Techniques for metadata-driven dynamic content serving

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10911516
  • Patent Number
    10,911,516
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 12, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 2, 2021
    3 years ago
Abstract
Techniques for metadata-driven dynamic content serving. Metadata content is stored as a source instance. The metadata content is utilized to provide dynamically-constructed pages. The metadata content is published to runtime pods communicatively coupled to receive the metadata content. The source instance includes a metadata definition repository and is a primary source of dynamic data for serving pages in the runtime pods. The runtime pods are groups of multiple servers that act as a single entity to dynamically generate metadata-driven content in response to requests received from client devices. A request for content is received with a selected one of the runtime pods for a specific site. The specific site is mapped to a user identified by a user identifier. The user identifier is utilized to retrieve site metadata from a site metadata server. Content is provided in response to the request with the selected runtime pod utilizing the metadata content.
Description
COPYRIGHT NOTICE

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.


TECHNICAL FIELD

Embodiments relate to techniques for providing metadata-driven content. More particularly, embodiments relate to techniques for hosting content in a manner that supports use of multiple servers to provide metadata-driven dynamic content.


BACKGROUND

Servers that provide content in the form of pages to requesting devices generally cannot provide constant uptime availability. This may be the result of various conditions including routine maintenance operations, system upgrades, content changes, etc. This is a less than optimal situation for providing content.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements.



FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram of a runtime pod that may interact with a source instance of data to support one or more pages.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a runtime pod.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a network architecture having two runtime pods.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a technique for utilizing runtime pods for providing dynamic page content.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a runtime pod that may operate in a multitenant environment.



FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of an example of an environment wherein an on-demand database service might be used.



FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram of an embodiment of elements of FIG. 6 and various possible interconnections between these elements.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description.


In various embodiments of architectures described herein, combinations of one or more servers are utilized to host metadata driven dynamic pages. These architectures may be referred to as “Runtime Pods” that may be configured to provide constant (100%) uptime availability. Embodiments of runtime pods utilize a collection of servers that may include, but are not limited to, reverse proxy servers, web application servers and/or database servers. In some embodiments, the servers operate as a single unit to host metadata driven dynamic pages. In one embodiment, these runtime pods are stateless.


In some embodiments, the runtime pod hosting is located and isolated away from a ‘source instance’ of the content. The source instance refers to a metadata definition repository and is a primary source of dynamic data for serving pages. In one embodiment, page metadata is created and maintained on the source instance. This allows the architecture to remain active when the source instance is down for any reason.


In one embodiment, a runtime pod may be utilized a version-aware application programming interface (API) to create, read, update and delete data from the source instance. The API is versioned so that the source instance and runtime pod(s) may be on different versions. If the source instance is down, the pages may still be available even if dynamic data from the source instance may not be show, or alternatively, a cached version of the data may be served.



FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram of a runtime pod that may interact with a source instance of data to support one or more pages. The example of FIG. 1 includes only a single runtime pod; however, any number of runtime pods may support utilizing the techniques described herein.


As discussed above, source instance 110 refers to a metadata definition repository and is a primary source of dynamic data for serving pages. Source instance 110 may be data stored by one or more databases that are interconnected and/or are communicatively coupled with runtime pod 120. In one embodiment, page metadata is created and maintained on source instance 110. The page metadata that is used to serve pages is published to runtime pod 120 after creation. When source instance 110 is updated, the updated metadata and/or other data may be published to runtime pod 120.


Runtime pod 120 operates to provide metadata driven dynamic content to devices that request data (not illustrated in FIG. 1). In one embodiment, modifications (e.g., Create, Read, Update, Delete operations, or CRUD) may be accomplished using API calls to source instance 110. In one embodiment, the API is versioned so that the source instance and runtime pod(s) may be on different versions.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a runtime pod. The example of FIG. 2 provides specific numbers of various components; however, in alternate embodiments, different numbers and/or combinations of these components may be utilized.


In one embodiment, runtime pod 120 includes firewall 210, which operates to permit or deny network transmissions based upon a set of rules to protect runtime pod 120 from unauthorized access while permitting legitimate communications to pass. In one embodiment, runtime pod 120 further includes load balancer 220, which operates to distribute requests across components of runtime pod 120.


In one embodiment, runtime pod 120 includes one or more proxy servers (e.g., 230, 235), which operate to a proxy server is a server (a computer system or an application) that act as an intermediary for requests from clients (not illustrated in FIG. 2) seeking resources from application servers (e.g., 240, 242, 244, 246, 248, 250). A request from a client is received by the proxy server (e.g., 230, 235), that requests some service, such as a file, connection, web page, or other resource, available from an application server. The proxy server evaluates the request according to its filtering rules.


In one embodiment, runtime pod 120 includes multiple application servers (e.g., 240, 242, 244, 246, 248, 250), which may be hardware servers and/or software servers that provide services to respond to requests received from client devices. The application servers utilize database 260 to provide content in response to requests from client devices.


Runtime pod 120 receives content from a source instance as described above with respect to FIG. 1. The metadata and/or other information may be stored and/or utilized by the components of runtime pod 120 to respond to requests from client devices even when the source instance is unavailable to the client devices. In one embodiment, runtime pod 120 operates as a single server/device to respond to requests. As discussed above, runtime pod 120 may provide a different version of data as compared to the source instance under certain conditions, but may function to provide 100% uptime availability.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a network architecture having two runtime pods. In alternate embodiments, more than two runtime pods may be supported in a similar manner.


In one embodiment, at least two runtime pods (e.g., 340, 360) are each maintained in an active state (e.g., an ACTIVE-ACTIVE configuration). That is, each of at least two runtime pods is capable of serving pages at any time. In one embodiment, the runtime pods are set up in a Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB) configuration.


Client device 300 may perform a domain lookup with Domain Name System (DNS) 320, which may return an address (e.g., IP address) of one of the active runtime pods (e.g., 340, 360). Client device 300 may then use the address to send a request to one of the runtime pods, which may function as described above.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a technique for utilizing runtime pods for providing dynamic page content. The technique described with respect to FIG. 4 may be utilized with the architectures described herein.


Metadata and/or other data may be developed for a site and stored in the source instance, 410. The metadata and/or other data is utilized to dynamically construct pages of content in response to requests received from client devices.


The metadata is published to one or more runtime pods, 420. As described above, the runtime pods are groups of multiple servers that act as a single entity to dynamically generate metadata-driven content in response to requests received from client devices. When the runtime pods received the published metadata, the data is transformed and stored in the runtime pod database(s), 430. This allows the runtime pod(s) to have the necessary metadata to respond to requests from client devices.


When the databases have been updated, the runtime pod(s) may respond to requests utilizing the metadata, 440. If the runtime pod has a previous version of the metadata, the previous version may be utilized until the newly-published metadata can be processed and ready for use by the runtime pod(s).


In one embodiment, a single runtime pod is capable of serving many individual sites from many different customers. The load from any site may be spread across the runtime pod. This may result in a more full utilization of hardware resources as well as simplification of management and deployment.


In one embodiment, a site definition is stored as metadata in a runtime pod database. For example, each site's metadata may be stored according to the site's identifier (e.g., primary key). The primary key of the site can be retrieved by looking it up in a domain mapping table by the domain of a request. The metadata may be retrieved and converted to a specific format indicated by the request. The result can be sent back to the requesting device as a response (e.g., HTTP response). In one embodiment, the metadata and/or response may be cached for subsequent requests.


In one embodiment, a multi-tenant database system utilizes tenant identifiers (IDs) within a multi-tenant environment to allow individual tenants to access their data while preserving the integrity of other tenant's data. In one embodiment, the multitenant database stores data for multiple client entities each identified by a tenant ID having one of one or more users associated with the tenant ID. Users of each of multiple client entities can only access data identified by a tenant ID associated with their respective client entity. In one embodiment, the multitenant database is a hosted database provided by an entity separate from the client entities, and provides on-demand and/or real-time database service to the client entities.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a runtime pod that may operate in a multitenant environment. The example of FIG. 5 illustrates a request received from a client device and processed by a runtime pod that is part of a multitenant environment. Any number of runtime pods may be supported within a multitenant environment.


A request is received from a client device 510 for a specific site (e.g., example.com). In one embodiment, runtime pod 500 includes domain mapping server 520 that operates to map the site from which the request comes (e.g., example.com) to a tenant identifier that may be used within the multitenant environment.


The tenant ID is then used to retrieve site metadata from site metadata server 530. The site metadata may then be used by render engine 540 to generate a response to be sent back to client device 510. In one embodiment, the response is provided in the form of an http response; however, other response formats may also be supported.



FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of an environment 610 wherein an on-demand database service might be used. Environment 610 may include user systems 612, network 614, system 616, processor system 617, application platform 618, network interface 620, tenant data storage 622, system data storage 624, program code 626, and process space 628. In other embodiments, environment 610 may not have all of the components listed and/or may have other elements instead of, or in addition to, those listed above.


Environment 610 is an environment in which an on-demand database service exists. User system 612 may be any machine or system that is used by a user to access a database user system. For example, any of user systems 612 can be a handheld computing device, a mobile phone, a laptop computer, a work station, and/or a network of computing devices. As illustrated in FIG. 6 (and in more detail in FIG. 6) user systems 612 might interact via a network 614 with an on-demand database service, which is system 616.


An on-demand database service, such as system 616, is a database system that is made available to outside users that do not need to necessarily be concerned with building and/or maintaining the database system, but instead may be available for their use when the users need the database system (e.g., on the demand of the users). Some on-demand database services may store information from one or more tenants stored into tables of a common database image to form a multi-tenant database system (MTS). Accordingly, “on-demand database service 616” and “system 616” will be used interchangeably herein.


A database image may include one or more database objects. A relational database management system (RDMS) or the equivalent may execute storage and retrieval of information against the database object(s). Application platform 618 may be a framework that allows the applications of system 616 to run, such as the hardware and/or software, e.g., the operating system. In an embodiment, on-demand database service 616 may include an application platform 618 that enables creation, managing and executing one or more applications developed by the provider of the on-demand database service, users accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 612, or third party application developers accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 612.


The users of user systems 612 may differ in their respective capacities, and the capacity of a particular user system 612 might be entirely determined by permissions (permission levels) for the current user. For example, where a salesperson is using a particular user system 612 to interact with system 616, that user system has the capacities allotted to that salesperson. However, while an administrator is using that user system to interact with system 616, that user system has the capacities allotted to that administrator.


In systems with a hierarchical role model, users at one permission level may have access to applications, data, and database information accessible by a lower permission level user, but may not have access to certain applications, database information, and data accessible by a user at a higher permission level. Thus, different users will have different capabilities with regard to accessing and modifying application and database information, depending on a user's security or permission level.


Network 614 is any network or combination of networks of devices that communicate with one another. For example, network 614 can be any one or any combination of a LAN (local area network), WAN (wide area network), telephone network, wireless network, point-to-point network, star network, token ring network, hub network, or other appropriate configuration. As the most common type of computer network in current use is a TCP/IP (Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol) network, such as the global internetwork of networks often referred to as the “Internet” with a capital “I,” that network will be used in many of the examples herein. However, it should be understood that the networks that the present invention might use are not so limited, although TCP/IP is a frequently implemented protocol.


User systems 612 might communicate with system 616 using TCP/IP and, at a higher network level, use other common Internet protocols to communicate, such as HTTP, FTP, AFS, WAP, etc. In an example where HTTP is used, user system 612 might include an HTTP client commonly referred to as a “browser” for sending and receiving HTTP messages to and from an HTTP server at system 616. Such an HTTP server might be implemented as the sole network interface between system 616 and network 614, but other techniques might be used as well or instead. In some implementations, the interface between system 616 and network 614 includes load sharing functionality, such as round-robin HTTP request distributors to balance loads and distribute incoming HTTP requests evenly over a plurality of servers. At least as for the users that are accessing that server, each of the plurality of servers has access to the MTS' data; however, other alternative configurations may be used instead.


In one embodiment, system 616, shown in FIG. 6, implements a web-based customer relationship management (CRM) system. For example, in one embodiment, system 616 includes application servers configured to implement and execute CRM software applications as well as provide related data, code, forms, webpages and other information to and from user systems 612 and to store to, and retrieve from, a database system related data, objects, and Webpage content. With a multi-tenant system, data for multiple tenants may be stored in the same physical database object, however, tenant data typically is arranged so that data of one tenant is kept logically separate from that of other tenants so that one tenant does not have access to another tenant's data, unless such data is expressly shared.


In certain embodiments, system 616 implements applications other than, or in addition to, a CRM application. For example, system 616 may provide tenant access to multiple hosted (standard and custom) applications, including a CRM application. User (or third party developer) applications, which may or may not include CRM, may be supported by the application platform 618, which manages creation, storage of the applications into one or more database objects and executing of the applications in a virtual machine in the process space of the system 616.


One arrangement for elements of system 616 is shown in FIG. 6, including a network interface 620, application platform 618, tenant data storage 622 for tenant data 623, system data storage 624 for system data 625 accessible to system 616 and possibly multiple tenants, program code 626 for implementing various functions of system 616, and a process space 628 for executing MTS system processes and tenant-specific processes, such as running applications as part of an application hosting service. Additional processes that may execute on system 616 include database indexing processes.


Several elements in the system shown in FIG. 6 include conventional, well-known elements that are explained only briefly here. For example, each user system 612 could include a desktop personal computer, workstation, laptop, PDA, cell phone, or any wireless access protocol (WAP) enabled device or any other computing device capable of interfacing directly or indirectly to the Internet or other network connection. User system 612 typically runs an HTTP client, e.g., a browsing program, such as Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser, Netscape's Navigator browser, Opera's browser, or a WAP-enabled browser in the case of a cell phone, PDA or other wireless device, or the like, allowing a user (e.g., subscriber of the multi-tenant database system) of user system 612 to access, process and view information, pages and applications available to it from system 616 over network 614.


Each user system 612 also typically includes one or more user interface devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, trackball, touch pad, touch screen, pen or the like, for interacting with a graphical user interface (GUI) provided by the browser on a display (e.g., a monitor screen, LCD display, etc.) in conjunction with pages, forms, applications and other information provided by system 616 or other systems or servers. For example, the user interface device can be used to access data and applications hosted by system 616, and to perform searches on stored data, and otherwise allow a user to interact with various GUI pages that may be presented to a user. As discussed above, embodiments are suitable for use with the Internet, which refers to a specific global internetwork of networks. However, it should be understood that other networks can be used instead of the Internet, such as an intranet, an extranet, a virtual private network (VPN), a non-TCP/IP based network, any LAN or WAN or the like.


According to one embodiment, each user system 612 and all of its components are operator configurable using applications, such as a browser, including computer code run using a central processing unit such as an Intel Pentium® processor or the like. Similarly, system 616 (and additional instances of an MTS, where more than one is present) and all of their components might be operator configurable using application(s) including computer code to run using a central processing unit such as processor system 617, which may include an Intel Pentium® processor or the like, and/or multiple processor units.


A computer program product embodiment includes a machine-readable storage medium (media) having instructions stored thereon/in which can be used to program a computer to perform any of the processes of the embodiments described herein. Computer code for operating and configuring system 616 to intercommunicate and to process webpages, applications and other data and media content as described herein are preferably downloaded and stored on a hard disk, but the entire program code, or portions thereof, may also be stored in any other volatile or non-volatile memory medium or device as is well known, such as a ROM or RAM, or provided on any media capable of storing program code, such as any type of rotating media including floppy disks, optical discs, digital versatile disk (DVD), compact disk (CD), microdrive, and magneto-optical disks, and magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data.


Additionally, the entire program code, or portions thereof, may be transmitted and downloaded from a software source over a transmission medium, e.g., over the Internet, or from another server, as is well known, or transmitted over any other conventional network connection as is well known (e.g., extranet, VPN, LAN, etc.) using any communication medium and protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, HTTP, HTTPS, Ethernet, etc.) as are well known. It will also be appreciated that computer code for implementing embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in any programming language that can be executed on a client system and/or server or server system such as, for example, C, C++, HTML, any other markup language, Java™ JavaScript, ActiveX, any other scripting language, such as VBScript, and many other programming languages as are well known may be used. (Java™ is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc.).


According to one embodiment, each system 616 is configured to provide webpages, forms, applications, data and media content to user (client) systems 612 to support the access by user systems 612 as tenants of system 616. As such, system 616 provides security mechanisms to keep each tenant's data separate unless the data is shared. If more than one MTS is used, they may be located in close proximity to one another (e.g., in a server farm located in a single building or campus), or they may be distributed at locations remote from one another (e.g., one or more servers located in city A and one or more servers located in city B).


As used herein, each MTS could include one or more logically and/or physically connected servers distributed locally or across one or more geographic locations. Additionally, the term “server” is meant to include a computer system, including processing hardware and process space(s), and an associated storage system and database application (e.g., OODBMS or RDBMS) as is well known in the art. It should also be understood that “server system” and “server” are often used interchangeably herein. Similarly, the database object described herein can be implemented as single databases, a distributed database, a collection of distributed databases, a database with redundant online or offline backups or other redundancies, etc., and might include a distributed database or storage network and associated processing intelligence.



FIG. 7 also illustrates environment 610. However, in FIG. 7 elements of system 616 and various interconnections in an embodiment are further illustrated. FIG. 7 shows that user system 612 may include processor system 612A, memory system 612B, input system 612C, and output system 612D. FIG. 7 shows network 614 and system 616. FIG. 7 also shows that system 616 may include tenant data storage 622, tenant data 623, system data storage 624, system data 625, User Interface (UI) 730, Application Program Interface (API) 732, PL/SOQL 734, save routines 736, application setup mechanism 738, applications servers 7001-700N, system process space 702, tenant process spaces 704, tenant management process space 710, tenant storage area 712, user storage 714, and application metadata 716. In other embodiments, environment 610 may not have the same elements as those listed above and/or may have other elements instead of, or in addition to, those listed above.


User system 612, network 614, system 616, tenant data storage 622, and system data storage 624 were discussed above in FIG. 6. Regarding user system 612, processor system 612A may be any combination of one or more processors. Memory system 612B may be any combination of one or more memory devices, short term, and/or long term memory. Input system 612C may be any combination of input devices, such as one or more keyboards, mice, trackballs, scanners, cameras, and/or interfaces to networks. Output system 612D may be any combination of output devices, such as one or more monitors, printers, and/or interfaces to networks.


As shown by FIG. 7, system 616 may include a network interface 620 (of FIG. 6) implemented as a set of HTTP application servers 700, an application platform 618, tenant data storage 622, and system data storage 624. Also shown is system process space 702, including individual tenant process spaces 704 and a tenant management process space 710. Each application server 700 may be configured to tenant data storage 622 and the tenant data 623 therein, and system data storage 624 and the system data 625 therein to serve requests of user systems 612. The tenant data 623 might be divided into individual tenant storage areas 712, which can be either a physical arrangement and/or a logical arrangement of data.


Within each tenant storage area 712, user storage 714 and application metadata 716 might be similarly allocated for each user. For example, a copy of a user's most recently used (MRU) items might be stored to user storage 714. Similarly, a copy of MRU items for an entire organization that is a tenant might be stored to tenant storage area 712. A UI 730 provides a user interface and an API 732 provides an application programmer interface to system 616 resident processes to users and/or developers at user systems 612. The tenant data and the system data may be stored in various databases, such as one or more Oracle databases.


Application platform 618 includes an application setup mechanism 738 that supports application developers' creation and management of applications, which may be saved as metadata into tenant data storage 622 by save routines 736 for execution by subscribers as one or more tenant process spaces 704 managed by tenant management process 710 for example. Invocations to such applications may be coded using PL/SOQL 734 that provides a programming language style interface extension to API 732.


A detailed description of some PL/SOQL language embodiments is discussed in commonly owned co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application 40/828,192 entitled, PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTENDING APIS TO EXECUTE IN CONJUNCTION WITH DATABASE APIS, by Craig Weissman, filed Oct. 4, 2006, which is incorporated in its entirety herein for all purposes. Invocations to applications may be detected by one or more system processes, which manages retrieving application metadata 716 for the subscriber making the invocation and executing the metadata as an application in a virtual machine.


Each application server 700 may be communicably coupled to database systems, e.g., having access to system data 625 and tenant data 623, via a different network connection. For example, one application server 7001 might be coupled via the network 614 (e.g., the Internet), another application server 700N-1 might be coupled via a direct network link, and another application server 700N might be coupled by yet a different network connection. Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) are typical protocols for communicating between application servers 700 and the database system. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that other transport protocols may be used to optimize the system depending on the network interconnect used.


In certain embodiments, each application server 700 is configured to handle requests for any user associated with any organization that is a tenant. Because it is desirable to be able to add and remove application servers from the server pool at any time for any reason, there is preferably no server affinity for a user and/or organization to a specific application server 700. In one embodiment, therefore, an interface system implementing a load balancing function (e.g., an F5 Big-IP load balancer) is communicably coupled between the application servers 700 and the user systems 612 to distribute requests to the application servers 700.


In one embodiment, the load balancer uses a least connections algorithm to route user requests to the application servers 700. Other examples of load balancing algorithms, such as round robin and observed response time, also can be used. For example, in certain embodiments, three consecutive requests from the same user could hit three different application servers 700, and three requests from different users could hit the same application server 700. In this manner, system 616 is multi-tenant, wherein system 616 handles storage of, and access to, different objects, data and applications across disparate users and organizations.


As an example of storage, one tenant might be a company that employs a sales force where each salesperson uses system 616 to manage their sales process. Thus, a user might maintain contact data, leads data, customer follow-up data, performance data, goals and progress data, etc., all applicable to that user's personal sales process (e.g., in tenant data storage 622). In an example of a MTS arrangement, since all of the data and the applications to access, view, modify, report, transmit, calculate, etc., can be maintained and accessed by a user system having nothing more than network access, the user can manage his or her sales efforts and cycles from any of many different user systems. For example, if a salesperson is visiting a customer and the customer has Internet access in their lobby, the salesperson can obtain critical updates as to that customer while waiting for the customer to arrive in the lobby.


While each user's data might be separate from other users' data regardless of the employers of each user, some data might be organization-wide data shared or accessible by a plurality of users or all of the users for a given organization that is a tenant. Thus, there might be some data structures managed by system 616 that are allocated at the tenant level while other data structures might be managed at the user level. Because an MTS might support multiple tenants including possible competitors, the MTS should have security protocols that keep data, applications, and application use separate. Also, because many tenants may opt for access to an MTS rather than maintain their own system, redundancy, up-time, and backup are additional functions that may be implemented in the MTS. In addition to user-specific data and tenant specific data, system 616 might also maintain system level data usable by multiple tenants or other data. Such system level data might include industry reports, news, postings, and the like that are sharable among tenants.


In certain embodiments, user systems 612 (which may be client systems) communicate with application servers 700 to request and update system-level and tenant-level data from system 616 that may require sending one or more queries to tenant data storage 622 and/or system data storage 624. System 616 (e.g., an application server 700 in system 616) automatically generates one or more SQL statements (e.g., one or more SQL queries) that are designed to access the desired information. System data storage 624 may generate query plans to access the requested data from the database.


Each database can generally be viewed as a collection of objects, such as a set of logical tables, containing data fitted into predefined categories. A “table” is one representation of a data object, and may be used herein to simplify the conceptual description of objects and custom objects according to the present invention. It should be understood that “table” and “object” may be used interchangeably herein. Each table generally contains one or more data categories logically arranged as columns or fields in a viewable schema. Each row or record of a table contains an instance of data for each category defined by the fields.


For example, a CRM database may include a table that describes a customer with fields for basic contact information such as name, address, phone number, fax number, etc. Another table might describe a purchase order, including fields for information such as customer, product, sale price, date, etc. In some multi-tenant database systems, standard entity tables might be provided for use by all tenants. For CRM database applications, such standard entities might include tables for Account, Contact, Lead, and Opportunity data, each containing pre-defined fields. It should be understood that the word “entity” may also be used interchangeably herein with “object” and “table”.


In some multi-tenant database systems, tenants may be allowed to create and store custom objects, or they may be allowed to customize standard entities or objects, for example by creating custom fields for standard objects, including custom index fields. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/817,161, filed Apr. 2, 2004, entitled “Custom Entities and Fields in a Multi-Tenant Database System”, and which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, teaches systems and methods for creating custom objects as well as customizing standard objects in a multi-tenant database system. In certain embodiments, for example, all custom entity data rows are stored in a single multi-tenant physical table, which may contain multiple logical tables per organization. It is transparent to customers that their multiple “tables” are in fact stored in one large table or that their data may be stored in the same table as the data of other customers.


Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.


In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes can be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. An article comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by one or more processors, are configurable to cause the one or more processors to: store metadata content as a source instance, the metadata content to be utilized to provide information to be used to manage and configure one or more virtual machines, wherein the metadata comprises at least network configuration information and maintenance event information;provide the metadata content to one or more virtual machines communicatively coupled to receive the metadata content, wherein the source instance comprises a metadata definition repository for metadata to the one or more virtual machines, at least one metadata server having the metadata content is available to the virtual machines;receive a request for metadata content with the at least one metadata server from the one or more virtual machines;retrieve site metadata from the at least one metadata server;provide site content, in response to the request with the selected at least one metadata server utilizing the metadata content.
  • 2. The article of claim 1 wherein the one or more runtime pods operate within a multitenant database environment, wherein the multitenant database environment stores data for multiple client entities each identified by a tenant identifier (ID) having one of one or more users associated with the tenant ID, each having one or more users with corresponding user identifiers, wherein users of each of multiple client entities can only access data identified by a tenant ID associated with the respective client entity, and wherein the multitenant database is a hosted database provided by an entity separate from the client entities, and provides on-demand database service to the client entities.
  • 3. The article of claim 2 wherein the multitenant environment comprises at least two runtime pods each having at least one virtual machine.
  • 4. The article of claim 3 wherein each runtime pod comprises a group of multiple servers that act as a single entity.
  • 5. The article of claim 3 wherein hosting of the runtime pods is isolated away from the source instance.
  • 6. The article of claim 2 further comprising instructions that, when executed, cause the one or more processors to: map a source of the request to a tenant ID corresponding to the source based on a user identifier;retrieve metadata corresponding to the tenant ID;generate the response with a render engine based on the metadata.
  • 7. A method comprising: storing metadata content as a source instance, the metadata content to be utilized to provide information to be used to manage and configure one or more virtual machines, wherein the metadata comprises at least network configuration information and maintenance event information;providing the metadata content to one or more virtual machines communicatively coupled to receive the metadata content, wherein the source instance comprises a metadata definition repository for metadata to the one or more virtual machines, at least one metadata server having the metadata content is available to the virtual machines;receiving a request for metadata content with the at least one metadata server from the one or more virtual machines;retrieving site metadata from the at least one metadata server;providing site content, in response to the request with the selected at least one metadata server utilizing the metadata content.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the one or more runtime one or more virtual machines operate within a multitenant database environment, wherein the multitenant database environment stores data for multiple client entities each identified by a tenant identifier (ID) having one of one or more users associated with the tenant ID, each having one or more users with corresponding user identifiers, wherein users of each of multiple client entities can only access data identified by a tenant ID associated with the respective client entity, and wherein the multitenant database is a hosted database provided by an entity separate from the client entities, and provides on-demand database service to the client entities.
  • 9. The method of claim 7 wherein the multitenant environment comprises at least two runtime pods each having at least one virtual machine.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 wherein each runtime pod comprises a group of multiple servers that act as a single entity.
  • 11. The method of claim 9 wherein hosting of the runtime pods is isolated away from the source instance.
  • 12. The method of claim 9 further comprising: mapping a source of the request to a tenant ID corresponding to the source based on a user identifier;retrieving metadata corresponding to the tenant ID;generating the response with a render engine based on the metadata.
  • 13. A system comprising: a metadata repository having at least one hardware processor and at least one memory device coupled to the at least one hardware processor, the metadata repository to store metadata content as a source instance, the metadata content to be utilized to provide information to be used to manage and configure one or more virtual machines, wherein the metadata comprises at least network configuration information and maintenance event information;a metadata server coupled with the metadata repository, the metadata server to provide the metadata content to one or more virtual machines communicatively coupled to receive the metadata content, wherein the source instance comprises a metadata definition repository for metadata to the one or more virtual machines, at least one metadata server having the metadata content is available to the virtual machines, to receive a request for metadata content with the at least one metadata server from the one or more virtual machines, and to retrieve site metadata from the at least one metadata server; anda render engine to provide site content, in response to the request with the selected at least one metadata server utilizing the metadata content.
  • 14. The system of claim 13 wherein the one or more runtime pods operate within a multitenant database environment, wherein the multitenant database environment stores data for multiple client entities each identified by a tenant identifier (ID) having one of one or more users associated with the tenant ID, each having one or more users with corresponding user identifiers, wherein users of each of multiple client entities can only access data identified by a tenant ID associated with the respective client entity, and wherein the multitenant database is a hosted database provided by an entity separate from the client entities, and provides on-demand database service to the client entities.
  • 15. The system of claim 13 wherein the multitenant environment comprises at least two runtime pods each comprising at least one virtual machine.
  • 16. The system of claim 15 wherein each runtime pod comprises a group of multiple servers that act as a single entity.
  • 17. The system of claim 15 wherein hosting of the runtime pods is isolated away from the source instance.
  • 18. The system of claim 13 the metadata server further to: map a source of the request to a tenant ID corresponding to the source based on a user identifier;retrieve metadata corresponding to the tenant ID;generate the response with a render engine based on the metadata.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This United States continuation patent application is related to, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/339,688, entitled “TECHNIQUES FOR METADATA-DRIVEN DYNAMIC CONTENT SERVING,” filed Oct. 31, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,212,209, with an issue date of Feb. 19, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/041,425, entitled “TECHNIQUES FOR METADATA-DRIVEN DYNAMIC CONTENT SERVING,” filed Feb. 11, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,525,720, with an issue date of Dec. 20, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/592,804, entitled “TECHNIQUES FOR METADATA-DRIVEN DYNAMIC CONTENT SERVING,” filed Jan. 8, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,276,995, with an issue date of Mar. 1, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/248,459, entitled “TECHNIQUES FOR METADATA-DRIVEN DYNAMIC CONTENT SERVING,” filed Sep. 29, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,935,360, with an issue date of Jan. 13, 2015; which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/419,611, entitled “A CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR DEVELOPING AND INTERACTING WITH WEBSITES,” filed Dec. 3, 2010, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (269)
Number Name Date Kind
5388214 Leiserson et al. Feb 1995 A
5577188 Zhu Nov 1996 A
5608872 Schwartz et al. Mar 1997 A
5649104 Carleton et al. Jul 1997 A
5715450 Ambrose et al. Feb 1998 A
5761419 Schwartz et al. Jun 1998 A
5815703 Copeland et al. Sep 1998 A
5819038 Carleton et al. Oct 1998 A
5821937 Tonelli et al. Oct 1998 A
5831610 Tonelli et al. Nov 1998 A
5873096 Lim et al. Feb 1999 A
5918159 Fomukong et al. Jun 1999 A
5963953 Cram et al. Oct 1999 A
6031987 Damani et al. Feb 2000 A
6092083 Brodersen et al. Jul 2000 A
6169534 Raffel et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178425 Brodersen et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189011 Lim et al. Feb 2001 B1
6216135 Brodersen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233617 Rothwein et al. May 2001 B1
6249291 Popp et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266669 Brodersen et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272537 Kekic et al. Aug 2001 B1
6295530 Ritchie et al. Sep 2001 B1
6324568 Diec Nov 2001 B1
6324693 Brodersen et al. Nov 2001 B1
6336137 Lee et al. Jan 2002 B1
6341262 Damani et al. Jan 2002 B1
D454139 Feldcamp Mar 2002 S
6367077 Brodersen et al. Apr 2002 B1
6393386 Zager et al. May 2002 B1
6393605 Loomans May 2002 B1
6405220 Brodersen et al. Jun 2002 B1
6429880 Marcos et al. Aug 2002 B2
6434550 Warner et al. Aug 2002 B1
6446089 Brodersen et al. Sep 2002 B1
6505212 Nakano et al. Jan 2003 B2
6535909 Rust Mar 2003 B1
6546397 Rempell Apr 2003 B1
6549908 Loomans Apr 2003 B1
6553563 Ambrose et al. Apr 2003 B2
6560461 Fomukong et al. May 2003 B1
6560639 Dan et al. May 2003 B1
6574635 Stauber et al. Jun 2003 B2
6577726 Huang et al. Jun 2003 B1
6581063 Kirkman Jun 2003 B1
6601087 Zhu et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604117 Lim et al. Aug 2003 B2
6604128 Diec Aug 2003 B2
6609150 Lee et al. Aug 2003 B2
6621834 Scherpbier et al. Sep 2003 B1
6636886 Katiyar et al. Oct 2003 B1
6654032 Zhu et al. Nov 2003 B1
6665648 Brodersen et al. Dec 2003 B2
6665655 Warner et al. Dec 2003 B1
6684438 Brodersen et al. Feb 2004 B2
6711565 Subramaniam et al. Mar 2004 B1
6724399 Katchour et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728702 Subramaniam et al. Apr 2004 B1
6728960 Loomans Apr 2004 B1
6732095 Warshaysky et al. May 2004 B1
6732100 Brodersen et al. May 2004 B1
6732111 Brodersen et al. May 2004 B2
6732332 Borysewicz et al. May 2004 B1
6754681 Brodersen et al. Jun 2004 B2
6763351 Subramaniam et al. Jul 2004 B1
6763501 Zhu et al. Jul 2004 B1
6768904 Kim Jul 2004 B2
6769032 Katiyar et al. Jul 2004 B1
6782383 Subramaniam et al. Aug 2004 B2
6792454 Nakano et al. Sep 2004 B2
6792475 Arcuri et al. Sep 2004 B1
6804330 Jones et al. Oct 2004 B1
6826565 Ritchie et al. Nov 2004 B2
6826582 Chatterjee et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826745 Coker et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829655 Huang et al. Dec 2004 B1
6842748 Warner et al. Jan 2005 B1
6850895 Brodersen et al. Feb 2005 B2
6850949 Warner et al. Feb 2005 B2
6889260 Hughes May 2005 B1
6938050 Le et al. Aug 2005 B2
6957218 Wyatt Oct 2005 B1
6961750 Burd et al. Nov 2005 B1
6968372 Thompson et al. Nov 2005 B1
6985927 O'Brien et al. Jan 2006 B2
7003528 Dan et al. Feb 2006 B2
7003777 Hines Feb 2006 B2
7020722 Sivier et al. Mar 2006 B2
7032225 Wang et al. Apr 2006 B2
7092995 Kaler et al. Aug 2006 B2
7117504 Smith et al. Oct 2006 B2
7171664 Wang et al. Jan 2007 B2
7246054 Szymanski et al. Jul 2007 B2
7287215 Arcuri et al. Oct 2007 B2
7289976 Kihneman et al. Oct 2007 B2
7330722 Kirtley et al. Feb 2008 B1
7340411 Cook Mar 2008 B2
7441008 Johnson Oct 2008 B2
7451393 Herbison et al. Nov 2008 B1
7523214 Kikkawa et al. Apr 2009 B2
7620655 Larsson et al. Nov 2009 B2
7627649 Saras Dec 2009 B2
7689593 Becker Mar 2010 B2
7752258 Lewin et al. Jul 2010 B2
7930318 Becker Apr 2011 B2
8190679 Gay et al. May 2012 B1
8306979 Mao et al. Nov 2012 B2
8364540 Soroca et al. Jan 2013 B2
8364648 Sim-Tang Jan 2013 B1
8397223 Chiang Mar 2013 B2
8402427 Chiang Mar 2013 B2
8442996 Maim May 2013 B2
8607139 Alexander Dec 2013 B2
8615583 Plamondon Dec 2013 B2
8671021 Maharajh et al. Mar 2014 B2
8819187 Hofmann Aug 2014 B1
8825830 Newton et al. Sep 2014 B2
8855469 Maharajh et al. Oct 2014 B2
8924412 Rhoads et al. Dec 2014 B2
8994815 Mito et al. Mar 2015 B2
9064010 Maharajh et al. Jun 2015 B2
9124650 Maharajh et al. Sep 2015 B2
9223892 Calvin et al. Dec 2015 B2
9276995 Calvin et al. Mar 2016 B2
9648125 Flack et al. May 2017 B2
20010037490 Chiang Nov 2001 A1
20010044791 Richter et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020022986 Coker et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020029161 Brodersen et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020029376 Ambrose et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020035577 Brodersen et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020042264 Kim Apr 2002 A1
20020042843 Diec Apr 2002 A1
20020046245 Hillar et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020049697 Nakano et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020059558 Hines May 2002 A1
20020072951 Lee et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082892 Raffel et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020095423 Dessloch et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020129352 Brodersen et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133561 O'Brien et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133637 Popp et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020140731 Subramaniam et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020143997 Huang et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152102 Brodersen et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020161734 Stauber et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020162090 Parnell et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165742 Robins Nov 2002 A1
20030004971 Gong et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030014442 Shiigi et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018705 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030018830 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028517 Nakano et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037119 Austin Feb 2003 A1
20030050929 Bookman et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030066031 Laane Apr 2003 A1
20030066032 Ramachadran et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069936 Warner et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070000 Coker et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070004 Mukundan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030070005 Mukundan et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074418 Coker Apr 2003 A1
20030088545 Subramaniam et al. May 2003 A1
20030093569 Sivier et al. May 2003 A1
20030097664 Meyers et al. May 2003 A1
20030120675 Stauber et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030151633 George et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030159136 Huang et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030182308 Ernst et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030119174 Brodersen et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030187821 Cotton et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030187921 Diec Oct 2003 A1
20030189600 Gune et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030191743 Brodersen et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204427 Gune et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030204810 Dam et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030206192 Chen et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030217117 Dan et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030225730 Warner et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030226132 Tondreau et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040001092 Rothwein et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010489 Rio Jan 2004 A1
20040015981 Coker et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024578 Szymanski et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040027388 Berg et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040095367 Weng et al. May 2004 A1
20040111398 England et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040111400 Chevalier Jun 2004 A1
20040111728 Schwalm Jun 2004 A1
20040112329 Johnson Jun 2004 A1
20040117795 Wang et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040123238 Hefetz et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128001 Levin et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153464 Groves Aug 2004 A1
20040167989 Kline et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040186860 Lee et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193510 Catahan, Jr. et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040199489 Barnes-Leon et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199536 Barnes-Leon et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199543 Braud et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040215604 Lyanoy Oct 2004 A1
20040215719 Altshuler Oct 2004 A1
20040230983 Shi et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040249854 Barnes-Leon et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260534 Pak et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040260659 Chan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040268299 Lei et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004903 Tsuda Jan 2005 A1
20050005089 Eckhart et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015357 Shahidi Jan 2005 A1
20050015384 Wehrman Jan 2005 A1
20050028081 Arcun et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050050555 Exley et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050060687 Ghazaleh et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050081142 Popp et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091026 Hodgson et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050091098 Brodersen et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050132272 Bodin et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050138086 Pecht-Seibert Jun 2005 A1
20050223022 Weissman et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050235256 Freydl Oct 2005 A1
20050246627 Saved Nov 2005 A1
20060206599 Milligan et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060212531 Kikkawa et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060218180 Bodlaender et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060294500 Chiang Dec 2006 A1
20070061408 Saras Mar 2007 A1
20070129928 Lin et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070162969 Becker Jul 2007 A1
20070204013 Castrucci Aug 2007 A1
20070214113 Lei et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080010381 Barraclough et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080052668 Craig et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080140759 Conner et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140760 Conner et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080140857 Conner et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080172608 Patrawala et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080207182 Maharam et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080222397 Wilkerson et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080288451 Jiang et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080288608 Johnson Nov 2008 A1
20080290987 Li Nov 2008 A1
20090037460 Medicke et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090106356 Brase et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090150518 Lewin et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090177744 Marlow et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090248793 Jacobsson et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100017368 Mao et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100095197 Klevenz et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100146565 Ospalik Jun 2010 A1
20100185614 O'Brien et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100250599 Schmidt et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100325583 Aarni et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110071901 Fries Mar 2011 A1
20110276664 Prahlad et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120010995 Skirpa et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120011167 Schmidt Jan 2012 A1
20120174064 Polly et al. Jul 2012 A1
20130097664 Herz et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130136253 Ben-Ami et al. May 2013 A1
20140089459 Werr Mar 2014 A1
20140173054 Varney et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140230076 Micucci et al. Aug 2014 A1
20150135300 Ford May 2015 A1
20150163206 McCarthy et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150310188 Ford et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160224638 Bestler et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160255139 Rathod Sep 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
2002032299 Jan 2002 JP
2002049585 Feb 2002 JP
WO-2005062211 Jul 2005 WO
WO-2007092373 Aug 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (57)
Entry
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,459 dated Mar. 7, 2013, 10 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,459 dated Apr. 18, 2014, 12 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,459 dated Sep. 30, 2013, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2009/000569 dated Jul. 27, 2009, 10 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2009/000569 dated Nov. 11, 2010, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,459 dated Sep. 9, 2014, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 dated Oct. 10, 2014, 28 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,472 dated Feb. 27, 2015, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/592,804 dated Mar. 27, 2015, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,028 dated Mar. 18, 2015, 21 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 dated Apr. 22, 2015, 24 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/935,890, dated May 15, 2014, 2 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/935,890, dated Jul. 9, 2013, 26 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/935,890, dated Jan. 28, 2013, 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,028 dated Jul. 8, 2015, 16 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/592,804 dated Jul. 9, 2015, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,472 dated Aug. 24, 2015, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 dated Aug. 31, 2015, 26 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/592,804 dated Oct. 14, 2015, 8 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 09737586.9 dated Nov. 18, 2015, 4 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 dated Jan. 4, 2016, 31 pages.
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,720,897 dated Jan. 18, 2013, 3 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/895,715 dated Oct. 12, 2012, 18 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/895,713 dated Jun. 25, 2013, 18 pages.
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2720897 dated Dec. 16, 2013, 3 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/935,890, dated Feb. 12, 2014, 15 pages.
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 09737586.9 dated Nov. 14, 2013, 6 pages.
Atterer, et al. “Tracking the Interaction of Users with AJAX Applications for Usability Testing,” Apr./May 2007, ACM, p. 1347-1350.
Chen, et al. “Function-Based Object Model Towards Website Adaptation,” May 2001, ACM, p. 587-596.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/806,238 dated Oct. 1, 2019, 21 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 dated Mar. 16, 2020, 27 pages.
“Responsive Layout Templates”, <http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSZLC2.sub.--7.0.0/com.ibm-commerce.aurora-starterstore.doc/refs/rsmaurorasa.sub--rwdtemplates.htm&- gt; 3 pgs.
Corrected Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 14/928,004 dated Sep. 22, 2017, 2 pages.
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 09737586.9 dated Dec. 16, 2011, 5 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 dated Jan. 12, 2017, 32 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 dated Jan. 5, 2018, 29 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 dated Jun. 12, 2019, 28 pages.
Gaul, Patrick, et al., “Supporting Mobile Devices with Microsoft Content Management Server 2002”, May 2003, 56 pgs.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 dated Jul. 11, 2018, 30 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 dated Jun. 15, 2017, 28 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 dated Jun. 16, 2016, 30 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/954,879 dated May 6, 2016, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/041,425 dated Apr. 22, 2016, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/339,688 dated Aug. 21, 2017, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/806,238 dated Mar. 5, 2019, 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,720,897 dated Sep. 12, 2014, 1 page.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/928,004 dated Feb. 24, 2017, 18 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/928,004 dated Jul. 6, 2017, 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/954,879 dated Aug. 26, 2016, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/954,879 dated Dec. 19, 2016, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/041,425 dated Aug. 12, 2016, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/339,688 dated Jun. 28, 2018, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/339,688 dated Oct. 25, 2018, 7 pages.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-505333 dated Apr. 30, 2013, 6 pages.
Stateless protocol, Wikipedia, available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stateless_protocol (accessed Dec. 30, 2017).
Stateless, TechTarget, available at http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/stateless (accessed Dec. 30, 2017).
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings for European Patent Application No. 09737586.9 dated Apr. 12, 2017, 7 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190379721 A1 Dec 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61419611 Dec 2010 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 15339688 Oct 2016 US
Child 16274174 US
Parent 15041425 Feb 2016 US
Child 15339688 US
Parent 14592804 Jan 2015 US
Child 15041425 US
Parent 13248459 Sep 2011 US
Child 14592804 US