Many document management applications such as MICROSOFT® Office SharePoint Server enable users to organize documents in a series of lists or libraries. Such document management applications can typically be accessed through a web browser or a rich client interface, and make it easy for organizations to share documents with various team members. When adding a new document through the document management application, the user typically selects which list or library to add the document to. Other users can then find that document by accessing that library specifically, or by performing one or more query searches across libraries to locate one or more documents of interest.
If the user wants to work with the same set of documents over a period of time, he or she typically has two options. The first option is that the user can perform the search multiple times to keep re-locating the documents. The second option is that the user can keep track of which varying libraries actually contain the documents that he or she is interested in working with. And then each time the user is ready to work with those documents, he/she must navigate to those respective libraries one by one to access the respective document of interest.
Various technologies and techniques are disclosed for creating and managing persistent document collections. In one implementation, a system for creating and managing persistent document collections is described. The system includes a data store is used for storing one or more persistent document collections. The system also includes a content management application that is used for managing documents for users, for creating one or more persistent document collections of a sub-set of the documents upon user request, and for storing the one or more persistent document collections in the data store.
In another implementation, a method is disclosed for enabling users to create and manage one or more persistent document collections. Documents that are managed by a content management application are displayed for user review. An add selection is received from a user which specifies at least one of the documents to add to a persistent document collection. The user can optionally specify additional attributes about the persistent document collection, such as storage space to allocate, etc. The persistent document collection is then created and stored in a data store.
In yet another implementation, techniques are described for a content management application that also allows external applications to access and manage documents contained in one or more persistent document collections. Users can create one or more persistent document collections from a sub-set of the documents. Users can also modify the one or more persistent document collections. A requested portion of one or more persistent document collections can be output upon request from an external application so that the external application can download one or more of the documents that are represented by the persistent document collection for further modification by the user.
This Summary was provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The technologies and techniques herein may be described in the general context as an application that manages persistent document collections, but the technologies and techniques also serve other purposes in addition to these. In one implementation, one or more of the techniques described herein can be implemented as features within a content management application such as MICROSOFT® Office SharePoint Server, or from any other type of program or service that manages documents for multiple users. In another implementation, one or more of the techniques described herein are implemented as features with other applications that interact with content management applications.
In one implementation, techniques are described for enabling users to create persistent document collections. The term “persistent document collection” as used herein is meant to include a group of one or more documents that are identified by a name or other identifier, and that get stored so that one or more users can access the underlying documents through the assigned grouping at later points in time. In another implementation, one or more of these persistent document collections can be accessed by one or more external applications to allow the user to work with them further from those external applications, or to allow those externals applications to perform other operations independently of the user. The term “external application” as used herein is meant to include an application that is separate from the document management application that created the persistent document collection(s).
Once created, the persistent document collection(s) are then stored in one or more data stores, such as data store 104. Depending on the implementation used, the content management application 102 handles interactions with the data store 104 and/or user interface 106 handles interactions with the data store 104. For example, when content management application 102 is a web application that resides on a web server, and with user interface 106 being displayed to the user in a web browser, then content management application 102 may handle interactions with the data store 104 directly. In other implementations, user interface 106 may contain logic for interacting directly with the data store 104, such as when user interface and content management application 102 are contained as part of the same executable file on a client computer. In either scenario, by storing the document collection(s) that get created by the user, the same and/or other users are able to access this grouping of documents more easily on later interactions with the content management application 102.
Turning now to
Yet another non-limiting example of an attribute that can be specified for a persistent document collection includes which one or more external applications should be allowed to access this persistent document collection. These are just a few non-limiting examples of the types of attributes that can be assigned to one or more persistent document collections. In other implementations, fewer and/or additional attributes could be used.
The persistent document collection is then stored in a data store (stage 210) so that the user who created it or other users with appropriate security permissions can access it later. The steps can be repeated to allow more documents to be added at a later time to this persistent document collection or a different persistent document collection (stage 212).
A list of documents that are part of a persistent document collection are displayed (stage 222), such as on a computer screen of a user. The user is able to specify a remove selection to remove selected document(s) from the persistent document collection, and the content management application processes the user selection when it is received to remove the document from the specified persistent document collection (stage 224). Alternatively or additionally, the user is also able to select one or more of the documents to view, and the content management application displays the contents of the selected document(s) in a user interface of the user when such a selection is received from the user (stage 226).
Turning now to
Turning now to
As shown in
Additionally, device 500 may also have additional features/functionality. For example, device 500 may also include additional storage (removable and/or non-removable) including, but not limited to, magnetic or optical disks or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated in
Computing device 500 includes one or more communication connections 514 that allow computing device 500 to communicate with other computers/applications 515. Device 500 may also have input device(s) 512 such as keyboard, mouse, pen, voice input device, touch input device, etc. Output device(s) 511 such as a display, speakers, printer, etc. may also be included. These devices are well known in the art and need not be discussed at length here.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims. All equivalents, changes, and modifications that come within the spirit of the implementations as described herein and/or by the following claims are desired to be protected.
For example, a person of ordinary skill in the computer software art will recognize that the examples discussed herein could be organized differently on one or more computers to include fewer or additional options or features than as portrayed in the examples.
This application is a continuation of, claims the benefit of and priority to, previously filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/453,320 entitled “Techniques for Managing Persistent Document Collections” filed on Mar. 8, 2017, which is a continuation of, claims the benefit of and priority to, previously filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/736,839 entitled “Techniques for Managing Persistent Document Collections” filed on Jun. 11, 2015, which is a continuation of, claims the benefit of and priority to, previously filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/602,822 entitled “Techniques for Managing Persistent Document Collections” filed on Jan. 22, 2015, and issued on Apr. 18, 2017 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,626,362, which is a continuation of, claims the benefit of and priority to, previously filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/336,554 entitled “Techniques for Managing Persistent Document Collections” filed on Dec. 17, 2008, and issued on Feb. 24, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,965,926, the subject matter of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5568640 | Nishiyama et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5790790 | Smith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790793 | Higley | Aug 1998 | A |
5870765 | Bauer et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5907324 | Larson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5987479 | Oliver | Nov 1999 | A |
6009442 | Chen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014677 | Hayashi et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6094657 | Hailpern et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6144991 | England | Nov 2000 | A |
6209004 | Taylor | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236987 | Horowitz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6295541 | Bodnar et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6493702 | Adar | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6584466 | Serbinis et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6615259 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636863 | Friesen | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6934740 | Lawande et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7107226 | Cassidy et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7269433 | Vargas | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7284191 | Grefenstette et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7418664 | Ben-Shachar et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7702730 | Spataro et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7725456 | Augustine | May 2010 | B2 |
7792789 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7810027 | Bendik | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831430 | Dodrill et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8019811 | Britto et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8078694 | Barton et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20020040431 | Kato et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020078035 | Frank et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020156840 | Ulrich et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030046351 | Maruyama et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030097410 | Atkins et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030126157 | Young et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040098383 | Tabellion et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040160629 | Hull et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040201604 | Kraenzel | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204085 | Vargas | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050027796 | San Andres | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038836 | Wang | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050060337 | Chou et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050216524 | Gomes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050273476 | Wertheimer | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060074928 | MacLaurin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060136837 | Ben-Shachar et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060184540 | Kung et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195480 | Spiegelman | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070100807 | Abe | May 2007 | A1 |
20070124348 | Claborn et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136395 | Fries | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070239802 | Razdow | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250531 | Wiggins et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080005138 | Gauthier et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005183 | Bostick et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040239 | Jacobi et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077631 | Petri | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080140766 | Mohan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177708 | Ayyar et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189595 | Petri | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222108 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080228675 | Duffy et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080281915 | Elad et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090063959 | Stejic | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090282088 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287731 | Motoyama et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100070469 | Bomma et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082548 | Crockett et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100434728 | May 2004 | KR |
2236699 | Sep 2004 | RU |
Entry |
---|
Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/453,320, dated Nov. 3, 2017, 54 pages. |
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 09836584.4”, dated Jun. 13, 2017, 7 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2011-7013330”, dated Oct. 21, 2015, 6 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2009333727”, dated Aug. 4, 2014, 2 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2009333727”, dated Mar. 21, 2014, 3 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Australian Patent Application No. 2009333727”, dated May 23, 2014, 3 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980151658.X”, dated Aug. 28, 2013, 4 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980151658.X”, dated Nov. 29, 2012, 11 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Mexico Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/006439”, dated Jul. 12, 2013, 3 Pages. (W/o English Translation). |
“Office Action Issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2011124538”, dated Oct. 23, 2013, 4 Pages. (W/o English Translation). |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Mexico Patent Application No. MX/a/2011/006439”, dated Sep. 11, 2014, 2 Pages. (W/o English Translation). |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in Russian Patent Application No. 2011124538”, dated Jun. 30, 2014, 8 Pages. |
Rajasekar, et al., “Collection-Based Persistent Archives”, In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems, pp. 176-184. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/602,822”, dated May 21, 2015, 36 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/602,822”, dated Dec. 16, 2016, 17 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/602,822”, dated Feb. 17, 2017, 2 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/602,822”, dated Aug. 2, 2016, 77 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,839”, dated Oct. 8, 2015, 21 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,839”, dated Dec. 15, 2016, 23 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,839”, dated Aug. 4, 2016, 35 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,839”, dated Mar. 30, 2016, 35 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/736,839”, dated Apr. 17, 2017, 16 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/453,320”, dated Nov. 3, 2017, 54 Pages. |
“Supplementary European Search Report Issued in Patent Application No. 09836584.4”, dated Nov. 28, 2012, 6 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,554”, dated Dec. 17, 2012, 17 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,554”, dated Aug. 26, 2011, 18 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,554”, dated Apr. 16, 2012, 15 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,554”, dated Apr. 10, 2014, 19 Pages. |
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,554”, dated Oct. 9, 2014, 16 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/336,554”, dated Feb. 28, 2011, 15 Pages. |
Das, et al., “Creating Digital Repository by Using GSDL: Review and Analysis”, Retrieved From «http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.healthnet.org.np/ocs/index.php/icikm-2008/icikm/paper/-%20viewFile/16/107,12 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/602,822”, dated Sep. 24, 2015, 47 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/602,822”, dated Mar. 24, 2016, 68 Pages. |
“Heavy Metal Shopping Cart Software”, Retrieved From «https://web.archive.org/web/20090307040518/http://www.make-a-store.com:80/site/category/p0_CRM_Customer_Relations_Management_Software», Oct. 14, 2008, 2 Pages. |
“International Search Report & Written Opinion Issued in PCT Application No. PCT/US09/63754”, dated Jun. 15, 2010, 6 Pages. |
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/453,320”, dated Mar. 21, 2018, 66 Pages. |
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/453,320”, dated Aug. 24, 2018, 75 Pages. |
“Oral Proceedings Issued in European Patent Application No. 09836584.4”, dated Sep. 28, 2018, 3 Pages. |
Redmond, Tony, “Managing Public Folder Replication”, Retrieved from https://www.itprotoday.com/email-and-calendaring/managing-public-folder-replication, May 31, 1998, 10 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170300484 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15453320 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 15642151 | US | |
Parent | 14736839 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15453320 | US | |
Parent | 14602822 | Jan 2015 | US |
Child | 14736839 | US | |
Parent | 12336554 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 14602822 | US |