Techniques disclosed herein relate generally to managing transitions into fluid delivery device operating modes.
Infusion pump devices and systems are relatively well known in the medical arts, for use in delivering or dispensing an agent, such as insulin or another prescribed medication, to a patient. A typical infusion pump includes a pump drive system which typically includes a small motor and drive train components that convert rotational motor motion to a translational displacement of a plunger (or stopper) in a reservoir that delivers medication from the reservoir to the body of a user via a fluid path created between the reservoir and the body of a user. Use of infusion pump therapy has been increasing, especially for delivering insulin for diabetics.
Continuous insulin infusion provides greater control of a diabetic's condition, and hence, control schemes are being developed that allow insulin infusion pumps to monitor and regulate a user's blood glucose level in a substantially continuous and autonomous manner. For example, an insulin infusion pump may operate in a closed-loop operating mode overnight while a user is sleeping to regulate the user's glucose level to a target glucose level. In practice, multiple different operating modes for providing continuous insulin infusion may be supported by an infusion pump. However, care must be taken when transitioning between operating modes to avoid potentially compromising a user's condition and ensure compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.
Additionally, in some situations, one or more preconditions must be satisfied before entering to a particular operating mode is allowed. When preconditions are not satisfied, entry into the operating mode may be denied, which may frustrate a user who would like to operate the infusion pump in that particular operating mode at that particular moment in time. Additionally, after entering a particular operating mode, various conditions may be encountered while operating the infusion pump in that operating mode that result in generation of alerts, which could be disruptive or distracting to the user. Thus, it is desirable to provide multiple different operating modes that facilitate greater and more customizable control over the user's physiological condition without degrading the user experience.
Techniques disclosed herein relate generally to managing transitions into fluid delivery device operating modes. The techniques may be practiced using a system comprising one or more processors and one or more processor-readable media; a processor-implemented method; and/or one or more non-transitory processor-readable media.
According to certain embodiments, the techniques involve obtaining status information pertaining to operation of a fluid delivery device, the status information including fluid delivery data; based on the status information, exiting a closed-loop operating mode of the fluid delivery device, the closed-loop operating mode being an operating mode in which dosage commands are automatically generated based on sensor measurement data; and after exiting the closed-loop operating mode, causing generation of a user notification recommending a remedial action to improve viability of a subsequent instance of the closed-loop operating mode.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The details of one or more aspects of the disclosure are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the techniques described in this disclosure will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
A more complete understanding of the subject matter may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in conjunction with the following figures, wherein like reference numbers refer to similar elements throughout the figures, which may be illustrated for simplicity and clarity and are not necessarily drawn to scale.
The following detailed description is merely illustrative in nature and is not intended to limit the embodiments of the subject matter or the application and uses of such embodiments. As used herein, the word “exemplary” means “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any implementation described herein as exemplary is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other implementations. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding technical field, background, brief summary or the following
While the subject matter described herein can be implemented in any electronic device that includes a motor, exemplary embodiments described below are implemented in the form of medical devices, such as portable electronic medical devices. Although many different applications are possible, the following description focuses on a fluid infusion device (or infusion pump) as part of an infusion system deployment. For the sake of brevity, conventional techniques related to infusion system operation, insulin pump and/or infusion set operation, and other functional aspects of the systems (and the individual operating components of the systems) may not be described in detail here. Examples of infusion pumps may be of the type described in, but not limited to, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,562,751; 4,685,903; 5,080,653; 5,505,709; 5,097,122; 6,485,465; 6,554,798; 6,558,320; 6,558,351; 6,641,533; 6,659,980; 6,752,787; 6,817,990; 6,932,584; and 7,621,893; each of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Embodiments of the subject matter described herein generally relate to fluid infusion devices including a motor that is operable to linearly displace a plunger (or stopper) of a reservoir provided within the fluid infusion device to deliver a dosage of fluid, such as insulin, to the body of a user. Dosage commands that govern operation of the motor may be generated in an automated manner in accordance with the delivery control scheme associated with a particular operating mode. For example, in a closed-loop operating mode, the dosage commands are generated based on a difference between a current (or most recent) measurement of a physiological condition in the body of the user (e.g., an interstitial fluid glucose level) and a target (or reference) value for that physiological condition. In a predictive operating mode, the dosage commands may be influenced by a predicted value (or anticipated measurement) for that physiological condition in the body of the user at some point in the future. Conversely, in an open-loop operating mode, the dosage commands may be configured to implement a predetermined delivery rate substantially independent of the current or predicted measurements of the physiological condition of the user.
As described in greater detail below primarily in the context of
In exemplary embodiments, operational information (e.g., start time, duration, and the like) pertaining to one or more prior instances of the operating mode is utilized to determine a time for when the diagnostic check(s) should be performed prior to an anticipated subsequent instance of the operating mode. At that diagnosis time in advance of the expected start time, various physical and algorithmic diagnostic checks are automatically performed to determine the viability of reinitiating or reentering the operating mode at that expected start time. The diagnostic checks determine the viability based at least in part on status information pertaining to the current and/or previous operation of the infusion device. This status information may include clinical status information or data for the patient (e.g., historical delivery data, reference measurement data, sensor measurement data, sensor calibration data, and the like) along with physical status information for the infusion device or other components of the infusion system (e.g., current battery level for the infusion device and/or sensor(s), current reservoir fluid level, and the like). When it is determined that a subsequent instance of the operating mode is not likely to be viable at the expected start time based on the currently available status information, an alert or user notification is automatically generated and provided to the user. The user notification indicates one or more recommended remedial actions that may be undertaken by the user to improve the future viability of the operating mode. In this manner, the user may engage in remedial actions in advance of the expected start time to increase the likelihood if not ensure that the operating mode will be viable by the time the user would like to reenter the operating mode. Additionally, remedial actions may also increase the likelihood if not ensure that the operating mode can be implemented for an anticipated duration without generating additional alerts that could otherwise require action by the user while in the operating mode. Thus, the overall user experience is improved by increasing the likelihood that the operating mode will be available when the user would like to enter the operating mode, while also decreasing the likelihood of the user being disturbed by additional alerts once the infusion device is implementing that operating mode.
As described in greater detail below primarily in the context of
In exemplary embodiments, before transitioning into a destination operating mode, clinical status information pertaining to the physiological condition of the user is also obtained. As described above, the clinical information may include, for example, recent or historical sensor measurement values of the physiological condition of the user, reference measurement values of the physiological condition of the user, sensor calibration history for the user, and the like. In one or more embodiments, the destination operating mode is automatically determined based at least in part on portions of the clinical information and the operational information for the current operating mode along with the device settings or user preferences establishing a hierarchical order for the operating modes. In this regard, the clinical information and/or the operational information may be used to identify and exclude operating modes that are likely to violate any applicable constraints or requirements upon entry, with the hierarchical information for the operating modes being used to select the most preferable operating mode from among the remaining potential operating modes.
Turning now to
In the illustrated embodiment of
The sensing arrangement 104 generally represents the components of the infusion system 100 configured to sense, detect, measure or otherwise quantify a condition of the user, and may include a sensor, a monitor, or the like, for providing data indicative of the condition that is sensed, detected, measured or otherwise monitored by the sensing arrangement. In this regard, the sensing arrangement 104 may include electronics and enzymes reactive to a biological condition, such as a blood glucose level, or the like, of the user, and provide data indicative of the blood glucose level to the infusion device 102, the CCD 106 and/or the computer 108. For example, the infusion device 102, the CCD 106 and/or the computer 108 may include a display for presenting information or data to the user based on the sensor data received from the sensing arrangement 104, such as, for example, a current glucose level of the user, a graph or chart of the user's glucose level versus time, device status indicators, alert messages, or the like. In other embodiments, the infusion device 102, the CCD 106 and/or the computer 108 may include electronics and software that are configured to analyze sensor data and operate the infusion device 102 to deliver fluid to the body of the user based on the sensor data and/or preprogrammed delivery routines. Thus, in exemplary embodiments, one or more of the infusion device 102, the sensing arrangement 104, the CCD 106, and/or the computer 108 includes a transmitter, a receiver, and/or other transceiver electronics that allow for communication with other components of the infusion system 100, so that the sensing arrangement 104 may transmit sensor data or monitor data to one or more of the infusion device 102, the CCD 106 and/or the computer 108.
Still referring to
As described above, in some embodiments, the CCD 106 and/or the computer 108 may include electronics and other components configured to perform processing, delivery routine storage, and to control the infusion device 102 in a manner that is influenced by sensor data measured by and/or received from the sensing arrangement 104. By including control functions in the CCD 106 and/or the computer 108, the infusion device 102 may be made with more simplified electronics. However, in other embodiments, the infusion device 102 may include all control functions, and may operate without the CCD 106 and/or the computer 108. In various embodiments, the CCD 106 may be a portable electronic device. In addition, in various embodiments, the infusion device 102 and/or the sensing arrangement 104 may be configured to transmit data to the CCD 106 and/or the computer 108 for display or processing of the data by the CCD 106 and/or the computer 108.
In some embodiments, the CCD 106 and/or the computer 108 may provide information to the user that facilitates the user's subsequent use of the infusion device 102. For example, the CCD 106 may provide information to the user to allow the user to determine the rate or dose of medication to be administered into the user's body. In other embodiments, the CCD 106 may provide information to the infusion device 102 to autonomously control the rate or dose of medication administered into the body of the user. In some embodiments, the sensing arrangement 104 may be integrated into the CCD 106. Such embodiments may allow the user to monitor a condition by providing, for example, a sample of his or her blood to the sensing arrangement 104 to assess his or her condition. In some embodiments, the sensing arrangement 104 and the CCD 106 may be used for determining glucose levels in the blood and/or body fluids of the user without the use of, or necessity of, a wire or cable connection between the infusion device 102 and the sensing arrangement 104 and/or the CCD 106.
In some embodiments, the sensing arrangement 104 and/or the infusion device 102 are cooperatively configured to utilize a closed-loop system for delivering fluid to the user. Examples of sensing devices and/or infusion pumps utilizing closed-loop systems may be found at, but are not limited to, the following U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,088,608, 6,119,028, 6,589,229, 6,740,072, 6,827,702, 7,323,142, and 7,402, 153, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In such embodiments, the sensing arrangement 104 is configured to sense or measure a condition of the user, such as, blood glucose level or the like. The infusion device 102 is configured to deliver fluid in response to the condition sensed by the sensing arrangement 104. In turn, the sensing arrangement 104 continues to sense or otherwise quantify a current condition of the user, thereby allowing the infusion device 102 to deliver fluid continuously in response to the condition currently (or most recently) sensed by the sensing arrangement 104 indefinitely. In some embodiments, the sensing arrangement 104 and/or the infusion device 102 may be configured to utilize the closed-loop system only for a portion of the day, for example only when the user is asleep or awake.
As best illustrated in
The housing 202 is formed from a substantially rigid material having a hollow interior 214 adapted to allow an electronics assembly 204, a sliding member (or slide) 206, a drive system 208, a sensor assembly 210, and a drive system capping member 212 to be disposed therein in addition to the reservoir 205, with the contents of the housing 202 being enclosed by a housing capping member 216. The opening 220, the slide 206, and the drive system 208 are coaxially aligned in an axial direction (indicated by arrow 218), whereby the drive system 208 facilitates linear displacement of the slide 206 in the axial direction 218 to dispense fluid from the reservoir 205 (after the reservoir 205 has been inserted into opening 220), with the sensor assembly 210 being configured to measure axial forces (e.g., forces aligned with the axial direction 218) exerted on the sensor assembly 210 responsive to operating the drive system 208 to displace the slide 206. In various embodiments, the sensor assembly 210 may be utilized to detect one or more of the following: an occlusion in a fluid path that slows, prevents, or otherwise degrades fluid delivery from the reservoir 205 to a user's body; when the reservoir 205 is empty; when the slide 206 is properly seated with the reservoir 205; when a fluid dose has been delivered; when the infusion pump 200 is subjected to shock or vibration; when the infusion pump 200 requires maintenance.
Depending on the embodiment, the fluid-containing reservoir 205 may be realized as a syringe, a vial, a cartridge, a bag, or the like. In certain embodiments, the infused fluid is insulin, although many other fluids may be administered through infusion such as, but not limited to, HIV drugs, drugs to treat pulmonary hypertension, iron chelation drugs, pain medications, anti-cancer treatments, medications, vitamins, hormones, or the like. As best illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment of
As best shown in
As illustrated in
The motor assembly 207 includes one or more electrical leads 236 adapted to be electrically coupled to the electronics assembly 204 to establish communication between the control electronics 224 and the motor assembly 207. In response to command signals from the control electronics 224 that operate a motor driver (e.g., a power converter) to regulate the amount of power supplied to the motor from a power supply, the motor actuates the drive train components of the drive system 208 to displace the slide 206 in the axial direction 218 to force fluid from the reservoir 205 along a fluid path (including tubing 221 and an infusion set), thereby administering doses of the fluid contained in the reservoir 205 into the user's body. Preferably, the power supply is realized one or more batteries contained within the housing 202. Alternatively, the power supply may be a solar panel, capacitor, AC or DC power supplied through a power cord, or the like. In some embodiments, the control electronics 224 may operate the motor of the motor assembly 207 and/or drive system 208 in a stepwise manner, typically on an intermittent basis; to administer discrete precise doses of the fluid to the user according to programmed delivery profiles.
Referring to
Referring to
In exemplary embodiments, the sensing arrangement 504 includes one or more interstitial glucose sensing elements that generate or otherwise output electrical signals having a signal characteristic that is correlative to, influenced by, or otherwise indicative of the relative interstitial fluid glucose level in the body 501 of the user. The output electrical signals are filtered or otherwise processed to obtain a measurement value indicative of the user's interstitial fluid glucose level. In exemplary embodiments, a blood glucose meter 530, such as a finger stick device, is utilized to directly sense, detect, measure or otherwise quantify the blood glucose in the body 501 of the user. In this regard, the blood glucose meter 530 outputs or otherwise provides a measured blood glucose value that may be utilized as a reference measurement for calibrating the sensing arrangement 504 and converting a measurement value indicative of the user's interstitial fluid glucose level into a corresponding calibrated blood glucose measurement value. For purposes of explanation, sensor glucose value, sensed glucose value, or variants thereof should be understood to encompass any glucose value indicative of a current glucose level in the body of the user that is based on the electrical signals output by the sensing element(s) of the sensing arrangement 504.
The pump control system 520 generally represents the electronics and other components of the infusion device 502 that control operation of the fluid infusion device 502 according to a desired infusion delivery program in a manner that may be influenced by the sensed glucose value indicative of a current glucose level in the body 501 of the user. The particular operating mode being implemented by the pump control system 520 influences the generated dosage commands for operating the motor 507 to displace the plunger 517 and deliver insulin to the body 501 of the user. For example, in a closed-loop (CL) operating mode, the pump control system 520 generates or otherwise determines dosage commands for operating the motor 507 based on the difference between a sensed glucose value and the target (or commanded) glucose value to regulate the sensed glucose value to the target. In other operating modes, the pump control system 520 may generate or otherwise determine dosage commands configured to maintain the sensed glucose value below an upper glucose limit, above a lower glucose limit, or otherwise within a desired range of glucose values. For example, in a predictive low glucose management (PLGM) operating mode, the pump control system 520 calculates or otherwise determines a predicted glucose value based on the currently sensed glucose value, and generates dosage commands configured to provide a basal infusion rate when the predicted glucose value is greater than a predictive suspend threshold and automatically suspends delivery (e.g., by providing dosage commands equal to zero) when the predicted glucose value is less than the predictive suspend threshold. In a low glucose suspend (LGS) operating mode, the pump control system 520 generates dosage commands configured to provide a basal infusion rate when the sensed glucose value is greater than a suspend threshold (which may be different from the predictive suspend threshold) and automatically suspends delivery when the sensed glucose value is less than the suspend threshold. In an open-loop (OL) operating mode, the pump control system 520 generates dosage commands configured to provide a predetermined open-loop basal infusion rate independent of the sensed glucose value. In practice, the infusion device 502 may store or otherwise maintain the target value, suspension threshold values, and/or other glucose threshold value(s) in a data storage element accessible to the pump control system 520.
The target glucose value and other threshold values may be received from an external component (e.g., CCD 106 and/or computing device 108) or be input by a user via a user interface element 540 associated with the infusion device 502. In practice, the one or more user interface element(s) 540 associated with the infusion device 502 typically include at least one input user interface element, such as, for example, a button, a keypad, a keyboard, a knob, a joystick, a mouse, a touch panel, a touchscreen, a microphone or another audio input device, and/or the like. Additionally, the one or more user interface element(s) 540 include at least one output user interface element, such as, for example, a display element (e.g., a light-emitting diode or the like), a display device (e.g., a liquid crystal display or the like), a speaker or another audio output device, a haptic feedback device, or the like, for providing notifications or other information to the user. It should be noted that although
In exemplary embodiments, the pump control system 520 includes or otherwise accesses a data storage element, memory, or other non-transitory computer-readable medium capable of storing programming instructions for execution by the pump control system 520. The computer-executable programming instructions, when read and executed, cause the pump control system 520 to determine dosage commands in accordance with a particular operating mode and perform various additional tasks, operations, functions, and processes described herein in the context of
Still referring to
In exemplary embodiments, the energy source 503 is realized as a battery housed within the infusion device 502 (e.g., within housing 202) that provides direct current (DC) power. In this regard, the motor driver module 514 generally represents the combination of circuitry, hardware and/or other electrical components configured to convert or otherwise transfer DC power provided by the energy source 503 into alternating electrical signals applied to respective phases of the stator windings of the motor 507 that result in current flowing through the stator windings that generates a stator magnetic field and causes the rotor of the motor 507 to rotate. The motor control module 512 is configured to receive or otherwise obtain a commanded dosage from the pump control system 520, convert the commanded dosage to a commanded translational displacement of the plunger 517, and command, signal, or otherwise operate the motor driver module 514 to cause the rotor of the motor 507 to rotate by an amount that produces the commanded translational displacement of the plunger 517. For example, the motor control module 512 may determine an amount of rotation of the rotor required to produce translational displacement of the plunger 517 that achieves the commanded dosage received from the pump control system 520. Based on the current rotational position (or orientation) of the rotor with respect to the stator that is indicated by the output of the rotor sensing arrangement 516, the motor control module 512 determines the appropriate sequence of alternating electrical signals to be applied to the respective phases of the stator windings that should rotate the rotor by the determined amount of rotation from its current position (or orientation). In embodiments where the motor 507 is realized as a BLDC motor, the alternating electrical signals commutate the respective phases of the stator windings at the appropriate orientation of the rotor magnetic poles with respect to the stator and in the appropriate order to provide a rotating stator magnetic field that rotates the rotor in the desired direction. Thereafter, the motor control module 512 operates the motor driver module 514 to apply the determined alternating electrical signals (e.g., the command signals) to the stator windings of the motor 507 to achieve the desired delivery of fluid to the user.
When the motor control module 512 is operating the motor driver module 514, current flows from the energy source 503 through the stator windings of the motor 507 to produce a stator magnetic field that interacts with the rotor magnetic field. In some embodiments, after the motor control module 512 operates the motor driver module 514 and/or motor 507 to achieve the commanded dosage, the motor control module 512 ceases operating the motor driver module 514 and/or motor 507 until a subsequent dosage command is received. In this regard, the motor driver module 514 and the motor 507 enter an idle state during which the motor driver module 514 effectively disconnects or isolates the stator windings of the motor 507 from the energy source 503. In other words, current does not flow from the energy source 503 through the stator windings of the motor 507 when the motor 507 is idle, and thus, the motor 507 does not consume power from the energy source 503 in the idle state, thereby improving efficiency.
Depending on the embodiment, the motor control module 512 may be implemented or realized with a general purpose processor, a microprocessor, a controller, a microcontroller, a state machine, a content addressable memory, an application specific integrated circuit, a field programmable gate array, any suitable programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof, designed to perform the functions described herein. Furthermore, the steps of a method or algorithm described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in firmware, in a software module executed by the motor control module 512, or in any practical combination thereof. In exemplary embodiments, the motor control module 512 includes or otherwise accesses a data storage element or memory, including any sort of random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), flash memory, registers, hard disks, removable disks, magnetic or optical mass storage, or any other short or long term storage media or other non-transitory computer-readable medium, which is capable of storing programming instructions for execution by the motor control module 512. The computer-executable programming instructions, when read and executed by the motor control module 512, cause the motor control module 512 to perform the tasks, operations, functions, and processes described herein.
It should be appreciated that
Referring to
The pump control module 602 generally represents the hardware, circuitry, logic, firmware and/or other component of the pump control system 600 that is coupled to the communications interface 604 and configured to determine dosage commands for operating the motor 507 to deliver fluid to the body 501 based on data received from the sensing arrangement 504 and perform various additional tasks, operations, functions and/or operations described herein. For example, in exemplary embodiments, pump control module 602 implements or otherwise executes a command generation module 614 that automatically calculates or otherwise determines a dosage command for operating the motor 507 of the infusion device 502 in accordance with a particular operating mode. In exemplary embodiments described herein, the command generation module 614 supports multiple different operating modes having different delivery control schemes associated therewith. Additionally, the command generation module 614 may generate dosage commands for delivering boluses that are manually-initiated or otherwise instructed by a user via a user interface element 608. The illustrated pump control module 602 also implements or otherwise executes a diagnostics module 612 that generates or otherwise provides user notifications or alerts via a user interface element 608. As described in greater detail below in the context of
Still referring to
It should be understood that
In exemplary embodiments, the control system 700 receives or otherwise obtains a target glucose value at input 702. In some embodiments, the target glucose value may be stored or otherwise maintained by the infusion device 502 (e.g., in memory 606), however, in some alternative embodiments, the target value may be received from an external component (e.g., CCD 106 and/or computer 108). In one or more embodiments, the target glucose value may be dynamically calculated or otherwise determined prior to entering the closed-loop operating mode based on one or more patient-specific control parameters. For example, the target blood glucose value may be calculated based at least in part on a patient-specific reference basal rate and a patient-specific daily insulin requirement, which are determined based on historical delivery information over a preceding interval of time (e.g., the amount of insulin delivered over the preceding 24 hours). The control system 700 also receives or otherwise obtains a current glucose measurement value from the sensing arrangement 504 at input 704. The illustrated control system 700 implements or otherwise provides proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control to determine or otherwise generate delivery commands for operating the motor 510 based at least in part on the difference between the target glucose value and the current glucose measurement value. In this regard, the PID control attempts to minimize the difference between the measured value and the target value, and thereby regulates the measured value to the desired value. PID control parameters are applied to the difference between the target glucose level at input 702 and the measured glucose level at input 704 to generate or otherwise determine a dosage (or delivery) command provided at output 730. Based on that delivery command, the motor control module 512 operates the motor 510 to deliver insulin to the body of the user to influence the user's glucose level, and thereby reduce the difference between a subsequently measured glucose level and the target glucose level.
The illustrated control system 700 includes or otherwise implements a summation block 706 configured to determine a difference between the target value obtained at input 702 and the measured value obtained from the sensing arrangement 504 at input 704, for example, by subtracting the target value from the measured value. The output of the summation block 706 represents the difference between the measured and target values, which is then provided to each of a proportional term path, an integral term path, and a derivative term path. The proportional term path includes a gain block 720 that multiplies the difference by a proportional gain coefficient, KP, to obtain the proportional term. The integral term path includes an integration block 708 that integrates the difference and a gain block 722 that multiplies the integrated difference by an integral gain coefficient, KI, to obtain the integral term. The derivative term path includes a derivative block 710 that determines the derivative of the difference and a gain block 724 that multiplies the derivative of the difference by a derivative gain coefficient, KD, to obtain the derivative term. The proportional term, the integral term, and the derivative term are then added or otherwise combined to obtain a delivery command that is utilized to operate the motor at output 730. Various implementation details pertaining to closed-loop PID control and determine gain coefficients are described in greater detail in U.S. Pat. No. 7,402,153, which is incorporated by reference.
In one or more exemplary embodiments, the PID gain coefficients are user-specific (or patient-specific) and dynamically calculated or otherwise determined prior to entering the closed-loop operating mode based on historical insulin delivery information (e.g., amounts and/or timings of previous dosages, historical correction bolus information, or the like), historical sensor measurement values, historical reference blood glucose measurement values, user-reported or user-input events (e.g., meals, exercise, and the like), and the like. In this regard, one or more patient-specific control parameters (e.g., an insulin sensitivity factor, a daily insulin requirement, an insulin limit, a reference basal rate, a reference fasting glucose, an active insulin action duration, pharmodynamical time constants, or the like) may be utilized to compensate, correct, or otherwise adjust the PID gain coefficients to account for various operating conditions experienced and/or exhibited by the infusion device 502. The PID gain coefficients may be maintained by the memory 606 accessible to the pump control module 602. In this regard, the memory 606 may include a plurality of registers associated with the control parameters for the PID control. For example, a first parameter register may store the target glucose value and be accessed by or otherwise coupled to the summation block 706 at input 702, and similarly, a second parameter register accessed by the proportional gain block 720 may store the proportional gain coefficient, a third parameter register accessed by the integration gain block 722 may store the integration gain coefficient, and a fourth parameter register accessed by the derivative gain block 724 may store the derivative gain coefficient.
In the illustrated embodiment, the transition diagnosis process 800 initializes or otherwise begins by obtaining operational information pertaining to one or more prior instances of the operating mode being analyzed and calculates or otherwise determines an expected start time and an expected duration of the next subsequent instance of the operating mode based on the operational information for the prior instances (tasks 802, 804). In this regard, the pump control system 520, 600 may store or otherwise maintain historical information pertaining to the previous operation of the infusion device 502 that characterizes prior instances of the different operating modes supported by the pump control system 520, 600. For example, the pump control system 520 may store or otherwise maintain operational information indicative of the respective start times of prior instances of the closed-loop operating mode along with the respective durations (or stop times) of prior instances of the closed-loop operating mode. Based on this historical operational information maintained for the closed-loop operating mode, the pump control system 520, 600 and/or diagnostics module 612 may determine an expected (or anticipated) start time for a subsequent instance of the closed-loop operating mode along with an expected duration for the subsequent instance of the closed-loop operating mode. For example, the expected start time may be calculated by averaging the individual start times for preceding instances of the closed-loop operating mode, and the expected duration may be calculated by averaging the respective durations of preceding instances of the closed-loop operating mode.
In exemplary embodiments, the transition diagnosis process 800 calculates or otherwise determines a buffer time before the subsequent instance of the destination operating mode is expected to be initiated (task 806). The buffer time represents the amount of time in advance of the expected start time for analyzing the future viability of entering the destination operating mode at the expected start time. In exemplary embodiments, the buffer time is determined so that it provides sufficient time for remedial actions to be undertaken to improve the viability the destination operating mode by the expected start time. For example, calculating the PID control parameters for the closed-loop operating mode may require a certain amount of reference blood glucose measurements, sensor measurement data, insulin delivery information, or the like. Accordingly, when the destination operating mode is the closed-loop operating mode, the buffer time is chosen to provide enough time between the diagnostics checks and the expected start time for the next instance of the closed-loop operating mode to allow the required amount of data for calculating the PID control parameters to be obtained by the expected start time. In this regard, the buffer time may vary depending on the particular destination operating mode being analyzed and the respective algorithmic diagnostic checks to be performed for that particular operating mode. For example, the buffer time for the closed-loop operating mode may be greater than the buffer time for a LGS operating mode due to the calculation of the closed-loop PID control parameters requiring a greater amount of underlying data than the LGS operating mode control parameters. In one embodiment, a five hour buffer time is utilized for the closed-loop operating mode to ensure historical delivery information sufficient for calculating patient-specific control parameters will likely exist at the expected start time for the closed-loop operating mode.
Additionally, the buffer time may vary dynamically depending on the iteration of the diagnosis process 800. For example, if previous iterations of the diagnosis process 800 have already determined that aspects of the destination operating mode that require a longer buffer time are unlikely to impact the future viability of the operating mode (e.g., sufficient historical data is available), the buffer time may be reduced for subsequent iterations of the diagnosis process 800. In one or more embodiments, where the diagnostics module 612 analyzes the viability of the sensing arrangement 504 as part of determining the viability for the next instance of the destination operating mode, the buffer time is determined to be greater than or equal to a minimum amount of time required to calibrate the sensing arrangement 504. In this regard, if a reliability or accuracy metric associated with the sensing arrangement 504 indicates a sensing element should be replaced, the buffer time ensures that there will be enough time to calibrate the sensing arrangement 504 with a new sensing element before the expected start time. In one embodiment, a minimum buffer time of two hours may be implemented.
The diagnosis process 800 continues by automatically identifying or otherwise determining when to begin analyzing the, of the destination operating mode based on the buffer time and the expected start time (task 808). In this regard, at the buffer time before the expected start time, the diagnosis process 800 obtains status information for the operation of the infusion device and calculates or otherwise determines viability of a subsequent instance of the operating mode based at least in part on that status information (tasks 810, 812). When one or more of the physical or algorithmic diagnostics checks indicates the destination operating mode is unlikely to be viable at the expected start time for the expected duration, the diagnosis process 800 automatically generates or otherwise provides one or more user notifications indicative of recommended remedial actions for improving the future viability of the operating mode (tasks 814, 816). In this regard, the diagnostics module 612 operates a user interface 540, 608 to provide indication of a remedial action that the user can perform to increase the likelihood that the operating mode will be viable at the expected start time.
In exemplary embodiments, the diagnostics module 612 automatically obtains clinical and physical status information pertaining to the current and/or previous operation of the infusion device 502 from the memory 606, such as, historical delivery data (e.g., timing and amounts of correction boluses, daily insulin delivered, etc.), blood glucose reference measurement data (e.g., measurement values obtained from blood glucose meter 530 and the corresponding times of measurement), sensor calibration data (e.g., current and/or previous calibration factors), recent sensor measurement data, the current status of the energy source 503 (e.g., the current battery level), the current amount of fluid remaining in the reservoir, and the like. The diagnostics module 612 analyzes the status information and determines the viability of the destination operating mode for the expected duration of the next instance of the destination operating mode. When one or more aspects of the status information fail to satisfy a respective viability criterion, the diagnostics module 612 determines that the operating mode is unlikely to be viable at the expected start time for the expected duration.
In exemplary embodiments, the diagnostics module 612 determines whether implementing the destination operating mode at the expected start time for the expected duration is viable from a physical perspective. In this regard, the diagnostics module 612 performs a number of physical diagnostics checks to verify the infusion device 502 is physically capable of implementing the destination operating mode at the expected start time for the expected duration. For example, the diagnostics module 612 may calculate or otherwise determine an expected amount of power consumption for the infusion device 502 over the sum of the remaining buffer time before the expected start time and the expected duration, and identifies or otherwise determines the infusion device 502 is not viable for the destination operating mode when the current battery level is less than the expected amount of power consumption. In this regard, the diagnostics module 612 effectively determines whether a low battery alert that could disrupt or otherwise degrade the user experience is likely to be generated by the infusion device 502 during the expected duration of the destination operating mode.
Similarly, the diagnostics module 612 may calculate an expected amount of insulin that will be delivered by the infusion device 502 over the sum of the remaining buffer time before the expected start time and the expected duration based on the historical delivery data and the user's recent sensor glucose measurement value(s), and determines the infusion device 502 is not viable for the destination operating mode when the current amount of insulin remaining is less than the expected amount of insulin to be delivered. Thus, the diagnostics module 612 effectively determines whether a low fluid alert is likely to be generated by the infusion device 502 at some point during the expected duration of the destination operating mode. The diagnostics module 612 may also determine whether any other critical alerts are likely to be generated during the expected duration or whether any events or conditions are likely to occur that would result in the destination operating mode automatically being terminated during the expected duration. In such embodiments, the diagnostics module 612 determines the infusion device 502 is not viable for the destination operating mode when it is determined that a critical alert (or alternatively, a number of alerts exceeding a maximum alert threshold) or an automatic exit event is likely to occur during the expected duration.
In one or more embodiments, the diagnostics module 612 may also calculate or otherwise determine the viability of the sensing arrangement 504 for the expected duration. For example, the diagnostics module 612 may calculate or otherwise determine one or more reliability or accuracy metrics associated with the sensing arrangement 504 based on recent sensor measurement values, blood glucose reference measurement values and/or other calibration information. The diagnostics module 612 determines a projected reliability or accuracy metrics during the expected duration, and identifies or otherwise determines the sensing arrangement 504 is not viable for the destination operating mode when the value of a projected metric is less than a replacement threshold value at any point during the expected duration. In this regard, the diagnostics module 612 effectively determines whether a replace sensor alert that could disrupt or otherwise degrade the user experience is likely to be generated by the infusion device 502 at some point during the expected duration. In other embodiments, the diagnostics module 612 may determine the sensing arrangement 504 is not viable for the destination operating mode if a difference between the current sensor glucose measurement value and a predicted glucose value is greater than a threshold value, a calibration factor for the sensing arrangement 504 will have expired by the expected start time, communications with the sensing arrangement 504 are deteriorating (e.g., based on an increasing number or frequency of dropouts in communications over a preceding time interval), a difference between the current calibration factor and the preceding calibration factor is greater than a threshold amount (e.g., a difference of more than 35%), or a difference between reference blood glucose measurement value and the corresponding sensor measurement value used for the current calibration factor is greater than a threshold amount (e.g., the sensor measurement value is more than 35% greater than or less than the reference blood glucose measurement value). Additionally, in some embodiments, the diagnostics module 612 may obtain a current battery level for the sensing arrangement 504, determine an expected amount of power consumption for the sensing arrangement 504 over the sum of the remaining buffer time before the expected start time and the expected duration, and determine the sensing arrangement 504 is not viable when its current battery level is less than that expected amount of power consumption.
Additionally, the diagnostics module 612 performs a number of algorithmic diagnostics checks to determine the availability of the destination operating mode at the expected start time. In this regard, the diagnostics module 612 determines the destination operating mode is likely to be unavailable if one or more control parameters relied on by the delivery control scheme of the destination operating mode cannot be calculated, determined, or otherwise obtained at the expected start time. Thus, if insufficient data exists for calculating a particular control parameter, the diagnostics module 612 may determine that the destination operating mode is likely to be unavailable, and therefore not viable. For example, in one embodiment, the closed-loop operating mode utilizes a maximum output insulin infusion rate (U/hr) that is calculated based on the user's total daily insulin dose. When the diagnostics module 612 determines that the less than two consecutive preceding days total daily insulin dose information exists, the diagnostics module 612 determines that the closed-loop operating mode likely will not be viable at the expected start time without a valid maximum output insulin infusion rate. In such situations, the diagnostics module 612 may generate a user notification to manually input a maximum output insulin infusion rate (or alternatively, a total daily insulin dose). Thus, if the user would like to implement the closed-loop operating mode at a subsequent time but is unsure of how to proceed, the user may contact his or her doctor or other healthcare provider for assistance in determining the maximum output insulin infusion rate (or total daily insulin dose) that is most likely to suit the user's individual needs and insulin response.
In exemplary embodiments, the diagnostics module 612 also determines whether the control parameters will be valid for the entirety of the expected duration of the next instance of the operating mode, and the diagnostics module 612 determines the destination operating mode is not likely to be viable if a control parameter relied on by the delivery control scheme is likely to become invalid at some point during the expected duration. For example, the diagnostics module 612 may determine an infusion rate calculated based on predicted sensor glucose values will be invalid during the expected duration based on the expected rate or frequency of communications dropouts between the infusion device 502 and the sensing arrangement 504.
In the case of a physical diagnostics check indicating the implementation of the operating mode may not be viable for the expected duration, the diagnostics module 612 recommends actions that the user can perform to help ensure the infusion device 502 and the sensing arrangement 504 will be physically capable of implementing the operating mode for the expected duration by the expected start time. For example, when the diagnostics module 612 determines the energy source 503 will likely be unable to provide the expected amount of power consumption by the infusion device 502 throughout the buffer time and the expected duration, the diagnostics module 612 may generate or otherwise provide an indication on a display device 540, 608 that recommends the user recharge or replace the energy source 503. Thus, in advance of the expected start time, the user may initiate replenishment of the energy source 503 so that its state of charge (or power capability) at the expected start time exceeds the expected power consumption over the expected duration. Similarly, when the diagnostics module 612 determines the fluid level of the reservoir is likely too low to provide the expected amount of insulin that will need to be delivered over the buffer time and the expected duration, the diagnostics module 612 may generate or otherwise provide an indication on a display device 540, 608 that recommends the user refill or replace the fluid reservoir. Thus, in advance of the expected start time, the user may replenish the reservoir of the infusion device 502 so that the amount of insulin onboard the infusion device 502 at the expected start time exceeds the expected insulin delivery over the expected duration. Likewise, when the diagnostics module 612 determines the sensing arrangement 504 is likely to require replacement, recalibration, or recharging, the diagnostics module 612 may generate or otherwise provide the appropriate notification to the user so that the user may recharge the sensing arrangement 504, replace the sensing element of the sensing arrangement 504, recalibrate the sensing arrangement 504, or the like.
Likewise, in the case of an algorithmic diagnostics check indicating the implementation of the operating mode may not be viable, the diagnostics module 612 recommends actions that the user can perform to help ensure the valid control parameters for the delivery control scheme associated with the destination operating mode will be able to be calculated at the expected start time. For example, if calculating a control parameter requires a particular number of blood glucose measurement values (or a particular number of pairs of blood glucose measurement values and sensor glucose measurement values) over a preceding interval of time (e.g., the prior 12 hours) the diagnostics module 612 may generate or otherwise provide an indication to the user to obtain one or more blood glucose measurement values via the blood glucose meter 530, so that the amount of blood glucose measurement data required for calculating that control parameter will be maintained by the infusion device 502 (e.g., in memory 606) at the expected start time. In one embodiment, the diagnostics module 612 generates a notification to obtain a new blood glucose measurement value via the blood glucose meter 530 in response to determining that no reference blood glucose measurement value within 12 hours of the expected start time is currently available.
In one embodiment, algorithmic diagnostics checks to determine the availability of the destination operating mode at the expected start time based on an expected duration of operation in another operating mode (e.g., which may be the current operating mode). For example, if the user is returning from a pump vacation or other period of non-operation, it may be required that the infusion device 502 be operated in an open-loop operating mode for a minimum period of time (e.g., 5 hours) to support calculating a plasma insulin estimate and/or other patient-specific parameters at the expected start time. In this regard, the buffer time may be chosen to be greater than or equal to the minimum period of time for the open-loop operating mode, and the diagnostics module 612 may generate or otherwise provide an indication to the user to operate the infusion device 502 in the open-loop operating mode when the amount of time that the infusion device 502 has been operated in the open-loop operating mode is less than the minimum period of time. In this regard, when the infusion device 502 is currently in the open-loop operating mode but has not been operated for the minimum period of time, the diagnostics module 612 may calculate or otherwise determine an amount of time required to achieve the minimum period of time and generate or otherwise provide a notification to the user that indicates how much longer the user should maintain the infusion device 502 in the open-loop operating mode.
Still referring to
It should be noted that in some embodiments, after the next instance of the destination operating mode is initiated, the diagnostics module 612 may periodically perform the physical and algorithmic diagnostic checks while the operating mode is being implemented to verify the continued viability of the operating mode (e.g., tasks 810, 812, 814). In such embodiments, when the diagnostics module 612 determines that the operating mode may not be viable, the diagnostics module 612 may generate or otherwise provide the appropriate recommendations to the user (e.g., task 816) so that the user may improve the future viability of the operating mode before any critical alerts are generated or before the operating mode must be terminated. Additionally, it should be noted that the operational information for the next instance of the destination operating mode may be stored or otherwise maintained for use in determining an updated expected start time and an updated expected duration during the next iteration of the diagnosis process 800 for the next subsequent instance of the operating mode (e.g., tasks 802, 804). In this regard, the expected start time, the expected duration and/or the buffer time may vary dynamically during operation of the infusion device 502 to adapt to changes in the user's usage of the particular operating mode.
In one exemplary embodiment, the diagnosis process 800 is performed for a closed-loop operating mode that the user operates the infusion device 502 in overnight while he or she is sleeping. For example, at bedtime, the user may manipulate the user interface 540, 608 to initiate the closed-loop operating mode to regulate the user's blood glucose while the user is sleeping. In this regard, the infusion device 502 may store or otherwise maintain historical operational information for the overnight closed-loop operating mode, such as, for example, the respective starting times at which the closed-loop operating mode is initiated along with the respective durations or times at which the closed-loop operating mode is terminated (e.g., when the user wakes up in the morning or the operating mode times out). Accordingly, during the day prior to a subsequent instance of the closed-loop operating mode, the diagnostics module 612 and/or the diagnosis process 800 may calculate or otherwise determine the user's average bedtime (e.g., by averaging the respective start times of the recent instances of the operating mode) and the average duration of the operating mode (e.g., the average amount of time the user sleeps) (e.g., tasks 802, 804). Thereafter, the diagnostics module 612 and/or the diagnosis process 800 automatically performs the diagnostics checks the buffer time before the user's average bedtime (e.g., tasks 808, 810, 812) to ensure that the overnight closed-loop operating mode will be available at the time the user is likely to go to bed. For example, if the average bedtime for the user is at 10 P.M. and the buffer time is determined to be five hours, the diagnostics module 612 and/or the diagnosis process 800 automatically performs the diagnostics checks at 5 P.M. to provide notifications of recommended actions for the user to increase the viability or availability of the overnight closed-loop operating mode (e.g., obtain a new blood glucose reference measurement value, replace or recalibrate the sensing arrangement 504, and the like).
Turning now to
The closed-loop control module 902 generally represents the components of the pump control system 520, 600 that are configured to support the closed-loop operating mode. In this regard, the closed-loop control module 902 may implement the closed-loop control system 700 of
The predictive low glucose control module 904 generally represents the components of the pump control system 520, 600 that are configured to support a PLGM operating mode. As described above, the PLGM control module 904 generates dosage commands to provide a basal infusion rate when a predicted glucose value is greater than a predictive suspend threshold and automatically suspends delivery (or generates dosage commands equal to zero) when the predicted glucose value is less than the predictive suspend threshold.
The low glucose control module 906 generally represents the components of the pump control system 520, 600 that are configured to support a LGS operating mode. As described above, the LGS control module 906 by generates dosage commands to provide a basal infusion rate when the current (or most recent) measurement of the user's interstitial fluid glucose level is greater than a suspend threshold and automatically suspends delivery when the current measurement value is less than the suspend threshold.
The open-loop control module 908 generally represents the components of the pump control system 520, 600 that are configured to support an open-loop operating mode. In this regard, the open-loop control module 908 generates dosage commands configured to provide a predetermined open-loop basal infusion rate.
In the illustrated embodiment, the command multiplexer 920 is coupled to the outputs of the respective control modules 902, 904, 906, 908 to selectively output the dosage command from one of the modules 902, 904, 906, 908 to the motor control module 512 in response to a selection signal from the supervisory control module 910. In this regard, the selection signal identifies the operating mode that is currently being implemented by the infusion device 102, 200, 502. The supervisory control module 910 generally represents the components of the pump control system 520, 600 that are coupled to the control modules 902, 904, 906, 908 and configured to support the operating mode transition process 1000 and perform the tasks, operations, functions, and processes described herein managing transitions between operating modes associated with the respective control modules 902, 904, 906, 908.
It should be appreciated that
Referring to
In response to detecting or otherwise identifying a desire to exit a particular operating mode, the operating mode transition process 1000 receives or otherwise obtains operational information pertaining to the operating mode being exited along with clinical information pertaining to the physiological condition of the user (tasks 1002, 1004). In this regard, the supervisory module 910 obtains operational information from the control module 902, 904, 906, 908 associated with the operating mode currently being implemented. The operational information includes timer values (e.g., a delivery suspend time, a refractory period time, and the like), delivery status (e.g., whether or not delivery has been suspended), alert or event information (e.g., hypoglycemic events or alerts, hyperglycemic events or alerts, and the like), the reason the operating mode is terminating (e.g., manually-initiated, timeout, invalid control parameters and/or invalid measurement values, an anomalous condition, or the like), and other information characterizing the current instance of the operating mode. In exemplary embodiments, the supervisory module 910 obtains clinical information for the user, such as, for example, recent sensor glucose measurement values, predicted glucose measurement values, blood glucose reference measurement values, sensor calibration data, other historical data, and the like, from memory 606.
Using the operational information and the clinical information, the mode transition process 1000 identifies or otherwise determines the available operating modes for the transition destination (task 1006). In this regard, the supervisory module 910 utilizes the clinical information in conjunction with the operational information to identify which other operating modes are viable destinations for the transition while excluding any operating modes that are likely to violate one or more applicable constraints or otherwise are not likely to be viable. In this manner, the mode transition process 1000 increases the likelihood that the destination operating mode will not result in violations of applicable delivery control rules, constraints, limits, or the like. The mode transition process 1000 also reduces the likelihood that the destination operating mode will generate alerts that could degrade the user experience, and reduces the likelihood that the destination operating mode will automatically terminate or exit after being activated.
For example, in one or more embodiments, a maximum suspension time limit may be imposed on the infusion device 502 across all operating modes, with the supervisory module 910 excluding operating modes that would likely result in the minimum suspension time being violated based on the current suspend duration for the initial operating mode and the current or predicted glucose values for the user. For example, if transitioning from a closed-loop operating mode that has been suspending delivery for a period of time, and the user's predicted glucose value indicates the PLGM operating mode will likely suspend delivery for an additional amount of time such that the sum of the current suspend duration for the closed-loop operating mode and the expected suspend duration for the PLGM operating mode exceeds the maximum suspension time, the supervisory module 910 may exclude the PLGM operating mode from consideration as a possible destination operating mode.
As another example, a maximum insulin delivery limit over a particular timeframe (e.g., the preceding 24 hours) may be imposed, with the supervisory module 910 excluding operating modes that would likely result in the maximum insulin delivery limit being delivered based on the amount of insulin delivered for the initial operating mode and the current or predicted glucose values for the user. For example, if the difference between current and/or predicted glucose values for the user and the target glucose value for the closed-loop operating mode indicates that the closed-loop operating mode is likely to result in an amount of fluid delivery that would cause a maximum insulin delivery limit to be violated, the supervisory module 910 may exclude the closed-loop operating mode from consideration as a possible destination operating mode. In lieu of the closed-loop operating mode, in some embodiments, if the mode transition process 1000 is initiated in response to the maximum insulin delivery limit being reached during implementation of a current operating mode, a safe basal delivery mode (or hybrid closed-loop delivery mode) may be identified as a possible destination operating mode. The safe basal delivery mode may be realized as a hybrid closed-loop operating mode that configured to maintain a delivery rate that does not violate either the maximum insulin delivery limit or a minimum insulin delivery limit independent of the current or predicted measurements of the user's glucose. In this regard, the safe basal delivery mode may impose a maximum delivery rate that is less than or equal to the maximum insulin delivery limit divided by its applicable timeframe and impose a minimum delivery rate that is greater than the minimum insulin delivery limit divided by its applicable timeframe. Thus, the delivery commands generated in the safe basal delivery mode based on the difference between the current sensor glucose measurement value and the target glucose measurement value are bounded such that they will not violate applicable delivery limits.
Similarly, the supervisory module 910 may exclude operating modes that would likely result in the minimum insulin delivery limit being violated based on the amount of insulin delivered for the initial operating mode and the current or predicted glucose values for the user. For example, if the difference between current and/or predicted glucose values for the user and the target glucose value indicates the closed-loop operating mode is unlikely to deliver fluid for an amount of time that would cause the minimum insulin delivery limit to be violated, the supervisory module 910 may exclude the closed-loop operating mode from consideration as a possible destination operating mode. In some embodiments, if the mode transition process 1000 is initiated in response to the minimum insulin delivery limit being reached during implementation of a current operating mode, a safe basal delivery mode may be identified as a possible destination operating mode in lieu of the closed-loop operating mode.
As another example, the supervisory module 910 may exclude operating modes that utilize sensor glucose measurement values based on sensor health information. In this regard, recent sensor glucose measurement values or historical calibration information for the sensing arrangement 504 indicating that the sensing arrangement 504 may not be viable for the particular operating mode. In this regard, if the previous sensor glucose measurement values or historical calibration information indicates the sensing arrangement 504 is unhealthy or may require recalibration or replacement, the supervisory module 910 prevents entry of operating modes that would otherwise be relying potentially unreliable sensor measurement values. For example, the supervisory module 910 may exclude the closed-loop operating mode from consideration as a possible destination operating mode if a difference between the current sensor glucose measurement value and a predicted glucose value is greater than a threshold value, a calibration factor for the sensing arrangement 504 has expired, communications with the sensing arrangement 504 have been interrupted, a difference between the current calibration factor and the preceding calibration factor is greater than a threshold amount (e.g., a difference of more than 35%), or a difference between reference blood glucose measurement value and the corresponding sensor measurement value used for the current calibration factor is greater than a threshold amount (e.g., the sensor measurement value is more than 35% greater than or less than the reference blood glucose measurement value). In other embodiments, an operating mode that utilizes sensor glucose measurement values may be excluded when a duration of time that has elapsed since the most recent calibration exceeds a threshold value.
In one exemplary embodiment, a desired maximum number of alerts over a particular timeframe (e.g., the preceding 24 hours) could be designated by the user, with the supervisory module 910 excluding operating modes that would likely result in that maximum number of alerts being exceeded. For example, the operational information obtained by the supervisory module 910 may include a current number of user notifications or alerts that have been generated by the current operating mode (e.g., by the respective control module 902, 904, 906, 908 implementing a corresponding counter). The supervisory module 910 may determine an expected number of user notifications or alerts to be generated by a particular operating mode based on the current and/or predicted glucose values for the user, and exclude that operating mode from the set of possible destination operating modes when the sum of the expected number of alerts and the current number of alerts exceeds the maximum number chosen by the user.
In one or more embodiments, the supervisory module 910 excludes operating modes based on the status of user notifications previously generated by the infusion device 502. For example, if a user notification has been generated that indicates the user should recalibrate or replace the sensing arrangement 504, and the user has not responded to the user notification by recalibrating or replacing the sensing arrangement 504 within a threshold amount of time (e.g., 90 minutes), the supervisory module 910 may exclude the closed-loop operating mode or other operating modes that rely on the sensing arrangement 504 from consideration as possible destination modes until the user responds to the notification.
Additionally, in one or more embodiments, the supervisory module 910 performs one or more diagnostic checks for the potential destination operating modes to verify or otherwise confirm the potential destination operating modes will be viable, in a similar manner as described above in the context of
Still referring to
After selecting the destination operating mode, the mode transition process 1000 continues by identifying or otherwise determining the types or subset of operational information pertaining to the current operating mode to be provided to the destination operating mode and providing that identified operational information to the destination operating mode (tasks 1010, 1012). In this regard, the supervisory module 910 passes at least a portion of the operational information obtained from the current operating mode control module 902, 904, 906, 908 to the destination module 902, 904, 906, 908 such that the implementation of the destination operating mode does not violate any delivery rules, constraints, limits, or the like. For example, the supervisory module 910 may obtain the current refractory period timer value, the current suspend duration timer value, or the like, from the control module 902, 904, 906, 908 corresponding to the current operating mode and provide those values to the control module 902, 904, 906, 908 corresponding to the destination operating mode to ensure that the destination operating mode does not violate a minimum refractory time period between suspending delivery, a maximum suspend duration, a minimum suspend duration, or the like. Additionally, the supervisory module 910 may provide the exit reason for the current operating mode, the current delivery status, information about alerts or events that occurred during the current operating mode, active insulin estimates, sensor health status and/or calibration information, and/or other historical delivery information to the destination operating mode control module 902, 904, 906, 908. The destination operating mode generates dosage commands in accordance with the operational information received from the preceding operating mode to provide a relatively seamless transition among operating modes.
Referring again to
Referring to
For example, the PLGM control module 904 may set its refractory timer to the value of the closed-loop refractory timer and maintain delivery until the total refractory time exceeds the minimum refractory time period before suspending delivery. Thus, even if the user's predicted glucose level is below the predictive suspend threshold, the PLGM control module 904 may continue providing dosage commands that result in a basal rate of infusion until the value of the PLGM refractory timer is greater than or equal to the minimum refractory time period. In some embodiments, the PLGM control module 904 may utilize the exit reason to determine whether to continue providing dosage commands until the value of the PLGM refractory timer is greater than or equal to the minimum refractory time period. For example, if the exit reason is manual (e.g., the user manually transitioned the infusion device 502 to the PLGM mode), the PLGM control module 904 may provide dosage commands until the minimum refractory time period is observed, however, if the exit reason is automatic, the PLGM control module 904 may suspend dosage commands before the minimum refractory time period is observed and reset the PLGM refractory timer as appropriate.
In some embodiments, the sensor health status and/or calibration information, estimated active insulin information, and/or other operational information from the closed-loop operating mode may be utilized in conjunction with the exit reason when determining whether to observe the minimum refractory time period in the PLGM operating mode. For example, the PLGM control module 904 may allow dosage commands to be suspended only if the sensing arrangement 504 was calibrated less than a threshold amount of time before the transition (e.g., within the last hour) and the estimated active insulin is greater than a safe threshold value, which may be manually set by a user or a default value maintained by the infusion device 502. Thus, the minimum refractory time period may still be observed for an automatic transition if the sensing arrangement 504 was not calibrated recently or the estimated active insulin is too low. Conversely, the PLGM control module 904 may automatically suspend delivery when the refractory time from the closed-loop control module 902 is less than the minimum refractory time period in response to determining the active insulin estimate from the closed-loop control module 902 is greater than the threshold value.
Similarly, if delivery is currently being suspended, the PLGM control module 904 may set its delivery suspend timer to the value of the closed-loop suspend timer (e.g., the amount of time delivery has been suspended in the preceding sixty minutes). Thus, even if the user's predicted glucose level is below the predictive suspend threshold, the PLGM control module 904 may begin providing dosage commands once the value of the PLGM delivery suspend timer is greater than the maximum suspension time period. Additionally, in some embodiments, the exit reason may be utilized by the PLGM control module 904 to determine whether to suspend delivery or resume delivery, either independently or in conjunction with the sensor health status and/or calibration information, estimated active insulin information, and/or other operational information, in a similar manner as described above. For example, if the sensing arrangement 504 was calibrated less than a threshold amount of time before the transition (e.g., within the last hour) and the estimated active insulin is less than a threshold value, the PLGM control module 904 may resume providing dosage commands even though the maximum suspension time period may not have been met.
When transitioning from the closed-loop operating mode to the LGS operating mode, the supervisory module 910 obtains information identifying the exit reason (e.g., manual or auto), the amount of time delivery has been suspended in the preceding sixty minutes, and the current value of the closed-loop refractory timer from the closed-loop control module 902 and provides the obtained values and information to the LGS control module 906 for generating dosage commands in accordance therewith, in a similar manner as described above for transitions to the PLGM operating mode.
In another example embodiment, when transitioning from the closed-loop operating mode to the open-loop operating mode, the supervisory module 910 may only provide the refractory timer values from the closed-loop control module 902 to the open-loop control module 908. In such an embodiment, the open-loop control module 908 provides dosage commands that result in an open-loop basal rate of infusion while dynamically updating the refractory timer value for a subsequent transition to another operating mode. In this regard, the refractory timer value is updated so that if the infusion device 502 subsequently transitions from the open-loop operating mode to another operating mode where delivery could be suspended, the minimum refractory period is still observed by the control module 902, 904, 906 associated with that subsequent operating mode before delivery is suspended. In other embodiments, in lieu of providing the refractory time information to the open-loop control module 908, the supervisory module 910 may independently manage and dynamically update the refractory time information, and subsequently provide the refractory time information to another destination control module 902, 904, 906 when transitioning from the open-loop operating mode. Similarly, in some embodiments, the supervisory module 910 may provide suspension information to the open-loop control module 908 (e.g., the amount of time delivery was suspended over a preceding time interval) for dynamically updating the suspension time information to ensure any maximum suspension limits are still observed by a control module 902, 904, 906 associated with that subsequent operating mode. Alternatively, the supervisory module 910 may also independently manage and dynamically update the refractory time information, and subsequently provide the refractory time information to a destination control module 902, 904, 906 when transitioning from the open-loop operating mode.
In other exemplary embodiments, when transitioning from the PLGM operating mode or the LGS operating mode to the closed-loop operating mode, the supervisory module 910 obtains information identifying the exit reason (e.g., manual or auto) and the current value of the respective refractory timer from the respective control module 904, 906 and provides the obtained values and information to the closed-loop control module 902. In this regard, the closed-loop control module 902 sets its refractory timer to the value of the refractory timer of the respective control module 904, 906 and may maintain delivery until the total refractory time exceeds the minimum refractory time period before suspending delivery. In other embodiments, the closed-loop control module 902 may suspend delivery even though the total refractory time is less than the minimum refractory time period. For example, the closed-loop control module 902 may obtain sensor calibration information from the preceding operating mode and determine whether a duration of time that has elapsed since the most recent calibration exceeds a threshold value corresponding to the reliable lifetime of a calibration factor for purposes of the closed-loop mode. When the duration of time that has elapsed since the most recent calibration exceeds the threshold value, the closed-loop control module 902 may generate a notification via the user interface 540 that prompts the user to obtain a new blood glucose reference measurement value for recalibrating the sensing arrangement 504 upon transitioning to the closed-loop mode. In response to the user manipulating the blood glucose meter 530 to obtain a new blood glucose reference measurement value, and the new blood glucose reference measurement value indicates delivery should be suspended, the closed-loop control module 902 may suspend delivery even though the total refractory time does not exceed the minimum refractory time period. Alternatively, in the absence of a new blood glucose reference measurement value that indicates delivery should be suspended, the closed-loop control module 902 may generate dosage commands to provide a minimum basal rate of infusion while the closed-loop refractory timer value is less than the minimum refractory time period even though the user's current glucoses measurement value may be less than the target glucose value for the closed-loop control system.
In yet other exemplary embodiments, when transitioning from the open-loop operating mode to another operating mode, the supervisory module 910 obtains information identifying the exit reason (e.g., manual or auto) and the current value of the refractory timer from the open-loop module 908 and provides the obtained value to the particular destination operating mode control module 902, 904, 906. In this regard, when transitioning from the open-loop operating mode, the destination operating mode control module 902, 904, 906 sets its refractory timer to the value provided by the supervisory module 910 to maintain delivery until the total refractory time exceeds the minimum refractory time period before allowing delivery to be suspended.
It will be appreciated that in practice there are numerous different types of information that may be exchanged among control modules 902, 904, 906, 908 to achieve a desired manner of transitioning and comply with the particular constraints, rules, and/or limits for a particular application. Accordingly, the above examples are provided merely to aid in understanding of the subject matter and are not intended to be limiting.
It should also be noted that in practice, the diagnosis process 800 of
To briefly summarize, the subject matter described herein facilitates transitioning between operating modes in a manner that enhances the user experience (e.g., by enabling the user to proactively increase viability of a desired operating mode and/or excluding operating modes that are likely to generate alerts from possible destinations for automatic transitions) and ensures compliance with applicable delivery control rules and other constraints (e.g., by excluding operating modes that are otherwise likely to result in a violation and transferring timer and/or counter values across operating modes).
For the sake of brevity, conventional techniques related to glucose sensing and/or monitoring, closed-loop glucose control, predictive glucose management, sensor calibration and/or compensation, and other functional aspects of the subject matter may not be described in detail herein. In addition, certain terminology may also be used in the herein for the purpose of reference only, and thus is not intended to be limiting. For example, terms such as “first”, “second”, and other such numerical terms referring to structures do not imply a sequence or order unless clearly indicated by the context. The foregoing description may also refer to elements or nodes or features being “connected” or “coupled” together. As used herein, unless expressly stated otherwise, “coupled” means that one element/node/feature is directly or indirectly joined to (or directly or indirectly communicates with) another element/node/feature, and not necessarily mechanically.
While at least one exemplary embodiment has been presented in the foregoing detailed description, it should be appreciated that a vast number of variations exist. It should also be appreciated that the exemplary embodiment or embodiments described herein are not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the claimed subject matter in any way. For example, the subject matter described herein is not limited to the infusion devices and related systems described herein. Moreover, the foregoing detailed description will provide those skilled in the art with a convenient road map for implementing the described embodiment or embodiments. It should be understood that various changes can be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the scope defined by the claims, which includes known equivalents and foreseeable equivalents at the time of filing this patent application. Accordingly, details of the exemplary embodiments or other limitations described above should not be read into the claims absent a clear intention to the contrary.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/439,610, filed Jun. 12, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/466,614, filed Mar. 22, 2017, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/561,128, filed Dec. 4, 2014. The subject matter of this application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/561,133, filed Dec. 4, 2014. The contents of these related applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14561128 | Dec 2014 | US |
Child | 15466614 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16439610 | Jun 2019 | US |
Child | 18117574 | US | |
Parent | 15466614 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 16439610 | US |