Temperature correction method and subsystem for automotive evaporative leak detection systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7086276
  • Patent Number
    7,086,276
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 28, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 8, 2006
    18 years ago
Abstract
A method and sensor or sensor subsystem permit improved evaporative leak detection in an automotive fuel system. The sensor or sensor subsystem computes temperature-compensated pressure values, thereby eliminating or reducing false positive or other adverse results triggered by temperature changes in the fuel tank. The temperature-compensated pressure measurement is then available for drawing an inference regarding the existence of a leak with reduced or eliminated false detection arising as a result of temperature fluctuations.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates, in general, to automotive fuel leak detection methods and systems and, in particular, to a temperature correction approach to automotive evaporative fuel leak detection.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Automotive leak detection systems can use either positive or negative pressure differentials, relative to atmosphere, to check for a leak. Pressure change over a given period of time is monitored and correction is made for pressure changes resulting from gasoline fuel vapor.


It has been established that the ability of a leak detection system to successfully indicate a small leak in a large volume is directly dependent on the stability or conditioning of the tank and its contents. Reliable leak detection can be achieved only when the system is stable. The following conditions are required:


a) Uniform pressure throughout the system being leak-checked;


b) No fuel movement in the gas tank (which may results in pressure fluctuations); and


c) No change in volume resulting from flexure of the gas tank or other factors.


Conditions a), b), and c) can be stabilized by holding the system being leak-checked at a fixed pressure level for a sufficient period of time and measuring the decay in pressure from this level in order to detect a leak and establish its size.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The method and sensor or subsystem according to the present invention provided a solution to the problems outlined below. In particular, an embodiment of one aspect of the present invention provides a method for making temperature-compensated pressure readings in an automotive evaporative leak detection system having a tank with a vapor pressure having a value that is known at a first point in time. According to this method, a first temperature of the vapor is measured at substantially the first point in time and is again measured at a second point in time. Then a temperature-compensated pressure is computed based on the pressure at the first point in time and the two temperature measurements.


According to another aspect of the present invention, the resulting temperature-compensated pressure can be compared with a pressure measured at the second point in time to provide a basis for inferring the existence of a leak.


An embodiment of another aspect of the present invention is a sensor subsystem for use in an automotive evaporative leak detection system in order to compensate for the effects on pressure measurement of changes in the temperature of the fuel tank vapor. The sensor subsystem includes a pressure sensor in fluid communication with the fuel tank vapor, a temperature sensor in thermal contact with the fuel tank vapor, a processor in electrical communication with the pressure sensor and with the temperature sensor and logic implemented by the processor for computing a temperature-compensated pressure based on pressure and temperature measurements made by the pressure and temperature sensors.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows, in schematic form, an automotive evaporative leak detection system in the context of an automotive fuel system, the automotive leak detection system including an embodiment of a temperature correction sensor or subsystem according to the present invention.



FIG. 2 shows, in flowchart form, an embodiment of a method for temperature correction, according to the present invention, in an automotive evaporative leak detection system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

We have discovered that, in addition to items a), b), and c) set forth in the Background section above, another condition that affects the stability of fuel tank contents and the accuracy of a leak detection system is thermal upset of the vapor in the tank. If the temperature of the vapor in the gas tank above the fuel is stabilized (i.e., does not undergo a change), a more reliable leak detection test can be conducted.


Changes in gas tank vapor temperature prove less easy to stabilize than pressure. A vehicle can, for example, be refueled with warmer than ambient fuel. A vacuum leak test performed after refueling under this condition would falsely indicate the existence of a leak. The cool air in the gas tank would be heated by incoming fuel and cause the vacuum level to decay, making it appear as though there were a diminution of mass in the tank. A leak is likely to be falsely detected any time heat is added to the fuel tank. If system pressure were elevated in order to check for a leak under a positive pressure leak test, and a pressure decay were then measured as an indicia of leakage, the measured leakage would be reduced because the vapor pressure would be higher than it otherwise would. Moreover, measured pressure would also decline as the vapor eventually cools back down to ambient pressure. A long stabilization period would be necessary to reach the stable conditions required for an accurate leak detection test.


The need for a long stabilization period as a precondition to an accurate leak detection test result would be commercially disadvantageous. A disadvantageously long stabilization period can be compensated for and eliminated, according to the present invention, by conducting the leak detection test with appropriate temperature compensation even before the temperature of the vapor in the gas tank has stabilized. More particularly, a detection approach according to the present invention uses a sensor or sensor subsystem that is able to either:


1) Provide information on the rate of change of temperature as well as tank vapor pressure level, and correct or compensate for the change in temperature relative to an earlier-measured temperature reference; or


2) Provide tank pressure level information corrected (e.g., within the sensor to a constant temperature reference), the result being available for comparison with other measured pressure to conduct a leak-detection test.


In order to obtain the data required for option 1), two separate values-must be determined (tank temperature rate of change and tank pressure) to carry out the leak detection test. These values can be obtained by two separate sensors in the tank, or a single sensor configured to provide both values.


Alternatively, if tank pressure is to be corrected in accordance with option 2), then a single value is required. This single value can be obtained by a new “Cp” sensor (compensated or corrected pressure sensor or sensor subsystem) configured to provide a corrected pressure.


To obtain this corrected pressure, Pc, the reasonable assumption is made that the vapor in the tank obeys the ideal gas law, or:


PV=nRT


where:


P=pressure;


V=volume;


n=mass;


R=gas constant; and


T=temperature.


This expression demonstrates that the pressure of the vapor trapped in the tank will increase as the vapor warms, and decrease as it cools. This decay can be misinterpreted as leakage. The Cp sensor or sensor subsystem, according to the present invention, cancels the effect of a temperature change in the constant volume gas tank. To effectuate such cancellation, the pressure and temperature are measured at two points in time. Assuming zero or very small changes in n, given that the system is sealed, the ideal gas law can be expressed as:

P1V1/RT1=P2V2/RT2

Since volume, V, and gas constant, R, are reasonably assumed to be constant, this expression can be rewritten as:

P2=P1(T2/T1).

This relation implies that pressure will increase from P1 to P2 if the temperature increases from T1 to T2 in the sealed system.


To express this temperature-compensated or -corrected pressure, the final output, Pc, of the Cp sensor or sensor subsystem will be:

Pc=P1−(P2−P1)

where Pc is the corrected pressure output. Substituting for P2, we obtain:

Pc=P1−(P1(T2/T1)−P1).

More simply, Pc can be rewritten as follows:

Pc=P1(2−T2/T1).


As an example using a positive pressure test using the Cp sensor or sensor subsystem to generate a temperature-compensated or -corrected pressure output, the measured pressure decay determined by a comparison between Pc and P2 (the pressure measured at the second point in time) will be a function only of system leakage. If the temperature-compensated or -corrected pressure, Pc, is greater than the actual, nominal pressure measured at the second point in time (i.e., when T2 was measured), then there must have been detectable leakage from the system. If Pc is not greater than the nominal pressure measured at T2, no leak is detected. The leak detection system employing a sensor or subsystem according to the present invention will reach an accurate result more quickly than a conventional system, since time will not be wasted waiting for the system to stabilize. The Cp sensor or subsystem allows for leakage measurement to take place in what was previously considered an unstable system.



FIG. 1 shows an automotive evaporative leak detection system (vacuum) using a tank pressure sensor 120 that is able to provide the values required for leak detection in accordance with options 1) and 2) above. The tank pressure/temperature sensor 120 should be directly mounted onto the gas tank 110, or integrated into the rollover valve 112 mounted on the tank 110.


Gas tank 110, as depicted in FIG. 1, is coupled in fluid communication to charcoal canister 114 and to the normally closed canister purge valve 115. The charcoal canister 114 is in communication via the normally open canister vent solenoid valve 116 to filter 117. The normally closed canister purge valve 115 is coupled to manifold (intake) 118 of internal combustion engine 118a. The illustrated embodiment of the sensor or subsystem 120 according to the present invention incorporates a pressure sensor, temperature sensor and processor, memory and clock, such components all being selectable from suitable, commercially available products. The pressure and temperature sensors are coupled to the processor such that the processor can read their output values. The processor can either include the necessary memory or clock or be coupled to suitable circuits that implement those functions. The output of the sensor, in the form of a temperature-compensated pressure value, as well as the nominal pressure (i.e., P2), are transmitted to processor 122, where a check is made to determine whether a leak has occurred. That comparison, alternatively, could be made by the processor in sensor 120.


In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the sensor or subsystem 120 includes pressure and temperature sensing devices electronically coupled to a separate processor 122 to which is also coupled (or which itself includes) memory and a clock. Both this and the previously described embodiments are functionally equivalent in terms of providing a temperature-compensated pressure reading and a nominal pressure reading, which can be compared, and which comparison can support an inference as to whether or not a leak condition exists.



FIG. 2 provides a flowchart 200 setting forth steps in an embodiment of the method according to the present invention. These steps can be implemented by any processor suitable for use in automotive evaporative leak detection systems, provided that the processor: (1) have or have access to a timer or clock; (2) be configured to receive and process signals emanating, either directly or indirectly from a fuel vapor pressure sensor; (3) be configured to receive and process signals emanating either directly or indirectly from a fuel vapor temperature sensor; (4) be configured to send signals to activate a pump for increasing the pressure of the fuel vapor; (5) have, or have access to memory for retrievably storing logic for implementing the steps of the method according to the present invention; and (6) have, or have access to, memory for retrievably storing all data associated with carrying out the steps of the method according to the present invention.


After initiation, at step 202 (during which any required initialization may occur), the processor directs pump 119 at step 204, to run until the pressure sensed by the pressure sensor equals a preselected target pressure P1. (Alternatively, to conduct a vacuum leak detection test, the processor would direct the system to evacuate to a negative pressure via actuation of normally closed canister purge valve 115). The processor therefore should sample the pressure reading with sufficient frequency such that it can turn off the pump 119 (or close valve 115) before the target pressure P1 has been significantly exceeded.


At step 206, which should occur very close in time to step 204, the processor samples, and in the memory records, the fuel vapor temperature signal, T1, generated by the temperature sensor. The processor, at step 208, then waits a preselected period of time (e.g., between 10 and 30 seconds). When the desired amount of time has elapsed, the processor, at step 210, samples and records in memory the fuel vapor temperature signal, T2, as well as fuel vapor pressure, P2.


The processor, at step 212, then computes an estimated temperature-compensated or corrected pressure, Pc, compensating for the contribution to the pressure change from P1 to P2 attributable to any temperature change (T2−T1).


In an embodiment of the present invention, the temperature-compensated or corrected pressure, Pc, is computed according to the relation:

Pc=P1(2−T2/T1)

and the result is stored in memory. Finally, at step 214, the temperature-compensated pressure, Pc, is compared by the processor with the nominal pressure P2. If P2 is less than Pc, then fuel must have escaped-from the tank, indicating a leak, 216. If, on the other hand, P2 is not less than Pc, then there is no basis for concluding that a leak has been detected, 218.


The foregoing description has set forth how the objects of the present invention can be fully and effectively accomplished. The embodiments shown and described for purposes of illustrating the structural and functional principles of the present invention, as well as illustrating the methods of employing the preferred embodiments, are subject to change without departing from such principles. Therefore, this invention includes all modifications encompassed within the spirit of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of diagnosing an evaporative emission control system to determine if a leak is present in the system, the method comprising: sealing the system from external influences;monitoring a pressure level with in the system over a cooling period, the monitoring including: providing a temperature-compensated pressure sensor having a pressure sensing element and a temperature sensing element,coupling a processor to the pressure sensing element and to the temperature sensing element, andreceiving, respectively, pressure and temperature signals therefrom,implementing logic by the processor for computing a temperature-compensated pressure on the basis of pressure and temperature measurements;computing the temperature-compensated pressure as a function of the pressure at a first point in time and the temperature measured at substantially the first point, and at a second point, in time, wherein the function comprises the expression: Pc=P1(2−T2/T1)
  • 2. A method of diagnosing an evaporative emission control system to determine if a leak is present in the system, the method comprising: sealing the system for external influences;monitoring a pressure level within the system over a cooling period, the monitoring including: providing a sensor subsystem for compensating for the effects on pressure measurement of changes in the temperature of the system vapor, the subsystem including a pressure sensor in fluid communication with the system vapor and a temperature sensor in thermal contact with the system vapor;providing a processor in electrical communication with the pressure sensor and with the temperature sensor;implementing logic by the processor for computing a temperature-compensated pressure based on pressure and temperature measurements made by the pressure and temperature sensors, the implementing logic including computing the temperature-compensated pressures as a function of pressure measured at a first point in time and of the temperature measured at the first, and at a second, point in time, wherein the function comprises: Pc=P1(2−T2/T1) where Pc is the temperature-compensated pressure, P1 is the pressure measured at the first point in time, T1 is the temperature measured at substantially the first point in time and T2 is the temperature measured at the second point in time; andindicating a potential leak condition through a comparison of the pressure level within the system and a given threshold.
  • 3. The method according to claim 2 further comprising: indicating the potential leak condition through a comparison of the temperature-compensated pressure, Pc and the pressure measured at the second point in time, P2.
  • 4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the leak condition is determined to exist if the pressure P2 is less than the temperature-compensated pressure, Pc.
Parent Case Info

This application is a Divisional patent application under 37 C.F.R. § 1.53(b), of pending prior application Ser. No. 09/165,772, filed on Oct. 2, 1998, which claims benefit of the earlier filing date of U.S. provisional application No. 60/060,858, filed on Oct. 2, 1997.

US Referenced Citations (94)
Number Name Date Kind
3110502 Pagano Nov 1963 A
3190322 Brown Jun 1965 A
3413840 Basile et al. Dec 1968 A
3516279 Maziarka Jun 1970 A
3586016 Meyn Jun 1971 A
3640501 Walton Feb 1972 A
3720090 Halpert et al. Mar 1973 A
3802267 Lofink Apr 1974 A
3841344 Slack Oct 1974 A
3861646 Douglas Jan 1975 A
3927553 Frantz Dec 1975 A
4009985 Hirt Mar 1977 A
4136854 Ehmig et al. Jan 1979 A
4164168 Tateoka Aug 1979 A
4166485 Wokas Sep 1979 A
4215846 Ishizuka et al. Aug 1980 A
4240467 Blatt et al. Dec 1980 A
4244554 DiMauro et al. Jan 1981 A
4354383 Härtel Oct 1982 A
4368366 Kitamura et al. Jan 1983 A
4474208 Looney Oct 1984 A
4494571 Seegers et al. Jan 1985 A
4518329 Weaver May 1985 A
4561297 Holland Dec 1985 A
4616114 Strasser Oct 1986 A
4717117 Cook Jan 1988 A
4766557 Twerdochlib Aug 1988 A
4766927 Conatser Aug 1988 A
4852054 Mastandrea Jul 1989 A
4901559 Grabner Feb 1990 A
4905505 Reed Mar 1990 A
5036823 MacKinnon Aug 1991 A
5069188 Cook Dec 1991 A
5090234 Maresca, Jr. et al. Feb 1992 A
5096029 Bauer et al. Mar 1992 A
5101710 Baucom Apr 1992 A
5253629 Fornuto et al. Oct 1993 A
5259424 Miller et al. Nov 1993 A
5263462 Reddy Nov 1993 A
5273071 Oberrecht Dec 1993 A
5327934 Thompson Jul 1994 A
5337262 Luthi et al. Aug 1994 A
5372032 Filippi et al. Dec 1994 A
5375455 Maresca, Jr. et al. Dec 1994 A
5388613 Krüger Feb 1995 A
5390643 Sekine Feb 1995 A
5390645 Cook et al. Feb 1995 A
5415033 Maresca, Jr. et al. May 1995 A
5419299 Fukasawa et al. May 1995 A
5425344 Otsuka et al. Jun 1995 A
5448980 Kawamura et al. Sep 1995 A
5507176 Kammeraad et al. Apr 1996 A
5509296 Kolb Apr 1996 A
5524662 Benjey et al. Jun 1996 A
5564306 Miller Oct 1996 A
5579742 Yamazaki et al. Dec 1996 A
5584271 Sakata Dec 1996 A
5603349 Harris Feb 1997 A
5614665 Curran et al. Mar 1997 A
5635630 Dawson et al. Jun 1997 A
5644072 Chirco et al. Jul 1997 A
5671718 Curran et al. Sep 1997 A
5681151 Wood Oct 1997 A
5687633 Eady Nov 1997 A
5743169 Yamada Apr 1998 A
5893389 Cunningham Apr 1999 A
5894784 Bobbitt, III et al. Apr 1999 A
5979869 Hiddessen Nov 1999 A
6003499 Devall et al. Dec 1999 A
6073487 Dawson Jun 2000 A
6089081 Cook et al. Jul 2000 A
6142062 Streitman Nov 2000 A
6145430 Able et al. Nov 2000 A
6168168 Brown Jan 2001 B1
6202688 Khadim Mar 2001 B1
6203022 Struschka et al. Mar 2001 B1
6328021 Perry et al. Dec 2001 B1
6343505 Cook et al. Feb 2002 B1
6450153 Perry et al. Sep 2002 B1
6453942 Perry Sep 2002 B1
6460566 Perry et al. Oct 2002 B1
6470861 Perry Oct 2002 B1
6470908 Perry Oct 2002 B1
6474313 Perry et al. Nov 2002 B1
6474314 Perry Nov 2002 B1
6478045 Perry Nov 2002 B1
6484555 Perry et al. Nov 2002 B1
6502560 Perry Jan 2003 B1
6505514 Perry Jan 2003 B1
6623012 Perry et al. Sep 2003 B1
6640620 Cook et al. Nov 2003 B1
6708552 Weldon Mar 2004 B1
6983641 Perry et al. Jan 2006 B1
20030000289 Weldon Jan 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
9950551 Oct 1999 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040237630 A1 Dec 2004 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60060858 Oct 1997 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09165772 Oct 1998 US
Child 10876683 US