The present invention is related to explosive devices, especially those of a military nature, and is more particularly directed to a unique method for combining the blast shield with the forward charge in a tandem warhead system requiring a very long time delay between firing of the forward and rear charges.
The short time delay (less than 500 micro-seconds) tandem shaped charge warhead is well known in the prior art. Examples are U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,750,582 and 4,714,022. The techniques used in these inventions involve a forward charge followed by a blast shield which is in turn followed by a rear charge. In these devices the tandem warhead attacks military targets such as tanks as follows: the forward charge fires first and disrupts the outer armor of the target by causing reactive armor plates to initiate, by fracturing the laminate material in laminate (e.g., glass) armors, or by causing plate motion in bulging plate or (e.g. Chobham) armors. After a very short time delay, generally less than 500 microseconds, the rear charge fires and penetrates the remaining armor of the target and causes lethal damage to the occupants or interior components. During the time interval between the firing of the forward charge and the firing of the rear charge, the rear charge and its associated time delay system is protected from damage and/or premature detonation by a blast shield between the charges. As the time delay between the firing of the forward charge and the rear charge is increased (to 2000 microseconds and beyond), the blast shield must be made quite massive in order to protect the rearward components during the detonation of the high explosive of the forward charge, i.e. as the time delay is increased, so must the mass of the blast shield be increased in order to protect the rear charge from increased blast fragments and detonation products of the forward charge. The blast shield and the time delay must also be adjusted such that the blast shield remains out of the region required for jet formation of the rear charge. Thus, the rearward movement of the blast shield (caused by the explosive force of the forward charge) must be of relatively slow velocity, dependent not only upon the separation distance available between the rear charge and the blast shield but also the time delay required. The prior art generally slowed down the blast shield velocity by increasing its mass. This method resulted in a relatively heavy tandem warhead where long time delays (greater than 2000 microseconds) were necessary.
It is therefore a primary object of the invention to reduce the size and weight of the blast shield by combining the blast shield with the forward charge thus eliminating the blast shield entirely or replacing it with a thin lightweight blast shield to protect the rear charge from fragments or detonation products of the forward charge in long time delay tandem warhead systems.
Another object of the invention is to reduce the amount of explosive surrounding the forward charge thus reducing the possibility of damage to the rear charge.
A further object of the invention is to reduce the weight of the warhead and the distance between the rear of the forward charge and the face of the rear charge, thus reducing the total weight and size of the projectile into which the warhead is placed.
In the present invention, the forward shaped charge liner remains essentially unaltered but the amount of explosive surrounding the forward shaped charge liner is greatly reduced. This reduction in the amount (or weight) of explosive surrounding the liner is compensated for by confining the forward charge with a thick metal casing. This confinement of the forward charge acts to keep the pressure high enough to allow the shaped charge liner to collapse in the normal manner. Using this technique, the explosive weight can be reduced 50 to 75 percent, which greatly reduces the possibility of interference with to the rear charge. The total warhead length can also be reduced by 20 to 40 percent and the overall warhead weight can be reduced by 10 to 30 percent. The forward charge confinement thickness is greater, and the explosive weight of the forward charge is less, than that used in any known warhead design. By proper selection and balance between the mass of the forward shaped charge explosive and the mass of the explosive confinement, successful and even enhanced collapse of the forward shaped charge liner is assured.
Referring now to
A unique method must be employed in assembling forward charge 10. A cast explosive, such as OCTOL (a composition consisting of 75% HMX and 25% TNT) is poured over liner 1. For safety reasons, booster 6 and detonator 7 are inserted into confinement housing 3 just before final assembly of warhead 20. Because of the physical constraints of housing 3, explosive 2 must first be cast over liner 1 in a dummy confinement tube. The dummy confinement tube is then removed and booster 6 is inserted into confinement housing 3. Next, liner 1 and explosive 2 are inserted into confinement housing 3 and retaining ring 4 is attached. Finally, detonator 7 is inserted into housing 3, completing the assembly. This method of assembly is necessary because cavity 8 is too small to assure a uniform, homogeneous explosive fill if explosive 2 were poured through cavity 8 into the cavity behind liner 1. Also, booster 6 cannot be inserted into its position through cavity 8 because the diameter of cavity 8 is smaller than the diameter of booster 6. The diameter of cavity 8 is smaller than the diameter of booster 6 to assure accurate detonator/booster alignment and, hence, a precision initiation. Cavity 8 cannot be larger than booster 6 or detonator 7 because a larger cavity 8 would reduce the mass of confinement housing 8 and would also allow a larger volume of detonation products to escape through cavity 8 and be directed toward rear charge 30. Pressed explosives such as LX-14 may also be used. In this case the explosive billit is machined to fit into the confinement cavity and a cavity is machined in the explosive to accept the shaped charge liner. However, upon initiation of explosive 2, some confinement housing 3 materials and/or explosive 2 products may escape through cavity 8 and fly toward rear charge 30, a thin low mass blast shield 15, designed to deflect this material, may be necessary in certain embodiments of this invention.
Shown in
An example of a forward charge fabricated according to the teachings of this invention as shown in
A distinct advantage of the present invention over the prior art is that following detonation of high explosive 2, the majority of the confinement housing 3 or 44 material will move laterally away from the charge axis-of-symmetry 12 and will not be directed parallel to charge axis 12 and thus towards rear charge 30.
Tests of a forward charge having a confined liner and explosive charge as shown in
In general, heavily confined shaped charges are not used in practice. Such charges are not weight efficient and in fact excessive metal confinement can disrupt the collapse of the shaped charge liner. Also, the use of confinement weight and diameter is usually inefficient in that the extra weight and diameter allowed in a fined charge can be better utilized as high explosive or liner material. In fact bare, e.g., non-confined, charges can perform as well as confined charges.
General design rules contend that the maximum confinement thickness be less than or equal to 0.1 of the charge diameter (CD). Confinement thicknesses above 0.1 CD provide no additional enhancement of the shaped charge jet (in fact severe confinement ratios may disrupt the jet collapse). In the present invention, the confinement thickness os 0.13 to 0.4 charge diameters. The confinement thickness, the explosive thickness and the liner thickness are all adjusted to provide a quality (i.e. not overdriven) jet from the shaped charge liner. In a typical application, the total high explosive to confinement weight ratio is between 0.06 and 1.0. At the plane of the base or equator of the shaped charge, the ratio of high explosive thickness to confinement thickness is between 0.1 and 2.0 depending on the liner thickness.
In addition, the confinement geometry need not be cylindrical as shown in
To those skilled in the art, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention can be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein and still will be within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
The invention described herein may be manufactured, used and licensed by or for the United States Government for Governmental purpose without payment to us of any royalty thereon.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3750582 | Kintish et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
4004515 | Mallory et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4606272 | Kerdraon | Aug 1986 | A |
4667598 | Grobler et al. | May 1987 | A |
4714022 | Chaumeau et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4724767 | Aseltine | Feb 1988 | A |
4841864 | Grace | Jun 1989 | A |
4860654 | Chawla et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4862804 | Chawla et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2306889 | Feb 1973 | DE |