A software application typically utilizes a user interface specifically designed to allow a human user to interface with the software application. A user interface may generate one or more user interface views to present information from the software application for viewing by a user on an output device such as a display, and also to receive control directives or commands from a user via an input device to control, navigate and interact with various features provided by the software application. In some cases, a device may be attached to multiple output devices, such as a laptop computer with a laptop screen and external monitor, a personal computer with dual-monitors, or a conferencing server with connected devices each having a different display. In such cases, an application may generate a single user interface view for presentation on the multiple displays, which is typically duplicated on each additional display. However, a single user interface may not necessarily be appropriate for each display. It is with respect to these and other considerations that the present improvements have been needed.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Various embodiments are generally directed to techniques to custom user interfaces for different displays. Some embodiments are particularly directed to enhanced techniques for generating and presenting customized user interface views for providing interoperability with a software application, with each customized user interface view specifically designed for a given display. In other words, a single software application may present different customized user interface views with different user interface elements on different displays, either at a same time or different times.
In one embodiment, for example, an apparatus such as an electronic device with a processing system may implement a custom user interface system that when executed by a processor is operative to adapt a user interface view of an application for presentation by one or more displays, and in some cases, potentially across multiple computing devices. The custom user interface system may comprise, among other elements, a user interface adaptation component operative to receive as input a user interface view of the application for presentation on a first display and an adaptation parameter, and modify the user interface view for presentation on a second display based on the adaptation parameter. A presentation component is operative to present the customized user interface view on the second display. Other embodiments are described and claimed.
These and other features and advantages will be apparent from a reading of the following detailed description and a review of the associated drawings. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are explanatory only and are not restrictive of aspects as claimed.
Conventional techniques allow an application to generate a single user interface view for presentation on multiple displays, with the single user interface view corrected for varying physical characteristics of a display, such as size, color, resolution, and so forth. For instance, assume a first display has a smaller dimension than a second display. An application may generate a single user interface view that is scaled for both displays, with a smaller version for the smaller display and a larger version for the larger display. In both cases, the user interface elements used to construct the user interface view remain the same. However, each display may be used for different purposes. For instance, during a meeting, a smaller display may be used to read a document while a larger display is to present the same document to a number of meeting participants. In such cases, having a scaled version of a same user interface view may not be useful for both purposes. Various user interface elements, such as a toolbar, may be useful on a smaller display to allow a presenter to manipulate a document, but may be a distraction to viewers when presented on the larger display. As such, multiple displays presenting scaled versions of a single user interface view may not be desirable for all potential scenarios.
To solve these and other problems, various embodiments are directed to enhanced techniques for automatically generating, modifying and presenting customized user interface views useful for providing interoperability with a software application, with each customized user interface view specifically designed for a given display. In other words, a single software application may present different customized user interface views with different user interface elements on different displays, either at a same time or different times. Further, the different customized user interface views may be automatically generated based on various adaptation parameters, such as a location of a user, among other adaptation parameters discussed more fully below.
In one embodiment, this may be accomplished using a custom user interface system. The custom user interface system may be implemented as part of an application program (e.g., a word processor, spreadsheet, etc.) or a system program (e.g., an operating system). Additionally or alternatively, the custom user interface system may be designed as a standalone software component interoperable with an application program or a system program. The custom interface component may receive content to be displayed by a user interface view for an application program, and generates customized user interface views to display the received content based on one or more adaptation parameters suitable for one or more displays used with the application. The user interface view and each customized user interface view may utilize different sets of user interface elements suitable for a given display. For instance, each set of user interface elements may have one or more mutually exclusive user interface elements. It may be appreciated, however, that in some cases different user interface views may share a certain number of user interface elements in common that are needed for all the user interface views.
In one embodiment, an apparatus such as an electronic device with a processing system may implement a custom user interface system that is operative to adapt a user interface view of an application for presentation by a display. The custom user interface system may comprise a user interface adaptation component operative to receive as input a user interface view of an application for a first display, and one or more adaptation parameters. The custom user interface system may generate one or more customized user interface view (e.g., versions of the user interface view) for the application for presentation on a second display. The user interface view may have a first set of user interface elements, and the customized user interface may have a second set of user interface elements selected based on one or more adaptation parameters. The second set of user interface elements may be different from the first set of user interface elements. The custom user interface system may further comprise a presentation component operative to present the user interface view and the customized user interface view for the application on the respective first and second displays. Other embodiments are described and claimed.
In the illustrated embodiment shown in
The components 110, 130 may be communicatively coupled via various types of communications media. The components 110, 130 may coordinate operations between each other. The coordination may involve the uni-directional or bi-directional exchange of information. For instance, the components 110, 130 may communicate information in the form of signals communicated over the communications media. The information can be implemented as signals allocated to various signal lines. In such allocations, each message is a signal. Further embodiments, however, may alternatively employ data messages. Such data messages may be sent across various connections. Exemplary connections include parallel interfaces, serial interfaces, and bus interfaces.
In one embodiment, an apparatus such as an electronic device with a processing system may implement a custom user interface system 100 generally arranged to dynamically and automatically modify, adapt or customize content for a user interface view 102 of an application for presentation by a display, with each customized user interface view 120-b specifically designed for a given display. In this manner, a single software application may present different customized user interface views 120-b each having a different set of user interface elements on different displays. The different customized user interface views 120-b may be presented at either a same time or different times with the user interface view 102 or each other.
In the illustrated embodiment shown in
The user interface adaptation component 110 may receive as input a user interface view 102 for a software program, such as an application program or a system program. The user interface view 102 may comprise various user interface elements specifically arranged to provide interoperability with a given software program. For instance, a user interface view 102 may include a toolbar, icons, control buttons, drop down menus, a document, multimedia information, and so forth. A user may use various input devices to interact with the user interface view 102 and control various aspects and operations of the software application. The user interface view 102 may be a user interface view built and ready for presentation by a display. Alternatively, the user interface view 102 may be a user interface view that is already presented by a display.
The user interface adaptation component 110 may also receive as input one or more adaptation parameters 104-a. The adaptation parameters 104-a may comprise values used to modify the user interface view 102 for a given display. In one embodiment, an adaptation parameter 104-1 may represent a physical characteristic of a display. Examples of physical characteristics of a display may include screen resolution, screen size, screen shape, operating frequency, refresh rate, and so forth. In one embodiment, an adaptation parameter 104-2 may represent a control directive of a user. Examples of control directives may include signals received from an input device (e.g., a keyboard, pointer, touch screen, etc.) initiated by a user. For instance, a user may manually change one or more user interface elements for the user interface view 102 (e.g., remove a toolbar). In one embodiment, an adaptation parameter 104-3 may represent a location of a user. For instance, measurements of a distance between a user location and a display may be made on a periodic, aperiodic or continuous basis. It may be appreciated that these are merely a few examples of adaptation parameters 104-a, and others may be used for alternative implementations. The embodiments are not limited in this context.
It is worthy to note that “a” and “b” and “c” and similar designators as used herein are intended to be variables representing any positive integer. Thus, for example, if an implementation sets a value for a=5, then a complete set of adaptation parameters 104-a may include adaptation parameters 104-1, 104-2, 104-3, 104-4 and 105-5. The embodiments are not limited in this context.
In operation, the custom user interface system 100 may receive as input a user interface view 102 of an application for presentation on a first display and one or more adaptation parameters 104-a. The custom user interface system 100 may modify or customize the user interface view 102 to create a customized user interface view 120-b suitable for presentation on a second display based on the adaptation parameters 104-a.
In various embodiments, a customized user interface view 120-b may have different user interface elements from those used by a given user interface view 102. In one embodiment, a user interface view 102 may have a first set of user interface elements, while a customized user interface view 120-1 may have a second set of user interface elements different from the first set of user interface elements. For instance, assume a user interface view 102 comprises a user interface for a word processing application, and has a first set of user interface elements that includes a document that is ready for editing, a toolbar, a page count, a word count, and a zoom control. The customized user interface view 120-1 may comprise a second set of user interface elements that includes all of the first set of user interface elements, with the addition of a ruler. Alternatively, the customized user interface view 120-1 may comprise only a document and a zoom control. It is worthy to note that the first and second sets of user interface elements do not need to have completely different user interface elements, but rather only a single user interface element needs to be different between the two sets.
The user interface adaptation component 110 may generate one or more custom user interface views 120-b for a given user interface view 102 as needed for different displays based on adaptation parameters 104-a. The user interface adaptation component 110 may receive a different set of adaptation parameters 104-a for each customized user interface view 120-b.
In one embodiment, the user interface adaptation component 110 may receive an adaptation parameter 104-1 comprising a value representing a property for a display, such as a physical characteristic of a display. Examples of physical characteristics of a display may include screen resolution, screen size, screen shape, operating frequency, refresh rate, and so forth. For example, assume the adaptation parameter 104-1 is a value representing a height and/or width of a display. The user interface adaptation component 110 may compare the adaptation parameter 104-1 for a secondary display with stored height and/or width values associated with a primary display used for a user interface view 102 (or read in real time from the primary display or display adapter). The user interface adaptation component 110 may determine that the secondary display is larger than the primary display based on the comparison. Rather than simply scaling a size for the user interface view 102, the user interface adaptation component 110 may modify various user interface elements from the user interface view 102 specifically for a larger display, such as those user interface elements suitable for viewers rather than those user interface elements suitable for a presenter. For instance, the user interface adaptation component 110 may increase font size beyond a scaled version of the original font size in the user interface view 102, to make text on a document more visually readable by a viewer at a distance. Similarly, the user interface adaptation component 110 may change a background color and text color to provide more contrast to enhance viewing of text on a document. The user interface adaptation component 110 may also remove user interface elements from the user interface view 102 that are not particularly useful or relevant to viewing rather than presenting, such as control user interface elements. In this manner, a user may use a laptop with a user interface view 102 with a document and editing user interface elements displayed on the laptop display, while a large touch display for a conference room attached to the laptop may have a customized user interface view 120-b with just the document and not any of the editing user interface elements. The customized user interface view 120-b may even enlarge the document for easier viewing at a distance by any meeting attendees in a conference room.
In one embodiment, the user interface adaptation component 110 may receive an adaptation parameter 104-2 comprising a value representing a control directive of a user. Examples of control directives may include signals received from an input device (e.g., a keyboard, pointer, touch screen, etc.) initiated by a user. For instance, rather than having the user interface adaptation component 110 automatically generate user interface elements for the customized user interface view 120-b, a user may manually select and change one or more user interface elements for the user interface view 102. Continuing with the previous example, a user may select editing user interface elements for the user interface view 102 on a laptop display, thereby allowing the user to edit a document during a meeting. The user may further deselect the editing user interface elements for the customized user interface view 120-b of a large touch display to enhance distance viewing by meeting participants in a conference room.
In one embodiment, the user interface adaptation component 110 may receive an adaptation parameter 104-3 comprising a value representing a location of a user relative to a display. For instance, measurements of a distance between a user location and a display may be made on a periodic, aperiodic or continuous basis. The measurements may be used to determine which user interface elements of a user interface view 102 are appropriate for a display proximate to the user. Continuing with the previous example, the user interface adaptation component 110 may receive an adaptation parameter 104-3 on a periodic basis indicating a distance between the user and the display. The user interface adaptation component 110 may select one set of user interface elements for a customized user interface view 120-b of large touch display based on the distance. For instance, user interface elements for editing tools may appear as a user moves closer to a display, and disappear as a user moves away from a display. In another example, user interface elements for editing tools may move from one side of a display to another side of a display based on which side the user is closer to a given moment in time.
In one embodiment, the user interface adaptation component 110 may receive an adaptation parameter 104-4 comprising a value representing components for a display. A display device may have one or more components providing additional capabilities beyond a display screen, such as a video camera, array microphone, touch sensors, motion sensors, speakers, and so forth. A computing device may typically access such capabilities, for example, via a USB interface or similar interface. The presence of such components could also influence displayed functionality and use of the display. For instance, the user interface adaptation component 110 may detect touch sensors implemented for a display, and generate a customized user interface view 120-b with user interface control elements for the touch sensor.
The presentation component 130 may present the customized user interface view 120-b on the second display. In one embodiment, the presentation component 130 may present the customized user interface view 120-b of the application on the second display at a same time as the user interface view 102 of the application is presented on the first display. In one embodiment, the presentation component 130 may present the customized user interface view 120-b of the application on the second display at a different time as the user interface view 102 of the application is presented on the first display. The presentation component 130 may be implemented as part of a main processing system for a computing device, or in a dedicated processing system such as a display adapter for one or more displays used with the main processing system of the computing device.
The datastore 232 may comprise a database storing information for the custom user interface system 100. The datastore 232 may comprise a local datastore implemented on a same device as the custom user interface system 100, or a remote datastore implemented on a different device from a device executing the custom user interface system 100. The datastore 232 may store information useful for the custom user interface system 100, such as information associated with a given application, a given computing system, a given display, a given display adapter, user interface elements, user interface templates, customized user interface templates, historical information, movement patterns, user preferences, user profiles, customization rules, and so forth. For instance, the datastore 232 may store specifications for each display attached to a device, such as screen size or resolution. Alternatively, some devices natively share capabilities, such as when attaching a device via a digital visual interface (DVI) cable, or attaching a USB monitor with cameras or sensors. In such cases, the datastore 232 may be an optional component.
The location component 234 may be arranged to determine a location of a user relative to a display, and encode the location as an adaptation parameter 104-3. The location component 234 may determine a location for a user based on information received from the video camera 240, the microphone 242 and/or the motion detector 244. Additionally or alternatively, the location component 234 may track a location for a user based on a device carried by the user, such as a smart phone. In this case, the location component 234 may automatically retrieve location information from a GPS device, cellular tower triangulation, wireless data network node detection, or similar location detection techniques. In addition to location of a user, the location component 234 may specifically be arranged to identify location of various body parts of a user, such as a user's arms, for motion capture gestures and other motion-based user interfaces.
The location component 234 may determine a location by analyzing video information received from the video camera 240. For instance, the video camera 240 may provide continuous video or periodic images to the location component 234 having images of a user and a display device. The location component 234 may measure a distance between the user and the display device, and encode the measured distance as the adaptation parameter 104-3. Additionally or alternatively, the location of a display device or other furniture and equipment within a conference room may be stored in the datastore 232, and the location component 234 may estimate distance of a user from a display device based on proximity to known locations within the conference room.
The location component 234 may determine a location by analyzing audio information received from the microphone 242. For instance, the microphone 242 may record sounds from the user, and use acoustic location techniques to determine a distance and direction for a user relative to a display device.
The location component 234 may determine a location by analyzing motion information received from the motion detector 244. For instance, the motion detector 244 may scan for movement of a user, and use motion detection techniques to determine a distance and direction for a user relative to a display device.
The user interface adaptation component 110 may receive an adaptation parameter 104-3 from the location component 234, and generate a customized user interface view 120-b based on the received adaptation parameter 104-3. For instance, assume a display is a large touch display with touch sensors. The user interface adaptation component 110 may adjust various control user interface elements of a user interface view 102 based on proximity to one side or another side of the large touch display to make it more convenient for a user to control an application. In another example, the user interface adaptation component 110 may adjust font size as a user moves away from the large touch display to allow the user to better see a document on the user interface view 102. In yet another example, the user interface adaptation component 110 may remove control user interface elements completely as a user moves away from the large touch display since the user will not be capable of using the touch screen.
The computing device 302 may include without limitation any of the electronic devices as described with reference to
The multiple displays 308-c may each comprise any electronic display for presentation of visual, tactile or auditive information. Examples for a display 308-c may include without limitation a cathode ray tube (CRT), bistable display, electronic paper, nixie tube, vector display, a flat panel display, a vacuum fluorescent display, a light-emitting diode (LED) display, electroluminescent (ELD) display, a plasma display panel (PDP), a liquid crystal display (LCD), a thin-film transistor (TFT) display, an organic light-emitting diode (OLED) display, a surface-conduction electron-emitter display (SED), a laser television, carbon nanotubes, nanocrystal displays, a head-mounted display, and so any other displays consistent with the described embodiments. In one embodiment, a display 308-c may be implemented as a touchscreen display. A touchscreen display is an electronic visual display that can detect the presence and location of a touch within the display area. The touch may be from a finger, hand, stylus, light pen, and so forth. The embodiments are not limited in this context.
The custom user interface system 100 may generate customized user interface views 120-b for one or more of the displays 308-c. As shown, the presentation component 130 may present a customized user interface view 120-1 of the application 304 on a display 308-2 at a same time as the user interface view 102 of the application 304 is presented on a display 308-1. As previously described, the user interface view 102 may be a current user interface view for an application rendered for a primary display, while the customized user interface view 120-1 may be an adapted version of the user interface view 102 specifically customized for a secondary display. While the user interface view 102 and the customized user interface view 120-1 may share some user interface elements in common, each will have at least one different user interface element from the other (e.g., an added UI element, a removed UI element, a modified UI element, etc.). It may be appreciated that the custom user interface system 100 may generate any number of customized interface views 120-b for any number of displays 308-c. The embodiments are not limited in this context.
The custom user interface system 100 may generate customized user interface views 120-b for one or more of the displays 408-d. In one embodiment, the presentation component 130 may present a customized user interface view 120-b of an application 404 on a display 408-2 at a different time as a user interface view 102 of the application 404 is presented on a first display 408-1. As shown in
By way of example, assume a user has two different displays attached to a device, with each display on opposite sides of a conference room. When the user moves towards the display 408-1, the presentation component 130 may turn on the display 408-1 and present the user interface view 102. The presentation component 130 may turn off the display 408-2 to converse power or improve audience focus. As the user moves toward the display 408-2, the presentation component 130 may turn off the display 408-1, and turn on the display 408-2 and present the customized user interface view 120.
Further assume the user interface adaptation component 110 receives an adaptation parameter 104-3 generated by the motion sensor 560 indicating that a user location is near a side 508 of the display 308-2. The user interface adaptation component 110 may generate the customized user interface view 120-1 of the user interface view 102-1 such that the control bar 504 is presented towards the side 508 of the display 308-2. This allows a presenter to more easily reach and utilize the touch sensors for managing the document 502 of the application 304.
Operations for the above-described embodiments may be further described with reference to one or more logic flows. It may be appreciated that the representative logic flows do not necessarily have to be executed in the order presented, or in any particular order, unless otherwise indicated. Moreover, various activities described with respect to the logic flows can be executed in serial or parallel fashion. The logic flows may be implemented using one or more hardware elements and/or software elements of the described embodiments or alternative elements as desired for a given set of design and performance constraints. For example, the logic flows may be implemented as logic (e.g., computer program instructions) for execution by a logic device (e.g., a general-purpose or specific-purpose computer).
In the illustrated embodiment shown in
The logic flow 600 may detect a second display for the device at block 604. For example, the display adapter 306 of the computing device 302 may detect a presence of additional displays available for the computing devices 302, such as the displays 308-2 through 308-c.
The logic flow 600 may customize the user interface view based on an adaptation parameter at block 606. For example, the user interface adaptation component 110 of the custom user interface system 100 may receive the user interface view 102 and one or more adaptation parameters 104-a, and customize the user interface view 102 based on the one or more adaptation parameters 104-a. In one embodiment, for example, the user interface adaptation component 110 may add, remove, modify, or move a user interface element of the user interface view 102 to generate a customized user interface view 120-b.
The logic flow 600 may present the customized user interface view on the second display at block 608. For example, the presentation component 130 may present a customized user interface view 120-1 on the second display 308-2 of the computing device 302.
In the various embodiments, it may be appreciated that a single device utilizing a single application may utilize multiple displays to present multiple user interface views, with the user interface views comprising different versions of a single user interface view. This is a significant improvement over other conventional computing systems utilizing multiple displays, where an application may generate a single user interface view for presentation on each of the multiple displays, with a user interface view scaled in size for a given display. In other words, each display has different user interface views synchronized across different display devices, rather than a tethering mode where a user interface view and any changes to a user interface view are simply replicated across all displays. The embodiments are not limited in this context.
As shown in
The system memory 706 may include various types of memory units, such as read-only memory (ROM), random-access memory (RAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), Double-Data-Rate DRAM (DDRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), static RAM (SRAM), programmable ROM (PROM), erasable programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), flash memory, polymer memory such as ferroelectric polymer memory, ovonic memory, phase change or ferroelectric memory, silicon-oxide-nitride-oxide-silicon (SONOS) memory, magnetic or optical cards, or any other type of media suitable for storing information. In the illustrated embodiment shown in
The computer 702 may include various types of computer-readable storage media, including an internal hard disk drive (HDD) 714, a magnetic floppy disk drive (FDD) 716 to read from or write to a removable magnetic disk 718, and an optical disk drive 720 to read from or write to a removable optical disk 722 (e.g., a CD-ROM or DVD). The HDD 714, FDD 716 and optical disk drive 720 can be connected to the system bus 708 by a HDD interface 724, an FDD interface 726 and an optical drive interface 728, respectively. The HDD interface 724 for external drive implementations can include at least one or both of Universal Serial Bus (USB) and IEEE 1394 interface technologies.
The drives and associated computer-readable media provide volatile and/or nonvolatile storage of data, data structures, computer-executable instructions, and so forth. For example, a number of program modules can be stored in the drives and memory units 710, 712, including an operating system 730, one or more application programs 732, other program modules 734, and program data 736. The one or more application programs 732, other program modules 734, and program data 736 can include, for example, the custom user interface system 100, the user interface adaptation component 110, the customized user interface views 120-b, the presentation component 130, the datastore 232, and the location component 234.
A user can enter commands and information into the computer 702 through one or more wire/wireless input devices, for example, a keyboard 738 and a pointing device, such as a mouse 740. Other input devices may include a microphone, an infra-red (IR) remote control, a joystick, a game pad, a stylus pen, touch screen, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 704 through an input device interface 742 that is coupled to the system bus 708, but can be connected by other interfaces such as a parallel port, IEEE 1394 serial port, a game port, a USB port, an IR interface, and so forth.
One or more monitors 744 or other type of display devices are also connected to the system bus 708 via an interface, such as a video adaptor 746. In addition to the monitor 744, a computer typically includes other peripheral output devices, such as speakers, printers, and so forth. One or more monitors 745 may also be connected to the system bus 708 via an input device interface 742 and/or a hub, such as USB hub 743. The monitors 745 may comprise various components, such as a video camera, array microphone, touch sensors, motion sensors, speakers, and so forth. The components may be connected to the input device interface 742 via the USB hub 743.
The computer 702 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections via wire and/or wireless communications to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 748. The remote computer 748 can be a workstation, a server computer, a router, a personal computer, portable computer, microprocessor-based entertainment appliance, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the computer 702, although, for purposes of brevity, only a memory/storage device 750 is illustrated. The logical connections depicted include wire/wireless connectivity to a local area network (LAN) 752 and/or larger networks, for example, a wide area network (WAN) 754. Such LAN and WAN networking environments are commonplace in offices and companies, and facilitate enterprise-wide computer networks, such as intranets, all of which may connect to a global communications network, for example, the Internet.
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 702 is connected to the LAN 752 through a wire and/or wireless communication network interface or adaptor 756. The adaptor 756 can facilitate wire and/or wireless communications to the LAN 752, which may also include a wireless access point disposed thereon for communicating with the wireless functionality of the adaptor 756.
When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 702 can include a modem 758, or is connected to a communications server on the WAN 754, or has other means for establishing communications over the WAN 754, such as by way of the Internet. The modem 758, which can be internal or external and a wire and/or wireless device, connects to the system bus 708 via the input device interface 742. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computer 702, or portions thereof, can be stored in the remote memory/storage device 750. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers can be used.
The computer 702 is operable to communicate with wire and wireless devices or entities using the IEEE 802 family of standards, such as wireless devices operatively disposed in wireless communication (e.g., IEEE 802.11 over-the-air modulation techniques) with, for example, a printer, scanner, desktop and/or portable computer, personal digital assistant (PDA), communications satellite, any piece of equipment or location associated with a wirelessly detectable tag (e.g., a kiosk, news stand, restroom), and telephone. This includes at least Wi-Fi (or Wireless Fidelity), WiMax, and Bluetooth™ wireless technologies. Thus, the communication can be a predefined structure as with a conventional network or simply an ad hoc communication between at least two devices. Wi-Fi networks use radio technologies called IEEE 802.11x (a, b, g, etc.) to provide secure, reliable, fast wireless connectivity. A Wi-Fi network can be used to connect computers to each other, to the Internet, and to wire networks (which use IEEE 802.3-related media and functions).
As shown in
The clients 802 and the servers 804 may communicate information between each other using a communication framework 806. The communications framework 806 may implement any well-known communications techniques, such as techniques suitable for use with packet-switched networks (e.g., public networks such as the Internet, private networks such as an enterprise intranet, and so forth), circuit-switched networks (e.g., the public switched telephone network), or a combination of packet-switched networks and circuit-switched networks (with suitable gateways and translators). The clients 802 and the servers 804 may include various types of standard communication elements designed to be interoperable with the communications framework 806, such as one or more communications interfaces, network interfaces, network interface cards (NIC), radios, wireless transmitters/receivers (transceivers), wired and/or wireless communication media, physical connectors, and so forth. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired communications media and wireless communications media. Examples of wired communications media may include a wire, cable, metal leads, printed circuit boards (PCB), backplanes, switch fabrics, semiconductor material, twisted-pair wire, co-axial cable, fiber optics, a propagated signal, and so forth. Examples of wireless communications media may include acoustic, radio-frequency (RF) spectrum, infrared and other wireless media. One possible communication between a client 802 and a server 804 can be in the form of a data packet adapted to be transmitted between two or more computer processes. The data packet may include a cookie and/or associated contextual information, for example.
Various embodiments may be implemented using hardware elements, software elements, or a combination of both. Examples of hardware elements may include devices, components, processors, microprocessors, circuits, circuit elements (e.g., transistors, resistors, capacitors, inductors, and so forth), integrated circuits, application specific integrated circuits (ASIC), programmable logic devices (PLD), digital signal processors (DSP), field programmable gate array (FPGA), memory units, logic gates, registers, semiconductor device, chips, microchips, chip sets, and so forth. Examples of software elements may include software components, programs, applications, computer programs, application programs, system programs, machine programs, operating system software, middleware, firmware, software modules, routines, subroutines, functions, methods, procedures, software interfaces, application program interfaces (API), instruction sets, computing code, computer code, code segments, computer code segments, words, values, symbols, or any combination thereof. Determining whether an embodiment is implemented using hardware elements and/or software elements may vary in accordance with any number of factors, such as desired computational rate, power levels, heat tolerances, processing cycle budget, input data rates, output data rates, memory resources, data bus speeds and other design or performance constraints, as desired for a given implementation.
Some embodiments may comprise an article of manufacture. An article of manufacture may comprise a computer-readable storage medium arranged to store logic. Examples of a computer-readable storage media include any storage medium capable of storing electronic data, including volatile memory or non-volatile memory, removable or non-removable memory, erasable or non-erasable memory, writeable or re-writeable memory, and so forth. Examples of the logic may include various software elements, such as software components, programs, applications, computer programs, application programs, system programs, machine programs, operating system software, middleware, firmware, software modules, routines, subroutines, functions, methods, procedures, software interfaces, application program interfaces (API), instruction sets, computing code, computer code, code segments, computer code segments, words, values, symbols, or any combination thereof. In one embodiment, for example, an article of manufacture may store executable computer program instructions that, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform methods and/or operations in accordance with the described embodiments. The executable computer program instructions may include any suitable type of code, such as source code, compiled code, interpreted code, executable code, static code, dynamic code, and the like. The executable computer program instructions may be implemented according to a predefined computer language, manner or syntax, for instructing a computer to perform a certain function. The instructions may be implemented using any suitable high-level, low-level, object-oriented, visual, compiled and/or interpreted programming language.
Some embodiments may be described using the expression “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” along with their derivatives. These terms mean that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
Some embodiments may be described using the expression “coupled” and “connected” along with their derivatives. These terms are not necessarily intended as synonyms for each other. For example, some embodiments may be described using the terms “connected” and/or “coupled” to indicate that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact with each other. The term “coupled,” however, may also mean that two or more elements are not in direct contact with each other, but yet still co-operate or interact with each other.
It is emphasized that the Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. Section 1.72(b), requiring an abstract that will allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein,” respectively. Moreover, the terms “first,” “second,” “third,” and so forth, are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4540850 | Herr et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4831552 | Scully et al. | May 1989 | A |
5297250 | Leroy et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5337407 | Bates et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339389 | Bates et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5495269 | Elrod et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5566291 | Boulton et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5675752 | Scott et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5704029 | Wright, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717869 | Moran et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5802299 | Logan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821925 | Carey et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821932 | Pittore | Oct 1998 | A |
5893098 | Peters et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907324 | Larson et al. | May 1999 | A |
6016478 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018346 | Moran et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6049334 | Bates et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6119147 | Toomey et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6192395 | Lerner et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208339 | Atlas et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230185 | Salas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6353436 | Reichlen | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6553417 | Gampper | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564246 | Varma et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6633315 | Sobeski | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6670970 | Bonura et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6735615 | Iwayama et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738075 | Torres et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
7035865 | Doss et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036076 | Anwar | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7051285 | Harrison et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7073127 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7075513 | Silfverberg et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7124164 | Chemtob | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7171567 | Bayer et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7203479 | Deeds | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225257 | Aoike et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228492 | Graham | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7233933 | Horvitz et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242389 | Stern | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7246316 | Furlong et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248677 | Randall et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251786 | Wynn et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257769 | Caspi | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269787 | Amitay et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7299193 | Cragun et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299405 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7299418 | Dieberger | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7401300 | Nurmi | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7426297 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7447713 | Berkheimerm | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7451183 | Romero et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451186 | Morinigo et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454439 | Gansner et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7466334 | Baba | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7469222 | Glazer | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7478129 | Chemtob et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7512906 | Baier | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7554576 | Erol et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571210 | Swanson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590941 | Wee et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599989 | Stevens et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606862 | Swearingen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7627830 | Espinoza et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7636754 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7669141 | Pegg | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7679518 | Pabla et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7730411 | Chotai et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7743098 | Anglin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7764247 | Blanco | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770116 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774221 | Miller et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774703 | Junuzovic et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7818678 | Massand | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7869941 | Coughlin et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7911409 | Chatterjee et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7941399 | Bailor et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962525 | Kansal | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7984387 | Batthish et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992089 | Murray et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8032832 | Russ et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8099458 | Burtner, IV et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126974 | Lyle et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8150719 | Perrella et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8161419 | Palahnuk et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8204942 | Roskind et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214748 | Srikanth et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8330795 | Iyer et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8352870 | Bailor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358762 | Renner et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8385964 | Haney | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8423883 | Stockman | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8437461 | Gartner et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8452839 | Heikes et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8517888 | Brookins | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8560487 | Jhoney et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8583148 | Ollila et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8606517 | Ehrlacher et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8631119 | Malkin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8667401 | Lozben | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8682973 | Kikin-Gil et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8768308 | Kim et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8826117 | Junee | Sep 2014 | B1 |
9118612 | Fish et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9383888 | Fish | Jul 2016 | B2 |
20010040592 | Foreman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020143876 | Boyer et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143877 | Hackbarth et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030020805 | Allen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030038831 | Engelfriet | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046296 | Doss | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030122863 | Dieberger et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137539 | Dees | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142133 | Brown et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158900 | Santos | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030179230 | Seidman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030220973 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222890 | Salesin et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024822 | Werndorfer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040027370 | Jaeger | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030992 | Moisa et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040062383 | Sylvain | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085354 | Massand | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128350 | Topfl et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150627 | Luman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161090 | Digate et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169683 | Chiu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040175036 | Graham | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194033 | Holzwarth et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196286 | Guzik | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230594 | Flam et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250201 | Caspi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254998 | Horvitz | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263636 | Cutler et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267701 | Horvitz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005025 | Harville et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018828 | Nierhaus et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055625 | Kloss | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050081160 | Wee et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088410 | Chaudhri | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091571 | Leichtling | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091596 | Anthony et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050125246 | Muller et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125717 | Segal et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138109 | Redlich et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138570 | Good et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050171830 | Miller et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050246642 | Valderas | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050285845 | Dehlin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004911 | Becker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010023 | Tromczynski et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010197 | Ovenden | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026253 | Kessen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053380 | Spataro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067250 | Boyer et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080610 | Kaminsky | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082594 | Vafiadis et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094441 | Beckmann et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060132507 | Wang | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136828 | Asano | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143063 | Braun et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143064 | Mock et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146765 | Van De Sluis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161585 | Clarke et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167996 | Orsolini et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168533 | Yip et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171515 | Hintermeister et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184872 | Dontcheva et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190547 | Bhogal et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195587 | Cadiz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060213443 | Yeom | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060234735 | Digate et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239212 | Pirzada et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060244734 | Hill | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259875 | Collins et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265398 | Kaufman | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282759 | Collins et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005752 | Chawla et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011231 | Manion | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033091 | Ravikumar et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070083597 | Salesky et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100937 | Burtner, IV et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106724 | Gorti et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109939 | Shimizu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112926 | Brett et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070150583 | Asthana et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168447 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174389 | Armstrong et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185870 | Hogue et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186171 | Junuzovic et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189487 | Sharland et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214423 | Teplov et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219645 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226032 | White et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226299 | Shaffer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070245238 | Fuggitt et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253424 | Herot et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276909 | Chavda et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279416 | Cobb et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294612 | Drucker et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070300185 | Macbeth | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001717 | Fiatal | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005235 | Hegde et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008458 | Gudipaty et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013698 | Holtzberg | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022225 | Erl | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040187 | Carraher et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040188 | Klausmeier | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059889 | Parker et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065580 | Spence et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066016 | Dowdy et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080084984 | Levy et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098328 | Rollin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109406 | Krishnasamy et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114844 | Sanchez et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115076 | Frank et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133551 | Wensley et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136897 | Morishima et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080141126 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147790 | Malaney et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177782 | Poston et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189624 | Chotai et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080239995 | Lee et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244442 | Veselova et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263010 | Roychoudhuri et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263460 | Altberg | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276174 | Hintermeister et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288889 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300944 | Surazski et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080303746 | Schlottmann et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307322 | Stochosky et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320082 | Kuhlke et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006980 | Hawley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006982 | Curtis et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090007014 | Corner et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019367 | Cavagnari et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030766 | Denner et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090037848 | Tewari et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043856 | Darby | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055739 | Murillo | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090089055 | Caspi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094367 | Song et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109180 | Do et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112703 | Brown | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119255 | Frank et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090119604 | Simard et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129596 | Chavez et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138552 | Johnson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138826 | Barros | May 2009 | A1 |
20090183095 | Deitsch | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090204465 | Pradhan | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090204671 | Hawkins et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210793 | Yee et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210822 | Schindler | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222741 | Shaw et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228569 | Kalmanje et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234721 | Bigelow et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235177 | Saul et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249223 | Barsook et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254843 | Van Wie et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265632 | Russ et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282339 | Van Melle et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090309846 | Trachtenberg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313125 | Roh | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313584 | Kerr et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090319562 | Holm-Petersen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327019 | Addae et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327425 | Gudipaty | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100031152 | Villaron et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037140 | Penner et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037151 | Ackerman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100058201 | Harvey et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079467 | Boss et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095198 | Bultrowicz et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097331 | Wu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100114691 | Wu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114991 | Chaudhary et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131868 | Chawla et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138756 | Saund et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149307 | Iyer et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174993 | Pennington et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100201707 | Rasmussen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235216 | Hehmeyer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235763 | Massand | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241968 | Tarara et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251140 | Tipirneni | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268705 | Douglas et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100279266 | Laine et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100295958 | Larsson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306004 | Burtner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100306018 | Burtner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100312706 | Combet et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324963 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110022967 | Vijayakumar | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110105092 | Felt et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110107241 | Moore | May 2011 | A1 |
20110113348 | Twiss et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110113351 | Phillips | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137894 | Narayanan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110153612 | Paul | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154180 | Evanitsky et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154192 | Yang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161130 | Whalin | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110185288 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110212430 | Smithmier et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239142 | Steeves et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110282871 | Seefeld et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289142 | Whalin | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110289433 | Whalin | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295879 | Logis et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120023418 | Frields et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120050197 | Kemmochi | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075337 | Rasmussen et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120078708 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120144325 | Mital et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150577 | Berg | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150863 | Fish | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159347 | Fish et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159355 | Fish et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179980 | Whalin | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179981 | Whalin | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120233543 | Vagell et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130007103 | Braun et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130035853 | Stout et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130091205 | Kotler et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091440 | Kotler et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091465 | Kikin-Gil et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097544 | Parker et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130101978 | Ahl et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130124978 | Horns et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125051 | Kelley et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132886 | Mangini | May 2013 | A1 |
20130154946 | Sakuramata et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130211980 | Heiferman | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212494 | Heiferman | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130239002 | Maloney et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246903 | Mukai | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130263020 | Heiferman | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140032481 | Lang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033068 | Gupta et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033088 | Shaver | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140207867 | Kotler et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140317561 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150127628 | Rathod | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1551567 | Dec 2004 | CN |
1723431 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1886977 | Dec 2006 | CN |
1928859 | Mar 2007 | CN |
1992625 | Jul 2007 | CN |
101198976 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101363739 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101364886 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101515226 | Aug 2009 | CN |
101689188 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101789871 | Jul 2010 | CN |
101834905 | Sep 2010 | CN |
1517260 | Mar 2005 | EP |
04257046 | Sep 1992 | JP |
2010176320 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2005139793 | Jun 2007 | RU |
WO 02061682 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2006100475 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2007092470 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bell, David et al., “Sensory Semantic User Interfaces (SenSUI)” Fluidity Research Group, Oct. 20, 2009. |
Zenghong, Wu et al. “Context Awareness and Modeling in Self-Adaptive Geo-Information Visualization” Retrieved on Aug. 30, 2010. |
Mitrovic, Nikola et al. “Adaptive User Interface for Mobile Devices” Published 2002. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, filed (Dec. 7, 2011), 36 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, filed (Oct. 14, 2011), 24 pages. |
“Online Calendar & Group Scheduling”, MOSAIC Technologies, retrieved from <http://www.webexone.com/Brandded/ID.asp?brandid=2348&pg=%20AppCalendar> on Apr. 24, 2009, 4 pages. |
Ju, Wendy et al., “Where the Wild Things Work: Capturing Shared Physical Design Workspaces”, Stanford University, CSCW '04, (Nov. 6, 2010), pp. 533-541. |
“Adobe Connect”, Retrieved from: <http://www.adobe.com/acom/connectnow/> on Oct. 11, 2010, (Sep. 16, 2010),3 pages. |
“Adobe ConnectNow”, Retrieved from: <http://www.adobe.com/acom/connectnow/> on Oct. 13, 2010, (2010),6 pages. |
“Cisco Context-Aware Mobility Solution: Presence Applications”, retrieved from https://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns394/ns348/ns788/brochure—c22-497557.html on Sep. 7, 2010, 5 pages. |
“Description for SharePoint Meeting Manager”, Retrieved from: <http://www.softpicks.net/software/Business/Project-Management/SharePoint-Meeting-Manager-47146.htm> on Oct. 11, 2010, (Jul. 27, 2009),2 pages. |
“GoToMeeting”, Retrieved from: <http://www.gotomeeting.com/fec/online—meeting> on Oct. 11, 2010, 1 page. |
“Meet mimio—The Digital Meeting Assistant”, Mayflower Business Systems Limited; http://www.kda.co.uk/mimio1/whitepaper.html, (May 1999),10 pages. |
“Meeting Center, Using Video in Your Meetings”, retrieved from http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/webex/Windows/Video.pdf on May 13, 2009; Cisco webex, 2 pages. |
“Meeting Management Software”, Retrieved from: <http://workingsmarter.typepad.com/my—weblog/2004/12/meeting—managem.html> on Oct. 11, 2010, (Dec. 10, 2004),2 pages. |
“Microsoft Office Communicator 2007 Getting Started Guide”, retrieved from http://www.ittdublin.ie/media/Media,22233,en.pdf, (Jul. 2007),77 pages. |
“Microsoft® Office Live Meeting Feature Guide”, Microsoft Corporation, Available at <http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/0/3/803f9ba6-5e12-4b40-84d9-d8a91073e3dc/LiveMeeting.doc>,(Jan. 2005),pp. 1-17. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, filed (May 19, 2011),28 pages. |
Adams, Lia et al., “Distributed Research Teams: Meeting Asynchronously in Virtual Space”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, (1999),17 pages. |
Bunzel, Tom “Using Quindi Meeting Capture”, retrieved from http://www.informit.com/guides/content.aspx?g=msoffice&seqNum=220, (Sep. 1, 2006),3 pages. |
Fruchter, Renate “Brick & Bits & Interaction (BBI)”, http://www.ii.ist.i.kyoto-u.ac.jp/sid/sid2001/papers/positions/bricksbitsinteraction.pdf, (2001),4 pages. |
Ionescu, Arna et al., “Workspace Navigator: Tools for Capture, Recall and Reuse using Spatial Cues in an Interactive Workspace”, Stanford Technical Report TR2002-04, http://bcj.stanford.edu/research/wkspcNavTR.pdf, (2002),16 pages. |
Karlson, Amy et al., “Courier: A Collaborative Phone-Based File Exchange System”, Technical Report; MSR-TR-2008-05; Microsoft Research, (Jan. 2008),17 pages. |
Kim, Hyun H., et al., “SmartMeeting: CMPT 481/811 Automatic Meeting Recording System”, http://www.cs.usask.ca/grads/hyk564/homePage/811/CMPT%20811%20final.doc, (2004),7 pages. |
Peddemors, A.J.H. et al., “Presence, Location and Instant Messaging in a Context-Aware Application Framework”, retrieved from htt://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.11.1.98.3321&rep=rep1&type=pdf; 4th International Conference on Mobile Data Management, MDM, (2003),6 pages. |
Rudnicky, Alexander I., et al., “Intelligently Integrating Information from Speech and Vision to Perform Light-weight Meeting Understanding”, retrieved from http://citesseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf, (Oct. 2005),6 pages. |
Watson, Richard “What is Mobile Presence?”, Retrieved from http://reseller.tmcnet.com/topics/unified-communications/articles/54033-what-mobile-presence.htm, (Apr. 10, 2009),4 pages. |
Werle, Patrik et al., “Active Documents Supporting Teamwork in a Ubiquitous Computing Environment”, The Research Group on Ubiquitous Computing; Department of Computer and Systems Sciences; KTH Center for Wireless Systems; retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.157.4661, (2001),4 pages. |
Yu, Shoou-Jong et al., “Who Said What When? Capturing Important Moments of a Meeting”, retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=silicon—valley; Technical Report, (Apr. 10-15, 2010),7 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, filed (Feb. 8, 2012),28 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed (Nov. 8, 2012), 12 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed (Jun. 4, 2012), 12 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,332, filed (Jul. 23, 2012), 19 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436306.8, Nov. 15, 2014, 6 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436635.2, Nov. 27, 2014, 11 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, Nov. 21, 2014, 8 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,332, filed Oct. 9, 2014, 23 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, filed Oct. 8, 2015, 39 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436635.2, Oct. 20, 2015, 12 Pages. |
“Notice on Reexamination”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, Aug. 24, 2015, 9 pages. |
“CSS Max-width Property”, Retrieved From: http://web.archive.org/web/20070608101036/http://www.w3schools.com/, 2007, 1 page. |
“Create Treemaps Using Easy Drag-and-drop Interactions”, Retrieved From: http://www.magnaview.nl/treemap/, 2010, 1 page. |
“GeoTime”, Retrieved at: https://web.archive.org/web/20101219085705/http://www.geotime.com/Product/GeoTime-%281%29/Features—Benefits.aspx, 2009, 10 pages. |
“The Beginner's Guide to Data Visualization”, Retrieved From: http://www.tableausoftware.com/beginners-data-visualization, 2010, 10 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436593.2, Jan. 6, 2014, 11 Pages. |
“Collaboration within the Telepresence Experience”, Retrieved From: http://www.wrplatinum.com/downloads/11056.aspx, Jan. 2010, 11 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 200980131157.5, Nov. 21, 2013, 11 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed Jun. 4, 2012, 12 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,886, filed Apr. 11, 2013, 13 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515, filed Feb. 24, 2011, 14 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,832, filed Aug. 12, 2013, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/472,101, filed Oct. 5, 2011, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, filed Feb. 4, 2011, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515, filed Mar. 3, 2009, 16 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/472,101, filed Mar. 28, 2012, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, filed Sep. 25, 2013, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed Dec. 20, 2013, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515, filed Sep. 30, 2010, 17 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,832, filed Dec. 30, 2013, 18 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, filed Mar. 13, 2012, 19 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515, filed Dec. 11, 2009, 19 pages. |
“Meeting Center Using Video in Your Meetings”, Retrieved From: http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/webex/Windows/Video.pdf, May 13, 2009, 2 Pages. |
“Mindshift Innovation”, Retrieved From: http://mindshiftinnovation.blogspot.com/2007/09/seadragon.html, Oct. 4, 2007, 2 Pages. |
“Datapoint version 1.1”, Retrieved From: http://www.filedudes.com/DataPoint-download-20853.html, 1997-2007, 2 Pages. |
“FREE PhotoMesa 3.1.2 (Windows)”, Retrieved From: https://web.archive.org/web/20071209231951/http://www.windsorinterfaces.com/photomesa.shtml, 2007, 2 Pages. |
“ZuiPrezi Nonlinear Presentation Editor”, ZuiPrezi Ltd., http://zuiprezi.kibu.hu/, 2007, 2 pages. |
“ProShow Producer Feature Overview”, Photodex Corporation: http://www.photodex.com/products/producer/features.html, 2008, 2 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, filed Sep. 6, 2011, 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, filed Nov. 20, 2012, 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, filed Dec. 3, 2013, 20 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,332, filed Dec. 5, 2013, 20 pages. |
“An Overview of Aabel 3Features”, Retrieved From: http://www.gigawiz.com/aabel3.html, Aug. 9, 2011, 21 pages. |
“CounterPoint User Manual”, Retrieved From: http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/counterpoint/, 2005, 21 pages. |
“Human and Technical Factors of Distributed Group Drawing Tools”, Retrieved From: http://grouplab.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/grouplab/uploads/Publications/Publications/1992-HumanTech.IWC.pdf, 1992, 29 Pages. |
“CounterPoint: A Zooming Presentation Tool”, Retrieved From: http://web.archive.org/web/20050205082738/www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/counterpoint/, Feb. 5, 2005, 3 Pages. |
“FREEPATH-EDU Nonlinear Presentation Software”, Grass Roots Software, 2008, 3 pages. |
“Aquatic Sugar: The Children's Interface, Translated for Adults”, Retrieved From: http://www.olpcnews.com/software/operating—system/aquatic—sugar—childrens—interface.html, Nov. 7, 2007, 5 Pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 09803312.9, Jul. 7, 2011, 6 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 200980131157.5, Jan. 30, 2013, 7 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 200980131157.5, Aug. 31, 2012, 7 pages. |
“Visualize and Map SalesForce Leads with SpatiaiKey”, Retrieved From: http://web.archive.org/web/20101120170237/http://www.spatialkey.com/support/tutorials/visualize-and-map-salesforce-leads-with-spatialkey-part-ii, 2010, 7 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 200980131157.5, Jul. 23, 2013, 8 pages. |
et al.,' “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2009/046529, Nov. 30, 2009, 11 Pages. |
Derthick, et al.,' “An Interactive Visualization Environment for Data Exploration”, Retrieved From: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/˜sage/KDD97.html, Aug. 1997, 10 Pages. |
Fernando, et al.,' “Narrowcasting Attributes for Presence Awareness in Collaborative Virtual Environments pdf”, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4019930, 2006, 6 pages. |
Geyer, et al.,' “Activity Explorer: Activity-centric Collaboration from Research to Product”, IBM Systems Journal, IBM® Retrieved From: http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/454/geyer.html., 2006, 26 Pages. |
Good, et al.,' “CounterPoint: Creating Jazzy Interactive Presentations”, Retrieved From: http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/1121/2/CS-TR-4225.pdf, 2001-2003, 9 Pages. |
Hewagamage, “Interactive Visualization of Spatiotemporal Patterns Using Spirals on a Geographical Map”, Proc. IEEE Symp. Visual Languages, 1999, 8 pages. |
Hupfer, “Introducing Collaboration into an Application Development Environment”, Retrieved From: http://pnexpert.com/files/IBM—Contextual—Collaboration.pdf, Nov. 6-10, 2004, 4 Pages. |
Izadi, et al.,' “Dynamo: A public interactive surface supporting the cooperative sharing and exchange of media”, Retrieved From: http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/132613/p159-izadi.pdf, 2003, 10 Pages. |
Little, “High-End Business Intelligence with Data Visualization for WPF 4”, Retrieved From: http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/90591/High-End-Business-Intelligence-with-Data-Visualization, Jun. 29, 2010, 7 Pages. |
Moran, et al.,' “Tailorable Domain Objects as Meeting Tools for an Electronic Whiteboard”, Retrieved From: http://pdf.aminer.org/000/121/871/tailorable—domain—objects—as—meeting—tools—for—an—electronic—whiteboard.pdf, 1998, 10 Pages. |
Nelson, “Just Around the Corner: Visual Fusion 4.5”, Retrieved From: http://www.idvsolutions.com/Company/Newsletters/2009/Q3/Vfx45Silverlight.aspx, Sep. 30, 2009, 6 Pages. |
Shaw, “Create Pan andd Zoom Effects in PowerPoint”, Retrieved From: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/powerpoint-help/create-pan-and-zoom-effects-in-powerpoint-HA010232631.aspx, 2007, 13 Pages. |
Thomas, et al.,' “Through-Walls Collaboration”, Retrieved From: http://www.tinmith.net/papers/piekarski-pervasive-2009.pdf, 2009, 8 Pages. |
Wempen, “PowerPoint 2007 Bible”, John Wiley & Sons, Feb. 27, 2007, 27 pages. |
Weverka, “PowerPoint 2007 All-in-One Desk Reference for Dummies”, Published by Wiley Publishing, Jan. 2007, 8 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436306.8, Feb. 8, 2014, 13 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, filed Mar. 27, 2014, 18 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, filed (Feb. 14, 2013), 29 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed Mar. 11, 2015, 17 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, filed Jun. 5, 2015, 21 pages. |
“Foreign Notice of Allowance”, CN Application No. 201110436306.8, Apr. 1, 2015, 4 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436593.2, Mar. 16, 2015, 7 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436635.2, May 18, 2015, 14 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, filed Apr. 9, 2015, 55 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, filed Mar. 13, 2015, 21 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, filed Mar. 27, 2015, 18 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,332, filed Apr. 10, 2015, 15 pages. |
Pash,“Google Docs Updates with a Drawing Editor, Real-Time Collaboration, and Speed”, Retrieved from <http://lifehacker.com/5513760/google-docs-updates-with-a-drawing-editor-real-time-collaboration-and-speed> on Jun. 8, 2015, Jun. 5, 2015, 17 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,886, filed Feb. 14, 2014, 26 Pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed Jun. 5, 2014, 13 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, filed Jun. 6, 2014, 19 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,332, filed Jul. 17, 2014, 23 pages. |
“Foreign Notice of Allowance”, RU Application No. 2011103151, Sep. 4, 2013, 18 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, filed Jul. 2, 2015, 24 pages. |
“Foreign Notice of Allowance”, CN Application No. 201110436593.2, Jun. 4, 2015, 6 Pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, filed (Jun. 20, 2013), 42 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,332, filed (Aug. 1, 2013),19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, filed (Jun. 20, 2013),19 pages. |
Bergmann, et al., “Automated Assistance for the Telemeeting Lifecycle”, Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (Oct. 1994), pp. 373-384. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, filed Aug. 11, 2014, 18 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436306.8, Sep. 17, 2014, 7 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436593.2, Sep. 12, 2014, 12 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436635.2, May 27, 2014, 14 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, Jan. 24, 2014, 12 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, Jul. 24, 2014, 10 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/472,101, filed Sep. 16, 2014, 10 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, filed Jul. 31, 2014, 41 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, filed Oct. 2, 2014, 14 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,886, filed Aug. 14, 2014, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,234, filed Jul. 18, 2014, 5 pages. |
“Notice on Reexamination”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, Jan. 4, 2016, 10 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, filed Nov. 20, 2015, 22 pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201210376181.9”, dated Aug. 17, 2016, 12 Pages. |
“Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201210376206.5”, dated Mar. 9, 2016, 9 Pages. |
Chinese Decision on Reexamination dated Dec. 5, 2016, in Application 201210376181.9, 17 pages. (No English Translation). |
Chinese Fifth Office Action dated May 30, 2014 in Appln No. 200980131157.5, 9 pgs. |
Chinese Final Rejection Received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201210376181.9, dated Jan. 20, 2016, 14 Pages. |
Chinese Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 30, 2016, in Appln No. 201210382816.6, 4 pgs. |
Chinese Notice of Reexamination dated Dec. 7, 2016, in Appln. No. 201210376206.5, 10 pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2015 in Appln No. 201210376206.5, 15 pgs. |
Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2015 in Appln No. 201210382816.6, 13 pgs. |
Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 2, 2014 in Appln No. 201210376181.9, 16 pgs. |
Chinese Second Office Action dated Aug. 26, 2015 in Appln No. 201210382816.6, 14 pgs. |
Chinese Second Office Action Issued in Patent Application No. 201210376181.9, dated Jul. 13, 2015, 13 Pages. |
Chinese Second Office Action Issued in Patent Application No. 201210376206.5, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 10 Pages. |
Chinese Sixth Office Action Received for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131157.5, dated Dec. 11, 2014, 9 Pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2016 in Appln No. 201210382816.6, 10 pgs. |
Chinese Third Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2015 in Appln No. 201210376206.5, 3 pgs. |
Fourth Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201210382816.6, dated Sep. 1, 2016, 6 Pages. |
Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201110436635.2, dated Apr. 1, 2016, 9 Pages. |
Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201110436635.2, dated Jul. 28, 2016, 9 Pages. |
Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201110436635.2, dated May 18, 2015, 13 Pages. |
Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201110436635.2, dated Oct. 20, 2015, 10 Pages. |
Office Action Received for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980131157.5, dated Jul. 6, 2015, 9 Pages. |
“Microsoft Word's Click and Type Feature”, published by SnipTools, Nov. 12, 2003 downloaded Jun. 28, 2015 from http://sniptools.com/vault/microsoft-words-click-and-type-feature; 2 pgs. |
“The Platinum Experience of Collaboration—CollaboratorHYPERMAX”, Retrieved Date: Jul. 16, 2010, http://www.businessoctane.com/group—telepresence.php, 7 pgs. |
“The Screen Capture Tool” by Help and Manual, archived Mar. 13, 1006 by the Internet Wayback Machine, downloaded Nov. 28, 2016, 3 pages, from https://web.archive.org/web/20060313150929/http://www.helpandmanual.com/help/help—toc.html?hm—advanced—tools—capture. |
Gallegos, D., et al. “CounterPoint User Manual” class project for Charles Paine at the University of New Mexico, Downloaded from Archive. Org 2005 capture, http://web.archive.org/web/20050205082738/www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/counterpoint/, 21 pgs. |
Rudnicky, Alexander I., et al., “Intelligently Integrating Information from Speech and Vision to Perform Light-weight Meeting Understanding”, retrieved from http://citesseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.1733&rep=rep1 &type=pdf. (Oct. 2005), 6 pages. |
Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/271,148, 20 pgs. |
Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,832, 22 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 10, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,886, 22 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 1, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, 13 pgs. |
Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/472,101, 14 pgs. |
Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,832, 18 pgs. |
Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/271,148, 19 pgs. |
Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, 17 pages. |
Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, 19 pages. |
Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/271,148, 56 pgs. |
Office Action dated Sep. 30, 2010, in U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515 18 pages. |
Office Action dated Jan. 6, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,886, 43 pgs. |
Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/271,148, 18 pgs. |
Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,234, 25 pgs. |
Office Action dated Jul. 7, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, 17 pgs. |
Office Action dated Jul. 9, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,886, 13 pgs. |
Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,234, 11 pgs. |
Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,234, 10 pgs. |
Office Action dated Oct. 31, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,832, 17 pgs. |
Office Action dated Mar. 13, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, 20 pages. |
Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/472,101, 14 pgs. |
Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, 16 pgs. |
Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,832, 27 pgs. |
Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2016, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,234, 11 pgs. |
Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,234, 11 pgs. |
Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,832, 17 pgs. |
Office Action dated Sep. 22, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/472,101, 9 pgs. |
Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/271,148, 19 pgs. |
Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,832, 18 pgs. |
Advisory Action dated Feb. 7, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,234, 3 pgs. |
Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, 26 pgs. |
Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 09803312.9, dated Feb. 17, 7 pages. |
Decision on Reexamination Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201210376206.5, dated Jun. 1, 2017, 18 pages. |
Notice of Allowace Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201210376181.9, dated Mar. 1, 2017, 4 pages. |
Notification of Reexamination Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201110436635.2, dated Apr. 27, 2017, 14 pages. |
Office Action dated Jun. 5, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 14,225,234, 11 pages. |
Office Action dated Sep. 12, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/271,148, 18 pages. |
Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2017, in U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,234, 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120166985 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |