The present application is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 national stage application of PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2019/055395 filed on Mar. 5, 2019, which claims the benefit and priority of EP18382142, filed on 7 Mar. 2018, the disclosure of each which is incorporated by reference in their entireties.
The present disclosure is related to a tank for shell transformers or shell reactors that is filled with an insulating liquid, such as oil.
Power transformers or reactors may be subject to internal arc energy in case of internal failure. The insulating fluid surrounding the active part of the transformer or reactor may then vaporize and create an expanding gas bubble, causing an overpressure that may break the transformer or reactor tank.
Such an arc fault is more critical in shell-form transformers or shell-form reactors, which have a form-fit tank that mechanically fits around the active part of the transformer/reactor and is more rigid than a tank of core-form technology. The tank of shell transformers or reactors is therefore less flexible and less able to deform without breaking when subject to a high tensile stress. In case of an internal arc, the resulting overpressure will create mechanical stresses in the tank that may exceed the ultimate tensile strength of at least certain regions or parts of the tank, which may thus suffer a non-admissible strain and break, at a low level of energy for internal arcs. The rupture of the tank may cause oil spills and the risk of fire breaking out.
Some solutions have been developed to address the problem of rupture of the tank in case of internal arc fault, especially for core-form transformers. Known solutions involve, for example, pressure relief devices, C-shaped clamps provided at discrete positions to reinforce the welded joint between different parts of the tank (for shell technology) and prevent them from breaking, or reinforcing ribs on the side walls of the tanks, as well as modifications of the tank dimensions.
However, known solutions may not be sufficient to prevent the rupture of the tank of a shell-type transformer or reactor in case of an internal arc fault, so it would be desirable to provide a tank that is safer and in which the risks of rupture is reduced.
According to a first aspect, a tank for a liquid-filled shell transformer or shell reactor is provided. The tank comprises a lower tank portion with a bottom plate and lower side walls, and an upper tank portion with upper side walls, the lower tank portion and upper tank portion being joined together along a substantially horizontal perimetric joining line and defining an internal space for housing an active part of the shell transformer or shell reactor and an insulating liquid. The tank also comprises a reinforcing cincture surrounding and joined to the lower side walls of the lower tank portion and the upper side walls of the upper tank portion and forming a sealed chamber enclosing the perimetric joining line between the lower tank portion and the upper tank portion.
In case of an overpressure caused by an internal arc in the transformer or reactor, the reinforcing cincture provides a protection of the joint between the two portions of the tank (lower and upper parts). In known tanks this joint is a weak and critic region due to its position and to its lack of flexibility, as usually it is a simply welded joint which does not allow it to deform and accommodate the overpressure without breaking in case of internal arc. Known measures such as the use of some discrete C-shaped clamps applied to the weld are not sufficient in such cases. The reinforcing cincture provides a higher ultimate tensile strength to the tank in the region of the joint and displaces the weakest point to other regions of the tank where the overpressure and the consequent stresses on the tank walls can be more easily accommodated, such as the upper region of the tank.
Furthermore, the reinforcing cincture being configured to form a sealed chamber surrounding the joint between the lower and upper portions of the tank means that even if the primary weld mail fail or break at one or more points due to a very high overpressure and stress, the insulating liquid, for example oil, will be confined in the chamber and will not spill out of the tank thanks to the additional protection. The reinforcing cincture therefore has the additional advantage of protecting the environment from an oil spill and from the risk of fire associated with such an oil spill.
The present disclosure also provides a liquid-filled shell transformer or shell reactor with a tank as disclosed herein.
Embodiments of tanks presented in the present disclosure are suitable for single-phase shell transformers and reactors, but may also be applied in polyphase shell systems, such as three-phase transformers and reactors.
According to a second aspect, the present disclosure provides a method for assembling a liquid-filled shell transformer or shell reactor, comprising:
Particular embodiments of the present device will be described in the following by way of non-limiting examples, with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
A tank according to embodiments disclosed herein is suitable and intended for housing the active part of a power transformer or a reactor, and more in particular a shell-form solution. Tanks for shell technology typically comprise a lower tank portion, into which is arranged the winding package, formed by multiple pancakes staked and connected in series. The transformer core is then stacked around the winding package, on the bottom plate of the tank, and an upper tank portion is then set on the lower tank portion surrounding the core and is welded to the lower tank portion. Finally, a tank cover is welded to the top of the upper tank portion, and the rest of the space in the tank is filled with an insulating liquid, such as oil.
Thus, the lower tank portion and upper tank portion define between them an internal space for the shell-form active part (windings, core, etc.) and the insulating liquid. The tank, and therefore the upper and lower tank portions, may be prismatic. Typically it may be a rectangular prism.
In the present disclosure the expressions upper, lower, vertical, horizontal, etc. are given with reference to the intended position of the transformer and the tank when in use.
In the present disclosure, the expression “transformers” is also meant to encompass autotransformers.
Joined to the side walls 11 is shown an upper reinforcing ring 110, which may be hollow and may for example have a U-shaped cross section as shown, but also a cross section that is rectangular or has any other shape and dimension. The upper reinforcing ring 110 may project horizontally further from the vertical side wall 11 than the flange 12.
Upper reinforcing ring 110 may surround all the upper tank portion 10 forming a continuous piece, and may be joined to the side walls 11 of the upper tank portion 10 by welding, for example by forming two continuous fillet welds 111 and 112 all around.
The lower tank portion 20 may comprise a bottom plate, side walls 21 that are substantially vertical and end in a horizontal flange 22 at the upper end thereof, extending all around the perimeter of the lower tank portion 20. The lower tank portion 20 may have smaller internal horizontal and vertical dimensions with respect to the upper tank portion 10, but the dimensions of the flange 12 of the upper tank portion 10 and of the flange 22 of the lower tank portion 20 may be configured to match and form between them a horizontal perimetric joining line between the upper tank portion 10 and the lower tank portion 20.
Joined to the flange 22 of the side walls 21 is shown a lower reinforcing ring 120, which may be hollow and may for example have a G-shaped cross section as shown, but also a cross section that is rectangular or has any other shape and dimension. The lower reinforcing ring 120 may project horizontally further from the vertical side wall 21 than the horizontal flange 22.
Lower reinforcing ring 120 may surround all the lower tank portion 20 forming a continuous piece, and it may be joined to the flange 22 of the lower tank portion 20 by welding, for example by forming two continuous fillet welds 121 and 122.
As shown in
The assembly of upper reinforcing ring 110, lower reinforcing ring 120 and belt 130 forms a reinforcing cincture 100 that surrounds the side walls 11 and 21 of the upper tank portion 10 and the lower tank portion 20, at the level of the perimetric joining line between them; the reinforcing cincture 100 is joined, e.g. welded, to the vertical part of the side walls 11 and to the flange 22 of the side walls 21. The upper reinforcing rings 110 are an embodiment of an upper reinforcing cincture portion, and the lower reinforcing rings 120 are an embodiment of a lower reinforcing cincture portion, which may be joined together, in this case through the closing plate or belt 130.
Belt 130 may be applied surrounding all the tank in a continuous and sealing way.
It will be appreciated in
The chamber 140 may be a single, substantially toroidal-like chamber all around the perimeter of the tank, or may be divided in multiple separate compartments for example by vertical plates (not shown).
In other embodiments the reinforcing cincture 100 may also be formed by different reinforcing elements from those described above: for example, it may comprise reinforcing rings with different shapes or having a variable geometry and/or configuration along the perimeter of the tank. For example, in a tank for a shell transformer having short-circuit beams on two opposite sides of the lower tank portion, the lower reinforcing ring may have a different shape on different sides of the lower tank portion, and may be joined to a different part of the lower tank portion, or in a different way. In other examples, reinforcing rings may be formed with non-hollow beams such as I-beams, T-beams or others; the upper and lower reinforcing rings may project different lengths, and/or they may be joined by a closing element different from a belt or closing plate 130; or may have shapes allowing the upper and lower reinforcement rings to form the sealed chamber and be welded to each other without the need for a closing plate or belt.
In other embodiments at least some of the joints, for example one or both the joints between the belt 130 and the reinforcing rings 110 and 120, may be formed by bolting instead of welding.
It will be appreciated from
A short circuit or a similar failure in the transformer windings may cause an internal arc generating an energy of e.g. 20 MJ. The weld seam 30 between the upper and lower portions of the tank is a weak point and is not able to withstand the resulting overpressure, and would tend to break; however, the reinforcing cincture 100 provides the weld seam region with a higher ultimate tensile strength, such that the weld seam may withstand much higher overpressures without failing and breaking.
Furthermore, in case the weld seam 30 should fail at one or more points of the perimeter of the tank and insulating oil should flow out, the reinforced, sealed chamber 140 would restrain this oil, thus preventing serious hazards such as a spill to the environment and the risk of fire.
In practice, the reinforcing cincture 100 causes a displacement of the weakest point of the tank from the weld seam 30 to other regions of the tank walls, that are more easily configured to absorb energy and deform without arriving to a rupture.
Embodiments of tanks as disclosed herein may additionally be provided with vertical ribs on the side walls 11 of the upper tank portion 10, so that the side walls with the ribs may be built with enough flexibility to absorb arc energy and deform, without reaching rupture. The number, position and configuration of the ribs to provide a suitable compromise between strength and flexibility will depend on each particular case.
The edges between two side walls 11 of the upper tank portion 110 and/or the edges between two side walls 21 of the lower tank portion 120 may be rounded, to better resist the overpressure.
Embodiments of liquid-filled shell transformers or shell reactors may be provided with a tank having a reinforced cincture 100, as disclosed above and as shown in
A transformer or reactor with a tank according to the present disclosure may be assembled by embodiments of a method comprising, as shown in
Although only a number of particular embodiments and examples have been disclosed herein, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the disclosed innovation and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof are possible. Furthermore, the present disclosure covers all possible combinations of the particular embodiments described. The scope of the present disclosure should not be limited by particular embodiments, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
18382142 | Mar 2018 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2019/055395 | 3/5/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/170642 | 9/12/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20110147115 | Ertl | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
205230706 | May 2016 | CN |
S41-4104 | Mar 1941 | JP |
5077827 | Jun 1975 | JP |
S5278020 | Jul 1977 | JP |
53-152128 | Nov 1978 | JP |
S56161619 | Dec 1981 | JP |
5521112 | Dec 1983 | JP |
S6041208 | Mar 1985 | JP |
H10270257 | Oct 1998 | JP |
2012062990 | Mar 2012 | JP |
2015018995 | Sep 2017 | JP |
20150023639 | Mar 2015 | KR |
20170126852 | Nov 2017 | KR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/EP2019/055395, dated May 7, 2019, 10 pages. |
Japanese Notice of Reasons for Refusal, JP2020-544635, dated Mar. 4, 2021, 4 pages. |
Kawamura et al., “Prevention of Tank Rupture Due to Internal Fault of Oil-Filled Transformer”, Cigre, International Conference on Large High Voltage Electric Systems, 1988 Session, Aug. 28-Sep. 3, 112, boulevard Haussmann—75008 Paris, 9 pages. |
Culver et al., “Prevention of Tank Rupture of Faulted Power Transformers by Generator Circuit Breakers”, ETEP vol. 6, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 1996, pp. 39-45. |
Petersen et al., “Guide for Transformer Fire Safety Practices”, Cigre, Working Group A2.33, Jun. 2013, 139 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210043370 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |