The present invention relates to a tape drive. Such a tape drive may form part of printing apparatus. In particular, such a tape drive may be used in transfer printers, that is, printers which make use of carrier-supported inks.
In transfer printers, a tape which is normally referred to as a printer tape and carries ink on one side is presented within a printer such that a printhead can contact the other side of the tape to cause the ink to be transferred from the tape on to a target substrate of, for example, paper or a flexible film. Such printers are used in many applications. Industrial printing applications include thermal transfer label printers and thermal transfer coders which print directly on to a substrate such as packaging materials manufactured from flexible film or card.
Ink tape is normally delivered to the end user in the form of a roll wound onto a core. The end user pushes the core on to a tape spool, pulls a free end of the roll to release a length of tape, and then engages the end of the tape with a further spool. The spools may be mounted on a cassette, which can be readily mounted on a printing machine. The printing machine includes a transport means for driving the spools, so as to unwind tape from one spool and to take up tape on the other spool. The printing apparatus transports tape between the two spools along a predetermined path past the printhead.
Known printers of the above type rely upon a wide range of different approaches to the problem of how to drive the tape spools. Some rely upon stepper motors operating in a position control mode to pay out or take-up a predetermined quantity of tape. Other known printers rely on DC motors operating in a torque mode to provide tension in the tape and to directly or indirectly drive the spools. Some known arrangements drive only the spool on to which tape is taken up (the take-up spool) and rely upon some form of “slipping clutch” arrangement on the spool from which tape is drawn (the supply spool) to provide a resistive drag force so as to ensure that the tape is maintained in tension during the printing and tape winding processes and to prevent tape overrun when the tape is brought to rest. It will be appreciated that maintaining adequate tension is an essential requirement for the proper functioning of the printer.
Alternative forms of known printer tape drives drive both the take-up spool and the supply spool. A supply spool motor may be arranged to apply a predetermined drag to the tape, by being driven in the reverse direction to the direction of tape transport. In such an arrangement (referred to herein as “pull-drag”), the motor connected to the take-up spool is arranged to apply a greater force to the tape than the motor connected to the supply spool such that the supply spool motor is overpowered and the supply spool thus rotates in the direction of tape transport. The supply spool drag motor keeps the tape tensioned in normal operation.
In a further alternative arrangement a supply spool motor may be driven in the direction of tape transport such that it contributes to driving the tape from the supply spool to the take-up spool. Such an arrangement is referred to herein as “push-pull”. The take-up motor pulls the tape onto the take-up spool as tape is unwound by the supply spool motor such that tape tension is maintained. Such a push-pull arrangement is described in our earlier UK Patent No. GB 2,369,602, which discloses the use of a pair of stepper motors to drive the supply spool and the take-up spool. In GB 2,369,602 a controller is arranged to control the energization of the motors such that the tape may be transported in both directions between spools of tape. The tension in the tape being transported between spools is monitored and the motors are controlled to energise both motors to drive the spools of tape in the direction of tape transport.
As a printer gradually uses a roll of tape, the outer diameter of the supply spool decreases and the outer diameter of the take-up spool increases. In slipping clutch arrangements, which offer an essentially constant resistive torque, the tape tension will vary in proportion to the diameter of the spools. Given that it is desirable to use large supply spools so as to minimise the number of times that a tape roll has to be replenished, this is a serious problem particularly in high-speed machines where rapid tape transport is essential. For tape drives that use both a take-up motor and a supply spool motor, the variation in spool diameters can make it difficult to determine the correct drive signal to be supplied to each motor such that tape tension is maintained, and/or that tape is unwound or rewound at the correct rate.
Given these constraints, known printer designs offer a compromise in performance by way of limiting the rate of acceleration, the rate of deceleration, and the maximum speed capability of the tape transport system. Overall printer performance has, as a result, been compromised in some cases.
Known tape drive systems generally operate in one of two manners, that is either continuous printing or intermittent printing. In both modes of operation, the apparatus performs a regularly repeated series of printing cycles, each cycle including a printing phase during which ink is being transferred to a substrate, and a further non-printing phase during which the apparatus is prepared for the printing phase of the next cycle.
In continuous printing, during the printing phase a stationary printhead is brought into contact with a printer tape the other side of which is in contact with a substrate on to which an image is to be printed. The term “stationary” is used in the context of continuous printing to indicate that although the printhead will be moved into and out of contact with the tape, it will not move relative to the tape path in the direction in which tape is advanced along that path. During printing, both the substrate and tape are transported past the printhead, generally but not necessarily at the same speed.
Generally only relatively small lengths of the substrate which is transported past the printhead are to be printed upon, and therefore to avoid gross wastage of tape it is necessary to reverse the direction of travel of the tape between printing operations. Thus in a typical printing process in which the substrate is travelling at a constant velocity, the printhead is extended into contact with the tape only when the printhead is adjacent to regions of the substrate to be printed. Immediately before extension of the printhead, the tape must be accelerated up to, for example, the speed of travel of the substrate. The tape speed must then be maintained at the constant speed of the substrate during the printing phase and, after the printing phase has been completed, the tape must be decelerated and then driven in the reverse direction so that the used region of the tape is on the upstream side of the printhead.
As the next region of the substrate to be printed approaches, the tape must then be accelerated back up to the normal printing speed and the tape must be positioned so that an unused portion of the tape close to the previously used region of the tape is located between the printhead and the substrate when the printhead is advanced to the printing position. Thus very rapid acceleration and deceleration of the tape in both directions is required, and the tape drive system must be capable of accurately locating the tape so as to avoid a printing operation being conducted when a previously used portion of the tape is interposed between the printhead and the substrate.
In intermittent printing, a substrate is advanced past a printhead in a stepwise manner such that during the printing phase of each cycle the substrate and generally but not necessarily the tape, are stationary. Relative movement between the substrate, tape and printhead are achieved by displacing the printhead relative to the substrate and tape. Between the printing phase of successive cycles, the substrate is advanced so as to present the next region to be printed beneath the printhead, and the tape is advanced so that an unused section of tape is located between the printhead and the substrate. Once again rapid and accurate transport of the tape is necessary to ensure that unused tape is always located between the substrate and printhead at a time that the printhead is advanced to conduct a printing operation.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,082,914 discloses a thermal transfer printer comprising an ink ribbon driven between a supply spool and a take-up spool via a printhead. The printhead transfers ink from the ink ribbon to a media, which is also driven past the printhead. Each spool is driven by a separate DC motor and controlled by a controller which detects the back EMF (BEMF) of the motors and controls drive of the motors.
The spools have inertia which is taken into account when determining the rate at which the motors are driven. This is used to calculate the appropriate motor torque during ribbon acceleration and deceleration to allow constant ribbon tension to be maintained.
The requirements of high speed transfer printers in terms of tape acceleration, deceleration, speed and positional accuracy are such that many known drive mechanisms have difficulty delivering acceptable performance with a high degree of reliability. Similar constraints also apply in applications other than high-speed printers, for instance drives used in labelling machines, which are adapted to apply labels detached from label web. Tape drives in accordance with embodiments of the present invention are suitable for use in labelling machines in which labels are detached from a continuous label web which is transported between a supply spool and a take-up spool.
It is an object of embodiments of the present invention to obviate or mitigate one or more of the problems associated with the prior art, whether identified herein or elsewhere. It is a further object of embodiments of the present invention to provide a tape drive which can be used to deliver printer tape in a manner which is capable of meeting the requirements of high speed production lines, although the tape drive of the present invention may of course be used in any other application where similar high performance requirements are demanded.
According to the present invention, there is provided, a tape drive comprising a first torque-controlled motor and a second position-controlled motor, two tape spool supports on which spools of tape may be mounted, each spool being drivable by a respective one of said motors, and a controller for controlling the energization of the motors such that the tape may be transported in at least one direction between spools mounted on the spool supports, wherein the controller is arranged to provide a control signal to the torque-controlled motor to set the tape tension, the control signal including a component to compensate for the inertia of a spool of tape driven by the torque-controlled motor.
The component may be indicative of an additional torque to be supplied by the torque control motor to compensate for torque generated by inertia of the spool of tape driven by the torque controlled motor. Torque may be determined by the product of inertia and angular acceleration.
It is preferred that each spool support is coupled to a respective motor by means of a drive coupling providing at least one fixed transmission ratio. Preferably, the ratio of angular velocities of each motor and its respective spool support is fixed. Such an arrangement requires that control of a motor to cause a desired linear tape movement from or to a respective spool takes into account the circumference of that spool.
The drive coupling may comprise a drive belt. Alternatively, as each spool support has a respective first axis of rotation and each motor has a shaft with a respective second axis of rotation, the respective first and second axes may be coaxial. Respective drive couplings may interconnect a respective spool shaft to a respective motor shaft.
The tape drive may be bi-directional. That is, the controller may be arranged to control the motors to transport tape in both directions between the spools. When a tape is transported in a first direction the torque control motor may be arranged to drive a tape spool supplying tape and the position control motor may be arranged to drive the tape spool taking up tape. The torque-controlled motor may be driven in the opposite direction to the first direction. When a tape is transported in a second direction which is opposite to the first direction, the position-controlled motor may be arranged to drive a tape spool supplying tape and the torque controlled motor may be arranged to drive a tape spool taking up tape, the torque-controlled motor may be driven in the first direction. At least one of the first and second motors may be controllable to operate either as a torque-controlled motor or as a position-controlled motor. That is, the motor may be configured such that it is programmable either to adopt a torque-controlled mode or a position-controlled mode.
A tape drive in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention relies upon both the motors that drive the two tape spools to drive the tape during tape transport. Thus the two motors operate in push-pull mode. This makes it possible to achieve very high rates of acceleration and deceleration. Tension in the tape being transported is determined by control of the drive motors and therefore is not dependent upon any components that have to contact the tape between the take-up and supply spools. Thus a very simple overall mechanical assembly can be achieved. Given that both motors contribute to tape transport, relatively small and therefore inexpensive and compact motors can be used.
A tape drive in accordance with certain other embodiments of the present invention operates in a pull-drag mode for which the motor attached to the spool currently taking in tape drives the spool in the direction of tape transport, whereas the other spool is driven in a reverse direction in order to tension the tape. In accordance with yet other embodiments of the present invention the tape drive motors may be arranged to operate in a push-pull mode for at least part of a printing cycle and a pull-drag mode for at least another part of the printing cycle.
The actual rotational direction of each spool will depend on the sense in which the tape is wound on each spool. If both spools are wound in the same sense then both spools will rotate in the same rotational direction to transport the tape. If the spools are wound in the opposite sense to one another, then the spools will rotate in opposite rotational directions to transport the tape. In any configuration, both spools rotate in the direction of tape transport. However, according to the operating mode of the supply spool motor, the direction in which it is driven may be also be in the same direction as the supply spool (when the motor is assisting in driving the tape, by pushing the tape off the spool) or the supply spool motor may be driven in the opposite direction to that of the supply spool (when the motor is providing drag to the tape in order to tension the tape).
The tape drive may be incorporated in a transfer printer for transferring ink from a printer tape to a substrate, which is transported along a predetermined path adjacent to the printer. The tape drive may act as a printer tape drive mechanism for transporting ink ribbon between first and second tape spools, and the printer further comprising a printhead arranged to contact one side of the ribbon to press an opposite side of the ribbon into contact with a substrate on the predetermined path. There may also be provided a printhead drive mechanism for transporting the printhead along a track extending generally parallel to the predetermined substrate transport path (when the printer is operating in an intermittent printing mode) and for displacing the printhead into and out of contact with the tape. A controller may control the printer ink ribbon and printhead drive mechanisms, the controller being selectively programmable either to cause the ink ribbon to be transported relative to the predetermined substrate transport path with the printhead stationary and displaced into contact with the ink ribbon during printing, or to cause the printhead to be transported relative to the ink ribbon and the predetermined substrate transport path and to be displaced into contact with the ink ribbon during printing.
The drive mechanism may be bi-directional such that tape may be transported from a first spool to a second spool and from the second spool to the first. Typically, unused tape is provided in a roll of tape mounted on the supply spool. Used tape is taken up on a roll mounted on the take-up spool. However, as described above, in order to prevent gross ribbon wastage, after a printing operation the tape can be reversed such that unused portions of the tape may be used before being wound onto the take-up spool.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
The supply shaft 1 is driven by a supply motor 12 and the take-up shaft 2 is driven by a take-up motor 13. The supply and take-up motors 12, 13 are illustrated in dashed outline, indicating that they are positioned behind the supply and take-up spools 3, 4. It will however be appreciated that in alternative embodiments of the invention, the spools are not directly driven by the motors. Instead the motor shafts may be operably connected to the respective spools by a belt drive or other similar drive mechanism. In either case, it can be seen that there is a fixed transmission ratio between a motor and its respective spool support.
A controller 14 controls the operation of motors 12, 13 as described in greater detail below. The supply and take-up motors 12, 13 are capable of driving the tape 6 in both directions. Tape movement may be defined as being in the print direction if the tape is moving from the supply spool 3 to the take-up spool 4, as indicated by arrows 15. When tape is moving from the take-up spool 4 to the supply spool 3, the tape may be considered to be moving in the tape reverse direction, as indicated by arrows 16.
When the printer is operating in continuous mode the printhead 5 will be moved into contact with the tape 6 when the tape 6 is moving in the print direction 15. Ink is transferred from the tape 6 to the substrate 10 by the action of the printhead 5. Tape movement may be reversed such that unused portions of the tape 6 are positioned adjacent to the printhead 5 before a subsequent printing operation is commenced.
In the configuration illustrated in
As described above, the printer schematically illustrated in
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, one of the supply motor 12 and/or the take-up motor 13 is a torque-controlled motor. The other motor is a position-controlled motor.
A torque-controlled motor is a motor that is controlled by a demanded output torque. An example of a torque-controlled motor is a DC motor without encoder feedback, or a DC motor having an encoder, but in which the encoder signal is temporarily or permanently not used. Alternatively, coupling a stepper motor with an encoder and using the encoder output signal to generate a commutation signal that in turn drives the motor can provide a torque-controlled stepper motor. Varying the current that may be drawn by the motor can vary the torque provided by a torque-controlled motor of either sort.
A position-controlled motor comprises a motor controlled by a demanded output rotary position. That is, the output position may be varied on demand, or the output rotational velocity may be varied by control of the speed at which the demanded output rotary position changes.
An example of a position-controlled motor is a stepper motor. A stepper motor is an open loop position-controlled motor, that is, it is supplied with an input signal relating to a demanded rotational position or rotational velocity, the stepper motor being driven to achieve the demanded position or velocity. A stepper motor may also be provided with an encoder providing a feedback signal indicative of the actual output position or velocity. The feedback signal may be used to generate an error signal by comparison with the demanded output rotary position, the error signal being used to drive the motor to minimise the error. A stepper motor provided with an encoder in this manner comprises a closed loop form of position-controlled motor.
An alternative form of closed loop position-controlled motor comprises a DC motor provided with an encoder. The output from the encoder provides a feedback signal from which an error signal can be generated when the feedback signal is compared to a demanded output rotary position, the error signal being used to drive the motor to minimise the error.
In the present context the term “DC motor” is to be interpreted broadly as including any form of motor that can be driven to provide an output torque, such as for example a brushless DC motor, a brushed DC motor, an induction motor or an AC motor. A brushless DC motor comprises any form of electronically commutated motor with integral commutation sensor. Similarly, the term stepper motor is to be interpreted broadly as including any form of motor that can be driven by a drive signal, each pulse indicating a required change of rotary position.
An encoder is any form of angular position sensing device, such as an optical encoder, magnetic encoder, resolver, capacitive encoder or any other form of position sensing device. An encoder may be connected to an output shaft of a motor and used to provide a feedback signal indicating the angular position or motion of the motor output shaft.
In one embodiment of the invention the take up motor 13 is a position-controlled motor (of any sort, as described above such as an open or closed loop stepper motor or a DC motor provided with a position encoder) and the supply motor 12 is a torque-controlled motor (of any sort, as described above such as a DC motor without a feedback signal from a position encoder or a stepper motor which derives its commutation signal from an output position encoder).
When the tape is travelling in the print direction the tape drive operates in a pull-drag mode. That is, the torque-controlled supply motor 12 provides a dragging force acting on the tape in order to keep the tape tensioned. The torque-controlled supply motor 12 is driven in the opposite direction to the direction of tape transport, however the force applied to the tape is chosen such that the position-controlled take up motor 13 is able to overpower the torque-controlled supply motor 12 such that the supply spool rotates in the direction of tape transport. Tension in the tape can be controlled by appropriate control of the torque-controlled motor, for example by controlling the current supplied to a brushed DC motor. The take-up motor is driven at the appropriate angular velocity in order to drive the tape past the printhead at the correct speed.
When the tape is travelling in the tape reverse direction, the tape drive operates in a push-pull mode. The torque-controlled supply motor applies a pulling force to the tape, and is responsible for setting the tension within the tape by appropriate control of the supply motor 12. The position-controlled take-up motor is driven to assist in transporting the tape, by being driven in the direction of tape transport; however, the position-controlled take-up motor is arranged to rotate less fast than the supply motor so that the net effect is that the tape remains tensioned between the spools.
As a further alternative, the supply and the take-up motors may be such that each motor can act as either a position-controlled motor or a torque-controlled motor. Such motors are referred to herein as dual control mode motors. A suitable motor for this purpose is a DC motor provided with an output position encoder. When operating in a position-controlled mode, the encoder output position signal is used as a feedback signal. When operating in a torque-controlled mode, the encoder output position signal is not used.
An alternative suitable dual control mode motor is an open loop position control motor (such as a stepper motor) provided with an output position encoder. When operating in a position-controlled mode either the encoder signal is not used or the encoder signal is used to provide a closed loop position-controlled stepper motor. When operating in a torque-controlled mode the encoder output signal is used to provide the commutation signal to the open loop position controlled motor.
By providing both spools with dual control mode motors the tape drive may be operated in push-pull mode in both directions (that is, the print direction and the tape reverse direction). Alternatively, the tape drive may be operated in pull-drag mode in both directions. This advantageously means that the drive signals controlling the motors can be the same when the tape is being transported in both directions (the only difference being the motor to which each drive signal is provided). For simplicity it may be that the same type of motor is used to drive both the supply spool and the take-up spool, however this need not be the case.
As yet a further variant, when the tape is being transported in the print direction, for a supply motor comprising a stepper motor and an output position encoder, the supply motor may operate in position control mode using encoder feedback (that is, closed loop position control). Closed loop position-controlled motors are preferred because as they have direct feedback of the actual output position this can be used in combination with the demanded output position in order to generate an error signal such that the motor is driven to minimise the error until the actual output position is equal to the demanded output position. A torque-controlled take-up motor such as a DC motor operating without encoder position feedback pulls the tape to set the tape tension. When the tape is being transported in the tape reverse direction both motors may operate in position control mode (the supply motor again acting as a closed loop position-controlled motor, or as an open loop position-controlled motor, and the take-up motor operating as a closed loop position-controlled DC motor). The result is that the tape drive operates in push-pull mode in both directions, however the implementation of the push-pull tape drive is different in each direction.
Further variants will be readily apparent to the appropriately skilled person, from the teaching herein, in the form of other combinations of DC motors and stepper motors with or without output position feedback, or indeed any other form of position-controlled or torque-controlled motors that are known in the art.
For a pair of motors within a tape drive, the drive signal supplied to the motor is varied as the diameter of the supply spool and the take-up spool vary and as the required tape tension varies. Determining the appropriate motor drive signal requires that the spool diameters are determined in order that the demanded motor torque or the demanded motor position for the printing operation can be adjusted accordingly.
One known method of monitoring the diameter of a spool of tape is based upon optical sensing comprising at least one emitter and detector pair. The emitter and detector pair is arranged such that as the diameter of the spool changes, the spool blocks that signal from the emitter to the detector, which may be detected. Such an optical spool diameter monitoring technique is disclosed in GB 2,369,602.
An alternative method for determining tape spool diameter is disclosed in GB 2,298,821. Here, tape is passed around an idler roller of known diameter. The idler roller is provided with an anti-slip coating to prevent slippage occurring between the tape and the idler roller when the tape is moved. The outer diameter of the idler roller is measured. Rotation of the idler roller is monitored. This is achieved by providing the idler roller with a magnetic disc having a north and south pole. Rotation of the idler roller can then be detected by an appropriate magnetic sensor. By detecting rotation of the idler roller of known diameter and knowing a number of steps through which a stepper motor has turned the diameter of a spool of tape associated with the stepper motor can be determined.
The drive signal controlling the torque controlled motor is optimised to apply an appropriate torque to the associated spool such that the tape is correctly tensioned at any time. However, a spool of tape has a significant mass, and hence at times at which the direction of tape transport is reversed or during rapid acceleration or deceleration the inertia of the spool may act to alter the effective tension applied to the tape. If uncorrected the effect of this inertia may take the tape tension beyond predetermined safe limits, risking damage to both the tape and the tape drive itself.
The moment of inertia of a spool of tape supported upon the spool, about a spool axis, can be calculated as follows:
J=JS+½M(R22+R12) (1)
where:
It can be seen from this equation that the inertia of the spool of tape is dependent upon the radius of the spool, and thus upon the diameter of the spool, which may be measured or determined directly or indirectly as discussed above.
As noted above, during periods of rapid acceleration or deceleration, or when the direction of tape transport is reversed, the effect of the inertia of the spool or spools on tape tension is at its maximum. In order to compensate for this effect, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention an additional component of the drive signal provided to the or each torque-controlled motor in a tape drive can be calculated.
The drive signal provided to a brushless DC torque-controlled motor comprises a current which is varied according to the direction of tape transport and whether the tape is operating in the steady state, accelerating or decelerating. The direction of the current supplied to a torque controlled motor determines the direction in which the motor is driven. The magnitude of the supply current determines the torque that is applied by the motor to the spool of tape.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the additional component comprises an additional motor supply current component that is added to or subtracted from the motor drive current in order to modify the torque applied by the motor to compensate for the inertial loading of the spool.
The additional torque component required to overcome the inertial loading of the spool of tape can be calculated as follows:
T=Jα (2)
where:
The required torque can be calculated as above. The angular acceleration is known at any particular time. Specifically, an acceleration profile associated with tape transport is established. This means that angular acceleration at any time can be determined from the acceleration profile. Inertia can be calculated as described above.
The torque generated by many torque-controlled motors is directly proportional to the current supplied to the motor. Consequently, the additional current component to be added to or subtracted from the motor drive current can be calculated based upon a relationship between torque and current for a particular motor, as represented by the motor's torque constant.
When the tape drive is operating in push-pull mode, with the torque-controlled motor pulling the tape, inertial compensation can be used to provide additional torque in order to prevent the inertia of the take-up spool resulting in a reduction of tape tension when the tape is being accelerated. When the tape is being decelerated, inertial compensation can be used to reduce the torque applied to the spool taking-up tape in order to assist in decelerating the tape and to prevent the tape tension increasing beyond safe levels.
When the tape drive is operating in pull-drag mode, with the torque-controlled motor dragging the tape, inertial compensation can be used to provide additional torque in the reverse direction to tape transport in order to prevent the inertia of the spool supplying tape resulting in the tape tension reducing when the tape is being decelerated. When the tape is being accelerated, inertial compensation can be used to reduce the torque applied to the spool supplying tape in order to assist in accelerating the tape and to prevent the tape tension increasing beyond safe levels.
When the direction of tape transport changes, a torque controlled motor may switch from dragging the tape to pulling the tape, or from pulling the tape to dragging the tape. For either change, the direction in which the motor is being driven does not change. That is, given that the direction of tape movement has changed, and given that the motor is driven in the direction of tape transport in one tape movement direction, and in a direction opposite to that of tape transport in the other movement direction, the motor continues to be driven in the same rotational direction.
The effect of inertial compensation when the direction of tape transport is reversed is to change the drive signal to the motor. Indeed, for rapid changes in tape direction, in order to prevent excessive tape tension the drive signal applied to a torque controlled motor may even briefly be reversed. That is, to assist in tape transport when going from pulling to dragging, the torque-controlled motor may briefly switch to pushing the tape in order to assist in reversing the tape direction.
As discussed above, the effect of inertial compensation in accordance with embodiments of the present invention is in addition to the drive signal applied to the torque-controlled motor in order to drive the tape in the steady state.
A stepper motor driving a tape may be caused to stall under excessive tape tension, which may occur due to inertial loading when the tape changes direction or when the tape is being rapidly accelerated or decelerated. A further benefit of inertial compensation, in addition to preventing damage to the tape, is that if the other tape drive motor comprises a position-controlled stepper motor then the risk of the stepper motor stalling is reduced.
Before inertial compensation can be applied it is necessary to calibrate the torque-controlled motor in order to accurately determine the relationship between the current supplied to the motor and the change in torque generated by the motor. This calibration may be performed empirically either before the tape drive is in operation or periodically throughout the tape drive's use. The calibration is to determine the angular acceleration provided to a spool per unit of current supplied to the torque-controlled motor where torque is directly proportional to current:
A=KtI/J (3)
where:
This calibration can be performed by a number of different methods. In first and second calibration methods, the tape between the spools is initially held slack and the second motor is held stationary. A known drive current is supplied to the torque controlled motor. The acceleration of the spool can be measured. In the first calibration method the acceleration is directly measured, for instance using an encoder attached to the motor. In the second calibration method the acceleration is indirectly measured by timing commutation pulses supplied to the torque controlled motor. This second calibration method is disadvantageous because it requires the torque-controlled motor to rotate a significant number of times before the spool acceleration can be measured, which consequently requires a significant amount of slack tape between the spools (which is undesirable due to the potential for tangling the tape).
A third calibration method which is currently preferred involves the tape between the spools being held taut. A known supply current drives a first torque-controlled motor (driving a first spool) while a second motor (driving a second spool) is allowed to free wheel. In this way the composite acceleration of the masses driven by the two spool motors can be measured. This composite acceleration is the acceleration of the inertia of the first spool, and the inertia of the second spool reflected through the gearing ratio of the diameters of the first and second spools. By repeating this process by driving the second motor a second composite acceleration can be measured. By knowing the diameters of the spools, the inertia of each spool can then be calculated.
The third calibration method can be expressed mathematically as follows:
First define:
The radiuses Ra2, Rb2 are known, Torques Ta, Tb are also known by setting currents supplied to the motors, and knowing the relationship between torque and current for each motor, i.e. the motors' torque constants. Accelerations αa and αb are measured. The only unknown variables are Ja and Jb. These are calculated by the following formulae:
Define:
That is, k is the gearing ratio between the two spool diameters.
Rearranging equation (4):
Ja=Jac−Jbk2 (6)
Rearranging equation (5):
Substituting equation (7) into equation (6):
Substituting equation (6) into equation (7):
Since, from equation (2):
Substituting equation (18) and (20) into equation (11):
Substituting equation (18) and (20) into equation (15):
Equation (26) and (24) provide the desired inertias Ja and Jb which can then be used for compensation calculations as described above.
As noted above, tape drives in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may be used in thermal transfer printers of the type described above. Tape drives in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may be advantageously used in a thermal transfer over printer, such as may be used within the packaging industry, for instance for printing further information such as dates and bar codes over the top of pre-printed packaging (such as food bags).
Additionally, tape drives in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may be used in other applications, and provide similar advantages to those evident in thermal transfer printers, for instance fast and accurate tape acceleration, deceleration, speed and positional accuracy.
An alternative application where such tape drives may be applied is in labelling machines, which are adapted to apply labels detached from a continuous tape (alternatively referred to as a label web). Tape drives in accordance with embodiments of the present invention are suitable for use in labelling machines in which a label carrying web is mounted on a supply. Labels are removed from the web, and the web is driven onto a take-up spool.
In general, tape drives in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may be used in any application where there is a requirement to transport any form of tape, web or other continuous material from a first spool to a second spool.
Further modifications and applications of the present invention will be readily apparent to the appropriately skilled person from the teaching herein, without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0704365.6 | Mar 2007 | GB | national |
This application claims priority to and is based on United Kingdom Application No. 0704365.6 filed Mar. 7, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In addition, this application claims priority to and is based on U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/894,508 filed Mar. 13, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3584805 | Lee | Jun 1971 | A |
3606201 | Petusky | Sep 1971 | A |
3610496 | Parker | Oct 1971 | A |
3704401 | Miller | Nov 1972 | A |
3781490 | Phillips | Dec 1973 | A |
3836831 | Van Heelsbergen | Sep 1974 | A |
3863117 | Paschetto | Jan 1975 | A |
3889893 | Silverman et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
3902585 | Mogtader | Sep 1975 | A |
3910527 | Buhler et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3926513 | Silver et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3982160 | Goldschmidt et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
3984809 | Dertouzos et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4000804 | Zaltieri | Jan 1977 | A |
4012134 | Silver et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4012674 | Spitsbergen et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4015799 | Koski et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4025830 | Delaporte | May 1977 | A |
4079828 | Babler | Mar 1978 | A |
4091913 | Ku et al. | May 1978 | A |
4093149 | Shroff et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4094478 | Shroff et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4095758 | Shroff | Jun 1978 | A |
4096417 | Chambolle | Jun 1978 | A |
4156257 | Roberts | May 1979 | A |
4161001 | Sakamoto | Jul 1979 | A |
4177731 | Kleist et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
RE30448 | Shroff | Dec 1980 | E |
4256996 | Brooks et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4266479 | Mahoney | May 1981 | A |
4286888 | Bennett et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4294552 | Mako | Oct 1981 | A |
4313376 | Swope et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4313683 | Brown et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4354211 | Gilovich et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4366371 | d'Alayer de Costermore d'Arc et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4375339 | Dyer et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4400745 | Shu | Aug 1983 | A |
4448368 | Skalko | May 1984 | A |
4461433 | Kani | Jul 1984 | A |
4479081 | Harris | Oct 1984 | A |
4525654 | Tajima et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4573645 | Harris, Jr. | Mar 1986 | A |
4577198 | Hibino et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4589603 | Muller | May 1986 | A |
4632582 | Houston | Dec 1986 | A |
4639880 | Yasuhiro | Jan 1987 | A |
4642655 | Sparer et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4650350 | Dorner | Mar 1987 | A |
4664336 | Koyama | May 1987 | A |
4692819 | Steele | Sep 1987 | A |
4696439 | Sukigara et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4712113 | Brooks et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4752842 | Odagiri | Jun 1988 | A |
4760405 | Nagira et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4786992 | Tajima et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4788558 | Caldwell et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4895466 | Hartman et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4897668 | Nagato et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4909648 | Hartman et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4924240 | Herbert et al. | May 1990 | A |
4952085 | Rein | Aug 1990 | A |
4953044 | Van Pelt et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4977466 | Nakata | Dec 1990 | A |
5012989 | Whyte, Jr. et al. | May 1991 | A |
5017943 | Ogita et al. | May 1991 | A |
5039027 | Yanagihara et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5080296 | Raggio et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5117241 | Stephenson | May 1992 | A |
5121136 | Kawakubo | Jun 1992 | A |
5125592 | Sato | Jun 1992 | A |
5160943 | Pettigrew et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5162815 | Hodge | Nov 1992 | A |
5218490 | Sakamoto et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222684 | Yoneda et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5259563 | Kakiwaki et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5281038 | Schofield et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5294203 | Williams | Mar 1994 | A |
5295753 | Godo et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297879 | Oikawa | Mar 1994 | A |
5300953 | Schulte | Apr 1994 | A |
5313343 | Yatomi | May 1994 | A |
5330118 | Yoshikawa | Jul 1994 | A |
5357270 | Herbert | Oct 1994 | A |
5366303 | Barrus et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372439 | Poole et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5415482 | Poole et al. | May 1995 | A |
5477400 | Kawamata | Dec 1995 | A |
5490638 | Driftmyer et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5505550 | Kitahara et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5529410 | Hunter et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5576751 | Wada et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5604652 | Nishida et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609425 | Kawano et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5639040 | Honjo | Jun 1997 | A |
5647679 | Green et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649672 | Wolff et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649774 | Harding et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5700096 | Satoh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701214 | Inoue et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5720442 | Yanagihara et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5731672 | Miyaguchi | Mar 1998 | A |
5733054 | Miazga | Mar 1998 | A |
5788384 | Goodwin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5795084 | Stone et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5803624 | Miazga et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5816719 | Palmer | Oct 1998 | A |
5820280 | Fox | Oct 1998 | A |
5906444 | Jorgensen | May 1999 | A |
5971634 | Buckby et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5993092 | Palmer | Nov 1999 | A |
6000868 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6036382 | Middleton | Mar 2000 | A |
6046756 | Iga et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6068206 | Lindsay, Jr. | May 2000 | A |
6082914 | Barrus et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6089768 | Barrus et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6128152 | Mace | Oct 2000 | A |
6142686 | Schanke et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6164203 | Keller | Dec 2000 | A |
6261012 | Haas et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6305628 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305629 | Chliwnyj et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307583 | Randolph et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6315471 | Hsieh et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6411317 | Fukuda | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6669136 | Niioka et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6754026 | Koski | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6840689 | Barrus et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6969064 | Ichikawa et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7682094 | McNestry et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20030049065 | Barrus et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040041047 | Karp et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040146331 | McNestry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1473110 | Feb 2004 | CN |
4215830 | Nov 1993 | DE |
0157096 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0176009 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0294633 | Dec 1988 | EP |
0 329 478 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0481579 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0481579 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0532238 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0556066 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0582285 | Feb 1994 | EP |
0 589 715 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0 683 055 | Nov 1995 | EP |
0 734 876 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0 741 044 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0 765 221 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0 804 343 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0 830 252 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 842 785 | May 1998 | EP |
0840311 | May 1998 | EP |
0854480 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 861 735 | Sep 1998 | EP |
0936078 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0945273 | Sep 1999 | EP |
0955178 | Nov 1999 | EP |
1000756 | May 2000 | EP |
1400362 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1 409 388 | Apr 2004 | EP |
1470926 | Oct 2004 | EP |
2783459 | Mar 2000 | FR |
9811893 | Mar 2000 | FR |
1 361 288 | Jul 1974 | GB |
1 576 750 | Oct 1980 | GB |
2077970 | Dec 1981 | GB |
2087104 | May 1982 | GB |
2 163 915 | Mar 1986 | GB |
2 175 253 | Nov 1986 | GB |
2201013 | Aug 1988 | GB |
2 272 669 | May 1994 | GB |
2289441 | Nov 1995 | GB |
2298821 | Sep 1996 | GB |
2 302 523 | Jan 1997 | GB |
2 306 916 | May 1997 | GB |
2 310 405 | Aug 1997 | GB |
2 315 244 | Jan 1998 | GB |
2 343 655 | May 2000 | GB |
2 349 605 | Nov 2000 | GB |
2354974 | Apr 2001 | GB |
2 369 326 | May 2002 | GB |
2369602 | Jun 2002 | GB |
2376662 | Dec 2002 | GB |
2400582 | Oct 2004 | GB |
2400818 | Oct 2004 | GB |
2404703 | Feb 2005 | GB |
2404896 | Feb 2005 | GB |
2416237 | Jan 2006 | GB |
2 422 815 | Aug 2006 | GB |
59-17125 | Jan 1984 | JP |
60-157891 | Aug 1985 | JP |
S60-157891 | Aug 1985 | JP |
60-211653 | Oct 1985 | JP |
61-169265 | Jul 1986 | JP |
63-104875 | May 1988 | JP |
63-122045 | May 1988 | JP |
63-317963 | Dec 1988 | JP |
1-300455 | Dec 1989 | JP |
1300455 | Dec 1989 | JP |
04008551 | Jan 1992 | JP |
4-274044 | Sep 1992 | JP |
4-305486 | Oct 1992 | JP |
05058014 | Mar 1993 | JP |
H5-58014 | Mar 1993 | JP |
A-H06-079938 | Mar 1994 | JP |
06126995 | May 1994 | JP |
H6-134275 | Jun 1994 | JP |
A-H07-032692 | Feb 1995 | JP |
08002078 | Jan 1996 | JP |
08244324 | Sep 1996 | JP |
H8-244324 | Sep 1996 | JP |
9-151011 | Jun 1997 | JP |
10-181972 | Jul 1998 | JP |
2000-229456 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2004-181691 | Jul 2004 | JP |
WO 9209517 | Jun 1992 | WO |
WO9301055 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO 9534896 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO9614990 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9628304 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9632258 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO9735727 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO9735728 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9736751 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9934983 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9946129 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0222371 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO03011728 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 03029013 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO2006069943 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Burke et al, Switchable Stepper Motor Control, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Nov. 1989, pp. 430-431, vol. 32, No. 63. |
Barnett, J.A., Use of Stepper Motor as Variable Load, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Apr. 1977, pp. 4120-4121, vol. 19, No. 11. |
Datamax DMX 5000 ATB Printer, Maintenance Manual, Documentation P/N:88-0080-01, Revision B, Datamax Corporation, 1987, 1993. |
Markem Corporation v. Zipher, Ltd. et al., Order, Sep. 1, 2009, pp. 1-2, Doc. 117, Case No. 07-cv-06-PB. |
Markem Corporation v. Zipher, Ltd. et al., Order, Jan. 12, 2010, pp. 1-5, Doc. 125, Case No. 07-cv-06-PB. |
Datamax Corporation, DMX 5000, ATB Printer, Maintenance Manual, Doc. P/N: 88-0080-01, Revision B, 1987. |
DMX-5000 ATB Printer Maintenance Manual. |
DMX-5000 Description of the Firmware of the ATB Printer. |
University Physics, 9th Edition—Young Freedman, pg. 308, 1996. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080219740 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60894508 | Mar 2007 | US |