The present invention relates to locking devices or security seals for locking or sealing items, such as cargo containers or doors or the like, and, more particularly, to a security device that has a tamper evident feature.
It is known in the art to provide a security seal or locking device for locking or sealing an item, such as cargo containers or doors or the like. The locking devices often include a flexible cable or bolt or the like extending from one end of a metallic or plastic locking body, where the cable or bolt or the like may be routed through an opening of the cargo container or door and received into another end of the locking body to substantially seal or secure the locking device to the cargo container or door.
An important feature of such devices is that they should show visible signs of attempts to gain access to the sealed item. Typically, there are two types of seals in general use for this purpose, tamper evident seals and barrier seals. Tamper evident seals perform a similar function to traditional wax seals used to seal confidential documents, as the seal has to be broken to gain access to the item, and once broken clearly shows that that the item is no longer secure. Barrier seals also provide visual evidence of tampering but also provide a degree of physical security, in some cases to a degree of security similar to that of a padlock.
A disadvantage of barrier seals when compared with tamper evident seals is cost. A tamper evident seal can be produced very cheaply and is often a single component plastic device such as a flexible strap with saw-tooth type projections along its length that is looped through the item to be sealed with the free end of the strap inserted into an integral receptacle that allows insertion but not withdrawal. A barrier seal is more expensive not only because of higher cost stronger materials, but also because of increased complexity and the associated increase in the number of components requiring factory assembly.
A typical design of a barrier seal employs a padlock type body incorporating a metal hasp to fasten and secure the item, but instead of a conventional locking mechanism released by a key, a disposable plastic seal incorporating flexible latches is inserted and trapped in the lock body to lock the mechanism that cannot be removed without destroying the seal, thus providing visual evidence of tampering. A disadvantage of this type of seal is the requirement of flexibility to allow the latch barbs to bend without breaking, and the need for the main portion of the seal to be brittle enough to break cleanly when attempts are made to remove it. Because of the requirement for flexibility, it is often easy for a thief to pry this type of seal out of the lock body and reinsert it again leaving little or no visual indication of tamper.
The present invention provides a security seal or locking device that has a lock body (such as a metallic lock body), which receives a locking element or hasp therein to secure the seal to a container or door, with an insertable and breakable and removable seal disposed in the lock body to secure the hasp at the lock body and thus to secure the locking device at the element or container or door to be locked or secured. The present invention provides a locking device that can be used to lock and secure containers, doors, boxes, document cases, wallets and the like, and in particular to airline in-flight cabin carts.
The locking device of the present invention provides a rigid lock body and hasp element, with a latch that engages and secures the hasp element in its closed position. A rigid frangible seal is inserted into the lock body to pivot and lock the latch into a locking position where it engages the hasp element to lock the locking device at a structure. The seal, when so inserted, is secured or locked in the lock body (via a spring loaded or biased latch) and cannot be removed without breaking the seal. The seal includes weakened portions to allow for breaking of the seal into two portions or pieces, which allows for first removal or partial removal of one portion to allow for pivotal movement of the latch to release the hasp, and (when the first portion of the seal has been at least partially removed) allows for removal of the second seal portion, such that the lock body and hasp can be reused with a new seal. The lock body receives and engages the portions of the seal so that, once the seal is broken, such breakage is noticeable and evident to a person viewing the locking device.
The present invention thus overcomes problems with prior art locking devices by providing a disposable seal with at least one non flexible latch engaging element designed to engage with a mating spring loaded movable component or latch within the lock body, which allows the whole seal to be produced in a rigid frangible material. Such rigid construction of the seal and of the lock body and hasp provides the ability to lock or secure the locking device at a structure to physically and mechanically secure the structure.
These and other objects, advantages, purposes and features of the present invention will become apparent upon review of the following specification in conjunction with the drawings.
Referring now to the drawings and the illustrative embodiments depicted therein, a locking device or mechanism or security seal 10 includes a lock body 12 and a hasp 14 (
In the illustrated embodiment, the lock body 12 houses a hasp locking latch 18 and a spring loaded or biased seal latch 20. The hasp locking latch 18 is pivotally mounted at the lock body 12 and pivots about a pivot axis 18a, while the seal latch 20 is also pivotally mounted at the lock body and pivots about a pivot axis 20a. As can be seen with reference to
The latches 18 and 20 pivot about their respective axes 18a, 20a when a seal item or element 22 (
Thus, the seal element 22 (see
Thus, when the seal 22 is inserted into the lock body 12, the seal cannot be removed unless it is first broken. It should also be noted that attempts to pull the hasp out of the body will not cause the hasp locking latch 18 to disengage from the free end 14a of the hasp 14, as disengaging rotation of the latch 18 (e.g., clockwise rotation of latch 18 in
In the illustrated embodiment, the generally planar portion 24 of the seal 22 includes a weakened or perforated portion 24a (weakened via perforations or reduced wall thickness along a line across the generally planar portion) that divides and defines two separable portions 22a, 22b of the seal (with the latch engaging element 28 being part of one seal portion 22a and the latch engaging element 30 being part of the other seal portion 22b). The base portion 26 also includes a weakened portion or slot or perforation 26a to facilitate breaking of the seal 22 into the two portions 22a, 22b.
Thus, in order to remove the seal 22 from the lock body 12, the seal portion 22a of the seal is pulled away from the lock body causing the weakened region or points indicated at 24a to fracture cleanly. The seal may be fractured or broken by a user pressing an exposed portion or tab 24b (which may protrude through an aperture in the locking body as can be seen in
After the weakened portions are broken, the seal portion 22a may be removed totally from the lock body, or at least far enough for element 28 to move out from the lock body to disengage from the portion 18b of the hasp locking latch 18. For example, the seal portion 22a may be twisted so the portion of the seal portion 22a along the weakened region is between the portion 22b and the interior surface 12f of the lock body at least until the element 28 is moved downward past the latch 18. If it is desired to fully remove the seal portion 22a before removal of the seal portion 22b, the dimensions of the lock body cavity and seal portions may be designed to provide a retraction path of the seal portion 22a out of the lock body after the weakened portions have been broken.
When the seal portion 22a is moved sufficiently outward from the lock body, the portion 18b can be pivoted or moved to pivot the latch 18 to disengage the portion 18c of the latch from the hasp and to move the portion 18b of the latch away from the latch engaging element 30 of the seal. When the portion 18b of the latch 18 is moved away from the latch engaging element 30, the latch engaging element 30 of the seal 22 (along with the rest of the second seal portion 22b) is free to move relative to the lock body 12 (such as in the direction of arrow ‘A’ in
Optionally, and desirably, the locking device includes a tamper evident feature that makes it so that a person viewing the locking device can readily determine that the seal has been fractured (even though the seal, in use, would be substantially within a housing of the locking device and not viewable). For example, and with reference to
During use, the locking device may (in its open state) be positioned at a structure to be secured, and the free end of the hasp may be inserted through the structure and inserted into the receiving portion 12a of the lock body. The hasp may be pressed into the lock body to the closed state, and the seal may then be inserted into the aperture at the base of the lock body. When the seal is inserted into the lock body, the seal element or tab 28 engages the latch 18 to pivot the latch to engage and secure the hasp in the closed position, while the seal element or tab 30 engages the latch 20 to pivot the latch during insertion of the seal, whereby the latch 20, when the seal is fully inserted, pivots back to its initial position to lock the seal in the lock body. Also, when the seal is fully inserted into the slots of the lock body, the base 26 of the seal nests in a receiving portion at the bottom of the lock body that is partially circumscribed or formed by a wall 12h of the lock body. Although the locking device is illustrated with the seal exposed (in
If the locking device is tampered with, the seal will break along the frangible portion(s), whereby one seal portion is movable or retractable to allow for pivoting of the hasp locking latch 18 to disengage or unlock the hasp. When the one seal portion is sufficiently moved, the other seal portion can be moved to disengage the seal latch 20 to allow for removal of the other seal portion from the lock body. If a person tries to reassemble the seal after breaking it, the lock body includes means for misaligning the seal portions after they are broken apart, such that any tampering with the locking device is readily apparent or evident.
Therefore, the present invention provides a locking device that includes a rigid padlock type locking body (such as a metallic locking body or other rigid material) and a rigid hasp (such as a metallic hasp or other rigid material) that is locked at the locking body via a pivotable rigid latch (such as a metallic latch or other rigid material). The locking device includes a one piece seal produced of a rigid material (such as a frangible rigid material, such as an engineered plastic or the like) that incorporates at least one non-flexible latch engaging element that is configured to engage with a spring loaded latch within the padlock type body.
Thus, when the seal is inserted into the lock body, the seal cannot be removed without first breaking the seal. The seal includes one or more frangible or weakened or perforated regions or points separating two parts of the seal, with one part remaining in place (and secured in place) in the locking body until the other is removed or partially removed. The rigid latch within the lock body engages and entraps the hasp when the seal is inserted and cannot release from the hatch until the seal has been broken and a portion of the seal at least partially removed from the lock body. An element forming part of the seal prevents the hasp entrapping latch from movement until at least one portion of the seal is removed or partially removed. Another element also precludes alignment of the seal portions (once broken) so that any tampering or breaking of the seal element is readily visible.
Changes and modifications to the specifically described embodiments may be carried out without departing from the principles of the present invention, which is intended to be limited only by the scope of the appended claims as interpreted according to the principles of patent law.
The present application claims the filing benefits of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 62/429,204, filed Dec. 2, 2016, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
98917 | Brooks | Jan 1870 | A |
344049 | Kirby | Jun 1886 | A |
421966 | Peacock | Feb 1890 | A |
549951 | Belanger | Nov 1895 | A |
816492 | Mohr | Mar 1906 | A |
1948255 | Brooks | Feb 1934 | A |
2160294 | Soref | May 1939 | A |
2683979 | Stageberg | Jul 1954 | A |
3591223 | Castro Neto | Jul 1971 | A |
3770307 | Van Gompel | Nov 1973 | A |
3984081 | Hoganson | Oct 1976 | A |
3994521 | Van Gompel | Nov 1976 | A |
4049303 | Irwin et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4057982 | Drayton | Nov 1977 | A |
4074916 | Schindler | Feb 1978 | A |
4141117 | Van Gompel | Feb 1979 | A |
4216568 | Anderson | Aug 1980 | A |
4280726 | McCoag | Jul 1981 | A |
4342477 | McClure | Aug 1982 | A |
4358944 | Stoffel | Nov 1982 | A |
4416478 | Canney | Nov 1983 | A |
4500124 | Swift | Feb 1985 | A |
4512599 | De Lima Castro Netto | Apr 1985 | A |
4640538 | Brammall | Feb 1987 | A |
4681356 | Brammall | Jul 1987 | A |
4747631 | Loynes et al. | May 1988 | A |
4775175 | Swift | Oct 1988 | A |
4793644 | Swift | Dec 1988 | A |
4883295 | Kesselman | Nov 1989 | A |
4893853 | Guiler | Jan 1990 | A |
4909552 | Weber et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
5092641 | Penick, Jr. | Mar 1992 | A |
5127687 | Guiler | Jul 1992 | A |
5147145 | Facey et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5170537 | Sperling | Dec 1992 | A |
5222776 | Georgopoulos et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230541 | Nowak | Jul 1993 | A |
5303567 | Nava | Apr 1994 | A |
5306054 | Georgopoulos | Apr 1994 | A |
5352003 | Bystry | Oct 1994 | A |
5359870 | Ruetlinger | Nov 1994 | A |
5538300 | Brown | Jul 1996 | A |
5582447 | Leon et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5611583 | Bystry et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5647620 | Kuenzel | Jul 1997 | A |
5743574 | Kohn | Apr 1998 | A |
5820176 | Leon et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6089056 | Yoda et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6131969 | Natkins | Oct 2000 | A |
6155617 | Kuenzel | Dec 2000 | A |
6199413 | McDaid et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6345847 | Dreisbach et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360411 | Bortz | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6398273 | Aichmann | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6457754 | Bystry et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6494508 | Dreisbach et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6540273 | Brammall et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6550830 | Kuenzel | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6578886 | Bystry et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578887 | Kienzler | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6581292 | Allis | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6719335 | Velschou et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7073358 | Lee | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7073828 | Foigel et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7118144 | Anderson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7278665 | Rogatnev | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7370892 | Collingham | May 2008 | B2 |
7472933 | Weedon et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7478847 | Kleynerman et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7641062 | Arakawa | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7988209 | Hudson | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8052180 | Lassen | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8327674 | Valerio | Dec 2012 | B2 |
9558682 | Dreisbach et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9688440 | Blonden | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20050230981 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060117816 | Lee | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060202489 | Collingham et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070262594 | Hudson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20110012377 | Simes et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20130200637 | Dreisbach et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202509902 | Oct 2012 | CN |
203531545 | Apr 2014 | CN |
20314436 | Nov 2003 | DE |
1967759 | Sep 2008 | EP |
WO2015133886 | Sep 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 6, 2018, from corresponding PCT application No. PCT/IB2017/057573. |
Extended European Search Report and Opinion dated May 18, 2020 from corresponding EP Application No. 17875767.0. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180155083 A1 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62429204 | Dec 2016 | US |