Telephony communication via varied redundant networks

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7483417
  • Patent Number
    7,483,417
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, February 15, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 27, 2009
    15 years ago
Abstract
A switched telephone network is arranged in a manner to enable packet voice communication between telephone terminals via multiple redundant packet switched networks. The packet switched networks may utilize different protocols, be operated by different entities, and have primary functions other than voice communication. One example of such a network may be internetworked networks, such as the Internet. One example of an alternate packet switched network may be a network whose primary function is control of a circuit switched telephone network. The common channel interoffice switching system (CCIS) of a public switched telephone network (PSTN) is a preferred example.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to methods and system structures for providing public and private telephone service between two terminals over selectable networks of differing types. More particularly the invention relates to providing such telephone service in a manner to permit optimization of a selectable parameter, such as, minimizing cost, maximizing quality, maximizing availability of connection, and the like.


BACKGROUND

The availability of public and private telephony communication has become so universal in the United States and in other developed countries that it has become critical to the functioning of modern society. At the same time, its very popularity and multipurpose use have led to demands that tax the efficient operation of the varied systems that provide that universality. While multiple types of networks are used for providing telephone service it is not always appreciated to what a large extent those different networks are interrelated. Thus, the very efficacy of one of the interrelated systems in optimizing one parameter may cause the overload or breakdown of an interrelated system, which is necessary to provide end to end service. In order that the nature of these problems may be fully appreciated, it is necessary to have an understanding not only of the factors which determine the inherent parameters of the individual networks, but also the factors which impose limitations on the interlinked networks. To that end there is here presented a brief description of the two networks which are most currently involved. These are the Internet and the public switched telephone network (PSTN).


The Internet is an interconnected global computer network of tens of thousands of packet-switched networks using the Internet protocol (IP). It is a network of networks. For purposes of understanding how the Internet works, three basic types of entities can be identified. These are end users, Internet service providers, and backbone providers. End users access and send information either through individual connections or through organizations such as universities and businesses. End users in this context include both those who use the Internet primarily to receive information, and content creators who use the Internet to distribute information to other end users. Internet service providers (ISPs), such as Netcom, PSI, and America Online, connect those end users to Internet backbone networks. Backbone providers, such as MCI, UUNet, and Sprint, route traffic between ISPs, and interconnect with other backbone providers.


This tripartite division highlights the different functionalities involved in providing Internet connectivity. The actual architecture of the Internet is far more complex. Backbone providers typically also serve as ISPs; for example, MCI offers dial-up and dedicated Internet access to end users, but also connects other ISPs to its nationwide backbone. End users such as large businesses may connect directly to backbone networks, or to access points where backbone networks exchange traffic. ISPs and backbone providers typically have multiple points of interconnection, and the inter-relationships between these providers are changing over time. It is important to appreciate that the Internet has no “center,” and that individual transmissions may be routed through multiple different providers based on a number of factors.


End users may access the Internet though several different types of connections, and unlike the voice network, divisions between “local service” providers and “long-distance” providers are not always clear. Most residential and small business users have dial-up connections, which use analog modems to send data over plain old telephone service (POTS) lines of local exchange carriers (LECs) to ISPs. Larger users often have dedicated connections using high-speed ISDN, frame relay or T1 lines, between a local area network at the customer's premises and the Internet. Although the vast majority of Internet access today originates over telephone lines, other types of communications companies, such as cable companies, terrestrial wireless, and satellite providers, are also beginning to enter the Internet access market.


The roots of the current Internet can be traced to ARPANET, a network developed in the late 1960s with funding from the Advanced Research Projects Administration (ARPA) of the United States Department of Defense. ARPANET linked together computers at major universities and defense contractors, allowing researchers at those institutions to exchange data. As ARPANET grew during the 1970s and early 1980s, several similar networks were established, primarily between universities. The TCP/IP protocol was adopted as a standard to allow these networks, comprised of many different types of computers, to interconnect.


In the mid-1980s, the National Science Foundation (NSF) funded the establishment of NSFNET, a TCP/IP network that initially connected six NSF-funded national supercomputing centers at a data rate of 56 kilobits per second (kbps). NSF subsequently awarded a contract to a partnership of Merit (one of the existing research networks), IBM, MCI, and the State of Michigan to upgrade NSFNET to T1 speed (1.544 megabits per second (Mbps)), and to interconnect several additional research networks. The new NSFNET “backbone,” completed in 1988, initially connected thirteen regional networks. Individual sites such as universities could connect to one of these regional networks, which then connected to NSFNET, so that the entire network was linked together in a hierarchical structure. Connections to the federally-subsidized NSFNET were generally free for the regional networks, but the regional networks generally charged smaller networks a flat monthly fee for their connections.


The military portion of ARPANET was integrated into the Defense Data Network in the early 1980s, and the civilian ARPANET was taken out of service in 1990, but by that time NSFNET had supplanted ARPANET as a national backbone for an “Internet” of worldwide interconnected networks. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, NSFNET usage grew dramatically, jumping from 85 million packets in January 1988 to 37 billion packets in September 1993. The capacity of the NSFNET backbone was upgraded to handle this additional demand, eventually reaching T3 (45 Mbps) speed.


In 1992, the NSF announced its intention to phase out federal support for the Internet backbone, and encouraged commercial entities to set up private backbones. Alternative backbones had already begun to develop because NSFNET's “acceptable use” policy, rooted in its academic and military background, ostensibly did not allow for the transport of commercial data. In the 1990s, the Internet has expanded decisively beyond universities and scientific sites to include businesses and individual users connecting through commercial ISPs and consumer online services.


Federal support for the NSFNET backbone ended on Apr. 30, 1995. The NSF has, however, continued to provide funding to facilitate the transition of the Internet to a privately-operated network. The NSF supported the development of three priority Network Access Points (NAPs), in Northern California, Chicago, and New York, at which backbone providers could exchange traffic with each other, as well as a “routing arbiter” to facilitate traffic routing at these NAPs. The NSF funded the vBNS (Very High-Speed Backbone Network Service), a non-commercial research-oriented backbone operating at 155 megabits per second. The NSF provides transitional funding to the regional research and educational networks, as these networks are now required to pay commercial backbone providers rather than receiving free interconnection to NSFNET. Finally, the NSF also remains involved in certain Internet management functions, through activities such as its cooperative agreement with SAIC Network Solutions Inc. to manage aspects of Internet domain name registration.


Since the termination of federal funding for the NSFNET backbone, the Internet has continued to evolve. Many of the largest private backbone providers have negotiated bilateral “peering” arrangements to exchange traffic with each other, in addition to multilateral exchange points such as the NAPs. Several new companies have built nationwide backbones. Despite this increase in capacity, usage has increased even faster, leading to concerns about congestion. The research and education community, with the support of the White House and several federal agencies, recently announced the “Internet II” or “next-generation Internet” initiative to establish a new high-speed Internet backbone dedicated to non-commercial uses.


As of January 1997 there were over sixteen million host computers on the Internet, more than ten times the number of hosts in January 1992. Several studies have produced different estimates of the number of people with Internet access, but the numbers are clearly substantial and growing. A recent Intelliquest study pegged the number of subscribers in the United States at 47 million, and Nielsen Media Research concluded that 50.6 million adults in the United States and Canada accessed the Internet at least once during December 1996—compared to 18.7 million in spring 1996. Although the United States is still home to the largest proportion of Internet users and traffic, more than 175 countries are now connected to the Internet.


According to a study by Hambrecht & Quist, the Internet market exceeded one billion dollars in 1995, and is expected to grow to some 23 billion dollars in the year 2000. This market is comprised of several segments, including network services (such as ISPs); hardware (such as routers, modems, and computers); software (such as server software and other applications); enabling services (such as directory and tracking services); expertise (such as system integrators and business consultants); and content providers (including online entertainment, information, and shopping).


The value of networks to each user increases as additional users are connected. For example, electronic mail is a much more useful service when it can reach fifty million people worldwide than when it can only be used to send messages to a few hundred people on a single company's network. The same logic applies to the voice telephone network.


However, this increasing value also can lead to congestion. Network congestion is an example of the “tragedy of the commons:” each user may find it beneficial to increase his or her usage, but the sum total of all usage may overwhelm the capacity of the network. With the number of users and host computers connected to the Internet roughly doubling each year, and traffic on the Internet increasing at an even greater rate, the potential for congestion is increasing rapidly. The growth of the Internet, and evidence of performance degradation, has led some observers to predict that the network will soon collapse, although thus far the Internet has defied all predictions of its impending doom.


Two types of Internet-related congestion may occur; congestion of the Internet backbones, and congestion of the public switched telephone network when used to access the Internet. These categories are often conflated, and from an end user standpoint the point of congestion matters less than the delays created by the congestion.


Congestion of the Internet backbones results largely from the shared, decentralized nature of the Internet. Because the Internet interconnects thousands of different networks, each of which only controls the traffic passing over its own portion of the network, there is no centralized mechanism to ensure that usage at one point on the network does not create congestion at another point. Because the Internet is a packet-switched network, additional usage, up to a certain point, only adds additional delay for packets to reach their destination, rather than preventing a transmission circuit from being opened. This delay may not cause difficulties for some services such as E-mail, but could be fatal for real-time services such as video conferencing and Internet telephony. At a certain point, moreover, routers may be overwhelmed by congestion, causing localized temporary disruptions known as “brownouts.”


Backbone providers have responded to this congestion by increasing capacity. Most of the largest backbones now operate at 155 Mbps (OC-3) speeds, and MCI has upgraded its backbone to OC-12 (622 Mbps) speed. Backbone providers are also developing pricing structures, technical solutions, and business arrangements to provide more robust and reliable service for applications that require it, and for users willing to pay higher fees.


Internet backbone congestion raises many serious technical, economic, and coordination issues. Higher-bandwidth access to the Internet will be meaningless if backbone networks cannot provide sufficient end-to-end transmission speeds. Moreover, the expansion of bandwidth available to end users will only increase the congestion pressure on the rest of the Internet. This has significant implications to local exchange carriers. Most residential subscribers reach their ISPs through dial-up connections to LEC networks. A modem at the customer premises is connected to a local loop, which is connected to a switch at a LEC central office. ISPs also purchase connections to the LEC network. In most cases, ISPs either buy analog lines under business user tariffs (referred to as “1 MBs”) or 23-channel primary rate ISDN (PRI) service. When a call comes into an ISP, it is received through a modem bank or a remote access server, and the data is sent out through routers over the packet-switched Internet. Both subscribers and ISPs share usage of LEC switches with other customers.


It is becoming increasingly apparent that the current flat charge pricing structure for Internet access contributes to the congestion of LEC networks. Switch congestion can arise at three points in LEC networks—the switch at which the ISP connects to the LEC (the terminating switch), the interoffice switching and transport network, and the originating end user switch. The point of greatest congestion is the switch serving the ISP, because many different users call into the ISP simultaneously.


LECs have engineered and sized their networks based on assumptions about voice traffic. In particular, several decades of data collection and research by AT&T, Bellcore, and others has shown that an average voice call lasts 3-5 minutes, and that the distribution between long and short calls follows a well-established curve. Because very few people stay on the line for very long periods of time, there is no need for LEC switches to support all users of the switch being connected simultaneously. Instead, LEC switches are generally divided into “line units” or “line concentrators” with concentration ratios of typically between 4:1 and 8:1. In other words, there are between four and eight users for every call path going through the switch. Call blockage on the voice network tends to be negligible because a significant percentage of users are unlikely to be connected simultaneously.


The distribution of Internet calls differs significantly from voice calls. In particular, Internet users tend to stay on the line substantially longer than voice users.


Because LEC networks have not been designed for these longer usage patterns, heavy Internet usage can result in switches being unable to handle the load (“switch congestion”). Internet connections tie up a end-to-end call path through the PSTN for the duration of the call. When the average hold time of calls through a switch increases significantly, the likelihood of all available call paths through the switch being in simultaneous use also goes up. If a particular line unit has an 8:1 concentration ratio, only one eighth of the subscriber lines into that line unit need to be connected at one time in order to block all further calls.


Because of the relatively short average duration of voice calls, the primary limiting factor on the capacity of current digital switched for voice calls is the computer processing power required to set up additional calls. Computer processing power can be expanded relatively easily and cheaply, because modern switch central processing units are designed as modular systems that can be upgraded with additional memory and processing capacity. However, Internet usage puts pressure not on the call setup capacity of the switch, but on the number of transmission paths that are concurrently open through the switch.


As may be appreciated from the foregoing the traffic problems that exist with respect to providing reliable telephony communications, particularly long distance communications, involves intertwined limitations that exist separately and in combination in the Internet and in the public switched telephone network.


DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
Summary of Invention

According to the invention there is provided a switched telephone network arranged in a manner to enable packet voice communication between telephone terminals via multiple redundant packet switched networks. The packet switched networks may utilize different protocols, be operated by different entities, and have primary functions other than voice communication. In one preferred embodiment of the invention packet voice communication may be provided over internetworked networks, such as the Internet, and alternately over a packet switched network whose primary function is control of a circuit switched telephone network. The common channel interoffice switching system (CCIS) of a public switched telephone network (PSTN) is a preferred example.


A voice communication link may be established from telephone terminal to telephone terminal via the Internet, the quality of voice communication may be monitored, and the link may be transferred to the common channel interoffice signaling network if and when the quality of voice communication deteriorates beneath a pre-established norm. The invention provides a means for monitoring the links of the common channel interoffice signaling system carrying the packetized voice communication and collecting the information needed to permit charging for the voice communication by time duration or by cells used to carry the packetized voice signal. The customer may be provided with the option of establishing the norm for diversion of the communication, or may elect which path is to be selected as the primary path.


OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION

It is a primary object of the present invention to provide a solution to the foregoing problems.


It is another object of the invention to provide enhanced reliable telephony service through varied redundant networks operating in combination.


It is yet another object of the invention to provide such service through mediated selection of an optimal path through such networks, wherein the mediation may be controlled by selectable parameters.


It is a further object of the invention to provide such service wherein the path is customer selectable.


Additional objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a simplified block diagram of the architecture of one embodiment of a redundant telephony communication network.



FIG. 2 shows a simplified block diagram of the architecture of another redundant telephony communication network.



FIG. 3 illustrates the functional architecture of one embodiment of an Internet Module for use in the communication system shown diagrammatically in FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram that represents the functionality of the processor interface of the Internet Module shown in FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 shows in diagrammatic form a communication system which may be used for redundant network telephone communication according to one preferred embodiment of the present invention.





BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Applicant's above identified copending parent application Ser. No. 08/634,543, filed Apr. 18, 1996, Public Internet Protocol Transport Network, describes a dual PSTN and Internet communication system which provides a network and methodology for facilitating telephone use of the Internet by customers on an impromptu basis. Provision is made to permit a caller to set-up and carry out a telephone call over the Internet from telephone station to telephone station without access to computer equipment and without the necessity of maintaining a subscription to any Internet service. Usage is made of CCIS (common channel interoffice signaling) signaling to set up the call and establish the necessary Internet connections and addressing. Calls may be made from telephone station to telephone station, from voice capable computer to voice capable computer, or from telephone to computer or computer to telephone.


Applicant's above-identified copending parent application Ser. No. 08/698,713, filed Aug. 16, 1996, Internet Telephone Service, describes an improved version of that system of networks which enables wireless telephone access to Internet telephony.


Applicant's above identified copending parent application Ser. No. 08/790,888, Internet Telephone Service with Mediation, describes yet another improvement providing dual path customer access to the ISP with traffic mediation to alleviate overload of the local PSTN between the customer and ISP (Internet Service Provider) circuits.


While each of these systems provides significant improvement of previously available Internet telephony service, they do not address the totality of overload conditions described in detail above.


Referring to FIG. 1 there is shown a simplified block diagram of the architecture of a preferred embodiment of the present invention which provides relief from another aspect of the multifaceted overload problem. FIG. 1 shows at 110 a public switched telephone network (PSTN) illustratively represented by a pair of SSP (service switching point) capable central office switching systems 112 and 114. The switching system 112 serves as end office for a plurality of customer or subscriber stations such as the telephones 116 and 118 and computer 120. These customer stations or terminals are connected to the central office switching system by local loops 121. In a similar manner the central office switching system 114 serves telephone terminals 122 and 124 and computer or PC 126 via local loops 128.


The central office switching systems 112 and 114 are SSP equipped and connected to an advanced intelligent network or AIN as represented by STP 130 and ISCP 132. The links between the STP, ISCP, and SSP equipped switching systems comprise packet switched data links carrying signaling system 7 (SS7) protocol signals. The central office switching systems are connected by trunks 134 and tandem switches (not shown).


The Internet access plant of a public Internet service provider (ISP) 136 is connected to the central office switch 112 via a first hunt group of lines 138 and a second hunt group of lines 140. The ISP facility is here shown in simplified form comprising a modem pool 142, a voice server pool of application processing units 144, a host or server 146, and router 148. The router 148 is connected to a gateway router 150 to connect to the Internet, shown as a cloud 152.


A telephone company (Telco) access hub 154 is connected to the central office switching system 114 by a plurality of lines, which may include POTS or plain old telephone service connections as well as ISDN links shown collectively at 156. The Telco's hub 154 may be of the type shown and described in detail in the common assignee's copending application Ser. No. 08/815,363, filed Mar. 11, 1997, and entitled Public IP Transport Network, which application is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.


The Telco access hub is here shown in simplified fashion as comprising a pool of network access servers (NASs) 158, a pool of voice servers 160, an Ethernet packet switch 162, and a gateway router 164. The gateway router is connected via a Telco switched multimegabit data service (SMDS) network 166 to the Internet 152 via an Internet gateway router 168. The voice servers may have Internet interface processors (not here separately shown) with functionality presently to be described.


The Telco access hub is designed to provide access to the Internet and related IP data transport service for users or customers employing a wide variety of procedures and intranetwork protocols. The hub provides Internet access to widespread local areas served by a public switched telephone network. Customers may obtain the use of various types of ports on the Telco platform such as, by way of example, analog 28.8 Kb/s service, ISDN service, dedicated ports for SMDS (switched multimegabyte data service), frame relay, T1, DDS or other available services. As a matter of convenience the hubs will be collocated with central office switching systems and oftentimes may be sited in the same building. Each hub and its equipment will be operated, maintained and provisioned by Telco personnel.


The current availability of the Telco SMDS service, makes it feasible to provide virtually immediate high speed service to business customers capable of interfacing via SMDS. This facilitates limitation of the load or traffic on the gateway routers in the hubs inasmuch as the SMDS signals may be bypassed around the router.


A key component of Telco provided Internet access for the region which it serves is the LATA hub. One such hub is provided for each LATA. Dedicated access is offered from such LATA hubs and will support connectionless services such as frame relay or SMDS. These are currently tariffed fast packet services which are non-distance sensitive. Other presently tariffed services also will be available from such LATA hubs, such as DDS or T1, however these services involve point to point circuits which require additional hardware and are distance sensitive. The Telco access system would allow Internet service provider customers such as UUNet, PSI, and the like, to provide service and seek additional users, while obtaining immediate transport from an alternate source.


The main module of equipment in the hub is the gateway router. The gateway router is connected via redundant links to the Telco SMDS network or “cloud” and thence to the Internet at large. The SMDS links may be 34 Mb/s or T1 links or any combination thereof or of similar links.


The Internet Protocol Routing Service (IPRS) provided by the hub provides for the collection, concentration and management of the customers traffic. IP Routing Service comprises network routers located at LATA hub sites that will collect the customer's (ISP's) end user traffic and concentrate it for connection and transport over a Telco Exchange Access Switched Multi-Megabit Data Service (XASMDS) Subscriber Network Interface.


The operation of this aspect of the system may be described as follows. A public Internet service provider or ISP, such as the ISP 136, may be increasing its customer base and experiencing circuit overload in the Telco network to its retail customers. By way of example, the overload is evidencing itself most adversely in the occurrence of an objectionably high number of busy signals to dial-up customers. The dial-up customers are within the region of the local exchange carrier (LEC) or Telco operating the PSTN which includes the central office switching systems 112 and 114. The Telco offers a public IP transport service through various contract arrangements. This includes use of its AIN equipped network, access hub, and SMDS network for connection to the Internet.


The ISP arranges with the Telco for the Telco to provide for the ISP a specified number of lines to the Telco's Internet access hub, with a sufficient capacity to provide virtually delay free connection to the Internet. The arrangement between the two companies may constitute a continuous lease of lines and access hub capacity by the ISP, or alternatively, may constitute a guarantee of adequate capacity to handle specified overload. As part of the arrangement the Telco will make available to the ISP an AIN/ISCP/IP monitoring and control functionality to provide transfer of load under conditions specified by the ISP.


Thus the AIN control network in FIG. 1 may be provided with an Intelligent Peripheral (IP) 170 of the type described in detail in the above identified copending application Ser. No. 08/816,227. The links between the STP, ISCP, and SSP equipped switching systems comprise packet switched data links carrying signaling system 7 (SS7) protocol signals. The intelligent peripheral 170 is connected to the SSP equipped switching system 114 by a voice and data link which may preferably comprise an ISDN link. The IP connected to the ISCP by a data link separate from the common channel signaling system which may use a signaling protocol such as TCP/IP, a generic data interface (GDI), or a like protocol.


As is described in further detail in the aforementioned copending application Ser. No. 08/816,227, the Telco installs in storage or databases in the ISCP and in the IP, tables of parameters and processing programs which are provided or specified by the ISP. Such parameters may be set for some or all of the dial-up numbers used by the ISP and served by the Telco in the region. The parameters are used to construct the operating algorithms. The experience of operating with the algorithms permits specification of various thresholds designed to signal imminent overload and to trigger preventive action, such as line redirection. The parameters and thresholds may also specify discontinuing the line redirection based on a change in the subsequent values of the same or additional parameters. Discontinuance of redirection may be predicated on “discontinuance” thresholds supplied by the ISP. In a simple case the ISP may direct discontinuing the line redirection when the threshold which was originally exceeded is no longer being exceeded.


While the foregoing describes an arrangement which provides significant improvement in minimizing or obviating network overload in a retail customer obtaining dial-up access to the Internet, there remains the problem of overload in the Internet itself, as previously described. Such overload is particularly serious in the case of Internet telephony, where delay time may rapidly produce an unacceptable quality of service.


The common assignee's copending application describes a network and method which addresses this problem by initially checking the quality of telephone service which is currently available on the Internet, and establishing an Internet telephone call only if that quality is acceptable to the prospective calling party. Details of this methodology are explained in detail in above mentioned copending application Ser. No. 08/821,027, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


However, it is also possible that the quality of telephone service available on the Internet may be acceptable at the time that the call is established, but may deteriorate during the call. The problem created by that situation may be ameliorated in the manner now described in relation to FIGS. 2, 3, and 4.


Using the architecture illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3, the quality of service existing in a data packet network during the course of a voice call through the Internet is monitored. A minimum acceptable level of service may be predefined with a threshold quality level stored in the user's Call Processing Record (CPR) in the AIN Integrated Services Control Point (ISCP). If the monitored quality is maintained in excess of the stored threshold, communication of the call continues through the established course of transmission. If the measured quality of service on the data network is not satisfactory, the routing of the call is changed to communication solely through a voice telephone network connection, which may include an Interexchange Carrier link, without terminating the call. The packet data network is thereby bypassed to obtain voice grade quality while maintaining the call.



FIG. 2 shows a simplified block diagram of an AIN controlled PSTN arranged in an architecture for implementing this improvement. Referring to FIG. 2, SSP capable central offices 13 and 17, which may be located in the same or different states and regions, are connected by trunks 14 and 16 respectively to the PSTN indicated by a cloud 10. Each central office is connected by local loops to subscribers customer premises equipment (CPE) such as telephone terminals 12 and PC 90. The telephone 12 may be a standard telephone used for Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS), with conversion of analog voice to digital signals performed at a central office, or a so-called “Internet Phone” that outputs digital voice signals. The SSPs 13 and 17 are connected by CCIS links to STP 31 which in turn may be connected to ISCP 40. While the STP functionality is here shown as constituting a single STP it will be appreciated that this is for the purpose of simplicity only and that a hierarchy of STPs may be involved.


Each of the central office SSPs 13 and 17 is connected to Internet Module or voice server 92 and 94, respectively, by T1 trunks 96 and 98. Alternatively, the Internet Module hardware may be situated at the central office and associated with the switching system. The Internet Modules or voice servers may be provided with SSP capabilities and connected into the CCIS network directly to an STP or, as illustrated by the links 102 and 104, to the SSPs 13 and 17. The Internet Modules may be linked together for signaling purposes by conventional F links. The Internet Modules are connected to the Internet cloud by T1/T3 trunks 111 and 112.


The functional architecture of one embodiment of an Internet Module which may be utilized in this arrangement is shown diagrammatically in FIG. 3. The Internet Module includes a gateway router 310 of the type now generally used in Internet practice, such as shown in FIG. 1 and described in related application Ser. No. 08/634,544, referenced above. An interface with processing capability is illustratively shown at 312. Connected to the router are a Domain Name Service (DNS) server 314 and a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) server 316 of the type conventionally used by Internet Service Providers in existing Internet Service. It will be understood that while the DNS and DHCP are here shown as elements of the Internet module they may constitute a DNS and a DHCP connected to the Internet. The router interface is connected to the central office and to the CCIS network while the router is connected to the Internet.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram that represents the functionality of the processor interface 312 and the router 310. The processor contains a common Generic Data Interface (GDI) 320 for communicating signaling messages with the ISCP over the common channel signaling network. Data communication by the gateway router of both signaling and information content through the Internet (or other equivalent packet network) occurs through TCP/IP protocol 324, packets being transmitted and received through physical transport layer 326. The physical transport layer may comprise Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM), frame relay or some other type of data communication mode.


While message and signaling communication with the common channel signaling network occurs through the GDI, communication of voice data is made through the Channel Serving Unit, Digital Serving Unit (CSU/DSU) 328. This unit, which may physically comprise a digital line card in the processor with standard 24 digital voice line inputs, packetizes voice data received from the telephone central office. The CSU/DSU coordinates with route determination unit 330 to identify packets, termination phone numbers and routes to the network termination gateway router. The route determination information is included in each packet for the data received from the originating central office SSP. The packetized data is compressed in accordance with stored algorithm 332, before being sent to the TCP/IP stack and physical transport layer for transmission to the far end gateway router. To complete transmission to the destination telephone, the termination router decompresses the received packets, depacketizes back to voice data which is then routed to the destination PSTN. Two way capability for each of the functions is provided for communication in both directions. While shown for illustrative purposes as separate blocks, the route determination and compression/decompression functions, as well as the quality test application, may be run, for example, by a UNIX-based computer.


The foregoing arrangements provide for relief from various aspects of the overall network overload problem. Relief for overload in the Internet itself is provided by diverting voice communication via the trunked PSTN. While this is generally acceptable for short haul voice communication it leaves something to be desired in providing relief for long haul traffic. Traffic of that type increases the load on multiple switching systems and interconnecting trunks. By way of example, completing a telephone call over the PSTN in even a limited area, such as the northern Virginia area, may involve the call going through as many as eight to ten offices or switching systems.



FIG. 5 illustrates a preferred embodiment of the present invention which provides additional relief. According to this embodiment there is provided a still further additional path to relieve congestion not only on the Internet but also on the PSTN or PSTNs which may be required to supply alternate routes.


Referring to FIG. 5, a first regional local exchange carrier (LEC) network A is represented by SSP equipped end offices (SSP/EOs) 510 and 512. SSP/EOs are connected by a representative trunk or trunks 514. These SSP/EOs 510 and 512, respectively, serve subscriber stations represented by telephone terminals 516 and 518 and personal computer (PC) 520, and telephone terminals 522 and 524 and PC 526. In addition to the telephone terminals and PCs, LEC A also serves an ISP 528 via SSP/EO 510. ISP 528 may be of the type illustrated in FIG. 1. The ISP 528 connects to the Internet 530 via a router 532 in the manner shown in FIG. 1. The LEC A also provides through SSP/EO 512 a Telco operated access hub of the type described in connection with FIG. 1. The access hub is connected to the SSP/EO by both voice and data links. The access hub also connects to the LEC SMDS network 536, and from there to the Internet 530 through a router 538.


The distal LEC B is similar to LEC A. LEC B is represented by SSP equipped end offices (SSP/EOs) 540 and 542 connected by a representative trunk or trunks 544. These SSP/EOs serve subscriber stations represented by telephone terminals 546 and 548 and personal computer (PC) 550, and telephone terminals 552 and 554 and PC 556. LEC B also serves an ISP 558 via SSP/EO 540. This ISP also may be of the type illustrated in FIG. 1. The ISP connects to the Internet 530 via a router 560 in the manner shown in FIG. 1. The LEC B also serves through SSP/EO 542 a Telco operated access hub 638 of the type previously described. The access hub connects to the LEC SMDS network 562, and from there to the Internet 530 through a router 564. The Telco access hubs 534 and The LECs A and B are connected by representative trunks 566 and 568 via tandem switches represented by the circles in the trunks.


The telephone system network shown in FIG. 5 is controlled by an advanced intelligent network (AIN), which includes a first mated pair of STPs 570-572 and a second mated pair of STPs 574-576. The mated pairs of STPs are connected to one another by C links 578, 580, 582, and 584. Each mated pair serves its respective transport area. Each STP is connected to an ISCP 575 and 577 and an Intelligent Peripheral (IP) 579 and 581. The IPs may be of the type described in detail in above referenced application Ser. No. 08/816,227.Such IPs provide storage, speech recognition, speech server and other capabilities. The IPSs are connected to the ISCPs and SSPs as described in connection with FIG. 1. The Telco access hubs 534 and 638 are also connected to their respective ISCPs 575 and 577 by GDI links 535 and 639, respectively.


STP 570 is connected to STP 574 by B link 585 and to STP 576 by D link 586. STP 572 is connected to STP 576 by B link 588 and to STP 574 by D link 590. The STPs are connected to SSPs 510, 512, 540, and 542 by A links 592-598.


The SS7 network constitutes a highly redundant data network, generally a 56 K switched data circuit. By way of example, an SS7 message from end office 510 to end office 540 might travel any one of eight possible routes. It could go from 510 to STP 570, from STP 570 to STP 574, STP 574 to SSP or EO 540. One variation on that route would be from STP 570 down the D link 586 to STP 576 to SSP/EO 542, and so forth. In the event a link between STP 570 and SSP/EO 540 was lost, an SS7 route could be established from end office 510 to SSP/EO 542 via STP 570 to STP 574 and the via C link 584 to STP 576 and then via A link 600 to SSP/EO 542. However, that would be an undesirable route unnecessarily using the C link. A links provide direct connectivity while C links provide circuitous routes using extra switches, a situation to be avoided. An alternate route would be from STP 570 via D link 586 to STP 576 via A link 600 to SSP/EO 542.


As is described in detail in the common assignee's above-identified pending application Ser. No. 08/353,281, filed Dec. 5, 1994, and continuation cases above identified, it has been discovered by the applicant that digitized voice may be transported in TCAP format in SS7 signals. It has further been discovered by the applicant that such SS7 voice transport may be carried out in substantially real time through the use of suitable vocoders, PADS, and routers, as described in the aforesaid applications. It is a basic purpose of this invention to utilize the SS7 network as an alternate multi-purpose network for transporting voice signals between calling and called telephone terminals. To this end the SSP/EOs are appropriately enabled as described. The SS7 network may be selected for packetized voice transport as a result of traffic overload in either or both the Internet and/or the PSTN trunked voice network or as a matter of choice.


In normal use of the PSTN the analog voice signal entering the originating end office, such as SSP/EO 512 in FIG. 5, is conventionally transformed in the end office switching system to a digital format and transported in that format through the trunked network 568 to the terminating end office, such as SSP/EO 542. In order to relieve or prevent traffic overload in either or both the Internet or the PSTN, according to the present invention, those signals in whole or in part are transported via the CCIS SS7 network. The digitized voice is packetized by the end office SSP/EO 512 with an appropriate routing label and handling instructions. The packets are then dispatched through the CCIS or SS7 network to the terminating end office SSP/EO 542.


This routing avoids use of the PSTN trunked network and its multiple intervening switching systems. As previously described, use of the PSTN may tie up from 8 to 10 switching offices for a call between two stations in even a limited area. If that same call is handled over the SS7 network it goes directly through that packet network without tying up any switches between the originating office and the terminating office.


This routing also relieves traffic on the lines or trunks used to connect the voice signals to the Telco access hub 534 or the ISP 528, either of which might be used to route the call via the Internet. Still further, this CCIS/SS7 routing reduces traffic in the backbone networks of the Internet and thereby avoids the voice signal degradation which such overload causes.


It is a feature of the invention that the redundancy of the SS7 network and packet switching techniques permits packets traveling different routes to the same destination. This redundancy is utilized as a feature of the invention to enable the existing SS7 network to handle the digital packet voice communication and thereby ameliorate or eliminate traffic overload, without requiring modification of the SS7 system. The SS7 network has been designed to perform its conventional signaling function while utilizing no more than approximately fifty percent of the network capacity. It is a feature of the invention that the availability of spare capacity is determined before diverting voice or other trunk signals into the CCIS SS7 network.


It will be appreciated that this feature of the invention provides a significant degree of solution to the telephone network and Internet congestion or traffic overload problems by opening an entirely new traffic path to carry the load. The amount of traffic diverted from one of the three networks to another may vary depending on fixed or dynamic parameters which may be designed into the network for automatic or manual actuation. The load condition in the CCIS network is monitored prior to the time that traffic is diverted thereby preventing overload of the critical CCIS control network.


According to one embodiment of the invention, there is provided a system and method for utilizing the SS7 or common channel signaling network to perform the still additional function of detecting predetermined events and/or the imminence of predetermined events, and then blocking or controlling those events from their incipiency. In this case it may be desired to divert or redirect calls to a predetermined destination, such as the SS7 network, when the rate of call attempts or calls exceed a specified parameter. One example of such a parameter may be the number of specified occurrences per time period (minute or fraction thereof, hour, etc.).


This is accomplished utilizing the CCIS or SS7 network in conjunction with programmable monitors associated with the CCIS links to the STPs, and control processors for those monitors. According to the invention these monitors are programmed to trap and temporarily record predetermined CCIS signaling data such as call set up messages, associated with specific events, which it is desired to block or control. Call setup messages utilize a call setup protocol known as the Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) User Part (ISUP) call setup protocol. The ISUP call setup protocol is described in the Bellcore standards, “TR-NWT 000317, Switching System Generic Requirements for Call Control Using the Integrated Services Digital Network User Part (ISDNUP)”, “TR NWT000394, Switching System Generic Requirements for Interexchange Carrier Interconnection Using the Integrated Services Digital Network User Part (ISDNUP)”, and “TR-NWT000444, Switching System Requirements Supporting ISDN Access Using the ISDN User Part”, which are hereby incorporated by reference.


The monitors on the CCIS links to a specified SSP may be programmed to trap selected call set up messages which inquire as to the availability of a line. The same monitors may be programmed to trap call set up messages which inquire as to the availability of a line and indicate that it is not available. Set up signals which indicate unavailability, such as in the case of a busy line, comprise one indication of the maximum load on the available voice circuits. Such a condition may be relieved by the provision of additional lines from the end office to the Internet server. However it is desired to minimize overloading with the existing network. When the occurrence of line busy conditions approaches or exceeds a pre-specified parameter it may provide an indication of the approach of an unacceptable degree of congestion in the voice circuits.


The monitors provide an output to an event detection center (EDC) processor having an SSP capability which is linked to the STPs. The SS7 signaling to and from the STPs can be monitored to maintain a continuous check on the load status of the CCIS SS7 network. The link to the EDC makes this information available to the EDC. According to one embodiment of the invention, the event detection center processor reacts to this information to block or control (such as diverting) specified calls via the CCIS network, after ascertaining that usable capacity exists in that network.


According to another feature of the invention, the event control processor communicates with the monitors either via the STP CCS links or via connection to a controller for the monitors. In this manner it is possible to predict the development of a traffic overload in one type of circuit, the normal voice circuits, and to divert some or all of that traffic into a different type of network in a unique manner to avoid the actual occurrence of the undesired overload situation. The different network, i.e., the CCIS network, thus acts to perform the multiple functions of handling conventional PSTN network control, activating the monitor network to provide warning signals, acting on warning signals from the monitor network control to and direct diversionary switching through CCIS signaling, transporting the diverted signals via the CCIS network, and billing for the call.


Another feature of the invention lies in the fact that no diversion of signals onto the CCIS network will occur if there exists a possibility that the addition of such diverted signals would cause an overload on the CCIS network. In addition to the foregoing, the invention provides that the SS7 network and event control processor may be arranged to supply the additional function of billing for voice calls via the SS7 network as well as the Internet.


Referring to FIG. 5, the above arrangement is now described in additional detail. An Event Detection Center (EDC) 608 includes an SSP and is connected to the common channel signaling network via A links 610 and 612. The EDC includes a processor with associated storage, and operator terminal 614. The EDC is also connected via MF lines to the Switching Control Center (SCC) 616, Revenue Accounting Office (RAO) 618, Business Office (BO) 620, Test Center 622, and Automatic Message Accounting Office (AMA) 624. The business office 620 is connected to the RCMAC (not shown) and to the Test Center. The AMA 624 is connected to the RAO 618.


Each STP is provided with a series of monitors M with one monitor bridged onto each STP link, each monitor having receive and transmit ports. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, each SSP has a point code comprising a nine-digit code assigned to every node in the network. Each operating company has its own network ID normally represented by three digits in the point code. The point code also contains a three-digit cluster number. A cluster can hold 32 SSPs, the SSPs being designated by the final three numbers. According to the invention the monitors M are addressable and have individual point codes for control and programming purposes.


The monitors include processors and temporary storage, as indicated by way of example at 626, connected to the monitor M 628 in FIG. 5. It will be understood that each of the remaining monitors M includes a similar processor and storage. Each of the monitors in a cluster for an STP is connected to a monitor controller 630. The controller 630 includes a processor and storage and may be provided with a terminal 632. The monitors and processors may be of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,478,732, issued Dec. 12, 1995, to Eugene M. Pester III, and assigned to the assignee of the instant application. That patent is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


As described in further detail in the aforesaid Pester patent, the monitors are controllable from remote stations to set traps which may be customized. Thus the monitors are programmed to trap packets and/or selectable fields and/or field contents on a real time basis to permit extremely rapid response to detected conditions. The system and method of the invention are applicable to not only a localized or regional communications network but also to a virtually unlimited interconnection of such networks. The monitors may comprise monitor circuit cards physically mounted at a monitor controller 630, that holds all monitor cards for that cluster. The monitor controller includes a 486 or the like type controller and memory or storage that keeps track of all 32 monitors and handles any messages.


The controller 630 and its monitors M may be regarded as an interface with the SS7 network. The equipment may be conveniently mounted at or adjacent to the STP with which the monitors are associated. A function of the monitor controller is recording all of the data forwarded by the monitors M.


The controller 630 may be similar to the stage one controller described in the aforesaid Pester patent. The controller 630 is connected to the event detection center 608 via a data link 634. The monitors may physically constitute a back plane capable of handling multiple cards. The monitor cards themselves include multiple monitors, such as four monitors per card. According to the invention the monitors may be programmed by monitor control signals delivered either via the SS7 or CCS network or via the data link between each monitor M and its associated monitor controller 630. In the first instance control signals may be delivered to specifically addressed monitors over the CCS links 610 and 612 in FIG. 5. In the latter instance the control signals are delivered over the line 634 connecting the EDC 608 to the monitor controller 630 and thence over the data link 636 from the monitor controller 630 to the monitor and its associated processor and storage 626.


The processor in the event detection center 608 may be loaded with the desired program or script via the terminal 614. This script will specify for identified monitors the particular signals or portions of signals to be trapped and the nature of the output signal to be delivered to the monitor controller 630. The monitor controller receives this designated information from all specified monitors in its cluster and provides an output signal to the event detection center processor 608 upon the occurrence of predetermined conditions as specified by the event detection center processor. The event detection processor in turn may respond to the receipt of these output signals from the monitor controller by directing to the SS7 or CCS network over the links 610, 612, routing or other control information to direct the handling of predetermined calls or further process the received signals.


The EDC 608 may be programmed from the terminal 614 or from the ISCP via STPs to trap the desired signals and to react to the receipt of the monitor controller output signal to implement various types of billing. This may be initiated by transmitting a signal to the Automatic Message Accounting (AMA) or Station Message Detail Recording (SMDR) Office for dispatch to the Revenue Accounting Office (RAO) for billing of the service and reporting the events that occurred. Further detail regarding such billing is described in the common assignees copending application Ser. No. 08/547,178, filed Oct. 24, 1995, which application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The arrangement shown in FIG. 5 is capable of providing a means for totalizing the units comprising packetized voice signals over the monitored packet switched network during voice communication over the network.


It will be understood that alternate methods may be used relying on the SS7 signaling to effect billing for SS7 and Internet voice calls. While the data internetwork comprising the Internet has been referred to herein it also will be understood that other data internetworks may be used for voice transport and may be billed in a similar manner. While billing in the public switched telephone network has traditionally been based on time of connection for toll calls, it is within the comprehension of the invention that a “per cell” or the like charge arrangement may be used. This is particularly appropriate for the SS7 or CCIS network when it is used as a backbone packet network in the manner of the present invention. The network which is here provided is particularly suited to such a billing arrangement. Not only is the new system capable of obtaining the necessary data via the SS7 CCIS network, but this also may be obtained on a customized basis from the monitoring and superimposed control that is provided.


The operation of the redundant network system shown in FIG. 5 in response to one illustrative example of one type of overload situation is now described. Using the operator terminal 614 the EDC may be programmed to implement the following script or program:


1. Identify the ISP or Telco access hub to which overload protection is to be implemented. In this example it will be assumed that Telco access hub 638 in FIG. 5 is to be protected.


2. Identify the SS7 or CCIS links to the SSP/EO to which that server is connected and identify the addresses of the monitors on those links. In this example those would be the monitors on links 600 and 606.


3. Send monitor set up signals from the EDC computer via either the SS7/CCIS links or the monitor controller to the identified addressed monitors on the specified links.


4. Through such set up signals program those monitors to trap data signals on the specified links which are caused by a call initiation request signal (IAM) requesting a connection to the designated server. The trapped signals will be stored in the temporary storage associated with the monitors.


5. Program the monitors and monitor controller to send to the monitor controller those stored signals which represent IAM signals which encountered a busy condition on the local link 640 to the Telco access hub 638.


6. Set a threshold limit for such busy conditions per time period, i.e., the rate at which such signals are received. When that threshold is reached, the monitor control sends to the event detection control (EDC) a message to take load reduction action.


7. When the EDC receives a signal that load reduction action is indicated it will check the availability of SS7 network capacity to handle overload. An SS7 network available capacity threshold which is necessary to permit diversion of signals onto the SS7 network has previously been set. The links 610 and 612 from the EDC to the STPs provide the EDC with a continuous indication of SS7 network load conditions.


8. When the EDC receives a signal that load reduction action is indicated, and the EDC has determined that excess capacity is available in the SS7 network, it will broadcast a message to all SSP/EOs in LEC-B. Upon receiving this message each SSP/EO sets its program to switch incoming calls bearing an Internet prefix to the SS7 network. This condition of the switches is maintained until a reset signal restores the switches to their former condition.


9. Once the monitor control signals the EDC that the IAM/busy signal threshold has been reached, the monitor control periodically checks its storage to determine if the threshold was reached during the latest predetermined time period. When the monitor control determines that the rate of arrival of IAM/busy signals has dropped below the threshold, it sends a message to the SSP/EOs to reset their programs to discontinue switching incoming Internet calls to the SS7 network.


The operation of the system and method of the invention pursuant to this programming is now described.


In this example an Internet connection is sought to link a calling telephone to a called telephone without using personal or office computer equipment. The subscriber in this example uses a POTS terminal to initiate an Internet call to a called party at a called POTS terminal. The caller goes off-hook and dials *82. This prefix has been established by the Telco offering the service as a predesignated prefix with which the public may initiate an Internet telephone call through a Telco Internet server or access hub. The dialing of the prefix *82 is followed by the dialing of the directory number of the called party.


Alternative to this procedure the Telco may program its switches or SSP/EOs to react to 1+ or 0+ dialing to suspend and return to the caller a recorded query such as “Type of long distance call?”. The voice recognition capability of the IPS 579 and 581 may then be utilized to allow the caller to use a voice signal to select between an Internet or telephone network call. The methodology may, for example, be of the type described in further detail in the common assignee's copending application Ser. No. 08/828,781, filed Mar. 27, 1997, entitled Phonetic Voice Activated Dialing. That application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The Telco may also provide the subscribers the option of choosing an SS7 call.


The local SSP/EO to which the calling terminal is connected responds to the off-hook and receives the dialed digits from the calling station. The SSP/EO switching system analyzes the received digits and determines from the prefix *82 that the call is an Internet call. Responsive to its programming it knows that the call must be completed through the Telco access hub, and that further processing is necessary. In this example it is assumed that the Telco access hub must be reached by a different SSP/EO than the SSP/EO to which the calling telephone terminal is connected. Such would be the case in FIG. 5 if telephone terminal 518 was the originating or calling terminal. In that case SSP/EO 510 would be the originating SSP/EO and SSP/EO 512 would be the destination SSP/EO to reach the Telco access hub 534.


The originating SSP/EO central office suspends the call and determines whether or not the lines from the destination SSP/EO to the Telco access hub are busy. If the called access hub line is busy, the destination SSP/EO notifies the originating SSP/EO via conventional SS7 signaling, and the originating SSP/EO provides a busy signal to the calling station.


When the receiving or destination SSP/EO notifies the originating SSP/EO that the access hub line is busy, this SS7 signal is noted by the monitor on the SS7 link on which that signal traveled. The initial inquiry to the destination SSP/EO and the busy response would be trapped by that monitor pursuant to its programming. Also pursuant to that programming the monitor would send request and busy signal sequence signals to the monitor control. The monitor control maintains a timed record of the number of request/busy signals received and increments that store. The monitor control ascertains whether the addition of the latest count reaches the predetermined threshold rate for such signals. If the threshold has not been reached the count is maintained but no action taken. If the threshold has been reached the monitor control signals the EDC to that effect. Upon receiving such notification the EDC checks for the availability of SS7 network capacity. If such capacity is not available no action is taken.


If excess capacity exists on the SS7 network the EDC broadcasts a message to all SSP/EOs in the network. Upon receiving this message each SSP/EO sets its program to switch incoming calls bearing the Telco Internet prefix to the SS7 network. This condition of the switches is maintained until a reset signal restores the switches to their former condition.


The processing sequence may be as follows for an Internet telephone call which is made after the switches have been set to divert Internet telephone calls to the SS7 network.


The caller goes off-hook and dials *82.


The central office SSP/EO responds to the off-hook and receives the dialed digits from the calling station.


The SSP/EO switching system analyzes the received digits and determines from the prefix *82 that the call is an Internet call.


The originating SSP/EO central office suspends the call and sends a CCIS query message through one or more of the STPs to the destination SSP/EO. However, this query is directed to the ultimate destination SSP/EO, which was identified by the destination telephone number initially dialed by the calling party. The message traverses the SS7 network between the two SSP/EOs.


The ultimate destination SSP/EO receives the query and determines whether or not the called station is busy. If the called station is busy, the ultimate destination SSP/EO so informs the originating SSP/EO.


The originating SSP/EO provides a busy signal to the calling station.


If the called station is not busy, the receiving ultimate destination SSP/EO busies out the called station line by blocking all calls.


The receiving or ultimate destination SSP/EO then informs the originating SSP/EO office that the called line is available and waiting and may be reached through the SS7 network.


The originating SSP/EO receives this message and a virtual connection of the two SSP/EOs is established through the SS7 network.


A telephony communication path from the calling to the called telephone terminal has now been established via the SS7 network.


If the call had been made from a telephone terminal connected to the same SSP/EO as the Telco access hub, the SSP/EO makes the busy/not busy determination internally. The switch also knows that it is presently programmed to send Internet calls to the SS7 network. Thus the switch internally directs the call to the SS7 network in the manner described in detail in parent application Ser. No. 08/790,888.


The foregoing operation of the system of the invention provides relief from overload in providing Internet voice communication due to overload in the PSTN access. It is also a feature of the invention that relief is provided where the Internet itself is encountering an overload condition which is producing a degradation of the quality of voice communication which is being supplied. This feature has been described in detail in connection with FIGS. 2-4 and the network illustrated in FIG. 5 includes that functionality. However, the system illustrated and described in relation to FIG. 5 has the additional capability of providing relief from Internet overload not only by diversion to the telephone trunked network, but also by diversion to the SS7 packet network. Not only does this provide the ability to maintain a quality telephone connectivity in the face of Internet overload, it also permits providing this service without having to create additional loading on the trunked telephone network.


According to the invention it is possible to provide multiple classes of telephony communication from telephone terminal to telephone terminal. This not only makes it possible to provide an improved quality of service but also provides a more universal guarantee of a user being able to complete a connection. Multiple options may be provided to the users. Thus the user may select his or her preferred routing at initiation of the establishment of the path. The routing may be changed during a communication to maintain quality.


Improved dial-up access to the Internet improves the reliability of that service for voice communication. If the improved service leads to congestion, the path may be diverted to the SS7 or CCIS network. However the CCIS traffic is monitored and that diversion will not be made if there is no available capacity in that network. If the path is diverted to the CCIS network and traffic approaches an overload point, then voice traffic may be diverted to the trunked network. This is an important feature. The CCIS network is now serving as a backbone packet network but its first priority must be controlling the public switched telephone network. Congestion presents a basic problem on any network and may present complex problems where those networks are interrelated.


The present invention provides not only an improved voice communication medium with redundant paths, but also provide a system and methodology for mediating between the redundant paths. This improves certitude of communication along with improved and monitored quality and maximum access to a minimum cost routing.


It will be readily seen by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention fulfills all of the objects set forth above. After reading the foregoing specification, one of ordinary skill will be able to effect various changes, substitutions of equivalents and various other aspects of the invention as broadly disclosed herein. It is therefore intended that the protection granted hereon be limited only by the definition contained in the appended claims and equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: establishing a voice communication between a first terminal and a second terminal, including establishing a first communication link via a first packet switched network and between the first terminal and second terminal for use by the voice communication;transmitting voice information between said first terminal and said second terminal over said first communication link;monitoring quality of service of communication in said first packet switched network;when said monitored quality of service does not meet a first threshold level, establishing a second communication link via only a second packet switched network and between said first terminal and second terminal for use by the voice communication, and transmitting voice information between said first terminal and said second terminal over said second communication link.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said first threshold level corresponds to a measure of quality of delivered voice signals.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein establishing said second communication link occurs automatically in response to the monitored quality of service falling below the first threshold level.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: transmitting a recorded voice message to the first terminal prior to establishing second communication link.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, further comprising: receiving a response to said recorded voice message from said first terminal prior to establishing said second communication link.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein said first terminal is connected to said first communication link via a first circuit-switched network, and wherein said second terminal is connected to said first communication link via a second circuit-switched network.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein said first circuit-switched network and said second circuit-switched network are part of the Public Switched Telephone Network.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said first terminal and said second terminal comprise telephone terminals.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the first packet switched network includes the Internet, and the second packet switched network includes the Common Channel Interoffice Switching system.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising: measuring a quality of service metric of the second packet switched network;wherein establishing said second communication link occurs when said monitored quality of service departs from said threshold value and the quality of service metric of the second packet switched network is above a second threshold level.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the quality of service metric of the second packet switched network is available capacity, and the second threshold level corresponds to a minimum available capacity.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising: retrieving the first threshold level from a record associated with a user of the first terminal.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the first communication link uses Internet Protocol (IP) communications, and wherein establishing the first communication link comprises determining an IP address for a terminating gateway router connected to the first packet switched network and configured to communicate with the second terminal.
  • 14. A method comprising: monitoring a quality of service metric of communications over a fast packet switched network, the quality of service metric including a measurement of unavailability conditions in response to call set-up messages;when said quality of service metric meets a threshold level, transmitting a first message to a plurality of switches, the first message indicating, that communications may be established using the first packet switched network;setting an indication in each of the plurality of the switches for the first packet switched network based on the first message;receiving at one of the plurality of switches a request to establish a voice communication between a first terminal and a second terminal,when the indication is set at the one of the plurality of switches for the first packet switched network, establishing said voice communication between said first terminal and second terminal via said first packet switched network and transmitting voice information between said first terminal and said second terminal over said first packet switched network;when the indication is not set at the one of the plurality of switches for the first packet switched network, establishing said voice communication between said first terminal and second terminal via a second packet switched network, and transmitting voice information between said first terminal and said second terminal over said second packet switched network.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, wherein monitoring the quality of service metric includes detecting at least one unavailability message, determining a rate of detection of the at least one unavailability message, comparing the rate of detection to the threshold level.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, further comprising: when said quality of service metric does not meet the threshold level, transmitting a second message to the plurality of switches, the second message indicating that communications may be established using the second packet switched network;setting the indication in each of the plurality of the switches for the second packet switched network based on the second message.
  • 17. The method of claim 14, wherein the first packet switched network includes the Internet, and the second packet switched network includes the Common Channel Interoffice Switching system.
  • 18. A method comprising: establishing a first voice communication link between a first terminal and a second terminal via a first packet switched network;transmitting voice information between said first terminal and said second terminal over said first voice communication link;monitoring quality of service on said first communication link;establishing a second voice communication link between said first terminal and second terminal via only a second packet switched network when said monitored quality of service does not meet a first threshold level.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation of prior U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/617,816, filed Jul. 17, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,012,898, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/931,985, filed Sep. 17, 1997 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/634,543, filed Apr. 18, 1996 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,438,218, “Internet Telephone Service”), Ser. No. 08/698,713, filed Aug. 16, 1996 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,125,113, “Internet Telephone Service”), and Ser. No. 08/790,888, filed Feb. 3, 1997, (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,122,225, “Internet Telephone Service with Mediation”). This application is also related to application Ser. No. 08/598,767, “Analog Terminal Internet Access,” filed Feb. 2, 1996, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/353,281, filed Dec. 5, 1994; Ser. No. 08/371,906, filed Jan. 12, 1995; Ser. No. 08/539,952, filed Oct. 6, 1995; Ser. No. 08/557,749, filed Dec. 13, 1995; Ser. No. 08/634,544, filed Apr. 18, 1996, Ser. No. 08/790,888 filed Feb. 3, 1997, Ser. No. 08/815,363, filed Mar. 11, 1997, Ser. No. 08/816,227, filed Mar. 12, 1997, Ser. No. 08/821,027, filed Mar. 19, 1997, and Ser. No. 08/547,178, filed Oct. 24, 1995, which applications are assigned to the assignee of the instant application. The specifications of those applications are incorporated herein by referenced in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (617)
Number Name Date Kind
4191860 Weber Mar 1980 A
4310727 Lawser Jan 1982 A
4313035 Jordan et al. Jan 1982 A
4313036 Jabara et al. Jan 1982 A
4371751 Matthews et al. Feb 1983 A
4371752 Matthews et al. Feb 1983 A
4375097 Ulug Feb 1983 A
4555594 Friedes et al. Nov 1985 A
4565903 Riley Jan 1986 A
4577066 Bimonte et al. Mar 1986 A
4585906 Matthews et al. Apr 1986 A
4602129 Matthews et al. Jul 1986 A
4609778 Franklin et al. Sep 1986 A
4611094 Asmuth et al. Sep 1986 A
4611096 Asmuth et al. Sep 1986 A
4625081 Lotito et al. Nov 1986 A
4630262 Callens Dec 1986 A
4652700 Matthews et al. Mar 1987 A
4672700 Poncy Jun 1987 A
4710917 Tompkins et al. Dec 1987 A
4730071 Schoenthal Mar 1988 A
4734931 Bourg et al. Mar 1988 A
4741820 Coughlin May 1988 A
4748618 Brown et al. May 1988 A
4765924 Inoue Aug 1988 A
4766604 Axberg Aug 1988 A
4771425 Baran et al. Sep 1988 A
4782485 Gollub Nov 1988 A
4788718 McNabb et al. Nov 1988 A
4790003 Kepley et al. Dec 1988 A
4827500 Binkerd et al. May 1989 A
4865763 Inoue Sep 1989 A
4866763 Cooper et al. Sep 1989 A
4872157 Hemmady Oct 1989 A
4872159 Hemmady Oct 1989 A
4872160 Hemmady et al. Oct 1989 A
4872197 Pemmaraju Oct 1989 A
4875206 Nichols Oct 1989 A
4877949 Danielson Oct 1989 A
4882476 White Nov 1989 A
4894824 Hemmady Jan 1990 A
4897874 Lidinsky et al. Jan 1990 A
4899333 Roediger Feb 1990 A
4899373 Lee et al. Feb 1990 A
4910794 Mahany Mar 1990 A
4916691 Goodman Apr 1990 A
4918722 Duehren et al. Apr 1990 A
4922348 Gillon et al. May 1990 A
4922486 Lidinsky May 1990 A
4942574 Zelle Jul 1990 A
4958341 Hemmady et al. Sep 1990 A
4969184 Gordon et al. Nov 1990 A
D315573 Schultz Mar 1991 S
5008906 Reichwein Apr 1991 A
5008926 Misholi Apr 1991 A
5009337 Bimbi Apr 1991 A
5012511 Hanle et al. Apr 1991 A
5018191 Catron et al. May 1991 A
5019699 Koenck May 1991 A
5023868 Davidson Jun 1991 A
5029199 Jones et al. Jul 1991 A
5029200 Haas et al. Jul 1991 A
5031098 Miller Jul 1991 A
5034975 Grimes Jul 1991 A
5052020 Koenck Sep 1991 A
5052943 Davis Oct 1991 A
5070536 Mahany Dec 1991 A
5098877 Coughlin Mar 1992 A
5115431 Williams May 1992 A
5123064 Hacker Jun 1992 A
5134647 Pugh et al. Jul 1992 A
5144282 Sutterlin Sep 1992 A
5146491 Silver et al. Sep 1992 A
5163080 Amoroso Nov 1992 A
5180232 Chadima, Jr. Jan 1993 A
5185860 Wu Feb 1993 A
5193110 Jones et al. Mar 1993 A
5195086 Baumgartner et al. Mar 1993 A
5195128 Knitl Mar 1993 A
5195183 Miller Mar 1993 A
5199062 Von Meister Mar 1993 A
5200993 Wheeler et al. Apr 1993 A
5202817 Koenck Apr 1993 A
5202825 Miller Apr 1993 A
5206901 Harlow et al. Apr 1993 A
5208848 Pula May 1993 A
5215011 Monney Jun 1993 A
5216233 Main Jun 1993 A
5218187 Koenck Jun 1993 A
5218188 Hanson Jun 1993 A
5223820 Sutterlin Jun 1993 A
5225071 Coughlin Jul 1993 A
5227614 Danielson Jul 1993 A
5231492 Dangi et al. Jul 1993 A
5235317 Sutterlin Aug 1993 A
5237604 Ryan Aug 1993 A
5243645 Bissell et al. Sep 1993 A
5243654 Hunter Sep 1993 A
5247571 Kay et al. Sep 1993 A
5254971 Sutterlin Oct 1993 A
5260986 Pershan Nov 1993 A
5263080 Jones et al. Nov 1993 A
5265155 Castro Nov 1993 A
5272749 Masek Dec 1993 A
5274696 Perelman Dec 1993 A
5280159 Schultz Jan 1994 A
5289378 Miller Feb 1994 A
5289468 Yoshida Feb 1994 A
5295154 Meier Mar 1994 A
5303297 Durrell et al. Apr 1994 A
5305181 Schultz Apr 1994 A
5308966 Danielson May 1994 A
5309437 Perlman et al. May 1994 A
5313053 Koenck May 1994 A
5317691 Traeger May 1994 A
5318719 Hughes Jun 1994 A
5322991 Hanson Jun 1994 A
5327421 Hiller et al. Jul 1994 A
5327486 Wolff et al. Jul 1994 A
5331580 Miller Jul 1994 A
5333266 Boaz Jul 1994 A
5341374 Lewen et al. Aug 1994 A
5345446 Hiller et al. Sep 1994 A
5346611 Coughlin Sep 1994 A
5347633 Ashfield et al. Sep 1994 A
5349497 Hanson Sep 1994 A
5349678 Morris Sep 1994 A
5353331 Emery et al. Oct 1994 A
5359185 Hanson Oct 1994 A
5361256 Doeringer et al. Nov 1994 A
5365524 Hiller et al. Nov 1994 A
5365546 Koenck Nov 1994 A
5367566 Moe et al. Nov 1994 A
5371858 Miller Dec 1994 A
5375068 Palmer et al. Dec 1994 A
5375159 Williams Dec 1994 A
5377186 Wegner et al. Dec 1994 A
5381465 Carter et al. Jan 1995 A
5384831 Creswell et al. Jan 1995 A
5384840 Blatchford et al. Jan 1995 A
5386467 Ahmad Jan 1995 A
5390175 Hiller et al. Feb 1995 A
5394436 Meier Feb 1995 A
5400393 Knuth Mar 1995 A
5406557 Baudoin Apr 1995 A
5408237 Patterson Apr 1995 A
5408382 Schultz Apr 1995 A
5410141 Koenck Apr 1995 A
5410754 Klotzbach et al. Apr 1995 A
5416842 Aziz May 1995 A
5420211 Hughes May 1995 A
5420916 Sekiguchi May 1995 A
5422882 Hiller et al. Jun 1995 A
5422941 Hasenauer et al. Jun 1995 A
5425028 Britton et al. Jun 1995 A
5425051 Mahany Jun 1995 A
5425090 Orriss Jun 1995 A
5425091 Josephs Jun 1995 A
5425780 Christie Jun 1995 A
5426636 Hiller et al. Jun 1995 A
5428636 Meier Jun 1995 A
5430719 Weisser et al. Jul 1995 A
5430727 Callon Jul 1995 A
5434852 La Porta et al. Jul 1995 A
5434913 Tung et al. Jul 1995 A
5436957 McConnell Jul 1995 A
5440621 Castro Aug 1995 A
5442690 Nazif et al. Aug 1995 A
5444709 Riddle Aug 1995 A
5452297 Hiller et al. Sep 1995 A
5457629 Miller Oct 1995 A
5465207 Boatwright Nov 1995 A
5466170 Pavek Nov 1995 A
5468947 Danielson Nov 1995 A
5468950 Hanson Nov 1995 A
5469497 Pierce et al. Nov 1995 A
5469500 Satter et al. Nov 1995 A
5473677 D'Amato et al. Dec 1995 A
5475732 Pester, III Dec 1995 A
5475737 Garner et al. Dec 1995 A
5475748 Jones Dec 1995 A
5479494 Clitherow Dec 1995 A
5481603 Gutierrez et al. Jan 1996 A
5483549 Weinberg et al. Jan 1996 A
5483587 Hogan et al. Jan 1996 A
5483676 Mahany Jan 1996 A
5487111 Slusky Jan 1996 A
5488575 Danielson Jan 1996 A
5490247 Tung et al. Feb 1996 A
5493568 Sampat et al. Feb 1996 A
5493573 Kobayashi et al. Feb 1996 A
5500859 Sharma et al. Mar 1996 A
5504746 Meier Apr 1996 A
5506887 Emery et al. Apr 1996 A
5506893 Buscher et al. Apr 1996 A
5515303 Cargin, Jr. May 1996 A
5517434 Hanson May 1996 A
5517560 Greenspan May 1996 A
5524145 Parker Jun 1996 A
5526353 Henley et al. Jun 1996 A
5526489 Nilakantan et al. Jun 1996 A
5528539 Ong Jun 1996 A
5537470 Lee Jul 1996 A
5539193 Gibbs Jul 1996 A
5539194 Miller Jul 1996 A
5541398 Hanson Jul 1996 A
5544010 Schultz Aug 1996 A
5555276 Koenck Sep 1996 A
5559068 Chen Sep 1996 A
5559871 Smith Sep 1996 A
5568645 Morris Oct 1996 A
5572583 Wheeler, Jr. et al. Nov 1996 A
5575961 Smyk Nov 1996 A
5576529 Koenck Nov 1996 A
5583564 Rao Dec 1996 A
5583920 Wheeler, Jr. Dec 1996 A
5583926 Venier et al. Dec 1996 A
5583929 Ardon Dec 1996 A
5586175 Hogan Dec 1996 A
5587577 Schultz Dec 1996 A
5590133 Billstrom et al. Dec 1996 A
5590181 Hogan Dec 1996 A
5590346 West Dec 1996 A
5594717 Watanabe et al. Jan 1997 A
5594784 Velius Jan 1997 A
5598464 Hess et al. Jan 1997 A
5598487 Hacker Jan 1997 A
5602456 Cargin Feb 1997 A
5602854 Luse Feb 1997 A
5604737 Iwami et al. Feb 1997 A
5608446 Carr et al. Mar 1997 A
5608447 Farry et al. Mar 1997 A
5608706 Gordon Mar 1997 A
5608786 Gordon Mar 1997 A
5610910 Focsaneanu et al. Mar 1997 A
5615251 Hogan Mar 1997 A
5617343 Danielson Apr 1997 A
5621787 McKoy et al. Apr 1997 A
5625180 Hanson Apr 1997 A
5625555 Davis Apr 1997 A
5625675 Katsumaru et al. Apr 1997 A
5625681 Butler, II Apr 1997 A
5625682 Gray et al. Apr 1997 A
5626682 Kobari et al. May 1997 A
5633919 Hogan May 1997 A
5638430 Hogan Jun 1997 A
5640001 Danielson Jun 1997 A
5644471 Schultz Jul 1997 A
5657317 Mahany Aug 1997 A
5661790 Hsu Aug 1997 A
5661792 Akinpelu et al. Aug 1997 A
5663208 Martin Sep 1997 A
5671436 Morrison Sep 1997 A
5672860 Miller Sep 1997 A
5673031 Meier Sep 1997 A
5679943 Koenck Oct 1997 A
5680442 Bartholomew et al. Oct 1997 A
5680446 Fleischer et al. Oct 1997 A
5680633 Koenck Oct 1997 A
5682379 Mahany Oct 1997 A
5694318 Miller Dec 1997 A
5696903 Mahany Dec 1997 A
5699528 Hogan Dec 1997 A
5706286 Reiman et al. Jan 1998 A
5708680 Gollnick Jan 1998 A
5708833 Kinney Jan 1998 A
5710728 Danielson Jan 1998 A
5712903 Bartholomew et al. Jan 1998 A
5712907 Wegner et al. Jan 1998 A
5722067 Fougnies Feb 1998 A
5724355 Bruno et al. Mar 1998 A
5724412 Srinivasan Mar 1998 A
5726984 Kubler et al. Mar 1998 A
5727002 Miller et al. Mar 1998 A
5732078 Arango Mar 1998 A
5732213 Gessel et al. Mar 1998 A
5737395 Irribarren Apr 1998 A
5737404 Segal Apr 1998 A
5737414 Walker et al. Apr 1998 A
5740164 Liron Apr 1998 A
5740366 Mahany Apr 1998 A
5742596 Baratz et al. Apr 1998 A
5742668 Pepe et al. Apr 1998 A
5742670 Bennett Apr 1998 A
5742675 Kilander et al. Apr 1998 A
5742905 Pepe et al. Apr 1998 A
5747785 Miller May 1998 A
5747786 Cargin, Jr. May 1998 A
5748619 Meier May 1998 A
5751706 Land et al. May 1998 A
5751707 Voit et al. May 1998 A
5751961 Smyk May 1998 A
5761294 Shaffer et al. Jun 1998 A
5763867 Main Jun 1998 A
5764741 Barak Jun 1998 A
5768513 Kuthyar et al. Jun 1998 A
5774535 Castro Jun 1998 A
5774660 Brendel et al. Jun 1998 A
5774695 Autrey et al. Jun 1998 A
5778313 Fougnies Jul 1998 A
5781620 Montgomery et al. Jul 1998 A
5790536 Mahany Aug 1998 A
5790548 Sistanizadeh et al. Aug 1998 A
5793762 Penners et al. Aug 1998 A
5793763 Mayes et al. Aug 1998 A
5793771 Darland et al. Aug 1998 A
5799072 Vulcan et al. Aug 1998 A
5799156 Hogan Aug 1998 A
5802502 Gell et al. Sep 1998 A
5802513 Bowie, III Sep 1998 A
5804805 Koenck Sep 1998 A
5805474 Danielson Sep 1998 A
5805587 Norris Sep 1998 A
5805807 Hanson Sep 1998 A
5809128 McMullin Sep 1998 A
5812534 Davis et al. Sep 1998 A
5812639 Bartholomew et al. Sep 1998 A
5812795 Horovitz et al. Sep 1998 A
5818836 DuVal Oct 1998 A
5825780 Christie Oct 1998 A
5825863 Walker Oct 1998 A
5828740 Khuc et al. Oct 1998 A
5834753 Danielson Nov 1998 A
5838665 Kahn et al. Nov 1998 A
5838682 Dekelbaum et al. Nov 1998 A
5841764 Roderique et al. Nov 1998 A
5844893 Gollnick Dec 1998 A
5844896 Marks et al. Dec 1998 A
5845267 Ronen Dec 1998 A
5848143 Andrews et al. Dec 1998 A
5850358 Danielson Dec 1998 A
5850433 Rondeau Dec 1998 A
5854833 Hogan Dec 1998 A
5854975 Fougnies Dec 1998 A
5862171 Mahany Jan 1999 A
5864610 Ronen Jan 1999 A
5867495 Elliot et al. Feb 1999 A
5867562 Scherer Feb 1999 A
5867566 Hogan Feb 1999 A
5870565 Glitho Feb 1999 A
5873099 Hogan Feb 1999 A
5883891 Williams et al. Mar 1999 A
5884032 Bateman et al. Mar 1999 A
5888087 Hanson Mar 1999 A
5889774 Mirashrafi et al. Mar 1999 A
5892822 Gottlieb et al. Apr 1999 A
5892971 Danielson Apr 1999 A
5895431 Miller Apr 1999 A
5895906 Danielson Apr 1999 A
5898668 Shaffer Apr 1999 A
5898673 Riggan et al. Apr 1999 A
5901140 Van As et al. May 1999 A
5903558 Jones et al. May 1999 A
5905736 Ronen et al. May 1999 A
5907547 Foladare et al. May 1999 A
5910946 Csapo Jun 1999 A
5912887 Sehgal Jun 1999 A
5914481 Danielson Jun 1999 A
5915001 Uppaluru Jun 1999 A
5915005 He Jun 1999 A
5917175 Miller Jun 1999 A
5917424 Goldman et al. Jun 1999 A
5918179 Foladare et al. Jun 1999 A
5923659 Curry et al. Jul 1999 A
5926482 Christie Jul 1999 A
5928292 Miller Jul 1999 A
5930343 Vasquez Jul 1999 A
5930700 Pepper Jul 1999 A
5937045 Yaoya et al. Aug 1999 A
5940479 Guy et al. Aug 1999 A
5940598 Strauss et al. Aug 1999 A
5940771 Gollnick Aug 1999 A
5946299 Blonder Aug 1999 A
5946386 Rogers et al. Aug 1999 A
5949056 White Sep 1999 A
5949776 Mahany Sep 1999 A
5949869 Sink Sep 1999 A
5953322 Kimball Sep 1999 A
5953338 Ma et al. Sep 1999 A
5953504 Sokal et al. Sep 1999 A
5953651 Lu et al. Sep 1999 A
5956391 Melen et al. Sep 1999 A
5958016 Chang et al. Sep 1999 A
5958052 Bellovin Sep 1999 A
5959998 Takahashi et al. Sep 1999 A
5966431 Reiman et al. Oct 1999 A
5969321 Danielson Oct 1999 A
5970065 Miloslavsky Oct 1999 A
5970477 Roden Oct 1999 A
5974043 Solomon Oct 1999 A
5974052 Johnson et al. Oct 1999 A
5978569 Traeger Nov 1999 A
5978840 Nguyen et al. Nov 1999 A
5979768 Koenck Nov 1999 A
5982774 Foladare et al. Nov 1999 A
5987499 Morris Nov 1999 A
5991291 Asai et al. Nov 1999 A
5991292 Focsaneanu et al. Nov 1999 A
5991301 Christie Nov 1999 A
5991308 Fuhrmann et al. Nov 1999 A
5991864 Kinney Nov 1999 A
5995608 Civaniar et al. Nov 1999 A
5999525 Krishnaswamy et al. Dec 1999 A
6005926 Mashinsky Dec 1999 A
6006100 Koenck Dec 1999 A
6006253 Kumar et al. Dec 1999 A
6012088 Li et al. Jan 2000 A
6014379 White et al. Jan 2000 A
6016343 Hogan Jan 2000 A
6018360 Stewart et al. Jan 2000 A
6021126 White et al. Feb 2000 A
6023147 Cargin Feb 2000 A
6023474 Christie Feb 2000 A
6026087 Mirashrafi et al. Feb 2000 A
6026091 Christie Feb 2000 A
6028858 Rivers et al. Feb 2000 A
6029261 Christie Feb 2000 A
6031840 Christie Feb 2000 A
6036093 Schultz Mar 2000 A
6046992 Meier Apr 2000 A
6047051 Ginzboorg et al. Apr 2000 A
6047326 Kilkki Apr 2000 A
6049813 Danielson Apr 2000 A
6052445 Bashoura et al. Apr 2000 A
6058000 Koenck May 2000 A
6064653 Farris May 2000 A
6069890 White et al. May 2000 A
6075783 Voit Jun 2000 A
6078582 Curry et al. Jun 2000 A
6078943 Yu Jun 2000 A
6081525 Christie Jun 2000 A
6084867 Meier Jul 2000 A
6088431 LaDue Jul 2000 A
6104645 Ong Aug 2000 A
6104704 Buhler et al. Aug 2000 A
6104711 Voit Aug 2000 A
6108341 Christie Aug 2000 A
6108704 Hutton et al. Aug 2000 A
6112206 Morris Aug 2000 A
6115737 Ely et al. Sep 2000 A
6118936 Lauer et al. Sep 2000 A
6122255 Bartholomew et al. Sep 2000 A
6125113 Farris et al. Sep 2000 A
6125126 Hallenstal Sep 2000 A
6128304 Gardell et al. Oct 2000 A
6131121 Mattaway Oct 2000 A
6134235 Goldman et al. Oct 2000 A
6134530 Bunting et al. Oct 2000 A
6137792 Jonas et al. Oct 2000 A
6141404 Westerlage et al. Oct 2000 A
6141412 Smith et al. Oct 2000 A
6144976 Silva Nov 2000 A
6149062 Danielson Nov 2000 A
6154445 Farris et al. Nov 2000 A
6157621 Brown et al. Dec 2000 A
6157636 Voit et al. Dec 2000 A
6157648 Voit et al. Dec 2000 A
6157823 Fougnies Dec 2000 A
6181695 Curry et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181703 Christie Jan 2001 B1
6185184 Mattaway Feb 2001 B1
6192050 Stovall Feb 2001 B1
6192400 Hanson Feb 2001 B1
6195425 Farris Feb 2001 B1
6201812 Christie Mar 2001 B1
6205139 Voit Mar 2001 B1
6212193 Christie Apr 2001 B1
6215790 Voit et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226678 Mattaway May 2001 B1
6236851 Fougnies May 2001 B1
6243373 Turock Jun 2001 B1
6243374 White Jun 2001 B1
6263372 Hogan Jul 2001 B1
6266685 Danielson Jul 2001 B1
6279038 Hogan Aug 2001 B1
6282192 Murphy et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282284 Dezonno et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282574 Voit et al. Aug 2001 B1
6285745 Bartholomew et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289010 Voit Sep 2001 B1
6292478 Farris Sep 2001 B1
6292479 Bartholomew et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292481 Voit et al. Sep 2001 B1
6295292 Voit et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298057 Guy Oct 2001 B1
6298062 Gardell et al. Oct 2001 B1
6298064 Christie Oct 2001 B1
6304567 Rosenburg Oct 2001 B1
6310941 Crutcher et al. Oct 2001 B1
6314103 Christie Nov 2001 B1
6327258 Deschaine et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330250 Curry et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335927 Elliott Jan 2002 B1
6343115 Foladare et al. Jan 2002 B1
6347084 Kelly Feb 2002 B1
6347085 Kelly Feb 2002 B2
6359880 Curry Mar 2002 B1
6363065 Thornton et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363349 Urs et al. Mar 2002 B1
6374302 Galasso et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375344 Hanson Apr 2002 B1
6385191 Coffman et al. May 2002 B1
6400702 Meier Jun 2002 B1
6407991 Meier Jun 2002 B1
6430195 Christie Aug 2002 B1
6430275 Voit et al. Aug 2002 B1
6438218 Farris et al. Aug 2002 B1
6449259 Allain et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449356 Dezonno Sep 2002 B1
6480588 Donovan Nov 2002 B1
6493353 Kelly et al. Dec 2002 B2
6513066 Hutton Jan 2003 B1
6539015 Voit et al. Mar 2003 B2
6542497 Curry Apr 2003 B1
6574216 Farris et al. Jun 2003 B1
6574681 White Jun 2003 B1
6584093 Salama et al. Jun 2003 B1
6594254 Kelly Jul 2003 B1
6600735 Iwama et al. Jul 2003 B1
6614768 Mahany Sep 2003 B1
6614781 Elliott Sep 2003 B1
6621942 Hacker Sep 2003 B1
6625170 Curry et al. Sep 2003 B1
6633846 Bennett et al. Oct 2003 B1
6643362 Hogan Nov 2003 B2
6678718 Khouri et al. Jan 2004 B1
6681994 Koenck Jan 2004 B1
6687738 Hutton Feb 2004 B1
6688523 Koenck Feb 2004 B1
6694359 Morris Feb 2004 B1
6701365 Hutton Mar 2004 B1
6711241 White et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714559 Meier Mar 2004 B1
6714983 Koenck Mar 2004 B1
6760429 Hung et al. Jul 2004 B1
6792256 Kinney Sep 2004 B1
6823384 Wilson et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826165 Meier Nov 2004 B1
6829645 Hutton Dec 2004 B1
6839340 Voit et al. Jan 2005 B1
6870827 Voit et al. Mar 2005 B1
6895419 Cargin May 2005 B1
6910632 Koenck Jun 2005 B2
6925054 Atterton et al. Aug 2005 B1
6990090 Meier Jan 2006 B2
7012898 Farris et al. Mar 2006 B1
7079534 Medhat Jul 2006 B1
7085362 Christie Aug 2006 B1
7088705 Curry Aug 2006 B2
7092379 Singh et al. Aug 2006 B1
7120319 Danielson Oct 2006 B2
7149208 Mattaway Dec 2006 B2
7206592 Gollnick Apr 2007 B1
7274662 Kalmanek et al. Sep 2007 B1
20020064149 Elliott May 2002 A1
20020159461 Hamamoto et al. Oct 2002 A1
20030078006 Mahany Apr 2003 A1
20030112767 Meier Jun 2003 A1
20030169767 Christie Sep 2003 A1
20030189941 Christie Oct 2003 A1
20030193933 Jones Oct 2003 A1
20040018851 Koenck Jan 2004 A1
20040023651 Gollnick Feb 2004 A1
20040038717 Mahany Feb 2004 A1
20040039816 Goss et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040039846 Goss et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040044667 Mahany Mar 2004 A1
20040073933 Gollnick Apr 2004 A1
20040090952 Kubler May 2004 A1
20040093363 Cargin May 2004 A1
20040114567 Kubler Jun 2004 A1
20040125753 Mahany Jul 2004 A1
20040145775 Kubler Jul 2004 A1
20040146020 Kubler Jul 2004 A1
20040146037 Kubler Jul 2004 A1
20040151150 Kubler Aug 2004 A1
20040151151 Kubler Aug 2004 A1
20040151164 Kubler Aug 2004 A1
20040160912 Kubler Aug 2004 A1
20040160913 Kubler Aug 2004 A1
20040162889 Morris Aug 2004 A1
20040165573 Kubler Aug 2004 A1
20040165793 Hacker Aug 2004 A1
20040166895 Koenck Aug 2004 A1
20040169583 Meier Sep 2004 A1
20040174841 Kubler Sep 2004 A1
20040174842 Kubler Sep 2004 A1
20040174843 Kubler Sep 2004 A1
20040203834 Mahany Oct 2004 A1
20040246940 Kubler Dec 2004 A1
20040264442 Kubler Dec 2004 A1
20050008002 Kubler Jan 2005 A1
20050013266 Kubler Jan 2005 A1
20050036467 Kubler Feb 2005 A1
20050078647 Meier Apr 2005 A1
20050083872 Kubler Apr 2005 A1
20050087603 Mahany Apr 2005 A1
20050195859 Mahany Sep 2005 A1
20050232213 Meier Oct 2005 A1
20050242192 Koenck Nov 2005 A1
20050254475 Kubler Nov 2005 A1
20060007951 Meier Jan 2006 A1
20060062240 Meier Mar 2006 A1
20060131420 Koenck Jun 2006 A1
20060233161 Koenck Oct 2006 A1
20060251226 Hogan Nov 2006 A1
20060268806 Meier Nov 2006 A1
20060268807 Meier Nov 2006 A1
20060291752 Hacker Dec 2006 A1
20070001007 Koenck Jan 2007 A1
20070007353 Danielson Jan 2007 A1
20070065046 Hacker Mar 2007 A1
20070076687 Low et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070086445 Mattaway Apr 2007 A1
20070121529 Meier May 2007 A1
20070206576 Radulovic Sep 2007 A1
20070263644 Christie et al. Nov 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
0235057 Sep 1987 EP
0335562 Oct 1989 EP
0365885 May 1990 EP
0381365 Aug 1990 EP
0722237 Jul 1996 EP
9723078 Jun 1997 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060140176 A1 Jun 2006 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 09617816 Jul 2000 US
Child 11354033 US
Parent 08931985 Sep 1997 US
Child 09617816 US
Continuation in Parts (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 08634543 Apr 1996 US
Child 08931985 US
Parent 08698713 Aug 1996 US
Child 08634543 US
Parent 08790888 Feb 1997 US
Child 08698713 US