1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the reduction of tangential and radial stress in a suspension element of a loudspeaker transducer. The suspension element, such as a surround or spider, is designed to increase its ability to expand in both the radial and tangential directions.
2. Related Art
Sound reproduction devices such as loudspeakers are utilized in a broad range of applications in many distinct fields of technology, including both the consumer and industrial fields. Sound reproduction devices utilize a combination of mechanical and electrical components to convert electrical signals, representative of the sound, into mechanical energy that produces sound waves in an ambient sound field corresponding to the electrical signal. Thus, variations of electric energy are converted into corresponding variations of acoustic energy, i.e., sound.
Traditional speakers convert the electric energy to sound with one or more drivers that produce sound waves by rapidly vibrating a flexible cone or diaphragm. A diaphragm is usually circular with a central cone-shaped and/or dome-shaped portion that is coupled to a cylindrical former having a coil wire wrapped around the cylinder. Generally, the coil or wire is wrapped around the exterior side of the cylindrical former. The combination former and coil shall be referred to as the “voice coil.” The voice coil is typically suspended by a “spider,” which is attached to the frame of the speaker. The spider holds the voice coil in position while allowing it to move freely back and forth. The exterior edge of the diaphragm is attached to the frame of the speaker via a surround. Both the spider and the surround generally act as a rim, made of flexible material that spans between the voice coil and the frame and the diaphragm and the frame, respectively.
The surround and the spider act to form the suspension system that positions the voice coil and allows the voice coil to move relative to a transducer magnet(s) when electrical current is directed to the voice coil. The suspension allows the voice coil to rapidly move up and down along the longitudinal axis and vibrate the diaphragm. The suspension needs to be flexible enough to allow for the movement of the voice coil and diaphragm while at the same time keeping the diaphragm from wobbling or becoming “de-centered.”
Generally, suspension designs are concerned with minimizing the radial stress of the surround caused by the movement of the voice coil and diaphragm. The surround generally has a uniform half circular cross-sectional shape that extends to the entire perimeter or circumference of the surround, when the surround is generally circular. Thus, the radius of the half circular cross-section of the surround remains constant along the perimeter of the surround, creating an arched or dome shaped rim about the speaker. Similarly, the spider has a uniform cross-section that extends to the entire perimeter of the spider. The cross-section of the spider generally forms uniform corrugations, where the peaks and valleys, i.e., ridges and grooves, typically are of the same radius. For purposes of this application, the terms perimeter and circumference shall be synonymous and may be used interchangeably to define the perimeter of the suspension elements, regardless of their shape.
When the diaphragm of the speaker is vibrated, the external edge of the diaphragm moves up and down along the longitudinal axis of the speaker. During both the up-stroke and down-stroke of the voice coil, the surround is extended from its resting position to accommodate the movement of the diaphragm and the spider is extended to accommodate the movement of the voice coil. Thus, as the voice coil moves up and down, the cross-sectional shapes of the surround and spider elongate. As the voice coil moves up and down, both radial and tangential stress is placed upon the suspension elements, i.e., the spider and the surround. The radial stress is caused by the extending of the suspension elements in a direction parallel to the outer and inner edges of the suspension elements. The tangential stress, also referred to as “hoop stress”, is the stress placed on the suspension elements in a direction perpendicular to the outer and inner edges of the suspension elements. It is the tangential and radial stress on the suspension elements that limits the excursion and stiffness of the diaphragm and movement of the voice coil.
The extent to which the suspension elements limit the amount of excursion of the diaphragm and the movement of the voice coil is dependent upon the size of the suspension elements. The bigger the suspension elements, the more the suspension elements can stretch and allow the diaphragm and voice coil to move more freely. Employing bigger suspension elements, is not, however, a viable solution in a smaller speaker design since the size of the diaphragm must be significantly reduced to accommodate a larger suspension. When a small surround is utilized the excursion of the diaphragm is reduced, limiting the performance of the speakers. Thus, a trade off is made between performance and size when utilizing small speakers, such as those speakers found in laptop computers or small electronic devices. A need therefore exists to design speaker systems having suspension elements that increase the excursion of the diaphragm and allow more movement of the voice coil by reducing the radial and tangential stress placed on the suspension elements. While addressing this need would help to increase the performance of small speakers, any size speaker could experience increased performance capabilities from such a design.
Speaker systems are provided having suspension elements that, in the case of the surround, are designed to increase the amount of excursion and linearity of the diaphragm and thereby improve the performance of the speaker systems. Such speaker systems include a diaphragm that vibrates within an excursion range, a voice coil coupled to the diaphragm, and at least one suspension element coupled to the voice coil. The design of the suspension elements in the speaker systems minimizes the stress on the suspension elements by incorporating various geometric designs into the suspension elements that allow the suspension elements to stretch more easily. The design is incorporated into the suspension elements of the speaker systems without modifying the perimeter size of the elements, allowing for greater excursion of the diaphragm and movement of the voice coil in the same size speaker. In addition to improving the excursion, a significant reduction in the stiffness of the suspension elements is also achieved. This allows for greater bass reproduction in the same size speaker. Further, the modifications to the stiffness also allow for a greater range of operation with constant stiffness, which assists in reducing distortion by allowing the force vs. deflection characteristics to be tailored.
Any geometric design that increases the suspension element's ability to stretch without altering the length of its perimeter or without changing its circumference may be utilized in the speaker systems. For example, peaks may be incorporated into the suspension element at various points along the suspension element. At the points where the peaks are not incorporated, the suspension element could maintain its generally half-circular or uniformly corrugated cross-sectional shape, as the case may be. Alternatively, on certain areas of the surround, the design of the peaks could be modified to create more of a parabolic cross-section, rather than a half-circular cross-section. The parabolic cross-section may also vary in shape along the surround. By varying the slope of the parabolic cross-section or shifting the parabolic shape from side to side, the surround, when viewed from the top, may have an appearance of sinusoidal wave face, among other things. Similarly, the ridges and grooves of the spider could take on a parabolic shape, or other varying shape along portions of the spider.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following figures. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
The voice coil 26 is attached to the underside of the diaphragm 24. The voice coil 26 and diaphragm 24 are attached to the frame 22 via a suspension system, which generally comprises two suspension elements, the spider 30 and the surround 32. The spider 30 is attached to both the frame 22 and the voice coil 26. The spider 30 is attached to the voice coil 26 in a manner that holds the voice coil 28 in position, yet allows the voice coil 26 to freely move up and down. Similarly, the diaphragm 24 is attached to the frame 22 via a surround 32. Alternatively, the surround 32 may be attached to a cylinder (not shown) that is in turn attached to the diaphragm 24. In this regard, the entirety of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/346,954, filed Jul. 1, 1999, titled Miniature Full Range Loudspeaker is incorporated by reference. In either instance, the surround 32 is made of a flexible material, generally circular in shape that allows the diaphragm 24 to freely move up and down.
The diaphragm 24 and the voice coil 26 move when electric current is run through the voice coil 26. When the electric current is run through the voice coil 26, a magnetic field is created around the coil 26. The polarity of the magnetic field is continuously reversed, causing the voice coil 26 to alternatively move toward and away from the permanent magnet 28 in the speaker 20. The movement of the voice coil 26 vibrates the diaphragm 24, creating sound. For this reason, both the spider 30 and the surround 32 must be made of flexible material that allows for the movement of the voice coil 26 and vibration of the diaphragm 24.
As the voice coil 26 moves and the diaphragm 24 is vibrated, the voice coil 26 and the diaphragm 24 move up and down, causing the suspension elements 30 and 32 to expand from their resting position, which is the position of the suspension elements 30 and 32 when the diaphragm 24 and voice coil 26 are not moving. The expansion of the suspension elements 30 and 32 causes the cross-section of the elements 30 and 32, taken across the inner edges 36 and 37 and outer edges 34 and 35 of the elements 30 and 32, to elongate. This causes both tangential stress and radial stress on the suspension elements 30 and 32. Again, radial stress is caused by the extending of the suspension elements 30 and 32 in a direction parallel to the outer edges 34 and 35 and inner edge 36 and 37 of the suspension elements 30 and 32, as shown by reference number 38 in
The surround 32 shown in
As seen in
Another implementation of a geometric design that could be used in a suspension element 30 or 32 of a speaker 20 is illustrated in
Yet another implementation of a geometric design that could be used in a suspension element 30 or 32 of a speaker 20 is illustrated in
In operation, the implementation of the different geometric design decreases the stress on the suspension elements 30 and/or 32. For example, when the surround 32 employs peaks 42, as the diaphragm 24 moves upward expanding the surround 32, the peaks 42 will flatten, giving the surround 32 greater ability to expand in both the tangential 40 and radial direction 38. When the surround 32 employs the sinusoidal wave face 48 design, the sinusoidal wave face 48, as the surround 32 expands, will become more linear or simply circular without the sinusoidal curve relative to the center circumference of the surround. This gives the surround 24 greater ability to expand in the radial direction 38. Similarly, the expansion of the spider 30 would have the same effect. The same designs employed in the surround 32 may be employed in the spider 30. Variation of these designs discussed above may also be employed in either suspension element 30 or 32. Varying peaks 42 may be included in the sinusoidal wave face implementation 48, such that the height of the dome 50 or ridge 54, as the case may be, would no longer be uniform. Additionally, waves may be implemented in segments in either the spider 30 or the surround 32 similar to the implementation of the peaks 42 in the surround 32 as shown in
While various embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible within the scope of this invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/053,585 filed Feb. 7, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,174,990 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/113,627 filed Mar. 27, 2002 and issued Feb. 8, 2005 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,851,513 and which claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/279,314, filed Mar. 27, 2001. The entirety of each of these patents and patent applications is incorporated by reference into this application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1744032 | Baldwin | Jan 1930 | A |
1757107 | Baltzley | May 1930 | A |
2358823 | O'Connor et al. | Sep 1944 | A |
2866515 | Hunter | Dec 1958 | A |
3154173 | Petrie | Oct 1964 | A |
3905448 | Kawakami et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3941396 | Bailey et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3997023 | White | Dec 1976 | A |
4284167 | Kozlow et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4321434 | Irie | Mar 1982 | A |
4324312 | Durbin | Apr 1982 | A |
4433214 | Jasinski | Feb 1984 | A |
4836561 | Lebeck et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4881617 | Faraone | Nov 1989 | A |
5371805 | Saiki et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5418337 | Schreiber | May 1995 | A |
5797602 | Less | Aug 1998 | A |
5880412 | Faraone | Mar 1999 | A |
6026929 | Faraone | Feb 2000 | A |
6176345 | Perkins et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6250648 | Ikeda et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6351544 | Noll | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6516077 | Yamaguchi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6567528 | Heed | May 2003 | B1 |
6582146 | Raymoure | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6611604 | Irby et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6697496 | Frasl | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6725967 | Hlibowicki | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726213 | Wang | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6729624 | Johnston | May 2004 | B1 |
6851513 | Stead et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6889796 | Pocock et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7054459 | Kuze et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7174990 | Stead et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7200240 | Ohara | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7275620 | Diedrich et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
20020144859 | Pocock et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030079936 | Kuze et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030121718 | Stead et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20060162993 | Honda et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070127768 | Horigome et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2348336 | Sep 2000 | GB |
58051694 | Mar 1983 | JP |
58127499 | Jul 1983 | JP |
60068799 | Apr 1985 | JP |
06105393 | Apr 1994 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070272475 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60279314 | Mar 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11053585 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 11656819 | US | |
Parent | 10113627 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 11053585 | US |