Patent Grant
11498731
The invention relates to a tamper-evident closure. Further, the invention relates to a container with such closure and its specific use.
Tamper-evident closures are often used for containers holding pharmaceutical substances.
A safety feature of such closures which sometimes has to be combined with child resistant characteristics is an indication whether the closure has already been opened before. For this purpose, tamper-evident indicators are commonly used. For screw caps, the most common tamper-evident indicator is a ring surrounding the lower end of the cap which is connected to the cap by means of a plurality of frangible bridges. When opening the cap for the first time, the frangible bridges are broken disconnecting the tamper-evident ring from the cap. However, such solution requires an adapted container with protruding parts or a peripheral groove close to the threaded neck.
Another solution for providing the tamper-evident function consists in welding a foil on the upper surface of the opening of the container. When using such solution, it is no longer possible to integrate a desiccant chamber on the closure which projects into the interior of the container.
It is the object of the invention to provide a closure for a container which combines several functionalities. On one hand, it should be tamper-evident. Further, it should be possible to use the closure in such a way that an active material, like a desiccant can be integrated. Finally, it should be possible to add the additional functionality of being child-resistant.
This object is solved by a tamper-evident closure of the features of claim 1, a container with such closure and its special use. Preferred embodiments follow from the dependent claims.
According to the invention, a tamper-evident closure for a container with an outer screw thread opening comprises an outer cap with a first side wall and a first top wall, and an inner cap with a second side wall and a second top wall. The inner cap is coaxially nested within the outer cap and provided with an inner thread to screw the inner cap onto the container. The outer cap and inner cap are provided with cooperating engagement means (first engagement means) which are arranged and shaped such that when opening the closure at least for the first time, the inner cap is rotated by the outer cap upon application on the outer cap of an axial force plus a turning mechanical torque in a first rotational direction. A part of the first top wall is a tamper-evident member which is connected to a surrounding region of the first top wall by a frangible means, and a protruding element is arranged at the first top wall facing the second top wall and/or the second top wall facing the first top wall so as to face the tamper-evident member. In that the protruding element faces the tamper-evident member, the protruding element may be used for breaking the frangible means, particularly by an axial movement of the outer cap relative to the inner cap. Alternatively or in addition thereto, the protruding element may be engaged with the opening formed when the tamper-evident member is removed from the first top wall, thereby serving as the engagement means and allowing for a rotation of the inner cap by the outer when opening the closure. According to a particular embodiment, the protruding element is arranged at least for breaking the frangible means.
The provision of an identification means further supports the customer to become aware that the tamper-evident member has been removed. Such identification means could be, for example, the provision of a protruding element with a different color which serves as a warning signal. Another possible identification means are frangible means which break such that a part of them remain connected to the first top wall and can be easily seen. Another possible identification means are indications provided on the top wall of the tamper-evident member and the surrounding region of the first top wall which supplement each other before the first opening and do no longer supplement each other once the tamper-evident member has been removed. Preferably, at least two indications are provided on the surrounding region of the first top wall. Finally, the protruding element can be provided with a warning symbol and/or text providing the information that the container has been tampered. All the above-described options for an identification means can be combined with each other in any possible ways.
Advantageously, the first top wall and/or the second top wall comprises an indication, more preferably at least two indications, that reveal once the tamper-evident member is removed such that, when the tamper-evident member is no more present, it becomes evident that the closure is no more tamper proof.
Preferably, the indication is present on the surrounding region and becomes visible once the tamper-evident member is removed such that, it becomes evident that a part of the first top wall is missing. For example, the indication can be present both on the outwardly facing surface of the tamper-evident member and the outwardly facing surface of the surrounding region, and supplement in such a way that, once the tamper-evident member is no more present, it becomes evident that a part of the top wall is missing and that the closure is no more tamper proof. In another example, the indication can be a protruding part of the surrounding region, wherein the protruding part is connected to a frangible means and remains once the tamper-evident member is removed. In this manner, it becomes visible that a part of the first top wall has been removed and that the container is no more tamper proof. Preferably, the remaining part of the surrounding region/frangible means protrudes at least 0.5 mm out of the surrounding region and into the opening left once the tamper-evident member has been removed.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the child-resistant and tamper-evident closure further comprises at least one elastic means which is provided between the inner cap and the outer cap, particularly for urging the outer cap away from the inner cap in the axial direction. To put it differently, such elastic means has the function to axially move back the outer cap away from the inner cap once the axial force on the outer cap is removed. In order to open the closure, a complex movement is required starting from the pushing down of the outer cap followed by the rotation of the outer cap while maintaining the force pushing down the outer cap. Thus, the at least one elastic means further contributes to the child resistance of the closure. Further, an inadvertent breaking of the tamper-evident member during shipping and storage can be avoided because the tamper-evident member is urged away from the protruding element.
The at least one elastic means can be a shape-memory resilient element, which is preferably integrally moulded with the outer cap or with the inner cap, preferably with the outer cap. Alternatively, it can be joined to the first or second top wall by bonding or over-moulding. In a particular embodiment, the elastic means can be provided on the protruding part of the inner cap. The protruding part on the inner cap can be provided with at least one blade which deflects when a downward pressure is applied and returns back to its original position by shape memory.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the tamper-evident closure further comprises a child-resistant means, wherein the child-resistant means comprises at least one elastic means which is provided between the outer cap and the inner cap, preferably for biasing the outer cap axially away from the inner cap. Therefore, each time the closure is opened, the user will have to push the outer cap towards the inner cap against the biasing force of the elastic means before the inner cap can be rotated together with the outer cap in the first rotational direction. Such complex movement and the application of a sufficient force to overcome the biasing force of the elastic means provides for a sufficient child-resistance.
In order to open such closure, a complex movement is required. The outer cap has to be pushed down relative to the inner cap before it is possible to unscrew the closure from the container. Such complex movement is child-proof. Further a tamper-evident member forms part of the first top wall which is the top wall of the outer cap. The protruding element arranged at the first top wall facing the second top wall and/or the second top wall facing the first top wall is sized such that the frangible means connecting the tamper-evident member to the surrounding region of the first top wall will be broken upon an axial movement of the outer cap towards the inner cap which is sufficient to bring the cooperating engagement means into an operational position relative to each other. In other words, in order to rotate the inner cap together with the outer cap when unscrewing the closure from a container, the outer cap must be pushed down towards the inner cap over an axial distance which exceeds the axial distance which is required to break the frangible means when first opening the closure.
More particularly, if the tamper-evident member is connected to the surrounding region of the first top wall by frangible means cooperation of engagement means for rotating the inner cap by the outer cap can be prevented. Accordingly, it is impossible to rotate the inner cap without breaking the frangible means.
According to an alternative preferred embodiment of the invention, the tamper-evident closure further comprises a blocking means for fixing the relative axial positions of the outer cap and the inner cap once the tamper-evident member has been removed by pushing the outer cap towards the inner cap. In other words, once the tamper-evident member has been removed before the first opening of the closure, the outer cap is fixed in its relative position with respect to the inner cap so that during the further use of the closure, it is no longer required to carry out a complex movement of pushing down the outer cap before opening the container by means of a rotation of the outer cap in the first rotational direction. Both the repeated opening and closing of the container is achieved by simple rotation of the tamper-evident closure.
The inventive closure is suitable for all types of screw-necked bottles or containers. There are no specific requirements for the shape of the neck of the bottle or container except for the provision of an outer thread.
Further, the inventive closure makes it easily possible to provide a desiccating element at the inner side of the closure, i.e. the surface of the second top wall of the inner cap which faces the interior of the container when the inventive closure is screwed onto a container.
The tamper-evident indication is very easy to notice because it is arranged at the top of the closure. Preferably, the tamper-evident member should have a diameter which is as large as possible. Preferably, the major diameter of the tamper-evident member is at least 60% of the diameter of the outer cap. Alternatively or in addition, the radial width of the surrounding region is at least 5 mm. When opening the closure, the outer cap has to be pushed towards the inner cap. A user who pushes down the outer cap will, under normal circumstances, look onto the top side of the closure so that the tamper-evident member is in a position where it cannot be missed that the closure has been opened before.
Finally, the provision of the tamper-evident member forming part of the first top surface is easier to manufacture. There is no need for a breakable ring which determines, in part, the moulding cycle time which is an important factor for such mass products. Furthermore, breakable rings can be easily broken or damaged when assembling or storing the caps before they will be screwed onto the container.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the closure further comprises second cooperating engagement means, the second engagement means being arranged and shaped such that when closing the closure, the inner cap is rotated by the outer cap upon application of a turning mechanical torque in a second rotational direction on the outer cap. When closing the closure onto the container, no childproof function is required. The second cooperating engagement means makes it possible to easily close the closure after its use because the inner cap is rotated by the outer cap upon application of a turning mechanical torque only and without the need for an axial relative displacement between the outer cap and the inner cap.
According to a first preferred variant, the second cooperating engagement means are arranged between the first sidewall and the second sidewall. According to a second preferred variant, the second cooperating engagement means are arranged between the first top wall and the second top wall and comprise the at least one elastic means. The second variant has the advantage that the overall diameter of the closure can be kept small because the inner diameter of the sidewall of the outer cap can be dimensioned such that it snugly fits over the outer diameter of the sidewall of the inner cap. No engagement means have to be arranged between the sidewalls of the inner cap and the outer cap. A further advantage of this embodiment is that the second cooperating engagement means comprise the at least one elastic means. Thus, the elastic means can have a double function in that they actually urge the outer cap away from the inner cap and, at the same time, form part of the second cooperating engagement means.
According to a preferred embodiment, the second cooperating engagement means arranged between the first top wall and the second top wall comprise a plurality of elastic members in the shape of inclined strips and a plurality of wedge-shaped elements, wherein, when rotating the outer cap in the second rotational direction, the elastic members come into a locking arrangement with the wedge-shaped elements so that the inner cap rotates with the outer cap in the second rotational direction. The wedge-shaped elements have the further advantage that, if the outer cap is rotated in the first rotational direction but without pushing down the outer cap relative to the inner cap, the elastic members slide over the wedge-shaped elements and will generate an audible indication. For the user, the audible indication signals that the outer cap has not been pushed down sufficiently to open the closure. At the same time, the audible indication provides for an additional safety because children who might try to open the closure might be heard by adults who can intervene, and will usually be fascinated by the generated sound so that small children will not have any motivation to operate the container in a different way than that which produces the sound by means of the ratcheting function of the second cooperating engagement means.
Preferably, the elastic members cooperating with the wedge-shaped elements comprise a basis starting at which the elastic members are attached to the first or second top wall, wherein the elastic members extend at the basis generally perpendicularly to the first or second top wall, an inclined portion ending at a second end, a curved transitional portion between the basis and the inclined portion, and, preferably, a reinforcing rib between the first or second top wall close to the basis and the inclined portion. Such elastic member has an increased strength and robustness. Strip-like elastic means which are inclined relative to the wall to which they are attached and which do not have a basis at which they start perpendicularly from the wall to which they are attached usually have a lower stiffness and are more prone to turn over or twist/wring if they are bent an increased number of times. In this case, the closure becomes inoperable because the inner cap can no longer be driven by turning the outer cap when opening. Further, the reinforcing rib acts as a fortification member which further strengthens the elastic members and stabilizes the angular orientation of the strip-like member. It has been found that such a shape does not only provide for an increased strength but also generates a relatively loud clicking noise if a plurality of such elastic members slide over the inclined surfaces of the wedge-shaped members. However, the intensity of the clicking noise can also be increased by other factors like the stiffness of the plastic material and the width and thickness of the elastic means which lead to a higher spring back elasticity of the elastic members. Preferably, the reinforcing ribs follow the curved shape of the elastic members and extend in a curved circumferential direction, i.e. parallel to the sidewall.
Preferably, the first engagement means are arranged between the first top wall and second top wall, respectively. Such arrangement places the engagement means close to the position where a user applies the pushing force for axially displacing the outer cap. As a result, a failsafe operation can be achieved even when using a material for the caps which has a higher resilience or considering fatigue of the material.
Preferably, the tamper-evident member and/or the surrounding region is provided with an opening which is sized to allow the passage of the tip of a finger. Such opening allows the user to conveniently remove the tamper-evident member. More preferably, the opening is provided on the tamper-evident member so that a user can use the tip of the finger inserted into the opening to apply an upwards direction pressure on the tamper-evident member. Alternatively the tamper-evident member is provided with a seizure member to grip the tamper-evident member for removing. For example a tongue, ring or latch, may be provided to grip the tamper-evident member for removing. If the protruding element is not used to separate the tamper-evident member from the surrounding region of the outer cap, the opening or the tongue/latch may also be used for breaking the frangible means. Furthermore, such opening or tongue/latch facilitates the removal of the tamper-evident member before the closure is first opened. In such a way, specific closures can be designed such that the force required for pushing down the outer cap towards the inner cap can be minimized. Such specific closures can be advantageous e.g. for closing a container for medication for arthritic persons.
According to a preferred embodiment, the frangible means comprises frangible bridges between the tamper-evident element and the surrounding region of the first top wall. As an alternative preferred embodiment, the frangible means comprises a continuous or discontinuous weakness of the material between the tamper-evident element and the surrounding region of the first top wall. Both options generate a well-defined strength of the frangible means so that the pushing force required for the first opening of the closure can be adjusted.
According to a preferred embodiment, the first side wall and the second side wall comprise cooperating locking elements to prevent a removal of the outer cap from the inner cap once assembled, the cooperating locking elements preferably being a continuous or discontinuous bead on the inner side of the first side wall of the outer cap and a continuous or discontinuous rib on the outer side of the second side wall of the inner cap. Alternatively, the cooperating locking elements may be formed by the combination of a protrusion on the outer/inner side of the second/first side wall of the inner/outer cap engaging with a corresponding groove on the inner/outer side of the first/second side wall of the outer/inner cap, respectively.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the tamper-evident closure further comprises a means for holding an active material, the active material preferably being a desiccant or oxygen scavenger. The active material can be any substance or a mixture of individual substances able to trap and/or release a gas which can be moisture, oxygen or an odor just to give some examples. Examples of desiccating agents are silica gel, molecular sieve, clay or other zeolites or a mixture thereof. Examples of oxygen scavengers are iron-based oxygen scavengers, organic oxygen scavengers, enzymatic scavengers, unsaturated polymers or a mixture thereof.
Preferably, the means for holding an active material is a chamber. The chamber can be integrally formed with the inner cap.
Alternatively, the means for holding an active material is a receptacle for the attachment of a canister provided on a side of the second top wall opposite to that facing the first top wall. Thus, the canister is attached on that surface of the second top wall which, when the closure is mounted on a container, faces the interior of the container.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the inner cap is provided with a sealing member which, when the closure is screwed onto a container, is arranged to provide a hermetic (moisture tight) seal between the inner cap and the opening of the container. The sealing member can be a gasket arranged to provide a hermetic seal between the inner cap and the upper surface of the sidewall of the container or any other kind of seal that can be integrally molded or assembled. Preferably, the sealing member is a ring-shaped inner sealing skirt which, when the closure is screwed onto a container, is arranged to provide a hermetic seal between the inner cap and the inner circumference of the opening of the container. Preferably, the sealing skirt comprises a slanted sealing surface, more particularly an inwardly slanted external sealing surface. The sealing skirt is preferably provided with an annular protrusion at or close to its distal end. In such a way, the closure prevents the ingress of moisture into the container once the closure has been firmly screwed onto the container. This increases the shelf-life of the content of the container (filled with moisture-sensitive items).
The tamper-evident member can be arranged off-center relative to the first top wall. Such arrangement still makes it possible to provide a clear indication that the closure has been opened before, while leaving sufficient space on the first top wall for other purposes, like the provision of a label.
According to a preferred embodiment, the protruding element is arranged at the second top wall facing the first top wall for breaking the frangible means, and the tamper-evident member and the protruding element have respective shapes and positions to provide a form-fit connection between the surrounding region of the first top wall and the protruding element. In such a way, the protruding element can have a double function in that, when first opening the closure, it breaks the frangible means, and further serves as a drive element to transmit the rotational torque applied to the outer cap to the inner cap. Accordingly, the protruding element and an opening formed by removing the tamper-evident member may be engaged thereby forming the first engagement means. This approach is particularly beneficial in combination with the use of the earlier described elastic member. In this case, the form-fit connection (engagement) between the protruding element and the opening formed by removing the tamper-evident member is only achieved upon application of an axial-force onto the outer cap, whereby the outer cap is moved towards the inner cap against the elastic force of the elastic member. The form-fit connection can be operable by means of a specific geometry not being fully circular and is, in this embodiment, operable in a rotational direction of the protrusion. Alternatively or in addition, the tamper-evident member can be provided in an off-center position in the first top wall as described above which provides for a form-fit operable in the first rotational direction. The latter may provide for the double function described above, even if the geometry of the protruding element is fully circular. In other words, any geometry can be selected to provide the form-fit connection, as long as the tamper-evident member does either not have a circular shape or is not provided in alignment with the center of rotation of the outer cap.
According to another aspect, the side edges of the protruding element or the inner edge of an opening formed when they tamper-evident member is removed may be provided with one or more beveled edge portions and one or more straight edge portions. In particular, the beveled edge portions have a slanted surface slanted relative to the axial direction. The straight edge portions are substantially parallel to the axial direction. Upon rotation of the outer cap in the first rotational direction, a corner edge of the opening or the protruding element slides along the beveled edge portions without transferring the rotational force from the outer cap to the inner cap. The corner edge is sufficiently pressed against the beveled edge portions only upon application of an axial force on the outer cap, whereby the mechanical torque is transferred from the outer cap via the engaged corner edge and beveled edge portions to the inner cap. Accordingly, the inner cap is rotated together with the outer cap by friction forces between the corner edge and the beveled edge portions. In this embodiment, the corner edge and the beveled edge portions being engaged by frictional forces form the first engagement means.
The shape of the protruding member can additionally increase the safety against the opening of the closure by a child. Shapes like a cross or a clover need to be correctly aligned by bringing the outer cap into a correct position relative to the inner cap. In such a way, the required operation for opening the closure becomes even more complex: in a first step, the outer cap has two be rotated relative to the inner cap in order to match the protruding element with the shape of the tamper-evident member. In a second step, the outer cap has to be pushed in an axial direction toward the inner cap. In a third step, the outer cap is rotated and will, by means of the form fit connection, also rotate the inner cap to unscrew the inner cap from the container. Especially the first step might not be possible for a young child even after the child could observe an adult when opening the closure.
A complex shape of the protruding member matching the shape of the tamper-evident member can also be used to represent a symbol or logo.
The protruding element is generally not visible before the first use of the closure. Yet, under certain circumstances, particularly if the outer shape of the protruding element and the tamper-evident member are not fully circular or if the tamper-evident member is arranged off-center relative to the first top wall, it may be required to align the protruding element with the tamper-evident member. This may be perceived difficult if the protruding element and therefore its positional relationship to the tamper-evident member is not visible. This problem may either be overcome by removing the tamper-evident member manually as already disclosed above and only afterwards align the opening formed by removing the tamper-evident member and the protruding element.
Alternatively, however, a landmark or point of reference can be provided to indicate to the user the position of the outer cap relative to the inner cap at which the protruding element and the tamper-evident member are properly aligned to each other. This landmark or point of reference can be visual. For example a window may be provided in the outer cap, such as in the first top wall or in the first side wall. The window can be aligned with a mark provided on the second top wall or the second side wall of the inner cap. In addition or alternatively, the landmark or point of reference can be sensitive and/or audible. As a mere example, a combination of a protrusion and a notch may be provided, which in an aligned position of the outer cap and the inner cap, contact each other or are engaged. The protrusion may be provided at one of the outer cap and the inner cap and the notch may be provided at the other of the inner cap and the outer cap, respectively. Upon a contact (abutment) or engagement, the user receives a sensible (feels a click or resistance) or audible (hears a click) feedback, that the outer cap and the inner cap are now perfectly aligned with respect to the protruding element and the tamper-evident member. According to a preferred embodiment, the landmark or point of reference provided on the outer cap is positioned on the tamper-evident member. Accordingly, once the tamper-evident member is removed, also the landmark or point of reference is removed. In another embodiment, the outer cap can be made of a transparent plastic material which makes it easier for the user to align the shapes and positions of the inner cap and the outer cap.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the protruding element is arranged at the second top wall facing the first top wall for breaking the frangible means and the protruding element is at least partially of a different color than the first top wall. After the first use, when the tamper-evident member has been removed from the first top wall, the user receives an additional visible indication of the prior opening. The different color can also be used for written information like the inscription “opened”. As an alternative, it is also possible to provide the tamper-evident member of a color which is different to that of the remaining part of the first top wall of the outer cap. In such a way, the optical appearance also changes after removal of the tamper-evident member. In this case, the outer cap with its tamper-evident member can be manufactured by bi-injection moulding (two component injection moulding). Yet, a different color in a portion of the inner cap and/or the outer cap can also be obtained by a screen printing (serigraphy), hot image transfer (hot stamping), pad printing (tampography) or hot stamping, etc.
Optionally, the protruding element can comprise written information or symbolics/imagery which may be obtained by using an engraved mould or one of the other possibilities mentioned above with respect to the optical appearance.
Preferably, the closure is made of a plastic material, preferably a polyolefin-based polymer.
The inventive container has the closure as described above fixedly screwed onto an outer screw thread of the container and closing same.
The inventive use of such container is for containing moisture-sensitive items, especially tablets and capsules containing a medical composition, neutraceuticals, herbalism or diagnostic products such as for example test strips.
In the following, specific embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In the following, some preferred embodiments of the invention will be described. Throughout the drawings, the same elements will be denoted by the same reference numerals.
The closure 10 consists of two caps which are nested into each other. In
The first top wall 18 comprises a tamper-evident member 24 and the surrounding region 26. The tamper-evident member 24 is connected to the surrounding region 26 by a frangible means 30. The frangible means can be frangible bridges 30 as shown in the examples of
The geometry of the outer cap 12 as shown in
The inner cap 14 is provided with a sealing skirt 38 which is arranged so that it establishes a sealing contact with the inner wall surface 40 of that part of the container 20 which surrounds the dispensing opening thereof. The sealing skirt 38 can be provided with an annular, outwardly protruding bead (not shown) in order to further improve the sealing capability of the sealing skirt 38.
The inner cap 14 is provided with a second sidewall 42 and a second top wall 44. The top wall 44 is provided with a protrusion 46. In the example according to
The inner cap 14 is further provided with a desiccant chamber 48. It is formed by an annular sidewall 50, also shown in
On the internal side of the first sidewall 16 a radially inwardly extending bead 56 is provided which, in the mounted state of the outer cap 12 on the inner cap 14, forms a positive lock with a radially outwardly extending flange 58 on the second sidewall 42 of the inner cap 14. The bead 56 and the flange 58 cooperate in a way so as to firmly hold the outer cap 12 on the inner cap 14 so that it can no longer be removed from the inner cap 14.
The top view of
Secondly, there are driving members 62 on that side of the first top wall 18 which, in the mounted state, faces the wall 44 of the inner cap 14. Finally, on the side of the first top wall 18 facing the inner cap 14, a plurality of elastic members 60 are provided which are formed integrally with the first top 18.
The inner cap 14 is provided with elements cooperating with the interacting elements 64 and the driving members 62.
In operation, the outer cap 12 and the inner cap 14 nested therein can be rotated together for screwing the closure 10 onto the container 20. The clockwise rotation direction for screwing the closure 10 onto the container brings the blade-like interacting elements 64 in engagement with the beveled or inclined surfaces 68. The beveled or inclined surfaces 68 provide an abutment which interacts with the blade-like interacting elements 64 provided on the internal side of the outer cap 12. This interaction is only possible when closing the closure 10 on the container 20 which is usually in a clockwise direction. When a user rotates the outer cap 12 in a counterclockwise direction in an attempt to open the closure 10, the blade-like interacting elements 64 slip over the beveled inclined surfaces 68. As a result, the rotation of the outer cap 12 will not lead to a corresponding rotation of the inner cap 14. However, it should be apparent that the same basic construction and functionalities can be provided in case that the rotational direction for closing and opening the container should be reversed.
An opening of the closure 10 requires that the driving members 62 of the outer cap 12 are brought in engagement with the serrations 66 of the inner cap 14. This is only possible after the outer cap 12 has been axially displaced towards the inner cap 14 against the retaining force of the elastic members 60. Only after the application of a pushing force onto the top surface of the outer cap 12, the driving members 62 can interact with the serrations 66 so that rotation of the outer cap 12 in a counterclockwise direction will also rotate the inner cap 14 in the same direction.
The elastic members 60 allow the disengagement of the driving members 62 and serrations 66 once the axial pressure on the outer cap 12 is released so that the elastic members 60 return to their relaxed position and displace the outer cap 12 in an axial direction away from the inner cap 14.
As a result, the closing of the closure 10 onto a container is easy to achieve and only requires a simple rotational movement of the outer cap 12, whereas the opening of the closure 10 requires a complex operation starting with an axial displacement of the outer cap 12 towards the inner cap 14 under axial pressure, followed by a rotational movement while maintaining the axial pressure. Such complex operation establishes a highly effective child resistance.
When first using the closure 10, the axial displacement of the outer cap 12 towards the inner cap 14 is used to break the frangible means 30 between the tamper-evident member 24 and the surrounding region 26 of the first top wall 18 of the outer cap 12. Thus, when first pushing down the closure 10, the frangible connections of the tamper-evident member 24 are broken and the tamper-evident member 24 separates from the surrounding region 26 of the first top wall 18.
Alternatively, the tamper-evident member 24 may completely manually be removed including breaking the frangible means. For this purpose, a tongue or latch or an opening in the tamper-evident member 24 may be provided. According to a preferred embodiment, however, the protruding element is used to break the frangible means.
The tamper-evident member 24 can be integrally formed with the first top wall 18 of the outer cap 12. It can be of a different colour and/or material than the surrounding region 26 of the first top wall 18. This can be realized by means of a bi-injection moulding process. It is either possible to first mould the tamper-evident means and then, moulding from the existing mould the surrounding region 26 of the first top wall 18 and the first sidewall 16 of the outer cap 12, or to first mould the outer cap 12 with a hollow space on its top wall and then to mould from the existing mould the tamper-evident member. By using a colour for the tamper-evident member that is different from the colour of the remaining part of the outer cap 12, the tampering becomes more evident.
A preferred solution uses a different colour at least in part for the protrusion 46 of the inner cap 14. After the tamper-evident member 24 has been removed, the different colour of the protrusion 46 can be seen and serves as a clear indication for the tampering.
Preferably, the tamper-evident member 24 is removed after the frangible means has been broken. It can comprise a window allowing the passing of a finger of the user for its easy removal. It can further comprise a seizure member that extends outwardly from the top surface of the tamper-evident member for facilitating its removal before the closure is first opened by the above-described complex operation starting with pushing down the outer cap 12 towards the inner cap 14. In other words, independent of the specific embodiment as described here, the provision of a window for the removal of the tamper-evident member 24 after the frangible means have been broken, or the removal of the tamper-evident member 24 before pushing down the outer cap 12 by means of a seizure member are possible.
In the embodiment as described with reference to
Nevertheless, it can be advantageous to select the shape of the protrusion 46 such that it corresponds to the geometry of the tamper-evident member 24.
Turning now to
The embodiment according to
Throughout the embodiments as described above, the inner cap 14 is provided with the protrusion 46 which can be used to break the frangible means 30 around the tamper-evident member 24 in the first top wall 18 of the outer cap 12. However, it is also possible to provide a protrusion on that side of the tamper-evident member 24 which, before the frangible means 30 has been broken, faces towards the second top wall 44 of the inner cap 14.
Further, the tamper-evident member 24 has already been removed in
The shape of the opening 96 and, hence, the tamper-evident member 24 and of the protruding element 46 shown in
Further, two protrusions 80 as first landmark element and a protrusion 82 as second landmark element are provided at the facing sides of the first top wall 18 and the second top wall 44, respectively.
The remainder of the configuration is similar to the previous embodiments and a detailed description thereof will be omitted.
Before use of the closure 10, the tamper-evident member 24 is fixed via the frangible means 30 to the surrounding region 26 of the outer cap 12 as shown in
In this alignment position as shown in
According to
A further embodiment not shown in the drawings combines the general principles laid down in
A first difference over the geometry of the inner cap as shown e.g. in
A second difference is the shape of the sealing skirt 38′ which distinguishes from the sealing skirt 38 as shown in
A further difference which is independent of the inwardly slanted external sealing surface is a small step in the outer diameter of the inner cap. In other words, the outer surface of the second sidewall 42 comprises a region 42a with a slightly lager outer diameter and a second region 42b in which the outer diameter of the inner cap is slightly smaller. This difference of the outer diameter of the inner cap allows an easy and quick assembly of the inner cap into the outer cap and reduces the reject rate. Since the region 42b with the smaller diameter is closer to the top of the inner cap as compared to the region 42a with a larger diameter, it is easier to center the inner cap for the assembly within the outer cap. If the orientation of the inner cap relative to the outer cap is not perfectly centered, the inner cap will still enter the outer cap and is self-centered therein during assembly. This simplifies a high-speed process of assembly.
A further difference as compared to the previous embodiments is the position of the inclined surfaces 68′ which, in the embodiment according to
Preferably, there are at least 10 inclined surfaces 68′ distributed over the second top wall 44. The advantage of a higher number of inclined surfaces 68′ is that the angle between the step portions of consecutive, wedge-shaped elements with the inclined surfaces 68′ is less than 20°. During the opening and without applying downward pressure on the outer cap, the inclined surfaces cooperate with the elastic members 60 of the outer cap as shown in
During the closing operation, the free end of the elastic members 60 move down the inclined surfaces 68′ and will be stopped at the step portions 69. In this way, the closing can be carried out by a simple rotation of the outer cap without requiring a downward pressure. The height of the step portions 69 is preferably at least 0.8 mm.
Further, in the embodiment according to
Turning now to
In addition to the embodiment as shown in
The major difference between the outer cap as shown in
The elastic member 60 according to the present embodiment has an increased robustness and stiffness as compared to the embodiment as shown in
In
As can be seen from
Preferably, the space between two consecutive elastic means is substantially the same as an elastic means.
t1≤⅔×T
wherein T is the thickness of the top wall 18 of the outer cap. As a specific example, the wall thickness T of the top wall 18 could be 1.2 mm, the thickness t1 at the basis 60a could be 0.8 mm and the thickness t2 at the front end 60b could be 1.2 mm. In general, the thickness t2 of the elastic member 60 at the free end 60b should be about 1 mm.
Further preferred dimensions follow from
W0≤⅔×T
with the thickness T of the top wall 18 of the outer cap (see
Finally, it was found to be advantageous to set the relative dimensions of the width W0 of the reinforcing rib 61 and the width W1 at the basis 60a of the elastic member 60 so that W1<W0.
The above-discussed preferred geometries, and especially
can be independently realized or be realized in any combinations thereof. The positions of the elastic members 60 and the wedge-shaped elements with the inclined surfaces 68′ can be exchanged so that the elastic members are attached to the upper surface of the top wall 44 of the inner cap 14.
No matter how the reinforcing rib 61 is shaped, the outer cap 12 with the elastic members 60 can be demolded without requiring a sliding mold. Nevertheless, due to the change of direction of the elastic members 60, which start from the top wall in a vertical direction and then run in an oblique direction, it is preferable to have a core of the mold that is in two parts for molding the internal surface of the cap. A mould 100 with a first part of the core 110 and a second part of the core 120 is shown in
The outer cap as shown in
In operation, if a user turns the outer cap relative to the inner cap in an opening rotational direction without pushing down the outer cap, there will be an audible indication of the elastic members 60 which ride up the beveled surfaces 68′ and then elastically snap down the step portions 69 of the wedge-shaped elements with the beveled surfaces 68′.
Once the outer cap 12 is sufficiently depressed relative to the inner cap 14, the tamper-evident member 24 will be removed from the outer cap by breaking the frangible means 30 between the top wall 18 of the outer cap 12 and the tamper-evident member 24. When further pushing down the outer cap 12 relative to the inner cap 14, the driving members 62 of the outer cap come into engagement with the serrations 66 of the inner cap so that the closure can be opened.
When closing the closure again, a user turns the outer cap in the opposite direction. The elastic members 60 abut against the step portions 69 of the wedge-shaped elements with the beveled surfaces 68′ so that the inner cap 14 will be rotated together with the outer cap 12. No depression of the outer cap 12 relative to the inner cap 14 is required.
The elastic members 60 have the further function to bias the inner cap 14 and outer cap 12 away from each other in an axial direction so that the tamper-evident member 24 will not be broken without the specific application of a downward pushing force on the outer cap 12 during the first use of the closure.
The embodiments as shown in
The embodiment according to
Both the inner cap 14 and outer cap 12 can be manufactured by means of injection moulding from a suitable plastic material. Examples of polymers usable are polyolefin-based polymers, in particular polyethylene and especially high density polyethylene, as well as polypropylene.
The material of the closure 10 as well as the material of the corresponding container has to be selected according to the specific field of application. The same applies for the use of an active agent for either trapping or releasing a gaseous component. These materials have to be selected according to the use of the container and its closure. Because of their high safety as being childproof combined with a very clear indication which makes any tampering highly evident, the container and closure are advantageously used for storing medical compositions, like tablets or capsules.
The major advantage of the inventive closure is its high versatility. It can be used for all screw-necked bottles or containers. Without any modification to a conventional screw necked bottle or container, it is possible to combine the three functions of being child resistant, tamper-evident and providing active control of the atmosphere in the container.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16305755 | Jun 2016 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2017/065411 | 6/22/2017 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2017/220729 | 12/28/2017 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2867342 | Baars | Jan 1959 | A |
| 3472410 | Turner | Oct 1969 | A |
| 3472420 | Hiatt | Oct 1969 | A |
| 3857505 | Mumford et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3896335 | Bogert | Jul 1975 | A |
| 3918602 | McIntosh | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3942436 | Lupkas | Mar 1976 | A |
| 4011960 | Mauvernay | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4138029 | Mahoney | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4281771 | Siegel | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4371088 | Gach | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4440306 | Van Buskirk | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4501370 | Kelley | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4527701 | Schaubeck | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4588098 | Uzdy | May 1986 | A |
| 4632264 | Evans | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4641759 | Kelley | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4669620 | Coifman | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4673095 | Puresevic | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4723673 | Tartaglia | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4801028 | Puresevic | Jan 1989 | A |
| 5005718 | Buono | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5054633 | Reijenga | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5148931 | Minh | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5176269 | Herman | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5265744 | Duty | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5344035 | Manera | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5381917 | Santagiuliana | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5520296 | Freed | May 1996 | A |
| 5605240 | Guglielmini | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5667085 | Ogden et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5762215 | Ogden | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5960972 | Larguia, Sr. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6029834 | Sanner | Feb 2000 | A |
| 8302792 | Logel et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8499949 | Lahusen | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 9586738 | Herrbach et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9650184 | Fily et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 10625913 | Acevedo | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 20050115968 | Myhre | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050150857 | Brozell | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20060108381 | Hoepner et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20070084735 | Lancesseur et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070108210 | Alvares et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070272646 | Lancesseur et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080251573 | Nobilet et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20100237072 | Ahn | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100288765 | Herrbach | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110062176 | Lourenco et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20150186770 | Arai | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150197366 | Chapin | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20170312174 | Azuma | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180118423 | Bois | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180346211 | Painchaud | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20200385182 | Lebon | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 7414787 | Jul 1988 | AU |
| 201419846 | Mar 2010 | CN |
| 204096281 | Jan 2015 | CN |
| 7441556 | Jun 1976 | DE |
| 0519627 | Dec 1992 | EP |
| 0544381 | Jun 1993 | EP |
| 1483678 | Aug 1977 | GB |
| 2141697 | Jan 1985 | GB |
| 2167050 | May 1986 | GB |
| 2011219110 | Apr 2011 | JP |
| WO 8500344 | Jan 1985 | WO |
| WO8902858 | Apr 1989 | WO |
| WO 9418087 | Aug 1994 | WO |
| WO9928205 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO2005007526 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO2006026836 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO2009138128 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO2011039400 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report with Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Sep. 14, 2017, with respect to International Application No. PCT/EP2017/065411. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the International Searching Authority, dated Dec. 25, 2018, with respect to International Application No. PCT/EP2017/065411. |
| European Search Report of The Hague, dated Sep. 7, 2017, in corresponding parallel EP application No. 17 177 381.5, cited only for references disclosed therein. |
| Official Communication of the EPO, dated Nov. 20, 2018, in corresponding parallel EP application No. 17 177 381.5—PCT/EP2018/0066754. |
| International Search Report with Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Nov. 20, 2018, with respect to International Application No. PCT/EP2018/0066754 claiming priority from EP 17 177 381.5. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190344938 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |
