed that the accuracy was 93.2% when performed using 150 markers, and increasing the number of markers did not improve the accuracy.


The tailored gene chip according to the present invention (i) includes a target marker repeatedly two or more times, and (ii) includes a nearby marker that satisfies the above conditions so that the accuracy of the genetic test is significantly increased, and data with high accuracy can be obtained even with a small number of nearby markers.


According to another aspect of the present invention, the present invention provides a method for selecting a nearby marker for improving accuracy of a genetic test, the method including a step of selecting a nearby marker having a linkage disequilibrium relationship with a target marker.


In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the nearby marker is in a close relationship with the target marker and more specifically, is preferably in a linkage disequilibrium relationship.


In an embodiment of the present invention, the nearby marker preferably satisfies one or more conditions selected from the group consisting of the following conditions (a) to (d).

    • Condition (a): The distance from the target marker is 1 b to 500 Kb
    • Condition (b): The frequency of alleles within the to-be-analyzed group is 0.01 to 0.5
    • Condition (c): The number of alleles is two (di-allele)
    • Condition (d): The calling rate is 50 to 99.99%


In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the distance of the nearby marker from the target marker is preferably 1 b to 500 Kb, more preferably 1 b to 300 Kb, and still more preferably 1 b to 250 Kb.


In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the nearby marker has the frequency of alleles in the to-be-analyzed population of preferably 0.01 to 0.5, and more preferably 0.1 to 0.3.


In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the number of alleles of the nearby marker is preferably two.


In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the calling rate of the nearby marker is preferably 50 to 99.99%, more preferably 60 to 99.99%.


The method for selecting a nearby marker according to the present invention can be used to rapidly select a suitable nearby marker according to a target marker or a target ethnic group, and the selected nearby marker can significantly increase the accuracy of a genetic test.


According to another aspect of the present invention, the present invention provides a computer-readable recording medium in which a program for executing the method for selecting a nearby marker is recorded.


As used herein, the term “recording medium” refers to a computer-readable medium as the computer-readable recording medium. The computer-readable recording medium includes all types of recording devices in which data readable by a computer system is stored. Examples of the computer-readable recording medium include a storage medium such as a magnetic storage medium (e.g., a floppy disk, a hard disk, etc.) and an optically readable medium (e.g., a CD, DVD, USB, etc.). In addition, it includes being implemented in the form of a carrier wave (e.g., transmission over the Internet). In addition, the computer-readable recording medium is distributed in a network-connected computer system so that the computer-readable code can be stored and executed in a distributed manner.


According to another aspect of the present invention, the present invention provides a method for analyzing a single nucleotide polymorphism imputation, the method including steps of: selecting a nearby marker having a linkage disequilibrium relationship with a target marker; and performing the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation using the target marker and the nearby marker.


As used herein, the term “single nucleotide polymorphism imputation” is a genetic test, which is a method of inferring the target marker genotype of another subject using the genotype result of another marker (i.e., a nearby marker) in a linkage disequilibrium relationship with high relevance to the target marker.


In an embodiment of the present invention, the target marker is preferably analyzed two or more times for single nucleotide polymorphism imputation.


In an embodiment of the present invention, the nearby marker preferably satisfies one or more conditions selected from the group consisting of the following conditions (a) to (d):

    • Condition (a): The distance from the target marker is 1 b to 500 Kb;
    • Condition (b): The frequency of alleles within the to-be-analyzed group is 0.01 to 0.5;
    • Condition (c): The number of alleles is two (di-allele); and
    • Condition (d): The calling rate is 50 to 99.99%.


The analysis method of the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation according to the present invention can acquire data with high accuracy with a smaller number of nearby markers compared to the analysis using nearby markers that are not related to the selection criteria.


According to another aspect of the present invention, the present invention provides a computer-readable recording medium in which a program for executing a method for the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation analysis on a computer is recorded.


MODES OF THE INVENTION

Hereinafter, the present invention is described in more detail through examples. These examples are only for illustrating the present invention, and it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that the scope of the present invention is not to be construed as being limited by these examples.


Experimental Example 1. Production of Gene Chip Data

In order to produce gene chip data, saliva, gargle, and oral epithelial cells from 7 Koreans produced from whole genome sequence (WGS) data were collected. DNA of the collected samples was extracted using the GeneAll mini kit. Gene chip data of the extracted DNA were produced using Axiom APMRA kit (Asia Precision Medicine Research Array Kit) and GeneTitan equipment. For each sample collected, the process was repeated three times to generate data. The Axiom APMRA chip used for gene chip data production contains more than 750,000 markers, which is composed of about 540,000 markers for a disease marker and single nucleotide polymorphism imputation for precision medicine research that considers Asian mutation characteristics.


Experimental Example 2. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Imputation

For a nearby marker for single nucleotide polymorphism imputation of the target gene marker, Korean genotype data on the location of the marker planted in the Axiome APMRA chip were collected and used from dbSNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Database).


The gene chip data produced in Experimental Example 1 was used as input data for single nucleotide polymorphism imputation. In addition, the result of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation was compared with the genotyping result derived from the whole genome sequence (WGS) of the sample to calculate the accuracy.


For single nucleotide polymorphism imputation analysis, software IMPUTE2 (ver2.3.2) was used. In more detail, single nucleotide polymorphism imputation analysis was performed even if there was a genotype result at the corresponding position using the -pgs option of the software IMPUTE2. The -buffer option was used to perform analysis so as to use the information on distant marker. In addition, the default options were used for other options in the software IMPUTE2.


Example 1. Analysis of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Imputation Using Axiom APMRA Chip

The accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation for 464 disease-related SNP target markers was measured using the Axiom APMRA chip, which includes a disease marker considering Asian mutation characteristics and a marker for single nucleotide polymorphism imputation. The single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy was analyzed while increasing the nearby markers one by one in the order closest to the target marker, and the minimum number of nearby markers showing an accuracy of 98% or more was confirmed. The results of measuring single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy are shown in FIG. 1.


As shown in FIG. 1, 429 SNP markers including markers rs7524102 and rs17401966 among all 464 SNP markers showed an accuracy of 99.6% or more when an average of 19.9 nearby markers were used. On the other hand, 35 SNP markers (including marker rs1229984) had a low accuracy of 93.2% on average, even though 150 nearby markers were used. As described above, Table 1 shows the SNP markers with low accuracy even when using a large number of nearby markers.














TABLE 1








Accuracy
Accuracy
Accuracy





when using 10
when using 50
when using 150


CHROM
POS
RS-ID
nearby markers
nearby markers
nearby markers




















chr1
11856378
rs1801133
0.786
0.778
0.944


chr1
103379918
rs3753841
0.833
0.976
0.944


chr1
161479745
rs1801274
0.921
0.937
0.976


chr1
196679455
rs10737680
0.817
0.96
0.968


chr1
200007432
rs3790844
0.778
0.913
0.968


chr11
2781519
rs179785
0.905
0.944
0.929


chr11
118477367
rs498872
0.786
0.929
0.929


chr12
4368352
rs10774214
0.937
0.929
0.857


chr12
57527283
rs11172113
0.913
0.921
0.913


chr13
42754522
rs4142110
0.698
0.905
0.857


chr14
100133942
rs2895811
0.722
0.929
0.968


chr15
28197037
rs1800414
0.786
0.929
0.976


chr15
78915245
rs6495309
0.913
0.968
0.944


chr15
91512067
rs2290203
0.929
0.929
0.929


chr16
1532463
rs13336428
0.754
0.921
0.929


chr17
800593
rs12603526
0.802
0.921
0.976


chr17
59447369
rs11653176
0.937
0.929
0.976


chr19
7166109
rs2059807
0.857
0.881
0.929


chr19
19379549
rs58542926
0.849
0.929
0.929


chr2
145223620
rs13382811
0.849
0.849
0.929


chr2
198631714
rs700651
0.841
0.929
0.913


chr21
44588757
rs7278468
0.921
0.921
0.857


chr22
37635055
rs2284038
0.952
0.857
0.929


chr22
43500212
rs5759167
0.786
0.937
0.921


chr5
11169945
rs6885224
0.69
0.921
0.897


chr5
59502520
rs966221
0.786
0.929
0.976


chr5
158764177
rs7709212
0.722
0.929
0.929


chr5
168195356
rs11134527
0.857
0.921
0.944


chr6
38365841
rs9296249
0.96
0.929
0.857


chr6
101964914
rs9390754
0.921
0.929
0.929


chr7
19049388
rs2107595
0.968
0.96
0.976


chr7
37746569
rs2392510
0.817
0.905
0.857


chr7
74126034
rs117026326
0.929
0.929
0.929


chr8
11480457
rs2243407
0.857
0.929
0.976


chr9
9261737
rs4626664
0.81
0.929
0.968









The above results indicate that some markers have low accuracy, so it is inappropriate to use the Axiom APMRA chip for genetic test.


Example 2. Optimization of Conditions for Selecting Nearby Markers to Increase Accuracy of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Imputation

In order to correct the 35 markers with low accuracy identified in Example 1, SNPs (i.e., nearby markers) were selected from dbSNPs under respective different conditions, and the accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation was compared.


2-1. Comparison of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Imputation Accuracy According to Distance from Target Marker


The single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy of the nearby marker was compared according to the distance from the target marker. First, nearby markers were divided into three groups based on distance from the target marker, i.e., (a) less than 250 Kb; (b) 250 Kb or more and less than 500 Kb; and (c) 500 Kb or more and less than 750 Kb. The nearby markers were analyzed in increasing order, one by one, in the order close to the target marker. A comparison result of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy is shown in FIG. 2.


As shown in FIG. 2, the group using only nearby markers with a distance from the target marker of less than 250 Kb had the highest single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy. On the other hand, it was confirmed that the group using a nearby marker having a distance from the target marker of 250 Kb or more had low single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy.


2-2. Comparison of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Imputation Accuracy According to Allele Frequency


The accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation according to allele frequency was compared. First, the nearby markers were divided into six groups based on the allele frequency of the to-be-tested population, i.e., (a) 0 or more, (b) 0.05 or more, (c) 0.10 or more, (d) 0.20 or more, (e) 0.30 or more, and (f) 0.40 or greater. The nearby markers were analyzed in increasing order, one by one, in the order close to the target marker. The comparison results of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy are shown in FIGS. 3 and 4.


As shown in FIG. 3, the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy was the highest when a nearby marker having an allele frequency of (c) 0.10 or more was used. Next, the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy of the nearby markers with allele frequencies of (b) 0.05 or more and (d) 0.20 or more was high.


In addition, as shown in FIG. 4, it was confirmed that as the allele frequency increased, the distance between the nearby marker and the target marker increased.


2-3. Comparison of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Imputation Accuracy According to Number of Alleles of Marker


The single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy according to the number of alleles was determined using a tri-allele SNP with three alleles and a di-allele SNP with two alleles. The accuracy was analyzed by increasing the nearby markers one by one in the order closest to the target marker. A comparison result of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy is shown in FIG. 5.


As shown in FIG. 5, the nearby markers having two alleles had significantly higher single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy compared to the nearby markers having three alleles.


2-4. Comparison of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Imputation Accuracy According to Genotype Production Rate (Call Rate)


There are regions with a low genotype production rate depending on the to-be-analyzed population group and the genomic data production method. Accordingly, the accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation was analyzed by using a nearby marker at the same location but varying the genotype production rate of dbSNP. The comparison result of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy is shown in FIG. 6.


As shown in FIG. 6, it was confirmed that the higher the genotype production rate of the nearby marker, the higher the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy.


Based on the above results, the conditions for selecting nearby markers to increase the accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation are as follows.

    • Distance from the target marker: less than 250 Kb
    • Frequency of alleles: 0.1 or more
    • Number of alleles of marker: two (di-allele)
    • Calling rate: 90% or more


Example 3. Analysis of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Imputation Accuracy Using Nearby Markers Selected as Optimal Conditions

Among the markers included in the Axiom APMRA chip, the number of markers corresponding to the conditions for selecting nearby markers of Example 2 was confirmed.


As a result, it was confirmed that the average number of markers satisfying the conditions for selecting nearby markers of Example 2 in the Axiom APMRA chip was 31 for low-accuracy markers and 49 for high-accuracy markers in single nucleotide polymorphism imputation.


Therefore, nearby markers were selected in order to further improve the accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation. Specifically, among the locations registered in the dbSNP, a nearby marker satisfying the conditions for selecting a nearby marker of Example 2 was confirmed. Through this, 150 or more nearby markers for target marker replacement were selected. Among them, nearby markers related to the marker rs6885224 are shown in Table 2. The accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation was confirmed using a tailored gene chip including a target marker repeated twice or more together with the selected nearby marker, and the results are shown in FIG. 7.














TABLE 2







Distance





RS-ID of
RS-ID of
from target


target
nearby
marker
Frequency
Type
Calling


markers
markers
(Kb)
of alleles
of alleles
rate




















rs6885224
rs917012
84
0.88
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs16901339
344
0.28
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs13182209
561
0.31
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs6860246
1203
0.76
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs6879413
1332
0.28
G, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs10078958
1707
0.41
T, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs10071197
1729
0.76
G, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs61751836
2171
0.26
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs10513079
2352
0.26
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs7702295
2445
0.53
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs72646806
2481
0.28
A, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs6861205
2580
0.31
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs7713461
2668
0.41
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs6883143
2791
0.49
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs16901347
2828
0.24
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs13155944
2993
0.43
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs12716080
2997
0.72
G, T
0.99


rs6885224
rs13362481
3046
0.41
C, T
0.99


rs6885224
rs61751837
3058
0.41
G, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs59700924
3363
0.26
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs2057793
3727
0.54
C, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs6892933
3966
0.41
C, G
0.99


rs6885224
rs4702790
4102
0.79
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs16901333
4179
0.26
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs12655907
5432
0.74
T, A
0.99


rs6885224
rs721768
5584
0.54
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs61751852
5773
0.26
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs7703504
5961
0.41
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs7721243
6075
0.41
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs1012092
6442
0.74
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs7715991
6816
0.88
C, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs79140420
6923
0.39
C, T
0.95


rs6885224
rs7715051
7441
0.41
C, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs61751855
7728
0.25
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs1978156
8320
0.89
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs10052776
8703
0.23
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs2023916
8708
0.88
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs7705503
8907
0.63
G, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs12716081
9142
0.23
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs16901329
9242
0.25
C, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs13179953
9248
0.17
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs7704256
9514
0.41
C, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs10062829
9549
0.12
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs2277054
9902
0.42
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs1990003
10288
0.56
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs1978155
10784
0.57
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs61753306
10853
0.25
T, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs6892303
11492
0.62
C, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs1990004
13673
0.56
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs1990005
14140
0.58
C, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs1990006
14151
0.56
C, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs4702791
14283
0.25
G, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs2057795
15348
0.71
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs13358276
15498
0.39
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs11953748
16018
0.24
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs72730911
16556
0.39
A, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs32280
16707
0.22
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs72730910
17574
0.12
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs73051687
17590
0.2
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs32277
17864
0.16
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs10059397
18026
0.39
C, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs66554550
18681
0.25
T, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs6877976
19045
0.39
G, A
0.99


rs6885224
rs62339099
19576
0.39
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs10055024
20137
0.39
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs32275
20394
0.22
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs2023534
20710
0.16
C, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs10036188
20742
0.39
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs32274
21053
0.46
C, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs757458
21108
0.39
A, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs757459
21252
0.39
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs12514212
21408
0.39
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs2400030
21527
0.39
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs2400029
21688
0.39
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs886525
21834
0.39
C, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs886526
21918
0.46
A, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs886527
22131
0.46
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs79989660
22161
0.4
A, G
0.99


rs6885224
rs35081177
22185
0.11
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs1859382
22273
0.46
G, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs12516262
22370
0.39
T, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs6881290
22451
0.46
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs6859601
22531
0.46
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs6880938
22643
0.71
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs62339097
22673
0.25
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs62339096
22753
0.24
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs6885587
22831
0.71
G, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs10041627
22863
0.71
T, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs10059890
23247
0.46
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs10067858
23307
0.71
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs10067783
23404
0.71
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs10074637
23465
0.71
A, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs10059740
23466
0.71
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs10059698
23494
0.71
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs10073056
23692
0.71
A, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs10066098
23744
0.71
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs12516033
24079
0.71
G, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs57133851
24150
0.25
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs2158445
24869
0.72
T, A
0.95


rs6885224
rs7713340
25332
0.42
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs34061113
25466
0.3
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs7709436
25707
0.49
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs40291
25777
0.21
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs10053794
25933
0.9
G, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs62339093
26460
0.26
G, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs32271
26767
0.21
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs32270
27080
0.21
G, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs32267
27550
0.21
G, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs32266
28484
0.21
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs32265
29029
0.21
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs16901308
29034
0.17
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs32264
29356
0.21
A, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs10044129
30587
0.18
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs730610
30894
0.73
A, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs27720
31916
0.14
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs6874039
32024
0.73
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs6873671
32250
0.73
C, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs6873490
32507
0.73
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs2214599
33052
0.41
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs1302802
33481
0.28
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs7736192
33643
0.73
A, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs7714658
33694
0.73
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs7732347
33714
0.73
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs7732720
33781
0.11
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs7731822
34048
0.73
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs6892380
34330
0.73
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs7713315
34737
0.1
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs10513073
35173
0.72
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs62339082
35574
0.42
C, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs6881497
36040
0.72
C, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs6876115
36792
0.67
C, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs2158444
37603
0.67
G, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs9942305
37760
0.1
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs10069711
37950
0.68
G, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs149188423
38111
0.11
G, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs10069596
38112
0.68
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs62339081
38270
0.24
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs6865035
38831
0.24
G, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs6864900
38888
0.24
G, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs153603
39885
0.19
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs13189665
40373
0.86
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs73742130
40426
0.35
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs16901404
41987
0.1
T, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs11748430
42226
0.1
A, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs1547940
42586
0.46
T, C
1.00


rs6885224
rs739957
42726
0.1
C, G
1.00


rs6885224
rs11133648
42754
0.37
T, C
0.99


rs6885224
rs2023923
43154
0.37
C, A
1.00


rs6885224
rs76254229
43306
0.21
C, T
1.00


rs6885224
rs79655595
43332
0.33
T, C
1.00









As shown in FIG. 7, in the case of the marker rs6885224, the accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation using the gene chip of this example was 99.9% when an average of 17.3 selected nearby markers were used. On the other hand, the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy of the Axiom APMRA chip in which markers independent of the selection criteria were arranged did not increase even if the number of markers was increased. When 150 markers were used, the accuracy was 93.2%. The above result means that the nearby marker selected according to the conditions of Example 2 can significantly improve the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation accuracy.


In order to improve the accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation, the present inventors have comprehensively developed a tailored gene chip including (i) a target marker repeatedly included two or more times, and (ii) a nearby marker satisfying the following conditions.

    • Distance from the target marker: less than 250 Kb
    • Frequency of alleles: 0.1 or more
    • Number of alleles of marker: two (di-allele)
    • Calling rate: 90% or more


The tailored gene chip according to the present invention has significantly increased the accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism imputation, and high-accuracy data can be obtained even with a small number of nearby markers.


As above, a specific part of the present invention has been described in detail. It is clear for those of ordinary skill in the art that this specific description is only a preferred embodiment, and the scope of the present invention is not limited thereby. Accordingly, it is intended that the substantial scope of the present invention be defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A tailored gene chip with improved accuracy of a genetic test, the chip comprising: a target marker; anda nearby marker having a linkage disequilibrium relationship with the target marker.
  • 2. The gene chip of claim 1, wherein the target marker is included two or more times in the gene chip.
  • 3. The gene chip of claim 1, wherein the nearby marker satisfies one or more conditions selected from the group consisting of condition (a) in which a distance from the target marker is 1 b to 500 Kb;condition (b) in which a frequency of alleles is 0.01 to 0.5 in a population to be analyzed;condition (c) in which the number of alleles is two (Di-allele); andcondition (d) in which a calling rate is 50 to 99.99%.
  • 4. A method for selecting a nearby marker for improving accuracy of a genetic test, the method comprising a step of selecting a nearby marker having a linkage disequilibrium relationship with a target marker.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the nearby marker satisfies one or more conditions selected from the group consisting of condition (a) in which a distance from the target marker is 1 b to 500 Kb;condition (b) in which a frequency of alleles is 0.01 to 0.5 in a population to be analyzed;condition (c) in which the number of alleles is two (Di-allele); andcondition (d) in which a calling rate is 50 to 99.99%.
  • 6. (canceled)
  • 7. A method for analyzing a single nucleotide polymorphism imputation, the method comprising steps of: selecting a nearby marker having a linkage disequilibrium relationship with a target marker; andperforming the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation using the target marker and the nearby marker.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the single nucleotide polymorphism imputation is to analyze the target marker two or more times.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the nearby marker satisfies one or more conditions selected from the group consisting of condition (a) in which a distance from the target marker is 1 b to 500 Kb;condition (b) in which a frequency of alleles is 0.01 to 0.5 in a population to be analyzed;condition (c) in which the number of alleles is two (Di-allele); andcondition (d) in which a calling rate is 50 to 99.99%.
  • 10. (canceled)
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10-2019-0175987 Dec 2019 KR national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/KR2020/017383 12/1/2020 WO