Embodiments relate to techniques for managing cloud-based resources. More particularly, embodiments relate to techniques for managing and/or tracking resources from disparate heterogeneous cloud environments.
As cloud-based resources and environments are increasingly used, users may often concurrently utilize different sets of cloud-based resources (aka, different clouds). In some situations, these clouds may be provided by the same corporate entity. For example, salesforce.com can provide services through Commerce Cloud, Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, etc. However, this use of disparate heterogeneous clouds can result in inefficiencies.
Embodiments of the invention are illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description.
In one embodiment, architecture 100 utilizes orchestration service/platform 110 to manage the various services and/or versions provided by architecture 100. Orchestration service/platform 110 can be based on, for example, Elastic Beanstalk available from Amazon Web Services (AWS). In one embodiment, orchestration service/platform 110 a single application program interface (API) for multiple types of users and tools attempting to access the resources provided, for example, administration (admin) API service 120. In one embodiment, Admin API Service 120 can utilize authentication and access service 125 to authenticate users prior to granting access to one or more resources provided via architecture 100.
As discussed above, various interfaces and/or types of devices can be used to access the resources of architecture 100. In the example of
Other users, having different roles and/or types of client devices can also be used to access the resources of architecture 100. For example, user 135 (e.g., a data scientist) can utilize exploration tool 134 to communicate with architecture 100 via admin API service 120. As another example, user 137 (e.g., a site reliability engineer) can utilize monitoring tool 136 to communicate with architecture 100 via admin API service 120.
In one embodiment, admin API service 120 provides an interface to scheduler service 140, which operates to schedule tasks to provide the services of architecture 100. In one embodiment, admin API service 120 provides an interface to monitoring service 144, which operates to provide monitoring of the services of architecture 100. In one embodiment, model management service 142 operates to manage model creation and usage through admin API service 120.
Use of modeling is discussed in greater detail below. In one embodiment, admin API service 120 also operates with provisioning service 146 (which is also coupled with scheduler service 140) to schedule and provision resources within architecture 100. In one embodiment, the modeling process includes 1) model training, which can be scheduled batch learning and/or real time learning; 2) scoring, which can be scheduled batch scoring and/or real time scoring; and 3) evaluation, which can be manually-triggered offline evaluation and/or real time evaluation.
In one embodiment, constant integration (CI) service 150 operates to manage versions of one or more services, models and/or resources. In one embodiment, CI service 150 utilizes one or more repositories 155 to manage services, models and/or resources within architecture 100. Repository 150 can be, for example, a Git repository or similar.
In one embodiment, architecture 100 can also include schema service 160 that operates to manage one or more database schemas within the environment. In one embodiment, architecture 100 can include datastore service 165 that manages data storage resources, for example, databases.
In one embodiment, executor service 170 includes data puller 172, data processor 174, modeling agent 176, scoring agent 178 and data pusher 180. In one embodiment, executor service 170 provides an interface between architecture 100 and resources external to architecture 100. These external resources can include, for example, cloud storage service 194 (e.g., Amazon Simple Storage Service, S3), customer relationship management service 192 (e.g., salesforce), cluster computing service 196 (e.g., Spark). Other services 190 can also be accessed via executor service 170.
Various functions and interactions of the components of executor service 170 are described in greater detail below. In general, data puller 172 operates to periodically pull data from one or more sources to be utilized for acquiring data to be utilized by executor service 170. The data can be used for modeling purposes, for example. In one embodiment, data processor 174 operates to process data from data puller 172 to be utilized by executor service 170. The data can be used for modeling purposes, for example.
In one embodiment, modeling agent 176 can utilize data from data processor 174 to generate, update, modify, delete and/or otherwise manage models to be used by executor service 170. In one embodiment, scoring agent 178 works with one or more models from modeling agent 176 to provide a scoring functionality that can be used by executor service 170. In one embodiment, data pusher 180 pushes data to one or more targets, which can be the same or different or overlap with, the sources of data utilized by data puller 172.
In one embodiment, architecture 200 utilizes orchestration service/platform 210 to manage the various services and/or versions provided by architecture 200. Orchestration service/platform 210 can be based on, for example, Elastic Beanstalk available from Amazon Web Services (AWS). In one embodiment, orchestration service/platform 210 a single application program interface (API) for multiple types of users and tools attempting to access the resources provided, for example, administration (admin) API service 220. In one embodiment, admin API service 200 provides an interface to multiple environments within architecture 200. In one embodiment, Admin API Service 220 can utilize authentication and access service 225 to authenticate users prior to granting access to one or more resources provided via architecture 200.
As discussed above, various interfaces and/or types of devices can be used to access the resources of architecture 200. In the example of
Other users, having different roles and/or types of client devices can also be used to access the resources of architecture 200. For example, user 235 (e.g., a data scientist) can utilize exploration tool 234 to communicate with architecture 200 via admin API service 220. As another example, user 237 (e.g., a site reliability engineer) can utilize monitoring tool 236 to communicate with architecture 200 via admin API service 220.
In one embodiment, admin API service 220 provides an interface to scheduler service 240, which operates to schedule tasks to provide the services of architecture 200. In one embodiment, admin API service 220 provides an interface to monitoring service 244, which operates to provide monitoring of the services of architecture 200. In one embodiment, model management service 242 operates to manage model creation and usage through admin API service 220. Use of modeling is discussed in greater detail below. In one embodiment, admin API service 220 also operates with provisioning service 246 (which is also coupled with scheduler service 240) to schedule and provision resources within architecture 200.
In one embodiment, constant integration (CI) service 250 operates to manage versions of one or more services, models and/or resources. In one embodiment, CI service 250 utilizes one or more repositories 255 to manage services, models and/or resources within architecture 200. Repository 250 can be, for example, a Git repository or similar.
In one embodiment, architecture 200 can also include schema service 260 that operates to manage one or more database schemas within the environment. In one embodiment, architecture 200 can include datastore service 265 that manages data storage resources, for example, databases.
In one embodiment, each of the services/agents discussed above with respect to
In one embodiment, executor service mirror 285 provides the services described above with respect to executor service 170 for mirrored environments supported by architecture 200. In one embodiment, executor service mirror 285 utilizes cloud storage service 287 for data storage used for modeling and other services provided by executor service mirror 285. In one embodiment, executor service QA 290 provides the services described above with respect to executor service 170 for quality assurance (testing) environments supported by architecture 200. In one embodiment, executor service QA 290 utilizes cloud storage service 292 for data storage used for modeling and other services provided by executor service live 290.
In one embodiment, executor service sandbox 295 provides the services described above with respect to executor service 170 for development (or otherwise isolated) environments supported by architecture 200. In one embodiment, executor service sandbox 295 utilizes cloud storage service 297 for data storage used for modeling and other services provided by executor service sandbox 295.
In one embodiment, provisioning service 305 can set up a schedule (307) for the various functions that follow with scheduler service 310. In one embodiment, the setup process can include checking and/or managing of credentials to make sure that the work to be done has been authorized.
In one embodiment, scheduler service 310 triggers a data pull (312) by sending a message or indication to data puller 340. In one embodiment, in response to receiving the indication from scheduler service 310, data puller 340 can create a schema (314) for (or with) schema service 320. Also in response to receiving the indication from scheduler service 310, data puller 340 can create a data set (316) for (or with) datastore service 322.
Data puller 340 can receive data (318) from an external data source (e.g., salesforce) that has data to be analyzed/modeled/filtered. The data can be received, for example, as the result of one or more database queries. In one embodiment, in response to receiving the data, data puller 340 can format the data (if necessary) and cause the data to be stored in cloud storage service 360. In one embodiment, after (or in parallel with) the data being stored in cloud storage service 360, data puller 340 can cause the data set to be committed (332) in datastore service 322. In one embodiment, once the desired data has been acquired and stored, completion of the data pull is reported (334) to scheduler service 310.
In one embodiment, scheduler service 310 triggers data processing (350) by sending a message or indication to data processor 342. Also in response to receiving the indication from scheduler service 310, data processor 342 can create a data set (352) for (or with) datastore service 322. In one embodiment, data processor 342 can run a search job 354 on data stored in cloud storage 365. In one embodiment, data stored in cloud storage 360 in one format can be copied/moved to cloud storage 365 and stored in a different format 356.
In one embodiment, after (or in parallel with) the data being read from cloud storage service 365, data processor 342 can cause the data set to be committed (358) in datastore service 322. In one embodiment, once the desired data has been acquired, stored and/or processed, completion of the data processing is reported (370) to scheduler service 310.
In one embodiment, scheduler service 310 can cause model management service 382 to create one or more model engines 384. In alternate embodiments, scheduler service 310 can get one or more model engines (384) from model management service 382. In one embodiment, model management service 382 returns the requested engine(s) 386, and can trigger a project build through scheduler service 310.
In one embodiment, triggering a project build causes project builder 390 to initiate building of the project (388) utilizing constant integration (CI) service 399 that tracks project components using repository 389. In one embodiment, CI service 399 checks the appropriate files out from repository 389 to build the project.
In one embodiment, when the project build is ready and sufficient data has been gathered, a modeling job can be triggered (398) by scheduler service 310 and performed by modeling agent 380. The modeling job can be run (394) by modeling agent 380 utilizing cloud storage 365. When the modeling job has been completed, modeling agent 380 can report completion (396) to scheduler service 310.
Creation (or getting) of an engine can be triggered by scheduler service 410 (450) and/or by a user via an interface (e.g., CLI 415). In response, model management service 420 can return the requested engine and trigger a project build (452). Project scheduler 410 can then trigger (454) project builder 445 to build the project.
In one embodiment, project builder 445 can create a data set to store the project artifacts (456) in datastore service 425. Project builder 445 can build the project (458) using CI service 430, that tracks project components using repository 480. In one embodiment, CI service 430 checks the appropriate files out from repository 480 to build the project. When the build is completed, CI service 430 notifies project builder 445 that the build has been completed (462). Project builder 445 can then notify (464) scheduler service 410 of the completion.
In one embodiment, scheduler service 410 triggers a modeling job if the project build is ready and enough data is available (468). Modeling agent 440 can then run the modeling job (470) using data from cloud storage 495. In one embodiment, cloud storage 495 receives data (and possibly reformats the data) from cloud storage service 490. When the modeling job has been completed, modeling agent 440 reports completion (474) to scheduler service 410.
In some embodiments, the functionality described above can be provided within a multitenant environment. As used herein, the term multi-tenant database system refers to those systems in which various elements of hardware and software of the database system may be shared by one or more customers. For example, a given application server may simultaneously process requests for a great number of customers, and a given database table may store rows for a potentially much greater number of customers.
Within a multitenant environment, a tenant includes a group of users who share a common access with specific privileges to a software instance. A multi-tenant architecture provides a tenant with a dedicated share of the software instance typically including one or more of tenant specific data, user management, tenant-specific functionality, configuration, customizations, non-functional properties, associated applications, etc. Each tenant can include one or more organizations (orgs) that have varying scope within the host tenant structure. Multi-tenancy contrasts with multi-instance architectures, where separate software instances operate on behalf of different tenants.
In one embodiment, a multi-tenant database system utilizes tenant identifiers (IDs) within a multi-tenant environment to allow individual tenants to access their data while preserving the integrity of other tenant's data. In one embodiment, the multitenant database stores data for multiple client entities each identified by a tenant ID having one or more users associated with the tenant ID. Users of each of multiple client entities can only access data identified by a tenant ID associated with their respective client entity. In one embodiment, the multitenant database is a hosted database provided by an entity separate from the client entities, and provides on-demand and/or real-time database service to the client entities.
Environment 510 is an environment in which an on-demand database service exists. User system 512 may be any machine or system that is used by a user to access a database user system. For example, any of user systems 512 can be a handheld computing device, a mobile phone, a laptop computer, a work station, and/or a network of computing devices. As illustrated in herein
An on-demand database service, such as system 516, is a database system that is made available to outside users that do not need to necessarily be concerned with building and/or maintaining the database system, but instead may be available for their use when the users need the database system (e.g., on the demand of the users). Some on-demand database services may store information from one or more tenants stored into tables of a common database image to form a multi-tenant database system (MTS). Accordingly, “on-demand database service 516” and “system 516” will be used interchangeably herein. A database image may include one or more database objects. A relational database management system (RDMS) or the equivalent may execute storage and retrieval of information against the database object(s). Application platform 518 may be a framework that allows the applications of system 516 to run, such as the hardware and/or software, e.g., the operating system. In an embodiment, on-demand database service 516 may include an application platform 518 that enables creation, managing and executing one or more applications developed by the provider of the on-demand database service, users accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 512, or third party application developers accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 512.
The users of user systems 512 may differ in their respective capacities, and the capacity of a particular user system 512 might be entirely determined by permissions (permission levels) for the current user. For example, where a salesperson is using a particular user system 512 to interact with system 516, that user system has the capacities allotted to that salesperson. However, while an administrator is using that user system to interact with system 516, that user system has the capacities allotted to that administrator. In systems with a hierarchical role model, users at one permission level may have access to applications, data, and database information accessible by a lower permission level user, but may not have access to certain applications, database information, and data accessible by a user at a higher permission level. Thus, different users will have different capabilities with regard to accessing and modifying application and database information, depending on a user's security or permission level.
Network 514 is any network or combination of networks of devices that communicate with one another. For example, network 514 can be any one or any combination of a LAN (local area network), WAN (wide area network), telephone network, wireless network, point-to-point network, star network, token ring network, hub network, or other appropriate configuration. As the most common type of computer network in current use is a TCP/IP (Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol) network, such as the global internetwork of networks often referred to as the “Internet” with a capital “I,” that network will be used in many of the examples herein. However, it should be understood that the networks that one or more implementations might use are not so limited, although TCP/IP is a frequently implemented protocol.
User systems 512 might communicate with system 516 using TCP/IP and, at a higher network level, use other common Internet protocols to communicate, such as HTTP, FTP, AFS, WAP, etc. In an example where HTTP is used, user system 512 might include an HTTP client commonly referred to as a “browser” for sending and receiving HTTP messages to and from an HTTP server at system 516. Such an HTTP server might be implemented as the sole network interface between system 516 and network 514, but other techniques might be used as well or instead. In some implementations, the interface between system 516 and network 514 includes load sharing functionality, such as round-robin HTTP request distributors to balance loads and distribute incoming HTTP requests evenly over a plurality of servers. At least as for the users that are accessing that server, each of the plurality of servers has access to the MTS' data; however, other alternative configurations may be used instead.
In one embodiment, system 516, shown in
One arrangement for elements of system 516 is shown in
Several elements in the system shown in
According to one embodiment, each user system 512 and all of its components are operator configurable using applications, such as a browser, including computer code run using a central processing unit such as an Intel Core series processor or the like. Similarly, system 516 (and additional instances of an MTS, where more than one is present) and all of their components might be operator configurable using application(s) including computer code to run using a central processing unit such as processor system 517, which may include an Intel Core series processor or the like, and/or multiple processor units. A computer program product embodiment includes a machine-readable storage medium (media) having instructions stored thereon/in which can be used to program a computer to perform any of the processes of the embodiments described herein. Computer code for operating and configuring system 516 to intercommunicate and to process webpages, applications and other data and media content as described herein are preferably downloaded and stored on a hard disk, but the entire program code, or portions thereof, may also be stored in any other volatile or non-volatile memory medium or device as is well known, such as a ROM or RAM, or provided on any media capable of storing program code, such as any type of rotating media including floppy disks, optical discs, digital versatile disk (DVD), compact disk (CD), microdrive, and magneto-optical disks, and magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data. Additionally, the entire program code, or portions thereof, may be transmitted and downloaded from a software source over a transmission medium, e.g., over the Internet, or from another server, as is well known, or transmitted over any other conventional network connection as is well known (e.g., extranet, VPN, LAN, etc.) using any communication medium and protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, HTTP, HTTPS, Ethernet, etc.) as are well known. It will also be appreciated that computer code for implementing embodiments can be implemented in any programming language that can be executed on a client system and/or server or server system such as, for example, C, C++, HTML, any other markup language, Java™, JavaScript, ActiveX, any other scripting language, such as VBScript, and many other programming languages as are well known may be used. (Java™ is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc.).
According to one embodiment, each system 516 is configured to provide webpages, forms, applications, data and media content to user (client) systems 512 to support the access by user systems 512 as tenants of system 516. As such, system 516 provides security mechanisms to keep each tenant's data separate unless the data is shared. If more than one MTS is used, they may be located in close proximity to one another (e.g., in a server farm located in a single building or campus), or they may be distributed at locations remote from one another (e.g., one or more servers located in city A and one or more servers located in city B). As used herein, each MTS could include one or more logically and/or physically connected servers distributed locally or across one or more geographic locations. Additionally, the term “server” is meant to include a computer system, including processing hardware and process space(s), and an associated storage system and database application (e.g., OODBMS or RDBMS) as is well known in the art. It should also be understood that “server system” and “server” are often used interchangeably herein. Similarly, the database object described herein can be implemented as single databases, a distributed database, a collection of distributed databases, a database with redundant online or offline backups or other redundancies, etc., and might include a distributed database or storage network and associated processing intelligence.
User system 512, network 514, system 516, tenant data storage 522, and system data storage 524 were discussed above in
Application platform 518 includes an application setup mechanism 638 that supports application developers' creation and management of applications, which may be saved as metadata into tenant data storage 522 by save routines 636 for execution by subscribers as one or more tenant process spaces 604 managed by tenant management process 610 for example. Invocations to such applications may be coded using PL/SOQL 634 that provides a programming language style interface extension to API 632. A detailed description of some PL/SOQL language embodiments is discussed in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,730,478 entitled, “Method and System for Allowing Access to Developed Applicants via a Multi-Tenant Database On-Demand Database Service”, issued Jun. 1, 2010 to Craig Weissman, which is incorporated in its entirety herein for all purposes. Invocations to applications may be detected by one or more system processes, which manage retrieving application metadata 616 for the subscriber making the invocation and executing the metadata as an application in a virtual machine.
Each application server 600 may be communicably coupled to database systems, e.g., having access to system data 525 and tenant data 523, via a different network connection. For example, one application server 6001 might be coupled via the network 514 (e.g., the Internet), another application server 600N-1 might be coupled via a direct network link, and another application server 600N might be coupled by yet a different network connection. Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) are typical protocols for communicating between application servers 600 and the database system. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that other transport protocols may be used to optimize the system depending on the network interconnect used.
In certain embodiments, each application server 600 is configured to handle requests for any user associated with any organization that is a tenant. Because it is desirable to be able to add and remove application servers from the server pool at any time for any reason, there is preferably no server affinity for a user and/or organization to a specific application server 600. In one embodiment, therefore, an interface system implementing a load balancing function (e.g., an F5 BIG-IP load balancer) is communicably coupled between the application servers 600 and the user systems 512 to distribute requests to the application servers 600. In one embodiment, the load balancer uses a least connections algorithm to route user requests to the application servers 600. Other examples of load balancing algorithms, such as round robin and observed response time, also can be used. For example, in certain embodiments, three consecutive requests from the same user could hit three different application servers 600, and three requests from different users could hit the same application server 600. In this manner, system 516 is multi-tenant, wherein system 516 handles storage of, and access to, different objects, data and applications across disparate users and organizations.
As an example of storage, one tenant might be a company that employs a sales force where each salesperson uses system 516 to manage their sales process. Thus, a user might maintain contact data, leads data, customer follow-up data, performance data, goals and progress data, etc., all applicable to that user's personal sales process (e.g., in tenant data storage 522). In an example of a MTS arrangement, since all of the data and the applications to access, view, modify, report, transmit, calculate, etc., can be maintained and accessed by a user system having nothing more than network access, the user can manage his or her sales efforts and cycles from any of many different user systems. For example, if a salesperson is visiting a customer and the customer has Internet access in their lobby, the salesperson can obtain critical updates as to that customer while waiting for the customer to arrive in the lobby.
While each user's data might be separate from other users' data regardless of the employers of each user, some data might be organization-wide data shared or accessible by a plurality of users or all of the users for a given organization that is a tenant. Thus, there might be some data structures managed by system 516 that are allocated at the tenant level while other data structures might be managed at the user level. Because an MTS might support multiple tenants including possible competitors, the MTS should have security protocols that keep data, applications, and application use separate. Also, because many tenants may opt for access to an MTS rather than maintain their own system, redundancy, up-time, and backup are additional functions that may be implemented in the MTS. In addition to user-specific data and tenant specific data, system 516 might also maintain system level data usable by multiple tenants or other data. Such system level data might include industry reports, news, postings, and the like that are sharable among tenants.
In certain embodiments, user systems 512 (which may be client systems) communicate with application servers 600 to request and update system-level and tenant-level data from system 516 that may require sending one or more queries to tenant data storage 522 and/or system data storage 524. System 516 (e.g., an application server 600 in system 516) automatically generates one or more SQL statements (e.g., one or more SQL queries) that are designed to access the desired information. System data storage 524 may generate query plans to access the requested data from the database.
Each database can generally be viewed as a collection of objects, such as a set of logical tables, containing data fitted into predefined categories. A “table” is one representation of a data object, and may be used herein to simplify the conceptual description of objects and custom objects. It should be understood that “table” and “object” may be used interchangeably herein. Each table generally contains one or more data categories logically arranged as columns or fields in a viewable schema. Each row or record of a table contains an instance of data for each category defined by the fields. For example, a CRM database may include a table that describes a customer with fields for basic contact information such as name, address, phone number, fax number, etc. Another table might describe a purchase order, including fields for information such as customer, product, sale price, date, etc. In some multi-tenant database systems, standard entity tables might be provided for use by all tenants. For CRM database applications, such standard entities might include tables for Account, Contact, Lead, and Opportunity data, each containing pre-defined fields. It should be understood that the word “entity” may also be used interchangeably herein with “object” and “table”.
In some multi-tenant database systems, tenants may be allowed to create and store custom objects, or they may be allowed to customize standard entities or objects, for example by creating custom fields for standard objects, including custom index fields. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/817,161, filed Apr. 2, 2004, entitled “Custom Entities and Fields in a Multi-Tenant Database System”, and which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, teaches systems and methods for creating custom objects as well as customizing standard objects in a multi-tenant database system. In certain embodiments, for example, all custom entity data rows are stored in a single multi-tenant physical table, which may contain multiple logical tables per organization. It is transparent to customers that their multiple “tables” are in fact stored in one large table or that their data may be stored in the same table as the data of other customers.
In one embodiment, instead of identifying data by cloud, the data can be identified by namespace. Table 700 graphically illustrates how multiple tenants (710, 720, 730) can have access to different cloud services (e.g., Marketing Cloud, Sales Cloud, Service Cloud). Each tenant has a tenant identifier (740) and can be associated with various clouds (750).
Table 700 further conceptually illustrates how multiple clouds can be based on a single namespace identifier (760), which can be used instead of the cloud identifier by the datastore service 770. In the example of
In one embodiment, the new case is provided to modeling module 820 to be analyzed using the available models. These models can use various characteristics of the case (e.g., language style, words used, source, time of day, length) to determine a resulting class type. In one embodiment, a confidence value is also determined (e.g., 97% confident the class is correct, 50% confident the class is correct). In the example of
In one embodiment, raw query 910 is generated from new case 900 and sent to modeling module 950. In one embodiment, modeling module 950 includes feature extractor 920 that analyzes raw query 910 to extract one or more features. The extracted features are utilized to generate featurized query 925 that can be provided to one or more models (e.g., 930, 940, 970, 975).
The models can use various characteristics of the case (e.g., language style, words used, source, time of day, length) to determine a resulting class type. In one embodiment, a confidence value is also determined (e.g., 97% confident the class is correct, 50% confident the class is correct). In the example of
In one embodiment, a programmer/engineer can specify input features and/or labels, 1000. This can be accomplished using, for example, an object-oriented programming language (e.g., Scala) via one or more files. In one embodiment, the programmer/engineer can specify algorithms and/or parameters to be used in the modeling process, 1010. This can be accomplished in the same file (as illustrated) or via additional files. In one embodiment, the programmer/engineer can further specify selection and/or evaluation methods, 1020. Similarly, this can be accomplished in the same file (as illustrated) or via additional files.
In one embodiment, data from an application (or other source) can be loaded from database 1050 to computing platform 1060 (e.g., Apache Spark) that can operate to determine one or more features from the data to be stored in database 1060. In one embodiment, the features from database 1060 can be analyzed by computing platform 1070 to generate one or more models to be stored in database 1075. In one embodiment, computing platform 1065 uses the features from database 1060 and the models from database 1075 to generate scores and other analytical results to be delivered to a user, which can be stored in database 1067.
In one embodiment, CI service 1100 can manage project files and control building of projects, 1150, 1152. In one embodiment, the resulting file (1155) can be used by one or more computing platforms (e.g., 1175, 1185, 1190) to acquire and analyze data (e.g., from database 1170) to identify or extract features (1180) to generate or modify models (1195) that can be used for modeling to provide scores and other analysis (1199) that can be delivered to a user (e.g., user 1105).
In one embodiment, data store 1200 can be a database system that provides storage functionality for multiple stages of the modeling process described herein. In one embodiment, data source 1210 can be any environment in which data to be modeled resides. For example, data source 1210 can be an on-demand services environment that stores tenant data for multiple tenants concurrently. Data source 1210 can be, for example, one of the cloud services provided by salesforce.com. Any user data (e.g., lead information, opportunity information, click rates, performance information).
In one embodiment, executor 1220 includes at least data puller 1222 and data pusher 1227. Data puller 1222 can operate to pull selected data from data source 1210 to be used by executor 1220 and/or other components. Similarly, data pusher 1227 can operate to push selected data to data source 1210 from executor 1220. In one embodiment, executor 1220 can also include one or more conversion agents (e.g., CSV2Avro 1230) that can function to convert data formats for use by different services. In one embodiment, snapshot metrics agent 1234 can function to monitor one or more service and/or resources to determine performance metrics or other factors.
In one embodiment, executor 1220 further includes prediction engine 1250, which can include components for generating, maintaining and utilizing models to generate predictions based on data pulled from data source 1210. In one embodiment, prediction engine 1250 includes at least training agent 1252 and scoring agent 1254. Training agent 1252 operates to perform training using models developed and managed as described herein. Similarly, scoring agent 1254 uses the trained models to generate scores based on data from data source 1210.
In one embodiment, provisioning agent 1282 operates with data puller 1222 and data pusher 1227 to manage the flow of data between executor 1220 and data source 1210. In one embodiment, scheduler 1280 operates with executor 1220 to orchestrate the generation, updating, management, utilization and/or lifecycle management of the modeling techniques described herein. In one embodiment, resource management agent 1284 and modeling service agent 1286 operate to manage the usage of models by executor 1220.
As discussed above, the environment can be accessed via one or more of several types of interfaces (e.g., Admin Proxy 1260, Access Service 1262, Data Exploration tool 1264 and/or CLI 1268). In one embodiment, the components of
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
While the invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention is not limited to the embodiments described, but can be practiced with modification and alteration within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The description is thus to be regarded as illustrative instead of limiting.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/402,948 entitled “METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MULTI-CLOUD, MULTI-TENANT, MULTI-ENVIRONMENT AND MULTI-ENGINE MACHINE LEARNING PLATFORM,” by Ka Hou Chan, Karl Ryszard Skucha, Kit Pang Szeto, Emmanual Felipe Oliveira, Jean-Marc Soumet and Simon Chan, filed Sep. 30, 2016, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5577188 | Zhu | Nov 1996 | A |
5608872 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5649104 | Carleton et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5715450 | Ambrose et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5761419 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5819038 | Carleton et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821937 | Tonelli et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831610 | Tonelli et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5873096 | Lim et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5918159 | Fomukong et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5963953 | Cram et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6092083 | Brodersen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6169534 | Raffel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178425 | Brodersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189011 | Lim et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216135 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233617 | Rothwein et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6266669 | Brodersen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6295530 | Ritchie et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6324568 | Diec | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324693 | Brodersen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336137 | Lee et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
D454139 | Feldcamp | Mar 2002 | S |
6367077 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393605 | Loomans | May 2002 | B1 |
6405220 | Brodersen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6434550 | Warner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446089 | Brodersen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6535909 | Rust | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549908 | Loomans | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553563 | Ambrose et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560461 | Fomukong et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574635 | Stauber et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577726 | Huang et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6601087 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604117 | Lim et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604128 | Diec | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6609150 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6621834 | Scherpbier et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6654032 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665648 | Brodersen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665655 | Warner et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684438 | Brodersen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6711565 | Subramaniam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724399 | Katchour et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728702 | Subramaniam et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728960 | Loomans | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732095 | Warshaysky et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732100 | Brodersen et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732111 | Brodersen et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6754681 | Brodersen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763351 | Subramaniam et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763501 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768904 | Kim | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6782383 | Subramaniam et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6804330 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826565 | Ritchie et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826582 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826745 | Coker et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829655 | Huang et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842748 | Warner et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850895 | Brodersen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850949 | Warner et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7289976 | Kihneman et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7340411 | Cook | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7620655 | Larsson et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20010044791 | Richter et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020022986 | Coker et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029161 | Brodersen et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020029376 | Ambrose et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035577 | Brodersen et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042264 | Kim | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042843 | Diec | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020072951 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082892 | Raffel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020129352 | Brodersen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140731 | Subramaniam et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143997 | Huang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152102 | Brodersen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161734 | Stauber et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161840 | Willcox | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162090 | Parnell et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165742 | Robins | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188625 | Jans | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004971 | Gong et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018705 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018830 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030066031 | Laane | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066032 | Ramachadran et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069936 | Warner et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070000 | Coker et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070004 | Mukundan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070005 | Mukundan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074418 | Coker | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088545 | Subramaniam et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120675 | Stauber et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030151633 | George et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159136 | Huang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187921 | Diec | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189600 | Gune et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191743 | Brodersen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204427 | Gune et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206192 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225730 | Warner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001092 | Rothwein et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010489 | Rio | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015981 | Coker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027388 | Berg et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040128001 | Levin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040186860 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193510 | Catahan, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199489 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199536 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199543 | Braud et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040249854 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260534 | Pak et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260659 | Chan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268299 | Lei et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050050555 | Exley et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091098 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050228803 | Farmer | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20090177744 | Marlow et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180097880 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62402948 | Sep 2016 | US |