Temperature regulating patient return electrode and return electrode monitoring system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8821487
  • Patent Number
    8,821,487
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 31, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 2, 2014
    9 years ago
Abstract
A temperature regulating patient return electrode and return electrode monitoring system for use in monopolar surgery, includes a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material disposed on its surface. The PTC material responds to local increases in temperature by increasing local resistance. This quality decreases the probability of a patient burn as a result of monopolar surgery. The return electrode monitoring system includes a generator for generating current; an active electrode coupled to the generator for supplying the current to a patient; and a return electrode coupled to the generator with a surface for receiving the current from the patient and returning the current to the generator. A positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material is disposed on the return electrode for regulating the temperature over the surface of the return electrode.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Technical Field


The present disclosure is directed to electrosurgical apparatus and systems, and, in particular, to a temperature regulating patient return electrode and a return electrode monitoring system for use in electrosurgery.


2. Description of the Related Art


During electrosurgery, a source or active electrode delivers energy, such as radio frequency energy, from an electrosurgical generator to the patient and a return electrode carries the current back to the electrosurgical generator. In monopolar electrosurgery, the source electrode is typically a hand-held instrument placed by the surgeon at the surgical site and the high current density flow at this electrode creates the desired surgical effect of cutting or coagulating tissue. The patient return electrode is placed at a remote site from the source electrode and is typically in the form of a pad adhesively adhered to the patient.


The return electrode has a large patient contact surface area to minimize heating at that site since the smaller the surface area, the greater the current density and the greater the intensity of the heat. That is, the area of the return electrode that is adhered to the patient is important because it is the current density of the electrical signal that heats the tissue. A larger surface contact area is desirable to reduce heat intensity. The size of return electrodes are based on assumptions of the maximum current seen in surgery and the duty cycle (e.g., the percentage of time the generator is on) during the procedure. The first types of return electrodes were in the form of large metal plates covered with conductive jelly. Later, adhesive electrodes were developed with a single metal foil covered with conductive jelly or conductive adhesive. However, one problem with these adhesive electrodes was that if a portion peeled from the patient, the contact area of the electrode with the patient decreased, thereby increasing the current density at the adhered portion and, in turn, increasing the heat applied to the tissue. This risked burning the patient in the area under the adhered portion of the return electrode if the tissue was heated beyond the point where circulation of blood could cool the skin.


To address this problem, split return electrodes and hardware circuits, generically called Return Electrode Contact Quality Monitors (RECQMs), were developed. These split electrodes consist of two separate conductive foils arranged as two halves of a single return electrode. The hardware circuit uses an AC signal between the two electrode halves to measure the impedance therebetween. This impedance measurement is indicative of how well the return electrode is adhered to the patient since the impedance between the two halves is directly related to the area of patient contact. That is, if the electrode begins to peel from the patient, the impedance increases since the contact area of the electrode decreases. Current RECQMs are designed to sense this change in impedance so that when the percentage increase in impedance exceeds a predetermined value or the measured impedance exceeds a threshold level, the electrosurgical generator is shut down to reduce the chances of burning the patient.


Although monitoring circuits are effective, they do not take into account the amount of time the current is being delivered or the heat generated at the return electrode. As new surgical procedures continue to be developed that utilize higher current and higher duty cycles, increased heating of tissue under the return electrode will occur.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,657,015 discloses a control device for cutting off high frequency current during electrosurgery if the heat buildup in the body tissue exceeds a predetermined value. In the '015 patent, a control electrode is affixed to the body spaced from the active electrode and separate from the neutral (i.e., return) electrode. The control electrode is designed to pick up the voltage existing on the body. The voltage signal is squared, integrated over time and compared to a reference voltage. The high frequency generator is turned off if the voltage value exceeds the reference voltage. The '015 patent does not effectively measure heating under the return electrode since the measurements are calculated by a separate control electrode. The '015 patent even states that the effective surface area of the neutral electrode is not a factor in the heat calculations.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,741,334 discloses a control circuit intended to reduce burning of tissue. As in the '015 patent, a separate control electrode is provided to determine the body voltage. The control electrode is spaced from the neutral electrode (i.e., the return electrode) and functions to detect a high frequency body surface voltage. The body surface voltage is converted into DC voltage by a converter and inputted to a comparator for comparison to a reference voltage. The generator is turned off if the body voltage exceeds the reference voltage. The '015 patent also discloses a monitor circuit for testing whether the neutral electrode is in good contact with the body surface of the patient. The comparator compares the body surface voltage detected by the control electrode with a reference voltage derived from the operational voltage of the surgical device. An audible signal is produced when these voltage values reach a predetermined ratio. Similar to the '015 patent, the '334 patent requires an additional electrode, measures voltage instead of current to determine overheating, and does not factor in the amount of time the high frequency energy is being applied.


SUMMARY

The present disclosure provides a temperature regulating patient return electrode and return electrode temperature monitoring system. The return electrode, for use in monopolar surgery, includes a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material on, or coating the return electrode. The PTC material responds to increases in localized temperature by increasing local resistance which in turn reduces current flow and lowers the temperature. This quality helps limit the probability of a patient suffering from a burn as a result of monopolar surgery.


In several contemplated embodiments, the return electrode is a pad comprised of different layers of material. At least one of the layers is a PTC material, such as a polymer/carbon based material, a cermet based material, a polymer material, a ceramic material, a dielectric material, or any combinations thereof. Another material that can be used for the PTC material is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,426, the contents of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, and is known as “PolySwitch RTM” made by the Raychem Corporation of California. In one embodiment, a top layer of the return electrode comprises an adhesive material for coming into contact with and adhering to the patient. This layer of adhesive helps to ensure an optimal patient contacting surface area, i.e., the portion of the return electrode that is in contact with the patient. The adhesive can be made of, but is not limited to, a polyhesive adhesive, a Z-axis adhesive, or a water-insoluble, hydrophilic, pressure-sensitive adhesive, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,699,146 and 4,750,482, the contents of which are herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.


In one aspect of the present disclosure, the return electrode monitoring system includes a generator for supplying current, a surgical instrument, a cable for transferring current from the generator to the surgical instrument, a return electrode having a PTC material for receiving the current through a patient, and a wire for returning the current from the return electrode back to the generator.


A return electrode monitor (REM) may be incorporated into the system to provide temperature monitoring, current monitoring, impedance monitoring, energy monitoring, power monitoring and/or contact quality monitoring for the return electrode. The REM can be part of or attached to the generator with wires connecting the REM to the return electrode. Further, the REM can disable the generator if the temperature of the return electrode reaches or exceeds a predetermined value.


In one embodiment, the return electrode is split into at least two parts. In this embodiment, the return electrodes enable various measurements (e.g., temperature, current, contact quality, impedance, etc.) to be taken between the return electrodes. In a related embodiment, the parts of the return electrode can be interlocking, thus providing an increased surface area between the return electrodes.


In another embodiment, a plurality of wires is disposed on the return electrode, such that the wires form a grid or matrix pattern. This embodiment enables various measurements (e.g., temperature, current, voltage, etc.) to be calculated at various places on the return electrode by determining the resistance between any two wires. An individual wire may be coupled to each pad of the plurality of pads for determining a resistance or impedance between any two individual wires.


Another embodiment of the present disclosure includes an electrosurgical system for eliminating patient burns during monopolar surgery. The system has a generator for generating current, an active electrode coupled to the generator configured to supply the current to a patient; and a return electrode coupled to the generator having a defined surface. The surface is configured to receive the current from the patient and return the current to the generator. A positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material is disposed on the return electrode which regulates the temperature over the surface of the return electrode. The PTC material may be configured to regulate a current density at the return electrode. The PTC layer may be a substantially continuous coating of parallel resistors and alternatively, the PTC layer may have at least four parallel resistors.


The electrosurgical system may include a temperature regulation device disposed in the generator for regulating temperature at the return electrode. Alternatively, the electrosurgical system may include a temperature monitoring device disposed in the generator for monitoring temperature at the return electrode and/or a generator disabling device disposed in the generator for disabling the generator when the temperature of the return electrode reaches a predetermined value. A return electrode monitor may also be included for monitoring temperature and/or a contact quality of the return electrode.


An individual wire may be coupled to each pad of a plurality of electrode pads and the system is configured to determine a parameter between any two individual wires. The parameter may be selected from the group consisting of power, resistance, impedance, and any combination thereof.


A method for eliminating patient burns while performing monopolar surgery is also disclosed. The method includes the steps of: placing a return electrode coated with a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material in contact with a patient; generating electrosurgical energy; and supplying the electrosurgical energy to the patient via an active electrode. The PTC material coating the return electrode regulates the temperature over the return electrode by responding to increases in localized temperature with a local increase in resistance. This spreads the temperature over the surface of the electrode.


Another example of the present disclosure includes an electrosurgical generator having a processor. A supply electrode is connected to the generator and is configured to deliver radiofrequency energy to a patient. A return electrode is connected to a return of the electrosurgical generator. The return electrode has a plurality of return electrode portions and an impedance sensor measures impedance values between the return electrode portions. The sensor outputs the impedance values to the processor to determine a contact reading. The processor compares the contact reading to a stored threshold reading to determine a degree of adherence of the return electrode on the patient. The processor may be configured to adjust or interrupt radiofrequency energy to the patient when the contact reading in indicative of poor adherence of the return electrode on the patient.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The above and other aspects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent in light of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a monopolar electrosurgical system;



FIG. 2 is a top plan view of a temperature regulating return electrode according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIGS. 3 and 3
a are cross-sectional views of a temperature regulating return electrode according to embodiments of the present disclosure;



FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of a monopolar electrosurgical system including a return electrode monitor (REM);



FIG. 5 is a temperature regulating return electrode according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 5A is a temperature regulating return electrode according to another embodiment of the present disclosure;



FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram of a return electrode monitoring system;



FIG. 7 is an example of a resistance versus temperature graph for a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material; and



FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of a return electrode with a PTC material and an adhesive layer according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the presently disclosed temperature regulating patient return electrode and return electrode monitoring system will be described herein below with reference to the accompanying drawing figures wherein like reference numerals identify similar or identical elements. In the following description, well-known functions or constructions are not described in detail to avoid obscuring the disclosure in unnecessary detail.


Referring initially to FIG. 1, a schematic illustration of a monopolar electrosurgical system 10 is shown. A surgical instrument (e.g., an active electrode) for treating tissue at the surgical site is designated by reference number 12. Electrosurgical energy is supplied to instrument 12 by generator 14 via cable 16 to cut, coagulate, etc. tissue. A return electrode, designated by reference numeral 50, is shown placed under a patient 20 to return the energy from the patient 20 back to the generator 14 via a wire 18.



FIGS. 2, 3 and 3a illustrate various embodiments of return electrode 50 for use in monopolar electrosurgery. Generally, the return electrode 50 is a pad having a top surface and a bottom surface configured to receive current during monopolar electrosurgery. While FIG. 2 depicts the return electrode 50 in a general rectangular shape, it is within the scope of the disclosure for the return electrode 50 to have any regular or irregular shape. Although electrosurgical references to “monopolar electrosurgery” and “bipolar electrosurgery” are made in the context of the application, one should appreciate that these references are simply exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure and form no limitation on the present disclosure. In fact, the present disclosure may extend to and encompass any surgery or diagnostic practices using radiofrequency energy.


Generally, the area of the return electrode 50 that is in contact with the patient 20 affects the current density of the signal that heats the tissue. The smaller the contact area the return electrode 50 has with the patient 20, the greater the current density and the greater and more concentrated the heating of tissue. Conversely, the greater the contact area of the return electrode 50, the smaller the current density and the less heating of the tissue. Further, the greater the heating of the tissue, the greater the probability of possibly burning the tissue. Although many other safeguards may be present in the electrosurgical generator to prevent and minimize such risks, it is important to either ensure a relative high amount of contact area between the return electrode 50 and the patient 20, or otherwise maintain a relatively low current density on the return electrode 50.


While there are various methods of maintaining a relatively low current density (including, inter alia, the use of electrosurgical return electrode monitors (REMs), such as the one described in commonly-owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,565,559, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety), the present disclosure ensures the return electrode 50 maintains a low current density by distributing the temperature created by the current over the surface of the return electrode 50.


Current density at the return electrode 50 is reduced via a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material 56 disposed on the return electrode 50. As best illustrated in FIG. 3, return electrode 50 includes a conductive body 54 coated with a PTC material 56. It is also within the scope of this disclosure for the return electrode 50 to be comprised of several layers, one or more of which layer being a PTC material 56. The PTC material 56 can be made of, inter alia, polymer/carbon based material, a cermet based material, a polymer material, a ceramic material, a dielectric material, or any combinations thereof, or still alternatively can be made from a polymer/carbon material. An example of such material that can be used for the PTC material is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,426, the contents of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, and is known as “PolySwitch RTM” made by the Raychem Corporation of California.


The PTC material 56 acts to distribute the temperature created by the current over the surface of the return electrode 50 to minimize the risk of patient burns. The PTC material 56 regulates the temperature over the area of the return electrode 50 by responding to increases in temperature with an increase in resistance in localized areas. The increase in resistance reduces the current in the localized area, thus causing the current to conduct more in the areas with lower resistance or lower temperature. Further, as current is applied through the PTC material 56 of return electrode 50, power is dissipated and the temperature is increased. The increase in temperature increases the resistance and limits the current, thus reducing the heating effect. This results in a return electrode 50 with a temperature that is substantially uniform throughout its entire surface and with varying levels of resistance. Consequently, there are no localized “hot spots,” which c an cause patient burns. As the overall temperature increases, consequently increasing the resistance, an REM (return electrode monitoring) circuit can detect and measure such increases and turn off an RF supply when a predetermined temperature has been exceeded.


In one embodiment, an adhesive layer 58 may be disposed on the PTC material 56 of return electrode 50, as illustrated in FIG. 3A. The adhesive layer 58 can be made of, but is not limited to, a polyhesive adhesive, a Z-axis adhesive or a water-insoluble, hydrophilic, pressure-sensitive adhesive. The function of the adhesive layer 58 is to ensure an optimal surface contact area between the return electrode 50 and the patient 20 and thus to further limit the possibility and any risks of a patient burn.


Return electrode 50 may be also split into a plurality of parts, depicted as two parts 50a and 50b in FIG. 5. This embodiment enables various measurements (e.g., temperature, current, contact quality, impedance, etc.) to be taken between the return electrodes 50a and 50b. Wires 18a and 18b return energy from each part 50a and 50b, respectively, of return electrode 50 back to generator 14. Wires 18a and 18b can be combined to form a single cable 18 (as illustrated in FIG. 5) or wires 18a and 18b can remain as individual wires (not shown) to return energy from return electrode 50 back to generator 14. A split return electrode 50 may be connected to an REM via multiple REM wires (not shown), each being connected to a part, e.g., 50a or 50b, of return electrode 50.


Referring now to FIG. 4, a schematic illustration of a monopolar electrosurgical system including a return electrode monitor (REM) is shown. In addition to regulating the temperature across the surface of the return electrode 50, the return electrode 50 with the PTC material 56 also acts as a thermistor or monitor for the temperature. This may be accomplished by using an REM circuit 60. The REM circuit 60 has a synchronous detector that supplies an interrogation current sine wave of about 140 kHz across both return electrodes 50a and 50b of the return electrode 50 and the patient 20 via wire 62. The REM circuit 60 is isolated from the patient 20 via a transformer(see FIG. 6). The impedance in the return electrode 50 is reflected back from the patient 20 to the REM circuit 60 via wire 18. The relationship between temperature and impedance can be linear or non-linear. By measuring the resistance across the two return electrodes 50a and 50b, the REM circuit 60 is able to monitor the overall temperature at the return electrode 50 and the contact quality of the return electrode 50. The relationship between temperature and resistance can also be linear or non-linear (an illustration of a non-linear relationship is depicted in FIG. 7). In this embodiment, the generator 14 would be disabled when the total increase in resistance or temperature of the return electrode 50 reaches a predetermined value. Alternatively, there may be several threshold values, such that when a first threshold is exceeded, the output power of the generator is reduced and, when a subsequent second threshold value is exceeded, the generator 14 is shutdown. This embodiment can be adapted to provide temperature regulation (achievable utilizing a PTC coating), temperature monitoring, current monitoring and contact quality monitoring for the return electrode 50, thus greatly reducing the probability of a patient burn.


In one embodiment, a plurality of wires 18a-18f may be disposed on the return electrode 50, such that the wires are spaced to substantially form a grid or matrix pattern, as illustrated in FIG. 5A. In this embodiment, several measurements can be calculated at various places on the return electrode 50 by determining the resistance between any two wires, e.g., wires 18a and 18b. Each square portion 50a, 50b, etc. of return electrode 50 may have a wire 18 coupled to it, but only wires 18a-18f are shown for clarity. This embodiment can also be adapted to provide temperature regulation, temperature monitoring, current monitoring and contact quality monitoring for the return electrode 50, thus greatly reducing the probability of a patient burn.


Now referring to FIG. 6, a schematic view of an electrosurgical generator 14 incorporating an REM circuit is shown. The electrosurgical generator 14 includes a microprocessor 26, an RF output stage 24 for generating an output voltage and output current for transmission to the surgical instrument 12, and an impedance sensor 40 for measuring the impedance between the split pads 50a and 50b of the return electrode 50 to determine the degree of adherence of the return electrode 50.


The REM circuit measures the total resistance of the return electrode 50. When the overall temperature on either or both return electrodes 50a or 50b is increased, the PTC coating increases the resistance. The REM circuit measures the temperature increase and thus inhibits the output of the generator 14. The REM circuit also measures the resistance and inhibits the output of the generator 14 if the patient impedance increases due to the return electrode 50 becoming partially or completely removed from the patient 20.


The return electrode 50 with a PTC layer 56 is schematically illustrated in FIG. 8. The PTC layer 56 is shown placed over each of the two return electrodes 50a and 50b. The PTC material 56 is a layer of a continuous coating of parallel resistors, illustrated as four resistors per return electrode 50 for clarity. A conductive adhesive layer 58 is shown above the PTC material 56 and is configured to maintain contact between the return electrode 50 and the patient 20 and for conducting RF energy back to the generator 14. The return electrodes 50a and 50b enable the patient impedance to be measured. The patient impedance is in a series connection with the two return electrodes 50a and 50b and the PTC material 56.


In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 6 with a split return electrode 50, an impedance sensor 40 may form part of the return electrode circuit. The impedance sensor 40 measures the impedance between the return electrodes 50a and 50b to determine the degree of adherence of the return electrode 50. That is, if a portion of the return electrode 50 becomes detached from the patient 20, the impedance will increase. The impedance sensor 40 transmits a signal indicative of the measured impedance to an input port of the microprocessor 26. An algorithm stored in a memory or in the microprocessor 26 factors in the impedance measurement when determining whether to adjust or terminate a power supply.


While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings, it is not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of preferred embodiments.

Claims
  • 1. An electrosurgical return electrode for use in monopolar surgery comprising: a conductive pad having a top surface and a bottom surface, wherein a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material is disposed on the conductive pad such that the PTC material entirely encompasses the conductive pad, the PTC material configured to spread temperature substantially uniformly over the entire top and bottom surfaces by responding to increases in localized temperature with a local increase in resistance.
  • 2. The electrosurgical return electrode of claim 1, wherein the pad includes at least two layers.
  • 3. The electrosurgical return electrode of claim 2, wherein at least one of the at least two layers is the PTC material.
  • 4. The electrosurgical return electrode of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the top surface of the pad defines a patient contacting surface.
  • 5. The electrosurgical return electrode of claim 4, further comprising an adhesive material disposed on the patient contacting surface.
  • 6. The electrosurgical return electrode of claim 5, wherein the adhesive material is selected from the group consisting of a polyhesive adhesive, a water-insoluble, hydrophilic, pressure-sensitive adhesive, a Z-axis adhesive, and any combinations thereof.
  • 7. The electrosurgical return electrode of claim 1, further comprising a second conductive pad operably coupled to the conductive pad.
  • 8. The electrosurgical return electrode of claim 7, wherein each of the conductive pad and the second conductive pad is coupled to respective wires.
  • 9. The electrosurgical return electrode of claim 1, wherein the PTC material is selected from the group consisting of a polymer/carbon based material, a cermet based material, a polymer material, a ceramic material, a dielectric material, and any combinations thereof.
  • 10. A system for eliminating patient burns during monopolar surgery, comprising: a generator configured to generate current;an active electrode adapted to couple to the generator and being configured to supply the current to a patient; anda return electrode adapted to couple to the generator, the return electrode having a surface configured to receive the current from the patient and return the current to the generator, wherein a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material is disposed on the return electrode such that the PTC material entirely encompasses the return electrode, the PTC material configured to spread the temperature substantially uniformly over the entire surface of the return electrode.
  • 11. The system for eliminating patient burns of claim 10, further comprising a temperature regulation device disposed in the generator configured to regulate the temperature of at least the return electrode.
  • 12. The system for eliminating patient burns of claim 10, further comprising a temperature monitoring device disposed in the generator configured to monitor the temperature at the return electrode.
  • 13. The system for eliminating patient burns of claim 12, further comprising a generator disabling device configured to disable the generator when the temperature of the return electrode reaches a predetermined value.
  • 14. The system for eliminating patient burns of claim 10, wherein the generator includes a device configured to monitor at least one of the temperature and a contact quality of the return electrode.
  • 15. The system for eliminating patient burns of claim 10, wherein the PTC material is configured to regulate current density at the return electrode.
  • 16. The system for eliminating patient burns of claim 10, further comprising a second conductive pad operably coupled to the conductive pad.
  • 17. The system for eliminating patient burns of claim 16, wherein the conductive pad is coupled to a first wire and the second conductive pad is coupled to a second wire and the system is configured to determine a parameter between the first and second wires.
  • 18. The system for eliminating patient burns of claim 17, wherein the parameter is selected from the group consisting of power, resistance, impedance, and any combination thereof.
  • 19. A method for eliminating patient burns while performing monopolar surgery, the method comprising the steps of: placing a return electrode with a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material disposed on and entirely encompassing the return electrode in contact with a patient;generating electrosurgical energy from an energy source; andsupplying the electrosurgical energy to the patient via an active electrode;wherein the PTC material on the return electrode spreads the temperature substantially uniformly over the entire surface of the return electrode by responding to increases in localized temperature with a local increase in resistance.
  • 20. An electrosurgical system comprising: a generator having at least a processor disposed therein, the electrosurgical generator being configured to supply electrosurgical energy to tissue;a supply electrode adapted to connect to the generator configured to supply the electrosurgical energy to the tissue;a return electrode having a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) material disposed on and entirely encompassing the return electrode, the PTC material configured to spread a temperature of the return electrode substantially uniformly over the entire surface thereof, the return electrode adapted to connect to the generator and configured to return the electrosurgical energy to the generator, said return electrode including an impedance sensor being configured to measure impedance values between a plurality of return electrode portions and output the impedance values to the at least one processor for determination of a contact reading, the processor operable to compare the contact reading to a stored threshold reading to determine a degree of adherence of the return electrode on the patient.
  • 21. The electrosurgical system of claim 20, wherein said processor adjusts radiofrequency energy to the patient when said contact reading reaches a threshold value.
  • 22. The electrosurgical system of claim 20, wherein the PTC layer is a substantially continuous coating of parallel resistors.
  • 23. The electrosurgical system of claim 20, further comprising a conductive adhesive layer in contact with the PTC layer, said adhesive layer configured to maintain contact between the plurality of return electrode portions and the patient.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS

The instant patent application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/666,798 to Arts, et al., filed on Mar. 31, 2005, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (245)
Number Name Date Kind
2536271 Fransen et al. Jan 1951 A
3380445 Frasier Apr 1968 A
3534306 Watrous et al. Oct 1970 A
3543760 Bolduc Dec 1970 A
3642008 Bolduc Feb 1972 A
3683923 Anderson Aug 1972 A
3812861 Peters May 1974 A
3913583 Bross Oct 1975 A
3923063 Andrews et al. Dec 1975 A
3933157 Bjurwill et al. Jan 1976 A
3987796 Gonser Oct 1976 A
4067342 Burton Jan 1978 A
4092985 Kaufman Jun 1978 A
4094320 Newton et al. Jun 1978 A
4102341 Ikuno et al. Jul 1978 A
4114622 Gonser Sep 1978 A
4117846 Williams Oct 1978 A
4121590 Gonser Oct 1978 A
4126137 Archibald Nov 1978 A
4166465 Esty et al. Sep 1979 A
4188927 Harris Feb 1980 A
4200104 Harris Apr 1980 A
4200105 Gonser Apr 1980 A
4213463 Osenkarski Jul 1980 A
4231372 Newton Nov 1980 A
4237887 Gonser Dec 1980 A
4253721 Kaufman Mar 1981 A
4303073 Archibald Dec 1981 A
4304235 Kaufman Dec 1981 A
4331149 Gonser May 1982 A
4343308 Gross Aug 1982 A
4381789 Naser et al. May 1983 A
4384582 Watt May 1983 A
4387714 Geddes et al. Jun 1983 A
4393584 Bare et al. Jul 1983 A
4416276 Newton et al. Nov 1983 A
4416277 Newton et al. Nov 1983 A
4437464 Crow Mar 1984 A
4494541 Archibald Jan 1985 A
4643193 DeMarzo Feb 1987 A
4657015 Irnich Apr 1987 A
4658819 Harris et al. Apr 1987 A
4662369 Ensslin May 1987 A
4669468 Cartmell et al. Jun 1987 A
4699146 Sieverding Oct 1987 A
4722761 Cartmell et al. Feb 1988 A
4725713 Lehrke Feb 1988 A
4741334 Irnich May 1988 A
4745918 Feucht May 1988 A
4748983 Shigeta et al. Jun 1988 A
4750482 Sieverding Jun 1988 A
4754757 Feucht Jul 1988 A
4768514 De Marzo Sep 1988 A
4770173 Feucht et al. Sep 1988 A
4788977 Farin et al. Dec 1988 A
4799480 Abraham et al. Jan 1989 A
4807621 Hagen et al. Feb 1989 A
4844063 Clark Jul 1989 A
4848335 Manes Jul 1989 A
4862889 Feucht Sep 1989 A
4873974 Hagen et al. Oct 1989 A
4895169 Heath Jan 1990 A
4942313 Kinzel Jul 1990 A
4947846 Kitagawa et al. Aug 1990 A
4955381 Way et al. Sep 1990 A
4961047 Carder Oct 1990 A
4969885 Farin Nov 1990 A
5000753 Hagen et al. Mar 1991 A
5004425 Hee Apr 1991 A
5010896 Westbrook Apr 1991 A
5038796 Axelgaard et al. Aug 1991 A
5042981 Gross Aug 1991 A
5061914 Busch et al. Oct 1991 A
5087257 Farin Feb 1992 A
5114424 Hagen et al. May 1992 A
5152762 McElhenney Oct 1992 A
5160334 Billings et al. Nov 1992 A
5196008 Kuenecke Mar 1993 A
5246439 Hebborn et al. Sep 1993 A
5271417 Swanson et al. Dec 1993 A
5276079 Duan et al. Jan 1994 A
5286255 Weber Feb 1994 A
5312401 Newton et al. May 1994 A
5336255 Kanare et al. Aug 1994 A
5352315 Carrier et al. Oct 1994 A
5362420 Itoh et al. Nov 1994 A
5370645 Klicek et al. Dec 1994 A
5385679 Uy et al. Jan 1995 A
5388490 Buck Feb 1995 A
5389376 Duan et al. Feb 1995 A
5390382 Hannant et al. Feb 1995 A
5409966 Duan et al. Apr 1995 A
5447513 Davison et al. Sep 1995 A
5449365 Green et al. Sep 1995 A
5452725 Martenson Sep 1995 A
5480399 Hebborn Jan 1996 A
5496312 Klicek Mar 1996 A
5496363 Burgio et al. Mar 1996 A
5520180 Uy et al. May 1996 A
5536446 Uy et al. Jul 1996 A
5540684 Hassler, Jr. Jul 1996 A
5599347 Hart et al. Feb 1997 A
5601618 James Feb 1997 A
5611709 McAnulty Mar 1997 A
5632280 Leyde et al. May 1997 A
5643319 Green et al. Jul 1997 A
5660892 Robbins et al. Aug 1997 A
5670557 Dietz et al. Sep 1997 A
5674561 Dietz et al. Oct 1997 A
5678545 Stratbucker Oct 1997 A
5688269 Newton et al. Nov 1997 A
5695494 Becker Dec 1997 A
5707369 Vaitekunas et al. Jan 1998 A
5718719 Clare et al. Feb 1998 A
5720744 Eggleston et al. Feb 1998 A
5766165 Gentelia et al. Jun 1998 A
5779632 Dietz et al. Jul 1998 A
5797902 Netherly Aug 1998 A
5800426 Taki et al. Sep 1998 A
5817091 Nardella et al. Oct 1998 A
5830212 Cartmell et al. Nov 1998 A
5836942 Netherly et al. Nov 1998 A
5846558 Nielsen et al. Dec 1998 A
5853750 Dietz et al. Dec 1998 A
5868742 Manes et al. Feb 1999 A
5924983 Takaki et al. Jul 1999 A
5947961 Netherly Sep 1999 A
5952398 Dietz et al. Sep 1999 A
5971981 Hill et al. Oct 1999 A
5976128 Schilling et al. Nov 1999 A
5985990 Kantner et al. Nov 1999 A
5999061 Pope et al. Dec 1999 A
6007532 Netherly Dec 1999 A
6010054 Johnson et al. Jan 2000 A
6030381 Jones et al. Feb 2000 A
6032063 Hoar et al. Feb 2000 A
6039732 Ichikawa et al. Mar 2000 A
6053910 Fleenor Apr 2000 A
RE36720 Green et al. May 2000 E
6059778 Sherman May 2000 A
6063075 Mihori May 2000 A
6083221 Fleenor et al. Jul 2000 A
6086249 Urich Jul 2000 A
6121508 Bischof et al. Sep 2000 A
6135953 Carim Oct 2000 A
6171304 Netherly et al. Jan 2001 B1
6200314 Sherman Mar 2001 B1
6203541 Keppel Mar 2001 B1
6214000 Fleenor et al. Apr 2001 B1
6232366 Wang et al. May 2001 B1
6240323 Calenzo, Sr. et al. May 2001 B1
6258085 Eggleston Jul 2001 B1
6275786 Daners Aug 2001 B1
6301500 van Herk et al. Oct 2001 B1
6310611 Caldwell Oct 2001 B1
6347246 Perrault et al. Feb 2002 B1
6350264 Hooven Feb 2002 B1
6357089 Koguchi et al. Mar 2002 B1
6358245 Edwards et al. Mar 2002 B1
6379161 Ma Apr 2002 B1
6409722 Hoey et al. Jun 2002 B1
6413255 Stern Jul 2002 B1
6415170 Loutis et al. Jul 2002 B1
6454764 Fleenor et al. Sep 2002 B1
6488678 Sherman Dec 2002 B2
6537272 Christopherson et al. Mar 2003 B2
6544258 Fleenor et al. Apr 2003 B2
6546270 Goldin et al. Apr 2003 B1
6565559 Eggleston May 2003 B2
6569160 Goldin et al. May 2003 B1
6582424 Fleenor et al. Jun 2003 B2
6666859 Fleenor et al. Dec 2003 B1
6669073 Milliman et al. Dec 2003 B2
6736810 Hoey et al. May 2004 B2
6796828 Ehr et al. Sep 2004 B2
6799063 Carson Sep 2004 B2
6830569 Thompson et al. Dec 2004 B2
6849073 Hoey et al. Feb 2005 B2
6860881 Sturm Mar 2005 B2
6875210 Refior et al. Apr 2005 B2
6892086 Russell May 2005 B2
6905497 Truckai et al. Jun 2005 B2
6939344 Kreindel Sep 2005 B2
6948503 Refior et al. Sep 2005 B2
6953139 Milliman et al. Oct 2005 B2
6959852 Shelton, IV et al. Nov 2005 B2
6997735 Ehr et al. Feb 2006 B2
7025765 Balbierz et al. Apr 2006 B2
7128253 Mastri et al. Oct 2006 B2
7143926 Shelton, IV et al. Dec 2006 B2
7160293 Sturm et al. Jan 2007 B2
7166102 Fleenor et al. Jan 2007 B2
7169144 Hoey et al. Jan 2007 B2
7169145 Isaacson et al. Jan 2007 B2
7182604 Ehr et al. Feb 2007 B2
7220260 Fleming et al. May 2007 B2
7229307 Ehr et al. Jun 2007 B2
7258262 Mastri et al. Aug 2007 B2
7267675 Stern et al. Sep 2007 B2
7278562 Mastri et al. Oct 2007 B2
7303107 Milliman et al. Dec 2007 B2
7308998 Mastri et al. Dec 2007 B2
7311560 Ehr et al. Dec 2007 B2
7357287 Shelton, IV et al. Apr 2008 B2
7380695 Doll et al. Jun 2008 B2
7422589 Newton et al. Sep 2008 B2
7473145 Ehr et al. Jan 2009 B2
20030139741 Goble et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030199870 Truckai et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040059323 Sturm et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040150504 Nicholson Aug 2004 A1
20050021022 Sturm et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050079752 Ehr et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050085806 Auge, II et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050101947 Jarrard et al. May 2005 A1
20050251130 Boveja et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060030195 Ehr et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041251 Odell et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041252 Odell et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041253 Newton et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060074411 Carmel et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079872 Eggleston Apr 2006 A1
20060173250 Nessler Aug 2006 A1
20060217742 Messerly et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060224150 Arts et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070049914 Eggleston Mar 2007 A1
20070049916 Isaacson et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070049919 Lee. Jr. et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073284 Sturm Mar 2007 A1
20070074719 Danek et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070161979 McPherson Jul 2007 A1
20070167942 Rick Jul 2007 A1
20070203481 Gregg et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070244478 Bahney Oct 2007 A1
20080009846 Ward Jan 2008 A1
20080033276 Ehr et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080083806 Scirica Apr 2008 A1
20080083813 Zemlok et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080249520 Dunning et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080249524 Dunning Oct 2008 A1
20080281309 Dunning et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281310 Dunning et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080281311 Dunning et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090036884 Gregg et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090036885 Gregg Feb 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (47)
Number Date Country
1 219642 Mar 1987 CA
3206947 Sep 1983 DE
3544443 Jun 1987 DE
42 38 263 May 1993 DE
4231236 Mar 1994 DE
197 17 411 Nov 1998 DE
198 01 173 Jul 1999 DE
103 28 514 Jun 2003 DE
102004010940 Sep 2005 DE
0262888 Apr 1988 EP
390937 Oct 1990 EP
836868 Apr 1998 EP
0 930 048 Jul 1999 EP
1 051 949 Nov 2000 EP
1076350 Feb 2001 EP
1 468 653 Oct 2004 EP
1 645 236 Apr 2006 EP
1707151 Oct 2006 EP
1 808 144 Jul 2007 EP
1902684 Mar 2008 EP
2276027 Jun 1974 FR
2516782 May 1983 FR
2 054 382 Feb 1981 GB
2374532 Oct 2002 GB
WO 9619152 Jun 1996 WO
WO 9737719 Oct 1997 WO
WO 9818395 May 1998 WO
WO 9853751 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9909899 Mar 1999 WO
WO 9911187 Mar 1999 WO
WO 0006246 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0032122 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0053113 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0065993 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0187175 Nov 2001 WO
WO 02058579 Aug 2002 WO
WO 02060526 Aug 2002 WO
WO 02099442 Dec 2002 WO
WO 03094766 Nov 2003 WO
WO 2004028385 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004074854 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2005048809 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005087124 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2005099606 Oct 2005 WO
WO 2005110263 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2005115262 Dec 2005 WO
WO 2008009385 Jan 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (28)
Entry
International Search Report PCT/US2004/004196 dated Oct. 4, 2007.
International Search Report EP06006961.4 dated Oct. 5, 2007.
International Search Report EP07000885.9 dated May 2, 2007.
International Search Report EP07007783.9 dated Aug. 6, 2007.
International Search Report EP06018206.0 dated Oct. 13, 2006.
International Search Report EP 05021944.3 dated Jan. 25, 2006.
International Search Report EP 05002027.0 dated May 12, 2005.
International Search Report from EP 06006961 dated Aug. 3, 2006.
Boyles, Walt; “Instrumentation Reference Book”, 2002; Butterworth-Heinemann ; 262-264.
International Search Report EP06023756.7 dated Feb. 21, 2008.
International Search Report EP07018375.1 dated Jan. 8, 2008.
International Search Report EP07019173.9 dated Feb. 12, 2008.
International Search Report EP07019178.8 dated Feb. 12, 2008.
International Search Report EP07253835.8 dated Feb. 20, 2007.
International Search Report EP08006731.7 dated Jul. 29, 2008.
International Search Report EP08006734.1 dated Aug. 18, 2008.
International Search Report EP07000567.3 dated Dec. 3, 2008.
International Search Report EP08006731 dated Jul. 14, 2008.
International Search Report EP08006735.8 dated Jan. 8, 2009.
International Search Report EP08008510.3 dated Oct. 27, 2008.
International Search Report EP08013758.1 dated Nov. 20, 2008.
International Search Report EP08013760.7 dated Nov. 20, 2008.
International Search Report EP08155779-partial dated Sep. 8, 2008.
International Search Report EP08155779 dated Jan. 23, 2009.
International Search Report EP09152032 dated Jun. 17, 2009.
International Search Report EP09152130.2 dated Apr. 6, 2009.
Examiner's First Report issued in corresponding Australian Appl. No. 2006201356 dated Nov. 16, 2010.
Australian Examiner's Report dated Dec. 7, 2011 in related Australian Application No. 2006201356.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060224150 A1 Oct 2006 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60666798 Mar 2005 US