Field of the Invention
This invention is directed to a tamper evident shield assembly for the port of a container such as, but not limited to, an intravenous (IV) bag or container, a medicine vial or another type of container that will typically be, but does not necessarily have to be, related to medicine. The inventive tamper evident shield assembly includes a housing that has a hollow interior as well as movably connected first and second housing segments that are selectively disposed from an open orientation and into a closed orientation. Additionally, a lock assembly is disposed on an exterior of the housing and operates to maintain the first and second housing segments in the closed orientation. The inventive tamper evident shield assembly also includes a frangible structure which, along with other structure, serves to assist with providing an indication as to if and when the inventive shield assembly has been tampered with.
Description of the Related Art
In medical care facilities across this country and in other countries, it is common practice for medical doctors and other authorized medical personnel to order that a patient be given a drug or medication orally, as well as by injection and by intravenous (IV) administration. As just one example of how common this is, it is currently estimated that more than 16 billion injections are administered on a worldwide basis in any given year.
Also, and as the costs of many new and other drugs can be quite expensive, it is becoming relatively common in hospital settings for a number of syringes and other types of medical containers to be pre-loaded or filled by a pharmacist, or other authorized personnel within a hospital or similar facility, at an appropriate location for subsequent dispensing to one or more patients. The pharmacy or other location where syringes and other types of medical containers are filled can and often will be located in a remote part of the hospital, relative to the patient care area where the medicine is to be administered. In some cases, the pre-loading of syringes and other medical containers occurs in another building or facility entirely, often referred to as “third party pharmacies.” This may even be a growing trend among hospitals to limit certain costs. Regardless, pre-loaded syringes and other medical containers can be delivered to a large number of nurse's stations in multiple hospital or medical buildings. Because many nurse's stations are typically remotely located from the pharmacy or other station that pre-loads syringes and the like with drugs, these are quite often given to another person for delivery to a nurse's station, for subsequent dosing of the patient by qualified personnel. From the foregoing, it may be understood that during the course of loading a syringe or other medical container with a drug, and delivering it to a nurse's station or to a patient, numerous personnel can easily be involved with the handling of the device and the drug inside.
Moreover, and especially in the case of a very expensive drug or an addictive drug that has been prescribed for a patient, such as morphine, there is some danger that a pre-loaded syringe or other medical container will be tampered with at some point by a person seeking to improperly gain access to the drug. This possibility can present real danger when an unauthorized person gains access to the contents of a pre-loaded syringe or other medical container. By way of examples only, the sterility of the syringe or medical container and/or its contents can become contaminated, or another possible outcome could involve the inappropriate substitution of some other, unauthorized substance in the syringe or other medical container, such as if saline solution were substituted for a dose of morphine. Thus, there is a problem of determining if a sealed, preloaded syringe or medication container has, or has not, been tampered with or has otherwise been exposed to contamination. These and related types of problems have been described in one or more of the present inventor's own previously granted U.S. patents, such as U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,348,895 and 8,591,462, both of which are incorporated herein by reference, as well as in other parties' patents, such as U.S. Pat. No. 5,328,474 to Raines.
However, certain problems remain in this particular field of art, despite the introduction of inventive products previously, such as those represented in the present inventor's own U.S. patents. For example, one problem relates to the ability to manufacture tamper evident devices in a manner that is both relatively easy and inexpensive, while another problem relates to the manner in which such tamper evident devices are assembled and placed on a syringe that has been pre-loaded with a drug, or on another device carrying a substance used to treat patients, such as an intravenous (IV) bag or medicine vial. Yet additional problems relate to the maintenance of sterility of such pre-loaded syringes and other medical containers during filling and storage at the manufacturing facility and during transport to and throughout the various hospital and medical buildings where they will be used. Accordingly, the present invention seeks to address such problems associated with the handling of tamper evident devices, whether as end caps or other closures that are used with syringes or as yet other containers associated with the storage and/or administering of medicine, and to address such problems regardless of whether they arise at the stage of manufacture, assembly, the loading of a drug or medicine, or further downstream, such as during their transport, storage or administration of same.
Therefore, there is a need for an improved, tamper evident device which is capable of being used with standard or conventional pre-loaded syringes, whether for administration of a drug orally or by injection, and with other medication administering or storing containers, in a manner which overcomes the problems and disadvantages that remain in this field of art, such as those referred to above. If any such improved tamper evident device were developed, it would preferably have appropriate and advantageous structural and operative features, and might include, but not be limited to, having an integral or one piece construction which facilitates a suitable interconnection with or mounting on a preloaded syringe or other container for medicine.
In addition, if any such improved tamper evident device were developed, it would preferably be structured to provide a clear and unmistakable indication of tampering or an attempt to gain access to the contents of the pre-loaded syringe or other container of medicine. Further, the structuring of any such tamper evident device, if one were developed, should be such as to prevent the opening thereof in order to provide access without requiring the complete or partial destruction of the tamper evident device, so that as a result, such structural damage to the device would be clear evidence of an attempted tampering. Finally, if any such improved tamper evident device were developed, it should also be structurally and operatively reliable, while being capable of being quickly and easily mounted in a protective position relative to the port, closure or syringe cap, etc. associated with the medication storage or administering container, in order to facilitate widespread use and acceptance throughout the medical field.
The present invention is intended to present a solution to these and other needs which remain in the relevant field of art, and as such, is directed to a shield assembly for a port or closure associated with any one of a variety of different containers specifically including, but not limited to, medical containers such as a medication vial, an Intra-Venous (IV) bag or container, an oral syringe, an injection syringe, and the like.
More specifically, the shield assembly of the present invention includes a housing having a hollow interior and additionally, comprises a first housing segment and a second housing segment which are either hingedly or otherwise movably connected to one another. As such, the first and second housing segments are collectively and relatively disposable into either an open orientation or a closed orientation. Moreover, the boundaries and/or dimensional parameters of the housing's aforementioned hollow interior is effectively determined when the housing is disposed in the closed orientation. In addition, the first and second housing segments are cooperatively dimensioned and configured to include a cooperative overall structure that define a dimension of the hollow interior of the housing which is sufficient to enclose the port or closure of the medical or other appropriate container. As explained in greater detail hereinafter, the dimension and configuration of the hollow interior of the housing may at least partially correspond to that of the closure/port of the container, if not substantially correspond thereto, so that access to the closure/port is restricted. However, and as will also be described in greater detail herein, the inventive shield assembly will ideally also include a tamper evident structure to readily signal when an unauthorized person has attempted to access or might have gained access to the port or closure, and it follows, to the contents of the medical or other container.
Therefore, additional structural and operative features of the shield assembly of the present invention include a lock assembly connected to the housing, and in the illustrated embodiments, to each of the first and second housing segments. For example, and in at least one preferred embodiment, the lock assembly includes a male member and a female member, each connected to and movable with a different one of the first and second housing segments. Further, the male and female members are cooperatively dimensioned and configured to assume an interlocking engagement with one another, when in a locked position. Accordingly, the female member of the lock assembly includes an opening through which the male member passes as it is disposed into and out of a locked position and an unlocked position. Additionally, relatively close dimensional tolerances exist between the outer surface(s) of the male member and the interior periphery of the opening of the female member. As a result, when in the locked position, the male member effectively “fills” or closes the opening of the female member. This corresponding, relatively close dimensional tolerance will prevent or at least restrict the successful application of a tool or instrument by an unauthorized person to the lock assembly, in an attempt to access the port/closure and the contents of the container, without an indication of tampering.
Accordingly, another preferred feature of the shield assembly of the present invention is the provision of a tamper evident structure. In the more preferred embodiments, the tamper evident structure comprises a frangible structure connected to the housing, and more specifically, to the aforementioned lock assembly. As such, the structural and operative features of the frangible structure will provide a clear indication of tampering when access to the port/closure and contents of the associated container is attempted or accomplished. In more specific terms, the frangible structure preferably comprises at least one, but in some embodiments a plurality of frangible members. The one or more frangible members are disposed immediately adjacent and/or are formed to be contiguous to the inner periphery of the opening of the female lock member. Due to the close tolerances between the male and female lock members, as set forth above, passage of the male member through the opening of the female lock member will result in movable engagement or contact between the male member and the one or more frangible members surrounding and/or defining the periphery of the opening in the female lock member.
Additionally, the one or more frangible members are preferably flexibly attached to the female lock member in order to accommodate such relative movement and/or movable engagement between the male member and the frangible structure. As a result, the flexible structuring of the one or more frangible members facilitates the passage of the male member through the opening of the female member and into the locked position, upon being moved from the unlocked position, without structurally affecting or compromising the frangible members. Yet another preferred feature of the present invention includes a restrictor disposed on the female lock member immediately adjacent to and/or in movement restricting relation with the frangible structure. As such, passage of the male member through the opening of the female member, when moving from an unlocked position into a locked position, will limit the movement or flexure of the one or more frangible members as the frangible structure comes into movable contact or engagement with the male member. This restriction of the movement or the flexure of the one or more frangible members will prevent detachment thereof from the female lock member, as the male member passes through the opening from an unlocked position to a locked position.
In contrast, when the male member is moving from the locked position and into the unlocked position, the relative dimensions, configurations and overall structures of the male lock member and female lock member results in an abutting engagement of the male lock member with the one or more frangible members. As such, when a person attempts to remove the inventive shield assembly so as to access the port or closure of the medical container, this abutting engagement will result in an excessive flexure of the one or more frangible members, and a detachment thereof from both the female lock member and remainder of the frangible structure. In turn, an at least partial detachment of the frangible structure, including the detachment of one or more frangible members from the female lock member, will result in an enlargement of the opening of the female member. Such an enlargement will likely be sufficient to prevent the aforementioned interlocking engagement from being resumed between the male member and a female member in the locked position. Additionally, the close dimensional tolerances between the male and female lock members will likely be eliminated due to the location of the one or more frangible members about the periphery of the opening of the female lock member. Further, the enlargement of the opening associated with the female lock member will allow an unencumbered passage of the male member through the opening of the female member, when the one or more frangible members has or have been removed, and the opening has been correspondingly enlarged.
As an intended result, the inability of the male member and female member to assume the interlocking engagement and/or the locked position therebetween will provide clear evidence that the inventive shield assembly has been tampered with. Therefore, an attempted or accomplished access to the port/closure of the container, as well as the contents thereof, will prevent re-use of the same shield assembly, because the male and female lock members will not be able to interlockingly engage one another into the closed position.
It is recognized that one way of overcoming the observable evidence arising from a person having tampered with the shield assembly of the present invention would be for him or her to replace the original shield assembly with a second or new, and un-used shield assembly. Accordingly, one or more preferred embodiments of the shield assembly of the present invention further include a tracking assembly, which in at least one embodiment comprises an indicator segment including a “tracking structure.” The tracking structure is disposed in an observable location that is preferably, but not necessarily, located on the exterior of the housing. Also, the tracking structure preferably comprises one or more predetermined codes capable of readily identifying and distinguishing each of the shield assemblies and/or housings associated therewith, from one another. The use of a predetermined code may include a variety of coded indicia such as, but not limited to, a bar code, which may also be electronically readable. Further, the predetermined code including coded indicia may be in the form of an optically scanned code, unique alpha/numerical serial number or other forms of coded indicia. Such coded indicia may be disposed on at least one portion of the housing or alternatively, on a plurality of the different components thereof. As indicated, the coded indicia is not necessarily limited to a bar code, but may assume other forms of code which may be electronically readable as well as visually observable. Further, the coded indicia applied to each of a plurality of the shield assemblies will ideally differ, so as to clearly distinguish one shield assembly from another. As a result, the coded indicia applied to the different housings or other portions of a plurality of shield assemblies will provide specific identifying information or data relating to a specific shield assembly.
Moreover, when considered to be appropriate and/or desirable, the coded indicia may be disposed on each of the plurality of components of a single shield assembly. When the coded indicia is disposed on different components of the same shield assembly, it may be identical or at least sufficiently similar so as to facilitate a determination that the various components are associated with the same shield assembly.
Additionally, the coded indicia should preferably serve to not only distinguish one shield assembly and/or housing from another but to determine the site and/or identity of the original manufacturer, as well as the distribution route from its manufacturing site to any holding site(s) and on to its eventual end point of intended use, which is most likely for the actual dispensing of medicine to a patient in accordance with an authorized prescription. The coded indicia in this instance should similarly include electronically or otherwise readable data to facilitate the determination of identifying shield assembly information such as, but not limited to, lot number, date of manufacture, serial numbers and/or component identifying information, if any, and the like. The procedure used to apply the coded indicia to the selected shield assembly as/or its components should be such as to not interfere with or derogatorily affect efficient manufacturing and/or assembly techniques and procedures for the shield assembly.
It can be appreciated that the provision of the inventive shield assembly with an indicator segment, such as a tracking assembly, will allow authorized personnel to determine whether one of these shield assemblies, once disposed in a closed orientation and in a locked position about a port/closure of a container, is, in fact, the original shield assembly that was applied, by checking the contents of the coded indicia. In practice, the tracking structure and any coded indicia would typically be recorded when a given shield assembly is applied in a closed orientation to a port/closure. This would prevent unauthorized personnel from attempting to substitute a second shield assembly for the original shield assembly, wherein the original shield assembly has been tampered with or removed to accomplish access to the port/closure and contents of the container associated therewith.
Yet another embodiment of the tracking assembly comprises a tracking structure which is preferably in the form of at least one RFID structure. While the description of this embodiment of the tracking assembly refers to a single RFID structure, it is emphasized that a plurality of such RFID structures could be utilized by being secured to different parts of the shield assembly, housing, lock assembly, etc.
As already described above, the first and second housing segments are movably connected to one another, and preferably, are hingedly connected to each other along a common, longitudinally disposed seam or junction. Accordingly, it is important to align the male locking member with the opening of the female locking member in order to accomplish the intended interlocking engagement between them. Therefore, one or more preferred embodiments of the shield assembly of the present invention include a stabilizing assembly. The stabilizing assembly includes an insert segment and a slot segment, with preferably, each disposed on and movable with a different one of the first and second housing segments. In operation, the insert segment is movable with a corresponding one of the first or second housing segments into an interior of the slot segment associated with the other of the first and second housing segments, as the first and second housing segments are disposed and moved relative to one another into the closed orientation.
Further, the thickness and/or transverse dimension of both the insert segment and the interior of the slot segment are such as to restrict movement of the insert segment when disposed within the interior of the slot segment. As a result, the first and second housing segments, respectively attached to the insert segment and the slot segment, will also be limited or restricted in their relative movement. In turn, the male lock member will be accurately or appropriately aligned within the opening of the female lock member, as the first and second housing segments are disposed into the closed orientation, concurrently with the insert segment passing into the interior of the slot segment. The aforementioned restricted relative movement of the insert segment and slot segment will be primarily, but not exclusively, in a direction corresponding to the longitudinal axis or the longitudinal seam, junction or hinge about which the first and second housing segments move relative to one another, as they are being disposed from an open orientation and into a closed orientation.
Yet another structural and operative feature may be incorporated in one or more embodiments of the shield assembly of the present invention, which involves the inclusion of a latch assembly. In the illustrated embodiment, the latch assembly includes an insert segment and a slot segment of the type described above with relation to the stabilizing assembly. Moreover, the latch assembly may be incorporated within and/or as part of the stabilizing assembly when both the stabilizing assembly and the latch assembly are structurally a part of the same shield assembly. Therefore, whether the latch assembly is used independently of or in combination with the stabilizing assembly, it comprises a plug mounted on and extending outwardly from a surface of an insert segment. The latch assembly further comprises a recess formed on the slot segment and disposed in at least partially aligned and receiving relation to the plug, when the first and second housing segments are disposed in the closed orientation. Therefore, when in the closed orientation, the plug will be at least partially inserted within the recess in a manner so as to establish a substantially fixed, interconnecting engagement therebetween. As a result, even if an unauthorized person attempts to defeat the aforementioned lock assembly, it will still not serve to open the housing and/or dispose the first and second housing segments in the open orientation. This is due to the fact that the latch assembly is located within the hollow interior of the housing when in its closed orientation. Therefore, the preferred plug and recess of the latch assembly described above will still be maintained in interlocking engagement with one another, which will also serve to maintain the first and second housing segments, and therefore the shield assembly itself, in the aforementioned closed orientation. If the unauthorized person attempts to use greater force to open the latch assembly, it will almost certainly result in at least partial destruction of the housing or portions thereof, and again, provide a clear indication that tampering has been attempted and/or access has been accomplished. It should additionally be appreciated that if such destruction of the original housing occurs, the aforementioned indicator segment and tracking structure, if utilized, will allow authorized personnel to easily and quickly determine that a second shield assembly has been substituted for the original shield assembly used to enclose and prevent access to the port/closure of a given container.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become clearer when the drawings as well as the detailed description are taken into consideration.
For a fuller understanding of the nature of the present invention, reference should be had to the following detailed description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
Like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
As represented in the accompanying Figures, the present invention is directed to a shield assembly, and is generally indicated as 10. As will be explained in greater detail hereinafter, the inventive shield assembly 10 is dimensioned, configured and structured to shield, protect and enclose a port or other closure as indicated at 100 or 100′ in the drawings. The terms “port” and “closure” may be used interchangeably herein and in either case, the port or closure 100 or 100′ will be of the type commonly associated with a variety of different containers, specifically including, but not limited to medical containers. As represented in
Referring now more generally to
In order to connect the shield assembly 10 with or mount it onto a port or closure 100, 100′, the housing segments 14 and 16 are first disposed in an open orientation, wherein the housing 12 can next be moved into a surrounding relation to the port/closure 100/100′. Further, the initial positioning of the shield assembly 10 is clearly demonstrated in
With initial reference now to
Furthermore, and in a most preferred embodiment of the inventive shield assembly 10, there will be a relatively close dimensional tolerance between the outer surface of the male segment member 32′ and the interior periphery of the opening 34′ of the female lock member 34. As a result, when in the locked position, the male segment 32′ effectively “fills” or closes the opening 34′ of the female member 34, as represented in
More specifically, and with reference now to
With further reference to the tamper evident structure of the present invention and
Additionally, and as illustrated in
Still referring to the tamper evident structure of the present invention and
It is recognized that one way of overcoming the observable evidence indicating that a person has tampered with the shield assembly 10, would be for him or her to replace the original shield assembly 10 with a second or new, and un-used shield assembly. Accordingly, one or more preferred embodiments of the shield assembly 10 further comprise a tracking assembly generally indicated as 39 and including an indicator segment 44, as represented in
Moreover, the predetermined codes or coded indicia, may have different data or content and may be applied to the housing 12 of each of a plurality of the shield assemblies 10. As such, each will differ from one another so as to clearly distinguish one shield assembly 10, and its components, from another, different shield assembly and its associated components. As a result, the predetermined codes applied to the different housings 12 or other portions of a plurality of different shield assemblies 10 will provide specific identifying information or data relating to a specific shield assembly. As a result, any one of a plurality of shield assemblies 10, housings 12 and associated components thereof may be distinguishable from one another. Further, each of the components of a common shield assembly 10, housing 12, etc. are capable of being identified as being associated with a common shield assembly, housing, etc.
Accordingly, when applicable, appropriate and/or desirable, a different predetermined code may be disposed on each of the plurality of components of each of a plurality of shield assemblies 10. Further, when the predetermined code is disposed on different components of the same shield assembly 10, it can be identical or at least sufficiently similar so as to facilitate a determination that the various components are associated with the same shield assembly 10. Additionally, the predetermined code in this instance should similarly include electronically, visually or otherwise readable data to facilitate the determination of relevant shield information such as, but not limited to, any or all of the following: lot number, date of manufacture, serial number, and other component identifying information. The procedure used to apply the predetermined code to the selected shield assembly 10 and/or its components should be such so as to not interfere with or derogatorily affect efficient manufacturing and/or assembly techniques and procedures associated with the inventive shield assembly 10.
With reference to
With further regard to the embodiment of
As also set forth above, when the male segment 32′ passes through the opening 34′ into the locked position, the frangible structure 38 will remain intact and the housing segments 14 and 16 will remain in the closed position. However, upon forced removal of the male segment 32′ from the locked position into the unlocked position, the frangible structure 38 will be at least partially detached causing a breaking and or separation of at least a portion of the antenna 43. As a result, the RFID structure 41 will not be operative and the detection of the RFID tag structure 41, by an electronic reader or detecting device will be prevented or significantly restricted. This will provide a clear indication that the two housing segments 14 and 16 had been previously opened, possibly indicating unauthorized tampering or attempted access to the port/closure 100/100′.
Also, if a different shield assembly and/or housing has been applied to the port/closure 100/100′, the electronic reader or detection device will read a different predetermined code then that originally assigned to the RFID structure 41 of the original shield assembly 10 and/or housing 12 first applied to the closure/port 100/100′, again providing a possible indication of tampering. It should therefore be apparent that in the additional preferred embodiment of
Therefore, the provision of the inventive shield assembly 10 with an indicator segment 44, such as a tracking structure 46, will allow authorized personnel to determine whether a given shield assembly 10 disposed in a closed orientation and in a locked position about a port/closure 100/100′ of a container such as 104, 106, etc. is, in fact, the original shield assembly applied to a given port/closure 100/100′ by checking the contents of the coded indicia. In practice, the tracking structure 46 and/or predetermined code associated there with will typically be recorded when a given shield assembly 10 is applied in a closed orientation to a port/closure 100/100′. This would prevent unauthorized personnel from attempting to substitute a second or different shield assembly for the original shield assembly, assuming that he or she tampered with the original shield assembly and removed it in order to accomplish access to the port/closure 100, 100′ and contents of the container, such as 104, 106 associated therewith.
As set forth above, the first and second housing segments 14 and 16 are movably connected to one another, and in the preferred embodiments, are hingedly connected to one another along a common, longitudinally disposed seam or junction 18 as reflected in
Further, the thickness and/or transverse dimension of both the insert segment 52 and the interior 55 of the slot segment 54 are such as to restrict movement of the insert segment 52 when disposed within the interior 55 of the slot segment 54. As a result, the first and second housing segments 14 and 16, to which either the insert segment 52 or the slot segment 54 are respectively attached, will also be limited or restricted in their relative movement. As a result, the male segment 32′ associated with male lock member 32 will be accurately or appropriately aligned with the opening 34′ of the female lock member 34, as the first and second housing segments 14 and 16 are disposed into the closed orientation, concurrently with the insert segment 52 passing into the interior 55 of the slot segment 54. The aforementioned, restricted relative movement of the insert segment 52 and slot segment 54 will be primarily, but not exclusively, in a direction corresponding to the longitudinal axis or the longitudinal seam, junction or hinge 18 about which the first and second housing segments 14 and 16 move, relative to one another, as they are being disposed from an open orientation into a closed orientation.
With reference again to
As a result, the ability of an unauthorized person to attempt access and the unlocking of the aforementioned male lock member 32 and female lock member 34 associated with the lock assembly 30, will still not serve to open the inventive shield 10 and/or to dispose the first and second housing segments 14 and 16 into an open orientation. This is due to the fact that the latch assembly 60 is located within the hollow interior 20 of the housing 12 when in its closed orientation. Therefore, plug 62 and recess 64 of the latch assembly 60 will almost certainly still be maintained in substantially fixed, interlocking engagement with one another, which in turn, will serve to maintain the first and second housing segments 14 and 16 and the housing 12 in the aforementioned closed orientation. Should the unauthorized person persist and cause a forced opening of the latch assembly 60, this will almost certainly result in at least partial destruction of a portion of the housing 12, and again, this will provide a clear indication that tampering has been attempted and/or access has been accomplished.
If such destruction of the original housing occurs, authorized personnel can easily observe this and take appropriate action. Additionally, if the unauthorized person attempted to hide his or her tampering by applying a new or second shield assembly on the port or closure 100, 100′ of the container, then the embodiment of the shield assembly 10 having an indicator segment 44 and tracking structure 46 would still allow authorized personnel to easily and quickly determine that a second shield assembly has been substituted for the original shield assembly used to enclose and prevent access to the port/closure 100/100′ of a given container 104, 106, etc. as has been described previously herein.
With reference now to
Since many modifications, variations and changes in detail can be made to the described preferred embodiment of the invention, it is intended that all matters in the foregoing description and shown in the accompanying drawings be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense. Thus, the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
Now that the invention has been described,
The present Non-Provisional patent application claims priority pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) to a prior filed Provisional patent application, namely, that having Ser. No. 61/984,347 filed on Apr. 25, 2014, as well as to another prior filed Provisional application, namely, that having Ser. No. 61/913,571 filed on Dec. 9, 2013, the contents of which are both incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1970631 | Sherman | Aug 1934 | A |
| 2834346 | Adams | May 1958 | A |
| 2888015 | Hunt | May 1959 | A |
| 3245567 | Knight | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3364890 | Andersen | Jan 1968 | A |
| 3706307 | Hasson | Dec 1972 | A |
| 3747751 | Miller et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3905375 | Toyama | Sep 1975 | A |
| 4216585 | Hatter | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4216872 | Bean | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4313539 | Raines | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4420085 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4430077 | Mittleman et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4457445 | Hanks | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4521237 | Logothetis | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4530697 | Kuhlemann et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4571242 | Klein et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4589171 | McGill | May 1986 | A |
| 4667837 | Vitello et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4693707 | Dye | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4726483 | Drozd | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4743231 | Kay et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4760847 | Vaillancourt | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4832695 | Rosenberg et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4834706 | Beck et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4844906 | Hermelin et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4919285 | Roof et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 5009323 | Montgomery et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5049129 | Zdeb et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5135496 | Vetter et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5165560 | Enniss, III et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5230429 | Etheredge, III | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5292308 | Ryan | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5328466 | Denmark | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5328474 | Raines | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5356380 | Hoekwater et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5458580 | Hajishoreh | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5468224 | Souryal | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5531695 | Swisher | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5540666 | Barta et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5549571 | Sak | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5558648 | Shields | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5624402 | Imbert | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5702374 | Johnson | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5776124 | Wald | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5785691 | Vetter et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5807343 | Tucker et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5883806 | Meador et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5884457 | Ortiz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5902269 | Jentzen | May 1999 | A |
| 5951522 | Rosato et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5951525 | Thorne et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5954657 | Rados | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5989227 | Vetter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6000548 | Tsals | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6021824 | Larsen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027482 | Imbert | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6068614 | Kimber et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6126640 | Tucker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6190364 | Imbert | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193688 | Balestracci et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6196998 | Jansen et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6280418 | Reinhard et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6322543 | Singh et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6338200 | Baxa et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6375640 | Teraoka | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6394983 | Mayoral et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6485460 | Eakins et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6500155 | Sasso | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6520935 | Jansen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6540697 | Chen | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6565529 | Kimber et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6581792 | Limanjaya | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6585691 | Vitello | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6726652 | Eakins et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6726672 | Hanly et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6764469 | Broselow | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6821268 | Balestracci | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6921383 | Vitello | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6942643 | Eakins et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 7141286 | Kessler et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7182256 | Andreasson et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7374555 | Heinz et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7404500 | Marteau et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7425208 | Vitello | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7437972 | Yeager | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7588563 | Guala | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7632244 | Buehler et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7641636 | Moesli et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7735664 | Peters et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 7762988 | Vitello | Jul 2010 | B1 |
| 7802313 | Czajka | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7918830 | Langan et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 8079518 | Turner et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8091727 | Domkowski | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8140349 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8328082 | Bochenko et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
| 8348895 | Vitello | Jan 2013 | B1 |
| 8353869 | Ranalletta et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8443999 | Reinders | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8556074 | Turner | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8579116 | Pether et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8591462 | Vitello | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8597255 | Emmott et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8597271 | Langan et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8616413 | Koyama | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8702674 | Bochenko | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8864021 | Vitello | Oct 2014 | B1 |
| 8864707 | Vitello | Oct 2014 | B1 |
| 8864708 | Vitello | Oct 2014 | B1 |
| 8945082 | Geiger et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 9101534 | Bochenko | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9199042 | Farrar et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9272099 | Limaye et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9336669 | Bowden et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9402967 | Vitello | Aug 2016 | B1 |
| 9463310 | Vitello | Oct 2016 | B1 |
| 20020023409 | Py | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020133119 | Eakins et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20030183547 | Heyman | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040064095 | Vitello | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040116858 | Heinz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186437 | Frenette et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040225258 | Balestracci | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050146081 | MacLean et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148941 | Farrar et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20060084925 | Ramsahoye | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20070106234 | Klein | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142786 | Lampropoulos et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20080068178 | Meyer | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20090149815 | Kiel et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20100084403 | Popish et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100126894 | Koukol et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20110044850 | Solomon et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110046550 | Schiller et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20120064515 | Knapp et al. | Mar 2012 | A2 |
| 20120096957 | Ochman | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120110950 | Schraudolph | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20130018356 | Prince et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20140155868 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20150305982 | Bochenko | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160144119 | Limaye et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160158449 | Limaye et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160176550 | Vitello et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160328586 | Bowden et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61984347 | Apr 2014 | US | |
| 61913571 | Dec 2013 | US |