Patent Grant
9233553
1. Technical Field
This invention generally relates to tape drive and printing apparatus and to methods of operation for same and to apparatus and methods which may be used in transfer printers, that is printers which make use of carrier-supported inks.
2. Related Art
In transfer printers, a tape which is normally referred to as a printer ribbon and carries ink on one side is presented within a printer such that a print head can contact the other side of the ribbon to cause the ink to be transferred from the ribbon onto a target substrate of for example paper or a flexible film. Such printers are used in many applications. Industrial printing applications include thermal transfer label printers and thermal transfer coders which print directly onto a substrate such as packaging materials manufactured from flexible film or card.
Ink ribbon is normally delivered to the end user in the form of a roll wound onto a core. The end user pushes the core onto a tape spool, pulls a free end of the roll to release a length of ribbon, and then engages the end of the tape with a further spool. Generally the spools are mounted on a cassette which can be readily mounted on a printing machine. The printing machine includes a transport means for driving the two spools, so as to unwind ribbon from one spool and to take up ribbon on the other spool. The printing apparatus transports ribbon between the two spools along a predetermined path past the printing head.
Known printers of the above type rely upon a wide range of different approaches to the problem of how to drive the ribbon spools. Some rely upon stepper motors, others on DC motors to directly or indirectly drive the spools. Generally the known arrangements drive only the spool onto which ribbon is taken up (the take-up spool) and rely upon some form of “slipping clutch” arrangement on the spool from which ribbon is drawn (the supply spool) to provide a resistive force so as to ensure that the ribbon is maintained in tension during the printing and ribbon winding processes and to prevent ribbon overrun when the ribbon is brought to rest. It will be appreciated that maintaining adequate tension is an essential requirement for proper functioning of the printer.
As a roll of ribbon is gradually used by the printer, the initial outside diameter of the supply spool decreases and the initial outer diameter of the take-up spool increases. In slipping clutch arrangements which offer an essentially constant resistive torque, the ribbon tension will vary in proportion to the diameter of the spools. Given that it is desirable to use large supply spools so as to minimize the number of times that a ribbon roll has to be replenished, this is a serious problem particularly in high speed machines where rapid ribbon transport is essential.
Dynamically changing ribbon tension gives rise to demands for tight tolerances for the torque delivered by the slipping clutch. Such tolerances are difficult to maintain as wear in the slipping clutch over time tends to change the resistive force exerted by the clutch. If the clutch force is too great the ribbon transport system may have inadequate power to drive the ribbon throughout the range of spool diameters from a new supply roll to an empty supply roll. Too little clutch force and slack in the ribbon could result in overrun of the supply spool. Given these constraints, typical printer designs have compromised performance by way of limiting the rate of acceleration, the rate of deceleration, and the maximum speed capability of the ribbon transport system. Overall printer performance has as a result been compromised.
Representative examples of conventional printing apparatus are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,000,804, U.S. Pat. No. 4,294,552, U.S. Pat. No. 4,479,081, U.S. Pat. No. 4,788,558 and British patent 2310405.
The system of U.S. Pat. No. 4,000,804 describes an arrangement for transferring a ribbon from a supply spool to a take-up spool which includes a pair of electric motors each one of which is connected to a corresponding spool shaft. The motors are direct current (DC) motors. The motor connected to the take-up spool is supplied by a constant current generator so as to wind up the ribbon with a substantially constant torque. The motor connected to the supply spool is supplied by a constant voltage generator so as to keep the ribbon tensioned during ribbon transfer. A change-over device alternates the function of the two spools when the ribbon is fully wound on the take-up spool. With the described arrangement, no account is taken of the change in diameters of the supply and take-up spools during ribbon transfer and thus ribbon tension varies substantially during the course of the full transfer of the ribbon from the supply spool to the take-up spool.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,294,552 discloses a bi-directional ribbon drive in which two spools are driven by respective stepper motors. The take-up spool is driven by its stepper motor, but the supply spool motor is fed a low level “drag” current to maintain the ribbon in tension. The motors are not actively controlled to compensate for spool diameter variations.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,479,081 describes an arrangement in which two stepper motors are provided, one driving the take-up spool and the other coupled to the supply spool. Feedback signals provide an indication of the angular velocity of the supply spool and a function table provides information on the rate of stepping pulses to be applied to the take-up spool. The ribbon is driven by the stepper motor driving the take-up spool, the other motor acting as a feedback transducer to enable appropriate control of the motor driving the take-up spool to take account of changing spool diameters while maintaining a constant ribbon speed. Thus although this arrangement does avoid the need for example of a capstan drive interposed between the two spools so as to achieve reliable ribbon delivery speeds, only one of the motors is driven to deliver torque to assist ribbon transport. There is no suggestion that the apparatus can operate in push-pull mode, that is the motor driving the take-up spool operating to pull the ribbon and the motor driving the supply spool operating to push the associated spool in a direction which assists tape transport.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,788,558 describes a ribbon drive mechanism in which two DC motors are provided, one driving the take-up spool and one driving the supply spool. Ribbon is delivered by a further drive roller driven by a stepper motor. The supply spool DC motor acts as a brake and does not assist in tape transport. Thus this is a conventional arrangement in which a capstan roller is used to control ribbon delivery speed. With such an arrangement it is a relatively simple matter as described to provide feedback information concerning the magnitude of the ribbon spools so as to maintain a desired ribbon tension, but the overall system is complex.
GB 2310405 describes a bi-directional printer ribbon drive mechanism in which a stepper motor drives a take-up spool. Accurate control of ribbon delivery is achieved by providing an idler roller which rotates in contact with the ribbon and thus enables a direct measurement of ribbon transport speed. The provision of such an idler roller and associated components adds to overall system complexities and cost.
None of the known arrangements is capable of coping well with the requirements of high speed industrial transfer printing systems. Such systems generally operate in one of two manners, that is either continuous printing or intermittent printing. In both modes of operation, the apparatus performs a regularly repeated series of printing cycles, each cycle including a printing phase during which ink is being transferred to a substrate, and a further non-printing phase during which the apparatus is prepared for the printing phase of the next cycle.
In continuous printing, during the printing phase a stationary print head is brought into contact with a printer ribbon the other side of which is in contact with a substrate onto which an image is to be printed. (The term “stationary” is used in the context of continuous printing to indicate that although the print head will be moved into and out of contact with the ribbon, it will not move relative to the ribbon path in the direction in which ribbon is advanced along that path). Both the substrate and printer ribbon are transported past the print head, generally but not necessarily at the same speed. Generally only relatively small lengths of the substrate which is transported past the printer head are to be printed upon and therefore to avoid gross wastage of ribbon it is necessary to reverse the direction of travel of the ribbon between printing operations. Thus in a typical printing process in which the substrate is traveling at a constant velocity, the print head is extended into contact with the ribbon only when the print head is adjacent regions of the substrate to be printed. Immediately before extension of the print head, the ribbon must be accelerated up to for example the speed of travel of the substrate. The ribbon speed must then be maintained at the constant speed of the substrate during the printing phase and, after the printing phase has been completed, the ribbon must be decelerated and then driven in the reverse direction so that the used region of the ribbon is on the upstream side of the print head. As the next region of the substrate to be printed approaches, the ribbon must then be accelerated back up to the normal printing speed and the ribbon must be positioned so that an unused portion of the ribbon close to the previously used region of the ribbon is located between the print head and the substrate when the print head is advanced to the printing position. Thus very rapid acceleration and deceleration of the ribbon in both directions is required, and the ribbon drive system must be capable of accurately locating the ribbon so as to avoid a printing operation being conducted when a previously used portion of the ribbon is interposed between the print head and the substrate.
In intermittent printing, a substrate is advanced past a print head in a stepwise manner such that during the printing phase of each cycle the substrate and generally but not necessarily the ribbon are stationary. Relative movement between the substrate, ribbon and print head are achieved by displacing the print head relative to the substrate and ribbon. Between the printing phase of successive cycles, the substrate is advanced so as to present the next region to be printed beneath the print head and the ribbon is advanced so that an unused section of ribbon is located between the print head and the substrate. Once again rapid and accurate transport of the ribbon is necessary to ensure that unused ribbon is always located between the substrate and print head at a time that the print head is advanced to conduct a printing operation.
The requirements in terms of ribbon acceleration, deceleration, speed and positional accuracy of high speed transfer printers is such that the known drive mechanisms have difficulty delivering acceptable performance with a high degree of reliability. Similar constraints also apply in applications other than high speed printers. Accordingly it is an object of the present exemplary embodiment to provide a tape drive which can be used to deliver printer ribbon in a manner which is capable of meeting the requirements of high speed production lines, although the tape drive of the present invention may of course be used in other applications where similar high performance requirements are demanded.
In an exemplary embodiment, there is provided a tape drive comprising two motors at least one of which is a stepper motor, two tape spool supports on which spools of tape may be mounted, each spool support being drivable by a respective motor, and a controller for controlling the energization of the motors such that tape may be transported in at least one direction between spools mounted on the spool supports, wherein the controller is operative to energize both motors to drive the spools of tape in the direction of tape transport.
A tape drive in accordance with an exemplary embodiment relies upon both the motors which drive the two tape spools to drive the tape during tape transport. Thus the two motors operate in push-pull mode. This makes it possible to achieve very high rates of acceleration and deceleration. Tension in the tape being transported is determined by control of the drive motors and therefore is not dependent upon any components which have to contact the tape between the take-up and supply spools. Thus a very simple overall mechanical assembly can be achieved. Given that both motors contribute to tape transport, relatively small and therefore inexpensive and compact motors can be used.
The actual rotational direction of each spool will depend on the sense in which the tape is wound on each spool. If both spools are wound in the same sense then both spools will rotate in the same rotational direction to transport the tape. If the spools are wound in the opposite sense to one another, then the spools will rotate in opposite rotational directions to transport the tape. In any configuration, both spools rotate in the direction of tape transport.
Preferably the controller is arranged to control the motors to transport tape in both directions between the spools. The motors may both be stepper motors and the controller may be operative to monitor tension in a tape being transported between spools mounted on the spool support and to control the motors to maintain the monitored tension between predetermined limits. Means are preferably provided to monitor the power supply to at least one of the motors and to calculate an estimate of tape tension from the monitored power. For example, where two stepper motors are provided, a power supply may deliver power to a stepper motor drive means which supplies current sequentially to windings of the stepper motors, the power being monitored by means for monitoring the magnitude of voltage and/or current supplied to the motors and/or the motor drive means. It will be appreciated that dependent upon the load applied to the motors the current and voltage delivered to the motor windings will both vary, irrespective of the type and nature of the motor drive means used. For this reason it is preferred to provide a regulated power supply which supplies a substantially constant voltage to the stepper motor drive means and to monitor the magnitude of current supplied to the stepper motor drive means from the power supply.
Preferably each stepper motor is energized by a respective motor drive circuit, a respective low resistance resistor being connected in series with each motor drive circuit, and voltage signals developed across the series resistors being monitored to monitor the current supplied to the motors. The voltage signals may be converted to digital signals for supply to a microcontroller which controls the generation of motor control pulse trains which are applied to the motor drive circuits. The current may be monitored over a predetermined period of time and preferably is monitored only during periods in which tape transport speed is substantially constant. The predetermined period of time may correspond to a predetermined length of tape transport.
Calibration data may be recorded for the or each stepper motor, the calibration data representing power consumption for the stepper motor at each of a series of step rates under no tape load conditions, and a measure of tape tension may be calculated by reference to a measure of motor step rate, the calibration data related to the step rate, and the power consumed by the motor.
The outside diameters of the tape spool may be directly monitored and the tape tension calculated to take into account the monitored diameters. The outside diameters may be monitored for each of a plurality of diameters which are mutually inclined to each other so as to enable the detection of spool eccentricity and therefore enable an accurate calculation of the spool circumference.
A measure of tension t may be calculated from measures of power supplied to the two motors, measures of the spool radii, calibration factors for the two motors related to the step rate of the motors. A calibration scaling factor may also be used to translate the calculated tension into a more interpretable value. Preferably the controller implements a control algorithm to calculate a length of tape to be added to or subtracted from the tape extending between the spools in order to maintain the value t between predetermined limits and to control the stepper motors to add or subtract the calculated length of tape to the tape extending between the spools. Alternatively, a measure of the difference between the current supplied to the two motors may be derived and stepping of the motors may be controlled dependent upon the difference measure. It will be appreciated that the difference measure could simply be the result of subtracting one current from the other or could relate to the ratio of the two measured currents. Motor speed may be maintained constant during a period in which the difference measure is within each of a series of tolerance bands defined between upper and lower limits, and the tolerance bands may be adjusted in dependence upon the ratio of the outside diameters of the spools. The controlling means may implement a control algorithm to calculate a length of tape to be added to or subtracted from the tape extending between the spools in order to maintain the difference measure between the upper and lower limit and to control the stepper motors to add or subtract the calculated length of tape to the tape extending between the spools.
A value corresponding to tape width may be input and the predetermined limit adjusted to take account of that tape width. For example, the control algorithm may comprise gain constants, and the gain constants may be adjusted to take account of tape width. The control algorithm may operate cyclically such that during one cycle the length of tape to be added or subtracted is calculated and during a subsequent cycle the motors are controlled to adjust the amount of tape between the spools. This approach is adopted because, as it will be appreciated that although the length of tape between the spools is to a first approximation independent of tension, stretching of the tape will mean that if tape is added to the length of tape extending between the spools this will be taken up by a reduction in stretch until the tension becomes zero. It will be further appreciated that for a given tension, a narrower tape will stretch more than a wider tape, therefore a change in tension, caused by the addition or subtraction of tape between the spools, will be less for a narrower tape than for a wider tape.
Tension monitoring makes it possible to generate a fault-indicating output if the measure of tension falls below a minimum acceptable limit to indicate for example a tape breakage.
Spool diameters may be monitored using an optical sensing system including at least one light emitter and at least one light detector arranged such that an optical path is established there between, a transport mechanism supporting at least one part of the optical sensing system and drivable so as to cause the optical path to sweep across a space within which spools to be measured will be located, and a controller operative to control the transport mechanism, to detect positions of the transport mechanism in which the output of the detector changes to indicate a transition between two conditions in one of which the optical path is obstructed by a spool and in the other of which the optical path is not obstructed by that spool, and to calculate the spool diameters from the detected positions of the transport mechanism in which the detector output changes.
One of the emitter and detector may be mounted on the transport mechanism, the other being fixed in position relative to the spools of tape, or alternatively both the emitter and detector may be mounted on the transport mechanism, the optical path between the emitter and detector being established by a mirror located at the side of the spools remote from the transport mechanism and arranged to reflect light from the emitter back to the detector. Spool diameters may be measured with the spools in a first position, the spools may then be rotated so that one spool rotates by for example 30°, the diameters may be measured again, and so on. This makes it possible to accurately assess spool eccentricity and outer circumference.
An exemplary embodiment has particular applicability where the transport mechanism is a print head transport mechanism of a transfer ribbon printer. The ratio of spools in such a machine can be calculated on the basis of the output of the diameter measuring means. The ratio calculating means may comprise means enabling a first stepper motor driving a take-up spool and disabling a second stepper motor driving a supply spool such that the second stepper motor acts as a generator, means for generating pulses from the second stepper motor, the pulse rate being proportional to motor speed, means for detecting the generated pulses to produce a measure of the rotation of the second stepper motor, means for monitoring stepping of the first stepper motor to produce a measure of the rotation of the first stepper motor, and means for comparing the measures of the rotations of the motors to calculate the ratio of the outside diameters of the spools.
After a number of operating cycles of the tape drive, in which tape is transported between the spools, an updated diameter for at least one of the spools may be calculated from a ratio between the spool diameters as initially monitored, a current ratio between the spool diameters, and the diameter of at least one spool as initially monitored.
Where the tape drive in accordance with an exemplary embodiment is incorporated in a transfer printer for transferring ink from a printer ribbon to a substrate which is transported along a predetermined path adjacent to the printer, the tape drive acting as a printer ribbon drive mechanism for transporting ribbon between first and second ribbon spools, the printer may further comprise a print head arranged to contact one side of the ribbon to press an opposite side of the ribbon into contact with a substrate on the predetermined path, a print head drive mechanism for transporting the print head along a track extending generally parallel to the predetermined substrate transport path and for displacing the print head into and out of contact with the ribbon, and a controller controlling the printer ribbon and print head drive mechanisms, the controller being selectively programmable either to cause the ribbon to be transported relative to the predetermined substrate transport path with the print head stationary and displaced into contact with the ribbon during printing, or to cause the print head to be transported relative to the ribbon and the predetermined substrate transport path and to be displaced into contact with the ribbon during printing.
The drive mechanism may be bidirectional such that ribbon may be transported from the first spool to the second spool and from the second spool to the first.
Where the print head is mounted on a print head carriage that is displaceable along the track, first and second carriages may be provided which are interchangeable and shaped such that with one carriage in position on the track the print head is disposed so as to enable printing on a substrate traveling in one direction along the substrate transport path and with the other carriage in position on the track the print head is disposed so as to enable printing on a substrate traveling in the other direction along the substrate path.
The tape drive may be incorporated in a printing apparatus comprising a housing, a print head mounted on a print head support assembly which is displaceable relative to the housing in a direction parallel to a print ribbon path along which a ribbon is driven by the tape drive, a first drive mechanism for displacing the print head support relative to the housing, a roller which in use supports a substrate to be printed on the side of the ribbon path remote from the print head, a second drive mechanism for displacing the print head relative to the print head support assembly to a printing position in which a portion of the print head bears against the roller or any substrate or ribbon interposed between the print head and roller, and a controller for adjusting the first drive mechanism to adjust the angular position of the print head relative to the rotation axis of the roller.
Preferably the print head is mounted on a print head support assembly which is displaceable relative to the housing in a direction parallel to a print ribbon path along which a ribbon is driven by the tape drive, a first drive mechanism for displacing the print head support relative to the housing, a peel off roller mounted on the print head support assembly and displaceable with the print head in the said parallel direction, and a second drive mechanism for displacing the print head relative to the print head support assembly and peel off roller between a ready to print position adjacent the print ribbon path and a printing position in which the print head would contact a print ribbon on the path, wherein a cam mechanism is provided which is engaged as a result of displacement of the print head support assembly to a predetermined position and when engaged causes retraction of the print head away from the ready to print position to a position spaced from the peel-off roller and the print ribbon path.
The cam mechanism may comprise a plate mounted in the housing and defining a slot, and a pin extending from a pivotal member mounted on the print head support assembly, engagement of the pin in the slot as a result of displacement of the print head support assembly to the predetermined position causing the pivotal member to rotate from a first position in which it supports the print head to a second position in which the print head is free to move to the position spaced from the peel-off roller and the print ribbon path.
The pivotal member may be mounted on a displaceable member mounted on the print head support assembly, displacement of the displaceable member from a retracted to an extended position when the pivotal member is in the first position causing the print head to move from the ready to print position from the printing position.
The printing apparatus may further comprise means for applying the print head to a ribbon supported in the drive mechanism, the print head comprising an array of printing elements each of which may be selectively energized to release ink from a portion of ribbon contacted by that element, and a controller for controlling energization of the printing elements and the advance of the ribbon so as to perform a series of printing cycles each of which includes a printing phase during which relative movement between the print head and ribbon results in the print head traversing a predetermined length of ribbon and a non-printing phase during which the ribbon is advanced a predetermined distance relative to the print head, wherein the controller is arranged selectively to energize different groups of printing elements during successive printing cycles, the groups of elements being distributed on the print head such that different groups contact different portions of the ribbon, and the controller is arranged to advance the ribbon such that the said predetermined distance of ribbon advance is less than the said predetermined length of ribbon, the groups of printing elements being energized such that that ribbon is advanced by at least said predetermined length of ribbon in the interval between any two printing phases in which the same group of printing elements are energized. Two groups of printing elements may be provided such that the distance of ribbon advance may be as little as half the predetermined length of ribbon.
Given the fundamental differences between continuous and intermittent printing systems as described above, it has been industry practice to provide printing apparatus which is capable either of use in a continuous printing application or for use in an intermittent printing application but not to provide a printer with the versatility to perform both functions. The fundamental difference between the two types of printing apparatus required for these two applications is that in one (continuous printing) the print head is stationary (using that term in the manner discussed above) whereas in the other (intermittent) the printing head must be displaceable. As a result, when a particular production line is converted from for example an intermittent printing application to a continuous printing application it is necessary to replace all of the printing equipment. This represents a considerable cost to users of such equipment.
It is an object of an exemplary embodiment to obviate or mitigate the problems outlined above.
According to a second aspect of an exemplary embodiment, there is provided a transfer printer for transferring ink from a printer ribbon to a substrate which is transported along a predetermined path adjacent the printer, comprising a printer ribbon drive mechanism for transporting ribbon between first and second ribbon spools, a print head arranged to contact one side of the ribbon to press an opposite side of the ribbon into contact with a substrate on the predetermined path, a print head drive mechanism for transporting the print head along a track extending generally parallel to the predetermined substrate transport path and for displacing the print head into and out of contact with the ribbon, and a controller controlling the printer ribbon and print head drive mechanisms, the controller being selectively programmable either to cause the ribbon to be transported relative to the predetermined substrate transport path with the print head stationary and displaced into contact with the ribbon during printing, or to cause the print head to be transported relative to the ribbon and the predetermined substrate transport path and to be displaced into contact with the ribbon during printing.
Thus the second aspect of this exemplary embodiment provides a printing apparatus with sufficient versatility to be able to be used in both continuous and intermittent applications.
The transfer printer of the second aspect of the exemplary embodiment as defined above may be used in conjunction with any or all of the features of the first aspect of the exemplary embodiment as discussed above. In particular, the drive mechanism may be bidirectional, the drive mechanism may comprise two stepper motors each driving a respective one of the first and second ribbon spools in the direction of tape transport, ribbon tension may be monitored and the stepper motors controlled to maintain the monitored tension within predetermined limits, the print head drive mechanism may comprise a further stepper motor coupled to the print head, and the print head may be mounted on a carriage that is displaceable along a track. In addition, first and second carriages which are interchangeable may be provided to enable printing on a substrate traveling in either direction along the substrate transport path and a peel off roller mounted adjacent the print head may be reversible in position relative to the print head.
As outlined above, in tape drives which are used to transfer tape such as a printer ribbon between two spools, the diameters of the spools chance during the course of tape transfer from one spool to the other. This dramatically affects the relative speeds of the two spools which must be maintained if the tape is to remain in tension. Various attempts have been made to account for this effect, and notably the approach adopted in U.S. Pat. No. 4,479,081. None of the known approaches however is satisfactory in delivering a reliable accurate measurement of spool diameters to thereby enable an accurate and appropriate control of drive motor speeds in an arrangement in which the two motors are operating in push-pull mode. Whereas some of the known systems can cope with tape drives in which the initial conditions are always the same (for example a fresh supply spool of known outside diameter is connected to an empty take-up spool), in many applications it is quite often the case that an operator will fit to a machine a tape which has been partially used such that the supply spool which initially was of known outside diameter has partly been transferred to the take-up spool.
It is an object of an exemplary embodiment to obviate or mitigate the problems outlined above.
According to a third aspect of an exemplary embodiment, there is provided an apparatus for measuring the diameters of two spools of tape mounted an a tape drive mechanism which is drivable to transport tape between the spools, comprising an optical sensing system including at least one light emitter and at least one light detector arranged such that an optical path is established there between, a transport mechanism supporting at least part of the optical sensing system and drivable so as to cause the optical path to sweep across a space within which spools to be measured will be located, and a controller operative to control the transport mechanism, to detect positions of the transport mechanism in which the output of the detector changes to indicate a transition between two conditions in one of which the optical path is obstructed by a spool and in the other of which the optical path is not obstructed by that spool, and to calculate the spool diameters from the detected positions of the transport mechanism in which the detector output changes.
This third aspect of an exemplary embodiment makes it possible to accurately determine spool sizes. In an apparatus such as a transfer printer with a displaceable print head the displaceable component can be readily mounted on the displaceable print head so as to require no additional electromechanical components over and above those necessary for the normal functioning of the apparatus.
The apparatus of the third aspect of the exemplary embodiment as defined above may be used in conjunction with any of the features of the first and second aspects of the exemplary embodiment as defined above.
Print heads used in for example transfer printers must be accurately positioned relative to a platen which supports a substrate to be printed if good quality print is to be produced, particularly at high printing speeds. An angular displacement of only a few degrees can radically affect print quality. The traditional approach to dealing with this problem is to position a print head on an appropriate support assembly in a nominally correct position, to then run a test print to see what quality results, and to then mechanically adjust the position of the print head so as to optimize print quality. This involves an installer making very small mechanical adjustments using for example spacers. This can be a time consuming process.
It is an object of an exemplary embodiment to obviate or mitigate the problems outlined immediately above.
According to a fourth aspect of an exemplary embodiment, there is provided a printing apparatus comprising a housing, a print head mounted on a print head support assembly which is displaceable relative to the housing in a direction parallel to a print ribbon path, a first drive mechanism for displacing the print head support relative to the housing, a roller which in use supports a substrate to be printed on the side of the ribbon path remote from the print head, a second drive mechanism for displacing the print head relative to the print head support assembly to a printing position in which a portion of the print head bears against the roller or any substrate or ribbon interposed between the print head and roller, and a controller for adjusting the first drive mechanism to adjust the angular position of the print head relative to the rotation axis of the roller.
Preferably, the portion of the print head that bears against the roller or any substrate or ribbon interposed between the print head and roller, is the portion of the print head that contains selectively energizeable printing elements. The elements may be linearly arranged along the portion of the print head, for example the linear array of elements may be arranged along an edge, or parallel in close proximity to an edge of the print head.
In operation, an installer could initially position a print head so that it would assume a nominal position which would be expected to produce good quality print. A test print run would then be used to assess print quality, the print head support would then be displaced relative to the housing, and a fresh print run would be conducted, the process being repeated until the resultant print quality was optimized. There is thus no requirement for the installer to make small mechanical adjustments to the position of the print head on its support.
The printing apparatus in accordance with the fourth aspect of the exemplary embodiment may be used in conjunction with any of the features of the first, second and third aspects of the exemplary embodiment as defined above.
In many tape drive mechanisms and particularly in ribbon printing machines, loading a fresh print ribbon can be a difficult process as the print ribbon has to be correctly positioned along a non-linear path. Often replacement print ribbons are mounted in a cassette which is designed to be readily mounted in a predetermined orientation on an associated printing apparatus. In such arrangement it is generally necessary to position a length of ribbon extending between support on the cassette between a print head and a peel off roller. This is difficult to achieve unless the print head and peel off roller can be moved apart to provide a wide enough track into which the ribbon can be inserted.
It is known to provide an arrangement in which either the print head or the peel off roller can be displaced by a lever mechanism which is actuated when a cassette is mounted on a printing apparatus. For example if the cassette is held in position by a mechanical latch, release of the latch will move the print head and peel off roller apart whereas engagement of the latch moves them together to a ready-to-print position.
Such arrangements are satisfactory in terms of performance but disadvantageous as valuable space is occupied by the lever mechanisms, thereby reducing the space available for taking large diameter spools of tape.
It is an object of an exemplary embodiment to obviate or mitigate the problems outlined above.
According to a fifth aspect of an exemplary embodiment, there is provided a printing apparatus comprising a housing, a print head mounted on a print head support assembly which is displaceable relative to the housing in a direction parallel to a print ribbon path, a first drive mechanism for displacing the print head support relative to the housing, a peel off roller mounted on the print head support assembly and displaceable with the print head in the said parallel direction, and a second drive mechanism for displacing the print head relative to the print head support assembly and peel off roller between a ready to print position adjacent the print ribbon path and a printing position in which the print head would contact a print ribbon on the path, wherein a cam mechanism is provided which is engaged as a result of displacement of the print head support assembly to a predetermined position and when engaged causes retraction of the print head away from the ready to print position to a position spaced from the peel-off roller and the print ribbon path.
In an arrangement in accordance with the fifth aspect of an exemplary embodiment, when a cassette carrying a print ribbon is to be replaced, an electronic signal can be generated to cause transport of the print support assembly to a predetermined position (a “docked” position). This automatically retracts the print head away from the peel-off roller, enabling the easy insertion of a tape between the print head and peel-off roller.
The printing apparatus according to the fifth aspect of the exemplary embodiment may be used in conjunction with any of the features of the first, second, third and fourth aspects of the exemplary embodiment as defined above.
Another problem encountered with printing machines is that of achieving sufficient tape transport speeds in the interval between printing phases of successive printing cycles. In some instances the time taken to transport a printing ribbon by a distance equal to the length of ribbon traversed by the printing head during one printing cycle is a limiting factor in overall machine speed. It would be advantageous to be able to reduce the distance that a ribbon is advanced between any two successive printing cycles.
According to a sixth aspect of an exemplary embodiment, there is provided a printing apparatus comprising a print head, a printing ribbon drive mechanism for advancing a printing ribbon between the print head and a path along which in use a substrate to be printed is advanced, means for applying the print head to a ribbon supported in the drive mechanism, the print head comprising an array of printing elements each of which may be selectively energized to release ink from a portion of ribbon contacted by that element, and a controller for controlling energization of the printing elements and the advance of the ribbon so as to perform a series of printing cycles each of which includes a printing phase during which relative movement between the print head and ribbon results in the print head reversing a predetermined length of ribbon and a non-printing phase during which the ribbon is advanced a predetermined distance relative to the print head, herein the controller is arranged selectively to energize different groups of printing elements during successive printing cycles, the groups of elements being distributed on the print head such that different groups contact different portions of the ribbon, and the controller is arranged to advance the ribbon such that the said predetermined distance of ribbon advance is less than the said predetermined length of ribbon, the groups of printing elements being energized such that the ribbon is advanced by at least said predetermined length of ribbon in the interval between any two printing phases in which the same group of printing elements are energized.
If the printing elements are arranged in two groups, for example alternate pixels distributed across a linear printing head, an image may be printed in one printing cycle using one group, the ribbon may be advanced by half the length of ribbon traversed by the printer during the first cycle, a second image may be printed using the other group during a second cycle, the ribbon may again be advanced by half the traverse distance of the printing head, and then the first group may be energized during a third printing cycle and so on. Thus the maximum tape travel between successive printing cycles can be half that which must be accommodated in conventional printing systems.
The printing apparatus according to the sixth aspect of the exemplary embodiment may be used in conjunction with any of the features of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth aspects of the exemplary embodiment as defined above.
It will of course be appreciated that if the printing elements were divided into three groups, tape advance between successive cycles could be limited to one third of the length of ribbon traversed by the print head in one cycle.
An exemplary embodiment will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a is an illustration of a modification to the drive system of
Referring to
The shaft 2 is driven by a stepper motor 14 (SM) and the shaft 3 is driven by a stepper motor 15 (SM). A further stepper motor 16 (SM) controls the position on its linear track of the print head 4. A controller 17 (Contr) controls each of the three stepper motors 14, 15 and 16 as described in greater detail below, the stepper motors being capable of driving the print ribbon 6 in both directions as indicated by arrow 18.
In the configuration illustrated in
As described in greater detail below, the printer schematically illustrated in
Referring to
Referring to
The housing cover plate 21 (
The print head assembly 4 is shown in a “docked” position in
The edge 32 of the print head 4 (which is of conventional form) supports an array of heating elements each of which is selectively energizeable. When the ribbon 6 is sandwiched between the head 4 and a substrate 13, ink adjacent any energized heating element is melted and transferred to the substrate. Thus by appropriate control of the heating elements, small portions of ink carried by the ribbon 6 can be transferred to the substrate 13. Each of these portions of ink can be considered as defining one pixel of the image to be printed.
Referring now to all of
The print head carriage 36 supports the print head assembly which comprises the print head 4 which is bolted to a pivotal plate 39 that is mounted to pivot about pivot pin 40 that in turn is mounted on a plate 41 bolted to the print head carriage 36. A spring 42 biases the plate 39 towards the plate 41 so that in the absence of any obstruction the print head 4 will assume the position relative to the print head carriage 36 as shown in
A pneumatic drive unit 44 is a sliding fit within a slot provided in the print head carriage 36 and drives a piston 45 which is shown in the extended position in
The bracket 50 is spring biased by a spring (not shown) coupled to a lever 50a (see
In the exemplary embodiment as illustrated in
Referring to
The described printer arrangement provides a number of very significant advantages. Firstly, it is possible to use the same apparatus for both continuous and intermittent printing. Conversion of a production line from one form of printing to another does not therefore mean that new printers must be purchased. Secondly, by making relatively minor modifications involving only one additional component (the alternative print head carriages of
Referring to
Referring to
Such overlapping printed regions could be used in both continuous and intermittent printing processes. In the described arrangement, adjacent regions overlap by half the width of each region, but different proportions of overlap could be envisaged. Given that adjacent printing regions overlap, it is important that a region of the ribbon which is overlapped by two adjacent printing regions is used in a manner which ensures that printing progresses only on the basis of using portions of the ribbon which are used in only one of the two overlapping regions. This can be achieved for example by selecting only alternate portions of the ribbon within any one printing region. For example, as illustrated in
To illustrate this advantage,
Referring to
Referring to
The advantages described with references to
Two emitters 28, 29 are used to ensure that for any one spool the detector 37 can “see” the shadow cast by at least one of the emitters regardless of spool diameter size. It will be appreciated however that other dispositions of one or more emitters and one or more detectors could be envisaged.
It will be appreciated that the calculation of the spool diameters would be somewhat simpler if the planes 78a, 78b, 79a and 79b were perpendicular to the direction of displacement of the detector 37. This can be achieved by for example replacing the emitters 28 and 29 with a mirror extending parallel to the direction of displacement of the print head carrier 36 and arranging both a transmitter and a detector on the print head carriage 36, the detector detecting light only when both it and the emitter are on a plane perpendicular to the mirror. Although such an arrangement is simple in terms of the required trigonometry it has disadvantages in that a failure of either the transmitter or detector could be interpreted as the detector being in the shadow of one of the spools.
Given knowledge of the spool diameters, the spools can be driven in push-pull mode so as to achieve high rates of acceleration and deceleration by appropriate control of the speeds of rotation of the two stepper motors. Tension in the ribbon between the two spools must however be closely controlled to avoid the tension becoming too high (resulting in over tightening of the ribbon on the spools or even ribbon breakage) or the tension becoming too low (resulting in loss of positional control as a result of the ribbon becoming slack). To avoid this occurring, changes in spool diameters over time are monitored by reference to the stepper motors and tension in the ribbon is directly monitored by reference to the current drawn by the stepper motors.
In one embodiment, when a fresh cassette is fitted onto an apparatus such as that described with reference to
Initially the take-up motor is energized to remove any slack from the length of ribbon extending between the two spools. A print head scan is then conducted with the optical system described with reference to
The same optical scan procedure is then performed in both directions to measure the radius of the supply spool. This information is then combined with the previously calculated ratio of spool diameters to give an accurate set of data related to the spool diameters and shapes. Ribbon fed from the supply spool to the take-up spool is then rewound back onto the supply spool so as to avoid ribbon wastage.
Stepper motors generally comprise two quadrature-wound coils and current is supplied in a sequence of pulses to one or both of the coils and in both senses (positive and negative) so as to achieve step advance of the motor shafts. In order to achieve a reasonable performance despite the inherent electrical time constant of these coils it is well known to over-drive stepper motors by applying a voltage that is much larger than the nominal rating of the motor and to pulse width modulate this voltage when the desired motor current is reached. For example, with a 3.6 volt motor capable of taking say 2 amps, a voltage of 36 volts may be applied. This results in a very rapid rise in current through the motor, typically in a few tens of micro seconds. Given such overdriving of the supply voltage, relatively short periods of supply voltage application are separated by relatively long periods during which no supply voltage is applied. As a result current from the supply to the motors is very far from smooth. In addition, even when a motor is operating with zero load relating to the function that it performs (equating to zero tension in the printer ribbon), the supply current to the motor will be a function of various factors such as the speed of rotation of the motor, the particular characteristics of that motor (efficiency etc.), and the particular characteristics of the motor drive circuitry (gain and offset variances). It is necessary therefore to calibrate the motors to take account of current variation related to these factors rather than motor load.
The motors are calibrated by driving each of them in zero-load conditions at each of a series of different speeds, for example at speeds corresponding to 125 steps per second, 250 steps per second, 375 steps per second and so on in increments of 125 steps per second up to 5000 steps per second. This will generally cover the range of ribbon speeds required for ribbon advancement, that range generally being from 100 mm per second to 600 mm per second ribbon transport speed. This process is repeated a number of times, for example twenty times, and the average result is used to calculate a motor calibration factor x for each step rate, and for each motor. The following relationship is used:
x=N/V
Where:
x is the calibration factor for the motor at the given step rate.
V is the average measured motor operation value at the given step rate.
N is a constant normalization or scaling factor.
From the above for each motor a series of values x is calculated for each of the predetermined step rates. When the apparatus is in use, for a given step rate one of the values x is selected for use in the calculation of ribbon tension, or a value for x is calculated for the given step rate by interpolation from the two values of x for the predetermined step rates closest to the given rate.
During motor calibration, no spools are mounted on the outputs of the stepper motors 92 and 93. For a given step rate for each motor the outputs of the ADCs 87 and 88 are recorded such that x and V for each motor at each of the preselected step rates is known. Those values are then used as described below to enable direct monitoring of ribbon tension in the ribbon between the spools 94 and 95, these spools having been mounted on the output shafts of the stepper motors 92 and 93.
The formulas used for tension calculation are as follows, assuming that motor 92 is pulling and motor 93 is pushing:
V1x1=(N+r1tx1)ƒ(T) (1)
V2x2=(N−r2tx2)ƒ(T) (2)
Where:
V1 is the output of ADC 88 given a selected constant step-rate ribbon feed
V2 is the output of ADC 87 during ribbon feed
r1 is the radius of the spool 94
r2 is the radius of the spool 95
x1 is the calibration factor for motor 92 for the selected constant step rate
x2 is the calibration factor for motor 93 for the step rate of motor 93
N is the scaling factor used during motor calibration
t is the ribbon tension
f(T) is a temperature-related function
Temperature variations which will affect the measured values V1 and V2 will generally affect both motors to the same extent. Therefore by dividing equation (1) by equation (2) the functions f(T) will cancel out. The equation can therefore be resolved to derive a measure of tension t as follows:
t=N((V1/x2)−V2/x1))/(V2r1+V1r2) (3)
Thus for any given step rate for the motors, the appropriate calibration factors x1, x2 can be looked up and used to derive a measure of the ribbon tension t. If the derived value of t is too high (above a predetermined limit), then a small step adjustment can be made to either or both of the motors to add a short section of ribbon to the length of ribbon between the spools. If the derived value of t is too low (below a different predetermined limit), then a short section of ribbon can be removed from the length of ribbon between the spools. The control algorithms used to determine the correction amounts of ribbon added to or removed from the length of ribbon between the spools may be of conventional form, for example the algorithms known as proportional integral derivative control algorithms (PID control). The algorithms make it possible to compare the measured tension t with predetermined upper and lower limits (the so-called deadband) and, if the measured tension is outside these limits, the difference between the measured tension t and a “nominal demand” tension which is set at a level between the upper and lower limits may be calculated, the result of that calculation being regarded as an error “signal”. This error “signal” is then mathematically processed through the PID algorithms, which include a proportional gain constant, as well as integral and derivative factors. The mathematical processing results in a “correction” amount of ribbon that needs to be added to or removed from the ribbon path between the spools during the next ribbon feed. This addition or removal of ribbon maintains ribbon tension within acceptable limits.
In greater detail, the correction value may be calculated by calculating the error (the difference between the nominal tension and the measured tension) and dividing the error by a gain factor which depends upon the ribbon width. The greater the gain factor the tighter the system will be as the nominal tension will be increased. The gain factor is also dependent upon the ribbon width as the gain constants are changed to take account of different ribbon widths. This is because a tension which might cause considerable stretch in a narrow ribbon would cause minimal stretch in a wide ribbon and therefore the effects of adding or removing ribbon from the length of ribbon between the spools is radically affected by ribbon stiffness. Successive cycles may adjust the gain factor from a value nominally of 100 (tight) to a value of nominally 80 (slack). For every consecutive tight or slack reading after a first reading, an extra 0.1 mm correction can be added. An error accumulator is also maintained, and if the accumulated corrections (which are negative for tight and positive for slack) exceed plus or minus 2 mm then an additional 0.1 mm is added to the correction. These are the two integral components which enable the system to operate in a stable manner and maintain ribbon tension at or close to the nominal tension.
The motor feed system splits the correction evenly between both motors in order to avoid large gaps between prints or over-printing on the ribbon. The system does this by calculating the number of steps that half the correction amounts to for the stepper motor with the largest real diameter. These steps are then re-calculated as a distance (relying upon the known spool diameters) and subtracted from the original correction amount. The resultant value is then used to calculate the correction for the motor driving the smaller diameter spool. Because the motor driving the smaller diameter spool has the smallest step size (when each step is converted to ribbon length) it can most accurately feed the remaining distance. Thus the mechanism adjusts the tension by an amount that is as near as possible to that demanded by the original correction.
It will be appreciated that if a particularly low tension reading is calculated by the above method, this can be taken by the control system as indicating a fault condition, for example ribbon breakage, or the ribbon becoming so slack that the system is most unlikely to be able to effect adequate control. In such circumstances, the control system can output a “broken ribbon” predetermined low limits, such that when the measured tension t falls below this limit, the control system can halt the printing process and assert appropriate fault outputs and warning messages. Thus the system can offer valuable “broken ribbon” detection without the need for additional sensing arrangements.
The method of monitoring ribbon tension as described with reference to
Preferably the motor currents are sampled over a period of time corresponding to for example the travel of the ribbon through a distance of at least 10 nun at a constant velocity. For example the current could be sampled at regular intervals with the interval between successive samples corresponding to for example one quarter of a step of the motor. The samples are added together and the sum is divided by the number of samples taken. This gives an average current which is reasonably representative of the power being drawn by the associated stepper motor.
An analysis of the waveforms of current supplied to stepper motors in the described embodiment shows that, in addition to the current fluctuations resulting from the pulse width modulated nature of motor control, there is a substantial amount of variation in the waveforms which will mean that individual samples may not be representative of the power being drawn by the motors. A more accurate representation of that power can be obtained if the monitored signals are passed through a low pass filter (not shown) before being averaged.
Referring to
Ar+As=constant (4)
Ar=(Dr/2)2−(d/2)2 (5)
As=(Ds/2)2−(d/2)2 (6)
Substituting from (5) and (6) into (4) gives:
Dr2+Ds2=constant=Drc2+Dsc2 (7)
Where Drc and Dsc are rewind and supply spool diameters respectively at initial calibration time.
Substituting in (7) gives:
where Rc is the ratio of rewind to the supply reel diameter at initial calibration.
Therefore Dr2(R2+1)/R2=Dsc2(Rc2+1)
and
Dr2=[R2/(R2+1)][Dsc2(Rc2+1)].
So knowing the initial calibration spool diameters ratio (Rc), supply spool diameters ratio (Rc), supply spool diameter at calibration (Dsc) and the current spool diameters ratio (R), the current diameter of either or both spools Dr or Ds can be derived.
In some applications it may be possible only to present a cassette carrying a substantially empty take-up spool and a substantially full supply spool of known outside diameter. In such circumstances it would not be necessary to determine the initial spool diameters. In general however it is to be preferred to directly measure the spool diameters as it is likely that machine operators will at least on occasions use non-standard spool configurations (for example ribbon which has been partially used on an earlier occasion).
As an alternative to the approach described above with reference to
No reference has been made in the above description to ribbon width, that is the dimension perpendicular to the direction of ribbon advance. It may be appropriate to provide a user with the option to manually enter a ribbon width value so as to enable the system to adjust the predetermined tolerance limits and PID control gain constants referred to above to take account of tape-width dependent characteristics of the apparatus, e.g. to select different target limits for the measured tension t (equation 3).
As discussed above, in transfer printers it is necessary to accurately position the print head relative to the platen which supports the substrate to be printed if good quality print is to be produced, particularly at high printing speeds. The described exemplary embodiment avoids the need to make these mechanical adjustments to optimize print head angle by making use of the fact that the print head is mounted on a displaceable carriage.
Angle 115 is the angle of inclination of the print head relative to the tangent line 110. This angle is critical to the quality of print produced and will typically be specified by the manufacturer as having to be within 1 or 2 degrees of a nominal value such as 30 degrees. Different print heads exhibit different characteristics however and it is desirable to be able to make fine adjustments of say a degree or two of the angle 115.
It will be appreciated that the angle 115 is dependent firstly upon the positioning of the print head on its support structure and secondly by the position of the tangent line 110. If the print head was to be moved to the right in
The printing methods described with reference to
Thus, during the printing phase of each printing cycle, the print head traverses a predetermined length of ribbon either as a result of displacement of the print head relative to a stationary or slower moving print ribbon, or as a result of displacement of the print ribbon relative to the print head. Thereafter the print ribbon is advanced a predetermined distance. The magnitude of that predetermined distance of ribbon advance is in many applications a limiting factor on the maximum speed of the overall apparatus. In known printers the predetermined distance of ribbon advance is generally at least as long as the predetermined length of ribbon which is traversed by the print head. The described apparatus makes it possible to operate in a manner in which the predetermined distance of ribbon advance is less than the predetermined length of ribbon traversed by the print head.
Referring to
The output represented in
Although this aspect of the exemplary embodiment has been described in detail in the context of intermittent printing, it will be appreciated that the same technique could be applied to a continuous printing apparatus in which relative movement between the printing ribbon and the print head is the result of transport of the ribbon past a stationary head rather than transport of a print head relative to a stationary ribbon.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0022206.7 | Sep 2000 | GB | national |
| 0028465.3 | Nov 2000 | GB | national |
| 0100493.6 | Jan 2001 | GB | national |
| 0111044.4 | May 2001 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/668,438 filed Nov. 5, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/362,399 filed Jan. 31, 2012, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,328,441 on Dec. 11, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/880,266 filed Sep. 13, 2010, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,221,009 on Jul. 17, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/401,871 filed Mar. 11, 2009, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,190 on Aug. 30, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/533,957 filed Sep. 21, 2006, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,682,094 on Mar. 23, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/380,182 filed Mar. 16, 2004, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,150,572 on Dec. 19, 2006, which is a U.S. national phase of international application PCT/GB01/03965 which designated the U.S. and was filed Sep. 5, 2001, and claims benefit of GB 0022206.7 dated Sep. 11, 2000; GB 0028465.3 dated Nov. 22, 2000; GB 0100493.6 dated Jan. 9, 2001, and GB 0111044.4 dated May 2, 2001, the entire contents of all of these applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2876655 | Tauscher | Mar 1959 | A |
| 3134917 | Miller, Jr. | May 1964 | A |
| 3584805 | Lee | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3606201 | Petusky | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3610496 | Parker | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3704401 | Miller | Nov 1972 | A |
| 3781490 | Phillips | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3809335 | Mantey | May 1974 | A |
| 3836831 | Van Heelsbergen | Sep 1974 | A |
| 3863117 | Paschetto | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3889893 | Silverman et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3902585 | Mogtader | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3910527 | Buhler et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3921043 | Luzio | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3982160 | Goldschmidt et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
| 3984809 | Dertouzos et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
| 3999090 | Sinnott | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4000804 | Zaltieri | Jan 1977 | A |
| 4012674 | Spitsbergen et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4015799 | Koski et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4025830 | Delaporte | May 1977 | A |
| 4079828 | Babler | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4091913 | Ku et al. | May 1978 | A |
| 4093149 | Shroff et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4094478 | Shroff et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4095758 | Shroff | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4096417 | Chambolle | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4103216 | Hayes | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4156257 | Roberts | May 1979 | A |
| 4161001 | Sakamoto | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4177731 | Kleist et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| RE30448 | Shroff | Dec 1980 | E |
| 4266479 | Mahoney | May 1981 | A |
| 4286888 | Bennett et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4291841 | Dalrymple et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4294552 | Mako | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4313376 | Swope et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4313683 | Brown et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4349771 | Buxton | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4354211 | Gilovich et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4355248 | Manson | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4366371 | d'Alayer de Costemore d'Arc et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4375339 | Dyer | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4448368 | Skalko | May 1984 | A |
| 4475829 | Goff, Jr. et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4479081 | Harris | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4543002 | Bittner et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4573645 | Harris, Jr. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4577198 | Hibino et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4582235 | Schulz | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4589603 | Muller | May 1986 | A |
| 4606661 | Aldrich et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4624588 | Bivin | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4632582 | Houston | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4639880 | Yasuhiro | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4642655 | Sparer et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4650350 | Dorner | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4664336 | Koyama | May 1987 | A |
| 4696439 | Sukigara et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4712113 | Brooks et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4752842 | Odagiri | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4754178 | Kavanaugh | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4760405 | Nagira et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4786992 | Tajima et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4788558 | Caldwell et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4895466 | Hartman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4897668 | Nagato et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4909648 | Hartman et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4922145 | Shtipelman | May 1990 | A |
| 4924240 | Herbert et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4952085 | Rein | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4953044 | VanPelt et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4969761 | Gibson-Saxty | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4974977 | Morgan et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4977466 | Nakata | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4987503 | Gardner | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5012989 | Whyte et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5017943 | Ogita et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5080296 | Raggio et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5117241 | Stephenson | May 1992 | A |
| 5121136 | Kawakubo | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5125592 | Sato | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5148403 | Gardner | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5160943 | Pettigrew et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5162815 | Hodge | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5181788 | Norman, Jr. et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5218490 | Sakamoto et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5259563 | Kakiwaki et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5281038 | Schofield et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5294203 | Williams | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5295753 | Godo et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5297879 | Oikawa | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5300953 | Schulte | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5313343 | Yatomi | May 1994 | A |
| 5357270 | Herbert | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5366303 | Barrus et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5372439 | Poole et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5415482 | Poole et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5477400 | Kawamata | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5490638 | Driftmyer et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5505550 | Kitahara et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5529410 | Hunter et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5576751 | Wada et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5604652 | Nishida et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5609425 | Kawano et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5639040 | Honjo | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5647679 | Green et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5649672 | Wolff et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5649774 | Harding et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5700096 | Satoh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5701214 | Inoue et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5720442 | Yanagihara et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5731672 | Miyaguchi | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733054 | Miazga | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5788384 | Goodwin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5795084 | Stone et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5796485 | Dassler et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5803624 | Miazga et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5816719 | Palmer | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5820280 | Fox | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5906444 | Jorgensen | May 1999 | A |
| 5918990 | Abumehdi | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5971634 | Buckby et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5993092 | Palmer | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6000868 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6036382 | Middleton | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6046756 | Iga et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6082914 | Barrus et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6089768 | Barrus et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6128152 | Mace | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6142686 | Schanke et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6164203 | Keller | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6247859 | Butcher | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6261012 | Haas et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6305628 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6305629 | Chliwnyi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6307583 | Randolph et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6315471 | Hsieh et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6411317 | Fukuda | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6669136 | Niioka et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6754026 | Koski | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6840689 | Barrus et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6969064 | Ichikawa et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7150572 | McNestry et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 8317421 | McNestry | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 20030049065 | Barrus et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20040041047 | Karp et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4215830 | Nov 1993 | DE |
| 0 033 100 | Jan 1981 | EP |
| 0157096 | Oct 1985 | EP |
| 0176009 | Apr 1986 | EP |
| 0 221 762 | May 1987 | EP |
| 0294633 | Dec 1988 | EP |
| 0 329 478 | Aug 1989 | EP |
| 0481679 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 0481579 | Apr 1992 | EP |
| 0532238 | Mar 1993 | EP |
| 0 546 303 | Jun 1993 | EP |
| 0556068 | Aug 1993 | EP |
| 0582285 | Feb 1994 | EP |
| 0 589 715 | Mar 1994 | EP |
| 0 734 876 | Oct 1996 | EP |
| 0 683 355 | Nov 1996 | EP |
| 0 741 044 | Nov 1996 | EP |
| 0 765 221 | Apr 1997 | EP |
| 0 804 343 | Nov 1997 | EP |
| 0 830 262 | Mar 1998 | EP |
| 0 842 785 | May 1998 | EP |
| 0840311 | May 1998 | EP |
| 0854480 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 0 861 735 | Sep 1998 | EP |
| 0936078 | Feb 1999 | EP |
| 0 955 178 | May 1999 | EP |
| 0945273 | Sep 1999 | EP |
| 0955178 | Nov 1999 | EP |
| 1000756 | May 2000 | EP |
| 1 409 388 | Apr 2004 | EP |
| 1470926 | Oct 2004 | EP |
| 2783469 | Mar 2000 | FR |
| 9811893 | Mar 2000 | FR |
| 1 361 288 | Jul 1974 | GB |
| 1 576 750 | Oct 1980 | GB |
| 2077970 | Dec 1981 | GB |
| 2087104 | May 1982 | GB |
| 2 163 915 | Mar 1986 | GB |
| 2 175 253 | Nov 1986 | GB |
| 2201013 | Aug 1988 | GB |
| 2 175 253 | Nov 1988 | GB |
| 2 272 669 | May 1994 | GB |
| 2289441 | Nov 1995 | GB |
| 2 298 821 | Sep 1996 | GB |
| 2 302 623 | Jan 1997 | GB |
| 2 306 918 | May 1997 | GB |
| 2 310 405 | Aug 1997 | GB |
| 2 315 244 | Jan 1998 | GB |
| 2343655 | May 2000 | GB |
| 2 349 805 | Nov 2000 | GB |
| 2354974 | Apr 2001 | GB |
| 2 369 326 | May 2002 | GB |
| 2 369 602 | Jun 2002 | GB |
| 2 369 602 | Aug 2002 | GB |
| 2400582 | Oct 2004 | GB |
| 2400818 | Oct 2004 | GB |
| 2404896 | Feb 2005 | GB |
| 59-17125 | Jan 1984 | JP |
| 60-157891 | Aug 1985 | JP |
| S60-157891 | Aug 1985 | JP |
| 60-211653 | Oct 1985 | JP |
| 61-169265 | Jul 1986 | JP |
| 63-104875 | May 1988 | JP |
| 63-122045 | May 1988 | JP |
| 63-317963 | Dec 1988 | JP |
| H1-115674 | May 1989 | JP |
| 1-300455 | Dec 1989 | JP |
| 4-274044 | Sep 1992 | JP |
| 4-305486 | Oct 1992 | JP |
| 05056014 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| H5-58014 | Mar 1993 | JP |
| A-H06-079938 | Mar 1994 | JP |
| 06126995 | May 1994 | JP |
| H6-134275 | Jun 1994 | JP |
| A-H07-032692 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| 08244324 | Sep 1996 | JP |
| H8-244324 | Sep 1996 | JP |
| 9-151011 | Jun 1997 | JP |
| 08002078 | Jan 1998 | JP |
| 10-181972 | Jul 1998 | JP |
| 2000-229456 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2000-229458 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2004-181691 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| WO 9209517 | Jun 1992 | WO |
| WO9301055 | Jan 1993 | WO |
| WO 9534896 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO9614990 | May 1996 | WO |
| WO 9628304 | Sep 1996 | WO |
| WO 9632268 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO9735727 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO9735728 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO 9738751 | Oct 1997 | WO |
| WO 9934993 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| WO9946129 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 0222371 | Mar 2002 | WO |
| WO03011728 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03029013 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. CAFC, Markem-Imaje Corporation, Plaintiff v. Zipher Ltd. and Videojet Technologies, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Case No. 2013-1032, Decided Mar. 25, 2013. |
| U.S. CAFC, Markem-Imaje Corporation, Plaintiff v. Zipher Ltd. and Videojet Technologies, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Case No. 2013-1032, Brief filed Jan. 9, 2013. |
| U.S. District Court for the District of NH, Markem-Imaje Corporation v. Zipher Ltd. and Videojet Techn., Inc., Case No. 07-cv-00006-PB, Memorandum and Order filed Aug. 9, 2012. |
| “Pulse of Air Is Key to High-Speed Bagging Equipment,” Hydraulics & Pneumatics, Sep. 1998, vol. 51, Issue 9, p. 4. |
| Baker et al, “Ribbon Drive Apparatus for Printer,” Jun. 1, 1981. |
| TK50 Tape Drive Subsystem Technical Manual, Jul. 1986. |
| “Ribbon Drive Apparatus for Printer,” Jan. 16, 2012. |
| Ampex Series 351 Magnetic Tape Recorder Service Manual. |
| Acarnley et al., “Detection of Rotor Position in Stepping and Switched Motors by Monitoring of Current Waveforms,” IEEE Trans. On Indust. Electr., vol. Ie-32, No. 3, Aug. 1985. |
| Akai Service Manual, Model GX-636. |
| Bechtle et al., “Delayed Closed-Loop Scheme for Stepping Motor Control,” DCL Stepping Motor Control, May 1976. |
| Bodson et al., “Appln. of Nonlinear Control Methods to the Positioning of a Permanent Magnet Stepper Motor,” Proceeding of the 28th Conf. on Dec. & Con., Tampa, FL, Dec. 1989. |
| Bodson et al., “High-Performance Nonlinear Feedback Control of a Permanent Magent Stepper Motor,” IEEE Transactions on Control Syst. Tech., vol. 1, No. 1, Mar. 1993. |
| Kuo et al., “Waveform Detection of Permanent-Magnet Step Motors—Part II,” Proceedings 8th Annual Symposium, Incremental Motion Control Systems and Devices, May 1979. |
| Cavill et al., “Variable Step Rate Ribbon Motion,” IP.Com, Inc., Mar. 1, 1980. |
| Clarkson et al., “Closed-Loop Control of Stepping Motor Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 24, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 1988. |
| Crnosija et al., “Optimal Closed-Loop Control of a Hybrid Step Motor with Chopper Drive,” Robotics & Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 187-192, 1991. |
| Crnosija et al., “Microcomputer Implementation of Optimal Algorithms for Closed-Loop Control of a Hybrid Stepper Motor Drives,” IEEE Trans., 1999. |
| Crnosija et al., “Micro. Implem. of Optimal Algorithms for Closed-Loop Control of a Hybrid Stepper Motor Drives,” IEEE Trans. on Indust. Electr., vol. 47, No. 6, Dec. 2000. |
| “Regulated Speed Ribbon Drive”. |
| Healy, A.J., “Simulation as Applied to the Design of Interactive Control Systems,” The American Soc. of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 95, Ser. G, No. 2, Jun. 1973. |
| “Model A-8/A-8LR 8 Track Recorder/Reproducer Service Manual,” Fostex Corp., Nov. 1982. |
| Grimbleby, J.B., “Simple Algorithm for Closed-Loop Control of Stepping Motors,” IEE Proc.-Electr. Power AppL, vol. 142, No. 1, Jan. 1995. |
| Gwaltney, David A., “Design of a Reel Mechanism for Control of an Orbiting Single Tether System,” IEEE 1990. |
| Halse et al., “A Simple X-Y Scanner,” Phys. Educ. vol. 21, No. 91, 1986. |
| Hendee, R.C., “Reel-to-Reel Web Motion Control,” IBM Corp., vol. 18, No. 5, Oct. 1975. |
| Hill et al., “Applications of Closed-Loop Stepping Motor Control In Multi-Motor Systems,” The Radio and Electronic Engineer, vol. 54, No. 11/12, pp. 457-461, Nov./Dec. 1984. |
| Lawrenson et al., “Viscously Coupled Inertial Damping of Stepping Motors,” Proc. IEE, vol. 122, No. 10, Oct. 1975. |
| Lin et al., “Waveform Detection of Permanent-Magnet Step Motors—Part I,” Proceedings 8th Annual Symposium, Incremental Motion Control Systems and Devices, May 1979. |
| McSparran, R.M., “Digital Closed-Loop Phase-Locked Stepper Motor Control,” Proceedings 5th Annual Symposium, Incremental Motion Control Systems and Devices, May 1976. |
| Miller et al., “System Design for CRT Film Scanning and Measuring,” 8th National Symposium of the Society for Information Display, Apr. 1967. |
| Tsavdaris, S.A., “Design of a Magnetic Tape Transport System Employing Stepper Motors,” Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, Dec. 1980. |
| Markem v. Zipher, UK High Court; And Court of Appeals Record. |
| GB 0121652.2 (Combined Search and Examination Report, Mar. 27, 2002). |
| GB 0121652.2 (Applicants Response to Combined Search and Examination Report, Sep. 26, 2002). |
| Chinese Application No. 01818632.7 First Office Action with English Translation (Dec. 31, 2004). |
| University Physics, 9th Edition—Young Freedman, p. 308. |
| DMX-5000 ATB Printer Maintenance Manual, 1993. |
| Datamax Corporation, DMX 5000, ATB Printer, Maintenance Manual, Doc. P/N: 88-0080-01, Revision B, 1987. |
| DMX-5000 Description of the Firmware of the ATB Printer, 1993. |
| U.S. CAFC, Markem-Imaje Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Zipher Ltd. and Videojet Technologies, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, Case No. 2010-1305, Decided: Sep. 9, 2011. |
| Burke et al, Switchable Stepper Motor Control, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Nov. 1989, pp. 430-431, vol. 32, No. 63. |
| Barnett, J.A., Use of Stepper Motor as Variable Load, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Apr. 1977, pp. 4120-4121, vol. 19, No. 11. |
| Tsavdaris, Sotirios A., “Design of a Magnetic Tape Transport System Employing Stepper Motors,” Naval Postgraduate School, Monterrey, CA, Dec. 1980. |
| Miller, W.F. et al., “System Design for CRT Film Scanning and Measuring,” Eighth National Symposium for the Society for Information Display, Apr. 1967. |
| Dubowsky, S, “Simulation as Applied to the Design of Interactive Control Systems,” Am. Soc. of Mech. Eng., Journ. of Dynamic Syst., Measrment, & Control, pp. 228-234, Jun. 1973. |
| Markem Corporation v. Zipher, Ltd. et al., Order, Sep. 1, 2009, pp. 1-2, Doc. 117, Case No. 07-cv-06-PB. |
| Markem Corporation v. Zipher, Ltd. et al., Order, Jan. 12, 2010, pp. 1-5, Doc. 125, Case No. 07-cv-06-PB. |
| Laidman, Russell, Stepper Motors and Control Part II—Bipolar Stepper Motor and Control, stepperworld.com, Jun. 1999, pp. 1-5. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140063171 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13668438 | Nov 2012 | US |
| Child | 14062093 | US | |
| Parent | 13362399 | Jan 2012 | US |
| Child | 13668438 | US | |
| Parent | 12880266 | Sep 2010 | US |
| Child | 13362399 | US | |
| Parent | 12401871 | Mar 2009 | US |
| Child | 12880266 | US | |
| Parent | 11533957 | Sep 2006 | US |
| Child | 12401871 | US | |
| Parent | 10380182 | US | |
| Child | 11533957 | US |
