1. Technical Field
The present disclosure is directed to electrosurgical apparatus and systems, and, in particular, to a temperature regulating patient return electrode and a return electrode monitoring system for use in electrosurgery.
2. Description of the Related Art
During electrosurgery, a source or active electrode delivers energy, such as radio frequency energy, from an electrosurgical generator to the patient and a return electrode carries the current back to the electrosurgical generator. In monopolar electrosurgery, the source electrode is typically a hand-held instrument placed by the surgeon at the surgical site and the high current density flow at this electrode creates the desired surgical effect of cutting or coagulating tissue. The patient return electrode is placed at a remote site from the source electrode and is typically in the form of a pad adhesively adhered to the patient.
The return electrode has a large patient contact surface area to minimize heating at that site since the smaller the surface area, the greater the current density and the greater the intensity of the heat. That is, the area of the return electrode that is adhered to the patient is important because it is the current density of the electrical signal that heats the tissue. A larger surface contact area is desirable to reduce heat intensity. The size of return electrodes are based on assumptions of the maximum current seen in surgery and the duty cycle (e.g., the percentage of time the generator is on) during the procedure. The first types of return electrodes were in the form of large metal plates covered with conductive jelly. Later, adhesive electrodes were developed with a single metal foil covered with conductive jelly or conductive adhesive. However, one problem with these adhesive electrodes was that if a portion peeled from the patient, the contact area of the electrode with the patient decreased, thereby increasing the current density at the adhered portion and, in turn, increasing the heat applied to the tissue. This risked burning the patient in the area under the adhered portion of the return electrode if the tissue was heated beyond the point where circulation of blood could cool the skin.
To address this problem, split return electrodes and hardware circuits, generically called Return Electrode Contact Quality Monitors (RECQMs), were developed. These split electrodes consist of two separate conductive foils arranged as two halves of a single return electrode. The hardware circuit uses an AC signal between the two electrode halves to measure the impedance therebetween. This impedance measurement is indicative of how well the return electrode is adhered to the patient since the impedance between the two halves is directly related to the area of patient contact. That is, if the electrode begins to peel from the patient, the impedance increases since the contact area of the electrode decreases. Current RECQMs are designed to sense this change in impedance so that when the percentage increase in impedance exceeds a predetermined value or the measured impedance exceeds a threshold level, the electrosurgical generator is shut down to reduce the chances of burning the patient.
Although monitoring circuits are effective, they do not take into account the amount of time the current is being delivered or the heat generated at the return electrode. As new surgical procedures continue to be developed that utilize higher current and higher duty cycles, increased heating of tissue under the return electrode will occur.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,657,015 discloses a control device for cutting off high frequency current during electrosurgery if the heat buildup in the body tissue exceeds a predetermined value. In the '015 patent, a control electrode is affixed to the body spaced from the active electrode and separate from the neutral (i.e., return) electrode. The control electrode is designed to pick up the voltage existing on the body. The voltage signal is squared, integrated over time and compared to a reference voltage. The high frequency generator is turned off if the voltage value exceeds the reference voltage. The '015 patent does not effectively measure heating under the return electrode since the measurements are calculated by a separate control electrode. The '015 patent even states that the effective surface area of the neutral electrode is not a factor in the heat calculations.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,741,334 discloses a control circuit intended to reduce burning of tissue. As in the '015 patent, a separate control electrode is provided to determine the body voltage. The control electrode is spaced from the neutral electrode (i.e., the return electrode) and functions to detect a high frequency body surface voltage. The body surface voltage is converted into DC voltage by a converter and inputted to a comparator for comparison to a reference voltage. The generator is turned off if the body voltage exceeds the reference voltage. The '015 patent also discloses a monitor circuit for testing whether the neutral electrode is in good contact with the body surface of the patient. The comparator compares the body surface voltage detected by the control electrode with a reference voltage derived from the operational voltage of the surgical device. An audible signal is produced when these voltage values reach a predetermined ratio. Similar to the '015 patent, the '334 patent requires an additional electrode, measures voltage instead of current to determine overheating, and does not factor in the amount of time the high frequency energy is being applied.
The present disclosure provides a temperature regulating patient return electrode and return electrode temperature monitoring system. The return electrode, for use in monopolar surgery, includes a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material on, or coating the return electrode. The PTC material responds to increases in localized temperature by increasing local resistance which in turn reduces current flow and lowers the temperature. This quality helps limit the probability of a patient suffering from a burn as a result of monopolar surgery.
In several contemplated embodiments, the return electrode is a pad comprised of different layers of material. At least one of the layers is a PTC material, such as a polymer/carbon based material, a cermet based material, a polymer material, a ceramic material, a dielectric material, or any combinations thereof. Another material that can be used for the PTC material is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,426, the contents of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, and is known as “PolySwitch RTM” made by the Raychem Corporation of California. In one embodiment, a top layer of the return electrode comprises an adhesive material for coming into contact with and adhering to the patient. This layer of adhesive helps to ensure an optimal patient contacting surface area, i.e., the portion of the return electrode that is in contact with the patient. The adhesive can be made of, but is not limited to, a polyhesive adhesive, a Z-axis adhesive, or a water-insoluble, hydrophilic, pressure-sensitive adhesive, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,699,146 and 4,750,482, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In one aspect of the present disclosure, the return electrode monitoring system includes a generator for supplying current, a surgical instrument, a cable for transferring current from the generator to the surgical instrument, a return electrode having a PTC material for receiving the current through a patient, and a wire for returning the current from the return electrode back to the generator.
A return electrode monitor (REM) may be incorporated into the system to provide temperature monitoring, current monitoring, impedance monitoring, energy monitoring, power monitoring and/or contact quality monitoring for the return electrode. The REM can be part of or attached to the generator with wires connecting the REM to the return electrode. Further, the REM can disable the generator if the temperature of the return electrode reaches or exceeds a predetermined value.
In one embodiment, the return electrode is split into at least two parts. In this embodiment, the return electrodes enable various measurements (e.g., temperature, current, contact quality, impedance, etc.) to be taken between the return electrodes. In a related embodiment, the parts of the return electrode can be interlocking, thus providing an increased surface area between the return electrodes.
In another embodiment, a plurality of wires is disposed on the return electrode, such that the wires form a grid or matrix pattern. This embodiment enables various measurements (e.g., temperature, current, voltage, etc.) to be calculated at various places on the return electrode by determining the resistance between any two wires. An individual wire may be coupled to each pad of the plurality of pads for determining a resistance or impedance between any two individual wires.
Another embodiment of the present disclosure includes an electrosurgical system for eliminating patient burns during monopolar surgery. The system has a generator for generating current, an active electrode coupled to the generator configured to supply the current to a patient; and a return electrode coupled to the generator having a defined surface. The surface is configured to receive the current from the patient and return the current to the generator. A positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material is disposed on the return electrode which regulates the temperature over the surface of the return electrode. The PTC material may be configured to regulate a current density at the return electrode. The PTC layer may be a substantially continuous coating of parallel resistors and alternatively, the PTC layer may have at least four parallel resistors.
The electrosurgical system may include a temperature regulation device disposed in the generator for regulating temperature at the return electrode. Alternatively, the electrosurgical system may include a temperature monitoring device disposed in the generator for monitoring temperature at the return electrode and/or a generator disabling device disposed in the generator for disabling the generator when the temperature of the return electrode reaches a predetermined value. A return electrode monitor may also be included for monitoring temperature and/or a contact quality of the return electrode.
An individual wire may be coupled to each pad of a plurality of electrode pads and the system is configured to determine a parameter between any two individual wires. The parameter may be selected from the group consisting of power, resistance, impedance, and any combination thereof.
A method for eliminating patient burns while performing monopolar surgery is also disclosed. The method includes the steps of: placing a return electrode coated with a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material in contact with a patient; generating electrosurgical energy; and supplying the electrosurgical energy to the patient via an active electrode. The PTC material coating the return electrode regulates the temperature over the return electrode by responding to increases in localized temperature with a local increase in resistance. This spreads the temperature over the surface of the electrode.
Another example of the present disclosure includes an electrosurgical generator having a processor. A supply electrode is connected to the generator and is configured to deliver radiofrequency energy to a patient. A return electrode is connected to a return of the electrosurgical generator. The return electrode has a plurality of return electrode portions and an impedance sensor measures impedance values between the return electrode portions. The sensor outputs the impedance values to the processor to determine a contact reading. The processor compares the contact reading to a stored threshold reading to determine a degree of adherence of the return electrode on the patient. The processor may be configured to adjust or interrupt radiofrequency energy to the patient when the contact reading in indicative of poor adherence of the return electrode on the patient.
The above and other aspects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent in light of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
a are cross-sectional views of a temperature regulating return electrode according to embodiments of the present disclosure;
Embodiments of the presently disclosed temperature regulating patient return electrode and return electrode monitoring system will be described herein below with reference to the accompanying drawing figures wherein like reference numerals identify similar or identical elements. In the following description, well-known functions or constructions are not described in detail to avoid obscuring the disclosure in unnecessary detail.
Referring initially to
Generally, the area of the return electrode 50 that is in contact with the patient 20 affects the current density of the signal that heats the tissue. The smaller the contact area the return electrode 50 has with the patient 20, the greater the current density and the greater and more concentrated the heating of tissue. Conversely, the greater the contact area of the return electrode 50, the smaller the current density and the less heating of the tissue. Further, the greater the heating of the tissue, the greater the probability of possibly burning the tissue. Although many other safeguards may be present in the electrosurgical generator to prevent and minimize such risks, it is important to either ensure a relative high amount of contact area between the return electrode 50 and the patient 20, or otherwise maintain a relatively low current density on the return electrode 50.
While there are various methods of maintaining a relatively low current density (including, inter alia, the use of electrosurgical return electrode monitors (REMs), such as the one described in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,565,559, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety), the present disclosure ensures the return electrode 50 maintains a low current density by distributing the temperature created by the current over the surface of the return electrode 50.
Current density at the return electrode 50 is reduced via a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material 56 disposed on the return electrode 50. As best illustrated in
The PTC material 56 acts to distribute the temperature created by the current over the surface of the return electrode 50 to minimize the risk of patient burns. The PTC material 56 regulates the temperature over the area of the return electrode 50 by responding to increases in temperature with an increase in resistance in localized areas. The increase in resistance reduces the current in the localized area, thus causing the current to conduct more in the areas with lower resistance or lower temperature. Further, as current is applied through the PTC material 56 of return electrode 50, power is dissipated and the temperature is increased. The increase in temperature increases the resistance and limits the current, thus reducing the heating effect. This results in a return electrode 50 with a temperature that is substantially uniform throughout its entire surface and with varying levels of resistance. Consequently, there are no localized “hot spots,” which c an cause patient burns. As the overall temperature increases, consequently increasing the resistance, an REM (return electrode monitoring) circuit can detect and measure such increases and turn off an RF supply when a predetermined temperature has been exceeded.
In one embodiment, an adhesive layer 58 may be disposed on the PTC material 56 of return electrode 50, as illustrated in
Return electrode 50 may be also split into a plurality of parts, depicted as two parts 50a and 50b in
Referring now to
In one embodiment, a plurality of wires 18a-18f may be disposed on the return electrode 50, such that the wires are spaced to substantially form a grid or matrix pattern, as illustrated in
Now referring to
The REM circuit measures the total resistance of the return electrode 50. When the overall temperature on either or both return electrodes 50a or 50b is increased, the PTC coating increases the resistance. The REM circuit measures the temperature increase and thus inhibits the output of the generator 14. The REM circuit also measures the resistance and inhibits the output of the generator 14 if the patient impedance increases due to the return electrode 50 becoming partially or completely removed from the patient 20.
The return electrode 50 with a PTC layer 56 is schematically illustrated in
In the embodiment illustrated in
While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings, it is not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of preferred embodiments.
The instant patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/666,798 to Arts, et al., filed on Mar. 31, 2005, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2536271 | Fransen et al. | Jan 1951 | A |
3380445 | Frasier | Apr 1968 | A |
3534306 | Watrous et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
3543760 | Bolduc | Dec 1970 | A |
3642008 | Bolduc | Feb 1972 | A |
3683923 | Anderson | Aug 1972 | A |
3812861 | Peters | May 1974 | A |
3913583 | Bross | Oct 1975 | A |
3923063 | Andrews et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3933157 | Bjurwill et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3987796 | Gonser | Oct 1976 | A |
4067342 | Burton | Jan 1978 | A |
4092985 | Kaufman | Jun 1978 | A |
4094320 | Newton et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4102341 | Ikuno et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4114622 | Gonser | Sep 1978 | A |
4117846 | Williams | Oct 1978 | A |
4121590 | Gonser | Oct 1978 | A |
4126137 | Archibald | Nov 1978 | A |
4166465 | Esty et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4188927 | Harris | Feb 1980 | A |
4200104 | Harris | Apr 1980 | A |
4200105 | Gonser | Apr 1980 | A |
4213463 | Osenkarski | Jul 1980 | A |
4231372 | Newton | Nov 1980 | A |
4237887 | Gonser | Dec 1980 | A |
4253721 | Kaufman | Mar 1981 | A |
4303073 | Archibald | Dec 1981 | A |
4304235 | Kaufman | Dec 1981 | A |
4331149 | Gonser | May 1982 | A |
4343308 | Gross | Aug 1982 | A |
4381789 | Naser et al. | May 1983 | A |
4384582 | Watt | May 1983 | A |
4387714 | Geddes et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4393584 | Bare et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4416276 | Newton et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4416277 | Newton et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4437464 | Crow | Mar 1984 | A |
4494541 | Archibald | Jan 1985 | A |
4643193 | DeMarzo | Feb 1987 | A |
4657015 | Irnich | Apr 1987 | A |
4658819 | Harris et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4662369 | Ensslin | May 1987 | A |
4669468 | Cartmell et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4699146 | Sieverding | Oct 1987 | A |
4722761 | Cartmell et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4725713 | Lehrke | Feb 1988 | A |
4741334 | Irnich | May 1988 | A |
4745918 | Feucht | May 1988 | A |
4748983 | Shigeta et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4750482 | Sieverding | Jun 1988 | A |
4754757 | Feucht | Jul 1988 | A |
4768514 | De Marzo | Sep 1988 | A |
4770173 | Feucht et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4788977 | Farin et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4799480 | Abraham et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4807621 | Hagen et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4844063 | Clark | Jul 1989 | A |
4848335 | Manes | Jul 1989 | A |
4862889 | Feucht | Sep 1989 | A |
4873974 | Hagen et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4895169 | Heath | Jan 1990 | A |
4942313 | Kinzel | Jul 1990 | A |
4947846 | Kitagawa et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4955381 | Way et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4961047 | Carder | Oct 1990 | A |
4969885 | Farin | Nov 1990 | A |
5000753 | Hagen et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5004425 | Hee | Apr 1991 | A |
5010896 | Westbrook | Apr 1991 | A |
5038796 | Axelgaard et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5042981 | Gross | Aug 1991 | A |
5061914 | Busch et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5087257 | Farin | Feb 1992 | A |
5114424 | Hagen et al. | May 1992 | A |
5152762 | McElhenney | Oct 1992 | A |
5160334 | Billings et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5196008 | Kuenecke | Mar 1993 | A |
5246439 | Hebborn et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5271417 | Swanson et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5276079 | Duan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5286255 | Weber | Feb 1994 | A |
5312401 | Newton et al. | May 1994 | A |
5336255 | Kanare et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5352315 | Carrier et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5362420 | Itoh et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370645 | Klicek et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5385679 | Uy et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388490 | Buck | Feb 1995 | A |
5389376 | Duan et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5390382 | Hannant et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5409966 | Duan et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5447513 | Davison et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5449365 | Green et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452725 | Martenson | Sep 1995 | A |
5480399 | Hebborn | Jan 1996 | A |
5496312 | Klicek | Mar 1996 | A |
5496363 | Burgio et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520180 | Uy et al. | May 1996 | A |
5536446 | Uy et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540684 | Hassler, Jr. | Jul 1996 | A |
5599347 | Hart et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601618 | James | Feb 1997 | A |
5611709 | McAnulty | Mar 1997 | A |
5632280 | Leyde et al. | May 1997 | A |
5643319 | Green et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5660892 | Robbins et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5670557 | Dietz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674561 | Dietz et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5678545 | Stratbucker | Oct 1997 | A |
5688269 | Newton et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695494 | Becker | Dec 1997 | A |
5707369 | Vaitekunas et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5718719 | Clare et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720744 | Eggleston et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5766165 | Gentelia et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5779632 | Dietz et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5797902 | Netherly | Aug 1998 | A |
5800426 | Taki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817091 | Nardella et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5830212 | Cartmell et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836942 | Netherly et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5846558 | Nielsen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853750 | Dietz et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5868742 | Manes et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5924983 | Takaki et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5947961 | Netherly | Sep 1999 | A |
5952398 | Dietz et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5971981 | Hill et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976128 | Schilling et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5985990 | Kantner et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999061 | Pope et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007532 | Netherly | Dec 1999 | A |
6010054 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6030381 | Jones et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032063 | Hoar et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039732 | Ichikawa et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6053910 | Fleenor | Apr 2000 | A |
RE36720 | Green et al. | May 2000 | E |
6059778 | Sherman | May 2000 | A |
6063075 | Mihori | May 2000 | A |
6083221 | Fleenor et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086249 | Urich | Jul 2000 | A |
6121508 | Bischof et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6135953 | Carim | Oct 2000 | A |
6171304 | Netherly et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200314 | Sherman | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203541 | Keppel | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214000 | Fleenor et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6232366 | Wang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240323 | Calenzo, Sr. et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6258085 | Eggleston | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275786 | Daners | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301500 | van Herk et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310611 | Caldwell | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6347246 | Perrault et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350264 | Hooven | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357089 | Koguchi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358245 | Edwards et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379161 | Ma | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6409722 | Hoey et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413255 | Stern | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415170 | Loutis et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454764 | Fleenor et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6488678 | Sherman | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6537272 | Christopherson et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6544258 | Fleenor et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546270 | Goldin et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565559 | Eggleston | May 2003 | B2 |
6569160 | Goldin et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6582424 | Fleenor et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6666859 | Fleenor et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6669073 | Milliman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6736810 | Hoey et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6796828 | Ehr et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799063 | Carson | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6830569 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6849073 | Hoey et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860881 | Sturm | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875210 | Refior et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6892086 | Russell | May 2005 | B2 |
6905497 | Truckai et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6939344 | Kreindel | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6948503 | Refior et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953139 | Milliman et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6959852 | Shelton, IV et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6997735 | Ehr et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7025765 | Balbierz et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7128253 | Mastri et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143926 | Shelton, IV et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160293 | Sturm et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166102 | Fleenor et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169144 | Hoey et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169145 | Isaacson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182604 | Ehr et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7220260 | Fleming et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7229307 | Ehr et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7258262 | Mastri et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267675 | Stern et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7278562 | Mastri et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7303107 | Milliman et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7308998 | Mastri et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7311560 | Ehr et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7357287 | Shelton, IV et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7380695 | Doll et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7422589 | Newton et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7473145 | Ehr et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20030139741 | Goble et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030199870 | Truckai et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040059323 | Sturm et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040150504 | Nicholson | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050021022 | Sturm et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050079752 | Ehr et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085806 | Auge, II et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101947 | Jarrard et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050251130 | Boveja et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060030195 | Ehr et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041251 | Odell et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041252 | Odell et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041253 | Newton et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074411 | Carmel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079872 | Eggleston | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060173250 | Nessler | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217742 | Messerly et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060224150 | Arts et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070049914 | Eggleston | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049916 | Isaacson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049919 | Lee. Jr. et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073284 | Sturm | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074719 | Danek et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070161979 | McPherson | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167942 | Rick | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070203481 | Gregg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070244478 | Bahney | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080009846 | Ward | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033276 | Ehr et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080083806 | Scirica | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080083813 | Zemlok et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080249520 | Dunning et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249524 | Dunning | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281309 | Dunning et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281310 | Dunning et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281311 | Dunning et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090036884 | Gregg et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090036885 | Gregg | Feb 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 219642 | Mar 1987 | CA |
3206947 | Sep 1983 | DE |
3544443 | Jun 1987 | DE |
42 38 263 | May 1993 | DE |
4231236 | Mar 1994 | DE |
197 17 411 | Nov 1998 | DE |
198 01 173 | Jul 1999 | DE |
103 28 514 | Jun 2003 | DE |
102004010940 | Sep 2005 | DE |
0262888 | Apr 1988 | EP |
390937 | Oct 1990 | EP |
836868 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0 930 048 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1 051 949 | Nov 2000 | EP |
1076350 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1 468 653 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1 645 236 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1707151 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1 808 144 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1902684 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2276027 | Jun 1974 | FR |
2516782 | May 1983 | FR |
2 054 382 | Feb 1981 | GB |
2374532 | Oct 2002 | GB |
WO 9619152 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9737719 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9818395 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9853751 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9909899 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9911187 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0006246 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0032122 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0053113 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0065993 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0187175 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 02058579 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02060526 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 02099442 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03094766 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004028385 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004074854 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2005048809 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005087124 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005099606 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005110263 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005115262 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2008009385 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report PCT/US2004/004196 dated Oct. 4, 2007. |
International Search Report EP06006961.4 dated Oct. 5, 2007. |
International Search Report EP07000885.9 dated May 2, 2007. |
International Search Report EP07007783.9 dated Aug. 6, 2007. |
International Search Report EP06018206.0 dated Oct. 13, 2006. |
International Search Report EP 05021944.3 dated Jan. 25, 2006. |
International Search Report EP 05002027.0 dated May 12, 2005. |
International Search Report from EP 06006961 dated Aug. 3, 2006. |
Boyles, Walt; “Instrumentation Reference Book”, 2002; Butterworth-Heinemann ; 262-264. |
International Search Report EP06023756.7 dated Feb. 21, 2008. |
International Search Report EP07018375.1 dated Jan. 8, 2008. |
International Search Report EP07019173.9 dated Feb. 12, 2008. |
International Search Report EP07019178.8 dated Feb. 12, 2008. |
International Search Report EP07253835.8 dated Feb. 20, 2007. |
International Search Report EP08006731.7 dated Jul. 29, 2008. |
International Search Report EP08006734.1 dated Aug. 18, 2008. |
International Search Report EP07000567.3 dated Dec. 3, 2008. |
International Search Report EP08006731 dated Jul. 14, 2008. |
International Search Report EP08006735.8 dated Jan. 8, 2009. |
International Search Report EP08008510.3 dated Oct. 27, 2008. |
International Search Report EP08013758.1 dated Nov. 20, 2008. |
International Search Report EP08013760.7 dated Nov. 20, 2008. |
International Search Report EP08155779-partial dated Sep. 8, 2008. |
International Search Report EP08155779 dated Jan. 23, 2009. |
International Search Report EP09152032 dated Jun. 17, 2009. |
International Search Report EP09152130.2 dated Apr. 6, 2009. |
Examiner's First Report issued in corresponding Australian Appl. No. 2006201356 dated Nov. 16, 2010. |
Australian Examiner's Report dated Dec. 7, 2011 in related Australian Application No. 2006201356. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060224150 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60666798 | Mar 2005 | US |