A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
Embodiments relate to techniques for providing metadata-driven content. More particularly, embodiments relate to techniques for hosting content in a manner that supports use of multiple servers to provide metadata-driven dynamic content.
Servers that provide content in the form of pages to requesting devices generally cannot provide constant uptime availability. This may be the result of various conditions including routine maintenance operations, system upgrades, content changes, etc. This is a less than optimal situation for providing content.
The invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements.
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description.
In various embodiments of architectures described herein, combinations of one or more servers are utilized to host metadata driven dynamic pages. These architectures may be referred to as “Runtime Pods” that may be configured to provide constant (100%) uptime availability. Embodiments of runtime pods utilize a collection of servers that may include, but are not limited to, reverse proxy servers, web application servers and/or database servers. In some embodiments, the servers operate as a single unit to host metadata driven dynamic pages. In one embodiment, these runtime pods are stateless.
In some embodiments, the runtime pod hosting is located and isolated away from a ‘source instance’ of the content. The source instance refers to a metadata definition repository and is a primary source of dynamic data for serving pages. In one embodiment, page metadata is created and maintained on the source instance. This allows the architecture to remain active when the source instance is down for any reason.
In one embodiment, a runtime pod may be utilized a version-aware application programming interface (API) to create, read, update and delete data from the source instance. The API is versioned so that the source instance and runtime pod(s) may be on different versions. If the source instance is down, the pages may still be available even if dynamic data from the source instance may not be show, or alternatively, a cached version of the data may be served.
As discussed above, source instance 110 refers to a metadata definition repository and is a primary source of dynamic data for serving pages. Source instance 110 may be data stored by one or more databases that are interconnected and/or are communicatively coupled with runtime pod 120. In one embodiment, page metadata is created and maintained on source instance 110. The page metadata that is used to serve pages is published to runtime pod 120 after creation. When source instance 110 is updated, the updated metadata and/or other data may be published to runtime pod 120.
Runtime pod 120 operates to provide metadata driven dynamic content to devices that request data (not illustrated in
In one embodiment, runtime pod 120 includes firewall 210, which operates to permit or deny network transmissions based upon a set of rules to protect runtime pod 120 from unauthorized access while permitting legitimate communications to pass. In one embodiment, runtime pod 120 further includes load balancer 220, which operates to distribute requests across components of runtime pod 120.
In one embodiment, runtime pod 120 includes one or more proxy servers (e.g., 230, 235), which operate to a proxy server is a server (a computer system or an application) that act as an intermediary for requests from clients (not illustrated in
In one embodiment, runtime pod 120 includes multiple application servers (e.g., 240, 242, 244, 246, 248, 250), which may be hardware servers and/or software servers that provide services to respond to requests received from client devices. The application servers utilize database 260 to provide content in response to requests from client devices.
Runtime pod 120 receives content from a source instance as described above with respect to
In one embodiment, at least two runtime pods (e.g., 340, 360) are each maintained in an active state (e.g., an ACTIVE-ACTIVE configuration). That is, each of at least two runtime pods is capable of serving pages at any time. In one embodiment, the runtime pods are set up in a Global Server Load Balancing (GSLB) configuration.
Client device 300 may perform a domain lookup with Domain Name System (DNS) 320, which may return an address (e.g., IP address) of one of the active runtime pods (e.g., 340, 360). Client device 300 may then use the address to send a request to one of the runtime pods, which may function as described above.
Metadata and/or other data may be developed for a site and stored in the source instance, 410. The metadata and/or other data is utilized to dynamically construct pages of content in response to requests received from client devices.
The metadata is published to one or more runtime pods, 420. As described above, the runtime pods are groups of multiple servers that act as a single entity to dynamically generate metadata-driven content in response to requests received from client devices. When the runtime pods received the published metadata, the data is transformed and stored in the runtime pod database(s), 430. This allows the runtime pod(s) to have the necessary metadata to respond to requests from client devices.
When the databases have been updated, the runtime pod(s) may respond to requests utilizing the metadata, 440. If the runtime pod has a previous version of the metadata, the previous version may be utilized until the newly-published metadata can be processed and ready for use by the runtime pod(s).
In one embodiment, a single runtime pod is capable of serving many individual sites from many different customers. The load from any site may be spread across the runtime pod. This may result in a more full utilization of hardware resources as well as simplification of management and deployment.
In one embodiment, a site definition is stored as metadata in a runtime pod database. For example, each site's metadata may be stored according to the site's identifier (e.g., primary key). The primary key of the site can be retrieved by looking it up in a domain mapping table by the domain of a request. The metadata may be retrieved and converted to a specific format indicated by the request. The result can be sent back to the requesting device as a response (e.g., HTTP response). In one embodiment, the metadata and/or response may be cached for subsequent requests.
In one embodiment, a multi-tenant database system utilizes tenant identifiers (IDs) within a multi-tenant environment to allow individual tenants to access their data while preserving the integrity of other tenant's data. In one embodiment, the multitenant database stores data for multiple client entities each identified by a tenant ID having one of one or more users associated with the tenant ID. Users of each of multiple client entities can only access data identified by a tenant ID associated with their respective client entity. In one embodiment, the multitenant database is a hosted database provided by an entity separate from the client entities, and provides on-demand and/or real-time database service to the client entities.
A request is received from a client device 510 for a specific site (e.g., example.com). In one embodiment, runtime pod 500 includes domain mapping server 520 that operates to map the site from which the request comes (e.g., example.com) to a tenant identifier that may be used within the multitenant environment.
The tenant ID is then used to retrieve site metadata from site metadata server 530. The site metadata may then be used by render engine 540 to generate a response to be sent back to client device 510. In one embodiment, the response is provided in the from of a http response; however, other response formats may also be supported.
Environment 610 is an environment in which an on-demand database service exists. User system 612 may be any machine or system that is used by a user to access a database user system. For example, any of user systems 612 can be a handheld computing device, a mobile phone, a laptop computer, a work station, and/or a network of computing devices. As illustrated in
An on-demand database service, such as system 616, is a database system that is made available to outside users that do not need to necessarily be concerned with building and/or maintaining the database system, but instead may be available for their use when the users need the database system (e.g., on the demand of the users). Some on-demand database services may store information from one or more tenants stored into tables of a common database image to form a multi-tenant database system (MTS). Accordingly, “on-demand database service 616” and “system 616” will be used interchangeably herein.
A database image may include one or more database objects. A relational database management system (RDMS) or the equivalent may execute storage and retrieval of information against the database object(s). Application platform 618 may be a framework that allows the applications of system 616 to run, such as the hardware and/or software, e.g., the operating system. In an embodiment, on-demand database service 616 may include an application platform 618 that enables creation, managing and executing one or more applications developed by the provider of the on-demand database service, users accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 612, or third party application developers accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 612.
The users of user systems 612 may differ in their respective capacities, and the capacity of a particular user system 612 might be entirely determined by permissions (permission levels) for the current user. For example, where a salesperson is using a particular user system 612 to interact with system 616, that user system has the capacities allotted to that salesperson. However, while an administrator is using that user system to interact with system 616, that user system has the capacities allotted to that administrator.
In systems with a hierarchical role model, users at one permission level may have access to applications, data, and database information accessible by a lower permission level user, but may not have access to certain applications, database information, and data accessible by a user at a higher permission level. Thus, different users will have different capabilities with regard to accessing and modifying application and database information, depending on a user's security or permission level.
Network 614 is any network or combination of networks of devices that communicate with one another. For example, network 614 can be any one or any combination of a LAN (local area network), WAN (wide area network), telephone network, wireless network, point-to-point network, star network, token ring network, hub network, or other appropriate configuration. As the most common type of computer network in current use is a TCP/IP (Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol) network, such as the global internetwork of networks often referred to as the “Internet” with a capital “I,” that network will be used in many of the examples herein. However, it should be understood that the networks that the present invention might use are not so limited, although TCP/IP is a frequently implemented protocol.
User systems 612 might communicate with system 616 using TCP/IP and, at a higher network level, use other common Internet protocols to communicate, such as HTTP, FTP, AFS, WAP, etc. In an example where HTTP is used, user system 612 might include an HTTP client commonly referred to as a “browser” for sending and receiving HTTP messages to and from an HTTP server at system 616. Such an HTTP server might be implemented as the sole network interface between system 616 and network 614, but other techniques might be used as well or instead. In some implementations, the interface between system 616 and network 614 includes load sharing functionality, such as round-robin HTTP request distributors to balance loads and distribute incoming HTTP requests evenly over a plurality of servers. At least as for the users that are accessing that server, each of the plurality of servers has access to the MTS' data; however, other alternative configurations may be used instead.
In one embodiment, system 616, shown in
In certain embodiments, system 616 implements applications other than, or in addition to, a CRM application. For example, system 616 may provide tenant access to multiple hosted (standard and custom) applications, including a CRM application. User (or third party developer) applications, which may or may not include CRM, may be supported by the application platform 618, which manages creation, storage of the applications into one or more database objects and executing of the applications in a virtual machine in the process space of the system 616.
One arrangement for elements of system 616 is shown in
Several elements in the system shown in
Each user system 612 also typically includes one or more user interface devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, trackball, touch pad, touch screen, pen or the like, for interacting with a graphical user interface (GUI) provided by the browser on a display (e.g., a monitor screen, LCD display, etc.) in conjunction with pages, forms, applications and other information provided by system 616 or other systems or servers. For example, the user interface device can be used to access data and applications hosted by system 616, and to perform searches on stored data, and otherwise allow a user to interact with various GUI pages that may be presented to a user. As discussed above, embodiments are suitable for use with the Internet, which refers to a specific global internetwork of networks. However, it should be understood that other networks can be used instead of the Internet, such as an intranet, an extranet, a virtual private network (VPN), a non-TCP/IP based network, any LAN or WAN or the like.
According to one embodiment, each user system 612 and all of its components are operator configurable using applications, such as a browser, including computer code run using a central processing unit such as an Intel Pentium® processor or the like. Similarly, system 616 (and additional instances of an MTS, where more than one is present) and all of their components might be operator configurable using application(s) including computer code to run using a central processing unit such as processor system 617, which may include an Intel Pentium® processor or the like, and/or multiple processor units.
A computer program product embodiment includes a machine-readable storage medium (media) having instructions stored thereon/in which can be used to program a computer to perform any of the processes of the embodiments described herein. Computer code for operating and configuring system 616 to intercommunicate and to process webpages, applications and other data and media content as described herein are preferably downloaded and stored on a hard disk, but the entire program code, or portions thereof, may also be stored in any other volatile or non-volatile memory medium or device as is well known, such as a ROM or RAM, or provided on any media capable of storing program code, such as any type of rotating media including floppy disks, optical discs, digital versatile disk (DVD), compact disk (CD), microdrive, and magneto-optical disks, and magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data.
Additionally, the entire program code, or portions thereof, may be transmitted and downloaded from a software source over a transmission medium, e.g., over the Internet, or from another server, as is well known, or transmitted over any other conventional network connection as is well known (e.g., extranet, VPN, LAN, etc.) using any communication medium and protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, HTTP, HTTPS, Ethernet, etc.) as are well known. It will also be appreciated that computer code for implementing embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in any programming language that can be executed on a client system and/or server or server system such as, for example, C, C++, HTML, any other markup language, Java™ JavaScript, ActiveX, any other scripting language, such as VBScript, and many other programming languages as are well known may be used. (Java™ is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc.).
According to one embodiment, each system 616 is configured to provide webpages, forms, applications, data and media content to user (client) systems 612 to support the access by user systems 612 as tenants of system 616. As such, system 616 provides security mechanisms to keep each tenant's data separate unless the data is shared. If more than one MTS is used, they may be located in close proximity to one another (e.g., in a server farm located in a single building or campus), or they may be distributed at locations remote from one another (e.g., one or more servers located in city A and one or more servers located in city B).
As used herein, each MTS could include one or more logically and/or physically connected servers distributed locally or across one or more geographic locations. Additionally, the term “server” is meant to include a computer system, including processing hardware and process space(s), and an associated storage system and database application (e.g., OODBMS or RDBMS) as is well known in the art. It should also be understood that “server system” and “server” are often used interchangeably herein. Similarly, the database object described herein can be implemented as single databases, a distributed database, a collection of distributed databases, a database with redundant online or offline backups or other redundancies, etc., and might include a distributed database or storage network and associated processing intelligence.
User system 612, network 614, system 616, tenant data storage 622, and system data storage 624 were discussed above in
As shown by
Within each tenant storage area 712, user storage 714 and application metadata 716 might be similarly allocated for each user. For example, a copy of a user's most recently used (MRU) items might be stored to user storage 714. Similarly, a copy of MRU items for an entire organization that is a tenant might be stored to tenant storage area 712. A UI 730 provides a user interface and an API 732 provides an application programmer interface to system 616 resident processes to users and/or developers at user systems 612. The tenant data and the system data may be stored in various databases, such as one or more Oracle™ databases.
Application platform 618 includes an application setup mechanism 738 that supports application developers' creation and management of applications, which may be saved as metadata into tenant data storage 622 by save routines 736 for execution by subscribers as one or more tenant process spaces 704 managed by tenant management process 710 for example. Invocations to such applications may be coded using PL/SOQL 734 that provides a programming language style interface extension to API 732.
A detailed description of some PL/SOQL language embodiments is discussed in commonly owned co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application 40/828,192 entitled, PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTENDING APIS TO EXECUTE IN CONJUNCTION WITH DATABASE APIS, by Craig Weissman, filed Oct. 4, 2006, which is incorporated in its entirety herein for all purposes. Invocations to applications may be detected by one or more system processes, which manages retrieving application metadata 716 for the subscriber making the invocation and executing the metadata as an application in a virtual machine.
Each application server 700 may be communicably coupled to database systems, e.g., having access to system data 625 and tenant data 623, via a different network connection. For example, one application server 7001 might be coupled via the network 614 (e.g., the Internet), another application server 700N-1 might be coupled via a direct network link, and another application server 700N might be coupled by yet a different network connection. Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) are typical protocols for communicating between application servers 700 and the database system. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that other transport protocols may be used to optimize the system depending on the network interconnect used.
In certain embodiments, each application server 700 is configured to handle requests for any user associated with any organization that is a tenant. Because it is desirable to be able to add and remove application servers from the server pool at any time for any reason, there is preferably no server affinity for a user and/or organization to a specific application server 700. In one embodiment, therefore, an interface system implementing a load balancing function (e.g., an F5 Big-IP load balancer) is communicably coupled between the application servers 700 and the user systems 612 to distribute requests to the application servers 700.
In one embodiment, the load balancer uses a least connections algorithm to route user requests to the application servers 700. Other examples of load balancing algorithms, such as round robin and observed response time, also can be used. For example, in certain embodiments, three consecutive requests from the same user could hit three different application servers 700, and three requests from different users could hit the same application server 700. In this manner, system 616 is multi-tenant, wherein system 616 handles storage of, and access to, different objects, data and applications across disparate users and organizations.
As an example of storage, one tenant might be a company that employs a sales force where each salesperson uses system 616 to manage their sales process. Thus, a user might maintain contact data, leads data, customer follow-up data, performance data, goals and progress data, etc., all applicable to that user's personal sales process (e.g., in tenant data storage 622). In an example of a MTS arrangement, since all of the data and the applications to access, view, modify, report, transmit, calculate, etc., can be maintained and accessed by a user system having nothing more than network access, the user can manage his or her sales efforts and cycles from any of many different user systems. For example, if a salesperson is visiting a customer and the customer has Internet access in their lobby, the salesperson can obtain critical updates as to that customer while waiting for the customer to arrive in the lobby.
While each user's data might be separate from other users' data regardless of the employers of each user, some data might be organization-wide data shared or accessible by a plurality of users or all of the users for a given organization that is a tenant. Thus, there might be some data structures managed by system 616 that are allocated at the tenant level while other data structures might be managed at the user level. Because an MTS might support multiple tenants including possible competitors, the MTS should have security protocols that keep data, applications, and application use separate. Also, because many tenants may opt for access to an MTS rather than maintain their own system, redundancy, up-time, and backup are additional functions that may be implemented in the MTS. In addition to user-specific data and tenant specific data, system 616 might also maintain system level data usable by multiple tenants or other data. Such system level data might include industry reports, news, postings, and the like that are sharable among tenants.
In certain embodiments, user systems 612 (which may be client systems) communicate with application servers 700 to request and update system-level and tenant-level data from system 616 that may require sending one or more queries to tenant data storage 622 and/or system data storage 624. System 616 (e.g., an application server 700 in system 616) automatically generates one or more SQL statements (e.g., one or more SQL queries) that are designed to access the desired information. System data storage 624 may generate query plans to access the requested data from the database.
Each database can generally be viewed as a collection of objects, such as a set of logical tables, containing data fitted into predefined categories. A “table” is one representation of a data object, and may be used herein to simplify the conceptual description of objects and custom objects according to the present invention. It should be understood that “table” and “object” may be used interchangeably herein. Each table generally contains one or more data categories logically arranged as columns or fields in a viewable schema. Each row or record of a table contains an instance of data for each category defined by the fields.
For example, a CRM database may include a table that describes a customer with fields for basic contact information such as name, address, phone number, fax number, etc. Another table might describe a purchase order, including fields for information such as customer, product, sale price, date, etc. In some multi-tenant database systems, standard entity tables might be provided for use by all tenants. For CRM database applications, such standard entities might include tables for Account, Contact, Lead, and Opportunity data, each containing pre-defined fields. It should be understood that the word “entity” may also be used interchangeably herein with “object” and “table”.
In some multi-tenant database systems, tenants may be allowed to create and store custom objects, or they may be allowed to customize standard entities or objects, for example by creating custom fields for standard objects, including custom index fields. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/817,161, filed Apr. 2, 2004, entitled “Custom Entities and Fields in a Multi-Tenant Database System”, and which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, teaches systems and methods for creating custom objects as well as customizing standard objects in a multi-tenant database system. In certain embodiments, for example, all custom entity data rows are stored in a single multi-tenant physical table, which may contain multiple logical tables per organization. It is transparent to customers that their multiple “tables” are in fact stored in one large table or that their data may be stored in the same table as the data of other customers.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes can be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This United States continuation patent application is related to, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/248,459, entitled “TECHNIQUES FOR METADATA-DRIVEN DYNAMIC CONTENT SERVING,” filed Sep. 29, 2011; and is further related to, and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/419,611, entitled “A CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR DEVELOPING AND INTERACTING WITH WEBSITES,” filed Dec. 3, 2010, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5388214 | Leiserson et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5577188 | Zhu | Nov 1996 | A |
5608872 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5649104 | Carleton et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5715450 | Ambrose et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5761419 | Schwartz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5819038 | Carleton et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821937 | Tonelli et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831610 | Tonelli et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5873096 | Lim et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5918159 | Fomukong et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5963953 | Cram et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6031987 | Damani et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6092083 | Brodersen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6169534 | Raffel et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178425 | Brodersen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189011 | Lim et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6216135 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233617 | Rothwein et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6249291 | Popp et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266669 | Brodersen et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272537 | Kekic et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6295530 | Ritchie et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6324568 | Diec | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324693 | Brodersen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336137 | Lee et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341262 | Damani et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
D454139 | Feldcamp | Mar 2002 | S |
6367077 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393386 | Zager et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393605 | Loomans | May 2002 | B1 |
6405220 | Brodersen et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6434550 | Warner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446089 | Brodersen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6505212 | Nakano et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6535909 | Rust | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6546397 | Rempell | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549908 | Loomans | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553563 | Ambrose et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560461 | Fomukong et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6560639 | Dan et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574635 | Stauber et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577726 | Huang et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6581063 | Kirkman | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6601087 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604117 | Lim et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6604128 | Diec | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6609150 | Lee et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6621834 | Scherpbier et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636886 | Katiyar et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6654032 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6665648 | Brodersen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665655 | Warner et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684438 | Brodersen et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6711565 | Subramaniam et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724399 | Katchour et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728702 | Subramaniam et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728960 | Loomans | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732095 | Warshavsky et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732100 | Brodersen et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732111 | Brodersen et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6732332 | Borysewicz et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754681 | Brodersen et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763351 | Subramaniam et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763501 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6768904 | Kim | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6769032 | Katiyar et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6782383 | Subramaniam et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6792454 | Nakano et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6792475 | Arcuri et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804330 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826565 | Ritchie et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826582 | Chatterjee et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6826745 | Coker et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829655 | Huang et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6842748 | Warner et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6850895 | Brodersen et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850949 | Warner et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6889260 | Hughes | May 2005 | B1 |
6938050 | Le et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6957218 | Wyatt | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6968372 | Thompson et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6985927 | O'Brien et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7003528 | Dan et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003777 | Hines | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020722 | Sivier et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7032225 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7092995 | Kaler et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7171664 | Wang et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7246054 | Szymanski et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7287215 | Arcuri et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7330722 | Kirtley et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7340411 | Cook | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7441008 | Johnson | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7451393 | Herbison et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7620655 | Larsson et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627649 | Saras | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7752258 | Lewin et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8190679 | Gay et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8306979 | Mao et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8364540 | Soroca et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8397223 | Chiang | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8402427 | Chiang | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8607139 | Alexander | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8615583 | Plamondon | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8671021 | Maharajh et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8819187 | Hofmann | Aug 2014 | B1 |
8994815 | Mito et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9064010 | Maharajh et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20010037490 | Chiang | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044791 | Richter et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020022986 | Coker et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029161 | Brodersen et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020029376 | Ambrose et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035577 | Brodersen et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042264 | Kim | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020042843 | Diec | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046245 | Hillar et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049697 | Nakano et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020059558 | Hines | May 2002 | A1 |
20020072951 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082892 | Raffel et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020129352 | Brodersen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133561 | O'Brien et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133637 | Popp et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140731 | Subramaniam et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143997 | Huang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152102 | Brodersen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161734 | Stauber et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162090 | Parnell et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165742 | Robins | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030004971 | Gong et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014442 | Shiigi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018705 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018830 | Chen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028517 | Nakano et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050929 | Bookman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066031 | Laane | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066032 | Ramachadran et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030069936 | Warner et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070000 | Coker et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070004 | Mukundan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030070005 | Mukundan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074418 | Coker | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030088545 | Subramaniam et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093569 | Sivier et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030120675 | Stauber et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030151633 | George et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159136 | Huang et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187921 | Diec | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189600 | Gune et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191743 | Brodersen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204427 | Gune et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204810 | Dam et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206192 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217117 | Dan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030225730 | Warner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030226132 | Tondreau et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040001092 | Rothwein et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040010489 | Rio | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015981 | Coker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024578 | Szymanski et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040027388 | Berg et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040111398 | England et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040111728 | Schwalm | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117795 | Wang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123238 | Hefetz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123293 | Johnson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128001 | Levin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167989 | Kline et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186860 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193510 | Catahan, Jr. et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199489 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199536 | Barnes Leon et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040199543 | Braud et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215604 | Ivanov | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230983 | Shi et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249854 | Barnes-Leon et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260534 | Pak et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260659 | Chan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040268299 | Lei et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005089 | Eckhart et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015357 | Shahidi | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050028081 | Arcuri et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050555 | Exley et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050060687 | Ghazaleh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091026 | Hodgson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091098 | Brodersen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050138086 | Pecht-Seibert | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050223022 | Weissman et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235256 | Freydl | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246627 | Sayed | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060206599 | Milligan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060212531 | Kikkawa et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218180 | Bodlaender et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060294500 | Chiang | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070061408 | Saras | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070129928 | Lin et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070204013 | Castrucci | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214113 | Lei et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080010381 | Barraclough et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080052668 | Craig et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080140759 | Conner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140760 | Conner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080140857 | Conner et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080172608 | Patrawala et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080207182 | Maharajh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080288451 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288608 | Johnson | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080290987 | Li | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090037460 | Medicke et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090106356 | Brase et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090150518 | Lewin et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090248793 | Jacobsson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100017368 | Mao et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100095197 | Klevenz et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100185614 | O'Brien et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100250599 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100325583 | Aarni et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110071901 | Fries | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110276664 | Prahlad et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120010995 | Skirpa et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011167 | Schmidt | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120174064 | Polly et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20140089459 | Werr | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2005062211 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO-2007092373 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,459 mailed Mar. 7, 2013, 10 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,459, mailed Apr. 18, 2014, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,459, mailed Sep. 30, 2013, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,459, mailed Sep. 9, 2014, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/CA2009/000569 mailed Jul. 27, 2009, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/CA2009/000569 mailed Nov. 11, 2010, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/935,890 mailed Jan. 28, 2013, 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/935,890 mailed Jul. 9, 2013, 26 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/935,890 mailed May 15, 2014, 2 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 mailed Apr. 22, 2015, 24 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,028 mailed Mar. 18, 2015, 21 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 mailed Oct. 10, 2014, 28 pages . |
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 09737586.9 mailed Nov. 14, 2013, 6 pages. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2720897 mailed Dec. 16, 2013, 3 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/895,715 mailed Oct. 12, 2012, 18 pgs. |
Office Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,720,897 mailed Jan. 18, 2013, 3 pgs. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,472 mailed Feb. 27, 2015, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/895,713 mailed Jun. 25, 2013, 18 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/935,890 mailed Feb. 12, 2014, 15 pages. |
Atterer, et al. “Tracking the Interaction of Users with AJAX Applications for Usability Testing,” Apr./May 2007, ACM, p. 1347-1350. |
Chen, et al. “Function-Based Object Model Towards Website Adaptation,” May 2001, ACM, p. 587-596. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/283,028 mailed Jul. 8, 2015, 16 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/248,472 mailed Aug. 24, 2015, 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/310,525 mailed Aug. 31, 2015, 26 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150127781 A1 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61419611 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13248459 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 14592804 | US |