This application hereby incorporates by reference U.S. application Ser. No. 11/090,553, filed on Mar. 25, 2005, and titled Ultrasonic Inspection Reference Standard For Composite Materials.
Composite laminate reference standards are employed when performing ultrasonic inspection of composite laminate materials. They are used to aid in the detection of defects such as delaminations, foreign material, and the detection and quantification of porosity. A relationship exists between the strength of a composite laminate and the presence of defect conditions. This relationship is established in the course of effects-of-defects programs that look at the strength degradation of materials as a result of defects. Composite reference standards are currently manufactured with representative conditions to aid in the detection of delaminations and foreign material. However, it may be difficult to manufacture reference standards, which are adapted to tie detection and quantification of defects in tapered, composite parts. A reference standard, and method for its manufacture and use, is needed for the inspection of tapered, composite parts.
In one aspect of the invention, an ultrasonic inspection reference standard for composite materials, having at least one first tapered section, comprises a member having at least one second tapered section. The member is manufactured from a fiber-free polymer resin.
In another aspect of the invention, an ultrasonic inspection process for tapered composite materials is disclosed. The process comprises the steps of manufacturing a reference standard, and inspecting a fiber-reinforced composite part, having at least one second tapered section, with an ultrasonic technique using the reference standard. The reference standard comprises a member having at least one first tapered section.
In a further aspect of the invention, a process for manufacturing an ultrasonic reference standard for tapered composite materials is disclosed. The process comprises the steps of creating a model of an ultrasonic inspection standard having a first tapered section, and manufacturing a reference standard having a second tapered section based on the model.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the invention will become better understood with reference to the following drawings, description and claims.
The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.
The following detailed description is of the best currently contemplated modes of carrying out the invention. The description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, but is made merely for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the invention, since the scope of the invention is best defined by the appended claims.
Generally, this invention discloses the use and manufacture of tapered ultrasonic inspection reference standards for analyzing and inspecting the strength of composite laminates having tapered regions.
Composite laminate reference standards may be utilized when performing ultrasonic inspection to establish the bulk attenuation properties for a pristine material. However, the production of composite laminate reference standards may be costly, inaccurate, and inefficient. Previous work has shown that photo-polymer resins used in stereo lithography (SLA), as well as conventional thermo set and thermoplastic resins like those used to bind fibers in composite laminates, have similar ultrasonic (acoustic) properties to graphite epoxy composite laminates. This is detailed in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/090,553, filed on Mar. 25, 2005, and titled Ultrasonic Inspection Reference Standard For Composite Materials, which is hereby incorporated by reference. The use of SLA on photo-polymer resins, and other resins, may produce reference standards more efficiently, less expensively, and/or more accurately than previous reference standards.
As shown in
To demonstrate the use of a fiber-free photo-polymer resin as a reference standard, a photo-polymer resin reference standard was manufactured in substantially the same configuration as a prior art graphite-epoxy reference standard by using the stereo lithography process 10 shown in
As shown in
The SLA process may produce reference standards with similar acoustic properties to graphite epoxy. This type of standard may be employed when inspecting flat or relatively flat composite laminates. However, this type of standard may have limited application for complex shaped composite laminates that employ ply drops or tapered regions.
It has been discovered that many variables may affect and prohibit accurate inspection of tapered regions in composite laminates. These variables may be due to a loss of energy in the tapered region that are difficult to account for in a flat reference standard. Amongst others, these variables may include the incident angle of the ultrasonic signal as it is scanning the tapered region, the orientation of the tapered region when it is being scanned, the inspection methodology utilized to scan the tapered region, the configuration of the tapered region, and porosity in the tapered region.
As mentioned, one of the variables which may affect inspection of tapered regions in composite laminates is the incident angle of the ultrasonic signal as it is scanning the tapered region. Ultrasonic signals that have an incident angle normal to the part surface produce the lowest energy loss as the sound passes through the part. Non-normal incident angles, like those in tapered regions, may reflect some energy and transmit the remaining energy to produce a higher level of ultrasonic attenuation. The amount of energy transmitted is typically measured in decibels.
Another of the variables which may affect inspection of tapered regions in composite laminates is the orientation of the tapered region in relation to the scan, which may affect the bulk attenuation of the ultrasonic signal. To illustrate this, the composite laminate 75 shown in
Yet another of the variables which may affect inspection of tapered regions in composite laminates is what inspection methodology is utilized. Most composite laminates are inspected using squirter type ultrasonic systems at frequencies ranging from 500 KHz to 10 MHz. Squirter type systems may have water column diameters ranging from 0.125″ to over 0.375″ depending on the application. These systems may employ transducers ranging in size from 0.5″ to 1.0″ with varying focal lengths from flat to 2″. Composite laminates may also be inspected using immersion type systems having backwalls or reflector plates. Which geometric variables and inspection methods are utilized may affect the resulting ultrasonic attenuation when inspecting tapered regions of composite laminates. These variables may make it difficult to apply a universal correction factor to tapered region data when interpreting ultrasonic data in these areas.
Another of the variables which may affect inspection of tapered regions in composite laminates is the configuration of the tapered region. Design engineers may try to maximize their designs by introducing ply lay-ups that meet strength requirements, but enable the reduction of weight through removal of unnecessary material. Ply drops are often referred to as being the ratio of ply length to ply thickness. For example, as illustrated in
Another variable which may affect the inspection of tapered regions in composite laminates is porosity in the tapered region. The addition of porosity in tapered regions may compound the inspection and interpretation of laminates due to the difficulty in manufacturing a reference standard displaying porous properties. Since some graphite/epoxy laminates have very tight levels of acceptance, it may be necessary to produce a reference standard which accurately mimics the porous properties of the part being inspected.
The present invention relates to tapered reference standards, and methods for their manufacture and use, which may substantially mimic the effect porosity has on ultrasonic sound as it passes through a tapered composite laminate. In an embodiment of the invention, an ultrasonic inspection reference standard may be manufactured using stereo lithography on a polymer resin to make a member comprising at least one tapered section. The reference standard may exhibit similar acoustic properties to a tapered composite laminate (fiber/resin combination) to be inspected. In other embodiments, varying types of fiber-free polymer resin may be utilized, including the utilization of a polymer resin which is substantially similar to the resin of a composite material to be inspected. In still other embodiments, a non-stereo lithography process may be applied. In other embodiments, the tapered reference standard may comprise a tapered member which is defined by a plurality of holes, or which is defined by one or more openings in which one or more discrete wires or meshes are disposed. In such manner, the tapered reference standard may be utilized to inspect porous, tapered composite parts.
In one embodiment of the invention, an ultrasonic inspection process starts with designing and building a three-dimensional model of the standard, according to a tapered, fiber-reinforced composite part to be inspected. The tapered, fiber-reinforced composite part to be inspected may comprise a graphite epoxy composite material having a tapered section. The three-dimensional model may be designed to include at least one tapered section to substantially mimic the ultrasonic material properties of the tapered, composite part to be inspected. The tapered section of the model may be predetermined prior to manufacture of the standard in order to provide the standard with at least one of the acceptable and rejectable ultrasonic properties of the tapered, fiber-reinforced composite part to be inspected. In such manner, the designed reference standard may substantially comprise the ultrasonic properties of a fiber-reinforced, tapered, composite part. The tapered section may be designed to be located in varying locations in the model, and may comprise varying sizes, shapes, orientations, configurations, and tapers.
Because there may be a difference in the ultrasonic attenuation of the part to be inspected, and the attenuation of the resin of which the reference standard may be manufactured, an offset thickness for the model may be determined in order to substantially provide the model with the equivalent ultrasonic attenuation of the part to be inspected. An example of the process which may be used to determine an offset thickness is shown in
In curing the photopolymer resin, the laser may raster back and forth curing resin in the areas dictated by the model in order to produce a member having one or more tapered sections as designated by the model. The tapered section may comprise a plurality of thicknesses, and may comprise any size, shape, orientation, configuration, or taper. The tapered section may be a substantially equivalent taper, or thickness, based on the material properties of the tapered, composite material to be inspected. The tapered section may be substantially continuous without the inclusion of stepped surfaces. After the SLA process is completed, the standard may be given a post UV cure to harden the resin and to finish manufacture of the standard.
The process may produce an ultrasonic reference standard comprising a fiber-free polymer resin member having at least one tapered section.
The manufactured standard may be used to inspect a tapered, fiber-reinforced, composite part using an ultrasonic technique. For instance, the manufactured standard may be ultrasonically scanned using ultrasonic inspection, such as pulse-echo and through-transmission. A tapered, fiber-reinforced composite part may be ultrasonically scanned using the same technique. The data obtained from scanning the tapered, fiber-reinforced, composite part may be compared with the data obtained from scanning the manufactured standard. Based on the data, a decision may be made as to whether to accept or reject the tapered, composite part.
The invention may produce a tapered reference standard which may be manufactured at lower manufacturing cost, which may be manufactured in less time, and which may be manufactured using a method which does not require any tooling, as compared to many existing tapered, fiber-reinforced composite reference standards. The manufactured tapered, ultrasonic inspection reference standard may substantially comprise the ultrasonic properties of a tapered, graphite-epoxy reference standard or other type of tapered reference standard made of varying materials. In such manner, the manufactured, tapered, ultrasonic inspection reference standard may replace a tapered, graphite-epoxy reference standard, or other type of tapered fiber-reinforced reference standard.
Using stereo lithography to produce index standards comprising tapered members may be of value because manufacturing costs may be roughly ten percent of the traditional cost of manufacturing composite standards with similar tapers. The ability to produce tapers in particular sizes, shapes, orientations, configurations, and tapers may make this approach desirable in the manufacturing of tapered reference standards. Additionally, the nature of the manufacturing process, including its tailorability and repeatability, may enable the production of large numbers of tapered reference standards having substantially equivalent acoustic properties to allow inspection of tapered, composite parts around the world. The cost of manufacturing and certification of reference standards may be reduced through use of the invention. The process may become the foundation for the development of tapered reference standards to characterize ultrasonic equipment, and may replace current tapered, composite reference standards, such as graphite-epoxy, tapered reference standards. The invention may be used for ultrasonic inspection of tapered, composite parts used in the aircraft industry, both commercial and defense, and in other non-aircraft applications.
It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing relates to exemplary embodiments of the invention and that modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3784043 | Presnick | Jan 1974 | A |
3908439 | Pelak et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3933026 | Ham | Jan 1976 | A |
4156123 | Fischer et al. | May 1979 | A |
4173139 | Conn | Nov 1979 | A |
4266154 | Marshall | May 1981 | A |
4393987 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4406153 | Ophir et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4445360 | Treder, Jr. | May 1984 | A |
4466270 | Kimura et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4566330 | Fujii et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4575330 | Hull | Mar 1986 | A |
4660419 | Derkacs | Apr 1987 | A |
4674334 | Chimenti et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4729235 | Podlech | Mar 1988 | A |
4747295 | Feist et al. | May 1988 | A |
4779452 | Cohen-Tenoudji | Oct 1988 | A |
5054310 | Flynn | Oct 1991 | A |
5065520 | Shimizu et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
RE33789 | Stevenson | Jan 1992 | E |
5127268 | Kline | Jul 1992 | A |
5163027 | Miller et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5163077 | Dupre | Nov 1992 | A |
5196343 | Zerhouni et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5238556 | Shirkhan | Aug 1993 | A |
5312755 | Madsen et al. | May 1994 | A |
5525385 | Weinstein et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5551881 | Henderson et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5603797 | Thomas et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5637175 | Feygin et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656763 | Flax | Aug 1997 | A |
5662566 | Marxrieser et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5837880 | Shakinovsky et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6238343 | Madsen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6364986 | Kieronski | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6405583 | Shirakawabe et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415051 | Callari et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415644 | Rockwood et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426274 | Tayanaka | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6635112 | Choy et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6649516 | Asakawa et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6684701 | Dubois et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6803095 | Halladay et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6843945 | Lee et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6925145 | Batzinger | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6959602 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6962701 | Koenig | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6962739 | Kim et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7010980 | Meier | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7076992 | Greelish | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7188559 | Vecchio | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7216544 | Vaccaro et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7320241 | Kollgaard et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7353709 | Kruger et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7357014 | Vaccaro et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7418860 | Austerlitz et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7424818 | Vaccaro et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7509832 | Vaccaro et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510817 | Benoit et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
20030086535 | Teppaz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20060213250 | Vaccaro et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060234391 | Weiss et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060265679 | Scheffer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070089479 | Vaccaro et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070101815 | Kollgaard et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107520 | Vaccaro et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070125177 | Vaccaro et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080087093 | Engelbart et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080121039 | Vaccaro et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134749 | Engelbart et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080196475 | Engelbart et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
28 14 3 36 | May 1979 | DE |
2221991 | Feb 1990 | GB |
61-265565 | Nov 1986 | JP |
08210953 | Aug 1996 | JP |
9013024 | Nov 1990 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070125177 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |