This disclosure relates to targeting operation sites.
Abnormalities of the hip socket and associated cartilage are often treated by surgical intervention. One such abnormality is femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), a condition of the hip joint in which rubbing of the femoral head and acetabulum damages the hip joint. FAI often damages the articular cartilage of the femoral head or of the acetabulum or damages the labral cartilage on and around the acetabular rim.
Although arthroscopy can be used to treat some abnormalities of the hip joint, its use is limited, and treatment of many abnormalities commonly involves distraction or dislocation of the hip. In many instances, an open surgical technique involves dislocation of the femoral head from the hip socket to expose all parts of the joint.
In a general aspect, a system includes an identifier that produces electromagnetic fields, an implement that includes an electromagnetic field sensor, and a control unit configured to determine the position of a tool relative to an operation site of a joint. The implement is configured to be inserted into the joint without dislocating the joint, and to protect a bone of a joint when the operation site is accessed.
In another general aspect, a system for targeting an operation site includes an identifier having an electromagnetic field generator configured to produce electromagnetic fields. The system includes an implement that includes a handle, a blade portion, and an electromagnetic field sensor coupled to the blade portion. The electromagnetic field sensor is configured to produce a signal responsive to electromagnetic fields produced by the electromagnetic field generator. The system includes a control unit configured to access information indicating a position of the electromagnetic field sensor relative to the operation site, receive a signal from the electromagnetic field sensor that is indicative of a position of a tool relative to the electromagnetic field sensor, and determine a position of the tool relative to an operation site based on the received signal and the position of the electromagnetic field sensor relative to the operation site.
Implementations may include one or more of the following features. The control unit is further configured to compare a position of the tool to an acceptable range of axes for drilling to the operation site, and determine, based on the comparison, that the position of the tool relative to the operation site corresponds to an acceptable position within the range of axes for drilling to the operation site. The control unit is further configured to output on a graphical user interface an indication that the position of the tool relative to the operation site is acceptable. To compare a position of the tool to an acceptable range of axes for drilling to the operation site, the control unit is configured to compare the position of the tool to a range of axes for drilling through the ilium to reach an acetabular operation site. The control unit is configured to determine a distance between a tip of the tool and the operation site based on the received signal, and output, on a user interface, the determined distance. The control unit is configured to identify a plurality of linear paths that extend to the operation site through the pelvis and satisfy one or more predetermined criteria for acceptability, and output information that identifies the plurality of linear paths. The control unit is configured to receive information indicating selection of one of the plurality of linear paths, determine the position of the tool relative to the selected linear path, and output information that indicates the position of the tool relative to the selected linear path.
The electromagnetic field sensor is removably coupled to the implement, and wherein the implement defines a channel configured to receive the electromagnetic field sensor. The channel extends through a portion of the blade portion. The implement comprises a landmark located at a known position of the blade portion. The electromagnetic field sensor is coupleable at any of a plurality of predefined positions within the channel. The implement comprises a plurality of landmarks, each of the plurality of landmarks corresponding to one of the plurality of predefined positions within the channel, the landmarks being visible at an exterior surface of the implement. The implement includes a substantially rigid translucent portion. The translucent portion is located over the channel such that the position of the sensor or a device coupled to the sensor is visible within the channel. The translucent portion is located on a convex side of the blade portion configured to face away from a femoral head when the implement is engaged to the femoral head.
In another general aspect, a method of targeting an operation site includes: identifying an operation site; positioning a blade portion of an implement at the operation site, the implement including an electromagnetic field sensor, the electromagnetic field sensor being positioned at a known position relative to the operation site; locating the operation site using an identifier, the identifier having an electromagnetic field generator, and the electromagnetic field sensor communicating with the electromagnetic field generator when locating the operation site; and targeting the operation site using the position of the electromagnetic field sensor.
Implementations can include one or more of the following features. For example, the operation site is an acetabular operation site and positioning the blade portion of the implement includes positioning the blade portion between an acetabulum and a femoral head. The acetabular operation site is a portion of one of the acetabulum, acetabular cartilage, or labral cartilage. Positioning an implement includes positioning a landmark of the implement at a known position relative to the operation site, the position of the landmark being known relative to the position of the electromagnetic field sensor, and targeting the operation site includes targeting the operation site using the position of the electromagnetic field sensor and the position of the landmark. Positioning the implement between an acetabulum and a femoral head includes positioning the electromagnetic field sensor of the implement between the acetabulum and the femoral head. Targeting an acetabular operation site includes orienting an axis for drilling that extends through a portion of the ilium and the operation site. Targeting an operation site includes identifying a path to the operation site. Targeting an operation site includes identifying a plurality of paths to the operation site, each path extending linearly between the operation site and a different point on the surface of a tissue surrounding the operation site; and selecting, from the plurality of paths, a particular path to use as an axis for drilling that minimizes disturbance of tissue surrounding the operation site. The method includes drilling a cannula to the operation site. Drilling a cannula to the operation site includes drilling to a portion of the implement. Identifying the operation site includes visually locating the operation site.
In another general aspect, an implement for use in targeting an operation site includes: a handle, a blade portion coupled to the handle, and an electromagnetic field sensor coupled to the blade portion.
Implementations can include one or more of the following features. For example, the electromagnetic field sensor is fixedly coupled to the implement. The electromagnetic field sensor is removably coupled to the implement, and the implement defines a channel configured to receive the electromagnetic field sensor. The channel extends through a portion of the blade portion. The electromagnetic field sensor can be coupled at one of a plurality of predefined positions within the channel. The implement includes a landmark located at a known position of the blade portion. The landmark is positioned at a known offset from the sensor. The landmark is a visual indicator. The implement includes a substantially rigid translucent portion. The blade portion is shaped to conform to a femoral head. The blade portion includes a concave section. The blade portion includes a curved portion.
In another general aspect, an implement for use in targeting an operation site includes a handle, a blade portion coupled to the handle, the blade portion comprising a curved portion, and an electromagnetic field sensor removably coupled to the blade portion. The implement defines a channel that extends through a portion of the blade portion and is configured to receive the electromagnetic field sensor. The blade portion includes a transparent or translucent portion near the channel.
In another general aspect, a method of confirming acceptable positioning of a tool relative to an operation site includes: receiving a signal from a sensor coupled to an implement, the signal being indicative of a position of the tool relative to the sensor, a blade portion of the implement being positioned at the operation site; determining the position of the tool relative to the operation site using a known position of the sensor relative to the operation site; comparing the position of the tool to an acceptable range of axes for drilling to the operation site; determining that the position of the tool relative to the operation site corresponds to an acceptable position within the range of axes for drilling to the operation site; and outputting on a graphical user interface an indication that the position of the tool relative to the operation site is acceptable.
Implementations can include one or more of the following features. For example, the signal from the sensor is further indicative of a position of the tool relative to a landmark of the implement, the position of the landmark relative to the operation site being known, and determining the position of the tool relative to the operation site includes determining the position of the tool relative to the operation site using a known position of the sensor relative to the landmark and the known position of the landmark relative to the operation site. The operation site is an acetabular operation site and the axes for drilling include axes for drilling through the ilium to reach the blade portion of the implement that is positioned between the acetabulum and the femoral head.
In another general aspect, a system for targeting an operation site includes: an identifier having a guide and an electromagnetic field generator configured to produce electromagnetic fields; an implement including a handle, a blade portion, and an electromagnetic field sensor coupled to the blade portion, the electromagnetic field sensor configured to produce a signal responsive to electromagnetic fields produced by the electromagnetic field generator; and a control unit configured to receive a signal from the electromagnetic field sensor, and determine a position of the guide relative to an operation site based on the received signal and a known position of the electromagnetic field sensor relative to the operation site.
The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the disclosure will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
A system for targeting an operation site of a hip joint includes an identifier that is attachable to an orthopaedic tool and that includes an electromagnetic field generator operable to generate an electromagnetic field having known properties. The system also includes one or more electromagnetic sensors for attachment to an implement that may be used during surgery. The system includes a control unit to drive the electromagnetic field generator, receive output signals from the sensor(s), and display relative positions of the implement and the identifier. For example, the identifier, sensors, and control unit can include features as described in WIPO International Publication Nos. WO2008/106593 and WO2009/108214, and as described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/758,747 and 12/768,689, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Referring to
Referring to
The useful range of the identifier 20 is a three-dimensional region around the identifier 20, referred to as the working volume of the identifier 20. The size and shape of the working volume is based on the characteristics of the electromagnetic fields produced by the electromagnetic field generator 20a and can be modified to be larger or smaller based on the need for targeting accuracy.
In some implementations, the working volume is a volume that surrounds the identifier 20. For example, the identifier 20 can be generally centrally located within the working volume. The working volume for some implementations, such as those used for targeting an acetabular operation site, can extend approximately 50 cm or more in width and approximately 40 cm or more in depth and be located at a distance of about 5 cm from the identifier 20. A drill guide, for example, will have a length of more than 5 cm to ensure that it is positioned within the working volume. Alternatively, for some uses, a working volume with smaller dimensions may be used to increase precision and accuracy.
The electromagnetic field sensor 30 communicates with the electromagnetic field generator of the identifier 20, for example, by receiving electromagnetic fields produced by the electromagnetic field generator when the electromagnetic field sensor 30 is located within electromagnetic communication with the electromagnetic field generator or within the working volume of the electromagnetic field generator of the identifier 20. When the electromagnetic field sensor 30 is located within the working volume of the identifier 20, the sensor 30 is able to generate output signals that indicate strength or intensity of the electromagnetic field generated by the identifier 20. The output signals can be used to accurately determine a location and orientation of the identifier 20 relative to the sensor 30. A sensor 30 located outside the working volume of the identifier 20, on the other hand, may not receive adequate electromagnetic energy from the identifier 20 to generate output signals that can be used to accurately determine the position of the identifier 20. The shape and size of the working volume of the identifier 20 depends in part on the configuration of the electromagnetic field generator 20a, specific characteristic of the operation of the electromagnetic field generator 20a, such as characteristics of a driving signal, and other factors.
An operator, such as a surgeon, can grip the identifier 20 by the housing 23 to position the identifier 20 relative to a patient, an implement, and/or a sensor, such as the electromagnetic field sensor 30. The identifier 20 can also include a coupling member 22 to which tools and other attachments are coupled. Using the coupling member 22, tools and other devices can be attached or guided by the identifier 20. For example, the coupling member 22 can receive a drill guide attachment 24 coupled to a drill guide 26. The identifier 20 is used to position the drill guide 26 so that a drill bit inserted through the drill guide 26 is guided to the position required by or appropriate for a medical procedure.
The identifier 20 can include a wired or wireless link to the control unit 50 to receive power and control signals to control the operation of the electromagnetic field generator 20a. For example, the identifier 20 can include a cable 27 that provides a connection to the control unit 50.
The control unit 50 controls the operation of the identifier 20 and receives inputs from one or more sensors 30. The control unit 50 also includes a user interface 52 that provides information to an operator of the system 100. The control unit 50 includes a processor that is configured to determine the location and orientation of the identifier 20 relative to the operation site 12 based on the input from the sensor 30 and information regarding the signal that controls the electromagnetic field generator 20a. The determination is made based on a known positional relationship between the sensor 30 and the operation site 12 and a determined position of the identifier 20 relative to the sensor 30.
The control unit 50 receives a signal that indicates a position of the identifier 20 relative to the operation site 12. For example, the signal can be received from the sensor 30. Using the signal from the sensor 30, the control unit 50 determines the position of the tool relative to the sensor 30. The control unit 50 also compares the position of the tool to an acceptable range of positions, such as a set of acceptable paths for drilling to the operation site 12.
In some implementations, the control unit 50 outputs on the user interface 52 an indication that the position of the identifier 20 relative to the operation site 12 or a landmark of the implement 40 is acceptable. For example, the output on the user interface 52 can include one or more elements, such as an element representing the angle of the identifier 20 relative to an axis to the operation site 12, one or more elements representing acceptable positions of the identifier 20 relative to the operation site 12, one or more elements representing unacceptable positions of the identifier 20 relative to the operation site 12, a numeric representation of the angle of the identifier 20 relative to one of the paths 64a-64c (
In some implementations, an electromagnetic field generator separate from the identifier can be used. For example, an identifier may be used that does not include an electromagnetic field generator. For example, an electromagnetic field generator can be a standalone unit or can be mounted to a chassis. The identifier can include an electromagnetic sensor that communicates with the electromagnetic field generator. A control unit can receive output signals of both the electromagnetic sensor of the identifier and the electromagnetic field sensor 30 coupled to the implement 40. The control unit can determine position of the identifier relative to the implement 40 based on the signals of the two electromagnetic field sensors. Additional sensors can also be used. Additional details of this implementation are described in WIPO International Publication Nos. WO2008/106593 and WO2009/108214, and in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/758,747 and 12/768,689, each of which, as noted above, is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Now referring to
The engagement of the insertable portion 44 and the femoral head allows the insertable portion 44 to act as a barrier to protect the femoral head from damage during surgery. The insertable portion 44 includes one or more blade portions 46 configured to contact a portion of the femoral head 16. The blade portion 46 can be, for example, substantially flattened, and can also be shaped to conform to the surface of the femoral head. For example, the blade portion 46 can include a curved portion that is curvilinear along a portion of the length of the blade portion 46. The blade portion 46 can include a concave or spoon-like portion to fit closely to the femoral head, even when the blade portion 46 is substantially flattened. The blade portion 46 may also be flexible to facilitate positioning in the hip joint 10, and to improve conformance to the femoral head 16. In some implementations, the blade portion 46 can have a curvature at some portions that generally corresponds to a diameter of approximately 40-60 mm. The blade portion 46 can be wide enough to protect the femoral head from damage and narrow enough to avoid obscuring visualization of the operating site.
A surgeon can position the insertable portion 44 in the hip joint 10 so that a portion of the insertable portion 44 has a known location relative to the operation site 12. For example, a surgeon can use an arthroscopic camera 60 to locate a defect of the acetabulum 14, and the surgeon can position the insertable portion 44 at a known position relative to the defect. As an example, while viewing the defective area of the acetabulum 14 using the arthroscopic camera 60, the surgeon can bring the insertable portion 44 into the viewing area of the arthroscopic camera 60. In such an implementation, the insertable portion 44 can include one or more markings or landmarks 47 disposed on the insertable portion 44 at a fixed position so that the surgeon can align the one or more markings or landmarks 47 relative to the defective area.
In some implementations, a surgeon can use other techniques to place the insertable portion 44 at a known location relative to the operation site 12, such as one or more of direct visualization, X-ray imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computerized tomography (CT).
Referring to
The sensor 30 includes, for example, an inductive sensor that is configured to respond to an electromagnetic field produced by the identifier 20 by outputting one or more induced electrical currents. The sensor 30 is capable of producing signals that allow the position of the identifier 20 to be determined. For example, the sensor 30 can include two or more inductive coils that each outputs an induced electrical current. The outputs of the sensor 30 allow determination of the location and orientation of the sensor 30 in up to six degrees of freedom, such as along three translational axes, generally called X, Y, and Z, and three angular orientations, generally called pitch, yaw, and roll, which are defined as rotation about the three translational axes.
The sensor 30 includes a connection to transmit the output signals, or data related to the signals. For example, a sensor lead 34 provides a wired connection for transmission of an output of the sensor 30. The sensor lead 34 can carry signals produced by the sensor 30 in response to electromagnetic fields. In some implementations, the connection can include a wireless transmitter. Additionally, the sensor lead 34 can include more than one connection, and the sensor lead 34 can carry power and control signals in addition to signals or data, and bi-directional communication is possible. For example, information regarding calibration of the sensor 30 can be stored in a storage device coupled to the sensor 30.
In some implementations, the sensor 30 can be coupled to the implement 40 at one of several positions relative to the implement 40. For example, the sensor 30 can move along the channel 48 (as indicated by arrow A in
In some implementations, the position of the sensor 30 relative to the implement 40 can be visibly determined. For example, the implement 40 can include a transparent or translucent portion 49 located at the insertable portion 44, for example, at the blade portion 46 of the insertable portion 44. The translucent portion 49 can be located near (e.g., at or over) a section of the channel 48 so that the position of the sensor 30 (or the housing that includes the sensor 30 or other device coupled to the sensor 30) is visible through the translucent portion 49 when the sensor 30 is located within a particular range of positions within the channel 48. The translucent portion 49 can be located at a portion of the channel 48 that is viewable at the side of the implement 40 that does not contact the femoral head 16. For example, the translucent portion 49 can be located on the blade portion 46, at a convex outer surface of the blade portion. For example, the translucent portion 49 is configured to face away from the femoral head when the implement 40 is engaged to the femoral head.
As noted above, the insertable portion 44 can also include features that facilitate positioning of the insertable portion 44 relative to the operation site 12. For example, the insertable portion 44 includes one or more landmarks 47 that are used as a reference point of the implement 40. As examples, a landmark may be a structure, a void, a boss, a channel, a detent, a flange, a groove, a member, a partition, a step, an aperture, a bore, a cavity, a dimple, a duct, a gap, a notch, an orifice, a passage, a slit, a hole, a marking, or a slot. The landmark 47 can be visibly discernible from the exterior of the insertable portion 44, for example, the landmark 47 is visible at a side of the blade portion 46 that does not contact the femoral head 16 so that the surgeon can position the landmark 47 relative to the operation site 12
In some implementations, the sensor 30 is fixed to the implement 40 at a known position relative to the insertable portion 44, to another portion of the implement 40, or relative to a landmark 47 of the insertable portion 44. For example, the sensor 30 can be located at a landmark 47 or at a known offset distance from a landmark 47.
Whether the sensor 30 is fixed to the implement 40 or removably attached to the implement 40, the position of the sensor 30 relative to the implement 40 is known at the time the operation site 12 is targeted. The position of the sensor 30 relative to the implement 40 is maintained during targeting, but can change if the surgical procedure or surgeon requires a change. Because the shape and dimensions of the implement 40 are known, and because the sensor 30 is maintained at a known position relative to the implement 40, the position of the sensor 30 can be used to determine the position of the operation site 12 when the implement 40 is positioned at a location relative to the operation site 12.
Referring to
Referring to
The insertable portion 44 of the implement 40 is positioned within the hip joint 10 so that the position of the implement 40 is known relative to the operation site 12. During the positioning of the implement 40, the arthroscopic camera 60 can be maintained in the hip joint 10 to facilitate placement of the implement 40. Images from the camera 60 can be used to locate a particular portion of the insertable portion 44, such as a landmark 47, at a known position relative to the operation site 12. For example, a landmark 47 of the insertable portion 44 can be located at or near to the operation site 12. The edges, end, or contours of the implement 40 can also be used to position the implement 40 relative to the operation site 12. The insertable portion 44 can be positioned relative to the operation site, and the operation site can be targeted and accessed as described below, without dislocating the hip joint 10.
Additionally, or alternatively, the position of the sensor 30 can be adjusted relative to the implement 40. For example, the sensor 30 can be moved to a portion of the channel 48 in proximity to the operation site 12. In one implementation, the sensor 30 can be moved along the channel 48 in the implement 40 to a position at or near the operation site 12. The position of the sensor 30 relative to the operation site 12 can be determined using images from the camera 60, for example, by viewing the position of the sensor 30 through the translucent portion 49 of the implement 40. Alternatively, as discussed above, one or more landmarks 47 can indicate the position of the implement 40 relative to the operation site 12, and the sensor 30 can be positioned at a known position out of several predefined positions relative to the implement 40. For example, a surgeon can position the sensor 30 at, or at a known offset from, one of the landmarks 47. Calibration of the sensor 30, if necessary, can be performed prior to inserting the implement 40 into the access port 62b.
Referring to
For example, in determining the position of the identifier 20 relative to the operation site 12, the control unit 50 can access information about the shape of the implement 40 and the location of the implement 40 relative to the operation site 12. This information can be input using the user interface 52 or another input mechanism. Additionally, the control unit 50 can access information regarding the location of the sensor 30 relative to the implement 40. For example, the sensor 30 can be attached at a pre-selected landmark 47 of the implement 40, or information regarding a landmark 47 of the implement 40 to which the sensor 30 is attached can be input to the control unit 50, such as by a user touching a portion of the interface 52 to indicate a landmark 47 near which the sensor 30 is attached. The signals of the sensor 30 can be used in combination with the information regarding known positions of the sensor 30 relative to the implement 40 and/or relative to the operation site 12 to determine the location and orientation of the identifier 20 relative to the operation site 12.
The control unit 50 outputs information about the position of the identifier 20 relative to the operation site 12 on the user interface 52. Based on the user interface 52, a surgeon or other operator can place the identifier 20 in a position where the interface 52 indicates that the tip 26a of the drill guide 26 is aligned along a linear axis to the operation site 12 (
The control unit 50 can also output information that indicates a distance (e.g., drill depth) between, for example, the tip 26a of the drill guide 26 and the operation site 12. The distance can be a distance that reaches the operation site 12 based on the current position of the identifier 20 relative to the sensor 30. In some implementations, the control unit 50 can determine the distance by subtracting the length of the drill guide 26 (e.g., the distance between the tip 26a of the drill guide 26 and the identifier 20) from the distance between the identifier 20 and the sensor 30. The control unit 50 can also adjust the distance based on any offsets between the sensor 30 and the operation site 12, for example, based on the position of the sensor 30 relative to the operation site 12. The operator can use the distance information to drill a hole through the pelvis to the proper depth, for example, a depth that reaches the operation site 12 but does not damage surrounding tissue.
Referring to
The control unit can identify the paths 64a-64c to extend to the operation site 12 through the pelvis (e.g., through the ilium) and to satisfy one or more predetermined criteria for acceptability. For example, the control unit 50 can determine each of the paths 64a-64c to have acceptable positioning relative to the pelvis, for example, to intersect the pelvis at a predefined range of locations and to extend within predetermined angle ranges relative to the pelvis. The paths 64a-64c can thus be selected by the control unit 50 to provide different options for accessing the operation site 12, where each path 64a-64c meets a set of constraints defined to, for example, meet the requirements of the procedure and/or avoid unnecessary tissue damage.
Providing multiple paths 64a-64c may enable the surgeon or operator to select a path that minimizes the amount of tissue disturbed during the surgical procedure and may enable the surgeon to optimize recovery time and minimize trauma to the areas surrounding the operation site. The control unit 50 can also identify and indicate to the surgeon an optimized or suggested path to access the operation site 12. For example, referring to
After the control unit 50 outputs information that identifies the one or more paths 64a-64c, the operator can optionally use the user interface 52 to select one of the paths 64a-64c as the desired path to access the operation site 12. The control unit 50 can receive information indicating selection of one of the plurality of paths 64a-64c, and can determine the position of the tool, such as a drill or drill guide 26, relative to the selected path based on the signals from the sensor 30. The control unit 50 can output information that indicates the position of the tool relative to the selected path.
The control unit 50 can also confirm acceptable positioning of a tool, such as a drill or drill guide 26, relative to the operation site 12 based on the signals from the sensor 30. For example, the control unit 50 can indicate on the interface 52 whether the drill guide 26 of the identifier 20 is aligned with the selected path 64b. The control unit 50 can also output information about various measurements and angles to assist the operator to align a tool along an appropriate drilling axis. The position of a tool can be determined to be acceptable when, for example, an axis defined by the tool is located within a predetermined distance or angle of a selected path 64b. Alternatively, the position of a tool can be determined to be acceptable when, for example, an axis defined by the tool extends through or within a predetermined distance of the operation site 12, and has an orientation relative to the pelvis or surrounding tissue that is within a predetermined range of orientations. The predetermined range of orientations can be selected to provide an appropriate angle of access for the surgical procedure and avoid unnecessary tissue damage.
The interface 52 of the control unit 50 can also indicate a current angular position of the identifier 20 relative to the operation site 12 or a landmark 47 of the implement 40 to confirm acceptable positioning of a tool relative to the operation site 12. For example, the control unit 50 can display a current angle of the drill guide 26 relative to an operation site 12 so that an operator, such as a surgeon, can confirm that a hole drilled in the pelvis will result in minimal damage to the tissue surrounding the operation site 12. As illustrated in
When the identifier 20 and other tools are aligned relative to the operation site 12, the operator of the identifier 20 can drill a cannula to the operation site 12 along the selected path, in the direction indicated by arrow A in
Referring to
Referring to
The process 800 includes positioning an implement (804), for example, positioning an implement between an acetabulum and a femoral head. The implement can include an electromagnetic field sensor positioned at a known position relative to the operation site. This may be achieved by, for example, (i) maintaining the electromagnetic field sensor at a known position relative to the implement and moving the implement to a known position relative to the operation site, or (ii) moving the electromagnetic field sensor relative to the implement, which is fixed relative to the operation site.
The process 800 includes locating the operation site using an electromagnetic identifier that includes an electromagnetic field generator (806). The electromagnetic field sensor can be located within a working volume of the electromagnetic field generator when locating the operation site.
The process 800 includes targeting the operation site through the pelvis using the position of the electromagnetic field sensor (808). For example, a path to the operation site through the pelvis (for example, through the ilium) can be identified. The process 800 can also include drilling a cannula through the pelvis (for example, through the ilium), to the operation site.
Referring to
A number of implementations and alternatives have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, although some of the implementations above have been described with respect to targeting an acetabular operation site, for example, a portion of the acetabulum, acetabular cartilage or labral cartilage, or confirming acceptable positioning of a tool relative to an acetabular operation site, the above-described implementations may be employed for targeting other operation sites within a body, such as for example, the shoulder joint. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority to and the full benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/436,047, filed Jan. 25, 2011, and titled “Targeting Operation Sites,” the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3219969 | Snavely | Nov 1965 | A |
4353110 | Ellis | Oct 1982 | A |
4532599 | Smith | Jul 1985 | A |
4621628 | Brudermann | Nov 1986 | A |
D297047 | Hon et al. | Aug 1988 | S |
4794930 | Machida et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5049151 | Durham et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5127913 | Thomas | Jul 1992 | A |
5217009 | Kronberg | Jun 1993 | A |
5251127 | Raab | Oct 1993 | A |
5281224 | Faccioli et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5320625 | Bertin | Jun 1994 | A |
5361766 | Nichols et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5383917 | Desai et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5411503 | Hollstien et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417688 | Elstrom et al. | May 1995 | A |
5433720 | Faccioli et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5514145 | Durham et al. | May 1996 | A |
5580156 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584838 | Rona et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585783 | Hall | Dec 1996 | A |
5957836 | Johnson | Sep 1999 | A |
5957934 | Rapoport | Sep 1999 | A |
6009878 | Weijand et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6036696 | Lambrecht et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039742 | Krettek et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6074394 | Krause | Jun 2000 | A |
6081741 | Hollis | Jun 2000 | A |
6106528 | Durham | Aug 2000 | A |
6157853 | Blume et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162228 | Durham | Dec 2000 | A |
6174335 | Varieur et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212419 | Blume et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233490 | Kasevich | May 2001 | B1 |
6267770 | Truwit | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6304091 | Shahoian et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311082 | Creighton et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6474341 | Hunter et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503249 | Krause | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6575973 | Shekalim | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6636757 | Jascob et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6675491 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6694168 | Traxel et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6718194 | Kienzle | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6747253 | Firth et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6807446 | Fenn et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6890332 | Truckai et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6991655 | Iversen | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7001346 | White | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7029478 | Hollstien et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7060075 | Govari et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
D528211 | Solar et al. | Sep 2006 | S |
7130676 | Barrick | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7152608 | Hunter et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7217276 | Henderson et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7253611 | Ma | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7294133 | Zink et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7295184 | Suprun et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7358481 | Yeoh et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7477926 | McCombs | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7532997 | Li et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7542791 | Mire et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7549960 | Govari | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7559931 | Stone | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7575550 | Govari | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7634306 | Sarin et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686818 | Simon et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7702379 | Avinash et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7727240 | Benton | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7729742 | Govari | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7780681 | Sarin et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785330 | Sherman et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7835785 | Scully et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840254 | Glossop | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846162 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7918853 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7925068 | Hoctor et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7927338 | Laffargue et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7949386 | Buly et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7955280 | Radinsky et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8007448 | Moctezuma de La Barrera | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8057479 | Stone | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8066706 | Schlienger et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8167823 | Nycz et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8176922 | Sherman et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8197494 | Jaggi et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8211108 | Matityahu | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8241296 | Wasielewski | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8301262 | Mi et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8337426 | Nycz | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8400312 | Hotokebuchi et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8623023 | Ritchey | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20020032445 | Fujiwara | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020052604 | Simon et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077540 | Kienzle | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020173792 | Severns et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030105470 | White | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120150 | Govari | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135211 | Cho | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030153829 | Sarin et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030164172 | Chumas et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208122 | Melkent et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040011365 | Govari et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034355 | Govari et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040097952 | Sarin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040147926 | Iversen | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040230199 | Jansen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243148 | Wasielewski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254584 | Sarin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027301 | Stihl | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027304 | Leloup et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035115 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050035116 | Brown et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043726 | McHale et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059885 | Melkent et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050070916 | Hollstien et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075562 | Szakelyhidi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050075632 | Russell et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080335 | Simon et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080427 | Govari et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085714 | Foley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085715 | Dukesherer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050099290 | Govari | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124988 | Terrill-Grisoni et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143726 | Bortkiewicz | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050148855 | Kienzle | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149050 | Stifter et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050197569 | McCombs | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228270 | Lloyd et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050242087 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245821 | Govari et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050261700 | Tuma et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060015031 | Kienzle | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060029186 | De Villiers et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052782 | Morgan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074405 | Malackowski et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084867 | Tremblay et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095047 | de la Barrera | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106400 | Fernandez et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142656 | Malackowski et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060184177 | Echeverri | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190011 | Ries | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060264731 | Murphy | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282168 | Sherman | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287613 | Amiot et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293593 | Govari et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293614 | Radinsky et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070093709 | Abernathie | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070129629 | Beauregard et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070162018 | Jensen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167744 | Beauregard et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070191827 | Lischinsky et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208251 | Anderson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225595 | Malackowski et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070249967 | Buly et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255132 | Shalgi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276370 | Altarac et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282440 | Visentin | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015551 | Feine | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080021309 | Amiot et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039857 | Giersch et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051910 | Kammerzell et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071142 | Gattani et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080086145 | Sherman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080146969 | Kurtz | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154266 | Protopsaltis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080221628 | Milbocker et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228195 | von Jako et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080255560 | Myers et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255584 | Beverland et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269596 | Revie et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281326 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281334 | Zheng et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090024023 | Welches et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090054910 | Zheng et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090088756 | Anderson | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099404 | Kraus et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099665 | Taylor et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125117 | Paradis et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138019 | Wasielewski | May 2009 | A1 |
20090165573 | Ledoux et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090171370 | Yoon et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090177080 | Kristan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090227862 | Smith et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090306665 | Lerner et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306666 | Czartoski et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326537 | Anderson | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100041985 | Simon et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063508 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100064216 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069911 | Borja et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076505 | Borja | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100011 | Roche | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100137869 | Borja et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137871 | Borja | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145337 | Janna et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152566 | Rains et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152573 | Ritchey et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100211177 | Abdou | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100249657 | Nycz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249796 | Nycz | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256635 | Mckenna et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100261998 | Stiehl | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274121 | Ritchey et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274253 | Ure | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274256 | Ritchey et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274306 | Pastore et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100289491 | Budker et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100312245 | Tipirneni et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110060339 | de Wekker | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110082366 | Scully et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110109311 | Walsh | May 2011 | A1 |
20110130765 | Fernandez | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110208037 | Rains et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110257518 | Buly et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270080 | Crane | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110276053 | Birkbeck et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288600 | Ritchey | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295108 | Cox et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110295253 | Bonutti et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120010500 | Couture et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022406 | Hladio et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120035468 | Ritchey et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120091122 | Ahmad et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120101361 | Rains | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120130279 | Stone | May 2012 | A1 |
20120136402 | Burroughs | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143047 | Kimura et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120157887 | Fanson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120184844 | Gielen et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209117 | Mozes et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220107 | Fukuda et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226094 | Ritchey | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120227542 | Koch | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120232561 | Fernandez | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245647 | Kunz et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253354 | Arlettaz | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277752 | Wasielewski | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120283599 | Borja | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120323247 | Bettenga | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330319 | Birkbeck et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130046310 | Ranawat et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130053856 | Penenberg | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130053858 | Penenberg | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130053904 | Penenberg | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130066323 | Nycz et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130131679 | Janna | May 2013 | A1 |
20130218007 | Petteys | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130289573 | Heilala | Oct 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2571508 | Jan 2006 | CA |
2698283 | May 2005 | CN |
201029876 | Mar 2008 | CN |
102008023760 | Dec 2009 | DE |
523905 | May 1993 | EP |
628287 | Apr 1995 | EP |
1391181 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1570782 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1382308 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1570781 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2130511 | Dec 2009 | EP |
1563810 | Mar 2010 | EP |
1743590 | Oct 2010 | EP |
1803394 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2294980 | Mar 2012 | EP |
1005791 | Jan 2008 | GR |
WO9421209 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO9500085 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO9713467 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO9832387 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO9947052 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO0134016 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO02062250 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO03044556 | May 2003 | WO |
WO03073951 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO03041611 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO03105659 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004030556 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO2004001569 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO2004069063 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO2004069063 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO2004091419 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO2004112610 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO2005000140 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO2005009303 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO2005023110 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005051241 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2005087125 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2005120203 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO2006060632 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2006067634 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO2006109983 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO2005084572 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO2006128301 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO2007025191 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO2007009088 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007061890 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2006094119 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007133168 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008014618 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO2008105874 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO2008106593 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO2009046547 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2009062314 | May 2009 | WO |
WO2009108214 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO2009131999 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO2010011978 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010028046 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO2010030809 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO2010052500 | May 2010 | WO |
WO2010063117 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO2010099247 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO2010111272 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO2010129141 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO2010129308 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO2011060536 | May 2011 | WO |
WO2011124661 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO2012080840 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO2012084739 | Jun 2012 | WO |
WO2012100825 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO2013025927 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO2013049534 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ekliptik, Guiding Star, Lidis: The Best Solution for Distal Interlocking, 2008, 2 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/055300, mailed Sep. 17, 2008, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2008/055300, mailed Sep. 1, 2009, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2007/063001, mailed Sep. 1, 2009, 5 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2007/063001, mailed Nov. 30, 2007, 3 pages. |
Office Action for European Application 08872996.7-1269, Jul. 21, 2011, 5 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2008/074520, mailed Jan. 23, 2009, 2 pages. |
Ekliptik, “Guiding Star”, reprinted from http://ekliptik.si/content/view/37/42, on Jul. 1, 2010, 2 pages. |
Ritchey, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 29/376,026, filed Sep. 30, 2010. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/032634, mailed Jan. 26, 2011, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2010/030784, mailed Oct. 29, 2010, 11 pages. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 07830964.7, mailed Jun. 18, 2010, 4 pages. |
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200880006490.9, mailed Mar. 31, 2011, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/051678, mailed Apr. 14, 2011, 8 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/547,716, mailed Apr. 2, 2012, 11 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/528,253, mailed Mar. 21, 2012, 9 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/758,747, mailed Apr. 10, 2012, 11 pages. |
Ex Parte Quayle Action in U.S. Appl. No. 29/376,026, mailed Apr. 30, 2012, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/919,255, mailed May 25, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/323,010, mailed Aug. 14, 2012. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 200880128908.3 mailed Apr. 24, 2012. |
Association of Surgical Technologists, “AST Recommended Standards of Practice for Surgical Drapes,” effective Apr. 13, 2008. |
Ashar, Tom, “Ultrasound Guidance for Placement of Central Venous Catheters,” Israeli Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 7, No. 2, Jun. 2007. |
Buckner, C., et al., “Real-Time Sonography wth Electromagnetic Tracking Navigation for Biopsy of a Hepatic Neoplasm Seen on on Arterial Phase Computed Tomography,” J Ultrasound Med 2011, 30:253-256. |
“GE Heathcare: Ultrasound Imaging Accessories, vol. 6,” CIVco Medical Solutions, Multi-Modality Imaging, 2011. |
“Guiding Star with the LIDIS module,” Ekliptik, 2007. |
Ekliptik, LIDIS module, brochure, 2010. |
Brochure for GE Healthcare Drapes and Sterile Covers, accessed on Jun. 21, 2012, at http://www.gehealthcare.com/usen/xr/surgery/docs/SurgeryDrapes&Film.pdf. |
Ekliptik, “User Manual: Guiding Star/LIDIS,” Jun. 16, 2010, reprinted from http://www.ekliptik.si/html/downloads/documents/manuals/LIDIS—user—manual.pdf. |
Medtronic, “Orthopaedic Navigation Soluations,” 2005, reprinted from http://behzadisportsdoc.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/medtronic—orthonaysolutions.pdf. |
GE Healthcare, “Interventional X-ray, OEC C-arm,” 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/123,792, mailed Sep. 14, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/528,253, mailed Aug. 16, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application PCT/US2012/022481, mailed Jul. 31, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/547,716, mailed Sep. 18, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/323,010, mailed Jun. 4, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/527,997, mailed May 21, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2012/041613, mailed Feb. 15, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/027042, mailed Jun. 12, 2013. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/123,792, mailed Jul. 2, 2013. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 07757660.1, mailed Jun. 5, 2013. |
Decision of Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2009-551851, mailed Jun. 11, 2013. |
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Application No. 08730964.7, mailed Jun. 6, 2013. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2012-508518 mailed Dec. 10, 2013. |
Office Action in Russian Application No. 2011146914, mailed Dec. 16, 2013. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2012-508611, mailed Jan. 28, 2014. |
‘Innomed Hip Instruments—hohmann retractors,’ reprinted from http://www.innonned.net/hip—rets—hohmanns.htm on Jan. 6, 2011, 8 pages. |
Office Action for Russian Application No. 2011146669/14 mailed Apr. 3, 2014, 5 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/768,689, mailed Jul. 9, 2014. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201080028779.8 mailed May 23, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120187941 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61436047 | Jan 2011 | US |