The present application relates generally to construction of an electrical connector. In particular, the present application relates to an electrical connector with multiple contact array materials.
Electrical connectors, for example those used in connection with differential signaling, twisted pair wiring, have a variety of different formats. For example, an RJ-11 electrical connector can have either two or three pairs of wires, or either four or six total wires. An RJ-45 electrical connector typically has four pairs of wires, representing eight total wires. Other types of electrical connectors have differing numbers of wires as well.
In some cases, the physical characteristics of a particular electrical connector allow that connector to be compatible with electrical connectors of alternative formats. For example, RJ-11 plugs having four wires are often constructed to fit in the same housing as an RJ-11 plug having six wires; accordingly, both variants can fit into the same RJ-11 jack. Similarly, RJ-45 jacks generally have a greater width than RJ-11 jacks, but are otherwise similarly sized. As such, RJ-45 jacks can receive an RJ-11 plug, when such a plug is either intentionally, or sometimes unintentionally, inserted.
The size similarities and physical compatibility of electrical connectors of various types can, at times, lead to drawbacks. For example, although a plug can be inserted into a mismatched (yet physically compatible) jack in some circumstances, the contacts of the plug may not directly correspond to or align with the contacts of the mismatched jack. For example, an RJ-11 plug can be inserted into the physical opening of an RJ-45 jack, but because of the different number and arrangement of wire pairs, contacts of the RJ-11 plug will not align with at least the two outermost contact springs of the RJ-45 jack (typically designated as pins 1 and 8). This misalignment of wires can lead to undue stress on the electrical connector. For example, in the event of insertion of an RJ-11 plug into an RJ-45 jack, it is often the case that a plastic housing portion of the RJ-11 plug engages the outermost contact springs of an RJ-45 jack, causing them to deform much more than would otherwise occur when those contact springs engage wires of a plug.
This insertion of a physically similar plug does not necessarily harm the RJ-45 jack during an initial insertion of that RJ-11 plug. However, RJ-45 jacks (and other such connectors) are designed to have a finite life span, typically referred to as a minimum number of insertions of a plug into the jack before the resiliency of the contact springs of the jack may become unreliable. When an RJ-11 plug is inserted, the increased deformation of contact springs in the RJ-45 jack results in decreased lifespan of the jack, due to loss of resiliency of the outermost contact springs.
To ensure that RJ-45 jacks have adequate life, the contact springs of the RJ-45 jack can be manufactured from a beryllium-copper material, which has good resiliency even when deflected a relatively large distance. However, this material can be expensive, difficult to obtain, and environmentally hazardous when disposed of.
For these and other reasons, improvements are desirable.
In accordance with the following disclosure, the above and other issues are addressed by the following:
In a first aspect, a telecommunications jack includes a housing having a socket sized to receive either a first telecommunications plug of a first type or a second telecommunications plug of a second type, the second telecommunications plug having a different arrangement of electrical contacts as compared to the first telecommunications plug. The jack includes a plurality of contact springs exposed within the socket, the plurality of contact springs positioned for alignment with electrical contacts of the first telecommunications plug when the first telecommunications plug is inserted into the socket. At least one of the contact springs remains unaligned with any of the electrical contacts of the second telecommunications plug when the second telecommunications plug is inserted into the socket. The at least one of the contact springs that remains unaligned with any of the electrical contacts of the second telecommunications plug comprises a resilient conductive material, and at least one other contact spring of the plurality of contact springs comprises a second material having a lower resiliency than the at least one of the contact springs.
In a second aspect, a method of constructing a telecommunications jack includes forming a first plurality of electrical leads from a first material, the first plurality of electrical leads including contact springs, and forming a second plurality of electrical leads from a second material, the second plurality of electrical leads including second contact springs. The method further includes positioning the first and second pluralities of electrical leads within a housing having a socket, thereby forming an electrical jack. The first material comprises a resilient conductive material and the second material comprises a second conductive material having a lower resiliency as compared to the first material.
In a third aspect, a telecommunications jack includes a housing having a socket sized to receive either an RJ-45 plug or an RJ-11 plug. The telecommunications jack further includes first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth contact springs exposed within the socket, the plurality of contact springs positioned for alignment with electrical contacts of RJ-45 plug when the RJ-45 plug is inserted into the socket. The first and eighth contact springs are engaged by a body of the RJ-11 plug when the RJ-11 plug is inserted into the socket, but remain disconnected from electrical contacts of the RJ-11 plug. The first and eighth contact springs are formed from a resilient conductive material, and wherein at least one of the second, third, fourth fifth, sixth, and seventh contact springs of the plurality of contact springs are formed from a second material having a lower resiliency than the of the contact springs.
Various embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts and assemblies throughout the several views. Reference to various embodiments does not limit the scope of the invention, which is limited only by the scope of the claims attached hereto. Additionally, any examples set forth in this specification are not intended to be limiting and merely set forth some of the many possible embodiments for the claimed invention.
In general the present disclosure relates to a telecommunications jack and methods of construction of such a jack. In various embodiments of the present disclosure, the telecommunications jack has contact springs constructed from materials of varying resiliencies and costs, thereby ensuring that contact springs possibly deflected to an extent greater than other contact springs (e.g., by a mis-matched plug having a different but size-compatible format to the telecommunications jack) are not fatigued to the extent that electrical continuity is risked.
Referring now to
In the embodiment shown, the telecommunications jack 10 is configured for use with twisted pair cabling. As generally seen in
In connection with the present disclosure, it is recognized that various sizes of telecommunications plugs will fit within a telecommunications jack can include those sized up to and including the RJ-45 plug. As illustrated in the comparison of
This arrangement is illustrated in
It is noted that, over time, if a mismatched plug is inserted into a jack and causes repeated, unexpectedly-large deflection of the contact springs 30a, 30h, it is possible that these contact springs will not rebound to a starting position, but will rather remain deflected. In such scenarios, if a matched plug (e.g., an RJ-45 plug) is inserted into the jack, that matched plug may not make electrical contact with the now-fatigued contact springs 30a, 30h. Although in some cases a high-resiliency material could be employed, it is unneeded and unnecessarily expensive to be used for all of the “middle” contact springs 20b-g.
Referring to
As seen in
Referring now to
In the embodiment shown, the contact strip arrays 100, 102 are formed such that, at opposing ends of the contact strips 42 of each array, alignment features are included. In the embodiment shown, each of the contact strip arrays 100, 102 includes an alignment mount 104 on each side. The alignment mount 104 allows the contact strip arrays 100, 102 to be mounted to a bending apparatus for forming the contact strips 42a-h as illustrated in
Generally, the first contact strip array 100 includes at least the first and eighth contact strips 42a, 42h, and in the embodiment shown includes the first, third, fifth, sixth, and eighth contact strips, 42a, 42c, 42e, 42f, 42h, respectively.
Concurrently, the second contact strip array 102 includes at least some of the contact strips 42 forming contact springs of the inner contacts not expected to be deformed by an RJ-11 connector; in the embodiment shown, the second contact strip array 102 includes the second, fourth, and seventh contact strips 42b, 42d, and 42g, respectively. In addition to forming the various contact strip arrays 100, 102 from different materials, the use of two different contact strip arrays allows the manufacturing process to be performed such that alignment of the contact strips is straightforward. For example, because first and second contact strips 42a-b form a crossover in the crossover zone 50, these contact strips are located on different contact strip arrays and located in an intended relative position on the contact strip. The same is true of the fourth and fifth contact strips 42d, 42e, and seventh and eighth contact strips 42g, 42h, which are on contact strip arrays 102, 100, respectively. Using the contact strips in the order and positioning in which they are formed on the contact strip arrays 100, 102 allows for the contact strip arrays to simply be bent to a desired geometry and overlaid on each other, resulting in the aligned arrangement illustrated in
It is noted that although in the embodiment shown, five of the contact strips are constructed from a material having a higher resiliency, this arrangement is one of manufacturing convenience based on the selected crossovers included at the crossover zone 50. In alternative embodiments in which different sets of cross-over arrangements are used, it may be convenient to include different contact strips on different contact strip arrays. Generally, the main constraint is to include at least the contact strips expected to encounter greater stresses or displacement (e.g., the outer contact strips 42a, 42h) to be included in a contact strip array constructed from a high resiliency material, while at least some of the other contact strips that are expected to encounter lesser stresses or displacement (e.g., one or more of the contact strips 42b-g) to be included in a contact strip array constructed from a lower resiliency material. Furthermore, although one example process for constructing a telecommunications jack is described herein, it is noted that other possible processes can be used, and different orders of method steps could be performed to equivalently construct such a telecommunications jack.
Additionally, and referring to
The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/768,217, filed on Feb. 22, 2013, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5244402 | Pasterchick, Jr. et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5647767 | Scheer et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5772466 | Morin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6338656 | Oliphant et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6368160 | Chang | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6890197 | Liebenow | May 2005 | B2 |
20020160662 | Arnett et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040127105 | Itano et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050191909 | Leong et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20090186532 | Goodrich et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100190366 | Fitzpatrick | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120188865 | Michaelis et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009-164087 | Jul 2009 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/017598—mailed May 26, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140295713 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61768217 | Feb 2013 | US |