A disadvantage with known fluid dispensing taps (such as that disclosed in WO2007054797) is release of the tap due to a pressure differential between the inside of the tap attached to a fluid container and the outside atmospheric pressure. Sterility of manufactured taps (for use in the storage and dispensing of sterile fluids such as fruit juices) is obtained during the tap manufacture using processes such as steam autoclaving at temperatures above 100° C. Such treatment can frequently result in an internal vacuum being created. This can result in inadvertent actuation of the tap and unwanted and potentially hazardous spillage of fluid from the tap. One solution to this problem is to increase the force required to release the tap by the user by increasing tolerances between a tap body and an actuation member of the tap or by biasing actuation of the tap. However this can be inconvenient or potentially hazardous to the user.
A further disadvantage with known taps is the risk of reaction of oxygen sensitive fluids, such as wine, with oxygen during transportation and/or storage of fluid within the fluid container to which the tap is attached before use of the tap. Such reaction can spoil the fluid and reduce shelf-life.
One solution to this problem is purging of the tap and contents of the container to which the tap is attached with nitrogen to reduce the oxygen content of the stored fluid to a level lower than normal air levels (approximately 21%) to reduce the efficiency of aerobic microbial growth. However such treatment can be expensive.
It is an object of the present invention to address the foregoing problems or at least to provide the public with a useful choice.
It is acknowledged that the term ‘comprise’ may, under varying jurisdictions, be attributed with either an exclusive or an inclusive meaning. For the purpose of this specification, and unless otherwise noted, the term ‘comprise’ shall have an inclusive meaning—i.e. that it will be taken to mean an inclusion of not only the listed components it directly references, but also other non-specified components or elements. This rationale will also be used when the term ‘comprised’ or ‘comprising’ is used in relation to one or more steps in a method or process.
Further aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the ensuing description which is given by way of example only.
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a tap assembly, comprising:
Preferably, the cover comprises a tamper evident indicator comprising a removable portion attached to the cover at at least one weakened join.
More preferably, the removable cover also comprises a pull-tab.
In this way the cover portion is configured to separate the removable portion of the cover from the body to expose the actuation member when a user breaks the at least one weakened join via the pull-tab.
Preferably, the actuation member comprises a button.
Preferably, the first engagement portion is a lip formed on the body which is configured to engage with a corresponding groove formed in the cover.
More preferably, the cover comprises a second engagement portion in the form of a groove formed in the actuation member which is configured to engage with a corresponding lip formed on the cover.
More preferably, the cover also comprises an annular band to sealingly engage with the body of the tap assembly after engagement of the annular bead with the engagement portion.
In this way the internal spaces between the cover and the actuation member and between the actuation member and the body are kept under aseptic conditions.
More preferably, the tap assembly also comprises at least one projection positioned on an end of the actuation member proximal to the sterility membrane.
In this way actuation of the actuation member causes the projection to pierce the sterility membrane to facilitate the flow of fluid between the fluid container and the tap assembly.
Preferably, the at least one projection is 3 to 5 projections.
More preferably, one of the projections is positioned proximal of the other projections with respect to the sterility membrane.
In this way, the proximal projection provides an initial point of entry into the sterility membrane and minimises the force required to pierce the sterility membrane.
Preferably, the at least one projection comprises at least one fluid passageway to facilitate the flow of fluid between the bore and the tap assembly after entry of the at least one projection into the sterility membrane.
Preferably, the at least one projection comprises at least one serration configured to maintain the projection in place relative to the sterility membrane after entry of the projection into the sterility membrane.
Preferably, the at least one projection is configured to pull away the cut sterility membrane from the intended fluid flow path after withdrawal of the at least one projection from the sterility membrane.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a tap assembly, comprising:
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided tap assembly, comprising:
Further aspects of the present invention will become apparent from the following description which is given by way of example only and with reference to the accompanying figures in which:
Referring to
A pair of wing-like projections 6 extends from the body 2 near the button 4A to provide convenient surfaces, transverse to the body, for an operator to grip with their index and middle fingers while depressing the button 4A with their thumb.
The tap assembly 1 also comprises a cover in the form of a cap 7 which encloses and abuts the button 4A to prevent actuation of the button 4A. Cap 7 is fitted by clip-fit engagement with annular lip 8 on body 2. The cap 7 attaches to a first engagement portion in the form of lip 8 of the body 2 at groove 9 (best seen in
The cap 7 has a pull tab 12 to facilitate a user gripping the cap 7 (best seen in
As shown in
If a sterility membrane is used, the push-rod 4 of the tap assembly 1 also incorporates three projections 16 positioned on an end of the push-rod 4 and proximal to the sterility membrane 15. Actuation of the push-rod 4 via the button 4A causes piercing of the sterility membrane 15 by the projections 16 and resultant flow of fluid from the attached fluid container (not shown) once the projections 16 are withdrawn by release of the button 4.
Optionally one of the projections (16A in
A person skilled in the art will appreciate that the shape of the projections 16 may be varied without departing from the scope of the present invention. Each projection 16 comprises a shear wall 16A, a tapered surface 16B, a piercing point 16C and an aperture 16D (best seen in
The base 17 may be connected to the push-rod 4 or may form an extension of the push-rod 4. Each projection can optionally include at least one serration (not shown) configured to maintain the projections 16 in place relative to the sterility membrane 15 after entry of the projections 16 into the sterility membrane 15 which aids in the cutting efficiency of the projections 16.
Thus preferred embodiments of the present invention have a number of advantages over the prior art which include:
Aspects of the present invention have been described by way of example only and it should be appreciated that modifications and additions may be made thereto without departing from the scope thereof as defined in the appended claims.
The present application is national phase of PCT/US2010/054973 filed Nov. 1, 2010, based on the provisional specification filed on Nov. 2, 2009 in relation to U.S. Patent Application No. 61/257,297.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2010/054973 | 11/1/2010 | WO | 00 | 5/1/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/162788 | 12/29/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4469249 | Malpas et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4570826 | Fattori | Feb 1986 | A |
4624392 | Malpas et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4722458 | Van Dal | Feb 1988 | A |
4884705 | Debetencourt | Dec 1989 | A |
5482176 | Maietta et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
7789269 | Pritchard | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20080283790 | Wrigley et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0043698 | Jan 1982 | EP |
0148971 | Jul 1985 | EP |
0304972 | Mar 1989 | EP |
2619612 | Feb 1989 | FR |
2082152 | Mar 1982 | GB |
WO 8102418 | Sep 1981 | WO |
2007054797 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007054797 | May 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
ISR for PCT/US2010/054973 dated Feb. 2, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120211519 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61257297 | Nov 2009 | US |