The present invention relates generally to computer or other networks, and more particularly to protocol processing for information communicated between hosts such as computers connected to a network.
One of the most CPU intensive activities associated with performing network protocol processing is the need to copy incoming network data from an initial landing point in system memory to a final destination in application memory. This copying is necessary because received network data cannot generally be moved to the final destination until the associated packets are: A) analyzed to ensure that they are free of errors, B) analyzed to determine which connection they are associated with, and C) analyzed to determine where, within a stream of data, they belong. Until recently, these steps had to be performed by the host protocol stack. With the introduction of the intelligent network interface device (as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/464,283, 09/439,603, 09/067,544, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/061,809), these steps may now be performed before the packets are delivered to the host protocol stack.
Even with such steps accomplished by an intelligent network interface device, there is another problem to be addressed to reduce or eliminate data copying, and that is obtaining the address of the destination in memory and passing that address to the network interface device. Obtaining this address is often difficult because many network applications are written in such a way that they will not provide the address of the final destination until notified that data for the connection has arrived (with the use of the “select( )” routine, for example). Other attempts to obtain this address involve the modification of existing applications. One such example is the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Remote DMA (RDMA) proposal, which requires that existing protocols such as NFS, CIFS, and HTTP be modified to include addressing information in the protocol headers. A solution is desired that does not require the modification of existing applications or protocols.
A multi-packet message (for example, a session layer message) is to be received onto a Network Interface device (NI device) and the data payload of the message is to be placed into application memory in a host computer. The NI device receives the first packet of the message and passes a first part of this first packet to the operating system on the host. In one embodiment, the first part of the first packet includes the session layer header of the message. The operating system passes this first part of the first packet to an application program. The application program uses the first part of the first packet to identify an address of a destination in application memory where the entire data payload is to be placed. The application program returns the address to the operating system and the operating system in turn forwards the address to the NI device. The NI device then uses the address to place the data portions of the various packets of the multi-packet message into the destination in application memory. In one embodiment, the NI device DMAs the data portions of the packets from the NI device directly into the destination. In some embodiments, the NI device DMAs only data into the destination such that the destination contains the data payload in one contiguous block without any session layer header information, without any transport layer header information, and without any network layer header information.
In some embodiments, the NI device is an interface card that is coupled to the host computer via a parallel bus (for example, the PCI bus). In other embodiments, the NI device is integrated into the host computer. For example, the NI device may be part of communication processing device (CPD) that is integrated into the host computer.
Other structures and methods are described in the detailed description below. This summary does not purport to define the invention. The invention is defined by the claims.
In one specific embodiment, NI device 102 is the Intelligent Network Interface Card (INIC) of FIGS. 21 and 22 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/464,283 (the entire disclosure of 09/464,283 is incorporated herein by reference). The NI device 102 in this specific embodiment is an expansion card that plugs into a card edge connector on the host computer (for example, a personal computer). The card includes an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) (for example, see ASIC 400 of FIG. 21 of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/464,283) designed by Alacritech, Inc. of 234 East Gish Road, San Jose, Calif. 95112. The card performs “fast-path processing” in hardware as explained in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/464,283. An INIC card (Model Number 2000-100001 called the “Alacritech 100x2 Dual-Server Adapter”) is available from Alacritech, Inc. of 234 East Gish Road, San Jose, Calif. 95112.
In a next step (step 301), driver 106 allocates a 256-byte buffer 108 in host memory as a place where NI device 102 can write data. Driver 106 then passes the address of 256-byte buffer 108 to NI device 102 so that NI device 102 can then use that address to write information into 256-byte buffer 108. Driver 106 does this by writing the address of 256-byte buffer 108 into a register 112 on the NI device 102. A status field at the top of the 256byte buffer 108 contains information indicating whether the 256-byte buffer contains data (and is valid) or not.
In step (step 302), NI device 102 receives the first packet 202 of message 200 (see
In a next step (step 303), kernel 105 responds by having the driver 106 look at the status field of the 256-byte buffer 108. If the status field indicates 256-byte buffer 108 is full and valid, then driver 106 passes the address of 256-byte buffer 108 to protocol stack 107. The first part of this 192 bytes is session layer header information, whereas the remainder of the 192 bytes is session layer data. Protocol stack 107 notifies application program 104 that there is data for the application program. Protocol stack 107 does this by making a call to the “remove_wait_queue” routine.
In a next step (step 304), the Samba application program 104 responds by returning the address of a first destination 109 in host memory. The Samba application program 104 does this by calling a socket routine called “recv”. The “recv” socket routine has several parameters: 1) a connection identifier that identifies the connection the first destination 109 will be for, 2) an address of the first destination 109 where the data will be put, and 3) the length of the first destination 109. (In some embodiments, Samba application program 104 calls “recv” to request less than 192 bytes.) Through this “recv” socket routine, kernel 105 receives from application program 104 the address of the first destination 109 and the length of the first destination 109. Kernel 105 then gives the address of the first destination 109 to the protocol stack 107.
In a next step (step 305), the protocol stack 107 moves the requested bytes in 256-byte buffer 108 to first destination 109 identified by the address. The first destination is in memory space of the application program 104 so that application program 104 can examine the requested bytes. If the application program 104 requested less than 192 bytes using “recv”, then driver 106 moves that subset of the 192 bytes to first destination 109 leaving the remainder of the 192 bytes in the 256-byte buffer. On the other hand, if the application program 104 requested all 192 bytes using “recv”, then driver 106 moves the full 192 bytes to first destination 109.
In a next step (step 306), the application examines the requested bytes in first destination 109. Application program 104 analyzes the session layer header portion, determines the amount of session layer data coming in the session layer message, and determines how long a second destination 110 should be so as to contain all the remaining session layer data of message 200. Application program 104 then returns to kernel 105 the address of second destination 110 and the length of the second destination 110. Application program 104 does this by calling the socket routine “recv”. Kernel 105 receives the address of second destination 110 and the length of the second destination 110 and gives that information to the protocol stack 107.
In a next step (step 307), the protocol stack 107 moves any session layer data in the 192 bytes (not session layer headers) in 256-byte buffer 108 to second destination 110 identified by the second address. This move of data is shown in
In a next step (step 308), the protocol stack 107 writes the address of second destination 110 and the length of second destination 110 into a predetermined buffer 111 in host memory. Driver 106 then writes the address of predetermined buffer 111 to a predetermined register 112 in NI device 102.
In a next step (step 309), NI device 102 reads the predetermined register 112 and retrieves the address of predetermined buffer 111. Using this address, NI device 102 reads the predetermined buffer 111 by DMA and retrieves the address of second destination 110 and the length of second destination 110.
In some embodiments, the second destination 110 is actually made up of a plurality of locations having different addresses of different lengths. The application program supplies a single virtual address for the NI device 102 to read (such as explained in step 310), but this virtual address is made up of many different physical pages. Driver 106 determines the addresses of the pages that are associated with this virtual address and passes these physical addresses and their lengths to NI device 102 by placing the addresses in predetermined buffer 111 and writing the address of predetermined buffer 111 to predetermined register 112 in NI device 102.
In a next step (step 310), NI device 102 transfers the data from the remaining portion of first packet 202 (without any session layer headers, and without any TCP or IP headers) directly into second destination 110 using DMA. In this example, the transfer is made across a parallel data bus (for example, across a PCI bus by which the NI device 102 is coupled to the host computer 100). This move of data is shown in
In a next step (step 311), subsequent packets are received onto NI device 102. For each packet, NI device 102 removes the TCP and IP headers and writes the remaining data (without session layer headers, TCP headers, or IP headers) directly to second destination 110 using DMA (for example, NI device 102 may write the data directly into the second destination across the PCI bus by which the NI device 102 is coupled to the host computer 100). The data from the many packets of the session layer message is written into second destination 110 such that there are no session layer headers, transport layer headers, or network layer headers between the data portions from the various packets of message 200.
In the above described specific embodiment, there is no session layer header, transport layer header, or network layer header between the data portions from the various packets of message 200 as the data portions are deposited into the second destination 110. This need not be the case, however. In some embodiments, session layer header information does appear in second destination 110. This is so because it is the application program that determines the length of the second destination 110.
In some embodiments, application program 104 returns a first destination that is larger than 192 bytes. In that case, there is no different second destination. The entire 192 bytes contained in the 256-byte buffer is moved to the first destination. The address of the remainder is given to the NI device as described above with respect to the second destination.
Although the NI device may be realized on an expansion card and interfaced to the host computer via a bus such as the PCI bus, the NI device can also be integrated into the host computer. For example, the NI device in some embodiments is disposed on the motherboard of the host computer and is substantially directly coupled to the host CPU. The NI device may, for example, be integrated into a memory controller integrated circuit or input/output integrated circuit that is coupled directly to the local bus of the host CPU. The NI device may be integrated into the Intel 82815 Graphics and Memory Controller Hub, the Intel 440BX chipset, or the Apollo VT8501 MVP4 Northbridge chip.
Although the present invention is described in connection with certain specific embodiments for instructional purposes, the present invention is not limited thereto. Advantages of the present invention may be realized wherein either no header information or just an insubstantial amount of header information is transferred from the network interface device into the second destination. All the data from the session layer message may be deposited into a single contiguous block of host memory (referred to as a destination) in some embodiments or may be deposited into several associated blocks (that together are referred to as a destination) of host memory in other embodiments. Accordingly, various modifications, adaptations, and combinations of various features of the described embodiments can be practiced without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of (is a continuation-in-part of) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/325,941, filed Dec. 1, 2008, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of (is a continuation of) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/881,271, filed Jun. 29, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,461,160; which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of (is a continuation of) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/789,366, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,757,746, filed Feb. 20, 2001, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of (is a continuation-in-part of) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/464,283, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,427,173, filed Dec. 15, 1999; which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of (is a continuation of) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/439,603, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,247,060, filed Nov. 12, 1999, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §. 120 of (is a continuation of) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/067,544, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,226,680, filed Apr. 27, 1998; and which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e)(1) of the Provisional Application filed under 35 U.S.C. §111(b), Ser. No. 60/061,809, filed on Oct. 14, 1997. The present application also claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of (and is a continuation-in-part of) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/027,842, filed Dec. 30, 2004, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of (and is a continuation of) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/706,398, filed Nov. 12, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,941,386, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of (and is a continuation of) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/208,093, filed Jul. 29, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,697,868, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of (and is a continuation-in-part of) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/514,425, filed Feb. 28, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,427,171, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of (and is a continuation-in-part of): a) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/141,713, filed Aug. 28, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,479, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of provisional application 60/098,296, filed Aug. 27, 1998; b) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/067,544, filed Apr. 27, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,226,680, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of provisional application 60/061,809, filed Oct. 14, 1997; and c) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/384,792, filed Aug. 27, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,434,620, which in turn claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119 of provisional application 60/098,296, filed Aug. 27, 1998. The subject matter of all of the above-identified patent applications (including the subject matter in the Microfiche Appendix of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/464,283), and of the two above-identified provisional applications, is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4366538 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4485455 | Boone et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4485460 | Stambaugh | Nov 1984 | A |
4589063 | Shah et al. | May 1986 | A |
4700185 | Balph et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4991133 | Davis et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5056058 | Hirata et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5058110 | Beach et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5097442 | Ward et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5129093 | Muramatsu et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5163131 | Row et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5212778 | Dally et al. | May 1993 | A |
5274768 | Traw et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5280477 | Trapp | Jan 1994 | A |
5281963 | Ishikawa et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5289580 | Latif et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5303344 | Yokoyama et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5392391 | Caulk et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5412782 | Hausman et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418912 | Christenson | May 1995 | A |
5448566 | Richter et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5485455 | Dobbins et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485460 | Schrier et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485579 | Hitz et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5506966 | Ban | Apr 1996 | A |
5511169 | Suda | Apr 1996 | A |
5517611 | Deering | May 1996 | A |
5517668 | Szwerinski et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522065 | Neufeld | May 1996 | A |
5524212 | Somani et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5524250 | Chesson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5535375 | Eshel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548730 | Young et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553241 | Shirakihara | Sep 1996 | A |
5557798 | Skeen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5566170 | Bakke et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574919 | Netravali et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5588121 | Reddin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590328 | Seno et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592622 | Isfeld et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596574 | Perlman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598410 | Stone | Jan 1997 | A |
5602987 | Harari et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5619650 | Bach et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629933 | Delp et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633780 | Cronin | May 1997 | A |
5634099 | Andrews et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634127 | Cloud et al. | May 1997 | A |
5642482 | Pardillos | Jun 1997 | A |
5664114 | Krech, Jr. et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5671355 | Collins | Sep 1997 | A |
5678060 | Yokoyama et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682534 | Kapoor et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684954 | Kaiserswerth et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689550 | Garson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692130 | Shobu et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5699317 | Sartore et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699350 | Kraslavsky | Dec 1997 | A |
5701434 | Nakagawa | Dec 1997 | A |
5701516 | Cheng et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706514 | Bonola | Jan 1998 | A |
5724552 | Taoda | Mar 1998 | A |
5727142 | Chen | Mar 1998 | A |
5732220 | Mayfield et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742765 | Wong et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749095 | Hagersten | May 1998 | A |
5751715 | Chan et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751723 | Vanden Heuvel et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752078 | Delp et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758084 | Silverstein et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758089 | Gentry et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758186 | Hamilton et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758194 | Kuzma | May 1998 | A |
5768527 | Zhu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768618 | Erickson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771349 | Picazo, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778013 | Jedwab | Jul 1998 | A |
5778419 | Hansen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790804 | Osborne | Aug 1998 | A |
5794061 | Hansen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799150 | Hamilton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802258 | Chen | Sep 1998 | A |
5802580 | McAlpine | Sep 1998 | A |
5809328 | Nogales et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809527 | Cooper et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812775 | Van Seters et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815646 | Purcell et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819111 | Davies et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828835 | Isfeld et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835370 | Nakamura | Nov 1998 | A |
5848293 | Gentry | Dec 1998 | A |
5870394 | Oprea | Feb 1999 | A |
5872919 | Wakeland | Feb 1999 | A |
5878225 | Bilansky et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878227 | Wade et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892903 | Klaus | Apr 1999 | A |
5898713 | Melzer et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5913028 | Wang et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915094 | Kouloheris et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917828 | Thompson | Jun 1999 | A |
5920566 | Hendel et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923759 | Lee | Jul 1999 | A |
5926642 | Favor | Jul 1999 | A |
5930830 | Mendelson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931918 | Row et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935205 | Murayama et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5935249 | Stern et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937169 | Connery et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941969 | Ram et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941972 | Hoese et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946708 | Fang et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950203 | Stakuis et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963876 | Manssen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978844 | Tsuchiya et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987022 | Geiger et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991299 | Radogna et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996013 | Delp et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996024 | Blumenau | Nov 1999 | A |
6005849 | Roach et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009478 | Panner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014380 | Hendel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014557 | Morton et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016513 | Lowe | Jan 2000 | A |
6021446 | Gentry, Jr. | Feb 2000 | A |
6021507 | Chen | Feb 2000 | A |
6026452 | Pitts | Feb 2000 | A |
6034963 | Minami et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038562 | Anjur et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041058 | Flanders et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041381 | Hoese | Mar 2000 | A |
6044438 | Olnowich | Mar 2000 | A |
6047323 | Krause | Apr 2000 | A |
6047356 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049528 | Hendel et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057863 | Olarig | May 2000 | A |
6061368 | Hitzelberger | May 2000 | A |
6065096 | Day et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067569 | Khaki et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067595 | Lindenstruth | May 2000 | A |
6070200 | Gates et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078564 | Lakshman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6078733 | Osborne | Jun 2000 | A |
6085234 | Pitts et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097734 | Gotesman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6101555 | Goshey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111673 | Chang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115615 | Ota et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122670 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141701 | Whitney | Oct 2000 | A |
6141705 | Anand et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145017 | Ghaffari | Nov 2000 | A |
6157944 | Pedersen | Dec 2000 | A |
6157955 | Narad et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6172980 | Flanders et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172981 | Cox et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173333 | Jolitz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178483 | Runaldue et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181705 | Branstad et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185215 | Aho | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202105 | Gates et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219693 | Napolitano et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223242 | Sheafor et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226680 | Boucher et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233242 | Mayer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233543 | Butts et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243667 | Kerr et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246683 | Connery et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247060 | Boucher et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6279051 | Gates et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289023 | Dowling et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298403 | Suri et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301612 | Selitrennikoff et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324649 | Eyres et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6334153 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6343345 | Hilla et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343360 | Feinleib | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345301 | Burns et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345302 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356951 | Gentry, Jr. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370114 | Gullicksen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370599 | Anan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385647 | Willis et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389468 | Muller et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389479 | Boucher et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393487 | Boucher et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6418169 | Datari | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421742 | Tillier | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421753 | Hoese et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427169 | Elzur | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427171 | Craft et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427173 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430626 | Witkowski et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434620 | Boucher et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434651 | Gentry, Jr. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449656 | Elzur et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452915 | Jorgensen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453360 | Muller et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453406 | Sarnikowski et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470397 | Shah et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470415 | Starr et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473425 | Bellaton et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480489 | Muller et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483804 | Muller et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487202 | Klausmeier et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487654 | Dowling | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6490631 | Teich et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6502144 | Accarie | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6523119 | Pavlin et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6526446 | Yang et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6542504 | Mahler et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570884 | Connery et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6591302 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6591310 | Johnson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594261 | Boura et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6631484 | Born | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6648611 | Morse et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650640 | Muller et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657757 | Chang et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6658480 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6678283 | Teplitsky | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681364 | Calvignac et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683851 | Willkie et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687758 | Craft et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697366 | Kim | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697868 | Craft et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6748502 | Watanabe et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751665 | Philbrick et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757746 | Boucher et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6765901 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6807581 | Starr et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6842896 | Redding et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6862264 | Moura et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6912522 | Edgar | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6938092 | Burns | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941386 | Craft et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6965941 | Boucher et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6976148 | Arimilli et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6980545 | Lindgren et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6996070 | Starr et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7016361 | Swonk et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7042898 | Blightman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047320 | Arimilli et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7073196 | Dowd et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7076568 | Philbrick et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7089326 | Boucher et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7093099 | Bodas et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7124205 | Craft et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133940 | Blightman et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7167926 | Boucher et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7167927 | Philbrick et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7174393 | Boucher et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181531 | Pinkerton et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185266 | Blightman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187679 | Dally et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191241 | Boucher et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191318 | Tripathy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7237036 | Boucher et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7254696 | Mittal et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260518 | Kerr et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7283522 | Siddabathuni | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7284070 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7287092 | Sharp | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7337241 | Boucher et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7461160 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7472156 | Philbrick et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7496689 | Sharp et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502869 | Boucher et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7519699 | Jain et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7543087 | Philbrick et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7584260 | Craft et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7620726 | Craft et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627001 | Craft et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7627684 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7640364 | Craft et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7664868 | Boucher et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7664883 | Craft et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7673072 | Boucher et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7694024 | Philbrick et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7738500 | Jones et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7809847 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7844743 | Craft et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853723 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20010004354 | Jolitz | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010013059 | Dawson et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010014892 | Gaither et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010014954 | Purcell et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010025315 | Jolitz | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010037406 | Philbrick et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010048681 | Bilic et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010053148 | Bilic et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020073223 | Darnell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020112175 | Makofka et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020156927 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030014544 | Pettey | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030046330 | Hayes | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066011 | Oren | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067903 | Jorgensen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030110344 | Szczepanek et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030165160 | Minami et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040010712 | Hui et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040042458 | Elzu | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040042464 | Elzur et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049580 | Boyd et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040049601 | Boyd et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054814 | McDaniel | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059926 | Angelo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040088262 | Boucher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040153578 | Elzur | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040158640 | Philbrick et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040210795 | Anderson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040213290 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040246974 | Gyugyi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249957 | Ekis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050060538 | Beverly | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050144300 | Craft et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060133386 | McCormack et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060248208 | Walbeck et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070083682 | Bartley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070140240 | Dally et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080043732 | Desai et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080170501 | Patel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080209084 | Wang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080240111 | Gadelrab | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090063696 | Wang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090086732 | Boucher et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
689138 | Dec 1995 | EP |
689139 | Dec 1995 | EP |
695993 | Feb 1996 | EP |
WO 9819412 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9850852 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9904343 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9965219 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0013091 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0104770 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0105107 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0105116 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0105123 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0140960 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0159966 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0186430 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 2007130476 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Beach, Bob. “UltraNet: An Architecture for Gigabit Networking.” IEEE Computer Society Press publication from 15th Conference on Local Computer Networks. Sep. 30-Oct. 3, 1990. 18 pages. |
Chesson, et al. “The Protocol Engine Chipset.” IEEE Symposium Record from Hot Chips III. Aug. 26-27, 1991. 16 pages. |
MacLean et al. “An Outboard Processor for High Performance Implementation of Transport Layer Protocols.” IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Globecom '91, presentation. Dec. 2-5, 1991. 7 pages. |
Ross et al. “FX1000: A high performance single chip Gigabit Ethernet NIC.” IEEE article from Compcon '97 Proceedings. Feb. 23-26, 1997. 7 pages. |
Strayer et al. “Ch. 9: The Protocol Engine.” From XTP: The Transfer Protocol. Jul. 1992. 12 pages. |
Publication entitled “Protocol Engine Handbook.” Oct. 1990. 44 pages. |
Koufopavlou et al. “Parallel TCP for High Performance Communication Subsystems.” IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Globecom '92, presentation. Dec. 6-9, 1992. 7 pages. |
Lilienkamp et al. “Proposed Host-Front End Protocol.” Dec. 1984. 56 pages. |
Thia et al. “High-Speed OSI Protocol Bypass Algorithm with Window Flow Control.” Protocols for High Speed Networks. 1993. pp. 53-68. |
Jolitz, William et al. “TCP/IP Network Accelerator and Method of Use.” filed Jul. 17, 1997. U.S. Appl. No. 60/053,240. |
Thia et al. “A Reduced Operational Protocol Engine (ROPE) for a multiple-layer bypass architecture.” Protocols for High Speed Networks. 1995. pp. 224-239. |
Form 10-K for Exelan, Inc., for the fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 1987. 10 pages. |
Form 10-K for Exelan, Inc., for the fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 1988. 10 pages. |
Merritt, Rick. “Ethernet Interconnect Outpacing Infiniband at Intel.” EE Times article. Sep. 11, 2002. 9 pages. |
Starr, David D. et al. “Intelligent Network Storage Interface Device.” for U.S. Appl. No. 09/675,700. Confirmation No. 9585; filed Sep. 29, 2000. |
Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Intelligent Network Interface System and Method for Accelerated Protocol Processing.” U.S. Appl. No. 09/692,561. Confirmation No. 5890; filed Oct. 18, 2000. |
Craft, Peter K. et al. “Transferring Control of TCP Connections Between Hierarchy of Processing Mechanisms.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/249,006. Confirmation No. 3046; filed Oct. 11, 2005. |
Starr, Daryl D. et al. “Accelerating Data Transfer in a Virtual Computer System with Tightly Coupled TCP Connections.” U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,366. Confirmation No. 3065; filed Mar. 24, 2009. |
Craft, Peter, K. et al. “TCP Offload Send Optimization.” U.S Appl. No. 12/504,021, Confirmation No. 9303; filed Jul. 16, 2009. |
Craft, Peter K. et al. “TCP Offload Device the Batches Session Layer Headers to Reduce Interrupts as Well as CPU Copies.” U.S. Appl. No. 12/581,342, Confirmation No. 2393; filed Oct. 19, 2009. |
Philbrick, Clive M. et al. “Freeing Transmit Memory on a Network Interface Device Prior to Receiving an Acknowledgment That Transmit Data Has Been Received by a Remote Device.” U.S. Appl. No. 12/470,980. Confirmation Number: 4934; filed May 22, 2009. |
Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Obtaining a Destination Address So That a Network Interface Device Can Write Network Data Without Headers Directly Into Host Memory.” U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,941. Confirmation Number: 2493; filed Dec. 1, 2008. |
Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Enabling an Enhanced Function of an Electronic Device.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,948. Confirmation Number: 9878; filed Nov. 19, 2007. |
Starr, Daryl D. et al. “Network Interface Device With 10 Gb/s Full-Duplex Transfer Rate.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/799,720. Confirmation Number: 6200; filed May 1, 2007. |
Craft, Peter K. et al. “Peripheral Device That DMAS the Same Data to Different Locations in a Computer.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/788,719. Confirmation Number: 5750; filed Apr. 19, 2007. |
Starr, Daryl D. et al. “TCP/IP Offload Device With Reduced Sequential Processing.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/348,810. Confirmation No. 8739; filed Feb. 6, 2006. |
Craft, Peter K. et al. “Protocol Stack That Offloads a TCP Connection From a Host Computer to a Network Interface Device.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/027,842. Confirmation No. 6231; filed Dec. 30, 2004. |
Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Method and Apparatus for Dynamic Packet Batching With a High Performance Network Interface.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/678,336. Confirmation No. 9798; filed Oct. 3, 2003. |
Philbrick Clive M. et al. “Method and Apparatus for Data Re-Assembly With a High Performance Network Interface.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/634,062. Confirmation No. 5537; filed Aug. 4, 2003. |
Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “High Network Interface Device and System for Accelerated Communication.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/601,237. Confirmation No. 9286; filed Jun. 19, 2003. |
Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Method and Apparatus for Distributing Network Traffic Processing on a Multiprocessor Computer.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/438,719. Confirmation No. 7151; filed May 14, 2003. |
Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Parsing a Packet Header.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/277,604. Confirmation No. 7644; filed Oct. 18, 2002. |
Starr, Daryl D.. et al. “Intelligient Network Storage Interface System.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/261,051. Confirmation No. 6753; filed Sep. 30, 2002. |
Chandranmenon, Girish P. et al. “Trading Packet Headers for Packet Processing.” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 4, No. 2. Apr. 1996. pp. 141-152. |
U.S. Appl. No. 08/964,304, entitled “File Array Storage Architecture.” filed Nov. 4, 1997. Inventors Napolitano et al. |
The Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/027,842 mailed on Dec. 3, 2010. |
Stevens, et al., “TCP/IP Illustrated, vol. 2.” pp. 754-757 1995. |
Stevens, Richard. “TCP/IP Illustrated, vol. 1.” Chapters 1 and 17. Published 1994; 13th printing. 1999. |
“Hardware Assisted Protocol Processing”, (which Eugene Feinber is working on). Downloaded from the internet and printed on Nov. 25, 1998. 1 page. |
“Z85C30 CMOS SCC Serial Communication Controller”, Zilog Inc. Zilog product Brief. 1997. 3 pages. |
“Smart LAN Work Requests.” Internet pages of Xpoint Technologies, Inc. printed Dec. 19, 1997. 5 pages. |
“Asante and 100BASE-T Fast Ethernet.” Internet pages printed May 27, 1997. 7 pages. |
“A Guide to the Paragon XP/S-A7 Supercomputer at Indiana University.” Internet pages printed Dec. 21, 1998. 13 pages. |
Stevens, Richard. “TCP/IP Illustrated, vol. 1, The Protocols.” 1994. pp. 325-326. |
“Northridge/Southbridge vs. Intel Hub Architecture.” Internet pages printed Feb. 19, 2001. 4 pages. |
“Gigabit Ethernet Technical Brief, Achieving End-to-End Performance.” Alteon Networks, Inc., First Edition. Sep. 1996. 15 pages. |
“Technical Brief on Alteon Ethernet Gigabit NIC Technology.” Internet pages downloaded from www.alteon.com. Printed Mar. 15, 1997. 14 pages. |
“VT8501 Apollo MVP4.” VIA Technologies, Inc. Revision 1.3. Feb. 1, 2000. pp. i-iv, 1-11, cover and copyright page. |
“iReady Rounding Out Management Team with Two Key Executives.” iReady News Archives article downloaded from http://www.ireadyco.com/archives/keyexec.html. Printed Nov. 28, 1998. 2 pages. |
“The Internet Tuner.” Internet pages from iReady Products, web sitehttp://www.ireadyco.com/products2html. Printed Nov. 25, 1998. 2 pages. |
iReady News Archives, Toshiba, iReady shipping Internet chip. Printed Nov. 25, 1998. 1 page. |
“Technology.” Interprophet article downloaded fromhttp://www.interprophet.com/technology.html. Printed Mar. 1, 2000. 17 pages. |
“The I-1000 Internet Tuner.” iReady Corporation article. Date unknown. 2 pages. |
“About Us Introduction.” iReady article downloaded from the internet http://www.iReadyco.com/about.html. Pritned Nov. 25, 1998. 3 pages. |
“Revolutionary Approach to Consumer Electronics Internet Connectivity Funded.” iReady News Archive article. San Jose, California. Nov. 20, 1997 (printed Nov. 2, 1998). 2 pages. |
“Seiko Instruments Inc. (SII) Introduces World's First Internet-Ready Intelligent LCD Modules Based on iReady Technology.” iReady News Archive article. Santa Clara, CA and Chiba, Japan. Oct. 26, 1998 (printed Nov. 2, 1998). 2 pages. |
“iReady internet Tuner to Web Enable Devices.” NEWSwatch article. Tuesday, Nov. 5, 1996 (printed Nov. 2, 1998). 2 pages. |
Lammers, David. “Tuner for Toshiba, Toshiba Taps iReady for Internet Tuner.” EE Times article. Printed Nov. 2, 1998. 2 pages. |
Carbone, J.S. “Comparison of Novell Netware and TCP/IP Protocol Architectures.” Printed Apr. 10, 1998. 19 pages. |
“AEA-7110C-a DuraSAN product.” Adaptec article. Printed Oct. 1, 2001. 11 pages. |
“iSCSI and 2Gigabit fibre Channel Host Bus Adapters from Emulex, QLogic, Adaptec, JNI.” iSCSI HBA article. Printed Oct. 1, 2001. 8 pages. |
“FCE-3210/6410 32 and 64-bit PCI-to-Fibre Channel HBA.” iSCSI HBA article. Printed Oct. 1, 2001. 6 pages. |
“iSCSI Storage.” ISCSI.com article. Pritned Oct. 1, 2001. 2 pages. |
Kalampoulkas et al. “Two-Way TCP Traffic Over Rate Controlled Channels: Effects and Analysis.” IEEE Transactions on Networking. vol. 6, No. 6. Dec. 1998. 17 pages. |
“Toshiba Delivers First Chips to Make Consumer Devices Internet-Ready Based on iReady Design.” IReady News article. Santa Clara, CA, and Tokyo, Japan. Oct. 14, 1998 (printed Nov. 2, 1998). 3 pages. |
Jolitz, Lynne. “Frequently Asked Questions.” Internet pages of InterProphet. Printed Jun. 14, 1999. 4 pages. |
Hitz et al. “File System Design for an NFS File Server Appliance.” Winter of 1992. 13 pages. |
“Adaptec Announces EtherStorage Technology.” Adaptec Press Release article. May 4, 2000 (printed Jun. 15, 2000). 2 pages. |
“EtherStorage Frequently Asked Questions.” Adapted article. Printed Jul. 19, 2000. 5 pages. |
“EtherStorage White Paper.” Adapted article. Printed Jul. 19, 2000. 7 pages. |
Berlino, J. et al. “Computers; Storage.” CIBC World Markets article. Aug. 7, 2000. 9 pages. |
Milunovich, S. Merrill Lynch article entitled “Storage Futures.” Merrill Lynch article. May 10, 2000. 22 pages. |
Taylor, S. “Montreal Start-Up Battles Data Storage Bottleneck.” CBS Market Watch article. Mar. 5, 2000 (printed Mar. 7, 2000). 2 pages. |
Satran, J. et al. “SCSI/TCP (SCSI over TCP).” Internet-draft article. Feb. 2000 (printed May 19, 2000). 38 pages. |
“Technical White Paper-Xpoint's Disk to LAN Acceleration Solution for Windows NT Server.” Internet pages. Printed Jun. 5, 1997. 14 pages. |
Harrer, Christopher et al. “Network Accelerator Chip Architecture, twelve-slide presentation.” Jato Technologies article. Printed Aug. 19, 1998. 13 pages. |
“Enterprise System Uses Flexible Spec.” EETimes article. Aug. 10, 1998 (printed Nov. 25, 1998). 3 pages. |
“Smart Ethernet Network Interface Cards,” which Berend Ozceri is developing. Internet pages. Printed Nov. 25, 1998. 2 pages. |
“GigaPower Protocol Processor Product Review.” Internet pages of Xaqti corporation. Printed Nov. 25, 1999. 4 pages. |
Oren, Amit (inventor). Assignee: Siliquent Technologies Ltd. “CRC Calculations for Out of Order PUDs.” U.S. Appl. No. 60/283,896, filed Apr. 12, 2003. |
Walsh, Robert J. “DART: Fast Application Level Networking via Data-Copy Avoidance.” Internet pages. Printed Jun. 3, 1999. 25 pages. |
Tanenbaum, Andrew S. Computer Networks, Third Edition, ISBN 0-13-349945-6. Mar. 6, 1996. |
Druschel, Peter et al. “LRP: A New Network Subsystem Architecture for Server Systems.” Article from Rice University. Oct. 1996. 14 pages. |
“TCP Control Block Interdependence.” Internet RFC/STD/FYI/BCP Archives article with heading “RFC2140” web address http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2140.html. Printed Sep. 2, 2002. 9 pages. |
“Tornado: for Intelligent Network Acceleration.” WindRiver article. Copyright Wind River Systems. 2001. 2 pages. |
“Complete TCP/IP Offload for High-Speed Ethernet Networks.” WindRiver White Paper. Copyright Wind River Systems. 2002. 7 pages. |
“Solving Server Bottlenecks with Intel Server Adapters.” Intel article. Copyright Intel Corporation. 1999. 8 pages. |
Schwaderer et al. “XTP in VLSI Protocol Decomposition for ASIC Implementation.” IEEE Computer Society Press publication from 15th Conference on Local Computer Networks. Sep. 30-Oct. 3, 1990. 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110280243 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60061809 | Oct 1997 | US | |
60098296 | Aug 1998 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10881271 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 12325941 | US | |
Parent | 09789366 | Feb 2001 | US |
Child | 10881271 | US | |
Parent | 09439603 | Nov 1999 | US |
Child | 09464283 | US | |
Parent | 09067544 | Apr 1998 | US |
Child | 09439603 | US | |
Parent | 13108729 | US | |
Child | 09439603 | US | |
Parent | 10706398 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 11027842 | US | |
Parent | 10208093 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 10706398 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12325941 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 13108729 | US | |
Parent | 09464283 | Dec 1999 | US |
Child | 09789366 | US | |
Parent | 11027842 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 13108729 | US | |
Parent | 09514425 | Feb 2000 | US |
Child | 10208093 | US | |
Parent | 09141713 | Aug 1998 | US |
Child | 09514425 | US | |
Parent | 13108729 | US | |
Child | 09514425 | US | |
Parent | 09067544 | Apr 1998 | US |
Child | 13108729 | US |