1. Field of the Invention
The invention is directed to packaging that will provide evidence of tampering to a die fold and sleeve primary package typically associated with chocolate bar products.
2. Description of the Related Art
Various seals and indicia, rupturable upon opening a package, are known in the art.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,874,096 is directed to a sealed packet for confectionery and the like with a reclosable adhesive opening strip. A supplementary strip may be applied to the opening strip, adhesively attached to the packaging and to the opening strip with a different level of adhesiveness, and also provided with pre-cut transverse lines, such that the strip breaks upon opening, which provides evidence of tampering if the opening strip is then reclosed.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,987,850 discloses a process for applying a revenue seal to a cigarette pack, for example. The seal is applied directly to the packaging, applying a laser beam to a smooth coating in the area where the seal is to be applied so that the seal will adhere better to that area. The seal is applied across a dividing line where the package is opened such that the seal will rupture on opening the cigarette pack.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,349,828 B1 is directed to a tamper evident packaging for a wound dressing in which two packaging layers are sealed to each other at their perimeter for example by heat sealing, adhesive sealing, RF sealing, or ultrasonic sealing. The layers may be sheets of medical grade paper, plastic, foil or the like. Within the sealing region on the perimeter are provided perforations in one or both packaging layers such that when the package is opened the layer tears along the perforation, leaving a portion of the layers attached and thus providing evidence that the package has been fully or partly opened.
It is also known to provide a confectionery product with a completely sealed inner wrapper of foil or foil-like material. However, once such a package is opened, it is completely and unattractively torn. The inner wrapper cannot subsequently function as a “plate” for the product, nor can it be neatly and conveniently re-wrapped around the product. Such a package may provide evidence of tampering, but important functionality of the wrapper is lost.
Confectionery products are handled by a large number of people at the point of sale prior to being finally purchased and consumed. This raises a particular concern that these products are more likely to be subjected to tampering. Thus, it is particularly desirable and an object of the invention to provide evidence of tampering to packaging associated with confectionery, such as an inner die fold and sleeve type packaging.
None of the above described prior art describes a tamper evident die fold or tamper evident die-fold-and-sleeve packaging concept
In one aspect, the invention is a tamper evident wrapper having a pattern of folds defining regions and capable of being folded along the folds to enclose a product. At least two of the regions are overlapping and attached to each other at a lap seal region when the wrapper is folded along the folds. At least one of the overlapping regions has a breakaway region such that upon opening the wrapper to access the product, the breakaway region tears away to provide evidence of tampering. Preferably, the breakaway region is defined by perforations (which may be die cut, or formed by some other method).
The inner wrapper may be included in a tamper evident die fold and sleeve primary package for a chocolate bar by taking an inner die fold wrapper substantially as described above and die folding it around the outer surface of a chocolate bar. The chocolate bar and wrapper are then enclosed in a substantially tubular, lap sealed outer sleeve.
An important object of the present invention is to provide a tamper evident die fold wrapper in a die fold and sleeve packaging format. A “die fold” or “die fold wrapper” as used herein, is simply a wrapper which is folded around a product in a mechanical wrapping operation in which a die is used to form the folds in the wrapper, such as by pushing the article and wrapper through the die. A “die-fold-and-sleeve” combination is a well known format in the packaging art comprising a die fold inner wrapper which is usually not sealed and made out of foil or paper laminated foil, and an essentially tubular lap sealed outer wrapper usually made of paper. This packaging format is closely associated in the consumer consciousness with chocolate products in bar form, and provides certain advantages. The outer sleeve bears informational and attractive printing and can be removed from the product by sliding without damaging the inner wrapper. In some cases, the product can be slid back into the outer sleeve. The inner wrapper, which is typically foil or other wrapper material having dead fold properties which permit it to conform to the shape of the piece inside, serves as a “plate” for the product once opened. The inner die fold and outer sleeve are typically folded together and sealed in the same packaging operation. The inner and outer wrapper can be “interlaced,” such that an inner portion of the outer wrapper is within the lap seal region of the inner wrapper and sealed with an adhesive.
As used herein, unless expressly stated otherwise, “inside” and “inner” means closer to the wrapped product and “outer” means toward an exterior surface of the packaging.
A “lap seal” is a seal in which an outside surface of one edge of a wrapper is sealed to the inside edge of an opposing overlapping edge of the wrapper, such that the resulting seal area is flat. This configuration is distinguished from a “fin seal,” in which an inside surface of one edge of the wrapper is sealed to an inside of another edge of the wrapper, leaving a “fin.” In the preferred embodiments herein, both the inner die fold and outer sleeve are lap sealed.
In a popular prior art die fold and sleeve packaging format, the inner die fold is not sealed but is merely wrapped shut. This type of package is relatively easily tampered with by sliding the outer sleeve off the inner die fold and unwrapping the inner die fold. The package can then be re-wrapped without leaving evidence of tampering. One method of making the inner die fold tamper evident would be to seal along the length of the overlapping edges of the die fold. In this case, the package provides evidence of tampering because the inner die fold is torn upon opening. However, tearing the entire inner die fold wrapper detracts from the overall aesthetic appeal of the packaging format, and destroys the “plate” functionality of the inner die fold wrapper.
The invention will be described in connection with preferred embodiments depicted in the Figures. An inner die fold wrapper (6) may be cut from roll stock wrapper material (4). Alternatively, the wrapper (6) could be provided in the form of an individual sheet. In a preferred embodiment, the wrapper (6) is cut from a preprinted roll stock of wrapper material, and the advancement of the roll stock through the cutting apparatus is controlled using print eyes (10, 12) printed on the roll stock, or by mechanical advancement. The sheet is cut at cut off lines (18, 20), which in preferred embodiments form the short sides of the inner die fold wrapper. In a preferred embodiment, the sides of the wrapper parallel to the machine direction are the sides which are ultimately lap sealed. To some extent, the designation of wrapper sides is arbitrary and dependent on the machinery used. Likewise, length and width of the inner die fold are not particularly limited, provided the wrapper can be die folded. Although the embodiment of
Inner wrapper material is preferred to have dead fold properties such that the wrapper folds securely around the object without adhesive. A “dead fold” means a fold which remains in position without sealing. Suitable inner wrapper materials include, without limitation, certain plastics, plastic laminated papers, coated papers, foils, and paper foil laminates. The preferred wrapper materials are soft temper foils or paper foil laminates having a thickness of about 10 to about 20 microns.
The inner wrapper material roll stock advances in a machine direction perpendicular to the cut off lines (18, 20). In registration with the advancement of the roll stock, perforations (14) are die cut on a side of the wrapper forming breakaway regions (22). The edge of the wrapper with the breakaway region is ultimately lap sealed to the opposing edge in the final product configuration. As shown in
Preferably the die cut perforations (14) are in the form of a closed shape, such as a triangle as shown in
Perforation cutting can be by any means known in the art, such as by platen die, rotary die, or a laser cutter. In the presently preferred embodiments, an interchangeable platen die is used.
Hot melt adhesives, which are solid or semisolid at room temperature and flow at elevated temperatures, are widely used in the packaging arts and are particularly preferred in connection with attaching the die cut breakaway region to the overlapping wrapper edge. Cold resin adhesives, which are liquid at room temperature when applied, are also widely used in the packaging industry and might be used in some circumstances. Cold resin adhesives are less preferred as they tend to cure more slowly and are generally used where greater adhesive strength is required. Cold resin adhesive typically requires residence time in a compression device to cure, which renders this type of adhesive less preferred for most applications.
The breakaway region (22) preferably breaks away cleanly along the perforations (14). This requires balancing the adhesive strength of the bond formed between the overlapping edges of the wrapper and the pull out strength of the perforations bounding the breakaway region. One or a plurality of breakaway regions may be employed. It is within the scope of the invention to employ a relatively long bead of adhesive along the length of the lap seal, provided that a breakaway region is defined by perforations. However, the use of an elongated seam in this manner is a less preferred embodiment because the resulting broken away structure is believed to provide a less attractive “plate” for the product.
The inner or outer surface of the inner wrapper and/or outer wrapper may bear printed indicia. The aesthetic appeal of the breakaway region may be enhanced by printing on the inside surface of the inner wrapper. In this manner a communication feature such as a logo or some other interesting design or promotion (e.g. a brand name, advertisement, or contest information) may appear on the breakaway region adhered to the opposite edge of the wrapper after it is torn off from the first edge. It has not generally been the practice in the art to print on an inner die fold sleeve, and of course printing on the breakaway regions as described herein is not known in the art, as the breakaway regions themselves are novel.
The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments is for purposes of illustration only and is not to be considered limiting of the invention, which is defined by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/402,420, filed Aug. 8, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1198288 | Taylor | Sep 1916 | A |
2083158 | Ramsey | Jun 1937 | A |
4093074 | Bielawski | Jun 1978 | A |
4508226 | Davis et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4566627 | Gendron | Jan 1986 | A |
4573634 | Kohler et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4666079 | Bolli et al. | May 1987 | A |
4723701 | Deutschlánder | Feb 1988 | A |
4724997 | Hogenkamp et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4746052 | Schmissrauter | May 1988 | A |
4754914 | Wischusen, III | Jul 1988 | A |
4770338 | Tatusch | Sep 1988 | A |
4850526 | Naef et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4874096 | Tessera-Chiesa | Oct 1989 | A |
4911302 | Butler | Mar 1990 | A |
5042653 | Ems | Aug 1991 | A |
5148970 | Johnston | Sep 1992 | A |
5207374 | Lo Duca | May 1993 | A |
5224779 | Thompson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5265794 | Johnston | Nov 1993 | A |
5366087 | Bane | Nov 1994 | A |
5671882 | Cerwinski et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5987850 | Schoch et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6070790 | Anderson | Jun 2000 | A |
6138905 | Hachenski | Oct 2000 | A |
6349828 | Sessions et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 030 247 | May 1958 | DE |
0 718 209 | Jun 1996 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040115316 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60402420 | Aug 2002 | US |