The present invention relates to tamper resistant electrical receptacles. More particularly, the present invention relates to tamper resistant electrical receptacles using laterally sliding shutters spring biased to block access to the device's electrical contacts.
Tamper resistant receptacles are known in the art. “Tamper Resistant” or “TR” receptacles are a class of electrical receptacle outlets configured to deny access to the device's electrical contacts unless force is applied simultaneously to both the hot and neutral plug openings of the device pursuant to NEC Code 406.11 et seq. The Code and related regulatory requirements provide that not only must the outlet openings remain blocked unless force is applied to both openings at the same time, but also that any foreign object 1/32 inch or larger, must be prevented from bypassing the blocking member of a plug opening.
As will be appreciated, these requirements were enacted in response to the phenomena of small children curiously inserting a small toy or metal object into the hot or neutral opening of a receptacle and suffering electrical shock, burns, or even death.
In meeting the standard and providing the level of protection sought from these devices, the art has gravitated towards a configuration of receptacles utilizing cooperating shutter members to block access beyond the faceplate openings of the outlet. Specifically, to ensure that force directed into only one of the two blade openings is prevented from reaching the electrical contact that lies beneath, a sliding shutter mechanism is spring-biased into a position blocking (or “shuttering”) the blade opening from underneath the faceplate. The shutter physically prevents an object entering the blade opening from reaching the electrical contact below that shutter. In order to allow the shutter of a respective blade opening to be uncovered, the spring-bias must be overcome by a camming action caused by the other plug blade during insertion in the other blade opening.
To this end, the most common prior art configuration of a TR receptacle includes a shutter assembly comprising a pair of cooperating shutters. Each of the shutters includes a blocking portion positioned below a respective one of the blade openings blocking access to the contacts. Each of the shutters also includes a cam portion that extends to the opposite blade opening that receives contact from a plug blade and translates the vertical force of a plug blade and camming action into a lateral sliding displacement of the blocking portion. Thus, force by vertical insertion of a plug-blade on the neutral blade opening will move the shutter from obstructing access to the electrical contact below the hot blade opening, and vice versa. Specifically, for example, during insertion of a plug, the neutral blade tine will cam against and past the shutter cam surface forcing the shutter cam arm to move laterally, thereby overcoming the spring bias of the shutter and causing the hot blade shutter blocking portion to slide into a position away from and revealing the electrical contact beneath the hot blade opening. Likewise, force on the hot blade opening will contact the cam surface and allow the blade to cam past and move the arm and compress the spring to move the shutter blocking portion that covers the neutral blade opening out of the way. As will be appreciated, with this configuration, when a child tries to insert a toy into either opening of the outlet, the blocking portion of the shutter remains immobile from the spring bias of the opposite shutter and prevents the child from reaching the electrical contact. However, when both blades of an electrical plug contact the shutters simultaneously, the simultaneous force and camming action allows both blades to continue their downward insertion by simultaneously sliding respective shutter blocking portions laterally out of the way of the electrical contacts of the opposite shutter until the blades cam past the shutters and are able to properly “plug in” to the outlet's internal face contacts.
Existing prior art TR receptacle designs and their operational details are available in U.S. Pat. No. 4,379,607 to Bowden, Jr.; U.S. Pat. No. 7,645,148 to Carbone et al.; and U.S. Publ. No. 2013/0295788 to Baldwin, et al. and the references cited therein, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The proliferation of these important safety devices has led to an appreciation of the issues affecting their effective life span. A presently appreciated issue recognized by the present inventors stems from the sharpness of plug blades being found on electrical products imported from overseas. As will be appreciated, during insertion of the plug blades into the outlet face openings, the vertical force of the incoming blades has the same point of contact on the cam surface. The cam surface of most prior art devices is an inclined “ramp” of about 45° that is of a length sufficient to cause lateral displacement during insertion of a distance that is equal to the entire distance necessary to un-shutter a blade opening (typically about 1.8 mm). Over time, these sharp blades having a single point of initial contact begin to deform and cut into the ramp surface which makes movement more difficult as the blades get stuck in gouges or scratches at the point of contact. With each successive insertion, more and more force is needed to friction force the camming action and concomitant lateral sliding of the shutters. At some point, the deformity of the ramp surface may make insertion of a plug excessively difficult or even impossible. As this point, the device has reached the end of its useful life.
The foregoing underscores some of the problems associated with conventional TR receptacles. Furthermore, the foregoing highlights the long-felt, yet unresolved need in the art for a TR receptacle that may extend the useful life of the device. Moreover, the forgoing highlights the long-felt, yet unresolved need in the art for a TR receptacle that has an extended service life at a reasonable cost.
Various embodiments of the present invention overcome various of the aforementioned and other disadvantages associated with prior art TR receptacles and offers new advantages as well. Although not wishing to be bound by theory, the present inventors' recognize that altering the camming surface of the lead frame of the shutter mechanism to a more frictionally advantageous configuration may extend the service life of some prior art TR receptacles.
According to one aspect of various embodiments of the present invention there is provided a TR receptacle having cooperating shutter mechanisms wherein each shutter member has a lead-in cam surface having a steep initial point of contact and a flatter sliding surface (tangent fillets) to provide both an advantageous point of contact while also providing sufficient lateral clearance to un-shutter a blade opening.
According to another aspect of various embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a TR receptacle having cooperating shutter mechanisms wherein each shutter member has a lead-in cam surface having a continuously convex radius thereby providing a curved surface for the entire length of the camming operation.
According to yet another aspect of various embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a TR receptacle having cooperating shutter mechanisms wherein each shutter member has a lead-in surface comprising a roller disposed in a fillet of a slide block cam surface.
The invention as described and claimed herein should become evident to a person of ordinary skill in the art given the following enabling description and drawings. The aspects and features of the invention believed to be novel and other elements characteristic of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The drawings are for illustration purposes only and are not drawn to scale unless otherwise indicated. The drawings are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The following enabling disclosure is directed to one of ordinary skill in the art and presupposes that those aspects of the invention within the ability of the ordinarily skilled artisan are understood and appreciated.
Various aspects and advantageous features of the present invention will become more apparent to those of ordinary skill when described in the detailed description of preferred embodiments and reference to the accompany drawing wherein:
While the present invention will be described in connection with a TR receptacle of the type having cooperating shutters generally described above, it will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art armed with the present specification that the present invention can be applied to a multiplicity of fields and uses. In particular, the present invention may find use in connection with other types of TR receptacles where reduction in point of impact is desirable. Finally, one of ordinary skill in the art armed with the present specification will also understand that the present system may be easily modified to include different configurations, mechanisms, methods, and kits, which achieve some or all of the purposes of the present invention.
Turning to the Figures, a commonly used shutter assembly for a TR receptacle is depicted generically in
As shown, the shutters 30, 40 each include a cam portion 32, 42 spring-biased directly beneath the associated hot or neutral blade opening of the faceplate assembly. The shutters 30, 40 also include lateral arms 33, 43 extending away from the cam portions 32, 42 and terminating in respective blocking portions 34, 44. The blocking portion 34 of the hot blade shutter 30 blocks access to the neutral blade's electrical contact of the receptacle, and the neutral blade blocking portion 44 blocks access to the hot blade's electrical contact of the receptacle.
In the generic embodiment shown in
As shown in
In any event, as will be appreciated, with the 45° sloping surface of existing devices, each time the blade of a plug is inserted into a receptacle, the blade will have the identical point of contact. The vertical force of the blade necessary to force lateral movement of the shutter by overcoming the spring bias of the shutter may be enough to scratch or bend the surface. With subsequent insertions, the plug blades can exacerbate cuts or bends in the surface resulting in more and more force being necessary to move the shutter. Over time, the deformation of the surface may reach a point that either so much force is necessary to slide past the point of contact, or the deformation is to a point that the shutter is unable to slide such that the device reaches the end of it useful life.
The present inventors, recognizing that this phenomena may be exacerbated by plug blades from overseas countries that are sharper than those traditionally found on domestic products, conceived of a low-cost modification that may increase the useful life of TR receptacles. In sum, the inventors altered the profile of the camming surface to reduce the frictionally force and point of impact damage. A first presently preferred embodiment of the invention utilizes a continuous radius operating surface as shown in
Another alternative embodiment of the present invention providing favorable friction and impact features is depicted in
Yet another alternative embodiment of the present invention providing favorable friction and impact features is depicted in
The frictional advantages of the present embodiments (and related embodiments) will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art armed with the present specification realizing that a force vector F incident on a point P of surface S can be expressed as the vector sum of a normal force vector FN and a parallel force vector Fp, where FN is directed toward and perpendicular to S at P, and Fp is directed along S (if S is flat) or along a tangent of S at P (if S is curved). For a given force magnitude F, adjusting the angle of F will increase or decrease the magnitudes of its normal and parallel force vector components, such that F2=FN2+Fp2. If an angle φ is the angle between F and a line normal to S at P, increasing φ will decrease FN and increase Fp, while decreasing φ will increase FN and decrease Fp. (Note that φ is not the angle between F and a line along the surface S, but rather the angle between F and a line normal to the surface S at point P)
Absent other forces, a frictional force f due to F is a force directed along S (if S is flat) or along a tangent of S at P (if S is curved), and directed in a direction opposite Fp. Its magnitude can be computed using the formula f=FN·μ, where μ is a coefficient of friction. Consequently, f is directly proportional to FN, such that increasing φ will decrease f, while decreasing φ will increase f. Therefore, F will have less resistance by friction and a greater Fp component as φ approaches 90°.
One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the coefficient of friction between certain materials may vary based on speed, and that different materials may deform or wear differently based on the angle of attack. Routine experimentation by the ordinarily skilled artisan is all that is needed to select suitable materials and a suitable design to achieve optimal results.
Accordingly, one of ordinary skill will appreciate that the exact dimensions and materials are not critical to the invention and all suitable variations should be deemed to be within the scope of the invention if deemed suitable for carrying out the objects of the invention.
Likewise, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that it is well within the ability of the ordinarily skilled artisan to modify one or more of the constituent parts for carrying out the various embodiments of the invention. Once armed with the present specification, routine experimentation is all that is needed to decide the parameters to adjust for carrying out the present invention.
The above embodiments are for illustrative purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention or the adaptation of the features described herein to particular TR receptacles. Those skilled in the art will also appreciate that various adaptations and modifications of the above-described preferred embodiments can be configured without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Therefore, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described.
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) to U.S. Provisional Application 62/015,015, filed Jun. 20, 2014, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4379607 | Bowden, Jr. | Apr 1983 | A |
4544219 | Barkas | Oct 1985 | A |
4822290 | Cauley | Apr 1989 | A |
4867694 | Short | Sep 1989 | A |
5006075 | Bowden, Jr. | Apr 1991 | A |
5020997 | Calderara | Jun 1991 | A |
5915981 | Mehta | Jun 1999 | A |
6056564 | Huang | May 2000 | A |
6086391 | Chiu | Jul 2000 | A |
6217353 | Yu-Tse | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238224 | Shao | May 2001 | B1 |
6422880 | Chiu | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6537088 | Huang | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537089 | Montague | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6555771 | Shao | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6776630 | Huang | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6786745 | Huang | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6893275 | Ng | May 2005 | B2 |
7179992 | Packard | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7455538 | Germain | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7510412 | Valentin | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7556513 | Ng | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7588447 | Ni | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7637756 | Hsu | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7645148 | Carbone | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7645149 | Carbone | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651347 | Germain | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7651348 | Huang | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7695293 | Sikes | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7820909 | Castaldo | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7833030 | Huang | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7859368 | Huang | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7883346 | Huang | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7887346 | Huang | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7914307 | Yang | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7934935 | Gao | May 2011 | B1 |
7938676 | Patel | May 2011 | B1 |
7942681 | Ni | May 2011 | B2 |
7985085 | Gao | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8007296 | Chen | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8044299 | Weeks | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8100705 | Chen | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8147260 | Huang | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8187011 | Baldwin | May 2012 | B1 |
8187012 | Baldwin | May 2012 | B1 |
8193445 | Li | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8242362 | Castaldo | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8297990 | Huang | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8366463 | Zhang | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8382497 | Huang | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8491319 | Baldwin | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8550829 | Huang | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8562362 | Jiang | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8568152 | Weeks | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8632347 | Chen | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8632348 | Baldwin | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8672695 | Baldwin | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8808013 | Baldwin | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8834186 | Lo | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858245 | Huang | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8888514 | Baldwin | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9048559 | Huang | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9059529 | Lai | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9059530 | Byrne | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9196995 | Scanzillo | Nov 2015 | B2 |
20090186500 | Benoit | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090311892 | Weeks | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100041259 | Ni | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100159722 | Chen | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110136358 | Zhang | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110263145 | Kim | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120083143 | Jiang | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120149221 | Huang | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130295788 | Baldwin | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140030898 | Baldwin | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150064944 | Scanzillo | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150372411 | Ewer | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150372412 | Samojeden | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150380856 | Mortun | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160013577 | Diakomis | Jan 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150372411 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62015015 | Jun 2014 | US |