1. Field of the Invention (Technical Field)
The present invention relates to task chairs that support the body of the user in healthy positions while the user performs various tasks over extended sitting periods and that provide independent and independently adjustable support to the lower and the upper back.
2. Description of Related Art
Note that the following discussion refers to a number of publications by author(s) and year of publication, and that due to recent publication dates certain publications are not to be considered as prior art vis-a-vis the present invention. Discussion of such publications herein is given for more complete background and is not to be construed as an admission that such publications are prior art for patentability determination purposes.
Today, the average worker performs less physical activity and workers perform increasingly more of their work while in a seated position. It is known that if any part of person's anatomical function is impinged or static (i.e., remaining in a fixed position) for extended periods of time, posture and health are compromised. It has been determined that both physically active and physically inactive people suffer health problems caused by prolonged sitting. Those problems include lower back pain, muscle tension, numbness, acid reflux, carpel tunnel syndrome, and general fatigue.
Peter Escogue, a recognized expert in anatomical function, suggests these problems are posture related as well as inactivity related. Proper anatomical posture promotes proper anatomical function, i.e. the body functions best when operated from a proper position. Escogue further observes that over a period of time, many persons compromise correct posture causing problems in correct anatomical function.
Static, improper posture (e.g., while sitting in a static improper supporting chair) causes poor leads to poor health. In the prior art, seats and chairs have been designed for comfort and for performing tasks. Task chairs were designed to incorporate pads, tilts, swivels, etc. Over time, health improvements were added to the combination of such items as family room recliners and workers' rigid elevating stools. Additions such as lumbar supports, adjustable armrests, seat backs with shapes designed for a general vertebrae contour, etc., were incorporated. However, today's combination task chairs offer few features to accommodate multiple tasks while simultaneously giving adequate consideration to seating health.
Task chairs are typically configured to allow tilting of the seat and backrest as a unit or tilting of the backrest relative to the seat. In chairs having a backrest pivotally attached to a seat in a conventional manner, the movement of the backrest relative to the seat can create shear forces acting on the legs and back of the user. These shear forces tend to cause an uncomfortable pulling of the user's clothing. In an attempt to compensate for these shear forces, some office chairs include a backrest which pivots while the seat tilts, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,859,801 (to Moore) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,429,917 (to Diffrient).
A related disadvantage of conventional task chairs is the configuration of the seat and/or backrest. Such seats typically include single or multi-density foam padding with a covering such as cloth, leather, mesh material or the like, such seating also tends to provide insufficient aeration since it acts as another layer of clothing and does not contain a Spinal Relief Channel in the back support, and/or contain a Coccyx Relief in the horizontal seat. In addition, the structural requirements of such an attachment limits the shape and size of the frame and the membrane.
Typically, the seats of office task chairs are supported by a single stage telescoping column which provides for vertical adjustment of the seat. These columns include a gas spring mounted in a telescoping tube which is slidable within a base tube. In accordance with guidelines set by the American National Standards Institute (A.N.S.I.) and Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturer's Association (B.I.F.M.A.), conventional office chairs in the United States are typically adjustable from a seat height of 16.0 inches from a floor to about 20.5 inches from a floor. Nevertheless, it is desirable to exceed this range of height adjustment to account for very small or large users and to accommodate the international population in general.
Typically, it is difficult to exceed this range of height adjustment with seats which tilt about the knees or ankles of the user. To offset the moments acting on single stage support columns, pneumatic manufacturers typically set a minimum overlapping distance of 2.95 inches (75 mm) between the tubes. Because such “ankle tilt” and “knee tilt” chairs have relatively large tilt housings, it is difficult to provide a lower minimum and higher maximum seat height while maintaining the required overlapping distance between the tubes. These types of tilting chairs also impart a greater moment on the tube since the pivot axis is offset from the support column. It is therefore desirable to provide a vertically adjustable support column having a greater overlapping distance to permit a greater stroke which decreases the minimum height and increases the maximum height of a chair seat.
Devices that incorporate a plurality of adjustable means have been disclosed in the prior art such as, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,478,379 (to Ambasz) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,189,971 (to Witzig). However, those devices do not allow for the independent adjustment of multiple, vertical backrest support arms.
Other devices disclose the use of various seat and back units incorporating means for altering the contour of the pads used on such seats such as, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,499,802 (to Drira) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,447,061 (to Klingler). However, these devices do not allow for the independent adjustment of multiple, vertical backrest support arms.
Although offering varying shapes, contours, masses and sizes, as well as a wide range of adjustment means. i.e. pivotal, tilt, height, in/out, up/down, soft/firm, etc., all attempts at healthy task chairs in the prior art are burdened with an interdependent posterior design support which ultimately restricts and compromises adjustability, dynamic support, and active seating. A chair that provides better posterior support and continuous animation, and better supports task functions, is needed.
The present invention comprises an adjustable task chair comprising a seat, at least two back support members, each back support member independently supported by a vertical brace support member, at least one of the back support members being adjustable, and each brace support member supported by a frame. One of the brace support members is preferably disposed behind the other brace support member. The invention further comprises at least one holding component mounted on a posterior section of the frame and holding each brace support member in a position. The chair preferably comprises at least one adjusting component for overcoming holding of the holding component to adjust at least one of the vertical brace support members. One of the back support members preferably supports a lower back of a seated person and another of the back support members supports an upper back of the seated person. The holding component preferably comprises a spring to bias each brace support member. The adjusting components may comprise an actuator system. At least one of the adjusting components connects to at least one pneumatic gas cylinder.
The invention further comprises at least one adjusting component to independently adjust a length of at least one brace support member and/or at least one adjusting component to independently adjust at least one brace support member in a direction towards, or away from, the seat. The adjusting component may comprise a telescoping component to adjust a length of the brace support member. The adjusting components may control an angle of at least one of the brace support members. The adjusting components may further control tilt lock of at least one brace support member. Also, the adjusting components may control tilt tension of at least one brace support member.
At least one back support member comprises vertical indentations along a center of the back support member, the indentations comprising dimensions sufficient to relieve pressure on a spine of a seated person when the seated person reclines against the back support member. Each back support member may comprise a pad, the pads oriented horizontally and sufficiently spaced apart to relieve pressure on a spine of a seated person when the seated person reclines against the back support members. The seat may comprise a depression to relieve pressure of a coccyx of a seated person when the person sits on the seat.
The invention also comprises at least one adjustable arm rest. The arm rests may be tiltably adjustable, adjustable in a direction toward, and away from, a center of the chair, adjustable in height, and/or rotatably adjustable.
The chair may comprise a shroud to hold and conceal adjusting systems. The chair may comprise at least one adjusting component to adjust at least one of the back support members in a vertical direction.
The chair comprises active seating and may comprise at least one adjustment alert.
A primary object of the present invention is to provide a task chair that promotes healthier seating by supporting proper anatomical posture and proper skeletal support and that and supports multiple task functions over extended seating periods.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a task chair that provides continuous position animation and “active seating”.
A primary advantage of the present invention is that it provides independent upper back support and lower back support that are easily and independently adjustable.
Another advantage of the present invention is that it provides anatomical support to the user while the user performs a wide range of tasks in a seated position.
Other objects, advantages and novel features, and further scope of applicability of the present invention will be set forth in part in the detailed description to follow, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into, and form a part of, the specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating one or more preferred embodiments of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. In the drawings:
The present invention relates to task chairs that support the body of the user in healthy positions while the user performs various tasks over extended sitting periods and that provide independent and independently adjustable support to the lower and the upper back.
Turning now to the figures, which describe the preferred embodiment of the present invention,
The height of either back support members 132, 133 may be adjusted by moving them up and down or by adjusting the length of brace support members 134, 135. The latter is the preferred embodiment.
Independent brace support members 134, 135 preferably attach to holding component 137 via connectors 170, 171 (shown in
In the preferred embodiment, brace support member 134, which is taller than brace support member 135, is disposed directly behind brace support member 135. This positioning of brace support members 134, 135 in such an orientation results not only in a more aesthetic appearance for chair 100, but also enables a user to straddle brace support members 134, 135 while sitting in chair 100 facing backwards. Sitting in chair 100 backwards enables the user to not only gain abdominal support from adjustable back support member 133, but also to gain upper chest support from adjustable back support member 132. Such support is often needed by users who engage in activities that require a substantial amount of time looking downward. For example dentists, jewelers, dental lab technicians, and computer wafer manufacturers would all benefit from anterior support.
In another embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus (not shown) for indicating the height of adjustable back support members 132, 133 can be provided. These would enable each user to quickly return the height of adjustable back support members 132, 133 to his or her desired setting. Numerous apparatuses known in the art can be utilized to achieve this objective. For example, such apparatus may comprise one or more dials with an indicator (not shown) which point to a series of numbers (i.e. an apparatus similar to a volume knob). The apparatus can also be incorporated by disposing a window (not shown) at the back of holding component 137, wherein one or more scales (not shown) are displayed and affixed to each of brace support members 134, 135. Therefore, when brace support members 134, 135 are moved, the scale would slide, thus showing a different numbered setting.
In the preferred embodiment, when the user requires elbow and lower arm support, whether anterior or posterior, forearm support members 140, 141 comprise adjustment flexibility to accommodate adjustments to the “tilt arm rest” from up to down, inwardly and outwardly, and to tilt downwardly from the posterior to anterior allowing an angled support. Such capability is useful for such tasks as typing as it has been suggested that a proper, healthy typing position involves a relaxed upper arm and shoulder support at the elbow, while simultaneously allowing lower arm, wrist, and hand to be in straight alignment angled downwardly from the elbow. This typing posture helps prevent carpel tunnel syndrome. Forearm support members are adjustable along all planes, including tilt, rotation, and in a direction toward and away from the center of chair 100.
Chair 100 provides flexibility through adaptability. For example, when the user requires anterior (forward) support, the seating can be reversed (i.e., the user can sit backwards) to accommodate forward tasks. As noted above, should the user require elbow and lower arm support, adjustable forearm support members 140, 141 are adjustable to support vertical and lateral task movements.
In the preferred embodiment, as shown in
Also shown in
In the preferred embodiment, as shown in
It should be apparent that such an actuator system can be used to control any of the various adjustable functions of chair 100. It should also be apparent that controlling the adjustability of brace support members 134, 135 may be accomplished by any means known in the art. For example, adjustments may be made with dials, slide mechanism, and the like to control the height, angle, and/or other properties of back support members 132, 133.
As shown in
Actuator system 80 preferably includes pneumatic gas cylinders 62, 64 connected to cables 7274 and to actuator linkage mechanisms 90, 92 that are linked to brace support members 134, 135.
A key to healthy, task seating is a series of adjustable support means that accommodate a wide range of individual body dimensions and preferences as well as a wide range of tasks to be accomplished in a seating position.
The “active seating” provided by the present invention allows for periodic adjustments to various seat supporting members, which allow the body's systems to remain active, uncompromised and functioning properly. Static seating is the antithesis of active seating.
To increase the benefits of the present invention and enhance “active seating”, another embodiment includes the incorporation various adjustment alert means (not shown) into chair 100 to alert a user that enough time has elapsed so that making an adjustment is advisable. Thus, a user can, without having to be too engaged in the use chair 100 be assured of not remaining in a static position for too long.
Thus, the present invention provides a series of independent bracing supports anywhere along the line of vertebrae from the sacrum to the cervix. Depending on the embodiment, two or more independently adjustable bracing support arms are secured to, and arise from, the seating frame, seat support, seat pedestal, or seat. One or more brace supports attach to these arms and each brace support arm has flexible adjustments in order to accommodate individual user dimensions. This arrangement of a series of independent hinged, spring arms with adjustable brace supports allows the user to participate in a wide range of tasks with optimum and healthy muscle/skeletal support.
The ability to frequently reposition the support members described herein in order to affect periodic, slight anatomical movement of muscoloskeletal, respiratory, nervous, digestive and circulatory systems ensures that these body systems remain uncompromised and unimpinged. This periodic slight repositioning of the various support members allows muscles to relax while redistributing anatomical pressure.
All elements described herein are preferably integrated to respond in concert to a myriad of user sizes and shapes and a wide variety of chair-based tasks with a healthy muscle/skeletal support system.
A chair in accordance with the description provided herein was constructed with the following components:
1. A lumbar support pad was attached to a vertical brace support member.
2. An upper back support pad was attached to a vertical brace support member.
3. The upper back vertical brace member was disposed directly behind the lumbar pad support pad's vertical brace support member.
4. Telescoping means were used for adjusting the vertical length of each vertical support brace.
5. Actuators systems were incorporated to independently adjust each vertical support brace member.
6. The actuator system incorporated two pneumatic gas cylinders, one for each vertical support brace member.
7. Attached to each gas cylinder was an actuator cable.
8. Each cable was controlled by an actuator button, one for each vertical brace support member.
9. Adjustable arm rests were provided using telescoping means for their height adjustment.
10. The arm rests were tiltable fore and aft.
11. The arm rests were adjustable side to side so that their distance away from the body of the chair could be increased as needed.
12. The seat height was adjustable.
13. The lumbar back rest incorporated a vertical indentation for the relief of spinal pressure.
14. The upper back rest incorporated a vertical indentation for the relief of spinal pressure.
15. The seat incorporated a rearward indentation for the relief of pressure to the coccyx.
16. A base with casters was provided.
17. The seat was provided with means to swivel.
The preceding examples can be repeated with similar success by substituting the generically or specifically described reactants and/or operating conditions of this invention for those used in the preceding examples.
Although the invention has been described in detail with particular reference to these preferred embodiments, other embodiments can achieve the same results. Variations and modifications of the present invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art and it is intended to cover in the appended claims all such modifications and equivalents. The entire disclosures of all references, applications, patents, and publications cited above are hereby incorporated by reference.
This application is a continuation-in-part application of, and claims priority to: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/401,481, entitled “The Health Chair A Dynamically Balanced Task Chair”, filed Mar. 28, 2003, which claims the benefit of the filing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/368,157; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/888,318, entitled “Task Chair”, filed Jul. 9, 2004, which claims the benefit of the filing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/485,775, entitled “Task Chair”, filed Jul. 9, 2003 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/528,427, entitled “Task Chair”, filed Dec. 9, 2003; and PCT Application Serial No. US/04/21761, filed Jul. 9, 2004. The claims and specifications of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
567096 | Harvey et al. | Sep 1896 | A |
1007985 | Smith | Nov 1911 | A |
1414637 | Gell | May 1922 | A |
2060298 | Gailey | Nov 1936 | A |
2182598 | Owler | Dec 1939 | A |
2304349 | Fox | Dec 1942 | A |
2712346 | Sprinkle | Jul 1955 | A |
2859797 | Mitchelson | Nov 1958 | A |
2859801 | Moore | Nov 1958 | A |
3015148 | Haddad | Jan 1962 | A |
3041109 | Eames et al. | Jun 1962 | A |
3059971 | Becker | Oct 1962 | A |
3072436 | Moore | Jan 1963 | A |
3107991 | Taussig | Oct 1963 | A |
3112987 | Griffiths et al. | Dec 1963 | A |
3115678 | Keen et al. | Dec 1963 | A |
3124092 | Raynes | Mar 1964 | A |
3124328 | Kortsch | Mar 1964 | A |
3165359 | Ashkouti | Jan 1965 | A |
3208085 | Grimshaw | Sep 1965 | A |
3214314 | Rowbottam | Oct 1965 | A |
3248147 | Testa | Apr 1966 | A |
3273877 | Geller et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3298743 | Albinson et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3301931 | Morin | Jan 1967 | A |
3314721 | Smith | Apr 1967 | A |
3333811 | Matthews | Aug 1967 | A |
3337267 | Rogers, Jr. | Aug 1967 | A |
3399926 | Hehn | Sep 1968 | A |
3431022 | Poppe et al. | Mar 1969 | A |
3434181 | Benzies | Mar 1969 | A |
3436048 | Greer | Apr 1969 | A |
3534129 | Bartel | Oct 1970 | A |
3544163 | Krein | Dec 1970 | A |
3589967 | Shirakawa | Jun 1971 | A |
3601446 | Persson | Aug 1971 | A |
3624814 | Borichevsky | Nov 1971 | A |
3640576 | Morrison et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3758356 | Hardy | Sep 1973 | A |
3807147 | Schoonen | Apr 1974 | A |
3817806 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3844612 | Borggren et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3864265 | Markley | Feb 1975 | A |
3880463 | Shephard et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3902536 | Schmidt | Sep 1975 | A |
3915775 | Davis | Oct 1975 | A |
3932252 | Woods | Jan 1976 | A |
3947068 | Buhk | Mar 1976 | A |
3961001 | Bethe | Jun 1976 | A |
3965944 | Goff, Jr. et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3999802 | Powers | Dec 1976 | A |
4008029 | Shokite | Feb 1977 | A |
4010980 | Dubinsky | Mar 1977 | A |
4013257 | Paquette | Mar 1977 | A |
4018479 | Ball | Apr 1977 | A |
4019776 | Takamatsu | Apr 1977 | A |
4036524 | Takamatsu | Jul 1977 | A |
4046611 | Sanson | Sep 1977 | A |
4047756 | Ney | Sep 1977 | A |
4062590 | Polsky et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4067249 | Deucher | Jan 1978 | A |
4087224 | Moser | May 1978 | A |
4107371 | Dean | Aug 1978 | A |
4108416 | Nagase et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4113627 | Leason | Sep 1978 | A |
4116736 | Sanson et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4125490 | Hettinga | Nov 1978 | A |
4149919 | Lea et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4152023 | Buhk | May 1979 | A |
4161504 | Baldini | Jul 1979 | A |
4174245 | Martineau | Nov 1979 | A |
4189880 | Ballin | Feb 1980 | A |
4190286 | Bentley | Feb 1980 | A |
4299645 | Newsom | Nov 1981 | A |
4302048 | Yount | Nov 1981 | A |
4314728 | Faiks | Feb 1982 | A |
4336220 | Takahashi | Jun 1982 | A |
4339488 | Brokmann | Jul 1982 | A |
4364887 | Becht et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4373692 | Knoblauch et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4375301 | Pergler et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4380352 | Diffrient | Apr 1983 | A |
4390206 | Faiks et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4411469 | Drabert et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4429917 | Diffrient | Feb 1984 | A |
4438898 | Knoblauch et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4465435 | Copas | Aug 1984 | A |
4469738 | Himelreich, Jr. | Sep 1984 | A |
4469739 | Gretzinger et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4494795 | Roossien et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4502729 | Locher | Mar 1985 | A |
4522444 | Pollock | Jun 1985 | A |
4529247 | Stumpf et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4545614 | Abu-Isa et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4548441 | Ogg | Oct 1985 | A |
4568455 | Huber et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4575150 | Smith | Mar 1986 | A |
4595237 | Nelsen | Jun 1986 | A |
4601516 | Klein | Jul 1986 | A |
4611851 | Noyes et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4629249 | Yamaguchi | Dec 1986 | A |
4629525 | Rasmussen | Dec 1986 | A |
4634178 | Carney | Jan 1987 | A |
4638679 | Tannenlaufer | Jan 1987 | A |
4640547 | Fromme | Feb 1987 | A |
4643481 | Saloff et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4653806 | Willi | Mar 1987 | A |
4666121 | Choong et al. | May 1987 | A |
4668012 | Locher | May 1987 | A |
4670072 | Pastor et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4691961 | Rogers, Jr. et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4703974 | Braeuning | Nov 1987 | A |
4709443 | Bigley | Dec 1987 | A |
4709962 | Steinmann | Dec 1987 | A |
4720142 | Holdredge et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4743323 | Hettinga | May 1988 | A |
4761033 | Lanuzzi et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4763950 | Tobler | Aug 1988 | A |
4776633 | Knoblock et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4779925 | Heinzel | Oct 1988 | A |
4793197 | Petrovsky | Dec 1988 | A |
4796950 | Mrotz, III et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4796955 | Williams | Jan 1989 | A |
4803118 | Sogi et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4815499 | Johnson | Mar 1989 | A |
4815789 | Marcus | Mar 1989 | A |
4819458 | Kavesh et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4826249 | Bradbury | May 1989 | A |
4829644 | Kondo et al. | May 1989 | A |
4830697 | Aizawa | May 1989 | A |
4831697 | Urai | May 1989 | A |
4842257 | Abu-Isa et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4846230 | Mock et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4852228 | Zeilinger | Aug 1989 | A |
4860415 | Witzke | Aug 1989 | A |
4861106 | Sondergeld | Aug 1989 | A |
4869554 | Abu-Isa et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4885827 | Williams | Dec 1989 | A |
4889384 | Sulzer | Dec 1989 | A |
4889385 | Chadwick et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4892254 | Schneider et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4902069 | Lehnert | Feb 1990 | A |
4904430 | Yamada | Feb 1990 | A |
4906045 | Hofman | Mar 1990 | A |
4927698 | Jaco et al. | May 1990 | A |
4939183 | Abu-Isa et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4942006 | Loren | Jul 1990 | A |
4943115 | Stucki | Jul 1990 | A |
4946224 | Leib | Aug 1990 | A |
4961610 | Reeder et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4966411 | Katagiri et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4968366 | Hukki et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4979778 | Shields | Dec 1990 | A |
4981325 | Zacharkow | Jan 1991 | A |
4981326 | Heidmann | Jan 1991 | A |
4986948 | Komiya et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4988145 | Engel | Jan 1991 | A |
5000515 | Deview | Mar 1991 | A |
5009827 | Abu-Isa et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5009955 | Abu-Isa | Apr 1991 | A |
5013089 | Abu-Isa et al. | May 1991 | A |
5015034 | Kindig et al. | May 1991 | A |
5029940 | Golynsky et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5033791 | Locher | Jul 1991 | A |
5070915 | Kalin | Dec 1991 | A |
5071189 | Kratz | Dec 1991 | A |
5096652 | Uchiyama et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100713 | Homma et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5106678 | Abu-Isa | Apr 1992 | A |
5107720 | Hatfield | Apr 1992 | A |
5114211 | Desanta | May 1992 | A |
5116556 | Danton | May 1992 | A |
5117865 | Lee | Jun 1992 | A |
5135694 | Akahane et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5143422 | Althofer et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5153049 | Groshens | Oct 1992 | A |
5228747 | Greene | Jul 1993 | A |
5240308 | Goldstein et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5288130 | Foster | Feb 1994 | A |
5288135 | Forcier et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5407248 | Jay et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5501507 | Hummitzsch | Mar 1996 | A |
5547251 | Axelson | Aug 1996 | A |
5678891 | O'Neill et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679891 | Matsuno et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5704689 | Kim | Jan 1998 | A |
6079782 | Berg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6089664 | Yoshida | Jul 2000 | A |
6095611 | Bar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6152532 | Cosentino | Nov 2000 | A |
6189971 | Witzig | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193313 | Jonsson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6254186 | Falzon | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6334650 | Chien-Chuan | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6334651 | Duan et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338530 | Gowing | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352307 | Engman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6386634 | Stumpf et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6431648 | Cosentino et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447061 | Klingler | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6478379 | Ambasz | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6499802 | Drira | Dec 2002 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050184570 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60528427 | Dec 2003 | US | |
60485775 | Jul 2003 | US | |
60368157 | Mar 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10888318 | Jul 2004 | US |
Child | 11032594 | US | |
Parent | 10401481 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 10888318 | US |