Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
This invention relates generally to plastic food containers. The invention is more specifically related to resealable plastic food containers having tamper evident sealing mechanisms.
It is known to use plastic containers in the food preparation and restaurant industry to package prepared foods. The typical food container of the prior art consists of a clear or solid colored base and a clear lid. In order to maintain the quality of food contents and prevent tampering with the contents of a sealed container, it is desirable that the food container, once initially sealed, not be capable of being initially opened without visible indication of the container having been opened. To achieve this feature, container manufacturers have designed containers having integral tamper evident features. Typically, these containers consist of a lid that is hingedly attached to a base. The lid seals to the base by superposing the rim of the lid upon the rim of the base. These types of plastic containers are sold as one-piece containers and are often referred to as “clamshell” containers or packages.
In one type of hinged tamper evident container the lid and base each have interlocking elements respectively located on or near the lid rim and base rim where the two rims meet when the container is sealed (i.e., at a non-hinged side or portion of the container). The interlocking element of the lid or base is conventionally located on a tab or flange extending from the rim of the lid or base. Either or both of the tabs are attached to their respective rims by a frangible section of plastic. When the lid and base are placed in initial sealing arrangement, the interlocking elements on or near the lid rim and base rim engage and lock together. In order to open the initially sealed container, the frangible section of one or both tabs must be ruptured so as to release the tab or tabs from the container. Because the interlocking sealing elements are located on the tabs, rupturing one or more tabs from the container disables the locking mechanism. The ruptured tab provides evidence of the container having been opened.
One shortcoming with the prior art food container described above is that the interlocked tabs can be cut from the container in clean fashion using scissors or another cutting implement so as to remove any indicia of the container having had a tamper evident mechanism.
In view of the issues presented by incorporating a tamper evident mechanism in the meeting rims of the hinged container, some manufacturers have incorporated tamper evident features as part of the structure that forms or includes the hinge. In these containers, the container is designed to require a severance near the hinge in order to unseal (initially open) the container. This construct make the hinge a single use hinge. These containers typically employ a square-shaped hinge arrangement (as seen from the side when the container is closed) in which the flange of the lid rim extends beyond the lid rim and then near-perpendicularly connects to a vertical segment that descends down from the lid flange. The vertical segment meets an extended portion of the base flange in similar near-perpendicular arrangement. The two flanges generally run parallel to each other and by their connection to the vertical segment form three sides of a square.
One example of a container with a square-shaped tamper evident hinge structure is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 7,073,680 (Boback, et al.). As can be seen in this patent, at the container's hinge area, the flange of the lid rim is vertically spaced above the flange of the base rim. A span of material (equal to the vertical spacing) adjoins to and descends from one end to the flange of the lid rim. The other end of the span of material adjoins to and ascends from the flange of the base rim. The span of material thus forms a strip of material connecting the lid rim flange and the base rim flange and operates to form hinge structure for the container. The lines of connection between the strip and the flanges are scored or include serial perforations such that the strip is a frangible section that can be torn away from the container after it is first sealed. With this type of tamper evident arrangement, one is left with a separate tear strip that must be disposed of and likely will not be recycled with the bulk of the container.
Another example of a clamshell container utilizing a square-shaped tamper evident hinge formation is shown in U.S. Published Patent Application No. 20120181280 (Barbier, et al). This reference discloses a hinge structure that is adapted to break by application of a squeeze force that causes the relative movement of two-adjacent sides (the top flange and the vertical span of material) that form the hinge arrangement.
Square-shaped hinge containers suffer from a variety of deficits. One is a tendency of the container not to remain fully open for purposes of filling the container. The memory of the square hinge mechanism is such that the lid tends to flop over and cover all or part of the base. Another deficit, at least as far as the Barbier container is concerned, is that the squeezing action required must move two adjacent, near perpendicular sides of the hinge structure and therefore the entire hinge structure must be effectively crushed in order to break the frangible line located at the bottom outside corner of the hinge structure. Thus, as is seen from the drawings in that published application, in order to rupture the frangible line, a squeezing force is applied to the entire box structure of the hinge area. This extended crushing motion may require the container to be stabilized with one's other hand in order to entirely rupture the frangible section. There is thus a need in the art for a re-closable plastic food container that is easy for end consumers to operate; combines reliable tamper evidence and defense against prying intrusion; and that uses a minimum of material to manufacture.
The present invention satisfies the needs in the art and provides an aesthetically appealing food container that is tamper resistant, tamper evident and easy to use. In this respect the present invention food container comprises a plastic food container that, when viewed from the left or right side, hinges about a frangible vertex instead of hinging about a square-shaped structure. Unlike in the case of containers with square-shaped hinge structures, the frangible vertex projects peripherally out from the container in horizontal alignment with the flanges of the lid rim and base rim. Hence, rather than crushing upon itself, the hinge-forming structure moves through empty space when pinched. When viewing the closed container from the rear side aspect (facing the hinge), the hinge is a scored, thinned or perforated line that represents the point where structure projecting from the lid and base flanges meet to form the hinge. Thus, as opposed to the prior art containers with square-shaped hinge structures, the container of the instant invention eliminates the vertical span at the hinge end by having the structures that extend from the flanges converge to form a hinge vertex.
There are several embodiments to the invention, which are broadly described in this summary section and more specifically described in the detailed description of the invention. In all embodiments the invention is directed to a tamper evident container having a lid and base hingedly attached to each other and capable of assuming an open arrangement, an initially sealed arrangement and an unsealed (opened) arrangement. The lid includes a cover surface and a lid rim. The inventive container includes a frangible hinge. The hinge is formed between a top pinch segment that peripherally projects from the lid rim flange and a bottom pinch segment that peripherally projects from the base rim flange. The frangible hinge is configured to rupture when the container is in the initially sealed arrangement by the application of a pinching force to the top pinch segment and bottom pinch segment that results in the relative vertical movement of the segments toward each other. In an alternate embodiment, the lid rim also includes a lid rim bead that includes an outer wall. The base of the alternate embodiment container includes a base rim that includes a base rim bead. The base rim bead includes an undercut inner wall that is configured to receive and frictionally engage the outer wall of the lid rim bead when the container is closed, whether in the initially sealed arrangement or when re-closed after opening.
In another embodiment the frangible hinge of the inventive container is connected to a top pinch segment that peripherally projects from the lid rim flange and a bottom pinch segment that peripherally projects from the base rim flange. When the container is in the initially sealed arrangement the top pinch segment and the bottom pinch segment have a vertical separation distance between them that extends between a first point on the top pinch segment and a second point on the bottom pinch segment. The frangible hinge is configured to rupture when the vertical separation distance is reduced which can occur by virtue of a pinching force applied to both pinch segments.
In another embodiment the frangible hinge of the inventive container is connected to a top pinch segment that peripherally projects from the lid rim flange and a bottom pinch segment that peripherally projects from the base rim flange. The top pinch segment includes a top vertex-forming segment and the bottom pinch segment includes a bottom vertex-forming segment. In the initially sealed configuration, the top vertex-forming segment and the bottom vertex-forming segment converge to form a vertex at their meeting point. The vertex is the container's hinge. As is further described herein, the top pinch segment may include a top pinch bead and the bottom pinch segment may include a bottom pinch bead. The pinch beads provide added rigidity to the pinch segments, which enhances the frangibility of the vertex hinge. Additionally, the pinch beads allow for more vertical movement during application of a pinching force, thus serving to ensure rupture of the frangible line. Also, the pinch beads designate a location at which a user can position his or her fingers to apply pinch force.
As shown in the figures, lid 2 and base 3 respectively include lid rim 4 and a base rim 5. Lid rim 4 includes peripherally projecting lid rim flange 9. Base rim 5 similarly includes base rim flange 10. Unlike other tamper evident containers that use a square-shaped, multi-segmented hinge structure, hinge 6 of the present invention container is confined to a vertex 30 that is vertically situated at a position interposed between the height of the lid rim flange and the height of the base rim flange. (In the case of the Boback container, the frangible lines are at the same height as the flange structures emanating from the rims. In the Barbier container, the frangible line is actually below the height of the flange structure emanating from the base rim.) Further, as can be particularly seen in
As shown in the figures, preferred embodiment container 1 is capable of assuming an open arrangement (
As is best shown in
Hinge 6 is formed between top pinch segment 7 that peripherally projects from lid rim flange 9 and bottom pinch segment 8 that peripherally projects from base rim flange 10. Frangible hinge 6 is configured to rupture when container 1 is in the first sealed arrangement by the application of a pinching force to top pinch segment 7 and bottom pinch segment 8 that results in the relative vertical movement of segments 7, 8 toward each other. The action of the hinge and container-opening technique is best seen in
Hinge 6 is frangible and its length can be seen best in
The geometric relationship of the hinge area structures and the action of opening the container can be described in more particular fashion. As shown best in
In the preferred embodiment, top pinch segment 7 includes a top vertex-forming segment 40 and bottom pinch segment 8 includes bottom vertex-forming segment 41. Hinge 6 is thus a vertex formed by the convergence of top hinge point-forming segment 40 and bottom hinge point-forming segment 41. In an alternate embodiment, either or both of lid rim 3 and base rim 4 could lack their respective flanges 9, 10 around the sides and front of container 1, in which case pinch segments 7, 8 would respectively connect to lid rim 3 and base rim 4 at the rear (hinge area) of the container.
As best shown in
In a preferred embodiment top finger rest segment 45 is substantially perpendicular (80-100 degrees) to first sidewall 43 of top pinch bead 42. It is also preferable that bottom finger rest segment 49 be substantially perpendicular to first sidewall 47 of the bottom pinch bead 46. As shown in the figures, second sidewall 44 and top finger rest segment 45 include a textured surface or knurling 67 so as to enhance purchase on top pinch segment 7 during pinching action. Additionally, as best seen in
Top pinch segment 7 further preferably includes transition segment 50 that extends between top pinch bead 42 and lid rim flange 9. More optimally, top pinch segment 7 includes a transition segment 50 that extends between second sidewall 44 of the shown embodiment top pinch bead 42 and lid rim flange 9. For optimal operation of the hinge breaking mechanism, bottom pinch segment 8 may also include a transition segment 51 that extends between bottom pinch bead 46 and base rim flange 10. In the particular embodiment shown, bottom pinch segment 8 includes a transition segment 51 that extends between second sidewall 48 of bottom pinch bead 46 and base rim flange 10. Top segment finger rest 45 is preferably longer than either first sidewall 43 or second sidewall 44 of top pinch bead 42.
To thwart prying into the container without rupturing hinge 6, base rim 5 may include rim bead 11 described above and shown in
As shown by the figures, the container can be polygonal with beveled corners at its floor. The inclusion of beveled corners also enhances the security of the container by reducing the chance of the container cracking open or developing holes should it be dropped. In this particular version container 1 has a base 3 that comprises floor 26 and a plurality of sidewalls 27. Each sidewall 27 has a top 28 and bottom 29. The bottom 29 of each sidewall 27 is connected to floor 26. The plurality of sidewalls 27 form a polygon in which each sidewall 27 extends between and connects to two other sidewalls 27. Each connection between sidewalls 27 forms a corner 32. Each corner 32 includes a bevel 64 that is connected to floor 26 and the sidewalls 27 that form that corner 32. In the shown embodiment, container 1 can include flutes 65 on sidewall 27 that add strength to the container and define the width of bevel 64.
A container constructed in accordance with the present invention can be manufactured in a variety of shapes and sizes, and is preferably formed of resins or plastic materials including, but not limited to, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride or polyethylene terephthalate (“PET”). The container is preferably thermoformed, but can be blow-molded or injection molded. The container lid and base can be transparent or translucent, and may be colored in either instance. Further, the container is preferably polygonal so as to include the described bevels 64, but can be of any shape.
Having described the invention in detail, those skilled in the art will appreciate that modifications may be made of the invention without departing from its spirit. Therefore, it is not intended that the scope of the invention be limited to the specific embodiment illustrated and described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2915214 | Frankel | Dec 1959 | A |
4218808 | Chu | Aug 1980 | A |
4273249 | Florian | Jun 1981 | A |
5242696 | McDevitt | Sep 1993 | A |
5897011 | Brilliant | Apr 1999 | A |
6135304 | Wyslotsky | Oct 2000 | A |
6572909 | Bagwell et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
7073680 | Boback et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7118003 | Sellari et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7246714 | Garg et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
D587993 | Vovan | Mar 2009 | S |
7568589 | Vovan | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7631776 | Vovan | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7685677 | Garg et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7712626 | Vovan | May 2010 | B2 |
7992743 | Vovan | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8056750 | Vovan | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8083089 | Vovan | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8123064 | Vovan | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8251249 | Vovan | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8371468 | Sellari et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
D693672 | Bontrager et al. | Nov 2013 | S |
8608008 | Gingras et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
D698241 | Fosse | Jan 2014 | S |
8672166 | Nazareth et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8757416 | Golota | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8795580 | Sellari et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8833589 | Vovan | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8851315 | Vovan | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8939307 | Gingras | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9016503 | Barbier | Apr 2015 | B2 |
20040118848 | Marshall | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070045317 | Rosender | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080023471 | Garg et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080308557 | Kyle et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090090712 | Vovan et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100072217 | Parikh et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100102074 | Parikh | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100181323 | Thaler | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110000929 | Brown et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120067009 | Bontrager et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120181280 | Barbier | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20130175280 | Stodd | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140069922 | Boback et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2005056414 | Jun 2005 | AU |
WO2006119538 | Nov 2006 | AU |
1695919 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2210819 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2580138 | Apr 2014 | EP |
WO03022703 | Mar 2003 | GB |
WO2005009857 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO2008008343 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/788,024, filed Jun. 30, 2015. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/788,054, filed Jun. 30, 2015. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/536,250, filed Aug. 14, 2015. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 14/869,135, filed Sep. 29, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170001775 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |