The invention relates generally to the field of locks. More specifically, the invention relates to devices that inhibit or prevent tampering with locks.
It is well known that intruders often attempt to enter through locked doors by inserting flexible tools such as plastic strips or thin metal strips between the closed door and the door jamb. Once inserted, the flexible tool may then force the lock bolt or latch away from the door jamb and back into the door to allow the door to be opened. In other cases, intruders may strike the door with a strong blow to split the door and/or the door jamb in the vicinity of the lock to allow the door to be forced open. And in some cases, intruders may pry off the stop rail from the door jamb in the vicinity of the door lock, allowing the lock to be easily manipulated using a flexible plastic or metal tool.
This disclosure advances the art by providing a tamper inhibiting device that adapts to a door lock. The tamper inhibiting device may be used with a door lock for strengthening the lip of the door lock for protection purposes. The tamper inhibiting device provides a cost effective way to enhance door security without modifying door locks.
In an embodiment, a tamper inhibiting device is provided for adapting to a lock for a door. The lock has a housing configured to attach to the door. The lock also has a locking component being receivable in the housing. The housing has a lip extending from an edge of the housing. The tamper inhibiting device includes a first portion being substantially planar and having a first edge and a second opposing edge between two distal ends. The first portion has an elongate opening between the first and second distal ends. The tamper inhibiting device also includes a second portion being substantially planar and extending substantially perpendicular to the first portion from the first edge of the first portion. The opening is adjacent the first edge of the first portion such that the lip of the housing juxtaposes the second portion when the tamper inhibiting device attaches to the lock.
Additional embodiments and features are set forth in the description that follows, and still other embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the specification or may be learned by the practice of the invention.
Illustrative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
The present disclosure may be understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings as described below. It is noted that, for purposes of illustrative clarity, certain elements in the drawings may not be drawn to scale.
Although lip 115 may provide some deterrence, various factors, such as manufacturing requirements and material strength, may result in lip 115 being smaller than desirable in some situations. Furthermore, it may be desirable to improve the prior art lock 100 without entirely replacing the lock box 110 or the locking component 120.
As shown in
In addition, the first portion 210 includes an elongated opening 218 adjacent the corner edge 205 that is configured to allow the lip 115 of the lock box 110 to pass through. Elongated opening 218 may be located between apertures 212 and corner edge 205 such that the lip 115 juxtaposes the second portion 220 when the lip 115 passes through the opening 218. Elongated opening 218 may be substantially rectangular-shaped. Preferably, lip 115 aligns substantially parallel to the second portion 220 when tamper inhibiting device 200 attaches to lock box 110 and locking component 120.
When referring to the tamper inhibiting device 200, the locking component 120, the lock box 110, and the fasteners (e.g., the screws 142, 144) may be the same as those in the prior art lock 100 shown in
In use, a user may start with the prior art lock 100, either with or without the cover plate 130. If the cover plate 130 is included, it may be removed and discarded. The screws 142 may couple the first portion 210 to the locking component 120, the lip 115 of the lock box 110 may pass through the elongated opening 218, and the screws 144 may couple the first portion 210 to the lock box 110.
The second portion 220 may be larger than the lip 115, as shown in
The tamper inhibiting device 200 may be fabricated, for example, by making a metal plate with the apertures 212, 214, 216 and the elongated opening 218, followed by bending the metal plate to form the two portions 210 and 220, as illustrated in
When referring to the tamper inhibiting device 300, locking component 120′, bolts/latches 122′, and lock box 110′ (
Accordingly, the first portion 310 may include aperture(s) 312 configured to allow the bolts/latches 122′ of the locking component 120′ to pass through. The first portion 310 may also include apertures 314 configured to allow the screws 142′ to couple the locking component 120′ to the first portion 310, and apertures 316 configured to allow the screws 144′ to couple the first portion 310 to the lock box 110′. Furthermore, the first portion 310 may include an elongated opening 318 adjacent the corner edge 305 that is configured to allow the lip 115′ of the lock box 110′ to pass through.
In use, the screws 142′ may couple the first portion 310 to the locking component 120′, the lip 115′ of the lock box 110′ may pass through the opening 318, and the screws 144′ may couple the first portion 310 to the lock box 110′. The second portion 320 may be larger than the lip 115′, as shown in
The tamper inhibiting device 300 may be fabricated, for example, by making a metal plate with the apertures 312, 314, 316 and the elongated opening 318, followed by bending the metal plate to form the two portions 310, 320.
Many different arrangements of the various components depicted, as well as components not shown, are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Embodiments of the present invention have been described with the intent to be illustrative rather than restrictive. Alternative embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not depart from its scope. A skilled artisan may develop alternative means of implementing the aforementioned improvements without departing from the scope of the present invention. It will be understood that certain features and subcombinations are of utility and may be employed without reference to other features and subcombinations and are contemplated within the scope of the claims.
This application is a non-provisional of, and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/261,665, filed Nov. 16, 2009, entitled “Tamper Inhibiting Device for Use with A Lock”, the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
425237 | Morton | Apr 1890 | A |
1092946 | Page | Apr 1914 | A |
1399897 | Singer | Dec 1921 | A |
1469829 | Teich | Oct 1923 | A |
1672962 | Stratmann | Jun 1928 | A |
1853456 | Ross | Apr 1932 | A |
2454904 | Wylie | Nov 1948 | A |
2497189 | Shaffer | Feb 1950 | A |
2815655 | Boer | Dec 1957 | A |
3271063 | Garrett | Sep 1966 | A |
3279840 | Barone | Oct 1966 | A |
3290081 | Sushan | Dec 1966 | A |
3377094 | Thompson | Apr 1968 | A |
3405962 | Sushan | Oct 1968 | A |
3592498 | Raccuglia | Jul 1971 | A |
3645045 | Gervis et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3651673 | Sendrowski et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3764173 | Griffith | Oct 1973 | A |
D229665 | Wilmot | Dec 1973 | S |
3895834 | Grinbaum et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3934910 | Radke | Jan 1976 | A |
3936085 | Long | Feb 1976 | A |
3963269 | Rosenberg | Jun 1976 | A |
3967845 | Governale | Jul 1976 | A |
3976318 | Krus | Aug 1976 | A |
3996774 | Best | Dec 1976 | A |
4005890 | Burch | Feb 1977 | A |
4010968 | Rehfeld | Mar 1977 | A |
4017106 | Salazar | Apr 1977 | A |
4057275 | La Beaud | Nov 1977 | A |
4074552 | Smith | Feb 1978 | A |
4096719 | Tranberg | Jun 1978 | A |
4130311 | Sushan | Dec 1978 | A |
4171837 | McRoy | Oct 1979 | A |
4174862 | Shane | Nov 1979 | A |
4178027 | Charron | Dec 1979 | A |
4183568 | Ferracane | Jan 1980 | A |
4195870 | Percoco | Apr 1980 | A |
4237712 | Cramer | Dec 1980 | A |
4345787 | Dabrowski | Aug 1982 | A |
4390199 | Taylor | Jun 1983 | A |
4397168 | Rotondi et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
D272413 | Hennessy | Jan 1984 | S |
4458931 | McBurnie | Jul 1984 | A |
4474394 | Crepinsek | Oct 1984 | A |
4484463 | Hennessy | Nov 1984 | A |
4547009 | Allen | Oct 1985 | A |
4629231 | Bouchard | Dec 1986 | A |
4635399 | Gehrke et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4720129 | Bouchard | Jan 1988 | A |
4725084 | Catricola | Feb 1988 | A |
4770452 | Petree, Jr. | Sep 1988 | A |
D302937 | Briggs | Aug 1989 | S |
4861082 | Priola et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4869087 | Day | Sep 1989 | A |
5131189 | Mascotte | Jul 1992 | A |
D352224 | Allenbaugh | Nov 1994 | S |
D353319 | Eckert | Dec 1994 | S |
5406814 | Zeager et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415020 | Allenbaugh | May 1995 | A |
5427422 | Madlener et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
D363424 | Lord | Oct 1995 | S |
D372191 | Bennett | Jul 1996 | S |
5547230 | Bank et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5566995 | Jagiela | Oct 1996 | A |
5678871 | Zarzycki, Jr. | Oct 1997 | A |
D446107 | Carter | Aug 2001 | S |
D452811 | Shedd et al. | Jan 2002 | S |
6406076 | Zarzycki, Jr. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
D474675 | Simon et al. | May 2003 | S |
7165793 | Richmond et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110113835 A1 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61261665 | Nov 2009 | US |