This invention relates to the field of stroke optimization for advanced swimmers. More specifically, it provides real-time feedback for estimating and optimizing flow-pattern efficiency around the hand.
Typical swimming strokes can be subdivided into five phases: entry, catch, pull, push and recovery. Although said phases differ in the prescribed position of the hand with respect to surrounding water, they all share one common principle: pressure against the water should be consistently minimized on the dorsal side of the hand. For example, contemporary front-crawl technique, for which the technical paddle is best suited, prescribes that the hand should enter the water with minimal resistance and, before progressing on to the catch phase, it should be oriented so that the palm is approximately parallel to the surface of the water. This arrangement ideally envisages minimal pressure from either side (dorsal or palmar) of the hand against water.
The catch phase marks the transition from the entry configuration onto one where the hand is nearly orthogonal to the water surface, setting the stage for an efficient pull phase. During this transition, a primary challenge is to avoid pressure against the dorsal side of the hand; this scenario can occur if the catch is initiated prematurely, thus generating drag that works against the forward glide associated with the entry phase.
During both pull and push phases, the hand must ideally lock in place and act as pivot by exerting maximal pressure against the palmar side, moving the swimmer forward by swiveling the arm around the hand. Except for the inevitable pressure that may be exerted by turbulence on the dorsal side of the hand, all forces coming from this side should be minimized to avoid displacing the hand in the direction opposite to that intended by the swimmer.
The final phase involves recovery to the entry phase. Similar to the catch phase, the recovery phase involves a delicate transition during which the hand is disengaged from pushing against the palmar side and is brought back into forward gliding configuration, ready for entry. If enacted prematurely, recovery causes water to exert pressure on the dorsal side of the hand. The resulting drag not only slows down forward propulsion, but also serves to destabilize correct reorientation of the hand.
When looking to improve their technique, swimmers consistently attempt to monitor flow pattern around their body (including the hand), either implicitly or explicitly. However, water flow surrounding the hand and body is exceedingly difficult to monitor accurately via somatosensory perception due to the saturating stimulation produced on the skin by the swimming action. As for monitoring absolute hand orientation per se (e.g. in relation to water surface orientation), this is challenging to achieve in the absence of stable visual cues (for example when executing front crawl), and proprioception is prohibitively poor when floating in water. For these reasons, swimmers can greatly benefit from devices that provide them with real-time feedback on correct placement/dynamics of the hand throughout the stroke cycle. The present invention is intended for such purpose, while at the same time retaining mechanical simplicity without involvement of sophisticated measuring components (e.g. accelerometers).
Previous patents aimed at aiding swimmers in stroke execution have rarely incorporated moving elements of any kind. The large majority of swimming hand paddles is designed around the principle of shaping a single rigid element so that it either reduces or enhances drag around the hand as a function of stroke mechanics (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 28,855, U.S. Pat. No. 4,913,418, U.S. Pat. No. 7,179,146 B2, U.S. Pat. No. 5,147,233, U.S. Pat. No. 5,511,998, U.S. Pat. No. D837,327 S, U.S. Pat. No. D748,752 S, U.S. Pat. No. 10,894,187 B2, U.S. Pat. No. D880,635 S, U.S. Pat. No. 10,549,169 B2, U.S. Pat. No. 10,518,135 B2, U.S. Pat. No. D864,331 S, U.S. Pat. No. D823,417 S, U.S. Pat. No. 10,022,608 B2, U.S. Pat. No. 9,931,541 B2, U.S. Pat. No. 9,717,953 B1, U.S. Pat. No. 8,496,506 B2, U.S. Pat. No. 7,566,252 B2, U.S. Pat. No. 7,494,395 B2, U.S. Pat. No. 7,147,526 B1, U.S. Pat. No. 7,125,299 B1, U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,650, U.S. Pat. No. 5,842,896, U.S. Pat. No. Des. 397,187, U.S. Pat. No. 5,651,710, U.S. Pat. No. Des. 378,307, U.S. Pat. No. 5,516,319 U.S. Pat. No. 5,376,036, U.S. Pat. No. Des. 318,894, U.S. Pat. No. 5,288,254, JP 3215059 U, JP 2014-73191 A, U.S. Pat. No. 9,308,418 B2, U.S. Pat. No. 1,546,670, U.S. Pat. No. 1,717,026). Because the aid takes on a rigid shape, it does not dynamically respond to water flow by modifying its configuration. As such, it is incapable of providing a targeted estimate of water flow pattern around the hand that is conveyed to swimmers via obvious configural changes. Furthermore, with a few exceptions (U.S. Pat. No. 5,288,254), those inventions are generally designed to aid swimmers in the execution of only the pull phase, namely that portion of the stroke cycle during which the hand is oriented perpendicularly to the direction of movement and is used to propel the swimmer forward.
Other relevant technical aids have occasionally incorporated moving elements, but of an entirely different nature and/or with unrelated objectives. The moving flap attached to the paddle disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,585,453 B2, for example, is designed to produce additional drag during the pull phase when the swimmer executes this movement incorrectly. Although this device presents some shared goals with the invention disclosed herein, it differs substantially both in design and in its capability to respond to flow pattern around the hand: to mention one difference, it does not respond to pressure applied to the back of the hand. Furthermore, it does not provide direct feedback to the swimmer, but rather indirectly via increased drag.
A different approach has been to maintain rigidity of the paddle, yet enhance its monitoring capabilities via electronic sensors that measure parameters such as orientation and acceleration of the hand (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 10,080,922 B2, U.S. Pat. No. 3,952,352, U.S. Pat. No. 2017/0043212 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 2017/0128808 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 2019/0021616 A1). Said sensors are costly, involve data storage and digital processing, and are not designed to specifically monitor water flow. Because the relationship between sensor-relayed parameters and water flow pattern around the hand is of an indirect nature, this approach does not provide effective monitoring of said pattern.
There is an additional class of devices which, upon cursory inspection, may appear related to the present invention: hinged paddles (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 2,017,463, U.S. Pat. No. 2,389,196, U.S. Pat. No. 5,647,783, U.S. Pat. No. 5,304,080). The critical difference between those devices and the present invention is that, in the case of previous devices, the hinged section is designed to serve a useful purpose, rather than a potentially disruptive role under incorrect stroke execution (as is the case for the present invention). Consider for example U.S. Pat. No. 1,541,100 (see also U.S. Pat. No. 5,304,080, US Pat. No. 2,389,196, U.S. Pat. No. 2017/0232303 A1, U.S. Pat. No. 2018/0001147 A1 for related examples): this paddle is designed so that it can bend around a hinge oriented orthogonally to the direction of movement, and in so doing assumes a concave shape analogous to the configuration that may be obtained with flexible paddles (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 6,899,581 B1, U.S. Pat. No. 4,746,313, U.S. Pat. No. 4,067,081, U.S. Pat. No. 3,938,207, EP 2,543,417 A1). In said design, the hinge is intended as a flexible element that should be exploited by swimmers to aid their efficiency. Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 2,017,463 presents two lateral flaps that only fold when flow pressure is applied to the dorsal portion of the hand, and not to the palmar side, similar to the present invention (see also U.S. Pat. No. 4,756,699, U.S. Pat. No. 4,316,300, JP 2015-181793 A for related designs attached to the forearm). In U.S. Pat. No. 2,017,463, however, the folding elements are intended for positive exploitation by the swimmer in order to carry the paddle back to its starting position before executing another pull: they are designed to reduce resistance of hand movement through water during the recovery phase of the stroke cycle. Furthermore, the principle behind U.S. Pat. No. 2,017,463 is only applicable in the restricted case of non-technical swimming style, in which the recovery phase is performed by simply executing the pull phase in reverse fashion. This approach is never utilized during technical swimming in conformity with contemporary practice (as described above). Similar considerations apply to U.S. Pat. No. 1,663,328 and U.S. Pat. No. 1,708,331.
The objective of the present invention is to equip swimmers with a paddle which, when used incorrectly, readily changes configuration so as to become ineffective/unusable, and does so in a manner that is immediately obvious to swimmers. This real-time feedback can then be exploited by swimmers to adjust their stroke execution in an effort to maintain the paddle in its stable configuration, a process that aligns with correct swimming technique. More specifically, whenever water pressure is applied to the dorsal side of the paddle, the device folds and/or separates into two elements, thus becoming a useless source of hindrance. On the contrary, when water pressure is applied to the palmar side, the paddle retains its flat rigid shape. During correct execution of the stroke cycle, pressure should only be applied to the palmar side of the paddle; under such conditions, swimmers would experience the present invention as no different than regular rigid paddles. During incorrect execution, however, movement of the hand almost invariably results in substantial pressure being applied to the dorsal side; under this scenario, swimmers are made immediately aware of the incorrect nature of their stroke technique by the evident loss of paddle functionality.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will in part be obvious and will in part be apparent from the specification and drawings.
In the essence of one inventive subcombination, the technical hand paddle comprises: one left planar or nearly planar element of trapezoidal or rectangular shape with rounded edges, referred to herein as “left plate”; one right planar or nearly planar element of trapezoidal or rectangular shape with rounded edges, not necessarily identical to the left plate, referred to herein as “right plate”; a longitudinal mechanism connecting said plates in such a fashion that they remain connected and parallel when fluid pressure is applied from one side of the plates in the direction perpendicular to the orientation of the plates, but become disconnected when fluid pressure is applied from the opposite side.
In the essence of a second inventive subcombination, the technical hand paddle comprises: the left and right plates detailed above; a longitudinal mechanism connecting said plates in such a way that they remain connected and parallel when fluid pressure is applied from one side of the plates, but fold when fluid pressure is applied from the opposite side.
In the essence of a third inventive subcombination, the technical hand paddle comprises: the left and right plates detailed above; an adjustable longitudinal mechanism connecting said plates in such a way that they remain connected and parallel when fluid pressure is applied from one side of the plane, but fold or become disconnected when fluid pressure is applied from the opposite side, and such that the mechanism can be adjusted with regard to the amount of pressure that causes the plates to fold or become disconnected.
It is a general objective of the present invention to provide swimmers with a hand paddle for strength-training that also prevents improper technique by changing configuration under the effect of water pressure patterns that are inconsistent with correct technical execution.
It is more particularly an objective of the present invention to provide swimmers with immediate feedback regarding the occurrence of incorrect stroke execution, so that swimmers can adjust said execution in real time.
Yet another particular objective of this invention is to achieve the above-stated goals via simple mechanical means that can be easily incorporated into a cost-effective design that is also robust and durable.
A further objective of this invention is to achieve the above-stated goals by means of an appealing design that is not too dissimilar in appearance from regular paddles, so that swimmers are not discouraged from utilizing it by cumbersome design or appearance that attracts unwanted attention.
Other objectives, features and advantages of the invention disclosed herein will be apparent from the drawings and detailed description below.
Referenced features of disclosed invention are illustrated in
The design principle underlying the present invention is summarized in Fif. 1-3. We refer to different views/sections of the inventive device with reference to the hand applied to the device, the hand extended forward with its palmar side parallel to the ground, as demonstrated in
The hand paddle is divided longitudinally (along the sagittal plane) into two separate elements (1-2), not necessarily of equal size or shape, and not necessarily planar. Said elements are depicted as symmetric and planar in
The mechanical principle depicted in
The right element of the paddle (
The left element of the paddle (
As demonstrated in
In the embodiment depicted in
As demonstrated in
The above detailed interlocking design, or variations upon it that retain the same function in their essence and purpose, can be readily augmented by the addition of simple devices that allow users to vary the amount of pressure required to produce folding/detachment. One possible and cost-effective implementation of said augmentation is illustrated in
The above detailed disclosure is intended as only illustrative of the preferred embodiment of, and not a limitation upon the scope of, the disclosed invention. Those skilled in the art will envision many other possible variations of the structure disclosed herein that nevertheless fall within the scope of the following claims. For example, it is conceivable that the planar elements of one paddle may be shaped in a slightly different manner than detailed above for the purpose of optimizing efficiency or incorporating ergonomic principles (U.S. Pat. No. 7,267,595 B1 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,643,027, U.S. Pat. No. D789,475 S, U.S. Pat. No. 9,492,712 B2, U.S. Pat. No. D890,283 S), and/or that said elements may be differ between themselves to accommodate the asymmetric shape of the hand (
It will thus be seen that the objects set forth above, among those made apparent from the preceding description, are efficiently attained and, because certain changes may be made in carrying out the above method and in the construction(s) set forth without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
It is also to be understood that the following claims are intended to cover all of the generic and specific features of the invention herein described and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween.