1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to “smart labels” or RFID tags, specifically RFID tags with a tamper evident or tamper indicating feature.
2. Description of the Related Art
Prior smart labels in the Automatic Identification Industry do not display evidence of tampering when removed or peeled away from a substrate. Most common paper or film labels with a pressure sensitive adhesive can easily be peeled up from a surface without tearing or damaging the label stock. Therefore, there is a need for a label that is made from a tamper-indicating material that would prevent access to the embedded RFID transponder without noticeable damage to the label stock. This security feature would prevent the RFID transponder from being removed, altered, replaced, or transferred to another label or substrate.
Radio frequency transponders (also known as “RFID tags”) generally include an antenna and integrated memory circuit with read/write capability used to store digital information, such as an electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) or similar electronic device. Active RFID tags include their own radio transceiver and power source (battery) and are generally sealed within a molded plastic housing or “button”. Passive RFID tags are energized to transmit and receive data by an electromagnetic field and do not include a radio transceiver or power source. As a result, they are small and inexpensive with limited range, resolution, and data storage capacity. Some common passive RFID tags include the Intermec Intellitag 500 ™ and Texas Instruments' TagIt ™. Passive RFID tags used in the Automatic Identification Industry are typically laminated or inserted into a paper or synthetic label stock backed with pressure sensitive adhesive for applying the printed label to a carton, automobile, pallet, airline baggage, parcel, or other article to be tracked. These labels are commonly referred to as “smart labels”.
A tamper evident smart label with an RFID or RF transponder. Use of tamper evident label materials in the layered construction of the smart label prevents removal, transferal, replacement and or alteration of the smart label without noticeable evidence of tampering.
A smart label made from tamper evident or tamper-indicating material designed to prevent access to the embedded RFID or RF transponder without noticeable visible damage to the label. This unique security feature deters the removal, alteration, replacement, or transference of the embedded RF transponder. This design is applicable for automotive compliance labeling, airline baggage, parcels, or any other article that requires tracking with a tamper evident smart label.
Tamper evident label materials are engineered to self-destruct when removed from a substrate. The primary function of these products is to produce a tamper-indicating label or seal by causing the label to fracture when removal from a substrate is attempted. There are a variety of different tamper evident or tamper-indicating label materials available from 3M Company, St. Paul, Minn., including 7610 ScotchMark Destructible White Vinyl. The 7610 product uses a fragile cast vinyl face with very low tensile and tear resistance designed to crack and break when peeled off of a surface because the permanent adhesive bond is stronger than the label face. Other types of tamper-indicating labels utilize a “void” pattern in the adhesive as with 3M 7866 Polyester. This product uses a clear polyester face stock with a white pigmented adhesive. A silicone type pattern is printed on back of the label face such that as the label is peeled from a surface only part of the adhesive removes with the label. The adhesive pattern is such that it creates a “VOID” word pattern across the label face stock. Applications for destructible tamper evident labels include safety warning labels, warranty seals, packaging seals, license labels, calibration seals, and asset labels.
As shown in
One application where this type of label is useful is in automotive compliance labeling. It is preferred by automotive manufacturers that the vehicle identification number (VIN) label and Federal Certification/Tire Pressure label located on the door jam of an automobile be tamper evident. This VIN label, in a smart label form according to the invention, includes an embedded RF transponder, an emerging technology preferred by the automotive industry.
A second embodiment, shown in
A third embodiment for providing tamper evidence is to incorporate a “void” adhesive pattern into the label product, as shown in
Note, any of the tamper evident labels described above could be applied to a substrate 3 independently of the RF transponder 2 (the RF transponder does not have to be embedded within the label). This can be accomplished simply by holding the RF transponder 2 against the substrate 3 or adhesive 1, then applying any label made of a tamper evident material over the RF transponder as indicated in
In another embodiment, in addition to using the tamper evident label materials to prevent an RF transponder 2 from being removed, altered, replaced, or transferred to another label or substrate, the RF transponder 2 itself may be formed in a tamper evident manner. Passive RF transponders 2 are typically manufactured using a polyester or polyamide base film 7 designed to accept the printed antenna 5 and mounted integrated circuit chip 6. A tamper-evident transponder is manufactured by using a tamper evident material as the transponder base film 7. Also, the RFID transponder substrate can be processed to include propagation tear cuts 4 around the perimeter of the antenna base film. When the attempt is made to remove the RF transponder 2 from either the label or a surface the label is attached to, these propagation cuts 4 will use the tensile strain created within the RF transponder 2 through the removal process to sever the transponder into one or more pieces, thus destroying the antenna 5 and thereby the functionality of the RF transponder 2. One example of possible propagation cuts 4 is shown in
An additional mechanism that could be added as an indicator of tampering would be to apply a covert technology such as holograms or microprinting for authenticity on any of these smart label designs. This would provide a secondary security measure to make it difficult to change or duplicate a smart label. Note also that these designs should not be limited to just RFID transponders. Any of these tamper-evident designs may also be applied to smart labels containing standard EAS devices (single bit electronic article surveillance devices). There may also be situations where the RF transponder or EAS device could be applied to the surface of a label instead of embedded in or under the label. This design may be necessary to readily identify if the RF transponder or EAS device is still present and has not been removed, altered, or tampered with in any manner.
This invention(s) is entitled to a range of equivalents and is to be limited only by the range of the claims, below.
The following references are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Patents:
Related Publications:
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/273,800 filed Mar. 6, 2001.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4099838 | Cook et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4300297 | Betterley | Nov 1981 | A |
4746556 | Matsuguchi et al. | May 1988 | A |
5018286 | Zahner | May 1991 | A |
5061535 | Kreckel et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5405197 | Makowka | Apr 1995 | A |
5464690 | Boswell | Nov 1995 | A |
5477219 | Zarembo et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5560657 | Morgan | Oct 1996 | A |
5629093 | Bischof et al. | May 1997 | A |
5660925 | Cooley et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5683774 | Faykish et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5850181 | Heinrich et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5884425 | Baldwin | Mar 1999 | A |
5900307 | Barcikowski | May 1999 | A |
5920290 | McDonough et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5981166 | Mandecki | Nov 1999 | A |
6002344 | Bandy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6050622 | Gustafson | Apr 2000 | A |
6255948 | Wolpert et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6419391 | Thomas | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6462765 | Conwell et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6572022 | Suzuki | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582791 | Peloquin et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020135481 A1 | Sep 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60273800 | Mar 2001 | US |