1. Field of the Invention
The subject matter disclosed generally relates to the field of tele-presence.
2. Background Information
Robots have been used in a variety of applications ranging from remote control of hazardous material to assisting in the performance of surgery. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,762,458 issued to Wang et al. discloses a system that allows a surgeon to perform minimally invasive medical procedures through the use of robotically controlled instruments. One of the robotic arms in the Wang system moves an endoscope that has a camera. The camera allows a surgeon to view a surgical area of a patient.
There has been marketed a mobile robot introduced by InTouch Technologies, Inc., the assignee of this application, under the trademark RP-7. The InTouch robot is controlled by a user at a remote station. The remote station may be a personal computer with a joystick that allows the user to remotely control the movement of the robot. Both the robot and remote station have cameras, monitors, speakers and microphones to allow for two-way video/audio communication. The robot camera provides video images to a screen at the remote station so that the user can view the robot's surroundings and move the robot accordingly.
The InTouch robot system can be used by doctors to remotely view and diagnose patients. For example, the robot can be used in an operating room so the remote operator can provide assistance in a procedure. Some operating rooms include monitors and/or cameras that are mounted on booms. The cameras may provide images to the remote viewer. The cameras are located relatively far from the operating table or provide an undesirable vantage point such that the images may not be of a satisfactory quality for the remote user. For example, the remote user may want a higher quality image of a wound or surgical site of the patient. Additionally, there are operating rooms that do not have boom mounted cameras. It would be desirable to provide a remote camera function for such rooms in a cost effective manner.
A remote controlled robot with a head that supports a monitor and is coupled to a mobile platform. The mobile robot also includes an auxiliary camera coupled to the mobile platform by a boom.
Disclosed is a remote controlled robot with a head that supports a monitor and is coupled to a mobile platform. The mobile robot also includes an auxiliary camera coupled to the mobile platform by a boom. The mobile robot is controlled by a remote control station. By way of example, the robot can be remotely moved about an operating room. The auxiliary camera extends from the boom so that it provides a relatively close view of a patient or other item in the room. An assistant in the operating room may move the boom and the camera. The boom may be connected to a robot head that can be remotely moved by the remote control station by moving a robot head. Alternatively, the boom may be connected to the body of the robot and remotely moved by moving the robot.
Referring to the drawings more particularly by reference numbers,
The remote control station 16 may include a computer 22 that has a monitor 24, a camera 26, a microphone 28 and a speaker 30. The computer 22 may also contain an input device 32 such as a joystick or a mouse. The control station 16 is typically located in a place that is remote from the robot 12. Although only one remote control station 16 is shown, the system 10 may include a plurality of remote stations. In general any number of robots 12 may be controlled by any number of remote stations 16 or other robots 12. For example, one remote station 16 may be coupled to a plurality of robots 12, or one robot 12 may be coupled to a plurality of remote stations 16, or a plurality of robots 12.
Each robot 12 includes a movement platform 34 that is attached to a robot housing 36. Also attached to the robot housing 36 is a camera 38, a monitor 40, a microphone(s) 42 and a speaker(s) 44. The microphone 42 and speaker 30 may create a stereophonic sound. The robot 12 may also have an antenna 46 that is wirelessly coupled to an antenna 48 of the base station 14. The system 10 allows a user at the remote control station 16 to move the robot 12 through operation of the input device 32. The robot camera 38 is coupled to the remote monitor 24 so that a user at the remote station 16 can view a subject such as a patient. Likewise, the robot monitor 40 is coupled to the remote camera 26 so that the patient can view the user. The microphones 28 and 42, and speakers 30 and 44, allow for audible communication between the patient and the user.
The remote station computer 22 may operate Microsoft OS software and WINDOWS XP or other operating systems such as LINUX. The remote computer 22 may also operate a video driver, a camera driver, an audio driver and a joystick driver. The video images may be transmitted and received with compression software such as MPEG CODEC.
The robot 12 includes an auxiliary camera 50 that extends from a boom 52. The boom 52 may have one or more passive joints such as slip, spring or ratchet joints. The camera 50 may also have a passive and/or active movement mechanism. This allows someone to manually move the position of the camera 50 relative to the robot 12. The auxiliary camera 50 can be attached to the electrical system of the robot 12 so that images captured by the camera 50 are transmitted to the remote control station 16 via the robot 12. Alternatively, the camera 50 may directly wirelessly transmit the video to the robot 12 for further transmission to the base station 14.
The camera 50 can be connected to the boom 52 with a quick release mechanism (not shown). The quick release mechanism allows the camera 50 to be readily detached from the boom 52. The camera 50 may a battery and a wireless transmitter that allows for hand held usage. The wireless transmitter may transmit images to the robot 12 for further transmission to the remote station 14.
The speaker 44 is coupled to the bus 156 by a digital to analog converter 164. The microphone 42 is coupled to the bus 156 by an analog to digital converter 166. The high level controller 150 may also contain random access memory (RAM) device 168, a non-volatile RAM device 170 and a mass storage device 172 that are all coupled to the bus 156. The mass storage device 172 may contain medical files of the patient that can be accessed by the user at the remote control station 16. For example, the mass storage device 172 may contain a picture of the patient. The user, particularly a health care provider, can recall the old picture and make a side by side comparison on the monitor 24 with a present video image of the patient provided by the camera 38. The robot antennae 46 may be coupled to a wireless transceiver 174. By way of example, the transceiver 174 may transmit and receive information in accordance with IEEE 802.11b.
The auxiliary camera 50 may be coupled to the bus 156 by a serial output port 175. The serial port 175 may include a Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter (“UART”) interface.
The controller 154 may operate with a LINUX OS operating system. The controller 154 may also operate MS WINDOWS along with video, camera and audio drivers for communication with the remote control station 16. Video information may be transceived using MPEG CODEC compression techniques. The software may allow the user to send e-mail to the patient and vice versa, or allow the patient to access the Internet. In general the high level controller 150 operates to control communication between the robot 12 and the remote control station 16.
The remote control station 16 may include a computer that is similar to the high level controller 150. The computer would have a processor, memory, I/O, software, firmware, etc. for generating, transmitting, receiving and processing information.
The high level controller 150 may be coupled to the low level control circuit 152 by serial port 176. The low level control 152 runs software routines that mechanically actuate the robot 12. For example, the low level control 152 provides instructions to actuate the movement platform to move the robot 12. The low level control 152 may receive movement instructions from the high level control 150. The movement instructions may be received as movement commands from the remote control station or another robot. Although two controllers are shown, it is to be understood that each robot 12 may have one controller, or more than two controllers, controlling the high and low level functions.
The robot 12 may have a head 204 that supports the camera 38, the monitor 40 and boom 52. The head 204 may have two degrees of freedom so that the camera 38, monitor 40 and auxiliary camera 50 can together be swiveled and pivoted as indicated by the arrows. The system may be the same or similar to a robotic system provided by the assignee InTouch-Health, Inc. of Santa Barbara, Calif. under the name RP-7. The system may also be the same or similar to the system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,925,357 issued Aug. 2, 2005, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
As shown in
The robot 12 can be moved by the operator at the remote station (not shown) so that the auxiliary camera 50 is located above the operating table 252. A person in the operating room may manually adjust the robot boom 52 to obtain a desired view through the camera 50. The remote operator may also move the auxiliary camera 50 by actuating the robot head 204 in the pan and/or tilt degrees of freedom. Mounting the auxiliary camera on the end of the boom 52 allows the camera 50 to take pictures/video of a patient located on the table 252 from a preferred vantage point.
The robot 12 can be maneuvered through a site such as an operating room by manipulating the input device 32 at a remote station 16. The cameras and monitors at both the robot and remote control stations allow for tele-conferencing between the patient and the person at the remote station(s). The robot 10 may be controlled by a number of different users. To accommodate for this the robot may have an arbitration system. The arbitration system may be integrated into the operating system of the robot 12. For example, the arbitration technique may be embedded into the operating system of the high-level controller 150.
By way of example, the users may be divided into classes that include the robot itself, a local user, a caregiver, a doctor, a family member, or a service provider. The robot 12 may override input commands that conflict with robot operation. For example, if the robot runs into a wall, the system may ignore all additional commands to continue in the direction of the wall. A local user is a person who is physically present with the robot. The robot could have an input device that allows local operation. For example, the robot may incorporate a voice recognition system that receives and interprets audible commands.
A caregiver is someone who remotely monitors the patient. A doctor is a medical professional who can remotely control the robot and also access medical files contained in the robot memory. The family and service users remotely access the robot. The service user may service the system such as by upgrading software, or setting operational parameters.
The robot 12 may operate in one of two different modes; an exclusive mode, or a sharing mode. In the exclusive mode only one user has access control of the robot. The exclusive mode may have a priority assigned to each type of user. By way of example, the priority may be in order of local, doctor, caregiver, family and then service user. In the sharing mode two or more users may share access with the robot. For example, a caregiver may have access to the robot, the caregiver may then enter the sharing mode to allow a doctor to also access the robot. Both the caregiver and the doctor can conduct a simultaneous tele-conference with the patient.
The system 10 can be used for doctor proctoring where a doctor at the remote station provides instructions and feedback to a doctor located in the vicinity of the robot. For example, a doctor at the remote location can view a patient and assist a doctor at the patient location in a diagnosis. Likewise, the remote doctor can assist in the performance of a medical procedure at the robot location.
The arbitration scheme may have one of four mechanisms; notification, timeouts, queue and call back. The notification mechanism may inform either a present user or a requesting user that another user has, or wants, access to the robot. The timeout mechanism gives certain types of users a prescribed amount of time to finish access to the robot. The queue mechanism is an orderly waiting list for access to the robot. The call back mechanism informs a user that the robot can be accessed. By way of example, a family user may receive an e-mail message that the robot is free for usage. Tables I and II, show how the mechanisms resolve access request from the various users.
The information transmitted between the station 16 and the robot 12 may be encrypted. Additionally, the user may have to enter a password to enter the system 10. A selected robot is then given an electronic key by the station 16. The robot 12 validates the key and returns another key to the station 16. The keys are used to encrypt information transmitted in the session.
The robot 12 and remote station 16 transmit commands through the broadband network 18. The commands can be generated by the user in a variety of ways. For example, commands to move the robot may be generated by moving the joystick 32 (see
Table IV provides a list of reporting commands that are generated by the robot and transmitted to the remote station through the network.
The processor 154 of the robot high level controller 150 may operate a program that determines whether the robot 12 has received a robot control command within a time interval. For example, if the robot 12 does not receive a control command within 2 seconds then the processor 154 provides instructions to the low level controller 150 to stop the robot 12. Although a software embodiment is described, it is to be understood that the control command monitoring feature could be implemented with hardware, or a combination of hardware and software. The hardware may include a timer that is reset each time a control command is received and generates, or terminates, a command or signal, to stop the robot.
The remote station computer 22 may monitor the receipt of video images provided by the robot camera. The computer 22 may generate and transmit a STOP command to the robot if the remote station does not receive or transmit an updated video image within a time interval. The STOP command causes the robot to stop. By way of example, the computer 22 may generate a STOP command if the remote control station does not receive a new video image within 2 seconds. Although a software embodiment is described, it is to be understood that the video image monitoring feature could be implemented with hardware, or a combination of hardware and software. The hardware may include a timer that is reset each time a new video image is received and generates, or terminates, a command or signal, to generate the robot STOP command.
The robot may also have internal safety failure features. For example, the robot may monitor communication between the robot controller and the robot servo used to operate the platform motors. The robot monitor may switch a relay to terminate power to the platform motors if the monitor detects a lack of communication between the robot controller and the motor servo.
The remote station may also have a safety feature for the input device 32. For example, if there is no input from the joystick for a certain time interval (eg. 10 seconds) the computer 22 may not relay subsequent input unless the user presses a button for another time interval (eg. 2 seconds), which reactivates the input device.
While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention, and that this invention not be limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those ordinarily skilled in the art.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4553309 | Hess et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
5617539 | Ludwig et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5867494 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6292713 | Jouppi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292714 | Okabayashi | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314631 | Pryor | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317953 | Pryor | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6373855 | Downing et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6411055 | Fujita et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6667592 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674259 | Norman et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6893267 | Yueh | May 2005 | B1 |
6990112 | Brent et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7222000 | Wang et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7467211 | Herman et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7483867 | Ansari et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7631833 | Ghaleb et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7657560 | DiRienzo | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7703113 | Dawson | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7737993 | Kaasila et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8126960 | Obradovich et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8320534 | Kim et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8374171 | Cho et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8400491 | Panpaliya et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8401275 | Wang et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8423284 | O'Shea | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8451731 | Lee et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8515577 | Wang et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8610786 | Ortiz | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8612051 | Norman et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8639797 | Pan et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8670017 | Stuart et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8836751 | Ballantyne et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849679 | Wang et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849680 | Wright et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8861750 | Roe et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8897920 | Wang et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8902278 | Pinter et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8996165 | Wang et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20020015296 | Howell | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020109775 | White et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128985 | Greenwald | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030135097 | Wiederhold et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030195662 | Wang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040143421 | Wang | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040218099 | Washington | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040260790 | Balloni et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050052527 | Remy | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073575 | Thacher et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050149364 | Ombrellaro | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060056655 | Wen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060056837 | Vapaakoski | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060066609 | Iodice et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071797 | Rosenfeld et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060161303 | Wang | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070093279 | Janik | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070116152 | Thesling | May 2007 | A1 |
20070170886 | Plishner | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070226949 | Hahm et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070263079 | Graham | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070290040 | Wurman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080051985 | D'Andrea et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080091340 | Milstein et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080161969 | Lee et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080232763 | Brady | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080263628 | Norman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080267069 | Thielman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090102919 | Zamierowski et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100066804 | Shoemake et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100171826 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100278086 | Pochiraju et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100301679 | Murray et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110022705 | Yellamraju et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110071675 | Wells et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110072114 | Hoffert et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110193949 | Nambakam et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110280551 | Sammon | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120059946 | Wang | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120113856 | Krishnaswamy | May 2012 | A1 |
20120203731 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120291809 | Kuhe et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130250938 | Anandakumar et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140047022 | Chan et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140085543 | Hartley et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140135990 | Stuart et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139616 | Pinter et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140155755 | Pinter et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Klapan et al., “Tele-3-dimensional computer-assisted functional endoscopic sinus surgery: New dimension in the surgery of the nose and paranasal sinuses” Dec. 2002, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 127 No. 6, pp. 549-557. |
Screenshot Showing Google Date for Lemaire Telehealth Manual, Screenshot Retrieved on Dec. 18, 2014, 1 page. |
Nomadic Technologies, Inc., “Nomad Scout Language Reference Manual”, Software Version: 2.7, Part No. DOC00002, Jul. 12, 1999, 47 pages. |
Fulbright et al., “SWAMI: An Autonomous Mobile Robot for Inspection of Nuclear Waste of Storage Facilities”, Autonomous Robots, vol. 2, 1995, pp. 225-235. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150127156 A1 | May 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12210102 | Oct 2008 | US |
Child | 14594729 | US |